JBC Invitrogen Ultrasensitive Cytokine Assays

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kon, J.
Right arrow Articles by Okajima, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kon, J.
Right arrow Articles by Okajima, F.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 23940-23947, August 20, 1999


Comparison of Intrinsic Activities of the Putative Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor Subtypes to Regulate Several Signaling Pathways in Their cDNA-transfected Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells*

Junko KonDagger , Koichi SatoDagger , Tomoko Watanabe§, Hideaki TomuraDagger , Atsushi KuwabaraDagger , Takao KimuraDagger , Ken-ichi TamamaDagger , Tamotsu IshizukaDagger , Naoya MurataDagger , Tsugiyasu Kanda, Isao Kobayashi, Hideo Ohta§, Michio Uiparallel , and Fumikazu OkajimaDagger **

From the Dagger  Laboratory of Signal Transduction, Institute for Molecular and Cellular Regulation, Gunma University, Maebashi 371-8512, § Pharmaceutical Research Laboratory, Kirin Brewery Co., LTD., 3 Miyahara-cho Takasaki 370-12,  Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Gunma University, Maebashi 371-8511, and the parallel  Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Honkomagome 3-18-22, Tokyo, Japan

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We examined the actions of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) on signaling pathways in Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with putative S1P receptor subtypes, i.e. Edg-1, AGR16/H218 (Edg-5), and Edg-3. Among these receptor-transfected cells, there was no significant difference in the expressing numbers of the S1P receptors and their affinities to S1P, which were estimated by [3H]S1P binding to the cells. In vector-transfected cells, S1P slightly increased cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in association with inositol phosphate production, reflecting phospholipase C activation; the S1P-induced actions were markedly enhanced in the Edg-3-transfected cells and moderately so in the AGR16-transfected cells. In comparison with vector-transfected cells, the S1P-induced [Ca2+]i increase was also slightly enhanced in the Edg-1-transfected cells. In all cases, the inositol phosphate and Ca2+ responses to S1P were partially inhibited by pertussis toxin (PTX). S1P also significantly increased cAMP content in a PTX-insensitive manner in all the transfected cells; the rank order of their intrinsic activity of S1P receptor subtypes was AGR16 > Edg-3 > Edg-1. In the presence of forskolin, however, S1P significantly inhibited cAMP accumulation at a lower concentration (1-100 nM) of S1P in a manner sensitive to PTX in the Edg-1-transfected cells but not in either the Edg-3 or AGR16-transfected cells. As for cell migration activity evaluated by cell number across the filter of blind Boyden chamber, Edg-1 and Edg-3 were equally potent, but AGR16 was ineffective. Thus, S1P receptors may couple to both PTX-sensitive and -insensitive G-proteins, resulting in the selective regulation of the phospholipase C-Ca2+ system, adenylyl cyclase-cAMP system, and cell migration activity, according to the receptor subtype.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P),1 one of the sphingolipid metabolites, has recently been suggested to affect a variety of cellular processes (1, 2). These cellular responses elicited by S1P have first been ascribed to the intracellular action of the lipid, because S1P accumulated in the cells in response to some kinds of cytokines, and moreover, S1P induced Ca2+ mobilization in a cell-free system (3-5). On the other hand, these S1P-induced responses are also accompanied by the stimulation of several early signaling events that are usually regulated by cell-surface receptors. These signaling events include activation of PLC (6-9), an increase in [Ca2+]i (10-12), regulation of adenylyl cyclase (6, 9, 10, 13), and Rho activation (14, 15). The presence of the latter mechanism has been supported by the recent identification of several cDNAs encoding G-protein-coupled receptors for S1P, i.e. Edg-1, AGR16/H218, and Edg-3 (16-23).

The transfection experiments of these S1P receptor subtypes demonstrated that these putative S1P receptors can actually couple to multiple signaling pathways. For example, transfection of Edg-1 induced the inhibition of cAMP accumulation in HEK293 cells (22), Sf9 cells (18), and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells (20), extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation in COS-1 cells (19), COS-7 cells (18), and CHO cells (20), and activation of Rho, resulting in a morphological change in HEK293 cells (19, 22). The transfection of Edg-1 also caused activation of PLC and [Ca2+]i increase in CHO cells and HEL cells (20), although the overexpression of Edg-1 in HEK293 cells and in Sf9 cells failed to affect the S1P-induced activation of PLC-Ca2+ system (18, 22). The expression of Edg-3 and AGR16 resulted in the activation of a serum response element-driven transcriptional reporter gene in Jurkat cells and the stimulation of Ca2+ flux in Xenopus oocytes in response to S1P (17). Coupling of Edg-3 (21) and AGR16 (23) to the Ca2+ signaling has recently been confirmed in CHO cells and K562 cells.

Thus, the previous transfection experiments suggest the involvement of these putative S1P receptor subtypes in the regulation of multiple signaling pathways. However, in these experiments, the responses to S1P were observed in the different species of cells, and the receptor numbers expressed in the cells have not always been estimated. Thus, it is difficult to evaluate and compare the intrinsic activity of the respective receptor subtype to regulate a specific signaling pathway from the previous transfection experiments. In the present study, we prepared the CHO cells that permanently express the respective S1P receptor subtype to a comparable level. This made it possible to compare their intrinsic activity to regulate the respective signaling pathway. Our data suggested that S1P selectively regulates multiple signaling pathways according to the receptor subtype.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- 1-Oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate (lysophosphatidic acid) and D-erythro-sphingosine were purchased from Sigma; sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) was purchased from Cayman Chemical Co.; sphingosylphosphorylcholine was purchased from Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc.; Fura 2/AM was purchased from Dojindo (Tokyo); and myo-[2-3H]inositol (23.0 Ci/mmol) and [3H]sphingosine (20.0 Ci/mmol) were purchased from American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc. U73122 was generously provided by the The Upjohn Co. [3H]S1P was enzymatically synthesized from [3H]sphingosine by sphingosine kinase-catalyzed phosphorylation as described previously (12). [3H]S1P was separated on silica gel 60 high performance thin-layer chromatography plates (Merck) in a solvent system of butanol-water-acetic acid (3:1:1). By this method, we could obtain [3H]S1P with the same specific activity as the labeled sphingosine. The sources of all other reagents were the same as described previously (21, 24-27)

Cell Cultures-- CHO cells that had been transfected with the pEFneo empty vector (28) or a pEFneo S1P receptor expression vector were cultured in DMEM containing 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, Inc.) in a humidified air/CO2 (19:1) atmosphere. The cells were maintained on 10-cm dishes for inositol phosphate response, [Ca2+]i response, and adenylyl cyclase activity and on 12-multiplates for measurements of cAMP content and S1P receptor binding unless otherwise specified. Twenty-four h before the experiments, the medium was changed to fresh DMEM (without serum) containing 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (fraction V). In the case of the inositol phosphate response, the medium was changed to the inositol-free DMEM containing 20 µCi of [3H]inositol (in 6 ml) and 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (fraction V). PTX treatment of the cells was performed by adding the toxin (100 ng/ml) to the medium 24 h before the experiments. Unless otherwise specified, the cells were harvested from the dishes and used in suspension for inositol phosphate and Ca2+ responses, and the cells attached to the plates without cell harvest were used for the cAMP response and S1P receptor binding.

Isolation of cDNAs for S1P Receptors and Construction of Expression Plasmid-- -The cDNAs for putative S1P receptors were cloned by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for Edg-1 (29) and AGR16 (30) (H218, an almost identical cDNA to AGR16, differs from AGR16 in only 2 nucleotides but has the same amino acid sequence (31)) from the total RNA of rat brain. Edg-3 (32) was cloned from the total RNA of HEK 293 cells as described previously (21). The 5' primers contain a restriction enzyme site (HindIII or EcoRI) and a Kozak sequence (CCACC) before the N-terminal region of receptor proteins. The 3' primers contained a restriction enzyme site (XbaI) and a stop codon in addition to the C-terminal region of the receptor proteins. The amplified fragments were digested with the restriction enzymes as described above and put in the pBluescript II plasmids (Stratagene), and the DNA sequence was checked.

To construct the S1P receptor expression plasmid, the amplified fragment was inserted into the EcoRI/XbaI site of the pEFneo expression plasmid for Edg-3 and into the HindIII/XbaI site of pEFneo expression plasmid for Edg-1 and AGR16. Of the three types of the putative S1P receptors, the wild type CHO cells expressed the mRNA of AGR16 (30) at 3.1 kilobases but not Edg-3 or Edg-1 (their expected size is 2.8 kilobases for Edg-3 (32) and 3.0 kilobases for Edg-1 (31)) (21). The CHO cells were transfected with pEFneo empty vector alone or the pEFneo vector containing Edg-1, AGR16, or Edg-3, and the neomycin (G418 sulfate at 1 mg/ml)-resistant cells were selected. We prepared three batches of CHO cells that were transfected with the empty vector or the respective receptor subtype cDNA. Since there was no appreciable difference in the amount of expression of S1P receptor transcript at around 1.8 kilobases between three batches of transfected cells regardless of the receptor subtype, all the data presented in the present study were from one batch of transfected cells. As shown in Fig. 1, there was no significant difference in the number of S1P binding to the cells among these receptor cDNA-transfected cells.

Measurement of S1P Receptor Binding-- This was performed by the methods slightly modified from those previously described (19). The cells were washed twice with an ice-cold Tris-buffered medium consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 15 mM NaF, and 0.4% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (fraction V). The medium was replaced with a fresh medium containing [3H]S1P at 3.125 to 100 nM. The plates were kept on ice for 30 min, and the cells were then washed twice with the same ice-cold medium to remove the unbounded ligand. The cells were solubilized with a cell-solubilizing solution composed of 0.1% SDS, 0.4% NaOH, and 2% Na2CO3, and the radioactivity was counted. The specific S1P binding to its receptor was estimated by subtracting the radioactivity in the presence of 10 µM unlabeled S1P.

Measurement of [3H]Inositol Phosphate Production-- The [3H]inositol-labeled cells were harvested from the 10-cm dishes with trypsin (0.05% in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.53 mM EDTA) and washed by sedimentation (250 × g x 5 min) and resuspension in the Hepes-buffered medium. The Hepes-buffered medium consisted of 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 134 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 2 mM CaCl2, 2.5 mM NaHCO3, 5 mM glucose, and 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (fraction V). The washing procedure was repeated, and the cells were finally resuspended in the same medium. Unless otherwise specified, the cells (about 5 × 106 cells) were preincubated for 5 min with 10 mM LiCl in polypropylene vials (20 ml) in a final volume of 2.0 ml. The test agents (×10) were then added to the medium, and the cells were further incubated for the indicated time. The cell suspension (0.5 ml) in triplicate was transferred to tubes containing 1 ml of CHCl3/CH3OH/HCl (100:100:1). [3H]-Labeled respective inositol phosphate including IP1, IP2, and IP3 was separated as described previously (24). Where indicated, the results were normalized to 105 dpm of the total radioactivity incorporated into the cellular inositol lipids. The radioactivity of the trichloroacetic acid (5%)-insoluble fraction was measured as the total radioactivity.

Measurement of [Ca2+]i-- The cells were harvested from the dishes with trypsin as described above, and then [Ca2+]i was measured as described previously (21).

