J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 24113-24123, August 20, 1999
Inducible Expression of the Cell Surface Heparan Sulfate
Proteoglycan Syndecan-2 (Fibroglycan) on Human Activated Macrophages
Can Regulate Fibroblast Growth Factor Action*
Steven
Clasper
§,
Sylvie
Vekemans¶
,
Martine
Fiore
,
Magda
Plebanski
,
Paul
Wordsworth**,
Guido
David¶
, and
David G.
Jackson

From the
University of Oxford, Molecular Immunology
Group, Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital,
Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU United Kingdom, ** Nuffield Orthopaedic
Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom, and ¶ Center for Human Genetics,
University of Leuven and Flanders Inter-University Institute for
Biotechnology, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
 |
ABSTRACT |
Monocyte/macrophages play important roles in
regulating tissue growth and angiogenesis through the controlled
release of heparin-binding growth factors such as fibroblast growth
factor (FGF), vascular endothelial growth factor, and heparin binding
epidermal growth factor. The action of these potent growth mediators is
known to be regulated by adsorption to heparan sulfate proteoglycans
(HSPGs) on the surface and within the extracellular matrix of other
neighboring cells, which respectively promote or restrict interactions
with their signal-transducing receptors on target cells. Here we report on the nature of HSPGs inducibly expressed on the surface of
macrophages that confer these cells with the capacity to regulate
endogenous growth factor activity. We reveal that activated human
macrophages express only a single major 48-kDa cell surface HSPG,
syndecan-2 (fibroglycan) as the result of de novo RNA and
protein synthesis. In addition, we demonstrate this macrophage HSPG
selectively binds the macrophage-derived growth factors FGF-2, vascular
endothelial growth factor and heparin binding EGF and can present FGF-2
in a form that transactivates receptor-bearing BaF32 cells. These results define a novel and unique proteoglycan profile for macrophages and imply a key role for syndecan-2 in the delivery of sequestered growth factors by inflammatory macrophages for productive binding to
their appropriate target cells in vivo.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Mononuclear phagocytes are recruited from peripheral blood to the
sites of tissue injury during the normal physiological processes of
wound healing and inflammation as well as in pathological processes such as atherogenesis and tumor development where they play a key role
in stimulating new tissue growth (1, 2). During the recruitment
process, blood-derived monocytes undergo progressive differentiation to
tissue macrophages characterized by changes in cell surface antigen
expression, increased phagocytic activity, and most notably acquisition
of the capacity to synthesize an array of different cytokines and
growth factors (2). Some of the most potent of these molecules are
heparin-binding growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor
(FGF),1 vascular endothelial
growth factor (VEGF), and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor
(hbEGF), which promote mesenchymal tissue growth and angiogenesis by
triggering the proliferation of fibroblasts, vascular endothelium,
neural, and smooth muscle cells (3-5). The production and release of
heparin-binding growth factors such as FGF is implicated in numerous
macrophage-mediated processes including tumor angiogenesis (6, 7),
arteriogenesis and capillary sprouting (8), wound healing (9), and
inflammation (10). In addition, the vascular smooth muscle mitogen
hbEGF has been directly visualized in macrophages associated with human atherosclerotic plaques (9).
The biological activity of macrophage-derived growth factors is known
to be regulated by interactions with heparan sulfate (HS) chains
attached to proteoglycans (HSPGs) present on the surface of neighboring
cells and within the surrounding extracellular matrix. In the case of
FGF-2, these interactions involve regularly spaced high affinity
(Kd 10
7-10
9
M) binding sites located in discrete domains of the GAG
chain where the basic (GlcA
1-4 GlcNAc)n disaccharide
repeat units are modified by tissue-specific epimerases and
sulfotransferases to IdoA(2-OSO3)
1,4GlcNSO3 (11-13). Sequestration by HSPGs on the surface
of cells and within the extracellular matrix is thought to limit
diffusion of growth factors within the tissues and prevent their rapid
degradation by proteolytic enzymes (14). More importantly, cell surface
HSPGs have been shown to be essential for productive binding of FGFs to
their conventional high affinity receptors, the FGFRs, a family of at
least eight alternatively spliced transmembrane polypeptides whose
cytoplasmic tails encode a tyrosine kinase activity (15-17). Similar
dependence on heparan sulfate has also been reported for the productive
binding of hbEGF (18, 19) and VEGF (20) to their respective tyrosine
kinase-linked receptors, consistent with a general role for HSPGs as
components of a dual receptor system for heparin-binding growth factors.
The levels of cell surface HS appear to be controlled by the regulation
of HSPG core protein synthesis. To date, five major cell surface HSPG
core polypeptides have been cloned and characterized including the
syndecans, betaglycans (type III TGF
receptors) glypicans (for
review, see Ref. 21) and discrete isoforms of the hyaluronan receptor
CD44 (22, 23). Among the most abundant HSPGs, the syndecans comprise a
family of four single chain transmembrane polypeptides (24, 25), each
with a distinct but partly overlapping pattern of tissue expression.
For example, syndecan-1 is expressed primarily on epithelial and
mesenchymal cells, syndecan-2 (fibroglycan) on endothelial cells and
fibroblasts, syndecan-3 (N-syndecan) on neural cells and
syndecan-4 (amphiglycan or ryudocan) on each of these cell types. The
primary role of the syndecans is thought to be the anchorage of cells
to the extracellular matrix (25), and in the case of syndecan-4,
participation in the transduction of extracellular
matrix-dependent signaling events (26). However each of the
syndecans also bind growth factors including FGF-2 via their
HS chains (for review, see Ref. 25), and syndecan-3 on neural cells has
been shown (27) to bind the growth factor pleiotrophin (heparin-binding
growth associated molecule). Such properties have led to the suggestion
that the syndecans may be key regulators of heparin-binding growth
factor action in vivo.
In our laboratory, we have explored the possibility that macrophages
use HSPGs to regulate the biological activity of their many
endogenously synthesized growth factors and chemokines. By comparison
with other cell types, little is known about the nature of macrophage
HSPGs (28, 29), although the synthesis of HS and its roles in
regulating lipid uptake and atherogenesis have been well documented in
these cells (30-32).
In this study, we reveal that primary human monocyte-derived
macrophages (MDMs) inducibly express a single major core protein, syndecan-2 (fibroglycan), previously thought to be restricted to
fibroblasts and endothelial cells. The functional significance of this
observation is underlined by the findings that 1) macrophages expressing syndecan-2 bind FGF-2, VEGF, and hbEGF; and 2) macrophages with bound FGF-2 can promote proliferation of neighboring
FGFR-transfected cells. Our results implicate syndecan-2 as the primary
macrophage HSPG involved in regulating macrophage-derived growth factor action.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Growth Factors, Chemokines, Cytokines, and
Antibodies--
Recombinant human FGF-2 (155 residue form) was
expressed in Escherichia coli from the bacterial expression
vector pFC80 (kindly donated by Dr. Antonella Isacchi, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Milan, Italy) and purified by affinity chromatography on
Hi-Trap heparin mini-columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using fast
protein liquid chromatography. The fluorescent chemokine derivatives
fluorescein isothiocyanate IL-8 and
N-methyl-N-(2-N-methyl,N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)aminoethyl)acetamido-RANTES (NBD-RANTES) described previously (33, 34) were the kind gift of Dr.
