![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 36, 25855-25861, September 3, 1999
From the Interleukin-9 (IL-9) activates three distinct
STAT proteins: STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5. This process depends on one
tyrosine of the IL-9 receptor, which is necessary for proliferation,
gene induction, and inhibition of apoptosis induced by glucocorticoids. By introduction of point mutations in amino acids surrounding this
tyrosine, we obtained receptors that activated either STAT5 alone or
both STAT1 and STAT3, thus providing us with the possibility to study
the respective roles of these factors in the biological activities of
IL-9. Both mutant receptors were able to prevent apoptosis, but only
the mutant that activated STAT1 and STAT3 was able to support induction
of granzyme A and L-selectin. In line with these results,
constitutively activated STAT5 blocked glucocorticoid-induced
apoptosis. In Ba/F3 cells, significant proliferation and
pim-1 induction were observed with both STAT-restricted mutants, though proliferation was lower than with the wild-type receptor. These results suggest that survival and cell growth are
redundantly controlled by multiple STAT factors, whereas
differentiation gene induction is more specifically correlated with
individual STAT activation by IL-9.
Interleukin-9 (IL-9)1 is
a pleiotropic cytokine that is active on hematopoietic progenitors,
lymphocytes, and mast cells (1, 2) and whose excessive expression has
been linked to asthma and lymphoma development (1, 3-6). In
particular, IL-9 inhibits apoptosis in T lymphomas and enhances their
proliferation (7-9). IL-9 interacts with a complex composed of the
IL-9 receptor (IL-9R) and the IL-2 receptor We recently showed that these effects are mediated by the JAK
(Janus kinase)-STAT (signal
transducer and activator of
transcription) pathway (11). IL-9 activates two JAK
tyrosine kinases, JAK1 and JAK3, pre-associated with IL-9R and the IL-2
receptor Unlike classical kinase substrates, the type of STAT activated by a
given cytokine is not dependent on the type of activated JAK kinase,
but on the ability of receptor phosphotyrosine motifs to interact with
certain STAT SH2 (Src homology 2)
domains (15). For instance, the phospho-Tyr-Glu-XX-His
sequence in the IFN- Activation of STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 by IL-9 depends on a single
phosphotyrosine at position 367 in IL-9R. This amino acid is also
required for gene induction, cell growth regulation, and apoptosis
inhibition by IL-9 (11, 14). The aim of this work was to discriminate
between the respective roles of each STAT in IL-9 signaling by mutating
amino acids surrounding IL-9R tyrosine 367. Our data point to a
specific role for STAT1 and STAT3 in differentiation gene induction. By
contrast, protection against apoptosis and proliferation was observed
in mutants activating either STAT5 or both STAT1 and STAT3, suggesting
redundancy in these cases.
Cytokines--
IL-3 was produced by transfected Chinese hamster
ovary cells (provided by A. Burgess, Ludwig Institute, Melbourne,
Australia). Recombinant human IL-9 and mouse IL-9 and IL-6 were
produced in the baculovirus system and purified as described previously
(11). Recombinant mouse IFN- Plasmid Constructions, DNA Transfection, and Analysis of
Transfected Cells--
Mutagenesis was performed using the Chameleon
double-stranded site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). Wild-type
and mutant hIL-9R cDNAs, as well as the STAT5
Murine T lymphoma BW5147 and pro-B Ba/F3 cells were cultured and
transfected by electroporation as described (11, 24). After selection
of clones with puromycin (1.5 and 3 µg/ml for BW5147 and Ba/F3 cells,
respectively), hIL-9R expression was checked by FACS analysis of cells
stained with biotinylated anti-hIL-9R antibody AH9R1 (11), followed by
phycoerythrin-conjugated streptavidin (Becton Dickinson). Three
independent clones expressing a similar level of hIL-9R were selected
in each transfection and analyzed in all subsequent experiments.
Propidium iodide staining and hexosaminidase assays were performed as
described previously (7). Ly-6A/E induction was monitored after a 24-h
stimulation by FACS analysis. Cells were stained with biotinylated
anti-Ly-6A/E antibodies (1 µg/ml; clone D7, Pharmingen, San Diego,
CA), followed by phycoerythrin-conjugated streptavidin. L-selectin
induction was also analyzed by FACS using the MEL-14 antibody (a gift
of A. Van Halteren, Free University of Amsterdam) and
fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody (Becton
Dickinson). Granzyme A protease activity was analyzed as described,
using
N Northern Blot Analysis--
RNA was extracted from
107 cells using 1 ml of Trizol solution (Life Technologies,
Inc.) following the manufacturer's instructions. Northern blot
analysis was performed as described with 10 µg of RNA (25). cDNA
probes coding for chicken STAT Oligofishing and EMSA--
These experiments were performed
as described previously (11). Briefly, nuclear extracts from
108 cytokine-treated cells were mixed with biotinylated GRR
oligonucleotide immobilized on agarose-linked streptavidin (GRR Fc
The GRR oligonucleotide was also used for EMSA, in addition to two GAS
oligonucleotides derived from the Ly-6A/E gene promoter (upper strand,
5'-TGCATATTCCTGTAAGTGA-3'; and lower strand, 5'-GGTCACTTACAGGAATATG-3') and the pim-1 promoter (26). Supershifts were performed with the following antibody: anti-STAT1 (0.75 µg; G16920, Transduction Laboratories), anti-STAT3 (1 µg; 13-7000, Zymed
Laboratories Inc.), or anti-STAT5 (1 µg; sc835X, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology). These antibodies were added to nuclear extracts (4 µl) diluted in binding buffer (19-µl final volume) for 15 min
before addition of the labeled oligonucleotide (105 cpm in
1 µl). Complexes were separated by electrophoresis on a 5%
polyacrylamide gel as described (11). Glycerol (5%) was added to the
gel to achieve a better resolution of complexes bound to the GRR oligonucleotide.
IL-9R Phosphorylation--
BW5147 cells (108
cells/10 ml) were treated with hIL-9 (500 units/ml) for 10 min or left
untreated. Cell lysates were prepared as described (11), and
tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were immunoprecipitated overnight with
agarose-linked anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 (20 µl; Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc.). After extensive washes, bound proteins were
separated on an 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and analyzed by Western
blotting with anti-IL-9R antibodies (1 µg/ml; sc698, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Distinct Amino Acids of the IL-9R STAT-binding Site Are Required
for Activation of STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5--
IL-9 activates three
distinct STAT proteins, i.e. STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5, in
most cell lines that have been analyzed so far (11,
27).2 We have previously
demonstrated that a single tyrosine of hIL-9R (at position 367 in the
mature protein) is required for the activation of these STAT proteins
by IL-9 (11). This suggested that the SH2 domains of STAT1, STAT3, and
STAT5 interact with tyrosine 367 and surrounding amino acids. A
glutamine is found three amino acids after tyrosine 367, fitting the
described consensus STAT3-binding motif, YXXQ (17). The
proline found at position 369 is also frequently observed in the
activating motif of STAT1 and STAT3 and could be important for STAT1
recruitment to the IL-6 receptor gp130 (28, 29). In addition,
comparison of amino acids surrounding hIL-9R tyrosine 367 and
STAT5-binding tyrosines of other cytokine receptors revealed that most
of these tyrosines are followed by a leucine (or a related hydrophobic
amino acid) (11). This suggested that each IL-9-activated STAT
interacts with distinct amino acids in addition to the phosphorylated
tyrosine 367. To test this hypothesis, we intended to dissociate their
activation by constructing hIL-9R mutants. Leucine 368 (which may be
important for STAT5 binding) was mutated to arginine, and proline 369 (which is possibly involved in STAT1 binding) was mutated to lysine
since arginine and lysine are found in some gp130 STAT3-binding sites
at the corresponding position (17). Glutamine 370 was mutated to
leucine, which is compatible with a STAT5-binding site of the
erythropoietin receptor (30).
Since hIL-9 is inactive on murine cells unless hIL-9R is transfected,
we introduced mutant hIL-9R in murine BW5147 lymphoma cells, which
express endogenous murine IL-9R and respond to murine IL-9 (11).
Transfected clones expressed a similar level of receptor, as shown by
FACS analysis (Fig. 1). We tested STAT
activation in these clones by an oligofishing experiment and by EMSA
(Fig. 2, A and B).
The wild-type receptor activated STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5, the latter
predominating significantly, based on EMSA using the GRR
oligonucleotide. As shown previously (11), mutation of tyrosine 367 (mut1 receptor) completely abolished STAT activation. Mutation of
leucine 368 (mut6) dramatically reduced the activation of STAT5,
whereas activation of the other STAT proteins was not affected, and
STAT3 predominated. By contrast, activation of STAT3 and STAT1 was
abolished by the replacement of glutamine 370 with leucine (mut7), and
this mutant activated only STAT5. Mutation of proline 369 (mut9) only
partially inhibited STAT1 activation. We obtained similar results with
transfected Ba/F3 cells (data not shown). Mutations did not
significantly modify phosphorylation of tyrosine 367 (Fig.
2C), which is the only IL-9R phosphorylated tyrosine (11),
ruling out the possibility that our observations result from
differences in IL-9R tyrosine phosphorylation.
Differentiation Gene Induction Correlates with STAT1 and STAT3
Activation--
We took advantage of the mut6 and mut7 receptor
mutants to define further the role of STAT proteins in IL-9 activities.
We started our study by analyzing the expression of granzyme A, a typical differentiation gene induced by IL-9 in T cell clones and T
lymphomas such as BW5147 (25). Granzyme A expression was analyzed by
Northern blotting and by a specific protease activity assay (Fig.
3). It was not enhanced by hIL-9 in
BW-mut1 cells, showing that this IL-9 activity is
STAT-dependent. Granzyme A was induced in cells transfected
with the STAT1/STAT3-activating mutant mut6, but not with mut7. This
indicated that STAT5 was unable to mediate this effect, which required
STAT1 and/or STAT3 activation. In line with this observation, IL-6,
which activated STAT3 and, marginally, STAT1, similarly induced
granzyme A expression (Fig. 4). Moreover,
IFN-
We obtained similar results for the induction of two other
differentiation markers, Ly-6A/E and L-selectin. Expression of Ly-6A/E
surface antigen was enhanced ~3-fold in BW5147 cells when murine IL-9
was added to the culture medium, as shown by FACS analysis (Fig.
5A). hIL-9 induced Ly-6A/E in
cells transfected with wild-type hIL-9R or mut6, but not with mut1 or
mut7 (Fig. 5A). This effect was also observed with IFN-
Ly-6A/E induction by IL-9, IL-6, or IFN- Role of STAT in Proliferation and pim-1 Oncogene Induction by
IL-9--
We have described that the mut1 mutation abolished
IL-9-mediated proliferation of the pro-B Ba/F3 cell line transfected
with IL-9R (11). Ba/F3-mut6 and Ba/F3-mut7 clones still proliferated in
response to hIL-9, but with a reduced sensitivity and, at least for
mut6, to a lesser extent (Fig. 7).
Half-maximal proliferation was indeed obtained with 2.2 ± 0.8, 11.3 ± 4.8, and 8.4 ± 1.5 units/ml IL-9 for the wild-type,
mut6, and mut7 receptors, respectively. We assume that several
STAT-regulated genes might be involved in proliferation, some being
specifically activated by STAT5 or STAT1/STAT3 and others being
redundantly activated by these transcription factors. The
pim-1 proto-oncogene might be a potential candidate since
STAT5 has been implicated in its induction by IL-3 in Ba/F3 cells (34).
Fig. 8A shows that the amount
of pim-1 RNA increased rapidly upon IL-9 treatment. This was
not observed in Ba/F3-mut1 cells, in contrast to mut6- or
mut7-transfected cells. Although pim-1 induction is slightly
more important with the mut6 mutant, our result suggested that this
process could be mediated either by STAT5 or by STAT1/STAT3 in response
to IL-9. IFN- Protection against Apoptosis Can Be Mediated by Either STAT5 or
STAT3 Activation--
IL-9 has been shown to protect T cells against
glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis through a
STAT-dependent mechanism (11, 14).
Dexamethasone-treated BW5147 cells present typical apoptosis features,
including DNA fragmentation (7). Here, we used a propidium iodide
exclusion assay to quantitatively assess cell death (7). BW5147 cells
transfected with wild-type, mut6, or mut7 hIL-9R were fully protected
against cell death when treated with IL-9, in contrast to
mut1-transfected cells (Fig. 9),
suggesting a redundant activity of STAT proteins in this model. To
further demonstrate that STAT factors can inhibit dexamethasone-induced apoptosis, we transfected BW5147 cells with a constitutively activated STAT5 construct consisting of a cDNA fusion protein composed of the
JAK2 kinase domain and STAT5 whose weak transactivation domain has been
replaced by a VP16 domain. This molecule has been shown to selectively
transactivate STAT5-sensitive promoters (35). As shown in Fig.
10, BW5147 transfectants expressing
this fusion protein had a constitutive STAT DNA-binding activity in
nuclear extracts and were more resistant to dexamethasone,
demonstrating that STAT5 activation suffices to mediate this effect. By
contrast, IFN- Activation of STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 by IL-9 depends on a single
phosphorylated tyrosine of IL-9R (tyrosine 367). Here, we show that
distinct amino acids surrounding tyrosine 367 are involved in the
activation of these factors: full STAT1 activation required proline 369 and glutamine 370; STAT3 required glutamine 370; and STAT5 required
leucine 368, in line with proposed consensus sequences (11, 17, 28,
29).
Based on these observations, we took advantage of the corresponding
IL-9R mutants to assess the respective roles of STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5
in various IL-9 activities in vitro. The results are
summarized in Table I. We first showed
that induction of differentiation genes such as granzyme A, Ly-6A/E,
and L-selectin could be mediated by STAT1 alone, although STAT3 (but
not STAT5) may also be involved. Granzyme A has been identified as a
gene induced by IL-9 (but not by IL-2) in the TS2 T cell clone (25). In
these cells, IL-9 activates the same STAT proteins as in BW5147 cells,
whereas IL-2 activates only STAT5.2 Thus, our data suggest
that specific gene induction in this model could be due to a distinct
STAT activation pattern. Moreover, IFN- While looking for proto-oncogenes regulated by IL-9, we observed that
pim-1 kinase expression was up-regulated by IL-9. The role
of this kinase in IL-9 signaling has to be further analyzed, particularly in hematopoietic cells, where pim-1 is
predominantly expressed (36). IL-3 also induced pim-1
expression, as described by Mui et al. (34), who
demonstrated a role for STAT5 in this process. Accordingly,
pim-1 induction by IL-9 could be mediated by STAT5 alone,
but also by STAT1 and/or STAT3. Noticeably, IFN- We have recently shown that the activation of STAT factors is
correlated with IL-9-induced proliferation of transfected Ba/F3 cells
(11). The experiments presented here suggest that activation of a
single STAT is sufficient to obtain a significant (but lower) IL-9
response, pointing to an additive effect of STAT factors. In line with
our data, a potent constitutively active mutant of STAT5 has been shown
recently to drive Ba/F3 proliferation in the presence of serum (38).
Identification of the STAT-regulated genes that are responsible for
proliferation should help to understand this effect.
Finally, analysis of protection against dexamethasone-induced apoptosis
revealed functional redundancy between IL-9-activated STAT3 and STAT5.
Moreover, the use of a constitutively activated STAT5 protein
demonstrated that STAT activation alone is sufficient to protect
against apoptosis. Interestingly, STAT5 is also activated by IL-2 and
IL-7, which are other potent inhibitors of glucocorticoid-induced cell
death (7). Recently, it was shown that IL-6 fails to prevent apoptosis
in STAT3-deficient T cells (39), in agreement with our results. By
contrast, STAT1 might not be involved in the process since IFN- We hypothesize that this effect of IL-9 is mediated by the induction of
a gene via either STAT3 or STAT5. However, we failed so far to detect
any change in the expression of well known inhibitors of apoptosis such
as bcl-2, bcl-X, and iap family genes
in BW5147 cells. Alternatively, STAT3 and STAT5 dimers have been shown
to interact with the glucocorticoid receptor and, at least for STAT5, to repress glucocorticoid-mediated transcription (40, 41). However,
IL-9 does not inhibit the expression of several corticoid-regulated genes in T cell clones (9). Further work will have to determine which
mechanism may account for apoptosis inhibition by IL-9. In summary, the
results reported here show that the activation of distinct STAT factors
in response to IL-9 plays both specific and redundant roles in the
activity of this cytokine and that cooperation between STAT proteins
may be required for some complex activities such as proliferation.
We thank Drs. R. Palacios, S. Nagata, A. Van
Halteren, A. Burgess, and W. Fiers for generous donations of reagents.
*
This work was supported in part by the Belgian Federal
Service for Scientific, Technical, and Cultural Affairs and by the Operation Televie.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Research assistant with the Fonds National de la Recherche
Scientifique, Belgium.
2
J.-B. Demoulin, unpublished observation.
The abbreviations used are:
IL, interleukin;
IL-9R, interleukin-9 receptor;
h, human;
IFN-
Distinct Roles for STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 in Differentiation
Gene Induction and Apoptosis Inhibition by Interleukin-9*
§,
,
,
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and the
Experimental Medicine Unit, Université Catholique de Louvain,
avenue Hippocrate, 74, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium and the
¶ Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, Tumor Biology
Center, Breisacher Strasse 117, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-chain. Other cytokines
using the IL-2 receptor
-chain, namely IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, and IL-15
(10), share some activities with IL-9 such as T cell proliferation
in vitro and inhibition of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis.
Yet, IL-9 specifically induces the expression of several genes, such as Ly-6A/E, granzymes, and mast cell-specific genes, which are not regulated by IL-2.
-chain, respectively (11-13). These kinases are
responsible for the activation of STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 transcription
factors by IL-9 (11, 14).
receptor interacts specifically with STAT1
(16), and phospho-Tyr-XX-Gln motifs in gp130 do so with
STAT3 (17). A second factor controlling specificity lies in the DNA
sequences recognized by each STAT complex, as shown by EMSA in
vitro analysis (18, 19). For example, STAT5 binds to the
-casein promoter element (
CAS) required for the control of this
gene by prolactin (20). Nevertheless, other DNA sequences, such as GRR,
a Fc
receptor type I promoter motif responsible for regulation by
IFN-
, bind to most STAT factors (11, 21). However, it is not known
if the Fc
receptor type I gene can be regulated in vivo
via all these STAT proteins. More generally, specificity in the
regulation of gene expression by different STAT proteins has been
studied only to a limited extent (22).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
was provided by W. Fiers (University of Gent, Gent, Belgium).
750-VP16-JAK2
construct, were inserted into the pEF-BOS-puro plasmid, which contains
a puromycin resistance gene (11, 23).
-benzyloxycarbonyl-L-lysine
thiobenzyl ester as substrate (25).
-actin, Pim-1, and mouse granzyme A were
retrieved from plasmid DNA (25) and 32P-labeled with the
Rediprime kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
receptor type I gene promoter: upper strand, 5'-ATGTATTTCCCAGAAA-3';
and lower strand, 5'-CCTTTTCTGGGAAATAC-3'). After extensive washing,
proteins were eluted from the beads and analyzed by Western blotting
with the following specific antibody: anti-STAT1 or anti-STAT5 (1 µg/ml; sc591 and sc1081, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or anti-STAT3 (1 µg/ml; S21320, Transduction Laboratories).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
hIL-9R expression in transfected cells.
BW5147 cells were stained with biotinylated anti-IL-9R antibody AH9R1
and phycoerythrin-coupled streptavidin (------) or with
phycoerythrin-coupled streptavidin alone (- - -) as described
(11). Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACScan, Becton
Dickinson). Untransfected cells were used as a control.
IL-9wt, wild-type IL-9.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
STAT activation by wild-type and
mutant hIL-9 receptors. A, BW5147 clones expressing
similar levels of the indicated receptor were stimulated with hIL-9
(500 units/ml) for 30 min or left untreated. Nuclear extracts were
prepared and incubated with biotinylated GRR oligonucleotide
immobilized on streptavidin-agarose. Bound proteins were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analyzed by Western blotting
with specific anti-STAT antibodies. Depicted sequences denote amino
acids 367-370 of the corresponding hIL-9R (single-letter code).
Similar results were obtained with three independent clones.
B, nuclear extracts from transfected BW5147 cells stimulated
for 10 min with the indicated cytokines were mixed with labeled
GGR oligonucleotide for EMSA analysis. When indicated, supershifts were
induced with anti-STAT1, anti-STAT3, or anti-STAT5 antibody.
C, BW5147 cells were treated with hIL-9 for 10 min or left
untreated. Tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were immunoprecipitated
(IP) from cell lysates with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody
4G10 and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-hIL-9R antibodies.
wt, wild-type.
, which activated only STAT1 in BW5147 cells, had a similar
effect, indicating that STAT1 activation is sufficient (Fig. 4).

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Induction of granzyme A expression by IL-9
depends on STAT1 and STAT3. BW5147 cells were stimulated with
hIL-9 (500 units/ml) for 48 h. A, RNA was extracted and
analyzed by Northern blotting with a granzyme A or
-actin probe.
B, cells were lysed, and granzyme A activity was measured as
described (25). To compare independent experiments, the basal activity
in untreated BW-hIL-9Rwt cells was arbitrary defined as 1 unit. The
means ± S.E. of three independent experiments are shown.
wt, wild-type.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
STAT activation and granzyme A induction by
IFN-
and IL-6. A, BW5147 cells
were stimulated with IFN-
(1000 units/ml) or IL-6 (5 × 104 units/ml) for 30 or 15 min, respectively. Nuclear
extracts were prepared and incubated with immobilized GRR
oligonucleotide. Bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with
anti-STAT1 or anti-STAT3 antibody. No signal was observed with
anti-STAT5 antibody (data not shown). B, cells were
stimulated with the same cytokine concentrations for 24 h. RNA was
extracted and analyzed by Northern blotting with a granzyme A or
-actin probe.
and, to a lesser extent, with IL-6 (32). In Ba/F3 cells, analysis of a
number of cell-surface markers revealed that IL-9 (but not IL-3)
up-regulated the expression of L-selectin, an adhesion molecule for
leukocytes. Like granzyme A and Ly-6A/E, L-selectin was enhanced in
Ba/F3-mut6 cells, but not in Ba/F3-mut1 or Ba/F3-mut7 cells (Fig.
5B).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
FACS analysis of Ly-6A/E and L-selectin
expression in transfected cells. A, BW5147 cells were
incubated with the indicated cytokines (IL-9 (500 units/ml), IFN-
(1000 units/ml), or IL-6 (5 × 104 units/ml)) for
24 h and then analyzed by flow cytometry with biotinylated
anti-Ly-6A/E antibodies and phycoerythrin-coupled streptavidin. A ratio
(expressed as a percentage) was obtained by dividing the mean channel
increase in response to hIL-9 by the mean channel increase in response
to mouse IL-9. Thus, 100% activity means that hIL-9 was as active as
mouse IL-9, used as a control in the experiment. The data presented
here correspond to the mean ± S.E. of three independent
experiments. B, Ba/F3 cells were stimulated for 48 h
with either hIL-9 (500 units/ml) or mouse IL-3 (100 units/ml) and
analyzed by FACS with anti-L-selectin antibody MEL-14 and
fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulins. wt,
wild-type.
involves a GAS that is
located 1230 base pairs before the first exon of the Ly-6A/E gene (32,
33). Gel shift assays performed with this GAS sequence showed that IL-9
was able to induce a band shift only in cells transfected with
wild-type hIL-9R or mut6, but not with mut7 (Fig. 6). Supershift with specific anti-STAT
antibodies indicated that the IL-9-induced complex was composed of
STAT1 and STAT3, but not STAT5. Accordingly, IL-3, which activates only
STAT5 in these cells,2 did not induce any complex with the
GAS probe (Fig. 6, last lane), although a strong band shift
was observed with the GRR probe (data not shown). These observations
demonstrated that STAT5 is not able to bind to the GAS element, in
contrast to STAT1 and STAT3. Thus, differences in the DNA-binding
properties of STAT proteins account for the specific induction of
Ly-6A/E by STAT1 and STAT3. It is likely that the L-selectin and
granzyme A genes are regulated by STAT factors in a similar way, but
the presence of GAS-type sites in their promoters has still to be
confirmed.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
STAT1 and STAT3 (but not STAT5) bind to the
GAS element of the Ly-6A/E promoter. Nuclear extracts were
prepared from transfected Ba/F3 cells starved overnight and stimulated
for 30 min with hIL-9 (500 units/ml) or IL-3 (500 units/ml). Gel shift
assays were performed with the GAS probe derived from the Ly-6A/E
promoter (32). Supershifts were carried out as described in the legend
to Fig. 2. wt, wild-type.
has been shown to induce pim-1 via the
binding of STAT1 to a GAS located in the pim-1 promoter
(26). Using this sequence in an EMSA experiment, we observed a gel
shift in response to IL-9 either in mut6- or mut7-transfected Ba/F3
cells, but not in cells expressing mut1, matching the pim-1
expression pattern (Fig. 8B).

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Ba/F3 proliferation in response to IL-9 is
reduced with mut6 and mut7 receptors. Ba/F3 cells transfected with
wild-type hIL-9R (wt;
), mut6 (
), or mut7 (
) were
washed and seeded in a microtiter plate with increasing amounts of IL-9
or IL-3. After 3 days in triplicate cultures, proliferation was
measured using a hexosaminidase activity assay. IL-9-induced
proliferation was divided by IL-3-mediated maximal proliferation. The
data presented here correspond to the mean ± S.E. of three
independent clones.

View larger version (93K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
pim-1 proto-oncogene
expression. A, transfected Ba/F3 cells were starved for
8 h in cytokine-free and serum-free medium before stimulation with
IL-3 (500 units/ml) or hIL-9 (500 units/ml) for 2 h. RNA was
extracted, and Northern blotting was performed as described under
"Experimental Procedures" with the whole Pim-1 cDNA or a
-actin cDNA as a probe. This experiment was reproduced twice
with independent clones. B, EMSAs were performed as
described in the legend to Fig. 6 with a pim-1 promoter GAS
oligonucleotide, and nuclear extracts from transfected Ba/F3 cells were
stimulated as described for A for 30 min (26).
wt, wild-type.
, which activated STAT1 and induced both Ly-6A/E and
granzyme A in BW5147 cells, did not inhibit the effect of
dexamethasone, suggesting that STAT1 was not sufficient. IL-6, which
weakly activated STAT3, partially inhibited the effect of dexamethasone
(Fig. 9) (7). Altogether, these data suggested that anti-apoptotic
activity could be mediated by either activated STAT3 or STAT5.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
The mut6 or mut7 receptor confers full
protection by hIL-9 against dexamethasone-induced apoptosis.
Transfected BW5147 cells were incubated for 24 h in the presence
of dexamethasone (100 ng/ml) and cyclosporin A (500 ng/ml) with or
without cytokine (200 units/ml IFN-
or 100 units/ml mouse
(mIL-9) or human IL-9). Cell viability was measured by FACS
analysis after staining with propidium iodide (125 µg/ml). One
significant experiment out of a total of four is shown. Error
bars indicate the S.D. values measured from triplicate cultures.
wt, wild-type.

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
A constitutively active variant of STAT5
inhibits apoptosis induced by dexamethasone. BW5147 cells were
stably transfected with a STAT5-VP16-JAK2 chimeric construct.
Constitutive STAT5 activation was tested by EMSA with a GRR probe.
Apoptosis in the absence (black bars) or presence
(hatched bars) of dexamethasone was assessed in one negative
and three positive clones as described in the legend to Fig. 9. The
data correspond to the means ± S.D. and are representative of two
experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and IL-6, cytokines that
activated only STAT1 or both STAT1 and STAT3, also induced the
expression of granzyme A and Ly-6A/E in BW5147 cells. Further analysis
of the STAT-binding site in the Ly-6A/E promoter indicated that
differences in DNA-binding properties of the different STAT proteins
account for specific gene induction. Analysis of mice deficient in
STAT1 and/or STAT3 should further establish the role of these STAT
proteins in gene induction by IL-9.
STAT1, STAT3, and/or STAT5 activation: correlation with IL-9 activities
has been shown to
regulate this gene via the binding of STAT1 on a GAS promoter element
(26). Our data indicated that STAT3 and STAT5 are also able to bind to
this GAS, which most likely participates in pim-1 regulation
by IL-9 and IL-3. Interestingly, pim-1 expression is also
induced by other cytokines activating STAT3 (IL-6) or STAT5 (IL-2,
granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Thus,
pim-1 expression in response to cytokines may be mediated by
binding of STAT1, STAT3, or STAT5 to a single GAS promoter element,
indicating redundancy between STAT proteins in this case.
did
not inhibit apoptosis in our model.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Research associate with the Fonds National de la Recherche
Scientifique, Belgium. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 32-2-764-7464; Fax: 32-2-762-9405; E-mail:
renauld@licr.ucl.ac.be.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
, interferon-
;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
GRR, IFN-
response region;
FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter;
GAS, IFN-
activation
site.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Renauld, J.-C.,
Kermouni, A.,
Vink, A.,
Louahed, J.,
and Van Snick, J.
(1995)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
57,
353-360[Abstract]
2.
Demoulin, J.-B.,
and Renauld, J.-C.
(1998)
Int. Rev. Immunol.
16,
345-364[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Renauld, J.-C.,
van der Lugt, N.,
Vink, A.,
van Roon, M.,
Godfraind, C.,
Warnier, G.,
Merz, H.,
Feller, A.,
Berns, A.,
and Van Snick, J.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
1327-1332[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Nicolaides, N.,
Holroyd, K. J.,
Ewart, S. L.,
Eleff, S. M.,
Kiser, M. B.,
Dragwa, C. R.,
Sullivan, C. D.,
Grasso, L.,
Zhang, L. Y.,
Messler, C. J.,
Zhou, T.,
Kleeberger, S. R.,
Buetow, K. H.,
and Levitt, R. C.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13175-13180 5.
Temann, U. A.,
Geba, G. P.,
Rankin, J. A.,
and Flavell, R. A.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
188,
1307-1320 6.
McLane, M. P.,
Haczku, A. H.,
van de Rijn, M.,
Weiss, C.,
Ferrante, V.,
MacDonald, D.,
Renauld, J. C.,
Nicolaides, N. C.,
and Levitt, R. C.
(1998)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
19,
713-720 7.
Renauld, J.-C.,
Vink, A.,
Louahed, J.,
and Van Snick, J.
(1995)
Blood
85,
1300-1305 8.
Vink, A.,
Renauld, J.-C.,
Warnier, G.,
and Van Snick, J.
(1993)
Eur. J. Immunol.
23,
1134-1138[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Louahed, J.,
Renauld, J.-C.,
Demoulin, J.-B.,
Baughman, G.,
Bourgeois, S.,
Sugamura, K.,
and Van Snick, J.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
156,
3704-3710[Abstract]
10.
Demoulin, J.-B.,
and Renauld, J.-C.
(1998)
Cytokines Cell. Mol. Ther.
4,
243-256
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 11.
Demoulin, J.-B.,
Uyttenhove, C.,
Van Roost, E.,
de Lestré, B.,
Donckers, D.,
Van Snick, J.,
and Renauld, J.-C.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4710-4716[Abstract]
12.
Russell, S.,
Johnston, J.,
Noguchi, M.,
Kawamura, M.,
Bacon, C.,
Friedmann, M.,
Berg, M.,
McVicar, D.,
Witthuhn, B.,
Silvennoinen, O.,
Goldman, A.,
Schmalstieg, F.,
Ihle, J.,
O'Shea, J.,
and Leonard, W.
(1994)
Science
266,
1042-1045 13.
Higuchi, M.,
Singh, S.,
Jafferzou, J. P.,
and Aggarwal, B. B.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
297-304[Abstract]
14.
Bauer, J.,
Liu, K.,
You, Y.,
Lai, S.,
and Goldsmith, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9255-9260 15.
Darnell, J.
(1997)
Science
277,
1630-1635 16.
Greenlund, A. C.,
Farrar, M.,
Viviano, B. L.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
1591-1600[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Stahl, N.,
Farruggella, T.,
Boulton, T.,
Zhong, Z.,
Darnell, J.,
and Yancopoulos, G.
(1995)
Science
267,
1349-1353 18.
Schindler, U.,
Wu, P.,
Rothe, M.,
Brasseur, M.,
and McKnight, S.
(1995)
Immunity
2,
689-697[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Rothman, P.,
Kreider, B.,
Azam, M.,
Levy, D.,
Wegenka, U.,
Eilers, A.,
Decker, T.,
Horn, F.,
Kashleva, H.,
Ihle, J.,
and Schindler, C.
(1994)
Immunity
1,
457-468[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Wakao, H.,
Gouilleux, F.,
and Groner, B.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
2182-2191[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Lin, J.-X.,
Migone, T.-S.,
Tsang, M.,
Friedmann, M.,
Weatherbee, J.,
Zhou, L.,
Yamauchi, A.,
Bloom, E.,
Mietz, J.,
John, S.,
and Leonard, W.
(1995)
Immunity
2,
331-339[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Leonard, W.,
and O'Shea, J.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
16,
293-322[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Mizushima, S.,
and Nagata, S.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
5322 24.
Palacios, R.,
and Steinmertz, M.
(1985)
Cell
41,
727-734[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Louahed, J.,
Kermouni, A.,
Van Snick, J.,
and Renauld, J.-C.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
5061-5070[Abstract]
26.
Yip-Scheider, M.,
Horie, M.,
and Broxmeyer, H.
(1995)
Blood
85,
3494-3502 27.
Grasso, L.,
Huang, M.,
Sullivan, C. D.,
Messler, C. J.,
Kiser, M. B.,
Dragwa, C. R.,
Holroyd, K. J.,
Renauld, J.-C.,
Levitt, R. C.,
and Nicolaides, N. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24016-24024 28.
Gerhartz, C.,
Heesel, B.,
Sasse, J.,
Hemmann, U.,
Landgraf, C.,
Schneider-Mergener, J.,
Horn, F.,
Heinrich, P.,
and Graeve, L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12991-12998 29.
Hemmann, U.,
Gerhartz, C.,
Heesel, B.,
Sasse, J.,
Kurapkat, G.,
Grötzinger, J.,
Wollmer, A.,
Zhong, Z.,
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
Graeve, L.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Horn, F.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12999-13007 30.
Damen, J.,
Wakao, H.,
Miyajima, A.,
Krosl, J.,
Humphries, R. K.,
Cutler, R.,
and Krystal, G.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
5557-5568[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Renauld, J.-C.,
Druez, C.,
Kermouni, A.,
Houssiau, F.,
Uyttenhove, C.,
Van Roost, E.,
and Van Snick, J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
5690-5694 32.
Demoulin, J. B.,
Maisin, D.,
and Renauld, J.-C.
(1999)
Eur. Cytokine Netw.
10,
49-56[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Khan, K. D.,
Shuai, K.,
Lindwall, G.,
Maher, S.,
Darnell, J.,
and Bothwell, A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6806-6810 34.
Mui, A.,
Wakao, H.,
Kinoshita, T.,
Kitamura, T.,
and Miyajima, A.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2425-2433[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Berchtold, S.,
Moriggl, R.,
Gouilleux, F.,
Silvennoien, O.,
Beisenherz, C.,
Pfitzner, E.,
Wissler, M.,
Stöcklin, E.,
and Groner, B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30237-30243 36.
Lilly, M.,
Le, T.,
Holland, P.,
and Hendrickson, S.
(1992)
Oncogene
7,
727-732[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Buckley, A. R.,
Buckley, D.,
Leff, M.,
Hoover, D.,
and Magnuson, N.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
5252-5259[Abstract]
38.
Onishi, M.,
Nosaka, T.,
Misawa, K.,
Mui, A.,
Gorman, D.,
McMahon, M.,
Miyajima, A.,
and Kitamura, T.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3871-3879 39.
Takeda, K.,
Kaisho, T.,
Yoshida, N.,
Takeda, J.,
Kishimoto, T.,
and Akira, S.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
4652-4660 40.
Stöcklin, E.,
Wissler, M.,
Gouilleux, F.,
and Groner, B.
(1996)
Nature
383,
726-728[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Zhang, Z.,
Jones, S.,
Hagood, J.,
Fuentes, N.,
and Fuller, G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30607-30610
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Zemskova, E. Sahakian, S. Bashkirova, and M. Lilly The PIM1 Kinase Is a Critical Component of a Survival Pathway Activated by Docetaxel and Promotes Survival of Docetaxel-treated Prostate Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., July 25, 2008; 283(30): 20635 - 20644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Jiang, J. Huang, W. Q. Li, T. Cavinato, J. R. Keller, and S. K. Durum Role of the Intracellular Domain of IL-7 Receptor in T Cell Development J. Immunol., January 1, 2007; 178(1): 228 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Qiu, R. Lai, Q. Lin, E. Lau, D. M. Thomazy, D. Calame, R. J. Ford, L. W. Kwak, R. A. Kirken, and H. M. Amin Autocrine release of interleukin-9 promotes Jak3-dependent survival of ALK+ anaplastic large-cell lymphoma cells Blood, October 1, 2006; 108(7): 2407 - 2415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Meyer, R. F. Gastwirt, D. D. Schlaepfer, and D. J. Donoghue The Cytoplasmic Tyrosine Kinase Pyk2 as a Novel Effector of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Activation J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28450 - 28457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Funaba, T. Ikeda, K. Ogawa, M. Murakami, and M. Abe Role of activin A in murine mast cells: modulation of cell growth, differentiation, and migration J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2003; 73(6): 793 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Baraldo, D. S. Faffe, P. E. Moore, T. Whitehead, M. McKenna, E. S. Silverman, R. A. Panettieri Jr., and S. A. Shore Interleukin-9 influences chemokine release in airway smooth muscle: role of ERK Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): L1093 - L1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Agrawal, M. L. Agarwal, M. Chatterjee-Kishore, G. R. Stark, and G. M. Chisolm Stat1-Dependent, p53-Independent Expression of p21waf1 Modulates Oxysterol-Induced Apoptosis Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2002; 22(7): 1981 - 1992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Xiao, T. Yin, X.-Y. Wang, T. Uchida, J. Chung, M. F. White, and Y.-C. Yang Specificity of Interleukin-2 Receptor gamma Chain Superfamily Cytokines Is Mediated by Insulin Receptor Substrate-dependent Pathway J. Biol. Chem., March 1, 2002; 277(10): 8091 - 8098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Biola, P. Lefebvre, M. Perrin-Wolff, M. Sturm, J. Bertoglio, and M. Pallardy Interleukin-2 Inhibits Glucocorticoid Receptor Transcriptional Activity through a Mechanism Involving STAT5 (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5) but Not AP-1 Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2001; 15(7): 1062 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Grohmann, M. L. Belladonna, C. Vacca, R. Bianchi, F. Fallarino, C. Orabona, M. C. Fioretti, and P. Puccetti Positive Regulatory Role of IL-12 in Macrophages and Modulation by IFN-{{gamma}} J. Immunol., July 1, 2001; 167(1): 221 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-B. Demoulin, J. Van Snick, and J.-C. Renauld Interleukin-9 (IL-9) Induces Cell Growth Arrest Associated with Sustained Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription Activation in Lymphoma Cells Overexpressing the IL-9 Receptor Cell Growth Differ., March 1, 2001; 12(3): 169 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J.-B. Demoulin, C. Uyttenhove, D. Lejeune, A. Mui, B. Groner, and J.-C. Renauld STAT5 Activation Is Required for Interleukin-9-dependent Growth and Transformation of Lymphoid Cells Cancer Res., July 1, 2000; 60(14): 3971 - 3977. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||