Accumulation of cAMP in Intact Cells-- The cells were washed once and preincubated for 10 min at 37 °C in the Hepes-buffered medium. The cells were then incubated with test agents in the presence of 0.5 mM IBMX to estimate the stimulatory activity of adenylyl cyclase (Fig. 6) or in the presence of 0.5 mM IBMX and 10 µM forskolin to estimate the inhibitory activity of adenylyl cyclase (Fig. 5). After a 10-min incubation, the reaction was terminated by adding 100 µl of 1 N HCl. Cyclic AMP in the acid extracts was measured as described previously (9).

Adenylyl Cyclase Activity in Cell-free System-- Crude membranes were prepared as described previously (26). Briefly, the CHO cells transfected with the respective S1P receptor were harvested from the dishes and washed once with phosphate-buffered saline. The cells were suspended in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4) containing 50 mM sucrose, 1 mM EGTA, and 2 µg/ml aprotinin, then homogenized in a Physcotron homogenizer (NS-310E, Niti-on, Tokyo, Japan) for 30 s, and centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was recentrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min, and the resultant pellet was used as crude plasma membranes. These membrane preparations (around 15 µg) were incubated 37 °C for 10 min with 10 nM GTPgamma S and/or 3 µM S1P in the same Hepes buffer containing 0.5 mM IBMX, 0.2 mM ATP, 7 mM phosphocreatine, 30 units/ml creatine phosphokinase, 100 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.1% bovine serum albumin (Fraction V) in a final volume of 200 µl. The reaction was terminated by adding 50 µl of 1 N HCl and boiling for 1 min. Cyclic AMP in the acid extracts was measured as described above.

Cell Migration-- The migration of cells were quantified using a blind Boyden chamber apparatus (Neuro Probe Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) as described previously (13). Briefly, the lower well of the chamber was filled with DMEM containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (fraction V) with the indicated concentration of S1P. The wells were subsequently covered with a polyvinylpyrrolidone-free filter with 8-mm pores (Neuro Probe) that were precoated for 72 h at 4 °C with 100 µg/ml type I collagen (Vitrogen; Collagen Corp., Palo Alto, CA). The cells were trypsinized, washed once in DMEM containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (fraction V), and resuspended. Cells (3 × 104 cells in 50 µl) were then loaded into the upper wells of the Boyden chamber. Migration was allowed to proceed for 4 h at 37 °C under a humidified air/CO2 (19:1) atmosphere. Cells remaining on the upper surface of the filters were mechanically removed, and then filters were fixed in methanol and stained with Diff-Quik Solution II. The number of cells that had migrated to the lower surface was determined by counting under microscopy at ×400 magnification.

Data Presentation-- All experiments were performed in duplicate or triplicate. The results of multiple observations were presented as the mean of two separate experiments or means ±S.E. of at least three separate experiments unless otherwise stated.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Expression of a Comparable Amount of S1P Receptors in CHO Cells Transfected with the Respective S1P Receptor Subtype-- In Fig. 1, S1P binding activity was measured in the respective S1P receptor subtype-transfected cells. In the control (empty vector-transfected) cells, only a small S1P binding activity was detected (Fig. 1A), and there was no significant correlation between B and B/F in the Scatchard plot (Fig. 1B). Since AGR16 mRNA expression is detected in the native CHO cells (27), the small binding activity might reflect binding to the endogenous S1P receptor. It should be noted, however, that in this experiment we used intact cells to lower the nonspecific binding due to the lipophilic nature of the lipid (19). Therefore, we could not discriminate the activity of the ligand uptake into the cells from the binding to the cell-surface receptors even though the experiments were performed on ice to lower the ligand uptake. On the other hand, in the cells transfected with receptor cDNAs, the apparent specific S1P binding activity was clearly increased (Fig. 1A), and significant correlation was observed between B and B/F in the Scatchard plot regardless of the receptor subtypes (Fig. 1, C--E). There were no appreciable differences in the maximal binding activity (4.25~5.69 pmol/mg) and Kd values (13.2~26.2 nM) among these receptor-transfected cells. These results suggest that a comparable number of S1P receptors with similar affinity to the ligand is expressed in these receptor subtype-transfected cells.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Estimation of the expression of S1P receptors in CHO cells transfected with their cDNAs. In A, the vector (open circle )-, AGR16 (black-triangle)-, Edg-1 (triangle )-, or Edg-3 ()-transfected cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of [3H]S1P. The specific S1P binding was plotted against the S1P concentration. In B-E, Scatchard plots are shown; B/F is plotted against B, in which B is the specific S1P binding (pmol/mg), and F is free (unbounded) S1P concentration (nM). The maximal binding (Bmax) and the binding dissociation constant (Kd) of the respective receptor subtype, i.e. AGR16 (C), Edg-1 (D), and Edg-3 (E) were estimated from the Scatchard plot. These values are shown in the each panel except for vector-transfected cells (B), because of no significant correlation between B and B/F; the correlation coefficient was 0.08, 0.95, 0.86, and 0.93 in the empty vector, AGR16, Edg-1, and Edg-3-transfected cells, respectively.

Activation of PLC-Ca2+ System by Edg-3 and AGR16-- Consistent with the previous study (21), the S1P-induced accumulation of inositol phosphate was remarkable in the Edg-3-transfected cells (Figs. 2, left panels and 3D). The AGR16-transfected cells (Figs. 2, left panels and 3B), but not Edg-1-transfected cells (Figs. 2, left panels and 3C), also displayed a higher ability than the vector-transfected cells to produce inositol phosphate in response to S1P. The difference in the inositol phosphate response is specific to S1P; the response to UTP, a P2 purinergic agonist, was hardly affected by the transfection of any receptor subtype (Fig. 2, right panels). PTX treatment suppressed by 50~80% the S1P action (Fig. 3). Thus, for the intrinsic activity to activate PLC, Edg-3 was the highest followed by AGR16, and a significant effect was not detected by Edg-1.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Time courses of S1P and UTP to induce the individual inositol phosphate production. The vector (open circle )-, AGR16 (black-triangle)-, Edg-1 (triangle )-, or Edg-3 ()-transfected cells were prelabeled with [3H]inositol and then harvested. The cells were incubated in suspension for the indicated time in the absence or presence of 1 µM S1P (left panels) or 100 µM UTP (right panels). The production of IP1 (A and B), IP2 (C and D) and IP3 (E and F) was measured. Results are expressed as percentages of the initial values without test agents. Normalized initial values (dpm) were 859 ± 8, 726 ± 22, 824 ± 26, and 833 ± 19 for IP1, 280 ± 10, 242 ± 2, 296 ± 18, and 289 ± 36 for IP2, and 293 ± 18, 220 ± 22, 208 ± 7, and 289 ± 16 for IP3 in the vector-, AGR16-, Edg-1-, and Edg-3-transfected cells, respectively. These values were not significantly changed during a 10-min incubation. Data are means of two separate experiments.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Dose-dependent S1P-induced inositol phosphate production. The vector (A)-, AGR16 (B)-, Edg-1 (C)-, or Edg-3 (D)-transfected cells were prelabeled with [3H]inositol in the presence () or absence (open circle ) of PTX and were harvested from the dish. The cells were incubated in suspension for 1 min with the indicated concentrations of S1P to measure IP2 plus IP3 production. Other experimental conditions were the same as those shown in Fig. 2. Results are expressed as percentages of the basal values without test agents. Normalized basal values (dpm) were 590 ± 42 and 654 ± 19 for vector, 518 ± 34 and 657 ± 12 for AGR16, 653 ± 32 and 626 ± 23 for Edg-1, and 628 ± 23 and 755 ± 29 for Edg-3 in the control (not treated with PTX) cells and the toxin-treated cells, respectively. Data are means ±S.E. of three separate experiments.

The activation of PLC is usually accompanied by an increase in [Ca2+]i. As expected from the inositol phosphate response, S1P induced a small but significant [Ca2+]i increase in the vector-transfected cells, possibly through endogenous S1P receptors (Fig. 4A). The S1P-induced increase in [Ca2+]i was markedly enhanced in the Edg-3-transfected cells (Fig. 4D) and moderately so in the AGR16-transfected cells (Fig. 4B). In this case, the S1P-induced [Ca2+]i increase was slightly higher in the Edg-1-transfected cells (Fig. 4C) than in the vector-transfected cells (Fig. 4A). The change in the Ca2+ response was specific to S1P, as evidenced by the observation that the lysophosphatidic acid-induced action was hardly affected by any receptor transfection (Fig. 4E). PTX treatment partially suppressed the S1P-induced actions in all cases.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effects of S1P and lysophosphatidic acid on [Ca2+]i. The vector (A)-, AGR16 (B)-, Edg-1 (C)-, or Edg-3 (D)-transfected cells were treated without (open circle ) or with () PTX and were harvested from the dish. The cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of S1P to monitor [Ca2+]i. In E, the change in [Ca2+]i induced by 1 µM lysophosphatidic acid was monitored in these vector- or receptor-transfected cells not treated with the toxin. The net [Ca2+]i change (peak value - basal value) at around 15 s was calculated. Data are means ±S.E. of three to four separate experiments.

Regulation of Adenylyl Cyclase by S1P Receptor Subtypes-- To estimate the activity of adenylyl cyclase in intact cells, the change in cAMP content was measured in the presence of IBMX, a potent inhibitor of phosphodiesterase. In the experiments shown in Fig. 5, forskolin, an activator of adenylyl cyclase, was also supplemented in the incubation medium to evaluate the inhibitory ability of S1P against adenylyl cyclase. In the vector-transfected cells, S1P had no significant effect at less than 100 nM S1P but significantly inhibited it at more than 1 µM (Fig. 5A). This inhibitory action was completely reversed by the treatment of the cells with PTX (Fig. 5A), suggesting the Gi/Go-protein-mediated action. When the cells were transfected with the respective receptor subtype, the pattern of the cAMP response to S1P was changed in a manner specific to each receptor. At the concentration lower than 100 nM S1P, where the lipid exerted no detectable effect on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation in the control vector-transfected cells, S1P slightly enhanced it in the AGR16-transfected cells (Fig. 5B), conversely inhibited it in the Edg-1-transfected cells (Fig. 5C), and exerted no apparent effect in the Edg-3-transfected cells (Fig. 5D). The inhibitory effect of S1P at lower concentration (1-100 nM) in the Edg-1-transfected cells was reversed by PTX treatment (Fig. 5C). This suggests the coupling of Edg-1 to Gi/Go-proteins, resulting in the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. At concentrations of S1P higher than 1 µM, the lipid-induced inhibitory action was apparently attenuated in both cells expressing AGR16 or Edg-3 (Fig. 5, B and D). Interestingly, in AGR16- and also Edg-3-transfected cells, which were treated with PTX, the cAMP level was significantly increased by increasing the concentration of S1P (Fig. 5, B and D).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Inhibitory action of S1P on cAMP accumulation. The vector (A)-, AGR16 (B)-, Edg-1 (C)-, or Edg-3 (D)-transfected cells were treated without (open circle ) or with () PTX. The cells were then incubated for 10 min with the indicated concentrations of S1P in the presence of 0.5 mM IBMX and 10 µM forskolin. Results are expressed as cAMP contents (nmol/mg of protein). Data are means ±S.E. of three to four separate experiments.

We next examined the ability of the respective receptor subtype to stimulate adenylyl cyclase. For this purpose, the experiments were done without forskolin addition (Fig. 6). Under these conditions, S1P hardly changed the cAMP level in vector-transfected cells, but its level significantly increased in response to S1P in all the cells transfected with the receptor subtype. The cAMP level increased around 2 times in the Edg-1-transfected cells (Fig. 6C) and roughly 10 times both in the AGR16- and Edg-3-transfected cells in response to 10 µM S1P (Fig. 6, B and D). However, at lower concentrations of S1P of less than 100 nM, the S1P-induced cAMP accumulation was higher in AGR16-transfected cells than Edg-3-transfected cells (Fig. 6, B and D). PTX did not exert an appreciable effect on the stimulatory action of S1P on cAMP accumulation in all the cases. This striking stimulatory action on the adenylyl cyclase in the cells expressing AGR16 or Edg-3 might partly account for the disappearance of the inhibitory action of S1P (Fig. 5).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Stimulatory action of S1P on cAMP accumulation. The vector (A)-, AGR16 (B)-, Edg-1 (C)-, or Edg-3 (D)-transfected cells were treated without (open circle ) or with () PTX. The cells were then incubated for 10 min with the indicated concentrations of S1P in the presence of 0.5 mM IBMX. Results are expressed as cAMP contents (nmol/mg protein). Data are means ± S.E. of three to four separate experiments.

It has been reported that adenylyl cyclase activation is in some cases regulated secondarily to the change in Ca2+ signaling (33). As shown in Fig. 7, the PLC inhibitor alone significantly increased the cAMP content by an unidentified mechanism, but the net S1P-induced cAMP accumulation was not appreciably affected by the enzyme inhibitor. Under these conditions, the S1P-induced [Ca2+]i increase was inhibited by more than 80% (21). Thus, it is unlikely that the S1P-induced activation of the PLC-Ca2+ system may be responsible for the lipid-induced cAMP accumulation.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Stimulatory S1P action on cAMP accumulation is not secondary to the lipid-induced PLC activation. In this experiment, the cells were harvested from the dishes like inositol phosphate and Ca2+ experiments. The AGR16 (A)- or Edg-3 (B)-transfected cells were incubated in suspension for 2 min with U73122 (5 µM) or vehicle (Me2SO (DMSO)) and then for another 10 min with (hatched column) or without (open column) 1 µM S1P. Results are expressed as cAMP contents (nmol/mg of protein). Data are means ±S.E. of six values from two separate experiments.

To further provide more direct evidence that the S1P receptor itself is coupled to the adenylyl cyclase system, we measured the enzyme activity in a cell-free system in Fig. 8. Compared with the results in intact cells, S1P effect was small, but the lipid significantly increased adenylyl cyclase activity in the presence of GTPgamma S in membranes from receptor-transfected cells; the rank order of the magnitude of the S1P-induced activity was roughly AGR16 > Edg-3 > Edg-1, which was comparable with that of the S1P-induced cAMP accumulation in intact cells. Thus, the S1P receptor subtype may couple to G-proteins, probably Gs, resulting in activation of adenylyl cyclase.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Stimulation of adenylyl cyclase depending on a guanine nucleotide in a cell-free system. The membrane preparations were incubated for 10 min with or without 3 µM S1P and 10 nM GTPgamma S. The enzyme activities (nmol/mg/10 min) in the absence of the guanine nucleotide were 3.22 ± 0.14 and 2.74 ± 0.15 for vector, 2.43 ± 0.04 and 3.65 ± 0.19 for AGR16, 2.42 ± 0.17 and 2.85 ± 0.16 for Edg-1, and 2.56 ± 0.07 and 2.45 ± 0.08 for Edg-3 in the absence and presence of S1P, respectively. Thus, there was no significant effect of S1P in the absence of GTPgamma S except for membranes prepared from AGR16-transfected cells, in which a small but significant effect of S1P was observed, possibly due to the endogenous guanine nucleotide. To evaluate the guanine nucleotide-dependent activation of adenylyl cyclase, the enzyme activation was induced by 10 nM GTPgamma S (the difference in the activity with and without GTPgamma S) in the absence (open column) or presence (hatched column) of S1P. *, the effect of S1P was significant (p < 0.05).

Stimulation of Cell Migration by Edg-1 and Edg-3-- S1P has been reported to induce the change in cell morphology and cell motility (2, 13-15, 19, 22, 34, 35). Here, we measured the activity of cell migration by a blind Boyden chamber method (Fig. 9A). For the vector- and AGR16-transfected CHO cells, S1P was ineffective in stimulating cell migration as determined by cell number across the filter of a Boyden chamber. However, S1P at 1-10 nM stimulated the migration activity of the Edg-1- and Edg-3-transfected cells. At concentrations higher than 100 nM, however, S1P lost its activity. The bell shape migration pattern has also been observed for other chemoattractants (36). The treatment of the cells with PTX markedly suppressed not only the S1P-induced action but also the basal activity without S1P (Fig. 9, B and C).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Dose-dependent effect of S1P on cell migration. In A, the vector (open circle )-, AGR16 (black-triangle)-, Edg-1 (triangle )-, or Edg-3 ()-transfected cells were loaded into the upper wells of the Boyden chamber, and cell migration activity for 4 h was measured. The lower wells were filled with the indicated concentrations of S1P. In B (Edg-1) and C (Edg-3), the cells were treated with or without PTX, and then cell migration activity was monitored in the presence (hatched column) or absence (open column) of 10 nM S1P. The number of the cells migrating into the lower surface of the membrane filter (per 0.60-mm2 field) were counted. Data are means ±S.E. of three separate experiments.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In the present study, we compared the intrinsic activity of the putative S1P receptors, i.e. Edg-1, AGR16, and Edg-3 to induce activation of PLC-Ca2+ system, inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, stimulation of adenylyl cyclase, and stimulation of cell migration activity in CHO cells that permanently express the respective S1P receptor subtype to a comparable level. Results are summarized in Table I.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Comparison of intrinsic activities of the S1P receptor subtypes to regulate PLC, adenylyl cyclase and cell migration

One of the universal actions of S1P is the activation of PLC and the subsequent increase in [Ca2+]i (6-12), although the involvement of PLC in the [Ca2+]i increase has not always been demonstrated (6, 10-12). Actually, transfection of Edg-1 (20), AGR16 (23), or Edg-3 (21) has been reported to enhance the S1P-induced activation of PLC and/or [Ca2+]i increase. Thus, all the putative S1P receptors have the potential to activate the PLC-Ca2+ system. However, the present study revealed that, in CHO cells expressing an almost equal number of S1P receptors, the intrinsic activity to activate the PLC-Ca2+ system varied in a manner specific to the subtype, i.e. their order being Edg-3 > AGR16 > Edg-1. We detected a small but significant enhancement of the S1P-induced [Ca2+]i increase in the Edg-1-expressing cells (Fig. 4) without a significant effect for the inositol phosphate response (Figs. 2 and 3). The failure of the Edg-1 effect on the inositol phosphate response might simply reflect a lower sensitivity for the detection of the PLC assay compared with the [Ca2+]i measurement. Alternatively, it might indicate the existence of the inositol phosphate-independent mechanism for [Ca2+]i increase. In other cell types, however, the overexpression of Edg-1 failed to stimulate Ca2+ signaling (18, 22). Thus, Edg-1 has a potential activity to couple to the Ca2+ signaling, but its intrinsic activity is very small compared with Edg-3 or AGR16, and hence this receptor subtype might not be important for the regulation of the Ca2+ signaling in the native cells.

We have recently found that only Edg-3 mRNA expression was detected among three types of S1P receptors in undifferentiated HL-60 cells, and its expression was down-regulated in association with the attenuation of the S1P-induced Ca2+ response during differentiation of the cells (37). This suggests that Edg-3 may couple to the PLC-Ca2+ system in HL-60 cells. In the native CHO cells, mRNA expression of AGR16, but neither Edg-1 or Edg-3, was detected (27). Similarly, in FRTL-5 cells, we detected only AGR16 mRNA expression (data not shown). In these cells, S1P seemed to increase [Ca2+]i depending on PLC activation (9, 21). Thus, both Edg-3 and AGR16 may be involved in the S1P-induced activation of the PLC-Ca2+ system in the native cells as well. S1P-induced PLC activation and [Ca2+]i increase have, in most cases, been reported to be attenuated by PTX treatment in native cells (6, 7, 10, 11). Similarly, the S1P-induced actions in the present study were also partially suppressed by PTX treatment (Figs. 3 and 4). Although the complete ADP-ribosylation of Gi/Go-proteins was not proven by the PTX treatment employed in the present study, the inhibitory action of S1P on the forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation was completely reversed (Fig. 5). This suggests that the function of Gi/Go-proteins may be lost under these conditions. On the other hand, the stimulatory action of S1P on cAMP accumulation was unaltered by the toxin treatment (Fig. 6), excluding the possible nonspecific toxic action of PTX. Thus, Edg-3 and AGR16 may couple to both PTX-sensitive Gi/Go-proteins and probably, the toxin-insensitive Gq/G11-proteins, resulting in the activation of PLC and the subsequent Ca2+ mobilization from the intracellular pool.

Consistent with the previous results (18, 20, 22), Edg-1 may couple to the inhibitory adenylyl cyclase system through PTX-sensitive Gi/Go-proteins (Fig. 5). On the other hand, we could not detect the inhibitory action of S1P in either the Edg-3- or the AGR16-expressing cells, in which S1P elicited a rather stimulatory action on cAMP accumulation (Fig. 6). However, the cAMP level was significantly higher in PTX-treated cells at lower concentrations of less than 100 nM S1P (Fig. 5, B and D), suggesting that the inhibitory S1P action was masked by the stimulatory S1P action in the cells not treated with PTX. In relation to this, it should be noted that in the native CHO cells, only AGR16 mRNA expression was detected among three types of the putative S1P receptor (27). Therefore, the inhibition of cAMP accumulation by higher concentrations (more than 1 µM) of S1P, which was observed in the vector-transfected cells (Fig. 5), might be mediated by the endogenous AGR16. Further experiments are necessary to define conclusively the ability of Edg-3 and AGR16 to couple to the inhibitory adenylyl cyclase system.

In addition to the inhibitory action on cAMP accumulation, S1P has in some cases been reported to stimulate cAMP accumulation reflecting activation of adenylyl cyclase, especially in smooth muscle cells (13). The order of the intrinsic activity of the stimulatory action on cAMP accumulation in the present receptor subtype-transfected cell system was AGR16 > Edg-3 > Edg-1. It is unlikely that the activation of adenylyl cyclase was the secondary action of the lipid-induced activation of PLC-Ca2+ system (Fig. 7). Actually, at least a part of the cAMP response may reflect the lipid receptor/Gs-protein-mediated activation of adenylyl cyclase as evidenced by the guanine nucleotide-dependent activation of the enzyme by S1P in a cell-free system (Fig. 8). However, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that S1P activated the enzyme partly through the production of autocrine stimulators such as prostaglandin in intact cells.

Finally, we evaluated the ability of the respective S1P receptor subtype to migrate the cells. Transfection of Edg-1 or Edg-3 into the CHO cells stimulated cell migration in response to S1P, whereas neither the vector nor AGR16 transfection appreciably affected the migration activity. Although the signaling mechanisms involved in the cell migration have not been well characterized, disassembly and assembly of actin filament may be involved in this process. The receptor-mediated rearrangement of actin filament has been shown to involve the G12/G13 family of G-proteins and the Rho family of small G-proteins (14, 15, 38, 39). In the present study, the S1P-induced action was markedly suppressed by PTX treatment. In this case, the basal activity was also suppressed by the toxin treatment (Fig. 9), suggesting that Gi/Go-proteins might be absolutely necessary for the induction of cell migration. However, this result never rules out the possible involvement of G12/G13-proteins in the cell migration. Thus, both Gi/Go-proteins and G12/G13-proteins might cooperatively regulate the cell migration activity. In the previous study, S1P has been shown to stimulate migration of T-lymphoma (15) similar to the S1P receptor-transfected CHO cells but conversely to inhibit migration of smooth muscle cells, neutrophils, and melanoma cells (2, 13). This cell type-dependent discrepancy in S1P effects on cell migration is intriguing. The difference in the expression of the S1P receptor subtype might be responsible for the opposite direction of the response to S1P. This deserves further investigation in a future study.

At the present stage of investigation, AGR16 and Edg-1 have been identified from rat and AGR16, Edg-1, and Edg-3 from human. In the present study, we used rat AGR16, rat Edg-1, and human Edg-3. Therefore, it is not completely excluded that the difference in the intrinsic activity of the receptor subtype to regulate the several signaling pathways might in part reflect the differences in the animal species. However, the amino acid sequence is very similar between rat and human; the homology is 92 and 90% overall in the coding region of Edg-1 and AGR16, respectively (16, 29, 30). In a future study, the intrinsic activity should be compared within the receptors from the same animal species. In this way, we could know the portion or domain within the receptor that is important for the regulation of the respective signaling pathway by transfection experiments using the chimera and mutated receptors.

Last but not least, in the present study each S1P receptor subtype was expressed in the CHO cells that were expressing many types of cell surface receptors including one of the S1P-receptor, AGR16. The interaction or synergism between more than two receptors is one mode of signaling mechanism for some extracellular ligands including ATP and adenosine (40, 41). Thus, there might be the interaction between the transfected receptors and the endogenous S1P receptors, which might result in the modification of the intrinsic activity of the transfected receptor, although such a cross-talk mechanism has not yet been reported in the case of the S1P receptors. Therefore, to evaluate a more accurate intrinsic activity of the respective S1P receptor subtype for the regulation of a specific signaling pathway, similar experiments may be necessary in the cells that are not expressing endogenous S1P receptors in a future study.

In conclusion, the putative S1P receptors that have recently been identified may couple to the PLC-Ca2+ system, adenylyl cyclase-cAMP system, and actin rearrangement-cell motility system through PTX-sensitive and -insensitive G-proteins in a manner selective to their subtype.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Yoko Shimoda for her dedicated help during the preparation of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by a research grant from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan and a research grant from Taisho Pharmaceuticals.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-27-220-8850; Fax: 81-27-220-8895; E-mail: fokajima@news.sb.gunma-u.ac.jp.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: S1P, sphingosine 1-phosphate; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; PTX, pertussis toxin; [Ca2+]i, cytoplasmic-free Ca2+ concentration; PLC, phospholipase C; G-protein, GTP-binding regulatory protein; IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine; IP1, inositol monophosphate; IP2, inositol bisphosphate; IP3, inositol trisphosphate; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; GTPgamma S, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Spiegel, S., and Merrill, A. H. J. (1996) FASEB J. 10, 1388-1397[Abstract]
2. Igarashi, Y. (1997) J. Biochem. 122, 1080-1087[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Olivera, A., and Spiegel, S. (1993) Nature 365, 557-560[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Ghosh, T. K., Bian, J., and Gill, D. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 22628-22635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Mattie, M., Brooker, G., and Spiegel, S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3181-3188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Goodemote, K. A., Mattie, M. E., Berger, A., and Spiegel, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10272-10277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Okajima, F., Tomura, H., Sho, K., Nochi, H., Tamoto, K., and Kondo, Y. (1996) FEBS Lett. 379, 260-264[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Im, D. S., Fujioka, T., Katada, T., Kondo, Y., Ui, M., and Okajima, F. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, G1091-G1099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Okajima, F., Tomura, H., Sho, K., Kimura, T., Sato, K., Im, D. S., Akbar, M., and Kondo, Y. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 220-229[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. van Koppen, C., Meyer zu Heringdorf, D., Laser, K. T., Zhang, C., Jakobs, K. H., Bunemann, M., and Pott, L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2082-2087[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Meyer zu Heringdorf, D., van Koppen, C. J., Windorfer, B., Himmel, H. M., and Jakobs, K. H. (1996) Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 354, 397-403[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Yatomi, Y., Yamamura, S., Ruan, F., and Igarashi, Y. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5291-5297[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Bornfeldt, K. E., Graves, L. M., Raines, E. W., Igarashi, Y., Wayman, G., Yamamura, S., Yatomi, Y., Sidhu, J. S., Krebs, E. G., Hakomori, S., and Ross, R. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 193-206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Postma, F. R., Jalink, K., Hengeveld, T., and Moolenaar, W. H. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 2388-2392[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Stam, J. C., Michiels, F., van der Kammen, R. A., Moolenaar, W. H., and Collard, J. G. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4066-4074[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Hla, T., and Maciag, T. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 9308-9313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. An, S., Bleu, T., Huang, W., Hallmark, O. G., Coughlin, S. R., and Goetzl, E. J. (1997) FEBS Lett. 417, 279-282[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Zondag, G. C. M., Postma, F. R., van Etten, I., Verlaan, I., and Moolenaar, W. H. (1998) Biochem. J. 330, 605-609
19. Lee, M.-J., Van Brocklyn, J. R., Thangada, S., Lui, C. H., Hand, A. R., Menzeleev, R., Spiegel, S., and Hla, T. (1998) Science 279, 1552-1555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Okamoto, H., Takuwa, N., Gonda, K., Okazaki, H., Chang, K., Yatomi, Y., Shigematsu, H., and Takuwa, Y. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 27104-27110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Sato, K., Kon, J., Tomura, H., Osada, M., Murata, N., Kuwabara, A., Watanabe, T., Ohta, H., Ui, M., and Okajima, F. (1999) FEBS Lett 443, 25-30[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Van Brocklyn, J. R., Lee, M. J., Menzeleev, R., Olivera, A., Edsall, L., Cuvillier, O., Thomas, D. M., Coopman, P. J., Thangada, S., Liu, C. H., Hla, T., and Spiegel, S. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 229-240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Gonda, K., Okamoto, H., Takuwa, N., Yatomi, Y., Okazaki, H., Sakurai, T., Kimura, S., Harii, K., and Takuwa, Y. (1999) Biochem. J. 337, 67-75
24. Okajima, F., Sho, K., and Kondo, Y. (1988) Endocrinology 123, 1035-1043[Abstract]
25. Okajima, F., and Kondo, Y. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26332-26340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Okajima, F., Sato, K., and Kondo, Y. (1989) FEBS Lett. 253, 132-136[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Sato, K., Tomura, H., Igarashi, Y., Ui, M., and Okajima, F. (1999) Mol. Pharmacol. 55, 126-133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Ohashi, H., Maruyama, K., Liu, Y. C., and Yoshimura, A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 158-162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Lado, D. C., Browe, C. S., Gaskin, A. A., Borden, J. M., and MacLennan, A. J. (1994) Gene 149, 331-336[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Okazaki, H., Ishizaka, N., Sakurai, T., Kurokawa, K., Goto, K., Kumada, M., and Takuwa, Y. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 190, 1104-1109[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. MacLennan, A. J., Browe, C. S., Gaskin, A. A., Lado, D. C., and Shaw, G. (1994) Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 5, 201-209[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Yamaguchi, F., Tokuda, M., Hatase, O., and Brenner, S. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 227, 608-614[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Taussig, R., Tang, W. J., Hepler, J. R., and Gilman, A. G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6093-6100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Sato, K., Tomura, H., Igarashi, Y., Ui, M., and Okajima, F. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 240, 329-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Uehata, M., Ishizaki, T., Satoh, H., Ono, T., Kawahara, T., Morishita, T., Tamakawa, H., Yamagami, K., Inui, J., Maekawa, M., and Narumiya, S. (1997) Nature 389, 990-994[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Yokomizo, T., Izumi, T., Chang, K., Takuwa, Y., and Shimizu, T. (1997) Nature 387, 620-624[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Sato, K., Murata, N., Kon, J., Tomura, H., Nochi, H., Tamoto, K., Osada, M., Ohta, H., Tokumitsu, Y., Ui, M., and Okajima, F. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 253, 253-256[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Moolenaar, W. H., Kranenburg, O., Postma, F. R., and Zondag, G. C. M. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 168-173[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Offermanns, S., Mancino, V., Revel, J. P., and Simon, M. I. (1997) Science 275, 533-536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Okajima, F., Sato, K., Nazarea, M., Sho, K., and Kondo, Y. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 13029-13037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Tomura, H., Itoh, H., Sho, K., Sato, K., Nagao, M., Ui, M., Kondo, Y., and Okajima, F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 23130-23137[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. K. Means, S. Miyamoto, J. Chun, and J. H. Brown
S1P1 Receptor Localization Confers Selectivity for Gi-mediated cAMP and Contractile Responses
J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2008; 283(18): 11954 - 11963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Gorshkova, D. He, E. Berdyshev, P. Usatuyk, M. Burns, S. Kalari, Y. Zhao, S. Pendyala, J. G. N. Garcia, N. J. Pyne, et al.
Protein Kinase C-{epsilon} Regulates Sphingosine 1-Phosphate-mediated Migration of Human Lung Endothelial Cells through Activation of Phospholipase D2, Protein Kinase C-{zeta}, and Rac1
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11794 - 11806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Damirin, H. Tomura, M. Komachi, J.-P. Liu, C. Mogi, M. Tobo, J.-Q. Wang, T. Kimura, A. Kuwabara, Y. Yamazaki, et al.
Role of lipoprotein-associated lysophospholipids in migratory activity of coronary artery smooth muscle cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2513 - H2522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. I. Jiang, J. Collins, R. Davis, K.-M. Lin, D. DeCamp, T. Roach, R. Hsueh, R. A. Rebres, E. M. Ross, R. Taussig, et al.
Use of a cAMP BRET Sensor to Characterize a Novel Regulation of cAMP by the Sphingosine 1-Phosphate/G13 Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., April 6, 2007; 282(14): 10576 - 10584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D.-J. Jun, J.-H. Lee, B.-H. Choi, T.-K. Koh, D.-C. Ha, M.-W. Jeong, and K.-T. Kim
Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Modulates Both Lipolysis and Leptin Production in Differentiated Rat White Adipocytes
Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5835 - 5844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. von Otte, J. R. J. Paletta, S. Becker, S. Konig, M. Fobker, R. R. Greb, L. Kiesel, G. Assmann, K. Diedrich, and J.-R. Nofer
Follicular Fluid High Density Lipoprotein-associated Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Is a Novel Mediator of Ovarian Angiogenesis
J. Biol. Chem., March 3, 2006; 281(9): 5398 - 5405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocrinology