J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 24270-24279, August 20, 1999
Cell Cycle-dependent Switch of Up- and
Down-regulation of Human hsp70 Gene Expression by
Interaction between c-Myc and CBF/NF-Y*
Takahiro
Taira
,
Madoka
Sawai
,
Masako
Ikeda§,
Katsuyuki
Tamai§,
Sanae M. M.
Iguchi-Ariga¶, and
Hiroyoshi
Ariga
From the
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
¶ College of Medical Technology, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku,
Sapporo 060, Japan, and § Ina Laboratories, MBL Co. Ltd.,
Ina 396, Japan
 |
ABSTRACT |
A CCAAT box-binding protein subunit, CBF-C/NF-YC,
was cloned as a protein involved in the c-Myc complex formed on the
G1-specific enhancer in the human hsp70
gene. CBF-C/NF-YC directly bound to c-Myc in vitro and
in vivo in cultured cells. The CBF/NF-Y·c-Myc complex
required the HSP-MYC-B element as well as CCAAT in the hsp70
G1-enhancer, while the purified CBF subunits
recognized only CCAAT even in the presence of c-Myc. Both the HSP-MYC-B
and CCAAT elements were also required for the enhancer activity. In transient transfection experiments, the CBF/NF-Y·c-Myc complex, as
well as transcription due to the G1-enhancer, was increased by the introduction of c-Myc at low doses but decreased at high doses.
The repression of both complex formation and transcription by c-Myc at
high doses was abrogated by the introduction of CBF/NF-Y in a
dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the CBF/NF-Y·c-Myc
complex bound to the G1-enhancer appeared in the early
G1 phase of the cell cycle when c-Myc was not higly
expressed and gradually disappeared after the c-Myc expression reached
its maximum. The results indicate that the cell
cycle-dependent expression of the hsp70 gene is regulated by the intracellular amount of c-Myc through the complex formation states between CBF/NF-Y and c-Myc.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The human heat shock 70 (hsp70) gene is induced by
various stresses, including heat shock (for reviews, see Refs. 1-3).
Without stress, the hsp70 gene is expressed in a cell
cycle-dependent manner, namely in the G1 and
the S phases (4-7). In addition to the heat shock element, several
transcriptional regulatory elements, including the sites for Sp1, AP2,
ATF, and CTF, have been found to contribute to a basal level of
hsp70 gene expression in the hsp70 gene promoter
region. CTF is a CCAAT box-binding protein, and two CCAAT boxes are
present in the hsp70 gene promoter, at about
150 and
90
from the transcription start site (8). Not only CTF (9) but also CBF of
114 kDa (10) have been cloned as binding proteins to these CCAAT
sequences. The hsp70 gene expression is also induced by
several oncogenes, including c-myc (11, 12), c-myb, p53, T antigens of SV40 and polyomavirus (13), and
adenovirus E1A (14-17). Although the precise mechanisms of the
regulation by these oncogenes have not been clarified, p53, Myb, and
E1A have been reported to regulate the hsp70 gene expression
by interacting with other proteins that directly bind to the respective
transcriptional elements in the hsp70 gene promoter (18).
Both E1A and p53 competitively bind to the CBF of 114 kDa to stimulate
and repress the hsp70 promoter activity (19). Up-regulation
of the gene by c-myc has been reported in
Drosophila and humans, and the region involved in the
regulation was identified to be from
120 to
1,250 in the human
hsp70 promoter (11, 12). We have identified two sequences
bound by c-Myc complexes in this region and termed them HSP-MYC-A (from
232 to
226) and HSP-MYC-B (from
157 to
151) (20). HSP-MYC-B is
adjacent to an inverted CCAAT box and one nucleotide is overlapped.
Both HSP-MYC-A and HSP-MYC-B functioned as an origin of DNA
replication, and the plasmids carrying both or either of the sequences
worked as an autonomous replicating plasmid (21). Of the two sequences,
only HSP-MYC-B showed a transcriptional enhancer activity which
contributed to the G1-specific expression of
hsp70 in the cell cycle (7). This enhancer function of
HSP-MYC-B was confirmed by another group (22). The c-Myc complexe was
therefore thought to be involved in the cell
cycle-dependent expression of the hsp70 gene. In
this study, we have verified the association of c-Myc with CBF/NF-Y,
CCAAT-binding proteins, and the involvement of the c-Myc·CBF/NF-Y
complex formed on the HSP-MYC-B element in the regulation of
hsp70 expression.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmids--
pACT-CBF-C was obtained from one-hybrid plasmids
followed by two-hybrid screening targeting the HSP-MYC-B and C-Myc
binding activities. For pCMV-CBF-C, pGEX-CBF-C, and pMBP-CBF-C, the
EcoRI-XhoI fragment of pACT-CBF-C was inserted
into the EcoRI-XhoI site of pcDNA3
(Invitrogen), pGEX-5X-1 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and pMAL-6P-1,1 respectively. For
pACT-CBF-A and -B the NcoI-XhoI fragment of pCite-2a-CBF-A and -B, respectively (23), was inserted into the
respective sites of pACT2. The pCMV-CBF-A, -B, pGEX-CBF-A, -B, and
pMBP-CBF-A, -B of the BglII-XhoI fragment of
pACT-CBF-A, -B was inserted into the BamHI-XhoI
site of pcDNA3, pGEX-5X-1, and pMAL-6P-1, respectively.
pCMV-GAL4-CBF-A, B, and C of the HindIII-BamHI
fragment of pGBT9 (CLONTECH) and
BglII-XhoI fragment of pACT-CBF-A, B, and C,
respectively, were inserted into the HindIII-XhoI
sites of pcDNA3. The c-Myc plasmids for the mammalian two-hybrid
system, wild type, N',
177,
M, and
Zip, have been described
previously (24), and
H1 and
LZ were constructed according to the
published procedure (25). pGEX-CBF-C(EP) (pGEX-CBF-C) was digested with
PstI and the resultant large fragment was self-ligated. pGEX-CBF-C(EN) (pGEX-CBF-C) was digested with NcoI and
XhoI, and the resultant large fragment was treated with the
Klenow fragment followed by self-ligation. pGEX-CBF-C(NX), the
pGEX-CBF-C, was digested with NcoI and the resultant large
fragment was self-ligated. pGEX-CBF-C(NP), pGEX-CBF-C(NX), was digested
with PstI and the resultant large fragment was self-ligated.
pGEX-CBF-C(PX), the CBF-C(PX) cDNA, was prepared by polymerase
chain reaction using pACT-CBF-C as a template and the following
oligonucleotides as primers: upper, 5'-GGAATTCCTGCAGTATATCCGCTTA-3';
lower, 5'-GTTGAAGTGAACTTGCGGGG-3'. The polymerase chain reaction
contained 10 ng of pACT-CBF-C, 10 pmol each of the primers, and 2.5 units of Taq polymerase (Nippongene). The reactions were
carried out for the first 5 min at 94 °C, and then for 30 cycles of
1 min at 94 °C followed by 2 min at 55 °C, and finally for 3 min
at 72 °C. The amplified fragment was digested with EcoRI
and XhoI, and cloned to the EcoRI-XhoI
sites of pGEX-5X-1. pHISi-4xwtB, the complementary oligonucleotides
(5'-AATTCTGGCCTCTGATTGGATG-3 and 5'-TCGACCAATCAGAGGCCAGAGCT-3')
corresponding to HSP-MYC-B, were synthesized, annealed, and inserted
into the SacI-XhoI sites of OVEC (26), and
multimerization of the elements (2x- and 4xwtB) was carried out
according Ref. 26. The tetramerized elements, 4xwtB, were inserted into
the SacI-SalI sites of pUC19 (pUC-4xwtB). The
HindIII site of pUC-4xwtB was changed to XbaI by
linker insertion, and the EcoRI-XbaI fragment of
this plasmid containing 4xwtB was inserted into the respective site of
pHISi. pLacZi-4xwtB, the EcoRI-SalI fragment of
pUC-4xwtB, was inserted into the respective site of pLacZi.
Cloning of cDNAs Encoding HSP-MYC B-binding Protein with
Association of c-Myc--
pHISi-4xwtB was digested with
KpnI to be linearized, and integrated to the chromosome in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae YM4271 by Ura selection.
pLacZi-4xwtB was digested with ApaI and integrated to the
chromosome in S. cerevisiae YM4271 by Ura selection. These two yeast strains were used for one-hybrid screening for His selection and
-galactosidase assay.
Cell Culture and Synchronization of the Cells--
Mouse Balb
3T3 and hamster CHO2 cells
were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium supplemented with
10% calf serum. Human Raji cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium
with 10% fetal calf serum. Balb 3T3 cells were also cultured under low
serum conditions (0.2% calf serum) for 48 h to enter the
G0 phase of the cell cycle.
Antibody--
A fusion protein of GST and CBF-C/NF-YC was
expressed in Escherichia coli DL21(DE3)pLysS and purified as
described previously (27). Rabbits were immunized by the purified
GST-CBF-C/NF-YC. The anti-CBF-C/NF-YC antibody from the rabbit serum
was prepared by affinity chromatography containing GST-CBF-C/NF-YC,
absorbed by GST, and used as a polyclonal anti-CBF-C/NF-YC antibody.
Polyclonal antibodies against NF-YA (pR
YA/C) and NF-YB (pR
YB)
were kindly provided by R. Mantovani (28) or purchased (Rockland
Inc.).
In Vitro Binding Assay--
GST-CBF-C/NF-YC and GST were
purified from 1 liter of E. coli BL21(DE3) culture
transformed with pGEX-CBF-C/NF-YC and pGEX-5X-1, respectively, as
described previously (27). One µg of GST-CBF-C/NF-YC or GST was first
applied to glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in a
buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 40 mM NaCl, 1% glycerol, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.5 µg/ml bovine serum albumin,
and about 50 µg of proteins in the Raji cell extract was then applied
to the column and washed with the buffer (20 mM Tris (pH
7.5), 25 mM NaCl, 1% glycerol, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 50 µg/ml bovine serum albumin).
The proteins recovered from the resin were separated in a 7.5%
polyacrylamide gel containing SDS, blotted onto a nitrocellulose filter, and reacted with a mouse anti-c-Myc antibody (C33, Santa Cruz).
Co-immunoprecipitation Assay--
About 10 mg of proteins from
Raji cells was first immunoprecipitated with a rabbit anti-CBF-A/NF-YB,
-B/-A (Rockland), or C antibody, or nonspecific mouse IgG. The binding
reactions for immunoprecipitation of c-Myc and CBF/NF-Y were carried
out in a buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM
EDTA, 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin,
150 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.25% Nonidet P-40.
After washing with the same buffer except for 0.05% Nonidet P-40
instead of 0.25%, the precipitates were separated on a 15 or 7.5%
polyacrylamide gel containing SDS, blotted onto a nitrocellulose
filter, and reacted with the rabbit anti-CBF-C/NF-YC antibody or a
mouse anti-c-Myc antibody (C33, Santa Cruz), respectively.
Luciferase Assay--
Two µg of a reporter plasmid and 1 µg
of CMV-
-gal, a
-galactosidase expression vector, were transfected
to cells approximately 60% confluent in a 6-cm dish by the standard
calcium phosphate method (29). Two days after transfection, whole cell
extracts were prepared by addition of the Triton X-100-containing
solution from the Pica gene kit (Wako Pure Chemicals Co. Ltd., Kyoto,
Japan) to the cells. About a one-fifth volume of the extract was used for
-galactosidase assay to normalize the transfection efficiency as
described previously (7), and the luciferase activity due to the
reporter plasmid was determined using the Pica gene kit and a
luminometer, Luminocounter ATP300 (Advantec Toyo Co. Ltd., Tokyo). The
same experiments were repeated 5-10 times.
Mammalian Two-hybrid Assay--
CHO cells were transfected with
2 µg of effector plasmids, expressing the wild type or mutants of
CBF/NF-Y and c-Myc fused to GALBD or VP16, in addition to 1 µg of
pCMV-
-gal and 1 µg of pH17-MX-Luc-Luc, and followed by luciferase
assay as described previously (24).
Gel-mobility Shift (Bandshift) Assay--
Preparation of nuclear
extracts and bandshift assays were carried out as described previously
(20).
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Cloning of cDNA Encoding a Protein That Recognizes Together
with c-Myc the Sequence Containing HSP-MYC-B and CCAAT--
The
c-Myc-containing complex formed on the HSP-MYC-B element was suggested
to be responsible for the G1-specific enhancer activity of
the element, but c-Myc did not directly bind to the element (20). We
thus planned to first clone proteins that directly bind to HSP-MYC-B,
and then to select one that associates with c-Myc. Since the wtB
oligonucleotide, 5'-CTGGCCTCTGATTGG-3', containing the HSP-MYC-B showed
a strong enhancer activity (Ref. 12; Fig. 9), tetramerized wtB was used
as a targeting sequence for the one-hybrid screening. After introducing
pHISi-4xwtB to S. cerevisiae to integrate in yeast genome,
the human brain cDNA library in pACT2 was applied to the
transformant, and the yeast were cultured in His(
) media. Among the
approximately 4 × 106 clones tested, more than 100 His-positive clones were obtained and subjected to
-galactosidase
assays. Plasmid DNAs were extracted from the 12
-galactosidase-positive clones and used for re-transforming the
S. cerevisiae SFY526 previously transformed with pGBT9-c-myc (30). The double transformants surviving in His(
) media were then
tested for
-galactosidase activity to see the interaction with c-Myc
fused to the GALBD. Finally, 12 clones were obtained and these were
classified into two groups, tentatively named as HSM-1 and HSM-2.
Through the BLAST search of their nucleic acid sequences, HSM-1 was
identified as a human homologue of rat NF-YC/CBF-C (31), while HSM-2
was a novel gene that encodes a protein with slight homology to
NF-YC/CBF-C. We further characterized HSM-1, i.e. the human
CBF-C/NF-YC, in this study.
CBF/NF-Y is a CCAAT-binding protein with three subunits of CBF, CBF-A,
CBF-B, and CBF-C, which correspond to NF-YB, NF-YA, and NF-YC,
respectively. The rat, mouse, and human cDNAs for CBF-A, CBF-B, and
CBF-C cDNAs have already been cloned (31-37). Among the three
subunits of CBF/NF-Y, CBF-B/NF-YA directly recognizes the CCAAT
sequence, not by itself but in the complex of the three subunits (23,
38, 39). The cDNA for human CBF-C/NF-YC was cloned in this study as
HSM-1 in the screening of HSP-MYC-B-binding proteins, probably because
the wtB probe used in the one-hybrid screening contained an inverted
CCAAT in addition to the HSP-MYC-B element, and yeast homologues of
CBF-B/NF-YA and CBF-A/NF-YB (HAP-2 and HAP-4, respectively) may
complement the respective human homologues to sustain the binding
activity of the cloned CBF-C/NF-YC to the wtB probe as described
previously (40). The HSM-1 cDNA we cloned contained 1,381 nucleotides, with several variations compared with those in the human
CBF-C/NF-YC cloned by Bellorini et al. (41), and encoded
exactly the same 335 amino acids as the human CBF-C/NF-YC. As in the
case of CBF-A/NF-YB and CBF-B/NF-YA, only two amino acids were
different between human and rat CBF-C. The expression of human
CBF-C/NF-YC in human tissues was examined by Northern blot analyses.
The results revealed that CBF-C/NF-YC was expressed almost ubiquitously
in all the human tissues tested (data not shown), as reported
previously (41).
Interaction of CBF/NF-Y with c-Myc in Vitro--
To verify the
interaction between CBF-C/NF-YC and c-Myc, in vitro binding
assays were carried out using CBF-C purified as fused to glutathione
S-transferase (GST) and the human Raji cell extract
containing c-Myc. Various deletion mutants of CBF-C as well as the wild
type protein were expressed in E. coli as GST fusion
proteins and purified. The fusion proteins and GST alone were,
respectively, applied to a glutathione-Sepharose column, and the Raji
cell extract was subsequently added to the same column. After extensive
washing of the column, the proteins bound to GST-CBF-C, or GST alone,
were blotted with a mouse anti-c-Myc monoclonal antibody (C-33, Santa
Cruz) (Fig. 1A). The
anti-c-Myc antibody used did not react with the purified GST-CBF-C
(Fig. 1A, lane 2). c-Myc was detected only in the eluate
with the fusion protein of wild type CBF-C (Fig. 1A, lane
3). Neither deletion mutants of CBF-C nor GST alone bound to c-Myc
(Fig. 1A, lanes 4-9). The results suggest that CBF-C/NF-YC
forms a complex with c-Myc, either directly or via other proteins in
the Raji cell extract.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Association of CBF-C/NF-YC with c-Myc
in vitro. A, the wild type (wt) or
various deletion mutants of CBF-C (schematically shown in the
left panel) were expressed in E. coli as fusion
proteins to GST, purified, and applied to the glutathione affinity
column. GST by itself was also applied in parallel as a control. The
crude extract prepared from human Raji cells (NE) was then
added to the column. After extensive washing, the resin was boiled in
the Laemmli buffer. The proteins bound to the resin were separated in a
10% polyacrylamide gel containing SDS and blotted with an anti-c-Myc
antibody (C-33, Santa Cruz). B, CBF-A, CBF-B, CBF-C, c-Myc,
and Max were expressed in E. coli as fusion proteins to MBP
and purified. MBP-c-Myc was then treated with PreScission protease to
release a free recombinant c-Myc. The free c-Myc was incubated with
either MBP by itself or fusion proteins to CBF-A, CBF-B, CBF-C, or Max,
and then precipitated with an anti-c-Myc antibody (C-33, Santa Cruz) or
nonspecific IgG. The precipitates were separated in a 10%
polyacrylamide gel containing SDS and blotted with an anti-MBP antibody
(New England Biolabs). My and Ig indicate the
anti-c-Myc antibody and nonspecific IgG, respectively. In
indicates the lanes containing either a fusion protein or MBP.
|
|
Similar binding assays were carried out using antibodies against each
subunit of CBF/NF-Y. Since the amino acid sequences of both CBF-A/NF-YB
and CBF-B/NF-YA are identical in rat and human except for 2 amino
acids, we used rat cDNAs for CBF-A and CBF-B (36, 37), instead of
the corresponding human cDNAs. Three subunits of CBF, as well as
Max as a positive control interacting with c-Myc, were expressed in
E. coli as fusion proteins with the maltose-binding protein
(MBP) and purified by the affinity column containing maltose. The
full-length c-myc cDNA was ligated to the MBP cDNA
in a modified MBP expression vector, in which the recognition site for
PreScission protease (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was introduced in the
junction between MBP and an insert cDNA to express. The fusion
protein MBP-c-Myc was first expressed in E. coli and
purified by the maltose resin. The recombinant full-length c-Myc was
then obtained by releasing MBP with PreScission protease and subjected
to binding reactions. The full-length c-Myc bound to the E-box sequence
together with Max (characterization of the recombinant c-Myc in
full-length will be described elsewhere). The MBP fusion protein with
either CBF subunits or Max, or MBP alone, was mixed with c-Myc and
applied to the agarose resin coupled with a mouse anti-c-Myc monoclonal
antibody (C-33, Santa Cruz) or nonspecific mouse IgG. The proteins
bound or not to either of the antibody-coupled resins were analyzed by
Western blotting with an anti-MBP antibody (Fig. 1B).
MBP-Max was recovered from the anti-c-Myc antibody-coupled resin (Fig.
1B, lane 1) but not from the resin with nonspecific IgG
(Fig. 1B, lane 2). Neither of the resins bound free MBP
(Fig. 1B, lanes 13 and 14). A little recovery of
MBP-CBF-A from both resins indicated that CBF-A nonspecifically interacts with the resin (Fig. 1B, lanes 4 and
5). MBP-CBF-C was detected in the eluate from the resin with
the anti-c-Myc antibody but not with IgG (Fig. 1B, lanes 10 and 11), while MBP-CBF-B was hardly recovered from either
resin (Fig. 1B, lanes 7 and 8). The results
indicate that CBF-C/NF-YC directly binds to c-Myc in a specific manner.
Interaction of CBF/NF-Y with c-Myc in Vivo--
To examine the
association of CBF/NF-Y with c-Myc in vivo, a mammalian
two-hybrid assay was carried out. The wild type or various deletion
mutants of c-Myc were fused to the VP16 transcriptional activation
domain (VP16AD), and each subunit of CBF/NF-Y was fused to the GALBD.
The constructs were transfected to hamster CHO cells in various
combinations together with pHE17-MX-Luc, which contains 6xGAL4, and
HTLV-1 promoter linked to the luciferase gene and luciferase assays
were carried out (Fig. 2). With the wild
type c-Myc, CBF-A and CBF-C stimulated luciferase activity, while CBF-B did not. c-Myc thus interacted in vivo with CBF-C, but not
with CBF-B, in transfected CHO cells as well as in vitro.
CBF-A was also suggested to interact with c-Myc in vivo,
less strongly than CBF-C. The affinity difference between CBF-A and
CBF-C was more significant in the interaction with c-Myc deletion
mutants, as described below. Among the various c-Myc mutants examined,
177 and
M deleting both myc boxes-1 and -2 or the
myc box-2 followed by the internal region, respectively,
interacted strongly with CBF-C and weakly with CBF-A, but did not
interact with CBF-B. Deletions in the C-terminal region of c-Myc, not
only a big deletion in mutant N but also small deletions in mutants
HZ,
H1, and
Zip, resulted in the loss of CBF binding activity.
These results implied that the C-terminal region of c-Myc spanning
amino acids 368-435 is required for the interaction with CBF-C/NF-YC,
and additionally with CBF-A/NF-YB.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Mammalian two-hybrid assays of CBF/NF-Y
subunits with c-Myc. CHO cells were transfected with expression
vectors for either the GALBD-CBF subunit and the wild type or deletion
mutants of c-Myc-VP16AD, in addition to pH17-MX-Luc as a reporter
plasmid. Two days after transfection, the cells were harvested and the
luciferase activity was measured. Relative luciferase activities to
that of the respective GALBD-CBF subunit in the presence of VP16AD are
shown.
|
|
The in vivo association between c-Myc and CBF/NF-Y was also
examined by co-immunoprecipitation assays. A rabbit polyclonal anti-CBF-C antibody was prepared by GST-CBF-C as an immunogen. The
antibody specifically detected CBF-C but not CBF-A or CBF-B in human,
mouse, and rat cells (data not shown). The human Raji cell extract was
first precipitated with the antibody against CBF-A, CBF-B (Rockland
Inc.), or CBF-C, or with nonspecific IgG. The precipitates were
separated in an SDS-polyacrylamide gel and blotted with an anti-c-Myc
antibody (C-33, Santa Cruz) (Fig. 3). The
64-kDa c-Myc in the Raji extract was precipitated with the antibody
against CBF-A, CBF-B, or CBF-C (Fig. 3, lanes 3-5), while the precipitate with nonspecific IgG did not contain the protein reacting with the anti-c-Myc antibody (Fig. 3, lane 2). The
results indicated that c-Myc associates with all CBF subunits in
vivo in human Raji cells. Since the three CBF subunits form a
stable complex in vivo (23, 38, 39), c-Myc was thought to
associate with the CBF·NF-Y complex in vivo.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Association of CBF/NF-Y with c-Myc in
vivo. The nuclear extract prepared from human Raji
cells was immunoprecipitated with the antibody against CBF-A/NF-Y-B,
CBF-B/NF-YA, or CBF-C/NF-YC, or with nonspecific IgG. The precipitates
were separated in a 10% polyacrylamide gel containing SDS and Western
blotted with an anti-c-Myc antibody (C-33, Santa Cruz). The 1/100
volume of the extract used for immunoprecipitation was analyzed in
parallel in the same gel (lane 1). The position of the bands
due to c-Myc is indicated on the right.
|
|
DNA-Protein Complex Targeting HSP-MYC-B and CCAAT
Sequences--
We have previously shown that a protein complex
containing c-Myc bound to the HSP-MYC-B sequence (20). To assess the
involvement of CBF/NF-Y in the c-Myc complex on HSP-MYC-B, bandshift
assays were carried out using specific antibodies. The Balb 3T3 nuclear extract was treated with an antibody against c-Myc (OM11-905, Genosys), CBF-A, -B (28), or -C, prior to binding reactions with a
labeled wtB oligonucleotide, and separated in a polyacrylamide gel
(Fig. 4). In the absence of antibodies,
two specific DNA-protein complexes, complexes I and II, were detected
(Fig. 4, A and B, lane 2). The anti-c-Myc
antibody abrogated the formation of both complexes, while neither
complex was affected by IgG (Fig. 4A, lanes 3-6). All three
antibodies against CBF subunits impaired the formation of complex I but
not of complex II (Fig. 4B, lanes 5-10). CBF/NF-Y was thus
suggested to be involved in c-Myc containing complex I on the wtB
oligonucleotide, but not in complex II. A rabbit polyclonal anti-Max
antibody (C-124, Santa Cruz) did not interfere with DNA-protein complex
formation (data not shown). Since c-Myc by itself does not bind to the
wtB probe, complex I may interact with the sequence via CBF/NF-Y.
Complex II may contain an unidentified protein(s) other than CBF/NF-Y
between c-Myc and the wtB sequence.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Nucleoprotein complex formation on the wtB
sequence. Bandshift assays were carried out using the Balb 3T3
nuclear extract (NE) and the labeled wtB sequence as a
probe. Prior to the addition of the probe, the reaction mixture was
incubated for 60 min at 0 °C in the presence or absence of the
indicated amounts of antibodies against c-Myc (OM11-905)
(A) or three CBF/NF-Y subunits (B) (pR YB,
pR YA/C, or -CBF-C), or of nonspecific IgG. The labeled probe was
then added to the mixture, and the mixture was further incubated at
room temperature for 30 min and analyzed in a 4% polyacrylamide gel.
Similar bandshift assays on the wtB sequence were carried out using
either the Balb 3T3 nuclear extract (C) or purified CBF
subunits as MBP fusion proteins (D) in the presence of
non-labeled oligonucleotides. Increasing amounts (× 20, 50, and 100 of
the probe) of non-labeled oligonucleotides corresponding to the wild
type (WW) or various mutants (Wm, mW, mm, and
C) of the wtB sequence (see middle panel) were
added to the reaction mixtures as competitors. The positions of two
specific DNA-protein complexes are indicated by arrows
(I and II). F shows the position of
free probes.
|
|
To determine the nucleotides recognized by complexes I and II, binding
reactions were carried out in the presence of various mutants of the
wtB probe (Fig. 4C). Mutations were introduced to wtB (WW)
within CCAAT (Wm) or HSP-MYC-B (mW), or both (mm). Another variant,
C, in which CCAAT was deleted from wtB, was also constructed. Excess
amounts of nonlabeled wtB oligonucleotide (WW) abolished the specific
nucleoprotein complexes (Fig. 4C, lanes 2-4). None of the
wtB variants (mW, Wm, or mm), on the other hand, affected the formation
of the complexes (Fig. 4C, lanes 5-16). The results
suggested that not only the inverted CCAAT but also the adjacent
nucleotides in the HSP-MYC-B element were involved in DNA-protein
association of complexes I and II.
When the CBF/NF-Y proteins purified as MBP fusion proteins were
subjected to binding reactions with the labeled wtB probe, a single
nucleoprotein complex appeared, with a faint background due to degraded
proteins (Fig. 4D, lane 3). The DNA-protein complex of the
purified CBF/NF-Y protein on wtB was canceled by excess amounts of
nonlabeled oligonucleotides carrying the intact CCAAT (WW and mW; Fig.
4D, lanes 4-6 and 10-12) but not by those with mutations or deletion in CCAAT (Wm,
C and mm; Fig. 4D, lanes 7-9 and 13-18). Thus, the purified CBF proteins
recognized the CCAAT motif in wtB, while complex I containing the CBF
proteins and c-Myc were formed on both HSP-MYC-B and CCAAT. The results of methylation interference experiments also suggested that complex I
was formed on almost the whole length of wtB sequence, while complex II
and the complex of recombinant CBF proteins interacted with the probe
within either the HSP-MYC-B or the CCAAT element, respectively (data
not shown).
Although c-Myc was involved in complex I, the purified c-Myc (the
MBP-released recombinant protein as described above for Fig.
1B) did not recognize the wtB probe by itself (Fig.
5A, lanes 2-4). The addition
of the purified c-Myc did not affect the nucleoprotein complex formed
between CCAAT in the wtB sequence and the purified CBF proteins:
complex I observed in the nuclear extract was not reconstituted by the
purified CBF proteins and the purified c-Myc (Fig. 5A, lanes
8-10). Complex I, representing a complex in vivo, was
thus thought to contain other proteins in addition to the CBF proteins
and c-Myc.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Nucleoprotein complex formation of purified
CBF proteins and c-Myc on wtB. Bandshift assays were carried out
using the three CBF subunit proteins purified as fusion proteins to
MBP, c-Myc purified as a fusion protein to MBP and released by
PreScission protease, and the labeled wtB sequence as a probe. The
positions of the CBF complex on wtB and the free probe are indicated as
CBF and F, respectively. A, various
amounts of the CBF proteins, or c-Myc together with or without CBF,
were subjected to the binding reactions. The amounts of c-Myc added to
the reactions were 10, 25, and 50 ng in lanes 1 and 8, 3 and 9, and 4 and 10,
respectively. The amounts of CBF subunits were 10, 25, 50, and 25 ng
each in lanes 5, 6, 7, and 8-10, respectively.
B, various amounts of c-Myc were preincubated with one of
the CBF subunits and then incubated with the other two proteins, as
indicated. Twenty-five ng of each of the CBF subunits were added to the
reactions. The amounts of c-Myc added to the reactions were 5, 10, 25, and 50 ng in lanes 2-5, 7-10, and 12-15,
respectively.
|
|
We have shown above that c-Myc directly associates with CBF-C (Fig.
1B). A previous report revealed that CBF-A and CBF-C were first associated and that CBF-B possessing the DNA binding activity was
recruited to the precomplexed CBF-A and CBF-C (23, 42). CBF-A and c-Myc
may independently interact with different sites of CBF-C, or
alternatively CBF-A and c-Myc may competitively associate with CBF-C.
Since the CBF complex on CCAAT was neither decreased nor shifted by the
addition of c-Myc (Fig. 5A), it was thought that c-Myc was
unable to interact with CBF-C in the preassociated CBF complex on
CCAAT. c-Myc was therefore incubated with CBF-A, -B or -C prior to the
addition of the other two subunits and the wtB probe (Fig.
5B). When CBF-B and -C were added to the preincubation of
c-Myc and CBF-A, the CBF complex on CCAAT was formed as efficiently as
in the absence of c-Myc (Fig. 5B, lanes 1-5). The affinity of CBF-C to CBF-A was therefore thought to be stronger than that to
c-Myc. The addition of CBF-A and CBF-C to the preincubated CBF-B with
c-Myc also yielded the CBF·CCAAT complex as in the absence of c-Myc
(Fig. 5B, lanes 6-10), although CBF-C preferred CBF-A to
c-Myc. The preincubation of CBF-C with c-Myc, on the other hand,
greatly inhibited the formation of the CBF complexes on CCAAT in the
wtB probe (Fig. 5B, lanes 11-15). No bands due to
nucleoprotein complexes other than the CBF·CCAAT complex
alternatively appeared. The results suggested that the preceding
interaction between CBF-C and c-Myc showed priority to CBF-A, which has
a higher affinity to CBF-C. The disruption of the CBF complex on CCAAT
did not yield another nucleoprotein complex on wtB as it was thought
that an unidentified protein (or proteins) in the nuclear extract,
other than c-Myc and the CBF proteins, is involved in complex I on wtB
and that the protein (or proteins) mediates between the complex and wtB
sequence. It was therefore thought that c-Myc interferes with the
association of CBF-C with CBF-A when c-Myc precedes CBF-A in the
interaction with CBF-C, but that it cannot intrude into the
precomplexed CBF proteins.
Regulation of the Transcriptional Activity of wtB Containing
HSP-MYC-B and CCAAT by c-Myc--
We have previously reported that the
HSP-MYC-B element was required for G1-specific enhancer
activity of the wtB sequence (7). Since the wtB sequence contains CCAAT
besides HSP-MYC-B, the effects of CCAAT on the transcriptional activity
of wtB were examined. The wild type (WW) or wtB variant with mutations
within either CCAAT (Wm) or HSP-MYC-B (mW), or both (mm), or deletion of CCAAT (
C) (see Fig. 4), was ligated to the TATA box of the human
hsp70 gene linked to the luciferase gene, and transfected to
mouse Balb 3T3 cells. The results of the luciferase activity assays of
the cells are shown in Fig. 6. The wild
type wtB (WW) in pwtB-TATA-Luc stimulated luciferase activity 22-fold
of that due to pHS-TATA-Luc containing the TATA box alone. All the
mutants tested lost the enhancer activity. The luciferase activity of pWm-TATA-Luc, pmW-TATA-Luc, pmm-TATA-Luc, or p
C-TATA-Luc was comparable to that of pHS-TATA-Luc. The results suggested that not only
the HSP-MYC-B element but also the CCAAT motif are required for the
transcriptional enhancer activity. Complex I recognizing both HSP-MYC-B
and CCAAT, but not the CBF complexes targeting only CCAAT, was hence
implied to be responsible for the transcriptional activity. Complex II
which did not contain CBF proteins was also suggested to be involved in
the regulation of transcriptional activity, since the complex was
formed on both HSP-MYC-B and CCAAT.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of mutations in the wtB sequence on
the transcriptional activity. Mutations were introduced into the
wtB sequence (see Fig. 4, middle panel) in a reporter
luciferase construct, pwtB-TATA-Luc, which carries the wtB sequence
linked to the minimal hsp70 promoter (HS-TATA)
(7). The mutated plasmids as well as pHS-TATA-Luc were transfected to
mouse Balb 3T3 cells, and the luciferase activities were assayed 2 days
after transfection. Relative luciferase activities to that due to
pHS-TATA-Luc are shown.
|
|
Since c-myc protein was shown to be involved in both
complexes I and II, the effects of c-Myc on the transcriptional
activity were examined. Various amounts of the expression vector for
c-Myc either in sense (pEF-c-myc) or antisense orientation
(pEF-anti-c-myc) were transfected to Balb 3T3 cells together with
pwtB-TATA-Luc, and the luciferase activities were assayed (Fig.
