J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 36, 25785-25791, September 3, 1999
Coordinate Regulation of the
2-Macroglobulin
Signaling Receptor and the Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related
Protein/
2-Macroglobulin Receptor by Insulin*
Uma Kant
Misra,
Govind
Gawdi,
Mario
Gonzalez-Gronow, and
Salvatore
V.
Pizzo
From the Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center,
Durham, North Carolina 27710
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have studied
insulin-dependent regulation of macrophage
2-macroglobulin signaling receptors
(
2MSR) and low density lipoprotein receptor-related
protein/
2M receptors (LRP/
2MR) employing
cell binding of 125I-
2M*, inhibition of
binding by receptor-associated protein (RAP) or Ni2+,
LRP/
2MR mRNA levels, and generation of second
messengers. Insulin treatment increased the number of
2M* high (
2MSR) and low
(LRP/
2MR) affinity binding sites from 1,600 and 67,000 to 2,900 and 115,200 sites per cell, respectively. Neither RAP nor
Ni2+ blocked the binding of
125I-
2M* to
2MSR on insulin-
or buffer-treated cells, but they both blocked binding to
LRP/
2MR. Insulin significantly increased LRP/
2MR mRNA levels in a dose- and
time-dependent manner. Insulin-augmented 125I-
2M* binding to macrophages was severely
reduced by wortmannin, LY294002, PD98059, SB203580, or rapamycin. The
increase in
2MSR receptor synthesis was reflected by
augmented generation of IP3 and increased
[Ca2+]i levels upon receptor ligation. Incubation
of macrophages with wortmannin, LY294002, PD98059, SB203580, rapamycin,
or antibodies against insulin receptors before insulin treatment and
2M* stimulation significantly reduced the
insulin-augmented increase in IP3 and [Ca2+]i levels. Pretreatment of cells with
actinomycin D or cycloheximide blocked the synthesis of new
2MSR. In conclusion, we show here that insulin
coordinately regulates macrophage
2MSR and
LRP/
2MR, utilizing both the PI 3-kinase and Ras
signaling pathways to induce new synthesis of these receptors.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Human
2-macroglobulin
(
2M)1 is a
homotetrameric proteinase inhibitor present at high concentration in
blood and tissue fluids (1, 2).
2M reacts with
endoproteinases of every mechanistic class in a reaction that induces a
major conformational change in the inhibitor. This change exposes
receptor recognition sites in the carboxyl terminus of each of its four
subunits, leading to rapid clearance from the circulation and in
vitro binding by cells expressing receptors for
receptor-recognized forms of
2M (
2M*) (2,
3). Small nucleophiles such as methylamine directly attack internal
-cysteinyl-
-glutamyl thiolesters present in each subunit causing
a similar conformational change in the inhibitor with comparable
exposure of receptor recognition sites (1-3). Low density lipoprotein
receptor-related protein/
2M receptor (LRP/
2MR) is a high molecular weight cell surface
receptor expressed by many cell types including macrophages,
fibroblasts, hepatocytes, adipocytes, and dermal dendritic cells
(2-5). LRP/
2MR is a scavenger receptor
(Kd ~5 nM) that binds multiple
structurally and functionally diverse ligands besides
2M*, including Pseudomonas exotoxin A,
lipoproteinase lipase, apolipoprotein E-enriched lipoproteins, urokinase, and tissue-type plasminogen activator alone or in
combination with plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, tissue factor
pathway inhibitor, and lactoferrin (2, 5). Generally, these ligands do
not compete with each other for binding to LRP/
2MR,
presumably because they bind to independent receptor domains; however,
receptor-associated protein (RAP, Mr ~39,000)
blocks the binding of all known ligands to this receptor (4, 5). In
addition to LRP/
2MR,
2M* binds to a
recently discovered
2M signaling receptor
(
2MSR) (Kd ~50 pM)
present on a more restricted range of cells than LRP/
2MR (5-14). Binding of
2M* to LRP/
2MR is
followed by uptake and degradation in lysosomes but not activation of a
signaling cascade (6, 7, 12). By contrast, binding of
2M* or its receptor binding fragment to
2MSR triggers typical signaling cascades, which regulate
cell proliferation (6-15). RAP and Ni2+ prevent
2M* binding to LRP/
2MR, but do not
inhibit the ability of
2M* to bind to
2MSR, and they do not affect signal transduction (16).
Based on a variety of evidence, we have proposed that
2MSR behaves like various growth factor receptors and
that it is involved in cellular growth regulation (6-14).
Insulin binding to its cognate receptor elicits a number of responses
including glucose and amino acid transport, increased glycogen
synthesis, gene transcription, growth regulation, and mitogenesis by
activating a complex signaling cascade of lipid, protein-tyrosine, and
serine/threonine kinases (17-22). Insulin-dependent signal
transduction is controlled by PI 3-kinase and p21ras,
respectively (17-22). Inhibition of PI 3-kinase by wortmannin or
LY294002, expression of dominant inhibitory mutants of p21ras,
or inhibition of farnesyl transferases suppress
insulin-dependent glucose transport, gene expression, and
mitogenesis (23, 24). Downstream targets of PI 3-kinase include the
ribosomal p70s6k, some isoforms of protein kinase C, and
the serine/threonine kinase akt, which is a direct target of
PI 3-kinase (24, 25). p21ras GTP activates a cascade of
protein-serine/threonine kinases, which include Raf, mitogen-activated
protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)
kinase, ERK1, ERK2, MAPK, casein kinase II, p70s6k, and
p90rsk, resulting in the phosphorylation of many cytosolic
and nuclear proteins (24, 26-28). A number of these kinases play
critical roles in the regulation of proliferation, differentiation, and cellular metabolism (27-33). We have recently reported that mitogenic effects observed upon ligation of macrophage
2MSR are
also accompanied by activation of the PI 3-kinase (34) and
p21ras (35) signaling pathways.
A relationship between insulin and 125I-
2M*
receptors was first reported from this laboratory by Ney et
al. (36), who showed that pretreatment of adipocytes and
fibroblasts with insulin enhanced the binding of
125I-
2M* to cell surface receptors and
decreased receptor-mediated degradation of
2M by
fibroblasts. These observations were later confirmed by others
(37-40). Certain growth factors, for example insulin and nerve growth
factors as well as cytokinins like interleukin-I
and tumor necrosis
factor-
, also up-regulate the synthesis of LRP/
2MR
and low density lipoprotein receptors in neurons (41) and HepG2 cells
(42). In the latter case, activation of ERK1 and -2 was required for
cytokinin-induced increased expression of low density lipoprotein
receptors (42). In the present study, we have studied the effect of
insulin on expression of macrophage LRP/
2MR and
2MSR by the following parameters: 1) binding of 125I-
2M* to high (
2MSR) and
low (LRP/
2MR) affinity binding sites on the cells and
generation of second messengers, namely IP3 and Ca2+; 2) RAP and Ni2+ sensitivity of binding of
125I-
2M* to
2MSR and
LRP/
2MR on buffer- or insulin-treated cells; 3)
sensitivity of 125I-
2M* binding and second
messenger generation to PI 3-kinase inhibitors, wortmannin and
LY294002, ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059, p38MAPK inhibitor
SB203580, and p70s6k inhibitor rapamycin; and 4)
LRP/
2MR receptor mRNA levels. Based upon these
criteria, we report here that insulin appears to regulate the
expression of macrophage LRP/
2MR and
2MSR
in a coordinate manner.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Brewer's thioglycollate broth was purchased from
Difco. Culture media were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Bovine
serum albumin, pertussis toxin, staurosporin, insulin, cycloheximide, actinomycin D, genestein, HEPES, and rapamycin were purchased from
Sigma. Fura-2/AM was obtained from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR).
Myo[2-3H]inositol (specific activity 10-20 Ci/mmol) was
purchased from American Radiolabeled Chemicals (St. Louis, MO). Insulin
receptor antibody was purchased from Immunotech (Westbrook, ME). A
plasmid containing the RAP cDNA was a kind gift from Dr. Joachim
Herz (University of Texas, Southwestern, Dallas, TX). It was used to produce RAP as described previously (11). [
-32P]dCTP
and 125I were purchased from NEN Life Science Products.
Iodobeads® were purchased from Pierce. Wortmannin, LY294002, PD98059,
and SB203580 were obtained from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA). Human
2M was purified, converted to
2M* with
methylamine, and radiolabeled with 125I as described
previously (6, 12). All other reagents used were of the highest grade available.
Insulin and Macrophage Binding of
125I-
2M*--
Pathogen-free C57BI/6 mice (6 weeks old) were obtained from Charles River (Raleigh, NC). Binding of
125I-
2M* to thioglycollate-elicited
macrophages was studied as detailed earlier (12, 13, 16).
125I-
2M* was added to cells in wells at
varying concentrations and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C. Free
ligand was separated from bound by aspirating the medium and monolayers
carefully washed five times with ice-cold RPMI 1640 medium containing
penicillin, streptomycin, and 2% bovine serum albumin (buffer A). The
cells were lysed with 1 M NaOH at 40 °C, and bound
activity was determined in a
-counter. The specific binding of
125I-
2M* was calculated by subtracting
nonspecific binding determined in the presence of 5 mM EDTA
(12, 13, 16, 43). To study the effect of insulin on
125I-
2M* binding, insulin (10 nM) was added to monolayers in buffer A, and monolayers
were incubated for specific periods of time at 37 °C, transferred to
ice, and washed five times with ice-cold buffer A. 125I-
2M* was added to wells at the specified
concentrations, monolayers were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C, and
binding was determined as described above. The effects of PI 3-kinase
inhibitor wortmannin (30 nM/30 min/37 °C) or LY294002
(20 µM/15 min/37 °C) on the binding of
125I-
2M* to insulin- or buffer-treated
macrophages was determined by addition to the monolayers prior to
incubation with insulin (10 nM/1 h/37 °C). Cells were
then washed, and binding of 125I-
2M* was
studied as outlined above. In experiments where the effects of PD98059
(50 µM/90 min/37 °C), SB203580 (15 µM/30
min/37 °C), or rapamycin (100 nM/5 min/37 °C) were
studied on insulin-augmented cellular binding of
125I-
2M*, these were added to monolayers
prior to adding insulin (10 nM/1 h/37 °C), and binding
of 125I-
2M* was determined as outlined
above. Protein in cell lysates was determined by the Bradford
method (44). Kd values were calculated using the
Sysstat Program as described previously (13).
