JBC Invitrogen Ultrasensitive Cytokine Assays

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schnare, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schnare, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, M. W.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 23691-23694, August 20, 1999

COMMUNICATION
A Candidate U1 Small Nuclear RNA for Trypanosomatid Protozoa*

Murray N. Schnare and Michael W. GrayDagger

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4H7, Canada

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In trypanosomatid protozoa, all mRNAs obtain identical 5'-ends by trans-splicing of the 5'-terminal 39 nucleotides of a small spliced leader RNA to appropriate acceptor sites in pre-mRNA. Although this process involves spliceosomal small nuclear (sn) RNAs, it is thought that trypanosomatids do not contain a homolog of the cis-spliceosomal U1 snRNA. We show here that a trypanosomatid protozoon, Crithidia fasciculata, contains a novel small RNA that displays several features characteristic of a U1 snRNA, including (i) a methylguanosine cap and additional 5'-terminal modifications, (ii) a potential binding site for common core proteins that are present in other trans-spliceosomal ribonucleoproteins, (iii) a U1-like 5'-terminal sequence, and (iv) a U1-like stem/loop I structure. Because trypanosomatid pre-mRNAs do not appear to contain cis-spliced introns, we argue that this previously unrecognized RNA species is a good candidate to be a trans-spliceosomal U1 snRNA.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In trypanosomatid protozoa, all mRNAs have identical 5'-terminal sequences. A 39-nucleotide (nt)1 spliced leader (SL) sequence is transferred from the 5'-end of a small SL RNA to the pre-mRNA in a process known as trans-splicing, which is very similar to the spliceosomal cis-splicing found in other eukaryotes (1). However, it is thought that trypanosomes and their relatives contain neither cis-spliced introns (1, 2) nor an equivalent of the U1 small nuclear (sn) RNA required for spliceosomal cis-splicing (3). The SL RNA is considered to be a trans-spliceosome-specific snRNA because it is found in a ribonucleoprotein particle that contains the same core proteins that are associated with other trans-spliceosomal snRNAs (4, 5). It has been proposed that during trans-splicing, sequences within the SL RNA are able to substitute for the function that U1 snRNA normally supplies in cis-splicing (3, 6, 7). Our discovery of a U1 snRNA homolog in Euglena gracilis (8), an organism that is specifically related to trypanosomatid protozoa (9), prompted us to re-evaluate a possible role for U1 snRNA in trypanosomatids.

In cis-splicing, during early stages of spliceosome assembly, the 5'-terminal region of U1 snRNA base pairs across the 5'-splice site (10). In the case of trans-splicing, it is commonly held that base pairing between U1 snRNA and the 5'-splice site may not be required for splicing of SL RNA sequences (1, 3, 6, 7). This view is supported by a study in which a trypanosomatid (Leptomonas collosoma) SL RNA sequence was placed upstream of a 3'-splice site, with the resulting chimeric substrate being efficiently spliced in a HeLa cell nuclear extract even after the 5'-end of >99% of the endogenous U1 snRNA had been removed by oligonucleotide-directed RNase H cleavage (7). This result provided support for an earlier proposal that U1 snRNA-like base pairing could be supplied by a region of the SL RNA upstream of the 5'-splice site (6). However, it was subsequently shown that U1 snRNP is, in fact, required for cis-splicing of the chimeric substrate, and that base pairing between the 5'-end of U1 snRNA and the SL RNA 5'-splice site does occur in these extracts when the 5'-end of U1 snRNA is intact (11). It has also been demonstrated recently that the proposed internal SL RNA base pairing across the 5'-splice site is not essential for trans-splicing in Leishmania tarentolae (12). In sum, the proposal that trypanosomatid SL RNA substitutes for U1 snRNA in trans-splicing has not gained experimental support, and the data do not definitively rule out the possibility that a U1 snRNA homolog is present in trypanosomatid protozoa but has not yet been identified. Here we show that a representative trypanosomatid, Crithidia fasciculata, contains a novel small RNA that displays several characteristic features expected of a U1 snRNA homolog.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Immunoprecipitation (3)-- 100 µl of 2 × buffer (1 × buffer = 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1.0 mM EDTA, 0.05% (v/v) Nonidet P-40) and 50 µl (5 µg) of anti-N2,N2,7-trimethylguanosine (m32,2,7G) monoclonal antibody (Oncogene Research Products, Ref. 13) were added to 50 µl (250 µg) of total RNA (prepared as described, see Ref. 14). After 1 h on ice, protein A-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, 3 mg in 100 µl of 1 × buffer) was added, and the sample was incubated on ice (30 min) with occasional mixing. The immunoprecipitate was recovered by centrifugation (5 min) and washed (five times) by resuspension in 1 ml of 1 × buffer followed by centrifugation. The final pellet was resuspended in 200 µl of H2O, 20 µl of 3.0 M NaOAc were added, and RNA was recovered by extraction with phenol-cresol (twice) followed by ethanol precipitation. Contaminating rRNA was removed by repeating the above immunoprecipitation procedure.

Amplification of DNA-- The following primers were used in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) experiments (8, 15): CfU1A (5'-CCCTCAAAATATGCTGCGAC-3'), CfU1 (5'-ATCAAGAAAGCACCAAGTCG-3'), 3'ARG (5'-ATCCGTGACAGGATTCGAAC-3'), 5'LEU (5'-AGATGGTCGAGTGGTCTAAG-3'). A reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR product was generated (16, 17) by first polyadenylating total RNA using yeast poly(A) polymerase followed by reverse transcription using primer P-94 (5'-AATAAAGCGGCCGCGGATCCAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT(G/A/C)-3'). A specific product was obtained after two rounds of PCR; primary PCR employed primer P-55 (5'-GGAGCTCAATAAAGCGGCCGC-3') and primer CfU1, while secondary PCR employed primer P-4 (5'-AATAAAGCGGCCGCGGATCCAA-3') and primer CfU1.

Sequence Analysis-- 5'-End-labeled PCR and RT-PCR products, as well as an RT product generated using 5'-end-labeled primer CfU1A, were sequenced by a modified chemical method.2 RNA was labeled with 32P at either the 5' or 3' end, sequenced by chemical and enzymatic methods, and subjected to terminal nucleotide analysis as described (8, 15, 18).

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Antibodies specific for m32,2,7G have been used to enrich for capped snRNAs in Trypanosoma brucei (3). Although no U1 snRNA homolog was found among the four largest m32,2,7G-capped RNAs, the experiments did detect other, smaller capped RNAs that were not further characterized (3). Additional snRNAs have also been detected by immunoprecipitation using antibodies directed against core proteins common to T. brucei spliceosomal snRNPs (5). Fig. 1 shows an electrophoretic profile of C. fasciculata RNAs that were immunoprecipitated using a monoclonal anti-m32,2,7G antibody. The antibody reacted efficiently with homologs of the m32,2,7G-capped RNAs identified previously in T. brucei. It also reacted efficiently with the 7-monomethylguanosine (m7G)-capped SL RNA (20) and with an intermediate of the trans-splicing reaction, the 39-nt free SL RNA exon. In addition, the antibody enriched for a subset of tRNAs that appear to have internal m7G in their variable loops, as judged by chemical reactivity during sequencing. When the amount of antibody relative to RNA was reduced in immunoprecipitation experiments, the RNA yield decreased but the intensity of individual bands relative to each other remained unchanged (data not shown). Although the monoclonal antibody did not distinguish between m7G and m32,2,7G caps, this procedure did allow us to identify a previously unrecognized methylguanosine (mG)-capped RNA that was present at approximately the same concentration as the known trans-spliceosomal snRNAs (U1 snRNA? in Fig. 1).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Anti-m32,2,7G immunoprecipitation of capped RNAs from C. fasciculata. RNAs were 3'-end-labeled and resolved in a 10% polyacrylamide, 7 M urea sequencing gel. Individual RNAs were identified by partial sequence analysis and comparison to known sequences. sno = small nucleolar. Notes: (a) the three U6 snRNA bands have identical 3' termini (19) and are immunoprecipitated due to base pairing with mG-capped U4 snRNA (3); denaturation of the sample (90 °C, 2 min) prior to immunoprecipitation greatly reduces the yield of U6 snRNA. (b) The yield of tRNAs is greatly increased by prior heat treatment (65 °C, 5 min). (c) The yield of tRNA fragments varies for different RNA preparations. (d) The 5'-terminal tRNAAsn fragment ends at the 5-methyluridine at position 54. (e) The 3'-terminal tRNATyr fragment starts at position A9. (f) The four SL RNAs (20-22) end at positions G83, U90, G91, and C92.

