JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyons-Darden, T.
Right arrow Articles by Topal, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lyons-Darden, T.
Right arrow Articles by Topal, M. D.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 25975-25978, September 10, 1999

COMMUNICATION
Abasic Sites Induce Triplet-repeat Expansion during DNA Replication in Vitro*

Tara Lyons-Darden and Michael D. TopalDagger

From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina Medical School, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7295

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The occurrence of triplet-repeat expansion (TRE) during transmission of genetic information is involved in many neurological and neuromuscular diseases including Fragile X syndrome and myotonic dystrophy. DNA slippage during replicative synthesis appears to cause TRE. The causes of DNA slippage, however, remain mostly unknown. We investigated the effects of abasic sites on the occurrence of TRE during DNA replication in vitro using Escherichia coli Klenow polymerase I as the model polymerase. Here we show that a single abasic site analog, synthesized in the triplet-repeat tract at the 5' end of the template strand, induced dramatic TRE during DNA synthesis. The amount of TRE induced decreased when the abasic site was moved to the middle of the repeat tract, consistent with effectively decreasing the length of the repeat tract. Placing the abasic site in the primer did not induce TRE. TRE was sequence-dependent. The damage-induced increase in growing strand TRE depended on the sequence of the growing strand repeat as AAT ~ ATT > CAG > CTG. The expansions required replication from a primer complementary to the repeat tract. The expanded tracts were sequenced and contained multiple additions of the original repeat. The results imply that DNA damage can play a significant role in generating TRE in vivo.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The occurrence of triplet-repeat expansion (TRE)1 during transmission of genetic information is involved in many diseases including Fragile X syndrome (1-3), the most common form of mental retardation; myotonic dystrophy, a neuromuscular disorder; and several neurodegenerative disorders (1, 2). DNA slippage (4) during replicative synthesis is believed to be a major contributor to TRE in vivo (5-8), because elimination of recombination in yeast (9) and in Escherichia coli (10) does not influence TRE, whereas elimination of mismatch repair does (10, 11). Pausing or blockage of DNA replication has been proposed to promote slippage by giving the DNA replication complex more time to dissociate and form misaligned DNA intermediates (12, 13). Hairpins (14-18), bulges (19, 20), tetraplexes (18, 21), and possibly "slipped" structures (22, 23) have been proposed to promote DNA slippage. The structures were proposed to act either as intermediates, by their formation within the repeat or by blocking or pausing replication toward the end of the repeat (12, 24) or a combination of both (13, 17, 24). Replication pause sites are hot spots for nucleotide misincorporation (25). If pausing also induces slippage, the occurrence within the repeat tract of DNA damage that blocks DNA replication could profoundly effect TRE.

Studies of replication of DNA template-primers in vitro with DNA polymerase alone are important for their potential ability to uncover mutation mechanisms. Replication of triplet-repeat tracts in vitro shows TRE (26-29). Here, we report the effects of tract length, tract sequence, and DNA damage on TRE during DNA replication in vitro. The abasic site analog tetrahydrofuran (THF) was used as the model DNA damage lesion. Abasic sites and THF block DNA replication (reviewed in Refs. 30 and 31), and the abasic site is one of the most common lesions that arise in cellular DNA (32). THF was synthesized in the triplet-repeat tracts separately in the template and in the primer strands. Replication using E. coli Klenow pol I as the model polymerase and primed from within the repeat tract demonstrated that THF in the template strand greatly enhanced TRE during DNA synthesis.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Oligodeoxyribonucleotides (oligonucleotides) were synthesized by the Lineberger DNA synthesis facility using an Applied Biosystems automated synthesizer. Oligonucleotides were synthesized as templates for DNA replication. The templates contained ACTGTGTCTGTC (Ua) at the 5' end and GCGACCTGATCC (Ub) at the 3' end, surrounding the triplet repeats (ATT)10, (ATT)20, (AAT)10, (AAT)20, (CTG)10, (CTG)20, (CAG)10, and (CAG)20, as indicated in figure legends. Templates containing 10-repeat tracts were also synthesized to contain the abasic site analog THF (phosphoramidite purchased from Glen Research) in place of the last base at the 5' end of the repeat tract. Primers were synthesized to be complementary to either Ub or to the repeat tract. The latter were three repeats in length. To study the effect of THF placement, THF was also placed at the beginning of the fourth repeat of (ATT)10 in place of A, Ua(ATT)3(FTT)(ATT)6Ub, where F is THF. THF was also synthesized in place of the middle residue of the primer to give AATAFTAAT. All of the templates were synthesized to contain a three-carbon spacer (Glen Research) at their 3' terminus that can not be removed or extended by DNA polymerase (not shown).

Assays-- The replication reaction contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), either 0.3 mM or 0.5 mM MgSO4, as indicated in the figure legends, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM of all four dNTPs, 5 µM of the primer and template, and either 0.1 unit/µl or 0.2 unit/µl of Klenow pol I (Promega). For annealing, primer and template were mixed, incubated at 90 °C in 50 mM Tris-HCl and MgSO4, and allowed to cool to room temperature. The reaction was started by addition of dithiothreitol, dNTPs, and polymerase and was incubated at the indicated temperatures for 2 h. The reactions were stopped by addition of EDTA to 23 mM and by cooling to 4 °C. Reaction products were resolved by either 2% agarose native or alkaline gel electrophoresis. The gels were either stained with ethidium bromide or, if radiolabeled substrates were used, analyzed using a Storm PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). All of the templates and primers were tested individually for their ability to support expansion under the above reaction conditions. Only primed templates supported TRE under our reaction conditions.

DNA Sequencing-- To determine the sequences of the TREs, the expanded primers were extended to the end of the template 5'-terminal unique sequence (Ua). For reactions involving abasic sites, the reaction products were melted and reannealed twice. First, the reaction products were melted and the extended primers were reannealed to templates identical to the reaction templates but lacking the abasic site. The new annealed template-primers were extended with Klenow polymerase to the end of the template downstream 5' unique sequence (Ua). Second, the extended primer strand was melted and reannealed to complementary sequencing primer for sequencing by automated methods.

Restriction Enzyme Digestion-- Restriction enzymes BbvI (New England Biolabs), which recognizes and cleaves the sequence GCAGC(8/12), and AciI, BsgI, MboII, MnlI, NlaIII, and PstI (New England Biolabs), and ThaI (Life Technologies, Inc.), which recognize variants of the CTG repeat, were used according to the manufacturer's recommended conditions.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We analyzed the effect of THF on TRE during DNA replication in vitro. Template-primers were constructed to contain a repeat tract flanked by two different unique sequences (Ua and Ub in Fig. 1). The 3' ends of the templates were blocked by a three-carbon spacer (Glen Research), which blocks extension by polymerase (not shown). Primers were constructed to be complementary to either the triplet-repeat tract (floating primer) or the unique flanking sequence 3' to the repeat tract (fixed primer). The former mimics the sliding model (6, 7) for expansion by DNA slippage and the latter mimics models involving bulge and hairpin intermediates (14-18). Replication from a floating primer generates long TREs under conditions of low Mg2+ (29). The presence of unique sequences flanking the repeat tract, however, significantly reduces the amount of TRE. Control experiments, using end-labeled template and primer, demonstrated that templates and primers by themselves did not support DNA synthesis by Klenow polymerase (not shown). DNA synthesis and TRE were detectable only when annealed primer-template was used for DNA replication.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The abasic site analog THF was synthesized at a unique position within the repeat tract. A, The model abasic site THF. B, 1, replication from a "floating" primer complementary to the repeat tract; 2, replication from a "fixed" primer complementary to the 3' unique flanking sequence Ub. THF is shown at the 5' end of the repeat tract. Filled circle, THF; arrows, replication primers; boxes, unique flanking sequences Ua and Ub; X, three carbon block on template to prevent extension by polymerase.

The model abasic site analog THF (Fig. 1A) was introduced at a single position at the 5' end of the 10-repeat tract just before the unique flanking sequence (Fig. 1B). Replication with both floating and fixed primers is portrayed in Fig. 1B, 1 and 2, respectively. The presence of THF at the end of the repeat tract gave significant TRE with the primer:template (AAT)3:U(FTT)(ATT)9U (Fig. 2), whereas there was little expansion in the absence of THF under these conditions. The conditions used previously to observe significant amounts of spontaneous TRE during DNA replication in vitro lacked unique sequences flanking the template repeat (26-29). The amount of THF-induced expansion that occurred at 42 °C increased with increased reaction time to approximately 1500 bases for primer AAT after 4 h (Fig. 2). Significant THF-induced expansion was also observed at 37 °C (Fig. 3, lane 3). Shifting the position of THF to the middle of the repeat tract (see "Experimental Procedures" for sequence) decreased the amount of expansion observed at 37 and 42 °C. The result is consistent with effectively shortening the length of the repeat tract in the template (Fig. 3, lanes 4 and 9). Placing THF in the middle of the primer did not enhance TRE (Fig. 3, lanes 5 and 10) and instead appeared to reduce the amount of fill-in replication product as measured by the intensity of the lowest molecular weight band (lanes 5 and 10).


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   THF-dependent increases in expansion of the primer strand with increasing time. The template was Ua(ATT)10Ub for unmodified and Ua(FTT)(ATT)9Ub, where Ua and Ub are defined in Fig. 1 legend and F is THF. The floating primer was (AAT)3. Assay conditions were as described under "Experimental Procedures" and the incubation temperature was 42 °C for the times indicated. Lanes 1 and 6, base pair markers; lanes 2 and 7, template-primer without and with THF, respectively, in the absence of polymerase; lanes 3-5, replication of template-primer lacking THF. Products were resolved by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. lanes 8-10, replication of template-primer containing THF.


View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Comparison of effect on TRE of THF in the middle versus the 5' end of the template repeat and in the primer strand. Lanes 1 and 6, base pair markers; lanes 2 and 7, no THF; lanes 3 and 8, THF located at the 5' end of the repeat tract (e); lanes 4 and 9, THF located in the middle of the template repeat tract (m); lanes 5 and 10, THF located in the middle of the primer (p). Assay conditions are described under "Experimental Procedures," and incubation was at 37 and 42 °C, as indicated, for 2 h.

Replications of all four of the 10-repeat templates with and without THF were compared under identical reaction conditions. The order of primer repeat expansion induced by THF, located at the 5' end of the template repeat tract, was ATT >=  AAT > CAG > CTG (summarized in Fig. 4). A small fraction of longer replication products in the absence of THF is visible in Fig. 4, lanes 2 and 4. These products appear to be the product of processive replication, since only a small fraction of substrate is extended to long product. Alternatively, the THF results imply that a low level of oligonucleotide with contaminating damage within the repeat could be responsible for the small background of long products visible in Fig. 4.


View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Comparative effect of THF in the template strand on primer expansion of (AAT)3, (ATT)3, (CAG)3, and (CTG)3. Expansion was measured relative to expansion of the identical repeat lacking THF. The repeats all contained 10 triplets (e.g. Ua(ATT)10Ub) and the THF position was at the end of the template repeat, the same as that in Fig. 1B, 1. All reactions were as described under "Experimental Procedures" except, for purposes of comparison, all reactions contained 0.3 mM MgSO4 and 0.2 unit of Klenow pol I/µl, and all reactions were incubated at 42 °C for 3 h.

Sequencing of the expanded ATT- and CAG-repeat primer DNA strands (see "Experimental Procedures") showed that the expansion sequences mimicked the primer repeat (not shown). CAG expansion products, from reactions in which the primer and template strands were separately labeled, were analyzed on alkaline gels. The results demonstrated that only the primer strand (and only from floating primers) was expanded (Fig. 5). The labeled products were also digested with restriction enzymes and analyzed on denaturing gels (Fig. 5, lanes 3 and 6). Both strands of the expansion products were cleaved by BbvI (GCAGC8/12) but not by enzymes that recognize variants of the CAG repeat (AciI, BsgI, MboII, MnlI, NlaIII, PstI, and ThaI) (not shown). The presence of multiple bands in lane 4 (template only) is probably due to residual secondary structure caused by hairpin formation by CTG repeats (14-18). No breakage at the abasic site was detectable above background. Strand breakage caused by the THF site would have given a band in Fig. 5 corresponding to a labeled 12- or 13-mer (Fig. 5, lane 4).


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effect of BbvI endonuclease on TRE products of replication of (CAG)3:Ua(FTG)(CTG)9Ub, where F is THF. Replication was for 3 h at 47 °C. Separate reactions used template (lanes 1-3) and primer (lanes 4-6) 5'-end-labeled with T4 kinase and 32P-labeled ATP as indicated. Reaction products in lanes 3 and 6 were digested with BbvI endonuclease, which recognizes the double-stranded CAG repeat. Reaction products were electrophoresed on an 8% polyacrylamide-urea denaturing gel and visualized using a Storm 840 PhosphorImager.

Using agarose gel electrophoresis, we analyzed the effects of temperature and tract length on replication of CTG template repeat tracts. Ten- and twenty-repeat tracts with and without THF were replicated. Only floating primers (i.e. primers complementary to the repeat tract) gave detectable levels of expansion. Increasing temperature increased TRE both with and without THF. The presence of THF in the template repeats enhanced expansion of triplet repeats over that without THF at all temperatures studied (Fig. 6). 20-repeat tracts reproducibly gave significantly more TRE than 10-repeat tracts. This was true at all temperatures studied whether or not THF was present. The difference between TRE with and without THF in 20-repeat tracts was not as dramatic as that for 10-repeat tracts. This was because of the large amount of "spontaneous" TRE for 20-repeat tracts. Similar increases in TRE with increasing repeat-tract length were found for all of the template-primers (not shown).


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The effects of temperature on CTG expansion with and without THF present in the repeat tract. Replication of (CAG)3:Ua(CTG)10Ub and (CAG)3:Ua(FTG)(CTG)9Ub is shown. F is THF. Experimental conditions are described under "Experimental Procedures."


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The effects of an abasic site in the triplet-repeat tract on the occurrence of TRE during DNA replication in vitro were determined. The model abasic site THF blocks DNA replication (33-36). Introduction of THF into a triplet-repeat tract was found to dramatically increase TRE during replicative synthesis in vitro. Low Mg2+ concentration was used to generate dramatic TRE (29) similar to the type II TREs observed in Fragile X syndrome and myotonic dystrophy (1-3). Although the Mg2+ concentration was less than that assumed to be at the replication fork in vivo, it served to destabilize the DNA so that DNA slippage is amplified enabling us to study factors that effect its occurrence in vitro. The expansions were only detected when a primer was used complementary to the repeat-tract sequence, rather than complementary to the unique upstream flanking sequence. Expansion by priming within the repeat tract was seen also in the absence of THF but to a much lesser extent. A sliding primer could occur in vivo by location of an Okazaki primer entirely within the repeat tract (6, 7). Alternatively, DNA damage or repair could produce a nick in the growing strand within the repeat tract, while the growing-strand end is located within the repeat tract. This would be more likely if replication were stalled within the repeat tract because of a blocking DNA lesion. Moreover, abasic sites may stimulate slippage by keeping the replication complex within the "slippery surface" of the triplet repeat. Characterization of the expansion products showed that only the primer strand was expanded. DNA sequencing showed that the AAT and CAG expansions were the same sequence as the starting repeat tracts. Restriction enzyme digestion of the CAG TRE products with and without THF showed that the template strands as well as the primer strands were digested. Digestion of the template strand means that it was not displaced from the primer strand as would occur if expansion were caused by a strand-switching mechanism. In addition, digestion of the primer strand confirmed that the triplet-repeat sequence was uniform over the entire expanded tract as shown by direct sequencing. Moving the abasic lesion from the end to the middle of the repeat tract reduced the amount of TRE. Moving the lesion, which blocks replication, closer to the beginning of the repeat effectively reduces the size of the repeat tract available to polymerase. We showed that under our conditions, longer triplet repeats are more susceptible to TRE than shorter triplet repeats. This is consistent with results in vivo (1, 2, 7) and with our understanding of DNA slippage (4, 20). Placing the lesion in the primer instead of the template gave no detectable TRE and decreased the intensity of the filled-in template-primer band. The result implies that THF in the primer interfered with replication priming probably by destabilizing the template-primer duplex.

It has been suggested that DNA slippage should be enhanced by an idling polymerase at a pause site caused by a DNA structure or bound protein (12). The suggestion, if correct, leads to the hypothesis that DNA damage that blocks replication could have profound effects on TRE. To test the hypothesis in vitro, we introduced the abasic site analog THF into triplet-repeat tracts and demonstrated that its presence dramatically increased the occurrence of expansion. This demonstration only has importance in vivo if abasic sites occur within repeat tracts with a high enough frequency to have meaningful impact. Abasic sites arise spontaneously through hydrolysis of DNA N-glycosyl bonds (37) and are estimated to occur at a rate of 10,000 abasic sites/cell/day under physiological conditions (37). The steady-state levels of abasic sites vary with the tissue sampled from a low of ~1 abasic site per 106 nucleotides to a high of 35 abasic sites per 106 nucleotides (38). Chemical exposures of cells in culture induced higher levels (38). Thus, given triplet-repeat tracts of 102 nucleotides and spontaneous steady-state levels of abasic sites, we would expect 0.0001-0.0035 abasic sites per given repeat tract. Assumption that the presence of an abasic site in the triplet-repeat tract results in a 104-fold (it could be significantly higher) increase in TRE per replicative event gives up to a 35-fold increase in TRE rates at that repeat tract. This calculation assumes that the repeat tract is a target for DNA damage equivalent to the bulk DNA. The latter assumption may underestimate levels of damage to triplet repeat tracts. Some repeats show mobilities during gel electrophoresis different from unique sequence DNA of the same size, indicative of unique structures (39). It is possible that repetitive DNA is a better target for DNA damage than unique sequence DNA. In addition, DNA lesions induced by endogenous and exogenous sources increase abasic sites by spontaneous depurination and by removal of damaged bases by DNA glycosylases (reviewed in Ref. 30). The experiments described here offer the first indications, to our knowledge, that DNA damage can induce large expansions of triplet repeats. The results imply that DNA damage plays a role in TRE diseases such as myotonic dystrophy and Fragile X syndrome.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Training Grant 5-T-32-ES07017.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7295. Tel.: 919-966-8208; Fax: 919-966-3015; E-mail: mdtopal@med.unc.edu.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: TRE, triplet-repeat expansion; THF, tetrahydrofuran; pol I, polymerase I.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Sutherland, G. R., and Richards, R. I. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 3636-3641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Ashley, C. T., and Warren, S. T. (1995) Annu. Rev. Genet. 29, 703-728[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Fu, Y.-H., Kuhl, D. P. A., Pizzuti, A., Pieretti, M., Sutcliffe, J. S., Richards, S., Verkerk, A. J. M. H., Holden, J. J. A., Fenwick, R. G., Jr., Warren, S. T., Oostra, B. A., Nelson, D. L., and Caskey, C. T. (1991) Cell 67, 1047-1058[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Streisinger, G., Okada, Y., Emrich, J., Newton, J., Tsugita, A., Terzaghi, E., and Inouye, M. (1966) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 31, 77-84[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Trinh, T. Q., and Sinden, R. R. (1991) Nature 352, 544-547[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Richards, R. I., and Sutherland, G. R. (1994) Nat. Genet. 6, 114-116[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Eichler, E. E., Holden, J. J. A., Popovich, B. W., Reiss, A. L., Snow, K., Thibodeau, S. N., Richards, C. S., Ward, P. A., and Nelson, D. L. (1994) Nature Genetics 8, 88-94[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Kang, S., Jaworski, A., Ohshima, K., and Wells, R. D. (1995) Nat. Genet. 10, 213-218[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Henderson, S. T., and Petes, T. D. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 2749-2757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Levinson, G., and Gutman, G. A. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 5323-5328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Strand, M. K., Prolla, T. A., Liskay, R. M., and Petes, T. D. (1993) Nature 365, 274-276[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Kang, S., Ohshima, K., Shimizu, M., Amirhaeri, S., and Wells, R. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27014-27021[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Ohshima, K., and Wells, R. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 16798-16806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Chen, X., Mariappan, S. V. S., Catasti, P., Ratliffe, R., Moyzis, R. K., Laayoun, A., Smith, S. S., Bradbury, E. M., and Gupta, G. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 5199-5203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Darlow, J. M., and Leach, D. R. F. (1995) Genetics 141, 825-832[Abstract]
16. Gacy, A. M., Goeliner, G., Juranic, N., Macura, S., and McMurray, C. T. (1995) Cell 81, 533-540[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Mitas, M. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 2245-2253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Weitzmann, M. N., Woodford, K. J., and Usdin, K. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9517-9523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Fresco, J. R., and Alberts, B. M. (1960) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 46, 311-321[Free Full Text]
20. Harvey, S. C. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 3047-3049[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Fry, M., and Loeb, L. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 4950-4954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Pearson, C. E., and Sinden, R. R. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 5041-5053[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Pearson, C. E., Wang, Y.-H., Griffith, J. D., and Sinden, R. R. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 816-823[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Usdin, K., and Woodford, K. J. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 4202-4209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Fry, M., and Loeb, L. A. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 763-767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Schlötterer, C., and Tautz, D. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 211-215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Ji, J., Clegg, N. J., Peterson, K. R., Jackson, A. L., Laird, C. D., and Loeb, L. A. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2835-2840[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Nakayabu, M., Miwa, S., Suzuki, M., Izuta, S., Sobue, G., and Yoshida, S. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 1980-1984[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Lyons-Darden, T., and Topal, M. D. (1999) Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 2235-2240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., and Siede, W. (1995) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis , ASM Press, Washington, D. C.
31. Loeb, L. A., and Preston, B. D. (1986) Annu. Rev. Genet. 20, 201-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Lindahl, T. (1992) Nature 362, 709-715
33. Miller, H., and Grollman, A. P. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 15336-15342[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Paz-Elizur, T., Takeshita, M., and Livneh, Z. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 1766-1773[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Shimizu, H., Yagi, R., Kimura, Y., Makino, K., Terato, H., Ohyama, Y., and Ide, H. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 597-603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Wang, G., Rahman, M. S., and Humayun, M. Z. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 9486-9492[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Lindahl, T., and Nyberg, B. (1972) Biochemistry 11, 3610-3618[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Nakamura, J., Walker, V. E., Upton, P. B., Chiang, S.-Y., Kow, Y. W., and Swenberg, J. A. (1998) Cancer Res. 58, 222-225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Chastain, P. D., II, Eichler, E. E., Kang, S., Nelson, D. L., Levene, S. D., and Sinden, R. R. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 16125-16131[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. D. Wells, R. Dere, M. L. Hebert, M. Napierala, and L. S. Son
Advances in mechanisms of genetic instability related to hereditary neurological diseases
Nucleic Acids Res., July 8, 2005; 33(12): 3785 - 3798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. L. Ruggiero and M. D. Topal
Triplet Repeat Expansion Generated by DNA Slippage Is Suppressed by Human Flap Endonuclease 1
J. Biol. Chem., May 28, 2004; 279(22): 23088 - 23097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
B. L. Heidenfelder and M. D. Topal
Effects of sequence on repeat expansion during DNA replication
Nucleic Acids Res., December 15, 2003; 31(24): 7159 - 7164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. L. Callahan, K. J. Andrews, V. A. Zakian, and C. H. Freudenreich
Mutations in Yeast Replication Proteins That Increase CAG/CTG Expansions Also Increase Repeat Fragility
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2003; 23(21): 7849 - 7860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. L. Heidenfelder, A. M. Makhov, and M. D. Topal
Hairpin Formation in Friedreich's Ataxia Triplet Repeat Expansion
J. Biol. Chem., January 17, 2003; 278(4): 2425 - 2431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. Nozawa, M. Suzuki, M. Takemura, and S. Yoshida
In vitro expansion of mammalian telomere repeats by DNA polymerase {alpha}-primase
Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2000; 28(16): 3117 - 3124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
P. Jin and S. T. Warren
Understanding the molecular basis of fragile X syndrome
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2000; 9(6): 901 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. P. Jakupciak and R. D. Wells
Gene Conversion (Recombination) Mediates Expansions of CTG{middle dot}CAG Repeats
J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2000; 275(51): 40003 - 40013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyons-Darden, T.
Right arrow Articles by Topal, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lyons-Darden, T.
Right arrow Articles by Topal, M. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.