J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 24280-24288, August 20, 1999
Prolonged Activation of Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase by
a Protein Kinase C-dependent and N17Ras-insensitive
Mechanism Mediates the Proliferative Response of
Gi/o-coupled Somatostatin sst4 Receptors*
Lynda A.
Sellers
From the Glaxo Institute of Applied Pharmacology, Department of
Pharmacology, University of Cambridge,
Cambridge, CB2 1QJ, United Kingdom
 |
ABSTRACT |
The human sst4 receptor,
recombinantly expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, mediates
proliferative activity of the peptide hormone somatostatin. This effect
was shown to involve activation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins
and was inhibited by overexpression of the 
-sequestrant,
transducin. Somatostatin-induced proliferation was abolished by the
MEK1 inhibitor, PD 98059, whereas the Src inhibitor, PP1, had no
effect. A marked increase was observed in the phosphorylation of
extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1 and ERK2) 10 min
after sst4 receptor activation, which was blocked by
pertussis toxin, decreased by PP1 and the 
-sequestrant, but
unaffected by PD 98059. In contrast, the somatostatin-induced phosphorylation of ERK obtained at 4 h, although sensitive to both
pertussis toxin and transducin, was unaffected by PP1 but ablated by PD
98059. Protein kinase C inhibition also abolished this
somatostatin-induced sustained phosphorylation of ERK, together with
the associated increase in cell proliferation. Expression of dominant
negative Ras (N17) failed to significantly reduce the
proliferative effect mediated by the sst4 receptor but
markedly attenuated the acute phase of the somatostatin-induced
phosphorylation of ERK obtained at 10 min. In contrast, the
phosphorylation induced at 4 h was unaffected. We conclude
that ERK activation by Gi/o-coupled sst4
receptors involves a Src and Ras-dependent acute
phase, but the proliferative response is dependent upon the
prolonged ERK-induced activity, mediated by protein kinase C.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The peptide hormone somatostatin induces numerous biological
actions, most of which are inhibitory, by interacting with cell membrane receptors of which five types, named sst1-5, have been heterologously expressed in different cells within the last few
years (1). The growth inhibitory effects of somatostatin are well
documented as it is considered to be the physiological regulator of
growth hormone release (2). As well as reducing the circulatory levels
of several other potential mitogenic hormones and growth factors (3),
somatostatin has also been shown to have a direct action on cellular
proliferation and tissue development, with therapeutic potential in
retarding the growth of tumor (4) and vascular smooth muscle cells
(5).
Numerous reports have demonstrated the expression of a high density of
somatostatin receptors on a variety of human cancer cells, including
most tumors of neuroendocrine origin (including gastroenteropancreatic
tumors), small cell lung carcinomas, brain tumors (glial tumors and
meningiomas), lymphomas, and melanomas as well as colorectal,
pituitary, kidandney, and breast tumors (6, 7). The antiproliferative
action of either somatostatin or its analogue octreotide, however, does
not correlate with this expression, having inhibitory actions on
pancreatic (8) and breast tumors (9), although eliciting no effect on
the growth of small cell lung (10) and colon tumors (11).
Growth-promoting effects of somatostatin have also been described
in vitro on human pancreatic carcinoid (12) and epidermoid
carcinoma cells (13), whereas in both rat mesangial cells (14) and
human pancreatic MIA-Pa-Ca-2 cells (15), somatostatin stimulates
proliferation in the absence of serum but inhibits the growth of
proliferating cells.
Little is known as to the identity of the receptor types mediating the
proliferative or antiproliferative responses of somatostatin in
tissues, and information has been restricted to studies involving partially selective receptor analogues (16). Activation of either mouse
recombinant sst2 or sst5 receptors, however,
has been shown to inhibit serum-induced proliferation (17), whereas
stimulation of the human recombinant sst4 receptor type
induces proliferation in the absence of other mitogenic agents (18).
Interestingly, the recently cloned rat sst2(b) receptor
splice variant has also been shown to induce a proliferative response,
in marked contrast to the antiproliferative property mediated by the
rat sst2(a) receptor following recombinant expression in
the same host cell line (19).
The molecular determinants that mediate the proliferative outcome of
somatostatin receptors have not yet been fully clarified. All five
human receptor types are functionally coupled to inhibition of
adenylate cyclase via pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins (20) and can
mediate phospholipase C activation with subsequent calcium mobilization
(21). Stimulation of sst1 and sst2 receptors has been shown to activate a protein-tyrosine phosphatase activity (22), and it has been suggested that such an activity may counteract the growth-promoting properties of receptors containing an intrinsic tyrosine kinase domain (23). The inhibition of basic fibroblast growth
factor-stimulated proliferation by activation of human sst1
receptors has also been proposed to be due to the induction of the cell
cycle inhibitor, p21cip1/WAF1, shown in a
recombinant system following the synergistic activation of
extracellular signal-regulated kinase
(ERK)1 by the growth factor
in the presence of somatostatin (24).
We have previously demonstrated that stimulation of recombinantly
expressed sst4 receptors by somatostatin gives rise to both a marked transient increase as well as a sustained period of ERK1 and
ERK2 phosphorylation (18). ERK phoshorylation at threonine 183 and
tyrosine 185 are widely used indices of mitogen-activated protein (MAP)
kinase activation by the ERK kinase, MEK1. We have also provided
evidence using a somatostatin analogue that induces only transient
phosphorylation of ERK following sst4 receptor activation
that it is the sustained component of MAP kinase activity that is
critical for the induced proliferative response. Other Gi
protein-coupled receptors (25) have recently been shown to utilize the
MAP kinase cascade through a Src-dependent mechanism following release of 
subunits. In this study therefore, we have
examined the ability of the human sst4 receptor to activate intracellular signaling components that converge on the MAP kinase cascade and in particular to see if a differential requirement can be
demonstrated for their involvement in mediating the acute or prolonged
phases of ERK phosphorylation. In addition, the resultant effect on
cell proliferation of any change detected in the somatostatin-induced ERK phosphorylation following effector inhibition was evaluated by
direct cell counting using a model to determine the re-population of
denuded areas in a previously confluent monolayer (16). The effect of
somatostatin on basal proliferation in the absence of exogenously added
mitogenic agents was examined, and responses induced by basic
fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) were used as a comparison.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO K1) cells were
obtained from The European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures.
Geneticin, LipofectAMINETM, and culture reagents were
supplied by Life Technologies, Inc. Thermanox coverslips were
manufactured by Nunc; otherwise Costar tissue culture plastic ware was
used. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-BB), bFGF, and anti-
actin antibodies were supplied by Sigma. Somatostatin was
custom-synthesized by Peninsula Laboratories. Genistein, lavendustin A,
lavendustin B, PD 98059, Ro 31-8220, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate,
and Bordetella pertussis toxin were purchased from
Calbiochem. PP1 was supplied by Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc.
Antibodies to ERK1 (C-16) and ERK2 (C-14) were obtained from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, whereas that specific to the phosphoforms was supplied
by New England Biolabs. Antibodies specific for Ras (L2 region) and
human Ha-ras cDNA (dominant negative S17N) in pUSEamp
together with the empty vector were supplied by Upstate Biotechnology.
The eukaryotic expression vector pCDNA3 and that incorporating
transducin cDNA were kind gifts of Alan Wise, Receptor Systems,
Glaxo Wellcome Medicines Research Center, Stevenage, UK. An appropriate
antibody for monitoring expression levels of transducin was purchased
from NEN Life Science Products.
Stable Expression of Somatostatin sst4 Receptors in
Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells--
The cDNA encoding the human
sst4 receptor was subcloned into the mammalian expression
vector pCIN4 harboring a neomycin-resistant gene as a selection marker.
CHO K1 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium/Ham's F-12 (1:1) containing 10% fetal calf serum and 1 mM
Glutamax I, and clonal lines stably overexpressing the sst4
receptor were prepared as described previously (18). Levels of receptor
density remained constant over the time course of the study, estimated
at 2.07 ± 0.43 pmol/mg of membrane protein (n = 3). All cultures were routinely maintained in the presence of the
selection agent G418 sulfate (specific activity 500 µg/ml) at
37 °C in humidified air containing 5% carbon dioxide and passaged when 95% confluence was reached.
Partial Denudation of Confluent Cell Monolayers and Assessment of
Proliferation--
Cells were grown to confluence in complete media on
Thermanox coverslips. Multiple parallel areas (400-µm wide) were
denuded of cells, by dragging a Perspex comb across the surface of each coverslip according to the method described previously (18, 26).
Coverslips were washed in phosphate-buffered saline and placed in a
fresh well containing drug or vehicle in media without serum. Cells
were harvested following incubation for 24 h by washing the
coverslip as above and adding 0.05% trypsin, 0.02% EDTA solution for
2-5 min. The digestion process was terminated by adding complete media
and the single cell suspension was counted using a Coulter CounterTM model Z1. Results were calculated from a minimum
of three experiments with four replicates per test group and expressed
as the arithmetic mean ± S.E. of the mean. Statistical analysis
was by analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test (SigmaStat
version 2).
Determination of Change in the Phosphorylation Status of ERK1 and
ERK2--
To analyze changes in the phosphorylation status of ERK1 and
ERK2 at various stages during the proliferative processes following partial denudation, whole cell protein extract was combined from four
coverslips for each treatment group. Proliferation was terminated by
washing the transfected CHO K1 cell monolayers in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline before applying SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer (50 µl of 3× strength) to each test well (1× sample buffer: 4% SDS, 5% glycerol, 60 mM Tris,
and 0.01% bromphenol blue, pH 6.8) under reducing conditions (50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol). After solubilization of cellular
protein by rapid mixing, the well contents were transferred to a
separate tube and combined with two further washings of the well with
deionized water (50 µl). Samples were vortexed, clarified by
centrifugation at 10,000 g for 2 min, and heated at 95 °C
for 5 min. Total cell protein for each of the extracts was measured by
microBCA (Pierce), and equivalent amounts of protein were
electrophoretically resolved on 10% polyacrylamide gels.
Following electrophoretic transfer onto nitrocellulose (0.22 µm)
using a semi-dry blotter, the membrane was washed briefly in
Tris-buffered saline (TBS: 50 mM Tris, 250 mM
NaCl, pH 7.5) and saturated overnight in TBS supplemented with 0.1%
Tween 20 and 5% dried milk. For detection with the antibodies to ERK1
and ERK2, the membranes were incubated with a 1:2,000 dilution (1:1 mix
of ERK1 and 2) or a 1:1,000 dilution of the anti-phospho-ERK antibody.
When used, the antibody to
actin was at a 1:5,000 dilution. All
primary incubations were for 1 h at 22 °C in TBS containing
0.1% Tween 20 followed by washing five times for 10 min each in TBS
containing 0.1% Tween 20. Membranes were incubated for 1 h at
22 °C with a 1:3,000 dilution of the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody in TBS containing 0.1% Tween
20 and 5% dried milk. Excess antibody was removed by washing as above,
and immunocomplexes were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Transient Expression of Dominant Negative Ras or
Transducin--
Human Ha-ras (S17N) cDNA was inserted
as an EcoRI fragment into pUSEamp under the control of the
cytomegalovirus promoter and used to transiently transfect CHO K1 cells
expressing the human recombinant sst4 receptor. Briefly,
cells at 50% confluence in serum-free media were transfected with 2 µg of DNA following complex formation with
LipofectAMINETM reagent, according to the manufacturer's
instructions. The DNA-containing media was removed following incubation
for 3 h at 37 °C, and the cells were incubated for an
additional 24 h in complete media before transferring onto
coverslips. Gene expression using immunoblot analysis as described
above was determined immediately before partial denudation,
approximately 48 h post-transfection using a primary antibody
concentration of 1:1,000. Transfection with transducin was carried out
by the same methodology using 1 µg of cDNA cloned in pCDNA3.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of Somatostatin on the Proliferation of Chinese Hamster
Ovary Cells Recombinantly Expressing Human sst4
Receptors--
Following partial denudation of a confluent monolayer,
the total number of CHO K1 cells recombinantly expressing human
sst4 receptors that remained on a single coverslip was
152 ± 3 × 103. After 24 h in the presence
of incomplete media, this number had slightly increased to 166 ± 5 × 103, with less than 0.6% of the cells detaching
from the coverslip over the time course examined. Application of
somatostatin (100 nM) immediately following denudation in
the absence of other exogenously added mitogenic factors caused a
significant increase in cell number (Table
I) that was comparable to that induced by
bFGF (Table I) using a concentration (10 ng/ml) that produced 80% of its maximal response.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Effect of various treatments on the proliferation induced by either
somatostatin (100 nM) or bFGF (10 ng/ml) of CHO K1 cells
expressing human recombinant sst4 receptors
Values are expressed as the mean cell count (×103 ± S.E.)
determined 24 h after partial denudation of a previously confluent
monolayer (n = 3). Values highlighted in bold indicate
the treatment is significantly different (p < 0.01)
from proliferation in the presence of somatostatin or bFGF alone.
|
|
Effect of Pertussis Toxin Pretreatment--
Pretreatment for
20 h with pertussis toxin (100 ng/ml) had no significant effect on
either basal or bFGF-induced (10 ng/ml) proliferation (Table I).
However, the increased proliferation induced by somatostatin (100 nM) was abolished following pretreatment with the toxin to
values not significantly different from basal (Table I).
Effect of Protein-tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors--
Neither tyrosine
kinase inhibitor, genistein (50 µM) nor lavendustin A (11 nM), had any significant effect on basal proliferation (Table I) in the absence of exogenous growth factors. However, both
inhibitors abolished the increase in proliferation induced by either
somatostatin (100 nM) or bFGF (10 ng/ml) (Table I). Importantly, the inactive enantiomer of lavendustin A, lavendustin B
(11 nM), had no effect on basal cell numbers or on the
proliferation induced by either somatostatin or bFGF (Table I).
Effect of MEK1 or Src-family Inhibitors--
The inhibitor of
MEK1, PD 98059 (2 µM), had no significant effect on basal
proliferation (Table I). The increase in proliferation elicited by
somatostatin (100 nM) was abolished on co-incubation with
PD 98059, whereas bFGF-induced (10 ng/ml) proliferation was only
partially reduced (Table I). Pretreatment with PD 98059 for 1 h
before partial denudation also completely inhibited
somatostatin-induced increases in cell number (from 240 ± 4 × 103 to 164 ± 3 × 103) but again
only partially inhibited bFGF-induced growth (from 244 ± 6 × 103 to 190 ± 4 × 103).
The Src-family inhibitor, PP1 (200 nM), had no significant
effect on basal proliferation (Table I). The increased cell counts induced by either somatostatin or bFGF were also unaffected by incubation with PP1 (Table I). Pretreatment of the cells with PP1 for
1 h before partial denudation, again elicited no significant effect on proliferation induced by somatostatin (237 ± 13 × 103 and 242 ± 5 × 103 in the
presence and absence of PP1, respectively) or bFGF (240 ± 10 × 103 and 247 ± 4 × 103). As a
positive control for PP1, proliferation induced by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-BB) was examined. The PDGF-evoked increase in cell
number (using 5 ng/ml) was significantly reduced by PP1 from 268 ± 7 × 103 to 185 ± 10 × 103.
Changes to the Phosphorylation Status of ERK1 and
ERK2--
Activation of MEK1 in mediating the proliferative action of
somatostatin was substantiated by assessing change to the
phosphorylation status of ERK1 and ERK2 using an antibody that
recognizes only the dually phosphorylated, active form of ERK. To
distinguish between effects on either the acute or prolonged phases of
MAP kinase activation, the phosphorylation status of ERK1 and ERK2 was
examined at 10 min and 4 h following partial denudation. For all
treatment groups there was no detectable change in the expression of
ERK1 or ERK2 protein at the time points investigated (Fig. 1A). An increase in the
phosphorylation status over basal was observed for both ERK1 and ERK2
following somatostatin treatment (100 nM), but that induced
at 10 min was considerably greater than that observed at 4 h
post-denudation (Fig. 1, B and C), consistent with previous observations (18). The enhanced phosphorylation of ERK1
and ERK2 induced by somatostatin at both time points was abolished by
pertussis toxin pretreatment (20 h at 100 ng/ml) and unaffected by
genistein (50 µM) (Fig. 1, B and
C). Neither pertussis toxin nor genistein had any detectable
effect on the basal level of phosphorylation of ERK1 or ERK2 at either
time point (Fig. 1, B and C).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Changes in the phosphorylation status of ERK1
and ERK2 in CHO K1 cells expressing human recombinant sst4
receptors induced by somatostatin at the onset of proliferative
events. Analysis at 10 min (panels A and B)
and 4 h (panel C) following partial denudation of
confluent monolayers was determined by Western detection using
antibodies specific to ERK1 and ERK2 (panel A) or that
recognizing the phosphorylated, active forms (panels B and
C). The immunoreactivity detected with antibodies for both
ERK1 (1:2,000 dilution) and ERK2 (1:4,000) had the correct
electrophoretic mobility on 10% polyacrylamide gels, as compared with
molecular weight standards, and panel A shows that
expression of the kinases remained unaffected by the various treatments
or between the time points examined. Whole cell protein extracts were
prepared from partially denuded monolayers incubated in the presence of
incomplete media (CON) or somatostatin (100 nM;
SRIF) after pertussis toxin pretreatment (20 h at 100 ng/ml;
PTX) or somatostatin co-incubated with PD 98059 (2 µM; PD), genistein (50 µM;
GEN), or PP1 (200 nM; PP1). For
direct comparison of the somatostatin-induced phosphorylation of ERK1
and ERK2 at the times examined, somatostatin-treated samples from the
alternative time point are shown at the end of panels B and
C. Western blots shown are a representative from at least
four separate experiments, and each panel has been taken from a single
immunoblot.
|
|
Differential effects of PD 98059 (2 µM) and PP1 (200 nM) treatments, however, were observed on the
somatostatin-induced increase in ERK phosphorylation at the times
examined. PD 98059 had no detectable effect on basal or
somatostatin-induced phosphorylation obtained 10 min post-denudation
(Fig. 1B). In contrast, the somatostatin-mediated increase
was reduced following PP1 treatment, with the Src inhibitor showing no
detectable effect on basal phosphorylation levels (Fig. 1B).
After 4 h of regenerative processes, the somatostatin-induced phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 was unaffected by PP1 but abolished by
PD 98059, with neither inhibitor having any observable effect on the
basal level of phosphorylation (Fig. 1C).
Effect of a Dominant Negative Mutant of Ras on Cell Proliferation
and ERK Phosphorylation--
To evaluate the involvement of Ras in
mediating the activation of ERK by somatostatin sst4
receptors, transient expression of the dominant negative mutant of Ras
(N17) was performed. This Ras mutant, in which amino acid 17 (serine)
is changed to asparagine, is thought to function by inhibiting guanine
nucleotide exchange factors (27). Transient transfection with the empty
vector had no significant effect on the proliferation induced in CHO K1
cells expressing the sst4 receptor by either somatostatin
(100 nM) or bFGF (10 ng/ml), as determined by counting the
number of cells forming the regenerating monolayers 24 h after
partial denudation (Fig. 2A).
Transient expression of N17Ras also failed to significantly effect the
increase in cell number evoked by somatostatin treatment, but in
contrast that induced by bFGF was markedly attenuated (Fig. 2A). Transfection with either the empty vector or that
incorporating N17Ras cDNA failed to significantly effect basal cell
counts (data not shown). The increase in N17Ras levels after
transfection was evaluated by immunoblotting cell extracts immediately
before partial denudation with a polyclonal antibody to Ras. The
inset in Fig. 2A shows that in mock-transfected
cells, the immunoreactivity with the anti-Ras antibody was almost
undetectable compared with the intense reactivity obtained from the
same number of cells transfected with pUSEamp(+) plasmids containing
dominant negative Ha-ras.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of dominant negative Ras on
somatostatin- and bFGF-induced cell proliferation and ERK
phosphorylation in CHO K1 cells recombinantly expressing human
sst4 receptors. The effect of transient expression of
N17Ras (-Ras) on the increased cell number induced by
somatostatin (100 nM; SRIF; closed
histograms) or bFGF (10 ng/ml; hatched histograms)
24 h after application to partially denuded cell monolayers is
shown in panel A. The number of cells obtained after
incubation in the presence of incomplete media is shown by the
open histogram (Basal), and the effect of
transfection with the empty plasmid, pUSEamp, on somatostatin- and
bFGF-stimulated proliferation is represented by the histograms labeled
Mock. Values are expressed as the mean cell number harvested
from a single coverslip (n = 3, 4 replicates). The
vertical bars represent the S.E., and those groups labeled
with * are significantly different from basal (p < 0.001). The treatment group labeled with # is significantly different
from that incubated in the presence of bFGF without transfection
(p < 0.01). The inset in panel A
shows an immunoblot of protein from cell samples extracted immediately
before partial denudation that had been transfected 48 h
previously with either pUSEamp (Mock) or that incorporating
dominant negative Ha-ras (-Ras). After separation
by 15% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transfer onto
nitrocellulose, detection was made with an anti- actin antibody to
demonstrate consistency of protein loading as well as with an antibody
to Ras. The effect of transient transfection with N17Ras
(-Ras) on the somatostatin-induced (100 nM;
SRIF) phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2, as detected by the
phosphospecific antibody using Western analysis, is shown in
panel B. Samples from cells transfected with the empty
plasmid 48 h prior to partial denudation are labeled Mock, and a
comparison is shown of the phosphorylation status of ERK1 and ERK2
determined at both 10 min and 4 h post-denudation. Samples labeled
CON were incubated for the appropriate times in the presence
of incomplete media. Consistency of protein loading was substantiated
by the evenness of the immunoreactivity obtained following detection of
the samples shown in panel B with the anti-ERK antibodies
(panel C). Panel D shows the effect of transient
expression of N17Ras on bFGF-induced (10 ng/ml; FGF)
phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2. Western blots shown are a
representative from at least three separate experiments, and each
panel has been taken from a single immunoblot.
|
|
The level of phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 induced by somatostatin
(100 nM) at either time point examined (10 min and 4 h) was unchanged by transfection with the empty plasmid (Fig. 2B). After transient expression of N17Ras, the
somatostatin-induced phosphorylation observed 10 min after partial
denudation was substantially decreased, whereas that obtained at 4 h was unaffected (Fig. 2B). Neither transfection with
pUSEamp or pUSEamp(N17ras) showed any effect on basal levels
of ERK phosphorylation observed at 10 min or 4 h (Fig.
2B). To show consistency in protein loading, detection of
ERK1 and ERK2 using phosphorylation state-independent pan antibodies was also made (Fig. 2C). Electrophoretic mobility shifts for
both ERK1 and ERK2 could be observed in those treatment groups where a
marked change in the phosphorylation status of these proteins had occurred.
It has previously been shown using the same model system as employed in
this study that bFGF (10 ng/ml) induces a sustained phosphorylation of
both ERK1 and ERK2 (18). However, in contrast to that evoked by
somatostatin, the time profile for the growth factor-stimulated
phosphorylation was biphasic, producing peaks at 10 min and again at
4 h post-denudation. In this study, ERK phosphorylation induced by
bFGF (10 ng/ml) at 10 min and 4 h was unaffected by transfection
with pUSEamp (Fig. 2D). However, transient expression of
N17Ras inhibited the growth factor-induced phosphorylation at both time
points examined (Fig. 2D). Neither transfection with pUSEamp
or pUSEamp(N17ras) showed any effect on basal levels of ERK
phosphorylation observed at 10 min or 4 h (Fig. 2D),
and the level of ERK protein expression remained unchanged across
treatment groups (data not shown).
Effect of Protein Kinase C Inhibition on Cell Proliferation and ERK
Phosphorylation--
The protein kinase C inhibitor, Ro 31-8220 (50 nM), had no significant effect on the number of CHO K1
cells (expressing the human recombinant sst4 receptor)
maintained in the absence of serum for 24 h after partial
denudation (Fig. 3A). However,
Ro 31-8220 abolished the increase in cell number induced by either somatostatin (100 nM) or bFGF (10 ng/ml) (Fig.
3A). Down-regulation of protein kinase C following
pretreatment of cells with the phorbol ester phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate (100 ng/ml for 24 h) also reduced the
somatostatin-induced increase in cell counts from 244 ± 6 × 103 to 172 ± 11 × 103. Incubation
with Ro 31-8220 abolished the induced phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2
observed following somatostatin treatment for 4 h (Fig.
