JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, H. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Rho, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, H. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Rho, H. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 23887-23892, August 20, 1999


The Activation of the Rat Copper/Zinc Superoxide Dismutase Gene by Hydrogen Peroxide through the Hydrogen Peroxide-responsive Element and by Paraquat and Heat Shock through the Same Heat Shock Element*

Hae Yong Yoo, Mun Seog Chang, and Hyune Mo RhoDagger

From the Department of Molecular Biology and Research Center for Cell Differentiation, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1) protects cells against oxidative hazards by the dismutation of superoxide radicals. The promoter activity of the SOD1 gene was increased 3-5-fold by hydrogen peroxide, paraquat (PQ) and heat shock. Functional analyses of the regulatory region of the SOD1 gene by deletions, mutations, and heterologous promoter systems confirmed the induction of the SOD1 gene by H2O2 through the hydrogen peroxide-responsive element (HRE) (between nucleotides -533 and -520). Gel mobility shift assays showed that the existence of an H2O2-inducible protein bound to the oligonucleotide of the HRE. Similar analyses showed that the heat shock activated the SOD1 promoter through the heat shock element (HSE) (between nucleotides -185 and -171). A strong specific far-shifted complex with the oligonucleotide of the HSE was observed by the treatment of heat shock. When cells were treated with PQ, a strong far-shifted complex with the HSE was observed and was competed out by the cold HSE probe, indicating that PQ also activated the SOD1 promoter through the same HSE site. It is very interesting to note that chemical and physical stresses, such as PQ and heat shock, respectively, activated the SOD1 promoter through the same cis-element HSE. These results indicate that the SOD1 was inducible by H2O2 through the HRE and by PQ and heat shock through the same HSE to protect cells from oxidative hazards.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1)1 is one of the major cellular defense enzymes that perform a vital role in protecting cells against the toxic effect of superoxide radicals. It catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide radicals (Obardot 2) to oxygen and hydrogen peroxide (1). SOD not only prevents the Fenton reaction and DNA nicking in vitro but also protects against toxicity by H2O2 in vivo without Obardot 2 being directly involved in the generation of DNA damage (2). The production and/or removal of superoxides has been observed to play a significant role in a variety of critical homeostatic mechanisms both at the cellular and organismic levels. Because biological macromolecules are targets for the damaging action of abundant oxygen radicals, it is assumed that these increased superoxides should be initially eliminated by SOD. Therefore, the regulation and induction mechanism of the SOD1 gene would be of great interest (3). It has also been reported that SOD1 could prevent oncogenesis and tumor promotion (4), reduce the cytotoxic and cardiotoxic effects of anticancer drugs (5), and protect against reperfusion damage of ischemic tissue (6). A recent report suggested that overexpression of SOD1 and catalase could increase the average lifespan of the fly (7). Lutropin, Ca2+, and reactive oxygen seemed to induce SOD1 in rats (8-10).

Stress conditions (i.e. oxidative stresses, heat shock, osmotic stress, and toxic metals) are deleterious to normal cellular function. To survive those environmental and physiological stresses, all organisms possess specific defense systems to protect themselves from various stresses. Aerobic organisms are continuously exposed to oxygen, which renders them prone to damage generated by oxygen-derived free radicals. Oxidative stress is largely mediated by reactive oxygen species, including superoxide anion (Obardot 2), H2O2, and hydroxyl radical (OH·), which are intermediates of oxygen reduction generated by metal ion catalyzed redox reactions, metabolism of chemicals, and normal physiological activities, including respiration and inflammatory responses to infection (11). The free radicals generated by these mechanisms cause severe damage to critical cellular macromolecules, including nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids (12). Oxidative damage has been strongly correlated with aging and a number of diseases, including Parkinson's disease, Lou Gehrig's disease (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), rheumatoid arthritis, and cancer (11, 13). Therefore, free radical levels must be carefully monitored under both physiological conditions and when generated by environmental stress.

Cells employ a number of defense mechanisms to sense and respond appropriately to oxidative stress. Enzymes such as superoxide dismutases and catalases play critical roles in oxidative stress protection through catalyzing the conversion of reactive oxygen species to less harmful products (12, 14). As has been demonstrated in yeast, cells lacking a functional gene encoding SOD1 are highly sensitive to dioxygen and redox-cycling drugs, fail to grow on respiratory carbon sources, and exhibit increased spontaneous mutagenesis rates and a number of other phenotypes during aerobic growth (15). Free radical scavenging activities are also exacerbated by small antioxidant molecules, including glutathione, thioredoxin, and ascorbic acid (12). In addition to the prevention of oxidative damage, repair mechanisms are employed by cells to remove or repair damaged cellular components, including exo- and endonucleases for DNA damage repair, proteolytic enzymes for degradation of severely damaged proteins, and phospholipases glutathione peroxide/transferase/reductase for degradation and repair of damaged lipids (16).

Superoxide dismutase plays a key role in protection from the damage caused by oxygen radicals. The SOD1 expression is highly induced during environmental stresses. However, little is known about how the environmental signal is transmitted to a transcriptional regulator in cells during oxidative stress such as hydrogen peroxide, paraquat (PQ) and heat shock. In this study, the induction of the SOD1 gene by hydrogen peroxide, PQ, and heat shock was investigated by the transfection of CAT expression vectors containing the rat SOD1 promoter. The deletion, mutation, and heterologous promoter systems were used to identify cis-elements that respond to hydrogen peroxide, PQ, and heat shock for minimizing hazardous effects. A specific interaction of the hydrogen peroxide-responsive element (HRE) binding protein and heat shock element (HSE) binding protein (heat shock factor) was also investigated by gel mobility shift assays. The results demonstrated that the SOD1 was inducible by H2O2 through the HRE and by PQ and heat shock through the same HSE to protect cells from oxidative hazards.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasmid Constructions-- The plasmids, containing the upstream region of the rat SOD1 gene (17) and the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase structural gene (CAT), were constructed as described previously (3). For the construction of pHREtk and pHSEtk, the oligonucleotide of the HRE (between nucleotides -533 and -520) and HSE (between nucleotides -185 and -171) sequence of the SOD1 promoter was cloned into the BamHI site of pBLCAT2Delta , which is derived from pBLCAT2. The plasmid pBLCAT2Delta has a minimal region (-80 to +51) of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter (18). Three copies of the HRE and HSE oligonucleotides were introduced. The plasmid pmHREtk and pmHSEtk are mutants of pHREtk and pHSEtk with three copies of the mutated site. Their sequences are as follows: SOD-HRE, 5'-GATCGGCTTGCCTAGGAAGCGCAAGG-3'/3'-CCGAACGGATCCTTCGCGTTCCCTAG-5'; SOD-mHRE, 5'-GATCGGCTTGCCTACTCTTAGCAAGG-3'/3'-CCGAACGGATGAGAATCGTTCCCTAG-5'; SOD-HSE, 5'-GATCTCGATTCTGGAACTTTCTCAG-3'/3'-AGCTAAGACCTTGAAAGAGTCCTAG-5'; SOD-mHSE, 5'-GATCTCGAGGATGTCCCTGGATCAG-3'/3'-AGCTCCTACAGGGACCTAGTCCTAG-5'. The inser- tion of the HRE and HSE consensus and mutant sequences was confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Cell Culture and Transfection-- Human HepG2 hepatoma cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/10% fetal calf serum/penicillin G sodium at 100 units/ml/streptomycin sulfate at 100 µg/ml/amphotericin B at 250 ng/ml. Cells were seeded into 60-mm plastic culture dishes (30-50% confluence) for 24 h prior to transfection. An equal amount (3.0 pmol) of the various constructs was transfected to the cells by the calcium phosphate DNA coprecipitation method (19). 5 µg of pRSVbeta -gal plasmid (20) was introduced in all experiments to correct the variations of transfection efficiency.

Chemical and Heat Shock Treatment and Nuclear Extract Preparation-- Chemicals were added to and heat shock treatment was carried out on the culture medium at 36 h after transfection, and the cells were maintained for appropriate times. The various chemicals were evaluated for cytotoxicity over a concentration range of 1-500 µM by monitoring cell death. Nuclear extracts were prepared by a modified procedure of Andrews and Faller (21).

CAT Assay-- The CAT assay was performed as described previously (22). The transfected cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and harvested. The pelleted cells were resuspended in 100 µl of 0.25 M Tris-Cl (pH 7.9) and lysed by three cycles of freezing and thawing. After removing cell debris by centrifugation, cell extracts were first assayed for beta -galactosidase activity (23). Equal quantities of proteins were assayed for CAT activity on the basis of beta -galactosidase activity. Extracts were incubated with 0.025 µCi of [14C]chloramphenicol, 0.25 M Tris-Cl (pH 7.6), 0.4 mM acetyl coenzyme A for 1 h at 37 °C. The enzyme assay was terminated by adding ethyl acetate. The organic layer was analyzed by TLC with chloroform/methanol (95:5). After autoradiography, both acetylated and unacetylated forms of [14C]chloramphenicol were scraped from the plate, and the conversion of chloramphenicol to acetylated form was calculated by measuring radioactivities. The relative CAT activities were calculated from the percentage conversion. Results are the average of three independent experiments.

Mobility Shift Assay-- The oligonucleotides for the HRE and HSE sites were synthesized and labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP and polynucleotide kinase (23). An equal amount (10 µg) of nuclear extract from each sample was mixed with labeled oligonucleotide for 20 min at 20 °C in a 15-µl solution containing 10 mM HEPES, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, and 2 µg of poly(dI-dC). The binding reaction mixtures were electrophoresed in 6% acrylamide gels in 0.5× TBE (44 mM Tris, 44 mM boric acid, and 1 mM EDTA). After electrophoresis, the gels were dried and exposed to x-ray film. For competition assays, a binding reaction was performed with an excess of cold probe or competitor DNA. In the supershift assay, the specific polyclonal antibody against Elk1 (Santa Cruz Biotech. Inc) was added to the reaction mixture after the binding reaction.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Activation of the SOD1 Promoter by Hydrogen Peroxide, PQ, and Heat Shock-- SOD1 is one of the major cellular defense enzymes protecting cells against oxidative stress. It was hypothesized that hydrogen peroxide, PQ, and heat shock are involved in the activation of the SOD1 promoter. H2O2 was used as a membrane-permeable reagent, which allows studies of the effects of oxygen radicals in living cells. If hydrogen peroxide is inefficiently removed or if an excess is present, it can react with superoxide to generate the highly toxic hydroxyl radical. PQ is a redox-active compound that is photoreduced and subsequently reoxidized by transfer of its electrons to oxygen, generating superoxide (Obardot 2). HepG2 cells were transfected with plasmid pRSP-1633, containing the rat SOD1 upstream region fused to the bacterial CAT. 36 h after transfection, hydrogen peroxide, PQ, and heat shock were separately applied to the transfected cells. The transfected cells were incubated in the presence of 200 µM H2O2, 50 µM PQ and at a temperature of 42 °C, respectively. After 2 h, the CAT activity of each transfected cell was determined (Fig. 1B). These treatments increased the expression of the SOD1 promoter about 3-fold. H2O2 and PQ at concentrations of up to 300 and 100 µM, respectively, did not affect cell viability. As shown in Fig. 2, the time-dependent activation of the SOD1 promoter by H2O2, PQ, and heat shock was observed. The level of CAT activity reached a maximum at 2 h when the cells transfected with pRSP-576 were treated with H2O2. Maximum activity appeared at 1 h with the treatment of PQ and heat shock. It may be possible that the peak of SOD1 activation occurred earlier than 1 h. When the cells transfected with pRSP-576 were treated with H2O2, a 3-fold induction of CAT activity was observed. No induction was observed in cells bearing the plasmid pRSP-412 (Fig. 3C). These results mean that the activation of the SOD1 gene by H2O2 may be due to the existence of DNA elements between -576 and -412. The induction by PQ was observed in both transfection experiments with pRSP-576 and pRSP-412 (data not shown). It seems that the cis-element corresponding to induction by PQ was located downstream of -412 of the SOD1 gene. When the SOD-CAT construct (pRSP-305) was transiently expressed in HepG2 cells, 4- and 3-fold induction of CAT activity by heat shock (42 °C) and PQ was observed, respectively (Fig. 3D). No induction was observed in cells bearing the plasmid pRSP-55 (Fig. 3D). These results mean that the activation of the SOD1 promoter by heat shock and PQ may be due to the existence of DNA elements between -305 and -56.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic diagram and the effect of H2O2, PQ, and heat shock on the SOD1 gene expression. A, schematic representation of the putative transcription factor binding sites with approximate locations in the SOD1 promoter. CCAAT, CAAT box; TATA, TATA box. The numbers represent the left end of the consensus sequence of each transcription factor binding site. B, activation of the SOD1 promoter (pRSP-1633) by H2O2, PQ, and heat shock. The transfected cells were treated with factors (H2O2, 200 µM for 2 h; HS, heat shock, 42 °C for 1 h; PQ, paraquat, 50 µM for 1 h). The results are the means of three experiments.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Time-dependent activation of the SOD1 promoter by H2O2, PQ, and heat shock. Cells transfected with pRSP-576 were treated with H2O2 (A), PQ (B), and heat shock (HS; C) for 0-4 h, and then CAT assays were carried out. The results are the means of three experiments. Relative CAT activity is expressed as compared with CAT activity obtained in untreated cells.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of H2O2, PQ, and heat shock on the activation of the SOD1 promoter. A, schematic diagram of the SOD1 promoter from nucleotides -576 to +85 (pRSP-576) and from nucleotides -412 to +85 (pRSP-412) attached to CAT. pRSP-576 contains the HRE site, but pRSP-412 does not. B, schematic diagram of the SOD1 promoter from nucleotides -305 to +85 (pRSP-305) and from nucleotides -55 to +85 (pRSP-55) attached to CAT. pRSP-305 contains the HSE site, but pRSP-55 does not. The transfected cells were treated with factors in the same conditions as Fig. 1B. The numbers in the names of plasmids represent the deletion points of SOD1 5'-flanking sequence. The results are the means of three experiments. Relative CAT activities with (+) and without (-) stress are indicated by the solid and open bars, respectively.

cis-Element Responsible for the Activation of SOD1 Promoter by H2O2-- When the plasmids pRSP-576 and pRSP-412 were transfected into HepG2 cells and exposed to H2O2, the induction with H2O2 was observed only in the case of transfection with pRSP-576 (Fig. 3C). However, the induction with PQ was observed in both cases (data not shown). These results might suggest that H2O2 and PQ regulate the SOD1 gene by different regulatory elements and factors. The region between -576 and -413 was previously identified as a positive regulatory element (PRE) (24). As an initial trial to identify the transcriptional enhancer element that was involved in H2O2 induction of the SOD1 gene, transient assays using CAT constructs were carried out. The plasmid pPREtk, which has the PRE linked to a herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase promoter connected to the CAT gene, and pRSP-576 as a positive control were introduced into HepG2 cells, and the cells were treated with H2O2 for 2 h. The CAT activity was measured, and typical results are shown in Fig. 4B. The results clearly indicate that the CAT activity of pPREtk increased about 5-fold with H2O2. The PRE was thought to be a major target for H2O2 stimuli to induce the SOD1 gene. From the sequence analysis of transcription factor binding sites in the PRE, the sequence of Elk1, which is the serum response factor accessory protein (25), was located between -533 and -520 of the SOD1 gene (24). Induction by H2O2 of c-fos and possibly other early response genes was mediated through the activation of the serum response element for the binding site of serum response factor (26). The -533 to -520 sequence named as the HRE was tested for induction ability by H2O2. Double-stranded oligonucleotide containing the HRE sequence was inserted upstream of the thymidine kinase promoter connected to the CAT gene (Fig. 5A). CAT activity was induced by H2O2 in cells transfected with pHREtk by 3-fold, but CAT activity was not induced by H2O2 when pmHREtk containing a mutated HRE site was transfected (Fig. 5C). These results confirmed that the HRE is responsible for the activation of the SOD1 promoter by H2O2.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Detection of the H2O2 related cis-element. A, schematic diagram of pRSP-576 and DNA fragment of PRE in the heterologous promoter (tk) attached to CAT (pPREtk). B, effect of H2O2 on the SOD1 promoter and PRE in the heterologous promoter. The results are the means of three experiments. Relative CAT activity is expressed as compared with CAT activity obtained in untreated cells.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Transcriptional activation of the SOD1 promoter by H2O2, heat shock, and PQ through HRE and HSE. A, schematic diagram of synthetic HRE (pHREtk) and mutated HRE oligonucleotide (pmHREtk) in the heterologous promoter (tk) attached to CAT. B, schematic diagram of synthetic HSE (pHSEtk) and mutated HSE oligonucleotide (pmHSEtk) in the heterologous promoter (tk) attached to CAT. C, effect of H2O2 on the synthetic HRE and mutated HRE in the heterologous promoter. D, effect of heat shock and PQ on the synthetic HSE and mutated HSE in the heterologous promoter. The transfected cells were treated by heat shock (42 °C) for 1 h and PQ (50 µM) for 1 h. Relative CAT activity is expressed as compared with CAT activity obtained in untreated cells.

