![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 26008-26014, September 10, 1999
§,
,
¶,
, and

From the
Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 and the ¶ Institute for
Genomic Research, Rockville, Maryland 20850
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In eukaryotes, the 20 S proteasome is the
proteolytic core of the 26 S proteasome, which degrades ubiquitinated
proteins in an ATP-dependent process. Archaebacteria lack
ubiquitin and 26 S proteasomes but do contain 20 S proteasomes. Many
archaebacteria, such as Methanococcus jannaschii, also
contain a gene (S4) that is highly homologous to the six
ATPases in the 19 S (PA700) component of the eukaryotic 26 S
proteasome. To test if this putative ATPase may regulate proteasome
function, we expressed it in Escherichia coli and purified
the 50-kDa product as a 650-kDa complex with ATPase activity. When
mixed with the well characterized 20 S proteasomes from
Thermoplasma acidophilum and ATP, this complex stimulated degradation of several unfolded proteins 8-25-fold. It also stimulated proteolysis by 20 S proteasomes from another archaebacterium and mammals. This effect required ATP hydrolysis since ADP and the nonhydrolyzable analog, 5'-adenylyl The 26 S proteasome, which is the major site of protein breakdown
in mammalian cells, is composed of the 20 S proteasome (molecular mass
of 700 kDa) and two 19 S regulatory complexes (700 kDa) (1, 2). The
20 S proteasome is a cylindrical proteolytic complex composed of four
stacked, seven-membered rings (3). In the presence of ATP, the 19 S
complex (also called PA700) becomes associated with each end of the
20 S cylinder (4, 5). The resulting 26 S particle degrades
ubiquitinated and certain non-ubiquitinated proteins in an
ATP-dependent process (1). Six of the approximately 18 subunits of the 19 S complex are ATPases whose precise functions in
protein degradation and in 26 S assembly remain unclear (4, 6-9).
Within the 19 S regulatory complex, these ATPases form a subcomplex
("base"), which binds directly to the 20 S core particle (10).
These ATPases are all members of the large AAA family, which contains
more than 100 ATPases that are involved in diverse cellular processes,
including protein degradation, cell division, peroxisome biogenesis,
vesicle transport, and meiosis (11, 12). Only eukaryotic cells contain
ubiquitin or 26 S proteasome complexes. The initial report of the
finding of ubiquitin in the archaebacterium Thermoplasma
acidophilum (13) and the cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis (14) has not been confirmed, and the sequencing of several prokaryotic genomes has not revealed genes for ubiquitin or
homologs of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (15). However, 20 S
proteasomes are present in archaebacteria (16-19) and in actinomycetes (20-22). The 20 S proteasome from archaebacteria, although containing only one type of The present studies were undertaken to investigate whether the
archaebacterial 20 S proteasome, like the eukaryotic particle, might
also function in an ATP-dependent manner in association with a regulatory ATPase complex. In bacteria, such as
Escherichia coli, which also lack ubiquitin, most
intracellular protein degradation requires ATP and is catalyzed by
large ATP-hydrolyzing proteolytic complexes (23, 24). Several of these
enzymes (ClpAP, ClpXP, and HslVU) are composed of central proteolytic
particles (ClpP and HslV) whose function in protein degradation
requires ATP hydrolysis by an associated ring-shaped ATPase complex
(ClpA, ClpX, and HslU) (24). Prior attempts to find a larger form of
the archaebacterial proteasome that functions in an
ATP-dependent fashion have not been successful (25).
However, the sequencing of the genome of Methanococcus
jannaschii and other archaebacteria have revealed a gene
(S4) (26), whose predicted protein sequence is similar to
that of the eukaryotic 26 S ATPases. Therefore, we investigated whether this protein, which we have termed
"PAN"1 for
proteasome-activating nucleotidase, can stimulate protein degradation
by archaebacterial 20 S proteasomes in an ATP-dependent reaction. In these studies, we have chosen primarily to study 20 S
proteasomes from T. acidophilum because their structure and enzymatic properties have been especially well characterized (3, 27-29).
Materials--
All fluorogenic peptides were purchased from
Bachem (Switzerland), [14C]formaldehyde from NEN Life
Sciences Products, and recombinant 20 S proteasomes
(Methanosarcina thermophila) from Calbiochem. All other
reagents were purchased from Sigma. Cloning of S4 and Expression of PAN--
The Methanococcus
S4 gene was amplified from plasmid pAMJHW03 by polymerase chain
reaction adding six codons for histidine residues to the 5'-end of the
gene (GenBankTM accession number U67559) (primer 1, 5'-GCGCGCGCATATGCATCACCATCACCATCACGTTTTTGAAGAATTTATTTC-3', and primer
2, 5'-GCGCGCGGATCCCTATT-ATCTGTAGAGAACATCCA-3'). The polymerase
chain reaction product was cloned into the T7 expression vector pRSETA
(Apr) (Invitrogen) resulting in pRSETA-S4. Since 6% of the
codons in the S4 gene are AGA or AGG, which are rare
arginine codons in E. coli, we transformed E. coli BL21(DE3) with plasmid pUBS520 (Kmr) which
carries the E. coli dnaY (argU) gene coding for
the minor arginine tRNAAGA/AGG (31). E. coli
BL21(DE3), pUBS520 cells were used for transformation with
pRSETA-S4.