When the preliminary sequence of this candidate U1 snRNA was used as a query in a GenBankTM search, we detected a similar sequence in a tRNA gene cluster from L. tarentolae (23), located on the opposite strand between upstream tRNAArg and downstream tRNALeu genes. PCR experiments (primer combination CfU1A and 3'ARG, see "Experimental Procedures") confirmed that in C. fasciculata there is also a tRNAArg gene on the opposite strand ~100 base pairs upstream of the candidate U1 snRNA sequence. Attempts to amplify the region in C. fasciculata DNA between this new sequence and a possible downstream tRNALeu gene (primer combination CfU1 and 5'LEU, see "Experimental Procedures") were unsuccessful, indicating that this particular gene linkage may not be conserved between L. tarentolae and C. fasciculata.

The first two residues of the novel RNA were identified as A by DNA sequencing (Fig. 2A) but were resistant to cleavage by RNases and alkali during enzymatic sequencing (not shown), indicating that they are O2'-methylated. The first residue was also resistant to cleavage in the A reaction during chemical sequencing (Fig. 2B), suggesting that it contains additional modifications. No other post-transcriptional modifications were encountered during sequencing, but we did detect a single site of heterogeneity, A/C at position 60 (Fig. 2, C and D).


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Sequence analysis of a potential U1 snRNA from C. fasciculata. A, chemical sequencing of a PCR product generated in the presence of 5'-end-labeled primer CfU1A and unlabeled primer 3'-ARG. B and D, chemical sequencing of 3'-end-labeled RNA prepared as in Fig. 1. C, chemical sequencing of an RT-PCR product generated in the presence of 5'-end-labeled primer CfU1. The A lanes in these sequencing gels represent chemical cleavage of A > G.

In order to further characterize the modified A at the 5'-end of the molecule, the RNA was 5'-end-labeled after removal of the mG cap structure by tobacco acid pyrophosphatase treatment. Gel-purified RNA was digested with snake venom phosphodiesterase, and the resulting radioactive mononucleotide was analyzed by thin layer chromatography. This experiment (Fig. 3, A and B) demonstrates that the candidate U1 snRNA has the same hypermodified 5'-terminal nucleoside, (N6,N6,O2'-trimethyladenosine (m26Am)) that is known to be present at the 5'-end of SL RNAs from C. fasciculata and T. brucei (20); in contrast, the U2 (Fig. 3A) and U4 (not shown) snRNAs have 5'-terminal O2'-methyladenosine (Am) residues. The similarity in methylation patterns observed between this new RNA and the SL RNA may be explained by the fact that six of the seven 5'-terminal nucleotides are identical in the two RNA species (Fig. 3C).


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   5'-Terminal modified nucleotide analysis. Thin layer chromatography was carried out using unlabeled pN and pAm as markers. Co-migration of the SL and U1? products was verified by eluting them from the original plate (A) and re-chromatographing them (B) using less of the SL RNA sample with the same solvent system (95% ethanol:H2O, 4:1, Ref. 18). Co-migration was also observed in a second solvent system (saturated ammonium sulfate:isopropanol, 40:1, Ref. 18; not shown). C, comparison of the 5'-terminal sequences of C. fasciculata U1 snRNA? and SL RNA (20-22). Note that the modifications present at positions three (O2'-methylcytosine, Cm) and four (3,O2'-dimethyluridine, m3Um) of the SL RNA are readily detected in RNA sequencing reactions (not shown) and on this basis are clearly not present in the candidate U1 snRNA. Terminal mG caps are not included.

