![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 36, 25254-25259, September 3, 1999
From the The thioredoxin superfamily consists of enzymes
that catalyze the reduction, formation, and isomerization of disulfide
bonds and exert their activity through a redox active disulfide in a Cys-Xaa1-Xaa2-Cys motif. The individual
members of the family differ strongly in their intrinsic redox
potentials. However, the role of the different redox potentials for the
in vivo function of these enzymes is essentially unknown.
To address the question of in vivo importance of redox
potential for the most reducing member of the enzyme family,
thioredoxin, we have employed a set of active site variants of
thioredoxin with increased redox potentials ( Thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases from Escherichia coli
that belong to the thioredoxin superfamily can have either reducing properties, like thioredoxin with a redox potential of Thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases with thioredoxin fold share a catalytic
disulfide bond with the sequence
Cys-Xaa1-Xaa2-Cys. An influence of the active
site dipeptide Xaa1-Xaa2 on the redox properties of these enzymes has been demonstrated, which results from a
modulation of the pKa value of the more N-terminal, nucleophilic active site cysteine (11-14). In DsbA, the extremely low
pKa value (~3.5) of the nucleophilic cysteine
stabilizes the reduced state of the active site making the protein an
excellent disulfide bond donor (15). Replacement of the
Xaa1-Xaa2 sequence of DsbA by that of
thioredoxin decreased the redox potential by 90 mV making DsbA a
1000-fold better reductant in terms of equilibrium constants with
substrate compounds (13). Conversely, a DsbA-like Xaa1-Xaa2 variant of thioredoxin became a
200-fold better oxidant (14). Despite these dramatic changes in redox
potentials, the corresponding mutant disulfide oxidoreductases did not
show phenotypic effects in bacteria under physiological conditions (10,
11, 16, 17). Furthermore, the most reducing member of the thioredoxin superfamily, thioredoxin, and variants thereof can, at least partially, substitute for the most oxidizing member DsbA when exported to the
periplasm (18, 19). This raises the question whether redox potential is
at all an important property of these proteins under physiological
growth conditions. A certain correlation between the redox potentials
of DsbA variants and their ability to complement a DsbA null phenotype
could only be demonstrated for the recovery of resistance toward the
reductant dithiothreitol (DTT)1
in the growth medium (11).
Thioredoxin and glutaredoxin-1 from E. coli serve as
cytoplasmic reductants of 3'-phosphoadenosine-5'-phosphosulfate
reductase, an enzyme in the pathway of sulfate reduction. Absence of
both trxA and grxA is accompanied by the
inability to grow on sulfate minimal medium unless a source of reduced
sulfur such as cysteine is provided (20). Thioredoxin is also the
preferred reductant of methionine-sulfoxide reductase as shown by the
inability of trxA mutants to use methionine sulfoxide as the
sole source of methionine (21). Moreover, a pathway for periplasmic
disulfide bond isomerization has recently been described (22) that
funnels reducing equivalents from thioredoxin in the cytosol to the
periplasmic disulfide isomerase DsbC via the membrane protein DsbD
(23). To address the question whether the intrinsic redox potential of
thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases is of any major importance in
vivo, we have used these in vivo functions of
thioredoxin to test a set of thioredoxin variants with increased redox
potentials (ranging from Materials--
DE52 and CM52 cellulose were from Whatman, the
Superdex 200 HiLoad 26/60 column and the PD10 columns were from
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, and 2',5'-ADP-agarose was from Sigma.
Tryptone and yeast extract were from Difco, and
isopropyl- Purification of Thioredoxin--
Thioredoxin wild type and the
thioredoxin variants were purified from overproducing E. coli strains as described previously (14). The protein
concentrations were measured by the specific absorbance at 280 nm
(14).
Construction of Thioredoxin Expression Plasmids with Arabinose
Promoter--
Molecular cloning techniques were based on Sambrook
et al. (24). The genes encoding the thioredoxin variants in
the corresponding T7 expression plasmids (14) were amplified by the
polymerase chain reaction using the following primers:
trxA-SacI, 5'-AGG CGA GCT CCT GTG GAG TTA TAT ATG AGC GAT
AAA ATT ATT CAC-3'; and trxA-HindIII, 5'-AAT AAG CTT ACG CCA
GGT TAG CGT CG-3'. The polymerase chain reaction products were digested
with SacI and HindIII and cloned into the
vector pBAD33 (25) cut with the same enzymes. The sequence of all
thioredoxin genes was confirmed by dideoxy sequencing of the resulting plasmids.
Overexpression and Purification of Thioredoxin
Reductase--
The gene coding for TR, trxB (26), was
amplified from the genome of the E. coli K12 wild-type
strain W3110 (27) by polymerase chain reaction using the following
oligonucleotide primers: N-terminal primer, 5'-CCA TTG TCT GTC TAG AAC
TAT GGG GAT CTC ATG GGC ACG-3'; and C-terminal primer: 5'-CTG ATT TGT
AAG CTT ATT TTG CGT CAG CTA AAC CAT C-3'. The amplified gene was cloned
into a derivative of the expression vector pTrx (14) via the
restriction sites XbaI and HindIII. In the
resulting expression plasmid pTR, the trxB gene is under
control of the T7 promoter/lac operator (28). Successful
cloning was verified by sequencing of the whole trxB gene.
For overproduction of TR, E. coli BL21(DE3) (28) harboring pTR was grown at 25 °C in 10 liters of LB medium containing
ampicillin (100 µg/ml). With an optical density at 550 nm of 1.0, isopropyl- Catalytic Parameters of TR for the Thioredoxin Variants--
The
assays were performed at 25 °C in 100 mM Tris/HCl, pH
8.0, containing 0.2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.2 mM
EDTA, 200 µM NADPH, 500 µM
dithionitrobenzoic acid, 33 nM TR, and varying concentrations of thioredoxin (wild type or variant) or DsbA (0.04-40 µM). All reactants (without TR) were mixed and
equilibrated for 5 min at 25 °C before the reactions were started by
the addition of TR. The reactions were followed by the formation of
2-nitro-5-thiobenzoate ( Thioredoxin-catalyzed Reduction of Insulin by DTT--
The test
was performed in 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, 2 mM EDTA (purged with nitrogen) containing insulin, DTT, and thioredoxin (wild type or variant) at concentrations of 130 µM, 1.0 mM, and 1.0 µM,
respectively. After incubation of thioredoxin with DTT for 10 min at
25 °C, the reaction was started by the addition of insulin.
Precipitation of reduced insulin was monitored by the increase in
optical density at 650 nm.
Thioredoxin-catalyzed Reduction of Insulin by NADPH--
The
reaction was performed at 25 °C in 100 mM potassium
phosphate, pH 7.0, 2 mM EDTA containing 500 µM NADPH, 80 µM insulin, 33 nM
TR, and 20 µM thioredoxin wild type (or the corresponding thioredoxin variants). The reaction was started by the addition of TR
and followed by the increase in optical density at 650 nm. The same
assay was also performed at pH 8.0 in 100 mM Tris/HCl, 0.2 mM EDTA using the same initial concentrations of reactants. In addition to the increase in optical density at 650 nm, the reaction
at pH 8.0 was also followed by the consumption of NADPH ( Reduction of Insulin, Lipoic Acid, and Oxidized DTT by
Thioredoxin--
Reduced thioredoxin was prepared by incubation of the
oxidized protein with a 1000-fold molar excess of DTT (50 mM) at pH 7.0 for 1 h and subsequent removal of DTT on
a PD10 gel filtration column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Assays with
thioredoxin as stoichiometric reductant were carried out at 25 °C in
100 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 0.2 mM EDTA. The
concentration of reduced thioredoxin was 1.0 µM in all
assays. Lipoic acid and oxidized DTT were used at concentrations
between 0.1 and 10 mM guaranteeing pseudo first-order conditions. The stoichiometric reduction of insulin was performed in
the same buffer as described above but at 15 °C with identical initial concentrations (1.0 µM) of reduced thioredoxin
and insulin. All reactions were followed by the decrease in the
specific tryptophan fluorescence of thioredoxin at 345 nm (excitation
at 295 nm) on a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrometer. The
fluorescence data were evaluated according to pseudo first-order
kinetics (or quasi second-order kinetics in the case of insulin reduction).
Stoichiometric Reduction of Thioredoxin by DTT--
Thioredoxin
(6.0 µM) was reduced at 25 °C by equimolar amounts of
DTT in 100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 1 mM
EDTA. The reaction was monitored by tryptophan fluorescence as
described above and evaluated according to second-order kinetics.
Thioredoxin-catalyzed Reduction of Lipoic Acid--
The assay
was performed at 25 °C in 100 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 0.2 mM EDTA containing 500 µM NADPH, 33 nM TR, 20 µM thioredoxin, and 1 mM lipoic acid. The reaction was started by the addition of
thioredoxin reductase, and NADPH consumption was detected by the
decrease in absorbance at 340 nm. Quartz cuvettes with a 0.1-cm path
length were used.
In Vivo Complementation Assays--
The corresponding
trxA null strains were transformed with the pBAD33
derivatives containing the genes of thioredoxin wild type and the
variants. All growth assays were performed at 37 °C in the absence
and in the presence of 0.2% (w/v) L-arabinose. Growth on
minimal medium was assayed using E. coli FÅ47
( Thioredoxin- and DsbC-dependent Folding of
Urokinase-like Plasminogen Activator (uPA) in the
Periplasm--
Assays were performed with a wild-type (RI281) and
trxA (RI363) strain (23) harboring pRDB8-A, a plasmid for
constitutive periplasmic expression of mouse uPA (34). The pBAD33
expression plasmids for the thioredoxin variants were introduced into
RI363. As a control, both RI363 and RI281 were cotransformed with the pBAD33 vector lacking the trxA gene. Bacteria were grown
with ampicillin (100 µg/ml) and chloramphenicol (10 µg/ml) on
NZ-rich medium (33) containing 0.2% glucose and 0.2% arabinose and
harvested at mid-logarithmic phase. Whole cell lysates were prepared by five cycles of freezing/thawing in sample buffer followed by separation on a nonreducing SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. uPA activity was demonstrated at 37 °C by assaying plasminogen activation using plasminogen/casein agar as described (35).
Western Blot Analysis of Thioredoxin Expression--
Aliquots of
the same cell extracts that were used for the plasminogen activation
assay were separated by reducing SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis; proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane
and probed for thioredoxin by immunostaining with polyclonal rabbit
antithioredoxin antibodies (gift from C. C. Richardson, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA).
All Active Site Variants of Thioredoxin with Increased Redox
Potential Are Substrates of TR--
NADPH constitutes the common donor
of reducing equivalents for all thioredoxin-dependent
reduction processes in E. coli. Thus, as a prerequisite for
an in vivo characterization of the active site variants of
E. coli thioredoxin listed in Table
I, it had to be proven that the variants
are still efficient substrates of TR. For this purpose, recombinant TR
from E. coli was overexpressed and purified. The substrate
properties of the variants toward E. coli TR were then
tested using the TR- and thioredoxin-catalyzed reduction of Ellman's
reagent (dithionitrobenzoic acid) by NADPH (31). In this assay, all
thioredoxin variants showed, within a factor of two, the same substrate
properties (kcat/Km values)
as wild-type thioredoxin (Table I). Consequently, all variants
principally have the potential of complementing thioredoxin deficiency
in vivo. In contrast, DsbA wild type is not a substrate of
TR (Table I).
In Vitro Model Reactions to Probe the Importance of Thioredoxin
Redox Potential--
To establish an in vitro model reaction that can
probe the importance of thioredoxin redox potential in
thioredoxin-catalyzed processes, we compared the different thioredoxin
variants with respect to their ability to catalyze the reduction of
insulin by DTT at pH 7.0. This reaction is a widely used standard assay for detecting thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase activity (36). Unexpectedly, this assay gave an inverse correlation between redox potential of the thioredoxin variants and the rate of insulin reduction, with the PDI-like, the glutaredoxin-like, and the DsbA-like variant being more efficient catalysts than wild-type thioredoxin (Fig.
1A). This result can however
be rationalized by considering the fact that the rate-limiting step in
the thioredoxin-catalyzed reduction of insulin by DTT is the
re-reduction of thioredoxin by DTT (36) and that the more oxidizing
variants, in accordance with their increased redox potentials, are
indeed reduced 20-40 times faster by DTT than the wild type (Table
II, values of
k2(DTTred)). A decreased rate of insulin
reduction by the variants, which one might expect from their increased
redox potentials, is obviously not a rate-limiting factor for this
model reaction.
In a search for a model reaction that directly probes the redox
potential of the thioredoxin variants, we thus had to choose another
reaction where the reductive force of the thioredoxin variants and not
their own reduction is rate-limiting for the catalytic cycle. First, we
used NADPH and TR for rapid and efficient recycling of reduced
thioredoxin (cf. Table I). As thioredoxin appears to be
mainly in the reduced state in E. coli cells (37), it is
likely that reduction of thioredoxin by NADPH is also not rate-limiting
for the catalytic cycle of thioredoxin in vivo. Second, we
looked for an alternative disulfide substrate that is reduced slower by
thioredoxin than insulin. We compared insulin with the disulfide
substrates lipoic acid and oxidized DTT with respect to the rate
constants of their reduction by the reduced thioredoxin variants at pH
8.0. Unexpectedly, the rate constants of insulin reduction, measured by
the increase in thioredoxin fluorescence, were extremely high
(104-105 M
Conversely, the reaction with insulin as substrate under the same
conditions was entirely independent of the redox potentials of the
variants with respect to initial NADPH consumption (Table II). HPLC
analysis of insulin reduction also yielded very similar initial
velocities for the reaction (Table II). The difference between insulin
and lipoic acid reduction can be explained by calculating the actual
velocities of each step catalyzed by thioredoxin. We found that
recycling of thioredoxin by NADPH was still slower than the reduction
of insulin under the conditions of our assay. With concentrations of 20 µM for thioredoxin, 33 nM for TR, and 80 µM for insulin and kcat values for
thioredoxin reduction of 20-30 s In Vivo Characterization of Thioredoxin Variants with Different
Redox Properties--
Having established an in vitro assay
for thioredoxin-catalyzed reduction of a disulfide substrate in which a
clear correlation between redox potential and reactivity could be
observed (Fig. 1B), we wanted to address the question
whether the thioredoxin variants would show the same pattern of redox
potential-dependent reactivity in vivo. The
variants were cloned into the vector pBAD33 where protein expression is
tightly regulated by the arabinose promoter (25). In the presence of
the inducer arabinose (0.2% w/v) the expression levels in the
trxA null mutant RI362 (23) were very similar for all
thioredoxin variants as determined by Western blot analysis (Fig.
2).
Mutants of E. coli lacking thioredoxin have a number of
readily assayed phenotypes. For instance, growth on minimal medium with
sulfate as a sole source of sulfur requires either thioredoxin or
glutaredoxin, because trxA, grxA double mutants cannot
reduce sulfate (20). When the plasmids encoding the thioredoxin
variants were introduced into a trxA, grxA double
mutant, we found that they all complemented for growth on sulfate
minimal medium, in contrast to the control plasmids lacking
trxA or encoding the inactive thioredoxin variant C35A that
lacks the buried active site cysteine (Table
III). The colony sizes correlated very
well with the redox potentials of the complementing thioredoxin
variants, with the most oxidizing glutaredoxin-like variant barely
being able to sustain growth (Table III).
On minimal medium, growth in the presence of methionine sulfoxide
should reflect the ability of the thioredoxin variants to complement a
thioredoxin null mutant strain for the reduction of methionine
sulfoxide to methionine in a methionine auxotroph strain (21). These
experiments were carried out by introducing the set of thioredoxin
expression plasmids to the trxA, metE strain A313 (21).
Again, the same redox potential-dependent order of complementation as that for sulfate reduction was observed for the
growth on methionine sulfoxide as the sole methionine source (Table
III).
Periplasmic disulfide bond isomerization is dependent on the
periplasmic disulfide isomerase DsbC. As only the reduced form of DsbC
is catalytically active as an isomerase, it is maintained in the
reduced state by reducing equivalents from NADPH in the cytosol, a
process catalyzed by TR and thioredoxin in the cytoplasm, and by DsbD
in the inner membrane of E. coli (22, 23). The evidence for
this pathway is that disruption of any of the corresponding genes leads
to the accumulation of oxidized DsbC and a severe defect in disulfide
bond isomerization during folding of proteins with multiple disulfide
bonds in the E. coli periplasm. Secretory expression of
mouse uPA is a convenient model for monitoring periplasmic disulfide
bond isomerase activity. uPA has six disulfide bonds in its protease
domain and can only fold into a biologically active conformation when
DsbC is functional in the periplasm. We assayed the ability of the
thioredoxin active site variants to complement a chromosomal
thioredoxin null mutation by monitoring their competence to restore
DsbC activity and thus periplasmic uPA activity. Using this assay,
complementation of the trxA null mutant RI362 (23) by the
thioredoxin variants again decreased exactly with increasing redox
potential of the variants (Fig. 2). As observed in the sulfate reduction assay, almost no complementation could be detected for the
most oxidizing, glutaredoxin-like thioredoxin variant.
The question of the importance of the redox potential of
thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases for their in vivo function
has so far only been addressed for catalysts of disulfide bond
formation and isomerization during protein folding in oxidizing
cellular compartments. In the endoplasmic reticulum of yeast, PDI
deficiency can only be complemented by secreted E. coli
thioredoxin variants with increased redox potentials but not by
wild-type thioredoxin (12), indicating that the oxidative force of this
essential protein is crucial for its function in vivo. This
view is supported by active site variants of yeast PDI that cause DTT
sensitivity and a reduced rate of protein folding in the endoplasmic
reticulum (38). In the periplasm of E. coli, active site
variants of DsbA, which are more than 1000-fold weaker oxidants than
the wild type, could still functionally replace DsbA under normal
growth conditions (11, 16, 17). Efficient functional replacement of
DsbA by thioredoxin could, however, only be achieved by secretion of
the same three most oxidizing thioredoxin variants that were used in
the present study (18, 19). It thus appears that the redox potential of
the final oxidant of polypeptides in the E. coli periplasm
is also important and that a certain minimum of oxidative force must be
retained for maintenance of disulfide bond formation in the periplasm.
The present investigation is the first study on the influence of the
intrinsic redox potential of a cytoplasmic member of the thioredoxin
family on its function in vivo. Complementation of three
phenotypes of trxA strains, i.e. deficiency in
reduction of sulfate, methionine sulfoxide, and periplasmic disulfide
bond isomerization, by a series of thioredoxin variants with different redox potentials was investigated. In all cases, the degree of trxA complementation strictly increased with decreasing
redox potential. Thus, the low redox potential of thioredoxin is
clearly a very important factor for its in vivo function.
In general, a change in redox potential of a thiol-disulfide
oxidoreductase can be caused by altered rate constants of its own
reduction and/or its own oxidation. We found that the in
vivo results on the different thioredoxin variants could only be
reproduced in vitro under conditions where recycling of
reduced thioredoxin is not rate-limiting for catalysis. We propose that
the main requirement for the low redox potential of thioredoxin is the
fact that reduction of thioredoxin by NADPH is not rate-limiting
in vivo, as this reaction is very efficiently catalyzed by
TR with a kcat/Km value of
about 107 M Another question that needs to be addressed in the context of our
in vivo experiments is whether the intracellular redox
potential in the cytoplasm determines a steady-state ratio of oxidized
and reduced thioredoxin and thus possibly the available concentrations of reduced thioredoxin. One would indeed expect that the intracellular concentration of the reduced relative to the oxidized enzyme increases in the case of the more oxidizing thioredoxin variants compared with
wild-type thioredoxin. However, it has been shown that wild-type thioredoxin is already mainly reduced in the cytoplasm (about 70% in
freshly prepared cell extracts (37)). Therefore, assuming unchanged
overall concentrations of thioredoxin, the concentration of reduced
thioredoxin can only increase to a small extent in the case of the more
oxidizing variants. Thus, the concentration of reduced thioredoxin
cannot be affected significantly in the case of the more oxidizing
variants. This further supports our conclusion that it is the rate by
which substrates are reduced by thioredoxin that determines the
in vivo function of this enzyme and that slower substrate
reduction by the thioredoxin variants is a consequence of their
increased redox potential. We have also demonstrated that the
thioredoxin expression level in our in vivo complementation
studies is practically the same as that in wild-type cells (Fig.
2B).
In the present study we have demonstrated the in vivo
importance of redox potential for a single cytoplasmic member of the thioredoxin family. We would like to emphasize that a correlation between redox potential and in vivo function does not
necessarily have to exist in general. On the one hand, it follows from
the above consideration that the rate-limiting step in the catalytic cycle of a thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase is the main determinant to
what extent and in which direction its intrinsic redox potential influences its in vivo function. On the other hand, the
situation in vivo is more complex because there are often
several enzymes that fulfill the same function but may recognize their
substrates with different specificities. For instance, ribonucleotide
reductase (NrdAB) has a lower Km value for
glutaredoxin 1 than for thioredoxin, but glutaredoxin 1 has a higher
redox potential (39, 40). Similarly, only glutaredoxin 1 and the
thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase NrdH are effective reductants of the
second E. coli ribonucleotide reductase, NrdEF (41), whereas
thioredoxin shows no reactivity despite the fact that it is the
strongest reductant of the three enzymes. It will thus be the combined
effect of redox potential, substrate specificity, and expression levels of related thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases that accounts for the different phenotypes that are observed for E. coli mutants
lacking components of the thioredoxin- and
glutaredoxin-dependent pathways. In the case of
NADPH-dependent members of the thioredoxin family, the
expression level of TR may determine the rate-limiting step of
catalysis. Clearly, all of these factors have to be taken into account
to get a complete view of the in vivo functions of each individual member of the thioredoxin family.
*
This work was supported by research Grant 41-25215 from the
ETH Zürich (to R. G.) and Grants NIH GM41883 and NIH GM55090 from the National Institutes of Health (to J. B.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 41-1-633-6819;
Fax: 41-1-633-1036; E-mail: rudi@mol.biol.ethz.ch.
The abbreviations used are:
DTT, dithiothreitol;
PDI, protein-disulfide isomerase;
TR, thioredoxin reductase;
HPLC, high
pressure liquid chromatography;
uPA, urokinase-like plasminogen
activator.
Importance of Redox Potential for the in Vivo
Function of the Cytoplasmic Disulfide Reductant Thioredoxin from
Escherichia coli*
,
§,
,
**, and
Institut für Molekularbiologie und
Biophysik, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule
Hönggerberg, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland, the
¶ Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, and
§ Schering AG, PDR Proteinchemie,
D-13342 Berlin, Germany
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
270 to
195 mV) for
functional studies in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli.
The variants proved to be efficient substrates of thioredoxin reductase, providing a basis for an in vivo
characterization of NADPH-dependent reductive processes
catalyzed by the thioredoxin variants. The reduction of sulfate and
methionine sulfoxide, as well as the isomerization of periplasmic
disulfide bonds by DsbC, which all depend on thioredoxin as catalyst in
the E. coli cytoplasm, proved to correlate well with the
intrinsic redox potentials of the variants in complementation assays.
The same correlation could be established in vitro by using
the thioredoxin-catalyzed reduction of lipoic acid by NADPH as a model
reaction. We propose that the rate of direct reduction of substrates by
thioredoxin, which largely depends on the redox potential of
thioredoxin, is the most important parameter for the in
vivo function of thioredoxin, as recycling of reduced thioredoxin
through NADPH and thioredoxin reductase is not rate-limiting for its
catalytic cycle.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
270 mV (1, 2),
or oxidizing properties, like DsbA with a redox potential of
122 mV
(3, 4). In general, the bacterial cytosolic members of the family such
as thioredoxin and glutaredoxin are efficient reductants of disulfide
bonds and are believed to be important for the maintenance of the
reducing redox status of the cytosol (5). In addition, thioredoxin
catalyzes the NADPH-dependent reduction of a number of
important metabolic enzymes such as ribonucleotide reductase,
3'-phosphoadenosine-5'-phosphosulfate reductase, and methionine-sulfoxide reductase, whose active sites become oxidized as
part of their catalytic cycle (see Holmgren and Björnstedt (6)).
In contrast, members with oxidizing redox properties like DsbA and DsbC
are found in the bacterial periplasm. These enzymes catalyze the
formation and isomerization of disulfide bonds during folding of newly
translocated proteins (7, 8). An exception to this correlation between
cellular localization and the redox potential appears to be the
periplasmically oriented thioredoxin-like proteins that are anchored to
the inner bacterial membrane. An example is TlpA from
Bradyrhizobium japonicum, which has a low redox potential
(
259 mV) despite its periplasmic orientation and is required for
cytochrome aa3 maturation (9, 10).
270 to
195 mV, cf. Table I) for
complementing activity in E. coli thioredoxin null mutants.
The selected mutant proteins are the three most oxidizing thioredoxin
variants that have been reported so far and bear the
Xaa1-Xaa2 dipeptide sequences of the following
members of the thioredoxin family: glutaredoxin (active site:
Cys-Pro-Tyr-Cys), DsbA (active site: Cys-Pro-His-Cys), and eukaryotic
protein-disulfide isomerase (PDI; active site: Cys-Gly-His-Cys). The
basis for the in vivo studies presented in this paper is the
finding that these thioredoxin variants are all substrates of
thioredoxin reductase (TR) and show a clear in vitro
correlation between their redox potentials and efficiency of catalyzing
the reduction of lipoic acid by NADPH as a model reaction.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-thiogalactopyranoside was purchased from
AGS (Heidelberg, Germany). L-arabinose, amino acids, DTT,
oxidized DTT, dithionitrobenzoic acid, DL-lipoic acid, methionine sulfoxide, and NADPH were from Sigma. Bovine insulin was
obtained from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). All other chemicals were of
analytical grade.
-D-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a final
concentration of 1 mM, and the cells were grown further for
18 h. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation, suspended in 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, and disrupted twice in a
French Pressure cell (18.000 p.s.i.). TR was enriched by anion exchange
chromatography on DE52-cellulose, fractional ammonium sulfate
precipitation, and affinity chromatography on 2',5'-ADP-agarose essentially as described (29). After gel filtration on Superdex 200 HR
in 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, and cation exchange chromatography on CM52-cellulose (pH 4.0, NaCl gradient), TR was more
than 99% pure as judged by Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gels. 60 mg of purified TR were obtained from this procedure. A
specific absorbance of A280 nm, 1 mg/ml, 1 cm = 1.39 was
used for determination of the TR concentration (30).
412 nm = 13600 M
1 cm
1) (31).
340 nm = 6200 M
1
cm
1, 0.1-cm quartz cuvettes) and by HPLC analysis of the
insulin reduction. For the latter analysis aliquots were removed from the reaction at different time points, the reactions were quenched with
formic acid (20% (w/v) final concentration), and the insulin reaction
products were separated by reversed-phase HPLC at 55 °C on a Vydac
218TP54 column using a linear gradient from 30 to 60% acetonitrile in
0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The decrease in the peak area of native
insulin served to quantify the initial velocity of the reactions.
Identical reactivities of the three disulfide bonds in insulin were
assumed for evaluating the initial decrease in native insulin.
trxA, grxA::kan, ara714,
leu::tn10) (32) on M63-plates (33) containing 0.2% (w/v) glucose and supplemented with leucine and isoleucine (50 µg/ml each). Methionine sulfoxide reduction assays were performed with the strain A313 (trxA::kan,
metE::tn10) (21) on M63-glucose plates supplemented with
methionine sulfoxide (100 µg/ml). After 72 h of growth, the
sizes of at least 5 well separated colonies were measured and averaged.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Properties of the active site variants of thioredoxin as substrates of
TR at pH 8.0 and 25 °C

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Dependence on thioredoxin redox potential of
thioredoxin-catalyzed reduction processes. A, reduction
of insulin (130 µM) by DTT (1 mM) at pH 7.0 and 25 °C catalyzed by 1 µM thioredoxin wild type or
its more oxidizing active site variants. The reactions were followed by
an increase in optical density at 650 nm caused by precipitation of
reduced insulin.
, thioredoxin wild type;
, glutaredoxin-type
thioredoxin;
, DsbA-type thioredoxin;
, PDI-type thioredoxin;
, uncatalyzed reaction. B, dependence on thioredoxin
redox potential of the initial rate of the reduction of lipoic acid (1 mM) by NADPH (0.5 mM) at pH 8.0 and 25 °C
catalyzed by thioredoxin reductase (33 nM) and the
different thioredoxin variants (20 µM each).
Model reactions with thioredoxin wild type and the thioredoxin variants
as stoichiometric oxidants and reductants and as catalysts of
NADPH-dependent reduction processes
1
s
1). In contrast, oxidized DTT and lipoic acid were
reduced 2-4 orders of magnitude slower (Table II). In particular, the
rate constants decreased with increasing redox potential of the
thioredoxin variants. Therefore, both oxidized DTT and lipoic acid
appeared to be suitable substrates for a thioredoxin-catalyzed model
reaction probing the redox potential of thioredoxin. As the apparent
rate constants for the reduction of lipoic acid by the thioredoxin variants were more sensitive toward the redox potentials of the variants compared with the reduction of oxidized DTT (Table II), we
chose lipoic acid as a model substrate for reactions with thioredoxin as reduction catalyst. Indeed, when the thioredoxin-catalyzed reduction
of lipoic acid by NADPH was measured for all the variants at saturation
of TR (20 µM thioredoxin, cf. Table I), a good correlation between the initial velocities of lipoic acid reduction (measured by NADPH consumption) and the redox potentials of the variants was observed (Fig. 1B and Table II).
1 (Table I), the
calculated initial velocity of insulin reduction is at least ten times
faster than recycling of reduced thioredoxin. Thus, insulin is such a
good substrate of thioredoxin that at least 100-fold higher
concentrations of TR would have been necessary to make insulin
reduction the rate-limiting step.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Recovery of DsbC-dependent
disulfide bond isomerization in the periplasm of the trxA strain RI363 by plasmid-encoded cytoplasmic expression of
thioredoxin variants. A, thioredoxin-dependent
disulfide bond isomerization in E. coli was assayed by the
activity of plasmid-encoded mouse uPA in the periplasm, a protein with
multiple disulfide bonds that requires DsbC and thioredoxin for
efficient folding. Cell extracts were subjected to nonreducing
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the gel was subsequently
underlayed with agar containing plasminogen and casein. The dark
zones result from proteolytic degradation of casein by activated
plasmin, which is generated by functional uPA. uPA activity in the
wild-type (WT) strain RI281 (23) cotransformed with the
expression vector pBAD33 lacking trxA (lanes 1 and 2 (1/100 dilution of 1)) was compared with the uPA
activity in the trxA strain RI363 (23) cotransformed with
pBAD33 derivatives for expression of the following thioredoxin
variants: inactive thioredoxin C35A (active site:
Cys-Gly-Pro-Ala) (lane 4), glutaredoxin-like
thioredoxin (lane 5), DsbA-like thioredoxin (lane
6), PDI-like thioredoxin (lane 7), and thioredoxin wild
type (lane 8). B, Western blot analysis of
thioredoxin levels in the E. coli lysates from A.
In vivo properties of the active site variants of thioredoxin with
increased redox potentials
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 s
1
(Table I). Consequently, the reductive force of thioredoxin toward its
protein substrates becomes the main determinant of its catalytic
efficiency in vivo. This view is supported by the insulin
reduction assays (Fig. 1A). Here the reduction of
thioredoxin by DTT is rate-limiting for catalysis so that an inverse
correlation between the redox potential of the thioredoxin variants and
their catalytic efficiency was obtained, again as predicted from the order of their redox potentials. Consequently, an in vitro
assay for thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases that reflects the in
vivo situation must be performed under conditions that guarantee
that the rate-limiting catalytic step is the same as that in
vivo. We believe that our newly established assay, making use of
the catalyzed reduction of lipoic acid by NADPH, is a valuable tool to
study the function of NADPH-dependent members of the
thioredoxin family in vitro.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Supported by an American Cancer Society Research Professorship.

Supported by a long term fellowship from the European Molecular
Biology Organization (EMBO).
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Krause, G.,
and Holmgren, A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
4056-4066 2.
Lin, T.-Y.,
and Kim, P. S.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
5282-5287[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Wunderlich, M.,
and Glockshuber, R.
(1993)
Protein Sci.
2,
717-726[Abstract]
4.
Zapun, A.,
Bardwell, J. C. A.,
and Creighton, T. E.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
5083-5092[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Prinz, W. A.,
Åslund, F.,
Holmgren, A.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15661-15667 6.
Holmgren, A.,
and Björnstedt, B.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
252,
199-209[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Bardwell, J. C. A.,
McGovern, K.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1991)
Cell
67,
581-589[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Missiakas, D.,
Georgopoulos, C.,
and Raina, S.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
2013-2020[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Loferer, H.,
Wunderlich, M.,
Hennecke, H.,
and Glockshuber, R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26178-26183 10.
Rossman, R.,
Stern, D.,
Loferer, H.,
Jacobi, A.,
Glockshuber, R.,
and Hennecke, H.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
406,
249-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Grauschopf, U.,
Winther, J. R.,
Korber, P.,
Zander, T. P.,
Dallinger, P.,
and Bardwell, J. C. A.
(1995)
Cell
83,
947-955[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Chivers, P. T.,
Laboissiere, M. C. A.,
and Raines, R. T.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2659-2667[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Huber-Wunderlich, M.,
and Glockshuber, R.
(1998)
Folding Des.
3,
161-171
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 14.
Mössner, E.,
Huber-Wunderlich, M.,
and Glockshuber, R.
(1998)
Protein Sci.
7,
1233-1244[Abstract]
15.
Nelson, J. W.,
and Creighton, T. E.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
5974-5983[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Jacobi, A.,
Huber-Wunderlich, M.,
Hennecke, J.,
and Glockshuber, R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21692-21699 17.
Hennecke, J.,
Sebbel, P.,
and Glockshuber, R.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
268,
1197-1215
18.
Debarbieux, L.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
10751-10756 19.
Jonda, S.,
Huber-Wunderlich, M.,
Glockshuber, R.,
and Mössner, E.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
3277-3287
20.
Russel, M.,
Model, P.,
and Holmgren, A.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
1923-1929 21.
Russel, M.,
and Model, P.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
14997-15005 22.
Rietsch, A.,
Belin, D.,
Martin, N.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13048-13053 23.
Rietsch, A.,
Bessette, P.,
Georgiou, G.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
6602-6608 24.
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
25.
Guzman, L. M.,
Belin, D.,
Carson, M. J.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
4121-4130 26.
Russel, M.,
and Holmgren, A.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
990-994 27.
Bachmann, B. J.
(1972)
Bacteriol. Rev.
36,
525-557 28.
Studier, F. W.,
and Moffat, B. A.
(1986)
J. Mol. Biol.
189,
113-130[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Prongay, A. J.,
Engelke, D. R.,
and Williams, C. H., Jr.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
2656-2664 30.
Pigiet, V. P.,
and Conley, R. R.
(1977)
J. Biol. Chem.
252,
6367-6372 31.
Luthman, M.,
and Holmgren, A.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
6686-6690 32.
Stewart, E. J.,
Åslund, F.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
5543-5550[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Miller, J. H.
(1972)
Experiments in Molecular Genetics
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
34.
Duvoisin, R. M.,
Belin, D.,
and Krisch, H. M.
(1986)
Gene (Amst.)
45,
193-201[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Belin, D.,
Vassalli, J. D.,
Combepine, C.,
Godeau, F.,
Nagamine, Y.,
Reich, E.,
Kocher, H. P.,
and Duvoisin, R. M.
(1985)
Eur. J. Biochem.
148,
225-232[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Holmgren, A.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
9627-9632 37.
Holmgren, A.,
and Fagerstedt, M.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
6926-6930 38.
Holst, B.,
Tachibana, C.,
and Winther, J. R.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
1229-1238 39.
Holmgren, A.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
3672-3678 40.
Åslund, F.,
Berndt, K. D.,
and Holmgren, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30780-30786 41.
Jordan, A.,
Åslund, F.,
Pontis, E.,
Reichard, P.,
and Holmgren, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
18044-18050
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Heras, M. Kurz, R. Jarrott, S. R. Shouldice, P. Frei, G. Robin, M. Cemazar, L. Thony-Meyer, R. Glockshuber, and J. L. Martin Staphylococcus aureus DsbA Does Not Have a Destabilizing Disulfide: A NEW PARADIGM FOR BACTERIAL OXIDATIVE FOLDING J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2008; 283(7): 4261 - 4271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Masip, D. Klein-Marcuschamer, S. Quan, J. C. A. Bardwell, and G. Georgiou Laboratory Evolution of Escherichia coli Thioredoxin for Enhanced Catalysis of Protein Oxidation in the Periplasm Reveals a Phylogenetically Conserved Substrate Specificity Determinant J. Biol. Chem., January 11, 2008; 283(2): 840 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Price-Whelan, L. E. P. Dietrich, and D. K. Newman Pyocyanin Alters Redox Homeostasis and Carbon Flux through Central Metabolic Pathways in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 J. Bacteriol., September 1, 2007; 189(17): 6372 - 6381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bjur, S. Eriksson-Ygberg, F. Aslund, and M. Rhen Thioredoxin 1 Promotes Intracellular Replication and Virulence of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Infect. Immun., September 1, 2006; 74(9): 5140 - 5151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-H. Cho and J. Beckwith Mutations of the Membrane-Bound Disulfide Reductase DsbD That Block Electron Transfer Steps from Cytoplasm to Periplasm in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol., July 1, 2006; 188(14): 5066 - 5076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Bernard, S. Quevillon-Cheruel, S. Merchant, B. Guiard, and P. P. Hamel Cyc2p, a Membrane-bound Flavoprotein Involved in the Maturation of Mitochondrial c-Type Cytochromes J. Biol. Chem., December 2, 2005; 280(48): 39852 - 39859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Vignols, C. Brehelin, Y. Surdin-Kerjan, D. Thomas, and Y. Meyer A yeast two-hybrid knockout strain to explore thioredoxin-interacting proteins in vivo PNAS, November 15, 2005; 102(46): 16729 - 16734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Vido, H. Diemer, A. Van Dorsselaer, E. Leize, V. Juillard, A. Gruss, and P. Gaudu Roles of Thioredoxin Reductase during the Aerobic Life of Lactococcus lactis J. Bacteriol., January 15, 2005; 187(2): 601 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Jeong, H. W. Yoon, S.-R. Lee, and S. G. Rhee Identification and Characterization of TRP14, a Thioredoxin-related Protein of 14 kDa: NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE SPECIFICITY OF THIOREDOXIN FUNCTION J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2004; 279(5): 3142 - 3150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. Bessette, J. Qiu, J. C. A. Bardwell, J. R. Swartz, and G. Georgiou Effect of Sequences of the Active-Site Dipeptides of DsbA and DsbC on In Vivo Folding of Multidisulfide Proteins in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol., February 1, 2001; 183(3): 980 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Debarbieux and J. Beckwith On the Functional Interchangeability, Oxidant versus Reductant, of Members of the Thioredoxin Superfamily J. Bacteriol., February 1, 2000; 182(3): 723 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. Bessette, F. Aslund, J. Beckwith, and G. Georgiou Efficient folding of proteins with multiple disulfide bonds in the Escherichia coli cytoplasm PNAS, November 23, 1999; 96(24): 13703 - |