![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 23956-23962, August 20, 1999
From the Medical Research Council of Canada Group in the Molecular
Biology of Membranes, Department of Biochemistry, University of
Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada
Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) participates in the
mitochondrial electron transport chain by oxidizing succinate to
fumarate and transferring the electrons to ubiquinone. In yeast, it is composed of a catalytic dimer, comprising the Sdh1p and Sdh2p subunits,
and a membrane domain, comprising two smaller hydrophobic subunits,
Sdh3p and Sdh4p, which anchor the enzyme to the mitochondrial inner
membrane. To investigate the role of the Sdh3p anchor polypeptide in
enzyme assembly and catalysis, we isolated and characterized seven
mutations in the SDH3 gene. Two mutations are premature truncations of Sdh3p with losses of one or three transmembrane segments. The remaining five are missense mutations that are clustered between amino acids 103 and 117, which are proposed to be located in
transmembrane segment II or the matrix-localized loop connecting segments II and III. Three mutations, F103V, H113Q, and W116R, strongly
but specifically impair quinone reductase activities but have only
minor effects on enzyme assembly. The clustering of the mutations
strongly suggests that a ubiquinone-binding site is associated with
this region of Sdh3p. In addition, the biphasic inhibition of quinone
reductase activity by a dinitrophenol inhibitor supports the hypothesis
that two distinct quinone-binding sites are present in the yeast
SDH.
The mitochondrial respiratory chain consists of four discrete
prosthetic group-containing protein complexes. One of these, the
succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex II or succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)1) donates
electrons derived from its substrate, succinate, to the respiratory
chain via the reduction of ubiquinone to ubiquinol. Generally, SDH is
made up of two parts: a soluble catalytic dimer and a membrane domain
(1-5). In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the catalytic
dimer is composed of the 67-kDa Sdh1p subunit, to which is attached a
covalent FAD cofactor (6-9), and the 28-kDa Sdh2p subunit (10), in
which are located three iron-sulfur clusters. The membrane-anchoring
domain is composed of the two hydrophobic subunits, Sdh3p and Sdh4p, of
16.7 and 16.6 kDa, respectively (11-13). Each subunit is believed to
have its amino terminus in the matrix and three transmembrane segments.
The catalytic dimer can catalyze electron transfer from succinate to
artificial electron acceptors, such as phenazine methosulfate (PMS),
but not to the physiological acceptor, ubiquinone. The presence of the
membrane domain anchors the catalytic dimer subunits to the inner
membrane, restores ubiquinone reductase activity, and renders the
enzyme sensitive to quinone analog inhibitors (1, 3). Thus, the
membrane domain is believed to contain at least one quinone-binding site.
In the bovine heart mitochondrial SDH, quinone binding has been
assigned to the QPs1 and QPs3 membrane domain subunits by cross-linking
with photoaffinity analogs of ubiquinone (14, 15). The quinone-binding
site in the QPs1 subunit, which corresponds to Sdh3p, is localized in
the matrix-facing loop connecting transmembrane segments II and III.
The quinone-binding domain in QPs3, which corresponds to Sdh4p, is
localized to the end of the first transmembrane segment toward the
cytosolic side of the membrane (15, 16). These results place the two
quinone-binding sites on opposite sides of the membrane, consistent
with a model formulated from inhibitor binding studies (17).
Recently, photoaffinity labeling identified a ubiquinone-binding site
in the Escherichia coli SdhC subunit, which corresponds to
Sdh3p, near the cytoplasmic end of the first transmembrane segment
(18). The site contains serine 27 and arginine 31, which are necessary
for succinate-ubiquinone reductase activity. It remains to be
determined whether a second ubiquinone-binding site is present.
The E. coli fumarate reductase, which uses electrons from
menaquinol to reduce fumarate to succinate, is structurally and catalytically similar to the succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductases (1-3, 5, 19). Mutagenesis and inhibitor studies suggest that it
contains two distinct quinone-binding sites, designated QA
and QB (17, 20). The QA site harbors a
nonexchangeable quinone that is the primary electron acceptor from the
iron-sulfur clusters in the catalytic dimer; it cycles between the
oxidized and the semiquinone states. The QA site
successively passes two electrons to the QB site, which
harbors an exchangeable quinone.
We have previously demonstrated the importance of residues 128-135 of
the carboxyl terminus of the yeast Sdh4p for ubiquinone reduction (21).
The positive charge provided by Lys-132 is crucial for this function
(22). In addition, we have recently documented the need for the
membrane domain in the assembly of the SDH-associated cytochrome
b562, although the role of this heme in
catalysis remains unclear (23, 24).
To further investigate the structure and function of the yeast SDH
membrane domain, we isolated and characterized seven SDH3 mutants. The mutant enzymes were characterized for their ability to
support respiratory growth, as well as for enzyme stability, quinone
reduction, heme b assembly, and inhibitor sensitivity. From
our analyses, we conclude that a ubiquinone-binding site is likely
associated with the matrix-facing loop connecting Sdh3p transmembrane
segments II and III. Thus, the yeast SDH is suggested to contain two
ubiquinone-binding sites that are topologically localized to different
faces of the membrane.
Strains--
The S. cerevisiae strains MH125 (MATa, trp1,
ura3-52, leu2-3, leu2-112, his3, his4, rme,
Media, Yeast Culture Conditions, and Isolation of
Mitochondria--
The yeast media used are SD (0.67% yeast nitrogen
base, 2% glucose), SG (0.67% yeast nitrogen base, 3% glycerol),
YPGal (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% galactose), YPDG (1% yeast
extract, 2% peptone, 0.1% glucose, 2% glycerol), and semisynthetic
galactose (0.3% yeast extract, 0.1% KH2PO4,
0.1% NH4Cl, 0.05% NaCl, 0.06% MgSO4·7H2O, 0.05% CaCl2, 0.003%
FeCl3, 2% galactose). Cultures were grown on SD for 2-3
days to select for plasmid retention, used to inoculate YPGal medium
supplemented with 0.01% glucose to a starting
A600 = 0.05, and grown aerobically at 30 °C
to stationary phase. Cells were harvested and lysed in a French
pressure cell for the preparation of submitochondrial particles (21).
For the preparation of mitochondria, cultures were grown in
semisynthetic galactose to late logarithmic phase
(A600 about 3), harvested, and lysed
enzymatically (21).
Random Mutagenesis--
An EcoRI-BglII
fragment containing the promoter and the entire coding region of the
SDH3 gene was subcloned into the yeast-E. coli
shuttle vector, YCplac111, to yield the plasmid pYCSDH3 and transformed
into the E. coli strain DH5 Enzyme Assays--
Unless otherwise stated, the
succinate-dependent reduction of quinone was monitored
spectrophotometrically at 22 °C as the malonate-sensitive
2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-decyl-1,4-benzoquinone (DB)-mediated reduction
of 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol (21). The
succinate-dependent, PMS-mediated reduction of
2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol is a measure of the membrane-associated
catalytic dimer; this activity does not require catalytically competent
Sdh3p and Sdh4p subunits, but they mediate the membrane association of
the dimer (7, 12). Quinone reduction was also directly monitored as the
reduction of DB, using the wavelength pair 280 and 325 nm (26), with a
Hewlett-Packard 8453 diode array spectrophotometer. The absorption
coefficient is 16 mM Miscellaneous Methods--
Measurements of covalently bound
flavin (12) and determinations of the apparent Michaelis parameters,
Km, Vmax, and the apparent
inhibition constants, Ki1 and
Ki2, were as described (21). Cytochrome
contents of mitochondria were estimated spectrally (23).
Mutagenesis of the SDH3 Gene--
We mutagenized an E. coli strain carrying the plasmid-borne yeast SDH3 gene
with ultraviolet light and reintroduced the mutated plasmids into the
SDH3 knockout strain, sdh3W3. Mutagenesis in E. coli, rather than in yeast, greatly reduces the production of
respiration-deficient mitochondrial petites. About 5000 Leu+ sdh3W3 transformants were tested for respiratory
growth on SG and YPDG media. Ten strains were impaired for growth,
indicating a respiration deficiency. The strains were further analyzed
by determining their growth yields on semisynthetic medium containing 0.5% galactose as carbon source. We isolated and sequenced the SDH3 genes from six strains that displayed growth yields
ranging from 10 to 50%. We have found that growth yields of less than 10% are often associated with null alleles that abolish enzyme assembly. Five SDH3 mutants contained single base
alterations, resulting in the substitutions of Phe-103 with Val
(F103V), His-106 with Tyr (H106Y), His-113 with Glu (H113Q), Trp-116
with Arg (W116R), and Leu-122 with a stop codon (L122stop). This latter
lesion truncates Sdh3p by removing the third transmembrane segment. A
sixth mutant contains a single base deletion in the codon for Leu-52
that causes a frameshift mutation (L52FrShift) and truncates Sdh3p
after the addition of two new amino acid residues, removing all three
transmembrane segments.
Ethyl methanesulfonate-treated plasmids were also isolated and tested
for the presence of mutations by transformation into sdh3W3. Of the
1000 colonies screened, only one was incapable of respiratory growth.
Sequencing revealed that the SDH3 gene contained two A to T
transversions, replacing His-106 and Asp-117 with Leu and Val,
respectively (H106L/D117V).
Fig. 1 shows the growth of the seven
mutants on semisynthetic medium containing 0.1-0.5% galactose. The
growth yield of sdh3W3 is 10% of its parent, MH125; this represents
only fermentative and no respiratory growth. The L52FrShift,
H106L/D117V, and L122stop mutants achieved growth yields of 10% each.
Because the L52FrShift is essentially an SDH3 knockout, it
was not characterized further. The growth yield of the W116R mutant was
reduced to 20%, consistent with its inability to grow on minimal
glycerol medium. A growth yield of less than 30% is typical of
petite strains. The F103V and H113Q mutants, with growth
yields of 35 and 40%, respectively, were also severely impaired for
growth on minimal glycerol. The H106Y mutant retained a significant
capacity for respiratory growth, with a 50% growth yield. These
results indicate that Trp-116, Phe-103, His-113, and His-106 or Asp-117
are important residues in Sdh3p. The loss of the third transmembrane
segment in the L122stop mutant highlights the importance of this
segment for SDH function.
Assembly of Mutant and Wild Type SDH Enzymes--
To determine
whether the SDH3 mutations interfere with enzyme assembly, we measured
the levels of covalent FAD in mitochondrial membranes from mutant and
wild type strains (Table I). In S. cerevisiae, SDH is the major covalent flavoprotein and the
covalent flavin levels of mitochondrial membranes reflect SDH assembly (27). The covalent FAD levels of the F103V, H113Q, and W116R strains
were not significantly different from the wild type. We conclude that
SDH assembly is not significantly impaired in these mutants. The
covalent FAD levels of the H106Y, H106L/D117V, and L122stop strains
were reduced, indicating some impairment of enzyme assembly.
Also shown in Table I are the succinate-PMS reductase activities of the
mutant and wild type enzymes. Membrane-associated succinate-dependent PMS reductase activity depends only on
the membrane anchoring function of the membrane domain and not on its
catalytic competence. To compare catalytic efficiencies, we determined
turnover numbers using covalent FAD levels. The succinate-PMS reductase
activities of the F103V, H106Y, H113Q, and W116R mutant enzymes are
similar to that of the wild type enzyme in MH125 or sdh3W3 pYCSDH3.
These data confirm that the primary defects in these mutants are not
due to impaired assembly. The L122stop mutant has a turnover number
only slightly less than that of MH125, indicating that its catalytic
dimer retains wild type activity, although the lower level of covalent
FAD in this mutant may indicate that the enzyme is only weakly attached
to the membrane. In contrast, the turnover number of the H106L/D117V
mutant enzyme is reduced, suggesting that an altered Sdh3p structure
influences catalysis by the attached catalytic dimer.
Steady State Sdh3p Levels--
The steady state levels of the wild
type and mutant Sdh3p subunits were compared by Western blot analysis
(Fig. 2) (23). The W116R, H106L/D117V,
H113Q, H106Y, and F103V Sdh3p levels (Fig. 2, lanes 4-8,
respectively) were similar to those of the wild type strains
(lanes 2 and 9). A truncated Sdh3p, expected to
migrate at about 13.8 kDa, was not detectable in the L122stop mutant
(lane 3). Its absence may be due to protein degradation, to
enzyme instability, or to an altered behavior in the gel or blotting
systems. However, the L122stop mutation did not eliminate enzyme
assembly, as judged by the covalent FAD level and the succinate-PMS
reductase activity of isolated membranes. As expected, Sdh3p was absent
in sdh3W3 (Fig. 2, lane 1).
Quinone Reductase Activities of SDH3 Mutants--
Mitochondrial
membranes of mutant and wild type strains were assayed for the
DB-mediated reduction of 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol (Table
II). The succinate-DB reductase
activities of the L122stop, F103V, H106L/D117V, and W116R mutants were
sharply reduced (25, 24, 20, and 18% of the wild type turnover number,
respectively). The H113Q mutant enzyme retained a low but significant
activity (35% of wild type level), whereas the H106Y mutant was not
greatly impaired (60% of wild type level). These values are consistent with the levels of respiratory growth seen on galactose medium (Fig. 1)
and with their respective abilities to grow on minimal glycerol medium.
As expected, sdh3W3 had no detectable activity.
We also measured the malonate-sensitive, succinate-cytochrome
c reductase and the succinate-oxidase activities of the
mutant enzymes (Table II). The first assay depends on complexes II and III of the respiratory chain, whereas the second depends on complexes II, III, and IV. Both assays rely on the reduction of endogenous ubiquinone. The succinate-cytochrome c reductase and the
succinate oxidase activities paralleled the succinate-DB reductase
activities. The membranes of the SDH3-deficient strain,
sdh3W3, had undetectable levels of these enzymatic activities. The NADH
oxidase and glycerol-1-phosphate-cytochrome c reductase
activities were largely unaffected in all the mutants. Because these
activities do not depend on succinate as the source of electrons, they
demonstrate the integrity of the remainder of the respiratory chain.
From these data, we can conclude that the effects that we have observed
arise from defective SDH function and that the SDH3
mutations do not have pleiotropic effects on the other respiratory
complexes present in the mitochondrial inner membrane.
Kinetics of Exogenous Quinone Reduction--
The kinetic
parameters, Km and Vmax, were determined
by varying the concentrations of DB at fixed concentrations of other
substrates. The results are summarized in Table
III. The apparent
KmDB values of the W116R and the H113Q
mutant enzymes were increased by 3-4-fold, whereas those of the F103V
and L122stop mutants were increased 2-fold. To compare the catalytic
efficiencies of the enzymes, we also expressed the apparent
Vmax as maximal turnover numbers
(kcat) based on covalent FAD contents. We
observed significant reductions in apparent kcat
values that were not paralleled by the turnover values determined with
the succinate-PMS reductase assay except for the H106L/D117V mutant
(Table I). This indicates that the W116R, H113Q, F103V, and L122 stop
mutations specifically affect the quinone reductase activities,
probably through defects in protein-quinone interactions, as suggested
by the apparent KmDB values. In
contrast, we observed only a small increase in the apparent
KmDB and a small decrease in the
apparent kcat value of the H106Y mutant enzyme.
The H106Y mutation likely does not affect protein-quinone interactions.
Thermal Stability Profiles of the SDH3 Mutants--
The Michaelis
constant, Km, is a complex parameter. Changes in
apparent Km may result from small structural perturbations that only alter the environment of the quinone-binding pocket or from larger perturbations that are propagated to the remainder of the enzyme. To explore these two possibilities, we determined the thermostabilities of the mutant and wild type enzymes. We incubated mitochondrial membranes at temperatures from 25 to 65 °C and monitored the succinate-dependent reduction of
DB directly at the wavelength pair of 280 and 325 nm (Fig.
3). All enzymes were stable at 25 °C.
However, at higher temperatures, the F103V, H106Y, L122stop, and
H106L/D117V mutant enzymes became thermolabile. This suggests
that these mutations induce structural perturbations that destabilize
the complex, possibly affecting the anchoring function of the membrane
domain. In contrast, the thermal profiles of the H113Q and W116R mutant
enzymes are comparable to that of the wild type enzyme, and the
structural perturbations produced by these lesions may be more
limited.
Sensitivities of SDH3 Mutants to a Quinone Analog
Inhibitor--
We have shown that
2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (s-BDNP) inhibits
the yeast SDH with nonlinear noncompetitive kinetics (21). We expect
that a mutation that affects quinone-reductase activity by altering a
quinone-binding site will also alter the sensitivity of that enzyme to
a quinone analog inhibitor. We determined the inhibitor sensitivities
of the H106Y, H113Q, and wild type enzymes. No reasonable estimates of
the inhibition constants could be determined for the remaining mutants
due to their low succinate-DB reductase activities. With both mutants,
complete inhibition could be attained. As previously reported (21),
s-BDNP inhibits the S. cerevisiae SDH in a
noncompetitive manner (Fig. 4,
inset). The inhibition patterns of the mutant enzymes are
also noncompetitive (data not shown). Replots of the abscissa
intercepts against the inhibitor concentrations are hyperbolic for the
wild type and the mutant enzymes (Fig. 4). Nonlinearity of replots can
result from a number of possibilities, including partial inhibition,
allosteric effects, inhibition by an alternative product, or binding of
the inhibitor to more than one site. In light of two-quinone binding
site models for SDH and related enzymes, we consider the latter
possibility most likely. Accordingly, the data were analyzed with an
equation for noncompetitive inhibition having two nonequivalent
Ki values (28),
SDH-associated Cytochrome b Levels--
The S. cerevisiae SDH possesses a fumarate-oxidizable cytochrome
b562 (23, 26, 29). To determine whether
cytochrome b562 assembly is affected by the
mutations, we measured the dithionite-reduced minus the
dithionite-reduced, fumarate-oxidized difference spectra of
mitochondria (Table I). The cytochrome contents of the mutants were all
significantly reduced, but there was no apparent correlation to the
succinate-DB reductase activities.
In this study, we provide several lines of evidence that three
amino acid residues (Phe-103, His-113, and Trp-116) in the S. cerevisiae Sdh3p subunit are important in the formation of a
quinone-binding site in SDH. First, the three mutants have impaired but
not abolished respiratory growth, indicating that the mutant SDH
enzymes are assembled and partially functional in vivo (Fig. 1). Second, the three mutants contain near normal levels of
membrane-associated covalent FAD, wild type turnover numbers with the
succinate-PMS reductase assay (Table I), and wild type levels of Sdh3p
polypeptide (Fig. 2). The mutant enzymes are thus assembled and
inserted into the membrane in normal amounts. Third, these three
mutants are significantly impaired in succinate-DB reductase,
succinate-cytochrome c reductase, and succinate oxidase
activities, assays that require the ability to reduce quinones (Table
II). Fourth, the mutations lead to increases in the apparent
KmDB values, with the highest increase
observed for the W116R enzyme (Table III). Fifth, two of the mutations,
H113Q and W116R, do not affect the thermostabilities of the mutant
enzymes, suggesting that the structural perturbations are minor. Sixth,
for the H113Q mutation, the inhibitor sensitivity analysis reveals that
only one of two inhibitor sites and by extension, one of the two
quinone-binding sites is affected. Finally, the F103V, H113Q, and W116R
residues are topologically clustered (Fig.
5), strongly arguing for their involvement in a common function, which we postulate is the formation of a quinone-binding site in or near the loop connecting transmembrane segments II and III. The specific roles of these and neighboring residues in the formation of this site can now be further explored by
site-directed mutagenesis.
The L122stop mutation results in many of the same effects as the F103V,
H113Q, and W116R mutations, such as a lowered succinate-DB reductase
activity and an elevated KmDB value.
However, it also results in lower covalent FAD (Table I) and Sdh3p
levels (Fig. 2), suggesting that the enzyme is not stably assembled.
This is further supported by its thermostability profile (Fig. 3). It
is perhaps not surprising that the L122stop mutation shares properties
with the quinone-binding site mutants, because it removes transmembrane
segment III of Sdh3p, and we postulate that a quinone-binding site is
associated with the loop connecting transmembrane segments II and III.
The H106L/D117V mutant enzyme has the very interesting property of
having a reduced turnover number in the succinate-PMS reductase assay
(Table I), suggesting that these SDH3 mutations propagate their effects into the catalytic dimer. We imagine that Asp-117 is
located at the interface between the catalytic and the membrane domains. (The H106L lesion is expected to be within the bilayer; see
Fig. 5.) Alternatively, Asp-117 may be near and perturb the PMS binding
site in the catalytic dimer. Asp-117 is the first membrane domain
residue proposed to modulate electron transport of the catalytic domain
in this family of enzymes. We will further explore Asp-117 by creating
additional mutations at this residue and in its vicinity.
The turnover numbers of the H106Y mutant enzyme for succinate-DB
reductase, succinate-cytochrome c reductase, and succinate oxidase activities were all decreased by 40%, whereas the apparent KmDB was only slightly elevated compared
with the wild type. This suggests that His-106 does not play a direct
role in quinone binding or reduction. Notably, the H106Y mutation
caused the largest reduction of cytochrome b562
of all the mutants (Table I). Interestingly, the H106Y mutation also
produced the enzyme with the highest succinate-DB reductase activity
per heme content, a value that is almost twice that of the wild type
enzyme (not shown).
Is His-106 an axial ligand for cytochrome b562?
In a multiple sequence alignment of SDH and FRD membrane subunits, the
yeast Sdh3p His-106 aligns with an absolutely conserved histidine
residue present in the second transmembrane segments of these enzymes (4). In some cases, such as His-70 of the Bacillus subtilis SDH and His-84 of the E. coli SDH, this histidine has been
experimentally shown to be a heme ligand (30-33). The conclusion that
His-106 is a heme liganding residue in Sdh3p can only be tentative
because the two mutations involving this position (H106Y and
H106L/D117V) do not completely eliminate cytochrome
b562 assembly. Cytochrome assembly may be
impaired but not prevented by the loss of a single ligand. In some
cases, a natural ligand is apparently replaced by an alternative
residue, as suggested by the reconstitution of the bovine cytochrome
b560 in either purified QPs1 or QPs3 subunits
(16, 34). Further studies will be necessary to clarify the role of
His-106.
The F103V, H113Q, and W116R quinone-binding site mutations may reduce
the heme contents of the respective enzymes by introducing structural
changes that perturb cytochrome assembly or by alterations of the
midpoint potential of the cytochrome. It has not been determined whether the electron transfer pathway between cytochrome
b562 and fumarate involves ubiquinone. Thus,
lowered heme contents may reflect a reduced ability to channel
electrons between heme and fumarate via a modified quinone-binding site.
The mutations analyzed in this study are localized to transmembrane
segment II and the following loop. This clustering argues for the
presence of a conserved quinone-binding site in SDH and FRD enzymes.
Mutagenesis studies of the E. coli FRD have identified a
number of amino acid residues that are critical for menaquinone binding
and/or oxidation (20, 35). In the FrdC subunit, Glu-29, Ala-32, Phe-38,
His-82, Trp-86, and Phe-87 interact with quinones. The latter three
residues are in topologically similar positions to our mutants, being
located in the loop following transmembrane segment II of the FrdC
polypeptide. In the bovine SDH, photoaffinity labeling experiments
identified the loop connecting transmembrane segments II and III of
QPs1 as critical region for quinone binding (14). Photoaffinity
labeling experiments have also identified the amino-terminal end of the
first transmembrane segment of the E. coli SdhC subunit as
required for quinone binding (18). This region corresponds to the
location of the first three FrdC mutations mentioned above. It seems
likely that residues close to the amino- and carboxyl-terminal ends of
transmembrane segments I and II, respectively, contribute to the
formation of a quinone-binding site. Our data do not exclude the
presence of additional Sdh3p residues involved in quinone binding. Our
screening procedure is biased against completely respiratory deficient
cells and thus might have prevented the isolation of mutations in
another region of Sdh3p, such as close to transmembrane segment I.
Recently, we reported that the quinone analog s-BDNP
inhibits the yeast SDH in a biphasic, noncompetitive manner (21).
Similar inhibition patterns are seen with the E. coli FRD
and the bovine SDH (17). We observed biphasic inhibition of the wild
type enzyme that can most simply be explained by two inhibitor sites
with a 10-fold difference in affinities. The H113Q and H106Y mutants also showed biphasic inhibition patterns, but with significant increases in their apparent Ki1 values,
suggesting a perturbation in the high affinity inhibitor-binding site.
If the s-BDNP inhibitor does bind to two sites, then two
quinone-binding sites are likely present in the yeast SDH. Similarly,
two sites are proposed for the E. coli FRD and for the
bovine SDH (14, 17, 20, 35). In our previous work (21), mutations
involving the carboxyl terminus of Sdh4p affected the apparent
Ki2 values for s-BDNP,
indicating that the two inhibitor sites and, by extension, the two
quinone-binding sites, are spatially distinct in the yeast SDH. We
cannot identify which of the two putative quinone-binding sites,
QA or QB, is affected in the SDH3
mutants or whether the inhibitor binding sites physically correspond to those sites, although the topological model for Sdh3p is consistent with it containing the QB site.
*
This research was supported by Grant PG-11440 from the
Medical Research Council of Canada.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The abbreviations used are:
SDH, succinate
dehydrogenase;
FRD, fumarate reductase;
PMS, phenazine methosulfate;
DB, 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-decyl-1,4-benzoquinone;
Q, ubiquinone;
s-BDNP, 2-secbutyl-4,6-dinitrophenol;
DCPIP, 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol.
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Succinate-ubiquinone
Oxidoreductase
IDENTIFICATION OF SDH3P AMINO ACID RESIDUES INVOLVED IN
UBIQUINONE BINDING*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
+) and sdh3W3 (MH125,
sdh3::TRP1), and the E. coli
strain DH5
have been described earlier (23, 25).
. Cells were UV-irradiated at
254 nm with a dose rate of 1.4 J m
1 s
1 on
LB plates in the dark to achieve 5-10% survival. The plates were
incubated overnight at 37 °C in the dark. Colonies were scraped from
a total of 100 plates, and plasmids were isolated. For chemical mutagenesis, suspensions of the DH5
pYCSDH3 were treated with 3%
ethyl methanesulfonate to give 5-10% survival. Mutagenized plasmids
were isolated and introduced into sdh3W3. Transformants were
replica-plated onto SG and YPDG media. Colonies that exhibited impaired
growth were further analyzed. Plasmids were recovered and retransformed
into sdh3W3 to ensure that any growth defects were plasmid-mediated.
Mutations were identified by sequencing the entire SDH3 gene.
1 cm
1. For
thermal stability measurements, membrane fractions (20 mg/ml) were
incubated at temperatures ranging from 25 to 65 °C in 50 mM potassium phosphate, 50 µM EDTA, pH 7.4, 2 mM KCN for 10 min and assayed immediately for succinate-DB
reductase activity by the addition of 50 µM DB and 20 mM succinate.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Growth of yeast strains on galactose
media. Yeast strains were grown at 30 °C on semisynthetic
liquid medium containing 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5% galactose and
the absorbance values at 600 nm were measured. Cultures were inoculated
at a starting A600 of 0.1 and allowed to reach
late stationary phase (approximately 100 h). The relative growth
yields were calculated using the final absorbance values reached on
0.5% galactose. Open squares, MH125; crosses,
sdh3W3/pYCSDH3; closed circles, W116R; closed
squares, H106Y; closed triangles, H113Q; closed
diamonds, F103V; and open circles, sdh3W3, L122stop,
H106L/D117V, and L52FrShift. The growth characteristics of these latter
four mutants are indistinguishable, and for simplicity, only one symbol
is used.
Measurements of SDH assembly in mitochondrial membranes

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Western blot analysis of mutant and wild type
mitochondria. Mitochondria were isolated from galactose-grown
cultures. 10 µg of protein per lane were electrophoresed on 13%
Tricine denaturing gels for Western blot analysis using an anti-Sdh3p
antibody. Lanes 1-9 are sdh3W3, MH125, L122stop, W116R,
H106L/D117L, H113Q, H106Y, F103V, and sdh3W3/pYCSDH3,
respectively.
Quinone-mediated enzymatic activities of mitochondrial membranes
The apparent Michaelis constants for succinate-DB reductase activities

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Thermal stability profiles of succinate-DB
reductase activities. DB reduction was monitored
spectrophotometrically at the wavelength pair of 280 and 325 nm after
incubating mitochondrial membranes at the indicated temperatures for 10 min. Activities are expressed as percentages of turnover numbers
observed at 25 °C for each strain. Values are the means of
triplicate determinations ± S.E.
where y is the slope or intercept in the presence of a
fixed concentration of the inhibitor I, a is the
slope or intercept in the absence of inhibitor, and
Ki1 and
Ki2 are the high affinity and low
affinity inhibition constants, respectively. There are good fits of the
data to the equation (Fig. 4). The apparent Ki
values for inhibitor binding at sites 1 and 2 (Ki1 and
Ki2) are presented in Table
IV. Consistent with our earlier
observations, there was a 10-fold difference between the affinities of
the two sites for s-BDNP in the wild type enzyme. There were
no significant apparent affinity differences at the mutant low affinity
inhibitor sites (Ki2) compared with the
wild type. In contrast, the Ki1 values
for the high affinity sites in the H106Y and the H113Q mutants were
increased 2- and 3-fold, respectively. These results are consistent
with a two quinone-binding site model in which the H106Y and the H113Q mutations only affect one of the sites.
(Eq. 1)

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Inhibition of succinate-DB reductase activity
by 2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol. The intercepts
(reciprocal maximal velocities) are plotted against inhibitor
concentration (filled circles, H113Q; open
squares, H106Y; open circles, wild type). The data were
fitted to Equation 1 by nonlinear least squares using the quasi-Newton
algorithm. Inset, double-reciprocal plots showing
noncompetitive inhibition of succinate-DB reductase activity of the
wild type enzyme by the inhibitor. The inhibitor concentrations are 0 (open circles), 0.07 (closed circles), 0.22 (open squares), and 0.8 (closed squares)
mM.
Apparent inhibition constants for succinate-DB reductase activities by
s-BDNP
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Topological model of the yeast Sdh3p.
Solid arrows indicate single amino acid substitutions,
open arrows indicate double mutations, and solid
lines indicate truncations. IMS, intermembrane space.
Residue numbering is based on the mature protein sequence.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Medical Research
Council of Canada Group in the Molecular Biology of Membranes, Dept. of
Biochemistry, University of Alberta, 474 Medical Sciences Bldg.,
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada. Tel.: 780-492-4853; Fax:
780-492-0886; E-mail: bernard.lemire@ualberta.ca.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Ackrell, B. A. C.,
Johnson, M. K.,
Gunsalus, R. P.,
and Cecchini, G.
(1992)
in
Chemistry and Biochemistry of Flavoenzymes
(Muller, F., ed), Vol. III
, pp. 229-297, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
2.
Cole, S. T.,
Condon, C.,
Lemire, B. D.,
and Weiner, J. H.
(1985)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
811,
381-403[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Hederstedt, L.,
and Ohnishi, T.
(1992)
in
Molecular Mechanisms in Bioenergetics
(Ernster, L., ed)
, pp. 163-197, Elsevier Science Publishers, New York
4.
Hägerhäll, C.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1320,
107-141[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Scheffler, I. E.
(1998)
Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol.
60,
267-315[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Chapman, K. B.,
Solomon, S. D.,
and Boeke, J. D.
(1992)
Gene
118,
131-136[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Robinson, K. M.,
von Kieckebusch-Gück, A.,
and Lemire, B. D.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
21347-21350 8.
Robinson, K. M.,
and Lemire, B. D.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10101-10107 9.
Schülke, N.,
Blobel, G.,
and Pain, D.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
8011-8015 10.
Lombardo, A.,
Carine, K.,
and Scheffler, I. E.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
10419-10423 11.
Abraham, P. R.,
Mulder, A.,
van't Riet, J.,
and Raué, H. A.
(1994)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
242,
708-716[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Bullis, B. L.,
and Lemire, B. D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
6543-6549 13.
Daignan-Fornier, B.,
Valens, M.,
Lemire, B. D.,
and Bolotin-Fukuhara, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
15469-15472 14.
Lee, G. Y.,
He, D.-Y., Yu, L.,
and Yu, C.-A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
6193-6198 15.
Shenoy, S. K., Yu, L.,
and Yu, C.-A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17867-17872 16.
Shenoy, S. K., Yu, L.,
and Yu, C.-A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8717-8722 17.
Yankovskaya, V.,
Sablin, S. O.,
Ramsay, R. R.,
Singer, T. P.,
Ackrell, B. A. C.,
Cecchini, G.,
and Miyoshi, H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21020-21024 18.
Yang, X., Yu, L.,
He, D.,
and Yu, C. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31916-31923 19.
Hägerhäll, C.,
and Hederstedt, L.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
389,
25-31[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Westenberg, D. J.,
Gunsalus, R. P.,
Ackrell, B. A. C.,
Sices, H.,
and Cecchini, G.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
815-822 21.
Oyedotun, K. S.,
and Lemire, B. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31382-31388 22.
Oyedotun, K. S.,
and Lemire, B. D.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1411,
170-179[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Oyedotun, K. S.,
and Lemire, B. D.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
442,
203-207[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Hederstedt, L.
(1998)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
26,
408-413[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Robinson, K. M.,
and Lemire, B. D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
4055-4060 26.
Bruel, C.,
di Rago, J.-P.,
Slonimski, P. P.,
and Lemesle-Meunier, D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
22321-22328 27.
Robinson, K. M.,
and Lemire, B. D.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
260,
34-51[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Cleland, W. W.
(1979)
Methods Enzymol.
63,
500-513[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Brasseur, G.,
Tron, G.,
Dujardin, G.,
Slonimski, P. P.,
and Brivet-Chevillotte, P.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
246,
103-111[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Fridén, H.,
and Hederstedt, L.
(1990)
Mol. Microbiol.
4,
1045-1056[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Hägerhäll, C.,
Fridén, H.,
Aasa, R.,
and Hederstedt, L.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
11080-11089[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Nakamura, K.,
Yamaki, M.,
Sarada, M.,
Nakayama, S.,
Vibat, C. R. T.,
Gennis, R. B.,
Nakayashiki, T.,
Inokuchi, H.,
Kojima, S.,
and Kita, K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
521-527 33.
Vibat, C. R. T.,
Cecchini, G.,
Nakamura, K.,
Kita, K.,
and Gennis, R. B.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
4148-4159[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Lee, G. Y.,
Zhu, J., Yu, L.,
and Yu, C.-A.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1363,
35-46[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Westenberg, D. J.,
Gunsalus, R. P.,
Ackrell, B. A. C.,
and Cecchini, G.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
19560-19567
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. S. W. Szeto, S. N. Reinke, B. D. Sykes, and B. D. Lemire Ubiquinone-binding Site Mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Succinate Dehydrogenase Generate Superoxide and Lead to the Accumulation of Succinate J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 27518 - 27526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Horsefield, V. Yankovskaya, G. Sexton, W. Whittingham, K. Shiomi, S. Omura, B. Byrne, G. Cecchini, and S. Iwata Structural and Computational Analysis of the Quinone-binding Site of Complex II (Succinate-Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase): A MECHANISM OF ELECTRON TRANSFER AND PROTON CONDUCTION DURING UBIQUINONE REDUCTION J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7309 - 7316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Oyedotun and B. D. Lemire The Quaternary Structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Succinate Dehydrogenase: HOMOLOGY MODELING, COFACTOR DOCKING, AND MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION STUDIES J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 9424 - 9431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Oyedotun, P. F. Yau, and B. D. Lemire Identification of the Heme Axial Ligands in the Cytochrome b562 of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Succinate Dehydrogenase J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 9432 - 9439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Guo and B. D. Lemire The Ubiquinone-binding Site of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Succinate-Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase Is a Source of Superoxide J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2003; 278(48): 47629 - 47635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Iverson, C. Luna-Chavez, L. R. Croal, G. Cecchini, and D. C. Rees Crystallographic Studies of the Escherichia coli Quinol-Fumarate Reductase with Inhibitors Bound to the Quinol-binding Site J. Biol. Chem., May 3, 2002; 277(18): 16124 - 16130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Adams, M. Rosenblueth, Y.-L. Qiu, and J. D. Palmer Multiple Losses and Transfers to the Nucleus of Two Mitochondrial Succinate Dehydrogenase Genes During Angiosperm Evolution Genetics, July 1, 2001; 158(3): 1289 - 1300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Oyedotun and B. D. Lemire The Quinone-binding Sites of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Succinate-ubiquinone Oxidoreductase J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2001; 276(20): 16936 - 16943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||