JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clasper, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clasper, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 24113-24123, August 20, 1999


Inducible Expression of the Cell Surface Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan Syndecan-2 (Fibroglycan) on Human Activated Macrophages Can Regulate Fibroblast Growth Factor Action*

Steven ClasperDagger §, Sylvie Vekemansparallel , Martine FioreDagger , Magda PlebanskiDagger , Paul Wordsworth**, Guido Davidparallel , and David G. JacksonDagger Dagger Dagger

From the Dagger  University of Oxford, Molecular Immunology Group, Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU United Kingdom, ** Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom, and  Center for Human Genetics, University of Leuven and Flanders Inter-University Institute for Biotechnology, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Monocyte/macrophages play important roles in regulating tissue growth and angiogenesis through the controlled release of heparin-binding growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF), vascular endothelial growth factor, and heparin binding epidermal growth factor. The action of these potent growth mediators is known to be regulated by adsorption to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) on the surface and within the extracellular matrix of other neighboring cells, which respectively promote or restrict interactions with their signal-transducing receptors on target cells. Here we report on the nature of HSPGs inducibly expressed on the surface of macrophages that confer these cells with the capacity to regulate endogenous growth factor activity. We reveal that activated human macrophages express only a single major 48-kDa cell surface HSPG, syndecan-2 (fibroglycan) as the result of de novo RNA and protein synthesis. In addition, we demonstrate this macrophage HSPG selectively binds the macrophage-derived growth factors FGF-2, vascular endothelial growth factor and heparin binding EGF and can present FGF-2 in a form that transactivates receptor-bearing BaF32 cells. These results define a novel and unique proteoglycan profile for macrophages and imply a key role for syndecan-2 in the delivery of sequestered growth factors by inflammatory macrophages for productive binding to their appropriate target cells in vivo.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mononuclear phagocytes are recruited from peripheral blood to the sites of tissue injury during the normal physiological processes of wound healing and inflammation as well as in pathological processes such as atherogenesis and tumor development where they play a key role in stimulating new tissue growth (1, 2). During the recruitment process, blood-derived monocytes undergo progressive differentiation to tissue macrophages characterized by changes in cell surface antigen expression, increased phagocytic activity, and most notably acquisition of the capacity to synthesize an array of different cytokines and growth factors (2). Some of the most potent of these molecules are heparin-binding growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF),1 vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (hbEGF), which promote mesenchymal tissue growth and angiogenesis by triggering the proliferation of fibroblasts, vascular endothelium, neural, and smooth muscle cells (3-5). The production and release of heparin-binding growth factors such as FGF is implicated in numerous macrophage-mediated processes including tumor angiogenesis (6, 7), arteriogenesis and capillary sprouting (8), wound healing (9), and inflammation (10). In addition, the vascular smooth muscle mitogen hbEGF has been directly visualized in macrophages associated with human atherosclerotic plaques (9).

The biological activity of macrophage-derived growth factors is known to be regulated by interactions with heparan sulfate (HS) chains attached to proteoglycans (HSPGs) present on the surface of neighboring cells and within the surrounding extracellular matrix. In the case of FGF-2, these interactions involve regularly spaced high affinity (Kd 10-7-10-9 M) binding sites located in discrete domains of the GAG chain where the basic (GlcAbeta 1-4 GlcNAc)n disaccharide repeat units are modified by tissue-specific epimerases and sulfotransferases to IdoA(2-OSO3) alpha  1,4GlcNSO3 (11-13). Sequestration by HSPGs on the surface of cells and within the extracellular matrix is thought to limit diffusion of growth factors within the tissues and prevent their rapid degradation by proteolytic enzymes (14). More importantly, cell surface HSPGs have been shown to be essential for productive binding of FGFs to their conventional high affinity receptors, the FGFRs, a family of at least eight alternatively spliced transmembrane polypeptides whose cytoplasmic tails encode a tyrosine kinase activity (15-17). Similar dependence on heparan sulfate has also been reported for the productive binding of hbEGF (18, 19) and VEGF (20) to their respective tyrosine kinase-linked receptors, consistent with a general role for HSPGs as components of a dual receptor system for heparin-binding growth factors.

The levels of cell surface HS appear to be controlled by the regulation of HSPG core protein synthesis. To date, five major cell surface HSPG core polypeptides have been cloned and characterized including the syndecans, betaglycans (type III TGFbeta receptors) glypicans (for review, see Ref. 21) and discrete isoforms of the hyaluronan receptor CD44 (22, 23). Among the most abundant HSPGs, the syndecans comprise a family of four single chain transmembrane polypeptides (24, 25), each with a distinct but partly overlapping pattern of tissue expression. For example, syndecan-1 is expressed primarily on epithelial and mesenchymal cells, syndecan-2 (fibroglycan) on endothelial cells and fibroblasts, syndecan-3 (N-syndecan) on neural cells and syndecan-4 (amphiglycan or ryudocan) on each of these cell types. The primary role of the syndecans is thought to be the anchorage of cells to the extracellular matrix (25), and in the case of syndecan-4, participation in the transduction of extracellular matrix-dependent signaling events (26). However each of the syndecans also bind growth factors including FGF-2 via their HS chains (for review, see Ref. 25), and syndecan-3 on neural cells has been shown (27) to bind the growth factor pleiotrophin (heparin-binding growth associated molecule). Such properties have led to the suggestion that the syndecans may be key regulators of heparin-binding growth factor action in vivo.

In our laboratory, we have explored the possibility that macrophages use HSPGs to regulate the biological activity of their many endogenously synthesized growth factors and chemokines. By comparison with other cell types, little is known about the nature of macrophage HSPGs (28, 29), although the synthesis of HS and its roles in regulating lipid uptake and atherogenesis have been well documented in these cells (30-32).

In this study, we reveal that primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) inducibly express a single major core protein, syndecan-2 (fibroglycan), previously thought to be restricted to fibroblasts and endothelial cells. The functional significance of this observation is underlined by the findings that 1) macrophages expressing syndecan-2 bind FGF-2, VEGF, and hbEGF; and 2) macrophages with bound FGF-2 can promote proliferation of neighboring FGFR-transfected cells. Our results implicate syndecan-2 as the primary macrophage HSPG involved in regulating macrophage-derived growth factor action.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Growth Factors, Chemokines, Cytokines, and Antibodies-- Recombinant human FGF-2 (155 residue form) was expressed in Escherichia coli from the bacterial expression vector pFC80 (kindly donated by Dr. Antonella Isacchi, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Milan, Italy) and purified by affinity chromatography on Hi-Trap heparin mini-columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using fast protein liquid chromatography. The fluorescent chemokine derivatives fluorescein isothiocyanate IL-8 and N-methyl-N-(2-N-methyl,N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)aminoethyl)acetamido-RANTES (NBD-RANTES) described previously (33, 34) were the kind gift of Dr. Tim Wells, Cell Biology Unit, Glaxo Wellcome Medicines Research Center, Stevenage, Hertfordshire UK. The additional heparin-binding growth factors FGF-1140,VEGF165, hbEGF148, the C-C chemokines MIP-1beta and MCP-1 (all carrier-free), and the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1alpha , IL-1beta , and TNFalpha were purchased from R&D Systems Europe, Abingdon, UK. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide was obtained from Sigma.

Monoclonal antibodies specific for the HSPG core polypeptide of human syndecan-1 (B-B4, Serotec, Kidlington, UK), syndecan-2 (10H4, 6G12), syndecan-4 (8G5), glypican-1 (S1), and the monoclonal antibody 3G10, which recognizes unsaturated Delta 45-glucuronosyl residues in heparinase III-treated HS, have been described previously (35). Antibodies to the glycosaminoglycans chondroitin 6-sulfate (MC21C, IgM) and heparan sulfate (10E4, IgM) were obtained from Seikagaku Corp. (Japan). The monoclonal antibody MAB120 specific for human FGF-2 was obtained from Chemicon International Inc. (USA). Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated Fab' fragment of goat anti-mouse IgG Fc and IgM and the isotype-matched control antibodies MOPC-31c (IgG1 Kappa), UPC-10 (IgG2a Kappa) and TEPC-183 (IgM Kappa) were obtained from Sigma.

Cell Lines, Transfectants, and Tissue Samples-- The human B cell line Namalwa was stably transfected with full-length human syndecan-2 cDNA in the expression vector pcDNA3 by electroporation (750 V/cm, 960 microFarads) followed by selection in RPMI 1640 10% serum containing G418 (1.25 mg/ml). Human IL-3-dependent BaF3 lymphoid cells transfected with the human flg FGF receptor (FGFR1, 2 Ig domain form), termed BaF32 cells were kindly donated by Prof. John Gallagher, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK and cultured in RPMI 1640, 10% fetal calf serum, 10% WEHI cell conditioned medium. Samples of synovial fluid were obtained with permission from patients with inflammatory arthritis attending the Nuffield Orthopaedic Center, Oxford, UK.

Isolation and Culture of Primary Human Peripheral Blood T Cells, Monocytes, and MDMs-- Primary human T cells, monocytes, and MDMs were prepared using either peripheral blood or synovial fluid mononuclear cells as the starting material. To prepare mononuclear cells, freshly drawn (heparinized) whole blood or synovial fluid was diluted 1:1 with RPMI 1640 tissue culture medium and layered on Lymphoprep density gradient medium (Nycomed, Norway). Gradients (50 ml total volume) were centrifuged (1,200 × g, 30 min), and the mononuclear cell band was removed by aspiration. Recovered cells were then washed (3 times) in RPMI 1640, 10% (v/v) autologous human serum by resuspension/recentrifugation.

For the isolation of monocytes, the mononuclear cell suspensions were incubated (1 h, 37 °C) in plastic tissue culture dishes (5-15 cm in diameter, 0.5-1 × 106 cells/cm2) in RPMI 1640, 10% (v/v) autologous human serum, to allow selective adherence of monocytes, followed by three successive rinses with warmed medium to remove contaminating nonadherent lymphocytes. The adherent monocytes were then either detached (1 h, 5 °C) in PBS, 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.5 and analyzed immediately (referred to as fresh monocytes) or cultured (37 °C, 5% CO2) in RPMI 1640, 10% autologous serum either alone or supplemented with TNFalpha (100 ng/ml), IL-1alpha (1 ng/ml), or LPS (0.5 µg/ml) for 2-5 days (referred to as monocyte-derived macrophages or MDM). These preparations were at least 80% monocytes as assessed by immunofluorescent staining with antibodies to the CD14 antigen.

For the isolation of T cells, the mononuclear cell suspensions were treated with goat anti-human IgG antibodies and passed over glass bead columns (CellectTM T cell enrichment immunocolumns, Biotex Laboratories, Canada) to selectively adsorb B cells and monocytes, respectively. The resulting purified T cells were washed, resuspended (2 × 106/ml) in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum, and induced to proliferate by culture (24-120 h) with the mitogenic lectin phytohemagglutinin (5 µg/ml, Wellcome, UK). Proliferative responses were confirmed by measuring the incorporation of [3H]thymidine into genomic DNA.

Treatment with Enzymes and Metabolic Inhibitors-- For selective cleavage of cell surface heparan sulfate, adherent monocytes or monocyte-derived macrophages in RPMI 1640, 10% human serum were supplemented with heparinase I (EC 4.2.2.7, 5-20 milliunits/ml, Oxford GlycoSciences, UK) and heparinase III (EC 4.2.2.8, 5-10 milliunits/ml, Seikagaku Corp.) and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator before detachment with EDTA as described above. For protease treatment, cells were incubated with trypsin, chymotrypsin, papain, or pepsin (Calbiochem) (each at 100 µg/ml) for 30 min at 37 °C before the addition of the protease inhibitors antipain (60 µg/ml), bestatin (10 µg/ml), chymostatin (20 µg/ml), leupeptin (10 µg/ml), pepstatin (10 µg/ml), E-64 (60 µg/ml), phosphoramidon (60 µg/ml), Pefabloc® SC (400 µg/ml), aprotinin (10 µg/ml), EDTA (1 mM), and detachment with EDTA. For inhibition of heparan sulfate metabolism, monocytes or MDM were supplemented with 30 mM sodium chlorate for 24 h before detachment.

Immunofluorescent and Immunoperoxidase Antibody Staining, Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry-- For immunofluorescent antibody staining, cells (5 × 105) were incubated (30 min, 5 °C) with saturating concentrations (>10 µg/ml Ig) of the appropriate mouse mAbs or isotype matched control mAbs in PBS, pH 7.5, supplemented with 5% normal human serum, 0.1% sodium azide followed by washing and reincubation (20 min, 5 °C) with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated Fab' fragment of goat anti-mouse IgG Fc or IgM secondary antibody as appropriate. Cells were then fixed in PBS containing 2% (v/v) formaldehyde before microscopy with a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope or flow cytometry on a Becton Dickinson FACScan. For immunoperoxidase staining, cells were pelleted onto glass microscope slides by cytospin centrifugation (500 rpm, 5 min), dried overnight, fixed in 100% acetone, incubated with primary antibody as described above, washed, incubated (1 h room temperature) with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (DAKO EnVision kit, DAKO, UK), washed again, and developed with diaminobenzidine.

SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting-- For Western blotting, samples of heparinase III-treated monocytes or MDM were electrophoresed on 12.5% polyacrylamide SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to nitrocellulose (Amersham Hybond-C Super) before blocking overnight (5% w/v dried milk powder, 0.2% Tween 20 in PBS, pH 7.5) and staining with mAbs (5 µg/ml, 1 h, 25 °C) to human syndecan-2 (10H4) or with the heparan sulfate-specific mAb 3G10. Bands were detected by autoradiography after incubation of the blots with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (1/1,500 dilution, 1 h, 25 °C) and luminol (Amersham ECL chemiluminescence detection kit).

Detection of mRNA by Reverse Transcriptase PCR-- Reverse transcriptase PCR was carried out as described previously. Briefly, total cellular RNA was purified by extraction of cells with guanidinium thiocyanate/acid phenol extraction/ethanol precipitation (36) and used as the template for oligo-dT primed first strand cDNA synthetic reactions (3 h, 42 °C) containing 5 µg of total RNA, 0.5 µM dNTPs, 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.3 and 2.5 milliunits of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase. Samples (2 µl) of the final products were then committed to 50-µl PCR reactions (94 °C, 1 min; 55 °C, 1 min; 72 °C, 1 min; 20-30 cycles) containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dNTPs, 1unit of Taq DNA polymerase and the primers Syn 2 F (5'-ATCCGGAAGCTTATGCGGCGCGCGTGGATC-3') and Syn 2 R Bgl (5'-ATCC GGGGATCCCCTTCTGTCCGTTTAAACAGACT-3') in a Perkin Elmer Cetus DNA thermal cycler. The PCR products were transferred to HYBOND N+ (Amersham, UK) and hybridized (52 °C) with the 32P end-labeled internal probe (5'-CAGAACAAGATACCTGCTCAGACA-3') in 6× SSC, supplemented with 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 0.2% SDS, and 5× Denhardt's solution, before washing (1× SSC, 0.5% SDS) at 57 °C (5 min). Parallel reactions were carried out using the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase primers G3PDHF (5'-TGGTCGTATTGGGCGCCTGG-3') and G3PDHR (5'-CCAAATTCGTTGTCATACCAGG-3') as a control for quantitation and for cDNA integrity.

Radioligand Binding Assays-- Purified recombinant FGF-2, VEGF, or hbEGF (5-20 µg) was radiolabeled to high specific activity (1 × 108 cpm/µg) with 1 mCi 125I by chloramine-T oxidation (1 min, 25 °C). Reactions were quenched by the addition of free tyrosine (1 mg/ml) and free radiolabel removed by centrifugation (2,500 rpm, 5 min) through 5-ml columns of Sephadex G-25 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Retention of heparin-binding capacity was confirmed for each batch of iodinated protein by incubation (1 h, 25 °C) with heparin-Sepharose beads (Sigma) in binding buffer (see below).

For binding assays, monocytes and MDM were dispensed into 96-well microtiter dishes and incubated (4 h, 5 °C) with different concentrations of radioiodinated FGF-2 either alone (total binding) or in the presence of a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled growth factor (nonspecific binding) or 10 µg/ml free heparin (non-HSPG mediated binding) in 50 µl of binding buffer (RPMI 1640, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.1% sodium azide), followed by four washes to remove unbound growth factor. The levels of free and bound radioligand in each case were determined by counting samples of the cell pellet and the combined washes, respectively. The equilibrium binding constant Kd was estimated from Scatchard plots (B versus B/F) where B represents specifically bound ligand (total bound minus nonspecifically bound) and F represents free radioligand.

Assay for Binding of FGF-2 to Syndecan-2 in Detergent-lysed Cells-- The capacity of syndecan-2 present in MDM to bind exogenously added FGF-2 was determined by an ELISA assay in which detergent-lysed extracts of MDM were added to FGF-coated microtiter plates and the immobilized HSPG detected with the syndecan-2 mAb 10H4. To perform the assay, 96-well ELISA plates were coated (overnight at room temperature) with recombinant human FGF-2 (20 µg/ml) in 50 mM Na2CO3/NaHCO3 buffer, pH 9.6 (100 µl/well), washed (×2, PBS, pH 7.5) and blocked with PBS, pH 7.5, containing 5% (w/v) dried milk powder and 0.2% (w/v) Tween 20 (blocking buffer). Samples of cytokine-treated MDM (107 cells) or syndecan-2 transfected Namalwa cells were then lysed in 1 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% (w/v) Triton X-100 supplemented with protease inhibitors (see above) for 30 min on ice and insoluble debris removed by centrifugation (12,000 × g, 5 min). Aliquots (100 µl) of the detergent extracts were next added (in triplicate) to the ELISA plates, incubated 1 h at room temperature, washed (×3 in blocking buffer) and reincubated for the same period with 100 µl of 10H4 syndecan-2 mAb or control isotype-matched antibody (2 µg/ml). Plates were then washed, incubated (1 h, room temperature) with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (1/4,000 dilution in PBS, pH 7.5, containing 5% (w/v) dried milk powder and 0.2% (w/v) Tween 20), washed again, and developed with o-phenylenediamine (0.4 mg/ml) in 25 mm citrate, 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 5.5. Following the addition of H2SO4 (1 M final concentration) plates were read at 495 nm in a Bio-Rad ELISA plate reader.

Assay for Cellular FGF-2 Production-- A proprietary FGF-2 ELISA assay system (Quantikine, R&D Systems Europe, Abingdon, UK) was used to measure cellular FGF-2 production from monocytes and MDM. Briefly, samples (200 µl) of cell lysates (106/ml PBS, pH 7.5, 0.1% Triton X-100) or of growth medium from monocytes cultured in RPMI 1640, 10% autologous human serum in 6-well tissue culture plates (Nunc, UK) were applied in duplicate to the anti-FGF antibody coated microtiter plates followed by incubation (2 h, room temperature), washing, and detection with a second horseradish peroxidase-conjugated FGF-2 antibody. Plates were then developed exactly as described above and read at 495 nm in a Bio-Rad ELISA plate reader.

