J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 36, 25613-25622, September 3, 1999
The High Resolution Crystal Structure of Recombinant
Crithidia fasciculata Tryparedoxin-I*
Magnus S.
Alphey
,
Gordon A.
Leonard§,
David G.
Gourley
,
Emmanuel
Tetaud
¶,
Alan H.
Fairlamb
, and
William N.
Hunter
From the
Department of Biochemistry, The Wellcome
Trust Building, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH, Scotland,
United Kingdom, § Joint Structural Biology Group, European
Synchrotron Radiation Facility, BP 220, F38043, Grenoble, CEDEX,
France, ¶ Laboratoire de Parasitologie Moleculaire,
Université Victor Ségalen, Bordeaux II, UPRESA-CNRS 5016, 146, Rue Léo Saignat, F33076 Bordeaux, CEDEX, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
Tryparedoxin-I is a recently discovered
thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase involved in the regulation of oxidative
stress in parasitic trypanosomatids. The crystal structure of
recombinant Crithidia fasciculata tryparedoxin-I in the
oxidized state has been determined using multi-wavelength anomalous
dispersion methods applied to a selenomethionyl derivative. The model
comprises residues 3 to 145 with 236 water molecules and has been
refined using all data between a 19- and 1.4-Å resolution to an
R-factor and R-free of 19.1 and 22.3%,
respectively. Despite sharing only about 20% sequence identity,
tryparedoxin-I presents a five-stranded twisted
-sheet and two
elements of helical structure in the same type of fold as displayed by
thioredoxin, the archetypal thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase. However,
the relationship of secondary structure with the linear amino acid
sequences is different for each protein, producing a distinctive
topology. The
-sheet core is extended in the trypanosomatid protein
with an N-terminal
-hairpin. There are also differences in the
content and orientation of helical elements of secondary structure
positioned at the surface of the proteins, which leads to different
shapes and charge distributions between human thioredoxin and
tryparedoxin-I. A right-handed redox-active disulfide is formed between
Cys-40 and Cys-43 at the N-terminal region of a distorted
-helix
(
1). Cys-40 is solvent-accessible, and Cys-43 is positioned in a
hydrophilic cavity. Three C-H···O hydrogen bonds donated from two
proline residues serve to stabilize the disulfide-carrying helix and
support the correct alignment of active site residues. The accurate
model for tryparedoxin-I allows for comparisons with the family of
thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases and provides a template for the
discovery or design of selective inhibitors of hydroperoxide metabolism
in trypanosomes. Such inhibitors are sought as potential therapies
against a range of human pathogens.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Parasitic trypanosomatids, belonging to the order Kinetoplastida,
cause debilitating and life-threatening human diseases such as African
sleeping sickness, Chagas' disease, and the leishmaniases (1). The
current therapies against these infections are inadequate due to poor
drug efficacy and toxicity combined with increasing drug resistance
(2). There is therefore an urgent need to understand how drugs already
in use function so that they might be improved and to identify new
targets for chemotherapeutic attack. The ideal target is an enzyme of a
metabolic pathway that is essential for the survival of the parasite
and either absent in the human host or one that presents differing
substrate specificities (3). Because trypanosomatids are susceptible to
oxidative stress, this aspect of their metabolism represents an
attractive target for the development of new trypanocidal agents
(4-6).
As with other organisms living in an aerobic environment, trypanosomes
are exposed to reactive oxygen intermediates such as superoxide anion
and hydrogen peroxide. These potentially destructive chemicals are
eliminated in most eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells by means of a
combination of superoxide dismutases, catalase, and a variety of
peroxidases. In mammalian cells, the principal route of hydrogen
peroxide detoxification involves glutathione peroxidase working in
concert with NADPH, glutathione, and glutathione reductase (7). The
medically important trypanosomatids do not contain catalase,
glutathione peroxidase, or glutathione reductase but rely on an
analogous system to regulate oxidative stress. The details of this
trypanothione peroxidase system have been elucidated in the model
trypanosome Crithidia fasciculata (6, 8, 10, 11) and are
shown in Fig. 1. NADPH provides reducing input to the flavoprotein
trypanothione reductase, which in turn maintains high levels of reduced
trypanothione
(N1,N8-bis(glutathionyl)spermidine),
a polyamine peptide conjugate unique to trypanosomatids (5).
Trypanothione reduces tryparedoxin, which then reduces tryparedoxin
peroxidase. The peroxidase then catalyzes the final reduction of
hydrogen peroxide and organic hydroperoxides to water or alcohols.
Hydroperoxide metabolism in mammals, yeasts, and some plants uses
thioredoxin peroxidase to reduce H2O2 and alkyl
hydroperoxides with reducing equivalents provided from a pathway
involving thioredoxin, thioredoxin reductase, and NADPH (Refs. 12-15,
Fig. 1).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic depiction of hydroperoxide disposal
by passing on reducing equivalents from NADPH. Shown is the
four-component trypanothione peroxidase system characterized in
C. fasciculata and the three-component thioredoxin
peroxidase system most commonly observed.
|
|
Tryparedoxin-I and tryparedoxin peroxidase are analogous to thioredoxin
and thioredoxin peroxidase, respectively. These proteins all utilize a
reactive Cys-sulfhydryl group to reduce disulfides or, alternatively,
to oxidize sulfhydryl groups. Tryparedoxin-I is a thiol-disulfide
oxidoreductase, a family of proteins that participates in a diverse
range of biological processes, which include the formation of or
isomerization of disulfides during protein folding events,
deoxyribonucleotide synthesis, repair of oxidative damage, activation
of transcription factors, modulation of protein-DNA interactions, and
the regulation of cell growth (see Refs. 12, 15-19). The archetypal
thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases is thioredoxin, a small globular
protein of approximate molecular mass 12 kDa (15, 17). The
three-dimensional structures of oxidized and reduced thioredoxins,
including Escherichia coli and human proteins have been
extensively characterized by NMR spectroscopy and x-ray
crystallography, as have thioredoxin-ligand interactions with peptides
that represent fragments of naturally occurring substrates (20-25).
Structures of other members of the thioredoxin superfamily have been
determined, and these include glutaredoxins (26-28), the bacterial
oxidant proteins DsbA (disulfide bond formation protein A (29)) and
TcpG (toxin-coregulated colonization pilus gene product (30)), a human
peroxiredoxin hORF6 (31), Pyrococcus furiosus disulfide
oxidoreductase (32) and the thioredoxin-like domain of eukaryotic
protein disulfide isomerase (33). Wide-ranging biochemical,
biophysical, and theoretical studies have been carried out, in
particular on thioredoxin and DsbA, seeking to understand structure-reactivity-function relationships (15, 17, 34-38).
In contrast, much less is known about the thioredoxin homologs recently
discovered in trypanosomes. The first of these was identified in
C. fasciculata and is called tryparedoxin-I (6, 8, 11). This
is a protein of 146 amino acids with a molecular mass of approximately
16 kDa; hence, significantly larger than typical thioredoxins.
Tryparedoxin-I contains a
Trp39-Cys-Pro-Pro-Cys43 sequence near the N
terminus that resembles the thioredoxin-type Trp-Cys-Gly (or
Ala)-Pro-Cys active-site motif (12), in which the vicinal cysteine
residues form a redox-active disulfide. Tryparedoxin has been found in
Trypanosoma brucei (39) and Trypanosoma
cruzi1 but not so far in
Leishmania species. However, tryparedoxins may be ubiquitous
for the trypanosomatids since a functional tryparedoxin peroxidase has
been identified in Leishmania major (40). A second tryparedoxin (II) has recently been cloned from C. fasciculata and also serves as a physiological electron donor for
tryparedoxin peroxidase (41).
A crystallographic study of tryparedoxin-I has been initiated to
delineate structure-function relationships in the
Kinetoplastida-specific trypanothione peroxidase system to enable
comparisons with thioredoxins and to investigate how this pathway might
be used for the development of trypanocidal agents. Attempts to solve
the structure of tryparedoxin-I by molecular replacement using
thioredoxin as a search model were unsuccessful (42), and we also
encountered problems of nonisomorphism following
cryo-protection/freezing of the crystals and difficulties in the
preparation of heavy-atom derivatives. It was therefore decided to
obtain experimental phases using multi-wavelength anomalous dispersion
(MAD (43)) targeting a selenomethionine derivative. We now describe the
preparation of the selenomethionyl protein, the structure solution and
refinement using diffraction terms to a resolution of 1.4 Å. The high
resolution model reveals the fold and secondary structure of
tryparedoxin-I together with the molecular details in and around the
active site. Comparisons with other thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases, in
particular human thioredoxin, are presented as appropriate.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Sample Preparation--
The methionine auxotrophic strain of
E. coli B834(DE3) was heat shock-transformed with the
plasmid carrying the gene for C. fasciculata tryparedoxin-I
(pET-TryX (11)) and selected on Luria-Bertani agar plates
containing 100 µg ml
1 ampicillin. Bacteria were
cultured in M9 media supplemented with the usual amino acids except
that L-selenomethionine (100 mg l
1) was
substituted for L-methionine. Expression of tryparedoxin-I was induced at mid-log phase with 0.4 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside, and cell growth was
allowed to continue for a further 4 h. Cells were harvested by
centrifugation (2500 × g) at 4 °C, resuspended in
binding buffer (20 mM Bis-Tris propane, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole, 5 mM
benzamidine), and lysed in a French press. The insoluble debris was
separated by centrifugation (27,000 × g) at 4 °C
for 20 min, the supernatant filtered then applied to a
Ni2+-resin column (Poros 4.6 mm/100 mm) pre-equilibrated
with binding buffer using a PerSeptive Biosystems BioCAD 700e. The
resin was washed at 5 ml min
1 with 18 column volumes of
20 mM Bis-Tris propane, 10 mM imidazole, pH
7.5, and the product was eluted by increasing the imidazole concentration to 60 mM in a single step. Fractions were
analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and those containing tryparedoxin-I pooled, dialyzed against binding buffer, and subjected to a second purification step on the Ni2+-resin column
using the same protocol. The protein was dialyzed into 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, and the histidine tag was cleaved with biotinylated-thrombin (Novagen). The protease was removed by use of a
streptavadin-agarose resin (Novagen), and the histidine tag was removed
by passage through the Ni2+-resin column. Pooled fractions
of tryparedoxin-I were dialyzed against 50 mM HEPES, pH
7.5, and concentrated (Centricon-10, Amicon) to approximately 10 mg
ml
1 for use in crystallization experiments.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass
spectroscopy (PerSeptive Biosystems, Voyager) was used to assess purity
and to confirm the full incorporation of selenomethionine. Orthorhombic
crystals in space group P212121
were obtained under similar conditions to those employed on the
wild-type protein (42). The selenomethionine tryparedoxin-I crystals
have unit cell dimensions of a = 38.39, b = 50.70, c = 70.82 Å with a single copy of the protein in the asymmetric unit. The
N-terminal hexahistidine affinity tag is cleaved by thrombin during the
purification procedure, leaving a Gly-Ser-His extension that ensures
that the initiating methionine is preserved on the recombinant protein.
Data Collection--
A single crystal (0.2 × 0.2 × 0.5 mm) was cryo-protected with 40% polyethylene glycol monomethyl
ether 2000 then flash-frozen in a nylon loop with a nitrogen stream at
170 °C (Oxford Cryo-stream), maintained at low temperature and
transported dry to the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility BM14 in
Grenoble (Statebourne Cryogenics Biotrek 3), then used for MAD data
collection. The x-ray detector was a charge coupled device (MAR
Research), and the choice of wavelengths for the peak
(
1), inflection point (
2), and remote data (
3) were derived from a XANES (x-ray absorption
near edge structure) scan of the Se K-absorption edge from the crystal. The three wavelengths were selected to provide the largest value for
the anomalous difference, f " (
1) and the
minimum value for f ' (
2 or inflection
point). The remote wavelength (
3) maximized the
dispersive difference,
f ' (
3-
2) and, by virtue of being at a higher energy, extended
the resolution to which data were recorded. The STRATEGY program (44)
was used to determine the range for data collection, and each
wavelength data set was subsequently collected in a sweep of 0.5°
oscillations through 87.5°. All data were processed, reduced, and
scaled using the HKL suite of programs (45) then analyzed using the
CCP4 software package (46). Relevant statistics are provided in Table
I.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Diffraction data statistics relevant to the MAD experiment on
selenomethionyl-tryparedoxin-I
Numbers in parentheses correspond to the highest resolution shell, a
bin of 0.1 Å. Rsym = | I <I> | / I, where the summation is over
all symmetry equivalent reflections. Ranom = | I (+) I ( ) /
(I(+) I( )). Riso = |FPH FP | / FP with respect to 2 as the reference
structure factor FP. FPH is the
structure factor of the derivative.
|
|
MAD Phasing, Model Building, Refinement, and Analysis--
An
anomalous difference Patterson function, calculated using the peak
wavelength data, revealed a single ordered selenium atom subsequently
identified as Se-Met84. MAD data were input to the program
SOLVE, and experimental phases were calculated from the selenium atom
position using a multiple isomorphous replacement approach (47, 48).
This calculation provided phases to 1.7-Å resolution with an overall
figure-of-merit of 0.69. Density modification by solvent flattening and
histogram matching with the program DM (49) increased the
figure-of-merit to 0.76. The resulting electron density map was of
excellent quality (Fig. 2) and readily
interpreted with the program O (50). The first five N-terminal residues
and the final C-terminal residue are disordered and are not included in
the model of tryparedoxin-I. This disorder at the N terminus of the
protein provides an explanation of why the selenium corresponding to
Se-Met1 could not be located in the anomalous difference
Patterson.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
A stereoview of the MAD phased electron
density map, at 1.7-Å resolution, with a section of the refined model
corresponding to residues at the N-terminal region of 4. The density is contoured at the 1 level
of that observed in the unit cell and is depicted in pink chicken
wire, amide nitrogens are colored cyan, carbon atoms
are purple, and oxygen atoms are red. This figure
was produced with the program O (50).
|
|
The resolution of the data was extended to 1.4 Å with the
3 data set measured at a shorter wavelength, and
refinement was accomplished using REFMAC (51) interspersed with
computer graphics map inspection (Silicon Graphics) and model
manipulation combined with ARP (52) for water placement. The
R-free was monitored as a guide for the refinement (53).
Several residues on the surface of the protein were poorly defined by
the MAD phased electron density map and truncated to alanines in the
first model; however, in the course of refinement, the complete side
chains could be built in. Similarly, as the refinement progressed, the
maps indicated dual conformations for seven residues, which were
successfully modeled as such. The stereochemistry of the tryparedoxin-I
model was assessed with PROCHECK (54), and further details are
presented in Table II.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Shape, Fold, and Secondary Structure of Tryparedoxin--
A ribbon
diagram showing the secondary structure and fold of C. fasciculata tryparedoxin-I is presented in Fig.
3, and the secondary structure is mapped
onto the amino acid sequence in Fig.
4a). The conservation of
sequence among the three tryparedoxins is color-coded on a C
trace
of tryparedoxin-I in Fig. 4b. Secondary structure was
assigned using a combination of automated methods in the programs DSSP
(55), PROCHECK (54), and PROMOTIF (56) and by visual inspection. The
three tryparedoxins for which sequence information is available all
share high levels of sequence identity with approximately 45% of
residues conserved across all three proteins (Fig. 4). The two examples
from C. fasciculata, namely tryparedoxin-I and II, are 52%
identical, and the T. brucei protein is 57% identical with
tryparedoxin-II. The sequence conservation extends over three
dimensions as shown in Fig. 4b, so the structure we present
can be considered as representative of this subset of the thioredoxin
superfamily. The sequence conservation also provides an indication of
which residues are likely to contribute to the stability and reactivity
of tryparedoxins, and in the analysis of the structural model, we pay
particular attention to those residues.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A ribbon diagram showing the secondary
structure of tryparedoxin-I. -Helices are colored
red, 310 helices ( ) are green,
-strands are cyan, and the redox-active disulfide is
yellow. The main chain of residues in random coil are
gray. Figs. 3 and 4b, 5b,
6, and 7b were produced with MOLSCRIPT (68) and
RASTER-3D (69).
|
|

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
a, the amino acid sequence of C. fasciculata tryparedoxin-I with the assignment of secondary
structure based on the crystallographic model. Residues encased in
gray are conserved in either tryparedoxin-II (41) or
T. brucei tryparedoxin-I (39), whereas residues in
black are strictly conserved in all three proteins. Residues
underlined with ~ and # are homologous and strictly conserved
with human thioredoxin, respectively. b, stereoview C
trace, colored according to sequence homology with other tryparedoxins.
The C -C links are colored depending on the conservation or not of
the C-terminal residue of the pair. Black indicates that a
residue is strictly conserved, cyan is conserved with one
other tryparedoxin, and red is not conserved.
|
|
Tryparedoxin-I is an ellipsoid of approximate dimensions 40 × 30 × 30 Å constructed around a seven-stranded twisted
-sheet scaffold using both parallel and anti-parallel alignments (Fig. 3). The
sheet starts with a
-hairpin formed by
1 and
2, then a
3-
1-
4-
2-
5 motif that can be considered as a combination of two right-handed
-
-
units sharing strand
4. Another
-hairpin formed by strands
6 and
7 completes the twisted
sheet. The first hairpin turn linking
1 and
2 is on the periphery
of the
-sheet, is solvent-accessible, and carries seven charged
residues, Glu12, Lys13, Arg15,
Arg16, Asp18, Glu20, and
Glu22. This segment of the structure is poorly conserved
among tryparedoxins. The longest helical stretch is provided by a
distorted
1, which is about five turns in length and curves over the
surface of the protein. There are three segments of the polypeptide in
a 310 helix conformation that involve residues between
2
and
3 (
1 in Fig. 3) and also the N-terminal sections leading into
helices
2 and
3 (
2 and
3 in Fig. 3).
The residues that comprise strands
3 and
4 are mostly buried and
conserved among tryparedoxins. These elements of secondary structure
provide a significant component of the hydrophobic core of the protein.
The core of tryparedoxin-I is mainly formed from the aromatic tyrosines
(residue numbers 34, 54, and 80), tryptophans (residues 70 and 86), and
phenylalanines (residues 32, 33, 35, 46, 53, 57, 63, 67, 77, 81, 91,
and 104). Thirteen of these aromatic residues are strictly conserved in
tryparedoxins, the exceptions being three phenylalanines (residues 33, 67, and 81), which are replaced by leucine or tyrosine, and
Phe57, which is replaced by histidine in the other proteins.
Comparison of Tryparedoxin and Thioredoxin--
Topology diagrams
for tryparedoxin-I and human thioredoxin are compared in Fig.
5a. Thioredoxin presents a
characteristic
/
-fold that is a five-stranded twisted
-sheet
assembly surrounded by four helices. This folding unit occurs as a
globular entity in glutaredoxin or as a component of multi-domain
systems exemplified by DsbA, TcpG and
glutathione-S-transferase (57), or peroxiredoxins (31) and
duplicated in the case of P. furiosus disulfide
oxidoreductase (32).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Comparison of tryparedoxin-I and human
thioredoxin (PDB entry 1ERU (21). a, topology maps
showing tryparedoxin-I (left) and human thioredoxin
(right). This panel was produced using the WWW
site documented by Westhead et al. (70) and the program DSSP
(55). b, stereoview showing a least-squares overlap of the
C atoms of tryparedoxin-I in black and human thioredoxin
in red, with the active-site disulfides colored
yellow. The view is the same as in Fig. 4, with the N- and
C-terminal residues labeled red or black
accordingly. The numbers 1, 3, and 6 identify the N-terminal regions of tryparedoxin-I 1, 3, and 6,
respectively.
|
|
Thioredoxins share only about 20% sequence identity with
tryparedoxin-I (11, 39), yet as we will show, the proteins are structurally related, sharing the three-dimensional alignment of seven
elements of secondary structure. The sequence homology is only
significant in two regions of the protein, namely the N-terminal end of
the disulfide-carrying helix,
1, and the loop that links
3 with
6 (Fig. 4a). This loop is adjacent in three-dimensional space to the active-site disulfide (Figs. 3 and 5b).
Least-squares superposition of a human thioredoxin monomer and
tryparedoxin-I were carried out using the algorithms implemented in the
program O (50). There are 39 C
atoms, corresponding to the residues of the
3-
1-
4 segment, that align with an
r.m.s.2 of 1.26 Å (Fig.
5b). Although a slightly lower r.m.s. of 1.14 Å is obtained
for the same alignment of tryparedoxin-I with E. coli
thioredoxin, this suggests that there is no significant difference, and
either thioredoxin model can be used for comparative purposes. Based on
these alignments we observe a close structural relationship between the
core of thioredoxins and five of the seven
-strands in
tryparedoxin-I, although the order of the strands is different, producing a distinctive topology for each protein (Fig. 5a).
-Strands
5,
4,
3,
6, and
7 of tryparedoxin-I align
with
1,
3,
2,
4, and
5 of thioredoxin, respectively. Two
helical sections also superimpose well with this alignment. The first
is the redox disulfide-carrying helix,
1 of tryparedoxin-I, which
overlaps with
2 of human thioredoxin for almost their entire lengths
of 5 turns. The second is
3 of both proteins, which are positioned near the active sites. The superposition overlaps at the C terminus of
tryparedoxin-I
3, which is extended by approximately one turn compared with human thioredoxin.
The Redox-active Disulfide and Environment--
This crystal
structure is of the oxidized form of tryparedoxin-I, where a
right-handed redox-active disulfide is formed between residues
Cys40 and Cys43 at the N terminus of
1. This
part of the helix protrudes out from the molecule. The disulfide
environment is constructed from the C-terminal residues of
3, the
turn that links
3 to the N terminus of
1, and residues of the
loop following the C terminus of
3 and the N-terminal section of
6. A complex network of hydrogen bonds occurs with and around the
redox-active disulfide as will be described.
In the Cys-Xaa1-Xaa2-Cys motif of
thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases, the N-terminal cysteine is
solvent-accessible, but dimerization and crystal packing effects
occlude solvent binding to these cysteines in human, E. coli, and Anabaena thioredoxin structures (20-22). In
tryparedoxin-I Cys40, S
is more accessible to solvent
than its partner Cys43 S
; indeed it forms a hydrogen
bond of length 3.09 Å with a water molecule (Fig.
6). This solvent molecule also hydrogen
bonds to the main chain carbonyl of Ile109 (distance 3.03 Å) and to two other water molecules (2.73 and 2.87 Å distant, not
shown). Such a pattern of hydration is similar to that observed for the
amino-proximal cysteine in the active site of Vibrio
cholerae TcpG (30). Cys40 is most likely to be the
cysteine that interacts directly with the substrates, and the
hydrogen-bonding solvent marks the space that substrate may occupy
during the reaction of tryparedoxin-I with either trypanothione or
tryparedoxin peroxidase. By comparison with thioredoxin, it is thought
that Cys40 of tryparedoxin-I will be more reactive than
Cys43. This is consistent with the observations made by
Gommel et al. (8), based on chemical modification studies
combined with mass spectrometry, that the amino-proximal cysteine is
indeed the more reactive of the two. There may be a contribution toward
this reactivity from the positive dipole that arises from helix
1.
However, as pointed out by Weichsel et al. (21) when
describing the structure of the human thioredoxin, the disulfide is
actually displaced relative to the optimal alignment with the helix
dipole (Fig. 6a). The position of
1 relative to the
Cys40-Cys43 disulfide suggests to us that this
dipole may contribute more to tryparedoxin-substrate interactions than
to the chemistry of the redox-active disulfide.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Two stereoviews of the redox-active disulfide
and its immediate environment. a, side view; b,
top view. Atomic positions are colored according to type:
black, C; cyan, N; red, O;
yellow, S and the disulfide bond. The solvent hydrogen
bonding to S C40 is depicted as a red cross in a
sphere. The single-letter amino acid code is used for labeling
purposes. Hydrogen bonding interactions are shown as green dashed
lines, C-H···O interactions are depicted as black
dashed lines. The cylinder in a indicates helix
1.
|
|
Cys43 lies below Cys40, buried within the
protein structure, and occupies a hydrophilic pocket lined by hydroxyl
groups from Tyr34, Ser36, Thr47,
and Tyr80. Cys43 S
accepts a hydrogen bond
from Ser36 O
(3.19 Å), which in turn accepts two
hydrogen bonds donated from the amide of Ala37 (2.95 Å)
and the hydroxyl of Tyr80 (2.77 Å). The hydroxyl groups of
Tyr34 and Thr47 are hydrogen-bonded to each
other at a distance of 2.74 Å. The pocket is filled with well ordered
solvent molecules and guarded by the basic residues, Arg44
and Lys83. In most thioredoxins this pocket contains a
highly conserved aspartate residue (Asp26 in the human
protein) linked via solvent to a lysine side chain at the edge of the
molecule (21), but like tryparedoxin-I, Anabaena thioredoxin
has a tyrosine rather than an aspartate at this position, and the high
resolution structure of the latter suggests that this substitution
alters the position of the redox-active disulfide relative to the
central
-sheet (22). In our structural alignments we see no evidence
to support a shift in position of the disulfide but conclude that the
substitution of the tyrosine hydroxyl (Tyr34) for the
aspartate carboxylate (Asp26 in human thioredoxin) may
influence the environment and reactivity of the buried cysteines.
The redox-active disulfide of tryparedoxin-I resides in the
pentapeptide sequence Trp39-Cys-Pro-Pro-Cys43.
As first noted by Gommel et al. (8), several thioredoxins of
plant origin, the thioredoxin from Caenorhabditis elegans, as well as mouse nucleoredoxin also carry this pentapeptide sequence. In thioredoxins the redox motif is Cys-Gly-Pro-Cys, in glutaredoxins it
is Cys-Pro-Tyr-Cys, and in protein disulfide oxidoreductases it is
Cys-Gly-His-Cys (12). The variance in the intervening residues of the
reactive cysteines is implicated in determining the redox potential of
each type of protein, although a complete understanding of all the
factors that are involved is lacking (35).
The loop and N-terminal end of strand
6 of tryparedoxin-I is well
conserved in terms of both sequence and structure with thioredoxins
(Figs. 4a and 5b). The sequence in tryparedoxin-I is
Val109-Glu-Ser-Ile-Pro-Thr114, and in a human
thioredoxin it is Val71-Lys-Cys-Met-Pro-Thr76
(see Fig. 2 in Ref. 11). The proline in this hexapeptide sequence is
strictly conserved and adopts a cis conformation. Further
discussion on this point will be made later. Crystallographic studies
show that human thioredoxin is a homodimer linked by a disulfide bond involving Cys73 of each monomer. Dimer formation occludes
the active site, and a conformational change must occur for the protein
to function (21). Site-directed mutagenesis and analysis of the C73S
mutant human thioredoxin still showed a dimer with a hydrogen bond
linking the serines. Our structural alignment places Ser108
of tryparedoxin-I on Cys73 of the human protein but this
serine is directed to bulk solvent, and we see no structural evidence
for dimer formation by tryparedoxin-I.
The redox potentials of the thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases and
pKa values for the individual cysteines in the
Cys-Xaa1-Xaa2-Cys motif have been extensively
studied, and this motif has been likened to a rheostat, a particularly
appropriate analogy (58). There are several major factors that
determine the redox properties and the role they play for the in
vivo activity of the proteins concerned. These factors include the
local environment of the cysteine sulfurs and their proximity to
functional groups, so that they can participate in hydrogen bonding and
van der Waals interactions or be influenced by longer range effects
such as a helix dipole as discussed earlier. The nature of the amino
acids that constitute Xaa1 and Xaa2 and also
the influence of the substrates that these proteins must interact with
can also influence the redox potentials. Despite the wealth of data, a
complete understanding of what determines the redox potentials of the
Cys-Xaa1-Xaa2-Cys motif eludes us, but given
the complexity of the system, this is perhaps not surprising.
Two tryptophans, Trp39 and Trp70, create a flat
ledge above the redox-active disulfide that leads to a wall created by
helix
3 and the loop leading into
6 and the C-terminal end of
4 (Figs. 6 and 7a). These residues are held in place by
hydrogen bonds shared between their N
1 atoms with the carbonyl
oxygen of Trp70 and the O
Ser101, with
distances of 2.93 and 2.92 Å, respectively. This helps to form a lid
covering the redox-active disulfide (Fig. 6). The interaction with
Ser101 is omitted from Fig. 6 for the purpose of clarity.
Just below the tryptophans are the side chains of Ala37 and
Ile109. The disulfide structure is stabilized by direct
hydrogen bonds to the S atoms as described earlier and by van der Waals
interactions with surrounding residues. For example Cys40
S
has contacts to Ile109 C
1 and C
1.
Prolines and C-H···O Hydrogen Bonding in
Tryparedoxin--
The amino acid sequence of C. fasciculata
tryparedoxin-I includes 10 proline residues, of which 9 are in well
defined electron density. The missing proline is Pro146,
the C-terminal residue for which we are unable to see any electron density. The nine ordered prolines are strictly conserved in the three
tryparedoxin sequences that are available (Fig. 4a), and they are all positioned on the surface of the molecule and are accessible to solvent. Seven are in a trans conformation,
whereas Pro110 and Pro141 are cis.
Pro110 is important because it is adjacent to and
participates in van der Waals contacts with the redox-active disulfide.
This cis-proline is a common structural feature of the
thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases. In DsbA, the mutation of the
cis-proline to trans-alanine destabilized the
structure, reducing activity to about 50% of the normal level, and
structural analysis indicated that the loop from
3 to
6 adopted a
different structure and lost the van der Waals interactions with the
redox-active disulfide (36). Clearly the unique structural contributions from a cis-proline in this position are
necessary to optimize activity and stability of this protein family.
Pro41 and Pro42 are the intervening residues of
the disulfide-forming cysteines, and so tryparedoxin-I contains a
reactive disulfide embedded in a unique environment created by the
three prolines. As discussed earlier, it is recognized that in the
Cys-Xaa1-Xaa2-Cys redox-active disulfide motif,
the intervening residues modulate the redox potentials of the
thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases (12, 58).
The existence of C-H···O interactions and the classification as
hydrogen bonds has provoked discussion in the literature (59, 60). It
is now widely accepted that they do form and contribute to the
stability of macromolecules (61) and to enzyme catalysis as discussed
in the context of serine proteases (62) or disulfide oxidoreductases
(63). With respect to tryparedoxin-I, there are three C-H···O
hydrogen-bonding interactions involving only protein atoms that are of
note. The importance of C-H···O hydrogen-bonding interactions is
not yet known, but they may alleviate the destabilizing effect of
having an unsatisfied hydrogen bond acceptor in the structure. Two of
the C-H···O hydrogen bonds are donated from the methylene group
Pro48 C
to the main chain carbonyls of Arg44
and Gly45, with C··O distances of 2.93 and 3.44 Å,
respectively (Fig. 6). Pro48 is positioned almost three
turns along helix
1, facing out toward solvent and causing a
distortion that redirects the final two turns of the helix. Such a
feature of prolines in helices is well documented (64). This
C-H···O hydrogen bonding interaction is conserved in crystal
structures of thioredoxins, as discussed by Chakrabarti and Chakrabarti
(65), and may contribute to the distortion of helix
1, which carries
the redox-active disulfide. We observe another C-H···O
interaction involving a proline, namely between Pro41 C
,
which is part of the active site-conserved motif
Trp39-Cys-Pro-Pro-Cys43, and the main chain
carbonyl of Trp39, with a distance of 3.16 Å (Fig. 6).
This interaction is unique to tryparedoxin-I, since in other
thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases for which structures are available, the
proline position is occupied by either a glycine, an alanine, or a histidine.
Since the ordered prolines are all accessible to solvent, we
investigated the possibility that C-H···O interactions with water molecules might be observed. We restricted our distance criteria to a
cutoff of 3.5 Å and note three C-H···O possible interactions involving Pro9 and Pro135. Pro9
C
interacts with two solvents that are 3.27 and 3.39 Å away, whereas Pro135 C
contacts a solvent 3.36 Å distant.
Tryparedoxin-I Surface for Substrate Recognition--
The shape
and charge at and around the redox-active disulfide of tryparedoxin-I
allow it to interact with both a small molecule metabolite,
trypanothione, and a protein, tryparedoxin peroxidase (Fig. 1). Fig.
7a shows the surface of
tryparedoxin-I colored according to electrostatic properties and
highlights the positions of the conserved
Trp39-Cys-Pro-Pro-Cys43 motif together with
residues that might interact with substrates. A similar view of human
thioredoxin is shown for comparison where the differences in size,
charge, and shape around the conserved redox-active site motif are
evident.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
a, surface and charge representation
around the redox-active disulfide of tryparedoxin-I and for comparison
human thioredoxin. This figure was produced using GRASP (9) and colored
as follows: white, neutral; red, negative
charges; blue, positive charges. The conserved motif
Trp39-Cys-Pro-Pro-Cys43 (tryparedoxin-I) and
Trp31-Cys-Gly-Pro-Cys35 (thioredoxin) is
outlined. Residues of tryparedoxin-I that might be involved
in protein-protein or protein-substrate interactions are identified.
b, stereoview of the conserved motif plus water molecule
from tryparedoxin-I in the same orientation as in panel
a.
|
|
The crystal structure of T7 DNA polymerase in complex with thioredoxin
(66) and NMR studies of thioredoxin and glutaredoxin complexes with
peptides or glutathione (23, 24, 28) indicate that these proteins
interact with ligands using the surface around the redox-active
disulfide. In particular, the loop carrying the cis-proline
adjacent to the redox-active disulfide participates in
-strand type
associations. In tryparedoxin-I, the amide and carbonyl of
Ile109 are positioned to accomplish just such an
interaction. On the other side of the
Cys40-Cys43 disulfide, the carbonyl of
Cys40 is also directed out to accept hydrogen bonds from
substrate (Fig. 6).
There is currently no structural information on tryparedoxin
peroxidase, but there is a model of trypanothione based on the crystal
structure of the complex with trypanothione reductase (63). We used
these coordinates to construct a model for the tryparedoxin-trypanothione complex using the computer graphics program
O (50). One of the metabolite sulfur atoms was overlapped with the
water molecule that is hydrogen bonded to S
Cys40, and
trypanothione was rotated about this point, seeking to minimize atomic
collisions and produce sensible chemical interactions of the type
previously observed for this ligand (63). The model (not shown) serves
to identify residues within the range of the redox-active disulfide of
tryparedoxin, which might be important in the recognition and binding
of trypanothione.
When the polyamine substrates glutathionylspermidine disulfide and
trypanothione bind in the active site of trypanothione reductase, they
are positioned beneath a tryptophan and to a certain extent shielded
from solvent (63, 67). When trypanothione binds to tryparedoxin-I, it
would remain on the surface of the protein, and the secondary amine of
the spermidine moiety would be solvent-accessible. Trp39 of
tryparedoxin-I may participate in cation-
interactions with the
secondary amine of trypanothione as observed for Trp19 of
C. fasciculata trypanothione reductase when in complex with glutathionylspermidine disulfide (66). van der Waals interactions with
the spermidine and cysteine components of trypanothione are also an
important component of binding (63). In tryparedoxin-I, Trp39, Pro41, Pro42,
Pro110, Trp70, and Ile109 are near
the redox disulfide and may interact in such a manner with trypanothione.
A cluster of acidic residues (Asp71, Glu72,
Glu73, Glu74, Asp75, and
Glu107) are located adjacent to the ledge created by
Trp39 and Trp70. These residues create a
negatively charged patch on the surface of the protein that could
attract then bind the positively charged substrate trypanothione (Fig.
7a). However, of these residues, only Asp71 and
Glu72 are strictly conserved with the other tryparedoxins.
Asp71 accepts hydrogen bonds from the hydroxyl group of
Ser38 (O
to Asp71 O
1 separation of 2.59 Å) and the main chain amide of Ser38 (N to O
2 distance
is 2.73 Å). Although on the periphery of the active site, these
interactions (not shown in any of the figures) serve to stabilize the
position of the N-terminal sections of the parallel strands
3 and
4. Ser38 is conserved in other tryparedoxins, and so
this appears to be a common structural feature of this group of
proteins. Glu72 is directed toward Trp39, and
the closest contact is 5.81 Å between Glu72 O
2 and
Trp39 N
1. This glutamic acid is a likely candidate to
interact with trypanothione and or tryparedoxin peroxidase.
Glutathione and trypanothione share
-glutamyl groups, and the
complex of glutaredoxin with glutathione indicates that the carboxylates interact with positively charged residues, including a
lysine and an arginine (28). In tryparedoxin-I there are three charged
residues just below the active site, Arg44
Lys83, and Arg128 (Fig. 6). These residues are
strictly conserved in the tryparedoxins and could form salt-bridges
with the glutamyl
-carboxylates of trypanothione. We can use the
solvent molecule that is hydrogen-bonded to S
Cys40 as a
marker for the position of substrate interacting with tryparedoxin-I, as described above (Figs. 6 and 7b). Arg44,
Arg128, and Lys83 are 7.9, 11.2, and 16.1 Å away, respectively, from this solvent position. In the complex of
T. cruzi trypanothione reductase with trypanothione, there
is a single charge-charge interaction formed between substrate and the
enzyme, and this involves Lys62 with a
-Glu carboxylate.
The distance between the trypanothione disulfide and Lys62
N
is 12.2 Å (63). On the basis of the model described above, we
predict that Arg44 and Arg128 of tryparedoxin-I
are definitely within range to interact directly with the carboxylates
of trypanothione. Mutagenesis studies and further crystallographic work
will now be used to test these predictions.
Summary--
We have determined an accurate crystal structure for
tryparedoxin-I, a newly discovered thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase. The initial electron density map that was used to construct the first model
of tryparedoxin-I was based on a MAD experiment at 1.7-Å resolution,
targeting a selenomethionine derivative. Refinement of the model and
incorporation of solvents was subsequently accomplished using
diffraction terms to a resolution of 1.4 Å. Tryparedoxin displays a
similar arrangement of secondary structure elements to thioredoxin and
can be classified as a member of the thioredoxin superfamily, although
each protein presents a distinctive topology. The high degree of
sequence homology among tryparedoxins indicates that the structure of
C. fasciculata tryparedoxin-I provides a model for this
subset of the thioredoxin superfamily. Residues that might play an
important, possibly essential role in the proteins function have been
identified. The molecule uses a redox-active disulfide to accept and
pass on reducing equivalents from and to its substrates. Although this
is a common use of the disulfide, the structural details in and around
the active site of tryparedoxin-I are distinct from other proteins for
which structures have been determined. Comparisons with structures of
trypanothione reductase, thioredoxin, and glutaredoxin provide a
working model for tryparedoxin interactions with the reducing substrate
and suggest which residues might be important for molecular
recognition. The high resolution model now provides the framework for
further experiments combining site-directed mutagenesis, biophysical
methods, and enzyme kinetics to investigate the detailed
structure-function relationships of tryparedoxins. With the structural
details now available, it may be possible to identify specific and
potent inhibitors to disrupt the pathway detailed in Fig. 1. Such
inhibitors could be useful tools to assist the characterization of the
proteins function in vivo and might be widely applicable to
studies of thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases. More important, however, is
the potential use of the tryparedoxin-I model in a structure-based
approach to identify new and improved therapies against a range of
trypanosomal infections.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank the European Union Program and EMBL
for their support allowing M. S. Alphey to carry out experiments
at ESRF. We also thank A. Mehlert for carrying out the mass
spectrometry measurements and C. S. Bond, D. R. Hall, and M. Peterson for contributions and support. Due to the extensive literature
on thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases, it has not been possible to include
references to all the primary literature, and we apologize to authors
whose work has not been included.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was funded by the BBSRC, The Wellcome Trust and
CCLRC-Daresbury.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The atomic coordinates and structure factors corresponding to the
three-wavelength MAD experiment and the coordinates of selenomethionyl tryparedoxin-I (code 1QK8) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank
at the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, New
Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
(0)1382-345745; Fax: (0)1382-345764; E-mail:
w.n.hunter@dundee.ac.uk.
1
E. Tetaud and A. H. Fairlamb, unpublished information.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviation used is:
r.m.s., root mean
square.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
WHO.
(1993)
Tropical Diseases: Progress in Research 1989-1990, Programme report 10
, World Health Organization, Geneva
|
| 2.
| Webster, L. T. (1990) in The Pharmacological Basis of
Therapeutics (Gilman, A. G., Rall, T. W., Nies, A. S., and Taylor,
P., eds) Section X, pp. 954-959, 978-998, and 1008-1017, 8th Ed.,
Pergamon Press, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
|
| 3.
|
Wang, C. C.
(1997)
Parasitology
114,
31-44
|
| 4.
|
Docampo, R.
(1990)
Chem. Biol. Interact.
73,
1-27[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Fairlamb, A. H.,
and Cerami, A.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
46,
695-729[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Nogoceke, E.,
Daniel, U. G.,
Kiess, M.,
Kalisz, H. M.,
and Flohé, L.
(1997)
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
378,
827-836
|
| 7.
|
Flohé, L.
(1989)
in
Glutathione: Chemical, Biochemical, and Medical Aspects
(Dolphin, D.
, and Avramovic, O., eds)
, pp. 643-731, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
|
| 8.
|
Gommel, D. U.,
Nogoceke, E.,
Morr, M.,
Kiess, M.,
Kalisz, H. M.,
and Flohé, L.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
248,
913-918[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Nicholls, A.
(1993)
GRASP Manual, Version 1.1
, Columbia University, New York
|
| 10.
|
Montemartini, M.,
Nogoceke, E.,
Singh, M.,
Steinert, P.,
Flohé, L.,
and Kalisz, H. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4864-4871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Tetaud, E.,
and Fairlamb, A. H.
(1998)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
96,
111-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Raina, S.,
and Missiakas, D.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
51,
179-202[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Prinz, W. A.,
Åslund, F.,
Holmgren, A.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15661-15667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Chae, H. Z.,
Chung, S. J.,
and Rhee, S. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27670-27678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Holmgren, A.
(1985)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
54,
237-271[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Matthews, J. R.,
Wakasugi, N.,
Virelizier, J.-L.,
Yodoi, J.,
and Hay, R. T.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
3821-3830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Holmgren, A.
(1995)
Structure
3,
239-243[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Jin, D.-Y,
Chae, H. Z.,
Rhee, S. G.,
and Jeang, K.-T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30952-30961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Zhang, P.,
Liu, B.,
Kang, S. W.,
Seo, M. S.,
Rhee, S. G.,
and Obeid, L. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30615-30618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Katti, S. K.,
LeMaster, D. M.,
and Eklund, H.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
212,
167-184
|
| 21.
|
Weichsel, A.,
Gasdaska, J. R.,
Powis, G.,
and Montfort, W. R.
(1996)
Structure
4,
735-751[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Saarinen, M.,
Gleason, F. K.,
and Eklund, H.
(1995)
Structure
3,
1097-1108[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Forman-Kay, J. D.,
Clore, G. M.,
Wingfield, P. T.,
and Gronenborn, A. M.
(1991)
Biochemistry
20,
3685-2698
|
| 24.
|
Qin, J.,
Clore, G. M.,
Kennedy, W. P.,
Kuszewski, J.,
and Gronenborn, A. M.
(1996)
Structure
4,
613-620[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Jeng, M-F.,
Reymond, M. T.,
Tennant, L. L.,
Holmgren, A.,
and Dyson, H. J.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
257,
299-308[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Katti, S. K.,
Robbins, A. H.,
Yang, Y.,
and Wells, W. W.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
4,
1998-2005[Abstract]
|
| 27.
|
Sun, C.,
Berardi, M. J.,
and Bushweller, J. H.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
280,
687-701[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Nordstrand, K.,
Aslund, A.,
Holmgren, A.,
Otting, G.,
and Berndt, K. D.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
286,
541-552[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Guddat, L. W.,
Bardwell, J. C. A.,
and Martin, J. L.
(1998)
Structure
6,
757-767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Hu, S-H.,
Peek, J. A.,
Rattigan, E.,
Taylor, R. K.,
and Martin, J. L.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
268,
137-146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Choi, H-J.,
Kang, S. W.,
Yang, C-H.,
Rhee, S. G.,
and Ryu, S-E.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
400-405[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Ren, B.,
Tibbelin, G.,
de Pascale, D.,
Rossi, M.,
Bartolucci, S.,
and Landenstein, R.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
602-611[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Kemmink, J.,
Darby, N. J.,
Dijkstra, K.,
Nilges, M.,
and Creighton, T. E.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
7684-7691[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Jacobi, A.,
Huber-Wunderlich, M.,
Hennecke, J.,
and Glockshuber, R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21692-21699[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Huber-Wunderlich, M.,
and Glockshuber, R.
(1998)
Folding Design
3,
161-171
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36.
|
Charbonnier, J-B.,
Belin, P.,
Moutiez, M.,
Stura, E. A.,
and Quemeneur, E.
(1999)
Protein Sci.
8,
96-105[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Gane, P. J.,
Freedman, R. B.,
and Warwicker, J.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
249,
376-387[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Aslund, F.,
Berndt, K. D.,
and Holmgren, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30780-30786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Ludemann, H.,
Dormeyer, M.,
Sticherling, C.,
Stallmann, D.,
Follman, H.,
and Krauth-Siegel, R. L.
(1998)
FEBS Letts.
431,
381-385[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Levick, M. P.,
Tetaud, E.,
Fairlamb, A. H.,
and Blackwell, J. M.
(1998)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
96,
125-137[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Montemartini, M.,
Kalisz, H. M.,
Kiess, M.,
Nogoceke, E.,
Singh, M.,
Steinert, P.,
and Flohé, L.
(1998)
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
379,
1137-1142
|
| 42.
|
Alphey, M. S.,
Tetaud, E.,
Gourley, D. G.,
Fairlamb, A. H.,
and Hunter, W. N.
(1999)
J. Struct. Biol.
126,
76-78[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Hendrickson, W. A.
(1991)
Science
254,
51-58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Ravelli, R. B. G.,
Sweet, R. M.,
Skinner, J. M.,
Duisenberg, A. J. M.,
and Krron, J.
(1997)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
30,
551-554
[CrossRef] |
| 45.
|
Otwinowski, Z.,
and Minor, W.
(1997)
Methods Enzymol.
276,
307-326
|
| 46.
|
Collaborative Computational Project Number 4.
(1994)
Acta Crystallogr. Sec. D
50,
760-763
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47.
|
Terwilliger, T. C.
(1994)
Acta Crystallogr. Sec. D.
50,
17-23
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48.
|
Terwilliger, T. C.,
and Berendzen, J.
(1997)
Acta Crystallogr. Sec. D
53,
571-579
|
| 49.
|
Cowtan, K.
(1994)
Joint CCP4 ESF-EACBM Newsletter
31,
34-38
|
| 50.
|
Jones, T. A.,
Zou, J. Y.,
Cowan, S. W.,
and Kjeldgaard, M.
(1991)
Acta Crystallogr. Sec. D
47,
110-119
|