Heat Shock and PQ Activation of the SOD1 Promoter through the Same HSE-- The activation of the SOD1 gene by heat shock and PQ was due to the DNA sequences between -305 and -56 (Fig. 3D). From the sequence analysis of transcription factor binding sites in this region, the heat shock element (NGAAN) (27), was found to be located between -185 and -171 of the SOD1 gene (Fig. 1A). Heat shock treatment of murine macrophage resulted in an enhanced capacity to release superoxide anion (Obardot 2) (28). Also, Omar and Pappolla (29) showed that heat shock protein synthesis was induced by high levels of superoxide anion. Therefore, it was assumed that the activation of the SOD1 promoter by heat shock and PQ may be mediated through the heat shock element. To confirm this possibility, the heat shock element was synthesized and ligated to the herpes simplex virus minimal thymidine kinase promoter proximal to the CAT gene (Fig. 5B). The CAT activity of this construct was analyzed after exposure of cells to either heat shock or PQ (Fig. 5D). When pHSEtk was transfected into HepG2 cells, CAT activity was induced by heat shock or PQ by about a 5-fold. But the CAT activity was not induced by heat shock or PQ when pmHSEtk containing the mutated HSE site was transfected. These findings indicate that the HSE is sufficient to confer the PQ response and that this inducibility is mediated by HSF. These results establish that the HSF play some kind of role in eukaryotic oxidative stress protection and suggest that heat and oxidative stress signals communicate with the HSF to activate gene transcription.

HRE Binding Protein and Increased Binding Activity Because of H2O2-- To determine the nuclear factors that interact with the HRE sequence, gel mobility shift assays were carried out by using a double-stranded oligonucleotide corresponding to HRE as a probe (Fig. 6). When a nuclear extract prepared from HepG2 cultures was incubated with a 32P-labeled SOD1 HRE probe, one prominent DNA-protein complex was observed. An HRE oligonucleotide-protein complex disappeared when unlabeled oligonucleotide (50×, 100×) was added to the reaction mixture (Fig. 6A, lanes 3 and 4). The formation of the protein-DNA complex was not inhibited with a mutated HRE oligonucleotide, indicating the specificity of this protein-DNA interaction. The binding of Elk1 to the HRE was further confirmed by the result that the protein-DNA complex was supershifted by the addition of the anti-Elk1 antibody (Fig. 6A, lane 6). These results imply that Elk1 is the binding protein of HRE. When nuclear proteins prepared from the H2O2-treated HepG2 cells (2 h) were used, the intensity of the specific complex increased (Fig. 6B). The binding activity of the HRE-binding factor was also investigated in the cell-free system (Fig. 6C). Nuclear extract prepared from nontreated HepG2 cells was incubated with H2O2 (200 µM) to examine the variation of its binding activity to the HRE site. The incubation of the nuclear extract with H2O2 resulted in increasing the intensity of the retarded complex (Fig. 6C, lane 3) and disappearance by competition with the cold probe (Fig. 6C, lane 4). Because the intensity of the specific HRE-protein complex was increased by H2O2 treatment in the cell-free system (Fig. 6C, lane 3), it was also assumed that hydrogen peroxide treatment increased the binding activity of the HRE binding protein.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   HRE binding protein and increased binding activity because of H2O2. A, identification of HRE binding protein. Gel mobility shift assay was performed using nuclear extracts prepared from untreated HepG2 cells. The probe corresponding to HRE was labeled at its 5' end. The DNA-protein complex disappeared by cold competitor (lane 3 and 4) but did not disappear by mutated HRE (mHRE) and was supershifted by anti-Elk1 antibody (lanes 5 and 6). B, increased binding activity of HRE binding protein in vivo. A gel mobility shift assay was performed using nuclear extracts prepared from H2O2-treated HepG2 cells (lane 2). C, nuclear extracts prepared from HepG2 cells grown in the absence of H2O2 were incubated with (lanes 3 and 4) H2O2 in vitro for 2 h.

HSE Binding Protein (Heat Shock Factor) and Change of Binding-- Gel mobility shift assays were used to detect sequence-specific binding of factors to the SOD1 HSE sequence in extracts from HepG2 cells. Nuclear extracts were prepared from cells that had been heat treated at 42 °C for 1 h or maintained at the control temperature of 37 °C. These extracts were incubated with a 5' end-labeled oligonucleotide containing an HSE sequence (between sequence -185 and -171 of the SOD1 gene). In reactions with extracts from the control cells, two sets of retarded bands were observed (Fig. 7). Bands produced by sequence-specific factor binding were identified by competition assays with unlabeled DNA fragments. Unlabeled HSE fragments competed efficiently with the formation of a faster-migrating protein-DNA complex (Fig. 7, lanes 3 and 4). No such competition was observed with the mHSE oligonucleotide (Fig. 7, lane 5). The formation of the more slowly migrating complex was not in competition with the HSE fragment. Thus, the latter complexes did not result from sequence-specific factor binding to the HSE sequences. When nuclear proteins prepared from the heat-treated cells were used, a strong specific far-shifted complex was observed. This strong new complex disappeared by self-competition (Fig. 7, lanes 9 and 10). The HSF in eukaryotes acquires high affinity DNA binding activity upon heat shock activation by conversion from a monomer to homotrimer (30). Therefore, the new far-shifted complex may be a homotrimer HSF-DNA complex. Analogous results were obtained from experiments with nuclear extracts from cells treated with PQ for 1 h (Fig. 8A). A far-shifted complex disappeared by self-competition, demonstrating a specific interaction (Fig. 8A, lane 5). These results indicate that the SOD1 gene protects cells from PQ toxicity in an HSF-dependent manner and that heat and oxidative stress signals communicate with HSF to activate gene transcription. The far-shifted protein complex disappeared after reequilibration to 37 °C for 1 h following a heat shock (Fig. 8B, lane 4). These results also showed that the transcription of the SOD1 gene is induced by heat shock through the same binding of the HSF to the HSE site.


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Detection of HSE binding protein. A gel mobility shift assay was performed using nuclear extracts prepared from untreated HepG2 cells (lanes 2-6) and from heat-treated HepG2 cells (lanes 8-12). The DNA-protein complex disappeared by cold competitor (lanes 3, 4, 9, and 10) but did not disappear with mutated HRE (mHRE) (lanes 5 and 11) and nonspecific competitor (lanes 6 and 12). Using nuclear extracts prepared from heat-treated cells, a far-shifted DNA-protein complex appeared. The location of specific DNA-protein complex is indicated by an arrowhead. Note that the induced strong bands disappeared with the cold probe.


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   The change of binding of HSE binding protein (HSF) by PQ and heat shock. A, a gel mobility shift assay was performed using nuclear extracts prepared from untreated and PQ-treated HepG2 cells. The DNA-protein complex disappeared by cold competitor (lane 3). When nuclear extracts from the cells treated with PQ (50 µM) for 1 h were used, a far-shifted band appeared (lane 4). B, the induction of a far-shifted band by heat shock in vitro. The +/- represents that reequilibration to 37 °C following a heat shock (42 °C). The location of specific DNA-protein complex is indicated by an arrowhead.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In transient expression experiments the activation of the SOD1 promoter by H2O2 was mediated through the HRE sequence. To analyze the target of transcriptional activation of the SOD1 gene, CAT plasmids were constructed that contain these elements in the upstream region of the thymidine kinase promoter. From these results, it was shown that the HRE sequence is one of the targets of transcriptional activation by H2O2. Also, we have found that superoxides could activate the SOD1 gene. Because the steady state concentration of H2O2 in the cell is so low (1 × 10-8 M) and specific enzymes (i.e. catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and myeloperoxidase) actively convert H2O2 to H2O in a fast speed, the resulting hydrogen peroxide by SOD1 is thought not to activate the SOD1 gene by the positive feedback mechanism. In this experiment, the promoter activation was observed at the concentration around 100 µM of H2O2. Active oxygens are suggested to be involved in inflammatory responses; the activations by H2O2 of c-fos, c-jun, and egr-1, which activate the expression of cellular genes, are probably essential for these responses. DNA damaging agents have been reported to activate c-fos and AP1-inducible genes such as those for collagenase and metallothionein (31). Active oxygens such as Obardot 2 or H2O2 are produced in mitochondria during oxidative electron transport and in the endoplasmic reticulum, peroxisomes, and nuclear and plasma membranes. The active oxygens generated in these locations may regulate certain cellular genes by inducing early response genes.

To mount an appropriate oxidative stress defense, cells must harbor oxidative stress sensors. A number of antioxidant responses in bacteria have been elegantly studied, and it has been established that reactive oxygen species are directly sensed by key regulatory molecules that activate the expression of genes encoding antioxidant proteins at the level of transcription (32-34). Distinct defense mechanisms are involved in H2O2 and Obardot 2 detoxification in Escherichia coli through the OxyR and SoxRS regulons, respectively. OxyR directly senses oxidative stress to activate the expression of H2O2-inducible genes, including those encoding catalase and alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (34). The SoxRS regulon is controlled in a two-stage process. First an iron-sulfur protein, SoxR, is activated by increases in intracellular superoxide anion levels and triggers transcription of the soxS gene. The SoxS protein in turn induces transcription of other genes of the regulon, including those encoding manganese superoxide dismutase, the DNA repair endonuclease IV, and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenese (32, 33, 35). The oxidative stress response and its relationship to heat shock phenomena are also being intensely investigated in eukaryotic systems. Unlike the bacterial systems described earlier, little is known about how eukaryotic cells co-ordinate gene expression in response to oxidative stress (34).

Heat shock proteins are known to protect cells from thermal and oxidative injuries as well as other types of injuries (36). In this study, we have found that the paraquat, Obardot 2-generating agent, could activate the SOD1 gene through the heat shock element. Heat shock may cause activation of the membrane-associated oxidase system directly or indirectly through HSP, resulting in increased Obardot 2 production. Oxygen free radicals induce heat shock protein synthesis in cultured human neuroblastoma cells (29). These findings suggest a common mechanism by which various forms of injury, such as hyperthermis, cause HSP induction, that is, via oxidative stress or increased production of oxygen free radicals.

The results presented in this study showed that the rat SOD1 gene was inducible by hydrogen peroxide, paraquat, and heat shock. It was shown that the HRE sequence is one of the targets of transcriptional activation by H2O2. Also, it was found that paraquat and heat shock induced the SOD1 gene through the HSE. These results establish that heat and PQ are communicated to HSF to activate gene transcription. The SOD1 enzyme could function as an inducible protective response against oxidative stresses. The SOD1 gene was induced by nontoxic ginsenoside Rb2 through the AP-2 site (3). The diversity of SOD1 inducers implies that there are multiple regulatory elements for the proper adjustment to various conditions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by a grant from Korea Science and Engineering Foundation through the Research Center for Cell Differentiation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Biology, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea. Tel.: 82-2-880-6688; Fax: 82-2-888-7784; E-mail: hyunerho@plaza.snu.ac.kr.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: SOD1, copper/zinc superoxide dismutase; SOD1, SOD1 gene; PQ, paraquat; HRE, hydrogen peroxide-responsive element(s); HSE, heat shock element(s); HSF, heat shock factor(s); CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; CAT, CAT gene; PRE, positive regulatory element.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Fridovich, I. (1975) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 44, 147-159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Imlay, J. A., and Linn, S (1988) Science 240, 1302-1309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Kim, Y. H., Park, K. H., and Rho, H. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24539-24543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. McCord, J. M., Keele, B. B., Jr., and Fridovich, I. (1971) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 68, 1024-1027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Huber, W., and Menander, K. B. (1980) Clin. Rheum. Dis. 6, 465-498
6. Fridovich, I. (1983) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 23, 238-257
7. Orr, W. C., and Sohal, R. S. (1994) Science 263, 1128-1130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Laloraya, M., Pradeep, K. G., and Laloraya, M. M. (1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 157, 146-153[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Nicotera, T. M., Notaro, J., Notaro, S., Schumer, J., and Sandberg, A. A. (1989) Cancer Res. 49, 5239-5243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Percival, S. S., and Harris, E. D. (1991) Biochem. J. 274, 153-158
11. Halliwell, B., and Gutteridge, J. M. C. (1984) Biochem. J. 219, 1-14[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Halliwell, B. (1994) Nutr. Rev. 52, 253-265[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Brown, J. R. H. (1995) Cell 80, 687-692[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Beyer, W., Imlay, J., and Fridovich, I. (1991) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 40, 221-253[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Gralla, E. B., and Valentine, J. S. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 5918-5920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Davies, K. J. A., Wiese, A. G., Sevanian, A., and Kim, E. H. (1990) Molecular Biology of Aging , pp. 123-141, Alan R. Liss, New York
17. Kim, Y. H., Yoo, H. Y., Jung, G., Kim, J., and Rho, H. M. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 133, 267-271[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Luckow, B., and Schütz, G. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 5490[Free Full Text]
19. Chen, C., and Okayama, H. (1988) BioTechniques 6, 632-638[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Edlund, T., Walker, M. D., Barri, P. J, and Rutter, W. J. (1985) Science 230, 912-916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Andrews, N. C., and Faller, D. V. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 2499[Free Full Text]
22. Kim, Y. H., Yoo, H. Y., Chang, M. S., Jung, G., and Rho, H. M. (1997) FEBS Lett. 401, 267-270[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
24. Chang, M. S., Yoo, H. Y., and Rho, H. M. (1999) Biochem. J. 339, 335-341
25. Treisman, R., Marais, R., and Wynne, J. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 4632-4640
26. Nose, K., Shibanuma, M., Kikuchi, K., Kageyama, H., Sakiyama, S., and Kuroki, T. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 201, 99-106[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Xiao, H., and Lis, J. T. (1988) Science 239, 1139-1142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Reddy, M. V., and Gangadharam, P. R. (1992) Infect. Immun. 60, 2386-2390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Omar, R., and Pappolla, M. (1993) Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 242, 262-267[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Westwood, J. T., and Wu, C. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 3481-3486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Angel, P., Ponting, A., Mallick, U., Rahmsdorf, H., Schorpp, M., and Herrlich, P. (1986) Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 1760-1766[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Demple, B., and Amabile-Cuevas, C. F. (1991) Cell 67, 837-839[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Farr, S. B., and Kogoma, T. (1991) Microbiol. Rev. 55, 561-585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Storz, G., Tartaglia, L. A., and Ames, B. N. (1990) Science 248, 189-194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Wu, J., and Weiss, B. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 3915-3920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Lindquist, S., and Craig, E. A. (1988) Annu. Rev. Genet. 22, 631-677[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
D. Son, I. Kojima, R. Inagi, M. Matsumoto, T. Fujita, and M. Nangaku
Chronic hypoxia aggravates renal injury via suppression of Cu/Zn-SOD: a proteomic analysis
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): F62 - F72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K.-I. Tanaka, T. Namba, Y. Arai, M. Fujimoto, H. Adachi, G. Sobue, K. Takeuchi, A. Nakai, and T. Mizushima
Genetic Evidence for a Protective Role for Heat Shock Factor 1 and Heat Shock Protein 70 against Colitis
J. Biol. Chem., August 10, 2007; 282(32): 23240 - 23252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Rossi, S. Ciafre, M. Balsamo, P. Pierimarchi, and M. G. Santoro
Targeting the heat shock factor 1 by RNA interference: a potent tool to enhance hyperthermochemotherapy efficacy in cervical cancer.
Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 66(15): 7678 - 7685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
R. Ebert, M. Ulmer, S. Zeck, J. Meissner-Weigl, D. Schneider, H. Stopper, N. Schupp, M. Kassem, and F. Jakob
Selenium Supplementation Restores the Antioxidative Capacity and Prevents Cell Damage in Bone Marrow Stromal Cells In Vitro
Stem Cells, May 1, 2006; 24(5): 1226 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. I. Rojo, M. Salinas, D. Martin, R. Perona, and A. Cuadrado
Regulation of Cu/Zn-Superoxide Dismutase Expression via the Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase/Akt Pathway and Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B
J. Neurosci., August 18, 2004; 24(33): 7324 - 7334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. A. Sonna, J. Fujita, S. L. Gaffin, and C. M. Lilly
Molecular Biology of Thermoregulation: Invited Review: Effects of heat and cold stress on mammalian gene expression
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2002; 92(4): 1725 - 1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
D. M. Hall, G. L. Sattler, C. A. Sattler, H. J. Zhang, L. W. Oberley, H. C. Pitot, and K. C. Kregel
Aging Lowers Steady-State Antioxidant Enzyme and Stress Protein Expression in Primary Hepatocytes
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2001; 56(6): B259 - B267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. A. Sonna, S. L. Gaffin, R. E. Pratt, M. L. Cullivan, K. C. Angel, and C. M. Lilly
Molecular Biology of Thermoregulation: Selected Contribution: Effect of acute heat shock on gene expression by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 2208 - 2220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. K. Okamoto, D. L. Robertson, T. F. Fagan, J. W. Hastings, and P. Colepicolo
Different Regulatory Mechanisms Modulate the Expression of a Dinoflagellate Iron-Superoxide Dismutase
J. Biol. Chem., June 1, 2001; 276(23): 19989 - 19993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow