![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 23699-23701, August 20, 1999
,
From the Department of Antiviral Research, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three high level, cross-resistant variants of the
HIV-1 protease have been analyzed for their ability to bind four
protease inhibitors approved by the Food and Drug Administration
(saquinavir, ritonavir, indinavir, and nelfinavir) as AIDS
therapeutics. The loss in binding energy ( The objective of anti-retroviral therapy for human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)1 infection is
complete viral suppression below the limits of detection. This goal has
not been routinely achieved until the development of potent inhibitors
targeted against the HIV-1 protease, an enzyme essential for viral
replication. One of the greatest barriers to achieving long term viral
suppression is the emergence of drug-resistant strains of HIV. The
appearance of drug-resistant viruses and the evaluation of drug
cross-resistance for a given enzymatic target (reverse transcriptase or
protease) have been the most serious issues in the treatment of
HIV-infected individuals. The correlation of active site mutations in
HIV-1 protease to decreases in inhibitor binding has been well
documented, whereas the role of non-active site mutations has not been
clearly defined (1). To date, several non-active site changes have been
described as compensatory mutations that tend to offset the detrimental
effects of active site mutations toward enzyme catalysis (2, 3), but
the effect of non-active site mutations toward binding has hitherto not
been analyzed quantitatively. In this report, our findings show that
non-active site amino acid substitutions are major factors leading to
the decreases in inhibitor binding to three clinically derived variants
of the HIV-1 protease.
Enzyme Preparation--
Synthetic oligonucleotide cassettes of
444 base pairs were designed according to the wild-type sequence of
pET-3b-HIVPR (4). Point mutations were incorporated into the DNA with a
bias toward optimal codon usage in Escherichia coli to yield
the amino acid mutations listed in Table I. The oligonucleotides were
annealed and ligated into pUC18 or pUC19 by Midland Certified Reagent
Co. The primary sequence was verified before subcloning into a pET-3b expression vector via NdeI and
Bpu1102I sites and reconfirmed by automated double-stranded
DNA sequencing. Clones carrying the mutant DNA were transformed and
expressed as described previously (3, 5). The cells were lysed in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet
P-40, 10 mM MgCl2, and 100 µg/ml DNase I
using a microfluidizer processor (Microfluidics International Corp.,
Newton, MA). The mutant protease was extracted, refolded, and purified
over affinity columns as described (3). Protein concentrations were
determined by amino acid analysis, and purity was confirmed by SDS-gel electrophoresis.
Kinetic Assays--
All enzyme-catalyzed reactions were
performed under initial velocity and steady-state conditions.
Specifically, conditions for the enzyme catalyzed hydrolysis of the
MA/CA cleavage site peptide VSQN-( Variants of the HIV-1 Protease--
Suboptimal doses of indinavir
in early clinical trials were effective in reducing viral loads during
the initial weeks of treatment. Subsequently, isolates from patients
began to show mutations in the protease gene that correlated directly
to in vivo resistance not only to indinavir but also to a
diverse panel of HIV-1 protease inhibitors (6). In similar fashions,
cross-resistance was also observed for viral isolates from patients
treated with other inhibitors (7-11).
Under the selective pressure of an inhibitor, it has been shown that
more than 20 of the 99 amino acid residues of HIV-1 protease can mutate
to yield a replication-competent yet resistant enzyme (12). Most
protease sequences from the HIV-1 viruses that achieve a high level of
cross-resistance ( Cross-resistance--
Table II lists
the Ki values of the four HIV protease inhibitors
against the wild-type and three mutant proteases in a low salt buffer.