Purification of PAN--
E. coli BL21(DE3), pUBS520,
pRSETA-S4 cells were grown at 30 °C in 500-ml flasks. Expression of
the PAN protein was induced by addition of 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio-
To remove contaminating proteins, the dialyzed sample was loaded onto a
MonoQ HR5/5 column (0.5 × 5 cm, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
equilibrated in buffer C. After washing the column, a linear gradient
of NaCl from 20 to 500 mM in buffer C was applied. PAN was
eluted at approximately 250 mM NaCl. The fractions were assayed for ATPase activity, and the active fractions were pooled and
loaded onto a Superose 6 HR column (1 × 30 cm, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated in buffer D (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5;
100 mM NaCl; 1 mM DTT). Native and recombinant
Thermoplasma proteasomes were purified as described
previously (28, 32). Protein concentrations were determined by the
Bradford method (33).
Nucleotidase Assay--
Hydrolysis of ATP and other nucleotide
triphosphates was assayed by measurement of the production of inorganic
phosphate according to the method of Ames (34). The reaction was
performed in 100 µl of buffer E containing 50 mM
Tris/HCl, pH 7.5; 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
DTT, plus 1 mM nucleotide (ATP, CTP, GTP, or UTP as
indicated) at 60 °C and stopped by adding 200 µl of 1% SDS
ultrapure (Sigma). 700 µl of a mixture containing 100 µl of 10%
ascorbic acid and 600 µl of 0.42% ammonium molybdate in 1 N H2SO4 were added and incubated at
37 °C for 45 min. The amount of inorganic phosphate was determined
by measurement of the absorption ( Peptide and Protein Degradation--
Thermoplasma
proteasomes (150 ng) and Methanococcus PAN (600 ng) were
incubated with different radiolabeled substrate proteins and assayed at
60 or 55 °C (where indicated) for typically 40 min. Breakdown of 3.4 µg of [14C]methyl- PAN Is Homologous to the ATPases in the Eukaryotic 26 S
Proteasome--
The predicted protein sequence of the M. jannaschii S4 gene (26) has 41-45% similarity with that of the
human and yeast 26 S proteasomal ATPases, as shown by multiple
sequence alignment (Fig. 1). Moreover,
analysis of the primary structure of the expressed protein, which we
named PAN (see below), revealed a similar organization of highly
conserved domains as is found in the six ATPases in the human and yeast
26 S particle. In the N-terminal region of PAN, a potential
coiled-coil (residues 49-83) was predicted with a probability >0.99
by the program Coils (35) (Fig. 1). Coiled-coils, which often mediate
protein-protein interactions (36), were predicted with probabilities
>0.9 in the N-terminal regions of five of the six human and yeast
ATPases and with a lower probability for the eukaryotic S4 subunit
(Fig. 1). The C-terminal region of PAN contains a P-loop domain
(residues 204-275 that include the Walker A and B motifs), which binds
and hydrolyzes nucleotides. There is also a second region of homology
of unknown function (residues 296-342), which is a hallmark of all
members of the AAA family (37, 38) (Fig. 1). Two additional clusters of
conserved residues (residues 173-189 and 377-403) are found in the
N-terminal and C-terminal part of PAN and eukaryotic (human and yeast)
26 S ATPases (Fig. 1). Recently, PSD95-like domains, which mediate C-terminal-specific protein-protein interactions (39), were identified
in the Clp family of ATPases that regulate the function of an
associated protease (i.e. the E. coli proteins
ClpA, ClpX, and HslU) (40). In contrast, we found no evidence for
PSD95-like domains in PAN or the eukaryotic 26 S ATPase sequences.
PAN Is a High Molecular Weight ATPase Complex--
To test if the
S4 gene product (PAN) from Methanococcus could
regulate proteolysis by archaebacterial 20 S proteasomes, we expressed
this gene in E. coli and isolated it as a soluble protein by
native Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. Upon gel filtration, the 50-kDa
PAN protein was eluted as a 650-kDa complex (Fig.
2A), as shown by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the fractions (Fig.
2B). These complexes contained predominantly the 50-kDa His6-PAN gene product, whose identity was confirmed by
N-terminal sequencing. Also present in lower amounts was a 40-kDa
fragment of this polypeptide, whose N-terminal sequence indicated that it was formed by internal initiation at Met74
(cf. Fig. 1). The truncated form and full-length
His6-PAN must be present within the same 650-kDa complex,
since both species were copurified together through Ni-NTA (as well as
MonoQ and Superose 6 chromatography) even though only the full-length
form contains the N-terminal His6 tag.
The fractions containing the PAN protein had ATPase activity, as
measured by the generation of inorganic phosphate from ATP (Fig. 2A).
ATP hydrolysis by PAN required Mg2+ ions and was markedly
inhibited by the addition of EDTA. The temperature optimum of the
ATPase activity was 73 °C (data not shown), which is close to the
growth optimum (85 °C) for Methanococcus cells (41).
PAN Activates Breakdown of Proteins but Not Small Peptides--
To
test whether PAN can stimulate the activity of archaebacterial
proteasomes, we used recombinant proteasomes from
Thermoplasma because their biochemical properties (27) and
structure (2, 3, 42) are well defined and because 20 S proteasomes
have not been isolated from Methanococcus. However,
Methanococcus contains genes for proteasomal
The magnitude of this proteolytic stimulation by PAN and ATP was
proportional to the amount of PAN added (Fig.
4), and maximal degradation occurred with
a PAN/proteasome molar ratio of the complexes of 4:1 (subunit ratio of
approximately 2:1), which was used in all of our subsequent assays. In
the presence of ATP, PAN also dramatically stimulated (10-39-fold
depending on the preparation) the degradation of several other
125I-labeled proteins, e.g.
With certain ATP-dependent proteases (La or HslVU) from
E. coli, ATP binding enhances degradation of small peptide
substrates as well as proteins (44), whereas with others (ClpAP or
ClpXP), ATP binding and hydrolysis are necessary only for degradation of proteins (45). In contrast to the marked stimulation of PAN Stimulates 20 S Proteasomes from Other Archaebacteria and
Mammals--
20 S proteasomes have also been characterized from
another archaebacterium, M. thermophila (16, 46). Although
its Nucleotide Specificity--
In addition to ATP, PAN was found to
cleave other nucleotide triphosphates at comparable rates (at l
mM). Surprisingly, the rate of CTP hydrolysis was twice
that of ATP, whereas GTP and UTP were hydrolyzed more slowly than ATP.
Because of this broad nucleotide specificity, we have termed PAN a
nucleotidase, rather than simply an ATPase. Moreover, these other
nucleotide triphosphates were also found to support the stimulation of
protein degradation by PAN (Table IV),
although ATP was most effective in promoting proteolysis. CTP also had
considerable activity, but since CTP is hydrolyzed faster than ATP, the
coupling of nucleotide and protein hydrolysis is less efficient than
with ATP (i.e. more nucleotides have to be consumed to
degrade a casein molecule). Because of this ability to hydrolyze
multiple nucleotide triphosphates, we named this complex
proteasome-activating nucleotidase or PAN.
A fundamental feature of intracellular protein breakdown in
eukaryotes and bacteria is its requirement for metabolic energy (1, 23,
24, 47). The present finding of an ATPase that markedly stimulates
protein degradation by archaebacterial proteasomes reveals that a
coupling of nucleotide and protein hydrolysis was established early in
evolution. Accordingly, these archaebacteria also contain genes that
encode homologs of the ATP-hydrolyzing protease La (Lon) (15, 18, 19,
26, 48), which is a major contributor to protein breakdown in bacteria
(49) and mitochondria (50). Although the eukaryotic 26 S proteasome
contains six related ATPases (2), there is only one homolog in the
Methanococcus genome (26) and in the recently sequenced
genomes of the archaebacteria, Methanobacterium
thermoautothrophicum (18), Archaeoglobus fulgidus (19),
and Pyrococcus horikoshii (48). Therefore, PAN should be
considered as the evolutionary precursor of the six eukaryotic 26 S
ATPases, which most likely arose from one primordial gene by gene
duplications during the evolution of eukaryotic cells. The eukaryotic
20 S particle also evolved through multiple gene duplications, in
which the single PAN thus appears likely to regulate 20 S function in many
archaebacteria, as shown by its ability to stimulate proteolysis by the
quite different proteasomes from Thermoplasma and
Methanosarcina. It is also most likely that PAN activates
these particles from Methanococcus, which is a methanogen
closely related to Methanosarcina. However, this protein is
probably not the only mode of regulation of proteasomes in these
prokaryotes. Despite several attempts, we have failed to find a PAN
homolog by polymerase chain reaction in Thermoplasma (the
source of our 20 S proteasomes) using primers synthesized according to
highly conserved regions of the archaebacterial PAN and eukaryotic
26 S ATPases. Moreover the complete genome of another archaebacterium,
Pyrobaculum aerophilum, has been sequenced; it contains
proteasomal genes, but no gene similar to PAN was found nor any ClpA
homolog.2 Therefore, the mode
of regulation of proteasomes in these species remains uncertain but
presumably involves distinct ATPase complexes.
PAN, its homologs in other archaebacteria, and the eukaryotic 26 S
ATPases share a single nucleotide binding domain, P-loop, three highly
conserved domains of unknown function, and an N-terminal coiled-coil
(Fig. 1). This coiled-coil region was shown to be essential for the
interactions of some of the 26 S ATPases with each other (52), and
they may also be important in the binding of substrates (53).
Surprisingly, the truncated 40-kDa fragment of PAN lacks about half of
the predicted coiled-coil, yet it was copurified in the same complex as
the full-length PAN (Fig. 2). Interestingly, one of the six homologous
ATPases in human and yeast 26 S proteasomes shows a low likelihood of
containing a coiled-coil domain (52,
54).3 ClpA and ClpB also
contain internal translation initiation sites that produce full-length
and truncated forms of these proteins that differ in their catalytic
properties (55, 56). However, by site-directed mutagenesis, we have
recently eliminated this internal initiation site in PAN and obtained a
similar sized PAN complex that contains only full-length subunits and
that, surprisingly, stimulates protein breakdown almost identically to
the preparations shown here.3
It is noteworthy that ATP and PAN dramatically stimulate the
degradation of several proteins (Tables I and II) but do not affect the
hydrolysis of tetrapeptide and tripeptide substrates (Table III).
Presumably, these small peptides can enter the 20 S particle and reach
the central chamber in the absence of PAN. X-ray analysis of the
Thermoplasma proteasome has shown that the outer The stimulation of the breakdown of proteins, but not of small
peptides, strongly suggests that PAN, by binding to the 20 S particle,
promotes protein translocation into the 20 S proteasome. It has often
been suggested that ATPases of the 26 S complex or ATP-dependent proteases function as chaperones to unfold
prospective substrates. However, the substrates studied here (casein or
oxidized Unlike several ATP-dependent proteases or chaperones (ClpA,
ClpX, and HslU), PAN hydrolyzes all four nucleotide triphosphates at
significant rates, and all four can support protein degradation. Although we assume that PAN functions primarily in an
ATP-dependent fashion in vivo, other nucleotides
(especially CTP) may also support protein breakdown. Unfortunately,
information is not available on the relative concentrations of these
different nucleotides in archaebacteria under different growth
conditions. This preference for ATP and CTP over GTP and UTP may even
be a general feature of the AAA family members. A similar preference in
nucleotide hydrolysis or in nucleotide-dependent
proteolysis was found with eukaryotic 26 S proteasomes and 19 S
regulatory particles (58), the E. coli metalloprotease FtsH
(59), and the Rhodococcus ARC complex (60). Recently, the
x-ray structure of the second ATPase domain (D2) of the human NSF
protein, a member of the AAA family, was determined (61, 62). It
functions with ATP, but not GTP, apparently because the active site
binds ATP in a syn conformation and does not sterically
admit the carbonyl and amine groups on GTP's (purine) ring in this
conformation (61, 62). Since CTP and UTP also differ in the presence of
the amine and carbonyl groups on the pyrimidine ring, binding of CTP
but steric hindrance of UTP binding would also appear likely.
Despite the very large evolutionary distance, the primary sequence and
domain organization of PAN and those of the human and yeast 26 S
ATPases are indeed very similar, and therefore, they probably function
quite similarly in promoting protein breakdown by the 20 S particle.
Therefore, further mechanistic and structural studies of the
PAN-proteasome complex should help clarify the precise role of ATP in
the formation and function of the 26 S eukaryotic complex. Certain
bacteria (actinomycetes), which also lack ubiquitin and 26 S
proteasomes, contain their 20 S proteasome
,
-imidophosphate, were
ineffective. CTP and to a lesser extent GTP and UTP were also
hydrolyzed and also stimulated proteolysis. We therefore named this
complex PAN for proteasome-activating nucleotidase. However, PAN did
not promote the degradation of small peptides, which, unlike proteins,
should readily diffuse into the proteasome. This ATPase complex appears to have been the evolutionary precursor of the eukaryotic 19 S complex, before the coupling of proteasome function to ubiquitination.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-subunit in the outer rings and one type of
-subunit in the central two rings, is quite similar in architecture to the eukaryotic proteasome and is clearly the evolutionary ancestor of the eukaryotic particle (2), which contains seven distinct but
homologous
-subunits and seven distinct but homologous
-subunits.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-[14C]Casein was
prepared by reductive methylation and stored in 50 mM
Tris/HCl, pH 7.5 (30).
-D-galactopyranoside to a
logarithmically (A600 = 0.7) growing culture.
The cells were induced for 3 h, washed with buffer A (50 mM NaH2PO4, pH 8.0; 300 mM NaCl), and frozen at
20 °C. To purify PAN, the
cells were thawed in cold water and lysed by lysozyme treatment (1 mg/ml for 30 min at 4 °C) and sonication (150 watts for 5 min at
50% duty cycle with a microtip, Branson sonifier). Membranes and cell debris were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g
for 20 min, and the supernatant was centrifuged for 1 h at
100,000 × g. The supernatant was loaded onto a Ni-NTA
agarose column (1.5 × 0.25 cm, Qiagen), which was washed with
buffer A and then with buffer B (50 mM
NaH2PO4, pH 6.0; 300 mM NaCl). The
PAN protein was eluted with 200 mM imidazole in buffer B
and dialyzed against buffer C (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5; 1 mM DTT).
820 nm) in an
Ultrospec 2000 spectrophotometer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
-casein (30,000 cpm/µg) was
assayed in 100 µl of buffer E with or without added nucleotide.
Degradation of 150 ng of 125I-
-lactalbumin (70,000 cpm/µg) and 640 ng of 125I-
-lactoglobulin (40,000 cpm/µg) was assayed in 25 µl of buffer E, and 200 ng of
125I-oxidized RNase A (450,000 cpm/µg) was assayed in 100 µl of the same buffer. The reactions were stopped by adding
trichloroacetic acid to a final concentration of 10%, and the activity
was expressed as the percentage of radioactive protein converted into
acid-soluble products. The fluorogenic peptides were dissolved at 10 mM in Me2SO and added at a final concentration
of 400 µM (4% Me2SO) in 100 µl of buffer E
for a single 30-min time point or at 100 µM (1%
Me2SO) in 1 ml of buffer E for continuous measurement at 60 °C. The released 7-amido-4-methylcoumarin (AMC) was detected (
ex 380 nm and
em 440 nm) in a
spectrofluorometer (Amicon Bowman Series 2 Luminescence Spectrometer).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (119K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The Methanococcus PAN is a
homolog of the eukaryotic 26 S ATPases. PAN and the six ATPases
of the yeast (Sc) and human (Hs) 19 S complexes
were aligned with MegAlign (DNASTAR) using the Clustal algorithm (PAM
250, Gap penalty 10, gap length penalty 10). The coiled-coil prediction
was performed with MacStripe 1.3.4, a program using the algorithm
developed by Lupas et al. (35). A window of 28 residues was
used, and only regions with a probability >0.9 were considered as
potential coiled-coils. Identical residues in all sequences are
shaded. The line above the sequences (residues
206-338 of Mj PAN) indicates the P-loop nucleotidase core domain,
containing the highly conserved Walker A and B boxes, and the second
region of homology, which is a hallmark of all AAA ATPases (37).
Dotted lines above the aligned sequences indicate two
regions with clusters of conserved residues. Underlined are
potential coiled-coil domains as predicted by Coils (35) with a
probability >0.9. Methionine 74, the first amino acid residue of the
truncated PAN protein (see text and Fig. 2), is indicated by an
asterisk. The human sequences were named according to Dubiel
and Rechsteiner (52, 65) and for the yeast subunits the newly proposed
nomenclature was used (7).

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The PAN protein forms a 650-kDa complex with
ATPase activity. A, Superose 6 chromatography and
ATPase activity of the recombinant PAN protein. ATPase activity was
measured by incubating 50 µl of the fractions in buffer E (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5; 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT) containing 1 mM ATP for 40 min at
60 °C in a volume of 100 µl. The production of inorganic phosphate
was measured by the ascorbic acid method (34). B, SDS-
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12% acrylamide) of the Superose 6 fractions. The Coomassie-stained gel shows molecular weight standard
proteins in lane M, and 15 µl of fractions 23-28 of the
Superose 6 chromatography shown in A labeled 23-28,
respectively. The N-terminal protein sequence analysis identified the
50-kDa protein as His6-PAN (MHHHHHHVFE), whereas the 40-kDa
protein is a truncated PAN protein (MKENEILRRE), which is most likely
the result of an internal initiation of translation at
Met74.
- and
-subunits (26) that are very similar (50 and 39% sequence
similarity, respectively) to those in T. acidophilum. In the
presence of PAN and ATP, these proteasomes degraded
[14C]methyl-
-casein 8-25 times faster (depending on
the preparation of substrate) than in the absence of the nucleotide
(Fig. 3). This effect requires ATP
hydrolysis, since the non-hydrolyzable analog, AMP-PNP, and ADP had
very little or no effect on the degradation of
-casein (Fig. 3 and
Table I). In the absence of PAN, the 20 S proteasomes degraded
-casein 8-12 times more slowly, and this
process was not altered by the addition of ATP.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
The Methanococcus PAN
protein activates the breakdown of proteins by the
Thermoplasma proteasome. Measurement of the
proteolytic activity was performed by mixing PAN (600 ng) and
Thermoplasma proteasomes (150 ng) at a molar ratio of the
complexes of 4:1 (subunit ratio of 2:1) with 3.4 µg of
-[14C]casein in buffer E with 1 mM ATP
(top line), with 1 mM AMP-PNP (middle
line), with 1 mM ADP or control without nucleotide
(lower line) in a volume of 100 µl. Data with ADP and
without any nucleotide were indistinguishable. The reaction mixture was
incubated at 60 °C for various periods, and the generation of
radioactivity soluble in 10% trichloroacetic acid was determined by
liquid scintillation counting. Proteasomes alone, incubated with the
same three nucleotides or without nucleotide, had similar activity as
proteasomes incubated with PAN and without any nucleotide. PAN alone
had no proteolytic activity when incubated under the same
conditions.
Ability of different nucleotides to support PAN-stimulated casein
degradation by 20 S proteasomes from different archaebacteria
-lactalbumin and
oxidized RNase A, which are hydrolyzed very slowly by 20 S proteasomes
alone (Table II). These polypeptides had
been oxidized to eliminate sulfhydryl cross-bridges and to facilitate
their entry into the 20 S particle (43). Like casein, these substrates
are unfolded (especially at 60 °C which was used in most assays) and
have been widely used as substrates for other ATP-dependent
proteases (ClpAP, HslVU, and the 26 S proteasome). Like these enzymes,
PAN plus 20 S proteasomes could not degrade two native globular
proteins, serum albumin or ovalbumin. Thus, PAN and ATP seem to promote
the selective breakdown of unfolded polypeptides (although these
substrates may have additional features allowing their recognition by
PAN).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effect of increasing amounts of PAN on casein
degradation. Maximal
-[14C]casein degradation was
observed with a molar ratio of four PAN complexes per proteasome
(assuming PAN functions as a 650-kDa multimer). 150 ng of
Thermoplasma 20 S proteasomes were incubated with
increasing concentrations of PAN (0-1.5 µg) in the presence of
buffer E, 1 mM ATP, and 2.5 µg of
-[14C]casein (100,000 cpm) in a total volume of 100 µl for 1 h at 55 °C. The reaction was stopped with 10%
trichloroacetic acid, and soluble counts were measured by liquid
scintillation.
Effect of PAN on the hydrolysis of various proteins by proteasomes
-casein degradation, PAN and ATP did not promote the cleavage of the standard fluorogenic peptide substrates of the 20 S proteasome, Suc-LLVY-AMC (where Suc is succinyl) (Fig. 5) or
Z-GGL-AMC (where Z is carbobenzoxy), nor did PAN and ATP enhance the
hydrolysis of several other peptides that are poorly cleaved by the
particle (Table III). Most likely, these
tetrapeptides or tripeptides are degraded in a PAN- and ATP-independent
fashion because, unlike proteins, they do not require an
ATP-dependent translocation step and can readily diffuse into the particle to reach the active sites located in the central chamber of the proteasome. This inability of PAN to stimulate proteasomal degradation of small fluorogenic peptides distinguishes PAN
from known activators of mammalian proteasomes (PA28 and PA700), which
stimulate the hydrolysis of tripeptides and, in the case of PA28,
enhances degradation of oligopeptides but not proteins (1).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
PAN does not stimulate the breakdown of
peptides by Thermoplasma proteasomes. The
hydrolysis of the fluorogenic peptide, Suc-LLVY-AMC (where Suc is
succinyl) (100 µM), was measured in buffer E at 60 °C.
150 ng of proteasomes were incubated with 600 ng of PAN (···) or
without PAN (
) in the presence of 1 mM ATP; proteasomes
incubated without PAN or with PAN in the absence of ATP gave similar
activity. The activity is expressed as arbitrary fluorescence
units.
Effect of PAN on 20 S proteasome hydrolysis of fluorogenic peptides
ex 380 and
em 440 nm).
The results shown are the mean values of duplicate measurements in a
typical experiment. Similar data were obtained in two or three separate
experiments.
- and
-subunits are highly homologous (46-60%) to those
from Thermoplasma, its active sites are quite different in
specificity. Nevertheless, the ability of Methanosarcina
proteasomes to degrade
-casein was stimulated severalfold by PAN and
ATP but not by PAN and ADP (Table I). Surprisingly, PAN even enhanced
2-4-fold the capacity of 20 S proteasomes from rabbit muscles to
degrade
-casein at 55 °C (but not at 37 °C where PAN is
inactive as an ATPase). In contrast, PAN and ATP could not promote, at
either temperature,
-casein degradation by the multimeric proteases
from E. coli, ClpP, and HslV, which normally function in
association with the specific ATPase complexes, ClpA or ClpX, and HslU,
respectively. In addition, when these regulatory ATPases were incubated
with the Thermoplasma proteasomes and ATP, they were unable
to stimulate protein breakdown at either 37 or 55 °C. Together,
these findings strongly suggest that the enhancement of protein
breakdown involves a specific interaction between PAN and the 20 S
particles (see below).
Relative abilities of different nucleotide triphosphates to be
hydrolyzed by PAN and to support protein breakdown by the
PAN-proteasome complex
-[14C]casein and 150 ng of proteasomes
added. The results shown are the mean values of duplicate measurements
in a typical experiment. Very similar data were obtained in two or
three separate experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-subunit and single
-subunit, typical of
prokaryotic proteasomes, gradually evolved into seven distinct, but
homologous,
-type and seven distinct, but homologous,
-type
subunits in the eukaryotic particle (51).
rings
surround a 13-Å channel (3), which appears to be the site of entry for
protein substrates (43), but this opening is closed in the crystal
structure of the yeast 20 S particle (57). Perhaps the binding of PAN
or the ATPases of the eukaryotic 19 S complex to the terminal
-rings of the 20 S proteasome enlarges this opening in an
ATP-dependent manner (8) and thus facilitates the access of
proteins to the active sites localized in the central chamber (28). In
addition, PAN may stimulate the uptake of a polypeptide by the
proteasome by altering its conformation and orientation (see below). In
fact, in more recent studies, we have demonstrated that PAN not only
forms a specific complex with the 20 S proteasome (as shown by
co-immunoprecipitation experiments) but PAN also interacts directly
with protein substrates (as shown by their ability to enhance ATPase
activity of PAN).
-lactalbumin) behave as unfolded molecules at 37 °C and
at 55 or 60 °C must completely lack any tertiary structure.
Consequently, the primary function of PAN under these conditions must
be to translocate the denatured polypeptide into the 20 S particle. Moreover, the ability of PAN to stimulate proteolysis by two different types of archaebacterial proteasomes and even mammalian proteasomes, but not by ClpP or HslV, also supports the idea that PAN acts by
forming a specific complex with the proteasome, rather than a mechanism
where PAN alone binds to the substrate and releases the polypeptide in
a form that then diffuses into the 20 S particle. By analogy to the
other bacterial ATPase complexes that regulate proteolysis (ClpA, ClpX,
and HslU) by specific proteolytic complexes (ClpP and HslV), it is
attractive to assume that the 650-kDa PAN complex contains two rings,
each of which is a complex of six or seven subunits that can bind to
the ends of the 20 S particle. Our attempts thus far to analyze the
structure of PAN by electron microscopy indicate ring-shaped structures
and stacked rings, but a variety of other complexes with heterogeneous
appearance were also present for reasons that are unclear.
and
genes in close
proximity to the gene for the ATPase termed ARC (60). Presumably, this
ring-shaped nucleotidase activates protein degradation by the bacterial
proteasomes by a similar mechanism as PAN, although it is not a close
homolog of PAN nor the 26 S ATPases. By contrast, PAN shows extensive
homologies to the 26 S proteasome and is therefore the most likely
evolutionary precursor to the 19 S complex and, in particular, to its
base, the portion which contains its six ATPases that associates with the 20 S proteasome (10). The one notable potential difference between
these ATPase complexes is that PAN does not enhance peptide hydrolysis
by its 20 S particle whereas the 19 S (PA700) complex does so,
perhaps because this effect may involve a non-ATPase subunit. Recent
findings have suggested that the other proteins of the 19 S complex
that comprise its "lid" are homologous to the COP9-signalosome-like
complex, which functions in signal transduction and translation (10,
63, 64). The combination of these components with PAN must have
been the critical step during the evolution of eukaryotic cells that
allowed the coupling of proteasome function to ubiquitin conjugation
and the establishment of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank R. Mattes (Universität Stuttgart) for providing us with pUBS520; G. Pfeifer (Martinsried) for electron microscopy; and D. Finley, M. Rohrwild, and S. Lecker for critically reading the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by research grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Human Frontier Science Program (to A. L. G.) and a postdoctoral fellowship from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to P. Z.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) U67559.
§ Present address: Dept. of Molecular Structural Biology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18a, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany.
¶ Present address: Dept. of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Choongnam 330-090, South Korea.
** Present address: Göttingen Genomics Laboratory, Institute for Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August-University, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell
Biology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA
02115-5730. Tel.: 617-432-1854; Fax: 617-232-0173; E-mail:
agoldber@bcmp.med.harvard.edu.
2 S. Fitz-Gibbon, personal communication.
3 D. Ng, P. Zwickl, and A. L. Goldberg, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
PAN, proteasome-activating nucleotidase;
AAA, ATPases associated with a
variety of activities;
AMC, 7-amido-4-methylcoumarin;
AMP-PNP, 5'-adenylyl
,
-imidophosphate;
ARC, AAA ATPase-forming
Ring-shaped complexes;
DTT, dithiothreitol.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Coux, O., Tanaka, K., and Goldberg, A. L. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 801-847[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Baumeister, W., Walz, J., Zühl, F., and Seemüller, E. (1998) Cell 92, 367-380[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Löwe, J.,
Stock, D.,
Jap, B.,
Zwickl, P.,
Baumeister, W.,
and Huber, R.
(1995)
Science
268,
533-539 |
| 4. |
DeMartino, G. N.,
Moomaw, C. R.,
Zagnitko, O. P.,
Proske, R. J.,
Chu-Ping, M.,
Afendis, S. J.,
Swaffield, J. C.,
and Slaughter, C. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20878-20884 |
| 5. | Peters, J. M., Cejka, Z., Harris, J. R., Kleinschmidt, J. A., and Baumeister, W. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 234, 932-937[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Dubiel, W., Ferrell, K., and Rechsteiner, M. (1995) Mol. Biol. Rep. 21, 27-34[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Glickman, M. H.,
Rubin, D. M.,
Fried, V. A.,
and Finley, D.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3149-3162 |
| 8. | Larsen, C. N., and Finley, D. (1997) Cell 91, 431-434[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Rubin, D. M., Glickman, M. H., Larsen, C. N., Dhruvakumar, S., and Finley, D. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4909-4919[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Glickman, M. H., Rubin, D. M., Coux, O., Wefes, I., Pfeifer, G., Cjeka, Z., Baumeister, W., Fried, V. A., and Finley, D. (1998) Cell 94, 615-623[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Beyer, A. (1997) Protein Sci. 6, 2043-2058[Abstract] |
| 12. | Patel, S., and Latterich, M. (1998) Trends Cell Biol. 8, 65-71[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Wolf, S., Lottspeich, F., and Baumeister, W. (1993) FEBS Lett. 326, 42-44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Durner, J.,
and Boger, P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
3720-3725 |
| 15. | Zwickl, P., Goldberg, A. L., and Baumeister, W. (1999) in Proteasomes: The World of Regulatory Proteolysis (Wolf, D. H. , and Hilt, W., eds) , R. G. Landes Bioscience Publishing Co., Georgetown, TX, in press |
| 16. |
Maupin-Furlow, J. A.,
and Ferry, J. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28617-28622 |
| 17. | Bauer, M. W., Bauer, S. H., and Kelly, R. M. (1997) Appl. Eviron. Microbiol. 63, 1160-1164[Abstract] |
| 18. |
Smith, D. S.,
Doucette-Stamm, L. A.,
Deloughery, C.,
Lee, H.,
Dubois, J.,
Aldrege, T.,
Bashirzadeh, R.,
Blakely, D.,
Cook, R.,
Gilbert, K.,
Harrison, D.,
and Hoang, L.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
7135-7155 |
| 19. | Klenk, H.-P., Clayton, R. A., Tomb, J.-F., White, O., Nelson, K. E., Ketchum, K. A., Dodson, R. J., Gwinn, M., Hickey, E. K., Peterson, J. D., Richardson, D. L., and Kerlavage, A. R. (1997) Nature 390, 364-370[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Tamura, T., Nagy, I., Lupas, A., Lottspeich, F., Cejka, Z., Schoofs, G., Tanaka, K., De Mot, R., and Baumeister, W. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 766-774[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Knipfer, N., and Shrader, T. E. (1997) Mol. Microbiol. 25, 375-383[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Nagy, I.,
Tamura, T.,
Vanderleyden, J.,
Baumeister, W.,
and De Mot, R.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
5448-5453 |
| 23. | Goldberg, A. L. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 203, 9-23[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Gottesman, S., Maurizi, M. R., and Wickner, S. (1997) Cell 91, 435-438[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Ehlers, C., Kopp, F., and Dahlmann, B. (1997) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 378, 249-253 |
| 26. | Bult, C. J., White, O., Olsen, G. J., Zhou, L., Fleischmann, R. D., Sutton, G. G., Blake, J. A., FitzGerald, L. M., Clayton, R. A., Gocayne, J. D., Kerlavage, A. R., Dougherty, B. A., Tomb, J. F., Adams, M. D., Reich, C. I., Overbeek, R., Kirkness, E. F., Weinstock, K. G., Merrick, J. M., Glodek, A., Scott, J. L., Geoghagen, N. S. M., and Venter, J. C. (1996) Science 273, 1058-1073[Abstract] |
| 27. |
Kisselev, A. F.,
Akopian, T. N.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1982-1989 |
| 28. |
Seemüller, E.,
Lupas, A.,
Stock, D.,
Löwe, J.,
Huber, R.,
and Baumeister, W.
(1995)
Science
268,
579-582 |
| 29. | Zwickl, P., Lottspeich, F., and Baumeister, W. (1992) FEBS Lett. 312, 157-160[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Rice, R. H.,
and Means, G. E.
(1971)
J. Biol. Chem.
246,
831-832 |
| 31. | Brinkmann, U., Mattes, R. E., and Buckel, P. (1989) Gene (Amst.) 85, 109-114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Dahlmann, B., Kopp, F., Kuehn, L., Niedel, B., Pfeifer, G., Hegerl, R., and Baumeister, W. (1989) FEBS Lett. 251, 125-131[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Ames, B. N. (1966) Methods Enzymol. 8, 115-118 |
| 35. | Lupas, A., Van Dyke, M., and Stock, J. (1991) Science 252, 1162-1164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Lupas, A. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 375-382[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. | Lupas, A., Flanagan, J. M., Tamura, T., and Baumeister, W. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 399-404[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. | Swaffield, J. C., and Purugganan, M. D. (1997) J. Mol. Evol. 45, 549-563[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Harrison, S. C. (1996) Cell 86, 341-343[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Levchenko, I., Smith, C. K., Walsh, N. P., Sauer, R. T., and Baker, T. A. (1997) Cell 91, 939-947[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Jones, W. J., Leigh, J. A., Mayer, F., Woese, C. R., and Wolfe, R. S. (1983) Arch. Microbiol. 136, 254-261[CrossRef] |
| 42. | Lupas, A., Zwickl, P., Wenzel, T., Seemüller, E., and Baumeister, W. (1995) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 60, 515-524[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Wenzel, T., and Baumeister, W. (1995) Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 199-204[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Rohrwild, M.,
Coux, O.,
Huang, H. C.,
Moerschell, R. P.,
Yoo, S. J.,
Seol, J. H.,
Chung, C. H.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5808-5813 |
| 45. |
Chung, C. H.
(1993)
Science
262,
372-374 |
| 46. |
Maupin-Furlow, J. A.,
Aldrich, H. C.,
and Ferry, J. G.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
1480-1487 |
| 47. | Ciechanover, A. (1994) Cell 79, 13-21[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. | Kawarabayasi, Y., Sawada, M., Horikawa, H., Haikawa, Y., Hino, Y., Yamamoto, S., Sekine, M., Baba, S., Kosugi, H., Hosoyama, A., Nagai, Y., Sakai, M., Ogura, K., Otsuka, R., Nakazawa, H., Takamiya, M., Ohfuku, Y., Funahashi, T., Tanaka, T., Kudoh, Y., Yamazaki, J., Kushida, N., Oguchi, A., Aoki, K., and Kikuchi, H. (1998) DNA Res. 5, 55-76[Abstract] |
| 49. | Goldberg, A. L., Moerschell, R. P., Chung, C. H., and Maurizi, M. R. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 244, 350-375[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. | Langer, T., and Neupert, W. (1996) Experientia (Basel) 52, 1069-1076 |
| 51. | Hilt, W., and Wolf, D. H. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 96-102[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 52. |
Richmond, C.,
Gorbea, C.,
and Rechsteiner, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13403-13411 |
| 53. |
Wang, W.,
Chevray, P. M.,
and Nathans, D.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
8236-40 |
| 54. |
Russell, S. J.,
Sathyanarayana, U. G.,
and Johnston, S. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32810-32817 |
| 55. |
Seol, J. H.,
Yoo, S. J.,
Kim, K. I.,
Kang, M. S.,
Ha, D. B.,
and Chung, C. H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29468-29473 |
| 56. |
Park, S. K.,
Kim, K. I.,
Woo, K. M.,
Seol, J. H.,
Tanaka, K.,
Ichihara, A.,
Ha, D. B.,
and Chung, C. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
20170-20174 |
| 57. | Groll, M., Ditzel, L., Löwe, J., Stock, D., Bochtler, M., Bartunik, H. D., and Huber, R. (1997) Nature 386, 463-471[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 58. |
Hoffman, L.,
and Rechsteiner, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32538-32545 |
| 59. |
Herman, C.,
Thevenet, D.,
Bouloc, P.,
Walker, G. C.,
and D'Ari, R.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1348-1355 |
| 60. | Wolf, S., Nagy, I., Lupas, A., Pfeifer, G., Cejka, Z., Mueller, S., Engel, A., De Mot, R., and Baumeister, W. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 277, 13-25[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 61. | Lenzen, C. U., Steinmann, D., Whiteheart, S. W., and Weis, W. I. (1998) Cell 94, 525-536[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 62. | Yu, R. C., Hanson, P. I., Jahn, R., and Brünger, A. T. (1998) Nat. Stuct. Biol. 5, 803-811[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 63. |
Seeger, M.,
Kraft, R.,
Ferrell, K.,
Bechotschir, D.,
Dumdey, R.,
Schade, R.,
Gordon, C.,
Naumann, M.,
and Dubiel, W.
(1998)
FASEB J.
12,
469-478 |
| 64. | Wei, N., Tsuge, T., Serino, G., Dohmae, N., Takio, K., Matsui, M., and Deng, X. W. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 919-922[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 65. |
Dubiel, W.,
Ferrel, K.,
Pratt, G.,
and Rechsteiner, M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
22699-22702 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. A. Horwitz, A. Navon, M. Groll, D. M. Smith, C. Reis, and A. L. Goldberg ATP-induced Structural Transitions in PAN, the Proteasome-regulatory ATPase Complex in Archaea J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2007; 282(31): 22921 - 22929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-i. Yamada, J.-i. Niwa, S. Ishigaki, M. Takahashi, T. Ito, J. Sone, M. Doyu, and G. Sobue Archaeal Proteasomes Effectively Degrade Aggregation-prone Proteins and Reduce Cellular Toxicities in Mammalian Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 18, 2006; 281(33): 23842 - 23851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sharon, S. Witt, K. Felderer, B. Rockel, W. Baumeister, and C. V. Robinson 20S Proteasomes Have the Potential to Keep Substrates in Store for Continual Degradation J. Biol. Chem., April 7, 2006; 281(14): 9569 - 9575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Farhoud, H. J. C. T. Wessels, P. J. M. Steenbakkers, S. Mattijssen, R. A. Wevers, B. G. van Engelen, M. S. M. Jetten, J. A. Smeitink, L. P. van den Heuvel, and J. T. Keltjens Protein Complexes in the Archaeon Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus Analyzed by Blue Native/SDS-PAGE and Mass Spectrometry Mol. Cell. Proteomics, November 1, 2005; 4(11): 1653 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|