Trypanosomatid snRNAs contain sequences that bind spliceosomal core proteins (4-6, 24, 25). The C. fasciculata SL RNA core-protein binding site, which is capable of interacting with mammalian Sm proteins (6) as well as with T. brucei core proteins (4), appears to consist of an AAAUUUUGA sequence followed by a short G + C-rich hairpin. The novel RNA reported here has an almost identical sequence, AUAUUUUGA (residues 44-52), followed by a 3'-terminal hairpin structure that is supported by compensating base changes in the L. tarentolae sequence (Fig. 4B).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Comparison of the C. fasciculata candidate U1 snRNA with known U1 snRNAs. A, secondary structure (26) of Homo sapiens U1 snRNA (27, 28) showing the locations of modified nucleosides (Um = O2'-methyluridine, psi  = pseudouridine) and the Sm core-protein binding site. B, potential secondary structure of the C. fasciculata RNA showing differences in its homolog from L. tarentolae (circled residues next to the C. fasciculata sequence). A trypanosomatid-specific spliceosomal core-protein (CP) binding site, analogous to the Sm site in higher eukaryotes, is indicated (Sm/CP site). C, 5'-terminal sections of the C. fasciculata (C.f.) nucleotide sequence are compared with the corresponding sections of U1 snRNA sequences (8, 29) from Euglena gracilis (E.g.), Physarum polycephalum (P.p.), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S.c.), and H. sapiens (H.s.). Dots represent residues that are identical to the C. fasciculata sequence. The loop region of stem/loop I is enclosed by parentheses. Secondary structure diagrams were generated using the program XRNA developed by B. Weiser and H. Noller (University of California, Santa Cruz, CA).

The presence of a core-protein binding site and a modified 5' terminus, both of which are specifically related to their trans-spliceosomal SL RNA counterparts, provides strong evidence that this new capped RNA is also a component of the trans-spliceosome. Given that U1 snRNA is the only typical spliceosomal snRNA that has not yet been discovered in trypanosomatid protozoa (3, 24, 25), it is not surprising that we also found primary sequence conservation between this C. fasciculata candidate U1 snRNA and known U1 snRNAs from other organisms (Fig. 4C; compare Fig. 4, A and B). Notably, the highly conserved 5'-terminal region contains the ACCU sequence (residues 6-9, overlined in Fig. 4) that has the potential to interact with conserved splice site sequences (10). The C. fasciculata candidate U1 snRNA also contains a stem/loop I sequence that, in mammalian systems, is the binding site for U1-70K, a U1 snRNP-specific protein (30).

In view of the unusually small size of the C. fasciculata candidate U1 snRNA (69 nt), it is also not surprising that it lacks some of the characteristic features of a U1 snRNA (Fig. 4, A versus B). The highly conserved stem/loop II, which serves as the binding site for the U1-A protein in other eukaryotes (30), is the most notable structural element that is missing. One could argue that stem/loop II functions are either unnecessary for trans-splicing or are supplied by another component of the spliceosome (RNA and/or protein). Other trypanosomatid snRNAs show a similar pattern of reduced size and sequence divergence compared with their homologs from other systems (1, 3, 19, 24, 25).

The presence of structurally divergent snRNAs in trypanosomatid protozoa may indicate that the highly accurate splice site selection required for cis-splicing systems may not be as important in a "trans-splicing only" system (1). For example, the demands on 5'-splice site selection machinery (including U1 snRNA) are considerably reduced in trans-splicing, where the 5'-splice site is already present in the spliceosome as part of the spliceosomal SL RNA. Similarly, reduced accuracy of branch point and 3'-splice site selection (1) in SL RNA trans-splicing (which occurs upstream of coding sequences) is likely to be tolerated, because errors would not disrupt the reading frame in the spliced product (1). On the other hand, with the discovery of an apparent U1 snRNA homolog, trypanosomatid protozoa may possess a complete set of spliceosomal snRNAs, raising the possibility that the mechanisms of trans- and cis-splicing are not as different as was previously thought. In this regard, in the absence of a complete genomic sequence, we cannot rule out the possibility that a least a few cis-spliced introns may eventually be found in the trypanosomatid group of protozoa.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank F. B. St. C. Palmer and R. Breckon for supplying cultures of C. fasciculata, D. F. Spencer for a gift of purified C. fasciculata DNA and the chemical sequencing protocol, and Y. Watanabe for the primers used for RT-PCR.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant MT-11212 (to M. W. G.) from the Medical Research Council of Canada and by a fellowship (also to M. W. G.) from the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (Program in Evolutionary Biology).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF157481.

Dagger To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 902-494-2521; Fax: 902-494-1355; E-mail: mwgray@is.dal.ca.

2 D. F. Spencer, unpublished protocol.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: nt, nucleotide; SL, spliced leader; sn, small nuclear; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT, reverse transcriptase; m32,2,7G, N2,N2,7-trimethylguanosine; m7G, 7-monomethylguanosine; mG, methylguanosine; m26Am, N6,N6,O2'-trimethyladenosine; Am, O2'-methyladenosine.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Agabian, N. (1990) Cell 61, 1157-1160[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Logsdon, J. M., Jr. (1998) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 637-648[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Mottram, J., Perry, K. L., Lizardi, P. M., Lührmann, R., Agabian, N., and Nelson, R. G. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 1212-1223[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Cross, M., Günzl, A., Palfi, Z., and Bindereif, A. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 5516-5526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Palfi, Z., and Bindereif, A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20159-20163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Bruzik, J. P., Van Doren, K., Hirsh, D., and Steitz, J. A. (1988) Nature 335, 559-562[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Bruzik, J. P., and Steitz, J. A. (1990) Cell 62, 889-899[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Breckenridge, D. G., Watanabe, Y., Greenwood, S. J., Gray, M. W., and Schnare, M. N. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 852-856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Sogin, M. L. (1991) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1, 457-463[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Ares, M., Jr., and Weiser, B. (1995) Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 50, 131-159[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Seiwert, S. D., and Steitz, J. A. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 3135-3145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Sturm, N. R., Fleishmann, J., and Campbell, D. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18689-18692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Krainer, A. R. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 9415-9429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Gray, M. W. (1979) Can. J. Biochem. 57, 914-926[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Greenwood, S. J., Schnare, M. N., and Gray, M. W. (1996) Curr. Genet. 30, 338-346[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Zaug, A. J., Lingner, J., and Cech, T. R. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 532-533[Free Full Text]
17. Thweatt, R., Goldstein, S., and Shmookler Reis, R. J. (1990) Anal. Biochem. 190, 314-316[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. MacKay, R. M., Spencer, D. F., Doolittle, W. F., and Gray, M. W. (1980) Eur. J. Biochem. 112, 561-576[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Xu, G.-L., Wieland, B., and Bindereif, A. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4565-4570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Bangs, J. D., Crain, P. F., Hashizume, T., McCloskey, J. A., and Boothroyd, J. C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 9805-9815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Muhich, M. L., Hughes, D. E., Simpson, A. M., and Simpson, L. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 3141-3153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Gabriel, A., Sisodia, S. S., and Cleveland, D. W. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 16192-16199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Shi, X., Chen, D.-H. T., and Suyama, Y. (1994) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 65, 23-37[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Dungan, J. M., Watkins, K. P., and Agabian, N. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 4016-4029[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Xu, Y., Ben-Shlomo, H., and Michaeli, S. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 8473-8478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Guthrie, C., and Patterson, B. (1988) Annu. Rev. Genet. 22, 387-419[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Branlant, C., Krol, A., Ebel, J.-P., Lazar, E., Gallinaro, H., Jacob, M., Sri-Widada, J., and Jeanteur, P. (1980) Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 4143-4154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Reddy, R., Henning, D., and Busch, H. (1981) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 98, 1076-1083[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Zwieb, C. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 102-103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Lührmann, R., Kastner, B., and Bach, M. (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1087, 265-292[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Mittra, J. R. Zamudio, J. M. Bujnicki, J. Stepinski, E. Darzynkiewicz, D. A. Campbell, and N. R. Sturm
The TbMTr1 Spliced Leader RNA Cap 1 2 '-O-Ribose Methyltransferase from Trypanosoma brucei Acts with Substrate Specificity
J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2008; 283(6): 3161 - 3172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. R. Zamudio, B. Mittra, S. Foldynova-Trantirkova, G. M. Zeiner, J. Lukes, J. M. Bujnicki, N. R. Sturm, and D. A. Campbell
The 2'-O-Ribose Methyltransferase for Cap 1 of Spliced Leader RNA and U1 Small Nuclear RNA in Trypanosoma brucei
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2007; 27(17): 6084 - 6092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
I. D. Tkacz, Y. Lustig, M. Z. Stern, M. Biton, M. Salmon-Divon, A. Das, V. Bellofatto, and S. Michaeli
Identification of novel snRNA-specific Sm proteins that bind selectively to U2 and U4 snRNAs in Trypanosoma brucei
RNA, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 30 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
J. R. Zamudio, B. Mittra, G. M. Zeiner, M. Feder, J. M. Bujnicki, N. R. Sturm, and D. A. Campbell
Complete Cap 4 Formation Is Not Required for Viability in Trypanosoma brucei
Eukaryot. Cell, June 1, 2006; 5(6): 905 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Z. Palfi, B. Schimanski, A. Gunzl, S. Lucke, and A. Bindereif
U1 small nuclear RNP from Trypanosoma brucei: a minimal U1 snRNA with unusual protein components
Nucleic Acids Res., April 29, 2005; 33(8): 2493 - 2503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
X.-h. Liang, A. Haritan, S. Uliel, and S. Michaeli
trans and cis Splicing in Trypanosomatids: Mechanism, Factors, and Regulation
Eukaryot. Cell, October 1, 2003; 2(5): 830 - 840.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Gunzl, A. Bindereif, E. Ullu, and C. Tschudi
Determinants for cap trimethylation of the U2 small nuclear RNA are not conserved between Trypanosoma brucei and higher eukaryotic organisms
Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2000; 28(19): 3702 - 3709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. N. Schnare, J. C. Collings, D. F. Spencer, and M. W. Gray
The 28S-18S rDNA intergenic spacer from Crithidia fasciculata: repeated sequences, length heterogeneity, putative processing sites and potential interactions between U3 small nucleolar RNA and the ribosomal RNA precursor
Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2000; 28(18): 3452 - 3461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Z. Palfi, S. Lücke, H.-W. Lahm, W. S. Lane, V. Kruft, E. Bragado-Nilsson, B. Séraphin, and A. Bindereif
The spliceosomal snRNP core complex of Trypanosoma brucei: Cloning and functional analysis reveals seven Sm protein constituents
PNAS, July 12, 2000; (2000) 150236097.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Y.-i. Watanabe and M. W. Gray
Evolutionary appearance of genes encoding proteins associated with box H/ACA snoRNAs: Cbf5p in Euglena gracilis, an early diverging eukaryote, and candidate Gar1p and Nop10p homologs in archaebacteria
Nucleic Acids Res., June 15, 2000; 28(12): 2342 - 2352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-x. Xu, L. Liu, and S. Michaeli
Functional Analyses of Positions across the 5' Splice Site of the Trypanosomatid Spliced Leader RNA. IMPLICATIONS FOR BASE-PAIR INTERACTION WITH U5 AND U6 snRNAs
J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2000; 275(36): 27883 - 27892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Z. Palfi, S. Lucke, H.-W. Lahm, W. S. Lane, V. Kruft, E. Bragado-Nilsson, B. Seraphin, and A. Bindereif
The spliceosomal snRNP core complex of Trypanosoma brucei: Cloning and functional analysis reveals seven Sm protein constituents
PNAS, August 1, 2000; 97(16): 8967 - 8972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schnare, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schnare, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, M. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.