J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 23752-23760, August 20, 1999
Functional Analysis of a Homopolymeric (dA-dT) Element That
Provides Nucleosomal Access to Yeast and Mammalian Transcription
Factors*
Keith A.
Koch
and
Dennis J.
Thiele§
From the Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan
Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0606
 |
ABSTRACT |
Eukaryotic organisms ranging from yeast to humans
maintain a large amount of genetic information in the highly compact
folds of chromatin, which poses a large DNA accessibility barrier to rapid changes in gene expression. The ability of the yeast
Candida glabrata to survive copper insult requires rapid
transcriptional autoactivation of the AMT1
copper-metalloregulatory transcription factor gene. The kinetics of
AMT1 autoactivation is greatly enhanced by homopolymeric
(dA-dT) element (A16)-mediated nucleosomal accessibility for Amt1p to a
metal response element in this promoter. Analysis of the nucleosomal
positional requirements for the A16 element reveal an impaired ability
of the A16 element to stimulate AMT1 autoregulation when
positioned downstream of the metal response element within the
nucleosome, implicating an inherent asymmetry to the nucleosome
positioned within the AMT1 promoter. Importantly, we
demonstrate that the A16 element functions to enhance
nucleosomal access and hormone-stimulated transcriptional activation
for the mammalian glucocorticoid receptor, in a rotational
phase-dependent manner. These data provide
compelling evidence that nucleosomal homopolymeric
(dA-dT) elements provide enhanced DNA access to diverse classes of
transcription factors and suggest that these elements may function in
this manner to elicit rapid transcriptional responses in higher
eukaryotic organisms.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A key component of many developmental, adaptive, and protective
signaling pathways in cells is the rapid transcriptional activation of
genes necessary to manifest changes in cellular homeostasis. The
proximal mediators of these signaling pathways are the transcriptional activators, which must physically interact with cis-acting DNA elements
within the promoters of their target genes. The organization of
eukaryotic DNA into chromatin poses a unique paradox for the cell to
maintain its genetic material in a compact arrangement and yet have the
capacity to respond quickly to extracellular stimuli to activate gene
expression. In contrast to the very high affinity that transcription
factors typically have for a given target DNA sequence on free DNA, the
same DNA sequence within chromatin can have >1000-fold lower affinity
(1). This poses a large thermodynamic barrier to surpass in order to
achieve a rapid transcriptional response for inducibly bound
transcription factors. Furthermore, the magnitude of the thermodynamic
barrier created by chromatin for each specific transcription factor can vary significantly and is often related to the position of the DNA-responsive element relative to the ends of the nucleosomal DNA
(translational phase) and the direction the responsive element faces in
relation to the histone core (rotational phase). Given that occupancy
of the responsive elements by transcription factors is directly
correlated with transcriptional activation, the thermodynamic barrier
created by chromatin also plays an integral role in modulating the
kinetics of target gene activation.
Classically, eukaryotic promoters have been categorized into two
general types, preset and remodeled, based on their chromatin architecture and the need for nucleosome remodeling on the promoter to
establish accessible DNA. The Drosophila heat
shock-responsive genes hsp26 and hsp70 provide
examples of a preset chromatin arrangement whereby the target DNA
sequences recognized by the heat shock transcription factor within each
of their respective promoters are maintained free of stably positioned
nucleosomes. The regions of the heat shock elements within each of
these promoters are hypersensitive to nuclease digestion, consistent
with the lack of stably positioned nucleosomes (2).
An alternative to maintaining a preset promoter chromatin configuration
is the use of stimulus-initiated nucleosome remodeling that is
orchestrated by the signal-responsive transcription factors. In
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a signal transduction pathway is activated in response to low environmental phosphate levels, which leads to the activation of the PHO5 gene through the Pho2p
and Pho4p transcription factors. The PHO5 gene harbors six
uniquely positioned nucleosomes within its promoter, of which four are effectively remodeled during phosphate starvation (3, 4). Nucleosome
remodeling on the PHO5 promoter is dependent on the binding
of Pho4p to a target DNA sequence known as UASp1, which is located
between two positioned nucleosomes. Importantly, the primary Pho4p
binding site is nonnucleosomal, and it is only after Pho4p-mediated
nucleosome remodeling that the adjacent nucleosomal Pho4p and Pho2p
binding sites become available and PHO5 transcription is potentiated.
Another example of stimulus-initiated nucleosome remodeling is
orchestrated by the activated glucocorticoid receptor
(GR)1 upon binding to a
nucleosomal glucocorticoid response element (GRE) located on the mouse
mammary tumor virus-long terminal repeat (MMTV-LTR). In response to
glucocorticoid hormone, the activated GR binds to the GREs located
within a positioned nucleosome in the MMTV-LTR to facilitate the
remodeling of this nucleosome, thereby providing binding site access to
the NF-1 transcription factor (5-8). The affinity of the NF-1
transcription factor for DNA is severely reduced for target DNA
sequences that are within a nucleosome, unlike the steroid receptors,
the DNA binding of which is only modestly affected by chromatin
(9-11). The stimulation of nucleosome remodeling from a nonnucleosomal
site in the case of PHO5, and a nucleosomal site in the case
of the MMTV-LTR, suggests that the exact mechanism of nucleosome
remodeling used on any given promoter will be intimately associated
with the nature of the transcription factor promoting the response and
its ability to interact with nucleosomal DNA.
A third generally applicable mechanism for achieving accessible
chromatin is through DNA structural element-facilitated nucleosome destabilization and/or the distortion of a stably positioned nucleosome to provide localized accessible DNA. This mechanism for attaining accessible chromatin was discovered by Struhl and colleagues using the
HIS3 promoter in S. cerevisiae (12, 13). The
S. cerevisiae HIS3 gene product functions in the histidine
biosynthetic pathway and is activated by the transcription factor Gcn4p
in response to amino acid starvation. The Gcn4p binding site on the
HIS3 promoter is located at
92 relative to the
transcriptional start site with an imperfect 17-bp poly(dA-dT) element
containing the sequence T4CAT11 located 12 bp
upstream of the binding site. Deletion of a 344-bp HIS3
upstream promoter region containing this poly(dA-dT) element resulted
in a severe decrease in the magnitude of Gcn4p-dependent gene activation, implicating the poly(dA-dT) element in fostering HIS3 transcriptional activation (13). Substitution of the
native imperfect poly(dA-dT) element with homopolymeric (dA-dT)
elements 17, 29, or 42 bp in length restored
Gcn4p-dependent transcriptional activation (12). Probing
the accessibility of this region using in vivo HinfI
cleavage and DNA methylation studies indicated a modest
poly(dA-dT)-dependent enhancement of accessibility
(1.9-fold increase in HinfI cleavage of the Gcn4p binding
site and a 10% difference in DNA methylation by Escherichia coli
dam methylase expressed in vivo). Iyer and Struhl (12)
concluded that the 42-bp homopolymeric (dA-dT) element functions by
improving the accessibility of the HIS3 promoter region
containing the Gcn4p binding site either by a local decrease in
nucleosome occupancy and/or an altered nucleosome conformation.
Several studies have provided evidence that the region containing the
Gcn4p binding site and the poly(dA-dT) element in the native
HIS3 promoter is in a region that lacks stably positioned nucleosomes. Using micrococcal nuclease to probe the chromatin structure of the wild-type HIS3 promoter, Losa et
al. (14) identified two strong nuclease hypersensitive sites in
the region of the poly(dA-dT) element that were separated by 110 bp.
They concluded that the separation between these nuclease sensitive
sites was insufficient to represent the boundaries of a stably
positioned nucleosome, which would be ~146 bp apart, and likely
represents a nuclease sensitive region lacking stably positioned
nucleosomes. Studies by Filetici et al. (15) further support
the contention that this region of the wild-type HIS3
promoter lacks stably positioned nucleosomes. Using radiolabeled
HIS3 gene fragments from different regions of the gene to
probe a Southern blot of mononucleosomal DNA, they demonstrated that
the region containing the poly(dA-dT) element and Gcn4p binding site is
specifically devoid of stably positioned nucleosomes. Furthermore, in
the studies by Iyer and Struhl (12), it is clear that the region of the
Gcn4p binding site is ~7-fold more sensitive to HinfI
cleavage than an adjacent site 65 bp upstream in the absence of the
poly(dA-dT) element, which is highly suggestive that the poly(dA-dT)
region does not contain stably positioned nucleosomes. The 42-bp
homopolymeric (dA-dT) used in the studies mentioned above may therefore
be acting to further promote the unstable chromatin architecture in
this region of the his3 promoter to promote Gcn4p
accessibility, or perhaps by a combination of this mechanism and
altering the conformation of nucleosomes that may be transiently
positioned in this region to allow nucleosomal access to Gcn4p.
Recently, we have described a distinct system that utilizes a
nucleosomal homopolymeric (dA-dT) element to mediate accessibility to
the copper-dependent transcription factor, Amt1p, in the
yeast Candida glabrata (16). The Amt1p transcription factor
in the yeast C. glabrata sits atop a hierarchy of genes that
are activated by the presence of high levels of copper in the
environment (17). Acting as both the sensor and transcriptional
activator, Amt1p binds Cu(I) and activates its own transcription
followed by the transcriptional activation of the MTI,
MTIIa, and MTIIb metallothionein genes, which
encode critical components of the copper ion detoxification pathway
(18). The rapid and robust transcriptional autoactivation of the
AMT1 gene is a critical step in this signaling pathway and
occurs through a single metal-responsive element (MRE) within the
AMT1 promoter (18). This MRE is located at the pseudodyad axis of symmetry of a stably positioned AMT1 promoter
nucleosome encompassing DNA from
113 to
260 relative to the
transcription start site, along with a homopolymeric (dA-dT) element
containing 16 contiguous adenosine residues (A16) that resides just
upstream of the MRE (16). DNase I analysis and restriction enzyme
access experiments with yeast chromatin suggest that the A16 element locally distorts the DNA at both ends, creating increased accessibility to neighboring DNA sequences (16). Homopolymeric (dA-dT) elements have
been shown to have unique structural characteristics that make them
rigid and less flexible than standard B-form DNA. In addition to having
a shorter helical repeat (10.0 bp/turn as opposed to 10.5 bp/turn) and
a narrow minor groove (~9 Å as compared with ~15 Å for B-form
DNA), homopolymeric (dA-dT) elements have additional bifurcated
hydrogen bonds that provide added structural stability (19). These
characteristics of homopolymeric (dA-dT) elements, and our previous
data, suggest that nucleosomal homopolymeric (dA-dT) elements can
resist conforming tightly to the histone protein face of the nucleosome
and create localized DNA distortions on either end of the element that
provide "access windows" for transcription factors.
Analysis of the crystal structure of a reconstituted nucleosome reveals
that there is an inherent asymmetry with respect to the number of
histone-DNA contacts made on either side of the dyad axis of symmetry
(20). Recent studies investigating triple helix formation at
nucleosomal poly(dA-dT) elements experimentally identified functional
differences between the ability of a triple helix to form on one side
of the nucleosome dyad axis as compared with its counterpart on the
other side of the dyad axis (21). In its natural context, the A16
element resides just upstream of the AMT1 promoter MRE. Here
we present the results of studies that address whether the positioning
of the A16 element on the nucleosome alters the ability of the
homopolymeric (dA-dT) element to stimulate AMT1
autoregulation by placing the A16 element downstream of the MRE.
Additionally, we investigate the length requirements for the
nucleosomal homopolymeric (dA-dT) element to function in
AMT1 autoregulation. Importantly, we also demonstrate that the function of the A16 element is conserved in the baker's yeast S. cerevisiae and does not depend on the Dat1 poly(dA-dT)
binding protein. Furthermore, we demonstrate the ability of the A16
element to foster nucleosomal access to the rat glucocorticoid receptor expressed in yeast, in a rotational phase-dependent manner.
Given the high frequency of occurrence of homopolymeric (dA-dT) tracts in promoter regions in yeast and mammalian genes, these elements may be
of widespread use in facilitating rapid transcriptional responses to
physiological and environmental stimuli.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Strains and Growth Conditions--
The C. glabrata
uracil auxotrophic strain (D) was used as the recipient for episomal
plasmids bearing wild-type or mutant AMT1-lacZ
reporter genes. The AMT1 disruption strain
(amt1-1) (17) was used for the integration of full-length
wild-type or mutant AMT1 genes in single copy at the
ura3 locus. The S. cerevisiae strain CY342
(MATa ade2-101 his3-200 leu2-
1 lys2-801 ura3-
99) was used for the glucocorticoid receptor experiments. S. cerevisiae strain KKY17 (CY342 + ace1
225) was used
to test the ability of AMT1 to autoregulate in baker's
yeast, and S. cerevisiae strain KKY20 (KKY17 + dat1
::kanMX2) was used to test the role of the Dat1 protein in AMT1 gene autoregulation. The E. coli strain DH5
F' was used for the construction and maintenance
of plasmids by standard techniques (22), except in the case of plasmids
that were used with the Chameleon double-stranded mutagenesis kit
(Stratagene), in which the manufacturer's strains were utilized.
Plasmids--
The plasmids pAXHA3, pAX-S16, and pAX-A16
were
produced in order to facilitate the construction of mutant
AMT1-lacZ reporter plasmids. pAXHA3 contains the 635-bp
XbaI-HaeIII fragment of the wild-type
AMT1 gene from pBZ-12 (23) cloned into the XbaI
and SmaI sites of pBluescript SK+. pAX-A16
is the
corresponding plasmid produced from the
XbaI-HaeIII fragment lacking the A16 derived from
pBZ12-A16
(16), and pAX-S16 is the corresponding plasmid derived
from pRSS16 (16). The 645-bp XbaI-EcoRI fragments
from pAXHA3 and pAX-S16 were used to replace the equivalent fragment in
pKTP-8T (13) to produce pA16-lacZ and pS16-lacZ,
respectively. The oligonucleotides
5'-CTCATCACGCCCACCTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTACTACTTTTAAGTCAGC-3' and
5'-CTCATCACGCCCACCAGCATGCGGATCCTGAACTACTTTTAAGTCAGC-3' were used in
conjunction with pAX-A16
and the Chameleon mutagenesis kit to
produce plasmids pAX-3'A16 and pAX-3'S16, respectively. The
oligonucleotides
5'-GCCAAATTAGCTTATCATGATTTTTTTTTTGGATCCCAGAATGTTAGTCTCCG-3' and
5'-GCCAAATTAGCTTATCATGATTTTTCCATGGGATCCCAGAATGTTAGTCTCCG-3' were
used with plasmid pAX-HA3 and the above mutagenesis kit to produce
plasmids pAX-A10 and pAX-A5, respectively. The DNA sequence of the
XbaI-EcoRI fragment from each respective plasmid
was confirmed by dideoxy sequencing, and these fragments were then used
to replace the equivalent fragment from plasmid pA16-lacZ to
produce the following mutant plasmids: p3'A16-lacZ,
p3'S16-lacZ, pA10-lacZ, and pA5-lacZ.
Plasmids pA16/3'A16-lacZ and pA16/3'S16-lacZ were constructed via three-piece ligation by simultaneously introducing the
XbaI-BspHI fragment of pAXHA3 and the
BspHI-EcoRI fragment from pAX-3'A16 and
pAX-3'S16, respectively, into the XbaI-EcoRI cut
pA16-lacZ vector. Plasmid pS16/3'A16-lacZ was
also produced by three-piece ligation using the
XbaI-BspHI fragment of pAX-S16 and the
BspHI-EcoRI fragment from pAX-3'A16.
The integrative plasmids pU1b-3'A16 and pU1b-3'S16 were produced by
combining the XbaI-StyI AMT1 promoter
fragment harboring their respective mutations with the remainder of the
AMT1 gene in the pU1b plasmid backbone (24). The resulting
plasmids were then used to integrate, in single copy, the mutant
AMT1 genes at the ura3 locus of the
amt1-1 strain as described previously (18). The new strains
designated 3'A16::URA3 and
3'S16::URA3 were tested for copper resistance,
along with strains A16::URA3 and
S16::URA3 made previously (16). Plasmids
pAX-S16GREin and pAX-S16GREout were constructed using the plasmid
pAX-S16 with the Chameleon mutagenesis kit and the
oligonucleotides
5'-CCTGATCATGATAAGCTCTGCTGTACAGGATGTTCTAGCTACTGGGCGTGATGAGCC-3' and
5'-GGATCCTGATCATGACTCTGCTGTACAGGATGTTCTAGCTACGTGGTGGGC-3', respectively. To generate pS16GREinZ and pS16GREoutZ, the
XbaI-EcoRI fragments of pAX-S16GREin and
pAX-S16GREout, respectively, were used to replace the corresponding
fragments in pA16-lacZ. The plasmids pA16GREinZ and
pA16GREoutZ were generated via the three-piece ligation approach
described above. The plasmid p413GPD-rGR was developed to
constituitively express the rat glucocorticoid receptor cDNA from
the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPD) promoter in S. cerevisiae. p413GPD-rGR contains the 2.8-kilobase XbaI
fragment encompassing the rat glucocorticoid receptor open reading
frame from CMV5rGRx subcloned into the XbaI site of p413-GPD
(25).
Disruption of the S. cerevisiae DAT1 Gene--
The
oligonucleotides
5'-CTTGTGAATCTACAAACTGTCCTAAAGTATATTGGAGCAGGACATTGGGTGGAAGCTTCGTACGCTGCA-3'
and
5'-CTAGTTATTATGTGGCATATACGAATGTTTTAGTGGTATGCTGGAAATGAAGGCCACTAGTGGATCTGA3', containing 50 bp of homology to the 5' and 3' ends of the
S. cerevisiae DAT1 gene, respectively, were used to amplify
by polymerase chain reaction the kanMX2 cassette from the plasmid
pFA-kanMX2 as described previously (26). Approximately 10 µg of the
resulting polymerase chain reaction product was used to transform
S. cerevisiae strain KKY17. The strain KKY20 was identified
that exhibited G418 resistance and displayed the correct chromosomal
disruption of the DAT1 gene (dat1
::kanMX2), as ascertained by polymerase
chain reaction.
Analysis of Wild-type and Mutant AMT1-lacZ Gene Expression in
Vivo--
The C. glabrata strain D was independently
transformed with pA16-lacZ, pS16-lacZ,
p3'A16-lacZ, p3'-S16-lacZ,
pA16/3'S16-lacZ, pA16/3'A16-lacZ,
pS16/3'A16-lacZ, pA10-lacZ, and
pA5-lacZ using the protocol of Ito et al. (27)
and plated onto SC-ura agar plates. Growth conditions,
CuSO4 induction of Amt1p-dependent transcription, and analysis of AMT1-lacZ mRNA
levels by RNase protection were carried out as described previously
(23). For the analysis of AMT1 mRNA levels in S. cerevisiae, ACT1 mRNA levels were used as the
internal control as described elsewhere (28). RNase protection analysis
was performed on at least two independent time courses of reporter gene
induction for each experiment.
Analysis of Yeast Chromatin--
Nuclei were isolated from 1 liter of cells grown to an absorbance at 600 nm of ~1.4 in synthetic
complete medium lacking uracil, using the method of Almer and Horz (3).
Micrococcal nuclease treatments were as described by Almer and Horz
(3), with the concentration of micrococcal nuclease used indicated in
the figure legends. After purification of the micrococcal nuclease
treated DNA, the DNA was subjected to secondary digestion with
StyI to completion. Control samples that were used for
marker lanes were left on ice without micrococcal nuclease during the
initial digestion, with subsequent purification and digestion of the
DNA by BspHI and StyI. Digested samples were
resolved on a 1% agarose gel, transferred to nitrocellulose and probed
with a random prime radiolabeled 700-bp XbaI-StyI
AMT1 fragment derived from plasmid pAXHA3.
Expression of Rat Glucocorticoid Receptor in S. cerevisiae and
Induction of Glucocorticoid-responsive Reporter Gene
Expression--
The S. cerevisiae strain CY342 was
cotransformed with the rat glucocorticoid receptor expression plasmid
p413GPD-rGR and one of the following reporter plasmids: pA16GREinZ,
pA16GREoutZ, pS16GREinZ, or pS16GREoutZ. Induction of
glucocorticoid-responsive gene expression was initiated by the addition
of 10 µM deoxycorticosterone (DOC) to log phase
(A650 = 1.0-1.5) cells in SC-ura-his medium. At
the time points indicated in the figure legends, cells were harvested, RNA was prepared, and steady-state lacZ and ACT1
mRNA levels were analyzed by RNase protection. The levels of rGR
expressed in each strain were determined by immunoblotting using a
monoclonal antibody to GR and standard techniques (22).
 |
RESULTS |
Homopolymeric (dA-dT)-mediated Nucleosomal Access to Amt1p Is
Affected by the Asymmetry of the Nucleosome--
Previous in
vivo footprinting analysis identified DNase I hypersensitive sites
at both ends of the 16-bp homopolymeric (dA-dT) element (A16) in the
AMT1 promoter (16). Replacement of the A16 with a T16
revealed that, like the homopolymeric (dA-dT) element used in the
HIS3 promoter (12), the nucleosomal AMT1
homopolymeric (dA-dT) element functions in an orientation-independent
manner (16). Further analysis of the AMT1 promoter revealed
that these regions of hypersensitivity represent localized areas of
accessible DNA within the nucleosome that may provide nucleosomal
access for Cu-Amt1p to the MRE located downstream of the A16 element. To test whether the inherent asymmetry of the nucleosome would influence A16 element function, AMT1 promoter derivatives
containing either A16 or a defined nonhomopolymeric sequence (S16)
positioned 3' to the MRE were fused to the E. coli lacZ gene
and introduced into C. glabrata strain D (Table
I and Fig.
1A). The distance between the
MRE and the 3'A16 was maintained the same as for the wild-type
AMT1 gene. Fig. 1B shows the results of indirect
end-labeling experiments of micrococcal nuclease treated nuclei derived
from C. glabrata cells harboring either the wild-type or
3'A16 reporter plasmids. These results clearly show that both the
wild-type AMT1-lacZ fusion and 3'A16-lacZ fusion
genes contain a stably positioned nucleosome over the region of the
homopolymeric (dA-dT) element and the MRE. Furthermore, these results
also clearly identify three additional positioned nucleosomes present
on both promoters, with two nucleosomes upstream of the MRE-containing
nucleosome and one nucleosome downstream downstream encompassing the
TATA box and transcription initiation site. Fig.
2, B and C, shows the results and quantitation of RNase protection analysis of steady state mRNA levels expressed from wild-type and mutant
AMT1-lacZ fusion genes during a time course of
exposure to copper ions. URA3 mRNA levels were analyzed
as the internal control. The wild-type AMT1 promoter
exhibits the characteristic rapid and robust transcriptional response
to copper ions, peaking at 30 min after copper addition to the cells,
whereas the S16-containing promoter displays both a weaker
transcriptional response and delayed kinetics of activation observed
previously (16). Interestingly, the 3'A16-lacZ promoter derivative also drives maximum levels of mRNA accumulation 30 min
after copper addition, but with an overall peak magnitude that is only
25% that of the wild-type AMT1-lacZ fusion. The
S16 and 3'S16-containing AMT1 promoters exhibit very low,
virtually indistinguishable, levels of AMT1 gene expression
in response to copper ions. Therefore, the enhanced expression rate and
magnitude observed for the 3'A16 is homopolymeric
(dA-dT)-dependent.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The A16 and 3'A16 elements are
nucleosomal. A, model for the topography of A16 and
3'A16 sequences relative to the MRE on the AMT1 promoter
nucleosome. B, micrococcal nuclease indirect end labeling to
identify AMT1 promoter nucleosomes on the A16 and 3'A16
promoters. Lanes 1 and 4 contain marker genomic
DNA for the A16 and 3'A16, respectively, digested with BspHI
and StyI. Lanes 2 and 5 contain
genomic DNA from nuclei treated with 1.56 units/ml MNase. Lanes
3 and 6 contain genomic DNA from nuclei treated with
12.5 units/ml MNase. The genomic DNA in lanes 2-4, and
6 were digested after purification with StyI. The
BspHI site is located directly 3' of the A16 element in the
wild-type AMT1 promoter.
|
|

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The A16 element functions
asymmetrically. RNase protection analysis of copper-induced
AMT1 gene induction for wild-type (A16), S16-, 3'A16-, and
3'S16-containing AMT1-lacZ reporter genes. A,
model for the topography of A16 and 3'A16 sequences relative to the MRE
on the AMT1 promoter nucleosome. B, C. glabrata D strain harboring the AMT1-lacZ
reporter plasmids described in Table I were grown to log phase in
SC-ura medium and treated with 100 µM CuSO4,
samples were taken at 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 min after the addition
of CuSO4, and total RNA was extracted. Fifteen µg of RNA
from each sample was analyzed by RNase protection assays.
Arrowheads show AMT1-lacZ mRNA and
URA3 mRNA. C, quantitation of
AMT1-lacZ mRNA expression in response to
copper. All values indicated are normalized to URA3 mRNA
levels as an internal control.
|
|
Chimeric AMT1 promoters were constructed to determine
whether the reduced activity observed for the 3' positioned A16 element relative to the wild-type position was simply due to altered
positioning of the MRE on the nucleosome, from the lack of 16 bp in the
normal position of the A16 element or due to the insertion of 16 bp
between the MRE and the 3' end of the nucleosome. Reporter plasmids
designated pS16/3'A16-lacZ and pA16/3'S16-lacZ
(Table I) were introduced into the C. glabrata D strain, and
the response to copper ion administration from these templates was
analyzed by RNase protection. Plasmid pS16/3'A16-lacZ has
the S16 sequence present at the wild-type position of the homopolymeric
(dA-dT) element, along with the 3'-positioned A16. This plasmid was
used to determine whether the lack of 16 bp at the normal A16 position
created artificially low levels of mRNA expression from the
3'A16-lacZ reporter gene. Plasmid pA16/3'S16-lacZ
was generated to determine whether insertion of 16 bp (S16) downstream
of the MRE would affect AMT1 autoregulation from a promoter
containing a wild-type positioned A16 element. Fig.
3 shows the results of RNase protection
analysis of expression from these chimeric AMT1 reporter
plasmids. Although there are small variations in the rate and extent of
gene activation from experiment to experiment (compare Fig. 2 to Fig.
3), these data clearly demonstrate that the addition of 16 bp
downstream of the MRE (pA16/3'S16-lacZ) does not
significantly affect the ability of AMT1 to autoregulate
with a wild-type positioned A16 element. Additionally, placing 16 bp
(S16) in the wild-type position of the A16 element, in a promoter
having a 3'A16 element, does not elevate its ability to autoregulate as
seen for the plasmid pS16/3'A16-lacZ. Taken together, these
results implicate the dominant constraint of the nucleosomal core
histones over A16 function in the 3' position and suggests a functional
asymmetry between the two pseudo-symmetrical halves of the
nucleosome.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The reduced activity of the 3'A16 element is
not due to repositioning of the MRE on the nucleosome. RNase
protection analysis of copper-induced AMT1 gene induction
for wild-type (A16), S16-, 3'A16-, A16/3'S16-, and S16/3'A16-containing
AMT1-lacZ reporter genes. A, analysis
of copper-induced AMT1-lacZ mRNA analysis of
C. glabrata cells harboring the reporter plasmids indicated
in Table I was performed as described in Fig. 1. B,
quantitation of AMT1-lacZ mRNA expression in
response to copper. All values indicated are normalized to
URA3 mRNA levels as an internal control.
|
|
To ascertain whether the lower levels of copper-inducible transcription
driven from the 3'A16 promoter are sufficient to foster copper
resistance in C. glabrata, full-length AMT1 genes
were reconstituted containing either the wild-type (A16), S16, 3'A16, or 3'S16 promoter arrangements. These plasmids were integrated, in
single copy, at the ura3 locus of the C. glabrata
strain amt1-1, which contains an insertionally inactivated
AMT1 gene. The resultant strains
A16::URA3, S16::URA3,
3'A16::URA3, and 3'S16::URA3
were then challenged on growth medium supplemented with a range of copper concentrations up to 1 mM. As shown in Fig.
4, all strains grow equally well on
plates lacking supplemental CuSO4. However, a modest
challenge with 50 µM CuSO4 resulted in the
inability of strains S16::URA3,
3'A16::URA3, and 3'S16::URA3
to grow. Furthermore, no growth differences between these strains were
observed at copper concentrations lower than 50 µM (data
not shown). For comparative purposes, the
A16::URA3 strain was able to grow at copper
concentrations above 1 mM. These data suggest that there is
a threshold level of rapid AMT1 autoregulation that must
occur to achieve sufficient levels of C. glabrata
metallothionein gene transcription required for cell survival.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The 3'A16-containing AMT1
gene is not competent to foster copper resistance to C. glabrata. Copper resistance phenotype of C. glabrata strains having full-length A16 (wild-type), 3'A16-, and
3'S16-containing AMT1 genes integrated at the
ura3 locus of the strain amt1-1. Strains
A16::URA3, S16::URA3, 3'A16::URA3, and
3'S16::URA3 were grown on synthetic complete medium with or
without the addition of 50 µM CuSO4 .
|
|
A Homopolymeric (dA-dT) Element Length Requirement for AMT1 Gene
Autoactivation--
Our model for A16 element-dependent
nucleosomal access is based on structural perturbations of the
nucleosomal DNA determined in part by the rigidity of the homopolymeric
(dA-dT) element and the diameter of the nucleosome (16, 29). Given this
model, we predict that there would be geometric constraints requiring a
minimal length for the homopolymeric (dA-dT) to function in providing
nucleosomal access to Amt1p. To test this hypothesis, the length of the
homopolymeric (dA-dT) element in the AMT1 promoter was
altered from 16 bp (A16) to either 10 bp (A10) or 5 bp (A5) while
maintaining a constant distance to the MRE (Table I). The results of
RNase protection analysis of copper-induced AMT1 gene expression in C. glabrata strains containing these reporter
plasmids is shown in Figs. 5A
and quantitated in Fig. 5B. Although the A5
element-containing AMT1 gene achieves 67% the magnitude of wild-type AMT1 gene expression, the rate of mRNA
accumulation at early time points after copper addition is noticeably
slower than for the wild-type gene. An AMT1 gene with an A10
element displays similar delayed kinetics of activation to that
observed for the A5 element-containing promoter but eventually achieves wild-type levels of AMT1-lacZ mRNA
accumulation. The variation in the size of the protected fragments at
the 45 min time point for the A16 and A10 samples (Fig. 5A)
was not reproducibly observed. These data suggest that a minimal length
requirement exists for maximal transcriptional activation at early time
points, which is consistent with a length requirement for the
homopolymeric (dA-dT) to mediate rapid nucleosomal access for Cu-Amt1p.
The large stimulatory effect on AMT1 autoregulation by the
shorter homopolymeric (dA-dT) elements may indicate that localized
perturbations in histone-DNA interactions, which would be predicted to
increase with length of the homopolymeric (dA-dT) element, result in a more stable Amt1p-nucleosome complex that would provide a more robust
transcriptional response. Although the effects of shortened (dA-dT)
tracts in the natural AMT1 gene have not been determined with respect to copper resistance in vivo, the slower rates
of activation by promoters bearing these shorter elements, fused to the
lacZ reporter, would be predicted to compromise growth in the presence
of copper.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Homopolymeric (dA-dT) element function is
directly related to its length. RNase protection analysis of
copper-induced AMT1 gene induction for wild-type (A16),
A10-, A5-, and S16-containing AMT1-lacZ reporter
genes. A, analysis of copper-induced
AMT1-lacZ mRNA analysis of C. glabrata cells harboring the reporter plasmids indicated in Table
I was performed as described in Fig. 1. B, quantitation of
AMT1-lacZ mRNA expression in response to
copper. All values indicated are normalized to URA3 mRNA
levels as an internal control.
|
|
A16 Element Function Is Conserved in S. cerevisiae and Can Dispense
with the Poly(dA-dT) Binding Protein Dat1p--
The model for A16
element function is based on nucleosomal structural perturbations
created, in large part, by inherent structural features of the A16
tract, which are independent of a poly(dA-dT) binding protein (16, 19).
To date, there are no reports of a poly(dA-dT) binding protein in the
yeast C. glabrata, and our previous attempts to identify an
A16 element binding activity were negative (16). We therefore sought to
ask whether a poly(dA-dT) binding protein might be involved in
AMT1 gene autoregulation using a surrogate genetic approach
in the yeast S. cerevisiae. The finding that poly(dA-dT)
binding activity is undetectable in protein extracts from a yeast
strain harboring a dat1
allele, supports the contention
that Dat1p is the predominant poly(dA-dT) binding protein in S. cerevisiae (30).
Dat1p has been reported to play completely opposite roles in the
transcription of different genes in S. cerevisiae. The basal expression of the his3 gene and a poly(dA-dT) based reporter
gene was shown to be elevated in a dat1
strain,
implicating Dat1p as a repressor of basal transcription (12). In
contrast, Dat1p has been shown to function synergistically with the
protein Reb1p to activate the basal expression of the ILV1
gene (31). Given these two profoundly different functions on different
promoters, we tested whether Dat1p would affect AMT1 gene
autoregulation through the A16 element. The entire AMT1
promoter and structural gene, contained on a centromeric plasmid, was
introduced into an S. cerevisiae strain harboring a deletion
of the gene encoding the homologous Ace1p copper-metalloregulatory
transcription factor. The ability of AMT1 to be properly
autoregulated in S. cerevisiae is shown in Fig.
6. In a time course of induction by
copper ions, the A16 element-containing AMT1 promoter
displayed the characteristic rapid and robust activation that is
observed for the regulation of the wild-type AMT1 gene in
C. glabrata. The S16 AMT1 variant gene also
exhibits the delayed kinetics of AMT1 autoactivation seen in
C. glabrata, which demonstrates that the function of the A16
element is conserved between S. cerevisiae and C. glabrata.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
A16 element function is conserved between the
opportunistic pathogenic yeast C. glabrata and the
baker's yeast S. cerevisiae. RNase protection
analysis of copper-induced AMT1 gene induction for wild-type
(A16) and S16-containing AMT1 genes in S. cerevisiae strain CY342. A, CY342 harboring plasmids
pRSAMT1 or pRSS16 was grown to log phase in SC-ura media and treated
with 100 µM CuSO4. Analysis of copper-induced
AMT1 mRNA was performed essentially as described in Fig.
1. B, quantitation of AMT1 mRNA expression in
response to copper. All values indicated are normalized to
ACT1 mRNA levels as an internal control.
|
|
The S. cerevisiae Dat1p is a 27-kDa protein that binds to
homopolymeric (dA-dT) elements, of at least 10 bp, in the DNA minor groove with very high affinity (32-34). We hypothesized that there could be an equivalent protein from C. glabrata that would
bind to the AMT1 promoter A16 element and modulate
autoregulation in response to copper ions. We therefore investigated
whether the Dat1 protein plays a role in AMT1 gene
autoregulation in S. cerevisiae. Wild-type (KKY17) and
isogenic dat1
(KKY20) S. cerevisiae strains were transformed with plasmids harboring the wild-type or S16 element-containing AMT1 genes. AMT1
autoregulation in response to copper administration was analyzed by
RNase protection, and the results are shown in Fig.
7. The results of these experiments clearly demonstrate that the homopolymeric (dA-dT) binding protein Dat1p does not play a role in regulating either basal AMT1
gene transcription or autoactivation in response to copper in S. cerevisiae. These data are strong supporting evidence that the A16
element functions to provide nucleosomal access to Amt1p by virtue of its structural properties and not through the action of poly(dA-dT) binding proteins.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The homopolymeric (dA-dT) binding protein
Dat1p is dispensable for normal AMT1 gene
autoregulation in S. cerevisiae. RNase protection
analysis of copper-induced AMT1 gene induction of wild-type
(A16) and S16-containing AMT1 genes in S. cerevisiae strains KKY17 (DAT1) and KKY20
(dat1 ). A, S. cerevisiae strains
KKY17 (DAT1) and KKY20 (dat1 ) harboring
plasmids pRSAMT1 or pRSS16 were grown to log phase in SC-ura media
prior to induction by copper. Copper treatment and analysis of
AMT1 and ACT1 mRNA levels was as described in
Fig. 1. B, quantitation of AMT1 expression in
response to copper. All values indicated are normalized to
ACT1 mRNA levels as an internal control.
|
|
Homopolymeric (dA-dT) Elements Function to Provide Nucleosomal
Access to Mammalian Transcription Factors--
Yeast and mammalian
promoters often harbor poly(dA-dT) tracts near cis-acting regulatory
elements (12, 16). These observations suggest the possibility that
nucleosomal access to diverse transcription factors could be
facilitated by poly(dA-dT) elements. To test the ability of the
AMT1 promoter A16 element to facilitate nucleosomal access
to a heterologous transcription factor, the mammalian GR was
investigated as a model system. The GR has previously been shown to
transcriptionally activate reporter genes in S. cerevisiae that contain GREs within their promoters, in a
glucocorticoid-dependent manner (33). The GR is a
fundamentally distinct type of transcription factor as compared with
Amt1p based on several features. Amt1p is a relatively small protein of
30 kDa that binds to its responsive elements as a Cu(I)-metallated
monomer, making critical DNA contacts in adjacent major and minor
grooves on the same face of the DNA double helix (18, 23). GR on the
other hand, binds to the GRE as a 188-kDa zinc-metallated homodimer
(35-39) that interacts with two consecutive major grooves on the same
face of the DNA double helix (32). To test the ability of the A16
element to confer GR access to a nucleosomal GRE, the MRE in the
AMT1 promoter was replaced by the GRE(II) sequence from the
rat tyrosine aminotransferase gene promoter (40) in two predicted
rotational phases. In the natural context, the AMT1 promoter
MRE has a rotational phase with the adjacent major and minor grooves of
the DNA bound by Amt1p facing inward toward the histone core of the
nucleosome, based on in vitro missing nucleoside analysis
(23) and DNase I footprinting studies in chromatin (16). Using the
rotational phasing coordinates derived from the DNase I footprinting
analysis of AMT1 promoter chromatin, AMT1
promoter derivatives were constructed in which the GRE is predicted to
face inward (GREin) in one case and outward (GREout) in the other, as
shown diagramatically in Fig.
8A. Both A16 element and
S16-containing AMT1 genes with either the GREin or GREout
version of the GRE replacing the MRE were cotransformed into strain
CY342 with the rGR expression plasmid p413GPD-rGR. DOC-induced gene
expression from the AMT1(GRE)-lacZ reporter plasmids was
analyzed by RNase protection (Fig. 8, B and C).
Consistent with the inability of the GR to bind to nucleosomes in
vitro that have the GRE rotationally phased inward toward the histone core (41, 42), little DOC-induced AMT1 expression was observed for either the A16 or S16 element-containing promoters with a GREin arrangement (Fig. 8, B and C). In
contrast, the GREout reporter plasmids exhibited robust A16
element-dependent transcriptional activation of the
AMT1(GRE)-lacZ reporter gene that is not observed with the
S16 element. Immunoblot analysis of rGR levels in each of the strains
tested (Fig. 8D) confirmed that the differences in
expression observed for the reporter genes were not due to variations
in rGR expression. Additionally, indirect end-labeling experiments with
yeast chromatin demonstrate that both the GREin and GREout promoters
contain stably positioned nucleosomes over the region of the GRE and
A16 and surrounding regions that strongly correlate with the positions
of nucleosomes in the wild-type AMT1 promoter (data not
shown). Furthermore, the rotational phase dependence of rGR activation
through the GRE strongly supports the presence of a nucleosome at this
position that has a rotational phase similar to that which we have
previously established for the MRE in the AMT1 promoter
(16). Due to the single-copy nature of the AMT1(GRE)-lacZ plasmids in S. cerevisiae, we were unable to verify the
rotational phasing of the GRE by high resolution DNase I cleavage
analysis. However, the A16 element dependence for GR-mediated
transcriptional activation is strong evidence that homopolymeric
(dA-dT)-mediated nucleosomal access is not specific to the Amt1p
transcriptional activator but can function to provide nucleosomal
access to a very different class of mammalian transcription
factors.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
The A16 element functions to provide
nucleosomal access to a mammalian transcription factor.
Glucocorticoid receptor-mediated gene activation in S. cerevisiae from AMT1-lacZ reporter genes
harboring a GRE in place of the MRE. A, diagrammatic
representation of AMT1 promoter nucleosomes having the MRE
replaced by the GRE with the GRE rotationally phased in
(GREin) (left) and rotationally phased out
(GREout) (right). The white region of
the GRE represents the face of the DNA bound by the rGR. B,
RNase protection analysis of DOC-induced
AMT1-lacZ gene induction for wild-type (A16) and
S16-containing AMT1-lacZ reporter genes having
the MRE replaced with the GREin or GREout versions of the GRE. S. cerevisiae strains harboring the above
AMT1-lacZ reporter plasmids and the rGR
expression plasmid p413GPD-rGR were grown to log phase in SC-ura-his
medium and treated with 10 µM DOC. Analysis of
DOC-induced AMT1-lacZ mRNA was performed
essentially as described in Fig. 1. C, quantitation of
AMT1-lacZ mRNA expression in response to
deoxycorticosterone. All values indicated are normalized to
ACT1 mRNA levels as an internal control. D,
Western blot analysis of rGR expression levels for each of the strains
used for the analysis of DOC-induced AMT1-lacZ
expression. rGR levels from 30-µg samples of total protein from each
strain used in B were analyzed using a monoclonal antibody
to GR, and a 30-µg protein sample from strain CY342 not expressing
the rGR ( ) was used as the negative control for rGR expression.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The ability of transcription factors to interact with their target
DNA sequences in vivo is a decisive factor in the ability of
organisms to respond rapidly, robustly, and appropriately to physiological, developmental, and environmental signals. The compaction of genomic DNA into the folds of chromatin effectively reduces the
affinity of DNA-binding proteins for DNA target sequences, resulting in
a thermodynamic barrier that transcription factors must overcome to
achieve activation of target gene expression. In many cases, the
energetic cost of breaking this thermodynamic barrier is borne by
nucleosome remodeling complexes, both for preset and transcription
factor-mediated promoter remodeling. The finding that a DNA structural
element within chromatin can function to reduce this barrier suggests
that a widespread fundamental mechanism could be utilized by any
eukaryotic organism to provide nucleosomal access to transcription
factors. To this end, we have sought to understand the conditions under
which the homopolymeric (dA-dT) element functions to facilitate
transcription factor access to its cognate target DNA sequences within chromatin.
The results of experiments with the homopolymeric (dA-dT) element
positioned downstream of the AMT1 promoter MRE provides evidence that the efficacy of A16 element-mediated nucleosomal access
to Amt1p is highly dependent on the location of the homopolymeric (dA-dT) element within the nucleosome. Furthermore, the reduced transcriptional activity of the 3'A16 element is not specific to
transcriptional activation by Amt1p, as this was also observed for the
transactivation by the glucocorticoid receptor having a 3'-positioned
A16 (data not shown). This apparent nucleosomal asymmetry is analogous
to what was found by Brown and Fox (21) for triple helix formation on
nucleosomes containing poly(dA-dT) elements. In this study, a fragment
of DNA was reconstituted into nucleosomes that contains two stretches
of 11-bp homopolymeric (dA-dT) (T11) on either side of the nucleosomal
dyad axis. Triple helix formation with an 11-bp poly T oligonucleotide
occurred equally well for two of the T11 elements on one side of the
nucleosomal dyad, but triple helix formation was significantly hindered
at the third position just 3' to the dyad axis, and no triple helix formation was seen at the fourth site further downstream of the dyad
axis (21).
The results of experiments in which the length of the homopolymeric
(dA-dT) element has been altered suggest a progressive change in both
the magnitude and the rate of transcription with increasing length. The
studies by Iyer and Struhl (12) revealed a similar finding using a
competitive growth strategy with various length homopolymeric (dA-dT)
elements in the his3 promoter. Our observation that a 5-bp
homopolymeric (dA-dT) element can provide robust stimulation of
copper-dependent AMT1 transcription that is
further enhanced by a 10-bp element, and yet both of these promoters do
not respond as quickly as the wild-type A16 element-containing promoter, suggests the existence of a length-dependent
continuum of homopolymeric (dA-dT) activity. The enhanced response rate that the A16 element provides over the A10 and A5 elements may represent a length requirement to achieve a sufficiently large perturbation of the nucleosomal structure by the rod-like structure of
poly(dA-dT) element to provide adequate access to Amt1p. The robust
activation of the smaller homopolymeric (dA-dT) elements may reflect
their inherent ability to sufficiently disturb histone-DNA interactions
to allow more stable Amt1p binding. Consistent with this hypothesis,
earlier studies by Li and Wrange (43) demonstrated that the 5-bp
sequence 5'-TAAAA-3', found in its natural context directly adjacent to
the GRE of the MMTV-LTR, strongly stimulated GR binding to nucleosomal
GREs in vitro.
With the average helical pitch for homopolymeric (dA-dT) sequences
being 3.2 Å/bp (23), an A16 element would be predicted to be 51.2 Å in length. Given that the DNA superhelix of the nucleosome is reported
to have an average diameter of ~83 Å (18) based on the crystal
structure, the A16 element would represent 61% of the length of the
diameter of the nucleosome. The corresponding shorter A10 element would
be 38% the length of the nucleosome diameter, and the A5 element would
be 19% of the diameter. When these data are taken together with the
results of Fig. 5, we can predict that the nucleosomal access window
that is generated by the rod-like structure of the homopolymeric
(dA-dT) element requires the length of this element to be >38% of the
nucleosomal diameter for the most rapid access by Cu-Amt1p. This could
vary depending on the features of the transcription factor in
question, such as the size, subunit structure, nature of DNA binding,
or other considerations.
Is the function of the nucleosomal AMT1 A16 element
dependent on its intrinsic structural rigidity rather than trans-acting factors? Although there are no known poly(dA-dT) binding proteins in
C. glabrata, the Dat1 protein from S. cerevisiae
represents the predominant poly(dA-dT) binding protein from this yeast
(30). Our finding that the AMT1 gene is properly
autoregulated by copper ions when introduced into S. cerevisiae (Fig. 6) allowed us to test the role of Dat1p in
AMT1 gene autoregulation in this yeast. The Dat1 protein
prefers to bind to homopolymeric (dA-dT) elements that are greater than
10 bp (34) and is incapable of binding to elements shorter than 10 bp
in vitro, which is similar to the length requirement for the
AMT1 promoter homopolymeric (dA-dT) element to provide the
most rapid transcriptional response to copper. Our finding that the
AMT1 gene is properly regulated in response to copper in
S. cerevisiae, and yet does not require Dat1p, is consistent
with the hypothesis of Iyer and Struhl (12) and Zhu and Thiele (16)
that the homopolymeric (dA-dT) element functions largely by virtue of
its intrinsic structure and is not simply a binding site for a
transcription factor that recruits or stabilizes the interaction of
Amt1p with the AMT1 promoter MRE in response to copper ions.
However, given the reported dominant nature of the nucleosome histone
core over DNA sequence and intrinsic structure, it is possible that
additional chromatin modifications are required for the AMT1
A16 element to function in facilitating access to transcription factors
to nucleosomal binding sites. Our current and future efforts
address this possibility both genetically and through nucleosome
reconstitution experiments.
The ability of the AMT1 promoter A16 element to mediate
nucleosomal access to the rat glucocorticoid receptor in yeast would suggest that homopolymeric (dA-dT) elements could function in higher
eukaryotic organisms in this context. In contrast to the ability of the
A16 element to foster interactions between Amt1p and the inwardly
facing MRE in the AMT1 promoter, the A16 element cannot
provide nucleosomal access to the rGR when the GRE is positioned in a
manner predicted to be rotationally phased inward. Given the large
difference in size between Amt1p and rGR and the differences in the
mode of DNA binding by these transcription factors, these data would
suggest that a rotational phase requirement for homopolymeric (dA-dT)
element function in providing nucleosomal access may exist for other
transcription factors.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank David Engelke and Tom Kerppola for
critically reading the manuscript, the reviewers for helpful comments
and suggestions, Craig Peterson for S. cerevisiae strain
CY342, Diane Robins and Kate Tullis for the rat glucocorticoid receptor
cDNA, William Pratt for monoclonal antibody to GR, and Chen Kuang
for outstanding technical support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM41840.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by the Cellular Biotechnology Training Program National
Institutes of Health Grant GM08353.
§
A Burroughs Wellcome Toxicology Scholar. To whom correspondence
should be addressed: Dept. of Biological Chemistry, University of
Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine Rd., Ann
Arbor, MI 48109-0606. Tel.: 734-763-5717; Fax: 734-763-4581; E-mail:
dthiele@ umich.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GR, glucocorticoid
receptor;
rGR, rat GR;
bp, base pair(s);
DOC, deoxycorticosterone;
GPD, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
GRE, glucocorticoid response
element;
MMTV-LTR, mouse mammary tumor virus-long terminal
repeat.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Owen Hughes, T.,
and Workman, J. L.
(1994)
Crit. Rev. Eukaryotic Gene Expression
4,
403-441[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Wallrath, L. L.,
Lu, Q.,
Granok, H.,
and Elgin, S. C. R.
(1994)
BioEssays
16,
165-170[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Almer, A.,
and Horz, W.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
2681-2687[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Straka, C.,
and Horz, W.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
361-368[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Archer, T. K.,
Lefebvre, P.,
Wolford, R. G.,
and Hager, G. L.
(1992)
Science
255,
1573-1576[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Cordingley, M. G.,
Riegel, A. T.,
and Hager, G. L.
(1987)
Cell
48,
261-270[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Richard-Foy, H.,
and Hager, G. L.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
2321-2328[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Truss, M.,
Bartsch, J.,
Schelbert, A.,
Hache, R. J.,
and Beato, M.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
1737-1751[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Archer, T. K.,
Cordingley, M. G.,
Wolford, R. G.,
and Hager, G. L.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
688-698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Blomquist, P.,
Li, Q.,
and Wrange, O.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
153-159[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Pazin, M. J.,
and Kadonaga, J. T.
(1997)
Cell
88,
737-740[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Iyer, V.,
and Struhl, K.
(1995)
EMBO J
14,
2570-2579[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Struhl, K.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
8419-8423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Losa, R.,
Omari, S.,
and Thoma, F.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
3495-3502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Filetici, P.,
Aranda, C.,
Gonzalez, A.,
and Ballario, P.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
242,
84-87[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Zhu, Z.,
and Thiele, D. J.
(1996)
Cell
87,
459-470[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Zhou, P.,
Szczypka, M. S.,
Sosinowski, T.,
and Thiele, D. J.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
3766-3775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Zhou, P.,
and Thiele, D. J.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
1824-1835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Nelson, H. C.,
Finch, J. T.,
Luisi, B. F.,
and Klug, A.
(1987)
Nature
330,
221-226[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Luger, K.,
and Richmond, T. J.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
8,
33-40[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Brown, P. M.,
and Fox, K. R.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
333,
259-267
|
| 22.
|
Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K.
(eds)
(1987)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, John Wiley & Sons, New York
|
| 23.
|
Koch, K. A,
and Thiele, D. J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
724-734[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Zhou, P.,
Szczypka, M. S.,
Young, R.,
and Thiele, D. J.
(1994)
Gene
142,
135-140[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Mumberg, D.,
Muller, R.,
and Funk, M.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
5767-5768[Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Wach, A.,
Brachat, A.,
Pohlmann, R.,
and Philippsen, P.
(1994)
Yeast
10,
1793-1808[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Ito, H.,
Fukada, Y.,
Murata, K.,
and Kimura, A.
(1983)
J. Bacteriol.
153,
163-168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Labbé, S.,
Zhu, Z.,
and Thiele, D. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15951-15958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Luger, K.,
Maeder, A. W.,
Richmond, R. K.,
Sargent, D. F.,
and Richmond, T. J.
(1997)
Nature
389,
251-259[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Winter, E.,
and Varshavsky, A.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
1867-1877[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Moreira, J. M.,
Remacle, J. E.,
Kielland-Brandt, M. C.,
and Holmberg, S.
(1998)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
258,
95-103[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Scheidereit, C.,
and Beato, M.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
3029-3033[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Schena, M.,
and Yamamoto, K. R.
(1988)
Science
241,
965-967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Reardon, B. J.,
Gordon, D.,
Ballard, M. J.,
and Winter, E.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
4900-4906[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Freedman, L. P.,
Luisi, B. F.,
Korszun, Z. R.,
Basavappa, R.,
Sigler, P. B.,
and Yamamoto, K. R.
(1988)
Nature
334,
543-546[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Miesfeld, R.,
Rusconi, S.,
Godowski, P. J.,
Maler, B. A.,
Okret, S.,
Wikstrom, A. C.,
Gustafsson, J. A.,
and Yamamoto, K. R.
(1986)
Cell
46,
389-399[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Severne, Y.,
Wieland, S.,
Schaffner, W.,
and Rusconi, S.
(1988)
EMBO J
7,
2503-2508[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Wrange, O.,
Eriksson, P.,
and Perlmann, T.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
5253-5259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Wrange, O.,
Okret, S.,
Radojcic, M.,
Carlstedt-Duke, J.,
and Gustafsson, J. A.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
4534-4541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Jantzen, H. M.,
Strahle, U.,
Gloss, B.,
Stewart, F.,
Schmid, W.,
Boshart, M.,
Miksicek, R.,
and Schutz, G.
(1987)
Cell
49,
29-38[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Li, Q.,
and Wrange, O.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4375-4684[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Pina, B.,
Bruggemeier, U.,
and Beato, M.
(1990)
Cell
60,
719-730[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Li, Q.,
and Wrange, O.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2471-2482[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike