![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 24059-24065, August 20, 1999
From the Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and
its specific receptor (uPAR) act in concert to stimulate cytoplasmic
signaling machinery and transcription factors responsible for cell
migration and proliferation. Recently we demonstrated that uPA
activates the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of
transcription (Stat1) signaling in human vascular smooth muscle and
endothelial cells. However, the important question whether other
transcription factors of the Stat family, in addition to Stat1, are
involved in the uPAR-related signaling has not been addressed. In this study, we demonstrate that Stat4 and Stat2, but not Stat3, Stat5, or
Stat6, are rapidly activated in response to uPA. We demonstrate further
that Stat4 and Stat2 rapidly and transiently translocate to the cell
nucleus where they bind specifically to the regulatory DNA elements.
Analysis of Stat complexes formed in response to uPA revealed a
Stat2-Stat1 heterodimer, which lacks p48, a DNA-binding protein known
to combine with Stat1-Stat2. This new uPA-induced Stat2-Stat1
heterodimer binds to GAS (the interferon- A variety of cytokines, growth factors, and polypeptide hormones
use the Janus kinases
(Jak)1/signal transducers and
activators of transcription (Stat) pathway to regulate expression of
specific genes (1, 2). Activated via receptor-associated Jaks, Stat
proteins can form homo- or heterodimers in which the phosphotyrosine of
one partner binds to the SH2 domain of the other (3). Activated Stat
dimers translocate then to the cell nucleus where they bind to specific
DNA sequences leading to transcriptional activation of target genes
(4). The ability of individual receptors to activate overlapping but distinct sets of Stat complexes contributes to their signal
specificity. Another important level of specificity in Stat signaling
is based on the unique sequence recognition by each homo- or
heterodimer that is formed from activated Stat monomers (5).
Stats were first described as components of interferon signaling
triggered via the activation of the cytokine receptor superfamily (1).
However, a substantial body of evidence has recently accumulated suggesting that Stats are also involved in transducing signals initiated by other receptors, such as growth factors receptor tyrosine
kinases (5), G-protein-coupled receptors (6), and glucocorticoid
receptors (7).
The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a
multifunctional protein responsible for several processes such as
direction of cell-surface proteolysis in space and time, regulation of
cellular adhesion, cell migration, and proliferation (see Refs. 8 and
9). uPAR possesses a high signaling capacity and can induce
transmembrane signaling leading to the activation of different signal
transduction pathways within the cytoplasm and transcriptional apparatus (10-17). However, a molecular basis for the biochemical events involved in the uPAR-mediated signaling leading to gene expression is still incompletely understood.
Recently we have demonstrated that in human vascular smooth muscle
(VSMC) and endothelial cells, uPAR is associated with two kinases of
the Janus family, Jak1 and Tyk2 (18, 19). uPAR activation by its
ligand, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), leads to the
activation of these kinases, which, in turn, provide the activation of
Stat1 and its subsequent translocation to the nucleus. uPAR association
with the Jak1/Stat1 pathway was also shown in human kidney epithelial
tumor cells (20). However, the question of how and to what extent other
Stats contribute to VSMC uPA responsiveness or whether Stat1 is the
only Stat protein involved in the uPAR-induced intracellular signaling
has yet not been addressed.
Besides formation of homodimers, activated Stat1 can form heterodimers
in combination with Stat3 or Stat2. The Stat1-Stat3 heterodimer binds
to the interferon- In this study, we investigated the responsiveness of various Stat
proteins to ligand-induced activation of uPAR in human VSMC. We
demonstrate that, in addition to Stat1, Stat2 and Stat4 are activated
in response to uPA. Upon uPA stimulation, both Stats are
tyrosine-phosphorylated and translocate to the nucleus where they bind
to specific DNA elements. Analysis of Stat complexes formed in response
to uPA revealed a Stat2-Stat1 heterodimer that lacks p48, a DNA-binding
protein known to combine with Stat1-Stat2. This new uPA-induced
Stat2-Stat1 heterodimer binds to the GAS element distinct from ISRE to
which the p48 protein-containing complexes generally bind.
Materials--
Chemicals were high quality commercial grade and
were purchased from Sigma, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Merck, or Serva
(Heidelberg, Germany). Radiochemicals were obtained from NEN Life
Science Products, and chemiluminescent signal enchancers were from
Tropix, Inc. (Bedford, MA) and NEN Life Science Products.
Aqua-Poly/Mount mounting media was purchased from Polysciences, Inc.
(Warrington, PA). Oligonucleotides were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA), T4 polynucleotide kinase was purchased from
Stratagene, and poly(dI-dC) and NAP-5 Sephadex G-25 DNA grade columns
were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Antibodies--
Mono- and polyclonal anti-phosphotyrosine
antibodies were from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY) and
Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY), and mono- and polyclonal
antibodies for Stat proteins were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.
and Transduction Laboratories. Highly phosphospecific polyclonal
antibodies for Stat1 (Tyr701) and Stat3 (Tyr
705) were provided by Quality Controlled Biochemicals
(Hopkinton, MA). The monoclonal p48 (ISGF Cell Culture--
Human vascular smooth muscle cells from
coronary artery were obtained from Clonetics (San Diego, CA). The cells
were grown in SmGM2 medium (Clonetics) supplemented with 5% fetal
bovine serum and were used between passages 3 and 6. For uPA
stimulation experiments, the cells were cultured for 24 h in
serum-free SmGM2 medium and were then treated with uPA as described below.
Tyrosine Phosphorylation, Western Blotting, and
Stripping--
Subconfluent and serum-starved VSMC were washed twice
with HEPES/NaCl buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl) and were treated with 1 nM uPA (Sigma)
at 37 °C for 5-30 min. Cells were put on ice, washed with ice-cold
HEPES-buffered saline containing 0.3 mM sodium
orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.1 mM quercetin,
and 0.1 mM N-CBZ-L-phenylalanine
chloromethyl ketone, and harvested by scraping. After centrifugation,
the pellets were lysed in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH
8.0, 138 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 2 mM EDTA, 1%
Triton X-100, and protease inhibitors as indicated above), left on ice
for 5 min, and centrifuged. Supernatants were used for PAGE and Western
blotting. The blots were developed with an appropriate antibody; the
immune complexes were visualized by an enhanced chemiluminescence
detection system. Stripping of the membranes was performed using 200 mM Immunoprecipitation and Cross-linking--
For
immunoprecipitation, cell lysates containing 800-1000 µg of protein
were precleared for 2 h at room temperature with
Gamma-Bind-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and were then
immunoprecipitated overnight at 4 °C by using 5 or 10 µg of
antibody coupled to protein G- or protein A-agarose (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc.). Precipitates were washed in PBS-Tween buffer and
were used for PAGE and Western blotting.
For cross-linking, cells were stimulated with uPA, washed and lysed as
described above (instead of Tris, 20 mM HEPES was used for
a lysis buffer), and cross-linked by the addition of 1 mM disuccinimidyl suberate for 30 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped with 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, and the samples were
used for immunoprecipitation and Western blotting.
Nuclear Extract Preparation and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift
Assay (EMSA)--
Nuclear extracts were prepared by subcellular
fractionation from VSMC that were either left untreated or treated with
1 nM uPA. Cells were put on ice, washed with ice-cold
HEPES-buffered saline containing the protease inhibitors, and harvested
by scraping. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 8 min
at 4 °C, and the cell pellet was resuspended in 0.25 M
sucrose in buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgSO4, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and protease inhibitors). A solution of 1% Nonidet P-40 was added to a
final concentration of 0.1%. The pellets were incubated on ice for 40 min and homogenized by 30 strokes in a Teflon glass Dounce homogenizer.
The homogenates were adjusted to 1.4 M sucrose by the
addition of 2.1 M sucrose in buffer A. 8 ml of this
suspension were transferred to each centrifuge tube and laid between 1 ml of 2.1 M and 2 ml of 0.8 M sucrose in buffer
A. The tubes were filled up with 1 ml of 0.25 M sucrose in
buffer A and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 65 min at
4 °C in a swinging bucket rotor. The pellets containing the nuclei
were resuspended in a small volume of buffer B (20 mM
HEPES, 20% glycerol, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA,
0.5 mM dithiothreitol, and protease inhibitors). The samples were used immediately or aliquoted and stored at
EMSA was performed for 30 min at room temperature in a volume of 20 µl containing 0.5 µg of nuclear protein extracts, 40 ng of
poly(dI-dC), 4 µl of 5× binding buffer (1× binding buffer: 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol) with or without 50- or 100-fold excess
of cold competitor or of unrelated competitor, and a radiolabeled probe
(3 × 104 cpm). In supershift EMSA, nuclear extracts
were incubated with 2 µg of experimental or isotypic control antibody
prior to the addition of a 32P-labeled probe. DNA-protein
complexes were separated on a 5% polyacrylamide gel in Tris-glycin
buffer (50 mM Tris, 0.4 M glycin, 2 mM EDTA).
The following double-stranded oligonucleotides were purchased from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. and were used in this study: GAS/ISRE,
27 bp (catalog no. 2537); Stat4, 27 bp (catalog no. 2569); Stat1, 25 bp
(catalog no. 2573); AP-1, 21 bp (catalog no. 2501); and NF Confocal Microscopy--
For the staining in uPA-induced nuclear
translocation experiments, the cells were fixed on glass coverslips
with 4% paraformaldehyde and were permeabilized with 80% methanol at
Statistics--
Each experiment has been repeated at least five
times, and the representative figures have been shown. For confocal
microscopy studies at least 20-40 cells from at least seven separate
experiments were examined under each experimental condition.
uPA Induces Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Stat2 and Stat4 and Their
Nuclear Translocation--
Cytoplasmic extracts of uPA-treated or
-untreated VSMC were precipitated using one of six (anti-Stat1, Stat2,
Stat3, Stat4, Stat5, and Stat6) antibodies, separated by SDS-PAGE, and
examined for phosphotyrosine incorporation into the proteins of Stats
size range. Reprobing of stripped blots with antibodies to individual Stat proteins was used for their identification in the
immunoprecipitates. In addition to the previously observed activation
of Stat1 (18, 19), uPA induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat2 and
Stat4 (Fig. 1, A,
B, and C) but not Stat3, Stat5, or Stat6 (Fig.
1D, shown for Stat3). The kinetics of this activation peaked
relatively fast after 8-10 min of stimulation for both Stats and
decreased after 15 min of stimulation. The phosphorylation of Stat4
remained at this basal level, whereas Stat2 showed a second reversible uPA-induced peak of tyrosine phosphorylation after 20 min of
stimulation.
To determine whether uPA-induced activation of Stat2 and Stat4 results
in their translocation to the cell nucleus, we resorted to laser
scanning confocal microscopy to analyze the subcellular localization of
both Stats. As shown in Figs. 2 and
3, uPA-activated Stat2 and Stat4
translocated efficiently into the nucleus. The kinetics of this
translocation were very close to the kinetics of their tyrosine
phosphorylation in response to uPA. Five to ten min of cell activation
resulted in predominantly nuclear staining for both Stats, which
declined after 13-15 min, although Stat2 demonstrated again a second
response phase peaking after 20 min of cell stimulation.
uPA Induces DNA Binding Complexes Which Contain Stat2 and
Stat4--
To explore whether the uPA-induced Stat factors could bind
DNA, we used two oligonucleotide probes, the GAS/ISRE probe, which serves as binding sites for various activated Stats, and the GAS-like probe possessing a high binding specificity for Stat4 (Stat4 gel shift
oligonucleotide) (23). Complex formation with these probes was examined
by EMSA using nuclear extracts from untreated cells and stimulated with
uPA cells (Fig. 4). uPA induced the
formation of at least one prominent nuclear complex with a GAS/ISRE
probe within 10 min of stimulation (Fig. 4A). In addition,
two more slowly migrating complexes were observed. However, this was
not a consistent finding; they were only weakly detectable and were unaffected by uPA treatment. No binding to the GAS/ISRE was detected in
the presence of excess unlabeled GAS/ISRE, whereas an unrelated oligonucleotide did not change the DNA-protein binding (Fig.
4A). To detect specific Stat proteins in the uPA-inducible
DNA-protein complex, gel supershift assays with Stat-specific
antibodies were performed. Stat1 and Stat2 antibodies, but not
antibodies to Stat3, Stat4, Stat5, or Stat6, blocked (Stat1) and
supershifted (Stat2) the complex (Fig. 4A and data not
shown). Surprisingly, antibody to p48, a DNA-binding protein that
associates with Stat1 and Stat2 to form the transcription factor ISGF3
(24), did not supershift or block the uPA-induced complex (Fig.
4A).
Use of the Stat4-specific probe enabled further identification of
uPA-activated Stat proteins in DNA binding complexes (Fig. 4B). With this probe, two complexes were observed. One
complex of slow mobility was induced by uPA stimulation within 7-10
min, was specific, as shown in cold competition EMSA experiments, and was completely supershifted by anti-Stat4 antibody (Fig.
4B), whereas antibodies to other Stat proteins were
ineffective. The second complex had a mobility similar to the
uPA-induced GAS/ISRE complex; however, it was not reproducibly
enchanced by uPA when this probe was used.
uPA-induced DNA Binding Complex Contains Stat1-Stat2
Heterodimer--
In response to stimulation, tyrosine phosphorylated
Stat1 and Stat2 multimerize to form either Stat1 homodimers that bind GAS sequence through an intrinsic DNA binding domain or Stat1-Stat2 heterodimers that bind ISRE sequences through the DNA binding domain of
p48 (3-5). Because uPA induces activation of both Stat1 (as shown by
us previously in Refs. 18 and 19) and Stat2 and considering that only
one uPA-related complex was observed in our EMSA experiments, we
explored the possibility of Stat1-Stat2 heterodimer formation in
response to uPA. To probe for heterodimers, coimmunoprecipitation of
Stat1 and Stat2 was examined (Fig.
5A). The Stat2 protein was
immunoprecipitated from the activated form at different time points,
and the immunoprecipitates were screened after PAGE and electroblotting
with antibody specific for the Stat1 tyrosine-phosphorylated site
(Stat1 Tyr701). The results of these experiments clearly
demonstrate that Stat1 was indeed associated with the Stat2 protein in
uPA-stimulated cells. Moreover, this Stat2-associated Stat1 protein
underwent tyrosine phosphorylation with kinetics very similar to those
revealed by Stat2 in response to uPA (Figs. 1A and
5A, upper panel). Phosphorylation of Stat1
increased within 5 min after uPA stimulation, decreased by 15 min, and
peaked again by 20 min. Reprobing of the blots with anti-Stat2 antibody
confirmed equal protein loading onto the gel (Fig. 5A,
lower panel). Development of the blot after its stripping
with anti-p48 antibody did not reveal any positive signal, whereas in
the whole cell lysates the p48 protein was available (data not
shown).
Formation of a Stat1-Stat2 complex lacking a p48 protein was
proven in the next experiments using chemical cross-linking (Fig. 5B). uPA-stimulated cells were subjected to cross-linking
using the bifunctional chemical cross-linker disuccinimidyl suberate, as described under "Experimental Procedures," followed by
immunoprecipitation with anti-Stat1 antibody. The immunoprecipitated
proteins were then separated by PAGE, immunoblotted with anti-Stat2,
and reprobed with anti-p48 antibodies. An additional high molecular
mass complex about 200 kDa was revealed in the cells subjected to
cross-linking. As in the above described experiments, no p48 protein
was found in the immunoprecipitates before or after cross-linking.
uPA-induced Stat1-Stat2 Heterodimer Binds GAS
Sequence--
Heterodimer Stat1-Stat2 is distinct from other Stat
complexes in that it requires a non-Stat molecule, p48, which is a
critical DNA binding component directing complex binding to ISRE
sequences through its own DNA binding domain. Because we did not find
p48 in the uPA-induced Stat1-Stat2 complexes, we explored the ability of these heterodimers to bind the palindromic GAS DNA sequence. The
induction of GAS binding activity attributable to the Stat1-Stat2 complex was determined in EMSA using nuclear extracts and a
Stat1-specific GAS oligonucleotide probe. Fig. 5C shows that
uPA induced DNA binding activity in a biphasic manner; the first peak
of complex formation was observed after 5 min of stimulation, and the
second one was observed after 15 min. Antibodies used in our study that specifically recognize Stat1 and Stat2 shifted this complex when added
to the DNA binding reaction demonstrating the presence of the Stat1 and
Stat2 proteins in the complex.
In this study, we demonstrate that, in addition to Stat1, Stat2
and Stat4 are activated in response to uPA in human VSMC. Upon uPA
stimulation, both Stats are tyrosine-phosphorylated and translocate to
the nucleus where they bind to DNA elements. Analysis of Stat complexes
formed in response to uPA revealed a new Stat2-Stat1 heterodimer that
lacks p48 protein and binds to the GAS DNA sequence.
Some cytokines and growth factors are known to promote tyrosine
phosphorylation and activation of more than one Stat protein (1-5).
This observation together with the data that only seven different Stat
proteins have been identified raises the question about the mechanisms
underlying transcriptional specificity of cytokine and growth factor
signaling. In part, this specificity might be explained by a different
pattern of activation of each Stat family member. Moreover, particular
Stats are activated differently in response to growth factors and
cytokine depending upon the cell type (5). However, the most important
level of specificity in Stat signaling is achieved via selective
interactions of individual Stats upon complex formation that allow
specific binding of these complexes to DNA consensus sequences (3, 4,
21). Recent findings revealed also that Stats bound to a distinct
pattern of adjacent sites, none of which bear a close resemblance to
the high affinity sequence identified by the random selection method (25).
Our finding that physiological concentration of uPA is able to induce
Stat4 activation, such as tyrosine phosphorylation, nuclear
translocation, and binding to the DNA Stat4-specific GAS element, is,
to our knowledge, the first indication that there is at least one more
natural ligand for the Stat4 protein beyond interleukin-12.
Interleukin-12 is known to be unique in inducing activation of Stat4
and the subsequent formation of protein-DNA complexes in human natural
killer cells, T helper cells, and lymphocytes (26-28). However,
expression of Stat4 in myeloid cells developing spermatogonia (29) and
vascular smooth muscle cells2
suggested that other Stat4-activating natural ligands might exist. In
response to interleukin-12, the Stat4 GAS binding homodimer is
generally induced (25). However, there are some findings demonstrating
that at least two additional Stat4-containing complexes do exist. Thus,
Stat4-Stat3 and Stat4-Stat1 Our study aiming at the uPA-induced Stat2 activation clearly
demonstrates that Stat2 undergoes tyrosine phosphorylation, nuclear translocation, and DNA binding in response to uPA. Notably, these processes revealed biphasic kinetics, peaking first at 5-8 min of
activation and then, after some decrease, again at 15-20 min. Interestingly, a similar biphasic activation of Stat1 and Stat2 was
shown in rat cardiomyocytes activated by angiotensin (30). However,
when the GAS/ISRE probe was used in our EMSA experiments, the time
course of complex formation was different, peaking only once at 10 min,
which confirms our previous data about the uPA-induced Stat1-GAS/ISRE
binding (18, 19). These results also suggest that the use of the GAS
probe favors the binding of a Stat2-containing complex in a biphasic
manner. Experiments exploring a composition of a uPA-induced
Stat2-containing complex, such as coimmunoprecipitation, tyrosine
phosphorylation, cross-linking, gel-shift, and supershift analyses,
revealed the formation in human VSMC of a novel uPA-inducible factor
consisting of Stat1 and Stat2. Stat1 protein coimmunoprecipitated in
these experiments with Stat2 demonstrated the same uPA-induced biphasic
activation of tyrosine phosphorylation, as Stat2 did. These data
indicate that both components of the heterodimer are activated
simultaneously in response to uPA. Of particular interest is the notion
that the Stat1-Stat2 heterodimer does not include p48 and binds to the
GAS sequence. At least, under our experimental conditions we did not
determine p48 after Stat1-Stat2 coimmunoprecipitation or after
cross-linking. Use of anti-p48 antibody in EMSA also did not reveal any
effect. These data point to a revision of the standard model where it
has been assumed that all three subunits are required for specific DNA
binding, which is directed to the ISRE. Our results might be
strengthened by the findings of others confirming the existence of
unusual Stat1-Stat2 complexes in some cells. Thus, the existence of two
different complexes following interferon- The biological significance of uPA-inducible Stat1-Stat2
complexes, as well as the functional role of uPA-related Jak/Stat activation, is difficult to assess, and it needs further intensive study. However, it is obvious that uPA activates a specific and unusual
subset of latent cytoplasmic transcription factors in human VSMC that
suggests a critical role of uPA in these cells, which might confer
specificity of a rapid and specific biological response.
We thank all of the members of the laboratory
for support especially Jana Krentler for excellent technical assistance.
*
This work was supported by Grant Du 344/1-1 from the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to I. D.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Franz Volhard Clinic,
Wiltbergstra
2
I. Dumler, A. Kopmann, K. Wagner, O. A.
Mayboroda, U. Jerke, R. Dietz, H. Haller, and D. C. Gulba, unpublished observations.
The abbreviations used are:
Jak, Janus kinase;
Stat, signal transducers and activators of transcription;
uPA, urokinase-type plasminogen activator;
uPAR, uPA receptor;
VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cell;
ISRE, interferon-stimulated response
element;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
bp, base pairs;
GAS, interferon-
Urokinase Induces Activation and Formation of Stat4 and
Stat1-Stat2 Complexes in Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells*
§,
,
,
,
,
, and
Franz Volhard Clinic and Max-Delbrück
Center for Molecular Medicine, Virchow Klinikum-Charité,
Humboldt University of Berlin, D-13125 Berlin, Germany and the
¶ Institute of Neurobiology, University of Amsterdam,
1098SM Amsterdam, Netherlands
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
activation site) distinct
from the interferon-stimulated response element to which the p48
protein containing complexes generally bind. We conclude that uPA
activates a specific and unusual subset of latent cytoplasmic
transcription factors in human vascular smooth muscle cells that
suggests a critical role of uPA in these cells.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
activation site (GAS), whereas the Stat1-Stat2
heterodimer associates with DNA-binding protein p48 to form the
transcription factor ISGF3, which recognizes an interferon-stimulated
response element (ISRE) present in many promoters activated by
interferon-
/
(see Refs. 3 and 21). Stat4, Stat5, and Stat6 have
yet to be shown to form heterodimeric complexes, although the highly
related isoforms of some of these Stats form heterodimers (7,
22).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
) antibody was purchased
from Transduction Laboratories, and polyclonal antibody was from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Alexa 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG was
purchased from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR), and Cy2-conjugated
anti-mouse IgG was from Jackson Immuno-Research Laboratories (West
Grove, PA).
-mercaptoethanol, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH
6.8, and 2% SDS for 30 min at 50 °C.
80 °C.
B, 22 bp
(catalog no. 2505). 5' end-labeled probes were prepared with 40 µCi
of [
-32P]ATP using a T4 polynucleotide kinase and were
gel-purified on NAP-5 Sephadex G-25 DNA grade columns.
20 °C. After overnight incubation at 4 °C with 1% bovine serum
albumin in PBS, the preparations were treated with anti-Stat or
anti-Stat4 monoclonal antibodies or control monoclonal antibodies all
diluted (5 µg/ml) in 0.2% bovine serum albumin/PBS. The samples were
washed three times in PBS and incubated in the dark humid chamber with
Cy2- or Alexa-488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (5-10 µg/ml). The
coverslips were washed four times in PBS and embedded in
Aqua-Poly/Mount mounting media. The images were acquired with NORAN
Instrument Odyssey XL laser scanning confocal microscope supported with
Intervision 1.5 software with an argon-krypton laser.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
uPA-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat2
and Stat4. The cells were treated with 1 nM uPA for
different times and lysed as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Stat proteins were immunoprecipitated from uPA-activated
cells using antibodies (Ab) to individual Stats, and the
immunoprecipitates (IP) were then subjected to SDS-PAGE and
Western blotting with anti-(P)-Tyr antibody (upper panels).
Quantification of the results by densitometry is shown below
each panel.

View larger version (105K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
uPA-induced nuclear translocation of
Stat2. A subconfluent VSMC monolayer was treated with 1 nM uPA at 37 °C for indicated periods of time, fixed,
and stained using anti-Stat2 antibody and corresponding
Alexa-488-conjugated secondary antibody as described under
"Experimental Procedures."

View larger version (138K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
uPA-induced nuclear translocation of
Stat4. The subconfluent VSMC monolayer was treated with uPA,
fixed, and stained as described in the legend to Fig. 2. Monoclonal
anti-Stat4 antibody was used for staining.

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
uPA-induced nuclear complexes contain Stat1,
Stat2, and Stat4. Nuclear extracts of VSMC were prepared after uPA
treatment for different periods of time, as indicated. EMSA was
performed with the GAS/ISRE (A) or Stat4 probe
(B). Solid arrows indicate the position of the
protein-DNA complex. For cold competition EMSA experiments, a 100-fold
molar excess of unlabeled GAS/ISRE, Stat4 probe competitor, or an
unrelated competitor (AP-1 or NF
B element sequence) was included as
indicated. Inhibition or supershifting of protein-DNA complexes
containing Stat1, Stat2, and Stat4, respectively, were achieved
by adding specific antibodies (Ab) to the binding reaction,
as indicated. Open arrows on the right denote
supershifted Stat2- and Stat4-containing complexes.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Stat1 and Stat2 form heterodimers in
uPA-stimulated VSMC. A, Stat2 was immunoprecipitated
from uPA-activated cells using anti-Stat2 antibody (Ab), and
the immunoprecipitates (IP) were then subjected to SDS-PAGE
and Western blotting with phosphotyrosine-specific antibody for Stat1
(Tyr701; upper panel). The blots were reprobed
with anti-Stat2 antibody, as described above, to demonstrate equal
protein loading (lower panel). B, cross-linking
of Stat1-Stat2 complexes with bifunctional chemical cross-linker
disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS). Cells were stimulated with
uPA, washed, lysed, and cross-linked by the addition of 1 mM disuccinimidyl suberate as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The complexes were immunoprecipitated
with anti-Stat1 antibody, then detected with anti-Stat2 antibody, and
reprobed with anti-p48 antibody. An arrowhead indicates
Stat1-Stat2 dimerized complexes. WB,
. C, EMSA
was performed using nuclear extracts from VSMC activated with uPA for
indicated times and the GAS probe. The details are the same as in Fig.
4.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
heterodimers have been found in some
cells (26-28), although the level of Stat3 phosphorylation was minimal
and the significance of this finding is unclear. Based on our results
from coimmunoprecipitation, tyrosine phosphorylation, and the
reactivity with antibodies in EMSA it is likely that uPA induces in
VSMC complexes containing Stat4 only. However, we cannot rule out that
some unknown Stat-unrelated proteins might also be a component of these
complexes or that uPA might induce binding of these Stat4-containing
complexes to other DNA sequences distinct from GAS.
stimulation, Stat2-p48 and
Stat2-Stat1, has been shown (31). Association of the bipartite
complexes appears to occur on the DNA ISRE target to form a multimeric
ISGF3 transcription factor. In addition, it was demonstrated that Stat2
is capable of forming a stable homodimer that interacts with p48, can
be recruited to DNA, and can activate transcription; this raises the
question of why Stat1 is required (32). However, these Stat2-p48 complexes were very unstable, although it is possible that Stat2 homodimers might bind to a DNA sequence distinct from either the ISRE
or the GAS element. Additional evidence for Stat1-Stat2 dimers capable
of forming a functional DNA binding domain in the absence of p48 has
been provided by Li et al. (33), who showed that these
dimers could bind to a palindromic GAS sequence. Interestingly, the
heterodimers were also able to interact with p48 to form ISGF3.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
e 50, 13125 Berlin-Buch, Germany. Tel.: 49-30-9417-2451; Fax: 49-30-9417-2453; E-mail: dumler@fvk-berlin.de.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
activation site.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
Kerr, I. M.,
and Stark, G. R.
(1994)
Science
264,
1415-1421 2.
Briscoe, J.,
Guschin, D.,
and Müller, M.
(1994)
Curr. Biol.
4,
1033-1035[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Ihle, J. N.
(1996)
Cell
84,
331-334[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Horvath, C. M.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
233-239[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Leaman, D. W.,
Leung, S.,
Li, X.,
and Stark, G. R.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
1578-1588[Abstract]
6.
Bhat, G. J.,
Thekkumkara, T. J.,
Thomas, W. G.,
Conrad, K. M.,
and Baker, K. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
19059-19065 7.
Cella, N.,
Groner, B.,
and Hynes, N. E.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
1783-1792 8.
Blasi, F.
(1997)
Immunol. Today
9,
415-417
9.
Dear, A.,
and Medcalf, R. L.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
252,
185-193[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Busso, N.,
Masur, S. K.,
Lazeda, D.,
Waxman, S.,
and Ossowski, L.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
259-270
11.
Dumler, I.,
Petri, T.,
and Schleuning, W.-D.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
343,
103-106[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Bohuslav, J.,
Horejsi, V.,
Hansmann, C.,
Stöckl, J.,
Weidle, U. H.,
Majdic, O.,
Bartke, I.,
Knapp, W.,
and Stockinger, H.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
181,
1381-1390 13.
Resnati, M.,
Guttinger, M.,
Valcamonica, S.,
Sidenius, N.,
Blasi, F.,
and Fazioli, F.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1572-1582[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Fazioli, F.,
Resnati, M.,
Sidenius, N.,
Higashimoto, Y.,
Appella, E.,
and Blasi, F.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
7279-7286[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Rabbani, S. A.,
Gladu, J.,
Mazar, A. P.,
Henkin, J.,
and Golzman, D.
(1997)
J. Cell. Physiol.
172,
137-145[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Nguyen, D. H. D.,
Hussaini, I. M.,
and Gonias, S. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8502-8507 17.
Tang, H.,
Kerins, D. M.,
Hao, Q.,
Inagami, T.,
and Vaughan, D. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
18268-18272 18.
Dumler, I.,
Weis, A.,
Mayboroda, O. A.,
Maasch, C.,
Jerke, U.,
Haller, H.,
and Gulba, D. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
315-321 19.
Dumler, I.,
Kopmann, A.,
Weis, A.,
Mayboroda, O. A.,
Wagner, K.,
Gulba, D. C.,
and Haller, H.
(1999)
Arterioscl. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
19,
290-297 20.
Koshelnick, Y.,
Ehart, M.,
Hufnagl, P.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Binder, B. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28563-28567 21.
Decker, T.,
Kovarik, P.,
and Meinke, A.
(1997)
J. Interf. Cytokine Res.
17,
121-134[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Kirken, R. A.,
Malabarba, M. G.,
Xu, J.,
Liu, X.,
Farrar, W. L.,
Hennighausen, L.,
Larner, A. C.,
Grimley, P. M.,
and Rui, H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14098-14103 23.
Yamamoto, K.,
Miura, O.,
Hirosawa, S.,
and Miyasaka, N.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
233,
126-132[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Wong, L. H.,
Krauer, K. G.,
Hatzinisiriou, I.,
Estcourt, M. J.,
Hersey, P.,
Tam, N. D.,
Edmondson, S.,
Devenish, R. J.,
and Ralph, S. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28779-28785 25.
Baden, H. A.,
Sarma, S. P.,
Kapust, R. B.,
Byrd, R. A.,
and Waugh, D. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17109-17114 26.
Jacobson, N. G.,
Szabo, S. J.,
Weber-Nordt, R. M.,
Zhong, Z.,
Schreiber, R. D.,
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
and Murphy, K. M.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
181,
1755-1762 27.
Bacon, C. M.,
Petricoin, E. F., III,
Ortaldo, J. R.,
Rees, R. C.,
Larner, A. C.,
Johnston, J. A.,
and O'Shea, J. J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
7307-7311 28.
Yu, C.-R.,
Lin, J.-X.,
Fink, D. W.,
Akira, S.,
Bloom, E. T.,
and Yamauchi, A.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
126-137[Abstract]
29.
Yamamoto, K.,
Quelle, F. W.,
Thierfelder, W. E.,
Kreider, B. L.,
Gilbert, D. J.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Silvennoinen, O.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
4342-4349 30.
Kodama, H.,
Fukuda, K.,
Pan, J.,
Makino, S.,
Sano, M.,
Takahashi, T.,
Hori, S.,
and Ogawa, S.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
82,
244-250 31.
Martinez-Moczygemba, M.,
Gutch, M. J.,
French, D. L.,
and Reich, N.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20070-20076 32.
Bluyssen, H. A. R.,
and Levy, D. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4600-4605 33.
Li, X.,
Leung, S.,
Qureshi, S.,
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
and Stark, G. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
5790-5794
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Shetty, T. Velusamy, S. Idell, H. Tang, and P. K. Shetty Regulation of urokinase receptor expression by protein tyrosine phosphatases Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): L414 - L421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Bernstein, R. S. Greenberg, L. Taliana, and S. K. Masur Urokinase Anchors uPAR to the Actin Cytoskeleton Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 2967 - 2977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Torpey, S. E. Maher, A. L. M. Bothwell, and J. S. Pober Interferon {alpha} but Not Interleukin 12 Activates STAT4 Signaling in Human Vascular Endothelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., June 18, 2004; 279(25): 26789 - 26796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kunigal, A. Kusch, N. Tkachuk, S. Tkachuk, U. Jerke, H. Haller, and I. Dumler Monocyte-expressed urokinase inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell growth by activating Stat1 Blood, December 15, 2003; 102(13): 4377 - 4383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Carsol, S. Gingras, and J. Simard Synergistic Action of Prolactin (PRL) and Androgen on PRL-Inducible Protein Gene Expression in Human Breast Cancer Cells: A Unique Model for Functional Cooperation between Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription-5 and Androgen Receptor Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2002; 16(7): 1696 - 1710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Alfano, N. Sidenius, B. Panzeri, F. Blasi, and G. Poli Urokinase-urokinase receptor interaction mediates an inhibitory signal for HIV-1 replication PNAS, June 25, 2002; 99(13): 8862 - 8867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Frucht IL-23: A Cytokine That Acts on Memory T Cells Sci. Signal., January 8, 2002; 2002(114): pe1 - pe1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Godshall, A. B. Lentsch, J. C. Peyton, M. J. Scott, and W. G. Cheadle STAT4 Is Required for Antibacterial Defense but Enhances Mortality during Polymicrobial Sepsis Clin. Vaccine Immunol., November 1, 2001; 8(6): 1044 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Farrar, J. D. Smith, T. L. Murphy, and K. M. Murphy Recruitment of Stat4 to the Human Interferon-alpha /beta Receptor Requires Activated Stat2 J. Biol. Chem., January 28, 2000; 275(4): 2693 - 2697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kusch, S. Tkachuk, H. Haller, R. Dietz, D. C. Gulba, M. Lipp, and I. Dumler Urokinase Stimulates Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Migration via a Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Tyk2 Interaction J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2000; 275(50): 39466 - 39473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||