JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whistler, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by von Zastrow, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whistler, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by von Zastrow, M.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 35, 24575-24578, August 27, 1999


Dissociation of Functional Roles of Dynamin in Receptor-mediated Endocytosis and Mitogenic Signal Transduction*

Jennifer L. Whistler and Mark von ZastrowDagger

From the Departments of Psychiatry and Cellular & Molecular Pharmacology, Program in Cell Biology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0984

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Dynamin plays a critical role in the membrane fission mechanism that mediates regulated endocytosis of many G protein-coupled receptors. In addition, dynamin is required for ligand-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by certain receptors, raising a general question about the role of dynamin in mitogenic signal transduction. Here we report that endocytosis of µ and delta  opioid receptors is not required for efficient ligand-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. Nevertheless, mitogenic signaling mediated by these receptors is specifically dynamin-dependent. Thus a functional role of dynamin in mitogenic signaling can be dissociated from its role in receptor-mediated endocytosis, suggesting a previously unidentified and distinct role of dynamin in signal transduction by certain G protein-coupled receptors.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Dynamin is a cytoplasmic GTPase that plays an essential role in receptor-mediated endocytosis via clathrin-coated pits and caveoli (1, 2). Dynamin is required for constitutive endocytosis of many membrane proteins as well as ligand-induced endocytosis of numerous receptors that mediate signal transduction, including receptor tyrosine kinases such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (3) and G protein-coupled receptors such as adrenergic (4) and opioid receptors (5, 6). The rapid removal of ligand-activated receptors from the cell surface mediated by this mechanism plays a well established role in functional desensitization of receptor-mediated signal transduction (7, 8). Recent studies indicate that ligand-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP)1 kinase both by receptor tyrosine kinases, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (3), and G protein-coupled receptors, such as the beta 2 adrenergic receptor (9), is also specifically inhibited by dominant-negative mutant dynamin. These observations have been interpreted to indicate that endocytosis of a wide variety of signaling receptors is a general requirement for receptor-mediated signal transduction via mitogenic kinase cascades (3, 9).

Recent studies have demonstrated that the alpha 2A adrenergic receptor, kappa  opioid receptor and m3 muscarinic receptor can signal to the MAP kinase cascade in the absence of detectable receptor endocytosis (10-12). However, both alpha 2A adrenergic and kappa  opioid receptor signaling to MAPK was not blocked by dominant-negative mutant dynamin (10, 11), suggesting these receptors can signal to MAPK through a dynamin-independent mechanism. In addition, although the effect of dominant-negative dynamin on the ability of the m3 muscarinic receptor to signal to MAPK was not examined, the m3 muscarinic receptor is coupled to Gq/11, which presumably activates MAPK via protein kinase C phosphorylation (13).

Opioid receptors couple via Gi to a variety of downstream effectors, including adenylyl cyclase (14, 15) and MAP kinase (16-18). Whereas these receptors are activated both by endogenously produced peptide ligands and by clinically important alkaloid drugs such as morphine and heroin, individual agonists differ significantly in their ability to induce dynamin-dependent endocytosis of the µ opioid receptor. Peptide agonists induce rapid endocytosis of µ opioid receptors via clathrin-coated pits (19, 20). In marked contrast, opioid receptors remain in the plasma membrane and are highly resistant to endocytosis following activation by alkaloid agonist drugs such as morphine (19, 21). This pharmacological dissociation between receptor activation and endocytosis can be observed in native neurons (21, 22) and is associated with differences in the regulation of opioid receptor-mediated signal transduction (5, 23). A requirement of receptor endocytosis for mitogenic signal transduction therefore suggests that opiate drugs such as morphine may be profoundly deficient in mitogenic signaling activity. However, morphine is capable of causing significant activation of MAP kinase via pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins (16, 24). Furthermore, signaling via MAP kinase contributes to some mechanisms of opioid receptor desensitization, suggesting a role of mitogenic signaling in the development of physiological tolerance to opiate drugs (24). Moreover, recent studies suggest an important role of MAP kinase signaling in the pathophysiology of physiological dependence and withdrawal following prolonged administration of morphine (18). Thus the physiological actions of addictive opiate drugs suggest a reappraisal of the relationship between receptor endocytosis and mitogenic signal transduction.

We have addressed this issue using a well established model cell system in which both µ and delta  opioid receptors are regulated by dynamin-dependent endocytosis (5, 6), and in which the agonist selectivity of opioid receptor endocytosis closely parallels that observed in native neurons (21, 22). Our studies indicate that endocytosis of µ and delta  opioid receptors is not required for efficient receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase. Nevertheless, opioid receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase measured in the same cells is strongly and specifically dynamin-dependent. These observations suggest a role of dynamin in mitogenic signal transduction mediated by certain G protein-coupled receptors that is distinct from its role in mediating endocytosis of the receptor itself.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Immunocytochemical Staining and Fluorescence Microscopy-- Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells (American Type Culture Collection) were grown on coverslips in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (University of California, San Francisco, cell culture facility). Stably transfected cells expressing µ opioid receptors were generated by calcium phosphate precipitation and selected with 100 µg/ml geneticin (Life Technologies, Inc.) For staining, cells were incubated for 30 min in medium containing 3.5 µg/ml M1 anti-FLAG antibody (Kodak IBI), then treated with 5 µM agonist for 30 min, and fixed using 4% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline. Cells were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in 3% dry milk in Tris-buffered saline + 1 mM CaCl2, then incubated with Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-mouse secondary antibody for 30 min (1:500, Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, Inc.). Conventional fluorescence microscopy was performed using a Nikon 60X NA1.4 objective.

Detection of MAP Kinase and Phospho-MAP Kinase by Immunoblotting-- Cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum then starved without serum for 18 h. Cells were then cultured for 2 h in fresh serum free medium, then exposed to new serum free medium containing agonist for 5 min. Cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in SDS sample buffer. Samples were passed through a 22-gauge needle to reduce sample viscosity, heated to 100 °C for 5 min, cooled on ice, then separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoreses, transferred to nitrocellulose, and detected by immunoblotting according to the manufacturer's instructions (NEB, Inc. Beverly MA).

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Ligand-dependent activation of MAP kinase was assayed in stably transfected HEK293 cells expressing murine µ opioid receptors using an antibody that specifically recognizes the activated form of p42/44 MAP kinase (Erk1 and Erk2). We compared the effects of opioid peptide (D-Ala2, N-methyl-Phe4, Gly-ol5]enkephalin, a hydrolysis-resistant analog of enkephalin) to those of the alkaloid analgesic drugs morphine and etorphine. Both of these drugs activate opioid receptors to signal via heterotrimeric G proteins, but differ dramatically in their effects on dynamin-dependent endocytosis of receptors (5, 6, 19). Morphine caused no detectable endocytosis of receptors, whereas etorphine promoted dynamin-dependent endocytosis of receptors to a similar extent as opioid peptide (Fig. 1A). Surprisingly, despite their dramatically different effects on receptor endocytosis, each of these agonists strongly induced receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase (Fig. 1B). Furthermore MAP kinase activation induced by all these agonists occurred with similar kinetics (not shown), causing peak activation at 5 min after addition to the culture medium. Quantitation of MAP kinase activation at this time point indicated that all of these ligands (when examined at saturating concentrations to avoid confounding effects of differences in agonist potency) (15, 25) were similarly efficacious for inducing receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase (Fig. 1C).


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Endocytosis of the µ opioid receptor was not required for signaling to MAP kinase. HEK293 cells stably transfected with the µ opioid receptor were treated with a saturating concentration (5 µM) of agonist or left untreated and examined for agonist-induced receptor endocytosis (A) or mitogenic signaling as measured by phosphorylation of p44 and p42 MAP kinase (Erk1 and Erk2) (B). Although morphine failed to induce receptor endocytosis, all agonists tested efficiently induced receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase. No activation of MAP kinase was observed in untransfected cells (data not shown), confirming that all signaling observed in transfected cells was mediated exclusively by the µ opioid receptor introduced by transfection. Quantitation of MAP kinase activation across three independent experiments by scanning densitometry confirmed the reproducibility of the signaling results and demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the relative efficacy of individual agonists to induce MAP kinase activation (C). Bars represent mean activation of MAP kinase as detected using the phospho-specific antibody. Error bars represent the mean ± S.D. of the data.

We next asked whether the ability of morphine to activate MAP kinase without inducing endocytosis of receptors was unique to this agonist, or whether this property may be more general to other analgesic drugs. Furthermore, as many analgesic drugs activate more than one type of opioid receptor when administered at clinically relevant concentrations, we also asked whether other opioid receptors were capable of mediating endocytosis-independent activation of MAP kinase. To accomplish this, we examined a chimeric mutant delta /kappa opioid receptor that is completely defective in endocytosis, even when activated by saturating concentrations of etorphine (6). Despite its failure to endocytose upon activation by agonist, this mutant opioid receptor mediated etorphine-induced activation of MAP kinase to an equal or greater extent than did the wild-type delta  opioid receptor (Fig. 2). Thus the ability of opiate drugs to induce endocytosis-independent activation of MAP kinase is not unique to morphine or the µ opioid receptor.


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Endocytosis of the delta  opioid receptor was not required for signaling to MAP kinase. HEK293 cells were stably transfected with the cloned murine µ or delta  opioid receptor, both of which endocytose rapidly following activation by etorphine, or with a chimeric mutant delta /kappa opioid receptor that couples efficiently to heterotrimeric G protein but is specifically defective in ligand-induced endocytosis. Cells were treated with a saturating concentration (5 µM) of etorphine for 5 min and assayed for MAP kinase activation. Although the mutant delta /kappa opioid receptor fails to internalize when activated by etorphine (6), this mutant receptor stimulated phosphorylation of MAP kinase to a similar or even slightly greater extent than did the wild-type delta  opioid receptor expressed at similar levels.

As an alternative test of a potential role of opioid receptor endocytosis in mitogenic signaling, we examined whether experimentally inducing dynamin-dependent endocytosis of morphine-activated opioid receptors was sufficient to enhance drug-induced activation of MAP kinase. To accomplish this, we examined receptor-mediated MAP kinase activation in cells overexpressing beta -arrestin at high levels, in which morphine promotes rapid, dynamin-dependent endocytosis of opioid receptors (5). Despite the profoundly different effects of morphine on opioid receptor endocytosis observed in this variant cell line compared with cells expressing receptors at similar level but not overexpressing beta -arrestin, no enhancement of morphine-induced activation of MAP kinase was observed (Fig. 3, compare lanes 4 and 7). Furthermore the amount of MAP kinase activation induced by morphine was closely similar to that induced by opioid peptide in both cell lines (Fig. 3, compare lanes 3 and 4 with lanes 6 and 7), even though morphine-induced endocytosis of opioid receptors is selectively enhanced by >40-fold in the cells overexpressing arrestin (5). Taken together, these experiments indicate that dynamin-dependent endocytosis of opioid receptors is neither necessary nor sufficient for receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase.


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Stimulation of endocytosis did not enhance signaling to MAP kinase. A clone of stably transfected HEK293 cells was subsequently transfected with epitope-tagged beta -arrestin, and a cell clone expressing receptors at the same level as parental cells and overexpressing beta -arrestin ~40-fold over endogenous levels was selected for study of MAP kinase activation. Cells were assayed for agonist-induced phosphorylation of MAP kinase. Although morphine-induced internalization of the µ opioid receptor is selectively enhanced >40-fold in the cells overexpressing arrestin (5), there was no enhancement of MAP kinase phosphorylation in these cells relative to that observed in the parental cell clone in which no morphine-induced endocytosis of receptors is detected.

Despite the ability of opiate drugs to strongly induce endocytosis-independent activation of MAP kinase, previous studies support an essential role of dynamin-dependent endocytosis of other G protein-coupled receptors in MAP kinase signaling. Furthermore, recent studies indicate that MAP kinase activation induced by opioid peptides is also strongly dynamin-dependent (26). Thus we examined whether opioid receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase induced by opiate drugs also required functional dynamin. To accomplish this, opioid-induced activation of MAP kinase was assayed in cells overexpressing K44E mutant dynamin I, which specifically inhibits endocytosis via clathrin-coated pits in a dominant-negative manner (1, 2). Surprisingly, these experiments clearly indicated that receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase induced by opiate drugs was also strongly and specifically dynamin-dependent. Receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase induced by both etorphine and morphine was completely blocked by K44E mutant dynamin (Fig. 4) even though morphine failed to induce any detectable endocytosis of receptors over the time course of MAP kinase activation. Overexpressing wild-type dynamin I at similar levels did not block opioid receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase by either agonist (Fig. 4), confirming the biochemical specificity of the inhibition observed.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Dominant-negative dynamin blocked opioid receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase. HEK293 cells were stably transfected with either the beta -2-adrenergic receptor or the µ opioid receptor. These stable cell lines were then transiently transfected with K44E dominant-negative dynamin (1, 2) or wild-type dynamin, and subsequently assayed for agonist-induced activation of MAP kinase. The efficiency of dynamin transfection and inhibition of ligand-induced endocytosis (both >75%) was verified by fluorescence microscopy in control experiments (not shown). K44E mutant dynamin completely inhibited isoproterenol-induced activation of MAP kinase mediated by the beta -2-adrenergic receptor, as reported previously by others. K44E mutant dynamin also blocked etorphine- and morphine-stimulated activation of MAP kinase mediated by the µ opioid receptor. In contrast, overexpression of wild-type dynamin at similar levels did not block receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase.

We conclude that endocytosis is not required for efficient ligand-induced activation of MAP kinase by µ and delta  opioid receptors, even though receptor-mediated signaling via this effector cascade is specifically dynamin-dependent. These studies establish the first example of MAP kinase activation by a G protein-coupled receptor that is dynamin-dependent but does not require endocytosis of the receptor protein. Thus these studies suggest an additional function of dynamin in mitogenic signal transduction that is distinct from its essential role in mediating endocytosis of the receptor itself.

Further studies will be required to elucidate the precise role of dynamin in mitogenic signal transduction. One possibility is that dynamin-dependent endocytosis of another protein, distinct from the opioid receptor itself, is required for receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinase. Another possibility is that dynamin may mediate a distinct biochemical function in signal transduction in addition to its essential role in endocytic membrane fission (27-29). In support of this latter hypothesis, we note that dynamin is a regulated GTPase that is capable of interacting with a wide variety of cytoplasmic and membrane-associated proteins. Although some of these interacting proteins are associated specifically with clathrin-coated pits, others (such as amphiphysin, Grb2, phospholipase Cgamma , phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and Src) are thought to mediate distinct or additional functions independent of, or in addition to, the membrane fission machinery itself (for review see Ref. 30). Moreover, a significant pool of cellular dynamin isoforms is associated with microdomains of the plasma membrane that are not engaged in endocytosis (2). Finally, although the traditionally accepted role of dynamin is as a mechanochemical GTPase that itself mediates endocytic membrane fission (31, 32), recent studies suggest that dynamin can function as a GTP-dependent molecular switch to regulate the membrane fission machinery in a manner analogous to the regulation of a downstream effector by a "classical" signaling GTPase (33).

Whereas previous studies provide strong evidence for significant heterogeneity in mechanisms of mitogenic signal transduction by individual G protein-coupled receptors in various cell types, the present results provide the first direct evidence for distinct functional roles of dynamin in G protein-coupled receptor-mediated endocytosis and signal transduction. These observations are specifically relevant to the physiological actions of opiate drugs such as morphine on the µ opioid receptor. However, it is clear from our studies that these observations are not unique to morphine nor to the µ opioid receptor. Moreover, as opioid receptors activate MAP kinase by a molecular mechanism similar to that of other Gi-coupled receptors (and distinct from an alternative protein kinase C-mediated mechanism activated by Gq-coupled receptors) (13), we anticipate that this dissociation between the signaling and endocytic activities of dynamin may be of general importance to certain other G protein-coupled receptors that activate MAP kinase in a dynamin-dependent manner.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Richard Vallee for dynamin and K44E-dynamin cDNA. We thank Peter Chu for technical assistance. J. L. W. thanks Stig Hansen for support.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DA10711 (to M. v. Z.) and National Research Service Award Grant DA05844 (to J. L. W.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of California, Nina Ireland Laboratory, Box 0984 IRE, 401 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA 94143-0984. Tel.: 415-476-7855; Fax: 415-476-7884; E-mail: zastrow@itsa.ucsf.edu.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MAP, mitogen-activated protein; MAPK, MAP kinase; HEK, human embryonic kidney.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Herskovits, J. S., Burgess, C. C., Obar, R. A., and Vallee, R. B. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 565-578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Damke, H., Baba, T., Warnock, D. E., and Schmid, S. L. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 127, 915-934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Vieira, A. V., Lamaze, C., and Schmid, S. L. (1996) Science 274, 2086-2089[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Zhang, J., Barak, L. S., Winkler, K. E., Caron, M. G., and Ferguson, S. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27005-27014[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Whistler, J. L., and von Zastrow, M. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 9914-9919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Chu, P., Murray, S., Lissin, D., and von Zastrow, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27124-27130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Ferguson, S. S., and Caron, M. G. (1998) Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 119-127 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Lefkowitz, R. J., Pitcher, J., Krueger, K., and Daaka, Y. (1998) Adv. Pharmacol. 42, 416-420
9. Daaka, Y., Luttrell, L. M., Ahn, S., Della Rocca, G. J., Ferguson, S. S., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 685-688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. DeGraff, J. L., Gagnon, A. W., Benovic, J. L., and Orsini, M. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11253-11259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Li, J., Luo, L., Krupnick, J. G., Benovic, J. L., and Liu-Chen, L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12087-12094[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Budd, D. C., Rae, A., and Tobin, A. B. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12355-12360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Gutkind, J. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1839-1842[Free Full Text]
14. Evans, C. J. (1993) in Biological Basis of Substance Abuse (Korenman, S. G. , and Barchas, J. D., eds) , pp. 31-48, Oxford University Press, New York
15. Raynor, K., Kong, H., Chen, Y., Yasuda, K., Yu, L., Bell, G. I., and Reisine, T. (1994) Mol. Pharmacol. 45, 330-334[Abstract]
16. Burt, R. P., Chapple, C. R., and Marshall, I. (1996) Br. J. Pharmacol. 117, 224-230[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Li, L. Y., and Chang, K. J. (1996) Mol. Pharmacol. 50, 599-602[Abstract]
18. Schulz, S., and Hollt, V. (1998) Eur. J. Neurosci. 10, 1196-1201[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Keith, D. E., Murray, S. R., Zaki, P. A., Chu, P. C., Lissin, D. V., Kang, L., Evans, C. J., and von Zastrow, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19021-19024[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Trapaidze, N., Keith, D. E., Cvejic, S., Evans, C. J., and Devi, L. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29279-29285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Keith, D. E., Anton, B., Murray, S. R., Zaki, P. A., Chu, P. C., Lissin, D. V., Monteillet-Agius, G., Stewart, P. L., Evans, C. J., and von Zastrow, M. (1998) Mol. Pharmacol. 53, 377-384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Sternini, C., Spann, M., Anton, B., Keith, D. J., Bunnett, N. W., von, Z., M., Evans, C., and Brecha, N. C. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 9241-9246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Zhang, J., Ferguson, S. S., Barak, L. S., Bodduluri, S. R., Laporte, S. A., Law, P. Y., and Caron, M. G. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 7157-7162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Polakiewicz, R. D., Schieferl, S. M., Dorner, L. F., Kansra, V., and Comb, M. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12402-12406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Raynor, K., Kong, H., Law, S., Heerding, J., Tallent, M., Livingston, F., Hines, J., and Reisine, T. (1996) Natl. Inst. Drug Abuse Res. Monogr. 161, 83-103
26. Ignatova, E. G., Belcheva, M. M., Bohn, L. M., Neuman, M. C., and Coscia, C. J. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 56-63[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Schmid, S. L. (1997) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 511-548[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Warnock, D. E., and Schmid, S. L. (1996) Bioessays 18, 885-893[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Hinshaw, J. E., and Schmid, S. L. (1995) Nature 374, 190-192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Schmid, S. L., McNiven, M. A., and De Camilli, P. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 504-512[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Sweitzer, S. M., and Hinshaw, J. E. (1998) Cell 93, 1021-1029[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Takei, K., Haucke, V., Slepnev, V., Farsad, K., Salazar, M., Chen, H., and De Camilli, P. (1998) Cell 94, 131-141[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Sever, S., Muhlberg, A. B., and Schmid, S. L. (1999) Nature 398, 481-486[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
H. Zhao, H. H. Loh, and P. Y. Law
Adenylyl Cyclase Superactivation Induced by Long-Term Treatment with Opioid Agonist Is Dependent on Receptor Localized within Lipid Rafts and Is Independent of Receptor Internalization
Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1421 - 1432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
T. Koch, A. Widera, K. Bartzsch, S. Schulz, L.-O. Brandenburg, N. Wundrack, A. Beyer, G. Grecksch, and V. Hollt
Receptor Endocytosis Counteracts the Development of Opioid Tolerance
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2005; 67(1): 280 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. K. Mishra, S. S. Jatiani, A. Kumar, V. R. Simhadri, R. V. Hosur, and R. Mittal
Dynamin Interacts with Members of the Sumoylation Machinery
J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31445 - 31454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Huang, Y. Sun, and X.-Y. Huang
Distinct Roles for Src Tyrosine Kinase in {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling to MAPK and in Receptor Internalization
J. Biol. Chem., May 14, 2004; 279(20): 21637 - 21642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
R. Zanner, M. Gratzl, and C. Prinz
Expression of the endocytic proteins dynamin and amphiphysin in rat gastric enterochromaffin-like cells
J. Cell Sci., May 1, 2004; 117(11): 2369 - 2376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. M. Holstein, K. A. Berg, L. M. F. Leeb-Lundberg, M. S. Olson, and C. Saunders
Calcium-sensing Receptor-mediated ERK1/2 Activation Requires G{alpha}i2 Coupling and Dynamin-independent Receptor Internalization
J. Biol. Chem., March 12, 2004; 279(11): 10060 - 10069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. M. Kahlig, J. A. Javitch, and A. Galli
Amphetamine Regulation of Dopamine Transport: COMBINED MEASUREMENTS OF TRANSPORTER CURRENTS AND TRANSPORTER IMAGING SUPPORT THE ENDOCYTOSIS OF AN ACTIVE CARRIER
J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 8966 - 8975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. J. Kim, M. Y. Kim, E. J. Lee, Y. S. Ahn, and J.-H. Baik
Distinct Regulation of Internalization and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation by Two Isoforms of the Dopamine D2 Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2004; 18(3): 640 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. G. Charest and M. Bouvier
Palmitoylation of the V2 Vasopressin Receptor Carboxyl Tail Enhances {beta}-Arrestin Recruitment Leading to Efficient Receptor Endocytosis and ERK1/2 Activation
J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2003; 278(42): 41541 - 41551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. C. Jimenez-Sainz, B. Fast, F. Mayor Jr., and A. M. Aragay
Signaling Pathways for Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1-Mediated Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Activation
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2003; 64(3): 773 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Elorza, P. Penela, S. Sarnago, and F. Mayor Jr.
MAPK-dependent Degradation of G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase 2
J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2003; 278(31): 29164 - 29173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Cao, J. Yao, and V. Shah
The Proline-rich Domain of Dynamin-2 Is Responsible for Dynamin-dependent in Vitro Potentiation of Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase Activity via Selective Effects on Reductase Domain Function
J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 2003; 278(8): 5894 - 5901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. J. Dell, J. Connor, S. Chen, E. G. Stebbins, N. P. Skiba, D. Mochly-Rosen, and H. E. Hamm
The beta gamma Subunit of Heterotrimeric G Proteins Interacts with RACK1 and Two Other WD Repeat Proteins
J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 2002; 277(51): 49888 - 49895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
J. M. Haugh
Localization of Receptor-Mediated Signal Transduction Pathways: The Inside Story
Mol. Interv., September 1, 2002; 2(5): 292 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Lu, J. T. Murray, W. Luo, H. Li, X. Wu, H. Xu, J. M. Backer, and Y.-G. Chen
Transforming Growth Factor beta Activates Smad2 in the Absence of Receptor Endocytosis
J. Biol. Chem., August 9, 2002; 277(33): 29363 - 29368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Szaszak, Z. Gaborik, G. Turu, P. S. McPherson, A. J. L. Clark, K. J. Catt, and L. Hunyady
Role of the Proline-rich Domain of Dynamin-2 and Its Interactions with Src Homology 3 Domains during Endocytosis of the AT1 Angiotensin Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., June 7, 2002; 277(24): 21650 - 21656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
B. H. Shah, J. Alberto Olivares-Reyes, A. Yesilkaya, and K. J. Catt
Independence of Angiotensin II-Induced MAP Kinase Activation from Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor Internalization in Clone 9 Hepatocytes
Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2002; 16(3): 610 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. N. Hislop, H. M. Everest, A. Flynn, T. Harding, J. B. Uney, B. E. Troskie, R. P. Millar, and C. A. McArdle
Differential Internalization of Mammalian and Non-mammalian Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptors. UNCOUPLING OF DYNAMIN-DEPENDENT INTERNALIZATION FROM MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE SIGNALING
J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2001; 276(43): 39685 - 39694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. Smith, R. Yu, and P. M. Hinkle
Activation of MAPK by TRH Requires Clathrin-Dependent Endocytosis and PKC but Not Receptor Interaction with {beta}-Arrestin or Receptor Endocytosis
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2001; 15(9): 1539 - 1548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
S. S. G. Ferguson
Evolving Concepts in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Endocytosis: The Role in Receptor Desensitization and Signaling
Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2001; 53(1): 1 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
R. D. York, D. C. Molliver, S. S. Grewal, P. E. Stenberg, E. W. McCleskey, and P. J. S. Stork
Role of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase and Endocytosis in Nerve Growth Factor-Induced Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Activation via Ras and Rap1
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2000; 20(21): 8069 - 8083.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y.-z. Zhang, D. B. Moheban, B. R. Conway, A. Bhattacharyya, and R. A. Segal
Cell Surface Trk Receptors Mediate NGF-Induced Survival While Internalized Receptors Regulate NGF-Induced Differentiation
J. Neurosci., August 1, 2000; 20(15): 5671 - 5678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
K. N. Fish, S. L. Schmid, and H. Damke
Evidence that Dynamin-2 Functions as a Signal-transducing GTPase
J. Cell Biol., July 11, 2000; 150(1): 145 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. L. Pierce, S. Maudsley, Y. Daaka, L. M. Luttrell, and R. J. Lefkowitz
Role of endocytosis in the activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade by sequestering and nonsequestering G protein-coupled receptors
PNAS, February 15, 2000; 97(4): 1489 - 1494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. L. Roudabush, K. L. Pierce, S. Maudsley, K. D. Khan, and L. M. Luttrell
Transactivation of the EGF Receptor Mediates IGF-1-stimulated Shc Phosphorylation and ERK1/2 Activation in COS-7 Cells
J. Biol. Chem., July 14, 2000; 275(29): 22583 - 22589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Cao, J. Yao, T. J. McCabe, Q. Yao, Z. S. Katusic, W. C. Sessa, and V. Shah
Direct Interaction between Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase and Dynamin-2. IMPLICATIONS FOR NITRIC-OXIDE SYNTHASE FUNCTION
J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2001; 276(17): 14249 - 14256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Saunders, J. V. Ferrer, L. Shi, J. Chen, G. Merrill, M. E. Lamb, L. M. F. Leeb-Lundberg, L. Carvelli, J. A. Javitch, and A. Galli
Amphetamine-induced loss of human dopamine transporter activity: An internalization-dependent and cocaine-sensitive mechanism
PNAS, June 6, 2000; 97(12): 6850 - 6855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whistler, J. L.
Right arrow