Although each of the four inhibitors exhibits binding to the wild-type
protease with equilibrium constants in the sub-nanomolar range
(Ki = 0.06 Effect of Non-active Site Residues on Binding--
To assess the
collective contribution of non-active site mutations for the variants
of the HIV-1 protease, we have reverted the single active site mutation
in each variant back to the wild type. The resultant mutants now
contain only point mutations away from the active site of
the protease. As seen in Table II, there remains a severe loss in
binding affinity for each of the "active site revertants" as
compared with the wild-type
protease.3 The
Ki values for the three variants and four inhibitors (n = 12) have increased 5-80-fold over the values
obtained for the wild-type enzyme. The results clearly reveal that a
significant contribution of resistance is due to amino acid changes
away from the immediate vicinity of the inhibitor binding pocket as
defined in numerous x-ray crystallographic studies.
The quantitative contribution of active site and non-active site
mutations toward affinity can be evaluated in terms of the Gibbs free
energy of binding,
Active Site versus Non-active Site Substitutions--
In previous
reports, different effects on catalysis have been assigned to active
site amino acid mutations and several selected non-active site
substitutions of the HIV-1 protease (2, 3). Active site changes such as
V82I and I84V have been found (3) at the enzyme level to cause a
concomitant loss in binding affinity as well as catalytic efficiency
(kcat/KM). Non-active site amino acid
changes such as M46I and L63P are found, on the other hand, to enhance
kcat/KM and are neutral
toward binding, thereby compensating for the detrimental loss in
catalytic efficiency caused by the substitutions in the active site
(3). The kinetic findings are consistent with the results of x-ray crystallography (18). There are no gross conformational changes introduced by the non-active site substitutions for either the native
or bound enzymes, but changes in amino acid side chains in the active
site pocket reveal clear interference of binding.
In this report, more complicated mutational profiles entailing over 10 amino acid changes are examined. All three of the active site
revertants exhibit 70-80% of the specific activity
(kcat/KM) (data not shown) of
the wild-type protease as well as approximately 50% of the binding
affinity for inhibitors, whereas the fully mutated enzymes display only
8-40% of wild-type activity
(data not shown).5 Thus, the
point mutation in the active site of the protease remains a major
factor in the loss of catalytic prowess of the enzyme as well as the
loss of binding affinity to the inhibitors. What the current data
reveal, in addition, is that apparently multiple mutations outside the
active site are involved not only in stabilizing the transition-state
binding of substrate (i.e. ES
The relationship at the molecular level of the two mechanisms of
resistance caused by the non-active site mutations is unclear at
present. We note that the overall conformation of inhibitor-bound structures of a mutant of the HIV-1 protease that contains nine point
mutations, eight of which are away from the active site of the enzyme,
is not noticeably different from those of the wild type at greater than
2.5 Å resolution.6

Gb)
going from the wild-type enzyme to mutant enzymes ranges from 2.5 to
4.4 kcal/mol, 40-65% of which is attributed to amino acid
substitutions away from the active site of the protease and not in
direct contact with the inhibitor. The data suggest that non-active
site changes are collectively a major contributor toward engendering
resistance against the protease inhibitor and cannot be ignored when
considering cross-resistance issues of drugs against the HIV-1 protease.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-naphthylalanine)-PIV were
established with respect to time and enzyme concentration to yield
linear initial velocity data. The enzyme concentrations employed in the
assay were as follows: wild-type, 5 pM;
A-44 and A-44r, 200 pM; V-18, K-60, and K-60r, 10 pM;
V-18r, 20 pM (r = active site revertant). Binding constants for each competitive
inhibitor were first estimated by determining IC50 values
with 12 inhibitor concentrations and solving for an estimated
Ki value using the equation Ki = IC50 × KM/(KM + [S]). The Ki value was then redetermined in
separate assays using a series of inhibitor concentrations that equaled
0.5, 1, 2, and 3 times the estimated Ki value. Six
substrate concentrations ranging from 50 to 600 µM were
employed for each inhibitor concentration. The final
Ki values were derived from replots of
KM/Vmax versus
inhibitor concentration from double-reciprocal plots. The Ki values for each inhibitor with wild-type enzyme
and selected others (e.g. the K-60 and saquinavir
pair) were determined multiple times to yield an average S.D. of 4.2%
(n = 14). Other assay conditions were as described
previously (3) with the exception that detection of product was
monitored with fluorescence (excitation = 270 nm, emission = 330 nm).
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1000 nM CIC95 with >5
different inhibitors) contain a constellation of approximately 8
12
amino acid changes, which include a set of mutations in the active site and another set located in other regions (flaps, hinge, etc.) of the
protease. At least a handful of substitutions, in and away from the
active site of the protease, is needed to elicit phenotypic resistance
against indinavir.2 For
indinavir, it is possible for four different active site amino acids to
mutate to yield some form of resistant HIV-1 protease. However, in most
cases the sequences examined from patient isolates contain only one
active site amino acid change. The predominant active site change
occurs at residue position 82. It is from this subset of patient
isolates (6) that three mutant enzymes have been chosen for this study.
The mutation sites of these mutants are shown in Table
I. Each isolate contains 9-11 changes
from the wild-type sequence (13), contains a single unique active site
modification, and is highly cross-resistant.
Wild-type and mutant HIV-1 protease sequences
0.24 nM), the introduction of various sets of mutations (Table I) leads to a 60-1800-fold increase in Ki for the inhibitors. Hence,
cross-resistance is demonstrated at the enzyme level as it has been at
the virus level (6) with this panel of HIV-1 protease variants.
Dissociation constants, Ki (nM), of four protease
inhibitors
Gb.4
The loss in affinity, 
Gb, for the active site
revertants ranges from 1 to 2.6 kcal/mol. These values account for
40-65% of the total binding energy of the inhibitor to the protease
variants A-44, V-18, and K-60.
Therefore, approximately one-half of the loss in affinity of the
inhibitors can be attributed to the collective action of the non-active
site amino acid substitutions induced by the inhibitor. The results are
summarized in Table III as expressed in
the ratio of 
Gbactive site
revertant/
Gbmutant.
It is noteworthy that for the four inhibitors examined, this ratio
falls within a narrow range for the contribution of the non-active site
residues toward binding. This result is unexpected because these
protease variants are derived from patients taking indinavir as their
sole protease inhibitor. The only outlier is with saquinavir in the
case of the K-60 enzyme where 100% of the binding energy is
due to the non-active site amino acids (i.e. the addition of
the active site V82F change has no effect on binding (see Table II)).
One possible explanation is that the negative effects of introducing
the bulky phenyl group to residue 82 in the S1 binding pocket of the
enzyme active site are counteracted by the introduction of added
binding interaction with the quinoline moiety of saquinavir in that
pocket. Molecular modeling of the protease active site has revealed
that it is possible for the aromatic quinoline of saquinavir to form
additional van der Waals interactions similar to that reported for
DMP323 (17).
Percent (%) contribution of non-active site amino acids to overall
decrease in binding energy

Gb for each inhibitor have been calculated
from RT × ln(Kimutant/Kiwild-type),
where R is the gas constant and T is absolute
temperature in Kelvin (see text for details).
), as
is already known (3, 19), but also in contributing significantly to the
destabilization of inhibitor binding. Thus, non-active site mutations
of the protease that emerge under the selective pressure of a drug are
capable of raising resistance via two mechanisms. Because all four
protease drugs select for many of the same non-active site amino acid
mutations in vivo (1, 12), our data also suggest that the
non-active site changes cannot be ignored when considering resistance
and cross-resistance issues relating to HIV-1 protease.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Colleen McDonough and Dr. Bruce Dorsey for their assistance, Dr. Sanjeev Munshi for molecular modeling, Drs. Paul Darke and Jon Condra for helpful discussions, and Dr. Emilio Emini for supporting this research. We also thank Drs. Addie and Arnold for years of helpful advice.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Antiviral
Research, Merck Research Laboratories, Sumneytown Pike WP26-344, West
Point, PA 19486. Tel: 215-652-7487; Fax: 215-652-6452; E-mail: lawrence_kuo@merck.com.
2 We note that a previous investigation (6) has shown that a panel of mutational substitutions in the HIV-1 protease is required to elicit significant phenotypic resistance to the protease inhibitor. Single substitutions of some of the non-active site residues (e.g. Leu-10, Val-32, Met-36, Met-46, Leu-63, Leu-90) exert no effect on viral susceptibility to indinavir. There are other non-active site substitutions (e.g. Lys-20, Ser-37, Ile-64, Val-77, Ile-93) in which the incidence of change does not correlate statistically or significantly with phenotypic resistance to indinavir. Residues 37 and 63 exhibit a high frequency of polymorphic changes seen in untreated patients, as explained in Table I. Thus, there do not appear to be "hot spots," among the non-active site residues in the three sequences chosen, that would be responsible for the resistance observed. At the enzyme level, a double mutation of Met-46 and Leu-63, two commonly seen substitutions, does not alter the binding of the four Food and Drug Administration-approved protease inhibitors (3).
3
The active site amino acid changes, found in the
context of the constellation of mutations seen in these resistant
enzymes, are responsible for the remaining loss in binding energy
(roughly 1-2.5 kcal/mol). We emphasize that the data do not imply that a similar magnitude of change in the Gibbs free energy of binding (
Gb) would necessarily be observed for the
binding of these inhibitors to individual mutants having a single
active site amino acid change within the context of the wild-type
protease. The reason is that the ground state energetics of the active
site revertants and the wild-type HIV-1 protease are unlikely to be the same.
4
Gb is related to
Ki by the equation
Gb = RT × ln(Ki), where R is
the gas constant and T is the absolute temperature in
Kelvin. 
Gb is the difference in the Gibbs free
energy of binding.
5 We have noted previously (3) that a full assessment of changes in the catalytic properties of the HIV-1 protease should be made with the panel of eight substrates representing all the cleavage sites of the HIV-1 polyprotein. Activity data have been estimated in this work using only one peptide analog that mimics the cleavage site (SQNY*PIV) between the MA and CA domains of the HIV-1 polyprotein (see "Materials and Methods"). Thus, the change in kcat/ KM for the three mutant proteases and their corresponding active site revertants are only rough indications of the effect of amino acid substitutions in and away from the active site of the enzyme.
6 S. Munshi, B. Galvin, Y. Li, D. Olsen, Z. Chen, and L. C. Kuo, submitted for publication.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviation used is: HIV-1, human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Boden, D.,
and Markowitz, M.
(1998)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42,
2775-2783 |
| 2. |
Pazhanisamy, S.,
Stuver, C. M.,
Cullinan, A. B.,
Margolin, N.,
Rao, B. G.,
and Livingston, D. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17979-17985 |
| 3. |
Schock, H. B.,
Garsky, V. M.,
and Kuo, L. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31957-31963 |
| 4. |
Ido, E.,
Han, H. P.,
Kezdy, F. J.,
and Tang, J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
24359-24366 |
| 5. |
Chen, Z.,
Li, Y,
Schock, H. B.,
Hall, D.,
Chen, E.,
and Kuo, L. C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
21433-21436 |
| 6. | Condra, J. H., Holder, D. J., Schleif, W. A., Blahy, O. M., Danovich, R. M., Gabryelski, L. J., Graham, D. J., Laird, D., Quintero, J. C., Rhodes, A., Robbins, H. L., Roth, E., Shivaprakash, M., Yang, T., Chodakewitz, J. A., Deutsch, P. J., Leavitt, R. Y., Massari, F. E., Mellors, J. W., Squires, K. E., Steigbigel, R. T., Teppler, H., and Emini, E. A. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 8270-8276[Abstract] |
| 7. | Schmit, J. C., Ruiz, L., Clotet, B., Raventos, A., Tor, J., Leonard, J., Desmyter, J., De Clercq, E., and Vandamme, A. M. (1996) AIDS 10, 995-999[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Molla, A., Korneyeva, M., Gao, Q., Vasavanonda, S., Schipper, P. J., Mo, H. M., Markowitz, M., Chernyavskiy, T., Niu, P., Lyons, N., Hsu, A., Granneman, G. R., Ho, D. D., Boucher, C. A., Leonard, J. M., Norbeck, D. W., and Kempf, D. J. (1996) Nat. Med. 2, 760-766[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Winters, M. A.,
Schapiro, J. M.,
Lawrence, J.,
and Merigan, T. C.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
5303-5306 |
| 10. | Craig, C., Race, E., Sheldon, J., Whittaker, L., Gilbert, S., Moffatt, A., Rose, J., Dissanayeke, S., Chirn, G. W., Buncan, I. B., and Cammack, N. (1998) AIDS 12, 1611-1618[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Dulioust, A.
(1999)
J. Virology
73,
850-854 |
| 12. | Condra, J. H. (1998) Drug Resist. Updates 1, 292-299 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Ratner, L., Haseltine, W., Patarca, R., Livak, K. J., Starcich, B., Josephs, S. F., Doran, E. R., Rafalski, J. A., Whitehorn, E. A., Baumeister, K., Ivanoff, L., Petteway, S. R., Pearson, M. L., Lautenberger, J. A., Papas, T. S., Ghrayeb, J., Change, N. T., Gallo, R. C., and Wong-Staal, F. (1985) Nature 3113, 277 |
| 14. | Deleted in proof |
| 15. | Deleted in proof |
| 16. | Deleted in proof |
| 17. | Ala, P. J., Huston, E. E., Klabe, R. M., McCabe, D. D., Duke, J. L., Rizzo, C. J., Korant, B. D., DeLoskey, R. J., Lam, P. Y., Hodge, C. N., and Chang, C. H. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 6556[CrossRef] |
| 18. | Chen, Z., Li, Y., Schock, H. B., Hall, D., Chen, E., and Kuo, L. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21433-21436 |
| 19. | Carroll, S. S., and Kuo, L. C. (1998) Int. Antiviral News 6, 103-107 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-T. Kim, H. Yoshida, M. Kojima, R. Kurita, W. Nishii, T. Muramatsu, H. Ito, S. J. Park, and K. Takahashi The Effects of Mutations in the Carboxyl-Terminal Region on the Catalytic Activity of Escherichia coli Signal Peptidase I J. Biochem., February 1, 2008; 143(2): 237 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. del Sol, H. Fujihashi, D. Amoros, and R. Nussinov Residue centrality, functionally important residues, and active site shape: Analysis of enzyme and non-enzyme families Protein Sci., September 1, 2006; 15(9): 2120 - 2128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Charpentier, D. E. Dwyer, F. Mammano, D. Lecossier, F. Clavel, and A. J. Hance Role of Minority Populations of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in the Evolution of Viral Resistance to Protease Inhibitors J. Virol., April 15, 2004; 78(8): 4234 - 4247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Simon, N. Padte, D. Murray, J. Vanderhoeven, T. Wrin, N. Parkin, M. Di Mascio, and M. Markowitz Infectivity and Replication Capacity of Drug-Resistant Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Variants Isolated during Primary Infection J. Virol., July 15, 2003; 77(14): 7736 - 7745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Hamilton, J. Inglese, and M. Ferrer A PDZ domain-based assay for measuring HIV protease activity: Assay design considerations Protein Sci., March 1, 2003; 12(3): 458 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Shafer Genotypic Testing for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2002; 15(2): 247 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. King, L. Melnick, M. Prabu-Jeyabalan, E. A. Nalivaika, S.-S. Yang, Y. Gao, X. Nie, C. Zepp, D. L. Heefner, and C. A. Schiffer Lack of synergy for inhibitors targeting a multi-drug-resistant HIV-1 protease Protein Sci., February 1, 2002; 11(2): 418 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |