J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 36, 25792-25800, September 3, 1999
DNA Methylation at Mammalian Replication Origins*
Theo
Rein
§,
Takehiko
Kobayashi¶,
Michelle
Malott
**,
Michael
Leffak
, and
Melvin L.
DePamphilis
From the NICHD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
20892-2753, the
Max Planck Institut für
Psychiatrie, Kraepelinstrasse 2-10, D-80804 München, Germany, the
¶ National Institute for Basic Biology, 38 Nishigonaka,
Myodaijicho, Okazaki 444, Japan, and the
Department of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Wright State University,
Dayton, Ohio 45435
 |
ABSTRACT |
In Escherichia coli, DNA methylation
regulates both origin usage and the time required to reassemble
prereplication complexes at replication origins. In mammals, at least
three replication origins are associated with a high density cluster of
methylated CpG dinucleotides, and others whose methylation status has
not yet been characterized have the potential to exhibit a similar DNA
methylation pattern. One of these origins is found within the
~2-kilobase pair region upstream of the human c-myc gene
that contains 86 CpGs. Application of the bisulfite method for
detecting 5-methylcytosines at specific DNA sequences revealed that
this region was not methylated in either total genomic DNA or newly synthesized DNA. Therefore, DNA methylation is not a universal component of mammalian replication origins. To determine whether or not
DNA methylation plays a role in regulating the activity of origins that
are methylated, the rate of remethylation and the effect of
hypomethylation were determined at origin
(ori-
), downstream of
the hamster DHFR gene. Remethylation at ori-
did not begin until
~500 base pairs of DNA was synthesized, but it was then completed by
the time that 4 kilobase pairs of DNA was synthesized (<3 min after
release into S phase). Thus, DNA methylation cannot play a significant
role in regulating reassembly of prereplication complexes in mammalian
cells, as it does in E. coli. To determine whether or not
DNA methylation plays any role in origin activity, hypomethylated
hamster cells were examined for ori-
activity. Cells that were
>50% reduced in methylation at ori-
no longer selectively
activated ori-
. Therefore, at some loci, DNA methylation either
directly or indirectly determines where replication begins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In early embryos undergoing rapid cell cleavage (e.g.
frogs, flies, sea urchin, fish), initiation of DNA replication appears neither to require specific DNA sequences nor to occur at specific DNA
sites. However, as development progresses past the blastula stage,
initiation of DNA replication begins to occur at specific sites (1, 2).
Thus, it is not surprising that initiation sites for DNA replication in
cultured mammalian cells occur at specific genomic loci (3). For
example, a 200-kb1 region at
the human
-globin gene (4, 5) and a 500-kb region at the mouse IgH
gene (6) are both replicated from a single initiation locus. Moreover,
what previously had been viewed as random initiation events distributed
throughout "initiation zones" in Schizosaccharomyces
pombe and hamster cells more likely reflects the presence of
several strongly preferred initiation sites (7, 8). Nevertheless, the
precise size and composition of these initiation loci, as well as the
parameters that define them remain the subject of intense investigation.
The fact that specific sites for initiation of DNA replication can be
developmentally acquired makes it clear that initiation sites in the
metazoa are determined at least in part by epigenetic parameters. These
parameters include nuclear structure, chromatin structure, and events
that occur during G1 phase of the cell division cycle
(reviewed in Ref. 3). In addition, replication origins are determined
by specific DNA sequences, although the precise nature of these
sequences is not yet known. Initiation occurs at the same well defined
sites within a large genetic locus that is present as a single copy per
haploid genome as it does in cells that have amplified the locus into
hundreds of copies (9-12). Therefore, each copy must contain specific
cis-acting sequences that determine where replication can begin.
Moreover, replication origins exhibit initiation activity when they are
translocated to other chromosomal sites
(13-15),2 and origin
activity can be eliminated by deletion of specific sequences either
within the initiation site or at some distance away (4, 5, 13, 16). The
distal sequences may act as enhancers to alter chromatin structure,
while the proximal sequences may act as assembly sites for
prereplication complexes. Several reports of autonomously replicating
sequence elements that function in mammalian cells and cell extracts
have been documented in detail and shown to correspond to initiation
sites for DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes (17-20). This does
not exclude the possibility that, under appropriate conditions, other
sequences may promote autonomous plasmid DNA replication in mammals
(21) as they do in Xenopus eggs (22) and in yeast (23).
One mechanism by which chromatin structure or nuclear organization
might affect origin activity is through DNA methylation at replication
origins. In Escherichia coli, DNA methylation plays a
direct role in regulating the efficiency of origin usage and the timing
of origin activation (see "Discussion"). In mammals, two
replication origins in hamster cells (24) and one in human cells (32)
are associated with an unusually dense cluster of methylated CpG
dinucleotides (CpGs) while other origins contain sufficient CpGs to
generate a similar pattern of DNA methylation (24). In one case (24),
these CpGs were shown to be methylated in active origins as well as in
the total cell population. Earlier reports that mammalian replication
origins were associated with an unusual "densely methylated island"
consisting of ~100 to ~500 base pairs in which all cytosines were
methylated, regardless of their dinucleotide composition (25, 26),
apparently resulted from incomplete DNA cleavage by
methylation-sensitive restriction endonucleases and incomplete reaction
of DNA with bisulfite followed by selective amplification of unreacted
DNA segments (24, 27).
DNA methylation at mammalian DNA replication origins might affect
initiation of DNA replication in at least two ways. First, DNA
methylation might delay reinitiation at origins in mammalian cells, as
it does in E. coli. For example, while newly replicated DNA
appears to be rapidly remethylated throughout most of the genome (28,
29), remethylation is delayed in as yet undefined parts of the genome
for up to 6 h (30). These genomic regions may represent
replication origins. Since the tumor suppressor p21WAF1 can
disrupt the interaction between PCNA and DNA methyltransferase (31),
p21 could potentially play a dual role at replication origins by
regulating activation of prereplication complexes through control of
Cdk2-cyclin A and E protein kinase activity and by delaying
remethylation of newly synthesized DNA. Following the E. coli scenario, this would allow hemimethylated origin DNA to be
sequestered by proteins that are sensitive to its methylation status,
thus delaying reassembly of a prereplication complex.
Alternatively, DNA methylation might promote specificity in the
selection of initiation sites, because DNA methylation can alter DNA
secondary structure (38, 39) and 5-methylcytosine in DNA can bind
specific proteins (40), one of which (MeCP2) also binds to nuclear
matrix (41). These properties could alter chromatin structure to make
some sites more or less accessible, or they could facilitate binding of
DNA replication proteins. Support for this hypothesis comes from
observations that induction of hypomethylation often advances the time
when specific sequences are replicated during S phase (33-37) and also
from the concurrent appearance of DNA methyltransferase activity
(42-44) and site-specific, prereplication complexes (45) at
mid-G1 phase in the cell cycle.
These considerations raised two important questions. First, is
DNA methylation a feature common to all mammalian replication origins?
Second, does DNA methylation play a role in regulating origin activity?
To address the first question, we determined the methylation status of
the human c-myc replication origin. This origin lies just
upstream of the c-myc promoter and is located within a CpG
island (17-20, 46-48), typical of a class of replication origins that
map to promoter regions of actively transcribed genes (18) that
replicate at the beginning of S phase (49). CpG islands are regions of
~1 kb that contain more than 50% G and C residues and a ratio of
observed/expected CpGs of greater than 0.6 (11). Although CpG islands
are considered devoid of 5-methylcytosine (50), attempts to evaluate
the methylated state of these origins have so far relied either on
methylation-sensitive restriction endonucleases that sample only a
small subset of cytosines (50) or on sequence analysis of only a small
fraction of the total number of CpGs within the island (28). These
studies would not have detected a situation in which some of the CpGs
within a CpG island are methylated, because they are associated with
the replication origin. These studies also would not have detected a
situation in which some cells within a population utilize the
replication origin and are therefore methylated at this site, while
other cells utilize the promoter and are therefore unmethylated at this site. Neither possibility would be detected without a complete sequence
analysis for methylated cytosines in total genomic DNA and in newly
replicated DNA where the methylated status of active replication
origins is specifically revealed. Our results demonstrate that DNA
methylation is not a component of all mammalian replication origins.
To address the second question, we determined the rate of remethylation
and the effect of hypomethylation at ori-
, a well characterized
replication origin located within a large nontranscribed intergenic
region in hamster cells. Our results demonstrate that the rate of
remethylation in mammalian cells cannot play a significant role in
regulating the rate at which prereplication complexes are reassembled,
because origins are rapidly remethylated. Nevertheless, hamster cells
containing hypomethylated DNA no longer exhibited site-specific
initiation of DNA replication in the ori-
locus, revealing that DNA
methylation does affect the initiation process at some origins. This
could occur either directly by facilitating the binding or activity of
replication proteins or indirectly by altering the concentrations of
critical replication proteins.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Mapping Methylated Cytosines in Specific DNA Sequences
The bisulfite method was used to detect methylated cytosines at
specific DNA sequences as described previously (24). For analysis of
nascent DNA, 1 µg of
X174 DNA was added as carrier prior to
bisulfite conversion.
Isolation Of Newly Synthesized DNA from Early Replication
Bubbles
Nascent Strand Length--
To isolate nascent DNA of different
lengths, CHO K1 cells were cultured and synchronized at their
G1/S transition by a double aphidicolin block as described
previously (8). The fraction of cells at their G1/S
boundary was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis
to be >90%. DNA was labeled, extracted, fractionated by sucrose
gradient centrifugation, and purified as described previously (8),
except that sucrose gradient fractions were collected that contained
DNA from 400 to 4000 residues in length.
Replication Time--
To isolate nascent DNA at different times
after cells were released into S phase, cells synchronized at their
G1/S transition were washed twice with prewarmed complete
medium and then cultured for 14 min in complete medium before
pulse-labeling nascent DNA for 1-2 min at 37 °C by the addition of
1 µM 3H-labeled deoxycytidine and 100 µM 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd). Cells then were washed
twice with prewarmed Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing
10% fetal calf serum and cultured in fresh prewarmed medium for 1 min
to 6 h. DNA was isolated and purified as described previously
(8).
c-myc Origin DNA--
HeLa cells were synchronized at their
G1/S transition by serum starvation and aphidicolin arrest
as described for CHO K1 cells (8). Cells were released into S phase for
10 min by washing twice with prewarmed medium before labeling nascent
DNA for 5 min with BrdUrd. Cells were washed and incubated in fresh
medium for another 4 h. Chromosomal DNA was extracted and digested
with restriction endonucleases (8). Nascent Br-DNA then was
affinity-purified and reacted with bisulfite. Alternatively, nascent
DNA was isolated from synchronized HeLa cells and fractionated
according to size by gel electrophoresis after sedimentation through
two sequential cesium chloride gradients as described previously
(20).
 |
RESULTS |
Some Replication Origins Are Not Methylated--
An origin
of bidirectional DNA replication (OBR) has been identified upstream of
the human c-myc gene (Fig. 1)
using several independent criteria. A replication initiation site was
initially located within a 3.5-kb region 5' to the c-myc
gene by extension in vitro of nascent DNA strands that had
been initiated in vivo (51). Subsequent analysis of nascent
DNA strand lengths from unsynchronized HeLa cells located the OBR
within a ~2-kb locus centered ~1.5 kb upstream of exon 1 (47). This
method also mapped an origin at the same position upstream of the
chicken c-myc gene (46). Analysis of the distribution of
short nascent DNA strands between the two DNA templates in synchronized
HeLa cells revealed several strand switches within this region,
consistent with the presence of one or more replication initiation
sites (48). A 2.4-kb segment from this region exhibits autonomous,
semiconservative replicating sequence activity in both transfected
cells and cell extracts, and replication begins within this 2.4-kb
locus (17, 20). Although most replication bubbles were centered ~1.4
kb upstream of promoter P1 (17), this region may contain more than one
autonomously replicating sequence element (19, 52). The 2.4-kb
c-myc initiation locus contains 110 CpG dinucleotides, or 1 CpG per 22 bp.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Human c-myc gene origin of
DNA replication. The 2.4-kb DNA fragment upstream of the human
c-myc gene (exon 1) with autonomously replicating activity
(17, 19, 20) is displayed along with the positions of CpG
dinucleotides. Vertical lines topped with open circles ("open
lollipops") denote unmethylated cytosines at CpG dinucleotides
that were determined in this study using the bisulfite method;
vertical lines alone denote positions of CpG
dinucleotides whose methylation status was not determined. In addition,
four DNase I hypersensitive sites (HS), and three
transcription start sites for promoters P0, P1, and P2 are indicated.
The results from four other origin mapping protocols also are
indicated. The average position of replication bubbles detected by
either electron microscopy or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis are
denoted by the "replication bubble," and their distribution range
is indicated by the shaded rectangle (17). The
OBR identified by nascent strand length analysis is denoted by the
large open arrow, and its precision is
indicated by the shaded rectangle (47). The
horizontal arrows above the c-myc
sequence indicate the polarity of nascent DNA strands in the
c-myc origin and the sites where their polarity changes,
indicative of initiation sites (48). The autonomously replicating
sequence (ARS) identified by Iguchi-Ariga et al.
(52) is indicated.
|
|
To determine whether or not methylated CpG dinucleotides
(mCpGs) are a feature of most, if not all, mammalian
replication origins, the methylation status of this region was
determined using the bisulfite method. Of the currently available
methods for mapping 5-methylcytosine (mC) at specific
genomic locations, the bisulfite method provides the greatest
sensitivity and is able to identify the methylation status of every
cytosine within a large sequence (53). Attention was focused on the
2-kb region from map position 200 to 2200 that contains the two changes
in nascent strand polarity, the OBR detected by nascent strand
analysis, and most of the replication bubbles detected by electron
microscopy and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. This region
contains 88 CpG dinucleotides with at least three high density clusters
of CpGs that, if methylated, would resemble those found at other origins.
Total chromosomal DNA from randomly proliferating HeLa cells was
digested with restriction endonucleases to produce fragments that could
be denatured completely. These fragments were treated with bisulfite to
convert cytosines, but not mC, into uracils. Specific
sequences were then amplified using appropriate PCR primers (converting
uracils into thymidines), and the amplification products were sequenced
using an internal primer. This method is preferable over sequencing
individual cloned isolates, because it more accurately reflects the
status of the total population and eliminates cloning artifacts (53,
54).
Following DNA sequencing, mC were displayed in the cytosine
lane, while cytosines were displayed in the thymine lane. All 86 cytosines within the c-myc DNA replication origin were
unmethylated, as evidenced by the conversion of all cytosines into
thymines. An example of the data is shown in Fig.
2, and the
results for the entire c-myc origin are summarized in Fig.
1. Because the PCR primers (Table I) were devoid of CpG dinucleotides,
bisulfite should convert all of the cytosines at these genomic sites
into uracils. Therefore, these PCR primers, which were designed to be
complementary to converted DNA, did not select for either methylated or
unmethylated CpG sites in the c-myc origin locus. Plasmid
DNA carrying the 2.4-kb HindIII fragment that contains the
c-myc replication origin was used to display the sequence
when it is completely unmethylated. The fact that one cytosine
(position 344) in this control sequence lies within a bacterial DNA
cytosine methylase (dcm) recognition sequence confirmed that the
bisulfite procedure would have detected methylated cytosines if they
had been present.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Identification of the methylated status of
CpG dinucleotides in the human c-myc gene replication
origin. Plasmid, genomic, and nascent DNA from HeLa cells was
treated with bisulfite and amplified with PCR using primers 1 and 4 (Table I). PCR products were sequenced using primer 2. The
closed lollipop identifies the methylated
dcm site in plasmid DNA. The open lollipops designate unmethylated cytosines in CpG
dinucleotides. T, G, C, and
A above the sequencing lanes indicate the nucleotide identified. Nucleotides
201-429 are shown as an example.
|
|
Since this bisulfite protocol does not detect DNA methylation in less
than 5-10% of the population (53), it was possible that only a
subpopulation of the cells were methylated at the c-myc
origin and that initiation of DNA replication at the c-myc origin occurred only in this subpopulation. Therefore, the methylation status of the c-myc origin was analyzed in newly synthesized
DNA. If active replication origins are methylated, then DNA
methyltransferase will remethylate the nascent DNA strand at each
hemimethylated CpG dinucleotide.
HeLa cells were synchronized at their G1/S-transition and
released into S phase for 10 min, and then nascent DNA was labeled for
5 min with BrdUrd. Cells were washed and incubated in fresh medium for
another 4 h to allow sufficient time for remethylation to occur.
Chromosomal DNA was extracted and cleaved with restriction enzymes to
eliminate the possibility that subsequent purification of nascent
Br-DNA retrieved c-myc sequences whose origin may not have
fired but were connected to an active, BrdUrd-labeled origin located
some distance away. Nascent Br-DNA was affinity-purified and analyzed
for mCpGs using the bisulfite method as described
previously (27). An example of these data is shown in Fig. 2, and the
total results are summarized in Fig. 1. Nascent DNA from the
c-myc replication origin, like total DNA, was devoid of
mC.
Theoretically, a signal from methylated DNA at active origins might
have been obscured in these experiments if replication forks from
neighboring origins had traveled through this region in some cells.
This could produce nascent c-myc DNA that was unmethylated. Therefore, nascent DNA in randomly proliferating HeLa cells was labeled
with BrdUrd, and Br-DNA 4-8 kb in length was isolated and then
analyzed for 5-methylcytosines. Again, all cytosines were found to be
unmethylated (data not shown), confirming that active c-myc
origins are located within an extended, fully unmethylated CpG island.
At Methylated Replication Origins, Remethylation Rapidly Follows
Replication--
To determine whether or not nascent DNA at
replication origins containing mCpGs is rapidly
remethylated, the rate of remethylation at ori-
was measured both as
a function of time after release into S phase and as a function of
nascent DNA strand length. Ori-
is a primary initiation site for
bidirectional DNA replication that has been identified in Chinese
hamster ovary (CHO) cells by six different origin mapping protocols in
12 different studies (summarized in Ref. 8). Ori-
has been localized
to a 2-kb region (8) centered ~17 kb downstream of the DHFR gene.
