Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arava, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arava, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 35, 24449-24452, August 27, 1999

COMMUNICATION
GRFbeta , a Novel Regulator of Calcium Signaling, Is Expressed in Pancreatic Beta Cells and Brain*

Yoav AravaDagger , Rony Seger§, and Michael D. WalkerDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Biological Chemistry and the § Department of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel 76100

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

By screening for genes expressed differentially in pancreatic beta cells, we have isolated a cDNA encoding GRFbeta , a novel 178-amino acid protein whose N terminus is identical to that of GRF1, a calcium-dependent guanine nucleotide exchange factor, and whose C terminus is unrelated to known proteins. We show that both GRF1 and GRFbeta are expressed selectively in beta cell lines, pancreatic islet cells and brain. Treatment of beta cell lines (beta TC1 and HIT) with calcium ionophore led to a significant elevation in activity of the Ras signal transduction pathway, as determined by phosphorylation of extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK). Transfection of beta cells with a plasmid encoding a dominant negative variant of GRF1 led to 70% reduction in ERK phosphorylation, consistent with a role for GRF1 in calcium-dependent Ras signaling in these cells. To examine the possible function of GRFbeta , cultured cells were transfected with a GRFbeta expression vector. This led to a significant reduction in both GRF1-dependent ERK phosphorylation and AP1-dependent reporter gene activity. The results suggest that GRF1 plays a role in mediating calcium-dependent signal transduction in beta cells and that GRFbeta represents a novel dominant negative modulator of Ras signaling.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Control of carbohydrate homeostasis is achieved largely through regulated secretion of insulin by pancreatic endocrine beta cells. The beta cell functions as a glucose sensor through specialized enzymatic machinery, including a high Km glucose transporter (Glut2) and a high Km glucokinase (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Elevated blood glucose levels lead to increased intracellular ATP/ADP ratios, causing closure of ATP-dependent potassium channels, membrane depolarization, and a resultant increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels. This, in turn, is believed to cause increased insulin biosynthesis and secretion through mechanisms that are poorly defined. Elevated glucose concentrations can activate MAP1 kinase pathways in cultured beta cells (3-5), accompanied by increased insulin secretion. However, specific inhibitors of MAP kinase showed little effect on insulin secretion (4-6). Since exposure of beta cells to glucose leads to nuclear translocation of ERK (4, 5), it is possible that one of the major effects of MAPK activation is modulation of transcription factor activity (7, 8), leading to changes in insulin biosynthetic rate. The precise actions of Ca2+ and the functional significance of elevated MAP kinase activity in beta cells remain to be established.

In order to better understand the molecular basis for cell-specific functions of beta cells, we have used representational difference analysis (9, 10) to identify genes expressed differentially between alpha and beta cells; this led to isolation of 26 cDNA clones (11, 12); using one of these, we have now isolated a clone encoding the novel protein GRFbeta , which shares an identical region with GRF1, a calcium-dependent guanine exchange factor originally identified in brain cells (13, 14). In this report, we document the sequence of GRFbeta , and demonstrate that both GRFbeta and GRF1 are expressed preferentially in beta cells and brain. In addition we show that GRF1 plays a role in calcium signaling in beta cells and that GRFbeta represents a naturally occurring, dominant negative form of GRF1.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Library Screening-- A beta TC1 cDNA library constructed in the vector lambda GT11 (15) was screened using a labeled DNA probe of clone 41 (12) generated by random priming. Inserts of positive clones were excised and subcloned to the vector pcDNA3. Sequencing was performed using an automated Applied Biosystems DNA sequencer.

Cell Lines-- HIT T15 (16) (hamster insulinoma), NIH3T3, and 293T cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). beta TC1 cells (17) (mouse beta cell line) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 15% FCS and 2.5% horse serum.

Plasmids and Transfections-- For reporter assay, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter plasmid containing nine copies of the AP1 binding sequence derived from the SV40 enhancer (4 µg), GRFbeta expression vector (5 µg), and RSV-luciferase internal control plasmid (2 µg) were transfected using the calcium phosphate procedure (18). Glycerol shock (10%) was performed after 5 h. Cells were harvested 40 h later and extracts prepared for assay of luciferase (Promega luciferase reagent) and CAT activity. For phosphorylation analysis, HA-tagged ERK1 expression plasmid (4 µg) was transfected into HIT cells together with 12 µg of GRF1Delta C, encoding a dominant negative GRF1, prepared from a GRF1 expression vector by EcoRI digestion to remove the catalytic domain (19). Transfections into 293T cells were performed in six-well plates with 0.25 µg of HA-ERK plasmid, 0.25 µg of GRF1 expression vector, where indicated, and 3.5 µg of GRFbeta expression vector or pcDNA3 parental vector alone.

RNA Preparation and RT-PCR Analysis-- RNA was prepared using the TRI reagent kit (Molecular Research Center, Inc.) followed by DNase I treatment for 20 min at 37 °C. Mouse islets were prepared by collagenase digestion followed by Histopaque density gradient centrifugation (20). Islet RNA was prepared by the guanidinium thiocyanate procedure (21). RT-PCR was performed using the Access RT-PCR System (Promega) with 0.5 µg of total RNA.

The primers used to detect GRFbeta were TCTAGCATCATGCAGAAAGCC (top strand primer corresponding to nt 130-150 of GRFbeta ) and GGGAGGAGAACCATAGATGG (bottom strand primer corresponding to nt 680-699). The predicted amplified fragment is 570 bp. The primers used to detect GRF1 were TCTAGCATCATGCAGAAAGCC (top strand primer, same as used for GRFbeta , corresponding to nt 216-236 of mouse GRF1) and GCGCAGGAAGTTGTTGACAAGG (bottom strand primer corresponding to nt 1014-1035). The predicted amplified fragment is 820 bp. The hybridization probe used for GRFbeta was a restriction fragment corresponding to the GRFbeta -specific region (nt 502-599). The hybridization probe used for GRF1 was a restriction fragment corresponding to nt 216-478.

One-fifth of the reaction was analyzed by Southern blot as described previously (12).

RNase Protection Assay-- DNase I-treated RNA samples (20 µg) were mixed with a 32P-labeled antisense probe produced by in vitro transcription reaction using T3 RNA polymerase. Samples were processed as described (21) except that RNase digestion was performed using 6 units of RNase ONE (Promega) in a total volume of 300 µl.

Immunoblot Analysis-- Cells extracts (21) were resolved on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and subjected to immunoblot analysis using the following antibodies: rabbit anti-ERK (1:30,000), mouse antiphosphorylated ERK (1:30,000), and mouse anti-HA epitope (1:500). Quantitation was performed on autoradiograms in which signals were within the linear response range using a Bio-Rad model GS-690 densitometer and Multi-Analyst software. Relative ERK phosphorylation for each sample was determined from the ratio of absorbance using anti-P ERK to that obtained using anti-HA or anti-ERK. Statistical significance was evaluated using two-tailed Student's t test.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cloning of GRFbeta -- Using clone 41, one of the products of the representational difference analysis (12), we screened a beta TC1 cDNA library and obtained a 859-bp cDNA with a complete open reading frame of 178 amino acids (Fig. 1A). A second cDNA clone isolated in the screen was identical in sequence except that it was truncated at the 5'-end. Data base comparisons using the 859-bp cDNA showed that its 5' portion is identical at the DNA level to the Ras guanine exchange factor, GRF1 (CDC25Mm1) (Fig. 1B) (13, 14, 22). We term the encoded 178-amino acid protein GRFbeta . Its N-terminal 92 amino acids are identical to the N terminus of mouse GRF1 (Fig. 1B), whereas the C-terminal 86 amino acids show no significant resemblance to known proteins. Thus GRFbeta lacks all the characteristic motifs of GRF1, except for the N-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain (Fig. 1B), half of which is identical to the corresponding portion of GRF1 and half of which derives from the novel C-terminal portion. The complete identity between 5' regions of GRFbeta and GRF1 at the DNA level suggests that these represent alternate splice products of a single gene. Consistent with this is the fact that both GRF1 and GRFbeta sequences match perfectly the sequence of a mouse genomic clone U55232 up to a position where all three sequences diverge completely (Fig. 1C). The sequence of the genomic clone at this location matches exactly the splice donor consensus sequence (23) (Fig. 1C). To characterize GRF1 and GRFbeta transcripts, we performed RNase protection assay, using a 462-nt antisense probe derived from the GRFbeta DNA sequence, which contained a 287-nt identity with GRF1 (Fig. 2A). A distinct band, corresponding in size to the expected 432-nt GRFbeta protected fragment was obtained using beta TC1 RNA, but not with alpha TC1 RNA (Fig. 2A). A faster migrating band corresponding to the expected 287-nt GRF1 protected fragment was also obtained with beta TC1 but not with alpha TC1 RNA (Fig. 2A).


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, DNA sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of GRFbeta (GenBankTM accession number AF169826). The protein segment identical to mouse GRF1 (CDC25Mm1) is underlined. An oligo(A) sequence (presumptive 3' terminus) is shown in bold. A putative PKA site is boxed. * indicates stop codon. The sequence of GRFbeta has been scanned against the data base at protein and DNA levels. Significant relatedness was observed only against GRF1 (GenBankTM accession number L20899), GRF2 (GenBankTM accession number U67326), and its species homologs. B, schematic map comparing GRFbeta and GRF1. The region of identity between GRF1 and GRFbeta is indicated by vertical bars. PH, pleckstrin homology domain. PH1 and PH2, pleckstrin homology domains of GRF1. C, alignment of GRFbeta (nt 301-375), GRF1 (nt 445-519; GenBankTM accession number L20899), and the genomic clone corresponding to GRF1/GRFbeta (nt 901-975; GenBankTM accession number U55232). Also shown is the splice donor consensus sequence (23). The sequence GT, corresponding to the invariant nucleotides found at the 5'-end of introns, is shown in bold letters.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A, RNase protection assay. Antisense probe was mixed with 20 µg of total RNA from beta TC1 and alpha TC1. Following RNase digestion, the products were resolved on sequencing gel and exposed to x-ray film. The scheme indicates the expected sizes of the intact antisense probe (462 nt) and the predicted protected bands corresponding to GRFbeta RNA (432 nt) and GRF1 (287 nt). The arrows indicate the migration of labeled DNA size markers. B, RT-PCR analysis of RNA extracted from the following mouse tissues: brain (B), pancreas (P), lung (L), testis (T), spleen (S), kidney (K), liver (Li), heart (H), muscle (M), beta TC1 (beta ), alpha TC1 (alpha ), and islets (Is). 0.5 µg total RNA (left panel) or 5 ng (right panel) was subjected to RT-PCR followed by hybridization with the indicated probes. The lower panel shows the ethidium bromide staining of PCR reactions performed with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPD) primers, as a control for the efficiency of the RT-PCR reaction.

To study the tissue distribution of GRFbeta , we performed RT-PCR analysis with RNA from different tissues using primers specific for each splice variant (Fig. 2B). Using the GRFbeta primers two bands were observed. By isolating and sequencing these bands separately we showed that the upper band represents GRFbeta and the lower band a truncated version lacking nucleotides 355-507. The highest levels of GRFbeta mRNA were seen in beta TC1 cells and in the brain, while GRF1 was expressed at highest levels in the brain and to a lesser extent in beta TC1 cells. Both transcripts appeared in substantial amounts in mouse islets, at similar levels as in beta TC1. Taken together, the RNase protection and the RT-PCR analyses indicate relatively high levels of GRFbeta and GRF1 in the brain and beta cells. However, while GRF1 was expressed at higher levels in the brain than in beta cells, GRFbeta showed the opposite pattern: higher expression in beta cells than in the brain.

GRF1 Involvement in ERK Activation by Calcium in Beta Cells-- To examine the possible role of GRF1 in beta cells, we treated HIT cells with calcium ionophores. We observed strong activation of the Ras pathway, as measured by the levels of activated ERK1/2, almost to the level of the activation obtained by 10% FCS (Fig. 3A). Activation was also observed following incubation with ionophore A23187 (Fig. 3B), KCl (50 mM for 10 min), and glucose (15 mM for 10 min) (data not shown). Furthermore, ionomycin led to activation of ERK also in beta TC1 cells (Fig. 3B), but not in the cell line 293T, which lacks endogenous GRF1 (14) (Fig. 3B).


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   ERK activation in different cell lines. Protein extracts (10 µg) were subjected to immunoblot using antibodies recognizing the phosphorylated form of ERK (alpha Phospho ERK) and antibodies recognizing both phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated ERK (alpha ERK). A, hamster beta cells (HIT) were incubated overnight in medium containing 0.1% FCS and then incubated with ionomycin (5 µM) or FCS (10%) for the indicated time (upper panels) or with A23187 for 20 min (+ = 4 µM, ++ = 8 µM) (lower panels). Numbers shown are the ratios between the signals obtained with alpha Phospho ERK and alpha ERK as measured by densitometer. B, 293T cells and beta TC1 cells were incubated overnight in medium containing 0.1% FCS and then incubated for 5 min in the absence or presence of 5 µM ionomycin.

To determine the role of GRF1 in the calcium-dependent activation, we constructed a plasmid encoding a truncated GRF1 protein, GRF1Delta C, lacking its catalytic domain, which is expected to display dominant negative activity (19). When HIT cells were transfected with GRF1Delta C, ionomycin-dependent phosphorylation of co-transfected epitope-tagged HA-ERK was reduced by approximately 70% (Fig. 4, A and B).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Inhibition of calcium activation by GRF1Delta C, the dominant negative form of GRF1. A, HIT cells were transfected with HA-ERK expression vector, together with 6 µg (+) or 12 µg (++) of expression vector encoding a truncated form of GRF1 lacking the catalytic domain (GRF1Delta C) or control vector. Cells were incubated overnight in medium containing 0.1% FCS and for a further 5 min in the presence or absence of 5 µM ionomycin. Cell extracts were subjected to immunoblot using alpha Phospho ERK and alpha HA and signals were measured by a densitometer. The histogram shows mean values for normalized HA-ERK phosphorylation, determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." *, mean ± S.E. (n = 5); p < 0.05. B, HIT cells were transfected with HA-ERK, in the presence of expression vector encoding GRF1Delta C or control vector. Cells were incubated overnight in medium containing 0.1% FCS and for a further 5 min in the presence of 5 µM ionomycin. Cell extracts (20 µg or 10 µg of protein) were subjected to immunoblot as described for A.

GRFbeta Is an Inhibitor of the Ras Signaling Pathway-- We tested whether GRFbeta (which contains the N-terminal 92 amino acids of GRF1) can affect the Ras/MAPK pathway. In 293T cells co-transfected with GRF1 and GRFbeta , the extent of ionomycin-dependent ERK activation was significantly lower than in cells transfected with GRF1 alone (Fig. 5A). Co-transfection of serum-treated NIH3T3 cells with an AP1 reporter plasmid and an expression vector encoding the intact GRFbeta protein produced a 2-fold lower CAT activity compared with co-transfection with control vector, almost to the inhibition level obtained with the dominant negative Ras variant N17 (Fig. 5B) (24). Thus GRFbeta behaves as an inhibitor of both GRF1-mediated Ras/ERK signal transduction and of serum-dependent MAPK signaling pathways leading to AP1 activation.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effect of GRFbeta on Ras signaling. A, 293T cells were transfected with a plasmid encoding HA-ERK and the indicated expression vector (+) or an empty vector (-). Cells were then incubated in the absence or presence of ionomycin, collected, and subjected to immunoblot with the indicated antibodies. The same amount of extract from HIT cells, treated with the same ionomycin concentration, was loaded on the gel as a control. The histogram shows mean values for normalized HA-ERK phosphorylation, determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." *, mean ± S.E. (n = 4); p < 0.05. B, NIH3T3 cells were transfected with a CAT reporter plasmid containing nine copies of the AP1 binding site together with expression vectors encoding GRFbeta or Ras (N17), a dominant negative mutated Ras, and RSV-luciferase as an internal control of transfection efficiency. Results are normalized CAT activity (mean ± S.E. (n = 3)) relative to cells transfected with the CAT reporter alone.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Proteins of the Ras family play a crucial role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and tumorigenesis (25). Their activity depends on the presence of guanine exchange factors (GEFs), which are essential to promote dissociation of GDP-bound Ras to facilitate binding of GTP. The Sos-related GEF proteins are distributed broadly in many cell types and typically activate Ras following activation of growth factor receptor and a membrane recruitment mechanism mediated by the adapter protein Grb2 (26). The GRF-related GEFs, on the other hand, are less widely distributed; GRF1 is present in neuronal cells (14) and additional tissues and tumor cells (27); it activates Ras in a calcium-dependent fashion (14, 28). Calcium-dependent activation is mediated through calmodulin binding to an N-terminal IQ domain; however the precise mechanism leading to calcium-dependent activation remains to be determined and involves also pleckstrin and coiled-coil domains of the protein (28). A number of naturally occurring splice variants have been identified previously (29); these apparently represent N-terminal truncations rather than C-terminal truncations. The physiological significance of these truncations has not been addressed.

In this study, we have demonstrated for the first time that GRF1 is expressed in pancreatic beta cells. The inhibitory effect of a truncated dominant negative form of GRF1 suggests that GRF1 is essential for activation of calcium-dependent MAP kinase activity in the beta cell. We have further identified GRFbeta , a novel 178-amino acid protein comprising the N-terminal 92 amino acids of GRF1, including a portion of the PH1 domain of GRF1 and 86 unrelated amino acids. GRFbeta RNA was detected in beta cells and brain. We provide evidence that GRFbeta represents a naturally occurring dominant negative form of GRF1, which may play a role in regulating the normal function of GRF1. The mechanism whereby GRFbeta inhibits signaling is not clear. On the one hand, the N terminus of GRF1 has been shown in in vitro studies to inhibit the catalytic activity of GRF1 (30), perhaps through intra-molecular rearrangement. On the other hand, in vivo studies clearly show that deletion of the N-terminal PH1 domain leads to both intracellular redistribution of the protein and loss of calcium responsiveness (28). Probably the PH1 domain has multiple functions, including a role in proper intracellular localization.

The physiological role of GRF1 is not yet established. Mice lacking the GRF1 gene display impaired memory consolidation and slow growth (31, 32). The presence of GRF1 in beta cells and the ability of a dominant negative form to inhibit calcium-dependent MAPK activity suggest a key role for GRF1 in beta cell calcium signaling. GRFbeta may function in vivo to modulate GRF1-dependent Ras activation. It remains to be established how GRF1 and GRFbeta are regulated to activate MAPK activity and how MAPK activity influences beta cell function.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank C. Ezerzer, V. Ablamunits, and S. Weiss for advice and assistance; Dr. L. Feig for kindly providing the GRF1 expression plasmid; Dr. S. Michaeli for advice; and Dr. S. Lev for helpful comments on the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by a grant (to M. D. W.) from the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Holds the Marvin Meyer and Jenny Cyker Chair of Diabetes Research. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 972-8-934-3597; Fax: 972-8-934-4118; E-mail: bcwalker@wiccmail.weizmann.ac.il.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MAP, mitogen-activated protein; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; FCS, fetal calf serum; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; HA, hemagglutinin; ERK, extracellular signal-related kinase; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; nt, nucleotide(s); bp, base pair(s); PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; PH, pleckstrin homology; GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Matschinsky, F. M., Glaser, B., and Magnuson, M. A. (1998) Diabetes 47, 307-315[Abstract]
2. Efrat, S., Tal, M., and Lodish, H. F. (1994) Trends Biochem Sci. 19, 535-538[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Frodin, M., Sekine, N., Roche, E., Filloux, C., Prentki, M., Wollheim, C. B., and Van Obberghen, E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7882-7889[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Khoo, S., and Cobb, M. H. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 5599-5604[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Benes, C., Roisin, M. P., Van, T. H., Creuzet, C., Miyazaki, J., and Fagard, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15507-15513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Burns, C. J., Howell, S. L., Jones, P. M., and Persaud, S. J. (1999) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 148, 29-35[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Macfarlane, W. M., Smith, S. B., James, R. F., Clifton, A. D., Doza, Y. N., Cohen, P., and Docherty, K. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20936-20944[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Macfarlane, W. M., McKinnon, C. M., Felton-Edkins, Z. A., Cragg, H., James, R. F., and Docherty, K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1011-1016[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Lisitsyn, N., Lisitsyn, N., and Wigler, M. (1993) Science 259, 946-951[Abstract]
10. Hubank, M., and Schatz, D. G. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 5640-5648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Arava, Y., Adamsky, K., Belleli, A., Shaltiel, S., and Walker, M. D. (1998) FEBS Lett. 425, 24-28[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Arava, Y., Adamsky, K., Ezerzer, C., Ablamunits, V., and Walker, M. D. (1999) Diabetes 48, 552-556[Abstract]
13. Shou, C., Farnsworth, C. L., Neel, B. G., and Feig, L. A. (1992) Nature 358, 351-354[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Farnsworth, C. L., Freshney, N. W., Rosen, L. B., Ghosh, A., Greenberg, M. E., and Feig, L. A. (1995) Nature 376, 524-527[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Walker, M. D., Park, C. W., Rosen, A., and Aronheim, A. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 1159-1166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Santerre, R. F., Cook, R. A., Crisel, R. M. D., Sharp, J. D., Schmidt, R. J., Williams, D. C., and Wilson, C. P. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 4339-4343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Efrat, S., Linde, S., Kofod, H., Spector, D., Delannoy, M., Grant, S., Hanahan, D., and Baekkeskov, S. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U. S. A. 85, 9037-9041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Wigler, M., Pellicer, A., Silverstein, S., Axel, R., Urlaub, G., and Chasin, L. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 1373-1376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Zippel, R., Orecchia, S., Sturani, E., and Martegani, E. (1996) Oncogene 12, 2697-2703[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Gotoh, M., Maki, T., Kiyoizumi, T., Satomi, S., and Monaco, A. P. (1985) Transplantation 40, 437-438[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (1988) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , Greene/Wiley-Interscience, New York
22. Cen, H., Papageorge, A. G., Zippel, R., Lowy, D. R., and Zhang, K. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 4007-4015[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Mount, S. M. (1982) Nucleic Acids Res. 10, 459-472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Quilliam, L. A., Kato, K., Rabun, K. M., Hisaka, M. M., Huff, S. Y., Campbell-Burk, S., and Der, C. J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1113-1121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Lowy, D. R., and Willumsen, B. M. (1993) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62, 851-891[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Qian, X., Vass, W. C., Papageorge, A. G., Anborgh, P. H., and Lowy, D. R. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 771-778[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Guerrero, C., Rojas, J. M., Chedid, M., Esteban, L. M., Zimonjic, D. B., Popescu, N. C., Font de Mora, J., and Santos, E. (1996) Oncogene 12, 1097-1107[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Buchsbaum, R., Telliez, J. B., Goonesekera, S., and Feig, L. A. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4888-4896[Abstract]
29. Cen, H., Papageorge, A. G., Vass, W. C., Zhang, K. E., and Lowy, D. R. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 7718-7724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Baouz, S., Jacquet, E., Bernardi, A., and Parmeggiani, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6671-6676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Brambilla, R., Gnesutta, N., Minichiello, L., White, G., Roylance, A. J., Herron, C. E., Ramsey, M., Wolfer, D. P., Cestari, V., Rossi, A. C., Grant, S. G., Chapman, P. F., Lipp, H. P., Sturani, E., and Klein, R. (1997) Nature 390, 281-286[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Itier, J. M., Tremp, G. L., Leonard, J. F., Multon, M. C., Ret, G., Schweighoffer, F., Tocque, B., Bluet, P. M., Cormier, V., and Dautry, F. (1998) Nature 393, 125-126[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Kowluru
Regulatory roles for small G proteins in the pancreatic {beta}-cell: lessons from models of impaired insulin secretion
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2003; 285(4): E669 - E684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arava, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arava, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement