![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 24335-24341, August 20, 1999
From the Divisions of Human Biology and Clinical Research, C2-023, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109 and Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Overexpression of the HER-2 (neu, erbB-2) receptor results in cellular transformation and is associated with a variety of human cancers. Multiple mechanisms, including gene amplification and transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and translational controls contribute to the regulation of HER-2 expression. One of the components of these regulatory mechanisms is a short upstream open reading frame (uORF) in the HER-2 mRNA that represses downstream translation in a variety of cell types. Here we explore the mechanism by which this uORF exerts its inhibitory effect.
As judged by comparisons of protein and mRNA abundance and by
polysomal distribution analyses, the uORF represses translation of the
HER-2 cistron or of a heterologous reporter gene. Despite its
conservation among mammalian species, the peptide sequence of the uORF
is not required for this inhibitory effect. Rather, the majority of
ribosomes that load on the HER-2 mRNA most likely translate the
uORF and are then unable to reinitiate at the downstream AUG codon, in
part due to the short intercistronic spacing. A minority of ribosomes
gain access to the HER-2 initiation codon either by leaky scanning past
the upstream AUG codon or by reinitiating after having translated the
uORF despite the short intercistronic region. These results suggest
that the HER-2 uORF controls synthesis of this oncoprotein by limiting
ribosomal access to downstream initiation sites.
The HER-2 (neu, erbB-2) oncogene encodes a
185-kDa transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase (1-4). Although HER-2
is involved in normal development as evidenced by neural and myocardial
defects in knock-out mice (5), most studies of HER-2 have focused on its role in cancer. Overexpression of HER2 occurs in numerous types of
human cancers and has been linked to neoplastic transformation and
aggressive tumor growth (6-12). Cells from tumors in which HER-2 is
overexpressed often contain amplified copies of the HER-2 gene.
However, in some cases HER-2 overexpression is due to transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms in the absence of gene
amplification (12-15). Moreover, under certain conditions, HER-2
receptor levels vary without changes in mRNA levels, suggesting
that translational controls also participate in the control of HER-2
protein synthesis (16, 17).
In eukaryotes, translational regulation of specific genes typically
occurs at translational initiation and is mediated by cis-acting sequences present in the 5' transcript leader,
such as upstream AUG codons and associated upstream open reading frames (uORFs1 (18, 19)). Although
uORFs are found in only 5 to 10 percent of eukaryotic mRNAs
overall, approximately two-thirds of oncogenes including HER-2 and many
genes involved in cellular growth and differentiation contain uORFs
(20). In the well studied case of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae
GCN4 gene, uORFs regulate protein synthesis by affecting which
downstream AUG codons are utilized by reinitiating ribosomes (21).
Ribosomes translate the first uORF in the GCN4 mRNA
under all conditions. They then reinitiate at another uORF when amino
acids are plentiful or, under starvation conditions, they bypass the
other uORFs and reinitiate at the GCN4 start codon. Several other uORFs
have been shown to act by a mechanism that depends on the uORF-encoded
peptide sequence and, in some cases, involves ribosomal stalling on the
mRNA (19, 22-28). For the vast majority of uORFs, insufficient
data are available to enable predictions about whether they affect
downstream translation and, if so, about the mechanism involved.
Previously, we demonstrated that two distinct translational mechanisms
control HER-2 protein expression (29). One is a cell type-dependent mechanism that causes increased HER-2
translation in transformed cells compared with primary cells. The other
is a cell type-independent repression of downstream translation
mediated by an upstream AUG codon. The upstream AUG codon is in an
optimal Kozak context (30) and initiates a six-codon uORF that
terminates five nt from the HER-2 start codon (see Fig. 1A).
Mutation of the upstream AUG codon eliminates the uORF and results in
an approximately 5-fold increase in downstream translation in each of
five cell types examined (29). The position and coding content of the uORF are highly conserved among mammalian species (29, 31-35), suggesting that these features may be important for the regulatory effects of the uORF.
In the current report, we present an analysis of the translational
mechanism by which the HER-2 uORF affects downstream translation. Our
results demonstrate that the HER-2 uORF inhibitory function does not
depend on the peptide sequence of the uORF, the identity of the
downstream cistron, or the precise 5' end of the mRNA. Instead, the
very short intercistronic spacing between the uORF and the downstream
cistron appears to be required for its inhibitory effect. Despite the
optimal context of the upstream AUG codon and the short intercistronic
spacing, both leaky scanning and ribosomal reinitiation after
translation of the uORF contribute to HER-2 protein synthesis. These
observations suggest that mammalian uORFs, like those in yeast, may
control access of ribosomes to alternative downstream initiation sites.
Plasmid Construction--
Control plasmids pEQ176 (36),
expressing full-length
To construct the HER-2 expression plasmids, the HER-2 ORF was isolated
from SV40/erbB2 (6) (provided by S. Aaronson, National Institutes of Health) by digesting with Bsu36I, blunting
with DNA polymerase (Klenow), then digesting with HindIII
and inserting the HER-2-coding region into the
HindIII/HindII sites of pBS+ (Stratagene). The
HER-2 ORF, isolated from this plasmid by digestion with
XbaI, blunting with DNA polymerase (Klenow), and cutting with HindIII, was ligated into the
HindIII/PvuII sites of pEQ176. The resulting
plasmid, pEQ580, contains 22 nt of the HER-2 leader immediately
upstream from the HER-2 AUG codon but does not contain the upstream AUG
codon. The HER-2 transcript leader from pEQ516, isolated by
HindIII/partial NcoI digestion, was inserted into the HindIII/NcoI sites of pEQ580 to generate
pEQ582. Plasmid pEQ581 is identical to pEQ582 except that the uORF AUG
codon has been mutated to AAG.
Plasmid pEQ591, a frameshift mutant of the HER-2 uORF, was constructed
by PCR-amplifying the HER-2 transcript leader from pEQ516 using oligos
#48 (see above) and #102 (GGAAGGTACCATGGTGCTCACTCGGCTCCGGCCACCATGG). The resulting fragment was digested with HindIII and
Asp718 and ligated into the
HindIII/Asp718 sites of pEQ176. To create uORF missense mutants pEQ721, pEQ722, and pEQ723, the products of PCR amplification of pEQ516 with oligos #48 and #150
(GGAAGGTACCATGGTGCTCANNNNNNNNNNNNNNCCATGGCT) were cloned into
pEQ176 as HindIII/Asp718 fragments.
The transcript leaders from pEQ516 and pEQ471 were PCR-amplified with
oligos #48 and #61 (GGAAGGTACCATGGTCTTAAGCTCACTGCGG) to introduce an
AflII site just downstream from the uORF. The resulting
fragments were cloned as HindIII/Asp718 fragments
into pEQ176, yielding pEQ526, the wt construct, and pEQ485, the
corresponding AAG mutant. A 50-nt intercistronic spacer consisting of
cytomegalovirus UL4 transcript leader sequences, derived by cutting
pEQ239 (36) with SpeI, blunting with DNA polymerase
(Klenow), and digesting with Asp718, was inserted into
pEQ526 and pEQ485 that had been digested with AflII, blunted
with DNA polymerase (Klenow), and cut with Asp718, yielding
pEQ717 and pEQ718, respectively. pEQ719 and pEQ720 were generated by
inserting a UL4 RsaI-Asp718 fragment from pEQ239
into pEQ526 and pEQ485 that had been digested with SpeI,
blunted, and digested with Asp718. A fragment generated by
PCR amplification of the UL4 transcript leader with primers gp48.3 (36)
and #105 (CGGCCTTAAGTGAAGAGTCTATAAAG) and digestion with
Afl2/Asp718 was inserted into pEQ526 and pEQ485
to generate pEQ608 and pEQ607, respectively.
A blunted BglII/SalI fragment derived from pM128
(provided by A. Hinnebusch, National Institutes of Health) containing
the 3'-most 152 nt of the S. cerevisiae GCN4 transcript
leader (37) was cloned into pEQ526 that had been cut with
AflII and blunted. Plasmid pEQ741 contains this sequence in
the same orientation as found in the GCN4 mRNA. The same
fragment was cloned into pEQ485 to yield the corresponding AAG mutant
pEQ743. The transcript leader and the 5' end of the HER-2 coding region
isolated as HindIII, blunted-ApaLI fragments from
pEQ578 and pEQ577 were inserted into pEQ176 that had been digested with
XhoI, blunted, then digested with HindIII to
generate pEQ673 containing the wt HER-2 leader and the corresponding
AAG mutant pEQ674.
pEQ573 was constructed by PCR amplification of pEQ516 with oligos #48
(see above) and #83 (GGAAGGTACCATGGTGCTCCCTGCGGC) to eliminate the uORF
stop codon. The resulting fragment was digested with HindIII
and Asp718 and cloned into the corresponding sites in
pEQ176. The product of PCR amplification with oligos #48 and #99
(GGAAGGTACCATGGTGCTCACTGCGGCTCCGGCCCCATGGTGGCGGCTGGACCC), having
a super optimal upstream AUG codon, was cloned into pEQ176 as a
HindIII/Asp718 fragment to produce pEQ559.
Plasmid pEQ592, the corresponding AAG construct, was produced in the
same manner using oligos #48 and #103
(GGAAGGTACCATGGTGCTCACTGCGGCTCCGGCCCCTTGGTGGCGGCTGGACCC). pEQ739,
in which the uORF contains a super optimal AUG codon and a mutated stop
codon, was produced in the same way by PCR amplification with oligos
#48 and #83 using pEQ559 as a template.
pEQ751, containing the full-length transcript leader with the HER-2
uORF fused to lacZ, was constructed by PCR amplification with oligos #106 (GGCCAAGCTTATTCCCCTCCATT GGGACCGGAG) and #163 (GGAAGGTACCAAGGATGCTCCCTGCGGC) using pEQ637 as a template. The insert
was digested with HindIII and Asp718 and cloned
into the same sites in pEQ176. pEQ752, the corresponding uORF AAG
mutant was made by the same strategy using pEQ655 as the template.
Cell Culture, Transfection, and RNA Analyses--
COS-7 cells
were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented
with 10% NuSerum (Collaborative Biomedical). 2 µg each of a test
Immunoblot Analysis--
At 48 h post-transfection, cells
were washed with phosphate-buffered saline then lysed with 2% SDS at
65 °C. The resulting cell lysates were denatured at 95-100 °C
for 5 min and then electrophoresed through 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide
gels, and the proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride
transfer membrane (TROPIX, Inc.) by electroblotting. Immunoblot
analysis was carried out according to the manufacturer's
recommendations using the Western-Light Plus chemiluminescent detection
system (TROPIX, Inc.) with rabbit polyclonal serum directed against the
14 carboxyl-terminal amino acids of HER-2. Whole cell RNA was harvested
from parallel dishes as described above and analyzed by Northern blot
analyses using a HER-2 extracellular domain fragment probe (29).
Inhibition of HER-2 Translation by the uORF--
Previous studies
revealed that the HER-2 uORF inhibits translation of a downstream
reporter gene (29). To determine whether it also inhibits expression of
the authentic HER-2 protein, we constructed plasmids having the HER-2
ORF downstream from transcript leader sequences having or lacking the
uORF (Fig. 1A). After
transfection of these plasmids into COS-7 cells, HER-2 protein levels
and mRNA accumulation were measured by immunoblot and Northern blot
analyses as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
wild-type transcript leader containing the uORF repressed HER-2 protein
expression compared with the leader containing a mutation in the
upstream AUG codon or to the control containing only a very short
leader (Fig. 1B, compare WT with AAG
and SL lanes). mRNA levels were similar among all
constructs, indicating that differences in protein expression did not
result from variation in transcript accumulation. The low level of
expression of HER-2 protein and RNA in mock-transfected cells suggested
that most of the protein and RNA detected in the other samples
represented products of the transgenes rather than the endogenous gene.
Nonetheless, we confirmed these results using FLAG-tagged HER-2
expression plasmids with which we could unambiguously detect transgene
expression (data not shown).
The transcript leader sequences in pEQ582 contained 93 nt, including
the uORF, from the 3' end of natural HER-2 transcript leader. Although
all reported HER-2 sequences share an identical 96 nt at the 3' end of
the transcript leader, some reports have suggested that the 5' end of
the leader may contain alternative sequences (2, 3, 31, 32). In
experiments using either
We also analyzed the effects of the uORF on HER-2 translation by
examining the polysomal association of mRNAs having and lacking the
uORF (Fig. 2). Polysomes in cells
transfected with pEQ582 (AUG) and pEQ581 (AAG) were fractionated on
sucrose gradients, and transgene mRNAs in each fraction were
detected by Northern blot hybridization using a probe specific for the
transgene 3'-untranslated region that is not contained in endogenous
HER-2 transcripts. Elimination of the uORF resulted in a shift of the
HER2 mRNA to larger polysomes, corresponding to more efficient
translation. The mean position of wild-type mRNAs was fraction
3, corresponding to disomes, whereas that for the AAG
construct was fraction 5, corresponding to approximately 6- and 7-mers. Similarities of the UV absorption profiles (not shown) and
of the distribution of actin mRNA (Fig. 2) between the two samples
indicated that the shift to larger polysomes, resulting from
elimination of the HER-2 uORF, was not an artifact of variation between
the two gradients. These results demonstrate that uORF represses HER-2
expression by reducing the ribosomal loading on the mRNA and thus
verify that the uORF inhibits HER-2 expression at the translational
level.
Inhibition by the HER-2 uORF Is Peptide
Sequence-independent--
We next investigated the mechanism by which
the HER-2 uORF exerts its repressive effect. Inhibition by uORFs in
several other eukaryotic genes is dependent upon the peptide-coding
sequence of the uORF (19, 26, 40). Because the HER-2 uORF sequence is
conserved among mammalian species (29, 31-35), we tested whether it is
required for inhibition of downstream translation. Effect of Intercistronic Spacing on Repression of Downstream
Translation--
Another feature of the HER-2 uORF that might account
for its inhibitory effect is the proximity of its termination codon to the initiation codon of the downstream cistron. In all mammalian species in which the sequence has been reported, this intercistronic spacing is only five nt. To test the role of this spacing on the inhibitory activity of the HER-2 uORF, we lengthened the intercistronic distance in our
In addition to effects due to intercistronic length, the sequence
of the intercistronic region may affect reinitiation frequency (41,
42). To further examine the role of intercistronic sequence on
translational inhibition, we tested the effects of a second spacer
sequence derived from a portion of the S. cerevisiae GCN4 transcript leader that has no upstream AUG codons or other known translational regulatory elements. Constructs containing the uORF or
the upstream AUG- mutation with an intercistronic spacing
of 171 nt were transfected into COS-7 cells, and
To evaluate the reinitiation potential of ribosomes that have
translated the authentic uORF, we constructed plasmids more closely
resembling the structure of the natural HER-2 mRNA. In pEQ673, the
Translational Initiation at the HER-2 AUG Codon--
Since the AUG
codon of the HER-2 uORF is in a very good context for initiation
(gccAUGg), we expected that most ribosomes that load onto the HER-2
mRNA would initiate at this AUG codon. Because of the short
intercistronic spacing, these ribosomes would not be expected to
reinitiate efficiently at the HER-2 AUG codon. These considerations
raise the question of how HER-2 is ever translated. One possibility is
that some ribosomes leak past the upstream AUG codon despite its
context. Alternatively, a few ribosomes that translate the uORF may
reinitiate at the HER-2 AUG codon despite the short intercistronic
spacing. To evaluate these possibilities we first mutated the stop
codon of the uORF (TGA
To further evaluate the contribution of leaky scanning, we mutated the
context of the uORF AUG to gccgccaccAUGg, a sequence shown by Kozak to
yield maximum initiation frequency in higher eukaryotes (46, 47). This
"super" optimal AUG context mutation (pEQ559) reduced Translation Initiation at the uORF AUG Codon--
Previous results
indirectly suggest that the HER-2 uORF is translated. To determine more
directly whether uORF translation occurs, we constructed a plasmid in
which the HER-2 uORF was fused in-frame to the Although HER-2 overexpression in tumor cells is often attributed
to gene amplification, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and
translational mechanisms also contribute to the regulation of HER-2
expression (12-17). Previously, we reported that translation of HER-2
mRNA is repressed in primary cells compared with transformed cells
as measured by polysome distribution analyses (29). However, even in
the transformed cells, the efficiency of HER-2 translation is
suboptimal. The preservation of the uORF and its repressive effect on
downstream translation in all cell types examined thus far, including
diploid human fibroblasts, human mammary epithelial cells, BT-474 and
MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines, and COS-7 cells, suggests that the uORF
is a major determinant of HER-2 protein expression.
The current studies strengthen the hypothesis that the HER-2 uORF
represses HER-2 protein synthesis. First, consistent with observed
effects of the uORF on a lacZ reporter (29), we found that
the uORF inhibited expression of the natural downstream cistron (Fig.
1). Second, the observed shift of mRNA to larger polysomes upon
elimination of the uORF (Fig. 2) supports the conclusion that the uORF
acts at the translational level.
Several considerations raised the possibility that the HER-2 uORF may
function in a sequence-dependent manner, similar to regulatory uORFs found in several other eukaryotic genes (19, 26, 40).
Reminiscent of the conservation of key codons between the
sequence-dependent uORFs in the arg-2 gene of
Neurospora crassa and the homologous CPA-1 gene
of S. cerevisiae (27, 40), the HER-2 uORF is conserved in
sequence among all mammalian species examined to date (29). The peptide
product of the sequence-dependent uORF2 of cytomegalovirus
is synthesized and mediates repression of translation termination and
ribosomal stalling on the UL4 gene mRNA (22, 48). Based on the high
level expression of a HER-2 uORF: The coding sequences of several uORFs can be mutated without altering
their effects on downstream translation (21, 49-51). In these cases,
ribosomes presumably translate the uORF but are then unable to
reinitiate efficiently at the downstream AUG codon. Parameters such as
the length of the intercistronic region affect the efficiency of
ribosomal reinitiation. For example, intercistronic spacing shorter
than ~80 nucleotides has been reported to hinder downstream
reinitiation (52). The 5-nt intercistronic region between the uORF and
the HER-2 AUG codon is conserved among mammalian HER-2 genes. We found
that increasing the intercistronic spacing by inserting additional
sequences reduced the inhibitory effect of the uORF (Figs. 4 and 5).
However, interpretation of our results is complicated by the
contribution of both increased expression from the AUG+
constructs and decreased expression from the corresponding
AUG In addition to the length of the intercistronic region, its nucleotide
sequence can influence translational reinitiation (41, 42). For
example, a uORF terminates seven nt upstream of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein The increased efficiency of ribosomes reinitiating after a longer
intercistronic spacer led us to evaluate whether ribosomes translating
the natural HER-2 mRNA reinitiate downstream from the HER-2 AUG
codon. In the natural HER-2 mRNA, the next two AUG codons after the
one initiating the HER-2 ORF are located 91 nt and 133 nt downstream
from the HER-2 AUG codon. Both of these codons are in the same reading
frame as HER-2, and both are flanked by a moderately strong initiation
sequence (gacAUGa and gacAUGc, respectively) (30). By positioning the
How do ribosomes ever gain access to the HER-2 AUG codon despite the
very good context of the uORF AUG codon and the short intercistronic
spacing? The results shown in Fig. 6 suggest that a small percentage of
ribosomes bypass the uORF AUG codon and that additional ribosomes are
able to reinitiate at the HER-2 start site after translation of the
uORF. The presence of a purine at the Our results suggest the hypothesis that the HER-2 uORF may serve to
control the access of ribosomes to downstream AUG codons, in some ways
similar to the role of first uORF in the GCN4 mRNA. Ribosomes translate the first GCN4 uORF and then, depending
on growth conditions, they either reinitiate at another upstream AUG
codon or at the further downstream GCN4 AUG codon (21). In
the case of HER-2, some ribosomes that have translated the HER-2 uORF
reinitiate at the nearby HER-2 AUG codon, whereas others reinitiate
further downstream. At present, we do not know whether the HER-2 uORF
acts in a constitutive or regulated manner. Analogous to the
GCN4 system, the efficiency with which ribosomes reinitiate at the alternative downstream AUG codons after translating the uORF
might be affected by cell type or growth conditions. This model
predicts that an amino terminus-truncated HER-2 protein might be
produced at a low level from the natural mRNA. Although we have not
yet detected such a protein (Fig. 1 and data not shown), additional
studies are needed to establish conditions for resolving the full
length HER-2 from this putative truncated form. What function might an
amino terminus-truncated HER-2 protein serve? Other studies show that
deletions of the amino terminus of the protein increase the tyrosine
kinase activity and transforming efficiency of the rat neu
gene (53, 54). Thus, even if it is produced only at a low level, this
putative alternative form of HER-2 may be biologically important.
Although HER-2 is essential for development (5), its overexpression can
lead to cellular transformation and tumor growth. Given the requirement
for precise control of the timing, location, and abundance of
HER-2 protein expression, perhaps it is not surprising that multiple
regulatory mechanisms, including repression by the uORF, have evolved.
In fact, an unusually large proportion of mRNAs from genes involved
in cellular growth control contain uORFs (20). As illustrated by the
recent report of uORF regulation of the S. cerevisiae cell
cycle regulator CLN3 (50), uORFs may serve as a general
strategy for linking cellular growth to proliferation. Thus, in
addition to providing information about control of HER-2 expression,
studies such as these are needed to further our understanding of the
variety of mechanisms by which uORFs affect gene expression.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase (
-gal), and pEQ430 (23),
expressing a truncated, inactive
-gal, have been described
previously. The highly conserved 93 nt from the 3' end of the HER-2
mRNA were PCR-amplified from human fibroblast DNA using primers #48
(CAAGAAGCTTGCGCCCGGCCCCCACC) and #49
(GGAAGGTACCATGGTGCTCACTGCGGC), digested with HindIII
and Asp718, and inserted into the
HindIII/Asp718 sites of pEQ176 to generate
pEQ516. pEQ471 is identical to pEQ516, except that the HER-2 uORF AUG
codon was mutated to AAG.
-gal expression plasmid and the pEQ430 control were transfected into
COS-7 cells in triplicate 60-mm dishes using calcium phosphate (29).
48 h post-transfection
-gal activity was measured by a
fluorimetric substrate cleavage assay (38), then whole cell RNA was
harvested by the acid guanidinium isothiocyanate method (39) and
analyzed by Northern blot hybridization with a
-gal probe. Polysomes
from COS-7 cells transfected with HER-2 expression plasmids were
separated on 15-50% sucrose gradients, and the RNA content of each
fraction was analyzed by Northern hybridization as described (36)
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The HER-2 uORF represses expression of
authentic HER-2 protein but not RNA. A, HER-2
expression plasmids contain the HER-2 uORF (black) with the
wt 93-nt HER-2 transcript leader (pEQ582 (WT)), the same
transcript leader with a mutated uORF AUG codon (pEQ581
(AAG)), or a short transcript leader containing 22 nt but no AUG
codon (pEQ580 (SL)). The first four nt of the HER-2 ORF are
shown (gray). B, 48 h after transfection
into COS-7 cells, cellular proteins were analyzed by immunoblot using
anti-HER2 antiserum. Accumulated HER-2 mRNA present in whole-cell
RNA harvested from parallel dishes was analyzed by Northern blot
hybridization.
-gal or HER-2 expression plasmids, we found
that the uORF had quantitatively similar effects on downstream
translation whether it was contained in the full-length 178-nt leader
(29) or only within the conserved 93-nt 3' region (data not shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effect of the uORF on polysomal association
of HER-2 mRNAs. After sucrose gradient fractionation of
extracts from COS-7 cells transfected with plasmids having the
wild-type (pEQ582, top) or AAG (pEQ581, bottom)
mutant transcript leader upstream from the HER-2 coding region, RNAs
were purified and examined on Northern blots probed first with a HER-2
probe and then with an actin probe. The percentage of HER-2 or actin
mRNA present in each fraction was determined by PhosphorImager
analysis.
-Gal expression
constructs in which the uORF was modified by shifting the reading frame
to generate a different amino acid sequence while preserving most of
the nucleotide sequence (pEQ591) or by random mutagenesis with a
degenerate oligonucleotide (pEQ721, -722, -723) were transfected into
COS-7 cells (Fig. 3).
-Gal activity
and mRNA accumulation were analyzed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Like the wt uORF, each of these mutant uORFs inhibited translation of the downstream
-gal gene,
demonstrating that the HER-2 uORF functions in a peptide
sequence-independent manner.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Translational inhibition by the HER-2 uORF is
sequence-independent. Expression constructs containing the
truncated wt (pEQ516) and AAG mutant (pEQ471) transcript leaders or
vectors in which the sequence of the HER-2 uORF were modified by
frameshift mutations (pEQ591) or random mutagenesis with degenerate
oligonucleotides (pEQ721-723) were transfected into COS-7 cells.
Controls (light bars) include pEQ176, which expresses
-gal with no HER-2 leader sequences (pEQ176), and a
truncated enzymatically inactive
-gal (pEQ430), which was
included in each sample as a control for transfection efficiency and
RNA recovery. At 48 h post-transfection,
-gal activity and
whole cell RNA was harvested for analysis of accumulated
-gal
mRNA levels. The means and S.D. of
-gal activities from
triplicate dishes are shown.
-gal reporter construct by inserting various fragments derived from the cytomegalovirus UL4 transcript leader. The
fragments used to construct these plasmids contain two adjacent AUG
codons, either of which can serve as initiation sites for
-gal
synthesis. The size of the intercistronic spacer shown in Fig.
4 for pEQ717, pEQ719, and pEQ608 is based
on the assumption that initiation occurs at the second of these two AUG
codons. If the first one is used, then the actual intercistronic
spacing would be three nt shorter. These spacers do not contain other AUG codons and, in other experiments, did not affect downstream reporter gene translation (36). Nonetheless, we constructed control
plasmids containing the same spacer sequences but having a mutation of
the AUG codon of the uORF to detect unexpected uORF-independent effects
of the spacer sequences. These plasmids were transfected into COS-7
cells and analyzed as described under "Experimental Procedures"
(Fig. 4). Expansion of the intercistronic spacing to 10 nt (pEQ526) had
little effect on downstream translation compared with the wt spacing.
However, expansion to 50, 116, or 148 nt increased
-gal expression
approximately 2-fold. The sequences used to expand the intercistronic
spacing also inhibited expression from the controls lacking the uORF.
This reduction may be due to the modest reduction in
-gal RNA
accumulation after transfection of constructs having the longer
insertions (Fig. 4, right panel). The inhibitory effect of
the uORF, when measured as the ratio of expression from the
AUG- to the corresponding AUG+ plasmid,
decreased from 7-fold with the wt spacing to 1.4-fold when the spacing
was 148 nt. These results suggest that repression by the HER-2 uORF is
alleviated, at least in part, by increasing the intercistronic
spacing.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Translational repression by the HER-2 uORF is
spacing-dependent. Plasmids containing either the wt
HER-2 uORF or a mutation of the upstream AUG codon to AAG and having
varying lengths of a translationally neutral CMV UL4 spacer
sequence between the HER-2 uORF and the downstream
-gal gene
(pEQ516, 471 = 5 nt; pEQ526, 485 = 10 nt; pEQ717, 718 = 50 nt; pEQ719, 720 = 116 nt; and pEQ608, 607 = 148 nt) were
transfected into COS-7 cells and analyzed as described in the legend to
Fig. 3. Fold inhibition by the uORF was calculated as the ratio of
-gal expression from each AUG- construct to that from
the corresponding AUG+ construct.
-gal expression was
analyzed (Fig. 5). For unknown reasons,
the GCN4 spacer greatly reduced the abundance of reporter
gene transcript accumulation from pEQ741 and pEQ743 compared with
plasmids lacking the GCN4 sequences. Nonetheless, this
intercistronic spacer also reduced the inhibitory effect of the uORF to
1.6-fold, similar to the results using the CMV UL4 spacer sequences
(Fig. 4).

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effect of alternative intercistronic spacers
on translational repression by the HER-2 uORF. To determine the
effects of other spacer sequences, two sets of constructs with either a
171-nt GCN4 spacer (pEQ741, 743 = AUG+/
) or a portion
of the HER-2 gene with authentic uORF-HER-2 spacing, an intact HER-2
start codon, and the 5'-most 79 nt of the HER-2 ORF (pEQ673, 674 = AUG+/
) were produced, transfected into COS-7 cells, and analyzed as
described in the legend to Fig. 3.
-gal ORF initiates 92 nt downstream from the uORF termination codon.
The "intercistronic" spacer in this case includes the five nt
between the uORF and the HER-2 AUG codon followed by the first 79 nt of
the HER-2 ORF and 7 nt of polylinker-derived sequences. In the natural
HER-2 mRNA there are two AUG codons, positioned 96 and 138 nt
downstream from the end of the uORF that encode methionines within the
HER-2 extracellular domain. Thus, the
-gal AUG codon in pEQ673 is
the third AUG codon from the 5' end and is in a position closely
approximating that of the first of the two in-frame internal AUG codons
present in the authentic HER-2 mRNA. Transfection assays of pEQ673
revealed only a low level of
-gal (~4%) compared with the control
having no HER-2 leader. However, the effect of the uORF was to increase
-gal expression approximately 2-fold compared with the
corresponding upstream AUG- mutant pEQ674 (Fig. 5).
Together with the results using heterologous intercistronic spacers
(Fig. 4 and 5), these data suggest that some ribosomes that translate
the uORF are able to reinitiate only after having traversed ~50 or
more nucleotides downstream from the uORF termination codon.
GGA; pEQ573), creating an extended uORF that
terminates at the next in-frame stop codon, 41 nt downstream from the
-gal initiation codon. This mutation greatly reduces the possibility
that
-gal can be made by reinitiation after translation of the uORF.
As shown in Fig. 6, deletion of the stop
codon reduced
-gal expression by approximately half (compare pEQ573
to pEQ516), suggesting that a portion of expression downstream from the
HER-2 uORF occurred by ribosomal reinitiation. The residual
-gal
expression from this construct could be due to leaky scanning (43) or,
conceivably, backward scanning after translation of the extended uORF.
Although backward scanning has been reported (44), our previous studies of ribosomes terminating in this region suggested that backward scanning, if it occurs at all, is very inefficient (45).

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Analysis of the mechanism by which expression
downstream of the HER-2 uORF occurs. Expression constructs with
various mutations affecting the AUG context and stop codon of the HER-2
uORF were utilized to study their effects on translation of the
downstream
-gal gene. Plasmids contained the wt (pEQ516; start codon
consensus = gccggagccATGg) and AAG mutant (pEQ471) transcript
leaders, a mutation of the uORF stop codon from TGA to GGA (pEQ573), an
improved consensus (gccgccaccATGg) start site (pEQ559,
AUG+;pEQ592 AUG-), and a combined improved
start codon consensus-stop codon mutant (pEQ739). The constructs were
transfected into COS-7 cells and analyzed as described in the legend to
Fig. 3.
-gal
expression by approximately 50%, supporting the conclusion that some
leaky scanning occurs at the wt AUG codon despite its excellent
context. Mutation of the uORF AUG codon in the super optimal context to
AAG (pEQ592) eliminated the repression, confirming that the observed
results were due to a translational effect of the uORF. Combining the
stop codon and super optimal AUG codon context mutations (pEQ739)
reduced
-gal expression to about half that for either single
mutation. Although we do not know how the small amount of
-gal that
is synthesized from this mutant is made, these data support the
conclusion that both leaky scanning and ribosomal reinitiation
contribute to HER-2 expression.
-gal ORF (pEQ751). In
this plasmid the uORF stop codon and the
-gal AUG codon were
mutated, and a single nucleotide was inserted to fuse the uORF to the
-gal ORF such that
-gal synthesis should only occur if ribosomes
initiate translation at the uORF AUG codon. pEQ751 and its
AUG- derivative (pEQ752) were transfected into COS-7
cells, and
-gal activity and mRNA accumulation were analyzed
(Fig. 7). The high level of
-gal
activity from pEQ751 (AUG+) compared with the background level
expressed by pEQ752 (AUG-) confirms that the HER-2 uORF
AUG codon is utilized as a translational initiation site in this
mRNA.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Translation initiation at the uORF AUG
codon. To assess whether the HER-2 uORF is translated, a HER-2
uORF fusion construct (pEQ751, AUG+) and the corresponding
AUG- mutant were made. In these plasmids the uORF stop
codon and the
-gal AUG codon were mutated, and a single nucleotide
was inserted to fuse the uORF to the
-gal ORF. Unlike the plasmids
shown in Figs. 3-6, these plasmids contained the entire 178 nt HER-2
leader (29) rather than the 93-nt conserved region leader.
Transfections were performed as described in the legend to Fig.
3.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-gal fusion gene (Fig. 7), we
hypothesize that the HER-2 uORF peptide product is also synthesized,
although we have not yet detected it. Despite these similarities, the
HER-2 uORF does not act in a sequence-dependent manner
since multiple missense mutants retain the inhibitory effect on
downstream translation (Fig. 3). In computer data base searches, we
have not detected the uORF sequence in any genes, including other
epidermal growth factor receptor gene family members, except for HER-2.
Thus we currently do not understand the significance of the
conservation of the peptide sequence. It might be required for an
unidentified function of the uORF other than inhibition of downstream translation.
mutants. The inserted spacer sequences might exert a
general inhibitory action affecting expression from both the
AUG- and AUG+ constructs. For example, the
constructs having GCN4 transcript leader sequences (Fig. 5)
did express lower amounts of
-gal RNA. Alternatively, by increasing
the distance that ribosomes must traverse before encountering an AUG
codon in the AUG- constructs, the spacer sequences might
cause ribosomes to fall off the message before they ever reach the
-gal AUG codon. This effect would be expected to reduce
-gal
translation from the AUG
mutants only. Until we identify
a spacer sequence that does not alter expression from AUG
mutants, we cannot be certain that the reinitiation block in the
natural HER-2 mRNA is due solely to the short distance. However, increasing the intercistronic spacer length to greater than ~50 nt
results in a nearly 2-fold increase in expression downstream from the
uORF, suggesting that at least some ribosomes that translate the uORF
are unable to reinitiate at the HER-2 AUG codon because of its
proximity to the uORF termination codon.
(C/EBP
) AUG codon and represses C/EBP
expression (41). However, minor changes in the intercistronic sequence greatly reduce the inhibitory effect of the uORF, indicating that the eukaryotic ribosomes can reinitiate after a very short intercistronic distance in certain cases. We have not yet found any
substitution mutations of the intercistronic spacer sequences that
alleviate the HER-2 uORF inhibitory
effect.2
-gal ORF in the approximate position of the first of these AUG
codons, we found that the uORF aids ribosomal reinitiation at this
downstream start site, although the overall efficiency of reinitiation
is low (Fig. 5).
3 position relative to the AUG
codon is usually thought to be sufficient for efficient initiation.
However, an A can be superior to G at
3, in some cases increasing
translational initiation by more than 3-fold (30). Thus, it is really
not too surprising that some ribosomes leak past the HER-2 uORF AUG
codon even though the uORF AUG codon has the context gccAUGg.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Gail Clinton (Oregon Health Sciences University) for providing an initial supply of HER-2 antiserum and Drs. Stuart Aaronson and Alan Hinnebusch (National Institutes of Health) for providing plasmids. We also thank the Biotechnology, Biocomputing, and Image Analysis Resources of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center for technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the Gustavus and Louise Pfeiffer Foundation, the Olympia Guild of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and Department of the Army Grant DAMD17-96-1-6159). The content of this information does not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the government, and no official endorsement should be inferred.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Human
Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave.
North, Mailstop C2-023, P. O. Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024. Tel.:
206-667-5122; Fax: 206-667-6523; E-mail ageballe@fhcrc.org.
2 S. J. Child, M. K. Miller, and A. P. Geballe, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
uORF, upstream open
reading frame;
-gal,
-galactosidase;
nt, nucleotide(s);
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
wt, wild type;
MUG, 4-methylumbelliferyl
-D-galactoside.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Bargmann, C. I., Hung, M. C., and Weinberg, R. A. (1986) Nature 319, 226-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Coussens, L.,
Yang-Feng, T. L.,
Liao, Y. C.,
Chen, E.,
Gray, A.,
McGrath, J.,
Seeburg, P. H.,
Libermann, T. A.,
Schlessinger, J.,
Francke, U.,
Levinson, A.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1985)
Science
230,
1132-1139 |
| 3. | Yamamoto, T., Ikawa, S., Akiyama, T., Semba, K., Nomura, N., Miyajima, N., Saito, T., and Toyoshima, K. (1986) Nature 319, 230-234[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Schechter, A. L., Stern, D. F., Vaidyanathan, L., Decker, S. J., Drebin, J. A., Greene, M. I., and Weinberg, R. A. (1984) Nature 312, 513-516[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Lee, K. F., Simon, H., Chen, H., Bates, B., Hung, M. C., and Hauser, C. (1995) Nature 378, 394-398[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Di Fiore, P. P.,
Pierce, J. H.,
Kraus, M. H.,
Segatto, O.,
King, C. R.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1987)
Science
237,
178-182 |
| 7. |
Di Marco, E.,
Pierce, J. H.,
Knicley, C. L.,
and Di Fiore, P. P.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
3247-3252 |
| 8. |
Hudziak, R. M.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
7159-7163 |
| 9. | Suda, Y., Aizawa, S., Furuta, Y., Yagi, T., Ikawa, Y., Saitoh, K., Yamada, Y., Toyoshima, K., and Yamamoto, T. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 181-190[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Liu, E., Thor, A., He, M., Barcos, M., Ljung, B. M., and Benz, C. (1992) Oncogene 7, 1027-1032[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Slamon, D. J.,
Clark, G. M.,
Wong, S. G.,
Levin, W. J.,
Ullrich, A.,
and McGuire, W. L.
(1987)
Science
235,
177-182 |
| 12. |
Slamon, D. J.,
Godolphin, W.,
Jones, L. A.,
Holt, J. A.,
Wong, S. G.,
Keith, D. E.,
Levin, W. J.,
Stuart, S. G.,
Udove, J.,
Ullrich, A.,
and Press, M. F.
(1989)
Science
244,
707-712 |
| 13. | Guerin, M., Barrois, M., Terrier, M. J., Spielmann, M., and Riou, G. (1988) Oncogene Res. 3, 21-31[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Berger, M. S.,
Locher, G. W.,
Saurer, S.,
Gullick, W. J.,
Waterfield, M. D.,
Groner, B.,
and Hynes, N. E.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
1238-1243 |
| 15. | Kraus, M. H., Popescu, N. C., Amsbaugh, S. C., and King, C. R. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 605-610[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Buhring, H. J.,
Sures, I.,
Jallal, B.,
Weiss, F. U.,
Busch, F. W.,
Ludwig, W. D.,
Handgretinger, R.,
Waller, H. D.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1995)
Blood
86,
1916-1923 |
| 17. | Oshima, M., Weiss, L., Dougall, W. C., Greene, M. I., and Guroff, G. (1995) J. Neurochem. 65, 427-433[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Matthews, M. B., Sonenberg, N., and Hershey, J. W. B. (1996) in Translational Control (Hershey, J. W. B. , Matthews, M. B. , and Sonenberg, N., eds) , pp. 1-29, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 19. | Geballe, A. P. (1996) in Translational Control (Hershey, J. W. B. , Matthews, M. B. , and Sonenberg, N., eds) , pp. 173-197, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 20. |
Kozak, M.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
887-903 |
| 21. | Hinnebusch, A. G. (1996) in Translational Control (Hershey, J. W. B. , Matthews, M. B. , and Sonenberg, N., eds) , pp. 199-244, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 22. | Cao, J., and Geballe, A. P. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 603-608[Abstract] |
| 23. |
Degnin, C. R.,
Schleiss, M. R.,
Cao, J.,
and Geballe, A. P.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
5514-5521 |
| 24. |
Hill, J. R.,
and Morris, D. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
726-731 |
| 25. |
Parola, A. L.,
and Kobilka, B. K.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
4497-4505 |
| 26. |
Reynolds, K.,
Zimmer, A. M.,
and Zimmer, A.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
134,
827-835 |
| 27. | Werner, M., Feller, A., Messenguy, F., and Pierard, A. (1987) Cell 49, 805-813[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Wang, Z.,
and Sachs, M. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
255-261 |
| 29. | Child, S. J., Miller, M. K., and Geballe, A. P. (1999) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31, 201-213[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Kozak, M. (1986) Cell 44, 283-292[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Ishii, S.,
Imamoto, F.,
Yamanashi, Y.,
Toyoshima, K.,
and Yamamoto, T.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. U. S. A.
84,
4374-4378 |
| 32. |
Tal, M.,
King, C. R.,
Kraus, M. H.,
Ullrich, A.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Givol, D.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
2597-2601 |
| 33. |
Suen, T. C.,
and Hung, M. C.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
6306-6315 |
| 34. | Nakamura, T., Ushijima, T., Ishizaka, Y., Nagao, M., Arai, M., Yamazaki, Y., and Ishikawa, T. (1994) Gene 140, 251-255[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | White, M. R., and Hung, M. C. (1992) Oncogene 7, 677-683[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. |
Schleiss, M. R.,
Degnin, C. R.,
and Geballe, A. P.
(1991)
J. Virol.
65,
6782-6789 |
| 37. |
Hinnebusch, A. G.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
6442-6446 |
| 38. | Biegalke, B. J., and Geballe, A. P. (1990) Virology 177, 657-667[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. |
Siebert, P. D.,
and Chenchik, A.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
2019-2020 |
| 40. |
Luo, Z.,
and Sachs, M. S.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
2172-2177 |
| 41. |
Lincoln, A. J.,
Monczak, Y.,
Williams, S. C.,
and Johnson, P. F.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9552-9560 |
| 42. |
Grant, C. M.,
and Hinnebusch, A. G.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
606-618 |
| 43. |
Kozak, M.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
108,
229-241 |
| 44. |
Peabody, D. S.,
and Berg, P.
(1986)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6,
2695-2703 |
| 45. | Cao, J., and Geballe, A. P. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 1030-1036[Abstract] |
| 46. |
Kozak, M.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
5073-5080 |
| 47. |
Kozak, M.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
2662-2666 |
| 48. | Cao, J., and Geballe, A. P. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 7109-7114[Abstract] |
| 49. |
Wang, L.,
and Wessler, S. R.
(1998)
Plant Cell
10,
1733-1746 |
| 50. |
Polymenis, M.,
and Schmidt, E. V.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2522-2531 |
| 51. | Steel, L. F., Telly, D. L., Leonard, J., Rice, B. A., Monks, B., and Sawicki, J. A. (1996) Cell Growth Differ. 7, 1415-1424[Abstract] |
| 52. |
Kozak, M.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
3438-3445 |
| 53. |
Bargmann, C. I.,
and Weinberg, R. A.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
5394-5398 |
| 54. |
Segatto, O.,
King, C. R.,
Pierce, J. H.,
Di Fiore, P. P.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
5570-5574 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Lichtinger, R. Ingram, M. Hornef, C. Bonifer, and M. Rehli Transcription Factor PU.1 Controls Transcription Start Site Positioning and Alternative TLR4 Promoter Usage J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 26874 - 26883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Tsuda, D. Z. Chang, T. Mine, C. Efferson, A. Garcia-Sastre, X. Wang, S. Ferrone, and C. G. Ioannides Taxol Increases the Amount and T Cell Activating Ability of Self-Immune Stimulatory Multimolecular Complexes Found in Ovarian Cancer Cells Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 67(17): 8378 - 8387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.P. Ponnampalam and P.A.W. Rogers Cyclic changes and hormonal regulation of annexin IV mRNA and protein in human endometrium Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 12(11): 661 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Biemar, D. A. Nix, J. Piel, B. Peterson, M. Ronshaugen, V. Sementchenko, I. Bell, J. R. Manak, and M. S. Levine Comprehensive identification of Drosophila dorsal-ventral patterning genes using a whole-genome tiling array PNAS, August 22, 2006; 103(34): 12763 - 12768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Sachs and A. P. Geballe Downstream control of upstream open reading frames Genes & Dev., April 15, 2006; 20(8): 915 - 921. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|