![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 23940-23947, August 20, 1999
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
**
From the We examined the actions of sphingosine
1-phosphate (S1P) on signaling pathways in Chinese hamster ovary cells
transfected with putative S1P receptor subtypes, i.e.
Edg-1, AGR16/H218 (Edg-5), and Edg-3. Among these receptor-transfected
cells, there was no significant difference in the expressing numbers of
the S1P receptors and their affinities to S1P, which were estimated by
[3H]S1P binding to the cells. In vector-transfected
cells, S1P slightly increased cytosolic Ca2+ concentration
([Ca2+]i) in association with inositol phosphate
production, reflecting phospholipase C activation; the S1P-induced
actions were markedly enhanced in the Edg-3-transfected cells and
moderately so in the AGR16-transfected cells. In comparison with
vector-transfected cells, the S1P-induced [Ca2+]i
increase was also slightly enhanced in the Edg-1-transfected cells. In
all cases, the inositol phosphate and Ca2+ responses to S1P
were partially inhibited by pertussis toxin (PTX). S1P also
significantly increased cAMP content in a PTX-insensitive manner in all
the transfected cells; the rank order of their intrinsic activity of
S1P receptor subtypes was AGR16 > Edg-3 > Edg-1. In the
presence of forskolin, however, S1P significantly inhibited cAMP
accumulation at a lower concentration (1-100 nM) of S1P in a manner sensitive to PTX in the Edg-1-transfected cells but not in
either the Edg-3 or AGR16-transfected cells. As for cell migration activity evaluated by cell number across the filter of blind Boyden chamber, Edg-1 and Edg-3 were equally potent, but AGR16 was
ineffective. Thus, S1P receptors may couple to both PTX-sensitive and
-insensitive G-proteins, resulting in the selective regulation of the
phospholipase C-Ca2+ system, adenylyl cyclase-cAMP system,
and cell migration activity, according to the receptor subtype.
Sphingosine 1-phosphate
(S1P),1 one of the
sphingolipid metabolites, has recently been suggested to affect a
variety of cellular processes (1, 2). These cellular responses elicited
by S1P have first been ascribed to the intracellular action of the
lipid, because S1P accumulated in the cells in response to some kinds of cytokines, and moreover, S1P induced Ca2+ mobilization
in a cell-free system (3-5). On the other hand, these S1P-induced
responses are also accompanied by the stimulation of several early
signaling events that are usually regulated by cell-surface receptors.
These signaling events include activation of PLC (6-9), an increase in
[Ca2+]i (10-12), regulation of adenylyl cyclase
(6, 9, 10, 13), and Rho activation (14, 15). The presence of the latter
mechanism has been supported by the recent identification of several
cDNAs encoding G-protein-coupled receptors for S1P, i.e.
Edg-1, AGR16/H218, and Edg-3 (16-23).
The transfection experiments of these S1P receptor subtypes
demonstrated that these putative S1P receptors can actually couple to
multiple signaling pathways. For example, transfection of Edg-1 induced
the inhibition of cAMP accumulation in HEK293 cells (22), Sf9
cells (18), and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells (20), extracellular
signal-regulated kinase activation in COS-1 cells (19), COS-7 cells
(18), and CHO cells (20), and activation of Rho, resulting in a
morphological change in HEK293 cells (19, 22). The transfection of
Edg-1 also caused activation of PLC and
[Ca2+]i increase in CHO cells and HEL
cells (20), although the overexpression of Edg-1 in HEK293 cells and in
Sf9 cells failed to affect the S1P-induced activation of
PLC-Ca2+ system (18, 22). The expression of Edg-3 and AGR16
resulted in the activation of a serum response element-driven
transcriptional reporter gene in Jurkat cells and the stimulation of
Ca2+ flux in Xenopus oocytes in response to S1P
(17). Coupling of Edg-3 (21) and AGR16 (23) to the Ca2+
signaling has recently been confirmed in CHO cells and K562 cells.
Thus, the previous transfection experiments suggest the involvement of
these putative S1P receptor subtypes in the regulation of multiple
signaling pathways. However, in these experiments, the responses to S1P
were observed in the different species of cells, and the receptor
numbers expressed in the cells have not always been estimated. Thus, it
is difficult to evaluate and compare the intrinsic activity of the
respective receptor subtype to regulate a specific signaling pathway
from the previous transfection experiments. In the present study, we
prepared the CHO cells that permanently express the respective S1P
receptor subtype to a comparable level. This made it possible to
compare their intrinsic activity to regulate the respective signaling
pathway. Our data suggested that S1P selectively regulates multiple
signaling pathways according to the receptor subtype.
Materials--
1-Oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate
(lysophosphatidic acid) and
D-erythro-sphingosine were purchased from Sigma;
sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) was purchased from Cayman Chemical Co.;
sphingosylphosphorylcholine was purchased from Biomol Research
Laboratories, Inc.; Fura 2/AM was purchased from Dojindo (Tokyo); and
myo-[2-3H]inositol (23.0 Ci/mmol) and
[3H]sphingosine (20.0 Ci/mmol) were purchased from
American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc. U73122 was generously provided by
the The Upjohn Co. [3H]S1P was enzymatically synthesized
from [3H]sphingosine by sphingosine kinase-catalyzed
phosphorylation as described previously (12). [3H]S1P was
separated on silica gel 60 high performance thin-layer chromatography
plates (Merck) in a solvent system of butanol-water-acetic acid
(3:1:1). By this method, we could obtain [3H]S1P with the
same specific activity as the labeled sphingosine. The sources of all
other reagents were the same as described previously (21, 24-27)
Cell Cultures--
CHO cells that had been transfected with the
pEFneo empty vector (28) or a pEFneo S1P receptor expression vector
were cultured in DMEM containing 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (Life
Technologies, Inc.) in a humidified air/CO2 (19:1)
atmosphere. The cells were maintained on 10-cm dishes for inositol
phosphate response,
[Ca2+]i response, and
adenylyl cyclase activity and on 12-multiplates for measurements of
cAMP content and S1P receptor binding unless otherwise specified.
Twenty-four h before the experiments, the medium was changed to fresh
DMEM (without serum) containing 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin
(fraction V). In the case of the inositol phosphate response, the
medium was changed to the inositol-free DMEM containing 20 µCi of
[3H]inositol (in 6 ml) and 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum
albumin (fraction V). PTX treatment of the cells was performed by
adding the toxin (100 ng/ml) to the medium 24 h before the
experiments. Unless otherwise specified, the cells were harvested from
the dishes and used in suspension for inositol phosphate and
Ca2+ responses, and the cells attached to the plates
without cell harvest were used for the cAMP response and S1P receptor binding.
Isolation of cDNAs for S1P Receptors and Construction of
Expression Plasmid--
-The cDNAs for putative S1P receptors were
cloned by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for Edg-1
(29) and AGR16 (30) (H218, an almost identical cDNA to AGR16,
differs from AGR16 in only 2 nucleotides but has the same amino acid
sequence (31)) from the total RNA of rat brain. Edg-3 (32) was cloned from the total RNA of HEK 293 cells as described previously (21). The
5' primers contain a restriction enzyme site (HindIII or
EcoRI) and a Kozak sequence (CCACC) before the N-terminal
region of receptor proteins. The 3' primers contained a restriction
enzyme site (XbaI) and a stop codon in addition to the
C-terminal region of the receptor proteins. The amplified fragments
were digested with the restriction enzymes as described above and put
in the pBluescript II plasmids (Stratagene), and the DNA sequence was checked.
To construct the S1P receptor expression plasmid, the amplified
fragment was inserted into the EcoRI/XbaI site of
the pEFneo expression plasmid for Edg-3 and into the
HindIII/XbaI site of pEFneo expression plasmid
for Edg-1 and AGR16. Of the three types of the putative S1P receptors,
the wild type CHO cells expressed the mRNA of AGR16 (30) at 3.1 kilobases but not Edg-3 or Edg-1 (their expected size is 2.8 kilobases
for Edg-3 (32) and 3.0 kilobases for Edg-1 (31)) (21). The CHO cells
were transfected with pEFneo empty vector alone or the pEFneo vector
containing Edg-1, AGR16, or Edg-3, and the neomycin (G418 sulfate at 1 mg/ml)-resistant cells were selected. We prepared three batches of CHO
cells that were transfected with the empty vector or the respective
receptor subtype cDNA. Since there was no appreciable difference in
the amount of expression of S1P receptor transcript at around 1.8 kilobases between three batches of transfected cells regardless of the
receptor subtype, all the data presented in the present study were from
one batch of transfected cells. As shown in Fig. 1, there was no
significant difference in the number of S1P binding to the cells among
these receptor cDNA-transfected cells.
Measurement of S1P Receptor Binding--
This was performed by
the methods slightly modified from those previously described (19). The
cells were washed twice with an ice-cold Tris-buffered medium
consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM
NaCl, 15 mM NaF, and 0.4% (w/v) bovine serum albumin
(fraction V). The medium was replaced with a fresh medium containing
[3H]S1P at 3.125 to 100 nM. The plates were
kept on ice for 30 min, and the cells were then washed twice with the
same ice-cold medium to remove the unbounded ligand. The cells were
solubilized with a cell-solubilizing solution composed of 0.1% SDS,
0.4% NaOH, and 2% Na2CO3, and the
radioactivity was counted. The specific S1P binding to its receptor was
estimated by subtracting the radioactivity in the presence of 10 µM unlabeled S1P.
Measurement of [3H]Inositol Phosphate
Production--
The [3H]inositol-labeled cells were
harvested from the 10-cm dishes with trypsin (0.05% in
phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.53 mM EDTA) and
washed by sedimentation (250 × g x 5 min) and resuspension in the Hepes-buffered medium. The Hepes-buffered medium
consisted of 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 134 mM NaCl,
4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM
KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 2 mM CaCl2, 2.5 mM
NaHCO3, 5 mM glucose, and 0.1% (w/v) bovine
serum albumin (fraction V). The washing procedure was repeated, and the
cells were finally resuspended in the same medium. Unless otherwise
specified, the cells (about 5 × 106 cells) were
preincubated for 5 min with 10 mM LiCl in polypropylene vials (20 ml) in a final volume of 2.0 ml. The test agents (×10) were
then added to the medium, and the cells were further incubated for the
indicated time. The cell suspension (0.5 ml) in triplicate was
transferred to tubes containing 1 ml of
CHCl3/CH3OH/HCl (100:100:1). [3H]-Labeled respective inositol phosphate including
IP1, IP2, and IP3 was separated as
described previously (24). Where indicated, the results were normalized
to 105 dpm of the total radioactivity incorporated into the
cellular inositol lipids. The radioactivity of the trichloroacetic acid (5%)-insoluble fraction was measured as the total radioactivity.
Measurement of [Ca2+]i--
The cells were harvested from the dishes with trypsin as described
above, and then [Ca2+]i was measured
as described previously (21).
Accumulation of cAMP in Intact Cells--
The cells were washed
once and preincubated for 10 min at 37 °C in the Hepes-buffered
medium. The cells were then incubated with test agents in the presence
of 0.5 mM IBMX to estimate the stimulatory activity of
adenylyl cyclase (Fig. 6) or in the presence of 0.5 mM IBMX
and 10 µM forskolin to estimate the inhibitory activity
of adenylyl cyclase (Fig. 5). After a 10-min incubation, the reaction
was terminated by adding 100 µl of 1 N HCl. Cyclic AMP in
the acid extracts was measured as described previously (9).
Adenylyl Cyclase Activity in Cell-free System--
Crude
membranes were prepared as described previously (26). Briefly, the CHO
cells transfected with the respective S1P receptor were harvested from
the dishes and washed once with phosphate-buffered saline. The cells
were suspended in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4) containing 50 mM sucrose, 1 mM EGTA, and 2 µg/ml aprotinin,
then homogenized in a Physcotron homogenizer (NS-310E, Niti-on, Tokyo,
Japan) for 30 s, and centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was recentrifuged at 10,000 × g
for 10 min, and the resultant pellet was used as crude plasma
membranes. These membrane preparations (around 15 µg) were incubated
37 °C for 10 min with 10 nM GTP Cell Migration--
The migration of cells were quantified using
a blind Boyden chamber apparatus (Neuro Probe Inc., Gaithersburg, MD)
as described previously (13). Briefly, the lower well of the chamber
was filled with DMEM containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (fraction V)
with the indicated concentration of S1P. The wells were subsequently covered with a polyvinylpyrrolidone-free filter with 8-mm pores (Neuro
Probe) that were precoated for 72 h at 4 °C with 100 µg/ml type I collagen (Vitrogen; Collagen Corp., Palo Alto, CA). The cells
were trypsinized, washed once in DMEM containing 0.1% bovine serum
albumin (fraction V), and resuspended. Cells (3 × 104
cells in 50 µl) were then loaded into the upper wells of the Boyden
chamber. Migration was allowed to proceed for 4 h at 37 °C
under a humidified air/CO2 (19:1) atmosphere. Cells
remaining on the upper surface of the filters were mechanically
removed, and then filters were fixed in methanol and stained with
Diff-Quik Solution II. The number of cells that had migrated to the
lower surface was determined by counting under microscopy at ×400 magnification.
Data Presentation--
All experiments were performed in
duplicate or triplicate. The results of multiple observations were
presented as the mean of two separate experiments or means ±S.E. of at
least three separate experiments unless otherwise stated.
Expression of a Comparable Amount of S1P Receptors in CHO Cells
Transfected with the Respective S1P Receptor Subtype--
In Fig.
1, S1P binding activity was measured in
the respective S1P receptor subtype-transfected cells. In the control
(empty vector-transfected) cells, only a small S1P binding activity was detected (Fig. 1A), and there was no significant correlation
between B and B/F in the Scatchard plot (Fig. 1B). Since
AGR16 mRNA expression is detected in the native CHO cells (27), the
small binding activity might reflect binding to the endogenous S1P
receptor. It should be noted, however, that in this experiment we used
intact cells to lower the nonspecific binding due to the lipophilic
nature of the lipid (19). Therefore, we could not discriminate the activity of the ligand uptake into the cells from the binding to the
cell-surface receptors even though the experiments were performed on
ice to lower the ligand uptake. On the other hand, in the cells
transfected with receptor cDNAs, the apparent specific S1P binding
activity was clearly increased (Fig. 1A), and significant correlation was observed between B and B/F in the Scatchard plot regardless of the receptor subtypes (Fig. 1,
C--E). There were no appreciable differences in
the maximal binding activity (4.25~5.69 pmol/mg) and
Kd values (13.2~26.2 nM) among these
receptor-transfected cells. These results suggest that a comparable
number of S1P receptors with similar affinity to the ligand is
expressed in these receptor subtype-transfected cells.
Activation of PLC-Ca2+ System by Edg-3 and
AGR16--
Consistent with the previous study (21), the S1P-induced
accumulation of inositol phosphate was remarkable in the
Edg-3-transfected cells (Figs. 2,
left panels and 3D). The AGR16-transfected cells (Figs. 2, left panels and 3B), but not
Edg-1-transfected cells (Figs. 2, left panels and
3C), also displayed a higher ability than the
vector-transfected cells to produce inositol phosphate in response to
S1P. The difference in the inositol phosphate response is specific to
S1P; the response to UTP, a P2 purinergic agonist, was
hardly affected by the transfection of any receptor subtype (Fig. 2,
right panels). PTX treatment suppressed by 50~80% the S1P
action (Fig. 3). Thus, for the intrinsic
activity to activate PLC, Edg-3 was the highest followed by AGR16, and
a significant effect was not detected by Edg-1.
The activation of PLC is usually accompanied by an increase in
[Ca2+]i. As expected from the
inositol phosphate response, S1P induced a small but significant
[Ca2+]i increase in the vector-transfected cells,
possibly through endogenous S1P receptors (Fig.
4A). The S1P-induced increase in [Ca2+]i was markedly enhanced in the
Edg-3-transfected cells (Fig. 4D) and moderately so in the
AGR16-transfected cells (Fig. 4B). In this case, the
S1P-induced [Ca2+]i increase was slightly higher
in the Edg-1-transfected cells (Fig. 4C) than in the
vector-transfected cells (Fig. 4A). The change in the
Ca2+ response was specific to S1P, as evidenced by the
observation that the lysophosphatidic acid-induced action was hardly
affected by any receptor transfection (Fig. 4E). PTX
treatment partially suppressed the S1P-induced actions in all
cases.
Regulation of Adenylyl Cyclase by S1P Receptor Subtypes--
To
estimate the activity of adenylyl cyclase in intact cells, the change
in cAMP content was measured in the presence of IBMX, a potent
inhibitor of phosphodiesterase. In the experiments shown in Fig.
5, forskolin, an activator of adenylyl
cyclase, was also supplemented in the incubation medium to evaluate the
inhibitory ability of S1P against adenylyl cyclase. In the
vector-transfected cells, S1P had no significant effect at less than
100 nM S1P but significantly inhibited it at more than 1 µM (Fig. 5A). This inhibitory action was
completely reversed by the treatment of the cells with PTX (Fig.
5A), suggesting the
Gi/Go-protein-mediated action. When the cells
were transfected with the respective receptor subtype, the pattern of
the cAMP response to S1P was changed in a manner specific to each
receptor. At the concentration lower than 100 nM S1P, where
the lipid exerted no detectable effect on forskolin-induced cAMP
accumulation in the control vector-transfected cells, S1P slightly
enhanced it in the AGR16-transfected cells (Fig. 5B), conversely inhibited it in the Edg-1-transfected cells (Fig.
5C), and exerted no apparent effect in the Edg-3-transfected
cells (Fig. 5D). The inhibitory effect of S1P at lower
concentration (1-100 nM) in the Edg-1-transfected cells
was reversed by PTX treatment (Fig. 5C). This suggests the
coupling of Edg-1 to Gi/Go-proteins, resulting
in the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. At concentrations of S1P higher
than 1 µM, the lipid-induced inhibitory action was apparently attenuated in both cells expressing AGR16 or Edg-3 (Fig. 5,
B and D). Interestingly, in AGR16- and also
Edg-3-transfected cells, which were treated with PTX, the cAMP level
was significantly increased by increasing the concentration of S1P
(Fig. 5, B and D).
We next examined the ability of the respective receptor subtype to
stimulate adenylyl cyclase. For this purpose, the experiments were done
without forskolin addition (Fig. 6).
Under these conditions, S1P hardly changed the cAMP level in
vector-transfected cells, but its level significantly increased in
response to S1P in all the cells transfected with the receptor subtype.
The cAMP level increased around 2 times in the Edg-1-transfected cells
(Fig. 6C) and roughly 10 times both in the AGR16- and
Edg-3-transfected cells in response to 10 µM S1P (Fig. 6,
B and D). However, at lower concentrations of S1P
of less than 100 nM, the S1P-induced cAMP accumulation was
higher in AGR16-transfected cells than Edg-3-transfected cells (Fig. 6,
B and D). PTX did not exert an appreciable effect on the stimulatory action of S1P on cAMP accumulation in all the cases.
This striking stimulatory action on the adenylyl cyclase in the cells
expressing AGR16 or Edg-3 might partly account for the disappearance of
the inhibitory action of S1P (Fig. 5).
It has been reported that adenylyl cyclase activation is in some cases
regulated secondarily to the change in Ca2+ signaling (33).
As shown in Fig. 7, the PLC inhibitor
alone significantly increased the cAMP content by an unidentified
mechanism, but the net S1P-induced cAMP accumulation was not
appreciably affected by the enzyme inhibitor. Under these conditions,
the S1P-induced [Ca2+]i increase was inhibited by
more than 80% (21). Thus, it is unlikely that the S1P-induced
activation of the PLC-Ca2+ system may be responsible for
the lipid-induced cAMP accumulation.
To further provide more direct evidence that the S1P receptor itself is
coupled to the adenylyl cyclase system, we measured the enzyme activity
in a cell-free system in Fig. 8. Compared with the results in intact cells, S1P effect was small, but the lipid
significantly increased adenylyl cyclase activity in the presence of
GTP Stimulation of Cell Migration by Edg-1 and Edg-3--
S1P has been
reported to induce the change in cell morphology and cell motility (2,
13-15, 19, 22, 34, 35). Here, we measured the activity of cell
migration by a blind Boyden chamber method (Fig.
9A). For the vector- and
AGR16-transfected CHO cells, S1P was ineffective in stimulating cell
migration as determined by cell number across the filter of a Boyden
chamber. However, S1P at 1-10 nM stimulated the migration
activity of the Edg-1- and Edg-3-transfected cells. At concentrations
higher than 100 nM, however, S1P lost its activity. The
bell shape migration pattern has also been observed for other
chemoattractants (36). The treatment of the cells with PTX markedly
suppressed not only the S1P-induced action but also the basal activity
without S1P (Fig. 9, B and C).
In the present study, we compared the intrinsic activity of the
putative S1P receptors, i.e. Edg-1, AGR16, and Edg-3 to
induce activation of PLC-Ca2+ system, inhibition of
adenylyl cyclase, stimulation of adenylyl cyclase, and stimulation of
cell migration activity in CHO cells that permanently express the
respective S1P receptor subtype to a comparable level. Results are
summarized in Table I.
One of the universal actions of S1P is the activation of PLC and the
subsequent increase in [Ca2+]i (6-12), although
the involvement of PLC in the [Ca2+]i increase
has not always been demonstrated (6, 10-12). Actually, transfection of
Edg-1 (20), AGR16 (23), or Edg-3 (21) has been reported to enhance the
S1P-induced activation of PLC and/or [Ca2+]i
increase. Thus, all the putative S1P receptors have the potential to
activate the PLC-Ca2+ system. However, the present study
revealed that, in CHO cells expressing an almost equal number of S1P
receptors, the intrinsic activity to activate the PLC-Ca2+
system varied in a manner specific to the subtype, i.e.
their order being Edg-3 > AGR16 > Edg-1. We detected a
small but significant enhancement of the S1P-induced
[Ca2+]i increase in the Edg-1-expressing cells
(Fig. 4) without a significant effect for the inositol phosphate
response (Figs. 2 and 3). The failure of the Edg-1 effect on the
inositol phosphate response might simply reflect a lower sensitivity
for the detection of the PLC assay compared with the
[Ca2+]i measurement. Alternatively, it might
indicate the existence of the inositol phosphate-independent mechanism
for [Ca2+]i increase. In other cell types,
however, the overexpression of Edg-1 failed to stimulate
Ca2+ signaling (18, 22). Thus, Edg-1 has a potential
activity to couple to the Ca2+ signaling, but its intrinsic
activity is very small compared with Edg-3 or AGR16, and hence this
receptor subtype might not be important for the regulation of the
Ca2+ signaling in the native cells.
We have recently found that only Edg-3 mRNA expression was detected
among three types of S1P receptors in undifferentiated HL-60 cells, and
its expression was down-regulated in association with the attenuation
of the S1P-induced Ca2+ response during differentiation of
the cells (37). This suggests that Edg-3 may couple to the
PLC-Ca2+ system in HL-60 cells. In the native CHO cells,
mRNA expression of AGR16, but neither Edg-1 or Edg-3, was detected
(27). Similarly, in FRTL-5 cells, we detected only AGR16 mRNA
expression (data not shown). In these cells, S1P seemed to increase
[Ca2+]i depending on PLC activation (9, 21).
Thus, both Edg-3 and AGR16 may be involved in the S1P-induced
activation of the PLC-Ca2+ system in the native cells as
well. S1P-induced PLC activation and [Ca2+]i
increase have, in most cases, been reported to be attenuated by PTX
treatment in native cells (6, 7, 10, 11). Similarly, the S1P-induced
actions in the present study were also partially suppressed by PTX
treatment (Figs. 3 and 4). Although the complete ADP-ribosylation of
Gi/Go-proteins was not proven by the PTX
treatment employed in the present study, the inhibitory action of S1P
on the forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation was completely reversed
(Fig. 5). This suggests that the function of
Gi/Go-proteins may be lost under these
conditions. On the other hand, the stimulatory action of S1P on cAMP
accumulation was unaltered by the toxin treatment (Fig. 6), excluding
the possible nonspecific toxic action of PTX. Thus, Edg-3 and AGR16 may
couple to both PTX-sensitive Gi/Go-proteins and
probably, the toxin-insensitive Gq/G11-proteins, resulting in the activation of
PLC and the subsequent Ca2+ mobilization from the
intracellular pool.
Consistent with the previous results (18, 20, 22), Edg-1 may couple to
the inhibitory adenylyl cyclase system through PTX-sensitive
Gi/Go-proteins (Fig. 5). On the other hand, we
could not detect the inhibitory action of S1P in either the Edg-3- or the AGR16-expressing cells, in which S1P elicited a rather stimulatory action on cAMP accumulation (Fig. 6). However, the cAMP level was
significantly higher in PTX-treated cells at lower concentrations of
less than 100 nM S1P (Fig. 5, B and
D), suggesting that the inhibitory S1P action was masked by
the stimulatory S1P action in the cells not treated with PTX. In
relation to this, it should be noted that in the native CHO cells, only
AGR16 mRNA expression was detected among three types of the
putative S1P receptor (27). Therefore, the inhibition of cAMP
accumulation by higher concentrations (more than 1 µM) of
S1P, which was observed in the vector-transfected cells (Fig. 5), might
be mediated by the endogenous AGR16. Further experiments are necessary
to define conclusively the ability of Edg-3 and AGR16 to couple to the
inhibitory adenylyl cyclase system.
In addition to the inhibitory action on cAMP accumulation, S1P has in
some cases been reported to stimulate cAMP accumulation reflecting
activation of adenylyl cyclase, especially in smooth muscle cells (13).
The order of the intrinsic activity of the stimulatory action on cAMP
accumulation in the present receptor subtype-transfected cell system
was AGR16 > Edg-3 > Edg-1. It is unlikely that the
activation of adenylyl cyclase was the secondary action of the
lipid-induced activation of PLC-Ca2+ system (Fig. 7).
Actually, at least a part of the cAMP response may reflect the lipid
receptor/Gs-protein-mediated activation of adenylyl cyclase
as evidenced by the guanine nucleotide-dependent activation
of the enzyme by S1P in a cell-free system (Fig. 8). However, we cannot
completely rule out the possibility that S1P activated the enzyme
partly through the production of autocrine stimulators such as
prostaglandin in intact cells.
Finally, we evaluated the ability of the respective S1P receptor
subtype to migrate the cells. Transfection of Edg-1 or Edg-3 into the
CHO cells stimulated cell migration in response to S1P, whereas neither
the vector nor AGR16 transfection appreciably affected the migration
activity. Although the signaling mechanisms involved in the cell
migration have not been well characterized, disassembly and assembly of
actin filament may be involved in this process. The receptor-mediated
rearrangement of actin filament has been shown to involve the
G12/G13 family of G-proteins and the Rho family
of small G-proteins (14, 15, 38, 39). In the present study, the
S1P-induced action was markedly suppressed by PTX treatment. In this
case, the basal activity was also suppressed by the toxin treatment
(Fig. 9), suggesting that Gi/Go-proteins might
be absolutely necessary for the induction of cell migration. However,
this result never rules out the possible involvement of
G12/G13-proteins in the cell migration. Thus,
both Gi/Go-proteins and
G12/G13-proteins might cooperatively regulate
the cell migration activity. In the previous study, S1P has been shown
to stimulate migration of T-lymphoma (15) similar to the S1P
receptor-transfected CHO cells but conversely to inhibit migration of
smooth muscle cells, neutrophils, and melanoma cells (2, 13). This cell type-dependent discrepancy in S1P effects on cell migration
is intriguing. The difference in the expression of the S1P receptor subtype might be responsible for the opposite direction of the response
to S1P. This deserves further investigation in a future study.
At the present stage of investigation, AGR16 and Edg-1 have been
identified from rat and AGR16, Edg-1, and Edg-3 from human. In the
present study, we used rat AGR16, rat Edg-1, and human Edg-3.
Therefore, it is not completely excluded that the difference in the
intrinsic activity of the receptor subtype to regulate the several
signaling pathways might in part reflect the differences in the animal
species. However, the amino acid sequence is very similar between rat
and human; the homology is 92 and 90% overall in the coding region of
Edg-1 and AGR16, respectively (16, 29, 30). In a future study, the
intrinsic activity should be compared within the receptors from the
same animal species. In this way, we could know the portion or domain
within the receptor that is important for the regulation of the
respective signaling pathway by transfection experiments using the
chimera and mutated receptors.
Last but not least, in the present study each S1P receptor subtype was
expressed in the CHO cells that were expressing many types of cell
surface receptors including one of the S1P-receptor, AGR16. The
interaction or synergism between more than two receptors is one mode of
signaling mechanism for some extracellular ligands including ATP and
adenosine (40, 41). Thus, there might be the interaction between the
transfected receptors and the endogenous S1P receptors, which might
result in the modification of the intrinsic activity of the transfected
receptor, although such a cross-talk mechanism has not yet been
reported in the case of the S1P receptors. Therefore, to evaluate a
more accurate intrinsic activity of the respective S1P receptor subtype
for the regulation of a specific signaling pathway, similar experiments
may be necessary in the cells that are not expressing endogenous S1P
receptors in a future study.
In conclusion, the putative S1P receptors that have recently been
identified may couple to the PLC-Ca2+ system, adenylyl
cyclase-cAMP system, and actin rearrangement-cell motility system
through PTX-sensitive and -insensitive G-proteins in a manner selective
to their subtype.
We thank Yoko Shimoda for her dedicated help
during the preparation of the manuscript.
*
This work was supported in part by a research grant from the
Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan and a research grant from Taisho Pharmaceuticals.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-27-220-8850;
Fax: 81-27-220-8895; E-mail: fokajima@news.sb.gunma-u.ac.jp.
The abbreviations used are:
S1P, sphingosine
1-phosphate;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
PTX, pertussis toxin;
[Ca2+]i, cytoplasmic-free Ca2+
concentration;
PLC, phospholipase C;
G-protein, GTP-binding regulatory
protein;
IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine;
IP1, inositol
monophosphate;
IP2, inositol bisphosphate;
IP3, inositol trisphosphate;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
GTP
Laboratory of Signal Transduction,
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical
Science,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
S and/or 3 µM S1P in the same Hepes buffer containing 0.5 mM IBMX, 0.2 mM ATP, 7 mM
phosphocreatine, 30 units/ml creatine phosphokinase, 100 mM
NaCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.1% bovine serum
albumin (Fraction V) in a final volume of 200 µl. The reaction was
terminated by adding 50 µl of 1 N HCl and boiling for 1 min. Cyclic AMP in the acid extracts was measured as described above.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Estimation of the expression of S1P receptors
in CHO cells transfected with their cDNAs. In A,
the vector (
)-, AGR16 (
)-, Edg-1 (
)-, or Edg-3
(
)-transfected cells were incubated with the indicated
concentrations of [3H]S1P. The specific S1P binding was
plotted against the S1P concentration. In B-E,
Scatchard plots are shown; B/F is plotted against B, in which B is the
specific S1P binding (pmol/mg), and F is free (unbounded) S1P
concentration (nM). The maximal binding
(Bmax) and the binding dissociation constant
(Kd) of the respective receptor subtype,
i.e. AGR16 (C), Edg-1 (D), and Edg-3
(E) were estimated from the Scatchard plot. These values are
shown in the each panel except for vector-transfected cells
(B), because of no significant correlation between B and
B/F; the correlation coefficient was 0.08, 0.95, 0.86, and 0.93 in the
empty vector, AGR16, Edg-1, and Edg-3-transfected cells,
respectively.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Time courses of S1P and UTP to induce the
individual inositol phosphate production. The vector (
)-, AGR16
(
)-, Edg-1 (
)-, or Edg-3 (
)-transfected cells were prelabeled
with [3H]inositol and then harvested. The cells were
incubated in suspension for the indicated time in the absence or
presence of 1 µM S1P (left panels) or 100 µM UTP (right panels). The production of
IP1 (A and B), IP2
(C and D) and IP3 (E and
F) was measured. Results are expressed as percentages of the
initial values without test agents. Normalized initial values (dpm)
were 859 ± 8, 726 ± 22, 824 ± 26, and 833 ± 19 for IP1, 280 ± 10, 242 ± 2, 296 ± 18, and
289 ± 36 for IP2, and 293 ± 18, 220 ± 22, 208 ± 7, and 289 ± 16 for IP3 in the vector-,
AGR16-, Edg-1-, and Edg-3-transfected cells, respectively. These values
were not significantly changed during a 10-min incubation. Data are
means of two separate experiments.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Dose-dependent S1P-induced
inositol phosphate production. The vector (A)-, AGR16
(B)-, Edg-1 (C)-, or Edg-3
(D)-transfected cells were prelabeled with
[3H]inositol in the presence (
) or absence (
) of
PTX and were harvested from the dish. The cells were incubated in
suspension for 1 min with the indicated concentrations of S1P to
measure IP2 plus IP3 production. Other
experimental conditions were the same as those shown in Fig. 2. Results
are expressed as percentages of the basal values without test agents.
Normalized basal values (dpm) were 590 ± 42 and 654 ± 19 for vector, 518 ± 34 and 657 ± 12 for AGR16, 653 ± 32 and 626 ± 23 for Edg-1, and 628 ± 23 and 755 ± 29 for
Edg-3 in the control (not treated with PTX) cells and the toxin-treated
cells, respectively. Data are means ±S.E. of three separate
experiments.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effects of S1P and lysophosphatidic acid on
[Ca2+]i. The vector
(A)-, AGR16 (B)-, Edg-1 (C)-, or Edg-3
(D)-transfected cells were treated without (
) or with
(
) PTX and were harvested from the dish. The cells were incubated
with the indicated concentrations of S1P to monitor
[Ca2+]i. In E, the change in
[Ca2+]i induced by 1 µM
lysophosphatidic acid was monitored in these vector- or
receptor-transfected cells not treated with the toxin. The net
[Ca2+]i change (peak value
basal value) at
around 15 s was calculated. Data are means ±S.E. of three to four
separate experiments.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Inhibitory action of S1P on cAMP
accumulation. The vector (A)-, AGR16 (B)-,
Edg-1 (C)-, or Edg-3 (D)-transfected cells were
treated without (
) or with (
) PTX. The cells were then incubated
for 10 min with the indicated concentrations of S1P in the presence of
0.5 mM IBMX and 10 µM forskolin. Results are
expressed as cAMP contents (nmol/mg of protein). Data are means ±S.E.
of three to four separate experiments.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Stimulatory action of S1P on cAMP
accumulation. The vector (A)-, AGR16 (B)-,
Edg-1 (C)-, or Edg-3 (D)-transfected cells were
treated without (
) or with (
) PTX. The cells were then incubated
for 10 min with the indicated concentrations of S1P in the presence of
0.5 mM IBMX. Results are expressed as cAMP contents
(nmol/mg protein). Data are means ± S.E. of three to four
separate experiments.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Stimulatory S1P action on cAMP accumulation
is not secondary to the lipid-induced PLC activation. In this
experiment, the cells were harvested from the dishes like inositol
phosphate and Ca2+ experiments. The AGR16 (A)-
or Edg-3 (B)-transfected cells were incubated in suspension
for 2 min with U73122 (5 µM) or vehicle
(Me2SO (DMSO)) and then for another 10 min with
(hatched column) or without (open column) 1 µM S1P. Results are expressed as cAMP contents (nmol/mg
of protein). Data are means ±S.E. of six values from two separate
experiments.
S in membranes from receptor-transfected cells; the rank order of
the magnitude of the S1P-induced activity was roughly AGR16 > Edg-3 > Edg-1, which was comparable with that of the S1P-induced
cAMP accumulation in intact cells. Thus, the S1P receptor subtype may
couple to G-proteins, probably Gs, resulting in activation
of adenylyl cyclase.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Stimulation of adenylyl cyclase depending on
a guanine nucleotide in a cell-free system. The membrane
preparations were incubated for 10 min with or without 3 µM S1P and 10 nM GTP
S. The enzyme
activities (nmol/mg/10 min) in the absence of the guanine nucleotide
were 3.22 ± 0.14 and 2.74 ± 0.15 for vector, 2.43 ± 0.04 and 3.65 ± 0.19 for AGR16, 2.42 ± 0.17 and 2.85 ± 0.16 for Edg-1, and 2.56 ± 0.07 and 2.45 ± 0.08 for
Edg-3 in the absence and presence of S1P, respectively. Thus, there was
no significant effect of S1P in the absence of GTP
S except for
membranes prepared from AGR16-transfected cells, in which a small but
significant effect of S1P was observed, possibly due to the endogenous
guanine nucleotide. To evaluate the guanine
nucleotide-dependent activation of adenylyl cyclase, the
enzyme activation was induced by 10 nM GTP
S (the
difference in the activity with and without GTP
S) in the absence
(open column) or presence (hatched column) of
S1P. *, the effect of S1P was significant (p < 0.05).

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Dose-dependent effect of S1P on
cell migration. In A, the vector (
)-, AGR16 (
)-,
Edg-1 (
)-, or Edg-3 (
)-transfected cells were loaded into the
upper wells of the Boyden chamber, and cell migration activity for
4 h was measured. The lower wells were filled with the indicated
concentrations of S1P. In B (Edg-1) and C
(Edg-3), the cells were treated with or without PTX, and then cell
migration activity was monitored in the presence (hatched
column) or absence (open column) of 10 nM
S1P. The number of the cells migrating into the lower surface of the
membrane filter (per 0.60-mm2 field) were counted. Data are
means ±S.E. of three separate experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Comparison of intrinsic activities of the S1P receptor subtypes to
regulate PLC, adenylyl cyclase and cell migration
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
S, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Spiegel, S.,
and Merrill, A. H. J.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
1388-1397[Abstract]
2.
Igarashi, Y.
(1997)
J. Biochem.
122,
1080-1087 3.
Olivera, A.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1993)
Nature
365,
557-560[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Ghosh, T. K.,
Bian, J.,
and Gill, D. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
22628-22635 5.
Mattie, M.,
Brooker, G.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3181-3188 6.
Goodemote, K. A.,
Mattie, M. E.,
Berger, A.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10272-10277 7.
Okajima, F.,
Tomura, H.,
Sho, K.,
Nochi, H.,
Tamoto, K.,
and Kondo, Y.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
379,
260-264[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Im, D. S.,
Fujioka, T.,
Katada, T.,
Kondo, Y.,
Ui, M.,
and Okajima, F.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
G1091-G1099 9.
Okajima, F.,
Tomura, H.,
Sho, K.,
Kimura, T.,
Sato, K.,
Im, D. S.,
Akbar, M.,
and Kondo, Y.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
220-229 10.
van Koppen, C.,
Meyer zu Heringdorf, D.,
Laser, K. T.,
Zhang, C.,
Jakobs, K. H.,
Bunemann, M.,
and Pott, L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
2082-2087 11.
Meyer zu Heringdorf, D.,
van Koppen, C. J.,
Windorfer, B.,
Himmel, H. M.,
and Jakobs, K. H.
(1996)
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol.
354,
397-403[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Yatomi, Y.,
Yamamura, S.,
Ruan, F.,
and Igarashi, Y.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5291-5297 13.
Bornfeldt, K. E.,
Graves, L. M.,
Raines, E. W.,
Igarashi, Y.,
Wayman, G.,
Yamamura, S.,
Yatomi, Y.,
Sidhu, J. S.,
Krebs, E. G.,
Hakomori, S.,
and Ross, R.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
130,
193-206 14.
Postma, F. R.,
Jalink, K.,
Hengeveld, T.,
and Moolenaar, W. H.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2388-2392[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Stam, J. C.,
Michiels, F.,
van der Kammen, R. A.,
Moolenaar, W. H.,
and Collard, J. G.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4066-4074[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Hla, T.,
and Maciag, T.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
9308-9313 17.
An, S.,
Bleu, T.,
Huang, W.,
Hallmark, O. G.,
Coughlin, S. R.,
and Goetzl, E. J.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
417,
279-282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Zondag, G. C. M.,
Postma, F. R.,
van Etten, I.,
Verlaan, I.,
and Moolenaar, W. H.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
330,
605-609
19.
Lee, M.-J.,
Van Brocklyn, J. R.,
Thangada, S.,
Lui, C. H.,
Hand, A. R.,
Menzeleev, R.,
Spiegel, S.,
and Hla, T.
(1998)
Science
279,
1552-1555 20.
Okamoto, H.,
Takuwa, N.,
Gonda, K.,
Okazaki, H.,
Chang, K.,
Yatomi, Y.,
Shigematsu, H.,
and Takuwa, Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27104-27110 21.
Sato, K.,
Kon, J.,
Tomura, H.,
Osada, M.,
Murata, N.,
Kuwabara, A.,
Watanabe, T.,
Ohta, H.,
Ui, M.,
and Okajima, F.
(1999)
FEBS Lett
443,
25-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Van Brocklyn, J. R.,
Lee, M. J.,
Menzeleev, R.,
Olivera, A.,
Edsall, L.,
Cuvillier, O.,
Thomas, D. M.,
Coopman, P. J.,
Thangada, S.,
Liu, C. H.,
Hla, T.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
229-240 23.
Gonda, K.,
Okamoto, H.,
Takuwa, N.,
Yatomi, Y.,
Okazaki, H.,
Sakurai, T.,
Kimura, S.,
Harii, K.,
and Takuwa, Y.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
337,
67-75
24.
Okajima, F.,
Sho, K.,
and Kondo, Y.
(1988)
Endocrinology
123,
1035-1043[Abstract]
25.
Okajima, F.,
and Kondo, Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26332-26340 26.
Okajima, F.,
Sato, K.,
and Kondo, Y.
(1989)
FEBS Lett.
253,
132-136[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Sato, K.,
Tomura, H.,
Igarashi, Y.,
Ui, M.,
and Okajima, F.
(1999)
Mol. Pharmacol.
55,
126-133 28.
Ohashi, H.,
Maruyama, K.,
Liu, Y. C.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
158-162 29.
Lado, D. C.,
Browe, C. S.,
Gaskin, A. A.,
Borden, J. M.,
and MacLennan, A. J.
(1994)
Gene
149,
331-336[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Okazaki, H.,
Ishizaka, N.,
Sakurai, T.,
Kurokawa, K.,
Goto, K.,
Kumada, M.,
and Takuwa, Y.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
190,
1104-1109[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
MacLennan, A. J.,
Browe, C. S.,
Gaskin, A. A.,
Lado, D. C.,
and Shaw, G.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
5,
201-209[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Yamaguchi, F.,
Tokuda, M.,
Hatase, O.,
and Brenner, S.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
227,
608-614[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Taussig, R.,
Tang, W. J.,
Hepler, J. R.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
6093-6100 34.
Sato, K.,
Tomura, H.,
Igarashi, Y.,
Ui, M.,
and Okajima, F.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
240,
329-334[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Uehata, M.,
Ishizaki, T.,
Satoh, H.,
Ono, T.,
Kawahara, T.,
Morishita, T.,
Tamakawa, H.,
Yamagami, K.,
Inui, J.,
Maekawa, M.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1997)
Nature
389,
990-994[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Yokomizo, T.,
Izumi, T.,
Chang, K.,
Takuwa, Y.,
and Shimizu, T.
(1997)
Nature
387,
620-624[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Sato, K.,
Murata, N.,
Kon, J.,
Tomura, H.,
Nochi, H.,
Tamoto, K.,
Osada, M.,
Ohta, H.,
Tokumitsu, Y.,
Ui, M.,
and Okajima, F.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
253,
253-256[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Moolenaar, W. H.,
Kranenburg, O.,
Postma, F. R.,
and Zondag, G. C. M.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
168-173[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Offermanns, S.,
Mancino, V.,
Revel, J. P.,
and Simon, M. I.
(1997)
Science
275,
533-536 40.
Okajima, F.,
Sato, K.,
Nazarea, M.,
Sho, K.,
and Kondo, Y.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
13029-13037 41.
Tomura, H.,
Itoh, H.,
Sho, K.,
Sato, K.,
Nagao, M.,
Ui, M.,
Kondo, Y.,
and Okajima, F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
23130-23137
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. K. Means, S. Miyamoto, J. Chun, and J. H. Brown S1P1 Receptor Localization Confers Selectivity for Gi-mediated cAMP and Contractile Responses J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2008; 283(18): 11954 - 11963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Gorshkova, D. He, E. Berdyshev, P. Usatuyk, M. Burns, S. Kalari, Y. Zhao, S. Pendyala, J. G. N. Garcia, N. J. Pyne, et al. Protein Kinase C-{epsilon} Regulates Sphingosine 1-Phosphate-mediated Migration of Human Lung Endothelial Cells through Activation of Phospholipase D2, Protein Kinase C-{zeta}, and Rac1 J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11794 - 11806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Damirin, H. Tomura, M. Komachi, J.-P. Liu, C. Mogi, M. Tobo, J.-Q. Wang, T. Kimura, A. Kuwabara, Y. Yamazaki, et al. Role of lipoprotein-associated lysophospholipids in migratory activity of coronary artery smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2513 - H2522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Jiang, J. Collins, R. Davis, K.-M. Lin, D. DeCamp, T. Roach, R. Hsueh, R. A. Rebres, E. M. Ross, R. Taussig, et al. Use of a cAMP BRET Sensor to Characterize a Novel Regulation of cAMP by the Sphingosine 1-Phosphate/G13 Pathway J. Biol. Chem., April 6, 2007; 282(14): 10576 - 10584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-J. Jun, J.-H. Lee, B.-H. Choi, T.-K. Koh, D.-C. Ha, M.-W. Jeong, and K.-T. Kim Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Modulates Both Lipolysis and Leptin Production in Differentiated Rat White Adipocytes Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5835 - 5844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. von Otte, J. R. J. Paletta, S. Becker, S. Konig, M. Fobker, R. R. Greb, L. Kiesel, G. Assmann, K. Diedrich, and J.-R. Nofer Follicular Fluid High Density Lipoprotein-associated Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Is a Novel Mediator of Ovarian Angiogenesis J. Biol. Chem., March 3, 2006; 281(9): 5398 - 5405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|