![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 35, 25018-25025, August 27, 1999
,From the Molecular Medicine Laboratories, Institute for Drug Discovery Research, Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 21 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8585, Japan
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A cDNA encoding a novel voltage-gated
K+ channel protein was isolated from human brain.
This protein, termed BEC1, is 46% identical to rat elk in the
ether-à-go-go K+ channel family. The
BEC1 gene maps to the 12q13 region of the human genome.
Northern blot analysis indicates that BEC1 is exclusively expressed in human brain, where the expression is concentrated in the
telencephalic areas such as the cerebral cortex, amygdala, hippocampus,
and striatum. By in situ hybridization, BEC1 is
detected in the CA1-CA3 pyramidal cell layers and the dentate gyrus
granule cell layers of the hippocampus. Specific signals are also found in neocortical neurons. Transfection of mammalian L929 and Chinese hamster ovary cells with BEC1 cDNA induces a
voltage-gated outward current with a fast inactivation component. This
current is insensitive to tetraethylammonium and quinidine.
Additionally, a second related gene BEC2 was isolated from
human brain. BEC2 is also brain-specific, located in the
neocortex and the striatum, and functional as a channel gene.
Phylogenetic analysis indicates that BEC1 and
BEC2 constitute a subfamily, together with elk,
in the ether-à-go-go family. The two genes may
be involved in cellular excitability of restricted neurons in the human
central nervous system.
Voltage-gated K+ channels play an essential role in
controlling cellular excitability in the nervous system, and regulate a variety of neuronal properties such as interspike membrane potential, action potential waveform, and firing frequency (1). These results
indicate the important functions of voltage-gated K+
channels in neuronal signal transduction and processing. Their contribution to behavioral phenotypes such as learning and memory have
also been studied (2, 3).
To date, many voltage-gated K+ channel genes have been
identified from different tissues such as heart and brain, and
constitute an evolutionarily related multigene superfamily (4-6). This
superfamily is classified into two groups, the Shaker and
the ether-à-go-go (eag)1 families.
The Shaker family is quite heterogeneous and mainly consists
of four subfamilies, Kv1-Kv4. Their protein structures are
characterized by six transmembrane regions (S1-S6) with a voltage-sensing S4 region and an ion-conducting pore region located between S5 and S6. K+ channels in the eag family
also have similar structural features. However, overall sequence
similarity between eag and Shaker-type K+ channels is very
low. Members of the eag family are related to cyclic
nucleotide-gated cation channels, hyperpolarization-activated cation
channels and plant hyperpolarization-activated K+ channels,
rather than Shaker-type channels (6). Indeed, a common feature of the C
terminus of eag-type channels is a putative cyclic nucleotide-binding
(CNB) domain, a characteristic of such ion channels.
The eag family consists of eag,
eag-related gene (erg), and elk
(6-8). In Drosophila, genetic mutations of eag
or erg induces a hyperexcitable phenotype (9-11). Human
erg maps to LQT2, the locus of inherited long-QT
syndrome, an abnormality of cardiac rhythm involving the repolarization
of the action potential (12). This gene is expressed not only in the
heart but also in the brain and parasympathetic ganglia (8). In a
dorsal root ganglionic cell line, pharmacological blocking of
erg currents causes the disappearance of spike-frequency
adaptation of firing (13). This finding suggests that mammalian
erg also contributes to the regulation of neuronal
excitability. Consequently, we attempted to identify other novel
erg-related genes expressed in mammalian brain. As a result,
a new gene encoding a voltage-gated K+ channel was
isolated, which is more closely related to elk than erg and is exclusively expressed in the human telencephalon.
This study reports the molecular cloning, distribution, and channel activity of this gene, BEC1. In addition, the identification
of another novel gene closely related to BEC1 is described,
indicating the existence of a new subfamily in the eag
K+ channel family.
Molecular Cloning of Human BEC1--
A BLAST search of the
expressed sequence tag (EST) data base of GenBank, using human erg as a
query amino acid sequence, retrieved two sequences with the accession
number R35526 (387 bases) and M79045 (231 bases). To identify the 5'
and 3' ends of the cDNA corresponding to each EST, 5' and 3' rapid
amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) were performed using the Human
Brain Marathon-Ready cDNA (CLONTECH) and
primers derived from each EST sequence. Amplified fragments were
directly cloned into the plasmid pCR2.1 (Invitrogen). Sequencing the
RACE products revealed that the two EST were part of a cDNA.
Determined sequences were assembled into a large contig (3610 bases)
with an open-reading frame encoding 1083 amino acids, which we called
human BEC1.
Finally, to verify that human BEC1 cDNA including the
entire open-reading frame could be cloned from an independent source, human poly(A)+ RNA (CLONTECH) was used
for reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Reverse
transcriptase reaction was primed with the random hexamer. Primers for
PCR were designed from the 3610-bp contig as follows:
5'-GGAATTCC CTA AGA TGC CGG CCA TGC-3' and
5'-GCTCTAGAGC ACT CTG AGG TTG GGC CGA AC-3', which contains artificial sequences with EcoRI and XbaI sites,
respectively (italic). Cycles were as follows: initial denature at
96 °C for 1 min; and 35 cycles of denaturation at 96 °C for
10 s, annealing at 68 °C for 30 s, and extension at
72 °C for 7 min. Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene) was
used. The RT-PCR exclusively generated a 3.3-kb fragment. The amplified
fragment was digested with EcoRI and XbaI, and
cloned into pME18S, a plasmid for mammalian expression (14). The
resulting BEC1 expression vector was termed pME-E1.
Molecular Cloning of Rat BEC1 and BEC2--
To isolate rat
homolog cDNAs of BEC1, RT-PCR was performed using
primers derived from two nucleotide sequences of BEC1
conserved with elk, 5'-ACc TTC CTG GAC ACC ATC GC-3' and
5'-CCa AAc ACC ACc GCg TGC AT-3', in which lowercase letters are
indicated mismatches with elk. These sequences correspond to
amino acid residues 13-19 (TFLDTIA) and 492-498 (MHAVVFG) of human
BEC1, which are shared only with elk among the eag family (Fig. 1). Rat
brain poly(A)+ RNA was prepared by guanidine thiocyanate
extraction followed by oligo(dT)-cellulose chromatography (15), and
converted into random-primed cDNA. The RT-PCR amplified two
fragments of 1.5 and 1.4 kb, which encode polypeptides with 97% and
59% identities to human BEC1, respectively. Because the N and C
termini were missing, 5'- and 3'-RACE were performed on the basis of
each determined sequence using the Rat Brain Marathon-Ready cDNA
(CLONTECH). Sequences of the 1.5-kb fragment and
its 5'- and 3'-RACE products were assembled into a contig (3715 bases)
with an open reading frame of 1087 amino acids, while sequences of the
1.4-kb fragment and its RACE were merged a contig (3736 bases) with an
open reading frame of 1017 amino acids. The 1087-amino acid sequence is
extremely similar (95%) to human BEC1, indicating that this is the rat
counterpart of BEC1. Another sequence shares 48% sequence similarity
with BEC1. We estimated that the latter gene was a homolog to
BEC1, which we named BEC2.
Molecular Cloning of Human BEC2--
BEC1 sequences
are markedly conserved between the human and the rat. Nucleotide
identity is 89% between both open reading frames of human and rat
BEC1. If human BEC2 cDNA is also extremely similar to the rat one, human BEC2 cDNA will be
amplified by RT-PCR using some primer sets derived from rat sequence.
Thus, to identify human BEC2, RT-PCR with human poly(A)+
RNA was performed using primers designed from the sequences around the
initiation and stop codon of rat BEC2 cDNA, 5'-GCC ATG
CCG GTC ATG AAG G-3' and 5'-GCC AGG GTC AGT GGA ATG TG-3'. A 3.1-kb fragment was specifically amplified by the RT-PCR (35 cycles of 98 °C, 15 s and 68 °C, 3 min) with TaKaRa LA Taq
(Takara Shuzo, Japan), directly cloned into pCR2.1 and sequenced. The
sequence has an open reading frame encoding 1017 amino acids with 89%
identity to rat BEC2, suggesting that this cDNA encodes human BEC2.
Both 5'- and 3'-cDNA ends were determined by RACE. The results
revealed a contig (3920 bases) of human BEC2 cDNA and
the presence of only a silent mismatch (T17C) in the reverse primer. To
construct an expression vector for human BEC2, the open reading frame
of human BEC2 cDNA in pCR2.1 was subcloned into pME18S.
This vector was named pME-E2.
Nucleotide Sequence Determination and Analysis--
Both strands
of each fragment were sequenced using ABI PRISM DNA sequencing reagents
and an ABI 377 DNA sequencer (Perkin-Elmer). Multiple sequence
alignment and phylogenetic analysis were performed using the Clustal W
program, version 1.7 (16), and neighbor-joining method of the Phylip
program, version 3.572c (17), respectively.
Northern Blot and RT-PCR Analysis of mRNA--
Northern blot
analysis of mRNA was performed using Multiple Tissue Northern blots
(CLONTECH), on which about 2 µg of
poly(A)+ RNA/lane had been immobilized. BEC1
distribution was determined using a random-primed
32P-labeled probe corresponding to amino acids 701-984 of
BEC1. The membranes were hybridized overnight at 42 °C, in 50%
formamide, 5× SSPE, 10× Denhardt's solution, 2% SDS, and 100 µg/ml sheared, denatured salmon sperm DNA, and then finally washed
twice for 30 min in 0.1× SSC, 0.1% SDS at 55 °C. The blots were
exposed to x-ray film (Hyperfilm-MP; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with two intensifying screens at
For RT-PCR analysis of human BEC2, the primers 5'-TCC GGC
TCG CTT GAG GTG CT-3' and 5'-CCA GTG GGG GAA TGA GAA GC-3' were used.
This primer set amplifies a 655-bp fragment corresponding to amino
acids 598-815 of BEC2. Random-primed cDNAs were synthesized from
each human tissue poly(A)+ RNA (1 µg,
CLONTECH). An aliquot (1/100 volume) of each
cDNA was amplified by 33 cycles of PCR (94 °C, 15 s;
60 °C, 15 s; 72 °C, 1 min) with AmpliTaq
(Perkin-Elmer). Ten-microliter aliquots of amplified products were
separated by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel and stained by
ethidium bromide. The plasmid (0.1 ng) carrying BEC1 or
BEC2 cDNA was used as a control template. The efficiency
of cDNA synthesis was estimated by RT-PCR (23 cycles) of the
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA (18).
In Situ Hybridization--
In situ hybridization was
performed essentially as described (19) using rat brain sections and a
digoxigenin-labeled single strand RNA probe corresponding to amino
acids 840-1013 of rat BEC1. The brains of adult Sprague-Dawley rats
were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned
at 7 µm thickness. Before hybridization, the sections were dewaxed,
fixed again in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, treated with proteinase K (5 µg/ml), 0.2 N HCl, 0.25% acetic anhydride in 0.1 M triethanolamine, dehydrated with ethanol, and dried. The
RNA probe was transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase using a DIG RNA
labeling kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), from a partial fragment of
BEC1 cDNA with a T7 promoter sequence incorporated by PCR.
Hybridization was performed overnight at 45 °C with the
digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probe (approximately 0.5 µg/ml) in
50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 10× Denhardt's solution, 600 mM NaCl, and 250 µg/ml E. coli transfer RNA.
After hybridization, sections were treated with ribonuclease A (5 µg/ml) at 37 °C for 30 min, and washed twice at 45 °C with 2×
SSC and 0.2× SSC for 20 min each. The hybridized digoxigenin-labeled
probe was detected with a DIG nucleic acid detection kit (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). Hybridization with the sense probe was
performed under identical conditions served as a negative control.
Electrophysiological Studies--
L929 and CHO cells were
transfected with BEC1 cDNA for electrophysiological
studies as described (20, 21). L929 cells were co-transfected with the
BEC1 expression vector pME-E1 described previously and the green
fluorescent protein expression vector phGFP S65T
(CLONTECH) using the modified calcium phosphate
precipitation method. Transfected cells were determined by observing
green fluorescent protein fluorescence with an epifluorescence
microscope. For stable transfection, BEC1 cDNA was
subcloned into pEF-BOS(dhfr), a derivative incorporating the
dihydrofolate reductase gene of the mammalian expression plasmid
pEF-BOS (22). CHO cells deficient in dihydrofolate reductase gene were
transfected with this plasmid using LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies,
Inc.), and cultured in medium without nucleotides. BEC1 expression was
amplified with methotrexate (Sigma) at 0.1-3 µM.
For electrophysiological studies of BEC2, L929 cells were
co-transfected with pME-E2 and phGFP S65T as described previously.
Electrophysiological recordings were performed from BEC1
transfectants using voltage-clamp technique in whole-cell
configurations (20). Currents were recorded using Axopatch ID
patch-clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments). Patch pipettes had
resistances of 2-5 megohms. The internal pipette solution contained
125 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 11 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES-K (pH 7.2). The external solution contained 140 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 2 mM
CaCl2, 0.8 mM MgCl2, 15 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES-Na (pH 7.4). All
recordings were done at room temperature (25 °C). Tetraethylammonium
(TEA) chloride and quinidine sulfate were purchased from Nakarai Tesque (Japan).
Identification of BEC1 and BEC2 Genes--
Two
erg-related sequences, the accession numbers R35526 and
M79045, were identified in the EST data base of GenBank using a BLAST
search with an amino acid sequence of human erg (6). R35526 (387 bases)
has two regions encoding amino acid sequences with 45% and 52%
identities to 42- and 23-amino acid portions around the S1 and S2
regions of human erg, respectively (smallest sum probability
p = 1.1 × 10
Another related gene, termed BEC2, was identified in rat or
human brain mRNA (see "Experimental Procedures"). Both human
and rat BEC2 consist of 1017 amino aids with 48% identity to BEC1. Amino acid sequences of BEC2 proteins are highly conserved between human and rat (89% identity), although the C-terminal part of BEC2
with about 400 amino acids is rather divergent, compared with BEC1.
Primary Structure of BEC1 and BEC2--
The sequence alignment of
BEC1 and BEC2 is shown in Fig. 1. BEC1 and BEC2 contain a hydrophobic
core corresponding to the six transmembrane regions, S1-S6, and the
pore region of voltage-gated K+ channels. The hydrophobic
core is highly conserved between BEC1 (residues 227-508) and BEC2
(residues 229-482) with 70% identities. This sequence similarity is
comparable to that among members in a given subfamily of all the known
K+ channel superfamily genes. The putative voltage-sensing
S4 and ion-conducting pore regions are also shared by BEC1 and BEC2. In
the S4 region, only three amino acids are different between BEC1 and
BEC2. The S4 regions of both BEC1 and BEC2 contain five positively
charged residues found at every third position. Additionally, other two
positively and one negatively charged residues are found at common
positions. The pore regions of BEC1 and BEC2 have a GFG triplet, a
common motif of eag-type K+ channels (6), and
contain four distinct amino acids from each other. Potential
N-glycosylation sites were found in the hydrophilic segments
between the S5 and pore region; BEC1 contains three sites and BEC2 one
site. An additional site was identified between the S3 and S4 region of
BEC2. In the C-terminal region, there is a sequence with significant
similarity to the CNB domain of cyclic nucleotide-binding proteins
such as cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channels and
hyperpolarization-activated cation channels. Although the CNB domains
of BEC1 and BEC2 are homologous to eag-type K+ channels,
they are markedly similar to each other (57% identity) among the
cyclic nucleotide-binding proteins. These results indicate that BEC1
and BEC2 may be members of a new subfamily of eag-type K+
channels. Also, phylogenetic analysis suggests that these novel genes
have a common ancestor with eag-type channels and represent an
additional branch in the eag family (Fig.
2).
Assignment of the BEC1 Gene in Human Genome--
Human EST R35526,
which corresponds to BEC1, is a partial sequence of the
clone 37299 in the human infant brain cDNA library 1NIB arrayed by
IMAGE consortium (24). This clone has been termed DRES61 and
assigned to the 12q13 region of the human genome using fluorescence
in situ hybridization analysis by Banfi et al.
(25). The complete sequence of DRES61 was recently submitted
to GenBank (accession number U69184), and consists of 1088 bases,
except a sequence of the adapter used in constructing the library. We performed sequence alignment of human BEC1 and
DRES61. The alignment revealed that the 3'-end sequence of
DRES61 with 879 bases was identical to the 5'-end sequence
of human BEC1 upstream of codon 282, except a silent
mismatch in codon 10 (CCT to CCG) of BEC1. An unique
chromosomal region has been identified by fluorescence in
situ hybridization with DRES61 cDNA, indicating
that BEC1 is derived from an identical gene to
DRES61. Taken together, the BEC1 locus is located
in the 12q13 region.
Tissue Distribution of BEC1 and BEC2--
Northern blot analysis
revealed the presence of a 4-kb BEC1 transcript in human
brain poly(A)+ RNA (Fig.
3A). The size of the mRNA
concurs with the length of our identified cDNA. No signals were
detected in other human tissues including the heart, placenta, liver,
lung, skeletal muscle, kidney, pancreas, spleen, thymus, prostate,
testis, ovary, small intestine, colon, and peripheral blood leukocytes.
Within human brain, 4-kb transcripts of BEC1 were detected
in cortical structures such as the cerebral cortex, amygdala, and
hippocampus, and the striatal regions including the putamen and caudate
nucleus (Fig. 3B). In these brain regions, an additional
6-kb transcript was identified, but it possessed weak signals.
Expression of only the 6-kb transcript was found in human cerebellum,
but the expression level was very low. BEC1 transcripts were
not detectable in the spinal cord or in the corpus callosum, which
contains primarily axons and glia. Thus, the expression of the
BEC1 transcripts is largely restricted to the telencephalon
in human tissues. The expression pattern of BEC1 contrasts
with that of human erg, which displays a more ubiquitous distribution in the brain (Fig. 3B).
Tissue distribution of BEC2 was also elucidated by Northern
blot analysis of human poly(A)+ RNA. Multiple signals were
detected only in the brain, with 4.4, 7.5, and ~10 kb (Fig.
3A). We have identified BEC2 cDNA with 3920 bases, as described under "Experimental Procedures." Considering an
addition of a poly(A) tail, the 4.4-kb transcript probably corresponds
to the identified cDNA. Since the signals were weak, tissue
distribution of BEC2 was further determined by RT-PCR
analysis. A 655-bp fragment corresponding to BEC2 was
amplified only from the brain mRNA (Fig.
4). This fragment was generated when the plasmid carrying BEC2 cDNA was used as a template, but
not BEC1 cDNA. These results suggests that
BEC2 is exclusively expressed in the brain, as well as
BEC1. Northern blot analysis of the brain regions indicated
the BEC2 expression restricted to the telencephalon, similar
to BEC1 (Fig. 3B). All size BEC2
transcripts were predominantly detected in the striatal regions such as
the putamen and caudate nucleus. In addition, hybridization signals for
BEC2 were detected in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus.
The expression pattern of BEC2 is nearly parallel to that of
BEC1, although the expression levels appear to be different
in each region.
Cellular Localization of BEC1 within the Brain--
In
situ hybridization was performed using rat brain sections to
determine the cellular localization of BEC1 within the
brain. Hybridization signals were prominently found in the
hippocampus, when only the antisense probe specific to BEC1
was used (Fig. 5A and
B). Specific signals were also detectable in the cerebral cortex. In the hippocampus, in situ hybridization showed
that BEC1 transcripts were concentrated in the pyramidal
cell body layers of the CA1 and CA3 field and in the granule cell
layers of the dentate gyrus. In the cerebral cortex, BEC1
signals were widely present from layer II to layer VI. Specific signals
were detected in cell bodies of neurons with typical pyramidal
shapes in the cerebral cortex (Fig. 5, C and
D).
Electrophysiological Characteristics of BEC1--
To characterize
electrophysiological properties of BEC1 using the whole-cell
voltage-clamp method, L929 cells were transiently transfected with the
BEC1 expression vector. The cells were clamped at a holding potential
of
For tail current analysis of BEC1, transfectants were depolarized to 80 mV from a holding potential of
We examined the effect of two classical K+ channel
blockers, TEA and quinidine, on the BEC1 channel. Kv2.1 was used as a
control K+ channel. TEA (10 mM) reduced current
amplitude of the Kv2.1 channel but did not affect that of the BEC1
channel in response to depolarization pulses (data not shown). In
general, K+ channels of the eag family are less
sensitive to TEA, compared with the Shaker family (26, 27).
Our results indicate that BEC1 also has the common feature. Conversely,
sensitivities to quinidine are heterogeneous in the eag
family. Quinidine potently inhibits the erg current with an
IC50 value of 0.9 µM (28), whereas the
sensitivity of eag current is low (27). BEC1 was insensitive
to 10 µM quinidine, which inhibited the channel activity of Kv2.1 (data not shown).
Stable BEC1 transfectants were constructed using
dihydrofolate reductase gene-deficient CHO cells and the gene
amplification induced by methotrexate. The 5C1-5 clone was selected as
a transfectant expressing high amount of BEC1. This cell produced an
outward current in response to depolarization steps (data not shown), just as L929 cells transiently transfected with BEC1
cDNA. The parent CHO cells showed no responses. These results
suggest that the identified current is caused by BEC1.
Channel Activity of BEC2--
The transient transfection of L929
cells and the whole-cell voltage-clamp method were used to identify
channel activity of BEC2, as well as BEC1. As shown in Fig.
7, depolarization steps induced an
outward current in BEC2-transfected cells, indicating that
the BEC2 gene also encodes a channel protein. The
inactivation process such as the BEC1 current was not observed in the
BEC2 current.
This study describes new members of the voltage-gated
K+ channel superfamily, BEC1 and
BEC2, which are exclusively expressed in human brain.
Although a number of voltage-gated K+ channel genes have
been isolated from the mammalian brain, almost all of those genes are
also expressed in other tissues such as the heart and skeletal muscle.
Among the Shaker-type channel genes identified in the brain,
Kv1.2, Kv1.4, Kv1.5, Kv2.1,
Kv3.2, Kv4.2, and Kv4.3 are detectable
in heart or skeletal muscle (29-31). Kv1.3 and
Kv3.1 are expressed in lymphocytes (32, 33). Expression of
mammalian erg also is predominant in heart (Ref. 12; Fig. 3A). Exclusive expression in the brain is a remarkable
feature of BEC1 and BEC2. In addition, both
messages are highly concentrated in the telencephalon of the human
brain, suggesting that this channel may contribute to excitability of
restricted neurons in the central nervous system. BEC1
messages in the hippocampus are prominently detected in the CA1 and CA3
pyramidal neurons and the dentate gyrus granule neurons, which
constitute the trisynaptic excitatory pathway, a neural circuit
important to establish long term synaptic potentiation and depression
(34). Given the contribution of voltage-gated K+ channels
to learning and memory, it is of high interest to study involvement of
BEC1 channel in this neural circuit.
BEC1 belongs to the eag family of voltage-gated
K+ channels. Identification of BEC2, a gene
closely related to BEC1, reveals the existence of a new
subfamily of eag-type channels. Both BEC1 and
BEC2 are homologous to elk, a
Drosophila putative K+ channel gene. The
recently identified rat homolog of elk, rat elk1
(23), is not identical but is the most closely related to
BEC1 and BEC2. Intriguingly, we have already
isolated a full-length cDNA of a third human gene,
BEC3.2 Rat
elk1 seems the rat ortholog of BEC3, since this
gene is 91% identical to BEC3. Thus, this subfamily
consists of at least three mammalian homologs of elk.
BEC1 elicits an outward current with a fast inactivation component.
Fast inactivating currents are also elicited by Shaker-type channels such as Kv1.4 and Kv4.2 (5). However, unlike these Shaker-type channels, the BEC1 current has not only the
transient component but also a steady-state component showing the
bell-shaped current-voltage relationship. The difference between
voltage dependence of both components is a feature of the BEC1 channel.
In contrast, BEC2 elicits a non-inactivating outward current. Sequence
similarity between BEC1 and BEC2 is high (70% identity) in the
hydrophobic core region important to channel properties. Comparing two
sequences may be considerable to identify amino acids determining the
difference between these channel properties.
Genetic mutations in several K+ channel genes have been
identified as genes responsible for inherited disorders (12, 35-37). Thus, the possibility that BEC1 mutants associate with
diseases should be considered. The BEC1 gene maps to the
12q13 region of the human genome. To date, several unsolved genetic
disorders have been assigned to the 12q13 region, for example a
late-onset form of familial Alzheimer disease (38) and nocturnal
enuresis (39). Genotype analyses using polymorphic markers within the BEC1 gene are necessary to analyze whether BEC1
is genetically linked to such disorders. The nucleotide T at position 3 of codon 10 of BEC1 is replaced by G in DRES61,
as described under "Results." This substitution is perhaps a single
nucleotide polymorphism within BEC1.
In summary, the identification of BEC1 and BEC2
genes further extends to the diversity of the K+ channel
multigene superfamily. We have demonstrated that both genes are
localized in human telencephalon and encode channel proteins.
Delineating their physiological roles may provide new insights into
neuronal signal transduction and processing in human telencephalon.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
80 °C for 5 days. To determine
BEC2 distribution, the membranes were hybridized as
described above with a random-primed 32P-labeled probe
corresponding to amino acids 747-965 of BEC2, finally washed twice for
30 min in 0.1× SSC, 0.1% SDS at 60 °C, and exposed to x-ray films
for 10 days. Distribution of human erg was determined as a
control gene using a probe corresponding to amino acids 1050-1159.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
8). M79045 (231 bases)
encodes a sequence with 64% identity to a 28-amino acid portion of the
S5 region (p = 0.0032). As described under
"Experimental Procedures," a series of RACE studies using primers
derived from each EST sequences caused to identification a cDNA
(3610 bases) with an open-reading frame encoding 1083 amino acids (Fig.
1), showing 28-46% identity to
K+ channels of the eag family. The greatest
similarity (46% identity) is to rat elk, which has been identified
only recently (23). Rat eag and human erg share 30% and 33% sequence
similarity with BEC1, respectively. We named this new protein the
brain-specific eag-like channel
1, BEC1. Additionally, rat counterpart of the BEC1 gene was identified in rat brain mRNA, which
encodes 1087 amino acids with 95% identity to human BEC1.

View larger version (112K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Sequence alignment of BEC1 and BEC2.
Conserved residues among more than three sequences are enclosed in
solid boxes. The six transmembrane regions (S1-S6), the
pore region, and the CNB domain are indicated by overlines.
Positively and negatively charged amino acids in the S4 region are
marked by plus and minus signs,
respectively. The potential N-glycosylation sites
(circled) are also indicated. hBEC1, human BEC1;
rBEC1, rat BEC1; hBEC2, human BEC2;
rBEC2, rat BEC1; elk, Drosophila elk
(GenBank U04246); HERG, human erg (U04270);
r-eag, rat eag (Z34264).

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic tree of the ion channel
superfamily including BEC channels. The tree was generated using
the neighbor-joining algorithm of the Phylip program, on the basis of a
multiple alignment of conserved sequences between the S1 region and the
CNB domain (residues 227-705 of human BEC1) analyzed with the Clustal
W program. BEC1, human BEC1; BEC2, human BEC2;
elk, Drosophila elk; HERG, human erg;
ERG2, rat erg2 (GenBank AF016192); ERG3, erg3
(AF016191); r-eag, rat eag; eag,
Drosophila eag (M61157); AKT1, KAT1
and KST1, the plant hyperpolarization-activated
K+ channels (X62907, M86990, and X79779, respectively);
cAMP, rat olfactory cyclic AMP-gated cation channel
(X55519); cGMP, bovine retinal cGMP-gated cation channel
(X51604); HAC1-3, mouse hyperpolarization-activated cation
channels (AJ225122-AJ225124).

View larger version (57K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Northern blot analysis of human
BEC1 and BEC2. A, tissue
distribution. B, distribution within human brain. Blots of
poly(A)+ RNA (2 µg) from human various tissues and brain
regions were hybridized individually with the 32P-labeled
probe specific to human BEC1 (top panel),
BEC2 (middle panel), or erg
(HERG, bottom panel). The positions of size
markers in kilobases are indicated.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
RT-PCR analysis of human
BEC2. Human poly(A)+ RNA (1 µg) was
reverse-transcribed with the random primer and amplified by PCR for
BEC2 (top panel) or glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (G3PDH, bottom panel). The plasmid
(0.1 ng) carrying BEC1 or BEC2 cDNA was used
as a control template for BEC1 amplification. Tick
marks indicate position of size markers: 1.5, 0.6, and 0.1 kilobase pairs.

View larger version (115K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Cellular localization of BEC1 in rat brain. A and B, in
situ hybridization analysis of rat brain coronal sections.
Cx, the cerebral cortex; DG, the granule cell
layer of the dentate gyrus; CA1 and CA3, the
pyramidal cell layer of the CA1 and CA3 field. C,
D, hybridization signals in rat cerebral cortex. The
sections were hybridized with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense
(A, C) or sense (B, D)
probe corresponding to amino acids 840-1013 of rat BEC1.
Scale bars: A and B, 1.5 mm; C and D, 50 µm.
90 mV and were depolarized to voltages between
60 and 100 mV.
Depolarizing steps induced an outward current in
BEC1-transfected cells (Fig.
6A, lower traces).
When the voltage was stepped to potentials above 20 mV, the outward current was rapidly inactivated and relaxed to a sustained plateau. The
peak current amplitude induced by depolarization to 100 mV was
0.14-7.3 nA (n = 41). Such responses were not observed
in control cells (Fig. 6A, upper traces). Fig.
6B shows averaged current-voltage curves for the peak
current within 40 ms and the current at the end of the 200-ms voltage
pulse, which correspond to transient and steady-state currents,
respectively. The transient current amplitude increased from
60 to
100 mV voltage-dependently. In contrast, the steady-state
current amplitude increased up to ~20 mV and then decreased with
further depolarization.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Electrophysiological studies of
BEC1. A, voltage-dependent outward currents
in L929 cells untransfected (control; upper traces) and
transfected with BEC1 cDNA (lower traces).
Cells were held at
90 mV, depolarized to voltages between
60 and
100 mV, and returned to
120 mV. B, the current-voltage
relationships of the peak current within 40 ms (circle) or
the current at the end of the 200-ms voltage pulse (square).
The current amplitude at each potential is normalized to amplitude of
the peak current recorded at 100 mV. Each point represents mean ± S.E. of 23-25 cells. C, tail current of the BEC1 channel.
Cells were depolarized to 80 mV to activate and inactivate BEC1
channels, and then was repolarized to voltages between
20 and
120
mV to give a tail current. Holding potential was
70 mV.
70 mV, and then were repolarized to
voltages between
20 and
120 mV (Fig. 6C). The BEC1
current was activated and inactivated by the 200-ms-long depolarizing
steps. Following repolarization allowed recovery from inactivation and
induced a tail current. The tail current reversed at approximately
80
mV in the bath solution containing 5.4 mM K+.
Considering the Nernst potential (
87 mV, 25 °C) for
K+, this result supports that BEC1 is a member of the
K+ channel family.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Voltage-dependent outward
currents in L929 cells transfected with BEC2 cDNA. Cells were held at
120 mV, depolarized to
voltages between
60 and 60 mV, and returned to
120 mV.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Toshiyuki Takemoto, Fumikazu Wanibuchi, and Masamichi Okada for helpful discussion, and we thank Ayako Matsuo and Hiroko Mukaiyama for expert technical assistance. We also thank Steven E. Johnson for editing this manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AB022696, AB022697, AB022698, and AB022699.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Yamanouchi
Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 21 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8585, Japan. Tel.: 81-298-52-5111; Fax: 81-298-52-5444; E-mail:
miyake@yamanouchi.co.jp.
2 A. Miyake and S. Mochizuki, unpublished observation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: eag, ether-à-go-go; CNB, cyclic nucleotide-binding; erg, eag-related gene; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; EST, expressed sequence tag; RT, reverse transcriptase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; TEA, tetraethylammonium; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobases; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; contig, group of overlapping clones.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Hille, B. (1992) Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes , Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA |
| 2. | Ben-Ari, Y., and Represa, A. (1990) Trends Neurosci. 13, 312-318[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Engel, J. E.,
and Wu, C. F.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
2254-2267 |
| 4. | Strong, M., Chandy, K. G., and Gutman, G. A. (1993) Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 221-242[Abstract] |
| 5. | Deal, K. K., England, S. K ., and Tamkun, M. M. (1996) Pharmacol. Rev. 76, 49-67 |
| 6. |
Warmke, J.,
and Ganetzky, B.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
3438-3442 |
| 7. |
Warmke, J.,
Drysdale, R.,
and Ganetzky, B.
(1991)
Science
252,
1560-1562 |
| 8. |
Shi, W.,
Wymore, R. S.,
Wang, H. S.,
Pan, Z.,
Cohen, I. S.,
McKinnon, D.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
9423-32 |
| 9. | Ganetzky, B., and Wu, C. F. (1983) J. Neurogenet. 1, 17-28[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Titus, S. A.,
Warmke, J. W.,
and Ganetzky, B.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
875-881 |
| 11. |
Wang, X.,
Reynolds, E. R.,
Deak, P.,
and Hall, L. M.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
882-890 |
| 12. | Curran, M. E., Splawski, I., Timothy, K. W., Vincent, G. M., Green, E. D., and Keating, M. T. (1995) Cell 80, 795-803[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Chiesa, N., Rosati, B., Arcangeli, A, Olivotto, M., and Wanke, E. (1997) J. Physiol. 501, 313-318 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Maruyama, K., and Takebe, Y. (1990) Med. Immunol. 20, 27-32 |
| 15. | Sugimoto, T., Saito, M., Mochizuki, M., Tahara, A., Watanabe, U., Hashimoto, S., and Kawashima, H. (1995) in Neurohypophysis: Recent Progress of Vasopressin and Oxytocin Research (Saito, T. , Kurokawa, K. , and Yoshida, S., eds) , pp. 409-413, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam |
| 16. |
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680 |
| 17. | Saitou, N., and Nei, M. (1987) Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406-425[Abstract] |
| 18. | Miyake, A., Mochizuki, S., Takemoto, Y., and Akuzawa, S. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 48, 407-416[Abstract] |
| 19. | Okumura, K., Kaneko, Y., Nonoguchi, K., Nishiyama, H., Yokoi, H., Higuchi, T., Itoh, K., Yoshida, O., Miki, T., and Fujita, J. (1997) Oncogene 14, 713-720[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Mochizuki, S., Miyake, A., and Furuichi, K. (1999) Amino Acids, in press |
| 21. |
Matsumoto, M.,
Nomura, T.,
Momose, K.,
Ikeda, Y.,
Kondou, Y.,
Akiho, H.,
Togami, J.,
Kimura, Y.,
Okada, M.,
and Yamaguchi, T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27217-27220 |
| 22. |
Mizushima, S.,
and Nagata, S.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
5322 |
| 23. |
Shi, W.,
Wang, H. S.,
Pan, Z.,
Wymore, R. S.,
Cohen, I. S.,
McKinnon, D.,
and Dixon, J.
(1998)
J. Physiol.
511,
675-682
|
| 24. |
Soares, M. B.,
Bonaldo, M. F.,
Jelene, P.,
Su, L.,
Lawton, L.,
and Efstratiadis, A.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
9228-0232 |
| 25. | Banfi, S., Borsani, G., Rossi, E., Bernard, L., Guffanti, A., Rubboli, F., Marchitiello, A., Giglio, S., Coluccia, E., Zollo, M., Zuffardi, O., and Ballabio, A. (1996) Nat. Genet. 13, 167-174[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Smith, P. L., Baukrowitz, T., and Yellen, G. (1996) Nature 379, 833-836[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Ludwig, J., Terlau, H., Wunder, F., Brüggemann, A., Pardo, L. A., Marguardt, A., Stühmer, W., and Pong, O. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4451-4458[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Yang, T.,
Snyders, D. J.,
and Roden, D. M.
(1997)
Circ. Res.
80,
782-789 |
| 29. |
Dixon, J. E.,
and McKinnon, D.
(1994)
Circ. Res.
75,
252-260 |
| 30. |
Serodio, P.,
Vega-Saenz de Miera, E.,
and Rudy, B.
(1996)
J. Neurophysiol.
75,
2174-2179 |
| 31. | Ghanshani, S., Pak, M., McPherson, J. D., Strong, M., Dethlefs, B., Wasmuth, J. J., Salkoff, L., Gutman, G. A., and Chandy, K. G. (1992) Genomics 12, 190-196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Attali, B.,
Romey, G.,
Honore, E.,
Schmid-Alliana, A.,
Mattei, M. G.,
Lesage, F.,
Ricard, P.,
Barhanin, J.,
and Lazdunski, M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
8650-8657 |
| 33. |
Grissmer, S.,
Ghanshani, S.,
Dethlefs, B.,
McPherson, J. D.,
Wasmuth, J. J.,
Gutman, G. A.,
Cahalan, M. D.,
and Chandy, K.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
20971-20979 |
| 34. | Levitan, I. B., and Kaczmarek, L. K. (1991) The Neuron: Cell and Molecular Biology , Oxford University Press, New York |
| 35. | Browne, D. L., Gancher, S. T., Nutt, J. G., Brunt, E. R., Smith, E. A., Kramer, P., and Litt, M. (1994) Nat. Genet. 8, 136-140[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Wang, Q., Curran, M. E., Splawski, I., Burns, T. C., Millholland, J. M., VanRaay, T. J., Shen, J., Timothy, K. W., Vincent, G. M., Jager, T.-D., Schwartz, P. J., Towbin, J. A., Moss, A. J., Atkinson, D. L., Landes, G. M., Conners, T. D., and Keating, M. T. (1996) Nat. Genet. 12, 17-23[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Biervert, C.,
Schroeder, B. C.,
Kubisch, C.,
Berkovic, S. F.,
Propping, P.,
Jentsch, T. J.,
and Steinlein, O. K.
(1998)
Science
279,
403-406 |
| 38. | Pericak-Vance, M. A., Bass, M. P., Yamaoka, L. H., Gaskell, P. C., Scott, W. K., Terwedow, H. A., Menold, M. M., Conneally, P. M., Small, G. W., Vance, J. M., Saunders, A. M., Roses, A. D., and Haines, J. L. (1997) JAMA 278, 1237-1241[Abstract] |
| 39. | Arnell, H., Hjalmas, K., Jagervall, M., Lackgren, G., Stenberg, A., Bengtsson, B., Wassen, C., Emahazion, T., Anneren, G., Pettersson, U., Sundvall, M., and Dahl, N. (1997) J. Med. Genet. 34, 360-365[Abstract] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Zou, Z. Lin, M. Humble, C. D. Creech, P. K. Wagoner, D. Krafte, T. J. Jegla, and A. D. Wickenden Distribution and functional properties of human KCNH8 (Elk1) potassium channels Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): C1356 - C1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sano, K. Inamura, A. Miyake, S. Mochizuki, C. Kitada, H. Yokoi, K. Nozawa, H. Okada, H. Matsushime, and K. Furuichi A Novel Two-pore Domain K+ Channel, TRESK, Is Localized in the Spinal Cord J. Biol. Chem., July 18, 2003; 278(30): 27406 - 27412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. M. Smith, H.-W. Tsui, E. W. Newell, X. Jiang, X.-P. Zhu, F. W. L. Tsui, and L. C. Schlichter Functional Up-regulation of HERG K+ Channels in Neoplastic Hematopoietic Cells J. Biol. Chem., May 17, 2002; 277(21): 18528 - 18534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. S. Cayabyab and L. C. Schlichter Regulation of an ERG K+ Current by Src Tyrosine Kinase J. Biol. Chem., April 12, 2002; 277(16): 13673 - 13681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sano, K. Inamura, A. Miyake, S. Mochizuki, H. Yokoi, H. Matsushime, and K. Furuichi Immunocyte Ca2+ Influx System Mediated by LTRPC2 Science, August 17, 2001; 293(5533): 1327 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Saganich, E. Machado, and B. Rudy Differential Expression of Genes Encoding Subthreshold-Operating Voltage-Gated K+ Channels in Brain J. Neurosci., July 1, 2001; 21(13): 4609 - 4624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-C. Shieh, M. Coghlan, J. P. Sullivan, and M. Gopalakrishnan Potassium Channels: Molecular Defects, Diseases, and Therapeutic Opportunities Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2000; 52(4): 557 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||