7A). While the c-myc construct in antisense did not affect the luciferase
activity at all, the sense construct yielded a biphasic fluctuation of enzyme activity (pEF-c-myc stimulated the luciferase activity in a
dose-dependent manner to a peak of 1.8-fold at 10 ng, but higher doses repressed the activity). When 1 µg of pEF-c-myc was co-transfected, luciferase activity was about 40% of that in the absence of pEF-c-myc. The 40% activity thus repressed by 1 µg of
pEF-c-myc was restored to the original level by the co-transfected expression vectors for both CBF-A and CBF-C or the three CBF subunits (Fig. 7B). CBF-C, which directly associates with c-Myc to
form the core of complex I, did not release by itself the repression by
pEF-c-myc. Neither CBF-A nor CBF-B affected the repressed activity. The
results suggest that the ratio among the CBF/NF-Y subunits and c-Myc is
important for the transcriptional activity of the wtB sequence,
probably via the formation of either the CBF complexes targeting CCAAT
or the c-Myc containing complex I on both HSP-MYC-B and CCAAT.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of additional c-myc
expression on the transcriptional activity of the wtB sequence
and the specific complex formation on the wtB sequence.
A, various amounts of a c-myc expression vector,
either in sense (pEF-c-myc) or antisense
(pEF-anti-c-myc) orientation (51), were transfected to Balb
3T3 cells together with the reporter plasmid pwtB-TATA-Luc. Two days
after transfection, the luciferase activities were assayed. Relative
luciferase activities to that due to the reporter plasmid alone are
shown. B, Balb 3T3 cells were transfected with various
combinations of expression vectors for the CBF subunits, as indicated,
in addition to 1 µg of pEF-c-myc and the reporter pwtB-TATA-Luc. Two
days after transfection, the luciferase activities were assayed.
Relative luciferase activities of the reporter plasmid alone are shown.
C and D, Balb 3T3 cells were transfected with
various amounts of the c-myc expression vector pEF-c-myc as
in A. Two days after transfection, the nuclear extracts were
prepared from the cells and subjected to bandshift assays using a
labeled wtB (C) or Sp1 element (D) as a probe.
The positions of the specific CBF/NF-Y complexes I and II, the Sp1
complex, and the free probe are indicated as I, II, Sp1, and F,
respectively. E, aliquots of the same nuclear extracts
prepared in C and D were also analyzed by Western
blotting using the anti-c-Myc antibody (C33) or an anti-CBF-C
antibody.
|
|
To further examine the involvement of complex I in the transcriptional
activity of wtB and the regulation of the activity by c-Myc, bandshift
assays were carried out using the nuclear extract prepared from cells
transfected with the expression vector for c-Myc as above. Various
amounts of c-myc expression vector, or the vector alone,
were transfected to Balb 3T3 cells, and the nuclear extracts were
prepared from transfected cells. The extracts were incubated with a
labeled wtB probe and analyzed (Fig. 7C). The transfection
of the vector alone affected neither the amounts of c-Myc and CBF-C nor
the electrophoretic patterns of complexes I and II (data not shown). In
the cells transfected with the c-myc expression vector,
c-Myc increased with doses of c-myc expression vector in
transfected cells, while the amount of CBF-C was almost constant (Fig.
7E). The DNA-protein complex I on the wtB probe was
increased in cells transfected with the c-myc expression
vector at low doses (5 or 10 ng) (Fig. 7C), where the
transcriptional activity of wtB was enhanced (Fig. 7A).
Complex I was then decreased in the cells transfected with the plasmid
at high doses (50 or 100 ng), where the transcriptional activity was
repressed (Fig. 7, A and C). Complex II, on the
other hand, was increased in a manner dependent on the dose of the
c-myc expression vector (Fig. 7C). The formation
of another DNA-protein complex, the Sp1 complex, was not affected by
the transfection of the c-myc expression vector (Fig.
7D). These results indicate that the transcriptional
enhancer activity of wtB is due to the formation of the specific
complex I containing CBF proteins and c-Myc on the sequence and that
c-Myc thus regulates the wtB enhancer activity via affecting different nucleoprotein complex formations on the wtB sequence: the balance of
the amounts, as well as the binding affinity, of c-Myc, CBF proteins,
and unidentified proteins involved in complexes I and II may control
the transcriptional activity of wtB contributing to the
hsp70 gene expression.
Cell Cycle-dependent Expression of DNA Binding Activity
of CBF·NF-Y Complex--
Since the endogenous c-Myc expression
changes considerably during the cell cycle, the nucleoprotein complex
on the wtB sequence was thought to vary during the cell cycle. To
examine this possibility, mouse Balb 3T3 cells were synchronized to the
G0 phase by serum starvation, and the nuclear extracts were
prepared at various stages of the cell cycle. The extracts were
subjected to bandshift assays with a labeled wtB probe and Western blot
analyses (Fig. 8, A and
B). c-Myc was accumulated during the S phase to a peak at
8 h after serum readdition, while the amounts of all the CBF/NF-Y subunits were constant during the cell cycle (Fig. 8A). The
DNA-protein complex I containing both CBF and c-Myc was considerably
altered during the cell cycle. The complex was weakly observed with the extract prepared from the G0-arrested cells, but was
strongly induced 4 h after the serum addition and then gradually
decreased but increased again after the 20 h (Fig. 8B).
The c-Myc expression was very low at the peak of complex I formation at
4 h after serum addition, high from 8 to 16 h, and decreased
after 20 h, when complex I re-increased (Fig. 8A). The
results suggested that complex I formation on the wtB probe is
increased when the c-Myc expression is low and that the complex
formation is inhibited when the c-Myc expression is high during the
cell cycle. The formation of complex II was rather constant up to
12 h and then slightly decreased (Fig. 8B). The cells
transfected with the reporter plasmid, pwtB-TATA-Luc, were similarly
synchronized and examined for luciferase activity. The luciferase
expression showed a sharp peak at 4 h and then decreased with a
minor peak at 20 h (Fig. 8C). The complex I formation thus reached a peak at 4 h after serum addition, i.e.
in the early G1 phase, when the introduced luciferase
expression due to the wtB sequence showed a strong peak and the
hsp70 expression also showed the first maximum (7). These
results suggest that cell cycle-dependent hsp70
gene expression is regulated by, at least to some extent, the formation
of nucleoprotein complex I containing CBF proteins and c-Myc on both
HSP-MYC-B and CCAAT in the wtB sequence and that the complex formation
is controlled by the intracellular amounts of c-Myc.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Changes in the CBF·NF-Y complex formation
and the transcriptional activity of the wtB sequence during the cell
cycle. Mouse Balb 3T3 cells were synchronized in the
G0 phase of the cell cycle by serum starvation for 48 h. The nuclear extracts were prepared from the cells harvested at
various times (0-24 h) after serum addition and examined for the
expression of c-Myc and the CBF subunits (A) and the complex
formation on the wtB sequence (B). R indicates
the samples from the cells at random culture. A, the
extracts were Western blotted using the anti-c-Myc antibody (C-33) or
the antibody against the subunits of CBF/NF-Y (pR YB, pR YA/C, or
-CBF-C). B, the extracts were subjected to bandshift
assays using a labeled wtB sequence as a probe. The positions of the
specific complex I, II, and free probes are indicated. C, 2 µg of the reporter plasmid pwtB-TATA-Luc was transfected to Balb 3T3
cells, and the cells were synchronized as described previously (12).
The luciferase activity was assayed at various times (0-24 h) after
serum addition. Relative luciferase activities to that of the cells at
random culture (R) are shown.
|
|
We described the transcriptional regulation of hsp70 by
c-myc through the formation of specific DNA-protein
complexes. c-Myc associated with CBF/NF-Y to form a specific
DNA-protein complex (complex I) on the wtB sequence in the
hsp70 gene promoter containing the HSP-MYC-B element and the
CCAAT box. c-Myc was also involved in another nucleoprotein complex
(complex II) with unidentified proteins other than CBF/NF-Y on the same
sequence. The in vivo ratio between complex I and complex II
on the wtB sequence varied according to the cell
cycle-dependent expression of c-myc expression. Complex I increased when the c-myc expression increased in
the early G1 phase and then decreased when c-Myc was
accumulated to reach a peak at the transition of G1 to S
phase. Complex II, on the other hand, increased form the
G1-S transition. The transcription due to the wtB sequence,
as well as the transcription of the hsp70 gene, increased in
the G1 phase to maximal expression at the same time of the
maximal formation of complex I and then decreased with the decrease in
the formation of complex I and the increase in the formation of complex
II. c-Myc was thus thought to switch the up- and down-regulation of the
hsp70 gene expression to show a peak in the G1
phase via transition between complex I and complex II on the wtB sequence.
c-Myc interacted with CBF-C directly and specifically in
vitro. Unidentified factor(s) other than c-Myc and CBF were
implied to be necessary for the formation of both complexes I and II, commonly or differently. Factor X, supposed to be involved in at least
complex I may directly bind to both c-Myc and the HSP-MYC-B element in
the wtB sequence to yield complex I (Fig.
9). Factor X may also interact with
CBF/NF-Y in complex I. Provided that factor X is a common factor to
intermediate c-Myc and the HSP-MYC-B element, complex I containing
CBF/NF-Y positively contributes to the transcriptional activity of the
wtB sequence, while complex II without CBF/NF-Y is a transcriptionally
inactive form. Alternatively, another factor, factor Y, may be a bridge
between c-Myc and the HSP-MYC-B element in complex II. The release of
CBF/NF-Y from complex I to yield complex II, or the replacement of
complex I containing factor X by complex II containing factor Y, was
observed in cells transfected with a c-myc expression vector
as well as in cells at the transition of the G1 to S phase
of the cell cycle, where the expression level of c-Myc, but not of CBF,
changed. During the S phase, the excess amount of c-Myc may upset the
proper ratio between c-Myc and CBF/NF-Y to form complex I on the wtB sequence.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
A molecular model for transcriptional
regulation via the wtB sequence during the cell cycle. The state
of specific DNA-protein complexes formed on the wtB sequence is
suggested to determine the G1-specific transcription due to
the sequence. A molecular model is shown. In the G1 phase
of the cell cycle, when the c-myc expression is moderate,
complex I containing an unidentified factor, factor X, in addition to
c-Myc and subunits A, B, and C of CBF/NF-Y is formed, and thereby the
transcription is active. In complex I, factor X and CBF-B/NF-YA
directly interact with HSP-MYC-B and CCAAT, respectively. In the S
phase, when the c-myc expression is increased, the
oversupplied c-Myc absorbs CBF-C/NF-YC and thus disrupts the CBF
complex on CCAAT. On the HSP-MYC-B element, complex II containing c-Myc
is bound via either factor X or another unidentified factor, factor Y. Complex II which does not contain the CBF/NF-Y proteins is
transcriptionally inactive.
|
|
CBF/NF-Y is a well characterized transcription factor and expressed
ubiquitously in a variety of mammalian cells. More than 170 genes have
been found to contain the CBF/NF-Y-binding CCAAT sequence, and some of
them were identified as target genes for CBF/NF-Y (43, 44). The human
hsp70 gene contains two CCAAT sequences in the promoter
region, at about
150 and
90 from the transcription start site (4).
Both the CCAAAT sequences were shown to be bound by NF-1/CTF in
vitro (14), and furthermore, the CCAAT sequence around
90 was
essential for the basal expression of the hsp70 gene (21).
Another CBF of 114 kDa, different from CBF/NF-Y, was also reported to
recognize the CCAAT sequence around
90 (13), and E1A and p53
competitively bind to the CBF of 114 kDa to stimulate or repress the
hsp70 promoter activity, respectively (22, 23). In this
report, we have shown that another CCAAT at
150 was recognized by
CBF/NF-Y and that c-Myc makes complexes with CBF/NF-Y on the sequence
to yield two opposite functions, i.e. activation and
repression, on the hsp70 promoter. The up- and
down-regulation by c-Myc via the sequence is thought to determine the
cell cycle-dependent expression, namely, the maximal
expression at the G1 phase, of the hsp70 gene.
The two CCAAT sequences at
90 and
150 in the hsp70
promoter are thus thought to be involved in the basal and cell
cycle-dependent expression of the gene, respectively.
The involvement of the CCAAT sequence in the cell
cycle-dependent expression was also reported in the R2 gene
of mouse ribonucleotide reductase (45) and in the cdc25C gene in which
CBF/NF-Y interacted with Sp1 (46). Furthermore, CBF/NF-Y has recently
been reported to interact with various proteins, including a TATA
box-binding protein, TBP (37), histone acetyltransferases GCN5 and
P/CAF (47, 48), the high mobility group protein HMG-I(Y) (49), and the
human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I Tax1 protein (50). The
ubiquitous transcription factor CBF/NF-Y may differently regulate a
variety of genes in partnership with various proteins.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to S. Sinha and S. N. Maity for the cDNAs of rat CBF-A and CBF-B, and R. Mantovani for
providing the anti-NF-YA and NF-YB antibodies. We also thank Yoko
Misawa and Kiyomi Takaya for technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants-in-aid from the Ministry
of Education, Science, Culture and Sports of Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequences of HSM-1/NF-YC and HSM-2 reported in
this paper have been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data
Bank with accession numbers D85425 and D89986, respectively.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Graduate School of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita 12, Nishi 6, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan. Tel.: 81-11-706-3745; Fax: 81-11-706-4988; E-mail: hiro@pharm.hokudai.ac.jp.
1
T. Niki, submitted for publication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CHO, Chinese hamster
ovary;
GALBD, GAL4 DNA-binding domain;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
MBP, maltose-binding protein.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Mayer, M. P.,
and Bukau, B.
(1998)
Biol. Chem.
379,
261-268[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Bukau, B.,
and Horwich, A. L.
(1998)
Cell
92,
351-366[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Craig, E. A.
(1989)
Bioessays
11,
48-52[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Wu, B. J.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
6070-6074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Kao, H. T.,
Capasso, O.,
Heintz, N.,
and Nevins, J. R.
(1985)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5,
628-633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Milarski, K. L.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
24,
9517-9521
|
| 7.
|
Taira, T.,
Narita, T.,
Iguchi-Ariga, S. M. M.,
and Ariga, H.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res
25,
1975-1983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Wu, B. J.,
Hurst, H. C.,
Jones, N. C.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1986)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6,
2994-2999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Morgan, W. D.,
Williams, G. T.,
Morimoto, R. I.,
Greene, J.,
Kingston, R. E.,
and Tjian, R.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
1129-1138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Lum, L. S.,
Sultzman, L. A.,
Kaufman, R. J.,
Linzer, D. I.,
and Wu, B. J.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
6709-6717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Kingston, R. E.,
Baldwin, A. S., Jr.,
and Sharp, P. A.
(1984)
Nature
312,
280-282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Kaddurah-Daouk, R.,
Greene, J. M.,
Baldwin, A. S., Jr.,
and Kingston, R. E.
(1987)
Genes Dev.
1,
347-357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Kingston, R. E.,
Cowie, A.,
Morimoto, R. I.,
and Gwinn, K. A.
(1986)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6,
3180-3190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Wu, B. J.,
Kingston, R. E.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
629-633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Simon, M. C.,
Fisch, T. M.,
Benecke, B. J.,
Nevins, J. R.,
and Heintz, N.
(1988)
Cell
52,
723-729[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Simon, M. C.,
Kitchener, K.,
Kao, H. T.,
Hickey, E.,
Weber, L.,
Voellmy, R.,
Heintz, N.,
and Nevins, J. R.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
2884-2890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Williams, G. T.,
McClanahan, T. K.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
2574-2587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Lum, L. S.,
Hsu, S.,
Vaewhongs, M.,
and Wu, B.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
2599-2605[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Agoff, S. N.,
Hou, J.,
Linzer, D. I.,
and Wu, B.
(1993)
Science
259,
84-87[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Taira, T.,
Negishi, Y.,
Kihara, F.,
Iguchi-Ariga, S. M. M.,
and Ariga, H.
(1992)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1130,
166-174[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Taira, T.,
Iguchi-Ariga, S. M. M.,
and Ariga, H.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6386-6397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Lin, H.,
Head, M.,
Blank, M.,
Han, L.,
Jin, M.,
and Goodman, R.
(1998)
J. Cell. Biochem.
169,
181-188
|
| 23.
|
Sinha, S.,
Kim, I. S.,
Sohn, K. Y.,
de Crombrugghe, B.,
and Maity, S. N.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
328-337[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Mori, K.,
Maeda, Y.,
Kitaura, H.,
Taira, T.,
Iguchi-Ariga, S. M. M.,
and Ariga, H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
29794-29800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Roy, A. L.,
Carruthers, C.,
Gutjahr, T.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1993)
Nature
365,
359-361[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Westin, G.,
Gerster, T.,
Müller, M. M.,
Schaffner, G.,
and Schaffner, W.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
6787-6798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Negishi, Y.,
Nishita, Y.,
Saëgusa, Y.,
Kakizaki, I.,
Galli, I.,
Kihara, F.,
Tamai, K.,
Miyajima, N.,
Iguchi-Ariga, S. M. M.,
and Ariga, H.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
1133-1143[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Mantovani, R.,
Pessara, U.,
Tronche, F.,
Li, X. Y.,
Knapp, A. M.,
Pasquali, J. L.,
Benoist, C.,
and Mathis, D.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
3315-3322[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Graham, F. J.,
and Van der Eb, A. J.
(1973)
Virology
52,
456-467[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Taira, T.,
Maëda, J.,
Onishi, T.,
Kitaura, H.,
Yoshida, S.,
Kato, H.,
Ikeda, M.,
Tamai, K.,
Iguchi-Ariga, S. M. M.,
and Ariga, H.
(1998)
Genes Cells
3,
549-565[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Sinha, S.,
Maity, S. N.,
Lu, J.,
and de Crombrugghe, B.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
1624-1628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Maity, S. N.,
Vuorio, T.,
and de Crombrugghe, B.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5378-5382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Vuorio, T.,
Maity, S. N.,
and de Crombrugghe, B.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
22480-22486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
van Huijsduijnen, R. H.,
Li, X. Y.,
Black, D.,
Matthes, H.,
Benoist, C.,
and Mathis, D.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
3119-3127[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Li, X. Y.,
Mantovani, R.,
Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R.,
Andre, I.,
Benoist, C.,
and Mathis, D.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
1087-1091[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Dmitrenko, V.,
Garifulin, O.,
and Kavsan, V.
(1997)
Gene
197,
161-163[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Bellorini, M.,
Lee, D. K.,
Dantonel, J. C.,
Zemzoumi, K.,
Roeder, R. G.,
Tora, L.,
and Mantovani, R.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
2174-2181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Kim, I. S.,
Sinha, S.,
de Crombrugghe, B.,
and Maity, S. N.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4003-4013[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Nakshatri, H.,
Bhat-Nakshatri, P.,
and Currie, R. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
28784-28791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Becker, D. M.,
Fikes, J. D.,
and Guarente, L.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
1968-1972[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Bellorini, M.,
Zemzoumi, K.,
Farina, A.,
Berthelsen, J.,
Piaggio, G.,
and Mantovani, R.
(1997)
Gene (Amst.)
193,
119-125[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Liang, S. G.,
and Maity, S. N.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31590-31598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Mantovani, R.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
1135-1143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Maity, S. N.,
and de Crombrugghe, B.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
5,
174-178
|
| 45.
|
Filatov, D.,
and Thelander, L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25239-25243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Zwicker, J.,
Gross, C.,
Lucibello, F. C.,
Truss, M.,
Ehlert, F.,
Engeland, K.,
and Müller, R.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
3822-3830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Currie, R. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1430-1434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Jin, S.,
and Scotto, K. W.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
4377-4384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Currie, R. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30880-30888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Pise-Masison, C. A.,
Dittmer, J.,
Clemens, K. E.,
and Brady, J. N.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1236-1243[Abstract]
|
| 51.
|
Iida, M.,
Taira, T.,
Ariga, H.,
and Iguchi-Ariga, S. M. M.
(1997)
Biol. Pharm. Bull.
20,
10-14[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.