Determination LRP/
2MR mRNA Levels--
The
effect of insulin on macrophage LRP/
2MR mRNA was
determined as described earlier (13). A partial human cDNA fragment ranging from base pair 188 to 6,179 inserted into plasmid pGEM 4 was
used for hybridization with mRNA isolated from insulin-treated and
-untreated macrophages. This plasmid was a kind gift of Dr. Joachim Herz.
Measurement of IP3 in Insulin-treated Cells--
The
formation of IP3 in [3H]myoinositol-labeled
macrophages under various experimental conditions was quantified
essentially according to methods published earlier (6-10). In
experiments where insulin effects were studied on
2M*-induced changes in IP3 levels, the cells
were treated with insulin at the specified concentrations or time
periods, and insulin was washed out with HHBSS before stimulating with
2M*. In studies where the effects of cycloheximide,
actinomycin D, genestein, or staurosporin were studied on changes in
IP3 in cells pretreated with insulin followed by
stimulation with
2M*, these agents were added at the
specified concentration and incubated for the specified time period at
37 °C prior to the addition of insulin or buffer. The effects of wortmannin, LY294002, PD98059, SB203580, or rapamycin also were examined on insulin-augmented increased IP3 formation of
2M*-stimulated cells. Macrophages labeled as above were
incubated with the respective inhibitors, before the addition of
insulin (10 nM/1 h/37 °C). The cells were incubated for
1 h, washed with HHBSS buffer containing 10 mM
Li+, 1 mM Ca2+, and 1 mM Mg2+, followed by stimulation with
2M* and quantification of IP3 as described above.
Insulin Receptor Antibody and Insulin-induced Changes in
IP3--
These studies were performed as outlined above
except that washed [3H]myoinositol-labeled macrophages
(3 × 106 cells/4.5 cm2) in a volume of
RPMI 1640 medium containing 0.25% bovine serum albumin, leupeptin (20 µg/ml), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM) were
incubated with antibody against insulin receptors (10 µg/ml) for 30 min at 25 °C. At the end of incubation, insulin (10 nM)
or buffer was added to monolayers, and the incubation continued for an
additional 60 min at 37 °C. The monolayers were washed five times
with ice-cold HHBSS buffer containing Li+,
Ca2+, and Mg2+, and cells were incubated in
this buffer for 5 min at 37 °C prior to stimulation with
2M* followed by quantification of inositol phosphates
(6-10).
Measurement of [Ca2+]i in
Insulin-treated Cells--
Changes in [Ca2+]i
levels in Fura-2/AM-loaded single cells were quantified using digital
imaging microscopy as described earlier (6-10). Briefly, cells were
incubated with the specified concentrations of insulin for the desired
time periods and loaded with Fura-2/AM in the last 30 min of
incubation. Monolayers were washed with HHBSS and stimulated with
2M*, and changes in [Ca2+]i were
measured as described (6-10). In experiments where the effects of
insulin were studied on
2M*-induced changes in
[Ca2+]i levels, the cells were treated with insulin
at specified concentrations or time periods, and insulin was washed out
with HHBSS before stimulating with
2M*. The
effects of cycloheximide, actinomycin D, genestein, or staurosporin on
changes in [Ca2+]i were studied in cells
pretreated with insulin followed by stimulation with
2M*. These agents were added at specified concentrations
and incubated for the specified period of time at 37 °C prior
to the addition of insulin or buffer.
 |
RESULTS |
Insulin Enhances the Binding of 125I-
2M*
to both
2MSR and LRP/
2MR--
Insulin
treatment increased the overall binding of
125I-
2M* to macrophages by about 1.5-2-fold
compared with buffer-treated cells (Fig.
1A). By Scatchard analysis,
the Kd for ligand binding to the high affinity
binding site (
2MSR) was 50 pM, and the
number of binding sites per cell was 1,600 (Fig. 1B). The Kd for ligand binding to the low affinity binding
sites (LRP/
2MR) was 25 nM, and the number of
binding sites per cell was 67,000 (Fig. 1B). Incubation of
macrophages with insulin prior to binding of ligand had little effect
on the Kd of binding to either site, but it
increased the number of both the high affinity (2,800) and the low
affinity (115,200) sites, respectively. RAP (10-fold excess) did not
block binding to the high affinity sites in buffer- or insulin-treated
macrophages, but it reduced binding to the low affinity site for the
ligand by about 50% in both buffer and insulin-treated cells (Fig.
1B). Like RAP, Ni2+, which inhibits the binding
of
2M* to LRP/
2MR but not to
2MSR (16), also inhibited the binding of
125I-
2M* by about 60% in both buffer- and
insulin-treated cells (Fig. 1C). The maximal binding of
125I-
2M* occurred when cells were exposed to
10 nM insulin, while at lower or higher concentrations,
insulin treatment markedly reduced ligand binding (Fig.
2).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Direct binding of
125I- 2M* to macrophage
cell surface receptors and Scatchard analysis of binding. Details
of binding studies are given under "Experimental Procedures."
A, the binding of 125I- 2M* was
determined in buffer-treated ( ) or insulin-treated ( ) macrophages
(2-2.5 × 105 cells) at the specified ligand
concentrations. The specific binding of the ligand was calculated by
subtracting nonspecific binding determined in the presence of 5 mM EDTA from total binding. The values are mean ± S.E. from four independent experiments performed in quadruplicate. The
effect of RAP (10-fold excess) on binding of
125I- 2M* at various ligand concentrations in
buffer-treated ( ) or insulin-treated ( ) macrophages was
determined. The specific binding was calculated as above. The values
are mean ± S.E. from three independent experiments performed in
quadruplicate. B, Scatchard analysis of the binding of
125I- 2M* to buffer-treated ( ) or
insulin-treated (10 nM/1 h) ( ) macrophages.
C, effect of Ni2+ treatment (10 mM)
on 125I- 2M* binding to macrophages. The
bars represent treatment with buffer (1),
Ni2+ (2), insulin (10 nM/1 h)
(3), and insulin followed by Ni2+
(4). Values are mean ± S.E. from two experiments
performed in quadruplicate.
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Insulin concentration and binding of
125I- 2M*.
Macrophages (5-6 × 105 cells) were incubated with
the indicated concentrations of insulin for 1 h at 37 °C and
washed, and binding of 125I- 2M* was
determined as detailed under "Experimental Procedures." Values are
mean ± S.E. from two experiments done in quadruplicate.
|
|
Insulin Increases mRNA Levels of
LRP/
2MR--
The maximum increase in
LRP/
2MR mRNA levels occurred when cells were treated
with 10 nM insulin, but above or below this insulin
concentration, a marked decrease in mRNA was observed (Fig.
3A). LRP/
2MR
expression was maximal at 1 h of incubation with 10 nM
insulin (Fig. 3B). The presence of actinomycin D before and
during insulin treatment nearly abolished the insulin-induced increase
in receptor mRNA, demonstrating that the increased mRNA level
observed in insulin-treated cells was due to insulin-induced new RNA
synthesis (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
mRNA levels of
LRP/ 2MR by Northern blot
hybridization. A, effect of insulin concentration on
receptor mRNA levels. Prior to extraction of mRNA, macrophages
were incubated with various concentrations of insulin,
2M*, or buffer at 37 °C, and mRNA was extracted.
mRNA (0.75 µg in each case) was used for Northern blot
hybridization. The slots are labeled with the insulin concentration
employed. The last slot is 2M* without insulin.
B, modulation of insulin increase in LRP/ 2MR
mRNA levels. Macrophages were treated with insulin (10 nM) for varying periods of time, and their mRNA was
isolated and analyzed (0.75 µg in each case). In some experiments,
cells were treated with actinomycin D (10 µg/ml/20 min) before adding
insulin. The data presented are representative of two independent
experiments. The slots are 2M* (100 pM)
(1), actinomycin D prior to insulin (10 nM/1 h)
(2), reagent blank without mRNA (3), insulin
(10 nM/1 h) (4), insulin (10 nM/2 h)
(5), and insulin (10 nM/4 h)
(6).
|
|
PI 3-Kinase and MAPK Inhibitors Reduce Insulin-induced Increased
Binding of 125I-
2M* to
Cells--
Wortmannin (45) and LY294002 (46), both inhibitors of PI
3-kinase, reduced insulin-augmented increased cellular binding of
125I-
2M* without significantly altering
basal ligand binding (Fig. 4A). PI 3-kinase activity is
required for activation of p70s6k, which plays a potential
role in regulating protein synthesis by phosphorylation of ribosomal S6
kinase (47). Treatment of cells with rapamycin, an inhibitor of
p70s6k (48), before insulin treatment reduced the
insulin-augmented increased binding of
125I-
2M* without significantly altering the
basal binding of 125I-
2M* to macrophages
(Fig. 4B). Activation of the Ras pathway is the second route
of signal transduction that has been implicated in the induction of
gene expression by insulin (49). Components of the pathway that
includes ERK1, ERK2, and p38MAPK are mediators of
phosphorylation of intracellular substrates such as protein kinases and
transcription factors as well as regulators of growth factor-induced
cell growth and differentiation (50, 51). Treatment of cells with
PD98059, a specific inhibitor of ERK1 and ERK2 (52), or SB203580, a
specific inhibitor of p38MAPK (53), before insulin
treatment, like the PI 3-kinase and p70s6k inhibitors
significantly decreased the insulin-augmented increased binding of
125I-
2M* to macrophages without
significantly affecting basal binding of the ligand (Fig.
4B). These results support the hypothesis that insulin
increased the binding of 125I-
2M* to
macrophages by activating both the PI 3-kinase and Ras signaling
pathways to achieve this synthesis.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of PI 3-kinase, MAPK, and
p70s6k inhibitors on insulin-induced increased binding of
125I- 2M* to
macrophages. Experimental details are given under "Experimental
Procedures." A, effect of wortmannin and LY294002
treatment of cells. The bars represent treatment with buffer
(1), insulin (10 nM/1 h) (2),
wortmannin (30 nM/30 min) followed by insulin (10 nM/1 h) (3), and LY294002 (20 µM/15 min) followed by insulin (10 nM/1 h)
(4). B, effect of MAPK and p70s6k
inhibitor treatment of cells. The bars represent treatment
with buffer (1), insulin (10 nM/1 h)
(2), PD98059 (50 µM/90 min) followed by
insulin (10 nM/1 h) (3), SB203580 (15 µM/30 min) followed by insulin (10 nM/1 h)
(4), and rapamycin (100 nM/5 min) followed by
insulin (10 nM)/1 h) (5). Values are mean ± S.E. from two independent experiments performed in
quadruplicate.
|
|
Insulin-induced Increase in IP3 Synthesis in
2M*-stimulated Cells Is Abolished by Actinomycin
D--
Binding of
2M* to
2MSR, but not
to LRP/
2MR, generates a signaling cascade (6-15).
Incubation of macrophages with insulin prior to stimulation with
2M* increased IP3 levels in a biphasic manner (Fig. 5). In insulin-treated
cells, a 2-4-fold increase in IP3 formation was observed
in the initial 60 s of agonist stimulation, followed by another
sustained increase of up to 5 min compared with buffer-treated cells
(Fig. 5A). The generation of IP3 after
2M* stimulation of insulin-pretreated macrophages was
proportional to the concentration of insulin up to 10 nM,
but incubation of macrophages with higher concentrations of insulin
caused a gradual decrease in IP3 formation (Fig.
5B). The maximal stimulation of IP3 synthesis
occurred after 1 h of insulin treatment, and a decrease in
IP3 formation occurred after longer treatment. Insulin by
itself showed no effect on the generation of IP3 in
macrophages under the experimental conditions. Preincubation of
macrophages with actinomycin D or cycloheximide before insulin
treatment showed little effect on the
2M*-induced early
increase in IP3 levels, but this treatment abolished the
insulin-induced sustained increase in IP3 levels (Fig.
6A). The addition of
actinomycin D after incubation of macrophages with insulin followed by
stimulation with
2M* had no effect on insulin-induced
increase in IP3. These results suggest that the potentiated
generation of IP3 in insulin-treated cells arises as a
consequence of the increased number of newly synthesized
2MSR. Treatment of macrophages with genestein (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) or staurosporin (a protein kinase C inhibitor) prior to incubation with insulin followed by stimulation with
2M* abolished the augmented increase in
IP3 production (Fig. 6B). Thus, the involvement
of protein kinase C and tyrosine kinases in insulin-induced
up-regulation of
2MSR and second messenger events
following
2MSR activation is evident.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Insulin-induced changes in IP3
levels in macrophages stimulated with 2M*. Details of quantification of
IP3 are described under "Experimental Procedures."
A, shown are buffer followed by 2M* (100 pM) ( ), insulin (10 nM/1 h) followed by
2M* (100 pM) ( ), and insulin alone ( ).
Values are mean ± S.E. from four independent experiments.
B, effect of insulin concentration on IP3
formation. Values are mean ± S.E. from three independent
experiments and are expressed percentage change in IP3 over
basal levels.
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Modulation of insulin-induced increased
synthesis of IP3 on 2M* stimulation. Experimental
details are given under "Experimental Procedures." A,
shown are buffer followed by 2M* ( ), insulin followed
by 2M* ( ), actinomycin D prior to insulin followed by
2M* ( ), insulin prior to actinomycin D followed by
2M* ( ), and cycloheximide prior to insulin followed
by 2M* ( ). Values are the mean ± S.E. from two
or three independent experiments in each case. B, effect of
genestein, staurosporin, and antibody against insulin receptor on
insulin-induced increase in IP3 synthesis after
2M* stimulation. The bars represent treatment
with buffer followed by 2M* (100 pM)
(1), insulin (10 nM/1 h) followed by
2M* (100 pM) (2), staurosporin
(20 nM/16 h) prior to insulin (10 nM/1 h)
followed by 2M* (3), and genestein (20 µM/16 h) prior to insulin (10 nM/1 h)
followed by 2M* (100 pM) (4), and
insulin receptor antibody (10 µg/ml 30 min/25 °C) prior to insulin
(10 nM/1 h) followed by 2M* (100 pM) (5). Values are mean ± S.E. from two
or three experiments performed in duplicate and are expressed as
percentage change in IP3 synthesis at 60 s after
2M* stimulation.
|
|
Effect of Antibodies against Insulin Receptor on Insulin-induced
Increase in IP3 Generation--
To demonstrate that the
effects of insulin on the binding of
2M* and generation
of IP3 occur consequent to its binding to insulin receptors
on macrophages, we next studied the effect of incubating macrophages
with insulin receptor antibody before adding insulin (Fig.
6B). As expected, treatment of macrophages with antibody
against membrane insulin receptors abolished the insulin-induced augmented increase in IP3 generation seen upon
2M* stimulation, but it showed very little effect on
IP3 generation in macrophages treated with buffer prior to
stimulation with
2M* (Fig. 6B). These results
show that the increased level of IP3 observed on
2M* stimulation of insulin-treated macrophages results
from first binding of insulin to its receptor followed by sequential
activation of downstream signal transduction events, resulting in
up-regulation of
2MSR.
Inhibition of Insulin-induced Increase in IP3 Formation
by PI 3-Kinase and MAPK Pathways Inhibitors--
We next evaluated the
involvement of the PI 3-kinase and MAPK pathways in the insulin-induced
up-regulation of
2MSR by quantifying the generation of
IP3 in cells treated with PI 3-kinase pathway inhibitors
wortmannin and LY294002, and MAPK pathway inhibitors PD98059 and
SB203580, and the p70s6k inhibitor rapamycin before insulin
treatment and
2M* stimulation (Fig.
7). As expected, inhibitor treatment
significantly reduced only the insulin-augmented increase in
IP3 generation but not basal levels observed upon
stimulation with
2M* (Fig. 7). These results suggest
that the potentiated increase in IP3 synthesis observed in
insulin-treated macrophages occurs due to the availability of increased
numbers of receptors and that insulin utilizes both PI 3-kinase and
MAPK pathways downstream of insulin stimulation to induce this new
synthesis of
2MSR.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
PI 3-kinase, MAPK, and p70s6k
inhibitors and insulin-induced increased synthesis of IP3
on 2M* stimulation. Details
are described under "Experimental Procedures." The bars
represent treatment with buffer (1), 2M* (100 pM) (2), insulin (10 nM/1 h)
followed by 2M* (100 pM) (3),
wortmannin (30 nM/30 min) prior to insulin followed by
2M* (100 pM) (4), LY294002 (20 nM/15 min) prior to insulin followed by 2M*
(100 pM) (5), PD98059 (50 µM/90
min) prior to insulin followed by 2M* (100 pM) (6), SB203580 (15 µM/30 min)
prior to insulin followed by 2M* (100 pM)
(7), and rapamycin (100 nM/5 min) prior to
insulin followed by 2M* (100 pM)
(8). Values are average of two or three independent
experiments and are expressed as percentage change in IP3
synthesis at 60 s after agonist stimulation.
|
|
Effect of Insulin on [Ca2+]i Levels in
2M*-stimulated Macrophages--
Many extracellular
stimuli cause an increase in cytosolic [Ca2+]i by
stimulating formation of IP3, which then binds to the
intracellular IP3 receptor, an ion channel. This causes its
opening and release of Ca2+ from intracellular
membrane-bound compartments. This is followed by the entry of
Ca2+ from the extracellular medium by capacitative
Ca2+ entry mechanisms (54). Treatment of macrophages with
insulin prior to stimulation with
2M* increased
[Ca2+]i levels by 2-3-fold compared with
buffer-treated macrophages (Fig.
8A). In a typical experiment,
[Ca2+]i levels in unstimulated cells,
2M*-stimulated cells, and insulin-treated and
2M*-stimulated cells were 144.51 ± 4.58, 356.78 ± 13.79, and 836.18 ± 15.80 nM,
respectively. The increase in [Ca2+]i levels was
proportional to insulin concentration, being maximal at 10 nM and showing a slight decrease thereafter (Fig.
8B). As would be predicted, the effect of insulin
concentration on [Ca2+]i levels upon
2M* stimulation is very similar to the augmented
increase in IP3 levels that was observed (Fig. 5). Increase in [Ca2+]i on
2M* stimulation of
insulin-treated macrophages was maximal at 1 h of insulin
treatment, and longer incubation resulted in a slight decrease in
[Ca2+]i levels. Incubation of macrophages with
actinomycin D, cycloheximide, genestein, or staurosporin in separate
experiments before treatment with insulin and stimulation with
2M* suppressed the insulin-augmented increase in
[Ca2+]i levels but only slightly affected
2M*-induced increases in
[Ca2+]i levels in buffer-treated macrophages
(Fig. 8C).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Insulin-induced changes in
[Ca2+]i on 2M* stimulation. A,
shown are buffer-treated macrophages stimulated with 2M*
(100 M) ( ), macrophages incubated with insulin (10 nM/1 h/37 °C) and then stimulated with
2M* (100 pM) as above ( ), and
buffer-treated macrophages stimulated with insulin (10 nM)
(×). The results shown are representative of 4-6 individual
experiments using 20-25 cells per experiment in each case. The
arrow indicates the time of addition. B, effect
of insulin concentration on changes in [Ca2+]i on
2M* stimulation. Macrophages were treated with indicated
concentrations of insulin for 1 h and then stimulated with
2M*. Values are mean ± S.E. performed in three
independent experiments and are expressed as percentage change in
[Ca2+]i levels over the basal value.
C, modulation of insulin-induced increase in
[Ca2+]i levels. Macrophages were treated with
buffer followed by 2M* (1), insulin (10 nM/1 h) followed by 2M* (100 pM)
(2), cycloheximide prior to insulin followed by
2M* (100 pM) (3), actinomycin D
prior to insulin followed by 2M* (100 pM)
(100 pM) (4), and staurosporin prior to insulin
followed by 2M* (5). The results are
representative of three experiments using 25-30 cells in each case.
Values are mean ± S.E. from three or four individual experiments
using 20-25 cells in each case and are expressed as percentage change
in [Ca2+]i levels over the basal value.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The primary observations of this study are that insulin treatment
of peritoneal macrophages prior to stimulation with
2M* are as follows. 1) Insulin treatment increases the number of both high
(
2MSR) and low (LRP/
2MR) affinity binding
sites by about 2-fold. 2) Treatment augments the increase in two second
messengers, namely IP3 and [Ca2+]i,
observed upon ligation of
2MSR with
2M*.
3) Increases in 125I-
2M* binding,
IP3, and [Ca2+]i levels observed upon
2M* stimulation are drastically reduced by preincubation
of macrophages with antibodies against insulin receptors, actinomycin
D, cycloheximide, PI 3-kinase inhibitors, a p70s6k
inhibitor, an ERK1/2 inhibitor, and a p38MAPK inhibitor. 4)
increases in 125I-
2M* binding to macrophages
are to a large extent contributed by new synthesis of receptors. The
results further demonstrate that insulin exerts a coordinate regulation
of the synthesis of both LRP/
2MR and
2MSR. These results contrast to previous suggestions that the insulin-augmented increase in the binding of
125I-
2M* to LRP/
2MR occurred
because of redistribution of receptors (36-39), decreased endocytosis
(36-39, 55), or increased half-life of receptor-ligand complex
(36).
Two mechanisms by which insulin exerts its metabolic and mitogenic
effects after binding to receptors are activation of PI 3-kinase and
its downstream signaling pathway and activation of the small GTP
binding protein p21ras and its downstream protein kinases
(17-22). Inhibition of PI 3-kinase activity by wortmannin and LY294002
attenuates the stimulation of glucose transport and mitogenesis by
insulin (27). This lipid kinase is linked to the regulatory cascade
that controls p70s6k and activation by insulin, which can
be selectively blocked by rapamycin (26, 56). The p21ras
pathway has been implicated in the induction of gene expression by
insulin (17-21, 26, 57). The expression of dominant inhibitory mutants
of p21ras inhibited insulin-stimulated gene expression (26).
Selective inhibition of farnesyl protein transferase prevented the
attachment of Ras proteins to plasma membranes and adversely affected
their activation by growth factors (58). In macrophages, ligation of
2MSR results in activation of the p21ras (35)
and PI 3-kinase (34) signaling pathways, and we have proposed that
these mechanisms are involved in
2M*-induced
mitogenesis (13, 14).
In most cells, insulin signaling extends to the nucleus with changes in
transcription of a variety of specific genes (20, 21, 32, 59). Insulin
receptors have been identified in nuclei (60, 61) causing stimulation
of nuclear tyrosine kinase activity, which could be important in
insulin action at the nuclear level (60-62). Insulin regulates the
transcription and turnover of mRNAs that encode proteins involved
both in growth and metabolic processes (17-22), stimulates
phosphorylation of a number of transcription factors, and DNA-binding
proteins (20-22, 32, 59), and increases the levels of several specific
mRNAs including that of the p33 gene, c-fos,
c-jun, early growth response genes, lipoprotein lipase (20,
21, 32, 59). The present work demonstrates that a coordinate
up-regulation of LRP/
2MR and
2MR by
insulin also occurs. The potentiated, biphasic increase in
IP3 generation in cells treated with insulin first and
subsequently stimulated with
2M* is largely attributed
to the availability of increased number of newly synthesized
2MSR molecules available for occupancy.
When insulin-treated cells are exposed to a
2M*, it
binds to two pools of
2MSR, one a constitutive/basal
pool, unaffected by actinomycin D, and the second a newly synthesized
pool, which is greatly reduced by actinomycin D, cycloheximide,
genestein, staurosporin, PI 3-kinase inhibitors, MAPK pathway
inhibitors, and antibodies against insulin receptors. The
insulin-expanded and constitutive/basal receptor pools, upon
2M* binding, trigger PIP2 hydrolysis,
generating IP3 that, upon binding to IP3
receptors, causes higher levels of [Ca2+]i. These
events trigger the onset of several intracellular signaling cascades
that act in synergy with those activated by insulin consequent to its
binding to receptors and thus enhance the cellular responses. Based
upon the similarities in second messenger generation elicited upon
ligation of
2MSR with those elicited upon ligation of
growth factor receptors with their cognate ligands, we have
hypothesized that
2MSR is a growth factor-like receptor
whose ligation with receptor-recognized forms of
2M generates a series of signaling events that play a role in growth and
that this receptor may be involved in tissue repair. Thus, in the
presence of a physiological concentration of insulin, the synergy or
"cross-talk" between insulin and
2MSR may be
physiologically important.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by NHLBI, National Institutes of
Health, Grant HL-24066.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: (919) 684-3528;
Fax: (919) 684-8689; E-mail: Pizzo001@mc.duke.edu.
1
The abbreviations and trivial names used
are:
2M,
2-macroglobulin;
2M*, receptor-recognized forms of
2M;
2MSR, the
2M* signaling receptor;
LRP/
2MR, the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/
2M receptor; RAP, the receptor-associated
protein; PI, phosphoinositide; IP3, inositol
1,4,5-trisphosphate; HHBSS, Hanks' balanced salt solution containing
Hepes, pH 7.4, and 3.5 nM NaHCO3; LY294002,
2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1benzopyran-4-one; SB203580, [4-(4-flurophenyl)-2-(4-methylsulfinylphenyl)-5-(4-pyridyl)1H imidazole; PD98059, 2'-amino-3-methoxyflavone; ERK1/2,
extracellular signal-regulated kinase, also termed p42/44MAPK; MAPK,
mitogen-activated protein kinase; p70s6k, 70-kDa ribosomal
S6 kinase; p90rsk, 90-kDa ribosomal S6 kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sottrup-Jensen, L.
(1987)
in
Plasma Proteins
(Putnam, F. W., ed)
, pp. 191-291, Academic Press, Inc., New York
|
| 2.
|
Chu, C. T.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1994)
Lab. Invest.
71,
792-812[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Salvesen, G.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1993)
in
Hemostasis and Thromboses: Basic Principles and Clinical Practice
(Colman, R. W.
, Hirsh, J.
, Marder, V. J.
, and Salzman, E. W., eds)
, pp. 241-258, J. B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia
|
| 4.
|
Strickland, D. K.,
Ashcom, J. D.,
Williams, S.,
Burgess, W. H.,
Migliorini, M.,
and Argraves, W. S.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
17401-17404[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Krieger, M.,
and Herz, J.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
63,
601-638[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Misra, U. K.,
Chu, C. T.,
Rubenstein, D. S.,
Gawdi, G.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
290,
885-891
|
| 7.
|
Misra, U. K.,
Chu, C. T.,
Gawdi, G.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12541-12547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Misra, U. K.,
Chu, C. T.,
Gawdi, G.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18303-18306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Misra, U. K.,
Gawdi, G.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
309,
151-158
|
| 10.
|
Misra, U. K.,
Gawdi, G.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1996)
J. Cell. Biochem.
61,
61-71[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Howard, G. C.,
Misra, U. K.,
DeCamp, D. L.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
97,
1193-1203[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Howard, G. C.,
Yamaguchi, Y.,
Misra, U. K.,
Gawdi, G.,
Nelson, A.,
DeCamp, D. L.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14105-14111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Misra, U. K.,
Gonzalez-Gronow, M.,
Gawdi, G.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
497-502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Misra, U. K.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1401,
121-128[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Webb, D. J.,
Hussini, I. M.,
Weaver, A. M.,
Kins, T. L.,
Chu, C. T.,
Pizzo, S. V.,
Owens, G. K.,
and Gonias, S. L.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
234,
714-722[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Odom, A. R.,
Misra, U. K.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
12395-12399[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Cheatham, B.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1995)
Endocr. Rev.
16,
117-142[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
White, M. F.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1-4[Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Lee, J.,
and Pilch, P. F.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
266,
C319-C334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
O'Brien, R. M.,
and Granner, D. K.
(1996)
Physiol. Rev.
76,
1109-1161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Proud, C. G.,
and Denton, R. M.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
328,
329-341
|
| 22.
|
Denton, R. M.,
and Tavare, J. M.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
227,
597-611[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Okada, T.,
Kawano, Y.,
Sakakibara, T.,
Hazeki, O.,
and Ui, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3568-3573[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Toker, A.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1997)
Nature
387,
673-676[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Downward, J.
(1998)
Science
279,
673-674[Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Medema, R. H.,
Wubbolts, R.,
and Bos, J. L.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
5963-5967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Cheatham, B.,
Vlahos, C. J.,
Cheatham, L.,
Wang, L.,
Blenis, J.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
4902-4911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Lee-Kwon, W.,
Park, D.,
and Bernier, M.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
331,
5691-5697
|
| 29.
|
Avruch, J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell Biochem.
182,
31-48[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1996)
J. Mol. Med.
74,
589-604[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Raingeaud, J.,
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
Barrett, T.,
Derijard, B.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
16,
1247-1255
|
| 32.
|
Cuenda, A.,
Cohen, P.,
Bhee-Scherrer, V.,
and Goedert, M.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
295-305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Enslen, H.,
Raingeaud, J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1741-1748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Misra, U. K.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1998)
Cell. Signalling
10,
441-445[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Misra, U. K.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13399-13402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Ney, K. A.,
Gidwitz,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1984)
Biochemistry
23,
3395-3403[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Gliemann, J.,
and Sonne, O.
(1985)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
845,
124-130[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Corvera, S.,
Graver, D. F.,
and Smith, R. M.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
10133-10138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Descamps, O.,
Bilheimer, D.,
and Herz, J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
974-981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Alessi, M. C.,
Juhan-Vague, I.,
Kooistra, T.,
Declerck, P. J.,
and Collen.
(1988)
Thromb. Haemostasis
60,
509-516
|
| 41.
|
Bu, G.,
Sun, Y.,
Schwartz, A. L.,
and Holtzman, D. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13359-13363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Kumar, A.,
Middleton, A.,
Chambers, T. C.,
and Mehta, K. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15742-15748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Enghild, J. J.,
Thogersen, I.,
and Pizzo, S. V.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
1400-1412
|
| 44.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Ui, M.,
Okada, T.,
Hazeki, K.,
and Hazeki, O. C.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20,
303-307
|
| 46.
|
Vlahos, C. J.,
Matter, W. F.,
Hui, K. Y.,
and Brown, R. F.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
5241-5248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Dardevet, D.,
Sornet, C.,
Vary, T.,
and Grizard, J.
(1996)
J. Endocrinol.
137,
4987-4094
|
| 48.
|
Jefferies, H. B.,
Fumagali, S.,
Dennis, P. B.,
Reinhard, C.,
Pearson, R. B.,
and Thomas, G.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
3693-3704[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Ceresa, B. P.,
and Pessin, J. E.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
182,
23-29[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Johnson, N. L.,
Gardner, A. M.,
Diener, K. M.,
Lange-Carter, C. A.,
Gleavy, J.,
Jarbe, M. B.,
Minden, A.,
Karin, M.,
Zon, L. I.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3229-3237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Kyriakis, J. M.,
and Avruch, J.
(1996)
BioEssays
18,
567-577[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
Cuenda, A.,
Cohen, P.,
Dudley, D. T.,
and Saltiel, A. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27489-27494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Price, D. F. J.,
Grove, J. R.,
Calvo, V.,
Avruch, J.,
and B |