JBC Oz Biosciences

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silberbach, M.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silberbach, M.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, C. T., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 35, 24858-24864, August 27, 1999


Extracellular Signal-regulated Protein Kinase Activation Is Required for the Anti-hypertrophic Effect of Atrial Natriuretic Factor in Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocytes*

Michael SilberbachDagger §, Travis GorencDagger , Ray E. Hershberger, Philip J. S. Storkparallel , Peter S. Steyger**, and Charles T. Roberts Jr.Dagger

From the Dagger  Department of Pediatrics, the  Department of Medicine, parallel  Vollum Institute, and ** Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) inhibits proliferation in non-myocardial cells and is thought to be anti-hypertrophic in cardiomyocytes. We investigated the possibility that the anti-hypertrophic actions of ANF involved the mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction cascade. Cultured neonatal rat ventricular myocytes treated for 48 h with the alpha 1-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine (PE) had an 80% increase in cross-sectional area (CSA). ANF alone had no effect but inhibited PE-induced increases in CSA by approximately 50%. The mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitor PD098059 minimally inhibited PE-induced increases in CSA, but it completely abolished ANF-induced inhibition of PE-induced increases. ANF-induced extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) nuclear translocation was also eliminated by PD098059. ANF treatment caused MEK phosphorylation and activation but failed to activate any of the Raf isoforms. ANF induced a rapid increase in ERK phosphorylation and in vitro kinase activity. PE also increased ERK activity, and the combined effect of ANF and PE appeared to be additive. ANF-induced ERK phosphorylation was eliminated by PD098059. ANF induced minimal phosphorylation of JNK or p38, indicating that its effect on ERK was specific. ANF-induced activation of ERK was mimicked by cGMP analogs, suggesting that ANF-induced ERK activation involves the guanylyl cyclase activity of the ANF receptor. These data suggest that there is an important linkage between cGMP signaling and the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade and that selective ANF activation of ERK is required for the anti-hypertrophic action of ANF. Thus, ANF expression might function as the natural defense of the heart against maladaptive hypertrophy through its ability to activate ERK.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Atrial natriuretic factor (ANF)1 is a peptide hormone that is normally expressed only in the cardiac atria and has a well characterized endocrine role in blood volume regulation (1). The ANF gene is also inducible in the ventricle under pathological circumstances and after exposure to hypertrophic agents (2-4), including the alpha 1-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine (PE) (5). Thus, significant increases in ANF mRNA are found in the mouse ventricle that is stressed by aortic banding (6), in genetic hypertension (7), and in viable ventricular myocardium following experimental infarction (8). Even though ventricular ANF expression has been considered to be a specific molecular marker of hypertrophy, its role in hypertrophy is unclear. ANF has been shown to have growth-inhibitory effects in both non-myocardial cells (9, 10) and cardiac myocytes (11). Furthermore, knockout mice lacking the ANF guanylate cyclase receptor appear to die suddenly due to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Thus, ventricular ANF may play a compensatory role that modifies the ventricular myocyte's growth response to hypertrophic signals.

Diverse stimuli lead to cardiac hypertrophy, including mechanical loading (6), myocardial infarction (12), and the effects of growth factors such as IGF-I (2-5). Although the molecular mechanisms responsible for mediating the cardiac growth response are poorly understood, they probably involve the integration of multiple, potentially antagonistic, pathways. Many hypertrophic signals, including those initiated by PE (13), IGF-I (14), and afterload stress (15), appear to merge at the level of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade. Consequently, each of the MAPK family members, ERK (13, 16), JNK (17), and p38 (18), have been implicated in the hypertrophic response.

Until recently, ERK was thought to be a positive regulator of the hypertrophic phenotype (13, 16). It is now known that, although the ERK pathway plays a primary role in the proliferative response in skeletal muscle, it is in fact inhibitory to the myogenic response in L6A1 myoblasts (19). Similarly, in cardiomyocytes, inactivation of ERK does not inhibit the ability of PE to increase ANF promoter activity (a key molecular marker of cardiac hypertrophy) (20). Others (21) have demonstrated that transfected dominant-negative Rac1 GTPase, a member of the Rho family, fails to inhibit PE-induced ERK activation but disrupts PE-induced sarcomerogenesis and leucine incorporation. Indeed, a number of recent investigations have implicated other ERK-independent signal transduction pathways as being critical in mediating the hypertrophic action of PE, including the MEKK1/JNK (22), p38 (18), Rac1 (21), and calcineurin pathways (23). Thus, ERK does not appear to be involved in initiating or maintaining cardiac hypertrophy.

We initially hypothesized that the anti-hypertrophic effect of ANF resulted from interference with ERK activation. However, in preliminary experiments we found that, although ANF pretreatment does inhibit subsequent growth factor-induced activation, ANF treatment alone causes rapid and robust ERK phosphorylation (24). On the basis of this evidence and work suggesting that ERK activation is not itself a hypertrophic stimulus, we hypothesized that the anti-hypertrophic action of ANF in the ventricular myocyte is mediated by activation of the ERK signaling cascade. Therefore, the present investigation was undertaken to determine if ERK signaling was involved in the anti-hypertrophic action of ANF and to better define the site of intersection between ANF signaling and the ERK cascade.

Most ANF actions are mediated through activation of its transmembrane guanylyl cyclase receptor, NPR-A (25). Receptor-generated cGMP binds to cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG), which is thought to mediate the principal biological functions of cGMP. However, very little is known about downstream PKG effects. cGMP-dependent nuclear localization of PKG causes transactivation of the Fos promoter, suggesting that the cGMP/PKG system plays a potentially important role in transcriptional regulation (26). Recently, Hood and Granger (28) reported that the stimulation of the ERK system by nitric oxide (NO) in endothelial cells is dependent on cGMP (27) and PKG activation. The ability of ANF, presumably through cGMP/PKG, to activate the ERK cascade in cardiac myocytes has not been previously studied.

Classical ERK activation involves a series of protein-protein interactions initiated by GTP loading of Ras that results in phosphorylation of the serine-threonine kinase Raf through recruitment to the cell membrane (29). Activated Raf in turn phosphorylates the MAPK/ERK kinase, MEK. MEK activation by Raf isoforms Raf-1 (30), B-Raf, and A-Raf has been well demonstrated, although A-Raf appears to activate selectively only MEK1 (31). Other phosphorylating proteins are also capable of activating MEK, such as the c-mos protooncogene (32) and MEK kinase 1 (33), a yeast STE11 homologue that is a more potent activator of JNK. MEK displays extremely high substrate selectivity toward ERK. An anchoring sequence on MEK is responsible for its physical association with ERK and serves to maintain the cytoplasmic location of ERK (34). Phosphorylation of ERK by MEK promotes ERK homodimerization, which is also required for ERK translocation to the nucleus (35), where it is capable of phosphorylating nuclear targets involved with transcriptional activation (36). Our preliminary data indicate that ANF signaling is also capable of activating ERK (24); however, the precise point at which ANF acts is unclear.

In this study we have confirmed that ANF significantly inhibits the hypertrophic effects of PE. Furthermore, we have extended this observation by demonstrating that activation of the ERK cascade is required for the anti-hypertrophic action of ANF, and we have established that ANF-induced ERK activation through cGMP involves MEK but not Raf.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Antibodies and Peptides-- Antibodies to p44/42 MAPK (ERK1 and ERK2), p38 MAPK, SAPK/JNK, MEK1/2, and corresponding phospho-specific antibodies (when available) were purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). ERK agarose-conjugated antibodies, MEK1, MEK2, Raf-1, B-Raf, and A-Raf antibodies, full-length MEK1, MAPK, and c-Jun substrate were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). For immunoprecipitation, protein A-Sepharose was purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. alpha -Atrial natriuretic polypeptide-1-28 (human) was obtained from Peninsula Laboratories Inc. (Belmont, CA), 8-bromo-cGMP from Sigma, IGF-I from Gro-Pep (Australia), and PE from American Regent Laboratories, Inc. (Shirley, NY). Angiotensin II, the MEK inhibitor PD098059, and the protein kinase C inhibitor RO-31-8220 were from Calbiochem.

Cell Culture-- Normal rat ventricular myocyte cells (NRVMC) were cultured from 1- to 2-day-old Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats as described previously (37). Ventricles were dissected free from atria and quartered. Myocytes were dissociated in trypsin and DNase I and pre-plated to remove non-myocyte cells. Myocytes were then plated on gelatin-coated tissue culture dishes at a density of 500/mm2 and maintained overnight at 1% CO2 in minimal essential medium with Hanks' salts and L-glutamine, supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 1 mM bromodeoxyuridine, 50 units/ml penicillin, and 1.5 mM vitamin B12. Myocytes were placed in a serum-free medium containing minimal essential medium with Hanks' salts and L-glutamine (Life Technologies, Inc.) and were supplemented with 10 µg/ml insulin, 10 µg/ml transferrin, 0.1 mM bromodeoxyuridine, 50 units/ml penicillin, and 1.5 mM vitamin B12 24 h before experimentation.

Western Blot Analysis-- For ERK, JNK, and p38 Western immunoblots following specific treatments, myocytes plated on 10-cm dishes were washed twice in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed on ice in buffer containing 10% sucrose, 1% Ipegal CA-630 (a Nonidet P-40 equivalent from Calbiochem), 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 137 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 10 mM NaF. For Raf Western immunoblots, the lysis buffer contained 10 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF, 50 mM NaCl (pH 7.4), containing 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 20 mM n-octylbeta -D-glucopyranoside, 0.1% (w/v) fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, and 2 mM Na3VO4. Lysates were centrifuged at 2000 × g to remove nuclei, and total protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method (38). Samples containing 100 µg of protein were separated on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and electrophoretically transferred to a Hybond-ECL membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using a wet transfer apparatus (Bio-Rad). Membranes were incubated in a blocking buffer containing 5% (w/v) nonfat dry milk (Lucerne) in TBS with 0.1% Tween 20. Membranes were probed with phospho-p42/44 MAPK, phospho-SAPK-JNK, phospho-p38 MAPK, or phospho-MEK1/2 antibodies overnight at 4 °C (all at 1:1000 dilution), washed twice in TBS-T, and then detected using a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The membranes were stripped under reducing conditions in a solution containing 62.5 mM Tris-Cl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, and 100 mM beta -mercaptoethanol for 30 min at 50 °C. Following re-blocking, membranes were probed with the respective Raf-1 (1:1000), A-Raf (1:200), B-Raf (1:1000), p42/44 MAPK (1:1000), SAPK/JNK (1:1000), p38 MAPK (1:5000), or MEK1/2 antibodies (1:1000) overnight at 4 °C and detected as described above in order to verify equal loading. Quantitation was done using the Molecular Imager System (Bio-Rad).

In Vitro Kinase Assays-- In all experiments, following specific treatments, myocytes plated on 10-cm dishes were washed twice in PBS and then lysed on ice in the appropriate lysis buffer. To determine the kinase activity of the Raf isoforms (adapted from the method described by Bogoyevitch et al. (39)) following treatments, cells were lysed as described for Raf Western immunoblots, and protein concentration was determined. In control experiments using Western immunoblotting, we determined that the detergent-insoluble pellets did not contain Raf. Antibodies recognizing Raf-1 coupled to agarose beads (5 µl) or A-Raf coupled to protein-Sepharose A (after preclearing lysates) were added to 150 µg of protein, and these were incubated with mixing at 4 °C for 4 h in a total volume of 500 µl. The immunoprecipitates were washed three times with lysis buffer and twice with wash buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 mM EGTA containing 0.5 mM Na3VO4, and 0.1% (v/v) mercaptoethanol. Immunoprecipitates were assayed for their activation of MEK using a coupled assay in which MEK activates ERK. The activity of ERK is subsequently measured by incorporation of 32P from [gamma -32P]ATP (NEN Life Science Products) into myelin basic protein (MBP) (Fisher). Immunoprecipitates were resuspended in 30 µl of buffer containing 30 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 mM EGTA (pH 7.5), 0.1% (v/v) mercaptoethanol, 0.03% w/v Brij 35, 10 mM magnesium acetate, and 20 mM n-octyl-beta -D-glucopyranoside that has been supplemented with 200 µM ATP, 2 µg/ml (60 ng/sample) MEK1, and 20 µg/ml (600 ng/sample) ERK. The reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 20 min with intermittent mixing and then terminated by mixing 15 µl of the supernatant with 15 µl of ice-cold wash buffer in which 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin was added. The diluted supernatants (10 µl) were mixed with 40 µl of MBP phosphorylation buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 mM EGTA (pH 8.0), 0.4 mg/ml MBP, 50 µM ATP, 12.5 mM magnesium acetate, and 1 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP to assay activity of ERK. The reaction was continued for 15 min at 30 °C and then terminated by spotting on P81 paper and washed 4 times in 75 mM phosphoric acid. Control reactions in which antibodies were incubated with buffer were done in parallel. Results were quantitated using scintillation counting. In additional experiments ERK activity was assayed by resolving MBP separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and quantitated by phosphorimaging (Molecular Imager System, Bio-Rad).

For MEK activity assays, MEK1 or MEK2 proteins were immunoprecipitated with specific antibody coupled to protein A-Sepharose from lysates prepared with the buffer used for the ERK Western immunoblots. Activity of the immunoprecipitated protein was measured as described for Raf activity, except that full-length MEK was omitted from the reaction buffer.

For ERK activity assays, the ERK Western immunoblot lysis buffer was used. Samples containing 100 µg of total protein were immunoprecipitated in a total volume of 500 µl of lysis buffer with ERK-specific, agarose-coupled antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The ERK immunoprecipitate was washed three times in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.2% Ipegal CA-630, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, and 5% sucrose (w/v). Kinase activity was determined by incubation of 10 µg of bovine MBP and 10 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP in 25 µl of assay buffer containing 80 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 80 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM ATP, 20 mM sodium fluoride, and 2 mM sodium orthovanadate for 30 min at 30 °C. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 65 µl of Laemmli sample buffer, and MBP was resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Results were quantitated by phosphorimaging.

For c-Jun kinase activity, following specific treatments, myocytes were washed twice in cold PBS, and whole-cell lysates were prepared in buffer containing 20 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.4), 2 mM EDTA, 50 mM beta -glycerophosphate, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 0.4 mM PMSF, 0.5 µg/ml aprotinin, and 0.5 µg/ml leupeptin. Lysates were centrifuged at 2000 × g to remove nuclei, and total protein concentration was measured. Samples containing 100 µg of total protein were immunoprecipitated in a total of 500 µl of lysis buffer with specific SAPK/JNK antibodies bound to protein A-Sepharose overnight at 4 °C. The immunoprecipitated JNK was washed twice in buffer containing 500 mM LiCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 1 mM DTT, and 0.1% Triton X-100 and then washed three times in assay buffer containing 20 mM MOPS (pH 7.2), 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, and 0.1% Triton X-100. Kinase activity was determined by incubation with 3 µg of c-Jun substrate and 10 µCi of [gamma -32P] ATP in 20 µl of assay buffer for 30 min at 30 °C. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 65 µl of Laemmli sample buffer, and MBP was resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Results were quantitated using the Molecular Imager System (Bio-Rad).

Cell Staining-- Prior to plating, chamber slides were pretreated with laminin (Life Technologies, Inc.) for at least 1 h. Following treatments, myocytes were washed twice in PBS, fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde/phosphate-buffered saline at room temperature for 10 min, washed once in PBS, and then permeabilized for 1 min in cold methanol, followed by another PBS wash. After blocking with 0.2% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 30 min, fixed cells were incubated with ERK-specific antisera (1:50), washed three times in blocking buffer, followed by immunofluorescent staining with fluorescein 5-isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:500) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). As an immunocytochemical control, the ERK primary antibody was replaced with primary antibodies pre-adsorbed with synthetic ERK peptide (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) containing the antigenic sites for the antibody. The specificity of the antibody was also confirmed by Western immunoblotting which demonstrated protein bands only at the expected molecular weight of ERK 42/44. Cells were visualized with a Bio-Rad 1024ES laser scanning confocal system, equipped with a krypton-argon laser, attached to a Nikon TE300 inverted microscope. Images were acquired using Lasersharp acquisition software (Bio-Rad) and prepared for publication using Lasersharp post-processing software (Bio-Rad).

Transfections-- For liposome-mediated transient transfections, myocytes plated on 60-mm dishes were exposed to a DNA-liposome complex according to the manufacturer's protocol for Lipofectin (Life Technologies, Inc.) using 8 µg of pCMV/beta -galactosidase (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). Cells were washed and incubated in serum-free media and treated as described. Following treatments, cells were washed in PBS (pH 7.4), fixed for 5 min in a solution containing 74% PBS (pH 7.4), 4% paraformaldehyde, and 0.25% glutaraldehyde, washed again, and then stained for 48 h at 20 °C in a reaction solution containing 95.4% PBS (pH 7.4), 1× MgCl2, 1× potassium ferricyanide, 1× potassium ferrocyanide, and 0.1% X-gal. Cells were washed twice and covered with 30% glycerol. To assess the effect of various treatments on cardiomyocyte growth, we measured the CSA of transfected cells with light microscopy using a computer-assisted automatic edge detection and measurement software package (BioScan Optimas, BioScan, Inc., Edmonds, WA).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

ANF Inhibition of PE-induced Myocyte Hypertrophy Is ERK-dependent (Fig. 1)-- To confirm that ANF treatment inhibits PE-induced hypertrophy, we measured cross-sectional area (CSA) in primary cultures of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMC). PE treatment increased NRVMC cross-sectional area by 80%. Treatment with a combination of PE and ANF reduced the PE-induced increase in cell size by approximately 50%. To determine that ANF-induced activation of ERK was necessary for its anti-hypertrophic actions, we assessed the ability of the MEK antagonist PD098059 to inhibit the inhibitory effect of ANF on PE-induced increases in CSA. PD098059 treatment alone had no effect on NRVMC CSA. PD098059 had a small inhibitory effect on the PE-induced increase in CSA but completely abolished ANF-induced inhibition of PE-induced increases in CSA, suggesting that the anti-hypertrophic action of ANF is ERK-dependent. This is consistent with previous findings that ANF is anti-proliferative in other cell types (9, 10) and inhibits thymidine uptake and leucine incorporation in cardiac myocytes (11).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   ANF inhibition of PE-induced hypertrophy is ERK-dependent. Serum-starved NRVMC were transfected with 8 µg of pCMV/beta -galactosidase and then treated as shown with ANF (1 µM), PD098059 (PD, 10 µM), and PE (1 µM) for 48 h. Transfected cells were stained with X-gal to facilitate computer-assisted edge detection by light microscopy. Multi-nucleated cells were excluded from the analysis. Three separate experiments were performed in duplicate, and at least 90 cells were measured in each treatment group (>= 15 transfected cells per 60-mm dish). For individual experiments, the mean CSA was calculated for each treatment group, and the percent increase over basal was determined. CSA (mean ± S.D.) for a representative experiment was 341 ± 73 µm2 for untreated cells, 363 ± 64 µm2 for ANF-treated cells, 620 ± 140 µm2 for PE-treated cells, and 470 ± 55 µm2 for cells treated with both ANF and PE. The values of the percent increase over basal within each experiment were then compared between the treatment groups using Student's t test for independent samples; *, p = 0.0007; **, p = 0.023 compared with PE.

ANF Causes ERK Translocation to the Nucleus-- Although the subcellular localization of ERK is predominantly cytoplasmic, nuclear translocation of the phosphorylated protein is thought to be necessary for many ERK functions (40). We reasoned that if ERK was significantly involved in the anti-hypertrophic effect of ANF, then ANF treatment should result in ERK nuclear translocation. In serum-starved quiescent NRVMC, diffuse cytoplasmic localization (and absent nuclear staining) of ERK was observed by confocal imaging (Fig. 2A). In contrast, intense nuclear staining was seen 1 h after ANF treatment (Fig. 2B). Nuclear translocation was evident as early as 15 min in nearly all cases and was significantly diminished at 2 h (data not shown). Furthermore, PD098059 inhibited ANF-induced nuclear translocation of ERK (Fig. 2C). Taken together, these data suggest that the anti-hypertrophic effect of ANF is ERK-dependent and that ANF-induced nuclear localization may be an essential component of this action.


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   ANF induces nuclear translocation of ERK. NRVMC were serum-starved for 24 h and either left untreated (A), treated with ANF (100 nM) for 60 min (B), treated with the MEK inhibitor PD098059 (10 µM) for 30 min prior to treatment with ANF for an additional 60 min (C). After fixation, cells were incubated with ERK antibodies (A-C), or ERK antibodies that were preincubated with ERK peptide containing the antigenic sites for the antibody (D), and visualized by confocal fluorescent microscopy. Bar indicates 50 µm. Pictures are representative of six experiments.

ANF Activates Components of the ERK Cascade-- To test more directly whether the anti-hypertrophic actions of ANF might occur through activation of the ERK signaling cascade, NRVMC were treated with ANF, and in vitro kinase activity assays were performed using immunoprecipitated Raf-1, MEK, and ERK. Treatment with TPA caused robust Raf-1 activation. However, ANF treatment had no effect on Raf-1 activation. In parallel experiments no effect was seen with other Raf isoforms, A-Raf and B-Raf (Fig. 3). ANF treatment resulted in a 3-4-fold increase in MEK activity (Fig. 4C). There was no difference between the ability of ANF to activate MEK1 or MEK2 (data not shown). This rapid increase in MEK activity was reflected in the ability of ANF to phosphorylate MEK as demonstrated by Western immunoblotting with anti-phospho-MEK antibody (Fig. 4A). These data suggest that the ANF signal intersects with the ERK cascade at the level of MEK and appears to be Raf-independent.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   ANF does not activate Raf. Serum-starved NRVMC were treated with ANF (100 nM) or TPA (1 µM) for the indicated times. Endogenous Raf-1 (A) or B-Raf (B) was immunoprecipitated and assayed for kinase activity by measuring incorporation of [gamma -32P]ATP into MBP as described under "Experimental Procedures." C, the results of three identical experiments are shown in which immunoprecipitated Raf-1 or A-Raf from ANF or TPA-treated cells were assayed for kinase activity. Data points represent the means ± S.D. and are expressed as percent change relative to unstimulated controls.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   ANF phosphorylates and activates MEK. A, serum-starved NRVMC were treated with 100 nM ANF for 10 min. Phosphorylation was determined by Western immunoblotting with specific phospho-MEK antibodies as described under "Experimental Procedures" using 100 µg of total protein. The blot was stripped and reprobed for total MEK to verify equal loading. B, myocytes were treated with ANF or IGF-I alone for 10 min or were pretreated with the MEK inhibitor PD098059 at the concentrations indicated for 30 min prior to a 10-min exposure to ANF. Western immunoblots were probed with specific phospho-ERK antibodies as described in A. C, in three separate identical experiments, endogenous MEK was immunoprecipitated, and kinase activity assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" (data are means ± S.D.).

We next determined that ability of ANF to activate and phosphorylate ERK itself. ANF caused rapid ERK activation (Fig. 5, A and C). Furthermore, simultaneous treatment with both PE and ANF was clearly not inhibitory and, in fact, appeared to be additive (Fig. 5B). In additional experiments, pretreatment with the MEK antagonist PD098059, as expected, eliminated the ability of ANF to phosphorylate ERK, indicating that ANF-induced ERK phosphorylation is MEK-dependent (Fig. 4B). ANF stimulated the phosphorylation of ERK in NRVMC in a dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 6).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   ANF activates ERK. A, serum-starved NRVMC were treated with ANF (100 nM) for the indicated times. Endogenous p42/44 ERK was immunoprecipitated and assayed for kinase activity by measuring incorporation of [gamma -32P]ATP into MBP. B, quiescent cells were left untreated, treated with PE (1 µM), or PE and ANF (100 nM) for 10 min (for A and B relative kinase activities are provided above). C, ERK activation after 10 min of ANF (100 nM) treatment. Data points represent the means ± S.D. from three separate experiments and are expressed as fold stimulation relative to unstimulated controls.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of increasing ANF dose on ERK phosphorylation. Serum-starved NRVMC were treated for 10 min with the indicated concentration of ANF (C = unstimulated control). Phosphorylation was determined by Western immunoblotting of whole cell lysates with specific phospho-ERK. Data were adjusted for total ERK levels and are expressed as fold stimulation relative to unstimulated controls (means ± S.E. of data from three separate experiments).

ANF-induced ERK Phosphorylation Is Specific-- To determine if the effect of ANF on ERK was specific, we tested its ability to activate other members of the MAPK family. ANF did not activate JNK in vitro, despite evidence of significant JNK activation by the protein kinase C inhibitor RO-31-8220 in these cells (data not shown and Ref. 41). ANF stimulated the phosphorylation of ERK but had a minimal effect on phosphorylation of JNK or p38 (Fig. 7). ERK phosphorylation was significantly increased after 5 min and was maximal at 10 min. ERK2 (p42) appeared to be the predominant ERK isoform identified by Western immunoblot. However, both isoforms appeared to be phosphorylated following ANF treatment.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   ANF treatment rapidly phosphorylates ERKs but not JNK or p38. Serum-starved NRVMC were treated with 100 nM ANF for the indicated periods (C = time 0-min unstimulated control). Phosphorylation was determined by Western immunoblotting of whole cell lysates with specific phospho-ERK (arrows indicate p42 and p44 isoforms), phospho-JNK (arrows indicate JNK1 and JNK2 isoforms), or phospho-p38 antibodies (A-C, respectively) as described under "Experimental Procedures" using 100 µg of total protein. Blots were stripped and reprobed for total ERK, JNK, or p38 to verify equal loading (less than 5% variation in all cases). Data are adjusted for total ERK, JNK, or p38 and expressed as fold stimulation relative to unstimulated controls (means ± S.E. of data from three separate experiments (D)).

cGMP Mimics ANF-induced Activation of ERK-- Most ANF actions are mediated through activation of its transmembrane guanylyl cyclase receptor, NPR-A (25), which is particularly abundant in the myocardium (42). To determine if ANF-stimulated ERK phosphorylation is mediated by cGMP, we used the cell-permeable derivative 8-bromo-cGMP. This cGMP analog caused a marked increase in ERK phosphorylation after 5- and 10-min treatments (Fig. 8), suggesting that ANF-induced ERK phosphorylation involves the guanylyl cyclase activity of the ANF receptor. Since most cGMP-mediated effects occur through activation of PKG, we attempted to inhibit the effect of 8-bromo-cGMP with the selective PKG antagonist KT5822 (43). However, KT5822 alone caused ERK phosphorylation, making it impossible to interpret the effect of KT5822 pretreatment on cGMP-induced ERK activity.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   ANF phosphorylation of ERK is mimicked by cGMP. Serum-starved NRVMC were treated with ANF or 8Br-cGMP for the times indicated. Phosphorylation was determined as in Fig. 4A. Arrows indicate p42 and p44 ERK isoforms.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Changes in cardiomyocyte morphology in response to hypertrophic signals are reflected at the molecular level by the regulated induction of important sarcomeric proteins, including the beta  myosin heavy chain, myosin light chain-2V, and skeletal muscle alpha -actin (44). Invariably, ventricular ANF mRNA is also rapidly expressed in this setting, although the physiological relevance of the production of a non-structural protein like ANF is unclear. In uncomplicated cardiac hypertrophy, circulating ANF levels are not increased (45), suggesting that local rather than systemic ANF actions might modify the hypertrophic response. In the present report we have confirmed that ANF has direct anti-hypertrophic effects in the ventricular cardiomyocyte, and we have extended this observation by establishing that ERK activation is required for this effect. Thus, the ability of ANF to activate ERK selectively and rapidly and to cause ERK nuclear translocation appears to be essential for the anti-hypertrophic action of ANF.

This study provides the first evidence of an important link between ANF and MAPK pathway in the heart and begins to define the molecular mechanisms involved in this interaction. Given that the classical pathway of ERK activation by growth factors involves the sequential activation of Ras, Raf, MEK, and ERK, there are a number of levels where ANF signaling through cGMP and (presumably) PKG could activate the MAPK pathway. Our findings that ANF treatment resulted in the phosphorylation and activation of MEK in the absence of any effect on Raf isoforms suggests that the ANF signal converges with the ERK cascade at the level of MEK. Additional evidence supporting an effect of cGMP signaling on ERK activation has come from studies utilizing NO, a signaling molecule with many important cGMP-mediated physiological functions (46). Hood and co-workers (27) have demonstrated that the activation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) on ERK is also NO/cGMP-dependent and further suggest, unlike our results, that this effect is Raf-dependent as well. The reason for this difference is unclear. It is possible that cGMP effects are tissue-specific (endothelial cells versus cardiac myocytes). Alternatively, a nonspecific assay was utilized by the study cited. Raf phosphorylation of the catalytic domain may be presumed in that study because an in vitro kinase assay demonstrated that immunoprecipitated Raf is capable of phosphorylating the nonspecific substrate, syntide-2. In our study, phosphorylation of immunoprecipitated Raf from ANF-treated cells is coupled to activation of full-length ERK, thereby specifically implicating or excluding involvement of the MAPK pathway. Consistent with our findings, Suhasini et al. (47) have established that PKG plays no role in the activation of Raf. These investigators went on to demonstrate that PKG phosphorylates Raf Ser43, a residue adjacent to the Ras binding domain and that preincubation with cGMP inhibits ERK activation by EGF. Phosphorylation of Ser43 is thought to uncouple the Ras-Raf kinase interaction. Thus, the demonstration that PKG phosphorylates Ser43 provides an intriguing explanation for our previous observation that pretreatment with ANF inhibits ERK activation by IGF-I (24). Taken together, these data suggest a dual role for ANF signaling through cGMP in the ERK system; ANF is capable of rapidly activating MEK and ERK and is also able to prevent the action of subsequent growth factor activation of ERK through its ability to prevent the Ras-Raf interaction.

ERK activation was previously thought to be critical in the molecular pathways that initiate the hypertrophic response, since dominant-interfering MEK mutants (13) or ERK depletion using specific antisense oligonucleotides inhibited growth factor-stimulated ANF and MLC-2 expression and attenuated PE-stimulated increases in myocyte area and sarcomerogenesis (16). However, there is now a preponderance of evidence, including our own, that the initiation and maintenance of cardiac hypertrophy are ERK-independent processes. ERK inhibition does not prevent, and in fact enhances, skeletal muscle cell differentiation in IGF-I-treated cells (19). Furthermore, ERK inhibition fails to down-regulate biochemical markers of hypertrophic activity in PE-treated cardiac myocytes (20). Conversely, ATP and carbachol, molecules that are known to activate ERK, do not cause hypertrophy (20). Indeed, ATP has been shown to have anti-hypertrophic actions in PE-treated cardiomyocytes (48). Finally, our observations that (a) ERK inhibition with PD098059 minimally inhibits PE-induced increase in CSA, (b) ANF rapidly activates ERK but inhibits PE-induced increases in cell size, and (c) ERK inhibition with PD098059 blocks the anti-hypertrophic action of ANF support the conclusion that ERK activation does not promote PE-induced hypertrophy. The idea that cardiac ERK activation is anti-hypertrophic is supported by our own observations and other investigations in which constitutively activated MEK through ERK activation induces the c-Fos promoter in transient transfection assays but inhibits PE-induced activation of key hypertrophic markers (49). Furthermore, MEK inhibition in cardiac myocytes transfected with constitutively active MEKK1 appears to promote hypertrophy through JNK activation (50). These data suggest that modulation of MEK itself, the intersecting point of the ANF signal and the ERK cascade, may significantly modulate the hypertrophic phenotype.

Cardiac hypertrophy is the functional consequence of virtually all diseases of the heart. In acquired heart diseases, remodeling of the left ventricle occurs as the direct result of afterload stress. In these cases, hypertrophy initially plays a beneficial role by normalizing wall stress but subsequently becomes a significant independent risk factor for dying from cardiovascular disease (51). Cardiac hypertrophy can also result from more than 100 different disease-causing genetic mutations of the contractile apparatus (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). Thus, hypertrophic signal transduction mechanisms present an attractive therapeutic target for treating heart disease because hypertrophy appears to be the final common pathway for the pathogenesis of a vast array of acquired and inherited disorders. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel antagonists are thought to be effective because of the anti-hypertrophic action (52). In animal models of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cyclosporin and FK506 can prevent the hypertrophic action of calcineurin, a calcium-regulated phosphatase (53). Our results suggest that, in addition to inhibiting hypertrophic pathways, enhancing the activity of endogenous anti-hypertrophic factors may also be useful in the treatment of maladaptive hypertrophy. The development of such new therapeutic tools that mimic or modulate the anti-hypertrophic effects of ANF in the cardiomyocyte will require a complete understanding of ANF signal transduction pathways in the heart.

In summary, our data suggest that activation of the ERK cascade is required for the anti-hypertrophic action of ANF. We have presented evidence for a novel interaction between ANF and ERK signaling cascades in NRVMC. These data suggest that ANF treatment results in functional activation of the ERK system, including ERK phosphorylation and nuclear translocation. Furthermore, ERK activation by ANF appears to be cGMP-mediated and requires MEK phosphorylation but occurs independently of classical ERK activation through Raf. Therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing cGMP-mediated mechanisms in the cardiomyocyte may be beneficial in hypertrophic diseases such as aortic stenosis and familial hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HD01051 and the Medical Research Foundation of Oregon (to M. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Pediatric Cardiology, UHN-60, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97201. Tel.: 503-494-3189; Fax 503-494-0496; E-mail: silberbm@ohsu.edu.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ANF, atrial natriuretic factor; CSA, cross-sectional area; PE, phenylephrine; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase; NO, nitric oxide; NRVMC, neonatal rat ventricular myocytes; MBP, myelin basic protein; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; DTT, dithiothreitol; PKG, cGMP-dependent protein kinase; SAPK, stress-activated protein kinase; X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta -D-galactopyranoside; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Levin, E. R., Gardner, D. G., and Samson, W. K. (1998) N. Engl. J. Med. 339, 321-328[Free Full Text]
2. Shubeita, H. E., McDonough, P. M., Harris, A. N., Knowlton, K. U., Glembotski, C. C., Brown, J. H., and Chien, K. R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20555-20562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Ito, H., Hiroe, M., Hirata, Y., Motoyoshi, T., Adachi, S., Shichiri, M., Koike, A., Nogami, A., and Marumo, F. (1993) Circulation 87, 1715-1721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Decker, R. S., Cook, M. G., Behnke-Barclay, M., and Decker, M. L. (1995) Circ. Res. 77, 544-555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Knowlton, K. U., Baracchini, E., Ross, R. S., Harris, A. N., Henderson, S. A., Evans, S. M., Glembotski, C. C., and Chien, K. R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7759-7768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Knowlton, K. U., Rockman, H. A., Itan, M., Vovan, A., Seidman, C. E., and Chien, K. R. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 1311-1318
7. Ohta, K., Kim, S., and Iwao, H. (1996) Hypertension 28, 627-634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Larsen, T. H., and Saetersdal, T. (1993) Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol. Incl. Mol. Pathol. 64, 309-314[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Itoh, H., Pratt, R. E., and Dzau, V. J. (1990) J. Clin. Invest. 86, 1690-1697
10. Cao, L., and Gardner, D. G. (1995) Hypertension 25, 227-234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Calderone, A., Thaik, C. M., Takahashin, N., Chang, D. D. L. F., and Colucci, W. S. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 812-818[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Gidh-Jain, M., Huang, B., Jain, P., Gick, G., and El-Sherif, N. (1998) J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 30, 627-637[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Gillespie-Brown, J., Fuller, S. J., Bogoyevitch, M. A., Cowley, S., and Sugden, P. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 28092-28096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Foncea, R., Andersson, M., Ketterman, A., Blakesley, V., Sapag-Hagar, M., Sugden, P. H., LeRoith, D., and Lavandero, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19115-19124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Yamazaki, T., Komuro, I., and Yazaki, Y. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 163, 197-201
16. Glennon, P. E., Kaddoura, S., Sale, E. M., Sale, G. J., Fuller, S. J., and Sugden, P. H. (1996) Circulation Res. 78, 954-961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Ramirez, M. T., Sah, V. P., Zhao, X. L., Hunter, J. J., Chien, K. R., and Brown, J. H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14057-14061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Wang, Y., Huang, S., Sah, V. P., Ross, J., Jr., Brown, J. H., Han, J., and Chien, K. R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2161-2168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Coolican, S. A., Samuel, D. S., Ewton, D. Z., McWade, F. J., and Florini, J. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6653-6662[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Post, G. R., Goldstein, D., Thuerauf, D. J., Glembotski, C. C., and Brown, J. H. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 271, 8452-8457
21. Pracyk, J. B., Koichi, T., Hegland, D. D., Kim, K. S., Sethi, R., Rovira, Il, Blasina, D. R., Lee, L., Bruder, J. T., Kovesde, I., Goldshmidt-Clermont, P. J., Irani, K., and Finkel, T. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 102, 929-937[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Ramirez, M. T., Sah, V. P., Zhao, X.-L., Hunter, J. J., Chien, K. R., and Brown, J. H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14057-14061
23. Molkentin, J. D., Lu, J. R., Antos, C. L., Markham, B., Richardson, J., Robbins, J., Grant, S. R., and Olson, E. N. (1998) Cell 93, 215-228[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Silberbach, M., Gorenc, T., Vossler, M., Stork, P. J., Hershberger, R. E., and Roberts, C. T., Jr. (1997) 79th Annual Meeting American Society of Endocrinology, Minneapolis, MN, June 11-14, 1997, p. 82, Abstract 13-3, Endocrine Society Press, Bethesda, MD
25. Chinkers, M., and Garbers, D. (1989) Science 245, 1392-1394[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Gudi, T., Lohmann, S. M., and Pilz, R. B. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 5244-5254[Abstract]
27. Parenti, A., Morbidelli, L., Cui, X. L., Douglas, J. G., Hood, J. D., Granger, H. J., Ledda, F., and Ziche, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4220-4226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Hood, J., and Granger, H. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23504-23508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Davis, R. J. (1995) Mol. Reprod. Dev. 42, 459-467[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Alessi, D. R., Saito, Y., Campbell, D. G., Cohen, P., Sithanandam, G., Rapp, U., Ashworth, A., Marshall, C. J., and Cowley, S. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1610-1619[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Wu, X., Noh, S. J., Zhou, G., Dixon, J. E., and Guan, K. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3265-3271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Seger, R., Ahn, N. G., Posada, J., Munar, E. S., Jensen, A. M., Cooper, J. A., Cobb, M. H., and Krebs, E. G. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 14373-14381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Lange-Carter, C. A., Pleiman, C. M., Gardner, A. M., Blumer, K. J., and Johnson, G. L. (1993) Science 260, 315-319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Fukuda, M., Gotoh, Y., and Nishida, E. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1901-1908[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Khokhlatchev, A. V., Canagarajah, B., Wilsbacher, J., Robinson, M., Atkinson, M., Goldsmith, E., and Cobb, M. H. (1998) Cell 93, 605-615[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Hill, C. S., Marais, R., John, S., Wynne, J., Dalton, S., and Treisman, R. (1993) Cell 73, 395-406[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Simpson, P. (1985) Circ. Res. 56, 884-894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Bogoyevitch, M. A., Marshall, C. J., and Sugden, P. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26303-26310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Dikic, I., Schlessinger, J., and Lax, I. (1994) Curr. Biol. 4, 702-708[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Beltman, J., McCormick, F., and Cook, J. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27018-27024[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Hansson, M., Barroso, C., Gulbenkian, S., and Forsgren, S. (1997) Cell Tissue Res. 290, 669-673[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Kase, H., Iwahashi, K., Nakanishi, S., Matsuda, Y., Yamada, K., Takahashi, M., Murakata, C., Sato, A., and Kaneko, M. (1987) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 142, 436-440[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Chien, K. R., Knowlton, K. U., Zhu, H., and Chien, S. (1991) FASEB J. 5, 3037-3046[Abstract]
45. Yamamoto, K., Burnett, J. C., Jr., Jougasaki, M., Nishimura, R. A., Bailey, K. R., Saito, Y., Nakao, K., and Redfield, M. M. (1996) Hypertension 28, 988-994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Lander, H. M., Jacovina, A. T., Davis, R. J., and Tauras, J. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19705-19709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Suhasini, M., Li, H., Lohmann, S. M., Boss, G. R., and Pilz, R. B. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 6983-6994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Zheng, J. S., Boluyt, M. O., Long, X., O'Neill, L., Lakatta, E. G., and Crow, M. T. (1996) Circ. Res. 78, 525-535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Thorburn, J., Carlson, M., Mansour, S. J., Chien, K. R., Ahn, N. G., and Thorburn, A. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell. 6, 1479-1490[Abstract]
50. Thorburn, J., Xu, S., and Thorburn, A. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1888-1900[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Levy, D., Garrison, R. J., Savage, D. D., Kannel, W. B., and Castelli, W. P. (1990) N. Engl. J. Med. 322, 1561-1566[Abstract]
52. Weinberg, E. O., Schoen, F. J., George, D., Kagaya, Y., Douglas, P. S., Litwin, S. E., Schunkert, H., Benedict, C. R., and Lorell, B. H. (1994) Circulation 90, 1410-1422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Sussman, M. A., Lim, H. W., Gude, N., Taigen, T., Olsen, E. N., Robbins, J., Colbert, M. C., Gaulberto, A., Wieczorek, D., and Molkentin, J. D. (1998) Science 281, 1690-1693[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
W. Wang, X. Liao, K. Fukuda, S. Knappe, F. Wu, D. L. Dries, J. Qin, and Q. Wu
Corin Variant Associated With Hypertension and Cardiac Hypertrophy Exhibits Impaired Zymogen Activation and Natriuretic Peptide Processing Activity
Circ. Res., August 29, 2008; 103(5): 502 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. K. Olson, K. N. Protheroe, J. L. Segar, and T. D. Scholz
Mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and regulation in the pressure-loaded fetal ovine heart
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): H1587 - H1595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. J. Schillinger, S. Y. Tsai, G. E. Taffet, A. K. Reddy, A. J. Marian, M. L. Entman, K. Oka, L. Chan, and B. W. O'Malley
Regulatable atrial natriuretic peptide gene therapy for hypertension
PNAS, September 27, 2005; 102(39): 13789 - 13794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. B. Patel, M. L. Valencik, A. M. Pritchett, J. C. Burnett Jr., J. A. McDonald, and M. M. Redfield
Cardiac-specific attenuation of natriuretic peptide A receptor activity accentuates adverse cardiac remodeling and mortality in response to pressure overload
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): H777 - H784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]