Tim Wells, Cell Biology Unit, Glaxo Wellcome Medicines Research Center,
Stevenage, Hertfordshire UK. The additional heparin-binding growth
factors FGF-1140,VEGF165, hbEGF148,
the C-C chemokines MIP-1
and MCP-1 (all carrier-free), and the
pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1
, IL-1
, and TNF
were purchased
from R&D Systems Europe, Abingdon, UK. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide was
obtained from Sigma.
Monoclonal antibodies specific for the HSPG core polypeptide of human
syndecan-1 (B-B4, Serotec, Kidlington, UK), syndecan-2 (10H4, 6G12),
syndecan-4 (8G5), glypican-1 (S1), and the monoclonal antibody 3G10,
which recognizes unsaturated
45-glucuronosyl residues
in heparinase III-treated HS, have been described previously (35).
Antibodies to the glycosaminoglycans chondroitin 6-sulfate (MC21C, IgM)
and heparan sulfate (10E4, IgM) were obtained from Seikagaku Corp.
(Japan). The monoclonal antibody MAB120 specific for human FGF-2 was
obtained from Chemicon International Inc. (USA). Fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated Fab' fragment of goat anti-mouse IgG Fc and
IgM and the isotype-matched control antibodies MOPC-31c
(IgG1 Kappa), UPC-10 (IgG2a Kappa) and TEPC-183
(IgM Kappa) were obtained from Sigma.
Cell Lines, Transfectants, and Tissue Samples--
The human B
cell line Namalwa was stably transfected with full-length human
syndecan-2 cDNA in the expression vector pcDNA3 by
electroporation (750 V/cm, 960 microFarads) followed by selection in
RPMI 1640 10% serum containing G418 (1.25 mg/ml). Human
IL-3-dependent BaF3 lymphoid cells transfected with the
human flg FGF receptor (FGFR1, 2 Ig domain form), termed
BaF32 cells were kindly donated by Prof. John Gallagher, Christie
Hospital, Manchester, UK and cultured in RPMI 1640, 10% fetal calf
serum, 10% WEHI cell conditioned medium. Samples of synovial fluid
were obtained with permission from patients with inflammatory arthritis
attending the Nuffield Orthopaedic Center, Oxford, UK.
Isolation and Culture of Primary Human Peripheral Blood T Cells,
Monocytes, and MDMs--
Primary human T cells, monocytes, and MDMs
were prepared using either peripheral blood or synovial fluid
mononuclear cells as the starting material. To prepare mononuclear
cells, freshly drawn (heparinized) whole blood or synovial fluid was
diluted 1:1 with RPMI 1640 tissue culture medium and layered on
Lymphoprep density gradient medium (Nycomed, Norway). Gradients (50 ml
total volume) were centrifuged (1,200 × g, 30 min),
and the mononuclear cell band was removed by aspiration. Recovered
cells were then washed (3 times) in RPMI 1640, 10% (v/v) autologous
human serum by resuspension/recentrifugation.
For the isolation of monocytes, the mononuclear cell suspensions were
incubated (1 h, 37 °C) in plastic tissue culture dishes (5-15 cm in
diameter, 0.5-1 × 106 cells/cm2) in RPMI
1640, 10% (v/v) autologous human serum, to allow selective adherence
of monocytes, followed by three successive rinses with warmed medium to
remove contaminating nonadherent lymphocytes. The adherent monocytes
were then either detached (1 h, 5 °C) in PBS, 5 mM EDTA,
pH 7.5 and analyzed immediately (referred to as fresh monocytes) or
cultured (37 °C, 5% CO2) in RPMI 1640, 10% autologous
serum either alone or supplemented with TNF
(100 ng/ml), IL-1
(1 ng/ml), or LPS (0.5 µg/ml) for 2-5 days (referred to as
monocyte-derived macrophages or MDM). These preparations were at least
80% monocytes as assessed by immunofluorescent staining with
antibodies to the CD14 antigen.
For the isolation of T cells, the mononuclear cell suspensions were
treated with goat anti-human IgG antibodies and passed over glass bead
columns (CellectTM T cell enrichment immunocolumns, Biotex
Laboratories, Canada) to selectively adsorb B cells and monocytes,
respectively. The resulting purified T cells were washed, resuspended
(2 × 106/ml) in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10%
fetal calf serum, and induced to proliferate by culture (24-120 h)
with the mitogenic lectin phytohemagglutinin (5 µg/ml, Wellcome, UK).
Proliferative responses were confirmed by measuring the incorporation
of [3H]thymidine into genomic DNA.
Treatment with Enzymes and Metabolic Inhibitors--
For
selective cleavage of cell surface heparan sulfate, adherent monocytes
or monocyte-derived macrophages in RPMI 1640, 10% human serum were
supplemented with heparinase I (EC 4.2.2.7, 5-20 milliunits/ml, Oxford
GlycoSciences, UK) and heparinase III (EC 4.2.2.8, 5-10 milliunits/ml,
Seikagaku Corp.) and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in a 5%
CO2 incubator before detachment with EDTA as described
above. For protease treatment, cells were incubated with trypsin,
chymotrypsin, papain, or pepsin (Calbiochem) (each at 100 µg/ml) for
30 min at 37 °C before the addition of the protease inhibitors
antipain (60 µg/ml), bestatin (10 µg/ml), chymostatin (20 µg/ml),
leupeptin (10 µg/ml), pepstatin (10 µg/ml), E-64 (60 µg/ml),
phosphoramidon (60 µg/ml), Pefabloc® SC (400 µg/ml), aprotinin (10 µg/ml), EDTA (1 mM), and detachment with EDTA. For
inhibition of heparan sulfate metabolism, monocytes or MDM were
supplemented with 30 mM sodium chlorate for 24 h
before detachment.
Immunofluorescent and Immunoperoxidase Antibody Staining,
Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry--
For immunofluorescent
antibody staining, cells (5 × 105) were incubated (30 min, 5 °C) with saturating concentrations (>10 µg/ml Ig) of the
appropriate mouse mAbs or isotype matched control mAbs in PBS, pH 7.5, supplemented with 5% normal human serum, 0.1% sodium azide followed
by washing and reincubation (20 min, 5 °C) with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated Fab' fragment of goat anti-mouse IgG Fc or
IgM secondary antibody as appropriate. Cells were then fixed in PBS
containing 2% (v/v) formaldehyde before microscopy with a Zeiss
Axioskop fluorescence microscope or flow cytometry on a Becton
Dickinson FACScan. For immunoperoxidase staining, cells were pelleted
onto glass microscope slides by cytospin centrifugation (500 rpm, 5 min), dried overnight, fixed in 100% acetone, incubated with primary
antibody as described above, washed, incubated (1 h room temperature)
with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (DAKO EnVision kit,
DAKO, UK), washed again, and developed with diaminobenzidine.
SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting--
For Western blotting, samples
of heparinase III-treated monocytes or MDM were electrophoresed on
12.5% polyacrylamide SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to nitrocellulose
(Amersham Hybond-C Super) before blocking overnight (5% w/v dried milk
powder, 0.2% Tween 20 in PBS, pH 7.5) and staining with mAbs (5 µg/ml, 1 h, 25 °C) to human syndecan-2 (10H4) or with the
heparan sulfate-specific mAb 3G10. Bands were detected by
autoradiography after incubation of the blots with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (1/1,500 dilution, 1 h, 25 °C) and luminol (Amersham ECL chemiluminescence detection kit).
Detection of mRNA by Reverse Transcriptase PCR--
Reverse
transcriptase PCR was carried out as described previously. Briefly,
total cellular RNA was purified by extraction of cells with guanidinium
thiocyanate/acid phenol extraction/ethanol precipitation (36) and used
as the template for oligo-dT primed first strand cDNA synthetic
reactions (3 h, 42 °C) containing 5 µg of total RNA, 0.5 µM dNTPs, 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.3 and 2.5 milliunits of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase. Samples
(2 µl) of the final products were then committed to 50-µl PCR
reactions (94 °C, 1 min; 55 °C, 1 min; 72 °C, 1 min; 20-30 cycles) containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dNTPs, 1unit of Taq DNA polymerase and the
primers Syn 2 F (5'-ATCCGGAAGCTTATGCGGCGCGCGTGGATC-3') and Syn 2 R Bgl
(5'-ATCC GGGGATCCCCTTCTGTCCGTTTAAACAGACT-3') in a Perkin Elmer Cetus
DNA thermal cycler. The PCR products were transferred to HYBOND
N+ (Amersham, UK) and hybridized (52 °C) with the
32P end-labeled internal probe
(5'-CAGAACAAGATACCTGCTCAGACA-3') in 6× SSC, supplemented with 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 0.2% SDS, and 5× Denhardt's solution,
before washing (1× SSC, 0.5% SDS) at 57 °C (5 min). Parallel
reactions were carried out using the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase primers G3PDHF (5'-TGGTCGTATTGGGCGCCTGG-3') and G3PDHR (5'-CCAAATTCGTTGTCATACCAGG-3') as a control for
quantitation and for cDNA integrity.
Radioligand Binding Assays--
Purified recombinant FGF-2,
VEGF, or hbEGF (5-20 µg) was radiolabeled to high specific activity
(1 × 108 cpm/µg) with 1 mCi 125I by
chloramine-T oxidation (1 min, 25 °C). Reactions were quenched by
the addition of free tyrosine (1 mg/ml) and free radiolabel removed by
centrifugation (2,500 rpm, 5 min) through 5-ml columns of Sephadex G-25
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Retention of heparin-binding capacity was
confirmed for each batch of iodinated protein by incubation (1 h,
25 °C) with heparin-Sepharose beads (Sigma) in binding buffer (see below).
For binding assays, monocytes and MDM were dispensed into 96-well
microtiter dishes and incubated (4 h, 5 °C) with different concentrations of radioiodinated FGF-2 either alone (total binding) or
in the presence of a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled growth factor
(nonspecific binding) or 10 µg/ml free heparin (non-HSPG mediated
binding) in 50 µl of binding buffer (RPMI 1640, 1 mg/ml bovine serum
albumin, 0.1% sodium azide), followed by four washes to remove unbound
growth factor. The levels of free and bound radioligand in each case
were determined by counting samples of the cell pellet and the combined
washes, respectively. The equilibrium binding constant
Kd was estimated from Scatchard plots (B
versus B/F) where B
represents specifically bound ligand (total bound minus nonspecifically
bound) and F represents free radioligand.
Assay for Binding of FGF-2 to Syndecan-2 in Detergent-lysed
Cells--
The capacity of syndecan-2 present in MDM to bind
exogenously added FGF-2 was determined by an ELISA assay in which
detergent-lysed extracts of MDM were added to FGF-coated microtiter
plates and the immobilized HSPG detected with the syndecan-2 mAb 10H4.
To perform the assay, 96-well ELISA plates were coated (overnight at
room temperature) with recombinant human FGF-2 (20 µg/ml) in 50 mM Na2CO3/NaHCO3
buffer, pH 9.6 (100 µl/well), washed (×2, PBS, pH 7.5) and blocked
with PBS, pH 7.5, containing 5% (w/v) dried milk powder and 0.2%
(w/v) Tween 20 (blocking buffer). Samples of cytokine-treated MDM
(107 cells) or syndecan-2 transfected Namalwa cells were
then lysed in 1 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% (w/v) Triton X-100 supplemented with protease
inhibitors (see above) for 30 min on ice and insoluble debris removed
by centrifugation (12,000 × g, 5 min). Aliquots (100 µl) of the detergent extracts were next added (in triplicate) to the
ELISA plates, incubated 1 h at room temperature, washed (×3 in
blocking buffer) and reincubated for the same period with 100 µl of
10H4 syndecan-2 mAb or control isotype-matched antibody (2 µg/ml).
Plates were then washed, incubated (1 h, room temperature) with
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (1/4,000
dilution in PBS, pH 7.5, containing 5% (w/v) dried milk powder and
0.2% (w/v) Tween 20), washed again, and developed with
o-phenylenediamine (0.4 mg/ml) in 25 mm citrate, 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 5.5. Following the addition of
H2SO4 (1 M final concentration)
plates were read at 495 nm in a Bio-Rad ELISA plate reader.
Assay for Cellular FGF-2 Production--
A proprietary FGF-2
ELISA assay system (Quantikine, R&D Systems Europe, Abingdon, UK) was
used to measure cellular FGF-2 production from monocytes and MDM.
Briefly, samples (200 µl) of cell lysates (106/ml PBS, pH
7.5, 0.1% Triton X-100) or of growth medium from monocytes cultured in
RPMI 1640, 10% autologous human serum in 6-well tissue culture plates
(Nunc, UK) were applied in duplicate to the anti-FGF antibody coated
microtiter plates followed by incubation (2 h, room temperature),
washing, and detection with a second horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
FGF-2 antibody. Plates were then developed exactly as described above
and read at 495 nm in a Bio-Rad ELISA plate reader.
BaF32 Cell Proliferation (Transactivation) Assay--
The
ability of macrophage cell surface HSPGs to act as low-affinity FGF
receptors and induce signaling via tyrosine kinase FGF receptors was
assessed using glutaraldehyde-fixed macrophages and FGFR1-transfected
BaF32 cells in a modification of the proliferation assay described by
Richard et al. (37) and Filla et al. (38). In
this modification, proliferation was measured as mitochondrial NADH/NADPH-dependent dehydrogenase activity in a
colorimetric assay in which the substrate MTS
(3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethyoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium inner salt) is reduced to a water-soluble formazan dye. Briefly, fresh
monocytes or cytokine-stimulated MDM were fixed with glutaraldehyde (1%, w/v in PBS, pH 7.5), blocked with glycine (0.1 M in
PBS, pH 7.5, 30 min) and suspended in RPMI 1640, 0.5% fetal calf
serum. Fixed cells (1.5-3 × 105) were then mixed
with an equal volume of BaF32 cells (3 × 105/ml) and
recombinant FGF-2 (10 nM, final concentration) in the same
medium in 96-well microtiter plates (final volume 180 µl/well) and
incubated for 3-5 days at 37 °C. At the end of this period, MTS
(150 µM in water) was added to each well and the plates
developed at 37 °C for 1 h before spectrophotometry on a
Bio-Rad ELISA plate reader at 595 nm.
 |
RESULTS |
Immunochemical Detection of Heparan Sulfate at the Surface of
Differentiated Human Macrophages--
To measure cell surface HSPG
expression in primary human monocyte/macrophages, we exploited the
specificity of the monoclonal antibody 3G10 to detect unsaturated
4,5 glucuronyl residues in core HS chains generated by
prior treatment of intact cells with the enzyme heparan sulfate lyase.
We first questioned whether mobilization of HS to the cell surface is
triggered by differentiation of blood monocytes to MDMs or by exposure
to pro-inflammatory mediators that activate macrophages and induce synthesis of heparin-binding growth factors. The results (Fig. 1, A and B)
indicate cell surface HS is indeed up-regulated severalfold on the
majority of MDM (characterized by elevated expression of the high
affinity Fc
receptor Fc
RI, CD14 and MHC class II
histocompatibility antigens, data not shown) within 24 h of
differentiation from monocytes and to a further extent on MDM treated
with either bacterial lipopolysaccharide or interleukin-1
. This
newly mobilized HS appears to be homogeneously distributed over the
surface of individual MDM as assessed by immunofluorescent staining
with the mAb 10E4, which binds intact HS (Fig. 1C).
Interestingly, no comparable levels of HS were detected on the surface
of mitogen-activated human T cells, indicating that the capacity for
extensive cell surface HS mobilization is not a general property of
hemopoietic cells (Fig. 1A).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Cell surface heparan sulfate expression on
primary human monocyte-derived macrophages and lymphocytes. Levels
of cell surface HS were measured on intact fresh human peripheral blood
monocytes, MDMs, and resting or mitogen-activated lymphocytes by
fluorescent antibody staining and FACS analysis (see "Experimental
Procedures"). Panel A shows the time courses of cell
surface HS expression during culture-induced differentiation of
monocytes to MDM and mitogen (phytohemagglutinin) stimulation of T
lymphocytes detected by heparinase III treatment and fluorescent
staining with the 4,5 HS-reactive 3G10 mAb (see
"Experimental Procedures"). Full-scale values for the upper and
lower histogram y axis are 50 and 200, respectively.
Panel B shows the final levels of cell surface HS induced on
MDM by incubation with the pro-inflammatory mediators IL-1 (1 ng/ml), TNF (100 ng/ml), and LPS (0.5 µg/ml). Control
nonheparinase treated cells were negative (not shown). Data are
expressed as the mean ± S.E. for triplicate determinations of
median fluorescence in each case. Panel C shows phase
contrast and fluorescent micrographs of fresh monocytes (1 and 2) and IL-1 -stimulated MDM (3 and
4), stained with the mAb 10E4, which detects intact HS
chains. The specificity of 10E4 for HS was confirmed in parallel cell
preparations after treatment with heparinase I/III (not shown).
|
|
The specificity of the HS mAbs in each of these experiments was
confirmed by separate controls, which showed that surface staining with
the 3G10 mAb depended on pretreatment of macrophages with heparinase
III and that surface staining with the 10E4 mAb was reduced by
digestion with this enzyme (not shown).
The Major HSPG Core Protein on Activated Macrophages Is
Syndecan-2--
To identify the proteoglycan core proteins decorated
with HS, we treated intact monocyte-derived macrophages with heparinase III and analyzed whole cell lysates by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with the
4,5 glucuronosyl sugar-reactive mAb 3G10. The
results (Fig. 2) revealed the presence of
a single major 48-kDa band on MDM whose abundance was further increased
by the inflammatory mediators IL-1
, TNF
, and LPS and which was
completely absent from unstimulated monocytes. Size comparisons with
the previously characterized (39) core proteins of syndecan-1 (85 kDa),
syndecan-2 (48 kDa), syndecan-4 (35 kDa), and glypican-1 (65 kDa) in
whole cell lysates prepared from cloned cDNA-transfected human
Namalwa B-lymphoma cells revealed co-migration of the macrophage 48-kDa
band with syndecan-2 (fibroglycan), the major fibroblast syndecan
variant (Fig. 2B). The additional faint 65-kDa band visible
in the MDM samples was identified as glypican-1 by virtue of its
co-migration with the authentic HSPG (note this particular HSPG is
endogenously expressed by Namalwa cells). Trace amounts of a further
130-kDa band in MDMs likely represent an HSPG form of the CD44
hyaluronan receptor (data not shown).2 Clearly, however,
the 48-kDa species is the single most abundant cell surface HSPG of
MDMs (>90% of total HSPG, see Fig. 2A).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The major HSPG on the surface of
differentiated and cytokine-stimulated macrophages is syndecan-2.
The HSPG core proteins present on the surface of primary human
monocytes, MDMs, and cytokine-stimulated MDM were identified by
heparinase III digestion and Western blotting with a panel of HS
reactive and core protein-specific mAbs and authentic HSPG
transfectants. Panel A shows the HSPG profile (3G10
4,5 HS mAb) of freshly isolated monocytes (lane
1), monocyte-derived macrophages (lane 2) and IL-1
(1 ng/ml), TNF (100 ng/ml), or LPS-stimulated (0.5 µg/ml) MDM as
indicated. Blots of nonheparinase treated monocytes were negative (not
shown). In panel B, IL-1 -stimulated monocytes were
electrophoresed in parallel with Namalwa B-lymphoma cells transfected
with cDNA encoding full-length human syndecan-1, syndecan-2,
syndecan-4, or glypican-1 and blotted with the 3G10 4,5
HS mAb. Panel C shows a Western blot of IL-1 -stimulated
MDM and syndecan-2 transfected B-lymphoma cells probed with the
syndecan-2 specific mAb 10H4. Similar blots of freshly isolated
monocytes were negative (not shown). The positions of the molecular
mass calibration markers myosin (205 kDa), -galactosidase (116 kDa),
phosphorylase b (97 kDa), bovine serum albumin (68 kDa), ovalbumin (45 kDa), and carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa) are indicated with
arrows. All SDS-PAGE gels contained 7.5% acrylamide.
|
|
The identification of the 48-kDa band as syndecan-2 was further
corroborated by Western blotting of IL-1
-stimulated MDM samples with
the polypeptide core-specific mAbs B-B4 (syndecan-1), 10H4 (syndecan-2), 8G5 (syndecan-4), and S1 (glypican-1), which revealed staining only with 10H4 (Fig. 2C and data not shown). In
addition, syndecan-2 could be clearly visualized in IL-1
-stimulated
MDM (but not in unstimulated monocytes) by immunoperoxidase staining of
detergent-permeabilized cells with the mAb 6G12, which recognizes the
syndecan-2 cytoplasmic tail (Fig. 3). The
syndecan-2 ectodomain-reactive mAb 10H4 used in Western blotting did
not yield consistent results in immunocytochemical staining because of
its poor reactivity with native proteoglycan (not shown).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescent
antibody staining of syndecan-2 in cytokine-stimulated
macrophages. Cytospin preparations of syndecan-2-transfected
Namalwa cells (panel A) and IL-1 -stimulated (1 ng/ml) MDM
(panels B and C) were permeabilized in 100%
acetone followed by staining with the syndecan-2 cytoplasmic tail mAb
6G12 and peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse Ig (see "Experimental
Procedures"). Untransfected Namalwa cells and unstimulated monocyte
controls were negative (not shown). In panel C, the
IL-1 -stimulated MDM were indirectly double-stained with mAbs to
syndecan-2 cytoplasmic tail (fluorescein) and the monocyte CD14 antigen
(Texas red) as described under "Experimental Procedures." A
contaminating (CD14-ve) lymphocyte can be seen overlying
the macrophages in the center of the picture. The magnification in each
case was × 400.
|
|
Next we compared syndecan-2 mRNA levels in primary human monocytes
and monocyte-derived macrophages using semi-quantitative reverse
transcriptase PCR amplification from total cellular RNA. The results
(Fig. 4) reveal abundant levels of the
458-base pair syndecan-2 PCR product in both culture-differentiated and
cytokine-stimulated (LPS, TNF
) MDM but little or no product in
resting monocytes. In addition, LPS-stimulated MDM yielded higher
levels of syndecan-2 product than either TNF
-stimulated or
unstimulated MDM, consistent with the measurements of both core protein
and HS by Western blotting and FACS analysis, respectively (Fig.
1A and Fig. 2A). Importantly the apparent
differences in syndecan-2 transcript levels were detected within the
exponential phase of the PCR reaction (20-30 cycles), where the level
of product is proportional to the number of copies of template DNA.
Finally each of the monocyte/macrophage cDNAs was found to yield
similar amounts of the housekeeping gene transcript
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Our results therefore point
to a specific induction of syndecan-2 gene expression during
monocyte/macrophage differentiation and activation.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Syndecan-2 mRNA is induced during
in vitro macrophage differentiation and
activation. Samples of RNA prepared from fresh peripheral blood
monocytes, MDM, and cytokine-stimulated MDM were reverse transcribed
and subjected to PCR (20-30 cycles as shown) to amplify either a
segment of the syndecan-2 coding sequence (syndecan-2) or
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) followed by
agarose gel electrophoresis and either Southern blot hybridization to a
32P-labeled internal syndecan-2 probe or ethidium bromide
staining, respectively (see "Experimental Procedures"). Controls in
which no reverse transcribed RNA was added during PCR (not shown) were
in all cases negative. The sizes of DNA calibration markers are
illustrated on the left of the figure. bp, base
pair(s).
|
|
Macrophage HSPGs Sequester Heparin-binding Angiogenic Growth
Factors--
In view of the fact that monocyte/macrophages themselves
actively synthesize heparin-binding growth factors, we assessed
GAG-mediated binding of the macrophage-derived angiogenic growth factor
FGF-2 to intact monocytes and macrophages using an iodine-125
radioligand binding assay. The results (Fig.
5) show that macrophages indeed acquire
GAG-associated binding sites for FGF-2 following either differentiation
or cytokine-stimulation and confirm that the extent of FGF-2 binding is
broadly proportional to the level of cell-surface HS detected with the
3G10 mAb (compare with Fig. 1A). The identification of these
sites as HSPGs is further supported by three lines of evidence. First,
binding is sensitive to protease digestion and is inhibited by free
heparin (Fig. 5, A and B). Second, lysates of
LPS-stimulated MDM display syndecan-2 mediated binding to FGF-2 in a
microtiter plate assay (Fig. 6). Third,
binding of 125I-FGF to the surface of IL-1
-stimulated
MDM is specific, saturable, of high affinity (Kd 125 nM, 106 sites/cell), and is highly sensitive to
competition by free heparin or heparan sulfate in comparison with
chondroitin sulfate (IC50, 0.1, 0.5, and 50 µg/ml,
respectively, Fig. 7).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Cell surface HSPGs on cytokine-stimulated
macrophages bind FGF-2. Intact primary human peripheral blood
monocytes, MDMs, and cytokine-stimulated MDM were subjected to a
radioligand binding assay with 125I-labeled FGF-2 (50 nM) to assess binding to cell surface HSPG and its
sensitivity to proteases. Panel A shows the extent of
binding to unstimulated monocytes and MDM incubated (72 h, 37 °C)
either in the presence or absence of 1 ng/ml IL-1 , or 0.5 µg/ml
LPS (see "Experimental Procedures"). In Panel B,
IL-1 -stimulated MDMs were pre-incubated in the presence or absence
(control) of each of the proteases shown, followed by
determination of 125I -FGF binding as in panel
A. Data in each case represent the mean ± S.E.
(n = 3) for total 125I -FGF binding (no
free heparin added, solid bars) and non-HSPG-mediated
binding (10 µg/ml free heparin added, open bars).
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Macrophage syndecan-2 binds FGF-2. The
capacity of syndecan-2 on IL-1 -stimulated (1 ng/ml) MDM and
transfected B-lymphoma cells to sequester FGF-2 was measured in an
ELISA using detergent-lysed cells and FGF-2 immobilized on a 96-well
microtiter plate (see "Experimental Procedures"). The histogram
shows the levels of syndecan binding to both FGF-2-coated and
control-uncoated wells in the presence and absence of free heparin
detected with the syndecan-2 mAb 10H4. Data in each case are the
mean ± S.E. of triplicate determinations.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Characterization of cell surface
HSPG-mediated FGF-2 binding. The specificity and binding affinity
of FGF-2 for cell surface HSPG on intact IL-1 -stimulated (1 ng/ml)
MDM was measured using an iodine-125 radioligand binding assay as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Panel A shows
a comparison of total 125I-FGF-2 binding (no competitor
added), nonspecific binding (100 × fold molar excess unlabeled
FGF-2 added) and non-HSPG mediated binding (10 µg/ml free heparin
added). Panel B shows a representative specific
125I-FGF-2 binding curve and corresponding Scatchard plot
(B/F, bound specific FGF-2/free FGF-2
versus bound specific FGF-2) from which the equilibrium
binding constant Kd (125 nM) was
estimated. Panel C compares the sensitivity of
125I-FGF-2 binding with inhibition by the free
glycosaminoglycans heparin, heparan sulfate, and chondroitin 4-sulfate,
calculated as the percent maximal binding (cpm bound in the presence of
free glycosaminoglycan/cpm bound in the absence of free
glycosaminoglycan × 100). Data in each panel is the mean ± S.E. for four replicate determinations.
|
|
To assess whether macrophage syndecan-2 displays similar affinity for
other macrophage-derived ligands, we performed both radioligand and
fluorescent binding analyses with a comprehensive panel including the
angiogenic growth factors FGF-1 and VEGF, the vascular smooth muscle
growth factor hbEGF, the C-C (
) chemokines RANTES, MIP-1
and
MCP-1, and the C-K-C (
) chemokine IL-8. The results (Fig.
8) revealed high affinity
heparin-inhibitible binding of IL-1
-stimulated MDM to
125I-VEGF (Kd, 90 nM) and
125I -hbEGF (Kd, 30 nM) at
similar receptor densities to FGF-2 (5-10 × 105
sites/cell). In contrast, no significant heparin-inhibitible binding
was observed to 125I-FGF-1 (Fig. 8C) or to any
of the chemokines, 125I-MIP-1
,
125I-MIP-1
, 125I-MCP-1,
125I-IL-8, and 125I-RANTES tested over the
range 0 to 600 nM. The integrity of the radioiodinated
ligands was in each case confirmed by parallel binding assays with
heparin-Sepharose (not shown). Furthermore, no binding of the
fluorescent derivatives, fluorescein isothiocyante IL-8 (33) or
NBD-RANTES (34), was detected in separate binding assays of
IL-1
-stimulated MDM as assessed by flow cytometry. In summary, these
results demonstrate that HSPGs, predominantly syndecan-2 on in
vitro activated human macrophages, display selective binding to
the macrophage-derived growth factors FGF-2, VEGF, and hbEGF but do not
appear to sequester chemokines.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Cell surface HSPG-mediated binding
of VEGF, hbEGF, and FGF-1. The affinity of intact
IL-1 -stimulated (1 ng/ml) MDM for 125I-labeled VEGF,
hbEGF, and FGF-1 was compared using a similar radioligand binding assay
described in the legend to Fig. 7. Panels A and B
show representative specific radioligand binding curves (total cpm
bound cpm bound in the presence of 10 µg/ml free heparin)
together with corresponding Scatchard plots from which the apparent
equilibrium binding constants (Kd, 111 nM, VEGF; Kd, 90 nM, hbEGF)
were estimated. Panel C shows a representative binding curve
for 125I-FGF-1 measured in the absence or presence of 10 µg/ml free heparin. Data are the mean ± S.E. of four replicate
determinations.
|
|
Macrophage HSPGs Can Transactivate FGFR1 on Neighboring
Cells--
To further assess the physiological function of syndecan-2
on MDM, we questioned whether these cells might use cell surface HSPG
to promote signal transduction (in trans) through FGF
receptors on neighboring cells. To explore this possibility, we assayed the capacity of glutaraldehyde-fixed (IL-1
-activated) monocytes and
MDM to induce the proliferation of FGFR1-transfected BaF32 cells (which
lack endogenous HSPGs) in the presence of nanomolar FGF-2
concentrations. The results (Fig. 9) show
that cytokine-stimulated MDM expressing syndecan-2 are indeed efficient
promoters of FGF-dependent proliferation, whereas fresh
unstimulated monocytes, which express little or no syndecan-2, are not.
The involvement of HS chains in this process could be clearly
demonstrated by the effects of heparinase III treatment, which reduced
BaF32 cell proliferation by 80%. Furthermore the capacity to stimulate
proliferation is not common to all "activated" cell types because
activated T-cells (which have little or no cell surface HS, see Fig.
1A) did not display such activity in our assays. Indeed
comparison with syndecan-2 transfected Namalwa cells suggests activated
macrophages are particularly efficient in augmenting BaF cell
proliferation. Whereas the former stimulated proliferation at a 10:1
ratio of presenting cells: BaF cells, cytokine-stimulated MDM were
equally active at a 1:1 ratio (data not shown). Such differences cannot
be explained by higher mean cell surface syndecan-2 expression levels
on macrophages, because these are lower than in the transfected cells
as assessed by Western blotting (see Fig. 2B). Differences
in the degree of homogeneity of cell surface syndecan-2 expression
rather than the average expression level between the two cell
populations, however, cannot be ruled out. In summary, our results show
for the first time that HSPGs on primary human macrophages not only bind FGF-2 but can also transactivate FGF receptors on neighboring cells.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Macrophage HSPGs promote FGF-2-mediated
proliferation of BaF32 cells. The capacity of HSPG·FGF complexes
on the surface of IL-1 -stimulated (1 ng/ml) MDM to promote FGF
receptor signaling was determined in proliferation assays with
FGFR1-transfected BaF32 cells (see "Experimental Procedures").
BaF32 cells were cultured in the presence or absence of 10 nM recombinant human FGF-2 either without further
additions, with free heparin added (20 ng/ml), or at a 1:1 ratio with
glutaraldehyde-fixed undifferentiated (unstimulated) peripheral blood
monocytes, 72-h IL-1 -stimulated MDM, or 72-h IL-1 -stimulated MDM
treated with heparinase I/III. Data shown are from a single experiment
(mean ± S.E., n = 3) that is representative of
three separate repeat experiments.
|
|
Syndecan-2 Expression and Macrophage Endogenous Growth Factor
Presentation--
Implicit in our results is the possibility that
activated macrophages may utilize syndecan-2 to present their own
endogenously synthesized growth factors at the cell surface.
Measurement of endogenous macrophage FGF-2 production using an ELISA
indicated significant levels (394 ± 106, 65 ± 30, and
66 ± 23 pg/107 cells, respectively, n = 3) in cell lysates after stimulation with LPS, IL-1
, or TNF
compared with trace levels (<10 pg/107 cells) in fresh
unstimulated monocytes. Hence the same agents we found to induce HSPG
expression and FGF-2 binding in monocyte-derived macrophages in
vitro also induce FGF-2 production by these cells. In all cases
however the cytokine-induced growth factor remained associated with the
cells and only trace levels (equivalent to 1 pg release from
107 cells) could be detected in culture supernatants.
Furthermore little if any cell surface bound FGF could be detected by
fluorescent antibody staining, and no soluble FGF was detected after
cleavage of HSPGs from the surface of cytokine-stimulated MDM with
either heparinase I or heparinase III (data not shown). Thus the FGF-2 produced is likely stored within intracellular vesicles and factors other than the inflammatory cytokines tested here must be required to
promote its release in vivo.
In Vivo Activated Macrophages Express Syndecan-2 and Sequester
FGF-2--
To establish whether syndecan-2 expression and growth
factor presentation are properties of in vivo activated
macrophage populations as well as the in vitro stimulated
MDM described above, we investigated the HSPG profile of macrophages
isolated from the peripheral blood and synovial fluid of individuals
with inflammatory joint disease. The results (Fig.
10A) revealed expression of
the same predominant 48-kDa core protein identified as syndecan-2 in
synovial macrophage samples in each of the inflammatory conditions
(rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosis, and psoriatic
arthritis), as confirmed by Western blotting with both the 3G10
4,5 glucuronate-specific mAb and the syndecan-2 specific
mAb 10H4. In contrast, no syndecan-2 was detected in parallel samples
of peripheral blood monocytes from any of the individuals tested (Fig.
10A). Interestingly, synovial fluid macrophages also
displayed GAG-mediated heparin-inhibitible binding of FGF-2, and this
was at least twice that of peripheral blood monocytes (Fig.
10B). These results confirm that syndecan-2 is the major
inducible HSPG expressed on activated macrophages in vivo
and suggest that in the case of synovitis, expression is induced
locally, most likely by inflammatory mediators released within the
tissue itself.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Syndecan-2 is the major cell surface HSPG of
in vivo activated macrophages in inflammatory
synovitis and binds FGF-2. The HSPG core protein profile of
synovial fluid macrophages and peripheral blood monocytes from
individuals with inflammatory joint disease was assessed by treatment
with heparinase III and Western blotting as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Panel A depicts Western blots
of equal numbers of synovial fluid macrophages (SFM) and
peripheral blood monocytes (PBM) from individuals with
psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosis, and rheumatoid
arthritis, respectively, probed with either the 3G10 HS mAb or the
10H4 syndecan-2 mAb as indicated. The parallel blot of syndecan-2
transfected Namalwa cells (Transfectant) indicates
co-migration of the monocyte HSPG core protein with authentic
syndecan-2. The molecular mass calibration markers (kDa) are the same
as those shown in Fig. 2. Panel B shows the extent of
heparin-inhibitible 125I-labeled FGF-2 binding (total
binding heparin inhibited binding) to synovial fluid
macrophages (SFM) from a patient with rheumatoid arthritis
and normal unstimulated peripheral blood monocytes (PBM,
equal cell numbers were used). Data are the mean ± S.E. of four
replicate determinations.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Macrophages migrate to the tissues during wound healing,
inflammation, and tumor angiogenesis where they play a major role in
promoting cell proliferation through the production of heparin-binding growth factors (2, 40). However the specific details of how these cells
regulate the bioavailability of many individual growth factors at the
appropriate times and in the appropriate tissue locations are not
clear. The action of heparin-binding growth factors produced by other
less motile cell types is known to be regulated both positively and
negatively by interactions with HSPGs within the surrounding tissues
and extracellular matrix. For example FGF-2 is relatively abundant in
normal uninflamed tissues where its association with matrix HSPGs
appears to block its capacity to promote the proliferation of
neighboring cells (42-44), despite their close proximity (45). Local
release of this latent FGF in mitogenically active form is thought to
be orchestrated by matrix-degrading proteinases and heparinases
secreted by "activated" platelets and neutrophils following tissue
injury (46-48). Such models, however, tend to exclude any role for
macrophage-derived HSPGs in tissue growth factor regulation, despite
the fact that these cells are an important and abundant source of
heparin-binding growth factors. These considerations prompted us to
characterize cell surface HSPG expression by human macrophages in
vitro and in vivo and to investigate their capacity to
regulate macrophage-derived growth factor action.
In the first part of this manuscript we showed, using the HS-specific
mAbs 3G10 and 10E4, that cell surface HS expression is induced during
in vitro differentiation of human monocyte-derived macrophages, conditions that give rise to cells resembling mature tissue macrophages. In addition we showed that the pro-inflammatory agents, bacterial lipopolysaccharide and IL-1
, induce further increases in HS, underlining the link between cell surface HS expression and inflammation. These results extend earlier reports of
GAG biosynthesis in macrophages and macrophage-derived cell lines
(49-51) based on biosynthetic labeling studies, and reveal HS as an
abundant and homogeneously distributed component of the human activated
macrophage cell surface. Intriguingly, the major core protein to which
the HS is attached was found to be syndecan-2 (fibroglycan), an HSPG
previously associated with fibroblasts and cells of endothelial origin.
Syndecan-2 was also found to be the dominant cell surface HSPG on
macrophages activated in vivo, underscoring the
physiological relevance of the finding. In particular, samples of
macrophages recovered from the synovial fluid of individuals with
inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus
erythematosis, and psoriatic arthritis) expressed predominantly
syndecan-2. In contrast, peripheral blood monocytes isolated from the
same individuals expressed little or no syndecan-2, confirming the
inducibility of this HSPG in inflamed tissue in vivo.
Interestingly, the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1 that was found to
induce macrophage syndecan-2 expression in vitro (see above)
is a key component of the cytokine network that maintains chronic
inflammation in the rheumatoid joint (52). Furthermore FGF-2, a high
affinity ligand for macrophage syndecan-2, is found abundantly within
inflamed synovial tissue where it stimulates the growth of
fibroblast-like synoviocytes and may also promote angiogenesis (53,
54). The expression of syndecan-2 by macrophages in synovial fluid may
therefore play a role in the pathology of inflammatory synovitis.
The expression of syndecan-2 on hematopoietic cells is a novel and
unexpected finding. Originally named fibroglycan (55) because of its
expression on human lung fibroblasts (35), syndecan-2 is in fact more
widely expressed and mRNA has been detected both in endothelial and
neural cell lines and to varying extents in brain, heart, muscle,
kidney, and lung (56). This pattern overlaps but is distinct from those
of syndecans 1, 3, and 4 and many cell types simultaneously express
combinations of different syndecans. Studies of syndecan-2 expression
in the mouse have revealed its localization at the sites of cell-cell
and cell-matrix adhesion, notably those at the interfaces of developing
epithelial and mesenchymal tissues (57). Expression has also been
documented in MS-5 murine bone marrow stromal cells, prompting the
suggestion that syndecan-2 may promote the differentiation of
hematopoietic stem cells in vivo (58). Surprisingly,
however, there have been no reports of syndecan-2 either in primary
murine macrophages or macrophage cell lines, where syndecan-1 has been
identified as the major cell surface HSPG (59, 60). Additionally,
expression of syndecan-1 in murine macrophages is regulated
translationally by changes in the level of cAMP (59), whereas
expression of syndecan-2 as shown in our studies appears to be
regulated at the transcriptional level. These apparent differences
between macrophages from different species are intriguing but are not
presently understood.
Our observations that activated MDM display heparin-mediated binding of
FGF-2 (Kd, 125 nM), VEGF
(Kd, 111 nM), and hbEGF
(Kd, 90 nM) are consistent with a
general role for syndecan-2 in the sequestration of heparin-binding
growth factors. Although we could not demonstrate unequivocally that syndecan-2 is the primary growth factor-binding HSPG, it is difficult to conclude otherwise because it is the single most abundant core protein on the MDM cell surface. Furthermore, we confirmed, using an
ELISA, that syndecan-2 present in MDM lysates displayed FGF-binding. Interestingly however, MDM cell surface HSPGs displayed no binding to
FGF-1 or to any of the heparin-binding chemokines tested, which included MCP-1, MIP 1
, MIP 1
, IL-8, and RANTES. This lack of chemokine binding concurs with recent reports describing the
chemokine-mediated blockade of primary human macrophage infection by
monocytotropic HIV (29, 61). In these studies, no HS-mediated binding
of RANTES to the cell surface was detected (29), despite the fact that
RANTES·HS complexes were efficient inhibitors of viral entry (61).
Hence it is likely that the cell surface HSPGs of human macrophages are
not promiscuous but instead display selectivity for a subset of
individual growth factors.
The finding that FGF·HSPG complexes on the surface of
cytokine-activated macrophages could efficiently induce proliferation of heterologous BaF32 cells lends further support to the current hypothesis that HSPGs function as co-receptors to regulate
heparin-binding growth factor action. In the case of syndecan-2
reported here, this co-receptor function could operate in
vivo for the presentation of growth factor either to signal
transducing receptors on macrophages themselves
(cis-activation) or to receptors on neighboring target cells
such as fibroblasts and endothelial cells
(trans-activation). Although we cannot rule out the former
possibility this seems less likely as we failed to detect FGFR1 in MDMs
by reverse transcriptase PCR. In addition we failed to observe
proliferation of MDM even after extended culture in the presence of
heparin-binding growth factors such as FGF-2, VEGF, and
hbEGF.3 We therefore favor
the alternative possibility that MDMs use inducible HSPGs such as
syndecan-2 to transactivate FGF receptor on neighboring cells. Although
such transactivatory capacity has been demonstrated recently for HSPGs
expressed on transformed fibroblast (37) and lymphoma cell lines (38),
this is the first report to demonstrate this phenomenon in primary
human macrophages, which bear only a single major HSPG species,
syndecan-2. We speculate that such an arrangement may facilitate the
precise targeting of growth factors by macrophages migrating in
response to chemokines while at the same time avoiding their release
within inappropriate tissues. Further investigation of the potential
importance of macrophage HSPGs in regulating such physiological
processes is now clearly warranted.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Antonella Isacchi for kindly
donating the recombinant FGF-2 plasmid and Dr. Tim Wells for
fluorescent chemokines. We also thank Professor John Gallagher for
helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Post-Doctoral research assistant funded by the Cancer Research Campaign.
Funded by Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen (G. 0181.97), the Geconcerteerde Onderzoeksacties 1996-2000, the Inter-University Network for Fundamental Research sponsored by the
Belgian government (IUAP P4/17), and the Flanders Inter-University Institute for Biotechnology.

Funded by an MRC Senior Scientific Fellowship and a Cancer
Research Campaign Project grant. To whom correspondence should be
addressed: University of Oxford, Nuffield Dept. of Medicine, Rm. 7407, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Tel.: 44-1865-221336; Fax: 44-1865-222502; E-mail: djackson@worf.molbiol. ox.ac.uk.
2
D. G. Jackson, M. Jones, and N. Athanason,
manuscript in preparation.
3
S. Clasper and D. G. Jackson, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
FGF, fibroblast
growth factor;
VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor;
hbEGF, heparin-binding epithelial growth factor;
HSPG, heparan sulfate
proteoglycan;
HS, heparan sulfate;
GAG, glycosaminoglycan;
FGFR1, FGF
receptor 1;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
MDM, monocyte-derived
macrophage;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
IL, interleukin;
TNF
, tumor necrosis factor
;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
RANTES, regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted factor;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
FACS, fluorescence-activated cell
sorter.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Auger, M. J.,
and Ross, J. A.
(1992)
The Macrophage
, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
|
| 2.
|
Werb, Z.,
Underwood, J. L.,
and Rappolee, D. A.
(1992)
in
Mononuclear Phagocytes
(Van Furth, R., ed)
, pp. 404-409, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA
|
| 3.
|
Burgess, W. H.,
and Maciag, T.
(1989)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
58,
575-606[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Leung, D. W.,
Cachianes, G.,
Kuang, W. J.,
Goeddel, D. V.,
and Ferrara, N.
(1989)
Science
246,
1306-1309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Besner, G. E.,
Higashiyama, S.,
and Klagsbrun, M.
(1990)
Cell Regul.
1,
811-819[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Polverini, P. J.,
and Leibovich, S. J.
(1984)
Lab. Invest.
51,
635-642[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Sunderkotter, C.,
Steinbrink, K.,
Goebeler, M.,
Bhardwaj, R.,
and Sorg, C.
(1994)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
55,
410-422[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Arras, M.,
Ito, W. D.,
Scholz, D.,
Winkler, B.,
Schaper, J.,
and Schaper, W.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
101,
40-50[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Rappolee, D. A.,
Mark, D.,
Banda, M. J.,
and Werb, Z.
(1988)
Science
241,
708-712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Baird, A.,
Mormede, P.,
and Bohlen, P.
(1985)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
126,
358-364[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Turnbull, J. E.,
Fernig, D. G.,
Ke, Y.,
Wilkinson, M. C.,
and Gallagher, J. T.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10337-10341[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Sanderson, R. D.,
and Bernfield, M.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
9562-9566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Kato, M.,
Wang, H.,
Bernfield, M.,
Gallagher, J. T.,
and Turnbull, J. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18881-18890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Saksela, O.,
Moscatelli, D.,
Sommer, A.,
and Rifkin, D. B.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
743-751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Yayon, A.,
Klagsbrun, M.,
Esko, J. D.,
Leder, P.,
and Ornitz, D. M.
(1991)
Cell
64,
841-848[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Ornitz, D. M.,
Yayon, A.,
Flanagan, J. G.,
Svahn, C. M.,
Levi, E.,
and Leder, P.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
240-247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Mason, I.
(1994)
Cell
78,
547-552[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Higashiyama, S.,
Abraham, J. A.,
and Klagsbrun, M.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
933-940[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Thompson, S. A.,
Higashiyama, S.,
Wood, K.,
Pollitt, N. S.,
Damm, D.,
McEnroe, G.,
Garrick, B.,
Ashton, N.,
Lau, K.,
Hancock, N.,
Klagsbrun, M.,
and Abraham, J. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2541-2549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Gitay-Goren, H.,
Soker, S.,
Vlodavsky, I.,
and Neufeld, G.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
6093-6098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
David, D.
(1993)
FASEB J.
7,
1023-1030[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Jackson, D. G.,
Bell, J. I.,
Dickinson, R.,
Timans, J.,
Shields, J.,
and Whittle, N.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
673-686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Bennett, K.,
Jackson, D. G.,
Simon, J. C.,
Tanczos, E.,
Peach, R.,
Modrell, B.,
Stamenkovic, I.,
Plowman, G.,
and Aruffo, A.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
687-698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Bernfield, M.,
Kokenyesi, R.,
Kato, M.,
Hinkes, M. T.,
Spring, J.,
Gallo, R. L.,
and Lose, E. J.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
8,
365-393[CrossRef]
|
| 25.
|
Carey, D. J.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
327,
1-16
|
| 26.
|
Oh, E. S.,
Woods, A.,
and Couchman, J. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8133-8136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Raulo, E.,
Chernousov, M. A.,
Carey, D. J.,
Nolo, R.,
and Rauvala, H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12999-13004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Kolset, S. O.,
and Gallagher, J. T.
(1990)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1032,
191-211[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Oravecz, T.,
Pall, M.,
Wang, J.,
Roderiquez, G.,
Ditto, M.,
and Norcross, M. A.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
4587-4592[Abstract]
|
| 30.
|
Laskin, J. D.,
Dokidis, A.,
Gardner, C. R.,
and Laskin, D. L.
(1991)
Hepatology
14,
306-312[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Edwards, I. J.,
Xu, H.,
Obunike, J. C.,
|