JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallegos, M.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gallegos, M.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 36, 25285-25290, September 3, 1999


Functions of the sigma 54 Region I in Trans and Implications for Transcription Activation*

María-Trinidad Gallegos, Wendy V. Cannon, and Martin BuckDagger

From the Department of Biology, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial College Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Control of transcription frequently involves the direct interaction of activators with RNA polymerase. In bacteria, the formation of stable open promoter complexes by the sigma 54 RNA polymerase is critically dependent on sigma 54 amino Region I sequences. Their presence correlates with activator dependence, and removal allows the holoenzyme to engage productively with melted DNA independently of the activator. Using purified Region I sequences and holoenzymes containing full-length or Region I-deleted sigma 54, we have explored the involvement of Region I in transcription activation. Results show that Region I in trans inhibits a reversible conformational change in the holoenzyme believed to be polymerase isomerization. Evidence is presented indicating that the holoenzyme (and not the promoter DNA per se) is one interacting target used by Region I in preventing polymerase isomerization. Activator overcomes this inhibition in a reaction requiring nucleotide hydrolysis. Region I in trans is able to inhibit activated transcription by the holoenzyme containing full-length sigma 54. Inhibition appeared to be noncompetitive with respect to the activator, suggesting that a direct activator interaction occurs with parts of the holoenzyme outside Region I. Stabilization of isomerized holoenzyme bound to melted DNA by Region I in trans occurs largely independently of the initiating nucleotide, suggesting a role for Region I in maintaining the open complex.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP)1 is a multisubunit enzyme consisting of an exchangeable sigma  subunit and a core enzyme (alpha 2beta beta ') (1). There are a variety of E. coli sigma  factors that are expressed in response to different growth conditions and environmental stresses which regulate the expression of genes accordingly. The type of sigma  factor associated with the core alters the sequence specificity of DNA binding and directs the holoenzyme to different classes of promoters (2, 3). The major sigma  protein in E. coli is sigma 70, which produces most of the cellular mRNA. sigma 54 is a minor factor that is not a member of the sigma 70 family of proteins (4) and has a distinct mechanism of transcription initiation.

sigma 54-Holoenzyme binds promoters in a transcriptionally inactive state, forming stable closed complexes (5-7). Isomerization of the closed complex to a transcriptionally competent open complex requires an activator protein bound to a DNA sequence with enhancer-like properties (5, 8) and nucleotide hydrolysis by the activator protein (6, 9, 10). Activation appears to involve direct contact between the activator and the holoenzyme (11-13). Isomerization from the closed complex to the open complex is believed to involve a major conformational change in the holoenzyme to reveal single-strand DNA binding determinants as one step and DNA melting to reveal the template strand (14, 15) as a second step. The pathway to stable DNA melting within the holoenzyme appears to involve at least one unstable intermediate and to be driven by nucleotide hydrolysis by the activator (15).

The functional domain organization of sigma 54 is complex, but different activities reside in different sequences: DNA binding motifs are localized in the carboxyl-terminal region, the central domain is needed to bind polymerase, and amino-terminal sequences are required for proper regulation of activation (16-20). When the amino-terminal domain (Region I) is deleted, sigma 54 can still bind RNA polymerase and direct it to DNA (14, 21, 22). However, the bound holoenzyme fails to respond to activator and form a stable open complex that can initiate transcription. If stably or transiently melted DNA is used, the holoenzyme with Region I deleted can produce transcripts, showing that its catalytic activity is intact (14, 22). This transcript is unusual in that it results from heparin-sensitive transcription, and its production is not enhanced by the addition of activator, implying that the amino terminus of sigma 54 contains essential activator response determinants.

Region I of sigma 54 is closely implicated in polymerase isomerization and DNA melting and is a major determinant of enhancer responsiveness. Current models suggest that Region I contains determinants for nucleating DNA melting, for inhibiting polymerase isomerization, and for the interaction of holoenzyme with melted DNA (14, 15, 22-24). Some properties of the holoenzyme that depend upon Region I sequences likely rely upon the interaction that Region I makes with the core RNAP subunits (17); others may depend upon more direct domain communication between Region I sequences and other parts of sigma 54 and possibly DNA. The conformation of the carboxyl-terminal sigma 54 DNA-binding domain is changed in the holoenzyme when Region I is deleted (25, 26), implying that Region I contributes to the physical properties of the holoenzyme, some of which involve sequences that are closely associated with the DNA binding function of sigma 54. In initial complexes that form between holoenzyme and promoter DNA, the sigma 54 contacts DNA that is melted in open complexes (27-29), suggesting that the sigma 54 DNA-binding domain may influence open complex formation.

To explore the involvement of Region I sequences in enhancer- and nucleotide-dependent activation of transcription, we have taken advantage of the domain structure of sigma 54 and worked with purified partial sigma sequences. We now show that the polymerase isomerization that occurs when Region I sequences are deleted is reversed by Region I added in trans and that inhibition of isomerization requires a Region I-protein interaction. We also show that Region I sequences in trans stabilize holoenzyme bound to melted DNA. Activator overcomes the inhibition caused by Region I in trans in a reaction requiring NTP hydrolysis, providing a formal demonstration that the anti-inhibition function of the activator occurs via its NTP hydrolysis activity. Transcription by the wild type holoenzyme was inhibited in a noncompetitive manner when the holoenzyme was challenged with Region I in trans, indicating that the activator may interact with parts of the holoenzyme outside of Region I for regulated stable open complex formation. The positive and negative activities of Region I appear to be crucial for the ordered progression from the closed complex to the open complex.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Proteins-- These were prepared as described previously (16, 20, 25). The Klebsiella pneumoniae sigma 54 protein (amino acids 1-477) and Delta Isigma 54 (amino acids 57-477) were used to form holoenzymes (Fig. 1A). Purified amino-terminal sequences of sigma 54 (amino acids 1-56) were obtained by overproducing an amino-terminal histidine-tagged fragment as a soluble sequence in E. coli (Ref. 17; Fig. 1A). Purified E. coli core RNA polymerase was from Epicentre Technologies. A purified carboxyl-terminal-deleted form of activator, PspFDelta HTH (31), was used in activation assays. Working protein solutions and stocks were stored at -20 °C and -70 °C, respectively, in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50% (v/v) glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol (TGED) containing 50-250 mM NaCl. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit.

DNA Footprinting Assays-- S1 nuclease footprinting was performed with linear homoduplex DNA prepared by primer extension of a single-strand M13mp19 clone of the Sinorhizobium meliloti nifH promoter (14). Reactions (25 µl) were conducted in STA buffer at 30 °C and contained 1.6 nM DNA together with 100 nM holoenzyme (core:sigma at a 1:2 ratio) and activator PspFDelta HTH (4 µM) and GTP (4 mM) where needed. When used, Region I (2 µM) was added to the reaction before holoenzyme assembly. Holoenzymes and DNA were incubated for 10 min, and for activation assays, PspFDelta HTH and GTP were added for an additional 10 min. S1 nuclease (700 units; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was added for 5 min before reactions were terminated by the addition of 10 mM EDTA followed by rapid phenol extraction. DNA was recovered by ethanol precipitation and run on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. Markers were generated by chemical cleavage of the DNA with piperidine after partial methylation with dimethyl sulfate.

Native Gel Complex Formation Assays-- A gel shift assay (25, 32) was used to detect holoenzymes bound to a radioactively labeled S. meliloti nifH heteroduplex 1 promoter DNA fragment in which top strand sequences -10 to -1 are mismatched (14). Typical holoenzyme interactions were carried out in STA buffer. Holoenzyme (core:Delta Isigma 54 ratio, 1:2) was assembled at 30 °C for 5 min, and then heteroduplex DNA (16 nM) was added for another 5 min, followed by glycerol bromphenol blue loading dye (final concentration, 10% glycerol) and, if required, heparin (final concentration, 100 µg/ml). Region I was added either before holoenzyme assembly or for 5 min after formation of the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme-DNA complex. Samples were then loaded onto 4.5% native polyacrylamide gels to separate free DNA and bound DNA that were detected by autoradiography. Quantitative data were from phosphorimager analyses.

In Vitro Transcription Assays-- For transcription from supercoiled DNA, template DNA (10 nM) was plasmid pMKC28 (21). Holoenzyme was assembled at 30 °C for 5 min, and then DNA was added for another 5 min. Region I (0.5 µM) was added either before holoenzyme assembly or for 5 min after the formation of the holoenzyme-DNA complex. Then, if necessary, nucleotide and activator were added for 10 min, followed by heparin (100 µg/ml) plus the remaining ribonucleotides (0.1 mM of each) and 3 µCi of [alpha -32P]UTP. After 10 min, RNA was precipitated and analyzed on 6% sequencing gels. Detection was by autoradiography and phosphorimaging.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Inhibition of RNAP Isomerization by Region I-- We previously showed that deletion of amino acids 1-56 (removing all of Region I) from K. pneumoniae sigma 54 allowed the holoenzyme to isomerize independently of the activator (14). The assay used employed S1 nuclease footprinting of holoenzyme on linear DNA templates containing the S. meliloti nifH promoter as the binding site for the holoenzyme. The sigma 54-holoenzyme showed a short footprint from -33 to -5, whereas the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme footprinted over and beyond the transcription start site to +20. Activated sigma 54-holoenzyme showed a similar extended footprint, and differences between +8 and +20 could be related to the absence of Region I in the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme. To determine whether the conformational change in the holoenzyme resulting in the extended footprint was reversible, we added Region I (amino acids 1-56) back in trans to S1 footprint assays. Results in Fig. 1B show that the extended footprint of Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme is lost when Region I is added in trans, demonstrating that polymerase isomerization can occur in a reversible manner. sigma 54-Holoenzyme footprints were essentially insensitive to Region I in trans (lane 3 versus lane 4), but the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme footprint changed (lane 5 versus lane 6) upon addition of Region I (loss of * reactivity). Footprints of sigma 54- and Delta Isigma 54-holoenzymes in the presence of Region I were essentially the same (lanes 4 and 6). Controls showed that Region I alone did not footprint the linear DNA (compare lane 2 and lane 7). Activated sigma 54-holoenzyme is shown as a control (lane 9 versus lane 8), as is the insensitivity of the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme to activator (lanes 10 and 11). Presumably, activator-driven RNAP isomerization normally involves the activator changing the Region I-dependent interactions responsible for maintaining the inhibited state of the holoenzyme.


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, assay of K. pneumoniae sigma 54 sequence is shown. Full-length sigma 54 (residues 1-477) is divided into three regions (I-III) based on sequence alignments (40). Purified K. pneumoniae sigma sequences 1-477, 57-477, and 1-56 were used in this work (16, 17, 30). B, S1 nuclease footprints on linear DNA. The extent of the holoenzyme footprint is indicated by a solid line. The asterisk indicates the -10 cutting lost on holoenzyme binding. The marker (M, lane 1) was a chemical cleavage "G" reaction. 0 (lane 2), DNA alone treated with S1 nuclease. sigma 54- and Delta Isigma 54-holoenzymes (Esigma 54 and EDelta Isigma 54, respectively) were at 100 nM, DNA was at 1.6 nM, activator PspFDelta HTH was at 4 µM, GTP was at 4 mM, and Region I was at 2 µM.

Additional evidence for the Region I-driven reversible conformational change in the holoenzyme was obtained by adding Region I in trans to ortho-copper phenanthroline footprint assays using supercoiled DNA. The hypersensitive site around -12 observed with the wild type holoenzyme (23) was absent in footprints with Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme (30) but recovered after the addition of Region I in trans (data not shown). Clearly, Region I is responsible for interactions between holoenzyme and the -12 promoter element detected with ortho-copper phenanthroline, and this -12 reactivity may be a signature of the inhibited state of the holoenzyme.

Inhibition of Stable Complex Formation on Melted DNA by Region I-- Removal of Region I sequences reveals a single-strand DNA binding activity in the holoenzyme and allows engagement with melted DNA sequences (14). We have used a heteroduplex DNA molecule with a region of unpaired DNA between -10 and -1 presenting stably melted DNA sequences. Experimentally, the stability of holoenzyme complexes with the melted DNA can be measured in a challenge assay in which pre-bound complexes are formed and then heparin is added. Bound and unbound labeled DNA are separated by native gel electrophoresis. Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme can bind stably to heteroduplex DNA in a reaction inhibited by the addition of Region I in trans to the holoenzyme before engagement with DNA (14). As suggested by the results shown in Fig. 1B, inhibition by Region I could occur by preventing polymerase isomerization and masking holoenzyme single-strand DNA binding activity.

To probe interactions involved in Region I inhibition, we titrated Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme with purified Region I sequences and with heteroduplex DNA. The number of Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme/heteroduplex DNA complexes surviving a 5-min heparin challenge was measured. We initially determined the minimum amount of Region I (residues 1-56) needed to cause significant inhibition of stable complex formation with 100 nM holoenzyme and 16 nM DNA (Fig. 2A). We observed that 0.3 µM Region I caused a 40% reduction of heparin-resistant complex formation. Keeping Region I (0.3 µM) and DNA constant but increasing the amount of holoenzyme (0.1-0.5 µM), we observed that more stable complexes formed (Fig. 2B, lanes 2, 4, 7, 10, and 13). The addition of extra Region I reversed this effect (lanes 5, 8, 11, and 14). This result suggests that the holoenzyme is one target of Region I. Using 32P-labeled Delta Isigma 54, we observed that increasing amounts of heteroduplex DNA did not overcome the Region I-dependent inhibition (data not shown), consistent with Region I interacting with holoenzyme rather than the free heteroduplex DNA to achieve inhibition. The 5-fold excess of Region I required for in trans inhibition (compared with its normal in cis functioning) may reflect the weak binding to the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme or the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme/DNA complex. Our experiments do not establish which holoenzyme form (free or bound to DNA) is the target for Region I-dependent inhibition of the activity required for interaction with melted DNA.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Region I-dependent inhibition of the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme stable complex on heteroduplex DNA. A, gel shift assays were conducted with Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme (100 nM) and heteroduplex DNA (16 nM). Increasing amounts of Region I were added before Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme assembly. Holoenzyme-DNA complexes were challenged with heparin (100 µg/ml for 5 min) and loaded onto a native polyacrylamide gel. Bound DNA and unbound DNA were separated, and the percentage of bound DNA was quantified by phosphorimager analysis. B, gel shift assays were conducted as described in A, but with the indicated amounts of Region I and Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme.

Stabilization of Holoenzyme Complexes on Melted DNA by Region I-- We previously established that initiating nucleotide increased the stability of the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme on heteroduplex DNA (14). We now find that stabilization is also afforded by Region I sequences in trans when added once the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme is bound to the DNA and can occur in a nucleotide-independent manner. First, we determined the effect of Region I concentrations on stable complex formation with 100 nM holoenzyme and 16 nM DNA (Fig. 3A) and observed that 2 µM Region I caused a 30% increment of heparin-resistant complex formation. We also analyzed the decay with time of complexes between heteroduplex DNA and Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme in a heparin challenge experiment (Fig. 3B). Clearly, Region I sequences added after DNA binding afford a stabilization (which is only modestly increased by the initiating nucleotide GTP; data not shown). Therefore, Region I sequences have a role in stabilizing the holoenzyme at the promoter when the DNA is stably melted out, and this is of potential significance for maintaining the open complex.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A, stabilization of Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme heparin-resistant heteroduplex DNA complexes by Region I is shown. Gel shift assays were conducted with Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme (100 nM) and heteroduplex DNA (16 nM). Increasing amounts of Region I were added after Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme-heteroduplex complexes were formed. Holoenzyme-DNA complexes were challenged with heparin (100 µg/ml for 5 min) and loaded onto a native gel in which bound DNA and unbound DNA were separated, and the percentage of bound DNA was quantified by phosphorimager analysis. B, effect of Region I on heparin stability. Gel shifts were conducted with Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme (100 nM) and heteroduplex DNA (16 nM) in the absence of Region I () or Region I (2 µM) added either before holoenzyme assembly (black-triangle) or after holoenzyme-DNA complex formation (). Samples were taken before (time 0) and after the addition of heparin for 1, 5, 10, and 20 min.

Effect of Region I on Bypass Transcription-- Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme transcribes independently of activator from stably or transiently melting DNA templates containing sigma 54 promoter sequences (14, 21, 22). Using the S. meliloti nifH promoter on a supercoiled plasmid, we showed that transcription by the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme was inhibited by the addition of Region I to the holoenzyme before the template and initiating nucleotide GTP (Fig. 4, lanes 3 and 4). The presence of GTP is required to stabilize the polymerase as an initiated complex before the heparin challenge, and the addition of remaining nucleotides is required for transcript elongation (compare lanes 1 and 3). Thus, the effects of Region I on transcript formation are consistent with the inhibition of polymerase isomerization and the binding of melted DNA demonstrated above (Figs. 1-3).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of Region I in trans upon transcription on supercoiled DNA. Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme (100 nM) alone or with 4 mM GTP was incubated with template DNA (10 nM; pMKC28) before heparin challenge and the addition of the remaining NTPs plus [alpha -32P]UTP. Region I (0.5 µM) was added either before holoenzyme assembly or after formation of the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme-DNA complex. Experiments were repeated at least three times to enhance the reliability of the data.

The addition of Region I to template-bound Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme did not result in stable complex formation and transcription (Fig. 4, lanes 5 and 6), in contrast to the situation with pre-melted DNA (Ref. 14; Fig. 3A). It is likely that the DNA melting on the supercoiled DNA is too transient and reversible to support this route to transcript formation. The addition of Region I may also drive the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme to the inhibited state (see Fig. 1B) within the time scale of the assay if the DNA does not remain open. Pre-bound Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme in the presence of GTP was largely insensitive to the subsequent addition of Region I (Fig. 4, lanes 7 and 8), indicating that the initiated complex is a state of the holoenzyme upon which Region I exerts little effect. Typically, in replica experiments, Region I added before DNA diminished transcription by 75%, whereas Region I added once the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme was bound to the DNA provoked only a 25% reduction.

Activator Overcomes Region I Inhibition-- Having established that Region I in trans inhibited bypass transcription by the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme (Fig. 4), we investigated whether activator protein PspFDelta HTH could overcome the inhibition and whether this required NTP hydrolysis. We also investigated whether activator and Region I in trans would allow the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme to transcribe via a heparin stable intermediate that would form independently of transcript initiation, as is the case with the wild type holoenzyme (Fig. 5). Footprints (Fig. 1) indicated that sigma 54-holoenzyme and Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme plus Region I in trans were similar, inferring that Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme could form an activable closed complex in the presence of Region I in trans. Bypass transcription is characterized as requiring the polymerase to form one or more phosphodiester bonds in the nascent transcript to establish heparin-resistant initiated complexes (24, 33). However, activated transcription results in the formation of a heparin stable open promoter complex without phosphodiester bond formation (6). Because of the complicating factor of activator hydrolyzing a nucleoside triphosphate to drive open complex formation, we used different GTP analogues to allow either activator function and RNA phosphodiester bond formation (GTP), activator function (dGTP) only, or phosphodiester bond formation (GTPgamma S or GMP-PNP) only. We used GTPgamma S (or GMP-PNP; data not shown) elongation substrates with a nonhydrolyzable gamma -beta bond to explore activator NTP hydrolysis requirements. We chose dGTP as a hydrolyzable nucleotide unable to support transcription elongation rather than ATP or dideoxy GTP to stop nonspecific initiation or inhibition of the subsequent transcript elongation from the S. meliloti nifH promoter (data not shown).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The activator overcomes Region I inhibition. Transcription assays were performed as described in the Fig. 4 legend with both sigma 54- and Delta Isigma 54-holoenzymes using GTP, GTPgamma S, and dGTP for hydrolysis by the activator and initiation of transcription, initiation only, or activator hydrolysis only, respectively. Region I (0.5 µM) was added before holoenzyme assembly. Experiments were repeated at least three times to enhance the reliability of the data.

Experiments with GTP-- Fig. 5 shows transcript levels resulting from bypass transcription using the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme and its inhibition by Region I added before DNA binding (lanes 1 and 2). The activator did not stimulate transcription by the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme, but it did reproducibly overcome a large fraction of the inhibition of bypass transcription seen when Region I was added in trans (lanes 7 and 8). Controls with sigma 54-holoenzyme showed that GTP supported activator-dependent transcription (lane 13), and that Region I slightly inhibited activation (lane 14).

Experiments with GTPgamma S-- Activators of the sigma 54 RNA polymerase must hydrolyze the gamma -beta bond of a NTP to stimulate the formation of open complexes (6). This is true for PspFDelta HTH and the wild type holoenzyme at the nifH promoter because no transcripts are detected when GTPgamma S replaces GTP (Fig. 5, lanes 15 and 13). However, bypass transcription occurs with GTPgamma S and is unchanged by the presence of PspFDelta HTH (lanes 1, 3, and 9), confirming that it is the activator involvement in open complex formation that correlates with gamma -beta bond hydrolysis. To determine whether gamma -beta bond hydrolysis was needed for the activator-dependent relief of inhibition caused by Region I, we conducted transcript assays using GTPgamma S. Results showed that gamma -beta bond hydrolysis was not needed for the inhibitory effect of Region I upon bypass transcription (lanes 3 and 4), but that it was clearly needed for relief of inhibition by the activator (lanes 9 and 10 versus lanes 7 and 8). We conclude that the anti-inhibition of Region I activity by the activator requires NTP hydrolysis (lanes 9 and 10 versus lanes 7 and 8), as does formation of the open complex (lanes 13 and 15).

Experiments with dGTP-- Transcripts are synthesized with the wild type holoenzyme when dGTP is used as the hydrolyzable nucleotide by PspFDelta HTH to form heparin stable open complexes (Fig. 5, lane 17), but dGTP does not support bypass transcription, as expected from the selectivity of RNA polymerase (lanes 5, 6, 11, and 12). In these assays, heparin resistance must be established before the addition of elongation substrates. Results confirm that heparin resistance in bypass transcription requires phosphodiester bond formation. The PspFDelta HTH and dGTP combination did not stimulate stable complex formation by the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme (lanes 5 and 11) or when Region I was in trans (lanes 6 and 12). We attempted to form stable activator-dependent noninitiated open complexes with the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme plus Region I in trans using different combinations of activators and promoters, but none yielded any (data not shown). Region I in cis appears to be necessary for the formation of a heparin stable noninitiated open complex via the action of the activator.

Inhibition of Activated Transcription by Region I-- We attempted to determine whether Region I interacted directly with the activator. Using PspFDelta HTH and dGTP to drive stable open complex formation by the wild type holoenzyme, we sought an inhibitory effect of Region I supplied in trans to measure the extent to which providing extra activator would overcome the inhibition. Transcript assays were conducted in which sigma 54-holoenzyme was pre-mixed with Region I and then added to template, after which activator and dGTP were added. Results (Fig. 6) showed that Region I reduced the activated transcript levels (see also Fig. 5, lanes 14 and 18). Plots of the levels of transcription in the presence and absence of Region I as a function of increasing activator concentration are shown in Fig. 6. The activator partially overcomes the inhibitory effect of Region I but does not restore transcription to the level obtained without Region I. Such behavior is consistent with a noncompetitive inhibition by Region I. The inhibition of transcription seen at a high activator concentration and in the presence of 0.5 or 1 µM Region I could mask relief of Region I-dependent inhibition; however, the 2 µM Region I data argue against this. Results suggest that Region I in trans is not interacting directly with the activator to cause inhibition, but that Region I is responsible for a conformational change in the holoenzyme that stabilizes the inhibited state. Lineweaver-Burk plots of PspFDelta HTH concentrations versus transcripts levels were consistent with the inhibition being noncompetitive (data not shown).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Activator and Region I interact noncompetitively. Transcription assays were performed as described in the Fig. 4 legend, but with sigma 54-holoenzyme, dGTP (4 mM), and different concentrations of PspFDelta HTH in the presence of 0.5 (), 1 (triangle ), and 2 µM (black-down-triangle ) Region I or in its absence ().


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The amino-terminal Region I of sigma 54 is pivotal in establishing enhancer-dependent transcription in bacteria. It has multiple roles and is strongly implicated in influencing the activities of the sigma and its holoenzyme that likely work together for the ordered progression from a closed complex to an open complex. These activities include DNA interactions in the closed complex that involve the -12 promoter element (18-20, 22, 34, 35), the nucleation of DNA melting and its associated fork junction binding by sigma (23, 36), the inhibition of polymerase isomerization (14), and an interaction with core polymerase (17). Our results now show that stabilization of Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme binding to melted DNA is also assisted by Region I sequences. Although not yet directly demonstrated, a stabilizing effect of Region I upon holoenzyme binding to a transition state of the DNA along the melting pathway would lower the activation energy for the strand separation process and increase the rates of open complex formation. The inability to detect stable open complex formation with holoenzymes lacking Region I may be attributable in part to the absence of stabilizing effects of Region I that help form and maintain the opened DNA.

It seems that Region I inhibits polymerase isomerization and engagement with melted DNA through a protein contact, consistent with the demonstration that Region I sequences bind to the core polymerase (17). Region I is also responsible for some interactions between the holoenzyme and the -12 promoter element (18-20, 22, 34, 35), and because Region I stabilizes the holoenzyme on melted DNA, a Region I-melted DNA interaction is possible. It is likely that the protein and/or DNA interactions made by Region I are changed by the activator to allow polymerase isomerization and DNA melting to occur. Overcoming the inhibitory effects of Region I to allow polymerase isomerization appears to be one role played by the activator and its associated NTP hydrolysis. Because polymerase isomerization can be driven simply by the removal of Region I and reversed by its addition in trans, the energy costs appear to be modest for this step and can be accounted for in terms of interactions that Region I makes within the holoenzyme. For the sigma 70-holoenzyme, the energy for isomerization is suggested to be equivalent to burying a few hydrophobic residues (37). Region I of sigma 54 has many leucine residues, some of which appear to be critical for keeping the holoenzyme in the inhibited state and could similarly be involved in isomerization (15, 24).

We were unable to form activator-dependent heparin stable open promoter complexes using Region I in trans to complement the defect in the holoenzyme assembled with Delta Isigma 54. It is possible that the normal cis configuration of Region I restricts some interactions and favors others so that a sequential pathway for stable DNA melting can be followed. Supplied in trans Region I may have additional freedom to interact outside the normal reaction ordinate and thus fail to make stable activator-dependent complexes with the Delta Isigma 54-holoenzyme. It is possible that Region I in trans cannot maintain a strained or stressed intermediate required for DNA strand opening. Stress generated in sigma 54 by Region I may be transferred to DNA in a reaction that is part of the sequence of events that leads to stable DNA opening, as appears to be the case for the sigma 70-holoenzyme (38).

An anti-inhibition activity of activator upon Region I supplied in trans was observed and suggests that a simpler set of Region I-dependent interactions is involved in this partial reaction of the activation pathway. The ability of the activator to overcome the in trans inhibition was clearly dependent upon NTP hydrolysis, providing a formal demonstration that one function of the activator is to overcome the inhibition exerted by Region I and hence to allow polymerase isomerization. The noncompetitive inhibitory effect of Region I suggests that sequences in the holoenzyme outside of Region I contain determinants for a direct interaction with the activator.

Results suggest that Region I can be viewed as a protein domain that functions to control an equilibrium between alternate states of the holoenzyme by favoring either the closed complex (blocking polymerase isomerization) or the open complex (stabilizing holoenzyme on melted DNA). To explain the opposing effects of Region I, we suggest that Region I is involved in several different networks of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions that maintain different conformations of the holoenzyme. In this model, the activator functions to change interactions so as to relieve inhibition and then allow other interactions to be established that more directly favor DNA melting by the holoenzyme.

Subunits of the bacterial core RNA polymerase have homologous counterparts in eukaryotic polymerases, and several subunits can represent different functional domains of a single bacterial protein (39). Separation of functions in this manner is commonplace among many different protein families. Although database searches indicate that Region I of sigma 54 has no obvious homologue among other transcription factors, except for the fact that some others are also glutamine-rich, it is clear that Region I can function as an isolated domain to control RNAP activity. It is possible that the Region I domain originated as a separate factor to control RNA polymerase activity (it has positive and negative activities) and was recruited to form part of sigma 54, enabling tightly regulated enhancer-dependent transcription.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank M. Chaney for advice regarding the transcription assays.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Wellcome and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council grants (to M. B.) and by a Biotechnology Marie Curie Fellowship (to M.-T. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-171-59-45442; Fax: 44-171-594-5419; E-mail: m.buck@ic.ac.uk.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: RNAP, RNA polymerase; STA, (25 mM Tris acetate, pH8.0; 8 mM magnesium acetate, 10 mM KCl; 1 mM dithiothreitol and 3.5% w/v polyethylene glycol 8000, GTPgamma S, guanosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate).

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Burgess, R., Travers, A., Dunn, J., and Bautz, E. (1969) Nature 221, 43-46[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Gross, C. A., Lonetto, M., and Losick, R. (1992) in Transcriptional Regulation (Yamamoto, K. , and McKnight, S., eds) , pp. 129-176, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
3. Helmann, J. D., and Chamberlin, M. J. (1988) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57, 839-872[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Lonetto, M., Gribskov, M., and Gross, C. A. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 3843-3849[Free Full Text]
5. Morett, E., and Buck, M. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 210, 65-77[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Popham, D., Szesto, D., Keener, J., and Kustu, S. (1989) Science 243, 629-635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Sasse-Dwight, S., and Gralla, J. D. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 8934-8938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Reitzer, L. J., and Magasanik, B. (1986) Cell 45, 785-792[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Austin, S., and Dixon, R. A. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 2219-2228[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Weiss, D. S., Batut, J., Klose, K. E., Keener, J., and Kustu, S. (1991) Cell 67, 155-167[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Hoover, T. R., Santero, E., Porter, S., and Kustu, S. (1990) Cell 63, 11-22[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Lee, J. H., and Hoover, T. R. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 9702-9706[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Su, W., Porter, S., Kustu, S., and Echols, H. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 5504-5508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Cannon, W., Gallegos, M.-T., Casaz, P., and Buck, M. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 357-370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Wang, J. T., and Gralla, J. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32707-32713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Cannon, W. V., Chaney, M. K., Wang, X.-Y., and Buck, M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 5006-5011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Gallegos, M. T., and Buck, M. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 288, 539-553[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Hsieh, M., and Gralla, J. D. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 239, 15-24[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Hsieh, M., Tintut, Y., and Gralla, J. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 373-378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Sasse-Dwight, S., and Gralla, J. D. (1990) Cell 62, 945-954[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Cannon, W., Chaney, M., and Buck, M. (1999) Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 2478-2486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Wang, J. T., Syed, A., and Gralla, J. D. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 9538-9543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Morris, L., Cannon, W., Claverie-Martin, F., Austin, S., and Buck, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 11563-11571[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Wang, J. T., Syed, A., Hsieh, M., and Gralla, J. D. (1995) Science 270, 992-994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Casaz, P., and Buck, M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 12145-12150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Casaz, P., and Buck, M. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 285, 507-514[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Buck, M., and Cannon, W. (1992) Nature 358, 422-424[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Cannon, W., Claverie-Martin, F., Austin, S., and Buck, M. (1994) Mol. Microbiol. 11, 227-236[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Cannon, W., Austin, S., Moore, M., and Buck, M. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 351-356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Cannon, W., Missailidis, S., Smith, C., Cottier, A., Austin, S., Moore, M., and Buck, M. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 248, 781-803[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Jovanovic, G., Weiner, L., and Model, P. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 1936-1945[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Wang, X.-Y., Kolb, A., Cannon, W., and Buck, M. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3478-3485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Syed, A., and Gralla, J. D. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 5619-5625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Wong, C., Tintut, Y., and Gralla, J. D. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 236, 81-90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Wang, L., and Gralla, J. D. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 5626-5631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Guo, Y., and Gralla, J. D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 11655-11660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. deHaseth, P. L., Zupancic, M. L., and Record, T. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 3019-3025[Free Full Text]
38. Buckle, M., Pemberton, I. K., Jacquet, M. A., and Buc, H. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 285, 955-964[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Archambault, J., and Friesen, J. D. (1993) Microbiol. Rev. 57, 703-724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Merrick, M. J. (1993) Mol. Microbiol. 10, 903-909[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. E. Dago, S. R. Wigneshweraraj, M. Buck, and E. Morett
A Role for the Conserved GAFTGA Motif of AAA+ Transcription Activators in Sensing Promoter DNA Conformation
J. Biol. Chem., January 12, 2007; 282(2): 1087 - 1097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
W. Cannon, S. R. Wigneshweraraj, and M. Buck
Interactions of regulated and deregulated forms of the {sigma}54 holoenzyme with heteroduplex promoter DNA
Nucleic Acids Res., February 15, 2002; 30(4): 886 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
M. Chaney, R. Grande, S. R. Wigneshweraraj, W. Cannon, P. Casaz, M.-T. Gallegos, J. Schumacher, S. Jones, S. Elderkin, A. E. Dago, et al.
Binding of transcriptional activators to sigma 54 in the presence of the transition state analog ADP-aluminum fluoride: insights into activator mechanochemical action
Genes & Dev., September 1, 2001; 15(17): 2282 - 2294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. R. Wigneshweraraj, A. Ishihama, and M. Buck
In vitro roles of invariant helix-turn-helix motif residue R383 in {{sigma}}54 ({{sigma}}N)
Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2001; 29(5): 1163 - 1174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
M. T. Kelly, J. A. Ferguson III, and T. R. Hoover
Transcription Initiation-Defective Forms of sigma 54 That Differ in Ability To Function with a Heteroduplex DNA Template
J. Bacteriol., November 15, 2000; 182(22): 6503 - 6508.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Pitt, M.-T. Gallegos, and M. Buck
Single amino acid substitution mutants of Klebsiella pneumoniae {sigma}54 defective in transcription
Nucleic Acids Res., November 15, 2000; 28(22): 4419 - 4427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page