![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 35, 24575-24578, August 27, 1999
From the Departments of Psychiatry and Cellular & Molecular Pharmacology, Program in Cell Biology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0984
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dynamin plays a critical role in the membrane
fission mechanism that mediates regulated endocytosis of many G
protein-coupled receptors. In addition, dynamin is required for
ligand-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by
certain receptors, raising a general question about the role of dynamin
in mitogenic signal transduction. Here we report that endocytosis of µ and Dynamin is a cytoplasmic GTPase that plays an essential role in
receptor-mediated endocytosis via clathrin-coated pits and caveoli (1,
2). Dynamin is required for constitutive endocytosis of many membrane
proteins as well as ligand-induced endocytosis of numerous receptors
that mediate signal transduction, including receptor tyrosine kinases
such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (3) and G protein-coupled
receptors such as adrenergic (4) and opioid receptors (5, 6). The rapid
removal of ligand-activated receptors from the cell surface mediated by
this mechanism plays a well established role in functional
desensitization of receptor-mediated signal transduction (7, 8). Recent studies indicate that ligand-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP)1 kinase both by
receptor tyrosine kinases, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor
(3), and G protein-coupled receptors, such as the Recent studies have demonstrated that the Opioid receptors couple via Gi to a variety of downstream
effectors, including adenylyl cyclase (14, 15) and MAP kinase (16-18).
Whereas these receptors are activated both by endogenously produced
peptide ligands and by clinically important alkaloid drugs such as
morphine and heroin, individual agonists differ significantly in their
ability to induce dynamin-dependent endocytosis of the µ opioid receptor. Peptide agonists induce rapid endocytosis of µ opioid receptors via clathrin-coated pits (19, 20). In marked contrast,
opioid receptors remain in the plasma membrane and are highly resistant
to endocytosis following activation by alkaloid agonist drugs such as
morphine (19, 21). This pharmacological dissociation between receptor
activation and endocytosis can be observed in native neurons (21, 22)
and is associated with differences in the regulation of opioid
receptor-mediated signal transduction (5, 23). A requirement of
receptor endocytosis for mitogenic signal transduction therefore
suggests that opiate drugs such as morphine may be profoundly deficient
in mitogenic signaling activity. However, morphine is capable of
causing significant activation of MAP kinase via pertussis
toxin-sensitive G proteins (16, 24). Furthermore, signaling via MAP
kinase contributes to some mechanisms of opioid receptor
desensitization, suggesting a role of mitogenic signaling in the
development of physiological tolerance to opiate drugs (24). Moreover,
recent studies suggest an important role of MAP kinase signaling in the
pathophysiology of physiological dependence and withdrawal following
prolonged administration of morphine (18). Thus the physiological
actions of addictive opiate drugs suggest a reappraisal of the
relationship between receptor endocytosis and mitogenic signal transduction.
We have addressed this issue using a well established model cell system
in which both µ and Immunocytochemical Staining and Fluorescence
Microscopy--
Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells (American Type
Culture Collection) were grown on coverslips in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (University of California, San Francisco, cell culture facility). Stably
transfected cells expressing µ opioid receptors were generated by
calcium phosphate precipitation and selected with 100 µg/ml geneticin (Life Technologies, Inc.) For staining, cells were incubated for 30 min
in medium containing 3.5 µg/ml M1 anti-FLAG antibody (Kodak IBI),
then treated with 5 µM agonist for 30 min, and fixed
using 4% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline. Cells were
permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in 3% dry milk in
Tris-buffered saline + 1 mM CaCl2, then
incubated with Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-mouse secondary antibody for
30 min (1:500, Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, Inc.). Conventional
fluorescence microscopy was performed using a Nikon 60X NA1.4 objective.
Detection of MAP Kinase and Phospho-MAP Kinase by
Immunoblotting--
Cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium with 10% fetal bovine serum then starved without serum for
18 h. Cells were then cultured for 2 h in fresh serum free
medium, then exposed to new serum free medium containing agonist for 5 min. Cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and lysed
in SDS sample buffer. Samples were passed through a 22-gauge needle to
reduce sample viscosity, heated to 100 °C for 5 min, cooled on ice,
then separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoreses, transferred to nitrocellulose, and detected by immunoblotting according to the
manufacturer's instructions (NEB, Inc. Beverly MA).
Ligand-dependent activation of MAP kinase was assayed
in stably transfected HEK293 cells expressing murine µ opioid
receptors using an antibody that specifically recognizes the activated
form of p42/44 MAP kinase (Erk1 and Erk2). We compared the effects of
opioid peptide (D-Ala2,
N-methyl-Phe4, Gly-ol5]enkephalin,
a hydrolysis-resistant analog of enkephalin) to those of the alkaloid
analgesic drugs morphine and etorphine. Both of these drugs activate
opioid receptors to signal via heterotrimeric G proteins, but differ
dramatically in their effects on dynamin-dependent endocytosis of receptors (5, 6, 19). Morphine caused no detectable
endocytosis of receptors, whereas etorphine promoted dynamin-dependent endocytosis of receptors to a similar
extent as opioid peptide (Fig.
1A). Surprisingly, despite
their dramatically different effects on receptor endocytosis, each of
these agonists strongly induced receptor-mediated activation of MAP
kinase (Fig. 1B). Furthermore MAP kinase activation induced
by all these agonists occurred with similar kinetics (not shown),
causing peak activation at 5 min after addition to the culture medium.
Quantitation of MAP kinase activation at this time point indicated that
all of these ligands (when examined at saturating concentrations to
avoid confounding effects of differences in agonist potency) (15, 25)
were similarly efficacious for inducing receptor-mediated activation of
MAP kinase (Fig. 1C).
opioid receptors is not required for efficient
ligand-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase.
Nevertheless, mitogenic signaling mediated by these receptors is
specifically dynamin-dependent. Thus a functional role of
dynamin in mitogenic signaling can be dissociated from its role in
receptor-mediated endocytosis, suggesting a previously unidentified and
distinct role of dynamin in signal transduction by certain G
protein-coupled receptors.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2
adrenergic receptor (9), is also specifically inhibited by
dominant-negative mutant dynamin. These observations have been
interpreted to indicate that endocytosis of a wide variety of signaling
receptors is a general requirement for receptor-mediated signal
transduction via mitogenic kinase cascades (3, 9).
2A adrenergic
receptor,
opioid receptor and m3 muscarinic receptor can signal to
the MAP kinase cascade in the absence of detectable receptor endocytosis (10-12). However, both
2A adrenergic and
opioid receptor signaling to MAPK was not blocked by
dominant-negative mutant dynamin (10, 11), suggesting these receptors
can signal to MAPK through a dynamin-independent mechanism. In
addition, although the effect of dominant-negative dynamin on the
ability of the m3 muscarinic receptor to signal to MAPK was not
examined, the m3 muscarinic receptor is coupled to Gq/11,
which presumably activates MAPK via protein kinase C phosphorylation
(13).
opioid receptors are regulated by
dynamin-dependent endocytosis (5, 6), and in which the agonist selectivity of opioid receptor endocytosis closely parallels that observed in native neurons (21, 22). Our studies indicate that
endocytosis of µ and
opioid receptors is not required for efficient receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase. Nevertheless, opioid receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase measured in the same
cells is strongly and specifically dynamin-dependent. These
observations suggest a role of dynamin in mitogenic signal transduction
mediated by certain G protein-coupled receptors that is distinct from
its role in mediating endocytosis of the receptor itself.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Endocytosis of the µ opioid receptor was not required for signaling to MAP
kinase. HEK293 cells stably transfected with the µ opioid
receptor were treated with a saturating concentration (5 µM) of agonist or left untreated and examined for
agonist-induced receptor endocytosis (A) or mitogenic
signaling as measured by phosphorylation of p44 and p42 MAP kinase
(Erk1 and Erk2) (B). Although morphine failed to induce
receptor endocytosis, all agonists tested efficiently induced
receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase. No activation of MAP kinase
was observed in untransfected cells (data not shown), confirming that
all signaling observed in transfected cells was mediated exclusively by
the µ opioid receptor introduced by transfection. Quantitation of MAP
kinase activation across three independent experiments by scanning
densitometry confirmed the reproducibility of the signaling results and
demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the relative
efficacy of individual agonists to induce MAP kinase activation
(C). Bars represent mean activation of MAP kinase
as detected using the phospho-specific antibody. Error bars represent
the mean ± S.D. of the data.
We next asked whether the ability of morphine to activate MAP kinase
without inducing endocytosis of receptors was unique to this agonist,
or whether this property may be more general to other analgesic drugs.
Furthermore, as many analgesic drugs activate more than one type of
opioid receptor when administered at clinically relevant
concentrations, we also asked whether other opioid receptors were
capable of mediating endocytosis-independent activation of MAP kinase.
To accomplish this, we examined a chimeric mutant
/
opioid
receptor that is completely defective in endocytosis, even when
activated by saturating concentrations of etorphine (6). Despite its
failure to endocytose upon activation by agonist, this mutant opioid
receptor mediated etorphine-induced activation of MAP kinase to an
equal or greater extent than did the wild-type
opioid receptor
(Fig. 2). Thus the ability of opiate
drugs to induce endocytosis-independent activation of MAP kinase is not unique to morphine or the µ opioid receptor.
|
As an alternative test of a potential role of opioid receptor
endocytosis in mitogenic signaling, we examined whether experimentally inducing dynamin-dependent endocytosis of
morphine-activated opioid receptors was sufficient to enhance
drug-induced activation of MAP kinase. To accomplish this, we examined
receptor-mediated MAP kinase activation in cells overexpressing
-arrestin at high levels, in which morphine promotes rapid,
dynamin-dependent endocytosis of opioid receptors (5).
Despite the profoundly different effects of morphine on opioid receptor
endocytosis observed in this variant cell line compared with cells
expressing receptors at similar level but not overexpressing
-arrestin, no enhancement of morphine-induced activation of MAP
kinase was observed (Fig. 3, compare
lanes 4 and 7). Furthermore the amount of MAP
kinase activation induced by morphine was closely similar to that
induced by opioid peptide in both cell lines (Fig. 3, compare
lanes 3 and 4 with lanes 6 and
7), even though morphine-induced endocytosis of opioid
receptors is selectively enhanced by >40-fold in the cells
overexpressing arrestin (5). Taken together, these experiments indicate
that dynamin-dependent endocytosis of opioid receptors is
neither necessary nor sufficient for receptor-mediated activation of
MAP kinase.
|
Despite the ability of opiate drugs to strongly induce
endocytosis-independent activation of MAP kinase, previous studies support an essential role of dynamin-dependent endocytosis
of other G protein-coupled receptors in MAP kinase signaling.
Furthermore, recent studies indicate that MAP kinase activation induced
by opioid peptides is also strongly dynamin-dependent (26).
Thus we examined whether opioid receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase induced by opiate drugs also required functional dynamin. To
accomplish this, opioid-induced activation of MAP kinase was assayed in
cells overexpressing K44E mutant dynamin I, which specifically inhibits
endocytosis via clathrin-coated pits in a dominant-negative manner (1,
2). Surprisingly, these experiments clearly indicated that
receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase induced by opiate drugs was
also strongly and specifically dynamin-dependent.
Receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase induced by both etorphine
and morphine was completely blocked by K44E mutant dynamin (Fig.
4) even though morphine failed to induce
any detectable endocytosis of receptors over the time course of MAP
kinase activation. Overexpressing wild-type dynamin I at similar levels
did not block opioid receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase by
either agonist (Fig. 4), confirming the biochemical specificity of the
inhibition observed.
|
We conclude that endocytosis is not required for efficient
ligand-induced activation of MAP kinase by µ and
opioid
receptors, even though receptor-mediated signaling via this effector
cascade is specifically dynamin-dependent. These studies
establish the first example of MAP kinase activation by a G
protein-coupled receptor that is dynamin-dependent but does
not require endocytosis of the receptor protein. Thus these studies
suggest an additional function of dynamin in mitogenic signal
transduction that is distinct from its essential role in mediating
endocytosis of the receptor itself.
Further studies will be required to elucidate the precise role of
dynamin in mitogenic signal transduction. One possibility is that
dynamin-dependent endocytosis of another protein, distinct from the opioid receptor itself, is required for receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase. Another possibility is that dynamin may
mediate a distinct biochemical function in signal transduction in
addition to its essential role in endocytic membrane fission (27-29).
In support of this latter hypothesis, we note that dynamin is a
regulated GTPase that is capable of interacting with a wide variety of
cytoplasmic and membrane-associated proteins. Although some of these
interacting proteins are associated specifically with clathrin-coated
pits, others (such as amphiphysin, Grb2, phospholipase C
,
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and Src) are thought to mediate distinct
or additional functions independent of, or in addition to, the membrane
fission machinery itself (for review see Ref. 30). Moreover, a
significant pool of cellular dynamin isoforms is associated with
microdomains of the plasma membrane that are not engaged in endocytosis
(2). Finally, although the traditionally accepted role of dynamin is as
a mechanochemical GTPase that itself mediates endocytic membrane
fission (31, 32), recent studies suggest that dynamin can function as a
GTP-dependent molecular switch to regulate the membrane
fission machinery in a manner analogous to the regulation of a
downstream effector by a "classical" signaling GTPase (33).
Whereas previous studies provide strong evidence for significant
heterogeneity in mechanisms of mitogenic signal transduction by
individual G protein-coupled receptors in various cell types, the
present results provide the first direct evidence for distinct functional roles of dynamin in G protein-coupled receptor-mediated endocytosis and signal transduction. These observations are
specifically relevant to the physiological actions of opiate drugs such
as morphine on the µ opioid receptor. However, it is clear from our studies that these observations are not unique to morphine nor to the µ opioid receptor. Moreover, as opioid receptors activate MAP kinase
by a molecular mechanism similar to that of other
Gi-coupled receptors (and distinct from an alternative
protein kinase C-mediated mechanism activated by Gq-coupled
receptors) (13), we anticipate that this dissociation between the
signaling and endocytic activities of dynamin may be of general
importance to certain other G protein-coupled receptors that activate
MAP kinase in a dynamin-dependent manner.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Richard Vallee for dynamin and K44E-dynamin cDNA. We thank Peter Chu for technical assistance. J. L. W. thanks Stig Hansen for support.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DA10711 (to M. v. Z.) and National Research Service Award Grant DA05844 (to J. L. W.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of
California, Nina Ireland Laboratory, Box 0984 IRE, 401 Parnassus Ave.,
San Francisco, CA 94143-0984. Tel.: 415-476-7855; Fax: 415-476-7884; E-mail: zastrow@itsa.ucsf.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: MAP, mitogen-activated protein; MAPK, MAP kinase; HEK, human embryonic kidney.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Herskovits, J. S.,
Burgess, C. C.,
Obar, R. A.,
and Vallee, R. B.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
565-578 |
| 2. |
Damke, H.,
Baba, T.,
Warnock, D. E.,
and Schmid, S. L.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
915-934 |
| 3. |
Vieira, A. V.,
Lamaze, C.,
and Schmid, S. L.
(1996)
Science
274,
2086-2089 |
| 4. |
Zhang, J.,
Barak, L. S.,
Winkler, K. E.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Ferguson, S. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27005-27014 |
| 5. |
Whistler, J. L.,
and von Zastrow, M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9914-9919 |
| 6. |
Chu, P.,
Murray, S.,
Lissin, D.,
and von Zastrow, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27124-27130 |
| 7. | Ferguson, S. S., and Caron, M. G. (1998) Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 119-127 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Lefkowitz, R. J., Pitcher, J., Krueger, K., and Daaka, Y. (1998) Adv. Pharmacol. 42, 416-420 |
| 9. |
Daaka, Y.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
Ahn, S.,
Della Rocca, G. J.,
Ferguson, S. S.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
685-688 |
| 10. |
DeGraff, J. L.,
Gagnon, A. W.,
Benovic, J. L.,
and Orsini, M. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11253-11259 |
| 11. |
Li, J.,
Luo, L.,
Krupnick, J. G.,
Benovic, J. L.,
and Liu-Chen, L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12087-12094 |
| 12. |
Budd, D. C.,
Rae, A.,
and Tobin, A. B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12355-12360 |
| 13. |
Gutkind, J. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1839-1842 |
| 14. | Evans, C. J. (1993) in Biological Basis of Substance Abuse (Korenman, S. G. , and Barchas, J. D., eds) , pp. 31-48, Oxford University Press, New York |
| 15. | Raynor, K., Kong, H., Chen, Y., Yasuda, K., Yu, L., Bell, G. I., and Reisine, T. (1994) Mol. Pharmacol. 45, 330-334[Abstract] |
| 16. | Burt, R. P., Chapple, C. R., and Marshall, I. (1996) Br. J. Pharmacol. 117, 224-230[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Li, L. Y., and Chang, K. J. (1996) Mol. Pharmacol. 50, 599-602[Abstract] |
| 18. | Schulz, S., and Hollt, V. (1998) Eur. J. Neurosci. 10, 1196-1201[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Keith, D. E.,
Murray, S. R.,
Zaki, P. A.,
Chu, P. C.,
Lissin, D. V.,
Kang, L.,
Evans, C. J.,
and von Zastrow, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19021-19024 |
| 20. |
Trapaidze, N.,
Keith, D. E.,
Cvejic, S.,
Evans, C. J.,
and Devi, L. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29279-29285 |
| 21. |
Keith, D. E.,
Anton, B.,
Murray, S. R.,
Zaki, P. A.,
Chu, P. C.,
Lissin, D. V.,
Monteillet-Agius, G.,
Stewart, P. L.,
Evans, C. J.,
and von Zastrow, M.
(1998)
Mol. Pharmacol.
53,
377-384 |
| 22. |
Sternini, C.,
Spann, M.,
Anton, B.,
Keith, D. J.,
Bunnett, N. W.,
von, Z., M.,
Evans, C.,
and Brecha, N. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
9241-9246 |
| 23. |
Zhang, J.,
Ferguson, S. S.,
Barak, L. S.,
Bodduluri, S. R.,
Laporte, S. A.,
Law, P. Y.,
and Caron, M. G.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7157-7162 |
| 24. |
Polakiewicz, R. D.,
Schieferl, S. M.,
Dorner, L. F.,
Kansra, V.,
and Comb, M. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12402-12406 |
| 25. | Raynor, K., Kong, H., Law, S., Heerding, J., Tallent, M., Livingston, F., Hines, J., and Reisine, T. (1996) Natl. Inst. Drug Abuse Res. Monogr. 161, 83-103 |
| 26. |
Ignatova, E. G.,
Belcheva, M. M.,
Bohn, L. M.,
Neuman, M. C.,
and Coscia, C. J.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
56-63 |
| 27. | Schmid, S. L. (1997) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 511-548[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Warnock, D. E., and Schmid, S. L. (1996) Bioessays 18, 885-893[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Hinshaw, J. E., and Schmid, S. L. (1995) Nature 374, 190-192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Schmid, S. L., McNiven, M. A., and De Camilli, P. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 504-512[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Sweitzer, S. M., and Hinshaw, J. E. (1998) Cell 93, 1021-1029[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Takei, K., Haucke, V., Slepnev, V., Farsad, K., Salazar, M., Chen, H., and De Camilli, P. (1998) Cell 94, 131-141[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Sever, S., Muhlberg, A. B., and Schmid, S. L. (1999) Nature 398, 481-486[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Zhao, H. H. Loh, and P. Y. Law Adenylyl Cyclase Superactivation Induced by Long-Term Treatment with Opioid Agonist Is Dependent on Receptor Localized within Lipid Rafts and Is Independent of Receptor Internalization Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1421 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Koch, A. Widera, K. Bartzsch, S. Schulz, L.-O. Brandenburg, N. Wundrack, A. Beyer, G. Grecksch, and V. Hollt Receptor Endocytosis Counteracts the Development of Opioid Tolerance Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2005; 67(1): 280 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Mishra, S. S. Jatiani, A. Kumar, V. R. Simhadri, R. V. Hosur, and R. Mittal Dynamin Interacts with Members of the Sumoylation Machinery J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31445 - 31454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Huang, Y. Sun, and X.-Y. Huang Distinct Roles for Src Tyrosine Kinase in {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling to MAPK and in Receptor Internalization J. Biol. Chem., May 14, 2004; 279(20): 21637 - 21642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zanner, M. Gratzl, and C. Prinz Expression of the endocytic proteins dynamin and amphiphysin in rat gastric enterochromaffin-like cells J. Cell Sci., May 1, 2004; 117(11): 2369 - 2376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Holstein, K. A. Berg, L. M. F. Leeb-Lundberg, M. S. Olson, and C. Saunders Calcium-sensing Receptor-mediated ERK1/2 Activation Requires G{alpha}i2 Coupling and Dynamin-independent Receptor Internalization J. Biol. Chem., March 12, 2004; 279(11): 10060 - 10069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Kahlig, J. A. Javitch, and A. Galli Amphetamine Regulation of Dopamine Transport: COMBINED MEASUREMENTS OF TRANSPORTER CURRENTS AND TRANSPORTER IMAGING SUPPORT THE ENDOCYTOSIS OF AN ACTIVE CARRIER J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 8966 - 8975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Kim, M. Y. Kim, E. J. Lee, Y. S. Ahn, and J.-H. Baik Distinct Regulation of Internalization and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation by Two Isoforms of the Dopamine D2 Receptor Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2004; 18(3): 640 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Charest and M. Bouvier Palmitoylation of the V2 Vasopressin Receptor Carboxyl Tail Enhances {beta}-Arrestin Recruitment Leading to Efficient Receptor Endocytosis and ERK1/2 Activation J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2003; 278(42): 41541 - 41551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Jimenez-Sainz, B. Fast, F. Mayor Jr., and A. M. Aragay Signaling Pathways for Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1-Mediated Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Activation Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2003; 64(3): 773 - 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Elorza, P. Penela, S. Sarnago, and F. Mayor Jr. MAPK-dependent Degradation of G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase 2 J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2003; 278(31): 29164 - 29173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Cao, J. Yao, and V. Shah The Proline-rich Domain of Dynamin-2 Is Responsible for Dynamin-dependent in Vitro Potentiation of Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase Activity via Selective Effects on Reductase Domain Function J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 2003; 278(8): 5894 - 5901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Dell, J. Connor, S. Chen, E. G. Stebbins, N. P. Skiba, D. Mochly-Rosen, and H. E. Hamm The beta gamma Subunit of Heterotrimeric G Proteins Interacts with RACK1 and Two Other WD Repeat Proteins J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 2002; 277(51): 49888 - 49895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Haugh Localization of Receptor-Mediated Signal Transduction Pathways: The Inside Story Mol. Interv., September 1, 2002; 2(5): 292 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Lu, J. T. Murray, W. Luo, H. Li, X. Wu, H. Xu, J. M. Backer, and Y.-G. Chen Transforming Growth Factor beta Activates Smad2 in the Absence of Receptor Endocytosis J. Biol. Chem., August 9, 2002; 277(33): 29363 - 29368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Szaszak, Z. Gaborik, G. Turu, P. S. McPherson, A. J. L. Clark, K. J. Catt, and L. Hunyady Role of the Proline-rich Domain of Dynamin-2 and Its Interactions with Src Homology 3 Domains during Endocytosis of the AT1 Angiotensin Receptor J. Biol. Chem., June 7, 2002; 277(24): 21650 - 21656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Shah, J. Alberto Olivares-Reyes, A. Yesilkaya, and K. J. Catt Independence of Angiotensin II-Induced MAP Kinase Activation from Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor Internalization in Clone 9 Hepatocytes Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2002; 16(3): 610 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Hislop, H. M. Everest, A. Flynn, T. Harding, J. B. Uney, B. E. Troskie, R. P. Millar, and C. A. McArdle Differential Internalization of Mammalian and Non-mammalian Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptors. UNCOUPLING OF DYNAMIN-DEPENDENT INTERNALIZATION FROM MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE SIGNALING J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2001; 276(43): 39685 - 39694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Smith, R. Yu, and P. M. Hinkle Activation of MAPK by TRH Requires Clathrin-Dependent Endocytosis and PKC but Not Receptor Interaction with {beta}-Arrestin or Receptor Endocytosis Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2001; 15(9): 1539 - 1548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. G. Ferguson Evolving Concepts in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Endocytosis: The Role in Receptor Desensitization and Signaling Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2001; 53(1): 1 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. York, D. C. Molliver, S. S. Grewal, P. E. Stenberg, E. W. McCleskey, and P. J. S. Stork Role of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase and Endocytosis in Nerve Growth Factor-Induced Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Activation via Ras and Rap1 Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2000; 20(21): 8069 - 8083. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-z. Zhang, D. B. Moheban, B. R. Conway, A. Bhattacharyya, and R. A. Segal Cell Surface Trk Receptors Mediate NGF-Induced Survival While Internalized Receptors Regulate NGF-Induced Differentiation J. Neurosci., August 1, 2000; 20(15): 5671 - 5678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. N. Fish, S. L. Schmid, and H. Damke Evidence that Dynamin-2 Functions as a Signal-transducing GTPase J. Cell Biol., July 11, 2000; 150(1): 145 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Pierce, S. Maudsley, Y. Daaka, L. M. Luttrell, and R. J. Lefkowitz Role of endocytosis in the activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade by sequestering and nonsequestering G protein-coupled receptors PNAS, February 15, 2000; 97(4): 1489 - 1494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. L. Roudabush, K. L. Pierce, S. Maudsley, K. D. Khan, and L. M. Luttrell Transactivation of the EGF Receptor Mediates IGF-1-stimulated Shc Phosphorylation and ERK1/2 Activation in COS-7 Cells J. Biol. Chem., July 14, 2000; 275(29): 22583 - 22589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Cao, J. Yao, T. J. McCabe, Q. Yao, Z. S. Katusic, W. C. Sessa, and V. Shah Direct Interaction between Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase and Dynamin-2. IMPLICATIONS FOR NITRIC-OXIDE SYNTHASE FUNCTION J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2001; 276(17): 14249 - 14256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Saunders, J. V. Ferrer, L. Shi, J. Chen, G. Merrill, M. E. Lamb, L. M. F. Leeb-Lundberg, L. Carvelli, J. A. Javitch, and A. Galli Amphetamine-induced loss of human dopamine transporter activity: An internalization-dependent and cocaine-sensitive mechanism PNAS, June 6, 2000; 97(12): 6850 - 6855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||