JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miyata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miyata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 23963-23968, August 20, 1999


Targeted Disruption of the Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene
MICROSOMAL EPOXIDE HYDROLASE IS REQUIRED FOR THE CARCINOGENIC ACTIVITY OF 7,12-DIMETHYLBENZ[a]ANTHRACENE*

Masaaki MiyataDagger , Gen Kudo§, Ying-Hue Lee, Tian J. Yangparallel , Harry V. Gelboinparallel , Pedro Fernandez-Salguero**, Shioko Kimura, and Frank J. GonzalezDagger Dagger

From the Laboratory of Metabolism, parallel  Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) is a conserved enzyme that is known to hydrolyze many drugs and carcinogens, and a few endogenous steroids and bile acids. mEH-null mice were produced and found to be fertile and have no phenotypic abnormalities thus indicating that mEH is not critical for reproduction and physiological homeostasis. mEH has also been implicated in participating in the metabolic activation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogens. Embryonic fibroblast derived from the mEH-null mice were unable to produce the proximate carcinogenic metabolite of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA), a widely studied experimental prototype for the polycylic aromatic hydrocarbon class of chemical carcinogens. They were also resistant to DMBA-mediated toxicity. Using the two-stage initiation-promotion skin cancer bioassay, the mEH-null mice were found to be highly resistant to DMBA-induced carcinogenesis. In a complete carcinogenesis bioassay, the mEH mice were totally resistant to tumorigenesis. These data establish in an intact animal model that mEH is a key genetic determinant in DMBA carcinogenesis through its role in production of the ultimate carcinogenic metabolite of DMBA, the 3,4-diol-1,2-epoxide.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH)1 is a critical phase I biotransformation enzyme that catalyzes hydrolysis of a large number of epoxide intermediates (1, 2). mEH is highly conserved in different mammalian species, is expressed in the embryo (3-5) and multiple organs, and is active toward some endogenous epoxy-steroids (6) and bile acids (7) thus suggesting that it plays a critical physiological role. mEH is usually thought to play a pivotal role in protection against the toxicity of reactive epoxide intermediates, because metabolism of epoxides by this enzyme results in the production of less reactive and less toxic dihydrodiol intermediates of drugs such as phenytoin and carbamazepine (8, 9) and epoxides of environmental toxins (10, 11). In contrast to this protective effect, mEH is thought to be required for the metabolic activation of the potent carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA), a widely studied experimental prototype for the polycylic aromatic hydrocarbon class of chemical carcinogens (12). P450s and mEH metabolize DMBA to both inert metabolites and metabolites that are electrophilic and capable of producing DNA adducts (Fig. 1). Cytochrome P450 CYP1B1 oxidizes DMBA to the 3,4-epoxide (13). This is followed by hydrolysis of the epoxide by mEH to the proximate carcinogenic metabolite, DMBA-3,4-diol. This metabolite can be further oxidized by either CYP1A1 or CYP1B1 to the principal ultimate carcinogenic metabolite, DMBA-3,4-diol-1,2-epoxide, that is capable of producing DNA adducts (14-17). Other ring hydroxylations and methyl hydroxylations of DMBA result in inactive metabolites that do not bind DNA. Based on this scheme, mEH should be a critical enzyme in the pathway leading to the carcinogenic activity of DMBA. However a role for mEH in DMBA carcinogenesis has not been established in an intact animal model.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Metabolism of DMBA by CYP1A1, CYP1B1, and mEH. Epoxides formed by P450s can either be hydrolyzed by mEH to trans-dihydrodiols or spontaneously hydrolyzed by water to phenols. The 2-phenol, 10,11-diol metabolites and methyl hydroxy metabolites are not shown. The pathway leading to the proximate (DMBA-3,4-diol) and ultimate (DMBA-3,4-diol-1,2-epoxide) metabolites is shown with thick arrows.

DMBA carcinogenesis bioassays have been established using mouse skin with either the two stage initiation-promotion protocol in which DMBA is initially applied followed by repeated applications of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), or the complete carcinogenesis assay where DMBA is continuously applied (18-20). In the two stage carcinogenesis model, metabolites of DMBA cause DNA adducts and TPA administration results in cell proliferation that serves to fix the mutations in cell cycle control genes leading to selection of rapidly dividing cancer cells. In the complete carcinogenesis scheme, DMBA serves as both an initiator and promoter of cell growth. It is not known whether the mechanism of carcinogenesis differs between the two protocols. The mouse skin cancer bioassays can be used to determine the effects of genes on DMBA carcinogenesis.

In this report, mEH-null mice were produced and found to have no phenotype, indicating that in mice, mEH is not essential for reproduction and physiological homeostasis. Using the two widely used skin cancer bioassays discussed above, mEH-null mice were found to be highly resistant to DMBA-induced carcinogenesis.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isolation and Sequencing of the cDNA and Gene-- The mouse mEH cDNA was isolated from a liver cDNA library (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using the rat mEH as a probe (21). Mouse soluble EH (sEH) cDNA was isolated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Total RNA was isolated from livers of 8-week-old male C57BL/6 mice using the Ultraspec RNA reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol (Biotecx Laboratories, Houston, TX). Primers were generated from the 5' (GGGAATTCATGGCGCTGCGTGTAGCCGCG) and 3' (GGGAATTCCTAAATCTTGGAGGTCACTGA) ends of the sEH cDNA sequence (22) and were used to amplify the cDNA using the cDNA Cycle Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The resultant cDNA was completely sequenced using an Applied Biosystems Model 377 sequencer (Foster City, CA). The mEH genomic clones were obtained from a mouse 129/Sv Lambda FIX genomic library (Stratagene) using the mouse mEH cDNA as a probe.

Construction of the Targeting Vector-- A 5.5-kbp BamHI fragment containing exon 2 was isolated from the genomic clone and subcloned into pUC18. To disrupt the gene, an ApaI fragment containing a part of exon 2 was deleted and replaced with the bacterial phosphoribosyltransferase II gene cassette (TK-NEO) derived from the pMC1Neo poly(A) vector including ApaI adapters (Stratagene). A herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene was inserted at the 3' end of mEH gene for use in negative selection with gancyclovir.

Production of Chimeric Mice-- The plasmid DNA used for targeting was purified by banding twice on cesium chloride gradients, linearized with SalI and introduced into embryonic stem (ES) cells purchased from Genome Systems Inc. (St. Louis, MO) by electroporation at 250 V, 250 µF capacitance using a Bio-Rad gene pulser. One day after electroporation, the ES cells were incubated in medium containing G418 (300 µg/ml) and gancyclovir (5 µM) as positive and negative selectable markers, respectively. The surviving ES cell clones were analyzed by Southern blotting using a probe corresponding to exon 3 and exon 4 of the mEH gene. The probes were derived from the mEH cDNA. The TK-NEO gene was used to identify specific homologous recombinants and eliminate clones having other nonspecific integration of the targeting construct. The ES cell clones heterozygous for the disrupted mEH gene were injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts to generate chimeric founder mice as described previously (23). The injected blastocysts were transferred into the uterus of pseudopregnant recipient NIH Swiss females to produce chimeric mice. Male chimeras were bred with C57BL/6 females to determine whether germ line transmission had occurred. The heterozygous mice, having germ line transmission of the targeted mEH allele, were interbred to generate homozygotes.

Genotyping of the ES Cells and Mice-- Genomic DNA was isolated from ES cells and mouse tails (24) and digested with XbaI and EcoRI. The digested DNA was subjected to electrophoresis in 0.6% agarose gels, transferred to a Gene Screen Plus nylon membrane (NEN Life Science Products) using 0.4 N NaOH, and hybridized with the mEH probe.

Analysis of mEH Expression-- Mouse liver tissue was homogenized in Ultraspec RNA reagent (Biotecx Laboratories). Total RNA (10 µg) was denatured and subjected to electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels containing 2.2 M formaldehyde and blotted to Gene Screen Plus nylon membranes. mEH and sEH cDNAs were labeled with [alpha -32P]dCTP using a random primer polymerase kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The conditions used for prehybridization, hybridization, and washing were previously described (23). Liver microsomal protein (10 µg) was subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Protein was electroblotted to nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell), and the immune complexes were detected by use of ECL reagent (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Rabbit antibody prepared against rat mEH was kindly provided by Dr. James P. Hardwick (Northeastern Ohio University College of Medicine).

DMBA Toxicity and Metabolism in Embryo-derived Fibroblasts-- Mice at gestation day 14 were euthanized by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, and the embryos were placed in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4). Following removal of internal organs and head, the remaining torsos were minced and placed into 2 ml of 0.25% trypsin for 45 min at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped by addition of incubation medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 250 µg/ml amphotericin B and 2 mM glutamine). The cells were grown at 37 °C in 5% carbon dioxide until confluent, trypsinized, and stored at -80 °C until use. The cells were thawed before use, grown for 1 day, trypsinized, and seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 3,000 cells/well in 100 µl of medium. Following incubation for 1 day, a series of dilutions of DMBA in 100 µl of medium were added to the cells and incubation continued for 3 days. The cells were fixed with 10% trichloroacetic acid, washed, and stained with sulforhodamine B (25). For metabolism studies, [3H]DMBA (1,033 mCi/mmol), purified by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography to remove impurities and dissolved in Me2SO, was incubated with 1.4 × 106 embryo-derived fibroblast (EF) cells in 5 ml of medium (the final concentration of DMBA was 0.3 µM) for 24 h. The cells were mechanically harvested and extracted with 1 volume of cold acetone, and the aqueous phase was extracted twice with 10 ml of ethyl acetate. The combined organic phase was dried, and the residues were analyzed by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography with a radio-detector (26). Comparing retention times with authentic compounds identified the metabolites formed. 12-Hydroxymethyl-7-methylbenz[a]anthracene (7M,12OH-DMBA); DMBA-3,4-dihydrodiol (3,4-diol); 2-,3-, and 4-hydroxybenz[a]anthracene (DMBA 2-, 3-, 4-phenols) were obtained from the NCI Chemical Carcinogen Repository (Frederick, MD). DMBA 8,9-dihydrodiol (8,9-diol) was formed by incubation of DMBA with human recombinant CYP1A1 (Gentest Corp., Woburn, MA) (26, 27).

Skin Carcinogenesis-- The skin tumor-induction experiments were carried out using the initiation-promotion protocol as described (18-20). Female mEH-null and wild-type mice, aged 8-11 weeks were shaved with electric clippers 2 days before treatment with DMBA (Sigma). The mice were initiated by treating once with 25 µg of DMBA in 200 µl of acetone, and 1 week later, they were treated with 5 µg of TPA (Mallinckrodt Baker, Inc., Paris, KY) in 200 µl of acetone. TPA was administered three times weekly for 25 weeks. As a control, wild-type mice were initiated with only acetone and promoted with TPA. For the complete carcinogenesis experiments, the mice received weekly applications of 12.8 µg of DMBA in 200 µl of acetone for 25 weeks. Skin papillomas greater than 1 mm in diameter were counted and the incidence was monitored weekly.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Generation and Characterization of mEH-Null Mice-- To investigate the developmental and physiological function of mEH and its role in chemical carcinogenesis, mEH-null mice were generated using the classical strategy of homologous recombination in ES cells. The mouse mEH gene was isolated and characterized and found to span 29 kbp (Fig. 2A) and have 9 exons (Table I), similar to the human and rat mEH genes (28, 29). The splice junctions and nucleotide sequences in each exon were highly conserved between the human and mouse mEH genes. The mouse mEH cDNA was isolated from a mouse liver cDNA library, and the nucleotide sequences of the exon portions in the mouse mEH gene were identical to those of the cDNA.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The restriction maps of the mEH gene, targeting constructs, and targeted allele, and the Southern blot genotypes of the resultant heterozygous and mEH-null mice. Panel A, restriction map of the mouse mEH gene. Panel B, restriction maps of the wild-type allele, targeting construct, and targeted allele are shown using ApaI (A) BamHI (B), EcoRI (E), and XbaI (X). Probes used for genotyping are indicated above the wild-type allele map. Restriction fragment sizes of the wild-type and targeting alleles for XbaI and EcoRI double digestion are shown. Panel C, Southern blot analysis of mouse tail DNA. DNAs were digested with XbaI and EcoRI, electrophoresed in a 0.6% agarose gel, transferred to nylon membranes, and hybridized with the 32P-labeled probe. The estimated sizes of the hybridized bands are shown. +/+, wild-type mice; +/-, heterozygous mice; -/-, homozygous mEH-null mice.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Exon-intron junctions of the mEH gene
The mEH gene was partially sequenced using primers derived from the mEH cDNA. Only the sequences flanking the exons are included.

A 5.5-kbp BamHI fragment containing exon 2 was used to make a vector for targeted gene disruption. A 0.7-kbp ApaI fragment containing a part of exon 2 was replaced with 1.1-kbp TK-NEO cassette encoding the NEO selectable marker (Fig. 2B). To allow the use of gancyclovir for negative selection, the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene expression cassette was inserted into 3' end of the targeting vector. The linearized targeting construct was electroporated into ES cells, and four ES cell homologous recombinant clones were found out of the 220 G418- and gancyclovir-resistant clones analyzed. Southern blot analysis demonstrated that heterozygous ES clones were obtained as indicated by the presence of an additional 7.7-kbp fragment obtained upon double digestion with XbaI and EcoRI (data not shown). When these clones were hybridized with the TK-NEO gene as a probe, only a single hybridizing band of 7.7-kbp with XbaI-EcoRI double-digested DNA was detected, demonstrating that these clones did not contain any additional random integrations of the targeting construct. One of these homologous recombinant ES cell clones was injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts and seven male chimeric mice were generated; one of these yielded germline transmission. Heterozygous (mEH+/-) mice were normal and used for interbreeding to generate homozygous (mEH-/- or mEH-null) mice. Breeding of the heterozygous mice produced offspring at the expected Mendelian distribution indicating that no in utero lethality occurs as a result of loss of the functional mEH gene. The mEH+/- and mEH-/- mice DNAs were analyzed for the presence of mutant alleles of the mEH gene (Fig. 2C). The absence of a diagnostic 10.5-kbp band and the presence of a 7.7-kbp band in the offspring clearly indicated that the mEH-null mice were born and viable.

mEH-null mice exhibited no differences in weight, development, fertility and behavior when compared with their wild-type littermate controls. The finding of no effect on fertility and reproduction was quite surprising, because mEH is expressed in the ovary and testis (30). Histological examination of several other organs, including liver, lung, kidney, intestine, spleen, thymus, heart, and brain, revealed no difference between mEH-null and wild-type mice, indicating that mEH is not a critical requirement for normal development and physiology. This finding of no apparent role in development and physiological homeostasis was of interest, because the enzyme is highly conserved at the level of amino acid sequence similarity (31-33) and substrate specificity in different mammalian species, and it is expressed in the embryo and multiple organs (3-5).

To evaluate the level of mEH mRNA, Northern blot analysis was performed (Fig. 3). As a control, sEH mRNA was also examined. sEH mRNA levels were not different among the mEH-null, mEH+/-, and wild-type mice. In the mEH-null mouse liver, a lower abundance RNA band (that was of slightly higher mobility than that seen in the wild-type mice) was detected using the mEH cDNA as a probe (Fig. 3). This transcript is probably derived from the disrupted allele although it is not certain how the TK-NEO cassette would alter splicing to produce a smaller mRNA. The lower level of expression of this transcript is not surprising, because mRNAs that do not encode a normal protein are typically unstable and rapidly degraded (34, 35). To further confirm that mEH protein is not expressed in the mEH-null mice, immunoblot analysis was performed using rabbit antibody against rat mEH. mEH protein was not detected in the mEH-null mouse liver microsomes (Fig. 4). The data confirm that the mEH is not expressed in the mEH-null mice.


View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Northern blot analysis of liver RNA. Total liver RNAs (10 µg) were subjected to Northern blotting. The mouse mEH and sEH cDNAs were used as probes. +/+, wild-type mice; +/-, heterozygous mice; -/-, homozygous mEH-null mice.


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Western blot analysis of liver microsomes. Liver microsomal proteins (10 µg) were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to nylon membranes, incubated with rabbit antibody, and the bands visualized using the ECL reagent. The ECL reagent was used to develop the blots. +/+, wild-type mice; +/-, heterozygous mice; -/-, homozygous mEH-null mice.

The Role of mEH in DMBA Metabolism and Toxicity-- To determine whether lack of the mEH affects the ability to metabolically activate DMBA, EF were prepared from wild-type and mEH-null mice and subjected to incubation with increasing concentrations of DMBA (Fig. 5). Cells that metabolically activate DMBA to electrophilic metabolites will be killed. Wild-type EF were killed by DMBA at less than 1 µM. In contrast, mEH-null EF were resistant to up to 10 µM of the carcinogen. These data suggest that cells lacking mEH are unable to catalyze the metabolic activation of DMBA. This was confirmed by direct analysis of DMBA metabolism by EF in situ. EF from wild-type mice were able to form the 3,4-diol metabolite that results from P450 oxidation to the 3,4-epoxide followed by hydrolysis to the diol by mEH (Table II). In contrast, no detectable DMBA-3,4-diol was formed in cells from mEH-null mice. These EF cells also failed to produce the 8,9-diol and 10,11-diol, whereas they were able to generate the phenol metabolites that result from hydrolysis of epoxides by water. These data indicate that cells from mEH-null mice are unable to produce the proximate carcinogenic metabolite of DMBA, the 3,4-diol, that is the precursor to the 3,4-diol-1,2-epoxide ultimate carcinogenic metabolite of DMBA.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Toxicity of DMBA in primary embryonic fibroblast. Survival of primary embryonic fibroblasts from wild-type (open circle ) and mEH-null () mice after exposure to DMBA. Concomitant control cells without DMBA were used as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± S.D. of eight.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
DMBA metabolism in mouse embryonic fibroblast
Primary mouse embryo fibroblasts were incubated with 0.3 µM [3H]DMBA for 24 h. The data represent the mean ± S.D. of three samples.

The Role of mEH in Susceptibility to Skin Cancer-- To test the role of mEH in DMBA-induced carcinogenesis, skin cancer bioassays were carried out comparing the mEH-null with wild-type mice (Fig. 6). The mEH-null allele is on a 129/Sv genetic background, and this stain is known to be sensitive to DMBA-induced skin carcinogenesis (36). In a standard initiation-promotion protocol, wild-type mice started to develop papillomas after 6 weeks of TPA treatment, and the percentage of mice with tumors increased to 70% by 15 weeks (Fig. 6A). This value is within the range of that found by others (37). The mean number of papillomas per mouse at 15 weeks of treatment was 4 (Fig. 6B). In contrast, papillomas first appeared in mEH-null mice at 9-10 weeks and the percentage of mice with tumors reached 20% at 17 weeks. The mean number of tumors per mouse in this group was 0.5 (Fig. 6B). These data indicate that lack of mEH results in a marked resistance to DMBA-induced skin cancer thus demonstrating in an intact animal model that mEH is a major determinant for susceptibility to DMBA-induced cancer. In contrast to the initiation-promotion assay, mEH-null mice were completely resistant to skin cancer when a complete carcinogenesis assay was performed in which only DMBA was applied. After 25 weeks of treatment, almost 80% of wild-type mice had papillomas, whereas none of the mEH-null mice had even a single detectable nodule (Fig. 6, C and D). This is strong evidence that there are significant mechanistic differences between the initiation-promotion skin cancer bioassay and the complete carcinogenesis assay, which involve metabolic activation of DMBA.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Skin cancer induction by DMBA. Skin cancer bioassays with wild-type (open circle ) and mEH-null () mice. In the DMBA initiation and TPA promotion study (panels A and B), the number of mice per group was 24 for wild-type, 26 for mEH-null, and 20 for control. Controls (triangle ) were wild-type mice that were not initiated with DMBA. In the DMBA complete carcinogenesis study (panels C and D), the number of mice in each group is 24. Panels A and C show the percentage of mice with papillomas versus time of treatment in weeks. Panels B and D show the mean number of papillomas per mouse versus time in weeks. Each point represents the mean ± S.E.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

There are a large number of enzymes that are involved in the detoxification of carcinogens including microsomal and soluble epoxide hydrolases, UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, glutathione S-transferases, and diaphorase. Although mEH is generally considered a detoxification enzyme for arene oxides, its involvement in the hydrolysis of chemical intermediates, leading to the ultimate carcinogenic metabolite, has only been demonstrated in vitro and has not previously been demonstrated in an intact animal model (38). In the complete carcinogenesis protocol, no cancers were found in the mEH-null mice thus establishing that mEH is required for the carcinogenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons such as DMBA in vivo. In the initiation-promotion carcinogen bioassay, the null mice did develop papillomas albeit at levels significantly lower than in wild-type mice. These studies indicate a possible mechanistic difference between the complete carcinogenesis and the TPA initiation-promotion bioassays. It is well established that mEH is absolutely required for production of the bay region diol-epoxide of DMBA that is highly mutagenic (12). However, the fact that tumors were found in the mEH-null mice treated with TPA suggests the existence of a second pathway for activation of DMBA that is dependent on TPA. DMBA is known to cause elevated hydrogen peroxide and oxidized bases, particularly 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine in epidermal DNA, although it is unknown whether this is dependent on P450 oxidation (39). Perhaps the active metabolites derived from this, or another P450 and mEH-independent pathway of DMBA activation such as that mediated by mutagenic sulfate esters (40), result in DNA adducts that are more readily repaired than those adducts produced by the DMBA diol-epoxide metabolite. Fixation of these adducts into mutations may require a strong hyperplastic response such as that found with TPA. These possibilities can now be investigated using the P450 and mEH null mouse models.

Recent studies with the CYP1B1-null mouse have established that CYP1B1 is critical for DMBA carcinogenesis in vivo using an oral route of administration that results in lymphomas in wild-type mice (41). These data support the in vitro evidence showing that CYP1B1 is considerably more active than CYP1A1 in producing the DMBA-3,4-diol proximate carcinogenic metabolite (13). These results establish that mEH is also required for DMBA carcinogenesis and validates the in vivo relevance of the bay region diol-epoxide pathway for metabolic activation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogens. These studies suggests that genetics differences in expression of P450s and mEH may be critical determinants of cancer susceptibility. In humans, hepatic mEH exhibits a wide range of expression levels between different people (42). Polymorphic allelic variants in the mEH gene have also been described in humans (43, 44). Thus, it is thought that interindividual variation in mEH expression in the human population could play a role in cancer susceptibility, teratogenesis, and cytotoxicity (45-47). These studies will provide a mechanistic-based framework in an intact animal model for future efforts in molecular epidemiology to determine whether genetic polymorphisms in human mEH confer altered sensitivities to the toxic and carcinogenic effects of xenobiotics that damage cells through epoxide intermediates.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Dr. Henry Hennings for expert advice on setting up the skin cancer bioassays, Dr. Jerrold Ward for performing gross pathology and histology, and James Hardwick for the antibody against rat mEH.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Present address: Dept. of Drug Metabolism and Molecular Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan.

§ Present address: Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo 134-0081, Japan.

Present address: Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.

** Present address: Departado de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, 06080 Badajoz, Spain.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 37, Rm. 3E-24, Bethesda, MD 20892. Tel.: 301-496-9067; Fax: 301-496-8419; E-mail: fjgonz@helix.nih.gov.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: mEH, microsomal epoxide hydrolase; kbp, kilobase pair(s); ES, embryonic stem; EF, embyro-derived fibroblast; sEH, soluble epoxide hydrolase; DMBA, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene; NEO, phosphoribosyltransferase II gene; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Seidegard, J., and DePierre, J. W. (1983) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 695, 251-270[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Guengerich, F. P. (1982) Rev. Biochem. Toxicol. 4, 5-30
3. Cresteil, T., Beaune, P., Kremers, P., Celier, C., Guengerich, F. P., and Leroux, J. P. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 151, 345-350[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Pacifici, G. M., Colizzi, C., Giuliani, L., and Rane, A. (1983) Arch. Toxicol. 54, 331-341[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Omiecinski, C. J., Aicher, L., and Swenson, L. (1994) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 269, 417-423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Vogel-Bindel, U., Bentley, P., and Oesch, F. (1982) Eur. J. Biochem. 126, 425-431[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. von Dippe, P., Amoui, M., Stellwagen, R. H., and Levy, D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 18176-18180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Kaneko, S. (1991) Reprod. Toxicol. 5, 179-198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Guenthner, T. M. (1990) in Conjugation Reactions in Drug Metabolism (Mulder, G. J., ed) , pp. 365-404, Taylor & Francis Ltd., London
10. Jerina, D. M. (1983) Drug. Metab. Dispos. 11, 1-4[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Oesch, F. (1983) Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 135, 81-105[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Phillips, D. H., and Grover, P. L. (1994) Drug. Metab. Rev. 26, 443-467[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Christou, M., Savas, U., Spink, D. C., Gierthy, J. F., and Jefcoate, C. R. (1994) Carcinogenesis 15, 725-732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Dipple, A., and Nebzydoski, J. A. (1978) Chem. Biol. Interact. 20, 17-26[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Tierney, B., Hewer, A., MacNicoll, A. D., Giovanni Gervasi, P., Rattle, H., Walsh, C., Grover, P. L., and Sims, P. (1978) Chem. Biol. Interact. 23, 243-257[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Wislocki, P. G., Gadek, K. M., Chou, M. W., Yang, S. K., and Lu, A. Y. (1980) Cancer Res. 40, 3661-3664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Christou, M., Jovanovich, M. C., and Jefcoate, C. R. (1989) Carcinogenesis 10, 1883-1890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Lau, H. H., Coffing, S. L., Lee, H., Harvey, R. G., and Baird, W. M. (1995) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 8, 970-978[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. DiGiovanni, J., Slaga, T. J., and Boutwell, R. K. (1980) Carcinogenesis 1, 381-389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Hennings, H., Devor, D., Wenk, M. L., Slaga, T. J., Former, B., Colburn, N. H., Bowden, G. T., Elgjo, K., and Yuspa, S. H. (1981) Cancer Res. 41, 773-779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Gonzalez, F. J., and Kasper, C. B. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 4697-4700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Grant, D. F., Storms, D. H., and Hammock, B. D. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 17628-17633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Lee, S. S., Pineau, T., Drago, J., Lee, E. J., Owens, J. W., Kroetz, D. L., Fernandez-Salguero, P. M., Westphal, H., and Gonzalez, F. J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3012-3022[Abstract]
24. Laird, P. W., Zijderveld, A., Linders, K., Rudnicki, M. A., Jaenisch, R., and Berns, A. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 4293[Free Full Text]
25. Skehan, P., Storeng, R., Scudiero, D., Monks, A., McMahon, J., Vistica, D., Warren, J. T., Bokesch, H., Kenney, S., and Boyd, M. R. (1990) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 82, 1107-1112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Shou, M., Korzekwa, K. R., Krausz, K. W., Buters, J. T., Grogan, J., Goldfarb, I., Hardwick, J. P., Gonzalez, F. J., and Gelboin, H. V. (1996) Mol. Carcinogen. 17, 241-249[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Eltom, S. E., Larsen, M. C., and Jefcoate, C. R. (1998) Carcinogenesis 19, 1437-1444[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Hassett, C., Robinson, K. B., Beck, N. B., and Omiecinski, C. J. (1994) Genomics 23, 433-442[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Falany, C. N., McQuiddy, P., and Kasper, C. B. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 5924-5930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Oesch, F., Glatt, H., and Schimassmann, H. (1977) Biochem. Pharmacol. 26, 603-607[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Porter, T. D., Beck, T. W., and Kasper, C. B. (1986) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 248, 121-129[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Skoda, R. C., Demierre, A., McBride, O. W., Gonzalez, F. J., and Meyer, U. A. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 1549-1554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Hassett, C., Turnblom, S. M., DeAngeles, A., and Omiecinski, C. J. (1989) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 271, 380-389[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Lim, S. K., Sigmund, C. D., Gross, K. W., and Maquat, L. E. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 1149-1161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Zhang, J., and Maquat, L. E. (1996) RNA 2, 235-243[Abstract]
36. Reiners, J. J., Jr., and Singh, K. P. (1997) Carcinogenesis 18, 593-597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Hennings, H., Lowry, D. T., Yuspa, S. H., Mock, B., and Potter, M. (1997) Mol. Carcinogen. 20, 143-150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Friedberg, T., Becker, R., Oesch, F., and Glatt, H. R. (1994) Carcinogenesis 15, 171-175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Frenkel, K., Wei, L., and Wei, H. (1995) Free. Radical Biol. Med. 19, 373-380[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Ogura, K., Sohtome, T., Sugiyama, A., Okuda, H., Hiratsuka, A., and Watabe, T. (1990) Mol. Pharmacol. 37, 848-854[Abstract]
41. Buters, J. T., Sakai, S., Richter, T., Pineau, T., Alexander, D. L., Savas, U., Doehmer, J., Ward, J. M., Jefcoate, C. R., and Gonzalez, F. J. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 1977-1982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Hassett, C., Lin, J., Carty, C. L., Laurenzana, E. M., and Omiecinski, C. J. (1997) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 337, 275-283[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Gaedigk, A., Speilberg, S. P., and Grant, D. M. (1994) Pharmacogenetics 4, 142-153[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Hassett, C., Aicher, L., Sidhu, J. S., and Omiecinski, C. J. (1994) Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, 433-442
45. Buehler, B. A., Delimont, D., van Waes, M., and Finnell, R. H. (1990) N. Engl. J. Med. 322, 1567-1572[Abstract]
46. McGlynn, K. A., Rosvold, E. A., Lustbader, E. D., Hu, Y., Clapper, M. L., Zhou, T., Wild, C. P., Xia, X. L., Baffoe-Bonnie, A., Ofori-Adjei, P., Chen, G. C., London, W. T., Shen, F. M., and Beutow, K. H. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 2384-2387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Smith, C. A., and Harrison, D. J. (1997) Lancet 350, 630-633[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
X. Ma, C. Cheung, K. W. Krausz, Y. M. Shah, T. Wang, J. R. Idle, and F. J. Gonzalez
A Double Transgenic Mouse Model Expressing Human Pregnane X Receptor and Cytochrome P450 3A4
Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2008; 36(12): 2506 - 2512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
A. F. Keating, K. S. Rajapaksa, I. G. Sipes, and P. B. Hoyer
Effect of CYP2E1 Gene Deletion in Mice on Expression of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase in Response to VCD Exposure
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2008; 105(2): 351 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. Gao, L. A. Mitchell, F. T. Lauer, and S. W. Burchiel
p53 and ATM/ATR Regulate 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-Induced Immunosuppression
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2008; 73(1): 137 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. Gao, F. T. Lauer, L. A. Mitchell, and S. W. Burchiel
Microsomal Expoxide Hydrolase Is Required for 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-Induced Immunotoxicity in Mice
Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2007; 98(1): 137 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
K. S. Rajapaksa, I. G. Sipes, and P. B. Hoyer
Involvement of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Enzyme in Ovotoxicity Caused by 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2007; 96(2): 327 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
X. Ma, Y. Shah, C. Cheung, G. L. Guo, L. Feigenbaum, K. W. Krausz, J. R. Idle, and F. J. Gonzalez
The Pregnane X Receptor Gene-Humanized Mouse: A Model for Investigating Drug-Drug Interactions Mediated by Cytochromes P450 3A
Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 194 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P.-H. Chu, T.-Y. Huang, J. Williams, and D. W. Stafford
Purified vitamin K epoxide reductase alone is sufficient for conversion of vitamin K epoxide to vitamin K and vitamin K to vitamin KH2
PNAS, December 19, 2006; 103(51): 19308 - 19313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
D. R. Boverhof, L. D. Burgoon, C. Tashiro, B. Sharratt, B. Chittim, J. R. Harkema, D. L. Mendrick, and T. R. Zacharewski
Comparative Toxicogenomic Analysis of the Hepatotoxic Effects of TCDD in Sprague Dawley Rats and C57BL/6 Mice
Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2006; 94(2): 398 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. Gao, F. T. Lauer, S. Dunaway, and S. W. Burchiel
Cytochrome P450 1B1 Is Required for 7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)-anthracene (DMBA) Induced Spleen Cell Immunotoxicity
Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2005; 86(1): 68 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S.-H. Liang, C. Hassett, and C. J. Omiecinski
Alternative Promoters Determine Tissue-Specific Expression Profiles of the Human Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene (EPHX1)
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2005; 67(1): 220 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
S. Toivonen, E.-L. Romppanen, M. Hiltunen, S. Helisalmi, L. Keski-Nisula, K. Punnonen, and S. Heinonen
Low-Activity Haplotype of the Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene Is Protective Against Placental Abruption
Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2004; 11(8): 540 - 544.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
C. J. Henderson and C. R. Wolf
Transgenic Analysis of Human Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes: Preclinical Drug Development and Toxicology
Mol. Interv., September 1, 2003; 3(6): 331 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
K. S. Sugamori, S. Wong, A. Gaedigk, V. Yu, H. Abramovici, R. Rozmahel, and D. M. Grant
Generation and Functional Characterization of Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase Nat1/Nat2Double-Knockout Mice
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2003; 64(1): 170 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Elsby, N. R. Kitteringham, C. E. Goldring, C. A. Lovatt, M. Chamberlain, C. J. Henderson, C. R. Wolf, and B. K. Park
Increased Constitutive c-Jun N-terminal Kinase Signaling in Mice Lacking Glutathione S-Transferase Pi
J. Biol. Chem., June 13, 2003; 278(25): 22243 - 22249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]