JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benuck, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Childs, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benuck, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Childs, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 36, 25419-25425, September 3, 1999


Mutations That Increase Acidity Enhance the Transcriptional Activity of the Glutamine-rich Activation Domain in Stage-specific Activator Protein*

Mitchel L. BenuckDagger , Zhe Li, and Geoffrey Childs§

From the Department of Molecular Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Sea urchin stage-specific activator protein (SSAP) activates transcription of the late H1 gene at the mid-blastula stage of development. Its C-terminal 202 amino acids form a potent glycine/glutamine rich activation domain (GQ domain) that can transactivate reporter genes to levels 5-fold higher than VP16 in several mammalian cell lines. We observed that, unlike other glutamine-rich activation domains, the GQ domain activates transcription to moderate levels in yeast. We utilized this activity to screen in yeast for intragenic mutations that enhance or inhibit the transcriptional activity of the GQ domain. We identified 37 loss of function and 23 gain of function mutants. Most gain of function mutations increased the acidity of the domain. The most frequently isolated mutations conferred enhanced transcriptional activity when assayed in mammalian cells. These mutations also enhance the ability of SSAP to up-regulate the late H1 promoter in sea urchin embryos. We conclude that the GQ domain fundamentally differs from other glutamine-rich activators and may share some properties of acidic activators. The ability of acidity to enhance SSAP-mediated transcription may reflect a mechanism by which phosphorylation of SSAP activates late H1 gene transcription during embryogenesis.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Correct spatial and temporal control of gene expression requires the organized recruitment of dozens of polypeptides to the promoters of individual genes. Transcriptional activators make up one brigade of this molecular army (1). These proteins typically contain a transcriptional activation domain, separable from the DNA-binding domain, which confers upon it the ability to up-regulate its target genes. A functionally accurate grouping of this brigade into divisions and subdivisions has escaped investigators for years. The lack of discrete, conserved structural elements between different activation domains has bred instead a loose classification scheme based upon overall amino acid content. The major families include acidic activators, such as Gal4 (2) and VP16 (3), glutamine-rich activators, such as Sp1 (4), proline-rich activators, such as CTF1 (5), and basic activators, such as that in T3Ra (6). Most evidence suggests that activation domains exist under physiological conditions as unstructured, sticky polypeptide chains (Ref. 7; reviewed in Ref. 1). Their job entails establishing protein-protein interactions with components of the basal transcription machinery, either directly or via coactivators and mediator proteins, and thereby stimulating any of several steps in the complicated pathways of transcription initiation or elongation (reviewed in Ref. 8).

At the level of amino acid sequence, the motifs or characteristics that confer these biological activities upon a polypeptide remain elusive. Initial mutagenesis studies on the acidic Gal4 domain implicated acidity as an overall biochemical property that confers activation potential upon a polypeptide (9, 10). However, subsequent studies suggested that other, nonacidic residues in acidic domains may contribute to the induction of secondary structure upon protein binding. In particular, the periodic spacing of hydrophobic residues in VP16 (11, 12) and other acidic domains (13, 14) led to the hypothesis that binding of an activator to its partner may induce an alpha -helical structure that, in turn, stabilizes the interaction. For at least one acidic activator, this has been shown to be the case: the acidic domain of CREB assumes an alpha -helical conformation upon binding to its in vivo interacting partner CBP (15). A similar controversy exists with respect to the glutamine-rich activators. Whereas individual glutamine residues themselves appear to lack critical significance, periodic spacing of hydrophobic residues seems to be important for activation mediated by these proteins as well (16). Some activities of transcription factors have even been mimicked by synthetic synthesis of polypeptide chains (17), suggesting that perhaps the only property necessary for a domain to function in activated transcription is the ability to bind to a general transcription factor (8). In all cases, however, the attributes that distinguish an activation domain from a random polypeptide remain to be determined.

Stage-specific activator protein (SSAP)1 is a sea urchin transcription factor responsible for the developmental activation of the late H1 histone gene at the mid-blastula stage of embryogenesis (18). In vivo, this protein binds as a dimer to three sites in a stage-specific enhancer 300 bases upstream of the late H1 transcription initiation site (19). Functional analysis revealed that the SSAP mRNA encodes a 41-kDa protein composed of two separable domains (20, 46). The N-terminal 180 amino acids make up the sequence-specific DNA-binding domain of SSAP and are sufficient to target the protein to its native binding site. The C-terminal 202 amino acids form a glycine-glutamine rich domain, the GQ domain, which shares homology with the glutamine-rich activation domains of the EWS and TLS proteins. When fused to the heterologous DNA-binding domain of Gal4, the GQ domain can activate transcription in several mammalian cell lines to levels 5-fold higher than VP16 (21), the standard benchmark for potent transcriptional activation. Deletion analysis indicates that SSAP requires most, if not all, of its amino acid sequence to function as an activator. We reasoned that this strict sequence requirement might indicate that the primary amino acid sequence of SSAP encodes highly specific motifs that function in concert as requisite determinants of transcriptional activity.

In this study, we address the question of what amino acid requirements exist for transcriptional activity of the GQ domain using random mutagenesis. Using a yeast one-hybrid-based functional screen, we identified 37 loss of function and 23 gain of function mutants to the GQ domain, as defined by their ability to activate transcription to levels below or above wild type, respectively. Most gain of function mutations increased the acidity of the domain and localize to the C-terminal half of the domain. Several of these mutants confer enhanced transcriptional activity upon the GQ domain in mammalian cells as well. Finally, we show that these mutations to the GQ domain enhance its ability to up-regulate the sea urchin late H1 promoter in vivo. We conclude that the glutamine-rich domain of SSAP fundamentally differs from other glutamine-rich activators. We suggest that the property of acidity in enhancing transcriptional activity may reflect a mechanism by which phosphorylation of SSAP temporally activates transcription of the late H1 gene during embryogenesis.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Whole Plasmid Mutagenesis-- To generate a library of GQ domain mutants, 20 ng of plasmid pBTM116-GQC (22) was transformed into Escherichia coli XL1-Red (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's instructions. 200 µl of the transformation was plated on LB/Amp plates and allowed to grow for 24 h. 10 ml of LB broth was swirled over the plate, decanted to a tube, and allowed to grow overnight at 37 °C. DNA was prepared from this culture using standard procedures (23) and represented the mutant library.

PCR Mutagenesis-- Primer design and mutagenesis were based on the methods of Lehming et al. (24). To generate mutant GQ fragments, primers 5'-TGACGAAGTTACCGTTAAGCG-3' and 5'-TGTGGTCAATAAGAGCGACC-3' were used to amplify a 1089-base pair fragment from pBTM116-GQC that encompassed the entire GQ domain as an EcoRI fragment along with regions of overlap with the wild type plasmid both 5' and 3' to the EcoRI sites. PCR conditions were essentially those of Cadwell and Joyce (25) with minor modifications. Mutagenic PCRs were set up in a total volume of 100 ml containing 1 ng of pBTM116, 20 pg of each primer, 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM MnCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM each dNTP, and 2.5 units of Taq polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). After an initial denaturing step of 94 °C for 3 min, PCR was performed for 30 cycles as follows: 94 °C for 1 min, 45 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 2 min. This protocol was estimated to produce approximately three base pair changes per insert.

Yeast Transformations and Selection of Mutants-- Transformation of L40 yeast was performed using the lithium acetate method (26, 27). 100 ml of competent L40 cells was mixed with either 2 µof g mutagenized pBTM116-GQC DNA or, in the case of gap repair mutagenesis, 2 mg of EcoRI-cut pBTM116 and 800 ng of PCR product added directly from the PCR. For screening, transformations were plated on 150-mm plates containing selective medium lacking Trp at an average density of ~5 × 103 colonies/plate to select initially for the presence of the plasmid. Colonies formed after 3 days of growth.

Selection for mutant plasmids was performed using one of two methods. In the case of whole plasmid mutagenesis, colonies were lifted to nitrocellulose and assayed for beta -galactosidase activity using a filter assay (28). Colonies that turned either dark blue or white were picked from the parent plate to fresh selective plates lacking Trp for propagation of the candidate plasmid. Plasmids were isolated and retransformed to confirm the phenotype. The EcoRI fragment containing the GQ domain was then excised from the candidate plasmid and subcloned into fresh EcoRI-cut pBTM116, and this new plasmid was then retransformed to confirm that the mutation(s) occurred within the GQ domain. Plasmids retaining the mutant phenotype after subcloning of the insert were sequenced to identify the mutations.

In the case of gap repair mutagenesis, after 3 days of growth on selective plates lacking Trp colonies were replica-plated to new 150-mm plates lacking Ura, Trp, His, and Lys but containing 50, 20, and 0 mM 3-aminotriazole (3-AT). Colonies were grown in the selection medium for 5 days. Colonies that either grew at 50 mM 3-AT or failed to grow at 20 mM 3-AT but grew in less stringent conditions were picked to fresh plates as above. Isolated plasmids were retransformed to confirm the mutant phenotype. The entire GQ domain of the mutant plasmids was then sequenced to identify the mutations.

beta -Galactosidase Quantitation-- Yeast extracts were prepared from saturated 10-ml cultures as described (29). 100 µl of extract was added to 900 µl of Z buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.27% beta -mercaptoethanol). 200 µl of 4 mg/ml of o-nitrophenyl-beta -D-galactopyranoside in Z buffer was added to start the reaction, and tubes were incubated at 30 °C for color development until a pale yellow color was visible. Reactions were stopped by adding 0.5 ml of 1 M Na2CO3. A420 values were taken and normalized against the protein concentration of individual extracts.

Mammalian Cell Culture, Transfection, and Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase (CAT) Assays-- HepG2 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.). Gal4-GQ fusion plasmids were prepared by subcloning the EcoRI fragment from pBTM116-GQ plasmids into the EcoRI site of pSG424. pSG424-GQ plasmids were then purified using the Wizard Maxiprep kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA mixtures for transfection contained 2 µg of the indicated CAT reporter plasmid and 1 µg of pGK-beta -galactosidase control plasmid. pIBI31 (IBI) was used as carrier DNA when necessary to make sure that each transfection mixture contained the same amount of total DNA. Cells were transfected using the Lipofectin lipid transfection reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.) as described by the manufacturer, except that 2 h prior to transfection, the media was replaced with 2.5 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum. DNA-Lipofectin mixtures were prepared in serum-free Opti-MEM. After incubation at 37 °C for 7 h, the transfection mixture was replaced with normal medium. Cells were harvested at 48 h posttransfection and lysed by freeze-thaw treatment (21). Transfection efficiencies were normalized among all samples according to beta -galactosidase activity expressed from the control plasmid. Normalized extracts were then used in CAT assays as described previously (30). Detection of CAT activity was accomplished by exposing the chromatography plates from the CAT assays on a Phosphor storage screen (Molecular Dynamics), scanning the screen using a Molecular Dynamics STORM system and quantitating the samples using ImageQuant version 1.2 for Macintosh.

Western Blots-- To check the expression of GQ domain GOF mutants in transfected HepG2 cells, normalized extracts from samples used in CAT assays were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (Millipore) using a Bio-Rad semidry transfer apparatus. GQ domain expression was detected using anti-bacterially expressed SSAP antibodies affinity purified against bacterially expressed LexA-GQ.

Microinjection of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus-- The procedure used to inject S. purpuratus zygotes was essentially that of McMahon et al. (31) and Colin (32) and exactly as described by Lai et al. (33). Templates for capped mRNA synthesis were prepared by PCR using pGC391 as a template, a 5' T7 primer, and the following three 3' primers: 1) for wild type SSAP, 5'-TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTATTATCGACTGTACGGATGG; 2) for R382L, 5'-TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTATTATAGACTGTACGGATGG; and 3) for K369Estop, 5'-TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTATTACTCGCCGTAGTTGTTGG. Capped mRNA was synthesized in vitro using the mMessage mMachineTM T7 polymerase kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Microinjection mixtures contained 30 ng/ml mRNA and 20 ng/ml reporter in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated deionized distilled sterile water. Embryos were harvested at 16 h postfertilization, and CAT assays were performed on embryo extracts as described (30).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Glutamine-rich Activation Domain of SSAP Activates Transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae-- All glutamine-rich activation domains studied to date fail to activate transcription from integrated reporter genes in the yeast S. cerevisiae (34, 35). Glutamine residues make up 21% (42 of 202) of the GQ domain, solidly supporting its classification as a glutamine-rich domain. Surprisingly, our laboratory has observed that the GQ domain can, in fact, activate transcription in S. cerevisiae to moderate levels (22). The L40 yeast two-hybrid strain, in which these observations were recorded, harbors integrated LexA-driven HIS3 and LacZ reporter genes. Wild type L40 is a histidine auxotroph and produces white-colored colonies on media containing histidine and X-gal in the growth media. L40 colonies transformed with plasmid pBTM116-GQC, which encodes a LexA-GQ fusion protein driven by the yeast ADH1 promoter, become His+ and form light blue colonies in the presence of X-gal. We characterized the growth phenotype of the transformants in the presence of varying concentrations of 3-AT, a HIS3 inhibitor. Colonies maintained a wild type growth rate in the presence of 3-AT concentrations as high as 20 mM. Growth was inhibited noticeably as 3-AT concentrations exceeded 20 mM. In 3-AT concentrations of 40 mM, no growth was observed after a 6-day incubation at 30 °C. This demonstrates that the GQ domain, when fused to the LexA DNA-binding domain, stimulates transcription of LexA-driven integrated reporter genes in yeast to moderate levels and distinguishes it from other previously characterized glutamine-rich domains.

Mutagenesis of the GQ Domain-- We took advantage of the phenotypes described above to perform a functional screen for mutants that positively or negatively affect the ability of the GQ domain to mediate transcriptional activation (Fig. 1). We randomly mutagenized the GQ domain using, in separate experiments, whole plasmid or PCR mutagenesis (see under "Experimental Procedures"). Mutant plasmids, or mutant fragments in conjunction with linearized pBTM116, were transformed into L40 yeast and plated on histidine-containing media. After 3 days, transformants were replica-plated to HIS- plates containing 0, 20, and 50 mM 3-AT. Gain of function mutants were defined by their ability to grow at 50 mM 3-AT, whereas loss of function mutants were defined by their inability to form colonies at 20 mM 3-AT. The mutant phenotypes were subsequently confirmed using the second measure of beta -galactosidase expression via a blue-white filter assay. The GQ domain from each mutant was manually sequenced to identify the sequence alterations.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Screening strategy for mutations that affect the transcriptional activity of the GQ domain in yeast. To the left of the figure are schematic illustrations of the reporter genes used for the screen. Both the HIS3 and LacZ genes contain multimerized LexA binding sites upstream of the transcription site. LexA-GQ can bind to these sites and activate transcription, allowing yeast to grow at 20 mM but not 50 mM 3-AT. This phenotype was used to detect yeast colonies that either failed to grow at 20 mM 3-AT or that succeeded in forming a colony even at 50 mM 3-AT. Alternatively, blue-white filter assays were used to detect colonies that, in a beta -galactosidase assay using X-gal as a substrate, turned either dark blue relative to the wild type or white.

Using these methods, 37 loss of function mutants and 23 gain of function mutants were isolated. Of the 37 loss of function mutants, 13 were identified in the whole plasmid mutagenesis screen, and 24 in the PCR mutagenesis screen. All 37 contained +1 or -1 frameshifts, leading to missense reads and premature truncation of the protein. The most distal frameshift isolated was at position 310 (see Fig. 2 for GQ amino acid sequence). Thus, amino acids between 310 and 382 contain residues critical for GQ-mediated transcription in S. cerevisiae. This is consistent with our previous findings in mammalian cell culture studies that amino acids 181-290 of SSAP fused to a Gal4(1-147) DNA-binding domain have no transcriptional activity and that truncation of the C-terminal 30 amino acids of the GQ domain at amino acid 352 severely cripples its ability to transactivate reporter genes (21).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Distribution of mutations identified in GQ domain sequences that conferred gain of function in the ability of the GQ domain to transactivate targeted reporter genes. The numbered sequence at the bottom of each row is the amino acid sequence of the wild type GQ domain. The numbering scheme, from 181 to 382, corresponds to the position of the amino acids within the context of full-length SSAP, a 382-amino acid protein. All mutations causing alterations in the amino acid sequence are identified by indicating above the wild type sequence which amino acid has been substituted. This distribution shows the two "hot spots" for mutation at Lys-369 and Arg-382, two basic residues in the C terminus. No distinction is made in this figure between mutations that were isolated as single events and mutations that were isolated in conjunction with other changes; for the description of isolated mutants, refer to Table I.

Acidic Mutations Enhance the Transcriptional Activity of the GQ Domain-- Table I lists the twenty-three gain of function mutants, termed GOF 1-23, and the amino acid substitutions that result from the identified DNA base changes. Unexpectedly, we isolated four mutants (GOFs 5, 20, 22, and 23) encoding truncated forms of the GQ domain as gain of function mutants. GOF 5 and GOF 20 contained an A right-arrow T transition that introduced a stop codon at residue Lys-369, whereas GOF 22 and GOF 23 contained a C right-arrow T transversion that similarly introduced a stop codon at residue Arg-382. The isolation of these mutations, and of GOF 23 in particular, which contains the deletion as the only mutation in its sequence, argues that the final 14 amino acids of the GQ domain are dispensable for full transcriptional activity. Furthermore, the identification of this deletion in a gain of function screen suggests that residues between amino acids 369 and 382 may negatively modulate its transcriptional activity, possibly through the three basic residues situated in this region (see below).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Mutants that increase the transcriptional activity of the GQ domain in yeast
Plasmids encoding LexA-GQ fusion proteins were isolated from yeast colonies that demonstrated, based upon growth phenotypes and blue-white color assays, increased LexA-GQ driven expression of HIS3 and LacZ reporter genes. The entire GQ domain of these plasmids was sequenced, and the amino acid changes resulting from the alterations in each individual DNA sequence are listed below. The mutants are named GOF, for gain of function, and numbered 1-23.

Lys-369 and Arg-382, the targets of the mutations described above, also distinguish themselves as the most frequent targets of missense mutations (Fig. 2). Overall, six mutants (GOFs 1-6) carried a K369E substitution, whereas three others (GOFs 17-19) contained a R382L substitution. These mutations and the nonsense mutations described above all eliminate basic residues, and, in the case of the K369E mutation, replace them with an acidic residue. Overall, 19 of the 23 gain of function mutants introduced a negative charge and/or eliminated a positive charge, thereby increasing the acidity of the domain. These results, achieved in the context of a glutamine-rich domain, parallel the results obtained when similar studies were performed upon the acidic activation domains of Gal4 and VP16. These results suggest that in addition to its sequence identification as a glutamine-rich activator, SSAP shares mechanistic similarities with acidic activators that are enhanced by the introduction of acidity to its domain. These properties of the GQ domain, in turn, may account for its transcriptional activity in S. cerevisiae.

We quantified the relative effects of several mutants in yeast extracts using liquid beta -galactosidase assays. This assay indicates that the mutants confer a 2-11-fold increase in transcriptional activity (Fig. 3). More mutations were identified closer to the C terminus of the protein, and overall, these mutations show more significant effects when assayed in isolation. The K369E mutation and the R382L mutation each conferred a 4-fold increase in activity in the absence of other mutations. The combination of multiple acidic mutations appears to have an additive effect on the fold enhancement (compare, for example, GOF 1 and GOF 5, or GOF 17 and GOF 19). Western blots of yeast extracts show that all the mutant proteins are expressed in roughly equal amounts relative to wild type (data not shown). Furthermore, our screen yielded no false positives; all gain of function mutants isolated in the screen contained, upon sequencing, base changes that altered the predicted amino acid sequence of the encoded protein. This suggests that enhanced transcription of reporter genes is indeed attributable to the altered amino acid(s) and not simply to expression levels. Some of the mutations generate relatively small enhancements (for example, GOF7 and GOF15); because of this, we cannot exclude the possibility that some small increases may result from a position effect. Clearly, the generally larger effects and the overall trend of acidic mutations support the hypothesis that acidity increases the activity of the GQ domain.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Quantitation of transcriptional activity by gain of function mutants in yeast. Quantitation was performed using liquid beta -galactosidase assays. For each set of extracts, the transcriptional activity of the wild type domain was set as 1, and all other values are expressed as relative values to the wild type level. All quantitations were performed in triplicate, and the error bars indicate the S.D. of triplicate values to either side of the mean.

GQ Domain Gain of Function Mutants Enhance Activated Transcription via a Conserved Mechanism-- We next investigated whether the mutations we isolated function via a conserved mechanism by testing the ability of our gain of function mutants to enhance transcription of reporter genes in HepG2 cells. Fragments containing the indicated mutations were subcloned into pSG424, allowing expression of mutant GQ domains as Gal4(1-147) fusion proteins. Equal amounts of wild type or mutant DNA were cotransfected with CAT reporter genes containing one (G1E4CAT) or five (G5E4CAT) Gal4 binding sites upstream of the adenovirus E4T promoter (36). We observed that GOF 5, 6, 15, and 17 all increased transcription in HepG2 cells from the G1E4CAT reporter (Fig. 4A). The R382L mutation alone (GOF 17) conferred a 3.7-fold increase over wild type levels, comparable to the effect observed in yeast. GOF 15, a weaker set of mutations in yeast, also retained its ability to enhance transcription. GOF 5 and GOF 6, both of which contain the K369E mutation, increased transcription by 2.7- and 1.5-fold, respectively. Both of these values represent significant drops with respect to the fold activity observed in yeast, but still reflect a gain of function. The difference between them can, as in yeast, be attributed to the presence of other acidic mutations and/or the Arg-382 deletion mutation present in GOF 5 but absent in GOF 6. Western blots show that in mammalian cells, as in yeast, the proteins are expressed at equal levels (Fig. 4B). The ability of these mutations to enhance transcription in mammalian cells as well confirms that the mutants isolated accelerate a conserved step(s) in the pathway toward activated transcription.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Quantitation of transcriptional activity by gain of function mutants in HepG2 cells. A, activity of the indicated mutants when assayed for transcription from the G1E4CAT reporter. This promoter contains a single binding site for the Gal4(1-147) DNA-binding domain, used in these experiments to target the GQ domain to the promoter. For each set of transfections, the transcriptional activity of the wild type Gal4(1-147)-GQ protein was considered to be 1, and the activities of the mutants were calculated relative to this value. B, activity of the indicated mutants when assayed, following transfection of the indicated quantity of DNA, for transcription from the G5E4CAT reporter, which contains five Gal4 binding sites. For each set of transfections, the transcriptional activity of the wild type protein following transfection of 10 ng of DNA was considered to be 1, and all other values were calculated relative to this value. All transfections were performed in triplicate, and the error bars indicate the S.D. of triplicate values to either side of the mean. C, Western blot of transfected HepG2 extracts probed with anti-bSSAP antibodies to detect Gal4(1-147)-GQ fusion proteins. The lower set of bands, comparing GOF 6 to Gal4-GQ, represents data from a second blot, and the corresponding wild type band from that blot is shown to facilitate the comparison.

When activating transcription from a promoter containing two or more binding sites, the GQ domain exhibits synergistic activation of transcription (37). The mechanisms governing synergistic activation are at least partially distinct from those involving only a single activation domain. We asked whether the same mutants conferred gain of function when transcribing from a promoter containing five binding sites. No mutant tested conferred any significant gain of function upon the G5E4CAT promoter in this assay (Fig. 4C and data not shown). This may simply indicate that under conditions of synergy, the promoter has already achieved maximal activation by SSAP. Alternatively, the synergy of multiple domains may enhance precisely those steps of activation enhanced by the mutations, thereby obscuring their effect in this context.

GQ Domain Gain of Function Mutants Enhance Activated Transcription of the Late H1 Promoter in Sea Urchins-- We then turned our attention to the mechanism by which SSAP activates transcription of the late H1 promoter in vivo. Our laboratory has demonstrated that activation of transcription from this promoter requires a phosphorylation event on threonine 339, 341, or 343 of the GQ domain of SSAP (46). From a biochemical perspective, the mutations isolated in this screen invite an intriguing comparison to phosphorylation. The K369E mutations, by introduction of a glutamic acid, partially mimic the introduction of a phosphorylated residue at that position. The R382L mutation eliminates a positively charged residue, similarly decreasing the charge of the domain. We therefore tested whether these mutations stimulate transcription mediated by full-length SSAP from its native binding site in sea urchins.

Using appropriately designed PCR primers, we introduced mutations in the C-terminal region of full-length SSAP. The first primer introduced the R382L mutation. The second contained the K369E mutation followed by a stop codon, essentially combining the substitution with the deletion of residues 370-382. As a control, we used a similarly designed primer to amplify the wild type SSAP sequence. This helped confirm that the mRNA could be properly translated without the 3' untranslated region of the native transcript.

Equal amounts of capped wild type or mutant mRNA were coinjected into fertilized S. purpuratus eggs along with pGC364 (Fig. 5A). This construct responds to microinjected SSAP mRNA in a temporal pattern identical to that of the native late H1 promoter (20). Embryos were harvested at 16 h of development, when transcription of the late H1 gene is at maximal levels, and CAT assays were performed. The results of this experiment are shown in Fig. 5B. In this experiment, wild type SSAP enhanced activity of the late H1 reporter construct by 1.7-fold. This value is slightly below, but within range of, the 2-fold increase we usually observe for microinjection of full-length SSAP mRNA in S. purpuratus eggs. In comparison, the R382L and K369Edel mutations increased transcription by 3.1- and 2.8-fold, respectively; alternatively stated, they conferred gain of function of 82 and 65% relative to wild type levels of transcription. It is important to note that these measurements, both for wild type and mutant SSAP transcripts, were all recorded in the presence of endogenous wild type SSAP activity. Thus, these values probably underestimate the true effect of these mutations in vivo. We conclude that acidic mutations do enhance the activity of the GQ domain in vivo and that these mutations reflect a physiologically meaningful aspect of transcriptional activation by SSAP.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Quantitation of transcriptional activity by gain of function mutants in sea urchins. A, diagram of the sea urchin late H1 promoter construct pGC364 used in this experiment. The promoter contains the full late H1 enhancer, which contains three binding sites for SSAP, upstream of the late H1 basal promoter. The construct also contains three additional SSAP-binding sites downstream of an SV40 poly(A) splice site. In this construct, the promoter directs transcription of the CAT reporter gene. B, activity of the indicated mutants when assayed for transcription from the pGC364 reporter. For each series of injections, all four mRNA samples were injected using the same batch of eggs. For each series, the endogenous activity of the reporter was defined as 1, and all other levels indicate relative activity to that of the reporter. Error bars indicate the S.D. of triplicate values to either side of the mean.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study, we mutagenized the glutamine-rich transactivation domain (GQ domain) of the sea urchin transcription factor SSAP in search of amino acid motifs critical for, or characteristic of, the ability of this domain to activate transcription. Several observations we have made, in both this and previous studies, argue that the GQ domain fundamentally differs from the classical glutamine-rich domains of Sp1, Oct1, and others previously described. First, the GQ domain activates transcription in S. cerevisiae. Several studies have documented the inability of classical glutamine-rich activators to activate transcription in yeast (34, 35). A few recent studies have led to modifications of this generalization. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, unlike in S. cerevisiae, glutamine-rich activators function comparably to their acidic and proline-rich counterparts (38). Even in S. cerevisiae, glutamine-rich activators have recently been reported to efficiently activate transcription from vector-based reporter genes (39). In any case, the GQ domain appears to be a unique example of a "glutamine-rich" activator that stimulates transcription of integrated yeast genes.

Second, GQ-mediated transcriptional activation requires nearly all of its 202 amino acids to function. Our study identified loss of function mutations that truncate the protein after amino acid 310. Previous deletion studies of SSAP, assayed using HeLa cells, have shown that truncations at residue 352 leave a crippled activation domain with activities less than 1% of wild type (21). However, the deleted residues do not independently account for the lost activity; a Gal4 fusion construct with GQ domain residues 291-382 is no more active than that containing residues 181-352 (21). Taken together, these results suggest that SSAP requires a minimal region of 187 amino acids for at least wild type function. In stark contrast, the domains of most other activation domains are modular in structure and require very short segments of the parent protein to retain activation function. Reiterated 18-amino acid segments of the Sp1 domain can effectively reconstitute wild type activity (40). A five-amino acid motif of VP16 can similarly activate transcription when reiterated as few as four times (41). This unusual length requirement of the GQ domain may suggest a higher order structural requirement for activation by SSAP.

Third, the ability of acidic residues to enhance activity suggests more mechanistic similarity with acidic domains than with glutamine-rich domains. Close inspection of the normal SSAP sequence fails to reveal any acidic motifs in the GQ domain; indeed, only 6 out of 202 residues are aspartic or glutamic acid. Yet acidic substitutions throughout the domain manage to enhance its transcriptional activity. The panel of mutations isolated in this screen closely parallels the assortment of acidic mutations isolated in previous yeast screens for mutations to acidic domains (see, e.g. Ref. 9). One possible interpretation of this finding might suggest that these mutations reflect the bias of the yeast system toward acidic activators over glutamine-rich activators and that these mutations represent the artifactual consequence of this bias. However, the fact that the wild type GQ domain activates transcription in yeast suggests that the enhancements to transcription conferred by mutations reflect enhancements the natural ability of this domain to mediate transcriptional activation. It is unlikely that these substitutions, in the context of the GQ domain, artificially introduce a new mechanism through which the GQ domain can now activate transcription in addition to its preexisting one(s). Additionally, the ability of several mutations to enhance GQ domain function in mammalian cells and sea urchins supports the argument that this battery of mutations, although initially isolated in a yeast screen, bears physiological relevance for the activity of the GQ domain in its natural context.

Fourth, the ability of the potent GQ domain to synergistically activate transcription to maximal levels when present in multiple copies at the promoter is a property more characteristic of acidic domains. Synergy results from the ability of a given activator to accelerate multiple steps of preinitiation complex assembly and/or processivity of full-length transcripts (42). Both acidic and glutamine-rich domains can synergistically activate transcription when present in multiple copies on a promoter. However, generally speaking, acidic activators are significantly more potent in this context and saturate a given promoter at lower copy number than do glutamine-rich activators. For example, Gal4-VP16 saturates its promoter when bound to five sites, and addition of more Gal4 sites fails to activate transcription any further (43). In our case, the failure of gain of function mutants to enhance transcriptional activity in the context of five binding sites suggests that the promoter is indeed saturated. Experiments by DeFalco (37) show that indeed, Gal4-GQ approaches saturating levels of transcription from a promoter with only two Gal4 binding sites, and the progression toward saturation with increasing numbers of binding sites is nearly identical to that of Gal4-VP16 in the same experimental context.

The isolation of acidic gain of function mutations is particularly interesting in light of the in vivo mechanism by which SSAP is regulated. SSAP is phosphorylated in a stage-specific fashion at the mid-blastula stage of development. This phosphorylation is required for activation of late H1 gene transcription (46). The mutations isolated in this screen mimic the biochemical effect of phosphorylation in that they increase the overall negative charge of the activation domain. Most phosphorylation events introduce a site-specific change in a protein, often leading to a structural alteration critical for the function of the phosphoprotein. In the case of SSAP, however, this is not likely to be the case. Analysis of the primary sequence of the GQ domain revealed no predicted secondary structural motifs that would be influenced by phosphorylation. As mentioned earlier, most activation domains are unstructured in solution in the physiological pH range. A single phosphorylation is unlikely to effect significant structural alterations in that context. Introduction of glutamic and aspartic acid residues at positions of mutation in the GQ domain sequence does not alter the structural predictions of computer-based algorithms. Structural studies on other activation domains support this conclusion. Most acidic domains are unstructured in aqueous solution at physiological pH and similarly have no predicted structural motifs. Although many have been induced to adopt an alpha -helical structure in acidic or hydrophobic environments, phosphorylation seems to play no role in aiding this conformational change. Two phosphorylation events on the acidic activation domain of c-Jun dramatically enhance its transcriptional activity in vivo but do not enhance the ability of the peptide to adopt an alpha -helical conformation in solution (44). Phosphorylation of the kinase-inducible domain of CREB is necessary for its interaction with CBP; however, in the absence of CBP, both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of CREB fail to adopt an alpha -helical structure (45). Furthermore, with respect to the GQ domain, our original screen isolated acidic mutations throughout the domain. Although we have only tested the more C-terminal residues in sea urchins, we feel it is likely that many of the others would have similar effects. The in vivo phosphorylation of SSAP itself can occur on any one of three residues (46), further suggesting that this phosphorylation is not a position-dependent modification. Instead, based on this study, we argue that the in vivo phosphorylation of the GQ domain effects transcriptional activation simply through the introduction of negative charge to the domain. This biochemical property, in turn, then enhances one or more critical protein-protein interactions between SSAP and a general transcription factor, an unknown coactivator, and/or the dimerization of SSAP itself.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. R. Sternglanz for yeast vectors and L40 strain and Dr. C. P. Yang for HepG2 cells. We are grateful to G. Prelich for helpful discussion throughout this project.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM30333 (to G. C.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Supported by National Institutes of Health Training Grant T32 GM07491.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461. Tel.: 718-430-3605; Fax: 718-430-8778.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: SSAP, stage-specific activator protein; 3-AT, 3-aminotriazole; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; GOF, gain of function; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta -D-galactopyranoside.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Triezenberg, S. J. (1995) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5, 190-196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Ma, J., and Ptashne, M. (1987) Cell 50, 137-142[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Triezenberg, S. J., Kingsbury, R. C., and McKnight, S. L. (1988) Genes Dev. 2, 718-729[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Courey, A. J., and Tjian, R. (1988) Cell 55, 887-898[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Kim, T. K., and Roeder, R. G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20866-20869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Hadzic, E., Desai-Yajnik, V., Helmer, E., Guo, S., Wu, S., Koudinova, N., Casanova, J., Raaka, B. M., and Samuels, H. H. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4507-4517[Abstract]
7. O'Hare, P., and Williams, G. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 4150-4156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Ptashne, M., and Gann, A. (1997) Nature 386, 569-577[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Gill, G., and Ptashne, M. (1987) Cell 51, 121-126[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Gill, G., Sadowski, I., and Ptashne, M. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 2127-2131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Cress, W. D., and Triezenberg, S. J. (1991) Science 251, 87-90[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Regier, J. L., Shen, F., and Triezenberg, S. J. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 883-887[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Ruden, D. M. (1992) Chromosoma 101, 342-348[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Sainz, M. B., Goff, S. A., and Chandler, V. L. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 115-122[Abstract]
15. Radhakrishnan, I., Perez-Alvarado, G. C., Parker, D., Dyson, H. J., Montminy, M. R., and Wright, P. E. (1997) Cell 91, 741-752[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Gill, G., Pascal, E., Tseng, Z. H., and Tjian, R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 192-196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Goodrich, J. A., Hoey, T., Thut, C. J., Admon, A., and Tjian, R. (1993) Cell 75, 519-530[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. DeAngelo, D. J., DeFalco, J., and Childs, G. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 1746-1758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Edelmann, L., and Childs, G. (1998) Gene Expr. 7, 133-147[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. DeAngelo, D. J., DeFalco, J., Rybacki, L., and Childs, G. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1254-1264[Abstract]
21. DeFalco, J., and Childs, G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 5802-5807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Zhang, D., and Childs, G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6868-6877[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
24. Lehming, N., McGuire, S., Brickman, J. M., and Ptashne, M. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 10242-10246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Cadwell, R. C., and Joyce, G. F. (1992) PCR Methods Appl. 2, 28-33[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Schiestl, R. H., and Gietz, R. D. (1989) Curr. Genet. 16, 339-346[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Hill, J., Donald, K. A., Griffiths, D. E., and Donald, G. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 5791[Free Full Text]
28. Breeden, L., and Nasmyth, K. (1985) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 50, 643-650[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (eds) (1988) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York
30. La Teana, A., Brandi, A., Falconi, M., Spurio, R., Pon, C. L., and Gualerzi, C. O. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 10907-10911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. McMahon, A. P., Novak, T. J., Britten, R. J., and Davidson, E. H. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 7490-7494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Colin, A. M. (1986) Methods Cell Biol. 27, 395-406[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Lai, Z. C., DeAngelo, D. J., DiLiberto, M., and Childs, G. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 2315-2321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Kunzler, M., Braus, G. H., Georgiev, O., Seipel, K., and Schaffner, W. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 641-645[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Ponticelli, A. S., Pardee, T. S., and Struhl, K. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 983-988[Abstract]
36. Carey, M., Lin, Y. S., Green, M. R., and Ptashne, M. (1990) Nature 345, 361-364[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. DeFalco, J. A. (1996) Cloning and Characterization of SSAP, A Novel Embryonic Transcription FactorPh.D. thesis , Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY
38. Remacle, J. E., Albrecht, G., Brys, R., Braus, G. H., and Huylebroeck, D. (1997) Embo J 16, 5722-5729[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Xiao, H., and Jeang, K. T. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22873-22876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Tanaka, M., and Herr, W. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6056-6067[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Seipel, K., Georgiev, O., and Schaffner, W. (1994) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 375, 463-470[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Blau, J., Xiao, H., McCracken, S., O'Hare, P., Greenblatt, J., and Bentley, D. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2044-2055[Abstract]
43. Lin, Y. S., Carey, M., Ptashne, M., and Green, M. R. (1990) Nature 345, 359-361[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. John, M., Briand, J. P., and Schnarr, M. (1996) Peptide Res. 9, 71-78
45. Hua, Q. X., Jia, W. H., Bullock, B. P., Habener, J. F., and Weiss, M. A. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 5858-5866[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Li, Z., and Childs, G. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 3684-3695[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. P. Ng, G. Potikyan, R. O. V. Savene, C. T. Denny, V. N. Uversky, and K. A. W. Lee
Multiple aromatic side chains within a disordered structure are critical for transcription and transforming activity of EWS family oncoproteins
PNAS, January 9, 2007; 104(2): 479 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. A. Krum, G. A. Miranda, C. Lin, and T. F. Lane
BRCA1 Associates with Processive RNA Polymerase II
J. Biol. Chem., December 26, 2003; 278(52): 52012 - 52020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X. Lu, A. Z. Ansari, and M. Ptashne
An artificial transcriptional activating region with unusual properties
PNAS, February 29, 2000; 97(5): 1988 - 1992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benuck, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Childs, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed