![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 36, 25447-25454, September 3, 1999
From the Department of Cell Biology, Lerner Research Institute,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
In mammalian selenoprotein mRNAs, the highly
structured 3' UTR contains selenocysteine insertion sequence (SECIS)
elements that are required for the recognition of UGA as the
selenocysteine codon. Our previous work demonstrated a tight
correlation between codon-specific translational read-through and the
activity of a 120-kDa RNA-binding protein that interacted specifically
with the SECIS element in the phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase mRNA. This study reports the RNA binding and biochemical properties of this protein, SECIS-binding protein 2 (SBP2). We detected
SBP2 binding activity in liver, hepatoma cell, and testis extracts from
which SBP2 has been purified by anion exchange and RNA affinity
chromatography. This scheme has allowed us to identify a 120-kDa
polypeptide that co-elutes with SBP2 binding activity from wild-type
but not mutant RNA affinity columns. A characterization of SBP2
biochemical properties reveals that SBP2 binding is sensitive to
oxidation and the presence of heparin, rRNA, and poly(G). SBP2 activity
elutes with a molecular mass of ~500 kDa during gel filtration chromatography, suggesting the existence of a large functional complex.
Direct cross-linking and competition experiments demonstrate that the
minimal phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase 3' UTR
binding site is between 82 and 102 nucleotides, which correlates with
the minimal sequence necessary for translational read-through. SBP2
also interacts specifically with the minimally functional 3' UTR of
another selenoprotein mRNA, deiodinase 1.
The cotranslational insertion of selenocysteine
(Sec)1 into a
select group of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins requires the
presence of cellular factors and cis-acting sequences in
their cognate mRNAs (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). In the case of bacteria, the structured cis-sequence (termed bacterial
selenocysteine insertion sequence) lies immediately downstream from an
in-frame opal codon (UGA) which directs the insertion of Sec (3). This process requires the activity of a specialized translation elongation factor (SELB) that interacts specifically with both the downstream sequences and with the selenocysteyl-tRNASec (4-7). The
synthesis of selenocysteyl-tRNA requires the action of three other gene
products: SELA, which converts seryl-tRNASec to
selenocysteyl-tRNASec (8); SELC, which encodes the Sec tRNA
(9); and SELD, which synthesizes the selenocysteine donor
selenophosphate (10).
The partially characterized process of Sec insertion into mammalian
selenoproteins, although sharing some fundamental properties of the
prokaryotic system, has many distinguishing features. First, the
cis-sequences reside in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) far downstream from the UGA codon (11). These sequences are predicted to
form a stable stem-loop (see Fig. 1) and contain discrete, highly
conserved selenocysteine insertion sequence (SECIS) elements that
include the following: three consecutive, unpaired A residues in the
terminal loop; AUGA in the stem 8-10 nucleotides (nt) 5' of the
terminal loop; and GA in the 3' region of the stem across from the AUGA
element (11-13). Recent structural analyses have focused on the
sequences in and around the AUGA and GA SECIS elements that have been
reported to form a non-Watson-Crick duplex (14, 15). The distance
between the UGA codon and the SECIS elements is naturally variable
between 500 and 5300 nt and therefore may represent an example of
3'-mediated translational regulation similar to that mediated by
poly(A) and other regulatory sequences found in various 3' UTRs
(reviewed in Ref. 16).
Most selenoproteins are involved in redox reactions in which the active
site Sec residue plays a central role in catalysis. This class of
selenoproteins includes the bacterial formate dehydrogenases, the
mammalian deiodinases, and glutathione peroxidases (GPxs), including
phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (PHGPx). Our studies
are focused primarily on the synthesis of PHGPx, the enzymatic activity
of which may play a role in the detoxification of pathogenic oxidized
lipids (17). This enzyme is expressed in most tissues but is
particularly abundant in testis, where it is targeted to the
mitochondrial and nuclear membranes (18, 19). Outside the realm of
oxidized lipids, the apparent association of a significant fraction of
PHGPx with chromatin (20) is of particular interest in light of recent
data that suggests that oxidized DNA may be a substrate for PHGPx
enzymatic activity (21).
In an attempt to identify factors that may be involved in regulating
Sec insertion, several groups have identified SECIS binding activities
by both gel retardation and UV cross-linking studies. To date, a
mammalian homolog of the bacterial selB gene has not been
discovered, but direct binding studies using mammalian SECIS elements
have identified factors that are potentially involved in linking the 3'
UTR to its potential targets such as ribosomes or tRNA. Shen et
al. (22) have identified an RNA-protein complex that requires a
perfectly base paired stem. This complex appears to consist of 55- and
65-kDa proteins, as determined by UV cross-linking analysis. Mutations,
including a deletion of only 6 nucleotides in the nonconserved basal
stem, that inhibit this binding activity correspond with those
resulting in the loss of GPx expression in vivo found in
previous studies (13, 23). Recently, the same group reported the
molecular cloning of this binding activity (termed dbpB), which belongs
to the Y-box family of RNA/DNA-binding proteins (24). An analysis of
its potential role in Sec insertion has not yet been reported. In
addition, Hubert et al. (34) described a binding activity
(termed SECIS-binding protein (SBP)) that interacted with a full-length
stem-loop derived from GPx mRNA. In this case, the activity was
determined to correspond to a 60-65-kDa protein identified by UV
cross-linking, but binding activity has not yet been correlated to any
functions related to selenoprotein synthesis, nor is it known whether
it binds to a specific SECIS element.
Previous results from our own laboratory demonstrated the existence of
a highly specific 120-kDa SECIS-binding protein (which we here term
SBP2), the binding of which was tightly correlated with selenoprotein
synthesis (25). SBP2 binding and translational read-through were both
eliminated by mutations to the AUGA SECIS element. Some mutations that
did not affect SBP2 binding did eliminate Sec insertion, and it was
thus concluded that SBP2 binding may be necessary but is not sufficient
for Sec incorporation. The current work describes the purification of
SBP2 and characterization of its biochemical and RNA binding properties.
Synthetic RNAs--
The rat PHGPx 3' UTR (nt 655-872) was
cloned into the EcoRI/HindIII sites of pAlter-Ex1
(Promega). Deletion mutants (M129, M102, and M81) were constructed with
synthetic oligonucleotides (listed in Table
I) used to PCR amplify the terminal
portions of the PHGPx 3' UTR stem loop that then were cloned into the
EcoRI and HindIII sites of pAlter-Ex1. Wild-type
and mutant RNAs were synthesized with T7 RNA polymerase from
HindIII linearized DNA templates. Deiodinase 1 constructs, a
gift from Marla Berry (Harvard Medical School), were made as described
(26) and were linearized with DraI. RNAs were radiolabeled
by incorporation of [ Extract Preparation and Chromatography--
Fresh, pretrimmed
rat testes were purchased from Pel-Freez (shipped on wet ice). The
tissue was minced with a razor, and Buffer A (20 mM
KPO4, pH 7.2, 100 mM KCl, 0.1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.05% Tween-20, 5% glycerol, 2 mM DTT) was added to 2 ml/g of wet weight of tissue
followed by homogenization with a Bio-Homogenizer (Fisher). Crude
extract was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 20 min, and
then that supernatant was centrifuged at 100,000 × g
for 1 h to yield S100 extracts ranging in protein concentration from 10 to 15 mg/ml. Kidney, spleen and liver extracts were made in the
same fashion except that 14,000 × g supernatants were
used for analysis. McArdle 7777 (rat hepatoma) cell extracts were
prepared in the same fashion except that 80% confluent cells were
scraped from 10-cm plates and pelleted. The cell pellet was washed
three times in 5 volumes of Buffer A and Dounce homogenized with a
micro-Dounce. All column chromatography was performed on the BioCad
Sprint chromatography system. Columns were jacketed with copper coils
for cooling. For partial purification, S100 extracts were diluted 1:1
with 20 mM KPO4, pH 7.2, and immediately
applied to a 1.6 × 26-cm S-Sepharose column (bed volume of 32 ml)
equilibrated in Buffer A. Proteins were eluted with a 5-column-volume
linear gradient from 100 to 800 mM KCl at 2 ml/min.
Fractions (2 ml) were collected, and 10 µl of each was assayed for
SBP2 by UV cross-linking (see below). Active fractions were pooled and
brought to 35% saturation with solid ammonium sulfate. The precipitate
was incubated on ice for 0.5 h followed by centrifugation for 10 min at 18,000 × g. Pellets were resuspended in
For gel filtration chromatography, 0.5 mg of the ammonium sulfate
fraction was applied to a 1 × 30-cm Superose-12 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with Buffer A plus 1.1 M
KCl. Proteins were eluted at 0.4 ml/min, and 1 min fractions were
collected. 100 µl of each fraction and 20 µl of the starting
material were dialyzed against Buffer A in a multiwell microdialysis
apparatus (Life Technologies, Inc.). Dialyzed fractions (16 µl each)
were analyzed for SBP2 activity by UV cross-linking. Sizing of SBP2 was
performed by comparison to standards run under identical conditions: apoferritin (443 kDa), RNA Affinity Chromatography--
Wild-type and UV Cross-linking Assay--
Extracts or column fractions were
incubated with 20 fmol of 32P-labeled (22,000 cpm/fmol)
synthetic RNA for 30 min at 37 °C in a final volume of 20 µl
containing Buffer A supplemented with 250 µg/ml Escherichia
coli tRNA, 10 mM DTT, and 5 µg/ml soybean trypsin
inhibitor (Sigma). Each reaction was treated with UV irradiation (Bio-Rad GS Genelinker) at 254 nm for 10 min in a 96-well tissue culture plate (Corning). The reaction was then treated with RNase A (1 mg/ml) for 30 min at 37 °C. Samples were analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE and subjected to autoradiography. Quantitation was performed by PhosphorImager analysis (Molecular Dynamics). For specific activity determinations, data were obtained from a single phosphorimage scan
except for the RNA affinity-derived activity, which was normalized to
known amounts of activity from the previous purification step. All
determinations of specific activity and inhibitor effects were carried
out under conditions of limiting protein within the linear range of the
cross-linking assay as described in Tables II and III.
Transient Transfections--
COS-7 cells were plated at 2 × 105 cells per 9.5-cm2 well in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's/Ham's F-12 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum
and 5 ng/ml Na2SeO3. At 70-80% confluency (18 h), 950 ng of test DNA was cotransfected with 50 ng of
pRSV- Tissue-specific Expression of SBP2--
Our previous analysis of
SBP2 binding activity was carried out with crude testicular extracts.
These extracts contained several proteins identified by UV
cross-linking that bound to the wild-type PHGPx 3'UTR, the most
abundant of which migrated as a 55-kDa protein. Based on UV
cross-linking and competition analysis, only a 120-kDa protein (SBP2)
bound to the UTR in a sequence-specific manner (25). Mutational
analysis of the AUGA and AAAA SECIS elements indicated that binding of
SBP2 required the AUGA element (see diagram in Fig.
1). To support the idea that SBP2 is a
general player in Sec insertion, and in order to identify the best
tissue from which to obtain SBP2 activity, extracts derived from
several rat tissues and McArdle 7777 cells, a rat hepatoma cell line, were analyzed. Fig. 2 shows UV
cross-linking analysis of crude extracts from testis, liver, kidney,
spleen, and McArdle 7777 cells using radiolabeled wild-type PHGPx 3'
UTR or a mutant (AUGA Characterization of SBP2--
The apparent abundance of SBP2 in
the testicular extracts assayed in Fig. 2 prompted our utilization of
this tissue as a starting point for SBP2 purification. Although the UV
cross-linking assay used to follow SBP2 binding activity is not highly
quantitative, we estimate a 26-fold purification of activity after
S-Sepharose chromatography and ammonium sulfate precipitation (Table
II). As expected, SBP2 may have the
characteristics of a basic protein or complex as evidenced by its
preferential interaction with cation exchange matrices, such as
S-Sepharose, at neutral pH. SBP2 does bind to a MonoQ column (anion
exchange) when the pH was raised to 8.0, but significant losses of
activity undermined its utility in the purification scheme. SBP2
activity eluted in a single peak from the S-Sepharose column at a point
in the gradient corresponding to ~200 mM KCl. The
activity was subsequently concentrated, and the excess KCl removed by
35% ammonium sulfate precipitation. The mixture obtained at this step
was used for the analyses described below and is referred to as
partially purified SBP2. This purification scheme was sufficient to
remove the major contaminating cross-linking proteins detected in S100
extracts, most notably the abundant 55-kDa protein (compare crude
testis extracts to the ammonium sulfate fraction in Fig. 2). The lower
molecular weight bands detected by UV cross-linking in the ammonium
sulfate fraction do not appear consistently and may represent
variations in the recovery of proteins that bind to the double stranded
stem of the full-length PHGPx 3' UTR (compare Figs. 2 and 6). The
specificity of partially purified SBP2 binding was verified by virtue
of its ability to cross-link to wild-type but not mutant (AUGA
The conditions under which maximal UV cross-linking activity can be
detected for partially purified SBP2 were analyzed. The optimal
reaction conditions include 50-100 mM KCl, pH 6.5-7.0, at
30-37 °C. The addition of magnesium did not augment cross-linking, and binding was not inhibited by up to 5 mM EDTA,
indicating that a metal co-factor is not necessary for this
interaction. SBP2 binding was not affected by repeated freeze/thaw
cycles and was cryostable. Nonionic detergents had no deleterious
effect on binding, and SBP2 binding was restored after treatment with 2 M guanidine HCl followed by dialysis. Denaturation,
however, in SDS or 6 M guanidine was irreversibly
inhibitory to binding activity. The effects of a variety of compounds
on the level of SBP2 UV cross-linking found in partially purified
preparations are summarized in Table III.
We chose to analyze an array of nucleic acids that may compete for
binding, as well as several divalent cations that may facilitate the
binding activity. In addition, we tested the effect of sodium selenite
to determine whether binding activity is regulated by selenium
concentration. Two-fold serial dilutions of each effector were assayed
in standard cross-linking reactions with limiting amounts (~2 µg)
of total protein from the ammonium sulfate fraction, and the inhibitory
concentration at 50% inactivation (IC50) was determined by
PhosphorImager-based quantitation. Table III groups the tested
substances into those that had little or no effect at the highest
concentration tested, those that had an intermediate effect, and those
that significantly inhibited binding. Although SBP2 binding activity
was not dramatically enhanced by any of these treatments,
NiCl2, heparin, poly(G), and rRNA were all significantly inhibitory. It is worth noting that although selenite
(NaSeO3) was inhibitory, the IC50 concentration
(72 µM) is approximately 3000 times the physiological
concentration. These results suggest that SBP2 interacts
nonspecifically with the ribose moiety of highly structured RNAs, such
as rRNA and poly(G), and is likely inactivated by oxidation by reactive
metal salts, such as NiCl2.
In order to determine the aggregate molecular mass of SBP2, partially
purified material was subjected to Superose-12 gel filtration chromatography. Under lower salt conditions (100 mM KCl),
SBP2 cofractionated with totally excluded material (cutoff molecular mass, 2000 kDa) and with another peak corresponding to 500 kDa. Under
higher salt conditions (400 mM KCl), the activity was only detected as 500 kDa (not shown). In an attempt to analyze monomeric SBP2, Superose-12 chromatography was run with 1.2 M KCl,
and the fractions were analyzed by UV cross-linking following
microdialysis (Fig. 3). In this case, the
majority of SBP2 activity eluted in a major peak corresponding to
~500 kDa and a minor peak corresponding to ~200 kDa. The recovery
of SBP2 activity under these conditions was good (~70%), thereby
discounting the possibility that we were only observing a small
fraction of the input material. These results suggest that the 120-kDa
SBP2 as detected by UV cross-linking is part of a homogeneous or
heterogeneous multiprotein complex that can be only partially
dissociated under high ionic strength conditions.
SBP2 Binding Is Redox-sensitive--
As it has been shown that
many DNA and RNA-binding proteins require free cysteine residues for
binding activity (31, 32), we studied SBP2 binding activity in the
context of altered redox potential. Extracts made in buffer lacking DTT
showed little if any SBP2 binding activity, whereas the addition of
10-300 mM DTT to the reaction stimulated SBP2
cross-linking activity. Furthermore, pretreatment of crude or partially
purified sources of SPB2 with the oxidizing agent diamide eliminated
binding activity, and this inhibition was reversed when 0.1 M DTT was added after diamide treatment (not shown). These
results suggest a role for free cysteine residues in the SBP2 protein.
To further this analysis, extracts were pretreated with the
irreversible sulfhydryl modifying agent N-ethylmaleimide.
Pretreatment with 5 mM N-ethylmaleimide
completely eliminated binding activity even after the addition of
excess DTT (not shown). Together, these results strongly suggest that free cysteine residues are in some way required for RNA binding.
Identification of SBP2 Polypeptide--
Further purification of
SBP2 by means of RNA affinity chromatography has allowed us to achieve
a 1500-fold purification (Table II) and identify a candidate
polypeptide corresponding to SBP2. Partially purified SBP2 was applied
to RNA affinity columns composed of wild-type or the AUGA deletion
mutant ( Determination of the SBP2 Binding Site in the PHGPx 3' UTR--
To
gain more insight into the binding properties of SBP2, we analyzed the
role of the basal sequences in the binding of SBP2 to the PHGPx 3' UTR.
We constructed progressively shorter UTRs lacking sequences
constituting the putative basal stem but retaining the three conserved
SECIS elements (Fig. 6A).
Mutant UTRs (M129, 129 nt; M102, 102 nt; M81, 81 nt) were used as
competitors in UV-cross-linking assays to wild-type
32P-labeled PHGPx 3' UTR. As shown in Fig. 6B,
only the shortest mutant (M81) was unable to compete effectively. The
concentration of cold RNA necessary for a 50% reduction in
cross-linking to the wild-type probe is shown for quantitative
comparison (Table IV). M129 and M102
competed as efficiently as the wild-type UTR, whereas M81 competed
least effectively, approximately 25 times less well than the other
constructs. Interestingly, the proposed structure of the M81 construct
lacks a significant number of paired residues basal to the AUGA SECIS
element, suggesting that a paired stem may stabilize the apical
structures.
To assay functionality, these same constructs were cloned into the 3'
UTR of a modified luciferase mRNA which contains an in-frame UGA
codon, a system used extensively in our previous study to establish the
relationship between SBP2 binding and translational read-through (25).
The ability of these mutant UTRs to allow read-through of the in-frame
UGA was determined by transfection of the luciferase constructs into
COS-7 cells, which were subsequently extracted and assayed for
luciferase activity. When compared with a wild-type control, the
shorter basal stem constructs (M129 and M102) possessed lower
luciferase activity, whereas the smallest construct (M81) resulted in
no read-through above background (Table IV). These changes in
translatability cannot be accounted for by changes in mRNA levels
as determined by Northern analysis of the mutant RNAs (not shown).
Taken together, the RNA binding and luciferase read-through data
indicate that the minimally functional PHGPx 3' UTR is between 82 and
102 nt.
Although it is clear from our results that SBP2 requires the AUGA SECIS
element and is likely binding to that site, it is possible that SBP2
also makes contacts in the 5' UTR or coding region of the PHGPx
mRNA in its potential role of linking the 3' UTR with translational
machinery. Even though the PHGPx 3' UTR is sufficient to allow
read-through of a UGA in a heterologous message (luciferase), it is
possible that SBP2 works with a higher efficiency in the presence of
coding region or 5' binding targets. To address this possibility, we
analyzed the ability of the PHGPx coding region to compete for binding
to the PHGPx 3' UTR. Full-length PHGPx mRNAs containing either
wild-type or mutant 3' UTRs were used as competitors in cross-linking
reactions with partially purified SBP2 (see below) and the
32P-labeled wild-type 3' UTR. Although the wild-type
full-length RNA competes as effectively as the 3' UTR alone
(IC50 = <3-fold), more than 100-fold excess of mutant RNA
is required to achieve the same effect.
SBP2 Binds to the Deiodinase 1 3' UTR--
Having previously
established that SBP2 binds to both the full-length PHGPx and GPx 3'
UTRs (25), we desired to determine whether or not the SBP2 binding site
might be present in another class of selenoprotein mRNAs. To this
end, we analyzed by UV cross-linking and competition experiments the
ability of SBP2 to interact specifically with the 3' UTR of the
selenoprotein deiodinase 1 (D1) mRNA. A comparison of the PHGPx 3'
UTR sequence and that found in D1 is shown in Fig.
7A. Although the conservation
of sequences making up the SECIS elements is clear, similarities
outside those regions are quite limited. We therefore predict that if
SBP2 does interact with the D1 3' UTR, then it is likely to be making
contact with a SECIS element, specifically AUGA.
Fig. 7B shows UV cross-linking of partially purified SBP2 to
the minimally functional rat D1 3' UTR, which is 42 nt in length. SBP2
did not cross-link to a D1 3' UTR with a SECIS mutation (AUGA Here we report the characterization and purification of a
SECIS-binding protein (SBP2) derived from rat testicular extracts. This
study represents the first biochemical characterization of a
SECIS-binding protein and begins the detailed analysis of the protein
factors involved in selenocysteine insertion. Recently, Shen et
al. (24) reported the molecular cloning of a cDNA that encodes
a GPx 3' UTR-binding protein (termed dbpB) that is a member of the
Y-box family of RNA/DNA-binding proteins. SBP2 does not appear to be in
any way related to dbpB, based on molecular mass (120 and 39 kDa,
respectively) and sequence specificity. In the case of dbpB, the
deletion of only 6 nt in the basal stem was sufficient to significantly
reduce binding of the factor. In contrast, the removal of at least 98 nt constituting the basal stem of the PHGPx 3' UTR had little or no
effect on SBP2 binding. In addition, our analysis of an abundant
protein eluting late during RNA affinity chromatography led to the
identification of peptides identical to sequences found in dbpB. This
protein does not preferentially bind the wild-type RNA column and does
not co-purify with SBP2.2
Another SBP in the 60 kDa range has also been identified (34), but an
investigation of binding specificity has not been reported.
We have purified SBP2 to a point at which a clear identification of a
corresponding 120-kDa polypeptide was possible based on selective
binding to a wild-type RNA affinity matrix. It is clear from Fig. 5
that SBP2 is not the only protein that can be isolated by RNA affinity
chromatography. Indeed, the analysis of the major factors in this
preparation may quickly identify other factors interacting with
distinct regions of the 3' UTR. SBP2 appears to be a basic protein that
preferentially interacts with structured RNA molecules as evidenced by
the inability of nonstructured ribohomopolymers, DNA and
poly(I):poly(C), to compete for binding. It does not appear to require
any co-factors and is stable once extracted from cells or tissues. The
biochemical properties of SBP2 are consistent with its potential role
in coordinating the interaction between highly structured RNA (the 3'
UTR) and other components of the Sec insertion machinery.
Of particular interest is the relatively large aggregate molecular
weight of SBP2 activity as determined by gel filtration chromatography,
which suggests the specific association of homologous or heterologous
factors. The isolation of SBP2 by RNA affinity chromatography should
provide the means (i.e. anti-SBP2 antibodies and/or SBP2
column matrix) with which to identify the associated factors and
subsequently determine their biological activities. It seems likely,
based on this observation, that the role of RNA-binding proteins in Sec
insertion will exceed in complexity that found in prokaryotes, in which
only a specialized elongation factor (SELB) is necessary. According to
the data presented in this work, SBP2 does not appear to be involved in
binding to other elements within the PHGPx mRNA, but it remains a
possibility that other factors may mediate protein/protein or RNA/RNA
contacts at the UGA codon.
Another significant finding from this study is that SBP2 binding
activity is not restricted to the testis. Extracts from liver and a
hepatoma cell line are in possession of an apparently identical binding
activity, and it is quite possible that other tissues do as well, even
though cross-linking activity could not be detected in kidney or spleen
extracts. The inhibition of SBP2 binding activity in the presence of
kidney, liver, and spleen extracts indicates the existence of a
potentially specific inhibitor. Work is in progress to determine
whether or not this inhibitor is a discrete and specific entity.
Together with the fact that SBP2 is known to bind the PHGPx, GPx (25)
and D1 (this report) 3' UTRs, these data support the idea that SBP2 is
a general factor involved in Sec incorporation and is not specific to
testicular expression of PHGPx.
In this report, we also set out to establish SBP2 as a general factor
involved in Sec insertion by virtue of its ability to bind the
deiodinase 1 3' UTR. In fact, this experiment indicates that SBP2 binds
to the D1 3' UTR with the same sequence specificity with which it binds
to PHGPx mRNA in that the AUGA SECIS element is required in both
cases. For PHGPx, we analyzed mutant RNA molecules that lacked varying
amounts of the putative basal stem region and found that only the
construct that lacked a significant amount of paired sequences basal to
the SECIS elements was unable to bind. In addition, the PHGPx 3' UTRs
with shortened stems were not as efficient at directing read-through in
our luciferase assay, indicating compromised functionality as well. It
is clear from this study that the basal stem of the PHGPx 3' UTR does
not play a significant role in SBP2 binding, but that a small amount of this structure is required for optimal binding and functionality as
determined by the read-through assay. In contrast, Martin et al. (26) found that a minimal PHGPx 3' UTR that lacked any
sequences basal to the AUGA SECIS element was sufficient when placed
downstream of the deiodinase coding region (26). This study did not use full-length or other PHGPx constructs for comparison, however, and it
is possible that differences in the assay systems may explain the
apparent discrepancy. From our study, we must conclude that the
sequence required for detectable levels of read-through and SBP2
binding in the PHGPx 3' UTR is between 82 and 102 nt in length and that
it is likely that the basal structure is involved in stabilizing the
structural context of the conserved SECIS elements found in the apical
portion of the proposed stem-loop structure.
The possibility that SBP2 functions to link the 3' UTR with the UGA
codon itself prompted our investigation of SBP2 binding sites in the 5'
UTR and coding region of the PHGPx mRNA. Competition studies using
full-length PHGPx mRNAs with either wild-type or mutant 3' UTRs
demonstrated that there are no high affinity binding sites other than
at the AUGA SECIS element. It is possible, however, that SBP2 does have
other RNA targets, such as the Sec tRNA (as in the case of SELB, the
bacterial SECIS-binding protein) or ribosomal RNA. Based on these
binding studies, therefore, we propose that SBP2 directly interacts
with the AUGA SECIS element.
Based on the results in this study, we envision that SBP2 plays a
central role as a member of a heterogeneous or homogeneous complex that
binds to selenoprotein mRNAs at the 3' UTR and perhaps elsewhere in
the message, providing the ribosome the information necessary to bypass
termination and incorporate selenocysteine. This model does not
necessitate a direct interaction between SBPs and the Sec tRNA, as it
is possible that they may only be involved in preventing termination
long enough for the limited supply of Sec tRNA to gain access.
We thank Marla Berry for providing deiodinase
constructs; Anuradha Mehta, Julia Fletcher, and Jeff Kneile for helpful
discussions; Andi Lesoon and Beth Summers for assistance with the early
phases of this work; and Paul Fox for use of the BioCad Sprint.
*
This work was supported by United States Public Health
Service Grants 50390 (to D. M. D.) and 1 F32 DK09878-01 (to
P. R. C.) and by an Established Investigator Award from the American
Heart Association (to D. M. D.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
2
P. R. Copeland and D. M. Driscoll,
unpublished results.
The abbreviations used are:
Sec, selenocysteine;
UTR, untranslated region;
PHGPx, phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione
peroxidase;
SECIS, selenocysteine insertion sequence;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
nt, nucleotide(s);
D1, deiodinase
1;
GPx, glutathione peroxidase;
SBP, SECIS-binding protein;
DTT, dithiothreitol.
Purification, Redox Sensitivity, and RNA Binding Properties of
SECIS-binding Protein 2, a Protein Involved in Selenoprotein
Biosynthesis*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]UTP as described (27).
Oligonucleotides used in this study
of the original volume and either dialyzed or used directly
for analysis or further purification. Protein concentrations were
determined with the Bio-Rad protein assay normalized to bovine serum
albumin standards.
-amylase (200 kDa), alcohol dehydrogenase (150 kDa), bovine serum albumin (66 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa),
and cytochrome c (12.4 kDa).
AUGA mutant
PHGPx 3' UTR RNAs were synthesized in bulk with Ribomax (Promega)
transcription reagents and immobilized on CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as described (28). The RNA beads (150-200
µg RNA/ml beads) were directly loaded into Amersham Pharmacia Biotech
HR 0.5 × 5 cm FPLC columns which were subsequently equilibrated
in Buffer A. Approximately 1 mg of protein from the ammonium sulfate
fraction was loaded at 0.2 ml/min, and the column was washed in Buffer A plus 170 mM KCl until A280
returned to baseline. Proteins were eluted (0.5 ml/min) with a linear
gradient (0.27-1.7 M KCl) in 10 min, followed by a step to
2 M KCl. Fractions (0.5 ml) were collected directly into
0.28 ml of saturated ammonium sulfate. After collection, fractions were
incubated on ice for 30 min and spun at 18,000 × g in
a 4 °C microcentrifuge for 10 min. The supernatant was removed and
saved for later analysis, and the pellets were resuspended in 50 µl
of Buffer A and stored at
80 °C. The pellets were resuspended in
15 ml of 0.2 N NaOH, SDS sample buffer was added, and
samples were electrophoresed on 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The amount
of activity derived from RNA affinity chromatography was calculated
directly from analysis of limiting amounts of column fractions
immediately after collection because the activity was not stable after
this procedure even when stored at
80 °C. The yield of protein
from RNA affinity chromatography was estimated by comparison to bovine
serum albumin standards on a Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel.
-galactosidase DNA using LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies,
Inc.) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. At 48 h
posttransfection, cells were harvested for detection of luciferase
activity using the luciferase assay system (Promega) or
-galactosidase activity using LumiGal 530 assay reagent (Lumigen).
Extracts were assayed using a ML2250 luminometer (Dynatech). Protein
assays were performed using the Bio-Rad protein assay reagent. The
luciferase activities were normalized to
-galactosidase activity,
and the results were expressed as relative luminescence units/mg of protein.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
ACGA) previously shown to be unable to bind
SBP2 (25). A 120-kDa cross-linking band that specifically binds the
wild-type UTR was detectable only in testes, liver, and McArdle 7777 extracts. The lack of SBP2 cross-linking activity in kidney and spleen,
as well as the reduced level observed in liver extracts, is potentially due to an inhibitor in these extracts because mixtures of these extracts with testicular extract inhibited binding (not shown). It is
clear from this analysis that SBP2 functions in at least one other
tissue. Among the extracts tested, that derived from testes had the
highest specific activity. This result is consistent with the fact that
the PHGPx mRNA and enzyme are over-represented in the testis
relative to other tissues (19, 29, 30).

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Proposed structure of the PHGPx 3' UTR.
Conserved SECIS elements are in boldface. Non-Watson-Crick
base pairs are noted by the filled circles (
).

View larger version (56K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Tissue distribution of SBP2. 50 µg of
crude tissue extract (left panel), 10 µg of McArdle cell
extract (middle panel), or 4 µg of partially purified SBP2
(ammonium sulfate (AMS) fraction) (right panel)
was incubated with 32P-labeled wild-type (wt) or
AUGA
ACGA mutant (mut) PHGPx 3' UTRs followed by UV
cross-linking.
ACGA) PHGPx 3' UTRs (Fig. 2).
Purification scheme for SBP2
Analysis of potential effectors of SBP2 binding activity

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Size exclusion chromatography of SBP2.
A, chromatogram obtained upon loading 0.5 mg of partially
purified SBP2 onto a Superose-12 column equilibrated in buffer
containing 1.2 M KCl. Fractions were analyzed by UV
cross-linking (B). SBP2 activity eluted in two peaks as
noted by arrows.
AUGA) PHGPx 3' UTR RNA covalently attached to CNBr-activated
Sepharose 4B. Bound proteins were eluted with a biphasic gradient from
0.1-2.0 M KCl. UV cross-linking analysis demonstrates that
SBP2 elutes from the wild-type column under high salt conditions,
suggesting a high affinity electrostatic interaction (Fig.
4B). In the case of the mutant
column, SBP2 activity was detected both in the flow-through fractions
as well as fractions eluted early in the gradient (Fig. 4A).
As indicated by the chromatogram in Fig. 4C, this procedure separated SBP2 activity from the bulk of the proteins that bind the
wild-type RNA column, which eluted earlier in the gradient at
~300-400 mM KCl. By raising the KCl concentration to
0.27 M for the initial binding conditions, a significant
enhancement of purification was obtained, as revealed by SDS-PAGE
analysis of peak fractions from wild-type and mutant RNA affinity
chromatography (Fig. 5). Under these
conditions, a 120-kDa polypeptide was clearly selected on the wild-type
but not the mutant RNA column. The specificity of SBP2 derived from RNA
affinity chromatography was verified by its inability to cross-link to
the AUGA
ACGA mutant 3' UTR (not shown). As no other polypeptides
above 35 kDa eluted specifically with SBP2 from RNA affinity
chromatography, it is likely that the other factors in the complex
derived from size exclusion chromatography do not directly interact
with the AUGA SECIS element, but rather with SBP2 itself or other
regions of the PHGPx 3' UTR. It is noteworthy that a 45-kDa band is
present in the mutant but not the wild-type preparation. The
specificity of this interaction is currently under investigation.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
RNA affinity chromatography of SBP2.
~1 mg of partially purified SBP2 was chromatographed on wild-type
(wt) (A) or
AUGA mutant (mut)
(B) RNA affinity matrices. Starting material (S),
flow-through (FT), and 5 µl of fractions 10-25 were
assayed in standard UV cross-linking reactions. C,
absorbance (280 nm) profile obtained during wild-type RNA affinity
chromatography.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Identification of SBP2 polypeptide. 10 µl of fraction 20 from wild-type (wt) and mutant
(mut) RNA affinity columns (as indicated) was analyzed by
8% SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining. Molecular markers (10 kDa)
are indicated on the left.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Minimum binding requirements for SBP2.
A, proposed structures of wild-type (wt) and stem
deletion mutant (mut) PHGPx 3' UTRs. Conserved SECIS
elements are in boldface. N5 represents 5 nt of
vector sequence present in these transcripts. B, unlabeled
RNAs were added to cross-linking assays at a 1.5-50-fold molar excess
over the 32P-labeled wild-type PHGPx 3' UTR in the presence
of 2 µg of partially purified SBP2. The inhibitory concentration at
50% inhibition for each RNA was determined by PhosphorImager-based
quantitation (see Table IV).
Translational read-through and competition for binding directed by
deletion mutants of the rat PHGPx 3' UTR

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
SBP2 binding to the D1 3' UTR.
A, sequence comparison of the terminal portions of the rat
D1 and rat PHGPx 3' UTRs. Identical bases are in boldface,
and SECIS elements are underlined. The minimally functional
D1 construct of 42 nt is denoted by the arrows.
B, 2 µg of partially purified SBP2 was incubated with
32P-labeled 3' UTRs, and samples were analyzed by UV
cross-linking followed by 8% SDS-PAGE. Lane 1, wild-type
(wt) PHGPx 3' UTR; lane 2, wild-type D1 3' UTR;
lane 3, D1 3' UTR with AUGA
AGA mutation
(mut). C, 1.5-50-fold molar excess of various
competitor RNAs (as indicated to the left of each panel)
were incubated with 32P-labeled wild-type PHGPx 3' UTR in
the UV cross-linking assay .
AGA)
that was previously shown to abolish Sec incorporation (33). For
comparison, cross-linking to the full-length 204 nt PHGPx 3' UTR is
also shown. Interestingly, the lower molecular weight bands detected by
the PHGPx probe are diminished in intensity with the D1 probe, which
lacked the basal stem. These proteins are likely binding to the long
stem of the PGHPx 3'UTR, as they were also detected when a version of
the D1 3'UTR with a longer stem is used (not shown). Fig. 7C
shows competition experiments that tested the ability of unlabeled RNAs
corresponding to the D1 constructs to effectively compete for binding
to the labeled PHGPx 3' UTR. The concentrations of competitor necessary
to inhibit 50% of the binding activity are shown for quantitative
comparison. The D1 3' UTR competes 50% of the signal at a 14-fold
molar excess, whereas the wild-type PHGPx 3' UTR competes 50% of the
signal at less than a 1.5-fold excess. From this analysis, it is clear that SBP2 is not solely associated with the anti-oxidative class of
selenoproteins, and it is likely to be in direct contact with the AUGA
SECIS element within the selenoprotein MRNAs. Consistent with similar
experiments with the PHGPx 3' UTR (see below), the basal stem does not
seem to be necessary for SBP2 binding, but there does appear to be some
enhancement when a portion of the base paired structure is present.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell Biology,
Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid
Ave. #NC-10, Cleveland, OH 44195. Tel.: 216-445-9758; Fax:
216-444-9404; E-mail: driscod@ccf.org.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Stadtman, T. C.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65,
83-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Low, S. C.,
and Berry, M. J.
(1996)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21,
203-208[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Huttenhofer, A.,
Westhof, E.,
and Bock, A.
(1996)
RNA
2,
354-366[Abstract]
4.
Baron, C.,
Heider, J.,
and Bock, A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
4181-4185 5.
Chen, G. F.,
Fang, L.,
and Inouye, M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
23128-23131 6.
Zinoni, F.,
Heider, J.,
and Bock, A.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4660-4664 7.
Heider, J.,
Baron, C.,
and Bock, A.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
3759-3766[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Forchhammer, K.,
and Bock, A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
6324-6328 9.
Leinfelder, W.,
Zehelein, E.,
Mandrand-Berthelot, M. A.,
and Bock, A.
(1988)
Nature
331,
723-725[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Ehrenreich, A.,
Forchhammer, K.,
Tormay, P.,
Veprek, B.,
and Bock, A.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
206,
767-773[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Berry, M. J.,
Banu, L.,
Chen, Y. Y.,
Mandel, S. J.,
Kieffer, J. D.,
Harney, J. W.,
and Larsen, P. R.
(1991)
Nature
353,
273-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Berry, M. J.,
Banu, L.,
Harney, J. W.,
and Larsen, P. R.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
3315-3322[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Shen, Q.,
Chu, F. F.,
and Newburger, P. E.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
11463-11469 14.
Walczak, R.,
Westhof, E.,
Carbon, P.,
and Krol, A.
(1996)
RNA
2,
367-379[Abstract]
15.
Walczak, R.,
Carbon, P.,
and Krol, A.
(1998)
RNA
4,
74-84[Abstract]
16.
Sachs, A. B.,
Sarnow, P.,
and Hentze, M. W.
(1997)
Cell
89,
831-838[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Thomas, J. P.,
Maiorino, M.,
Ursini, F.,
and Girotti, A. W.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
454-461 18.
Godeas, C.,
Sandri, G.,
and Panfili, E.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1191,
147-150[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Pushpa-Rekha, T. R.,
Burdsall, A. L.,
Oleksa, L. M.,
Chisolm, G. M.,
and Driscoll, D. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26993-26999 20.
Godeas, C.,
Tramer, F.,
Micali, F.,
Roveri, A.,
Maiorino, M.,
Nisii, C.,
Sandri, G.,
and Panfili, E.
(1996)
Biochem. Mol. Med.
59,
118-124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Bao, Y.,
Jemth, P.,
Mannervik, B.,
and Williamson, G.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
410,
210-212[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Shen, Q.,
McQuilkin, P. A.,
and Newburger, P. E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30448-30452 23.
Shen, Q.,
Leonard, J. L.,
and Newburger, P. E.
(1995)
RNA
1,
519-525[Abstract]
24.
Shen, Q.,
Wu, R.,
Leonard, J. L.,
and Newburger, P. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
5443-5446 25.
Lesoon, A.,
Mehta, A.,
Singh, R.,
Chisolm, G. M.,
and Driscoll, D. M.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1977-1985[Abstract]
26.
Martin, G. W.,
Harney, J. W.,
and Berry, M. J.
(1998)
RNA
4,
65-73[Abstract]
27.
Driscoll, D. M.,
Lakhe-Reddy, S.,
Oleksa, L. M.,
and Martinez, D.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
7288-7294 28.
Kaminski, A.,
Hunt, S. L.,
Patton, J. G.,
and Jackson, R. J.
(1995)
RNA
1,
924-938[Abstract]
29.
Weitzel, F.,
Ursini, F.,
and Wendel, A.
(1990)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1036,
88-94[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Zhang, L. P.,
Maiorino, M.,
Roveri, A.,
and Ursini, F.
(1989)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1006,
140-143[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Bandyopadhyay, S.,
and Gronostajski, R. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29949-29955 32.
Hentze, M. W.,
Rouault, T. A.,
Harford, J. B.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1989)
Science
244,
357-359 33.
Martin, G. W.,
Harney, J. W.,
and Berry, M. J.
(1996)
RNA
2,
171-182[Abstract]
34.
Hubert, N.,
Walczak, R.,
Carbon, P.,
and Krol, A.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
464-469
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. V. Papp, J. Wang, D. Kennedy, D. Boucher, Y. Zhang, V. N. Gladyshev, R. N. Singh, and K. K. Khanna Functional characterization of alternatively spliced human SECISBP2 transcript variants Nucleic Acids Res., November 12, 2008; (2008) gkn829v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Bubenik and D. M. Driscoll Altered RNA Binding Activity Underlies Abnormal Thyroid Hormone Metabolism Linked to a Mutation in Selenocysteine Insertion Sequence-binding Protein 2 J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2007; 282(48): 34653 - 34662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Squires, I. Stoytchev, E. P. Forry, and M. J. Berry SBP2 Binding Affinity Is a Major Determinant in Differential Selenoprotein mRNA Translation and Sensitivity to Nonsense-Mediated Decay Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2007; 27(22): 7848 - 7855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Caban, S. A. Kinzy, and P. R. Copeland The L7Ae RNA Binding Motif Is a Multifunctional Domain Required for the Ribosome-Dependent Sec Incorporation Activity of Sec Insertion Sequence Binding Protein 2 Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2007; 27(18): 6350 - 6360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Howard, M. W. Moyle, G. Aggarwal, B. A. Carlson, and C. B. Anderson A recoding element that stimulates decoding of UGA codons by Sec tRNA[Ser]Sec RNA, June 1, 2007; 13(6): 912 - 920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Clery, V. Bourguignon-Igel, C. Allmang, A. Krol, and C. Branlant An improved definition of the RNA-binding specificity of SECIS-binding protein 2, an essential component of the selenocysteine incorporation machinery Nucleic Acids Res., March 19, 2007; 35(6): 1868 - 1884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. Papp, J. Lu, F. Striebel, D. Kennedy, A. Holmgren, and K. K. Khanna The Redox State of SECIS Binding Protein 2 Controls Its Localization and Selenocysteine Incorporation Function. Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(13): 4895 - 4910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||