![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 23963-23968, August 20, 1999
From the Laboratory of Metabolism, Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) is a conserved
enzyme that is known to hydrolyze many drugs and carcinogens, and a few endogenous steroids and bile acids. mEH-null mice were produced and
found to be fertile and have no phenotypic abnormalities thus indicating that mEH is not critical for reproduction and physiological homeostasis. mEH has also been implicated in participating in the
metabolic activation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogens. Embryonic fibroblast derived from the mEH-null mice were unable to
produce the proximate carcinogenic metabolite of
7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA), a widely
studied experimental prototype for the polycylic aromatic
hydrocarbon class of chemical carcinogens. They were also resistant to
DMBA-mediated toxicity. Using the two-stage initiation-promotion skin
cancer bioassay, the mEH-null mice were found to be highly resistant to
DMBA-induced carcinogenesis. In a complete carcinogenesis bioassay, the
mEH mice were totally resistant to tumorigenesis. These data establish
in an intact animal model that mEH is a key genetic determinant in DMBA
carcinogenesis through its role in production of the ultimate
carcinogenic metabolite of DMBA, the 3,4-diol-1,2-epoxide.
Microsomal epoxide hydrolase
(mEH)1 is a critical phase I
biotransformation enzyme that catalyzes hydrolysis of a large number of
epoxide intermediates (1, 2). mEH is highly conserved in different
mammalian species, is expressed in the embryo (3-5) and multiple
organs, and is active toward some endogenous epoxy-steroids (6) and
bile acids (7) thus suggesting that it plays a critical physiological
role. mEH is usually thought to play a pivotal role in protection
against the toxicity of reactive epoxide intermediates, because
metabolism of epoxides by this enzyme results in the production of less
reactive and less toxic dihydrodiol intermediates of drugs such as
phenytoin and carbamazepine (8, 9) and epoxides of environmental toxins
(10, 11). In contrast to this protective effect, mEH is thought to be
required for the metabolic activation of the potent carcinogen
7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA), a widely studied
experimental prototype for the polycylic aromatic hydrocarbon class of
chemical carcinogens (12). P450s and mEH metabolize DMBA to both inert
metabolites and metabolites that are electrophilic and capable of
producing DNA adducts (Fig. 1). Cytochrome P450 CYP1B1 oxidizes DMBA to the 3,4-epoxide (13). This is
followed by hydrolysis of the epoxide by mEH to the proximate carcinogenic metabolite, DMBA-3,4-diol. This metabolite can be further
oxidized by either CYP1A1 or CYP1B1 to the principal ultimate carcinogenic metabolite, DMBA-3,4-diol-1,2-epoxide, that is capable of
producing DNA adducts (14-17). Other ring hydroxylations and methyl
hydroxylations of DMBA result in inactive metabolites that do not bind
DNA. Based on this scheme, mEH should be a critical enzyme in the
pathway leading to the carcinogenic activity of DMBA. However a role
for mEH in DMBA carcinogenesis has not been established in an intact
animal model.
DMBA carcinogenesis bioassays have been established using mouse skin
with either the two stage initiation-promotion protocol in which DMBA
is initially applied followed by repeated applications of
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), or the complete carcinogenesis assay where DMBA is continuously applied (18-20). In
the two stage carcinogenesis model, metabolites of DMBA cause DNA
adducts and TPA administration results in cell proliferation that
serves to fix the mutations in cell cycle control genes leading to
selection of rapidly dividing cancer cells. In the complete carcinogenesis scheme, DMBA serves as both an initiator and promoter of
cell growth. It is not known whether the mechanism of carcinogenesis differs between the two protocols. The mouse skin cancer bioassays can
be used to determine the effects of genes on DMBA carcinogenesis.
In this report, mEH-null mice were produced and found to have no
phenotype, indicating that in mice, mEH is not essential for
reproduction and physiological homeostasis. Using the two widely used
skin cancer bioassays discussed above, mEH-null mice were found to be
highly resistant to DMBA-induced carcinogenesis.
Isolation and Sequencing of the cDNA and Gene--
The mouse
mEH cDNA was isolated from a liver cDNA library (Stratagene, La
Jolla, CA) using the rat mEH as a probe (21). Mouse soluble EH (sEH)
cDNA was isolated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain
reaction. Total RNA was isolated from livers of 8-week-old male C57BL/6
mice using the Ultraspec RNA reagent according to the manufacturer's
protocol (Biotecx Laboratories, Houston, TX). Primers were generated
from the 5' (GGGAATTCATGGCGCTGCGTGTAGCCGCG) and 3'
(GGGAATTCCTAAATCTTGGAGGTCACTGA) ends of the sEH cDNA sequence (22)
and were used to amplify the cDNA using the cDNA Cycle Kit
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The resultant cDNA was completely sequenced using an Applied Biosystems Model 377 sequencer (Foster City,
CA). The mEH genomic clones were obtained from a mouse 129/Sv Lambda
FIX genomic library (Stratagene) using the mouse mEH cDNA as a probe.
Construction of the Targeting Vector--
A 5.5-kbp
BamHI fragment containing exon 2 was isolated from the
genomic clone and subcloned into pUC18. To disrupt the gene, an
ApaI fragment containing a part of exon 2 was deleted and
replaced with the bacterial phosphoribosyltransferase II gene cassette (TK-NEO) derived from the pMC1Neo poly(A) vector including
ApaI adapters (Stratagene). A herpes simplex virus thymidine
kinase gene was inserted at the 3' end of mEH gene for use in negative selection with gancyclovir.
Production of Chimeric Mice--
The plasmid DNA used for
targeting was purified by banding twice on cesium chloride gradients,
linearized with SalI and introduced into embryonic stem (ES)
cells purchased from Genome Systems Inc. (St. Louis, MO) by
electroporation at 250 V, 250 µF capacitance using a Bio-Rad gene
pulser. One day after electroporation, the ES cells were incubated in
medium containing G418 (300 µg/ml) and gancyclovir (5 µM) as positive and negative selectable markers, respectively. The surviving ES cell clones were analyzed by Southern blotting using a probe corresponding to exon 3 and exon 4 of the mEH
gene. The probes were derived from the mEH cDNA. The TK-NEO gene
was used to identify specific homologous recombinants and eliminate
clones having other nonspecific integration of the targeting construct.
The ES cell clones heterozygous for the disrupted mEH gene were
injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts to generate chimeric founder mice as
described previously (23). The injected blastocysts were transferred
into the uterus of pseudopregnant recipient NIH Swiss females to
produce chimeric mice. Male chimeras were bred with C57BL/6 females to
determine whether germ line transmission had occurred. The heterozygous
mice, having germ line transmission of the targeted mEH allele, were
interbred to generate homozygotes.
Genotyping of the ES Cells and Mice--
Genomic DNA was
isolated from ES cells and mouse tails (24) and digested with
XbaI and EcoRI. The digested DNA was subjected to
electrophoresis in 0.6% agarose gels, transferred to a Gene Screen
Plus nylon membrane (NEN Life Science Products) using 0.4 N
NaOH, and hybridized with the mEH probe.
Analysis of mEH Expression--
Mouse liver tissue was
homogenized in Ultraspec RNA reagent (Biotecx Laboratories). Total RNA
(10 µg) was denatured and subjected to electrophoresis in 1% agarose
gels containing 2.2 M formaldehyde and blotted to Gene
Screen Plus nylon membranes. mEH and sEH cDNAs were labeled with
[ DMBA Toxicity and Metabolism in Embryo-derived
Fibroblasts--
Mice at gestation day 14 were euthanized by carbon
dioxide asphyxiation, and the embryos were placed in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4). Following removal of internal organs and head, the
remaining torsos were minced and placed into 2 ml of 0.25% trypsin for
45 min at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped by addition of incubation
medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine
serum, 100 µg/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 250 µg/ml
amphotericin B and 2 mM glutamine). The cells were grown at
37 °C in 5% carbon dioxide until confluent, trypsinized, and stored
at Skin Carcinogenesis--
The skin tumor-induction experiments
were carried out using the initiation-promotion protocol as described
(18-20). Female mEH-null and wild-type mice, aged 8-11 weeks were
shaved with electric clippers 2 days before treatment with DMBA
(Sigma). The mice were initiated by treating once with 25 µg of DMBA
in 200 µl of acetone, and 1 week later, they were treated with 5 µg
of TPA (Mallinckrodt Baker, Inc., Paris, KY) in 200 µl of acetone. TPA was administered three times weekly for 25 weeks. As a control, wild-type mice were initiated with only acetone and promoted with TPA.
For the complete carcinogenesis experiments, the mice received weekly
applications of 12.8 µg of DMBA in 200 µl of acetone for 25 weeks.
Skin papillomas greater than 1 mm in diameter were counted and the
incidence was monitored weekly.
Generation and Characterization of mEH-Null Mice--
To
investigate the developmental and physiological function of mEH and its
role in chemical carcinogenesis, mEH-null mice were generated using the
classical strategy of homologous recombination in ES cells. The mouse
mEH gene was isolated and characterized and found to span 29 kbp (Fig.
2A) and have 9 exons (Table
I), similar to the human and rat mEH
genes (28, 29). The splice junctions and nucleotide sequences in each
exon were highly conserved between the human and mouse mEH genes. The
mouse mEH cDNA was isolated from a mouse liver cDNA library,
and the nucleotide sequences of the exon portions in the mouse mEH gene
were identical to those of the cDNA.
A 5.5-kbp BamHI fragment containing exon 2 was used to make
a vector for targeted gene disruption. A 0.7-kbp ApaI
fragment containing a part of exon 2 was replaced with 1.1-kbp TK-NEO
cassette encoding the NEO selectable marker (Fig. 2B). To
allow the use of gancyclovir for negative selection, the herpes simplex
virus thymidine kinase gene expression cassette was inserted into 3' end of the targeting vector. The linearized targeting construct was
electroporated into ES cells, and four ES cell homologous recombinant
clones were found out of the 220 G418- and gancyclovir-resistant clones
analyzed. Southern blot analysis demonstrated that heterozygous ES
clones were obtained as indicated by the presence of an additional 7.7-kbp fragment obtained upon double digestion with XbaI
and EcoRI (data not shown). When these clones were
hybridized with the TK-NEO gene as a probe, only a single hybridizing
band of 7.7-kbp with XbaI-EcoRI double-digested
DNA was detected, demonstrating that these clones did not contain any
additional random integrations of the targeting construct. One of these
homologous recombinant ES cell clones was injected into C57BL/6
blastocysts and seven male chimeric mice were generated; one of these
yielded germline transmission. Heterozygous (mEH+/
mEH-null mice exhibited no differences in weight, development,
fertility and behavior when compared with their wild-type littermate controls. The finding of no effect on fertility and reproduction was
quite surprising, because mEH is expressed in the ovary and testis
(30). Histological examination of several other organs, including
liver, lung, kidney, intestine, spleen, thymus, heart, and brain,
revealed no difference between mEH-null and wild-type mice, indicating
that mEH is not a critical requirement for normal development and
physiology. This finding of no apparent role in development and
physiological homeostasis was of interest, because the enzyme is highly
conserved at the level of amino acid sequence similarity (31-33) and
substrate specificity in different mammalian species, and it is
expressed in the embryo and multiple organs (3-5).
To evaluate the level of mEH mRNA, Northern blot analysis was
performed (Fig. 3). As a control, sEH
mRNA was also examined. sEH mRNA levels were not different
among the mEH-null, mEH+/ The Role of mEH in DMBA Metabolism and Toxicity--
To determine
whether lack of the mEH affects the ability to metabolically activate
DMBA, EF were prepared from wild-type and mEH-null mice and subjected
to incubation with increasing concentrations of DMBA (Fig.
5). Cells that metabolically activate
DMBA to electrophilic metabolites will be killed. Wild-type EF were
killed by DMBA at less than 1 µM. In contrast, mEH-null
EF were resistant to up to 10 µM of the carcinogen. These
data suggest that cells lacking mEH are unable to catalyze the
metabolic activation of DMBA. This was confirmed by direct analysis of
DMBA metabolism by EF in situ. EF from wild-type mice were
able to form the 3,4-diol metabolite that results from P450 oxidation
to the 3,4-epoxide followed by hydrolysis to the diol by mEH (Table
II). In contrast, no detectable DMBA-3,4-diol was formed in cells from mEH-null mice. These EF cells
also failed to produce the 8,9-diol and 10,11-diol, whereas they were
able to generate the phenol metabolites that result from hydrolysis of
epoxides by water. These data indicate that cells from mEH-null mice
are unable to produce the proximate carcinogenic metabolite of DMBA,
the 3,4-diol, that is the precursor to the 3,4-diol-1,2-epoxide
ultimate carcinogenic metabolite of DMBA.
The Role of mEH in Susceptibility to Skin Cancer--
To test the
role of mEH in DMBA-induced carcinogenesis, skin cancer bioassays were
carried out comparing the mEH-null with wild-type mice (Fig.
6). The mEH-null allele is on a 129/Sv
genetic background, and this stain is known to be sensitive to
DMBA-induced skin carcinogenesis (36). In a standard
initiation-promotion protocol, wild-type mice started to develop
papillomas after 6 weeks of TPA treatment, and the percentage of mice
with tumors increased to 70% by 15 weeks (Fig. 6A). This
value is within the range of that found by others (37). The mean number
of papillomas per mouse at 15 weeks of treatment was 4 (Fig.
6B). In contrast, papillomas first appeared in mEH-null mice
at 9-10 weeks and the percentage of mice with tumors reached 20% at
17 weeks. The mean number of tumors per mouse in this group was 0.5 (Fig. 6B). These data indicate that lack of mEH results in a
marked resistance to DMBA-induced skin cancer thus demonstrating in an
intact animal model that mEH is a major determinant for susceptibility
to DMBA-induced cancer. In contrast to the initiation-promotion assay,
mEH-null mice were completely resistant to skin cancer when a complete carcinogenesis assay was performed in which only DMBA was applied. After 25 weeks of treatment, almost 80% of wild-type mice had papillomas, whereas none of the mEH-null mice had even a single detectable nodule (Fig. 6, C and D). This is
strong evidence that there are significant mechanistic differences
between the initiation-promotion skin cancer bioassay and the complete
carcinogenesis assay, which involve metabolic activation of DMBA.
There are a large number of enzymes that are involved in the
detoxification of carcinogens including microsomal and soluble epoxide
hydrolases, UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, glutathione S-transferases, and diaphorase. Although mEH is generally
considered a detoxification enzyme for arene oxides, its involvement in
the hydrolysis of chemical intermediates, leading to the ultimate carcinogenic metabolite, has only been demonstrated in vitro
and has not previously been demonstrated in an intact animal model (38). In the complete carcinogenesis protocol, no cancers were found in
the mEH-null mice thus establishing that mEH is required for the
carcinogenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons such as DMBA
in vivo. In the initiation-promotion carcinogen bioassay, the null mice did develop papillomas albeit at levels significantly lower than in wild-type mice. These studies indicate a possible mechanistic difference between the complete carcinogenesis and the TPA
initiation-promotion bioassays. It is well established that mEH is
absolutely required for production of the bay region diol-epoxide of
DMBA that is highly mutagenic (12). However, the fact that tumors were
found in the mEH-null mice treated with TPA suggests the existence of a
second pathway for activation of DMBA that is dependent on TPA. DMBA is
known to cause elevated hydrogen peroxide and oxidized bases,
particularly 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine in epidermal DNA, although it
is unknown whether this is dependent on P450 oxidation (39). Perhaps
the active metabolites derived from this, or another P450 and
mEH-independent pathway of DMBA activation such as that mediated by
mutagenic sulfate esters (40), result in DNA adducts that are more
readily repaired than those adducts produced by the DMBA diol-epoxide
metabolite. Fixation of these adducts into mutations may require a
strong hyperplastic response such as that found with TPA. These
possibilities can now be investigated using the P450 and mEH null mouse models.
Recent studies with the CYP1B1-null mouse have established that CYP1B1
is critical for DMBA carcinogenesis in vivo using an oral
route of administration that results in lymphomas in wild-type mice
(41). These data support the in vitro evidence showing that
CYP1B1 is considerably more active than CYP1A1 in producing the
DMBA-3,4-diol proximate carcinogenic metabolite (13). These results
establish that mEH is also required for DMBA carcinogenesis and
validates the in vivo relevance of the bay region
diol-epoxide pathway for metabolic activation of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbon carcinogens. These studies suggests that genetics
differences in expression of P450s and mEH may be critical determinants
of cancer susceptibility. In humans, hepatic mEH exhibits a wide range
of expression levels between different people (42). Polymorphic allelic
variants in the mEH gene have also been described in humans (43, 44).
Thus, it is thought that interindividual variation in mEH expression in
the human population could play a role in cancer susceptibility,
teratogenesis, and cytotoxicity (45-47). These studies will provide a
mechanistic-based framework in an intact animal model for future
efforts in molecular epidemiology to determine whether genetic
polymorphisms in human mEH confer altered sensitivities to the toxic
and carcinogenic effects of xenobiotics that damage cells through
epoxide intermediates.
We thank Dr. Henry Hennings for expert advice
on setting up the skin cancer bioassays, Dr. Jerrold Ward for
performing gross pathology and histology, and James Hardwick for the
antibody against rat mEH.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo 134-0081, Japan.
¶
Present address: Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia
Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
**
Present address: Departado de Bioquímica y Biología
Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, 06080 Badajoz, Spain.
The abbreviations used are:
mEH, microsomal
epoxide hydrolase;
kbp, kilobase pair(s);
ES, embryonic stem;
EF, embyro-derived fibroblast;
sEH, soluble epoxide hydrolase;
DMBA, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene;
NEO, phosphoribosyltransferase II gene;
TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate.
Targeted Disruption of the Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene
MICROSOMAL EPOXIDE HYDROLASE IS REQUIRED FOR THE CARCINOGENIC
ACTIVITY OF 7,12-DIMETHYLBENZ[a]ANTHRACENE*
,
,
,
Laboratory of Molecular
Carcinogenesis, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
20892
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Metabolism of DMBA by CYP1A1, CYP1B1, and
mEH. Epoxides formed by P450s can either be hydrolyzed by mEH to
trans-dihydrodiols or spontaneously hydrolyzed by water to
phenols. The 2-phenol, 10,11-diol metabolites and methyl hydroxy
metabolites are not shown. The pathway leading to the proximate
(DMBA-3,4-diol) and ultimate (DMBA-3,4-diol-1,2-epoxide) metabolites is
shown with thick arrows.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]dCTP using a random primer polymerase kit
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The conditions used for prehybridization,
hybridization, and washing were previously described (23). Liver
microsomal protein (10 µg) was subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. Protein was electroblotted to nitrocellulose membrane
(Schleicher & Schuell), and the immune complexes were detected by use
of ECL reagent (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Rabbit antibody prepared against rat mEH was kindly provided by Dr. James P. Hardwick
(Northeastern Ohio University College of Medicine).
80 °C until use. The cells were thawed before use, grown for 1 day, trypsinized, and seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 3,000 cells/well in 100 µl of medium. Following incubation for 1 day, a
series of dilutions of DMBA in 100 µl of medium were added to the
cells and incubation continued for 3 days. The cells were fixed with
10% trichloroacetic acid, washed, and stained with sulforhodamine B
(25). For metabolism studies, [3H]DMBA (1,033 mCi/mmol),
purified by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography to
remove impurities and dissolved in Me2SO, was incubated
with 1.4 × 106 embryo-derived fibroblast (EF) cells
in 5 ml of medium (the final concentration of DMBA was 0.3 µM) for 24 h. The cells were mechanically harvested
and extracted with 1 volume of cold acetone, and the aqueous
phase was extracted twice with 10 ml of ethyl acetate. The combined
organic phase was dried, and the residues were analyzed by
reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography with a
radio-detector (26). Comparing retention times with authentic compounds
identified the metabolites formed.
12-Hydroxymethyl-7-methylbenz[a]anthracene (7M,12OH-DMBA); DMBA-3,4-dihydrodiol (3,4-diol); 2-,3-, and
4-hydroxybenz[a]anthracene (DMBA 2-, 3-, 4-phenols)
were obtained from the NCI Chemical Carcinogen Repository (Frederick,
MD). DMBA 8,9-dihydrodiol (8,9-diol) was formed by incubation of DMBA
with human recombinant CYP1A1 (Gentest Corp., Woburn, MA) (26, 27).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The restriction maps of the mEH gene,
targeting constructs, and targeted allele, and the Southern blot
genotypes of the resultant heterozygous and mEH-null mice.
Panel A, restriction map of the mouse mEH gene.
Panel B, restriction maps of the wild-type
allele, targeting construct, and targeted allele are shown using
ApaI (A) BamHI (B),
EcoRI (E), and XbaI (X).
Probes used for genotyping are indicated above the wild-type allele
map. Restriction fragment sizes of the wild-type and targeting alleles
for XbaI and EcoRI double digestion are shown.
Panel C, Southern blot analysis of mouse tail DNA. DNAs were
digested with XbaI and EcoRI, electrophoresed in
a 0.6% agarose gel, transferred to nylon membranes, and hybridized
with the 32P-labeled probe. The estimated sizes of the
hybridized bands are shown. +/+, wild-type mice; +/
, heterozygous
mice;
/
, homozygous mEH-null mice.
Exon-intron junctions of the mEH gene
) mice were normal
and used for interbreeding to generate homozygous (mEH
/
or
mEH-null) mice. Breeding of the heterozygous mice produced offspring at the expected Mendelian distribution indicating that no in
utero lethality occurs as a result of loss of the functional mEH
gene. The mEH+/
and mEH
/
mice DNAs were analyzed for the presence of mutant alleles of the mEH gene (Fig. 2C). The absence of
a diagnostic 10.5-kbp band and the presence of a 7.7-kbp band in the
offspring clearly indicated that the mEH-null mice were born and viable.
, and wild-type mice. In the mEH-null mouse
liver, a lower abundance RNA band (that was of slightly higher mobility
than that seen in the wild-type mice) was detected using the mEH
cDNA as a probe (Fig. 3). This transcript is probably derived from
the disrupted allele although it is not certain how the TK-NEO cassette
would alter splicing to produce a smaller mRNA. The lower level of
expression of this transcript is not surprising, because mRNAs that
do not encode a normal protein are typically unstable and rapidly
degraded (34, 35). To further confirm that mEH protein is not expressed in the mEH-null mice, immunoblot analysis was performed using rabbit
antibody against rat mEH. mEH protein was not detected in the mEH-null
mouse liver microsomes (Fig. 4). The data
confirm that the mEH is not expressed in the mEH-null mice.

View larger version (77K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Northern blot analysis of liver RNA.
Total liver RNAs (10 µg) were subjected to Northern blotting. The
mouse mEH and sEH cDNAs were used as probes. +/+, wild-type mice;
+/
, heterozygous mice;
/
, homozygous mEH-null mice.

View larger version (67K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Western blot analysis of liver
microsomes. Liver microsomal proteins (10 µg) were subjected to
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to nylon membranes,
incubated with rabbit antibody, and the bands visualized using the ECL
reagent. The ECL reagent was used to develop the blots. +/+, wild-type
mice; +/
, heterozygous mice;
/
, homozygous mEH-null mice.

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Toxicity of DMBA in primary embryonic
fibroblast. Survival of primary embryonic fibroblasts from
wild-type (
) and mEH-null (
) mice after exposure to DMBA.
Concomitant control cells without DMBA were used as 100%. Each point
represents the mean ± S.D. of eight.
DMBA metabolism in mouse embryonic fibroblast

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Skin cancer induction by DMBA. Skin
cancer bioassays with wild-type (
) and mEH-null (
) mice. In the
DMBA initiation and TPA promotion study (panels A and
B), the number of mice per group was 24 for wild-type, 26 for mEH-null, and 20 for control. Controls (
) were wild-type mice
that were not initiated with DMBA. In the DMBA complete carcinogenesis
study (panels C and D), the number of mice in
each group is 24. Panels A and C show the
percentage of mice with papillomas versus time of treatment
in weeks. Panels B and D show the mean number of
papillomas per mouse versus time in weeks. Each point
represents the mean ± S.E.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Present address: Dept. of Drug Metabolism and Molecular
Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: National Institutes
of Health, Bldg. 37, Rm. 3E-24, Bethesda, MD 20892. Tel.: 301-496-9067;
Fax: 301-496-8419; E-mail: fjgonz@helix.nih.gov.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Seidegard, J.,
and DePierre, J. W.
(1983)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
695,
251-270[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Guengerich, F. P.
(1982)
Rev. Biochem. Toxicol.
4,
5-30
3.
Cresteil, T.,
Beaune, P.,
Kremers, P.,
Celier, C.,
Guengerich, F. P.,
and Leroux, J. P.
(1985)
Eur. J. Biochem.
151,
345-350[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Pacifici, G. M.,
Colizzi, C.,
Giuliani, L.,
and Rane, A.
(1983)
Arch. Toxicol.
54,
331-341[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Omiecinski, C. J.,
Aicher, L.,
and Swenson, L.
(1994)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
269,
417-423 6.
Vogel-Bindel, U.,
Bentley, P.,
and Oesch, F.
(1982)
Eur. J. Biochem.
126,
425-431[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
von Dippe, P.,
Amoui, M.,
Stellwagen, R. H.,
and Levy, D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
18176-18180 8.
Kaneko, S.
(1991)
Reprod. Toxicol.
5,
179-198[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Guenthner, T. M.
(1990)
in
Conjugation Reactions in Drug Metabolism
(Mulder, G. J., ed)
, pp. 365-404, Taylor & Francis Ltd., London
10.
Jerina, D. M.
(1983)
Drug. Metab. Dispos.
11,
1-4[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Oesch, F.
(1983)
Prog. Clin. Biol. Res.
135,
81-105[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Phillips, D. H.,
and Grover, P. L.
(1994)
Drug. Metab. Rev.
26,
443-467[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Christou, M.,
Savas, U.,
Spink, D. C.,
Gierthy, J. F.,
and Jefcoate, C. R.
(1994)
Carcinogenesis
15,
725-732 14.
Dipple, A.,
and Nebzydoski, J. A.
(1978)
Chem. Biol. Interact.
20,
17-26[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Tierney, B.,
Hewer, A.,
MacNicoll, A. D.,
Giovanni Gervasi, P.,
Rattle, H.,
Walsh, C.,
Grover, P. L.,
and Sims, P.
(1978)
Chem. Biol. Interact.
23,
243-257[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Wislocki, P. G.,
Gadek, K. M.,
Chou, M. W.,
Yang, S. K.,
and Lu, A. Y.
(1980)
Cancer Res.
40,
3661-3664 17.
Christou, M.,
Jovanovich, M. C.,
and Jefcoate, C. R.
(1989)
Carcinogenesis
10,
1883-1890 18.
Lau, H. H.,
Coffing, S. L.,
Lee, H.,
Harvey, R. G.,
and Baird, W. M.
(1995)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
8,
970-978[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
DiGiovanni, J.,
Slaga, T. J.,
and Boutwell, R. K.
(1980)
Carcinogenesis
1,
381-389 20.
Hennings, H.,
Devor, D.,
Wenk, M. L.,
Slaga, T. J.,
Former, B.,
Colburn, N. H.,
Bowden, G. T.,
Elgjo, K.,
and Yuspa, S. H.
(1981)
Cancer Res.
41,
773-779 21.
Gonzalez, F. J.,
and Kasper, C. B.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
4697-4700 22.
Grant, D. F.,
Storms, D. H.,
and Hammock, B. D.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
17628-17633 23.
Lee, S. S.,
Pineau, T.,
Drago, J.,
Lee, E. J.,
Owens, J. W.,
Kroetz, D. L.,
Fernandez-Salguero, P. M.,
Westphal, H.,
and Gonzalez, F. J.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
3012-3022[Abstract]
24.
Laird, P. W.,
Zijderveld, A.,
Linders, K.,
Rudnicki, M. A.,
Jaenisch, R.,
and Berns, A.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
4293 25.
Skehan, P.,
Storeng, R.,
Scudiero, D.,
Monks, A.,
McMahon, J.,
Vistica, D.,
Warren, J. T.,
Bokesch, H.,
Kenney, S.,
and Boyd, M. R.
(1990)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
82,
1107-1112 26.
Shou, M.,
Korzekwa, K. R.,
Krausz, K. W.,
Buters, J. T.,
Grogan, J.,
Goldfarb, I.,
Hardwick, J. P.,
Gonzalez, F. J.,
and Gelboin, H. V.
(1996)
Mol. Carcinogen.
17,
241-249[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Eltom, S. E.,
Larsen, M. C.,
and Jefcoate, C. R.
(1998)
Carcinogenesis
19,
1437-1444 28.
Hassett, C.,
Robinson, K. B.,
Beck, N. B.,
and Omiecinski, C. J.
(1994)
Genomics
23,
433-442[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Falany, C. N.,
McQuiddy, P.,
and Kasper, C. B.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
5924-5930 30.
Oesch, F.,
Glatt, H.,
and Schimassmann, H.
(1977)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
26,
603-607[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Porter, T. D.,
Beck, T. W.,
and Kasper, C. B.
(1986)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
248,
121-129[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Skoda, R. C.,
Demierre, A.,
McBride, O. W.,
Gonzalez, F. J.,
and Meyer, U. A.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
1549-1554 33.
Hassett, C.,
Turnblom, S. M.,
DeAngeles, A.,
and Omiecinski, C. J.
(1989)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
271,
380-389[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Lim, S. K.,
Sigmund, C. D.,
Gross, K. W.,
and Maquat, L. E.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
1149-1161 35.
Zhang, J.,
and Maquat, L. E.
(1996)
RNA
2,
235-243[Abstract]
36.
Reiners, J. J., Jr.,
and Singh, K. P.
(1997)
Carcinogenesis
18,
593-597 37.
Hennings, H.,
Lowry, D. T.,
Yuspa, S. H.,
Mock, B.,
and Potter, M.
(1997)
Mol. Carcinogen.
20,
143-150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Friedberg, T.,
Becker, R.,
Oesch, F.,
and Glatt, H. R.
(1994)
Carcinogenesis
15,
171-175 39.
Frenkel, K.,
Wei, L.,
and Wei, H.
(1995)
Free. Radical Biol. Med.
19,
373-380[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Ogura, K.,
Sohtome, T.,
Sugiyama, A.,
Okuda, H.,
Hiratsuka, A.,
and Watabe, T.
(1990)
Mol. Pharmacol.
37,
848-854[Abstract]
41.
Buters, J. T.,
Sakai, S.,
Richter, T.,
Pineau, T.,
Alexander, D. L.,
Savas, U.,
Doehmer, J.,
Ward, J. M.,
Jefcoate, C. R.,
and Gonzalez, F. J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
1977-1982 42.
Hassett, C.,
Lin, J.,
Carty, C. L.,
Laurenzana, E. M.,
and Omiecinski, C. J.
(1997)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
337,
275-283[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Gaedigk, A.,
Speilberg, S. P.,
and Grant, D. M.
(1994)
Pharmacogenetics
4,
142-153[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Hassett, C.,
Aicher, L.,
Sidhu, J. S.,
and Omiecinski, C. J.
(1994)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
23,
433-442
45.
Buehler, B. A.,
Delimont, D.,
van Waes, M.,
and Finnell, R. H.
(1990)
N. Engl. J. Med.
322,
1567-1572[Abstract]
46.
McGlynn, K. A.,
Rosvold, E. A.,
Lustbader, E. D.,
Hu, Y.,
Clapper, M. L.,
Zhou, T.,
Wild, C. P.,
Xia, X. L.,
Baffoe-Bonnie, A.,
Ofori-Adjei, P.,
Chen, G. C.,
London, W. T.,
Shen, F. M.,
and Beutow, K. H.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
2384-2387 47.
Smith, C. A.,
and Harrison, D. J.
(1997)
Lancet
350,
630-633[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Ma, C. Cheung, K. W. Krausz, Y. M. Shah, T. Wang, J. R. Idle, and F. J. Gonzalez A Double Transgenic Mouse Model Expressing Human Pregnane X Receptor and Cytochrome P450 3A4 Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2008; 36(12): 2506 - 2512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Keating, K. S. Rajapaksa, I. G. Sipes, and P. B. Hoyer Effect of CYP2E1 Gene Deletion in Mice on Expression of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase in Response to VCD Exposure Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2008; 105(2): 351 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gao, L. A. Mitchell, F. T. Lauer, and S. W. Burchiel p53 and ATM/ATR Regulate 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-Induced Immunosuppression Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2008; 73(1): 137 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gao, F. T. Lauer, L. A. Mitchell, and S. W. Burchiel Microsomal Expoxide Hydrolase Is Required for 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-Induced Immunotoxicity in Mice Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2007; 98(1): 137 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Rajapaksa, I. G. Sipes, and P. B. Hoyer Involvement of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Enzyme in Ovotoxicity Caused by 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2007; 96(2): 327 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Ma, Y. Shah, C. Cheung, G. L. Guo, L. Feigenbaum, K. W. Krausz, J. R. Idle, and F. J. Gonzalez The Pregnane X Receptor Gene-Humanized Mouse: A Model for Investigating Drug-Drug Interactions Mediated by Cytochromes P450 3A Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 194 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-H. Chu, T.-Y. Huang, J. Williams, and D. W. Stafford Purified vitamin K epoxide reductase alone is sufficient for conversion of vitamin K epoxide to vitamin K and vitamin K to vitamin KH2 PNAS, December 19, 2006; 103(51): 19308 - 19313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Boverhof, L. D. Burgoon, C. Tashiro, B. Sharratt, B. Chittim, J. R. Harkema, D. L. Mendrick, and T. R. Zacharewski Comparative Toxicogenomic Analysis of the Hepatotoxic Effects of TCDD in Sprague Dawley Rats and C57BL/6 Mice Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2006; 94(2): 398 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gao, F. T. Lauer, S. Dunaway, and S. W. Burchiel Cytochrome P450 1B1 Is Required for 7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)-anthracene (DMBA) Induced Spleen Cell Immunotoxicity Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2005; 86(1): 68 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-H. Liang, C. Hassett, and C. J. Omiecinski Alternative Promoters Determine Tissue-Specific Expression Profiles of the Human Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene (EPHX1) Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2005; 67(1): 220 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Toivonen, E.-L. Romppanen, M. Hiltunen, S. Helisalmi, L. Keski-Nisula, K. Punnonen, and S. Heinonen Low-Activity Haplotype of the Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene Is Protective Against Placental Abruption Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2004; 11(8): 540 - 544. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Henderson and C. R. Wolf Transgenic Analysis of Human Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes: Preclinical Drug Development and Toxicology Mol. Interv., September 1, 2003; 3(6): 331 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Sugamori, S. Wong, A. Gaedigk, V. Yu, H. Abramovici, R. Rozmahel, and D. M. Grant Generation and Functional Characterization of Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase Nat1/Nat2Double-Knockout Mice Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2003; 64(1): 170 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Elsby, N. R. Kitteringham, C. E. Goldring, C. A. Lovatt, M. Chamberlain, C. J. Henderson, C. R. Wolf, and B. K. Park Increased Constitutive c-Jun N-terminal Kinase Signaling in Mice Lacking Glutathione S-Transferase Pi J. Biol. Chem., June 13, 2003; 278(25): 22243 - 22249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||