J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 24408-24416, August 20, 1999
Disruption of Ligand Binding to the Insulin-like Growth
Factor II/Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor by Cancer-associated
Missense Mutations*
James C.
Byrd
,
Gayathri R.
Devi
§,
Angus T.
De Souza¶,
Randy L.
Jirtle
, and
Richard G.
MacDonald
**
From the
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center,
Omaha, Nebraska 68198-4525, the ¶ Department of Safety of
Medicines, Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, Macclesfield,
Cheshire SK10 4TG, United Kingdom, and the
Department of
Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center,
Durham, North Carolina 27710
 |
ABSTRACT |
The insulin-like growth factor II/mannose
6-phosphate receptor (IGF2R) carries out multiple regulatory and
transport functions, and disruption of IGF2R function has been
implicated as a mechanism to increase cell proliferation. Several
missense IGF2R mutations have been identified in human cancers,
including the following amino acid substitutions occurring in the
extracytoplasmic domain of the receptor: Cys-1262
Ser, Gln-1445
His, Gly-1449
Val, Gly-1464
Glu, and Ile-1572
Thr. To
determine what effects these mutations have on IGF2R function, mutant
and wild-type FLAG epitope-tagged IGF2R constructs lacking the
transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains were characterized for binding of
insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-II and a mannose 6-phosphate-bearing
pseudoglycoprotein termed PMP-BSA (where PMP is pentamannose phosphate
and BSA is bovine serum albumin). The Ile-1572
Thr mutation
eliminated IGF-II binding while not affecting PMP-BSA binding. Gly-1449
Val and Cys-1262
Ser each showed 30-60% decreases in the
number of sites available to bind both 125I-IGF-II and
125I-PMP-BSA. In addition, the Gln-1445
His mutant
underwent a time-dependent loss of IGF-II binding, but not
PMP-BSA binding, that was not observed for wild type. In all, four of
the five cancer-associated mutants analyzed demonstrated altered ligand binding, providing further evidence that loss of IGF2R function is
characteristic of certain cancers.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The insulin-like growth factor II/mannose 6-phosphate receptor
(IGF2R)1 has evolved in
mammals to carry out multiple functions. Distinct regions in its
extracytoplasmic domain interact with two classes of ligands, namely
the mitogenic growth factor, insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II),
and proteins that bear a mannose 6-phosphate (Man-6-P) marker as a
result of post-translational modification in the Golgi (1). The IGF2R
is a 300-kDa type I transmembrane receptor that is comprised of a
40-residue NH2-terminal signal sequence, followed by 15 homologous repeats made up of 124-192 amino acid residues, a
23-residue transmembrane domain, and a 167-residue cytoplasmic domain
(2, 3). Functional mapping studies of the extracytoplasmic domain have
revealed the location of distinct binding sites for both Man-6-P (4-6)
and IGF-II (7-11).
In addition to being localized to unique regions of the receptor, the
two binding functions are thought to serve different physiologic roles.
Along with the cation-dependent mannose 6-phosphate receptor (CD-MPR), the IGF2R carries out lysosomal enzyme targeting through its Man-6-P binding activity (for review see Refs. 1, 12, and
13). This same Man-6-P binding function of the IGF2R has also been
shown to be necessary for the activation of transforming growth
factor-
(14), which bears Man-6-P residues in its secreted, prohormone form (15). After activation, transforming growth factor-
exerts effects on cellular proliferation by interacting with its own
serine/threonine kinase receptors, usually resulting in growth
inhibition (16-19). In contrast, IGF-II binding to the IGF2R at the
cell surface is thought to result in internalization and degradation of
the ligand, thereby down-regulating the level of this mitogenic factor
(20, 21).
The multiple functions of the IGF2R suggest a role for this receptor as
a growth inhibitor. In addition, several observations support the
hypothesis that Man-6-P/IGF2R acts as a tumor suppressor gene. Microsatellite instability has been observed at the
Man-6-P/IGF2R locus in tumors of the gastrointestinal tract
(22, 23) and endometrium (22). Increased secretion of cathepsin D and
other Man-6-P-bearing proteins has been observed in association with cancer of both the prostate and breast (24-26). Furthermore, loss of
heterozygosity (LOH) at the Man-6-P/IGF2R locus has been
correlated with poorly differentiated states in early breast carcinomas
(27). IGF2R has also been found at decreased levels in hepatocellular carcinomas (28, 29), which may be explained by LOH at the Man-6-P/IGF2R locus in these tumor types (30-32).
Whereas the observation of LOH in tumor samples suggests that loss of
receptor function may be involved in the progression to a transformed
phenotype in these cancers, another hallmark of a tumor suppressor is
the presence of loss-of-function mutations in copies of the gene
remaining in the tumor cells. The screening of tumors that exhibit LOH
has led to the discovery of several mutations (31-33), which could
serve to strengthen the hypothesis that the IGF2R is a tumor suppressor
if these mutations somehow alter normal receptor function. Many of the
identified mutations are frameshift or nonsense mutations that would
prevent the translation of the complete, mature IGF2R (33, 34).
However, several missense mutations, many of which are located in the
extracytoplasmic domain of the receptor, have also been identified (33,
34).
To address the question whether the five cancer-associated missense
mutations affect the function of the IGF2R, receptor constructs bearing
these mutations in the extracytoplasmic domain were assayed for their
ability to interact with both IGF-II and a Man-6-P-bearing protein. The
Cys-1262
Ser, Gly-1449
Val, Gly-1464
Glu, and Ile-1572
Thr mutations that were observed in hepatocellular carcinoma and the
breast cancer-associated Gln-1445
His mutation were expressed as
soluble receptor constructs. Ligand binding analysis revealed that four
of the mutants, all but Gly-1464
Glu, altered either Man-6-P
binding, IGF-II binding, or both. These alterations in ligand binding
to the IGF2R mutants suggest a mechanism for loss of receptor function
that is consistent with the Man-6-P/IGF2R as a tumor suppressor.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Recombinant human IGFs were provided by M. H. Niedenthal, Lilly. Carrier-free Na125I (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) was used for radioiodination of IGF-II to specific
activities between 40 and 85 Ci/g by Enzymobead reagent (Bio-Rad). The
native Y-2448 O-phosphomannan of Hansenula holstii was a gift from Dr. M. E. Slodki (retired). The pCMV5 vector (35) was kindly provided by Dr. David W. Russell (University of
Texas Southwestern Medical Center). The 8.6-kilobase pair human IGF2R
cDNA (2) was a gift of Dr. William S. Sly (St. Louis University
Medical Center). Other reagents and supplies were obtained from sources
as indicated.
Preparation of Epitope-tagged Soluble Receptor Constructs--
A
cDNA encoding the human IGF2R (2) was cloned into pCMV5 using the
5' SalI site and the 3' XbaI site. The 5,157-nt
fragment from nt 162 to 5319 of the receptor cDNA was removed by
digesting with EagI followed by re-ligation. This smaller
insert allowed for the addition of the 24-nucleotide FLAG epitope
followed by two stop codons using amplification with VentTM
polymerase and two primers. The 5' primer contained an XhoI
restriction site preceding the sequence corresponding to nt 94-113 of
the receptor cDNA. The 3' primer represented sequence complementary to nt 7602-7620 at the carboxyl terminus of repeat 15 in the receptor cDNA followed by 24 nt encoding the FLAG epitope, DYKDDDDK, two stop codons, and an XbaI site. The product was digested with
XbaI and XhoI and subcloned into pBKCMV
(Invitrogen). This plasmid was then digested with HindIII
and XbaI so that the insert could be moved back into pCMV5.
Finally, wild-type or mutant EagI fragments were subcloned
into the construct, reconstituting a complete FLAG epitope-tagged
receptor construct termed 15F. Site-directed mutagenesis was carried
out using the QuikChangeTM mutagenesis kit (Stratagene).
Pfu-directed thermal cycling was conducted with a fragment
of the human IGF2R cDNA encompassing two PflMI sites (nt
3847-6315) in pCRII (Invitrogen). Complementary primer pairs
correspond to the following: (a) nt 3921-3952 substituting T to A at nt 3931 creating the Cys-1262
Ser (C1262S) mutation and a
silent G to A mutation at nt 3939 to create a HindIII site; (b) nt 4470-4494 containing a G to T mutation at nt 4482 creating the Gln-1445
His (Q1445H) mutation; (c) nt
4478-4522 substituting G to T at nt 4493 creating the Gly-1449
Val
(G1449V) mutation and containing a silent CCTG to TTTA mutation at nt
4503-4506 incorporating a DraI site; (d) nt
4530-4557 substituting G to C at nt 4493 creating the Gly-1464
Glu
(G1464E) mutation; (e) nt 4840-4874 substituting T to C at
nt 4862 creating the Ile-1572
Thr (I1572T) mutation. The resultant
product was digested with PflMI and subcloned into a shuttle
vector containing the IGF2R cDNA. The presence of each mutation was
determined by sequence analysis. Finally, the mutant constructs were
digested with EagI, and the 5.2-kilobase fragment was
subcloned into the pCMV5 vector containing the FLAG-tagged (15F) human
receptor construct.
Expression of the Wild-type and Mutant Receptor Constructs in
293T Cells--
Transient expression of the constructs was carried out
in 293T human embryonic kidney cells cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum plus 5 µg/ml
gentamycin at 37 °C in 5% CO2. The transfections were
carried out by a modification of the calcium phosphate method described previously (36). The major changes to the published protocol were that
the cells were grown in the presence of 5 µg/ml gentamycin, and the
chloroquine shock was not applied. Conditioned medium was prepared by
replacing the transfection media with serum-free Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium on day 3 and was collected on day 6 of the
transfection. Freeze/thaw cell lysates were prepared on day 6 by
suspending the cells in 0.5 ml of 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, and freezing and thawing the cells 4 times at
80 °C, followed by centrifugation and collection of the
supernatant. Finally, Triton X-100 cell extracts were prepared on day 5 or day 6 following transfection with a solution containing 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, pH
7.4, as described earlier (10). Protein concentrations of the crude
cell lysates and extracts were determined using the bicinchoninic acid
assay (Sigma).
Immunoblot Analysis of Cell Lysates for Quantification of
Receptor Construct Expression--
Immunoblot analysis was conducted
using the M2 anti-FLAG antibody (VWR Scientific, Chicago, IL) on 0.2 mg
of cell lysate protein. The cell lysate aliquots were electrophoresed
on 6% reducing SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to BA85 nitrocellulose
paper. The blots were blocked with 3% nonfat milk in 15 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 and probed
with the M2 anti-FLAG antibody (1:1000 dilution) followed by a
secondary rabbit anti-mouse IgG (Dako). The resultant antibody complex
was developed with 125I-protein A (NEN Life Science
Products) and detected with autoradiography followed by PhosphorImager
analysis (Molecular Dynamics) to quantify relative expression of the
receptor constructs.
Immunoadsorption of the 15F Receptor Constructs from Cell
Lysates--
To separate the 15F constructs from other cellular
proteins, especially the endogenous 293T IGF2R, the epitope-tagged
receptors were routinely immunoadsorbed to M2 resin. Lysate protein
(0.2 mg) was incubated with 12 µl of packed M2 resin in
HEPES-buffered saline (HBS) with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 5 mM Man-6-P at 3 °C for 16 h. The use of Man-6-P was
necessary to prevent co-immunoprecipitation of lysosomal enzymes and
other Man-6-P-bearing glycoproteins present in the cell extracts. The
affinity resin was collected by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for approximately 12 s. The resultant resin pellets
were washed twice with 0.75 ml of HBS containing 0.05% Triton X-100
(HBST). This purified resin-bound form of the receptor was then used
for further experimentation.
125I-IGF-II Binding Analysis--
The ability of the
15F constructs to bind IGF-II was measured by incubating equal amounts
of immunoadsorbed receptor constructs with 2 nM
125I-IGF-II and 100 nM unlabeled IGF-I for 3-4
h at 3 °C in 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM
NaCl, 0.05% Triton X-100, and 0.5% BSA. The addition of IGF-I to the
binding reaction prevented interference from IGF-binding proteins that
exist in the cell lysate preparations. The resin was washed twice with
HBST to remove unbound ligand. Finally, the amount of bound
125I-IGF-II was determined using a gamma counter. For
affinity labeling, cross-linking was done by adding 0.25 mM
disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) to the binding reaction at the end of the
3-4-h binding reaction. After 30 min on ice, cross-linking was
terminated with the addition of 0.8 ml of 0.1 M Tris-HCl,
pH 7.4, followed by incubation at 3 °C for 15 min. The covalent
ligand-receptor complex was resolved on a 6% reducing SDS-PAGE gel
followed by autoradiography. Competitive binding analyses of receptor
constructs to IGF-II were conducted by incubating equal amounts of
immunoadsorbed 15F construct in the presence of 2 nM
125I-IGF-II with increasing amounts of unlabeled IGF-II
from 0 to 500 nM. Again, 100 nM unlabeled IGF-I
was included in the binding reaction. At the end of a 3-4-h incubation
at 3 °C, bound ligand was determined by centrifuging the resin,
washing, and counting in a gamma counter as described for the IGF-II
binding reactions. The data were fit to a model for one-site
competitive binding using GraphPad PrismTM software.
Analysis of Mannose 6-Phosphate Binding--
Pentamannose
phosphate (PMP) was hydrolyzed and purified from a yeast cell wall
phosphomannan following the procedure of Murray and Neville (37). The
product of the hydrolysis was conjugated to BSA following the procedure
of Braulke et al. (38). Briefly, 15 mg/ml BSA was incubated
in the presence of 0.2 M PMP and 160 mM
NaCNBH3 at 37 °C for 4-5 days. The resultant product
was purified on a 30-ml G-50 Sephadex column in phosphate-buffered
saline. The flow-through fractions were collected, pooled, and stored at
20 °C. Aliquots of the protein (25 µg) were iodinated to a specific activity of 30 µCi/µg by incubation in 0.5 M
phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, with 2 mCi of Na125I using
pre-coated IODO-GEN tubes (Pierce) for 25 min. The product was
separated from free iodine on a G-50 column. The iodinated PMP-BSA was
collected from the flow-through fractions and stored at
20 °C
until use. Binding analysis with this ligand was conducted in much the
same way as for IGF-II. Typically, aliquots of immunoadsorbed receptor
constructs were incubated at 3 °C for 3-4 h in HBS plus 1% BSA in
the presence of 1 nM 125I-PMP-BSA, with or
without 5 mM Man-6-P. The resin pellets were then washed
with HBST and counted in a gamma counter to determine the amount of
binding. Western ligand blotting was performed on cell lysates with
125I-PMP-BSA following a modified procedure published
earlier for 125I-IGF-II detection of IGF-binding proteins
(IGFBPs) (39). Cell lysates (0.2 mg) were electrophoresed on 6%
SDS-PAGE and electroblotted to BA85 nitrocellulose. The proteins were
renatured, and the blots were blocked with 1% BSA. Affinity for
PMP-BSA was detected by probing the blots with 1.5 × 106 cpm 125I-PMP-BSA in 8 ml of blocking
solution for 16-24 h at 3 °C. The blots were then washed and
exposed to x-ray film. Competitive binding analysis of receptor
constructs using PMP-BSA was conducted as described for IGF-II.
Briefly, equal amounts of immunoadsorbed receptor construct were
incubated with 1 nM 125I-PMP-BSA in the
presence of increasing amounts of unlabeled ligand. The amount of bound
ligand was determined, and regressions for single-site competitive
binding were calculated.
IGF-II and PMP Affinity Depletion Analysis--
Equal amounts of
wild-type, C1262S, and G1449V receptor constructs (approximately 5 mg
of transfected 293T cell lysates) were immunoadsorbed to 0.5 ml of
anti-FLAG M2 resin (Sigma) in the presence of 5 mM Man-6-P
for 4 h at 3 °C. The resin was then collected and washed 4 times with 1 ml of HBST. The receptor constructs were then eluted with
0.5 ml of 1 mg/ml FLAG peptide in HBS according to the manufacturer's
procedure. Aliquots of the purified constructs (200 µl) were then
serially incubated 2-3 times with a 4:1 ratio (volume of purified
construct:resin) of packed IGF-II-Sepharose (11) or PMP-Sepharose (8).
In addition, the wild-type construct was incubated with blank resin as
a negative control. The amount of unbound receptor at the end of each
3-h incubation was determined by centrifugation and anti-FLAG
immunoblot of the supernatant. The percent remaining was calculated by
PhosphorImager analysis.
 |
RESULTS |
Expression of Wild-type (WT) and Mutant IGF2R Constructs--
To
address the question of how the cancer-associated missense mutations,
occurring in the extracytoplasmic domain of the IGF2R (Fig.
1), affect the ligand binding functions
of the receptor, the mutations were incorporated individually into
truncated receptor constructs that contain all 15 repeats of the
extracytoplasmic domain of the IGF2R followed by an 8-residue FLAG
epitope tag. These constructs and the empty pCMV5 vector, as a control,
were transiently expressed in 293T human embryonic kidney cells.
Conditioned medium, freeze/thaw lysates, and Triton X-100 cell extracts
were analyzed for the presence of the constructs. Surprisingly, none of
the WT 15F constructs were secreted into the media but were found at
high levels in both the freeze/thaw and Triton X-100 cell extracts
(data not shown). Because they contained the highest levels of
transfected construct, the Triton X-100 cell extracts were analyzed for
relative expression levels by an M2 anti-FLAG immunoblot (Fig.
2) and were used as a source of the
constructs in the remaining experiments. The WT 15F IGF2R construct and
all of the mutant cDNA constructs were capable of making proteins. The levels of expression for each construct were quantified by PhosphorImager analysis and were found to be nearly equivalent, depending on the transfection. For example, although in Fig. 2 the
I1572T mutant appears to be expressed to about half the level as the
other constructs, this difference was not apparent in lysates from two
other transfections (data not shown).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic illustration of the IGF2R showing
the cancer-associated missense mutations. The overall structure of
the human IGF2R is shown, with emphasis on the extracytoplasmic repeats
thought to be involved in ligand binding and the position of the
cancer-associated missense mutations. The extracytoplasmic repeats are
represented by rectangles and are numbered from
the amino terminus according to Lobel et al. (3). The
arginine residues thought to coordinate interactions with Man-6-P (6)
are also indicated.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Expression of WT and mutant IGF2R constructs
in 293T cells. The control vector (CMV5) and each of
the IGF2R constructs were transfected into 293T cells. Cell lysates
(0.2 mg of protein) prepared on days 5 or 6 after transfection were
resolved by SDS-PAGE, immunoblotted to nitrocellulose, and probed with
the M2 anti-FLAG antibody followed by development with
125I-protein A. A representative autoradiogram is
shown.
|
|
IGF-II Binding Analysis--
Based on the PhosphorImager data,
equal amounts of receptor constructs were immunoadsorbed to M2
anti-FLAG resin so that detailed analysis of IGF-II binding could be
made by affinity cross-linking. Initially, the immunoadsorbed receptors
were incubated in the presence of 125I-IGF-II, cross-linked
with 0.25 mM DSS, and resolved on a 6% SDS-PAGE gel
followed by autoradiography (Fig.
3A). Quantification of the
amounts of displaceable 125I-IGF-II present in the 250-kDa
cross-linked bands was carried out by PhosphorImager analysis. Both the
Q1445H and G1464E mutant receptors showed the same amount of affinity
labeling as the WT 15F, whereas the I1572T mutant demonstrated a
complete loss of IGF-II affinity labeling under these conditions. The
C1262S mutation caused an approximately 90-95% reduction in the
intensity of the receptor/ligand band, and the G1449V mutation
diminished the intensity of the cross-linked band by approximately
60%.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Analysis of IGF-II affinity cross-linking and
binding to the IGF2R constructs. A, IGF-II affinity
cross-linking was carried out on cell lysates from 293T cells
transfected with vector (CMV5) or with the WT or mutant
IGF2R constructs. Equal amounts of each receptor construct, as
determined by PhosphorImager analysis of anti-FLAG immunoblots, were
immunoadsorbed using anti-FLAG resin and incubated with 2 nM 125I-IGF-II in the presence (+) or absence
( ) of 1 µM unlabeled IGF-II for 3 h at 3 °C.
Bound ligand was cross-linked to receptor by adding 0.25 mM
DSS. The radioactive ligand-receptor complexes were resolved by
SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. B, direct IGF-II
binding measurements were made to complement the affinity labeling
experiments. Equal amounts of each receptor construct immunoadsorbed to
anti-FLAG resin, or resin exposed to 0.2 mg of pCMV5 mock-transfected
293T cell lysates, were incubated in the presence of 2 nM
125I-IGF-II. Bound radioligand was determined by
centrifuging the resin pellets, washing, and counting in a gamma
counter. Radioactivity retained in the presence of 1 µM
IGF-II was subtracted from each binding reaction to determine specific
binding, which has been expressed as a percentage of wild-type binding.
Depicted is a representative binding analysis from one out of three
sets of transfected cell lysates. Data are means ± range
(n = 2).
|
|
To determine if the changes in affinity labeling among the C1262S,
G1449V, and I1572T mutant receptors were due to decreased ligand
binding, a more direct assay of IGF-II binding was used. The
immunoadsorbed receptor constructs were incubated with 2 nM 125I-IGF-II for 3-4 h at 3 °C. The amount of bound
ligand was determined by washing the resin pellet and counting in a
gamma counter. A representative binding analysis is shown in Fig.
3B. Some variability in IGF-II binding ability was noted
among constructs expressed from different transfections. To obtain an
average measurement of binding, the C1262S and G1449V receptor
constructs were transfected in three independent experiments, and
duplicate binding reactions were conducted on each set so that a mean
could be calculated. In accordance with the affinity labeling analysis,
the Q1445H and G1464E mutations both showed no difference in IGF-II
binding when compared with WT. In addition, the I1572T mutant
demonstrated a knockout of IGF-II binding, whereas G1449V caused a
36.5 ± 8.2% reduction in binding. The C1262S mutation, which
caused a nearly complete obliteration of affinity labeling,
demonstrated only a 51.5 ± 5.9% abrogation of IGF-II binding,
suggesting a change in the IGF-II cross-linking efficiency for this
mutated receptor construct.
To determine if these alterations in IGF-II binding caused by C1262S
and G1449V were due to changes in either the affinity or the number of
available binding sites (Bmax), competitive
binding analysis was carried out (Fig.
4A). Equal amounts of WT and
mutant 15F constructs were immunoadsorbed to M2 resin and incubated
with 2 nM 125I-IGF-II in the presence of
increasing concentrations of unlabeled IGF-II. The amount of
radiolabeled IGF-II bound at equilibrium was determined for each
concentration of unlabeled IGF-II, and IC50 values were
calculated. The WT receptor had an IC50 of 5.3 nM, whereas C1262S and G1449V showed no significant
difference from WT with IC50 values of 3.4 and 4.7 nM, respectively.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Analysis of IGF-II binding isotherms for the
WT, C1262S, and G1449V IGF2R constructs. A, equal
amounts of immunoadsorbed WT ( ), C1262S ( ), and G1449V ( )
receptor constructs were incubated with 2 nM
125I-IGF-II in the presence of increasing concentrations of
unlabeled IGF-II. Bound radioligand at each concentration of unlabeled
IGF-II was determined by centrifuging the resin pellets, washing, and
counting in a gamma counter. The data have been plotted as a percentage
of WT binding for each concentration of unlabeled IGF-II. The data were
fit to a single binding site model using GraphPad PrismTM
software, which is represented as a line. B,
Scatchard plots were prepared by replotting the data in A as
Bound/Free versus Bound. Linear
regression analysis showed that in each case, the major change in
binding is due to a decrease in Bmax.
|
|
The competitive binding data for IGF-II were also analyzed by Scatchard
plot analysis (Fig. 4B). The WT 15F receptor construct demonstrated a Kd of 1-5 nM, which is
consistent with the IGF-II affinity previously measured for the rat
receptor in our laboratory (10). The C1262S and G1449V mutations did
not alter the affinity of the receptor construct for IGF-II. However, the C1262S and G1449V mutant constructs demonstrated decreases in
Bmax of 43 and 61% relative to WT,
respectively. These data show that a change in the available number of
binding sites, not a uniform alteration of affinity, is responsible for
the decreased ability of these mutant constructs to bind IGF-II.
Analysis of Man-6-P Binding Function--
Two approaches were
employed to probe the Man-6-P binding function of the receptor
constructs. First, a Western ligand blotting procedure was used with
125I-PMP-BSA as the probe (Fig.
5A). For samples
transfected with 15F, the ligand blot demonstrated two bands
corresponding to the higher molecular weight, endogenous 300-kDa IGF2R,
and the smaller, 250-kDa 15F transfected construct (arrow,
Fig. 5A). The WT, Q1445H, G1464E, and I1572T receptors all
bound PMP-BSA in this assay, whereas C1262S demonstrated no detectable
PMP-BSA binding. Interestingly, the C1262S mutation also completely
inhibited binding to 125I-IGF-II in the Western ligand blot
procedure (data not shown). The G1449V mutant showed variable ability
to interact with PMP-BSA in this assay. Independent experiments were
conducted using three sets of lysates from cells transiently
transfected with G1449V; two of them demonstrated no ability to bind
PMP-BSA, and one set showed some binding, although less than wild type.
To determine whether these changes in band intensity on the ligand blot
were due to decreased Man-6-P binding, a direct binding assay was
employed for measurement of the amount of 125I-PMP-BSA
bound to equal amounts of immunoadsorbed receptor constructs (Fig.
5B). The C1262S mutant showed a 61.6 ± 3.6%
reduction, and G1449V caused a 26.7 ± 2% decrease in PMP-BSA
binding. The I1572T mutant, although demonstrating a complete knockout
of IGF-II binding (Fig. 3), was equivalent to WT in its ability to
interact with PMP-BSA (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Analysis of PMP-BSA binding by the IGF2R
constructs. A, Western ligand blotting was conducted to
reveal affinity for Man-6-P-bearing ligands. Cell lysates (0.2 mg of
protein) were transblotted to nitrocellulose following SDS-PAGE. The
endogenous receptor and transfected receptor constructs were renatured
and probed with 1.5 × 106 cpm of
125I-PMP-BSA. The autoradiogram shows both the higher
molecular weight endogenous IGF2Rs and the lower molecular weight 15F
IGF2R constructs (arrow). B, PMP-BSA binding was
measured by incubating equal amounts of receptor constructs
immunoadsorbed to anti-FLAG resin or resin exposed to 0.2 mg of
pCMV5-transfected 293T cell lysates with 1 nM
125I-PMP-BSA in the presence or absence of 5 mM
Man-6-P for 3 h at 3 °C. Bound ligand was determined in a gamma
counter after washing the resin pellets. The data are plotted as a
percentage of WT binding (mean ± range, n = 2).
The experiment shown is representative of three replicates.
|
|
Competitive binding analysis was carried out with PMP-BSA in the same
way as with IGF-II, comparing the C1262S and G1449V mutants to WT.
PMP-BSA bound to the 15F construct with a Kd of 1-2
nM, which corresponds to the affinity of a divalent
Man-6-P-bearing saccharide for the bovine IGF2R as reported earlier
(40). Both the C1262S and G1449V mutants showed no difference in
affinity for PMP-BSA when compared with WT. As with the effects on
IGF-II binding, the decrease in PMP-BSA binding by these mutants was due to a decrease in Bmax (Fig.
6).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Analysis of PMP-BSA binding isotherms for the
WT, C1262S, and G1449V IGF2R constructs. Equal amounts of
immunoadsorbed WT ( ), C1262S ( ), and G1449V ( ) receptor
constructs were incubated with 1 nM
125I-PMP-BSA in the presence of increasing concentrations
of unlabeled ligand, and binding was determined as described in Fig. 4.
The amount of bound radioligand was determined and plotted against the
concentration of unlabeled PMP-BSA. The downward shift of the top
plateau for the mutant constructs demonstrates a decrease in
Bmax for C1262S and G1449V when compared with
wild type.
|
|
Characterization of Loss of IGF-II Binding to Q1445H Receptor
Constructs during Storage--
Whereas the Q1445H mutant IGF2R
construct was identical to the WT control insofar as its ability to
bind IGF-II or PMP-BSA when first prepared from cells, subsequent
direct binding reactions on stored cell lysates revealed a loss of
IGF-II binding ability that was not observed for the WT receptor
construct (Fig. 7A) or any of
the other mutant proteins (data not shown). This loss was specific to
the IGF-II binding function, as PMP-BSA binding was unaltered upon
extended storage (Fig. 7B). To characterize this phenomenon
further, IGF-II binding was assayed on Q1445H lysates frozen at
80 °C for different times (Fig. 7C). These results
indicated that the Q1445H mutant underwent a sharp transition in its
ability to bind IGF-II after about 10 days at
80 °C. Competitive binding and Scatchard plot analyses, using Q1445H receptor constructs that demonstrated about a 50% reduction in IGF-II binding, revealed that the loss of the IGF-II binding function was due to a change in
Bmax (Fig. 7D). This loss of binding
function during storage at
80 °C was specific to the IGF-II
binding function of only the Q1445H mutant, as the other mutant
constructs demonstrated no difference from the WT over a 2-month period
(data not shown).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Analysis of ligand binding by Q1445H receptor
constructs following storage at 80 °C. IGF-II (A)
and PMP-BSA (B) binding analyses of lysates that were fresh
or stored at 80 °C for 8 weeks were conducted as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The results are reported as a percentage
of WT binding at the times indicated. C, decay of IGF-II
binding function was measured over time for both WT ( ) and Q1445H
( ) receptor constructs. Fresh lysates were collected from 293T cells
transfected with either the WT or Q1445H 15F cDNA. These samples
were stored at 80 °C and analyzed at the indicated times for their
ability to bind IGF-II. Results are reported as a percentage of the
binding activity detected at time 0. D, IGF-II binding
isotherms for 4-week-old WT ( ) and Q1445H ( ) receptors were
obtained as described in the text, and the data were represented as
Scatchard plots.
|
|
IGF-II and PMP Affinity Depletion Experiments--
One possible
explanation for the decrease in Bmax for binding
IGF-II or PMP-BSA observed for some of the mutant IGF2R constructs is
loss of high affinity ligand binding of a subpopulation of the
receptors. To test this prediction, the existence of subpopulations of
C1262S and G1449V mutant constructs differing in ligand affinity was
investigated by chromatography on immobilized IGF-II or PMP. The
constructs were first purified on anti-FLAG resin in the presence of 5 mM Man-6-P to remove endogenous phosphomannosylated
ligands. They were then subjected to two to three serial exposures to
either PMP-Sepharose (Fig. 8,
A and B) or IGF-II-Sepharose (Fig. 8,
C and D). The amount of unbound receptor
construct remaining in solution after each exposure was determined by
anti-FLAG immunoblot analysis of the supernatant. Surprisingly, the
C1262S and G1449V mutants were able to bind the immobilized ligands to
the same extent as WT upon successive exposures to each resin. The
C1262S mutant bound to both PMP- and IGF-II-Sepharose resins to the
same extent as the WT construct; about 90-95% bound after only one exposure to either resin. The G1449V mutant, however, demonstrated a
slower association with both resins in comparison to the WT and C1262S
constructs, with 52% of the receptor still present after one exposure
to PMP-Sepharose and about 26% remaining after one exposure to
IGF-II-Sepharose. Whereas the G1449V mutant was less able to bind the
immobilized ligands after one round of the depletion when compared with
both the WT and C1262S constructs, it demonstrated almost complete
binding after 2 exposures to PMP-Sepharose or 3 exposures to
IGF-II-Sepharose (Fig. 8, B and D). No evidence for binding-incompetent subpopulations of either mutant construct could
be detected in this assay.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
PMP- and IGF-II-Sepharose depletion
analysis. Aliquots (0.2 ml) of purified WT ( ), C1262S ( ),
and G1449V ( ) 15F IGF2R constructs were subjected to serial
incubations with either PMP-Sepharose (A) or
IGF-II-Sepharose (C) for 3-h periods at 3 °C. The amount
of unbound construct at the end of each 3-h period was determined by
anti-FLAG immunoblot analysis of each supernatant, followed by
PhosphorImager analysis for both PMP-Sepharose (B) and
IGF-II-Sepharose (D). The amount prior to any exposure to
resin was set as 100%.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The observation of several missense mutations occurring in the
extracytoplasmic domain of the IGF2R in specific tumors raises the
question of whether and how these mutations might alter the function of
this protein. Sequence analysis of the positions corresponding to the
C1262S, Q1445H, G1449V, G1464E, and I1572T mutations in the human, rat,
mouse, and bovine receptors revealed that all but G1464E are conserved
without exception, suggesting that they are important in the overall
structure and function of their respective repeats. In order to
determine how these five Man-6-P/IGF2R missense mutations
affect the ligand binding functions of the receptor, the mutants have
been tested as IGF2R cDNA constructs comprised of the signal
sequence and the 15 extracytoplasmic repeats, followed by an 8-residue
FLAG epitope tag at the carboxyl terminus. This 15F construct allows
isolation and separation of the mutants from the endogenous receptor
background found in most cell types, by virtue of its unique epitope tag.
When expressed transiently in 293T cells, the 15F construct was not
secreted into the culture medium but was found at high levels in cell
lysates prepared by either Triton X-100 extraction or freeze/thaw
procedures. This finding was unexpected, as a soluble IGF2R construct
bearing a deletion of only the transmembrane domain was found to be
secreted in transgenic mice (41). The incorporation of the FLAG epitope
may play a role in the retention of the 15F construct, but other
truncated FLAG-tagged IGF2R constructs were found to be secreted, and
replacement of the FLAG tag with a c-Myc epitope did not lead to
secretion of the extracytoplasmic domain (data not shown). The
observation that the 15F construct could be released into a
detergent-free solution by freeze/thaw indicates that it is
water-soluble. Retention of the 15F construct within the cell may also
indicate the presence of an independent intracellular retention signal
in the extracytoplasmic domain. Such a signal has been proposed to
exist by Dintzis et al. (42), who found that the IGF2R
extracytoplasmic domain was required for a predominantly intracellular
localization of epidermal growth factor receptor/IGF2R chimeras.
Further experiments are under way to determine the significance and
molecular basis of 15F retention within the transfected 293T cells.
Triton X-100 cell lysates were used for the remainder of the current
study, because they contained the highest levels of transfected construct. Immunoblotting of these lysates revealed that mRNAs derived from all of the mutant cDNAs were apparently capable of being translated into proteins that were homogeneous by gel
electrophoresis, with molecular masses consistent with the predicted
250 kDa. Deletion of the IGF2R transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains
does not appear to affect the ligand binding functions of the receptor,
as WT 15F binds IGF-II and a Man-6-P-bearing ligand with affinity
constants that are consistent with observed values for the intact IGF2R of 3-5 and 1-2 nM, respectively.
To test whether the mutations affect ligand binding to the IGF2R, the
mutant receptor constructs were analyzed for the ability to interact
with IGF-II and PMP-BSA, a Man-6-P-bearing ligand. It has been shown
previously that the two Man-6-P-binding sites localize to repeats 1-3
and 7-9 of the extracytoplasmic domain (5, 6). In particular, Arg-435
and Arg-1334 in repeats 3 and 9 of the bovine receptor are thought to
be involved in coordinating interactions with the phosphate groups of
Man-6-P-bearing proteins (6, 43). Previous studies have shown repeats
11 and 13 to be important for high affinity IGF-II binding (8-11).
With binding functions mapping to such an extensive portion of the
receptor, mutations occurring in the extracytoplasmic domain could
disrupt one or both of its binding activities.
When assayed for their ability to bind IGF-II by affinity cross-linking
or by direct binding, three of the cancer-associated mutations
demonstrated a measurable reduction in ligand-receptor association.
C1262S, G1449V, and I1572T all cause decreased binding of IGF-II,
suggesting a disruption of the IGF-II binding domain. These mutations
are located in repeats 9, 10, and 11, respectively. The hepatocellular
carcinoma-associated mutant, I1572T, substituting a polar residue, Thr,
for a bulky, hydrophobic residue, Ile, in the heart of the IGF-II
binding domain, causes a complete knockout of IGF-II binding. This
mutation had previously been shown to knockout IGF-II binding in a
truncated receptor construct comprising the first half of repeat 1 fused to repeat 11 (10). It is less obvious how C1262S and G1449V,
which reside outside the IGF-II binding domain, are capable of
affecting IGF-II binding. Several possibilities could account for this
effect. Destabilization of a single repeat may foster interdomain
effects. Also, disruption of the conserved disulfide bonding pattern of
the repeats may have global effects, which may account for the observed
ligand binding disruption caused by the C1262S mutation. This cysteinyl residue is thought to be involved in the conserved disulfide bonding pattern of the 9th repeat (3). The disulfide bond pattern appears to be
disrupted to a degree that when electrophoresed on a non-reducing SDS-PAGE gel, the mobility of the C1262S mutant is altered relative to
WT (data not shown).
In addition to disrupting IGF-II binding, C1262S causes a decrease in
IGF-II cross-linking efficiency when compared with WT 15F. One possible
interpretation of these data is that C1262S causes the displacement of
a lysyl residue away from radiolabeled IGF-II in the bound state. The
homobifunctional cross-linking agent employed in these studies, DSS,
utilizes lysyl side chains for its cross-linking chemistry. With a
spacer arm length of 11.4 Å, small alterations of the protein backbone
could be responsible for decreased cross-linking efficiency. The G1449V
mutation results in the substitution of a bulky, hydrophobic residue,
Val, for a small, neutral residue, Gly, that would be predicted to have a high degree of conformational freedom (44). This mutation, also
located in repeat 10, outside the major IGF-II- or Man-6-P-binding regions of the receptor, is capable of decreasing the binding interactions of the 15F construct. However, in contrast to the C1262S
mutation, the G1449V mutation does not seem to affect the efficiency of
IGF-II/IGF2R cross-linking.
The C1262S and G1449V mutations also affect interactions with the
Man-6-P-bearing ligand, PMP-BSA. C1262S failed to show any detectable
binding to PMP-BSA in the Western ligand blot, whereas G1449V showed
variable ability to bind PMP-BSA in this assay. The ligand blotting
protocol involves denaturing the proteins with subsequent renaturation
after non-reducing SDS-PAGE. Because of this property of the assay, not
only are inherent binding interactions detected, but the ability of
these mutant receptors to renature on the nitrocellulose membrane also
contributes to the measured end point. It was necessary to determine if
the mutant receptors were capable of binding PMP-BSA in an assay that
did not involve a cycle of denaturation-renaturation. Direct binding
analysis confirmed that both C1262S and G1449V have reduced PMP-BSA
binding when compared with WT. These mutations did not completely
eliminate PMP-BSA binding, as the ligand blot would suggest, but only
reduced binding, as reminiscent of the IGF-II binding data. Thus,
failure to detect PMP-BSA binding to these mutant IGF2Rs in the ligand blot suggests the possibility of a potential defect in in
vitro refolding caused by these mutations.
Competitive binding analysis with both IGF-II and PMP-BSA revealed that
the C1262S and G1449V mutations reduce binding by decreasing the number
of binding sites (Bmax) in the population of
receptors, while having no apparent effect on the relative affinity
toward IGF-II or PMP-BSA. In addition, affinity depletion with either
IGF-II or PMP-BSA covalently attached to Sepharose beads demonstrated
that nearly all the C1262S and G1449V receptor molecules are eventually
capable of interacting with ligand, even though the G1449V mutant
showed a decrease in the rate of depletion with both immobilized
ligands. Several possible explanations may account for this surprising
finding. These data could be explained if the mutations induced a
conformation of the receptor that is incapable of binding ligand which
is in equilibrium with a conformation that can bind. A difference in
the rate of conversion between such conformations could account for
G1449V causing a decrease in the rate of association with the
immobilized ligands in the context of the experimental time frame.
Alternatively, the observed decrease in the rate of ligand association
for the G1449V mutant may be compensated by a reduced rate of
dissociation, resulting in little or no effect on the equilibrium
dissociation constant. Such changes in the binding characteristics of
this mutant could have dramatic effects on the ability of tumor cells
to bind, internalize, and degrade IGF-II through the IGF2R pathway.
The existence of IGF2R dimers could also explain the discrepancy
between the change in Bmax and the ability of
the C1262S and G1449V mutants to interact with immobilized ligand.
Previous reports have suggested that the IGF2R exists as a monomer in
solution (45), but cross-linking studies of IGF2R molecules in cell
membranes imply that the receptor exists in multimeric forms (46).
While this manuscript was being prepared for publication, York et
al. (47) reported that bivalent ligands are capable of increasing the rate of IGF-II internalization, which was attributed to their ability to cross-link IGF2R molecules, suggesting that multimeric forms
of the IGF2R form in the presence of bivalent Man-6-P ligands. If the
soluble IGF2R constructs exist as multimers, heterodimers formed
between receptors that can bind ligand and those that cannot would
interfere with separation of receptor species by affinity chromatography. Finally, it should also be noted that the presence of a
bipartite Man-6-P binding domain may complicate the interpretation of
the Man-6-P binding analysis. The two Man-6-P-binding sites may be
functionally distinct, as recent studies have suggested (43). Thus, an
alternative explanation for our data may be that the decreased PMP-BSA
binding observed for C1262S and G1449V is due to a loss of function of
only a single site.
The Q1445H mutation may provide a tool for further investigation of the
possible mechanisms for Bmax effects on the
IGF-II binding domain. This mutant construct is capable of binding and cross-linking IGF-II to the same extent as WT when freshly extracted from cells. However, over time in storage at
80 °C, the IGF-II binding function is selectively lost. Thus, there seems to be some
instability of repeats 11-13 comprising the IGF-II binding domain.
Other analyses, such as rates of denaturation at 37 or 47 °C and the
pH dependence of ligand dissociation, showed little change relative to
WT (data not shown). Regardless of the cause, competitive binding
analysis of the mutant Q1445H construct that showed a 50% loss of
IGF-II binding was due to a decreased number of detectable binding
sites and not an affinity change. Because the Q1445H mutation does not
affect the PMP-BSA binding profile of the receptor construct, it is
likely that the Bmax change observed for this
mutation is due to a localized disruption or distortion of the IGF-II
binding region. Finally, it is unclear whether the instability of the
IGF-II binding domain is manifested in a functional change in the
Q1445H mutant receptor in vivo. Full-length versions of the
Q1445H mutant IGF2R in 293T cells have recently been expressed, and
preliminary studies have revealed similar instability upon storage of
plasma membrane preparations bearing the Q1445H mutant receptor.2 Experiments to
measure the thermal stability and half-life of the mutant receptors
in living cells are planned.
It is interesting to note the location of each of the mutations
examined in this study relative to the conserved cysteinyl residues
within each repeat. Most of the repeats contain 8 conserved cysteinyl
residues, and based on the patterns of conservation in the bovine
receptor, these have been predicted to form disulfide bonds in the
pattern: 1 + 2, 3 + 4, 5 + 7, and 6 + 8 (3). The CD-MPR is a 46-kDa
membrane protein that shares sequence homology to each repeating unit
of the IGF2R (3, 48). Recent analysis of the crystal structure of the
CD-MPR revealed that the extracytoplasmic domain is made up of
-strands that comprise two
-sheets (49). By assuming that the
repeating units in the extracytoplasmic domain of IGF2R are similar,
then each of the extracytoplasmic repeats is comprised of these two
-sheet half-domains connected by a coil between the 4th and 5th
cysteinyl residues. The I1572T mutation occurs near this putative
linking region in the 4th
-strand. It is possible that this mutation
alters the folded conformation of the repeat so that the final compact
structure is not formed. Substituting a polar residue in place of the
Ile at position 1572 could interfere with the van der Waals
interactions between hydrophobic residues that are proposed to hold the
two
-sheets together. Based on the homology to the CD-MPR, the
substitution of Val for Gly at position 1449, which decreases binding
to both IGF-II and PMP-BSA, may limit the conformational flexibility of
the peptide backbone in a turn between the 5th and 6th
-strands. The
Q1445H mutation also occurs near this turn within the 5th
-strand.
Interestingly, the G1464E mutation, which shows no measurable change in
its ligand binding characteristics, occurs just after the 5th conserved
cysteinyl residue. The disulfide bond that occurs at this position may
stabilize the overall structure of the 10th repeat containing the
G1464E mutation.
If the observed mutations are capable of disrupting the conformation of
the repeat in which they occur, the question still remains as to how
disruption of a single repeat can obliterate functions that occur in
other parts of the IGF2R. It has been postulated that each of the
extracytoplasmic repeats is capable of folding independently of the
others based on the analogy to the CD-MPR. This hypothesis has been
supported by the fact that truncated receptor constructs are capable of
binding IGF-II and Man-6-P ligands, suggesting that the two binding
functions act independently of each other (6, 7, 10, 11). In addition, reciprocal inhibition of Man-6-P and IGF-II binding has been observed for the IGF2R suggesting some interaction between the binding sites for
these two classes of ligands (50-52). The observation that the C1262S
and G1449V mutations, which reside outside of the minimal IGF-II and
Man-6-P binding domains, reduce ligand interactions implies that the
domains do not act independently of each other.
In summary, we have demonstrated that four of five mutations found in
association with LOH in human cancers have altered ligand-binding properties. Both the C1262S and G1449V mutations decreased the IGF-II
and Man-6-P binding functions of the IGF2R. The I1572T mutation caused
a complete loss of detectable binding to IGF-II, while leaving the
Man-6-P binding function intact. Unlike these mutations, the Q1445H
mutation caused a loss of IGF-II binding capability but only on
extended storage at low temperature. These decreases in ligand
interaction occurred as a result of changes in the number of binding
sites without changing the apparent affinity of ligand-receptor complex
formation. Overall, the observation that these cancer-associated
mutations affect the normal function of the IGF2R supports the
hypothesis that this receptor is involved in the progression of tumorigenesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Betty A. Jackson for
technical assistance and Drs. Thomas E. Smithgall and James A. Rogers
for providing 293T cells. We also appreciate helpful discussion with
and suggestions from Beverly S. Schaffer, Dr. Jung H. Park, Dr. Robert
E. Lewis, Dr. C. Kirk Phares, and Dr. Myron L. Toews. We thank Margaret H. Niedenthal of Lilly Research Laboratories for providing the IGFs,
and Drs. William S. Sly and David W. Russell for providing the human
IGF2R cDNA and pCMV5, respectively. DNA sequencing costs were
subsidized by NCI Core Grant CA36727 from the National Institutes of
Health and the Nebraska Research Initiative.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants DK44212 (to R. G. M.), CA25951 (to R. L. J.), and ES08823 (to R. L. J.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Dept. of Pediatrics, Oregon Health Sciences
University, Portland, OR 97201-3098.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, 984525 Nebraska Medical CTR, Omaha, NE
68198-4525. Tel: 402-559-7824; Fax: 402-559-6650; E-mail:
rgmacdon@unmc.edu.
2
G. R. Devi, J. C. Byrd, A. T. De
Souza, R. L. Jirtle, and R. G. MacDonald, manuscript in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IGF2R, insulin-like
growth factor II receptor;
IGF, insulin-like growth factor;
Man-6-P, mannose 6-phosphate;
PMP, pentamannose phosphate;
BSA, bovine serum
albumin;
CD-MPR, cation-dependent mannose 6-phosphate
receptor;
LOH, loss of heterozygosity;
DSS, disuccinimidyl suberate;
nt, nucleotide;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
WT, wild
type.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kornfeld, S.
(1990)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
18,
367-374[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Oshima, A.,
Nolan, C. M.,
Kyle, J. W.,
Grubb, J. H.,
and Sly, W. S.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
2553-2562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Lobel, P.,
Dahms, N. M.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
2563-2570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Dahms, N. M.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
11458-11467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Westlund, B.,
Dahms, N. M.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
23233-23239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Dahms, N. M.,
Rose, P. A.,
Molkentin, J. D.,
Zhang, Y.,
and Brzycki, M. A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5457-5463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Dahms, N. M.,
Wick, D. A.,
and Brzycki-Wessell, M. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3802-3809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Garmroudi, F.,
and MacDonald, R. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
26944-26952[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Schmidt, B.,
Kiecke-Siemsen, C.,
Waheed, A.,
Braulke, T.,
and von Figura, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14975-14982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Garmroudi, F.,
Devi, G.,
Slentz, D. H.,
Schaffer, B. S.,
and MacDonald, R. G.
(1996)
Mol. Endocrinol.
10,
642-651[Abstract]
|
| 11.
|
Devi, G. R.,
Byrd, J. C.,
Slentz, D. H.,
and MacDonald, R. G.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol.
12,
1661-1672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Kornfeld, S.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
61,
307-330[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Dahms, N. M.,
Lobel, P.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
12115-12118[Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Dennis, P. A.,
and Rifkin, D. B.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
580-584[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Munger, J.,
Harpel, J. G.,
Gleizes, P.,
Mazzieri, R.,
Nunes, I.,
and Rifkin, D.
(1997)
Kidney Int.
51,
1376-1382[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Alevizopoulos, A.,
and Mermod, N.
(1997)
BioEssays
19,
581-591[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Attisano, L.,
Wrana, J.,
Lopez-Casillas, F.,
and Massague, J.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1222,
71-80[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Yingling, J. M.,
Wang, X. F.,
and Bassing, C. H.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1242,
115-136[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Saltis, J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
116,
227-232[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Oka, Y.,
and Czech, M. P.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
9090-9093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Oka, Y.,
Rozek, L. M.,
and Czech, M. P.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
9435-9442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Ouyang, H.,
Shiwaku, H. O.,
Hagiwara, H.,
Miura, K.,
Abe, T.,
Kato, Y.,
Ohtani, H.,
Shiiba, K.,
Souza, R. F.,
Meltzer, S. J.,
and Horii, A.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
1851-1854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Souza, R. F.,
Appel, R.,
Yin, J.,
Wang, S.,
Smolinski, K. N.,
Abraham, J. M.,
Zou, T.-T.,
Shi, Y.-Q.,
Lei, J.,
Cottrell, J.,
Cymes, K.,
Biden, K.,
Simms, L.,
Leggett, B.,
Lynch, P. M.,
Frazier, M.,
Powell, S. M.,
Harpaz, N.,
Sugimura, H.,
Young, J.,
and Meltzer, S. J.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
14,
255-257[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Ross, J. S.,
Nazeer, T.,
Figge, H.,
Fisher, H.,
and Rifkin, M.
(1995)
Am. J. Clin. Pathol.
104,
36-41[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Sleat, D. E.,
Chen, T.-L.,
Raska, K., Jr.,
and Lobel, P.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
3424-3430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Mathieu, M.,
Rochefort, H.,
Barenton, B.,
Prebois, C.,
and Vignon, F.
(1990)
Mol. Endocrinol.
4,
1327-1335[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Chappell, S. A.,
Walsh, T.,
Walker, R. A.,
and Shaw, J. A.
(1997)
Br. J. Cancer
76,
1558-1561[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Sue, S. R.,
Chari, R. S.,
Kong, F.-M.,
Mills, J. J.,
Fine, R. L.,
Jirtle, R. L.,
and Meyers, W. C.
(1995)
Ann. Surg.
222,
171-178[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Su, Q.,
Liu, Y.-F.,
Zhang, J.-F.,
Zhang, S.-X.,
Li, D.-F.,
and Yang, J.-J.
(1994)
Hepatology
20,
788-799[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
De Souza, A. T.,
Hankins, G. R.,
Washington, M. K.,
Fine, R. L.,
Orton, T. C.,
and Jirtle, R. L.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
1725-1729[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Yamada, T.,
De Souza, A. T.,
Finkelstein, S.,
and Jirtle, R. L.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10351-10355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Hankins, G. R.,
De Souza, A. T.,
Bentley, R. C.,
Patel, M. R.,
Marks, J. R.,
Iglehart, J. D.,
and Jirtle, R. L.
(1996)
Oncogene
12,
2003-2009[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
De Souza, A. T.,
Hankins, G. R.,
Washington, M. K.,
Orton, T. C.,
and Jirtle, R. L.
(1995)
Nat. Genet.
11,
447-449[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
De Souza, A. T.,
Yamada, T.,
Mills, J. J.,
and Jirtle, R. L.
(1997)
FASEB J.
11,
60-67[Abstract]
|
| 35.
|
Andersson, S.,
Davis, D. L.,
Dahlbäck, H.,
Jörnvall, H.,
and Russell, D. W.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
8222-8229[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Pear, W. S.,
Nolan, G. P.,
Scott, M. L.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8392-8396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Murray, G. J.,
and Neville, D. M., Jr.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
11942-11948[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Braulke, T.,
Causin, C.,
Waheed, A.,
Junghans, U.,
Hasilik, A.,
Maly, P.,
Humbel, R. E.,
and von Figura, K.
(1988)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
150,
1287-1293[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Hossenlopp, P.,
Seurin, D.,
Segovia-Quinson, B.,
Hardouin, S.,
and Binoux, M.
(1986)
Anal. Biochem.
154,
138-143[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Tong, P. Y.,
Gregory, W.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
7962-7969[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Zaina, S.,
Newton, R. V. S.,
Paul, M. R.,
and Graham, C. F.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
3886-3895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Dintzis, S. M.,
Velculescu, V. E.,
and Pfeffer, S. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12159-12166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Marron-Terada, P. G.,
Brzycki-Wessell, M. A.,
and Dahms, N. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22358-22366[Abstract/ |