Ori-
encompasses the OBR originally identified at this site by a
transition between leading and lagging strand synthesis (55). Ori-
contains 12-15 mCpGs, nine of which are clustered within
356 bp flanking the minimal OBR to form a cluster of mCpGs
whose density is ~10 times greater than the average DNA methylation for human DNA (Fig. 3; Refs. 24 and
27).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Hamster DHFR gene
ori- . ori- is a 2-kb locus downstream
of the DHFR gene in hamster cells that has been identified as a primary
(high frequency) initiation site by six different origin mapping
protocols (summarized in Ref. 8). Closed lollipops denote methylated cytosines at CpG dinucleotides
that were determined using four independent methods, including the
bisulfite method (24, 27). Nine of these mCpGs are
clustered within a 356-bp region (shaded box)
adjacent to the OBR that was defined by the transition between
discontinuous and continuous DNA synthesis (55). The CpG cluster
contains an A:T element containing 60 adenosines on one strand and 60 thymines on the other with only four single base pair interruptions
within the dense CpG cluster. A micrococcal nuclease-hypersensitive
site (MNase HS site) that is specific for cells at their
G1/S phase border and for DNA associated with nuclear
matrix maps to this A:T element (100). Map positions are based on the
sequence under GenBankTM accession number X94372.
|
|
To measure the rate of remethylation at ori-
, CHO cells were
synchronized at their G1/S transition by arresting them
with aphidicolin, a specific inhibitor of replicative DNA polymerases
and
. They were then released into S phase for 14 min before adding BrdUrd to label nascent DNA. After 1 min in BrdUrd, the cells
were washed free of label and incubated in fresh medium for up to
6 h in order to determine the length of time required for newly
replicated hemimethylated DNA to become fully methylated DNA. Nascent
Br-DNA was then isolated, and the methylation state of the five
mCpGs within the CpG cluster at map position 2400 (Fig. 3)
was determined as described above for nascent c-myc Br-DNA.
This protocol allowed replication forks that had formed during the
synchronization procedure to leave ori-
before nascent DNA was
labeled. Thus, all BrdUrd-labeled DNA containing ori-
sequences were
synthesized during the 1-min pulse-labeling period immediately
preceding the chase period and not during the long period of
aphidicolin arrest.
These results showed that nascent ori-
DNA was completely
remethylated within 1-3 min of DNA synthesis. A strong signal from methylated DNA (indicated by cytosine residues in the C
lane at the positions of CpG dinucleotides) was evident
within 1 min of pulse labeling, whereas the signal from unmethylated
DNA (indicated by thymidine residues in the T
lane at the positions of CpG dinucleotides) was weak and
disappeared completely at later times during the chase period (Fig.
4).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Remethylation at ori- as a function of the time elapsed after the initiation of DNA
replication. Nascent DNA was pulse-labeled for 1 min at the
beginning of S phase in CHO cells. The cells were transferred to
unlabeled medium and cultured for the times indicated before isolating
their DNA and determining the extent of CpG methylation at nucleotide
positions 2372-2443 using the bisulfite method. Sense strand DNA was
selectively amplified with primers 2s and 3s and sequenced with primer
4s (24). Top panel, the positions of cytosines
within CpG dinucleotides are identified by lollipops.
Open lollipops identify unmethylated CpGs, and
closed lollipops identify methylated CpGs.
A, C, G, and T indicate the
nucleotide identified in each lane. Reference DNA was taken
from randomly proliferating CHO K1 cells. Bottom panel, the fraction of methylation at each of the five CpGs
shown in the top panel was estimated using the
program NIH Image after scanning autoradiographs, averaging the five
CpGs, and plotting them as a function of time after the BrdUrd
pulse.
|
|
This conclusion was confirmed and extended by analysis of DNA
methylation as a function of the length of the nascent DNA strand. CHO
cells were again synchronized at their G1/S transition and then released into culture medium containing BrdUrd. After 15 min,
chromosomal DNA was purified, heat-denatured, and then fractionated according to length by sedimentation through a neutral sucrose gradient. The average length of nascent DNA in various fractions was
determined by analytical gel electrophoresis in which DNA length
standards were run in parallel. DNA methylation was not detected in
nascent DNA strands 400 or 500 nucleotides long; mCpGs were
first detected in nascent DNA fragments of 700 nucleotides, and DNA
methylation was completed in nascent DNA fragments with an average
length of 4000 nucleotides (Fig. 5).
These results showed that DNA methylation did not occur concomitantly
with DNA synthesis but was closely linked to DNA synthesis, because
nascent ori-
DNA was completely remethylated by the time that 4000 nucleotides had been synthesized.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Remethylation at ori- as a function of nascent DNA strand length. Nascent DNA was
labeled for 15 min at the beginning of S phase in CHO cells. DNA was
isolated, fractionated according to length, purified by affinity
chromatography, and then analyzed for mCpGs in the ori-
locus as in Fig. 4. Shaded lollipops denote
partial methylation.
|
|
DNA Hypomethylation Results in Loss of Initiation Site
Specificity--
To determine whether or not DNA methylation plays any
role in the initiation of DNA replication in mammalian cells, CHO cell lines were obtained from D. Woodcock that had been selected for their
ability to survive treatment with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, an inhibitor
of DNA methyltransferase (56). Total genomic DNA methylation in these
cell lines was reduced 25-30%. In one of these cell lines (CHO C14),
the relative intensities of each of the 15 mCpGs within a
~2-kb region containing the ori-
OBR and the high density cluster
of CpG dinucleotides (Fig. 3) varied significantly (Fig.
6). The fraction of mC at
each CpG dinucleotide revealed that, on average, CHO C14 cells were
only 49% as methylated in the ori-
locus and 47% as methylated in
the CpG cluster as were CHO K1 cells. The same CpG dinucleotides were
completely methylated in CHO K1 (Figs. 4 and 5 and Ref. 24) and CHO
Scc30 cells, a clonal isolate of CHO K1 that was parent to CHO C14
(data not shown).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Ori- methylation
status in a hypomethylated hamster cell line. The methylation
status of ori- in CHO C14 cells was determined using the bisulfite
method as described previously (24). The gel shows an example of
bisulfite sequence analysis for nucleotides 2375-2487 using primers 2a
and 3a for amplification and primer 4a for sequencing.
Lollipops designate positions of cytosines in CpG
dinucleotides, and the extent of their shading reflects the
fraction of mC at that position. The fraction of
methylation at each GpG plotted next to the sequence position was
determined by measuring the ratio of cytosine to thymine in the data
generated by the bisulfite method for mapping 5-methylcytosine.
|
|
To determine whether or not DNA hypomethylation affected initiation of
DNA replication, CHO C14 cells were analyzed for initiation at origins
and
' using the same "nascent strand abundance assay" that
we used to identify these origins in CHO K1 cells (8). Since nascent
DNA strands on the order of 1 kb long originate predominantly from
newly formed replication bubbles, the number of strands containing a
particular sequence will be proportional to the frequency of initiation
events at that sequence. This assay is the most sensitive, quantifiable
assay currently available for detecting replication origins in
mammalian cells.
Cells were synchronized at their G1/S boundary and then
released into S phase in the presence of BrdUrd to label nascent DNA. DNA was purified, denatured, and then fractionated by sucrose gradient
centrifugation to isolate chains 800 ± 200 nucleotides long.
Nascent Br-DNA was purified from this pool by affinity chromatography and analyzed by competitive PCR to determine the relative
concentrations of 15 different genomic sites. Two sites (H and I) were
located in a region of the DHFR gene where initiation events have not been detected by any origin mapping protocol, including two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The remaining 13 sequences were located in a 13-kb
region downstream from the DHFR gene that contained ori-
and -
'
(8).
Competitive PCR measures the number of copies of a specific sequence in
a DNA sample by employing an internal competitor DNA to correct for
variation in the efficiency of amplification by different PCR primer
sets and between different PCR reactions using the same primer set. The
target DNA and competitor DNA share the same primer recognition sites,
but the competitor DNA contains a 20-nucleotide insertion so that the
amplified target and competitor products can be distinguished by gel
electrophoresis. Thus, when the ratio of amplified competitor to
amplified target sequences is 1, the number of target molecules in the
DNA sample is the same as the number of competitor DNA molecules that
were added. Results with primer sets I, 6, 9, and 13 illustrate the
method (Fig. 7A).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Absence of site-specific initiation of DNA
replication in a hypomethylated hamster cell line. A,
competitive PCR was used to quantify the relative amounts of specific
sequences in CHO C14 cells, as described previously (8). A fixed amount
of newly synthesized Br-DNA was amplified in the presence of increasing
amounts of competitor DNA. DNA products were resolved by gel
electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide. Primer sets I (DHFR
gene), 6 (ori- peak), 9, and 13 are shown as examples. Total target
DNA (T) = (T:T + (T:C + C:T)/2) and the
total competitor DNA (C) = (C:C + (T:C + C:T)/2).
T:T and C:C are
homoduplexes (gel bands marked H). T:C
and C:T are heteroduplexes. Background staining
in gels was subtracted from DNA bands before calculations were made.
B, the relative abundance of 15 different sequences (see
Fig. 3 in Ref. 8) was determined on newly synthesized BrdUrd-labeled
DNA from CHO C14 cells synchronized at their G1/S boundary,
and on nonreplicating DNA from serum-starved cells. The ratios of
nascent Br-DNA/nonreplicating DNA were calculated in each experiment,
and the amount of each probe was normalized to the average of probes H
and I (DHFR gene). Since initiation events have never been detected
near probes H and I by any origin mapping method (including
two-dimensional gel electrophoresis), numbers of 1 or less
(shaded area) indicate the absence of initiation
events. Mean values for two independent experiments with CHO C14 cells
( ) and for five independent experiments with CHO K1 cells ( , same
as in Ref. 8) were plotted on their nucleotide "map position"
(GenBankTM accession no. X94372). The region shown is from
12 to 27 kb downstream of the 3'-end of the DHFR gene. Error bars indicate S.E. Primer sets H, I, 6, and 12 were used to
confirm in one experiment that CHO Scc30 cells behaved like CHO K1
cells (data not shown).
|
|
The two slower migrating bands are heteroduplexes between target and
competitor DNA that formed during the final cycle of denaturation and
renaturation. Therefore, the amount of target and competitor DNA in
these heteroduplexes was included in determining the actual amount of
target DNA present so that the ratio of [total C]/[total T] was
linear as a function of the amount of competitor DNA added to the
polymerase chain reaction (8). The number of copies of each sequence
was determined both in the nascent Br-DNA fraction and in a sample of
0.8 kb of DNA isolated from nonproliferating cells, and the ratio of
nascent Br-DNA to nonreplicating DNA at each PCR primer set was
determined in order to eliminate any inaccuracy in our competitor DNA
concentrations. These ratios were then normalized to the average ratio
observed for probes H and I. Thus, regardless of the actual number of
copies detected in each experiment, the relative number of copies at
each sequence will reveal preferential sites of initiation.
The results revealed that hypomethylated CHO C14 cells, in contrast to
fully methylated CHO K1 or CHO Scc30 cells, did not initiate DNA
replication preferentially at either ori-
or -
' (Fig.
7B). Samples of Br-DNA isolated from either C14 cells
(example in Fig. 7A), K1 cells (example in Fig. 4 of Ref.
8), or Scc30 cells (data not shown) contained ~200 copies of
sequences defined by primer set I (DHFR gene). However, samples of
Br-DNA from K1 and Scc30 cells contained 8-17 times more sequences at
primer set 6 (ori-
peak) than samples of Br-DNA from C14 cells.
Therefore, initiation events at ori-
and -
' in CHO C14 cells were
reduced to background.
 |
DISCUSSION |
A role for DNA methylation in the regulation of DNA replication in
mammalian cells was suggested two decades ago based on the E. coli paradigm (57). The E. coli origin of chromosome replication, ori-C, is a 245-bp region containing 11 GATC sites (58)
that are methylated at the N-6 position of adenine by deoxyadenosine methyltransferase (59, 60). Control of replication timing within each
cell is critically dependent on the level of deoxyadenosine methyltransferase (61). The activity of both ori-C and the closely related ori-R in bacteriophage P1 is regulated by methylation on two
levels: sequestration of hemimethylated origin DNA through SeqA (62)
and severely reduced origin activity in unmethylated DNA (63). When
ori-C is replicated, the GATC sequences within ori-C become
hemimethylated (64, 65) and sequestered at the cell membrane (64)
through association with SeqA protein (62, 66-68). SeqA inhibits both
the formation and activity of prepriming complexes (62, 66-69).
Methylation at ori-C also influences the local DNA structure and
stability (62, 66-71) and its interaction with replication proteins
(72). Hemimethylated ori-C is refractory to further initiation events
(73-75) due to the inability of DnaA protein to access ori-C (76),
thus preventing premature reinitiation when free DnaA levels are still
high (64, 65, 76). OriC persists in this hemimethylated/sequestered
state for ~8 min, or about 10 times longer than for most other sites
on the E. coli chromosome (64, 65).
Thus, although deoxyadenosine methyltransferase is not required for
E. coli cell proliferation, the methylation status at replication origins in E. coli regulates both origin
efficiency and the rate at which replication origins can be reused. In
fact, GATC sites and the dam methylation system are
conserved among enteric bacteria, suggesting that this form of
regulation is widespread (77). Nevertheless, it is not universal, since
it is absent from Bacillus subtilis and
Pseudomonas. An analogous situation may exist in eukaryotes.
DNA Methylation at Mammalian Replication Origins
One would not expect DNA methylation to be universally required
for initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotes, because mammals appear
to use the same proteins for assembly of prereplication complexes as do
yeast and flies, and these eukaryotes are virtually devoid of
methylated bases (60). Nevertheless, two replication origins have been
identified in hamsters (ori-
, ori-RPS14; Ref. 24) and one in humans
(ori-dnmt1C1; Ref. 32) that are associated with a high density cluster
of mCpG dinucleotides. Other replication origins, such as
the human c-myc origin, are located within CpG islands and
therefore contain sufficient CpG dinucleotides to form analogous high
density clusters of mCpGs (24). CpG islands are generally
assumed to be completely unmethylated, but prior to the present study,
only a few CpG islands have been examined using the bisulfite method,
and these studies were limited to no more than ~0.3 kb of sequence
(78-83).
Results presented here demonstrate that the ~2-kb region upstream of
the human c-myc gene that contains a replication origin is
devoid of 5-methylcytosines (Fig. 1). This was true both for total
cellular DNA and for newly synthesized DNA. Our analysis, which
included all 86 CpG dinucleotides between positions 200 and 2150, is
consistent with the limited data available from previous studies on the
mammalian c-myc gene locus. Previous studies using methylation-sensitive restriction endonucleases did not detect mCpGs until ~5 kb downstream of this region (84-86),
suggesting that this CpG island is exceptional, because it is
completely demethylated over a much larger range than previously
reported for CpG islands (usually about 1 kb (87)). A small subset of CpG dinucleotides downstream of the promoter (84, 86, 88, 89) as well
as within the promoter region in mouse and human cells (85, 90) have
been examined by methylation-sensitive restriction endonucleases and
found to be unmethylated. Six CpG dinucleotides within the origin
region (positions 1036-1156) were found to be unmethylated using the
hydrazine method (85), but this method would not detect methylation in
less than 25% of the molecules (53, 85). Another study using the
bisulfite method also concluded that the human c-myc origin
was unmethylated (28), but this study examined only 10% of the CpGs
(positions 764-1095), and these were located in the region of lowest
CpG density (Fig. 1). Thus, they were not representative of the high
density cluster of CpGs described for methylated origins (24, 32).
Moreover, this study detected only eight CpGs in a region that contains nine. Finally, one of the PCR primers ("MYC OUT") used in
this study contained a CpA dinucleotide that is complementary to
bisulfite-treated DNA only if the genomic CpG is not methylated. As
previously shown (24, 25, 27), this can lead to selective amplification
of DNA molecules that are not methylated, giving a false impression that most of the cells contain unmethylated DNA at this locus. Nevertheless, taken together with the results reported here and with
results showing that the human lamin B2 replication origin is not
methylated (28), it is clear that DNA methylation is not required for
initiation of DNA replication at all initiation sites in mammalian
cells. Like transcription factor binding sites (18, 91), clusters of
mCpGs may be components of some origins but not of others.
It has been suggested that most, if not all, unmethylated CpG islands
contain replication origins (50). However, the hamster DHFR gene has a
CpG island of ~1 kb at its 5'-end (92), but at least seven different
origin mapping methods have failed to detect DNA replication initiation
events in the DHFR gene or its promoter region (18). The observation
that some CpG islands serve as replication origins may simply reflect
the fact that some transcription factors can facilitate origin
activity, while others do not (18, 91).
Potential Roles for DNA Methylation in the Initiation of Mammalian
DNA Replication
Regulating Reinitiation--
One potential role for DNA
methylation at mammalian replication origins could be to delay the
reassembly of prereplication complexes, analogous to the role of DNA
methylation at E. coli origins. In E. coli, the
time required to replicate the genome is 40 min (93). Therefore,
remethylation of ori-C is delayed until ~20% of the chromosome has
replicated (8 min/40 min) or until each replication fork has traveled
~470 kb. In CHO K1 cells, the time to replicate the genome is ~8
h.3 Therefore, remethylation
of the dense CpG cluster at ori-
was delayed until ~0.6% of the
genome was replicated (3 min/480 min) or until each replication fork
had traveled 2-4 kb. Thus, the delay in remethylation at ori-
was
no greater than the delay reported for replication forks distributed
throughout the mammalian genome (29) and was at least 10 times faster
than observed at replication origins in E. coli. However,
remethylation at replication origins in hamster cells did not occur
concomitantly with DNA replication, as previously suggested for monkey
and human cells (28), but was delayed until >500 nucleotides had been
synthesized (Fig. 5). It has been reported that amplification of a
mixture of unmethylated and methylated, bisulfite-converted alleles can be biased toward one or the other methylation status (94). If such a
bias existed at ori-
, it would affect significantly only values
between 10 and 90% methylation (94) and therefore would not affect
this conclusion. The rapid remethylation observed at hamster ori-
was consistent with the rapid remethylation observed with a
collection of nonspecified origin sequences isolated from monkey and
human cells (28). Thus, DNA methylation cannot play a significant
role in regulating reassembly of prereplication complexes in mammalian
cells as it does in E. coli.
Facilitating Binding or Activity of Initiation Proteins at Specific
Sites--
Relative to CHO K1 and CHO Scc30 cells, CHO C14 cells were
only 49% as methylated at the ori-
locus and 47% as methylated in
the CpG cluster. Remarkably, this level of hypomethylation eliminated
preferential initiation of DNA replication at ori-
and ori-
',
revealing that DNA methylation is either directly or indirectly
involved in determining where replication begins.
Direct involvement of DNA methylation at replication origins would
occur if DNA methylation facilitated either the association of proteins
at specific sites or the function of proteins bound to replication
origins. These roles are analogous to those proposed for transcription
factors at replication origins (18, 91, 95). For example,
mCpG dinucleotides bind specific proteins such as MeCP2,
and these proteins can alter chromatin structure through their
association with other proteins (96, 97) and can bind to nuclear matrix (41). Furthermore, the CpG cluster at ori-
contains a 60-bp A:T
element (adenines on one strand, thymines on the other, Fig. 3).
Similar A:T elements serve as essential components of replication origins in the fission yeast, S. pombe (98), and can
stimulate transcription from yeast promoters, apparently via nucleosome phasing (99). Flanking the A:T element with mCpG
dinucleotides may accentuate its function. In fact, the A:T element at
ori-
becomes hypersensitive to micrococcal nuclease as cells enter S
phase (100). Since no specific attachments to nucleoskeleton have been
detected in the DHFR gene region (103), the fact that this micrococcal
nuclease-hypersensitive site is specifically associated with nuclear
matrix DNA suggests that it contains the newly formed replication
forks. Newly replicated DNA is preferentially associated with nuclear
structure (103), and both prenucleosomal DNA and immature chromatin at
replication forks are hypersensitive to micrococcal nuclease (101,
102). DNA methylation may prevent premature extension of these bubbles by increasing the melting temperature of flanking sequences, as suggested for the GC-rich region in the E. coli phage P1
replication origin (104). Such micrococcal nuclease-hypersensitive
sites have been detected in the DHFR gene initiation zone only at
ori-
and ori-
(100).
Regulating Expression of Proteins That Affect Selection of
Initiation Sites--
Indirect involvement of DNA methylation in the
initiation of DNA replication may involve regulating the expression of
genes whose products determine the distribution of initiation sites. For example, as the ratio of histone H1 to DNA is increased in Xenopus egg extracts, the frequency of initiation decreases
(107), and as the ratio of initiation proteins to DNA is reduced in
these extracts, the frequency of initiation sites decreases (105) and the distribution of sites changes from random to specific (106). These
results suggest that those origins that are most accessible and have
the greatest affinity for replication proteins can be selectively
activated. Conversely, SV40 T-antigen, a protein that can interact
nonspecifically with DNA and initiate DNA unwinding (108), increases
the frequency of initiation sites in hamster cell chromosomes (109),
and decreases origin specificity (110). Moreover, the number of
initiation sites used by hamster cells can be increased by holding them
at their G1/S phase boundary (111). These results suggest
that increasing the level of initiator proteins allows less accessible,
lower affinity origins to be activated. Thus, changes in the
concentrations of proteins that can either activate or repress
initiation sites can determine the number and locations of replication origins.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
**
Supported by Public Health Service Grant GM53819.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: NICHD, National
Institutes of Health, Bldg. 6, Rm. 416, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD 20892-2753. Tel.: 301-402-8234; Fax: 301-480-9354; E-mail: depamphm@box-d.nih.gov.
2
T. Kobayashi, T. Rein, J. Bogan, and M. L. DePamphilis, unpublished data. Malott, M., and Leffak, M. (1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol., in press.
3
T. Rein, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
kb, kilobase pair(s);
bp, base pair(s);
ori-, origin;
OBR, origin of bidirectional
DNA replication;
mCpG, methylated CpG dinucleotide;
mC, 5-methylcytosine;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase;
Br-DNA, bromo-DNA.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sasaki, T.,
Sawado, T.,
Yamaguchi, M.,
and Shinomiya, T.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
547-555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Hyrien, O.,
Maric, C.,
and Méchali, M.
(1995)
Science
270,
994-997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
DePamphilis, M. L.
(1999)
BioEssays
21,
5-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Aladjem, M. I.,
Groudine, M.,
Brody, L. L.,
Dieken, E. S.,
Fournier, R. E.,
Wahl, G. M.,
and Epner, E. M.
(1995)
Science
270,
815-819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Kitsberg, D.,
Selig, S.,
Keshet, I.,
and Cedar, H.
(1993)
Nature
366,
588-590[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Ermakova, O. V.,
Nguyen, L. H.,
Little, R. D.,
Chevillard, C.,
Riblet, R.,
Ashouian, N.,
Birshtein, B. K.,
and Schildkraut, C. L.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
3,
321-330[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Dubey, D. D.,
Zhu, J.,
Carlson, D. L.,
Sharma, K.,
and Huberman, J. A.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3638-3647[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Kobayashi, T.,
Rein, T.,
and DePamphilis, M. L.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3266-3277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
DePamphilis, M. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
1-4[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Carroll, S. M.,
DeRose, M. L.,
Kolman, J. L.,
Nonet, G. H.,
Kelly, R. E.,
and Wahl, G. M.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
2971-2981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Kelly, R. E.,
DeRose, M. L.,
Draper, B. W.,
and Wahl, G. M.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4136-4148[Abstract]
|
| 12.
|
Virta-Pearlman, T. L.,
Gunaratne, P. H.,
and Chinault, A. C.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
5931-5942[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Aladjem, M. I.,
Rodewald, L. W.,
Kolman, J. L.,
and Wahl, G. M.
(1998)
Science
281,
1005-1009[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Handeli, S.,
Klar, A.,
Meuth, M.,
and Cedar, H.
(1989)
Cell
57,
909-920[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Orr-Weaver, T. L.
(1991)
BioEssays
13,
97-105[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Kalejta, R. F.,
Li, X.,
Mesner, L. D.,
Dijkwel, P. A.,
Lin, H. B.,
and Hamlin, J. L.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
2,
797-806[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Berberich, S.,
Trivedi, A.,
Daniel, D. C.,
Johnson, E. M.,
and Leffak, M.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
245,
92-109[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
DePamphilis, M. L.
(1996)
in
DNA Replication in Eukaryotic Cells
(DePamphilis, M. L., ed)
, pp. 45-86, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 19.
|
McWhinney, C.,
Waltz, S. E.,
and Leffak, M.
(1995)
DNA Cell Biol.
14,
565-579[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Trivedi, A.,
Waltz, S. E.,
Kamath, S.,
and Leffak, M.
(1998)
DNA Cell Biol.
17,
885-896[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Krysan, P. J.,
Smith, J. G.,
and Calos, M. P.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
2688-2696[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Blow, J. J.,
and Chong, J. P. J.
(1996)
in
DNA Replication in Eukaryotic Cells
(DePamphilis, M. L., ed)
, pp. 971-982, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 23.
|
Kipling, D.,
and Kearsey, S. E.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
265-272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Rein, T.,
Zorbas, H.,
and DePamphilis, M. L.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
416-426[Abstract]
|
| 25.
|
Tasheva, E. S.,
and Roufa, D. J.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
5636-5644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Tasheva, E. S.,
and Roufa, D. J.
(1995)
Somatic Cell Mol. Genet.
19,
369-383
|
| 27.
|
Rein, T.,
Natale, D. A.,
Gärtner, U.,
Niggemann, M.,
DePamphilis, M. L.,
and Zorbas, H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10021-10029[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Araujo, F. D.,
Knox, J. D.,
Szyf, M.,
Price, G. B.,
and Zannis-Hadjopoulos, M.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3475-3482[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Gruenbaum, Y.,
Szyf, M.,
Cedar, H.,
and Razin, A.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
4919-4921[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Woodcock, D. M.,
Simmons, D. L.,
Crowther, P. J.,
Cooper, I. A.,
Trainor, K. J.,
and Morley, A. A.
(1986)
Exp. Cell Res.
166,
102-112
|
| 31.
|
Chuang, L. S.-H.,
Ian, H.-I.,
Koh, T.-W.,
Ng, H.-H.,
Xu, G.,
and Li, B. F. L.
(1997)
Science
277,
1996-2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Araujo, J. D.,
Knox, F. D.,
Ramchandani, S.,
Peletier, R.,
Bigey, P.,
Price, G.,
Szyf, M.,
and Zannis-Hadjopoulos, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9335-9341[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Bickmore, W. A.,
and Carothers, A. D.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
2801-2809[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
Jablonka, E.,
Goitein, R.,
Marcus, M.,
and Cedar, H.
(1985)
Chromosoma
93,
152-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Selig, S.,
Ariel, M.,
Goitein, R.,
Marcus, M.,
and Cedar, H.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
419-426[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Shafer, D. A.,
and Priest, J. H.
(1984)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
36,
534-545[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Subramanian, P. S.,
and Chinault, A. C.
(1997)
Somat. Cell Mol. Genet.
23,
97-109[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Murchie, A. I. H.,
and Lilley, D. M. J.
(1989)
J. Mol. Biol.
205,
593-602[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Zacharias, W.,
O'Connor, T. R.,
and Larson, J. E.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
2970-2978[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Nan, X.,
Tate, P.,
Li, E.,
and Bird, A.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
414-421[Abstract]
|
| 41.
|
Weitzel, J. M.,
Buhrmeister, H.,
and Strätling, W. H.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
5656-5666[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Adams, R. L. P.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
265,
309-320[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Szyf, M.,
Bozovic, V.,
and Tanigawa, G.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
10027-10030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Vogel, M. C.,
Papdopoulos, T.,
Müller-Hermelink, H. K.,
Drahovsky, D.,
and Pfeifer, G. P.
(1988)
FEBS Lett.
236,
9-13[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Wu, S.,
and Gilbert, D.
(1996)
Science
271,
1270-1272[Abstract]
|
| 46.
|
Phi-van, L.,
Sellke, C.,
von Bodenhausen, A.,
and Strätling, W. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
18300-18307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Vassilev, L.,
and Johnson, E. M.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
4899-4904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Waltz, S. E.,
Trivedi, A. A.,
and Leffak, M.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
1887-1894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Simon, I.,
and Cedar, H.
(1996)
in
DNA Replication In Eukaryotic Cells
(DePamphilis, M. L., ed)
, pp. 387-408, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 50.
|
Delgado, S.,
Gomez, M.,
Bird, A.,
and Antequera, F.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
2426-2435[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Leffak, M.,
and James, C. D.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
586-593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Iguchi-Ariga, S. M.,
Okazaki, T.,
Itani, T.,
Ogata, M.,
Sato, Y.,
and Ariga, H.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
3135-3142[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Rein, T.,
DePamphilis, M. L.,
and Zorbas, H.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
2255-2264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Clark, S. J.,
Harrison, J.,
Paul, C. L.,
and Frommer, M.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
2990-2997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
| Burhans, W. C., Vassilev, L. T., Caddle, M. S., Heintz,
N. H., and DePam
|
| 56.
|
Woodcock, D. M.,
Crowther, P. J.,
Simmons, D. L.,
and Cooper, I. A.
(1986)
Exp. Cell Res.
162,
23-32[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Taylor, J.
(1978)
in
DNA Synthesis: Present and Future
(Molineux, I.
, and Kohiyama, M., eds)
, pp. 149-159, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 58.
|
Oka, A.,
Sugimoto, K.,
Takanami, M.,
and Hirota, Y.
(1980)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
178,
9-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Geier, G. E.,
and Modrich, P.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
1408-1413[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Antequer |