BaF32 Cell Proliferation (Transactivation) Assay-- The ability of macrophage cell surface HSPGs to act as low-affinity FGF receptors and induce signaling via tyrosine kinase FGF receptors was assessed using glutaraldehyde-fixed macrophages and FGFR1-transfected BaF32 cells in a modification of the proliferation assay described by Richard et al. (37) and Filla et al. (38). In this modification, proliferation was measured as mitochondrial NADH/NADPH-dependent dehydrogenase activity in a colorimetric assay in which the substrate MTS (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethyoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium inner salt) is reduced to a water-soluble formazan dye. Briefly, fresh monocytes or cytokine-stimulated MDM were fixed with glutaraldehyde (1%, w/v in PBS, pH 7.5), blocked with glycine (0.1 M in PBS, pH 7.5, 30 min) and suspended in RPMI 1640, 0.5% fetal calf serum. Fixed cells (1.5-3 × 105) were then mixed with an equal volume of BaF32 cells (3 × 105/ml) and recombinant FGF-2 (10 nM, final concentration) in the same medium in 96-well microtiter plates (final volume 180 µl/well) and incubated for 3-5 days at 37 °C. At the end of this period, MTS (150 µM in water) was added to each well and the plates developed at 37 °C for 1 h before spectrophotometry on a Bio-Rad ELISA plate reader at 595 nm.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Immunochemical Detection of Heparan Sulfate at the Surface of Differentiated Human Macrophages-- To measure cell surface HSPG expression in primary human monocyte/macrophages, we exploited the specificity of the monoclonal antibody 3G10 to detect unsaturated Delta 4,5 glucuronyl residues in core HS chains generated by prior treatment of intact cells with the enzyme heparan sulfate lyase. We first questioned whether mobilization of HS to the cell surface is triggered by differentiation of blood monocytes to MDMs or by exposure to pro-inflammatory mediators that activate macrophages and induce synthesis of heparin-binding growth factors. The results (Fig. 1, A and B) indicate cell surface HS is indeed up-regulated severalfold on the majority of MDM (characterized by elevated expression of the high affinity Fcgamma receptor Fcgamma RI, CD14 and MHC class II histocompatibility antigens, data not shown) within 24 h of differentiation from monocytes and to a further extent on MDM treated with either bacterial lipopolysaccharide or interleukin-1alpha . This newly mobilized HS appears to be homogeneously distributed over the surface of individual MDM as assessed by immunofluorescent staining with the mAb 10E4, which binds intact HS (Fig. 1C). Interestingly, no comparable levels of HS were detected on the surface of mitogen-activated human T cells, indicating that the capacity for extensive cell surface HS mobilization is not a general property of hemopoietic cells (Fig. 1A).


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Cell surface heparan sulfate expression on primary human monocyte-derived macrophages and lymphocytes. Levels of cell surface HS were measured on intact fresh human peripheral blood monocytes, MDMs, and resting or mitogen-activated lymphocytes by fluorescent antibody staining and FACS analysis (see "Experimental Procedures"). Panel A shows the time courses of cell surface HS expression during culture-induced differentiation of monocytes to MDM and mitogen (phytohemagglutinin) stimulation of T lymphocytes detected by heparinase III treatment and fluorescent staining with the Delta 4,5 HS-reactive 3G10 mAb (see "Experimental Procedures"). Full-scale values for the upper and lower histogram y axis are 50 and 200, respectively. Panel B shows the final levels of cell surface HS induced on MDM by incubation with the pro-inflammatory mediators IL-1alpha (1 ng/ml), TNFalpha (100 ng/ml), and LPS (0.5 µg/ml). Control nonheparinase treated cells were negative (not shown). Data are expressed as the mean ± S.E. for triplicate determinations of median fluorescence in each case. Panel C shows phase contrast and fluorescent micrographs of fresh monocytes (1 and 2) and IL-1alpha -stimulated MDM (3 and 4), stained with the mAb 10E4, which detects intact HS chains. The specificity of 10E4 for HS was confirmed in parallel cell preparations after treatment with heparinase I/III (not shown).

The specificity of the HS mAbs in each of these experiments was confirmed by separate controls, which showed that surface staining with the 3G10 mAb depended on pretreatment of macrophages with heparinase III and that surface staining with the 10E4 mAb was reduced by digestion with this enzyme (not shown).

The Major HSPG Core Protein on Activated Macrophages Is Syndecan-2-- To identify the proteoglycan core proteins decorated with HS, we treated intact monocyte-derived macrophages with heparinase III and analyzed whole cell lysates by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with the Delta 4,5 glucuronosyl sugar-reactive mAb 3G10. The results (Fig. 2) revealed the presence of a single major 48-kDa band on MDM whose abundance was further increased by the inflammatory mediators IL-1alpha , TNFalpha , and LPS and which was completely absent from unstimulated monocytes. Size comparisons with the previously characterized (39) core proteins of syndecan-1 (85 kDa), syndecan-2 (48 kDa), syndecan-4 (35 kDa), and glypican-1 (65 kDa) in whole cell lysates prepared from cloned cDNA-transfected human Namalwa B-lymphoma cells revealed co-migration of the macrophage 48-kDa band with syndecan-2 (fibroglycan), the major fibroblast syndecan variant (Fig. 2B). The additional faint 65-kDa band visible in the MDM samples was identified as glypican-1 by virtue of its co-migration with the authentic HSPG (note this particular HSPG is endogenously expressed by Namalwa cells). Trace amounts of a further 130-kDa band in MDMs likely represent an HSPG form of the CD44 hyaluronan receptor (data not shown).2 Clearly, however, the 48-kDa species is the single most abundant cell surface HSPG of MDMs (>90% of total HSPG, see Fig. 2A).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The major HSPG on the surface of differentiated and cytokine-stimulated macrophages is syndecan-2. The HSPG core proteins present on the surface of primary human monocytes, MDMs, and cytokine-stimulated MDM were identified by heparinase III digestion and Western blotting with a panel of HS reactive and core protein-specific mAbs and authentic HSPG transfectants. Panel A shows the HSPG profile (3G10 Delta 4,5 HS mAb) of freshly isolated monocytes (lane 1), monocyte-derived macrophages (lane 2) and IL-1alpha (1 ng/ml), TNFalpha (100 ng/ml), or LPS-stimulated (0.5 µg/ml) MDM as indicated. Blots of nonheparinase treated monocytes were negative (not shown). In panel B, IL-1alpha -stimulated monocytes were electrophoresed in parallel with Namalwa B-lymphoma cells transfected with cDNA encoding full-length human syndecan-1, syndecan-2, syndecan-4, or glypican-1 and blotted with the 3G10 Delta 4,5 HS mAb. Panel C shows a Western blot of IL-1alpha -stimulated MDM and syndecan-2 transfected B-lymphoma cells probed with the syndecan-2 specific mAb 10H4. Similar blots of freshly isolated monocytes were negative (not shown). The positions of the molecular mass calibration markers myosin (205 kDa), beta -galactosidase (116 kDa), phosphorylase b (97 kDa), bovine serum albumin (68 kDa), ovalbumin (45 kDa), and carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa) are indicated with arrows. All SDS-PAGE gels contained 7.5% acrylamide.

The identification of the 48-kDa band as syndecan-2 was further corroborated by Western blotting of IL-1alpha -stimulated MDM samples with the polypeptide core-specific mAbs B-B4 (syndecan-1), 10H4 (syndecan-2), 8G5 (syndecan-4), and S1 (glypican-1), which revealed staining only with 10H4 (Fig. 2C and data not shown). In addition, syndecan-2 could be clearly visualized in IL-1alpha -stimulated MDM (but not in unstimulated monocytes) by immunoperoxidase staining of detergent-permeabilized cells with the mAb 6G12, which recognizes the syndecan-2 cytoplasmic tail (Fig. 3). The syndecan-2 ectodomain-reactive mAb 10H4 used in Western blotting did not yield consistent results in immunocytochemical staining because of its poor reactivity with native proteoglycan (not shown).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescent antibody staining of syndecan-2 in cytokine-stimulated macrophages. Cytospin preparations of syndecan-2-transfected Namalwa cells (panel A) and IL-1alpha -stimulated (1 ng/ml) MDM (panels B and C) were permeabilized in 100% acetone followed by staining with the syndecan-2 cytoplasmic tail mAb 6G12 and peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse Ig (see "Experimental Procedures"). Untransfected Namalwa cells and unstimulated monocyte controls were negative (not shown). In panel C, the IL-1alpha -stimulated MDM were indirectly double-stained with mAbs to syndecan-2 cytoplasmic tail (fluorescein) and the monocyte CD14 antigen (Texas red) as described under "Experimental Procedures." A contaminating (CD14-ve) lymphocyte can be seen overlying the macrophages in the center of the picture. The magnification in each case was × 400.

Next we compared syndecan-2 mRNA levels in primary human monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages using semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR amplification from total cellular RNA. The results (Fig. 4) reveal abundant levels of the 458-base pair syndecan-2 PCR product in both culture-differentiated and cytokine-stimulated (LPS, TNFalpha ) MDM but little or no product in resting monocytes. In addition, LPS-stimulated MDM yielded higher levels of syndecan-2 product than either TNFalpha -stimulated or unstimulated MDM, consistent with the measurements of both core protein and HS by Western blotting and FACS analysis, respectively (Fig. 1A and Fig. 2A). Importantly the apparent differences in syndecan-2 transcript levels were detected within the exponential phase of the PCR reaction (20-30 cycles), where the level of product is proportional to the number of copies of template DNA. Finally each of the monocyte/macrophage cDNAs was found to yield similar amounts of the housekeeping gene transcript glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Our results therefore point to a specific induction of syndecan-2 gene expression during monocyte/macrophage differentiation and activation.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Syndecan-2 mRNA is induced during in vitro macrophage differentiation and activation. Samples of RNA prepared from fresh peripheral blood monocytes, MDM, and cytokine-stimulated MDM were reverse transcribed and subjected to PCR (20-30 cycles as shown) to amplify either a segment of the syndecan-2 coding sequence (syndecan-2) or glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) followed by agarose gel electrophoresis and either Southern blot hybridization to a 32P-labeled internal syndecan-2 probe or ethidium bromide staining, respectively (see "Experimental Procedures"). Controls in which no reverse transcribed RNA was added during PCR (not shown) were in all cases negative. The sizes of DNA calibration markers are illustrated on the left of the figure. bp, base pair(s).

Macrophage HSPGs Sequester Heparin-binding Angiogenic Growth Factors-- In view of the fact that monocyte/macrophages themselves actively synthesize heparin-binding growth factors, we assessed GAG-mediated binding of the macrophage-derived angiogenic growth factor FGF-2 to intact monocytes and macrophages using an iodine-125 radioligand binding assay. The results (Fig. 5) show that macrophages indeed acquire GAG-associated binding sites for FGF-2 following either differentiation or cytokine-stimulation and confirm that the extent of FGF-2 binding is broadly proportional to the level of cell-surface HS detected with the 3G10 mAb (compare with Fig. 1A). The identification of these sites as HSPGs is further supported by three lines of evidence. First, binding is sensitive to protease digestion and is inhibited by free heparin (Fig. 5, A and B). Second, lysates of LPS-stimulated MDM display syndecan-2 mediated binding to FGF-2 in a microtiter plate assay (Fig. 6). Third, binding of 125I-FGF to the surface of IL-1alpha -stimulated MDM is specific, saturable, of high affinity (Kd 125 nM, 106 sites/cell), and is highly sensitive to competition by free heparin or heparan sulfate in comparison with chondroitin sulfate (IC50, 0.1, 0.5, and 50 µg/ml, respectively, Fig. 7).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Cell surface HSPGs on cytokine-stimulated macrophages bind FGF-2. Intact primary human peripheral blood monocytes, MDMs, and cytokine-stimulated MDM were subjected to a radioligand binding assay with 125I-labeled FGF-2 (50 nM) to assess binding to cell surface HSPG and its sensitivity to proteases. Panel A shows the extent of binding to unstimulated monocytes and MDM incubated (72 h, 37 °C) either in the presence or absence of 1 ng/ml IL-1alpha , or 0.5 µg/ml LPS (see "Experimental Procedures"). In Panel B, IL-1alpha -stimulated MDMs were pre-incubated in the presence or absence (control) of each of the proteases shown, followed by determination of 125I -FGF binding as in panel A. Data in each case represent the mean ± S.E. (n = 3) for total 125I -FGF binding (no free heparin added, solid bars) and non-HSPG-mediated binding (10 µg/ml free heparin added, open bars).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Macrophage syndecan-2 binds FGF-2. The capacity of syndecan-2 on IL-1alpha -stimulated (1 ng/ml) MDM and transfected B-lymphoma cells to sequester FGF-2 was measured in an ELISA using detergent-lysed cells and FGF-2 immobilized on a 96-well microtiter plate (see "Experimental Procedures"). The histogram shows the levels of syndecan binding to both FGF-2-coated and control-uncoated wells in the presence and absence of free heparin detected with the syndecan-2 mAb 10H4. Data in each case are the mean ± S.E. of triplicate determinations.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Characterization of cell surface HSPG-mediated FGF-2 binding. The specificity and binding affinity of FGF-2 for cell surface HSPG on intact IL-1alpha -stimulated (1 ng/ml) MDM was measured using an iodine-125 radioligand binding assay as described under "Experimental Procedures." Panel A shows a comparison of total 125I-FGF-2 binding (no competitor added), nonspecific binding (100 × fold molar excess unlabeled FGF-2 added) and non-HSPG mediated binding (10 µg/ml free heparin added). Panel B shows a representative specific 125I-FGF-2 binding curve and corresponding Scatchard plot (B/F, bound specific FGF-2/free FGF-2 versus bound specific FGF-2) from which the equilibrium binding constant Kd (125 nM) was estimated. Panel C compares the sensitivity of 125I-FGF-2 binding with inhibition by the free glycosaminoglycans heparin, heparan sulfate, and chondroitin 4-sulfate, calculated as the percent maximal binding (cpm bound in the presence of free glycosaminoglycan/cpm bound in the absence of free glycosaminoglycan × 100). Data in each panel is the mean ± S.E. for four replicate determinations.

To assess whether macrophage syndecan-2 displays similar affinity for other macrophage-derived ligands, we performed both radioligand and fluorescent binding analyses with a comprehensive panel including the angiogenic growth factors FGF-1 and VEGF, the vascular smooth muscle growth factor hbEGF, the C-C (beta ) chemokines RANTES, MIP-1beta and MCP-1, and the C-K-C (alpha ) chemokine IL-8. The results (Fig. 8) revealed high affinity heparin-inhibitible binding of IL-1alpha -stimulated MDM to 125I-VEGF (Kd, 90 nM) and 125I -hbEGF (Kd, 30 nM) at similar receptor densities to FGF-2 (5-10 × 105 sites/cell). In contrast, no significant heparin-inhibitible binding was observed to 125I-FGF-1 (Fig. 8C) or to any of the chemokines, 125I-MIP-1alpha , 125I-MIP-1beta , 125I-MCP-1, 125I-IL-8, and 125I-RANTES tested over the range 0 to 600 nM. The integrity of the radioiodinated ligands was in each case confirmed by parallel binding assays with heparin-Sepharose (not shown). Furthermore, no binding of the fluorescent derivatives, fluorescein isothiocyante IL-8 (33) or NBD-RANTES (34), was detected in separate binding assays of IL-1alpha -stimulated MDM as assessed by flow cytometry. In summary, these results demonstrate that HSPGs, predominantly syndecan-2 on in vitro activated human macrophages, display selective binding to the macrophage-derived growth factors FGF-2, VEGF, and hbEGF but do not appear to sequester chemokines.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Cell surface HSPG-mediated binding of VEGF, hbEGF, and FGF-1. The affinity of intact IL-1alpha -stimulated (1 ng/ml) MDM for 125I-labeled VEGF, hbEGF, and FGF-1 was compared using a similar radioligand binding assay described in the legend to Fig. 7. Panels A and B show representative specific radioligand binding curves (total cpm bound - cpm bound in the presence of 10 µg/ml free heparin) together with corresponding Scatchard plots from which the apparent equilibrium binding constants (Kd, 111 nM, VEGF; Kd, 90 nM, hbEGF) were estimated. Panel C shows a representative binding curve for 125I-FGF-1 measured in the absence or presence of 10 µg/ml free heparin. Data are the mean ± S.E. of four replicate determinations.

Macrophage HSPGs Can Transactivate FGFR1 on Neighboring Cells-- To further assess the physiological function of syndecan-2 on MDM, we questioned whether these cells might use cell surface HSPG to promote signal transduction (in trans) through FGF receptors on neighboring cells. To explore this possibility, we assayed the capacity of glutaraldehyde-fixed (IL-1alpha -activated) monocytes and MDM to induce the proliferation of FGFR1-transfected BaF32 cells (which lack endogenous HSPGs) in the presence of nanomolar FGF-2 concentrations. The results (Fig. 9) show that cytokine-stimulated MDM expressing syndecan-2 are indeed efficient promoters of FGF-dependent proliferation, whereas fresh unstimulated monocytes, which express little or no syndecan-2, are not. The involvement of HS chains in this process could be clearly demonstrated by the effects of heparinase III treatment, which reduced BaF32 cell proliferation by 80%. Furthermore the capacity to stimulate proliferation is not common to all "activated" cell types because activated T-cells (which have little or no cell surface HS, see Fig. 1A) did not display such activity in our assays. Indeed comparison with syndecan-2 transfected Namalwa cells suggests activated macrophages are particularly efficient in augmenting BaF cell proliferation. Whereas the former stimulated proliferation at a 10:1 ratio of presenting cells: BaF cells, cytokine-stimulated MDM were equally active at a 1:1 ratio (data not shown). Such differences cannot be explained by higher mean cell surface syndecan-2 expression levels on macrophages, because these are lower than in the transfected cells as assessed by Western blotting (see Fig. 2B). Differences in the degree of homogeneity of cell surface syndecan-2 expression rather than the average expression level between the two cell populations, however, cannot be ruled out. In summary, our results show for the first time that HSPGs on primary human macrophages not only bind FGF-2 but can also transactivate FGF receptors on neighboring cells.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Macrophage HSPGs promote FGF-2-mediated proliferation of BaF32 cells. The capacity of HSPG·FGF complexes on the surface of IL-1alpha -stimulated (1 ng/ml) MDM to promote FGF receptor signaling was determined in proliferation assays with FGFR1-transfected BaF32 cells (see "Experimental Procedures"). BaF32 cells were cultured in the presence or absence of 10 nM recombinant human FGF-2 either without further additions, with free heparin added (20 ng/ml), or at a 1:1 ratio with glutaraldehyde-fixed undifferentiated (unstimulated) peripheral blood monocytes, 72-h IL-1alpha -stimulated MDM, or 72-h IL-1alpha -stimulated MDM treated with heparinase I/III. Data shown are from a single experiment (mean ± S.E., n = 3) that is representative of three separate repeat experiments.

Syndecan-2 Expression and Macrophage Endogenous Growth Factor Presentation-- Implicit in our results is the possibility that activated macrophages may utilize syndecan-2 to present their own endogenously synthesized growth factors at the cell surface. Measurement of endogenous macrophage FGF-2 production using an ELISA indicated significant levels (394 ± 106, 65 ± 30, and 66 ± 23 pg/107 cells, respectively, n = 3) in cell lysates after stimulation with LPS, IL-1alpha , or TNFalpha compared with trace levels (<10 pg/107 cells) in fresh unstimulated monocytes. Hence the same agents we found to induce HSPG expression and FGF-2 binding in monocyte-derived macrophages in vitro also induce FGF-2 production by these cells. In all cases however the cytokine-induced growth factor remained associated with the cells and only trace levels (equivalent to 1 pg release from 107 cells) could be detected in culture supernatants. Furthermore little if any cell surface bound FGF could be detected by fluorescent antibody staining, and no soluble FGF was detected after cleavage of HSPGs from the surface of cytokine-stimulated MDM with either heparinase I or heparinase III (data not shown). Thus the FGF-2 produced is likely stored within intracellular vesicles and factors other than the inflammatory cytokines tested here must be required to promote its release in vivo.

In Vivo Activated Macrophages Express Syndecan-2 and Sequester FGF-2-- To establish whether syndecan-2 expression and growth factor presentation are properties of in vivo activated macrophage populations as well as the in vitro stimulated MDM described above, we investigated the HSPG profile of macrophages isolated from the peripheral blood and synovial fluid of individuals with inflammatory joint disease. The results (Fig. 10A) revealed expression of the same predominant 48-kDa core protein identified as syndecan-2 in synovial macrophage samples in each of the inflammatory conditions (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosis, and psoriatic arthritis), as confirmed by Western blotting with both the 3G10 Delta 4,5 glucuronate-specific mAb and the syndecan-2 specific mAb 10H4. In contrast, no syndecan-2 was detected in parallel samples of peripheral blood monocytes from any of the individuals tested (Fig. 10A). Interestingly, synovial fluid macrophages also displayed GAG-mediated heparin-inhibitible binding of FGF-2, and this was at least twice that of peripheral blood monocytes (Fig. 10B). These results confirm that syndecan-2 is the major inducible HSPG expressed on activated macrophages in vivo and suggest that in the case of synovitis, expression is induced locally, most likely by inflammatory mediators released within the tissue itself.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Syndecan-2 is the major cell surface HSPG of in vivo activated macrophages in inflammatory synovitis and binds FGF-2. The HSPG core protein profile of synovial fluid macrophages and peripheral blood monocytes from individuals with inflammatory joint disease was assessed by treatment with heparinase III and Western blotting as described under "Experimental Procedures." Panel A depicts Western blots of equal numbers of synovial fluid macrophages (SFM) and peripheral blood monocytes (PBM) from individuals with psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosis, and rheumatoid arthritis, respectively, probed with either the 3G10 Delta  HS mAb or the 10H4 syndecan-2 mAb as indicated. The parallel blot of syndecan-2 transfected Namalwa cells (Transfectant) indicates co-migration of the monocyte HSPG core protein with authentic syndecan-2. The molecular mass calibration markers (kDa) are the same as those shown in Fig. 2. Panel B shows the extent of heparin-inhibitible 125I-labeled FGF-2 binding (total binding - heparin inhibited binding) to synovial fluid macrophages (SFM) from a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and normal unstimulated peripheral blood monocytes (PBM, equal cell numbers were used). Data are the mean ± S.E. of four replicate determinations.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Macrophages migrate to the tissues during wound healing, inflammation, and tumor angiogenesis where they play a major role in promoting cell proliferation through the production of heparin-binding growth factors (2, 40). However the specific details of how these cells regulate the bioavailability of many individual growth factors at the appropriate times and in the appropriate tissue locations are not clear. The action of heparin-binding growth factors produced by other less motile cell types is known to be regulated both positively and negatively by interactions with HSPGs within the surrounding tissues and extracellular matrix. For example FGF-2 is relatively abundant in normal uninflamed tissues where its association with matrix HSPGs appears to block its capacity to promote the proliferation of neighboring cells (42-44), despite their close proximity (45). Local release of this latent FGF in mitogenically active form is thought to be orchestrated by matrix-degrading proteinases and heparinases secreted by "activated" platelets and neutrophils following tissue injury (46-48). Such models, however, tend to exclude any role for macrophage-derived HSPGs in tissue growth factor regulation, despite the fact that these cells are an important and abundant source of heparin-binding growth factors. These considerations prompted us to characterize cell surface HSPG expression by human macrophages in vitro and in vivo and to investigate their capacity to regulate macrophage-derived growth factor action.

In the first part of this manuscript we showed, using the HS-specific mAbs 3G10 and 10E4, that cell surface HS expression is induced during in vitro differentiation of human monocyte-derived macrophages, conditions that give rise to cells resembling mature tissue macrophages. In addition we showed that the pro-inflammatory agents, bacterial lipopolysaccharide and IL-1alpha , induce further increases in HS, underlining the link between cell surface HS expression and inflammation. These results extend earlier reports of GAG biosynthesis in macrophages and macrophage-derived cell lines (49-51) based on biosynthetic labeling studies, and reveal HS as an abundant and homogeneously distributed component of the human activated macrophage cell surface. Intriguingly, the major core protein to which the HS is attached was found to be syndecan-2 (fibroglycan), an HSPG previously associated with fibroblasts and cells of endothelial origin. Syndecan-2 was also found to be the dominant cell surface HSPG on macrophages activated in vivo, underscoring the physiological relevance of the finding. In particular, samples of macrophages recovered from the synovial fluid of individuals with inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosis, and psoriatic arthritis) expressed predominantly syndecan-2. In contrast, peripheral blood monocytes isolated from the same individuals expressed little or no syndecan-2, confirming the inducibility of this HSPG in inflamed tissue in vivo. Interestingly, the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1 that was found to induce macrophage syndecan-2 expression in vitro (see above) is a key component of the cytokine network that maintains chronic inflammation in the rheumatoid joint (52). Furthermore FGF-2, a high affinity ligand for macrophage syndecan-2, is found abundantly within inflamed synovial tissue where it stimulates the growth of fibroblast-like synoviocytes and may also promote angiogenesis (53, 54). The expression of syndecan-2 by macrophages in synovial fluid may therefore play a role in the pathology of inflammatory synovitis.

The expression of syndecan-2 on hematopoietic cells is a novel and unexpected finding. Originally named fibroglycan (55) because of its expression on human lung fibroblasts (35), syndecan-2 is in fact more widely expressed and mRNA has been detected both in endothelial and neural cell lines and to varying extents in brain, heart, muscle, kidney, and lung (56). This pattern overlaps but is distinct from those of syndecans 1, 3, and 4 and many cell types simultaneously express combinations of different syndecans. Studies of syndecan-2 expression in the mouse have revealed its localization at the sites of cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion, notably those at the interfaces of developing epithelial and mesenchymal tissues (57). Expression has also been documented in MS-5 murine bone marrow stromal cells, prompting the suggestion that syndecan-2 may promote the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells in vivo (58). Surprisingly, however, there have been no reports of syndecan-2 either in primary murine macrophages or macrophage cell lines, where syndecan-1 has been identified as the major cell surface HSPG (59, 60). Additionally, expression of syndecan-1 in murine macrophages is regulated translationally by changes in the level of cAMP (59), whereas expression of syndecan-2 as shown in our studies appears to be regulated at the transcriptional level. These apparent differences between macrophages from different species are intriguing but are not presently understood.

Our observations that activated MDM display heparin-mediated binding of FGF-2 (Kd, 125 nM), VEGF (Kd, 111 nM), and hbEGF (Kd, 90 nM) are consistent with a general role for syndecan-2 in the sequestration of heparin-binding growth factors. Although we could not demonstrate unequivocally that syndecan-2 is the primary growth factor-binding HSPG, it is difficult to conclude otherwise because it is the single most abundant core protein on the MDM cell surface. Furthermore, we confirmed, using an ELISA, that syndecan-2 present in MDM lysates displayed FGF-binding. Interestingly however, MDM cell surface HSPGs displayed no binding to FGF-1 or to any of the heparin-binding chemokines tested, which included MCP-1, MIP 1alpha , MIP 1beta , IL-8, and RANTES. This lack of chemokine binding concurs with recent reports describing the chemokine-mediated blockade of primary human macrophage infection by monocytotropic HIV (29, 61). In these studies, no HS-mediated binding of RANTES to the cell surface was detected (29), despite the fact that RANTES·HS complexes were efficient inhibitors of viral entry (61). Hence it is likely that the cell surface HSPGs of human macrophages are not promiscuous but instead display selectivity for a subset of individual growth factors.

The finding that FGF·HSPG complexes on the surface of cytokine-activated macrophages could efficiently induce proliferation of heterologous BaF32 cells lends further support to the current hypothesis that HSPGs function as co-receptors to regulate heparin-binding growth factor action. In the case of syndecan-2 reported here, this co-receptor function could operate in vivo for the presentation of growth factor either to signal transducing receptors on macrophages themselves (cis-activation) or to receptors on neighboring target cells such as fibroblasts and endothelial cells (trans-activation). Although we cannot rule out the former possibility this seems less likely as we failed to detect FGFR1 in MDMs by reverse transcriptase PCR. In addition we failed to observe proliferation of MDM even after extended culture in the presence of heparin-binding growth factors such as FGF-2, VEGF, and hbEGF.3 We therefore favor the alternative possibility that MDMs use inducible HSPGs such as syndecan-2 to transactivate FGF receptor on neighboring cells. Although such transactivatory capacity has been demonstrated recently for HSPGs expressed on transformed fibroblast (37) and lymphoma cell lines (38), this is the first report to demonstrate this phenomenon in primary human macrophages, which bear only a single major HSPG species, syndecan-2. We speculate that such an arrangement may facilitate the precise targeting of growth factors by macrophages migrating in response to chemokines while at the same time avoiding their release within inappropriate tissues. Further investigation of the potential importance of macrophage HSPGs in regulating such physiological processes is now clearly warranted.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Antonella Isacchi for kindly donating the recombinant FGF-2 plasmid and Dr. Tim Wells for fluorescent chemokines. We also thank Professor John Gallagher for helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Post-Doctoral research assistant funded by the Cancer Research Campaign.

parallel Funded by Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen (G. 0181.97), the Geconcerteerde Onderzoeksacties 1996-2000, the Inter-University Network for Fundamental Research sponsored by the Belgian government (IUAP P4/17), and the Flanders Inter-University Institute for Biotechnology.

Dagger Dagger Funded by an MRC Senior Scientific Fellowship and a Cancer Research Campaign Project grant. To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of Oxford, Nuffield Dept. of Medicine, Rm. 7407, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK. Tel.: 44-1865-221336; Fax: 44-1865-222502; E-mail: djackson@worf.molbiol. ox.ac.uk.

2 D. G. Jackson, M. Jones, and N. Athanason, manuscript in preparation.

3 S. Clasper and D. G. Jackson, unpublished observations.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: FGF, fibroblast growth factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; hbEGF, heparin-binding epithelial growth factor; HSPG, heparan sulfate proteoglycan; HS, heparan sulfate; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; FGFR1, FGF receptor 1; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; MDM, monocyte-derived macrophage; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; IL, interleukin; TNFalpha , tumor necrosis factor alpha ; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; RANTES, regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted factor; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Auger, M. J., and Ross, J. A. (1992) The Macrophage , Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
2. Werb, Z., Underwood, J. L., and Rappolee, D. A. (1992) in Mononuclear Phagocytes (Van Furth, R., ed) , pp. 404-409, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA
3. Burgess, W. H., and Maciag, T. (1989) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58, 575-606[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Leung, D. W., Cachianes, G., Kuang, W. J., Goeddel, D. V., and Ferrara, N. (1989) Science 246, 1306-1309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Besner, G. E., Higashiyama, S., and Klagsbrun, M. (1990) Cell Regul. 1, 811-819[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Polverini, P. J., and Leibovich, S. J. (1984) Lab. Invest. 51, 635-642[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Sunderkotter, C., Steinbrink, K., Goebeler, M., Bhardwaj, R., and Sorg, C. (1994) J. Leukocyte Biol. 55, 410-422[Abstract]
8. Arras, M., Ito, W. D., Scholz, D., Winkler, B., Schaper, J., and Schaper, W. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 40-50[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Rappolee, D. A., Mark, D., Banda, M. J., and Werb, Z. (1988) Science 241, 708-712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Baird, A., Mormede, P., and Bohlen, P. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 126, 358-364[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Turnbull, J. E., Fernig, D. G., Ke, Y., Wilkinson, M. C., and Gallagher, J. T. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 10337-10341[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Sanderson, R. D., and Bernfield, M. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 9562-9566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Kato, M., Wang, H., Bernfield, M., Gallagher, J. T., and Turnbull, J. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18881-18890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Saksela, O., Moscatelli, D., Sommer, A., and Rifkin, D. B. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 107, 743-751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Yayon, A., Klagsbrun, M., Esko, J. D., Leder, P., and Ornitz, D. M. (1991) Cell 64, 841-848[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Ornitz, D. M., Yayon, A., Flanagan, J. G., Svahn, C. M., Levi, E., and Leder, P. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 240-247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Mason, I. (1994) Cell 78, 547-552[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Higashiyama, S., Abraham, J. A., and Klagsbrun, M. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 933-940[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Thompson, S. A., Higashiyama, S., Wood, K., Pollitt, N. S., Damm, D., McEnroe, G., Garrick, B., Ashton, N., Lau, K., Hancock, N., Klagsbrun, M., and Abraham, J. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2541-2549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Gitay-Goren, H., Soker, S., Vlodavsky, I., and Neufeld, G. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 6093-6098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. David, D. (1993) FASEB J. 7, 1023-1030[Abstract]
22. Jackson, D. G., Bell, J. I., Dickinson, R., Timans, J., Shields, J., and Whittle, N. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 673-686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Bennett, K., Jackson, D. G., Simon, J. C., Tanczos, E., Peach, R., Modrell, B., Stamenkovic, I., Plowman, G., and Aruffo, A. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 687-698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Bernfield, M., Kokenyesi, R., Kato, M., Hinkes, M. T., Spring, J., Gallo, R. L., and Lose, E. J. (1992) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8, 365-393[CrossRef]
25. Carey, D. J. (1997) Biochem. J. 327, 1-16
26. Oh, E. S., Woods, A., and Couchman, J. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8133-8136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Raulo, E., Chernousov, M. A., Carey, D. J., Nolo, R., and Rauvala, H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 12999-13004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Kolset, S. O., and Gallagher, J. T. (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1032, 191-211[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Oravecz, T., Pall, M., Wang, J., Roderiquez, G., Ditto, M., and Norcross, M. A. (1997) J. Immunol. 159, 4587-4592[Abstract]
30. Laskin, J. D., Dokidis, A., Gardner, C. R., and Laskin, D. L. (1991) Hepatology 14, 306-312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Edwards, I. J., Xu, H., Obunike, J. C.,