3B). However, there was no detectable change in the level of somatostatin-induced immunoreactivity detected with the anti-phosphospecific antibody obtained 10 min after partial denudation (Fig. 3B). Similarly, bFGF-induced ERK phosphorylation
at 10 min was unaffected by Ro 31-8220, whereas that obtained at 4 h was markedly attenuated (Fig. 3C). Ro 31-8220 had no
apparent effect on the basal level of ERK phosphorylation observed at
either time point (Fig. 3, B and C) or on the
expression levels of the kinases (data not shown).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of the protein kinase C inhibitor, Ro
31-8220, on somatostatin- and bFGF-induced cell proliferation and ERK
phosphorylation in CHO K1 cells recombinantly expressing human
sst4 receptors. Panel A shows the mean
number of cells harvested from a single coverslip after application of
incomplete media (Basal; open histograms),
somatostatin (100 nM; SRIF; closed
histograms), or bFGF (10 ng/ml; hatched histograms) in
the presence and absence of Ro 31-8220 (50 nM;
Ro). Values are expressed as the mean cell number ± S.E., obtained 24 h after partial denudation of a previously
confluent monolayer (n = 3, 4 replicates). Groups
labeled with * are significantly different from basal
(p < 0.001), and those labeled with # are
significantly different from values in the presence of either
somatostatin or bFGF but in the absence of Ro 31-8220 (p < 0.001). The effect of Ro 31-8220 on the
phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 induced by either somatostatin (100 nM; SRIF) or bFGF (10 ng/ml; FGF) at
10 min and 4 h immediately after partial denudation is shown in
panels B and C, respectively. Control samples
incubated in incomplete media (CON) with or without Ro
31-8220 (Ro) at both time points are also shown. Detection
was made by Western analysis using the phosphospecific ERK antibody.
Each panel has been taken from a single immunoblot and is a
representative of three separate experiments.
|
|
Effect of Transient Transfection with Transducin on Cell
Proliferation and ERK Phosphorylation--
Neither mock transfection
with pCDNA3 nor pCDNA3 incorporating transducin cDNA had
any significant effect on basal proliferation of CHO K1 cells
recombinantly expressing the sst4 receptor, determined 24 h following partial denudation in the absence of exogenous growth factors (data not shown). The increased cell number induced by
the submaximal concentration of bFGF (10 ng/ml) was also unaffected following transfection with either plasmid (Fig.
4A). However, the
proliferation induced by somatostatin (100 nM) was
significantly reduced following transient expression of transducin,
whereas that following mock transfection was unaffected (Fig.
4A). The inset in Fig. 4A shows a
representative immunoblot of protein extract from cells transfected
with either the empty vector or that incorporating transducin cDNA,
determined immediately before denudation. For the same number of cells
as indicated by the consistency in
actin levels, those transfected
with transducin cDNA showed marked immunoreactivity as detected by
an anti-transducin antibody compared with those transfected with the
empty vector.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of the
 sequestrant, transducin, on
somatostatin-induced cell proliferation and ERK phosphorylation in CHO
K1 cells recombinantly expressing human sst4
receptors. The effect of transient expression of transducin
(Trans) on the increased cell number induced by somatostatin
(100 nM; SRIF; closed histograms) or
bFGF (10 ng/ml; hatched histograms) 24 h after
application to a partially denuded cell monolayer is shown in
panel A. The number of cells obtained after incubation in
the presence of incomplete media is shown by the open
histogram (Basal), and the effect of transfection with the empty
plasmid, pCDNA3, on somatostatin- and bFGF-stimulated proliferation
is represented by the histograms labeled Mock. Values are
expressed as the mean cell number harvested from a single coverslip
(n = 3, 4 replicates). The vertical bars
represent the S.E., and those groups labeled * are significantly
different from basal (p < 0.001). The treatment group
labeled # is significantly different from that incubated in the
presence of somatostatin without transfection (p < 0.01). The inset in panel A shows an immunoblot
of protein from cell samples extracted immediately before partial
denudation that had been transfected 48 h previously with either
pCDNA3 (Mock) or that incorporating transducin cDNA
(Trans). Western detection was made with an anti- actin
antibody to demonstrate consistency of protein loading as well as by
the anti-transducin antibody (Trans). The effect of
transient expression of transducin (Trans) on the
phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 induced by somatostatin (100 nM; SRIF) as well as that obtained after
incubation with incomplete media (CON), as detected by the
phosphospecific antibody using Western analysis, is shown in
panel B. Samples from cells transfected with the empty
plasmid 48 h before partial denudation are labeled
Mock, and a comparison is shown of the phosphorylation
status of ERK1 and ERK2 determined at both 10 min and 4 h
post-denudation. The Western blot shown is a representative from at
least three separate experiments, and the panel has been
taken from a single immunoblot.
|
|
There was no detectable change in the basal level or
somatostatin-induced phosphorylation of ERK1 or ERK2 in samples allowed to regenerate for either 10 min or 4 h after mock transfection (data not shown). However, overexpression of transducin reduced the
somatostatin-induced phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 observed at both
10 min and 4 h after denudation compared with mock-transfected cells (Fig. 4B). Transducin overexpression had no apparent
effect on basal phosphorylation levels at either time point examined (Fig. 4B).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Activation of the MAP kinase cascade, which in most systems
requires Ras and Raf, is a universal downstream response to the stimulation of most receptor protein-tyrosine kinases and has been
demonstrated following activation of the G protein-coupled somatostatin
sst4 receptor (18, 28). Using a well characterized model to
determine the re-population of denuded areas in an otherwise confluent
monolayer, we have previously demonstrated that the somatostatin-induced proliferative response of this receptor type depends on the sustained activation of ERK1 and ERK2 and independent of
a robust transient phase (18). One of the advantages of this model is
that cells are synchronized in G0 or early G1
of the cell cycle at the onset of the investigative period, and to
substantiate that effects are on a proliferative rather than a
motogenic process, the total number of cells forming the regenerating
monolayer after 24 h in the presence of test agents was determined
in the current study. The aim of this investigation was to attempt to
identify the transduction effectors involved in mediating the sustained activation of ERK1 and ERK2 by somatostatin sst4 receptors
and, hence, those responsible for inducing the proliferative response.
The protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, genistein and lavendustin A,
had no effect on basal cell numbers at concentrations that abolished
the increased proliferation induced by bFGF. The signaling cascades
activated by bFGF receptors would thus seem dependent on this type of
phosphate transfer process for transduction of the proliferative
function and is compatible with the well characterized mechanism
through which this family of receptors mediate their mitogenic effects
(29). It would also appear that transmission of the growth-promoting
activity of sst4 receptors is similarly dependent on a
protein-tyrosine kinase activity. However, in contrast to the growth
factor receptor, which contains an intrinsic tyrosine kinase domain
within the COOH terminus of each subunit forming the active dimer, the
site of intervention of these kinase blockers in the transduction
process for sst4 receptor-mediated growth must be localized
to secondary effectors. The lack of effect of genistein on the
somatostatin-induced ERK phosphorylation determined at time points
representative of the acute and sustained phases of MAP kinase
activation suggests that either a parallel cooperative pathway
utilizing a tyrosine kinase is essential for growth or, alternatively,
that the kinase lies exclusively downstream from MAP kinase. Evidence
for a pertussis toxin-insensitive pathway mediating tyrosine
phosphorylation of the transcription factor STAT3 has recently been
provided for the sst4 receptor (18), and it may be that the
genistein-sensitive effector is situated within this particular cascade
(see Fig. 5). Interestingly, it has also
been shown in this previous study that only after the additional
phosphorylation on serine residues of this same transcription factor as
a consequence of prolonged MAP kinase activation, could a proliferative
response be induced by somatostatin.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Proposed mechanism that transduces the
proliferative response of somatostatin in CHO K1 cells recombinantly
expressing the human sst4 receptor.
Gi-coupled receptors typically converge at or before Src to
mediate Ras-dependent MAP kinase activation. In contrast,
receptors coupled to pertussis toxin-insensitive Gq/11
activate protein kinase C, which in turn can mediate a Ras-independent
MAP kinase activation. The proliferative response mediated via the
sst4 receptor requires G release, consistent with
mitogenic pathways of other Gi/o-coupled receptors but
appears independent of the transient activation of ERK, which is Src-
and Ras-dependent. By contrast, the sustained activation of
ERK (known to be associated with nuclear translocation) and the
proliferative response of somatostatin are both dependent on protein
kinase C (PKC) activity. Activation of protein kinase C by
sst4 receptors has not been determined in this study but
could be via  -mediated phospholipase C- (PLC )
stimulation (21) or the  -dependent phosphoinositide
3-OH kinase (PI-3) isoform. Sustained MAP kinase activation
is critical for the somatostatin-induced proliferative response, but an
additional, as yet uncharacterized tyrosine kinase activity is also
required in a cooperative pathway. This could possibly involve the
tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3, shown to be mediated through a
pertussis toxin-insensitive mechanism following sst4
receptor activation (18). The site of action of the inhibitors used in
this study are shown by the shaded boxes. SOS,
son of seven less. GRB, adaptor protein Grb2.
|
|
The growth-promoting effect of somatostatin is additionally dependent
on a pertussis toxin-sensitive pathway that distinguishes its
proliferative mechanism from that of bFGF. Other Gi
protein-coupled receptors have been shown to mediate rapid tyrosine
phosphorylation of several proteins that participate in mitogenic
signal transduction such as the adapter protein Shc (30), which is a
major substrate for Src kinase. The mechanism whereby these receptors
stimulate tyrosine phosphorylation is poorly understood, although
activation of the Src-family kinases by several G protein-coupled
receptors has been reported (31). In addition, activation of Src seems to account for the Gi-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation
events that direct recruitment of the Shc and Grb2 adaptor proteins to the membrane (32), thus providing a route into the Ras-ERK cascade (Fig. 5).
To determine whether activation of the MAP kinase cascade was a
prerequisite for processing the growth effects induced by somatostatin,
the selective MEK1 inhibitor, PD 98059 (33), was used in the
proliferation model. It is well documented that the dual-specific
kinase MEK stimulates ERK by phosphorylation on threonine (Thr-183) and
tyrosine (Tyr-185) residues, which following subsequent translocation
into the nucleus, activates transcription factors, resulting in
enhanced cell growth (34). In this study, the proliferative effect of
somatostatin was abolished by PD 98059, confirming that the MAP kinase
cascade is critical for the growth-promoting effect of somatostatin by
the sst4 receptor. In contrast, bFGF-stimulated proliferation in the same host cell was only partially inhibited on
co-application with PD 98059, which is consistent with the ability of
this receptor type to recruit a multitude of secondary effectors and
initiate a number of distinct, yet parallel signaling pathways. An
involvement of MEK1 in the sst4 receptor-mediated proliferative response was further supported by the demonstration of
increased phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 following somatostatin treatment. However, although both the acute and sustained phases of MAP
kinase activation were abolished by pertussis toxin, a differential
effect on the temporally distinct activities was observed following
MEK1 inhibition. Abolition of the sustained phase with PD 98059, although having no observable effect on the transient activity, is
supportive evidence for the requirement of the prolonged activation of
MAP kinase in mediating cell growth. The lack of effect of the MEK1
inhibitor on the marked transient phosphorylation of ERK is possibly
due to the ineffectiveness of the concentration of PD 98059 administered with somatostatin and is in keeping with other reports
showing that high levels of MAP kinase activity are PD
98059-insensitive (33).
Several Gi-coupled receptors have been shown to mediate MAP
kinase activation through the 
-component of the G protein
possibly through the activation of the Src-family of tyrosine kinases
(35). The proliferative response induced by somatostatin was inhibited following overexpression of the 
-sequestering protein,
transducin, in contrast to the lack of effect on bFGF-induced growth.
However, the Src-family inhibitor, PP1 (36), failed to reduce the
proliferative effect induced by either mitogen in this cell line. The
bFGF results were somewhat unexpected since it is well known that Src
is a co-transducer of mitogenic signals arising from a number of
tyrosine kinase growth factor receptors, such as platelet-derived
growth factor or epidermal growth factor receptors (37). However, the association of Src with bFGF receptors appears to be cell-specific (38), and in this respect, bFGF-induced proliferation in vascular smooth muscle cells has been shown to be partially inhibited by the Src
inhibitor PP1, as determined by the same model system employed in this
current study.2 PP1 in CHO K1
cells transfected with the somatostatin sst4 receptor was
shown to reduce platelet-derived growth factor-stimulated growth.
The inability of PP1 to inhibit somatostatin-induced proliferation
suggests Src is not involved in this response mechanism, and therefore
the process through which MEK is activated appears to be very different
to that employed by other Gi protein-coupled receptors
(35). However, further examination of the somatostatin-induced ERK
phosphorylation showed that the transient phase was sensitive to the
Src inhibitor, in contrast to the PP1-independent prolonged phosphorylation. The attenuation of the transient phosphorylation of
ERK by the Src inhibitor without any resultant effect on the proliferative response again suggests that it is the sustained activation of MAP kinase that is critical for proliferation. In addition, the sensitivity of the transient and not the prolonged phase
of ERK phosphorylation to Src-inhibition provides evidence that
different transduction events are involved in mediating the temporally
distinct MAP kinase activities. The involvement of Src in mediating the
acute phase of ERK phosphorylation and the insensitivity of this
component to genistein seem incompatible. However, genistein is a
nonselective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and it may be that in this
system, Src activity is unaffected by the concentration of genistein used.
The mechanisms by which Gi and Gq-coupled
receptors typically activate MAP kinase are through
Ras-dependent or protein kinase C-dependent
pathways, respectively. However, a few exceptions to this rule have
been recently reported for Gq-coupled receptors in that MAP
kinase can be activated through a pertussis toxin-insensitive but
protein kinase C-independent pathway (39). In this study, we have
demonstrated that the transient phosphorylation of ERK by
sst4 receptors is sensitive to both transducin and dominant negative Ras (N17) but unaffected following protein kinase C
inhibition. These results are also in accord with the 
-mediated
Src stimulation utilized by other Gi-coupled receptors to
activate MAP kinase through a Ras-dependent mechanism (Fig.
5). In addition, these data are also consistent with the acute phase of
MAP kinase activity not being involved in mediating a growth response,
as expression of N17Ras had no effect on somatostatin-induced
proliferation or the prolonged activation of MAP kinase.
Since it appears that the sustained activation of MAP kinase, required
for the somatostatin-induced proliferative effect, utilizes a distinct
but convergent pathway to that mediating the transient
Ras-dependent ERK phosphorylation, we examined the
involvement of protein kinase C, which can activate the Ras-ERK cascade
at the point of Raf (40) (Fig. 5). Both the proliferation and sustained phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 induced by somatostatin were abolished
following protein kinase C blockade. This suggests that protein kinase
C involvement is critical for the growth response and is placed
upstream to ERK activation, consistent with other reports investigating
MAP kinase stimulation through Gq-coupled receptors (39).
Receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated activation of Raf-1 is coupled to
Ras, and bFGF-induced proliferation of CHO K1 cells used in this study
was N17Ras-sensitive together with both the acute and sustained phases
of ERK phosphorylation. By contrast, protein kinase C-mediated
activation of Raf-1 is thought to be Ras-independent and is in keeping
with the lack of effect on the prolonged MAP kinase phosphorylation and
the induced proliferative response observed in this study following application of somatostatin to cells overexpressing N17Ras. Activation of Raf-1 by protein kinase C has been shown to be insensitive to
dominant negative Ras (41), indicating that protein kinase C activates
Raf by a mechanism distinct from that initiated by activation of
receptor tyrosine kinases. Although in this study the acute phase of
ERK phosphorylation induced by bFGF was unaffected by a protein kinase
C inhibitor, the sustained component was reduced, and the proliferative
effect was abolished. It thus appears that it is the sustained ERK
activity that is also critical for bFGF to induce cell proliferation.
However, in contrast to that following sst4 receptor
activation, the sustained phase of ERK phosphorylation induced by bFGF
appears to involve both Ras- and protein kinase C-dependent
mechanisms, and both seem to be required for the proliferative effect.
The protein kinase C family has at least 11 members, 6 of which (
,
,
,
, µ,
) have been shown to be expressed in the CHO K1
cells used in this study.2 Both the typical and atypical
protein kinase C isozymes are activated by diacylglycerol, which is
produced by the metabolism of phosphatidylinositols. Although
sst4 receptors have been shown to mediate inositol
1,4,5,-trisphosphate production (21), it has not been determined here
if through 
release, the subsequent stimulation of phospholipase
C-
is mandatory for the sustained ERK phosphorylation induced by
somatostatin. Activation of MAP kinase after sst4 receptor
stimulation has been shown to be dependent on phosphoinositide 3-OH
kinase (42). Signaling targets of the lipid products of this kinase
activity include the calcium-independent protein kinase C isoforms
(43), raising the possibility that ERK activation through protein
kinase C in this study could be via a calcium-independent pathway.
Involvement of phosphoinositide 3-OH kinase in the prolonged activation
of ERK would also be in keeping with the G
dependence of both
this and the proliferative events observed after somatostatin
application, as a phosphoinositide 3-OH kinase responsive to 
subunits has recently been cloned (44).
Very little evidence is currently available as to the identity of the
molecular determinants responsible for the sustained activation of MAP
kinase. Recently it has been shown that in PC12 cells, Ras must be
activated for the initial phase of ERK activation following stimulation
of the nerve growth factor receptor (TrkA), but the sustained phase
involves another small GTPase, Rap1 (45). In this study we have
demonstrated that sst4 receptors can stimulate cellular
proliferation through transduction mechanisms with a critical
requirement for a sustained, protein kinase C-dependent activation of MAP kinase. Stimulation of MAP kinase has been shown to
regulate a diverse range of functional responses, sometimes with
opposing effects. For example, although we have shown a critical requirement for ERK activity in the sst4 receptor-mediated
proliferative effect, this activity also appears to be necessary for
the growth inhibitory response of sst1 receptor types (24).
These apparent conflicting functional processes following activation of
the MAP kinase cascade will be better explained once the kinetics of
ERK activation as well as the strength of the stimulus for a given receptor type have been fully evaluated and elements of the
transduction machinery required for the temporally distinct activities
have been identified.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
I thank Patrick Humphrey for encouragement and
constructive criticism of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Glaxo Institute of
Applied Pharmacology, Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Rd., Cambridge, CB2 1QJ, U.K. Tel.:
44-1223-334-177; Fax: 44-1223-334-178; E-mail:
wtem15797@glaxowellcome.co.uk.
2
L. A. Sellers, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ERK, extracellular
signal-regulated kinase;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
bFGF, basic
fibroblast growth factor;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline;
MEK, MAP
kinase kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hoyer, D.,
Bell, G. I.,
Berelowitz, M.,
Epelbaum, J.,
Feniuk, W.,
Humphrey, P. P. A.,
O'Carroll, A-M.,
Patel, Y. C.,
Schonbrunn, A.,
Taylor, J. E.,
and Reisine, T.
(1995)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
16,
86-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Lamberts, S. W. J.,
Oosterom, R.,
Neufeld, M.,
and Del Pozo, E.
(1985)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
60,
1161-1165[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Gerich, J. E.
(1981)
Am. J. Med.
70,
619-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Hofland, L. J.,
and Lamberts, S. W. J.
(1996)
Baillière's Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
10,
163-176[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Eriksen, U. H.,
Amtorp, O.,
Bagger, J. P.,
Emanuelsson, H.,
Foegh, M.,
Henningsen, P.,
Saunamäki, K.,
Schaeffer, M.,
Thayssen, P.,
Ørskov, H.,
Kuntz, R. E.,
and Popma, J. J.
(1995)
Am. Heart J.
130,
1-8[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Reubi, J. C.,
Schaer, J. C.,
Waser, B.,
and Mengod, G.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
3455-3459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Evers, B. M.,
Parekh, D.,
Townsend, C. M.,
and Thompson, J. C.
(1991)
Ann. Surg.
213,
190-198[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Liebow, C.,
Reilly, C.,
Serrano, M.,
and Schally, A. V.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
2003-2007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Pagliacci, M. C.,
Tognellini, R.,
Grignani, F.,
and Nicoletti, I.
(1991)
Endocrinology
129,
2555-2562[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Macaulay, V. M.,
Smith, I. E.,
Everard, M. J.,
Teale, J. D.,
Reubi, J. C.,
and Millar, J. L.
(1991)
Br. J. Cancer
64,
451-456[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Dy, D. Y.,
Whitehead, R. H.,
and Morris, D. L.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
917-923[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Ishizuka, J.,
Beauchamp, R. D.,
Evers, B. M.,
Townsend, C. M.,
and Thompson, J. C.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
185,
577-581[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Kamiya, Y.,
Ohmura, E.,
Arai, M.,
Fuji, T.,
Hayakawa, F.,
Ito, J.,
Kawaguchi, M.,
Tsushima, T.,
and Sakuma, N.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
191,
302-307[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Ruiz-Torres, P.,
Lucio, F. J.,
González-Rubio, M.,
Rodríguez-Puyol, M.,
and Rodríguez-Puyol, D.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
195,
1057-1062[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Douziech, N.,
Calvo, E.,
Coulombe, Z.,
Muradia, G.,
Bastien, J.,
Aubin, R. A.,
Lajas, A.,
and Morisset, J.
(1999)
Endocrinology
140,
765-777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Lauder, H.,
Sellers, L. A.,
Fan, T-P. D.,
Feniuk, W.,
and Humphrey, P. P. A.
(1997)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
122,
663-670[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Buscail, L.,
Estève, J-P.,
Saint-Laurent, N.,
Bertrand, V.,
Reisine, T.,
O'Carroll, A-M.,
Bell, G. I.,
Schally, A. V.,
Vaysse, N.,
and Susini, C.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
1580-1584[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Sellers, L. A.,
Feniuk, W.,
Humphrey, P. P. A.,
and Lauder, H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16423-16430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Alderton, F.,
Fan, T-P. D.,
Schindler, M.,
and Humphrey, P. P. A.
(1998)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
125,
1630-1633[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Patel, Y. C.,
Greenwood, M. T.,
Warszynska, A.,
Panetta, R.,
and Srikant, C. B.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
198,
605-612[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Akbar, M.,
Okajima, F.,
Tomura, H.,
Majid, M. A.,
Yamada, Y.,
Seino, S.,
and Kondo, Y.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
348,
192-196[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Buscail, L.,
Delesque, N.,
Estève, J-P.,
Saint-Laurent, N.,
Prats, H.,
Clerc, P.,
Robberecht, P.,
Bell, G. I.,
Liebow, C.,
Schally, A. V.,
Vaysse, N.,
and Susini, C.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
2315-2319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Pan, M. G.,
Florio, T.,
and Stork, P. J. S.
(1992)
Science
256,
1215-1217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Florio, T.,
Yao, H.,
Carey, K. D.,
Dillon, T. J.,
and Stork, P. J. S.
(1999)
Mol. Endocrinol.
13,
24-37[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
van Biesen, T.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
Hawes, B. E.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1996)
Endocr. Rev.
17,
698-714[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Lauder, H.,
Frost, E. E.,
Hiley, C. R.,
and Fan, T-P. D.
(1998)
Angiogenesis
2,
67-80
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27.
|
Feig, L. A.,
and Cooper, G. M.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
3235-3243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Bito, H.,
Mori, M.,
Sakanaka, C.,
Takano, T.,
Honda, Z.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Nishida, E.,
and Shimizu, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12722-12730[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Heldin, C-H.
(1995)
Cell
80,
213-223[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Cazaubon, S. M.,
Ramos-Morales, F.,
Fischer, S.,
Schweighoffer, F.,
Strosberg, A. D.,
and Couraud, P. O.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
24805-24809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Chen, Y. H.,
Pouyssegur, J.,
Courtneidge, S. A.,
and van Obberghen Schilling, E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27372-27377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Luttrell, L. M.,
Della Rocca, G. J.,
van Biesen, T.,
Luttrell, D. K.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4637-4644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
Cuenda, A.,
Cohen, P.,
Dudley, D. T.,
and Saltiel, A. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27489-27494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Hill, C. S.,
and Treisman, R.
(1995)
Cell
80,
199-211[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Luttrell, L. M.,
Hawes, B. E.,
van Biesen, T.,
Luttrell, D. K.,
Lansing, T. J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19443-19450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Hanke, J. H.,
Gardner, J. P.,
Dow, R. L.,
Changelian, P. S.,
Brissette, W. H.,
Weringer, E. J.,
Pollok, B. A.,
and Connelly, P. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
695-701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Broome, M. A.,
and Hunter, T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16798-16806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Roche, S.,
Koegl, M.,
Barone, M. V.,
Roussel, M. F.,
and Courtneidge, S. A.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
1102-1109[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Charlesworth, A.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
2323-2329[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Kolch, W.,
Heidecker, G.,
Kochs, G.,
Hummel, R.,
Vahidi, H.,
Mischak, H.,
Finkenzeller, G.,
Marme, D.,
and Rapp, U. R.
(1993)
Nature
363,
249-252
|
| 41.
|
Marais, R.,
Light, Y.,
Mason, C.,
Paterson, H.,
Olson, M. F.,
and Marshall, C. J.
(1998)
Science
280,
109-112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Sakanaka, C.,
Ferby, I.,
Waga, I.,
Bito, H.,
and Shimizu, T.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
205,
18-23[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Toker, A.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1997)
Nature
387,
673-676[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Stephens, L. R.,
Eguinoa, A.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Lui, M.,
Cooke, F.,
Coadwell, J.,
Smrcka, A. S.,
Thelen, M.,
Cadwallader, K.,
Tempst, P.,
and Hawkins, P. T.
(1997)
Cell
89,
105-114[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
York, R. D.,
Yao, H.,
Dillon, T.,
Ellig, C. L.,
Eckert, S. P.,
McCleskey, E. W.,
and Stork, P. J. S.
(1998)
Nature
392,
622-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea