![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 36, 25490-25498, September 3, 1999
§,
,
,
,
From the Departments of
Pathology,
¶ Pharmacology, and ¶¶ Cell Biology and Neuroscience
and the 
Hamon Center for Therapeutic
Oncologic Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical
Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-9073, the
Department of Internal
Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, the
** Department of Neurobiology, University of Heidelberg, D-69120
Heidelberg, Germany, and the §§ Department
of Medical Biochemistry, Ohio State University,
Columbus, Ohio 43210
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hyperphosphorylated forms of the neuronal
microtubule (MT)-associated protein tau are major components of
Alzheimer's disease paired helical filaments. Previously, we reported
that AB The axonal microtubule
(MT)1-associated protein
(MAP) tau (1, 2) is encoded by one alternatively spliced gene that
directs the synthesis of six tau isoforms in human brain (3). The
C-terminal half of brain tau encompasses three or four contiguous
MT-binding repeats that act synergistically with regions flanking both
sides of the repeats to support higher affinity MT binding (4-6). All tau isoforms in human brain contain 21 serine/threonine phosphorylation sites (7), some of which modulate MT binding of tau (8-11). Only a few
sites on tau are phosphorylated at any moment in normal adults (12,
13). In Alzheimer's disease brain, however, tau is more heavily
phosphorylated (12, 13), due in part to decreased tau phosphatase
activity (13, 14). Hyperphosphorylated tau is the principal component
of Alzheimer's disease paired helical filaments and neurofibrillar
lesions present in several other neurodegenerative disorders (15) and
has very low affinity for MTs (16, 17). Although non-phosphorylated tau
can assemble into paired helical filament-like filaments in
vitro (18-21), it is reasonable to hypothesize that changes in
tau phosphorylation are decisive events in paired helical filament
biogenesis in vivo.
To study how tau phosphorylation is regulated, we have been focusing on
protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), a heterotrimeric enzyme that comprises
one catalytic C subunit, one non-catalytic A subunit, and one of
several structurally distinct, regulatory B subunits (22). We
previously reported that PP2A is likely to be a major tau phosphatase
in vivo (23). Initially, we found that a pool of AB Here, we describe the use of tau deletion mutants, specific PP2A
enzymes, and intact and proteolyzed MTs to define binding sites on tau
for PP2A, on PP2A for tau and MTs, and on MTs for PP2A. When considered
collectively, the results indicate how structural interactions among
PP2A, tau, and MTs can control the phosphorylation of tau. The results
suggest, moreover, that disruption of the normal interactions could
contribute significantly to the development of tauopathies such as
Alzheimer's disease.
Binding of PP2A to Tau--
Purified bovine brain or bovine
cardiac (24, 25) or human recombinant (22) AB Assembly and Limited Proteolysis of Tubulin--
Purified bovine
brain tubulin (29) at 5 µM (equal to 0.5 mg/ml) was
polymerized into MTs by incubation for 10 min at 37 °C in PEM buffer
(0.1 M PIPES, pH 6.9, 2 mM EGTA, and 5 mM MgCl2) containing 1 mM GTP and
20 µM Taxol (provided by Nancita Lomax, NCI, National
Institutes of Health). When used in PP2A enzymatic assays, MTs were
first washed free of GTP by centrifugation at 100,000 × gmax for 20 min at 30 °C in a Beckman TLA
100.3 rotor, followed by resuspension in PEM buffer lacking GTP, but
containing 20 µM Taxol. This step was essential because
high levels of free GTP interfered with PP2A enzymatic assays. To
remove C-terminal domains of polymerized tubulin, Taxol-stabilized MTs
were incubated overnight at 30 °C with ~1% (w/w) subtilisin
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) (30). Proteolysis was then terminated by
addition of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to 5 mM.
Subtilisin-digested MTs were sedimented for 45 min at 100,000 × gmax in a Beckman TLA 100.3 rotor, resuspended
in PEM buffer containing 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
and 20 µM Taxol, and used immediately for
co-sedimentation assays. The extent of MT proteolysis was verified by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) as described previously
(30-32).
MT Co-sedimentation Assays--
PP2A and tau were incubated
either individually or together for 15-20 min at room temperature with
PEM buffer alone or with PEM buffer containing F-actin (33) or intact
or subtilisin-digested MTs. The samples were then centrifuged at
~50,000 × gmax for 20 min at 25 °C in
a Beckman TLA 100.3 rotor. Next, the supernatants were collected, and
each pellet was resuspended to the starting volume (20-50 µl). The
samples were then resolved by SDS-PAGE using 12% polyacrylamide gels,
transferred to nitrocellulose, and immunoblotted with antibodies to the
C subunit of PP2A or with the Tau-1 (1) or Tau-5 (28) antibodies.
Dephosphorylation of Tau by PP2A--
Radiolabeled soluble tau
(~5 mol of phosphate/mol of protein) was produced by incubating
bovine brain tau with protein kinase A (Sigma) in the presence of 20 µM [ Dephosphorylation of Tubulin by PP2A--
Purified AB Effects of MTs on PP2A Activity--
AB AB
Fig. 1 summarizes the results of the binding assays in which AB
Deletion of the N-terminal 29-mer inserts (rTau8) or residues 84-161
(rTau2), which include part of the second N-terminal repeat, did not
impair binding of four-repeat tau to AB
Taken together, these data demonstrate that the overall PP2A-binding
region on tau encompasses the MT-binding repeats and a short sequence
N-terminal to the repeats. It is thus indistinguishable, within the
limits of experimental resolution, from the MT-binding region on tau
(4-6). Interestingly, lower affinity binding of AB
To seek further evidence that sequences on tau immediately N-terminal
to the MT-binding repeats actually bind AB Direct, Isoform-specific Binding of PP2A to MTs--
Our previous
finding that a pool of AB
In the next series of experiments, increasing concentrations of AB
To assess whether AB
The fact that the monomeric C subunit co-sedimented with MTs indicates
that it contains a binding site for MTs. However, our findings suggest
that the presence of A and B subunits modulates interactions of the
catalytic C subunit with MTs and that each type of B subunit does so in
its own unique way. As reported previously for binding of various forms
of PP2A to tau (23), the AB Tau and PP2A Bind to Different Sites on MTs--
Binding to MTs of
several MAPs such tau and MAP2 can be partially inhibited by prior
exposure of either unassembled (32) or polymerized (30, 31) tubulin
to the protease subtilisin, which removes a small C-terminal fragment
from both MTs Inhibit Dephosphorylation of Tau by AB
The inhibitory effect of MTs on the tau phosphatase activity of PP2A
was also analyzed by incubating 200 nM protein kinase A-phosphorylated bovine brain tau with 40 nM AB
Although the MT-mediated inhibition of tau dephosphorylation by AB PP2A Preferentially Dephosphorylates Unassembled Versus Polymerized
Tubulin--
Neuronal MTs exist as a mixture of different populations
of Previously, we reported that a pool of AB One mechanism that apparently can account for the MT-binding activity
of PP2A is direct association via the C subunit. This conclusion is
supported by the finding that three distinct PP2A holoenzymes, the AC
complex, and free C subunits all bound to MTs, albeit with varying
affinities (Fig. 4). These in vitro data should not be
assumed to mean that all PP2A enzymes efficiently interact with MTs
in vivo, however. For example, in contrast to AB One potential physiological consequence of the binding of PP2A to MTs
is reduced phosphatase activity of the enzyme (Figs. 6 and 7). In the
case of tau, this phosphatase inhibition could result from at least two
factors: immobilization of the catalytic subunit of PP2A on MTs and
competition between MTs and PP2A for tau binding. It is likely that
inhibition of catalytic activity occurs subsequent to direct binding of
the C subunit to MTs. Such an interaction may induce conformational
changes in PP2A, which partially or completely conceal the catalytic
site, preventing efficient access to substrates. The inhibition of PP2A
activity by MTs also provides an explanation for reports that MT
depolymerization induces okadaic acid-sensitive dephosphorylation of
tau in cultured cells (11, 44). Together, these results underscore the
possible importance of MT dynamics in the regulation of the
phosphorylation state of PP2A-sensitive substrates, including tau. In
addition to the control of PP2A activity by regulatory proteins,
post-translational modifications, and biochemical factors (22, 25, 43),
selective anchoring of PP2A to MTs may represent a novel way to
regulate specific subcellular pools of PP2A.
Whereas MT assembly dynamics may regulate PP2A activity, PP2A, in turn,
might modulate MT stability in axons by regulating the MT-binding and
-stabilizing activities of tau (23, 45). Moreover, cycles of tubulin
phosphorylation and dephosphorylation have been proposed to regulate MT
functions during neuronal differentiation and to mediate interactions
of MTs with other cellular components (38, 46). Interestingly, AB Based on the collective results presented here and in related
reports from our laboratories and others, we propose a model in which
AB
C, the dominant brain isoform of protein phosphatase 2A
(PP2A), is localized on MTs, binds directly to tau, and is a major tau
phosphatase in cells. We now describe direct interactions among tau,
PP2A, and MTs at the submolecular level. Using tau deletion mutants, we
found that AB
C binds a domain on tau that is indistinguishable from
its MT-binding domain. AB
C binds directly to MTs through a site that
encompasses its catalytic subunit and is distinct from its binding site
for tau, and AB
C and tau bind to different domains on MTs. Specific
PP2A isoforms bind to MTs with distinct affinities in
vitro, and these interactions differentially inhibit the ability
of PP2A to dephosphorylate various substrates, including tau and
tubulin. Finally, tubulin assembly decreases PP2A activity in
vitro, suggesting that PP2A activity can be modulated by MT dynamics in vivo. Taken together, these findings indicate
how structural interactions among AB
C, tau, and MTs might control the phosphorylation state of tau. Disruption of these normal
interactions could contribute significantly to development of
tauopathies such as Alzheimer's disease.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C, the
major PP2A isoform in brain (22), is associated with MTs in brain and
cultured cells (17). Subsequently, we determined that tau binds with
high affinity to AB
C and AB
C; less tightly to AB'C; and poorly,
if at all, to AC or individual PP2A subunits (23). Finally, we found
that the relative affinities of PP2A isoforms for tau correlated with
their tau phosphatase activities, and suppression of PP2A activity in
cells stimulated Alzheimer's disease-like phosphorylation of tau and
prevented tau from binding MTs (23).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C (300 nM)
in storage buffer (25 mM Tris, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, and 50% glycerol, pH 7.5) was incubated for 15 min on ice in a final volume of 5 µl with a 600 nM concentration of either purified bovine brain tau (26)
or any of several previously described human recombinant tau (rTau) fragments (27, 28). We also used one new recombinant tau fragment, rTau9 (see Fig. 1), which was made following the same method used to
generate previously produced fragments (27). In some assays, PP2A was
incubated on ice for 15 min with 1-5 µM okadaic acid before adding tau. For competition experiments with the synthetic tau
peptide 224KKVAVVRTPPKSP236 (numbered according
to the longest isoform of human brain tau (3)), 300 nM
AB
C was first incubated for 15 min with 1 or 10 µM
peptide and then for an additional 15 min in the presence of peptide
plus 600 nM tau. After all incubations were completed, samples were applied directly onto pre-cast, nondenaturing 8-25% polyacrylamide gels (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech); subjected to native
gel electrophoresis using the Amersham Pharmacia Biotech PhastSystem;
and transferred to nitrocellulose for immunoblotting with antibodies to
the C or B
subunits of PP2A (23). Immunoreactive proteins were
detected using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (ECL, Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). Blots were densitometrically scanned and
quantitatively analyzed using a PhosphorImager and ImageQuant software
(Molecular Dynamics, Inc.).
-32P]ATP, 10 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, and 10 µM cAMP and then purifying phosphorylated tau as
described previously (23). Radiolabeled, MT-bound tau was obtained by
incubating radiolabeled soluble tau with Taxol-assembled MTs,
centrifuging MTs for 10 min in a Beckman TLA 100.3 rotor at
~50,000 × gmax, and resuspending MTs in
GTP-free PEM buffer. For the experiment shown in the upper
panel of Fig. 6, ~1000 cpm each of radiolabeled soluble and
MT-bound tau were incubated for 5-45 min at 30 °C with 14 nM AB
C, and dephosphorylation of tau was halted at
various time points by addition of 3× sample buffer for SDS-PAGE. For
the experiment shown in the lower panel of Fig. 6, 200 nM radiolabeled soluble tau was mixed with 40 nM AB
C and 0-10 µM tubulin that had been
polymerized in the presence of Taxol. The samples were incubated at
30 °C for 15 min, after which tau dephosphorylation was terminated
by addition of 3× sample buffer for SDS-PAGE. The samples were
resolved by SDS-PAGE using 12% polyacrylamide gels, and
32P incorporation into tau was measured on dried gels using
a PhosphorImager.
C, AC,
or C subunits (25 nM) in storage buffer were incubated for
15 min with either polymerized or dimeric tubulin (20 µM)
in a final volume of 50 µl of phosphatase assay buffer (20 mM MOPS, 0.02%
-mercaptoethanol, and 0.25 mg/ml bovine
serum albumin, pH 7.0). The reactions were performed in 96-well
U-bottom microtiter plates. Green reagent (BIOMOL Research Labs, Inc.) was used in a quantitative colorimetric assay for free phosphate (Pi) released after 30-min incubations at room temperature.
Pi levels were determined by measuring
A620 nm according to the manufacturer's
instructions. Control wells containing only tubulin, MTs, or buffer
alone, but no phosphatases, were used to determine the background
values of Pi, and the PP2A activities reported here were
background-corrected.
C, AC, or C subunits
were incubated for 15 min with or without 5 µM
polymerized or dimeric tubulin. The samples were then incubated for 5 min at 30 °C with a 100 µM concentration of either of
two substrates: radiolabeled phosphorylated myosin light chain (24) or
the synthetic phosphopeptide RRREEE(pT)EEE (Biosynthesis Inc.).
Dephosphorylation of myosin light chain was assayed by measuring the
release of 32Pi as described previously (17).
Dephosphorylation of the phosphopeptide was determined by measuring the
release of Pi using the colorimetric assay described above
for tubulin. Dephosphorylation of polymerized or dimeric tubulin by
PP2A enzymes represented, at most, ~4% of the total phosphatase
activity measured for phosphorylated myosin light chain or the phosphopeptide.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C and MTs Bind to the Same Region within Tau--
To localize
the binding site on tau for AB
C, a gel mobility shift assay (23)
coupled with immunoblotting (see "Experimental Procedures") was
used to monitor binding of AB
C to 13 different rTau proteins, all
but one of which (rTau9) have been previously described (27, 28). These
recombinant proteins are derived from adult (rTau1-rTau6) or fetal
(rTau7-rTau13) isoforms of human brain tau. The largest recombinant
tau that was used, rTau1, contains four MT-binding repeats (four-repeat
tau) and two 29-mer N-terminal inserts. As shown in Fig.
1, each of the other rTau proteins
contained one or more unique deletions. Their N- and C-terminal amino
acids and the boundaries of their deletions are numbered relative to the amino acid sequence of the largest isoform of brain tau (3), which
is equivalent to rTau1.

View larger version (62K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
AB
C binds to the
MT-binding domain on tau. Purified bovine brain AB
C (300 nM) was incubated on ice for 15-30 min in the presence of
various recombinant proteins (600 nM) derived from adult
(rTau1-rTau6) or fetal (rTau7-rTau13) isoforms of human brain tau.
For each combination of AB
C and a rTau species, nondenaturing gel
electrophoresis was used to separate complexes containing both proteins
from free AB
C and rTau. The resulting gels were immunoblotted with a
monoclonal antibody specific for the C subunit of PP2A, and
densitometry of the immunoblots was used to estimate the percentage of
total AB
C that was bound to each rTau. Values shown are the
means ± S.D. of at least three separate experiments. For each
rTau species, the N- and C-terminal amino acids and the boundaries of
deletions (indicated by black lines) are numbered relative
to the 441-amino acid sequence of the largest human adult tau isoform
(3), which is equivalent to rTau1.
C and
the pertinent rTau proteins were used at 300 and 600 nM,
respectively. Densitometry of the resulting immunoblots was used to
estimate the percentage of PP2A that was bound to each rTau protein.
Maximal binding of AB
C (
95%) was observed for every rTau protein
that contains all four MT-binding repeats plus extensive sequence
contiguous with the N terminus of the repeats. Included in this group
are rTau1 and rTau2, which do not have any C-terminal deletions, and
rTau6 and rTau8, which are missing part or all of the C-terminal 45 amino acid residues of native tau. A modest decrease in binding (to
~80%) was observed for rTau7, which is equivalent to the fetal
isoform of brain tau (3), contains only three MT-binding repeats
(three-repeat tau), and lacks the two N-terminal inserts. A similar
level of AB
C binding (~75%) was observed for rTau5, the C
terminus of which is in the middle of the third MT-binding repeat, but
contains no other deletions relative to rTau1. By comparison, rTau4,
which contains a large internal deletion and includes just part of the
last MT-binding repeat, was able to bind only ~45% of AB
C. The
minimal protein that retained the ability to bind AB
C (~38%) was
rTau12, which lacks all four MT-binding repeats, but, near its C
terminus, contains a proline-rich sequence that has MT-binding activity
independent of the repeats (4, 5). In stark contrast, rTau13, which lacks residues 221-242 of rTau12, but is otherwise identical, failed
to bind any AB
C.
C. Other deletions located
N-terminal to the MT-binding repeats yielded demonstrable, albeit
modest effects. A slight reduction in binding (to ~90%) was observed
for rTau3, which contains all four MT-binding repeats, but lacks most
of the proline-rich MT-binding domain located immediately N-terminal to
those repeats. Likewise, binding to AB
C correlated roughly with
protein length for the three-repeat proteins (rTau9, rTau10, and
rTau11) that have extensive N-terminal deletions.
C can be achieved
by proteins that contain only the extreme N-terminal (rTau12) or
C-terminal (rTau4) part of the overall binding region on tau for
AB
C. In addition, the binding affinity of PP2A for tau increases
with the number of MT-binding repeats present in tau. It is also
important to note that inclusion of 1 µM okadaic acid in
the binding reactions completely suppressed PP2A activity, but had no
effect on the extent of PP2A interaction with tau (data not shown).
C, the synthetic peptide
224KKVAVVRTPPKSP236, which corresponds to a
portion of this region, was tested for its ability to compete with
native tau for binding to AB
C. The sequence of this portion of tau
is invariant among all isoforms of human, rat, mouse, and bovine tau.
Bovine brain AB
C (300 nM) was preincubated first with 1 or 10 µM peptide, after which bovine brain tau (600 nM) or an equivalent volume of buffer was added. After an
additional 15-min incubation, binding of AB
C to tau was monitored by
native gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting with an anti-B
antibody (23). As shown in Fig. 2, 10 µM (but not 1 µM) peptide partially
inhibited binding of PP2A to tau. In addition, 10 µM
peptide induced a shift in the electrophoretic mobility of PP2A on
native gels, consistent with the formation of an AB
C-peptide
complex.

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
A synthetic tau peptide competes with native
tau for AB
C binding. Bovine brain AB
C
(300 nM) was preincubated for 15 min with a 1 or 10 µM concentration of the synthetic peptide
224KKVAVVRTPPKSP236, corresponding to the
224-236-amino acid sequence of the longest human adult tau isoform,
and then further incubated for 15 min with 600 nM native
bovine brain tau or buffer alone. The samples were analyzed by
nondenaturing gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with a
polyclonal antibody to the B
subunit of PP2A. Note the presence of
AB
C-peptide complexes and a decreased amount of AB
C-tau complex
in the presence of 10 µM peptide.
C copurifies with MTs in vitro
and is associated with MTs in cells (17) raised the question of how
AB
C, and possibly other PP2A isoforms as well, might bind to MTs.
The results presented in Figs. 1 and 2 strongly imply that tau cannot
serve as a MT-anchoring protein for PP2A because they show that AB
C
and MTs bind to the same region on tau. To determine whether PP2A might
bind directly to MTs, a series of MT co-sedimentation assays were
performed with various purified PP2A enzymes. As shown in Fig.
3 (upper panel), when bovine
brain or human recombinant AB
C heterotrimers were mixed with MTs and centrifuged, ~50% of PP2A was recovered in the MT pellets under the
experimental conditions utilized. The possibility that AB
C may have
nonspecifically co-sedimented with MTs under these conditions was
assessed in parallel control experiments, in which MTs were omitted or
F-actin was substituted for MTs. AB
C proteins did not sediment in
either of these cases, emphasizing the specificity of the direct
interaction between AB
C and MTs. In addition, 0.5 M NaCl
was found to prevent co-sedimentation of PP2A with MTs, indicating that
ionic interactions are important for association of the enzyme with
MTs. As was observed for the binding of AB
C to tau, inclusion of 5 µM okadaic acid in the assays completely suppressed PP2A
activity, but had no effect on the extent of interaction of AB
C with
MTs (data not shown).

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
AB
C co-sediments
with MTs. Upper panel, purified recombinant AB
C (100 nM) was incubated with buffer alone, 5 µM
F-actin, or 5 µM Taxol-polymerized tubulin (MTs) in the
absence or presence of 0.5 M NaCl. The samples were then
centrifuged, and fractions corresponding to the supernatants
(s) and pellets (p) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotting with a monoclonal antibody to the C subunit of PP2A. All
pellets were resuspended to original sample volumes, and equal aliquots
of supernatants and pellets were loaded on the gel. Lower
panel, MT co-sedimentation assays with increasing concentrations
of purified AB
C were performed and analyzed as described in the
upper panel.
C
were incubated with MTs and then centrifuged to generate MT-bound
(pellet) and unbound (supernatant) fractions. Fig. 3 (lower
panel) shows that AB
C co-pelleted with MTs in a
concentration-dependent manner. The highest concentration
of AB
C that we were able to use for these experiments (1 µM) was not sufficient for saturation binding to ~5
µM assembled tubulin (see Fig. 4). Nevertheless, ~40%
of 1 µM AB
C bound to ~5 µM assembled
tubulin, indicating that MTs must be able to accommodate >1 AB
C
heterotrimer/12.5 tubulin dimers. Furthermore, because ~80% of
AB
C bound to MTs when the total concentration of AB
C was 0.1 µM (Fig. 3, lower panel), the binding of
AB
C to MTs must be tight. Efforts to use Scatchard analysis to
determine saturation binding and a dissociation constant more
accurately were unsuccessful for AB
C and other forms of PP2A (Figs.
3 (lower panel) and 4) because the Scatchard plots could not
be described accurately by simple linear equations (data not shown).
C is the only form of PP2A that can bind MTs, we
compared the behavior of distinct PP2A enzymes in the MT
co-sedimentation assay. As shown in Fig.
4, all enzymatically active proteins
tested, including the AB
C and AB'C holoenzymes, the AC dimer, and
the catalytic C subunit, were able to bind MTs to some extent. However,
distinct PP2A isoforms appeared to have distinct affinities for MTs
because at fixed molar concentrations of PP2A and polymerized tubulin,
the ratio of MT-bound to soluble enzyme varied considerably among the
phosphatases tested. Based on the results presented in Fig. 4, the
ability of PP2A to bind to MTs can be ranked as follows: AB
C > AC > AB
C > C > AB'C. When actin filaments were
substituted for microtubules, virtually none of the PP2A enzymes
pelleted, demonstrating that their binding to microtubules was specific
(data not shown).

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Differential binding of distinct PP2A enzymes
to MTs. Co-sedimentation assays were performed with 10 µM Taxol-polymerized tubulin and increasing
concentrations (10-1000 nM) of purified AB
C, AB
C,
AB'C, AC, or C subunits and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting
with a monoclonal antibody to the C subunit of PP2A. The relative
amounts of MT-bound and unbound enzymes were calculated by quantitative
densitometric analysis of the immunoblots. The results shown are
representative of a typical experiment.
C heterotrimer bound more tightly to MTs
than any of the other forms of PP2A that were assayed. In addition, we
found that neither AB
C nor AC forms detectable complexes with
unpolymerized tubulin during nondenaturing gel electrophoresis (data
not shown), implying that PP2A can efficiently interact with tubulin
only when the tubulin has polymerized.
- and
-tubulin. To compare the binding sites on MTs for
PP2A and tau, co-sedimentation experiments were therefore performed
using untreated or subtilisin-treated MTs, bovine brain AB
C, and
bovine brain tau. The resulting supernatants and pellets were analyzed
for the presence of tau, intact or cleaved tubulin, and AB
C by
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Representative results are shown in Fig.
5, and equivalent results were obtained when AC was substituted for AB
C (data not shown). As expected from
previous studies (30-32), the electrophoretic mobilities of nearly all
of the
- and
-tubulin increased after exposure of MTs to
subtilisin (data not shown), but subtilisin did not alter the
proportion of total tubulin that sedimented (~90%) (data not shown).
Binding of tau to MTs was significantly weakened, but not completely
abolished, by pretreatment of MTs with subtilisin, as reported
previously (31). In contrast to tau, AB
C co-sedimented with
subtilisin-treated MTs as efficiently as with untreated MTs. We also
found that preincubation of AB
C with tau did not prevent the
phosphatase from co-sedimenting with either intact or
subtilisin-digested MTs. Taken together, these results lead us to
conclude that AB
C can bind to a site on MTs that overlaps minimally,
if at all, with the binding site on MTs for tau.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
AB
C and tau bind to
different sites on the MT wall. Aliquots of Taxol-stabilized MTs
(20 µM tubulin) were incubated overnight with or without
subtilisin, which removes C-terminal sequences from both
- and
-tubulin (30, 32). Co-sedimentation assays were then performed in
the presence of bovine brain tau or recombinant AB
C (~128
nM) that had been preincubated with or without bovine brain
tau (~500 nM). MT-bound and unbound AB
C and tau were
detected by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using a monoclonal antibody to
the C subunit of PP2A or the monoclonal tau-5 antibody. Note that
subtilisin treatment of MTs led to decreased binding of tau, but did
not affect binding of PP2A. s, supernatant; p,
pellet.
C--
Because the
binding domain on tau for PP2A (Figs. 1 and 2) cannot be distinguished
from the MT-binding domain on tau (4-6) and PP2A must bind to that
site in order to dephosphorylate tau (23), we postulated that MTs would
inhibit the tau phosphatase activity of PP2A by competing with PP2A for
binding to tau. To test this possibility, bovine brain tau was
phosphorylated by protein kinase A in the presence of
[
-32P]ATP (34). Radiolabeled soluble tau was then
incubated with MTs, after which the mixture was centrifuged to pellet
MTs. The pellet was then resuspended in a buffer that contained 20 µM Taxol, but lacked free GTP, which interferes with the
enzymatic activity of PP2A. MT-associated tau was incubated with AB
C
for varying periods of time. In parallel, equal counts (~1000 cpm) of
soluble tau were similarly treated with AB
C in the absence of MTs.
Finally, dried SDS-polyacrylamide gels were analyzed quantitatively
using a PhosphorImager to measure the extent of tau dephosphorylation in each sample. As shown in Fig. 6
(upper panel), AB
C was able to remove ~70% of the
radiolabeled, covalently bound phosphate from soluble tau within 15 min, whereas only ~50% of the phosphate had been removed from
MT-associated tau after 45 min. Thus, MTs inhibited the rate of tau
dephosphorylation by AB
C. Control experiments demonstrated that the
tau phosphatase activity of PP2A was not affected by 20 µM Taxol (data not shown).

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
MTs inhibit dephosphorylation of tau by
AB
C. Upper panel, bovine brain
tau was phosphorylated by protein kinase A in the presence of
[
-32P]ATP. ~1000 cpm (400 nM) of
MT-bound (+MTs) and soluble (
MTs) tau were
incubated for the indicated times at 30 °C with ~14 nM
purified bovine brain AB
C. Samples were then resolved by SDS-PAGE,
and 32P levels in tau were measured on dried gels using a
PhosphorImager. Error bars indicate the S.D. values for data
from two independent experiments. Lower panel, radiolabeled,
protein kinase A-phosphorylated tau (200 nM) was incubated
with or without Taxol-stabilized MTs at the indicated concentrations of
polymerized tubulin, after which bovine brain AB
C was added to 40 nM. The dephosphorylation reactions were performed for 5 min at 30 °C as described above. The data shown are the means ± S.D. of results from three separate experiments and are expressed as
the percentage of phosphate on tau that was not exposed to AB
C
(control).
C and a
concentration series of MTs for 15 min. Fig. 6 (lower panel)
shows that tau dephosphorylation by PP2A was inhibited by MTs in a
concentration-dependent manner. In the absence of MTs,
<15% of the original 32P levels remained covalently bound
to tau. In contrast, ~20% of 32P remained when 1 µM assembled tubulin was present, and ~45% remained at
assembled tubulin concentrations of 2 µM or higher.
C
likely resulted, at least in part, from competition between MTs and
AB
C for binding to tau, we hypothesized that the direct interaction
of PP2A with MTs may also affect its catalytic activity in general. To
test this hypothesis, purified AB
C, AC, and C subunits were
incubated with buffer alone or with buffer containing 5 µM unassembled or Taxol-polymerized tubulin. The
phosphatase activity of each sample was then measured using either of
two characterized PP2A substrates that do not bind MTs: phosphorylated myosin light chain or the synthetic phosphopeptide RRREEE(pT)EEE (35).
As shown in Fig. 7, incubation of PP2A
enzymes with unpolymerized tubulin did not inhibit phosphatase
activity for the substrates. In contrast, preincubation of PP2A enzymes
with Taxol-stabilized MTs significantly inhibited their ability to
dephosphorylate both substrates. Interestingly, the extent of
inhibition varied between ~20 and 60%, depending on both which form
of PP2A was tested and the chosen substrate. The phosphatase activities
of AB
C, AC, and C for myosin light chain and the synthetic peptide
were insensitive to Taxol in these assays (data not shown).

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
MTs inhibit the catalytic activity of
PP2A. Purified AB
C, AC, and C subunits (25 nM each)
were incubated for 15 min in buffer alone or in buffer containing 5 µM soluble or Taxol-polymerized tubulin. Then, a 100 µM concentration of either of two phosphorylated
substrates, myosin light chain (MLC) or the synthetic
RRREEE(pT) EEE peptide, was added, and the samples were incubated for
5 min at 30 °C to allow substrate dephosphorylation. The data shown
are the means ± S.E. of triplicate determinations from two
separate experiments and are expressed as the percentage of PP2A
activity measured with each substrate in the absence of tubulin
(control).
- and
-tubulin isotypes (36). It has been reported previously that the neuron-specific
III-tubulin isoform, which represents ~25% of neuronal
-tubulin, is phosphorylated in cultured cells and in vivo (37-39). Remarkably, phosphorylated
III-tubulin can be dephosphorylated by PP2A, but not by any of
several other protein phosphatases that have been tested to date (37).
Based on these results, we measured dephosphorylation of unassembled or
Taxol-polymerized brain tubulin by bovine brain AB
C and AC. As shown
in Fig. 8, both forms of tubulin were
dephosphorylated by AB
C and AC. During the 30 min in which the
reactions were allowed to proceed, however, polymerized tubulin was
dephosphorylated to just 40% the level of unassembled tubulin.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
PP2A dephosphorylates unassembled tubulin
more rapidly than assembled tubulin. Purified AB
C and AC
enzymes (25 nM) were incubated for 15 min at 30 °C with
20 µM soluble or Taxol-polymerized bovine brain tubulin,
which includes naturally phosphorylated
III-tubulin. PP2A activity
was then measured as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Values are expressed as the percent of maximal PP2A activity and are
the means ± S.E. of duplicate determinations from two separate
experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C is localized on
intracellular MTs and binds to tau in vitro (23). A question that naturally arose from those observations was, "Does tau anchor PP2A to neuronal MTs ?" There is precedent for MAPs acting as bridges
between MTs and enzymes that control protein phosphorylation. For
example, tau and MAP2 anchor PP1 (40) and protein kinase A (41) to MTs,
respectively. As far as PP2A is concerned, however, the results
presented here demonstrate that tau cannot be responsible for linking
the enzyme to MTs. Instead, the data presented in Figs. 1 and 2 imply
that PP2A and MTs bind to tau in a mutually exclusive manner. The
interaction site on tau for PP2A corresponds approximately to amino
acid residues 221-396 of adult human tau and thus encompasses the
MT-binding repeats and nearby flanking regions that form the overall
MT-binding domain on tau (4-6). Interestingly, AB
C (Fig. 1), like
MTs (5, 6), was able to bind tau variants containing truncated
MT-binding regions as small as only one repeat or the proline-rich
domain located immediately N-terminal to the repeats. Since the C
subunit of PP2A does not bind to tau alone (23), the MT-binding domain
on tau can be viewed as a site that anchors the PP2A holoenzyme and
enables its catalytic subunit to dephosphorylate residues located
predominantly elsewhere on tau. This might explain why the tau
phosphatase activities for various forms of PP2A are correlated with
their affinities for tau (23) and why okadaic acid, which binds tightly
to the catalytic site on PP2A and abolishes its enzymatic activity
(42), does not interfere with binding of PP2A to tau.
C, the
AB'C holoenzyme showed very low affinity for MTs in our in
vitro assays (17) and is not known to be associated with MTs
in vivo (43). Our finding that the affinity for MTs of PP2A holoenzymes varied according to their regulatory B subunits (Fig. 4) is
consistent with the model that distinct PP2A isoforms are differentially targeted to specific subcellular compartments through their regulatory subunits (17, 22, 23, 43). It also must be noted that
although direct binding of PP2A to MTs has now been shown to occur,
other possible binding mechanisms cannot be formally excluded. For
example, perhaps PP2A can also be linked to MTs indirectly through a
MAP intermediate, as has been described for PP1 and tau (40).
C
and AC preferentially dephosphorylated depolymerized as compared with
polymerized brain tubulin (Fig. 8). This difference may result from the
binding of PP2A to MTs, but not to soluble tubulin.
III-Tubulin is
the only known form of phosphorylatable brain tubulin and is found
primarily in the assembled pool of tubulin in vivo (37-39).
Because phosphate can turn over rapidly on
III-tubulin, it was
hypothesized that higher levels of phosphorylation in assembled MTs
likely resulted from slower dephosphorylation of tubulin phosphate in
polymers rather than in monomers (38). Since AB
C is the only known
phosphatase capable of dephosphorylating
III-tubulin (37, 46), this
hypothesis is supported by our in vitro data showing the
preferential dephosphorylation of unassembled tubulin by AB
C. Thus,
AB
C may be an important modulator of MT phosphorylation levels and
functions in neurons. Yet, the lack of effect of okadaic acid on the
ability of PP2A to co-sediment with MTs and the presence of AB
C on
non-neuronal MTs both suggest that the interactions between PP2A and
MTs are not simply restricted to dephosphorylation of tubulin. Their
functional significance for the regulation of the cytoskeleton remains
to be defined.
C regulates the phosphorylation state of tau by a complex
mechanism involving structural interactions as well as enzyme-substrate
interactions among AB
C, tau, and MTs (Fig.
9). Because AB
C binds to the
MT-binding domain of tau and MTs inhibit the tau phosphatase activity
of PP2A, the model presumes that AB
C can dephosphorylate tau
primarily, if not exclusively, when tau is dissociated from MTs. This
is in stark contrast to the tau phosphatase activity of PP1 because tau
acts as a bridge between PP1 and MTs; PP1 binds to a portion of tau
that is distinct from the MT-binding site on tau; and PP1 has the
potential to dephosphorylate both soluble and MT-bound tau (40). For
simplicity's sake, however, the model does not take into account other
factors that are involved in the regulation of PP2A and MTs. Many
neurodegenerative disorders besides Alzheimer's disease are
characterized by the presence of filaments assembled from
hyperphosphorylated tau. The recent discovery of a direct link between
tau mutations and neurodegenerative disorders such as FTDP-17 has
underscored the importance of functional tau for neuronal integrity and
survival (15). In this context, tau mutations, especially those
occurring within the MT-binding domain of tau, could affect its ability
to bind to PP2A. Although it has been proposed earlier that a decrease
in tau phosphatase activity, especially that contributed by PP2A, could
underlie the biogenesis of hyperphosphorylated tau in Alzheimer's
disease (23, 44, 47), the data we present here and in a prior report (17) suggest specific molecular mechanisms by which this could occur,
namely, any alteration of the MT-binding site on tau, by mutation or
post-translational modification, might compromise the ability of PP2A
to bind and thereby dephosphorylate tau. It is easy to imagine how such
a situation could lead to the accumulation of highly phosphorylated
tau, as occurs in Alzheimer's disease. Likewise, deregulation of MT
dynamics could indirectly affect endogenous levels of PP2A activity and
deregulate PP2A-controlled signaling pathways. The fate of tau thus
appears to be intimately linked to the complex interrelationships
existing among tau, MTs, and PP2A. Disruption of the normal structural
and enzymatic interactions among these factors might be a major
underlying cause of the development of tauopathies.

View larger version (105K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Model for the role of structural interactions
among AB
C, tau, and MTs for the regulation of
tau phosphorylation. The model emphasizes the following points. 1)
Normal and hyperphosphorylated tau are depicted as containing one to
two and four covalently bound phosphates, respectively, even though
actual in vivo levels may be much higher. 2) Both MT-bound
and soluble tau are presumed to be accessible to protein kinases. 3)
PP2A binds to tau and MTs through distinct sites and therefore might be
able to anchor tau to MTs. 4) Since MTs and PP2A compete for binding to
the same region on tau and binding of PP2A to MTs inhibits its
catalytic activity, PP2A can efficiently dephosphorylate tau only when
neither protein is bound to MTs. Depolymerization of MTs or
dissociation of PP2A from MTs thus potentiates the phosphatase activity
of PP2A for soluble tau. In contrast to PP2A, other tau phosphatases
such as PP1 (40) may be able to dephosphorylate both MT-bound and
soluble tau. 5) As long as the tau kinases and phosphatases remain in
proper balance, the phosphorylation state of tau will remain within
limits that favor binding of tau molecules to MTs, as opposed to other
tau molecules. 6) If the balance becomes altered in favor of the
kinases, however, phosphates may accumulate on tau at specific sites
such as serine 214 or serine 262, which, when phosphorylated,
dramatically diminish the MT-binding activity of tau (48). The
elimination of MTs as favored binding partners for tau may then
contribute to an environment that permits tau to self-associate into
paired helical filaments. Disruption of the normal structural
interactions between PP2A and tau may also lead to tau
hyperphosphorylation. PHFs, paired helical filaments.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AG12300 (to E. S. and C. L. W.), GM49505 and HL31107 (to M. C. M.), AG14452 (to J. K.), and NS30485 (to G. S. B.); by Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association Grant IIRG-93-113 (to G. L.); and by Welch Foundation Grant I-1236 (to G. S. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235-9073. Tel.: 214-648-2327; Fax: 214-648-2077; E-mail: Estelle.Sontag@email.swmed.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: MT, microtubule; MAP, microtubule-associated protein; PP2A, protein phosphatase 2A; PP1, protein phosphatase 1; rTau, recombinant tau; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid; PAGE, polyacryl- amide gel electrophoresis.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Binder, L. I.,
Frankfurter, A.,
and Rebhun, L. I.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
101,
1371-1378 |
| 2. |
Weingarten, M. D.,
Lockwood, A. H.,
Hwo, S.-Y.,
and Kirschner, M. W.
(1975)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
72,
1858-1862 |
| 3. | Goedert, M., Spillantini, M. G., Jakes, R., Rutherford, D., and Crowther, R. A. (1989) Neuron 3, 519-526[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Mandelkow, E.-M., Biernat, J., Drewes, G., Gustke, N., Trinczek, B., and Mandelkow, E. (1995) Neurobiol. Aging 16, 355-363[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Goode, B. L., Denis, P. E., Panda, D., Radeke, M. J., Miller, H. P., Wilson, L., and Feinstein, S. C. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 353-365[Abstract] |
| 6. | Gustke, N., Trinczek, B., Biernat, J., Mandelkow, E.-M., and Mandelkow, E. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 9511-9522[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Goedert, M., Trojanowski, J. Q., and Lee, V. M.-Y. (1997) in Molecular Mechanisms of Dementia (Wasco, W. , and Tanzi, R. E., eds) , pp. 199-218, Humana Press, Inc., Totowa, NJ |
| 8. |
Illenberger, S.,
Zheng-Fischöfer, Q.,
Preuss, U.,
Stamer, K.,
Baumann, K.,
Trinczek, B.,
Biernat, J.,
Godemann, R.,
Mandelkow, E.-M.,
and Mandelkow, E.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
1495-1512 |
| 9. | Biernat, J., Gustke, N., Drewes, G., Mandelkow, E.-M., and Mandelkow, E. (1993) Neuron 11, 153-163[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Leger, J.,
Kempf, M.,
Lee, G.,
and Brandt, R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8441-8446 |
| 11. | Xie, H., Litersky, J. M., Hartigan, J. A., Jope, R. S., and Johnson, G. V. (1998) Brain Res. 798, 173-183[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Morishima-Kawashima, M.,
Hasegawa, M.,
Takio, K.,
Suzuki, M.,
Yoshida, H.,
Titani, K.,
and Ihara, Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
823-829 |
| 13. | Matsuo, E. S., Shin, R.-W., Billingsley, M., Van de Voorde, A., O'Connor, M., Trojanowski, J. Q., and Lee, V. M.-Y. (1994) Neuron 13, 989-1002[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Goedert, M., Jakes, R., Qi, Z., Wang, J. H., and Cohen, P. (1995) J. Neurochem. 65, 2804-2807[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Spillantini, M. G., and Goedert, M. (1998) Trends Neurosci. 21, 428-433[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Busciglio, J., Lorenzo, A., Yeh, J., and Yankner, B. A. (1995) Neuron 14, 879-888[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
Sontag, E.,
Nunbhaki-Craig, V.,
Bloom, G. S.,
and Mumby, M. C.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
1131-1144 |
| 18. | Goedert, M., Jakes, R., Spillantini, M. G., Hasegawa, M., Smith, M. J., and Crowther, R. A. (1996) Nature 383, 550-553[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Wilson, D. M.,
and Binder, L. I.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24306-24314 |
| 20. | Wilson, D. M., and Binder, L. I. (1997) Am. J. Pathol. 150, 2181-2195[Abstract] |
| 21. |
Friedhoff, P.,
von Bergen, M.,
Mandelkow, E.-M.,
Davies, P.,
and Mandelkow, E.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
15712-15717 |
| 22. |
Kamibayashi, C.,
Estes, R.,
Lickteig, R. L.,
Yang, S.-I.,
Craft, C.,
and Mumby, M. C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20139-20148 |
| 23. | Sontag, E., Nunbhakdi-Craig, V., Lee, G., Bloom, G. S., and Mumby, M. C. (1996) Neuron 17, 1201-1207[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Mumby, M. C.,
Russell, K. L.,
Garrard, L. J.,
and Green, D. D.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
6257-6265 |
| 25. |
Kamibayashi, C.,
Estes, R.,
Slaughter, C.,
and Mumby, M. C.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
13251-13260 |
| 26. |
Kim, H.,
Binder, L. I.,
and Rosenbaum, J.
(1979)
J. Cell Biol.
80,
266-276 |
| 27. |
Brandt, R.,
and Lee, G.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
3414-3419 |
| 28. |
Carmel, G.,
Mager, E. M.,
Binder, L. I.,
and Kuret, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32789-32795 |
| 29. |
Fullerton, A. T.,
Bau, M. Y.,
Conrad, P. A.,
and Bloom, G. S.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
2699-2714 |
| 30. | Paschal, B. M., Obar, R. A., and Vallee, R. B. (1989) Nature 342, 569-572[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Melki, R., Kerjan, P., Waller, J., Carlier, M.-F., and Pantaloni, D. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 11536-11545[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Serrano, L., Montejo de Garcini, E., Hernandez, M. A., and Avila, J. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 153, 595-600[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |
Spudich, J. A.,
and Watt, S.
(1971)
J. Biol. Chem.
246,
4866-4871 |
| 34. |
Scott, C. W.,
Spreen, R. C.,
Herman, J. L.,
Chow, F. P.,
Davison, M. D.,
Young, J.,
and Caputo, C. B.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
1166-1173 |
| 35. | Pinna, L. A., and Donella-Deana, A. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1222, 415-431[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Ludueña, R. F. (1993) Mol. Biol. Cell 4, 445-457[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. | Khan, I. A., and Luduena, R. F. (1996) Biochemistry. 35, 3704-3711[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Gard, D. L.,
and Kirschner, M. W.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
100,
764-774 |
| 39. | Diaz-Nido, J., Serrano, L., Hernandez, M. A., and Avila, J. (1990) J. Neurochem. 54, 211-222[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Liao, H.,
Li, Y.,
Brautigan, D. L.,
and Gundersen, G. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21901-21908 |
| 41. |
Vallee, R. B.,
DiBartolomeis, M. J.,
and Therukauf, W. E.
(1981)
J. Cell Biol.
90,
568-576 |
| 42. | Bialojan, C., and Takai, A. (1988) Biochem. J. 256, 283-290[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. |
McCright, B.,
Rivers, A. M.,
Audlin, S.,
and Virshup, D. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22081-22089 |
| 44. |
Merrick, S. E.,
Demoise, D. C.,
and Lee, V. M.-Y.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
5589-5594 |
| 45. |
Merrick, S. E.,
Trojanowski, J. Q.,
and Lee, V. M.-Y.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
5726-5737 |
| 46. | Yamamoto, H., Saitoh, Y., Fukunaga, K., Nishimura, H., and Miyamoto, E. (1988) J. Neurochem. 50, 1614-1623[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. | Gong, C.-X., Shaikh, S., Wang, J.-Z., Grundke-Iqbal, I., and Iqbal, K. (1995) J. Neurochem. 65, 732-738[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. | Mandelkow, E.-M., and Mandelkow, E. (1998) Trends Cell Biol. 8, 425-427 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Chen, B. Li, I. Grundke-Iqbal, and K. Iqbal I1PP2A Affects Tau Phosphorylation via Association with the Catalytic Subunit of Protein Phosphatase 2A J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10513 - 10521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Planel, Y. Tatebayashi, T. Miyasaka, L. Liu, L. Wang, M. Herman, W. H. Yu, J. A. Luchsinger, B. Wadzinski, K. E. Duff, et al. Insulin Dysfunction Induces In Vivo Tau Hyperphosphorylation through Distinct Mechanisms J. Neurosci., December 12, 2007; 27(50): 13635 - 13648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||