![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 36, 25285-25290, September 3, 1999
From the Department of Biology, Imperial College of Science
Technology and Medicine, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial
College Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
Control of transcription frequently involves the
direct interaction of activators with RNA polymerase. In bacteria, the
formation of stable open promoter complexes by the
Escherichia coli RNA polymerase
(RNAP)1 is a multisubunit
enzyme consisting of an exchangeable The functional domain organization of Region I of To explore the involvement of Region I sequences in enhancer- and
nucleotide-dependent activation of transcription, we have taken advantage of the domain structure of Proteins--
These were prepared as described previously (16,
20, 25). The Klebsiella pneumoniae DNA Footprinting Assays--
S1 nuclease footprinting was
performed with linear homoduplex DNA prepared by primer extension of a
single-strand M13mp19 clone of the Sinorhizobium meliloti
nifH promoter (14). Reactions (25 µl) were conducted in STA
buffer at 30 °C and contained 1.6 nM DNA together with
100 nM holoenzyme (core: Native Gel Complex Formation Assays--
A gel shift assay (25,
32) was used to detect holoenzymes bound to a radioactively labeled
S. meliloti nifH heteroduplex 1 promoter DNA fragment in
which top strand sequences In Vitro Transcription Assays--
For transcription from
supercoiled DNA, template DNA (10 nM) was plasmid pMKC28
(21). Holoenzyme was assembled at 30 °C for 5 min, and then DNA was
added for another 5 min. Region I (0.5 µM) was added
either before holoenzyme assembly or for 5 min after the formation of
the holoenzyme-DNA complex. Then, if necessary, nucleotide and
activator were added for 10 min, followed by heparin (100 µg/ml) plus
the remaining ribonucleotides (0.1 mM of each) and 3 µCi
of [ Inhibition of RNAP Isomerization by Region I--
We previously
showed that deletion of amino acids 1-56 (removing all of Region I)
from K. pneumoniae
Additional evidence for the Region I-driven reversible conformational
change in the holoenzyme was obtained by adding Region I in
trans to ortho-copper phenanthroline footprint assays
using supercoiled DNA. The hypersensitive site around Inhibition of Stable Complex Formation on Melted DNA by Region
I--
Removal of Region I sequences reveals a single-strand DNA
binding activity in the holoenzyme and allows engagement with melted DNA sequences (14). We have used a heteroduplex DNA molecule with a
region of unpaired DNA between
To probe interactions involved in Region I inhibition, we titrated
Stabilization of Holoenzyme Complexes on Melted DNA by Region
I--
We previously established that initiating nucleotide increased
the stability of the Effect of Region I on Bypass
Transcription--
The addition of Region I to template-bound
Activator Overcomes Region I Inhibition--
Having established
that Region I in trans inhibited bypass transcription by the
Experiments with GTP--
Fig. 5 shows transcript levels resulting
from bypass transcription using the Experiments with GTP Experiments with dGTP--
Transcripts are synthesized with the
wild type holoenzyme when dGTP is used as the hydrolyzable nucleotide
by PspF Inhibition of Activated Transcription by Region I--
We
attempted to determine whether Region I interacted directly with the
activator. Using PspF The amino-terminal Region I of It seems that Region I inhibits polymerase isomerization and engagement
with melted DNA through a protein contact, consistent with the
demonstration that Region I sequences bind to the core polymerase (17).
Region I is also responsible for some interactions between the
holoenzyme and the We were unable to form activator-dependent heparin stable
open promoter complexes using Region I in trans to
complement the defect in the holoenzyme assembled with
An anti-inhibition activity of activator upon Region I supplied
in trans was observed and suggests that a simpler set of
Region I-dependent interactions is involved in this partial
reaction of the activation pathway. The ability of the activator to
overcome the in trans inhibition was clearly dependent upon
NTP hydrolysis, providing a formal demonstration that one function of
the activator is to overcome the inhibition exerted by Region I and
hence to allow polymerase isomerization. The noncompetitive inhibitory effect of Region I suggests that sequences in the holoenzyme outside of
Region I contain determinants for a direct interaction with the activator.
Results suggest that Region I can be viewed as a protein domain that
functions to control an equilibrium between alternate states of the
holoenzyme by favoring either the closed complex (blocking polymerase
isomerization) or the open complex (stabilizing holoenzyme on melted
DNA). To explain the opposing effects of Region I, we suggest that
Region I is involved in several different networks of protein-protein
and protein-DNA interactions that maintain different conformations of
the holoenzyme. In this model, the activator functions to change
interactions so as to relieve inhibition and then allow other
interactions to be established that more directly favor DNA melting by
the holoenzyme.
Subunits of the bacterial core RNA polymerase have homologous
counterparts in eukaryotic polymerases, and several subunits can
represent different functional domains of a single bacterial protein
(39). Separation of functions in this manner is commonplace among many
different protein families. Although database searches indicate that
Region I of We thank M. Chaney for advice regarding the
transcription assays.
*
This work was supported by Wellcome and Biotechnology and
Biological Sciences Research Council grants (to M. B.) and by a Biotechnology Marie Curie Fellowship (to M.-T. G.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The abbreviations used are:
RNAP, RNA
polymerase;
STA, (25 mM Tris acetate, pH8.0;
8
mM magnesium acetate, 10 mM KCl;
1
mM dithiothreitol and 3.5% w/v polyethylene glycol 8000, GTP
Functions of the
54 Region I in Trans
and Implications for Transcription Activation*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
54 RNA polymerase is critically dependent on
54 amino Region I sequences. Their presence correlates
with activator dependence, and removal allows the holoenzyme to engage
productively with melted DNA independently of the activator. Using
purified Region I sequences and holoenzymes containing full-length or
Region I-deleted
54, we have explored the involvement of
Region I in transcription activation. Results show that Region I
in trans inhibits a reversible conformational change in the
holoenzyme believed to be polymerase isomerization. Evidence is
presented indicating that the holoenzyme (and not the promoter DNA
per se) is one interacting target used by Region I in
preventing polymerase isomerization. Activator overcomes this
inhibition in a reaction requiring nucleotide hydrolysis. Region I
in trans is able to inhibit activated transcription by the
holoenzyme containing full-length
54. Inhibition
appeared to be noncompetitive with respect to the activator, suggesting
that a direct activator interaction occurs with parts of the holoenzyme
outside Region I. Stabilization of isomerized holoenzyme bound to
melted DNA by Region I in trans occurs largely
independently of the initiating nucleotide, suggesting a role for
Region I in maintaining the open complex.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
subunit and a core enzyme (
2
') (1). There are a variety of E. coli
factors that are expressed in response to different
growth conditions and environmental stresses which regulate the
expression of genes accordingly. The type of
factor associated with
the core alters the sequence specificity of DNA binding and directs the
holoenzyme to different classes of promoters (2, 3). The major
protein in E. coli is
70, which produces most
of the cellular mRNA.
54 is a minor factor that is
not a member of the
70 family of proteins (4) and has a
distinct mechanism of transcription initiation.
54-Holoenzyme binds promoters in a transcriptionally
inactive state, forming stable closed complexes (5-7). Isomerization of the closed complex to a transcriptionally competent open complex requires an activator protein bound to a DNA sequence with
enhancer-like properties (5, 8) and nucleotide hydrolysis by the
activator protein (6, 9, 10). Activation appears to involve direct contact between the activator and the holoenzyme (11-13).
Isomerization from the closed complex to the open complex is believed
to involve a major conformational change in the holoenzyme to reveal
single-strand DNA binding determinants as one step and DNA melting to
reveal the template strand (14, 15) as a second step. The pathway to
stable DNA melting within the holoenzyme appears to involve at least
one unstable intermediate and to be driven by nucleotide hydrolysis by
the activator (15).
54 is complex, but
different activities reside in different sequences: DNA binding motifs are localized in the carboxyl-terminal region, the central domain is
needed to bind polymerase, and amino-terminal sequences are required
for proper regulation of activation (16-20). When the amino-terminal
domain (Region I) is deleted,
54 can still bind RNA
polymerase and direct it to DNA (14, 21, 22). However, the bound
holoenzyme fails to respond to activator and form a stable open complex
that can initiate transcription. If stably or transiently melted DNA is
used, the holoenzyme with Region I deleted can produce transcripts,
showing that its catalytic activity is intact (14, 22). This transcript
is unusual in that it results from heparin-sensitive transcription, and
its production is not enhanced by the addition of activator, implying that the amino terminus of
54 contains essential
activator response determinants.
54 is closely implicated in polymerase
isomerization and DNA melting and is a major determinant of enhancer
responsiveness. Current models suggest that Region I contains
determinants for nucleating DNA melting, for inhibiting polymerase
isomerization, and for the interaction of holoenzyme with melted DNA
(14, 15, 22-24). Some properties of the holoenzyme that depend upon
Region I sequences likely rely upon the interaction that Region I makes with the core RNAP subunits (17); others may depend upon more direct
domain communication between Region I sequences and other parts of
54 and possibly DNA. The conformation of the
carboxyl-terminal
54 DNA-binding domain is changed in
the holoenzyme when Region I is deleted (25, 26), implying that Region
I contributes to the physical properties of the holoenzyme, some of
which involve sequences that are closely associated with the DNA
binding function of
54. In initial complexes that form
between holoenzyme and promoter DNA, the
54 contacts DNA
that is melted in open complexes (27-29), suggesting that the
54 DNA-binding domain may influence open complex formation.
54 and worked
with purified partial sigma sequences. We now show that the polymerase
isomerization that occurs when Region I sequences are deleted is
reversed by Region I added in trans and that inhibition of
isomerization requires a Region I-protein interaction. We also show
that Region I sequences in trans stabilize holoenzyme bound to melted DNA. Activator overcomes the inhibition caused by Region I
in trans in a reaction requiring NTP hydrolysis, providing a formal demonstration that the anti-inhibition function of the activator
occurs via its NTP hydrolysis activity. Transcription by the wild type
holoenzyme was inhibited in a noncompetitive manner when the holoenzyme
was challenged with Region I in trans, indicating that the
activator may interact with parts of the holoenzyme outside of Region I
for regulated stable open complex formation. The positive and negative
activities of Region I appear to be crucial for the ordered progression
from the closed complex to the open complex.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
54 protein
(amino acids 1-477) and
I
54 (amino acids 57-477)
were used to form holoenzymes (Fig. 1A). Purified
amino-terminal sequences of
54 (amino acids 1-56) were
obtained by overproducing an amino-terminal histidine-tagged fragment
as a soluble sequence in E. coli (Ref. 17; Fig.
1A). Purified E. coli core RNA polymerase was
from Epicentre Technologies. A purified carboxyl-terminal-deleted form of activator, PspF
HTH (31), was used in activation assays. Working
protein solutions and stocks were stored at
20 °C and
70 °C,
respectively, in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50% (v/v)
glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol
(TGED) containing 50-250 mM NaCl. Protein concentrations
were determined using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit.
at a 1:2 ratio) and activator
PspF
HTH (4 µM) and GTP (4 mM) where
needed. When used, Region I (2 µM) was added to the
reaction before holoenzyme assembly. Holoenzymes and DNA were incubated
for 10 min, and for activation assays, PspF
HTH and GTP were added
for an additional 10 min. S1 nuclease (700 units; Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) was added for 5 min before reactions were terminated by the
addition of 10 mM EDTA followed by rapid phenol extraction.
DNA was recovered by ethanol precipitation and run on 6% denaturing
polyacrylamide gels. Markers were generated by chemical cleavage of the
DNA with piperidine after partial methylation with dimethyl sulfate.
10 to
1 are mismatched (14). Typical
holoenzyme interactions were carried out in STA buffer. Holoenzyme
(core:
I
54 ratio, 1:2) was assembled at 30 °C for 5 min, and then heteroduplex DNA (16 nM) was added for
another 5 min, followed by glycerol bromphenol blue loading dye (final
concentration, 10% glycerol) and, if required, heparin (final
concentration, 100 µg/ml). Region I was added either before
holoenzyme assembly or for 5 min after formation of the
I
54-holoenzyme-DNA complex. Samples were then loaded
onto 4.5% native polyacrylamide gels to separate free DNA and bound
DNA that were detected by autoradiography. Quantitative data were
from phosphorimager analyses.
-32P]UTP. After 10 min, RNA was precipitated and
analyzed on 6% sequencing gels. Detection was by autoradiography and phosphorimaging.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
54 allowed the holoenzyme
to isomerize independently of the activator (14). The assay used
employed S1 nuclease footprinting of holoenzyme on linear DNA templates
containing the S. meliloti nifH promoter as the binding site
for the holoenzyme. The
54-holoenzyme showed a short
footprint from
33 to
5, whereas the
I
54-holoenzyme footprinted over and beyond the
transcription start site to +20. Activated
54-holoenzyme
showed a similar extended footprint, and differences between +8 and +20
could be related to the absence of Region I in the
I
54-holoenzyme. To determine whether the
conformational change in the holoenzyme resulting in the extended
footprint was reversible, we added Region I (amino acids 1-56) back
in trans to S1 footprint assays. Results in Fig.
1B show that the extended
footprint of
I
54-holoenzyme is lost when Region I is
added in trans, demonstrating that polymerase isomerization
can occur in a reversible manner.
54-Holoenzyme
footprints were essentially insensitive to Region I in trans
(lane 3 versus lane 4), but the
I
54-holoenzyme footprint changed (lane 5 versus
lane 6) upon addition of Region I (loss of * reactivity).
Footprints of
54- and
I
54-holoenzymes
in the presence of Region I were essentially the same (lanes
4 and 6). Controls showed that Region I alone did not
footprint the linear DNA (compare lane 2 and lane
7). Activated
54-holoenzyme is shown as a control
(lane 9 versus lane 8), as is the insensitivity of the
I
54-holoenzyme to activator (lanes 10 and
11). Presumably, activator-driven RNAP isomerization
normally involves the activator changing the Region
I-dependent interactions responsible for maintaining the inhibited state of the holoenzyme.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A, assay of K. pneumoniae
54 sequence is shown. Full-length
54
(residues 1-477) is divided into three regions (I-III)
based on sequence alignments (40). Purified K. pneumoniae
sigma sequences 1-477, 57-477, and 1-56 were used in this work (16,
17, 30). B, S1 nuclease footprints on linear DNA. The extent
of the holoenzyme footprint is indicated by a solid line.
The asterisk indicates the
10 cutting lost on holoenzyme
binding. The marker (M, lane 1) was a chemical
cleavage "G" reaction. 0 (lane 2), DNA alone
treated with S1 nuclease.
54- and
I
54-holoenzymes (E
54 and
E
I
54, respectively) were at 100 nM, DNA was at 1.6 nM, activator PspF
HTH was
at 4 µM, GTP was at 4 mM, and Region I was at
2 µM.
12 observed
with the wild type holoenzyme (23) was absent in footprints with
I
54-holoenzyme (30) but recovered after the addition
of Region I in trans (data not shown). Clearly, Region I is
responsible for interactions between holoenzyme and the
12 promoter
element detected with ortho-copper phenanthroline, and this
12 reactivity may be a signature of the inhibited state of the holoenzyme.
10 and
1 presenting stably melted
DNA sequences. Experimentally, the stability of holoenzyme complexes
with the melted DNA can be measured in a challenge assay in which
pre-bound complexes are formed and then heparin is added. Bound and
unbound labeled DNA are separated by native gel electrophoresis.
I
54-holoenzyme can bind stably to heteroduplex DNA in
a reaction inhibited by the addition of Region I in trans to
the holoenzyme before engagement with DNA (14). As suggested by the
results shown in Fig. 1B, inhibition by Region I could occur
by preventing polymerase isomerization and masking holoenzyme
single-strand DNA binding activity.
I
54-holoenzyme with purified Region I sequences and
with heteroduplex DNA. The number of
I
54-holoenzyme/heteroduplex DNA complexes surviving a
5-min heparin challenge was measured. We initially determined the
minimum amount of Region I (residues 1-56) needed to cause significant
inhibition of stable complex formation with 100 nM
holoenzyme and 16 nM DNA (Fig.
2A). We observed that 0.3 µM Region I caused a 40% reduction of heparin-resistant
complex formation. Keeping Region I (0.3 µM) and DNA
constant but increasing the amount of holoenzyme (0.1-0.5 µM), we observed that more stable complexes formed (Fig.
2B, lanes 2, 4, 7, 10, and 13). The
addition of extra Region I reversed this effect (lanes 5, 8, 11, and 14). This result suggests that the holoenzyme
is one target of Region I. Using 32P-labeled
I
54, we observed that increasing amounts of
heteroduplex DNA did not overcome the Region I-dependent
inhibition (data not shown), consistent with Region I interacting with
holoenzyme rather than the free heteroduplex DNA to achieve inhibition.
The 5-fold excess of Region I required for in trans
inhibition (compared with its normal in cis functioning) may
reflect the weak binding to the
I
54-holoenzyme or the
I
54-holoenzyme/DNA complex. Our experiments do not
establish which holoenzyme form (free or bound to DNA) is the target
for Region I-dependent inhibition of the activity required
for interaction with melted DNA.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Region I-dependent inhibition of
the
I
54-holoenzyme
stable complex on heteroduplex DNA. A, gel shift assays
were conducted with
I
54-holoenzyme (100 nM) and heteroduplex DNA (16 nM). Increasing
amounts of Region I were added before
I
54-holoenzyme
assembly. Holoenzyme-DNA complexes were challenged with heparin (100 µg/ml for 5 min) and loaded onto a native polyacrylamide gel. Bound
DNA and unbound DNA were separated, and the percentage of bound DNA was
quantified by phosphorimager analysis. B, gel shift assays
were conducted as described in A, but with the indicated
amounts of Region I and
I
54-holoenzyme.
I
54-holoenzyme on heteroduplex
DNA (14). We now find that stabilization is also afforded by Region I
sequences in trans when added once the
I
54-holoenzyme is bound to the DNA and can occur in a
nucleotide-independent manner. First, we determined the effect of
Region I concentrations on stable complex formation with 100 nM holoenzyme and 16 nM DNA (Fig.
3A) and observed that 2 µM Region I caused a 30% increment of heparin-resistant
complex formation. We also analyzed the decay with time of complexes
between heteroduplex DNA and
I
54-holoenzyme in a
heparin challenge experiment (Fig. 3B). Clearly, Region I
sequences added after DNA binding afford a stabilization (which is only
modestly increased by the initiating nucleotide GTP; data not shown).
Therefore, Region I sequences have a role in stabilizing the holoenzyme
at the promoter when the DNA is stably melted out, and this is of
potential significance for maintaining the open complex.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
A, stabilization of
I
54-holoenzyme heparin-resistant heteroduplex DNA
complexes by Region I is shown. Gel shift assays were conducted with
I
54-holoenzyme (100 nM) and heteroduplex
DNA (16 nM). Increasing amounts of Region I were added
after
I
54-holoenzyme-heteroduplex complexes were
formed. Holoenzyme-DNA complexes were challenged with heparin (100 µg/ml for 5 min) and loaded onto a native gel in which bound DNA and
unbound DNA were separated, and the percentage of bound DNA was
quantified by phosphorimager analysis. B, effect of Region I
on heparin stability. Gel shifts were conducted with
I
54-holoenzyme (100 nM) and heteroduplex
DNA (16 nM) in the absence of Region I (
) or Region I (2 µM) added either before holoenzyme assembly (
) or
after holoenzyme-DNA complex formation (
). Samples were taken before
(time 0) and after the addition of heparin for 1, 5, 10, and 20 min.
I
54-holoenzyme transcribes
independently of activator from stably or transiently melting DNA
templates containing
54 promoter sequences (14, 21, 22).
Using the S. meliloti nifH promoter on a supercoiled
plasmid, we showed that transcription by the
I
54-holoenzyme was inhibited by the addition of
Region I to the holoenzyme before the template and initiating
nucleotide GTP (Fig. 4, lanes 3 and 4). The presence of GTP is required to stabilize
the polymerase as an initiated complex before the heparin challenge,
and the addition of remaining nucleotides is required for transcript
elongation (compare lanes 1 and 3). Thus,
the effects of Region I on transcript formation are consistent with the
inhibition of polymerase isomerization and the binding of melted
DNA demonstrated above (Figs. 1-3).

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effect of Region I in trans upon transcription on supercoiled DNA.
I
54-holoenzyme (100 nM) alone or with 4 mM GTP was incubated with template DNA (10 nM;
pMKC28) before heparin challenge and the addition of the remaining NTPs
plus [
-32P]UTP. Region I (0.5 µM) was
added either before holoenzyme assembly or after formation of the
I
54-holoenzyme-DNA complex. Experiments were repeated
at least three times to enhance the reliability of the data.
I
54-holoenzyme did not result in stable complex
formation and transcription (Fig. 4, lanes 5 and
6), in contrast to the situation with pre-melted DNA (Ref.
14; Fig. 3A). It is likely that the DNA melting on the
supercoiled DNA is too transient and reversible to support this route
to transcript formation. The addition of Region I may also drive the
I
54-holoenzyme to the inhibited state (see Fig.
1B) within the time scale of the assay if the DNA does not
remain open. Pre-bound
I
54-holoenzyme in the presence
of GTP was largely insensitive to the subsequent addition of Region I
(Fig. 4, lanes 7 and 8), indicating that the
initiated complex is a state of the holoenzyme upon which Region I
exerts little effect. Typically, in replica experiments, Region I added
before DNA diminished transcription by 75%, whereas Region I added
once the
I
54-holoenzyme was bound to the DNA provoked
only a 25% reduction.
I
54-holoenzyme (Fig. 4), we investigated whether
activator protein PspF
HTH could overcome the inhibition and whether
this required NTP hydrolysis. We also investigated whether activator
and Region I in trans would allow the
I
54-holoenzyme to transcribe via a heparin stable
intermediate that would form independently of transcript initiation, as
is the case with the wild type holoenzyme (Fig.
5). Footprints (Fig. 1) indicated that
54-holoenzyme and
I
54-holoenzyme plus
Region I in trans were similar, inferring that
I
54-holoenzyme could form an activable closed complex
in the presence of Region I in trans. Bypass transcription
is characterized as requiring the polymerase to form one or more
phosphodiester bonds in the nascent transcript to establish
heparin-resistant initiated complexes (24, 33). However, activated
transcription results in the formation of a heparin stable open
promoter complex without phosphodiester bond formation (6). Because of
the complicating factor of activator hydrolyzing a nucleoside
triphosphate to drive open complex formation, we used different GTP
analogues to allow either activator function and RNA
phosphodiester bond formation (GTP), activator function (dGTP)
only, or phosphodiester bond formation (GTP
S or GMP-PNP) only.
We used GTP
S (or GMP-PNP; data not shown) elongation substrates with
a nonhydrolyzable
-
bond to explore activator NTP hydrolysis
requirements. We chose dGTP as a hydrolyzable nucleotide unable to
support transcription elongation rather than ATP or dideoxy GTP to stop
nonspecific initiation or inhibition of the subsequent transcript
elongation from the S. meliloti nifH promoter (data not
shown).

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The activator overcomes Region I
inhibition. Transcription assays were performed as described in
the Fig. 4 legend with both
54- and
I
54-holoenzymes using GTP, GTP
S, and dGTP for
hydrolysis by the activator and initiation of transcription, initiation
only, or activator hydrolysis only, respectively. Region I (0.5 µM) was added before holoenzyme assembly. Experiments
were repeated at least three times to enhance the reliability of the
data.
I
54-holoenzyme
and its inhibition by Region I added before DNA binding (lanes
1 and 2). The activator did not stimulate transcription by the
I
54-holoenzyme, but it did reproducibly
overcome a large fraction of the inhibition of bypass transcription
seen when Region I was added in trans (lanes 7 and 8). Controls with
54-holoenzyme showed
that GTP supported activator-dependent transcription (lane 13), and that Region I slightly inhibited activation
(lane 14).
S--
Activators of the
54
RNA polymerase must hydrolyze the
-
bond of a NTP to stimulate
the formation of open complexes (6). This is true for PspF
HTH and
the wild type holoenzyme at the nifH promoter because no
transcripts are detected when GTP
S replaces GTP (Fig. 5, lanes
15 and 13). However, bypass transcription occurs with
GTP
S and is unchanged by the presence of PspF
HTH (lanes 1, 3, and 9), confirming that it is the
activator involvement in open complex formation that correlates with
-
bond hydrolysis. To determine whether
-
bond hydrolysis
was needed for the activator-dependent relief of inhibition
caused by Region I, we conducted transcript assays using GTP
S.
Results showed that
-
bond hydrolysis was not needed for the
inhibitory effect of Region I upon bypass transcription (lanes
3 and 4), but that it was clearly needed for relief of inhibition by the activator (lanes 9 and 10 versus lanes 7 and 8). We conclude
that the anti-inhibition of Region I activity by the activator requires
NTP hydrolysis (lanes 9 and 10 versus lanes 7 and 8), as does formation of the open
complex (lanes 13 and 15).
HTH to form heparin stable open complexes (Fig. 5, lane
17), but dGTP does not support bypass transcription, as expected
from the selectivity of RNA polymerase (lanes 5, 6, 11, and
12). In these assays, heparin resistance must be established
before the addition of elongation substrates. Results confirm that
heparin resistance in bypass transcription requires phosphodiester bond
formation. The PspF
HTH and dGTP combination did not stimulate stable
complex formation by the
I
54-holoenzyme (lanes
5 and 11) or when Region I was in trans
(lanes 6 and 12). We attempted to form stable
activator-dependent noninitiated open complexes with the
I
54-holoenzyme plus Region I in trans
using different combinations of activators and promoters, but none
yielded any (data not shown). Region I in cis appears to be
necessary for the formation of a heparin stable noninitiated open
complex via the action of the activator.
HTH and dGTP to drive stable open complex
formation by the wild type holoenzyme, we sought an inhibitory effect
of Region I supplied in trans to measure the extent to which
providing extra activator would overcome the inhibition. Transcript
assays were conducted in which
54-holoenzyme was
pre-mixed with Region I and then added to template, after which
activator and dGTP were added. Results (Fig.
6) showed that Region I reduced the
activated transcript levels (see also Fig. 5, lanes 14 and
18). Plots of the levels of transcription in the presence
and absence of Region I as a function of increasing activator
concentration are shown in Fig. 6. The activator partially overcomes
the inhibitory effect of Region I but does not restore transcription to
the level obtained without Region I. Such behavior is consistent with a
noncompetitive inhibition by Region I. The inhibition of transcription
seen at a high activator concentration and in the presence of 0.5 or 1 µM Region I could mask relief of Region
I-dependent inhibition; however, the 2 µM
Region I data argue against this. Results suggest that Region I
in trans is not interacting directly with the activator to
cause inhibition, but that Region I is responsible for a conformational
change in the holoenzyme that stabilizes the inhibited state.
Lineweaver-Burk plots of PspF
HTH concentrations versus
transcripts levels were consistent with the inhibition being
noncompetitive (data not shown).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Activator and Region I interact
noncompetitively. Transcription assays were performed as described
in the Fig. 4 legend, but with
54-holoenzyme, dGTP (4 mM), and different concentrations of PspF
HTH in the
presence of 0.5 (
), 1 (
), and 2 µM (
) Region I
or in its absence (
).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
54 is pivotal in
establishing enhancer-dependent transcription in bacteria.
It has multiple roles and is strongly implicated in influencing the
activities of the sigma and its holoenzyme that likely work together
for the ordered progression from a closed complex to an open complex. These activities include DNA interactions in the closed complex that
involve the
12 promoter element (18-20, 22, 34, 35), the nucleation
of DNA melting and its associated fork junction binding by sigma (23,
36), the inhibition of polymerase isomerization (14), and an
interaction with core polymerase (17). Our results now show that
stabilization of
I
54-holoenzyme binding to melted DNA
is also assisted by Region I sequences. Although not yet directly
demonstrated, a stabilizing effect of Region I upon holoenzyme binding
to a transition state of the DNA along the melting pathway would lower
the activation energy for the strand separation process and increase
the rates of open complex formation. The inability to detect stable
open complex formation with holoenzymes lacking Region I may be
attributable in part to the absence of stabilizing effects of Region I
that help form and maintain the opened DNA.
12 promoter element (18-20, 22, 34, 35), and
because Region I stabilizes the holoenzyme on melted DNA, a Region
I-melted DNA interaction is possible. It is likely that the protein
and/or DNA interactions made by Region I are changed by the activator
to allow polymerase isomerization and DNA melting to occur. Overcoming
the inhibitory effects of Region I to allow polymerase isomerization
appears to be one role played by the activator and its associated NTP
hydrolysis. Because polymerase isomerization can be driven simply by
the removal of Region I and reversed by its addition in
trans, the energy costs appear to be modest for this step and can
be accounted for in terms of interactions that Region I makes within
the holoenzyme. For the
70-holoenzyme, the energy for
isomerization is suggested to be equivalent to burying a few
hydrophobic residues (37). Region I of
54 has many
leucine residues, some of which appear to be critical for keeping the
holoenzyme in the inhibited state and could similarly be involved in
isomerization (15, 24).
I
54. It is possible that the normal cis
configuration of Region I restricts some interactions and favors others
so that a sequential pathway for stable DNA melting can be followed.
Supplied in trans Region I may have additional freedom to
interact outside the normal reaction ordinate and thus fail to make
stable activator-dependent complexes with the
I
54-holoenzyme. It is possible that Region I in
trans cannot maintain a strained or stressed intermediate required
for DNA strand opening. Stress generated in
54 by Region
I may be transferred to DNA in a reaction that is part of the sequence
of events that leads to stable DNA opening, as appears to be the case
for the
70-holoenzyme (38).
54 has no obvious homologue among other
transcription factors, except for the fact that some others are also
glutamine-rich, it is clear that Region I can function as an isolated
domain to control RNAP activity. It is possible that the Region I
domain originated as a separate factor to control RNA polymerase
activity (it has positive and negative activities) and was recruited to
form part of
54, enabling tightly regulated
enhancer-dependent transcription.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-171-59-45442;
Fax: 44-171-594-5419; E-mail: m.buck@ic.ac.uk.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
S, guanosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate).
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Burgess, R.,
Travers, A.,
Dunn, J.,
and Bautz, E.
(1969)
Nature
221,
43-46[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Gross, C. A.,
Lonetto, M.,
and Losick, R.
(1992)
in
Transcriptional Regulation
(Yamamoto, K.
, and McKnight, S., eds)
, pp. 129-176, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
3.
Helmann, J. D.,
and Chamberlin, M. J.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
57,
839-872[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Lonetto, M.,
Gribskov, M.,
and Gross, C. A.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
3843-3849 5.
Morett, E.,
and Buck, M.
(1989)
J. Mol. Biol.
210,
65-77[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Popham, D.,
Szesto, D.,
Keener, J.,
and Kustu, S.
(1989)
Science
243,
629-635 7.
Sasse-Dwight, S.,
and Gralla, J. D.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
8934-8938 8.
Reitzer, L. J.,
and Magasanik, B.
(1986)
Cell
45,
785-792[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Austin, S.,
and Dixon, R. A.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
2219-2228[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Weiss, D. S.,
Batut, J.,
Klose, K. E.,
Keener, J.,
and Kustu, S.
(1991)
Cell
67,
155-167[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Hoover, T. R.,
Santero, E.,
Porter, S.,
and Kustu, S.
(1990)
Cell
63,
11-22[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Lee, J. H.,
and Hoover, T. R.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
9702-9706 13.
Su, W.,
Porter, S.,
Kustu, S.,
and Echols, H.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5504-5508 14.
Cannon, W.,
Gallegos, M.-T.,
Casaz, P.,
and Buck, M.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
357-370 15.
Wang, J. T.,
and Gralla, J. D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32707-32713 16.
Cannon, W. V.,
Chaney, M. K.,
Wang, X.-Y.,
and Buck, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5006-5011 17.
Gallegos, M. T.,
and Buck, M.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
288,
539-553[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Hsieh, M.,
and Gralla, J. D.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
239,
15-24[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Hsieh, M.,
Tintut, Y.,
and Gralla, J. D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
373-378 20.
Sasse-Dwight, S.,
and Gralla, J. D.
(1990)
Cell
62,
945-954[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Cannon, W.,
Chaney, M.,
and Buck, M.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
2478-2486 22.
Wang, J. T.,
Syed, A.,
and Gralla, J. D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
9538-9543 23.
Morris, L.,
Cannon, W.,
Claverie-Martin, F.,
Austin, S.,
and Buck, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
11563-11571 24.
Wang, J. T.,
Syed, A.,
Hsieh, M.,
and Gralla, J. D.
(1995)
Science
270,
992-994 25.
Casaz, P.,
and Buck, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
12145-12150 26.
Casaz, P.,
and Buck, M.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
285,
507-514[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Buck, M.,
and Cannon, W.
(1992)
Nature
358,
422-424[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Cannon, W.,
Claverie-Martin, F.,
Austin, S.,
and Buck, M.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
11,
227-236[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Cannon, W.,
Austin, S.,
Moore, M.,
and Buck, M.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
351-356 30.
Cannon, W.,
Missailidis, S.,
Smith, C.,
Cottier, A.,
Austin, S.,
Moore, M.,
and Buck, M.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
248,
781-803[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Jovanovic, G.,
Weiner, L.,
and Model, P.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
1936-1945 32.
Wang, X.-Y.,
Kolb, A.,
Cannon, W.,
and Buck, M.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3478-3485 33.
Syed, A.,
and Gralla, J. D.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
5619-5625 34.
Wong, C.,
Tintut, Y.,
and Gralla, J. D.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
236,
81-90[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Wang, L.,
and Gralla, J. D.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
5626-5631 36.
Guo, Y.,
and Gralla, J. D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
11655-11660 37.
deHaseth, P. L.,
Zupancic, M. L.,
and Record, T.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
3019-3025 38.
Buckle, M.,
Pemberton, I. K.,
Jacquet, M. A.,
and Buc, H.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
285,
955-964[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Archambault, J.,
and Friesen, J. D.
(1993)
Microbiol. Rev.
57,
703-724 40.
Merrick, M. J.
(1993)
Mol. Microbiol.
10,
903-909[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. E. Dago, S. R. Wigneshweraraj, M. Buck, and E. Morett A Role for the Conserved GAFTGA Motif of AAA+ Transcription Activators in Sensing Promoter DNA Conformation J. Biol. Chem., January 12, 2007; 282(2): 1087 - 1097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Cannon, S. R. Wigneshweraraj, and M. Buck Interactions of regulated and deregulated forms of the {sigma}54 holoenzyme with heteroduplex promoter DNA Nucleic Acids Res., February 15, 2002; 30(4): 886 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chaney, R. Grande, S. R. Wigneshweraraj, W. Cannon, P. Casaz, M.-T. Gallegos, J. Schumacher, S. Jones, S. Elderkin, A. E. Dago, et al. Binding of transcriptional activators to sigma 54 in the presence of the transition state analog ADP-aluminum fluoride: insights into activator mechanochemical action Genes & Dev., September 1, 2001; 15(17): 2282 - 2294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Wigneshweraraj, A. Ishihama, and M. Buck In vitro roles of invariant helix-turn-helix motif residue R383 in {{sigma}}54 ({{sigma}}N) Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2001; 29(5): 1163 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Kelly, J. A. Ferguson III, and T. R. Hoover Transcription Initiation-Defective Forms of sigma 54 That Differ in Ability To Function with a Heteroduplex DNA Template J. Bacteriol., November 15, 2000; 182(22): 6503 - 6508. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pitt, M.-T. Gallegos, and M. Buck Single amino acid substitution mutants of Klebsiella pneumoniae {sigma}54 defective in transcription Nucleic Acids Res., November 15, 2000; 28(22): 4419 - 4427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|