![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 36, 25201-25204, September 3, 1999
andFrom the Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An anion channel of the chloroplast envelope was
previously shown to be involved in protein import. Some gating
characteristics of the channel are presented. The pore size of the
channel is estimated to be around 6.5 Å. Antibodies raised to Tic110
completely inactivate the protein import-related channel. These
observations suggest that the channel is associated with the Tic
machinery and can function as the protein conducting channel of the
inner envelope membrane.
Chloroplasts are organelles surrounded by two membranes. A large
part of the chloroplast proteins is nuclear encoded. These proteins are
synthesized in the cytosol and have to be imported into the
chloroplast. Nuclear encoded chloroplast proteins are therefore
synthesized with an N-terminal extension called the transit sequence.
The transit sequence is both necessary and sufficient to target a
protein to the chloroplast (1). Several components of the chloroplast
import system have been identified (for recent reviews see Refs. 2 and
3). The two surrounding membranes both have their own import machinery
that function independently of each other (4). The outer and the inner
membrane machinery have been termed
Toc1 (translocon of the outer
membrane of chloroplasts) and Tic (translocon of the inner membrane of
chloroplasts), respectively (5). One of the components of Tic has been
identified as Tic110 (6, 7). Tic110 is an integral membrane protein of
the chloroplast inner envelope membrane. It has a large hydrophilic
part, which faces the chloroplast stroma (8).
An anion channel of the chloroplast envelope was shown to be involved
in protein import (9). This envelope channel, which is located in the
inner membrane, will be called protein
import-related anion
channel (PIRAC) here. The PIRAC was shown to be inactivated, i.e. the open probability of the channel
(Po) was decreased, by the addition of precursor
protein. The inactivation was found to be dependent on ATP and the
presence of a functional transit sequence. The exact role of PIRAC in
chloroplast protein import, however, is not known yet.
In this report a further characterization of PIRAC is described. An
initial approximation of the pore size of PIRAC is made. Furthermore,
the relationship between PIRAC and the Tic machinery is investigated.
It is found that antibodies raised to Tic110 completely inactivate
PIRAC.
Chloroplast Isolation--
Chloroplasts were isolated from pea
leaves by cutting them gently with a razor blade in electrolyte
solution used in the bath for the electrophysiological measurements, as
indicated in the text. The sliced preparation was transferred directly
to a chamber, which was mounted on a light microscope to allow visual
selection of single intact chloroplasts.
Electrophysiological Measurements--
A standard patch clamp
technique was used to record the currents across the chloroplast
envelope (10). Electrodes were pulled from borosilicate glass by a
two-step pull and extensively fire-polished. Electrodes were filled
with electrolyte solution as indicated in the text. Electrode
resistances were found to be typically around 30 megaohms.
Currents were measured using an Axopatch 200B patch clamp amplifier
(Axon Instruments). The data were filtered at a cut-off frequency of 1 kHz, using an eight-pole Bessel filter (internal filter of the Axopatch
200B). The filtered data were digitized at 10 kHz using a CED
1401+ (Cambridge Electronic Design). Data were analyzed
with the patch and voltage clamp software (Cambridge Electronic Design).
Current recordings were made from inside-out patches obtained by moving
the pipette away from the chloroplast after giga-seal formation (10).
Potentials are given with regard to the pipette interior, and the bath
was kept at ground, using a 250 mM KCl agar bridge.
The seal resistances obtained in inside-out patches of the
chloroplast envelope were typically between 15 and 30 gigaohms. Because
of the abundance of large pores in the outer envelope membrane (11), it
is highly unlikely that the seals consist of the outer membrane alone.
Moreover, in over 2000 successful seals no (changes in) current signals
associated with gating activity of the pores were ever observed. It is
conceivable that the seal consists of a sandwich-like structure of the
outer and the inner membranes. In this configuration gating of the
outer membrane pores would cause shifts in the base-line current
because of the opening and closing of the pore. Such shifts in
base-line currents were never observed in any of the successful seals,
which argues against the presence of the outer membrane in the patch.
In addition no light-induced currents (12) were ever observed after
seal formation (i.e. in the attached configuration) or after
excision of the patch. This finding indicates that the thylakoid
membrane under the conditions used here was not included in the patch. The patch is therefore likely to consist of the inner membrane alone.
The possibility cannot be excluded, however, that the outer membrane
pores are silent in a patch consisting of both the outer and inner
membrane tightly compressed. Such a sandwich-like patch would give rise
to a higher capacitance seal as compared with a seal with only one
membrane present. When patch pipettes identical to those used in the
present chloroplast experiments were applied to obtain seals of the
vacuole membrane in the inside-out configuration, the capacitive
current induced by a stepwise change in holding potential was not
significantly different (data not shown). This finding indicates that
the membrane sizes or the thickness of the seals obtained from the
chloroplast envelope or the vacuole membrane are identical, thus
arguing for a seal consisting of the inner envelope membrane alone. In
single-channel recordings presented here, the current runs across the
inner membrane. Because only the effect of an antibody added to the
stromal side of the patch is described, the data are not affected by
the presence or absence of the outer membrane in the patch.
Gating Properties of PIRAC--
The single-channel conductance of
PIRAC in symmetrical 100 mM KCl is 42 pS. This conductance
is calculated from the current voltage relationship, where the open
channel current is plotted against the membrane potential. In Fig.
1A, single-channel recordings of PIRAC in symmetrical 100 mM KCl buffer at different
membrane potentials are shown. Fig. 1B shows small parts of
the same single-channel recordings at a higher time resolution. At
positive potentials the channel shows fast transitions between the open
and the closed levels. This behavior is known as flickering. At
negative potentials flickering is less pronounced, as can be judged
from Fig. 1B. The single-channel recordings of PIRAC (Fig.
1) show no indication for the existence of subconductance levels. Fig.
2 shows the current-voltage relationship
of PIRAC in 100 mM KCl; each point was taken from at least
five different single-channel recordings. In buffer containing 25 mM KCl, the single-channel conductance of PIRAC is found to be around 10 pS (not shown). The open probability of PIRAC in symmetrical 100 mM KCl is found to be around 0.85 (not
shown).
It was shown previously that PIRAC is an anion selective channel (9).
To determine the anion selectivity of PIRAC, the KCl concentration of
the bath solution was lowered from 100 to 10 mM. In this
10-fold KCl gradient across the patch, the current-voltage relationship
(Fig. 2) shows a reversal potential of +33 mV. Using the
Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation, this reversal potential corresponds to a
permeability ratio of
PCl PIRAC Is Associated with Tic--
To identify a possible
association of PIRAC with Tic the effect of the addition of antibodies
to Tic110 on PIRAC gating was tested. When Tic110 IgG was added to the
bath solution PIRAC activity could be observed directly after excision
of the patch. After approximately 60 s, PIRAC activity was
completely lost. In Fig. 3 a
single-channel recording of PIRAC in the presence of Tic110 IgG is
shown. This loss of PIRAC activity in the presence of Tic110 IgG was
found in 14 of 18 single-channel recordings. Single-channel recordings
of PIRAC without antibody in the bath solution very rarely show loss of
channel activity because of channel rundown. In the control situation,
channel rundown is observed in approximately 5% of PIRAC containing
patches and occurs in these patches after several hundreds of seconds.
The loss of channel activity in the presence of Tic110 IgG can
therefore be ascribed to the action of the antibodies.
To test the specificity of the antibody effect on PIRAC gating,
antibodies against a component of the outer membrane translocon, Toc75,
were added to the bath solution as well. In the presence of these
antibodies, loss of PIRAC activity in single-channel recordings was
never observed in 10 recordings of 180 s or longer.
PIRAC has been shown to be an envelope anion channel with a
single-channel conductance of 50 pS in 250 mM KCl (9). This value is close to the 42-pS conductance reported here in 100 mM KCl. The value for the single-channel conductance of
PIRAC in 25 mM KCl is around 10 pS. Thus, it appears that
below 100 mM KCl the conductance depends linearly on the
KCl concentration. From this concentration dependency it can be
concluded that the saturation value of PIRAC single-channel conductance
is close to 50 pS. Saturation of the single-channel conductance in
relatively low ionic strength buffers was also observed previously for
the reconstituted Toc75 channel (14). The reversal potential found here
for a 10-fold KCl gradient (10/100 mM) is in good agreement with what has been found before in 25/250 mM KCl (9). The
open probability found in 100 mM KCl is identical to the
open probability of PIRAC in 25/250 mM KCl as described
elsewhere (9). This correspondence indicates that the open probability
of PIRAC is not influenced by salt concentration or gradient.
The data presented here demonstrate that PIRAC is associated with the
import machinery of the chloroplast inner envelope membrane. It was
shown previously that PIRAC is inactivated by a translocation-competent precursor protein (9). This inactivation is the result of an interaction between precursor protein and a protein complex of which
PIRAC is a constituent.2 The
loss of PIRAC activity induced by antibodies to Tic110 demonstrates that PIRAC is associated with Tic110. This component of the chloroplast inner envelope membrane protein import machinery is an integral membrane protein with a large hydrophilic stretch facing the
chloroplast stroma (8). It is thought that Tic110 functions as a
docking site for stromal chaperones that are involved in protein
import. An association of Tic110 and stromal chaperonin 60 was shown to exist in isolated chloroplasts (6). Another stromal chaperone, the
Hsp100 homologue ClpC, was also shown to interact with Tic110 (16).
This suggested role for Tic110 implies that the large hydrophilic part
of the protein, which faces the stroma, is located near the
stroma-facing exit of the protein translocation channel of the inner
envelope membrane.
The inactivation of PIRAC by antibodies to Tic110 shows close
similarities with the inactivation of the mitochondrial multiple conductance channel by antibodies to Tim23 (17). The multiple conductance channel has been shown to be blocked by a mitochondrial presequence. This channel is therefore thought to be involved in
mitochondrial protein import (18).
Because of the inactivation of PIRAC by Tic110 antibodies, it seems
likely that PIRAC represents the protein conducting channel of the
inner membrane. With an approximate PIRAC pore size of 6.5 Å,
precursor proteins have to be completely unfolded to pass through the
PIRAC pore. The reconstituted protein translocation channel of the
outer membrane, Toc75, has been reported to have an approximate pore
size of 8.5 Å (14). This value is based on the same approximation as
the one used for PIRAC in this study, which indicates that the pores of
the protein import channels of the outer and inner membranes are of
comparable sizes.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A, single-channel recordings of PIRAC in
symmetrical 100 mM KCl at different holding potentials.
B, small parts of the recordings shown in A
displayed at a higher time resolution.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Current-voltage relationship of PIRAC in
symmetrical 100 mM KCl (open symbols) and
10/100 mM KCl (closed symbols),
respectively.
/PK+ of
6.6. If PIRAC is considered as a water-filled cylindrical pore, the
diameter of the pore would be around 6.5 Å. This estimation is based
on the simplest model of channel geometry and is fairly rough (13), but
it provides limits for the hydrophilic pore at the narrowest point. The
same approximation was used to estimate the pore diameter of the
reconstituted Toc75 channel (14). If the resistivity in the channel is
assumed to be five times the bulk resistivity (15) a pore diameter of
15 Å is calculated.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Single-channel recording of PIRAC in the
presence of antibodies to Tic110. The bath solution contained 25 mM KCl, and the pipette was filled with a 250 mM KCl solution. The holding potential used was
20
mV.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank W.-A. Rensink for the kind gift of antibodies and Dr. J. Snel and H. Dassen for useful discussions.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work is part of a joined program, "Chloroplast Protein Import," in collaboration with Prof. B. de Kruijff and Prof. P. Weisbeek and is supported by the Foundation for Earth and Life Sciences, with financial aid from The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 31-317-482824;
Fax: 31-317-484740; E-mail:
paul.vandenwijngaard@guest.pf.wau.nl.
2 P. W. J. van den Wijngaard, unpublished results.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: Toc, translocon of the outer membrane of chloroplasts; Tic, translocon of the inner membrane of chloroplasts; PIRAC, protein import-related anion channel; pS, picosiemens.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | De Boer, A. D., and Weisbeek, P. J. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1071, 221-253[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Fuks, B., and Schnell, D. J. (1997) Plant Physiol. 114, 405-410[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Heins, L., Collinson, I., and Soll, J. (1998) Trends Plant Sci. 3, 56-61 |
| 4. |
Scott, S. V.,
and Theg, S. M.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
63-75 |
| 5. | Schnell, D. J., Blobel, G., Keegstra, K., Kessler, F., Ko, K., and Soll, J. (1997) Trends Cell Biol. 7, 303-304 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Kessler, F.,
and Blobel, G.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
7684-7689 |
| 7. | Lübeck, J., Soll, J., Akita, M., Nielsen, E., and Keegstra, K. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 4230-4238[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Jackson, D. T.,
Froehlich, J. E.,
and Keegstra, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
16583-16588 |
| 9. |
Van den Wijngaard, P. W. J.,
and Vredenberg, W. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29430-294331 |
| 10. | Hamill, O. P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B., and Sigworth, F. J. (1981) Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 391, 85-100[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Flügge, U., and Benz, R. (1984) FEBS Lett. 169, 85-89[CrossRef] |
| 12. | Vredenberg, W., Bulychev, A., Dassen, H., Snel, J., and Van Voorthuysen, T. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1230, 77-80[CrossRef] |
| 13. | Hille, B. (1992) Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes , 2nd Ed. , pp. 294-298, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA |
| 14. | Hinnah, S. C., Hill, K., Wagner, R., Schlicher, T., and Soll, J. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 7351-7360[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Smart, O. S.,
Breed, J.,
Smith, G. R.,
and Sansom, M. S. P.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
72,
1109-1126 |
| 16. | Nielsen, E., Akita, M., Davila-Aponte, J., and Keegstra, K. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 935-946[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
Lohret, T. A.,
Jensen, R. E.,
and Kinnally, K. W.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
377-386 |
| 18. |
Lohret, T. A.,
and Kinnally, K. W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15950-15953 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Bedard and P. Jarvis Recognition and envelope translocation of chloroplast preproteins J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2005; 56(419): 2287 - 2320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Inaba, M. Li, M. Alvarez-Huerta, F. Kessler, and D. J. Schnell atTic110 Functions as a Scaffold for Coordinating the Stromal Events of Protein Import into Chloroplasts J. Biol. Chem., October 3, 2003; 278(40): 38617 - 38627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Chen, M. D. Smith, L. Fitzpatrick, and D. J. Schnell In Vivo Analysis of the Role of atTic20 in Protein Import into Chloroplasts PLANT CELL, March 1, 2002; 14(3): 641 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |