|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 35, 24671-24676, August 27, 1999
From the AML1 plays a critical role during hematopoiesis
and chromosomal translocations involving AML1 are commonly associated
with different forms of leukemia, including pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia. To understand the function of AML1 during B cell
differentiation, we analyzed regulatory regions of B cell-specific
genes for potential AML1-binding sites and have identified a putative
AML1-binding site in the promoter of the B cell-specific tyrosine
kinase gene, blk. Gel mobility shift assays and transient
transfection assays demonstrate that AML1 binds specifically to this
site in the blk promoter and this binding site is important
for blk promoter activity. Furthermore, in
vitro binding analysis revealed that the AML1 runt DNA-binding
domain physically interacts with the paired DNA-binding domain of BSAP,
a B cell-specific transcription factor. BSAP has been shown previously
to be important for B cell-specific regulation of the blk
gene. Physical interaction of AML1 with BSAP correlates with functional
cooperativity in transfection studies where AML1 and BSAP
synergistically activate blk promoter transcription by more
than 50-fold. These results demonstrate physical and functional interactions between AML1 and BSAP and suggest that AML1 is an important factor for regulating a critical B cell-specific gene, blk.
AML1 is a member of the PEBP2/CBF family of transcription factors
(1, 2). These factors consist of heterodimers between the DNA binding
To study the function of AML1 in B-cell differentiation, we analyzed
regulatory regions of B cell-specific genes for the presence of
AML1-binding sites. We observed a consensus AML1-binding site in the
promoter of the blk gene. BLK, a Src family member, encodes a B cell-specific, 55-kDa protein tyrosine kinase p55Blk
(24). BLK is associated with the B cell antigen receptor and is
involved in signal transduction events (25). The B cell antigen receptor complex is formed by membrane IgM noncovalently associated with heterodimers of B29 and mb-1 (26, 27). Antigen cross-linking to
the B cell antigen receptor leads to a rapid and transient increase in
tyrosine kinase activity resulting in activation of several signal
transduction pathways, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase
pathway. The antigen receptor does not itself contain an intrinsic
tyrosine kinase domain; therefore, tyrosine kinase activation is due to
signal transduction mediated through interaction of two B cell antigen
receptor-associated proteins, Ig Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
The probe for
the EMSA was a double-stranded oligonucleotide with bp Plasmid Construction--
A murine blk promoter (bp
Cell Culture and Transfection--
The human B cell line BJA-B,
promonocytic cell line THP-1, and murine B cell line Ba/F3 were
maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine
serum and 2 mM L-glutamine. THP-1 cell culture
medium contained 2 × 105 M
2-mercaptoethanol. Ba/F3 cell culture medium also contained 10%
conditioned WEHI-3B medium as a source for interleukin-3. Maintenance
and transfection of CV-1 cells were as described previously (48). BJA-B
and Ba/F3 cells were transfected by electroporation in RPMI 1640 medium
at 960 microfarads and 220 or 270 V, respectively. Cells were harvested
5 h after transfection. Rous sarcoma virus-human growth hormone
expression construct was co-transfected with luciferase reporter
constructs for normalizing transfection efficiency (45).
In Vitro Translation--
Protein in vitro
translation was performed with TnT T7-coupled reticulocyte lysate
system according to the manufacturer's protocol (Promega). The TnT
lysate contains approximately 150 µg/µl endogenous protein. Each
in vitro translation reaction uses 25 µl of TnT lysate in
a 50 µl of reaction.
GST Pull-down Experiments--
The GST-pull down experiments
were as described previously (49).
AML1 Interacts with a Sequence 3' of the BSAP Site of the Murine
blk Promoter--
The TEL/AML1 fusion protein is associated with pre-B
acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Since the TEL/AML1 protein has lost the Ets DNA-binding domain of TEL, but still contains the intact AML1 DNA-binding domain, this fusion protein could possibly generate leukemia by interfering with the function of normal AML1 or other PEBP2/CBF family members in the activation of critical B cell developmental genes. Therefore, we searched the regulatory regions of
several B cell-specific genes for putative AML1-binding sites and found
an AML1 binding consensus sequence "TGTGGT" in the B cell-specific
blk promoter at bp AML1 Induces blk Promoter Transcription--
To determine whether
the AML1-binding site is functionally relevant for blk
promoter activity, the AML1 site was mutated from TGTGGT to TGCACT in
the blk promoter luciferase construct to generate pBlk(mAML1)-luc. As shown in Fig.
3A, transient transfection
into the B cell line BJA-B demonstrated that the blk gene
upstream region from bp AML1 Physically Interacts with BSAP--
As shown in Fig. 1, the
AML1-binding site is relatively close to the transcription initiation
site of the blk gene. Six base pairs upstream of the AML1
site is a region that has been identified as a BSAP-binding site (33,
34). BSAP is a B cell-specific activating protein, which is a critical
transcription factor for B cell-specific gene expression and B cell
development. Since AML1 has been shown to interact and cooperate with
other transcription factors, and the AML1 site is adjacent to the
BSAP-binding site, we analyzed whether AML1 can cooperate with BSAP in
regulating blk gene expression. First, we studied their
physical interaction using GST-pull down assays, in which
Escherichia coli expressing GST fusion proteins immobilized
on glutathione-agarose beads were incubated with in vitro
translated 35S-labeled proteins. As shown in Fig.
4A, in vitro
translated full-length AML1 can be specifically retained on agarose
beads containing the fusion protein made from BSAP (GST-BSAP), but not
on glutathione beads containing only GST. This result indicates that
AML1 can physically interact with BSAP. To analyze this interaction in more detail, DNA constructs containing only the
NH2-terminal portion of AML1 (a.a. 1-208) or the AML1 runt
homology domain (a.a. 87-208) were in vitro translated in
the presence of [35S]methionine. As shown in Fig. 4,
B and C, both peptides can specifically interact
with GST-BSAP fusion protein, but not GST protein alone. These results
indicate that the runt homology domain of AML1 is responsible for the
interaction with BSAP. To determine which domain of BSAP is responsible
for its interaction with AML1, GST-fusion proteins containing
COOH-terminal deletion mutants of BSAP were used in the binding
reactions. Removal of the carboxyl terminus up to a.a. 312 did not have
any effect on AML1 interaction (Fig. 4E, lane 3). The BSAP
NH2-terminal portion (a.a. 1-159) containing the paired
DNA-binding domain retained the interaction with AML1 as well (Fig.
4E, lane 4). In contrast, GST-fusion protein containing only
the BSAP COOH-terminal portion (a.a. 234-391) did not show any
interaction with AML1. These results demonstrate that AML1 can directly
interact with BSAP and this interaction is through the runt homology
domain of AML1 and the paired domain of BSAP (6, 42, 51).
AML1 Cooperates with BSAP in Transactivation of the blk
Promoter--
Both AML1-binding site mutation analysis and
transactivation analysis indicate that AML1 is an important
transcription factor for blk promoter activity (Fig. 3).
BSAP has been shown to be a critical regulator of blk
promoter activity (33, 34) and data in Fig. 4 have demonstrated the
physical interaction between these two transcription factors. To
determine whether physical interaction between AML1 and BSAP is
associated with functional cooperativity in activating blk
gene expression, we performed co-transactivation experiments in monkey
kidney CV-1 cells as shown in Fig. 5. In
the presence of only the parental expression vector (control),
luciferase expression directed by the blk promoter is
~2-fold over the promoter-less construct. When BSAP was used alone in
the transactivation experiments, there was an 8-fold induction of
blk promoter activity. AML1 together with its heterodimer partner CBF AML1 is a transcription factor identified by studying t(8;21)
associated acute myeloid leukemia (1, 52-54). The function of AML1 in
hematopoiesis has been demonstrated by analyzing its role in regulating
the expression of critical hematopoietic genes and by studying AML1
null mice (55, 56). AML1 knockout mice die during embryogenesis with
the block of definitive hematopoiesis (16, 17). These studies indicate
that AML1 plays an important role during early hematopoietic progenitor
cell formation. AML1 binds to the regulatory elements of genes
specifically expressed in different lineages of hematopoietic cells or
of genes important for lineage development. Recently, AML1 has been
found to associate with a chromosomal translocation, t(12;21), commonly
associated with B-cell lineage differentiation, indicating an important
role for AML1 during B cell development (20, 22). Nevertheless, only
one potential B cell-specific target gene for AML1, the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene enhancer (57), has been identified to date. Therefore,
we decided to search for other potential target genes for AML1 in B
cells. We identified a putative AML1-binding site in the promoter
region of the B cell-specific blk gene and tested the
potential role of AML1 in B-cell specific blk gene
regulation. We provide strong evidence here that AML1 directly
interacts with a functionally important region of the blk
promoter and transactivates the promoter. Furthermore, we demonstrate
that AML1 physically interacts with another critical B-cell
transcription factor BSAP and synergizes with BSAP in regulating
blk promoter activity. There are different alternatively
spliced forms of AML1, which have been named as AML1 (AML1a), AML1A
(AML1b), and AML1B (AML1c). In this paper, we used "AML1" to
include different forms of the AML1 protein. AML1B was used in the
transactivation and in vitro transcription reactions.
AML1 is a member of the CBF protein family. All three It has been reported previously that CBF Mutation of the AML1 site in the blk promoter significantly
reduced promoter activity. However, this mutation did not abolish the
promoter activity, indicating that AML1 is an important factor for the
promoter activity. Other transcription factors that bind to the
blk promoter could also contribute to the promoter activity. As shown in Fig. 1, besides the AML1-binding site, there are several other potential transcription factor-binding sites including a binding
site for the B cell-specific BSAP transcription factor just upstream of
the AML1 site. BSAP has been reported previously to play a crucial role
in the regulation of the blk promoter (33, 34). Therefore,
we analyzed whether AML1 and BSAP could interact with each other and
whether there is any synergy between these two factors in promoter
activation. The results from GST-pull down assays demonstrated a strong
interaction between these two factors, and the interaction is between
the AML1 runt homology domain and the BSAP NH2-terminal
paired domain. The original function of the runt homology domain
includes direct binding to DNA and formation of heterodimers with
CBF We thank Scott Hiebert for the AML1
expression construct and antiserum against AML1; Patty Zwollo and Steve
Desiderio for BSAP cDNA and blk promoter construct; Yan
Liu for the excellent technical assistance; and
Marie-Térèse Little for critical reading of the manuscript.
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants AI39613 (to T. A. L.), CA/AI59589 (to D. E. Z.), and CA72009 (to D. E. Z. and T. A. L.)
and American Cancer Society Grant DHP-166 (to D. E. Z.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Leukemia Society of America Scholar. To whom correspondence
should be addressed: Rm. 953, Harvard Institutes of Medicine, 77 Ave.
Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-667-8930; Fax: 617-667-3299;
E-mail: dzhang@bidmc.harvard.edu.
The abbreviations used are:
bp, base pair(s);
BSAP, B cell-specific activating protein;
EMSA, electrophoretic
mobility shift assay;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
a.a., amino acid(s).
AML1 (CBF
2) Cooperates with B Cell-specific Activating
Protein (BSAP/PAX5) in Activation of the B Cell-specific
BLK Gene Promoter*
§,
§,
§,
New England Baptist Bone and Joint
Institute, and § Department of Medicine, Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Massachusetts 02115
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
subunit and the
subunit, CBF
, which does not bind DNA
directly but enhances the binding of the
subunit (3). Multiple
subunit genes, including CBF
1
(AML3), AML1 (CBF
2), and
CBF
3 (AML2), as well as
alternatively spliced isoforms of the
and
subunits have been
detected (4, 5). All of the CBF
proteins have a DNA-binding domain
(the runt domain), which is similar to the Drosophila
pair-rule gene, runt (6). AML1 and other PEBP2/CBF
proteins are
transcription factors whose recognition sequence is required for tissue
specific expression of several hematopoietic genes including
M-CSF receptor, GM-CSF, IL-3, T cell receptors, immunoglobulin µ heavy chain,
defensin NP-3, and myeloperoxidase (7-15). AML1 knockout mice
indicate, furthermore, that AML1 is indeed a critical regulator of
early hematopoiesis (16, 17). The AML1 gene is frequently
associated with chromosomal translocations in different forms of
leukemia, including t(8;21), t(3;21), in addition to t(12;21) (1,
18-20). The
subunit of PEBP2/CBF is also involved in a chromosomal
inversion, inv (16), associated with FAB M4eo AML (21). Therefore, each of the two chains of the PEBP2/CBF heterodimer is directly implicated in the pathogenesis of leukemia. T(12;21) is a common chromosomal abnormality in childhood pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (20, 22).
This translocation generates two chimeric genes, TEL/AML1 and AML1/TEL. Only the TEL/AML1 chimeric gene
product is consistently detected in cells with t(12;21) (23). The
TEL/AML1 chimeric gene expresses a fusion protein that
contains the 333 NH2-terminal amino acids of the TEL
protein encoding the Pointed dimerization domain but lacking the Ets
DNA-binding domain, and almost the entire AML1 protein, including the
AML1 DNA-binding domain. Therefore, the TEL/AML1 fusion protein can
interact with AML1 DNA-binding sites and possibly interfere with AML1
function during B cell differentiation. This indicates that AML1 may
play an important role in controlling gene expression during normal B
cell differentiation.
(mb-1) and Ig
(B29) with the
cytoplasmic Src-like kinases, BLK, LYN, and FYN (28). This rapid and
transient activation of tyrosine kinases triggers a cascade of
downstream events, leading to changes in gene expression and either
cell proliferation and differentiation or apoptosis. BLK is exclusively
expressed in B cells at the pro-B, pre-B, and mature B cell stages, but
not in plasma cells or non-B cells (29). The function of BLK in B cell
antigen receptor signaling is not clear, although several studies have
implicated the BLK kinase in antigen receptor cross-linking mediated
growth arrest and apoptosis (30, 31). However, transgenic mice
expressing a constitutively activated BLK mutant in the B cell lineage
develop B lymphoid tumors (32). Therefore, control of blk
gene expression could be directly related to B cell development and
neoplasia. B cell specificity of blk gene expression is
primarily regulated at the transcriptional level and a
320-bp1 promoter region of
the murine blk promoter appears to contain most of the B
cell-specific regulatory elements (29, 33). Relatively little is known
about the transcriptional regulation of blk gene expression.
It has been reported that B cell-specific activator protein (BSAP/Pax5)
binds to the blk promoter, and recently BSAP as well as
NF-
B were shown to transactivate the blk promoter (33,
34). BSAP is a critical transcription factor for B cell development
with a similar expression pattern as BLK (35, 36). BSAP belongs to the
paired box (Pax) gene family, which plays an important role
during the development of the central nervous system and during B cell
development (35-37). BSAP has been shown to act as both a positive and
negative regulator of gene expression controlling the expression of
several B cell-specific genes including CD19,
blk, and various immunoglobulin genes (33, 38-43). We now report that AML1 binds to a functionally important region of the blk promoter, directly interacts with the paired box
DNA-binding domain of BSAP protein through its runt homology domain,
and cooperates with BSAP in activating blk promoter transcription.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
47 to
28 of
the blk upstream region (Fig. 1). A 32P-labeled
probe was prepared by T4 kinase phosphorylation in the presence of
[
-32P]ATP (NEN Life Science Products Inc.). Nuclear
protein for the EMSA was prepared from Ba/F3 cells according to the
method published by Schreiber et al. (44). Approximately 0.5 ng of probe was incubated with 5 µg of nuclear protein or 1 µl of
in vitro translated protein in 20 µl of binding buffer
containing 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 30 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, 0.4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
12% glycerol at 4 °C for 20 min (45). All reactions contain 1 µg
of poly(dI-dC). Reactions were electrophoresed at 10 V/cm on a 6%
polyacrylamide gel (bisacrylamide/acrylamide ratio = 1:29) in
0.5 × TBE (45 mM Tris borate, 1 mM EDTA)
at 4 °C. For supershift experiments, 1 µl of polyclonal rabbit
antiserum raised against a 17-amino acid NH2-terminal
peptide from AML1 was added to the binding reaction mixture 10 min
prior to addition of the probe (46).
191 to +136) DNA fragment was subcloned into the KpnI and
XhoI sites of the pXP2 luciferase reporter gene construct to
form pBlk-luc (47). pBlk-luc(mAML1), which contains a mutation at the
AML1 binding was generated using QuickChange Mutagenesis Kit
(Stratagene). The AML1 site was changed from TGTGGT to TGCACT. AML1 and
CBF
expression constructs, pCMV5-AML1 and pCMV5-CBF
, were
received from Dr. Scott Hiebert (46). BSAP cDNA was received from
Dr. Steve Desiderio (33) and inserted into the NotI site of
the pCI expression vector. The GST-BSAP full-length fusion protein was
generated by inserting a blunt-ended NotI fragment of the
BSAP cDNA into the SmaI site of pGEX-5X-3. GST-BSAP1-312 and GST-BSAP1-159 were
generated by deleting a SmaI-XhoI fragment or a
SacII-XhoI fragment from the carboxyl terminus of
GST-BSAP, respectively. GST-BSAP234-391 was generated by
inserting a PvuII-NotI fragment of BSAP into BamHI (blunt ended) and NotI sites of pGES-5X-3.
Full-length AML1, AML11-208, and AML187-208
were as reported previously (48).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
39 to
34, just downstream of the
BSAP-binding site (Fig. 1). In addition
to the putative AML1 site we also detected putative binding sites for
several other transcription factors including three putative
Ets-binding sites and a helix-loop-helix protein-binding site (Fig. 1).
To test whether AML1 can interact with the blk promoter,
oligonucleotides containing the AML1 consensus sequence from the
blk promoter were used in EMSA experiments with nuclear
extracts from the B cell line, Ba/F3, or with in vitro
translated AML1. As shown in Fig. 2A, Ba/F3 nuclear extract
formed a specific protein-DNA complex with the blk promoter
bp
47 to
28 oligonucleotide. This protein-DNA complex was
specifically competed by unlabeled self-oligonucleotide or an
oligonucleotide encoding the Moloney murine leukemia virus enhancer
PEBP2/CBF-binding site (50), but not by an unlabeled non-PEBP2/CBF
binding oligonucleotide. These data suggested that this complex
contains a PEBP2/CBF related protein. To further characterize this
protein, antiserum raised against the NH2-terminal region
of one of the PEBP2/CBF family members, AML1 (46), was used in the EMSA
analysis. Upon the addition of the anti-AML1 antiserum, the specific
protein-DNA complex was drastically reduced and a supershifted band was
detected indicating that the protein in Ba/F3 cell nuclear extracts
interacting with the blk promoter AML1 site is either
identical with AML1 or closely related. Additional EMSA analysis
demonstrated that in vitro translated AML1 formed a complex
with the same radiolabeled blk promoter probe (Fig. 2B).
These results clearly demonstrate that PEBP2/CBF transcription factors,
such as AML1, can interact specifically with the blk promoter AML1 site.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
5'-Flanking sequence of the murine
blk gene. This DNA sequence is under GenBank
accession number M81822. The major transcription initiation site is
numbered as +1 and marked with an arrow. Potential
transcription factor binding sequences are underlined.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Transcription factor AML1 binds to the
blk promoter. The blk promoter region
oligonucleotide bp
47 to
28 was 32P-labeled and
incubated with 1 µg of double-stranded poly(dI-dC) in the absence or
presence of either nuclear extracts or in vitro translated
proteins. A, labeled oligonucleotide was incubated in the
absence of nuclear extracts (lane 1) or in the presence of 5 µg of nuclear extracts prepared from the B cell line Ba/F3
(lanes 2-6). For competition analysis, 50-fold molar
excesses of unlabeled blk bp
47 to
28 oligonucleotide (lane
3), AML1 consensus-binding site oligonucleotide from Moloney
murine leukemia virus enhancer (lane 4), and an
oligonucleotide containing a PU.1-binding site (lane 5) were
used in the binding reactions. In lane 6, 1 µl of
anti-AML1 serum was added to the binding reaction. B, in vitro translated AML1 and CBF
were used in the
bandshift experiments. Radiolabeled blk promoter
oligonucleotide was incubated with 2 µl of in vitro
translation reticulocyte lysate control without any protein expression
DNA (lane 1), 5 µg of nuclear extracts from THP-1 cells
(lane 2), 2 µl of in vitro translated AML1
(lane 3), or 2 µl of in vitro translated AML1
and 2 µl of in vitro translated CBF
(lane
4). The top of the gel (T), the migration of
the AML1-DNA complex (AML1), and the free probes
(F) are marked on the right of each panel. The
smaller arrow in panel A marks a specific
DNA-protein complex, which is either CBF
-DNA complex in the absence
of CBF
or with degraded CBF proteins. * in panel B marks
the nonspecific shifted bands formed with endogenous protein in
unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate or with nuclear extracts from THP-1
cells.
191 to +136 has strong promoter activity as
previously shown (33). A 25-fold increase in luciferase expression was observed in comparison to the promoter-less luciferase construct pXP2.
Mutation of the AML1-binding site in the blk promoter
reduced the promoter activity to 67% when compared with the wild type promoter. Furthermore, the same mutation also reduced the promoter activity to a similar level in another B cell line, Ba/F3. This indicates that the AML1-binding site in the blk promoter is
a functionally relevant site, although not absolutely essential. To
test whether AML1 can indeed transactivate the blk promoter, co-transfection experiments were performed in CV-1 cells with expression vectors for AML1 and its heterodimer partner CBF
. As
shown in Fig. 3B, exogenous AML1 together with CBF
expression increases transcription of the wild type blk
promoter-luciferase construct by 7-fold. Mutation of the AML1-binding
site reduced transactivation of the blk promoter by
AML1/CBF
to less than 2-fold. These data together with the results
from the DNA-protein interaction studies demonstrate that AML1 or a
related family member plays a significant role in B cell-specific
regulation of the blk promoter.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
AML1 is an important transcription factor for
blk promoter activity. A, mutation of
the AML1-binding site significantly reduces blk promoter
activity. The promoterless pXP2 luciferase construct, the wild-type blk
promoter-luciferase construct (pBLK-luc), and the AML1 site mutated
construct (pBLK(mAML1)-luc) were transiently transfected into B cell
lines BJA-B (
) and Ba/F3 (
). B, AML1 stimulates
transcription from the blk promoter. CV-1 cells were
transfected by the Ca3(PO4)2 precipitation
method with 3.5 µg of the wild type blk
promoter-luciferase construct (pBLK-luc) or the AML1-binding site
mutated blk promoter construct (pBLK(mAML1)-luc). These
constructs were co-transfected with or without 0.5 µg each of AML1
and its heterodimer partner CBF
expression vector pCMV-AML1B and
pCMV-CBF
. The averages and standard deviations were generated from
three separate experiments. Luciferase activities were normalized for
transfection efficiency with the co-transfected growth hormone plasmid
Rous sarcoma virus-human growth hormone. The error bars
indicate the mean ± S.D.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
AML1 physically interacts with BSAP.
Panel A shows the domain structure of AML1 and BSAP. The
details of the constructions are described under "Experimental
Procedures." Five µl of in vitro translated
(IVT), 35S-labeled full-length AML1 (panel
B), NH2-terminal portion of AML1 (panel C),
or AML1 runt homology domain (panel D) were loaded on the
gel and served as positive controls (lane 1), or incubated
with E. coli-produced GST (lane 2), and GST-BSAP
(lane 3) immobilized on glutathione-agarose beads.
Panel E, 5 µl of in vitro translated,
35S-labeled full-length AML1 was directly loaded on the gel
(IVT; lane 1), incubated with E. coli-produced
GST (lane 2), GST-BSAP1-159 (lane
3), GST-BSAP1-312 (lane 4), or
GST-BSAP234-392 (lane 5) immobilized on
glutathione-agarose beads. Bound proteins were analyzed in
SDS-polyacrylamide gels and were visualized by autoradiography.
activated the blk promoter 12-fold. When all
three transcription factors, BSAP, AML1, and CBF
were used in the
same transactivation experiment, blk promoter activity was
induced by 51-fold. These results demonstrate a strong transcriptional synergy of blk promoter activity in the presence of all
three factors, indicating that physical interaction between AML1 and BSAP leads to functional cooperativity in the context of the
blk promoter.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
AML1 and BSAP synergistically activate the
blk promoter. CV-1 cells were transfected by the
Ca3(PO4)2 precipitation method with
3.5 µg of blk promoter-luciferase construct (pBLK-luc) in
the presence or absence of 0.5 µg of the AML1, CBF
, and BSAP
expression constructs pCMV-AML1B, pCMV-CBF
, or pCI-BSAP,
respectively, as indicated. The averages and standard deviations were
generated from three separate experiments. Luciferase activities were
normalized for transfection efficiency with the co-transfected growth
hormone plasmid Rous sarcoma virus-human growth hormone. The
error bars indicate the mean ± S.D. Fold increases in
the promoter activity are relative to that in the absence of any
additional transcription factors.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
subunits of
the CBF family contain the highly conserved runt homology domain, which
encodes the DNA-binding domain. Therefore, all three
subunits
recognize the same "TGTGGT" DNA sequence. Previous studies by
others have identified different members of the CBF
protein in B
cell lines and a B cell-enriched tissue spleen, using antibodies
specifically against three different CBF
subunits. Their results
show that AML1 and AML2 are expressed at similar levels in B lineage
cells; AML3 is not detectable (58). The AML1 antiserum that we used in
Fig. 2 is raised against the AML1 NH2-terminal 17 amino
acids. The NH2-terminal region is conserved between all
three CBF
proteins. Since both AML1 and AML2 are expressed at
similar levels in B cells and both AML1 and AML2 have a similar DNA
binding activity (58), it is possible that both of them are in the
supershifted protein-DNA complex as shown in Fig. 2.
enhances AML1 binding to
DNA (3) and CBF
-AML1 forms a slower mobility shifted band with DNA
than AML1-DNA complex (46). As shown in Fig. 2B, in
vitro translated AML1 binds to DNA and addition of CBF
enhances the binding of AML1 with the DNA. However, we did not detect an obvious
slower mobility complex. This is probably due to the lack of a
particular modification in the in vitro translation system that is required for forming a stable complex of a heterodimer CBF
protein with DNA, or the specific experimental conditions do not favor
the formation of the complex during gel electrophoresis.
. There have been reports about AML1 physically interacting with
other transcription factors through the runt homology domain, including
Ets-1, PU.1, and CAAT/enhancer-binding protein family members (14, 48,
49). Similarly, the paired domain of BSAP has been shown to be involved
in protein-protein interactions with members of the Ets family (59).
The interaction between AML1 and BSAP represents a new class of
interaction between AML1 and other transcription factors.
Interestingly, it is the DNA-binding domain that is involved in the
interaction of both transcription factors. It will be interesting to
further study the specific amino acids involved in the different
interactions. The interaction and synergy between Ets-1 and AML1 is
crucial for the enhancer function of several T cell receptor genes (14, 60); furthermore, the interactions and synergies between AML1 and PU.1
(49), Myb (61), and CAAT/enhancer-binding protein (48) have been
demonstrated to serve critical functions during activation of myeloid
specific gene expression. Both AML1 and BSAP are critical regulators of
hematopoiesis (16, 17, 62). In addition, both genes have been directly
implicated in B cell malignancies (20, 63). The interaction and synergy
between AML1 and BSAP could play a significant role in B cell-specific gene expression and disruption of this interaction due to chromosomal translocations or other chromosomal abnormalities could play a critical
role in B cell transformation. Further experiments using other B
cell-specific gene targets will be extremely interesting.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Miyoshi, H.,
Shimizu, K.,
Kozu, T.,
Maseki, N.,
Kaneko, Y.,
and Ohki, M.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
10431-10434 2.
Daga, A.,
Tighe, J. E.,
and Calabi, F.
(1992)
Nature
356,
484[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Wang, S.,
Wang, Q.,
Crute, B. E.,
Melnikova, I. N.,
Keller, S. R.,
and Speck, N. A.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
3324-3339 4.
Ogawa, E.,
Maruyama, M.,
Kagoshima, H.,
Inuzuka, M.,
Lu, J.,
Satake, M.,
Shigesada, K.,
and Ito, Y.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6859-6863 5.
Levanon, D.,
Negreanu, V.,
Bernstein, Y.,
Bar-Am, I.,
Avivi, L.,
and Groner, Y.
(1994)
Genomics
23,
425-432[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Kagoshima, H.,
Shigesada, K.,
Satake, M.,
Ito, Y.,
Miyoshi, H.,
Ohki, M.,
Pepling, M.,
and Gergen, P.
(1993)
Trends Genet.
9,
338-341[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Zhang, D. E.,
Fujioka, K.,
Hetherington, C. J.,
Shapiro, L. H.,
Chen, H. M.,
Look, A. T.,
and Tenen, D. G.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
8085-8095 8.
Frank, R.,
Zhang, J.,
Uchida, H.,
Meyers, S.,
Hiebert, S. W.,
and Nimer, S. D.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
2667-2674[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Hsiang, Y. H.,
Spencer, D.,
Wang, S.,
Speck, N. A.,
and Raulet, D. H.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
150,
3905-3916[Abstract]
10.
Cameron, S.,
Taylor, D. S.,
TePas, E. C.,
Speck, N. A.,
and Mathey-Prevot, B.
(1994)
Blood
83,
2851-2859 11.
Suzow, J.,
and Friedman, A. D.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
2141-2151 12.
Nuchprayoon, I.,
Meyers, S.,
Scott, L. M.,
Suzow, J.,
Hiebert, S.,
and Friedman, A. D.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
5558-5568 13.
Westendorf, J. J.,
Yamamoto, C. M.,
Lenny, N.,
Downing, J. R.,
Selsted, M. E.,
and Hiebert, S. W.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
322-333 14.
Giese, K.,
Kingsley, C.,
Kirshner, J. R.,
and Grosschedl, R.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
995-1008 15.
Hernandez-Munain, C.,
and Krangel, M. S.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
473-483 16.
Wang, Q.,
Stacy, T.,
Binder, M.,
Marin-Padilla, M.,
Sharpe, A. H.,
and Speck, N. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
3444-3449 17.
Okuda, T.,
van Deursen, J.,
Hiebert, S. W.,
Grosveld, G.,
and Downing, J. R.
(1996)
Cell
84,
321-330[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Mitani, K.,
Ogawa, S.,
Tanaka, T.,
Miyoshi, H.,
Kurokawa, M.,
Mano, H.,
Yazaki, Y.,
Ohki, M.,
and Hirai, H.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
504-510[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Nucifora, G.,
and Rowley, J. D.
(1995)
Blood
86,
1-14 20.
Golub, T. R.,
Barker, G. F.,
Bohlander, S. K.,
Hiebert, S. W.,
Ward, D. C.,
Bray-Ward, P.,
Morgan, E.,
Raimondi, S. C.,
Rowley, J. D.,
and Gilliland, D. G.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4917-4921 21.
Liu, P.,
Tarle, S. A.,
Hajra, A.,
Claxton, D. F.,
Marlton, P.,
Freedman, M.,
Siciliano, M. J.,
and Collins, F. S.
(1993)
Science
261,
1041-1044 22.
Shurtleff, S. A.,
Buijs, A.,
Behm, F. G.,
Rubnitz, J. E.,
Raimondi, S. C.,
Hancock, M. L.,
Chan, G. C.,
Pui, C. H.,
Grosveld, G.,
and Downing, J. R.
(1995)
Leukemia
9,
1985-1989[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Hiebert, S. W.,
Sun, W.,
Davis, J. N.,
Golub, T.,
Shurtleff, S.,
Buijs, A.,
Downing, J. R.,
Grosveld, G.,
Roussell, M. F.,
Gilliland, D. G.,
Lenny, N.,
and Meyers, S.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1349-1355[Abstract]
24.
Dymecki, S. M.,
Niederhuber, J. E.,
and Desiderio, S. V.
(1990)
Science
247,
332-336 25.
Burkhardt, A. L.,
Brunswick, M.,
Bolen, J. B.,
and Mond, J. J.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
7410-7414 26.
Lin, J.,
and Justement, L. B.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
149,
1548-1555[Abstract]
27.
Mason, D. Y.,
Van Noesel, C. J.,
Cordell, J. L.,
Comans-Bitter, W. M.,
Micklem, K.,
Tse, A. G.,
Van Lier, R. A.,
and Van Dongen, J. J.
(1992)
Eur. J. Immunol.
22,
2753-2756[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Reth, M.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
10,
97-121[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Dymecki, S. M.,
Zwollo, P.,
Zeller, K.,
Kuhajda, F. P.,
and Desiderio, S. V.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
4815-4823 30.
Yao, X. R.,
and Scott, D. W.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
7946-7950 31.
Yao, X. R.,
and Scott, D. W.
(1993)
Immunol. Rev.
132,
163-186[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Malek, S. N.,
Dordai, D. I.,
Reim, J.,
Dintzis, H.,
and Desiderio, S.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7351-7356 33.
Zwollo, P.,
and Desiderio, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
15310-15317 34.
Zwollo, P.,
Rao, S.,
Wallin, J. J.,
Gackstetter, E. R.,
and Koshland, M. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
18647-18655 35.
Barberis, A.,
Widenhorn, K.,
Vitelli, L.,
and Busslinger, M.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
849-859 36.
Adams, B.,
Dorfler, P.,
Aguzzi, A.,
Kozmik, Z.,
Urbanek, P.,
Maurer-Fogy, I.,
and Busslinger, M.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
1589-1607 37.
Urbanek, P.,
Wang, Z. Q.,
Fetka, I.,
Wagner, E. F.,
and Busslinger, M.
(1994)
Cell
79,
901-912[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Kozmik, Z.,
Wang, S.,
Dorfler, P.,
Adams, B.,
and Busslinger, M.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
2662-2672 39.
Singh, M.,
and Birshtein, B. K.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
3611-3622 40.
Liao, F.,
Birshtein, B. K.,
Busslinger, M.,
and Rothman, P.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
152,
2904-2911[Abstract]
41.
Neurath, M. F.,
Strober, W.,
and Wakatsuki, Y.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
730-742[Abstract]
42.
Neurath, M. F.,
Stuber, E. R.,
and Strober, W.
(1995)
Immunol. Today
16,
564-569[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Rinkenberger, J. L.,
Wallin, J. J.,
Johnson, K. W.,
and Koshland, M. E.
(1996)
Immunity.
5,
377-386[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Schreiber, E.,
Matthias, P.,
Muller, M. M.,
and Schaffner, W.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
6419 45.
Zhang, D. E.,
Hetherington, C. J.,
Chen, H. M.,
and Tenen, D. G.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
373-381 46.
Meyers, S.,
Downing, J. R.,
and Hiebert, S. W.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6336-6345 47.
Oettgen, P.,
Akbarali, Y.,
Boltax, J.,
Best, J.,
Kunsch, C.,
and Libermann, T. A.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5091-5106[Abstract]
48.
Zhang, D. E.,
Hetherington, C. J.,
Meyers, S.,
Rhoades, K. L.,
Larson, C. J.,
Chen, H. M.,
Hiebert, S. W.,
and Tenen, D. G.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1231-1240[Abstract]
49.
Petrovick, M. S.,
Hiebert, S. W.,
Friedman, A. D.,
Hetherington, C. J.,
Tenen, D. G.,
and Zhang, D. E.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3915-3925 50.
Wang, S. W.,
and Speck, N. A.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
89-102 51.
Czerny, T.,
Schaffner, G.,
and Busslinger, M.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2048-2061 52.
Rowley, J. D.
(1990)
Semin. Hematol.
27,
122-136[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
53.
Erickson, P.,
Gao, J.,
Chang, K. S.,
Look, T.,
Whisenant, E.,
Raimondi, S.,
Lasher, R.,
Trujillo, J.,
Rowley, J.,
and Drabkin, H.
(1992)
Blood
80,
1825-1831 54.
Nisson, P. E.,
Watkins, P. C.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1992)
Cancer Genet. Cytogenet.
63,
81-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
55.
Tenen, D. G.,
Hromas, R.,
Licht, J. D.,
and Zhang, D. E.
(1997)
Blood
90,
489-519 56.
Shivdasani, R. A.,
and Orkin, S. H.
(1996)
Blood
87,
4025-4039 57.
Erman, B.,
Cortes, M.,
Nikolajczyk, B. S.,
Speck, N. A.,
and Sen, R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
1322-1330 58.
Meyers, S.,
Lenny, N.,
Sun, W.,
and Hiebert, S. W.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
303-312[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
59.
Fitzsimmons, D.,
Hodsdon, W.,
Wheat, W.,
Maira, S. M.,
Wasylyk, B.,
and Hagman, J.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2198-2211 60.
Wotton, D.,
Ghysdael, J.,
Wang, S.,
Speck, N. A.,
and Owen, M. J.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
840-850 61.
Britos-Bray, M.,
and Friedman, A. D.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
5127-5135[Abstract]
62.
Nutt, S. L.,
Urbanek, P.,
Rolink, A.,
and Busslinger, M.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
476-491 63.
Busslinger, M.,
Klix, N.,
Pfeffer, P.,
Graninger, P. G.,
and Kozmik, Z.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
6129-6134
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-H. Kuo, R. M. Gerstein, and L. H. Castilla Cbf{beta}-SMMHC impairs differentiation of common lymphoid progenitors and reveals an essential role for RUNX in early B-cell development Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1543 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bousquet, C. Broccardo, C. Quelen, F. Meggetto, E. Kuhlein, G. Delsol, N. Dastugue, and P. Brousset A novel PAX5-ELN fusion protein identified in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia acts as a dominant negative on wild-type PAX5 Blood, April 15, 2007; 109(8): 3417 - 3423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Starkova, J. Madzo, G. Cario, T. Kalina, A. Ford, M. Zaliova, O. Hrusak, and J. Trka The Identification of (ETV6)/RUNX1-Regulated Genes in Lymphopoiesis Using Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in ETV6/RUNX1-Positive Lymphoid Leukemic Cells Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2007; 13(6): 1726 - 1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Peterson, A. Boyapati, V. Ranganathan, A. Iwama, D. G. Tenen, S. Tsai, and D.-E. Zhang The Hematopoietic Transcription Factor AML1 (RUNX1) Is Negatively Regulated by the Cell Cycle Protein Cyclin D3 Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2005; 25(23): 10205 - 10219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Tiacci, S. Pileri, A. Orleth, R. Pacini, A. Tabarrini, F. Frenguelli, A. Liso, D. Diverio, F. Lo-Coco, and B. Falini PAX5 Expression in Acute Leukemias: Higher B-Lineage Specificity Than CD79a and Selective Association with t(8;21)-Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 64(20): 7399 - 7404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Cho, Y. Akbarali, L. F. Zerbini, X. Gu, J. Boltax, Y. Wang, P. Oettgen, D.-E. Zhang, and T. A. Libermann Isoforms of the Ets Transcription Factor NERF/ELF-2 Physically Interact with AML1 and Mediate Opposing Effects on AML1-mediated Transcription of the B Cell-specific blk Gene J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 19512 - 19522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schwieger, J. Lohler, J. Friel, M. Scheller, I. Horak, and C. Stocking AML1-ETO Inhibits Maturation of Multiple Lymphohematopoietic Lineages and Induces Myeloblast Transformation in Synergy with ICSBP Deficiency J. Exp. Med., November 4, 2002; 196(9): 1227 - 1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Spender, G. H. Cornish, A. Sullivan, and P. J. Farrell Expression of Transcription Factor AML-2 (RUNX3, CBF{alpha}-3) Is Induced by Epstein-Barr Virus EBNA-2 and Correlates with the B-Cell Activation Phenotype J. Virol., April 16, 2002; 76(10): 4919 - 4927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Emelyanov, C. R. Kovac, M. A. Sepulveda, and B. K. Birshtein The Interaction of Pax5 (BSAP) with Daxx Can Result in Transcriptional Activation in B Cells |