![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 26051-26056, September 10, 1999
,From the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Bernhard-Nocht-Strasse 74, 20359 Hamburg, Germany
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To obtain insight into the mechanism of
metronidazole resistance in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba
histolytica, amoeba trophozoites were selected in
vitro by stepwise exposures to increasing amounts of
metronidazole, starting with sublethal doses of 4 µM.
Subsequently, amoebae made resistant were able to continuously multiply
in the presence of a 40 µM concentration of the drug. In
contrast to mechanisms of metronidazole resistance in other protozoan
parasites, resistant amoebae did not substantially down-regulate
pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase or up-regulate P-glycoproteins, but
exhibited increased expression of iron-containing superoxide dismutase
(Fe-SOD) and peroxiredoxin and decreased expression of flavin reductase
and ferredoxin 1. Episomal transfection and overexpression of the various antioxidant enzymes revealed significant reduction in susceptibility to metronidazole only in those cells overexpressing Fe-SOD. Reduction was highest in transfected cells simultaneously overexpressing Fe-SOD and peroxiredoxin. Although induced
overexpression of Fe-SOD did not confer metronidazole resistance to the
extent found in drug-selected cells, transfected cells quickly adapted to constant exposures of otherwise lethal metronidazole concentrations. Moreover, metronidazole selection of transfected amoebae favored retention of the Fe-SOD-containing plasmid. These results strongly suggest that peroxiredoxin and, in particular, Fe-SOD together with
ferredoxin 1 are important components involved in the mechanism of
metronidazole resistance in E. histolytica.
Metronidazole (1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-methyl-5-nitroimidazole)
is the drug of choice for the treatment of infections caused by
anaerobic or microaerophilic microorganisms and has been used in
clinical practice for >25 years (1). The drug enters the cell through
passive diffusion, where a nitro group is subsequently reduced to
reactive cytotoxic nitro radicals by reduced ferredoxin or flavodoxin.
Ferredoxin and flavodoxin function as electron acceptors of
pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase, hydrogenase, and some other enzymes
found specifically in microaerophilic bacteria and protozoan
parasites (2-4). The selective toxicity of metronidazole for anaerobic
and microaerophilic organisms is due to the redox potential of their
electron transport components, which are sufficiently negative to
reduce the nitro group of metronidazole (3, 5). Under aerobic
conditions, the nitro radicals can be oxidized by oxygen, which leads
to futile cycling and detoxification of the drug. During this reaction,
superoxide radical anions are formed that may also be toxic for the
anaerobic organisms (6). Treatment with metronidazole is usually very
effective. However, metronidazole resistance is well documented for
various bacteria and protozoan species (7, 8).
Aerobic as well as anaerobic resistance to metronidazole has been
described in Trichomonas vaginalis. In this organism,
activation of the drug occurs in a specific organelle called the
hydrogenosome, in which pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase, ferredoxin,
and hydrogenase are localized. Some clinical T. vaginalis
strains exhibit resistance only under aerobic conditions (9, 10). Under
anaerobic conditions, these isolates are metronidazole-sensitive. They
show no decrease in pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase or hydrogenase
levels, which are required for reductive activation of metronidazole.
These trichomonads have lowered oxygen-scavenging capabilities, leading to higher oxygen concentrations and therefore to a futile cycling of
reduced metronidazole and inactivation of the drug (11, 12). Other
reports have indicated decreased levels of ferredoxin in metronidazole-resistant trichomonads (13, 14) or overexpression of a
gene encoding an ATPase related to the P-glycoprotein family (7).
Anaerobic resistance to metronidazole has only been induced in
vitro (15, 16) and has been correlated with decreased levels or
total lack of pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase and hydrogenase, leading to inactivation of the pyruvate-oxidizing pathway that is
responsible for metronidazole activation (17, 18). Similar findings
have been reported for metronidazole-resistant strains of
Giardia accompanied by chromosomal rearrangements
(19-21).
Recently, Samarawickrema et al. (22) described for the first
time the in vitro induction of metronidazole resistance
under microaerophilic conditions in the protozoan parasite
Entamoeba histolytica, the causative agent of human
amoebiasis. Like Giardia, E. histolytica has no
hydrogenosomes and hydrogenase, and drug activation occurs in the
cytosol (23). Interestingly, amoebae made resistant exhibited normal
levels of pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase activity, but a
substantial increase in the iron-containing superoxide dismutase
(Fe-SOD)1 (22). Up to now,
studies about the regulation of ferredoxin and P-glycoproteins have not
been performed in drug-resistant E. histolytica isolates.
Besides Fe-SOD, which catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide radical
anions to oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, two other enzymatic antioxidants, a flavin reductase (NADPH:flavin oxidoreductase) and a
peroxiredoxin, have been identified in E. histolytica.
Flavin reductase functions as a disulfide reductase, but is also able to reduce oxygen to form hydrogen peroxide (24). Peroxiredoxin was shown to remove hydrogen peroxide, which is produced during the
flavin reductase reaction or during dismutation of superoxide radical
anions by amoebic Fe-SOD. The peroxiredoxin-mediated hydrogen peroxide-removing reaction is dependent on the presence of thiols or
flavin reductase activity (25, 26). This tight interaction of the
enzymatic antioxidants might suggest involvement of the three enzymes
in the mechanism of amoeba metronidazole resistance, as up-regulation
of Fe-SOD should result in elevated levels of hydrogen peroxide, which
are toxic and therefore need to be inactivated.
In this study, we report on the pattern of expression of the different
antioxidant enzymes as well as of ferredoxin and P-glycoprotein in
metronidazole-resistant E. histolytica trophozoites. In
addition, recently developed methods for Entamoeba
transfection were applied to elucidate whether overexpression of Fe-SOD
and/or of the other antioxidant enzymes is sufficient to confer amoeba
resistance to metronidazole.
Parasite Culture
The axenically cultured trophozoites of the E. histolytica isolate HM-1:IMSS were grown in TYI-S-33 medium (27)
under microaerophilic (5-7% O2) or anaerobic conditions
using Anaerocult C or A, respectively (Merck).
To induce metronidazole resistance, amoebae growing in the
mid-logarithmic phase under microaerophilic conditions were exposed to
a low concentration of the drug (4 µM) for 24 h.
Live amoebae were transferred in new medium without the drug and
cultivated until mid-logarithmic phase. This procedure was repeated
three times with the same concentration before higher metronidazole concentrations were used (8, 12, 16, 20, 25, 29, 33, 37, and 40 µM).
Expression Constructs
All plasmids used for the transfection of E. histolytica trophozoites are derivatives of the expression vectors
pEhNEO/CAT and pEhHYG/CAT (28, 29). The chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase gene was removed by restriction with the
endonucleases KpnI and BamHI (pNeoCass/pHygCass)
and replaced by the E. histolytica genes coding Fe-SOD,
peroxiredoxin, and flavin reductase, respectively (30-32). The
Fe-SOD-, peroxiredoxin-, and flavin reductase-coding sequences were
amplified by polymerase chain reaction of the respective DNA fragments.
The transfection vectors were pBS (Stratagene)-derived plasmids
containing the neomycin phosphotransferase- or hygromycin phosphotransferase-coding sequence flanked by 480 base pairs of the
5'-untranslated sequence and 600 base pairs of the 3'-untranslated sequence of an E. histolytica actin gene. The Fe-SOD-,
peroxiredoxin-, or flavin reductase-coding sequence is flanked by 485 base pairs of the 5'-untranslated sequence of an E. histolytica lectin gene and 600 base pairs of the 3'-untranslated
actin gene (pNeoFe-SOD, pNeoPRD, pNeoFR, pHygFe-SOD, and pHygFR)
(29).
Transfection
Transfections were performed by electroporation as described
previously (28). Drug selection started 48 h after transfection, using a 10 µg/ml concentration of the neomycin analogue G418 or 5 µg/ml hygromycin. After 2 weeks, the concentration of G418 was increased to 50 µg/ml, and the concentration of hygromycin was increased to 10 µg/ml. For transfection of E. histolytica
with two different expression vectors, the trophozoites were first transfected with the plasmid containing the neo gene. After
2 weeks of cultivation in the presence of 10 µg/ml G418, they were transfected with the second plasmid, which contains the hyg
gene. These amoebae were cultivated for 2 weeks in the presence of 5 µg/ml hygromycin and 10 µg/ml G418. After 2 weeks of cultivation, a
G418 concentration of 50 µg/ml and a hygromycin concentration of 10 µg/ml were used.
Cultivation of Transfected E. histolytica Trophozoites in the
Presence of Metronidazole
Trophozoites (1 × 106) transfected with
pNeoCass, pNeoFe-SOD, pNeoPRD, or pNeoFR were cultivated in 50-ml
culture flasks in TYI-S-33 medium supplemented with 6 µM
metronidazole and 50 µg/ml G418 for 72 h. Each day, fresh
culture medium, G418, and metronidazole were added to the amoebae.
After 48 and 72 h of cultivation in the presence of metronidazole,
viable amoebae were counted. Trophozoites transfected with pNeoCass
were used as controls.
Double-transfected amoebae were cultivated in TYI-S-33 medium for
96 h without G418 and hygromycin. After 96 h, 1 × 106 amoebae were cultivated in TYI-S-33 medium supplemented
with 6 µM metronidazole. After 48 and 72 h of
cultivation in the presence of metronidazole, viable amoebae were
counted. It is important to cultivate amoebae transfected with
expression vectors containing the hyg gene for a few days
without addition of hygromycin because the combination of hygromycin
and metronidazole is highly toxic for E. histolytica.
Overexpression of Fe-SOD, peroxiredoxin, and flavin reductase after
96 h without addition of G418 and hygromycin was examined by
Western blot analysis.
Each assay was done five times in duplicate. Viability of the amoebae
was examined by trypan blue exclusion (0.5 mg/ml). The survival rate of
the transfected amoebae relative to the controls was determined. The
p value was calculated using one-way analysis of variance.
DNA and RNA Analyses
Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies,
Inc.). Plasmid DNA from Escherichia coli was extracted by the alkaline lysis method using a plasmid mega kit (QIAGEN Inc.). Northern blotting was carried out by standard protocols. Hybridizations were performed in 0.5 M Na2HPO4,
7% SDS, and 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.2) at 55 °C. Blots were
washed in 40 mM Na2HPO4 and 1% SDS
(pH 7.2) at 55 °C.
Enzymatic Assays
E. histolytica trophozoites were harvested in the
mid-logarithmic phase of growth by chilling on ice for 10 min and
centrifuged at 430 × g (4 °C, 5 min). The pellet
was washed twice in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, freeze-thawed
five times in solid CO2/ethanol, and sedimented by
centrifugation at 150,000 × g at 4 °C for 40 min.
The 150,000 × g supernatant (trophozoite extract) was
used for the enzymatic assays.
Peroxiredoxin Assay--
The consumption of
H2O2 by E. histolytica peroxiredoxin
was determined using a reaction mixture containing 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.2 mM dithiothreitol, 50 µM H2O2, and different amounts of
protein. Before addition of H2O2, protein
samples were preincubated with 0.2 mM dithiothreitol for 30 min. The reaction was stopped after 30 min by trichloroacetic acid
precipitation (10% final concentration). After removal of the
precipitated protein, 0.2 ml of 10 mM ferrous ammonium
sulfate and 0.1 ml of 2.5 M potassium thiocyanate were
added to a 1-ml aliquot of the supernatant.
H2O2 was determined spectrophotometrically (at
480 nm) using known amounts of H2O2 (1-50
µM) as a standard (33).
Flavin Reductase--
Flavin reductase activity was determined
as described (34). The activity was assayed by measuring the initial
rate of NADPH oxidation at 340 nm ( Superoxide Dismutase Assay--
The activity of superoxide
dismutase was determined by the reduction of ferricytochrome
c according to standard methods (35). All assays were done
at least in triplicate.
Protein Analysis
Proteins were separated on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and
immunoblotting was carried out as described (36). The rabbit polyclonal
anti-Fe-SOD, anti-peroxiredoxin, and anti-flavin reductase antisera
were described previously (24, 25, 37). Protein concentration was
determined using the bicinchoninic acid reagent assay (Pierce).
Generation of in Vitro Metronidazole-resistant E. histolytica
Trophozoites--
Cultivation of wild-type E. histolytica
trophozoites (HM-1) under microaerophilic conditions (5-7% oxygen) in
the presence of various amounts of metronidazole revealed that a
concentration of 12 µM was sufficient to reproducibly
kill 50% of the cells within 24 h and was lethal for all cells
after prolonged exposures over 72 h. In contrast, amoebae grown
under strict anaerobic conditions were less susceptible to
metronidazole. At a concentration of 12 µM, only 28% of
the cells died within 24 h, and only 50% did so within 72 h.
As, from a clinical point of view, only those E. histolytica
trophozoites that are resistant to metronidazole in the presence of
oxygen are of medical importance, all further experiments were
performed under microaerophilic conditions. To generate
metronidazole-resistant amoebae, cells were challenged with increasing
amounts of the drug, starting with 4 µM and ending up
with 40 µM metronidazole added to the culture medium. The
whole procedure took ~200 days, and afterwards, cells made resistant (HM-1/Met) were continuously maintained in the presence of 40 µM metronidazole for several months. Although the
doubling time of resistant cells was slower compared with that of
wild-type cells, HM-1/Met cells constantly multiplied, and microscopic
inspection did not reveal any abnormalities. A further increase in the
metronidazole concentration resulted in a significant decrease in the
doubling time, and at a concentration of 200 µM, no
further multiplication was observed. However, even at this drug
concentration, cells were still viable, as evidenced by their adherence
to the culture plate, regular amoeboid movement, and trypan blue exclusion.
Expression of Antioxidant Enzymes in Metronidazole-resistant E. histolytica Trophozoites--
Expression of peroxiredoxin, flavin
reductase, Fe-SOD, and pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase was compared
between wild-type amoebae (HM-1) and those made resistant and
continuously grown in the presence of 40 µM metronidazole
(HM-1/Met). Northern blot analyses revealed a slight decrease of
~20% for pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase RNA and a more
pronounced decrease of ~40% for flavin reductase RNA in resistant
amoebae, whereas the levels of Fe-SOD and peroxiredoxin RNAs in these
cells were found to be increased by 5.1- and 2.9-fold, respectively
(Fig. 1A). These results
corresponded with respective protein data as evidenced by Western
blotting (Fig. 1B) and enzymatic assay analyses (Table I). Compared with HM-1 cells, HM-1/Met
cells exhibited 40% less NADPH oxidase activity, but 5.5 times higher
Fe-SOD- and 4.0 times higher H2O2-removing
activities.
In addition to the various antioxidant enzymes, the levels of RNA
expression of the two E. histolytica ferredoxins
(ferredoxins 1 and 2) and of the six P-glycoprotein genes
(pgp1 through pgp6) were compared between
metronidazole-susceptible and -resistant amoebae by Northern blot
analysis (Fig. 1C). There were no differences in the
expression of the various P-glycoprotein genes and the ferredoxin 2 gene, but a strong decrease of ~80% was found in the expression of
ferredoxin 1-specific RNA in metronidazole-resistant amoebae.
Overexpression of Antioxidant Enzymes in E. histolytica
Trophozoites by Stable Episomal Transfection--
To further analyze
the role of Fe-SOD, peroxiredoxin, and flavin reductase in the
metronidazole resistance of E. histolytica trophozoites,
mutants that stably overexpressed the various antioxidant enzymes were
generated by episomal transfection. Compared with cells transfected
with the respective control plasmid (pNeoCass), transfection with the
expression plasmid pNeoFe-SOD, pNeoPRD, or pNeoFR resulted in amoebae
expressing exceedingly higher levels of Fe-SOD, peroxiredoxin, or
flavin reductase RNA (Fig. 2). Likewise, extracts of these cells contained higher
amounts and exhibited elevated activities of the corresponding
antioxidant enzymes (Fig. 3 and Table
II). Fe-SOD activity was increased by
7.8-fold, H2O2-removing activity by 4.0-fold,
and NADPH oxidase activity by 15.2-fold. Interestingly, cells
overexpressing Fe-SOD revealed induction of peroxiredoxin, whereas
overexpression of peroxiredoxin did not influence Fe-SOD
expression.
In addition to cells overexpressing one of the three antioxidant
enzymes, mutants were generated simultaneously overexpressing peroxiredoxin and Fe-SOD or peroxiredoxin and flavin reductase. For
comparison, amoebae were transfected with the two control plasmids
pNeoCass and pNeoHyg. The level of expression of each of the respective
enzymes in the double-transfected mutants was comparable with the level
of expression in cells transfected with a single construct, with the
exception that H2O2-removing activity was
~20-30% higher in cells transfected with pNeoPRD and pHygFe-SOD compared with those transfected with either pNeoPRD or pNeoFe-SOD (Figs. 2 and 3 and Table II).
Survival of Transfected E. histolytica Trophozoites in the Presence
of Metronidazole--
Compared with nontransfected cells, amoebae
transfected with the control plasmids and selected with G418 and/or
hygromycin were more sensitive to metronidazole, as only a 5 µM concentration of the drug was sufficient to kill 50%
of the cells within 24 h, and none of the cells survived at this
drug concentration after prolonged exposures over 120 h.
Therefore, amoebae transfected with the different constructs were
challenged with 6 µM metronidazole and followed for 48 and 72 h. Although a decrease in the number of viable cells for
all transfected lines was observed, the survival rate of those
overexpressing Fe-SOD, irrespective of whether pNeoFe-SOD or pHygFe-SOD
and pNeoPRD were transfected, was significantly higher. The survival
rate after 72 h was highest for the pHygFe-SOD/pNeoPRD double-transfected amoebae (Fig. 4).
Moreover, under prolonged exposures to metronidazole, only cells of the
two mutants overexpressing Fe-SOD survived and multiplied.
In general, amoebae lose their episomally transfected plasmids within a
few weeks after selection with G418 or hygromycin has been omitted. To
investigate whether metronidazole would favor maintenance of the
Fe-SOD-containing plasmid, amoebae transfected with pNeoFe-SOD were
cultivated for several weeks in the presence or absence of 6 µM metronidazole, but without further G418 selection. Subsequent Northern blot analyses revealed elevated levels of Fe-SOD
RNA and the presence of the neo transcript only in those trophozoites exposed to metronidazole (Fig.
5). In contrast to amoebae made resistant
to 40 µM metronidazole (HM-1/Met), transfected cells
selected with a 6 µM concentration of the drug did not
exhibit decreased expression of the ferredoxin 1 gene or any changes in the level of RNA for the gene encoding ferredoxin 2, pyruvate-phosphate oxidoreductase, or P-glycoprotein.
In an attempt to characterize the mechanism of metronidazole
resistance in the protozoan parasite E. histolytica, we have generated, by stepwise selection over >200 days, amoebae that were
able to continuously multiply in the presence of a 40 µM concentration of the drug. This concentration was ~4 times higher than the concentration necessary to reproducibly kill the respective wild-type cells within 72 h. In addition, amoebae made resistant tolerated a constant exposure to 200 µM metronidazole
(but without further multiplication) for several weeks, which is
>2-fold higher than the drug concentration found in serum during
therapy (~80 µM after administration of 500 mg of
metronidazole and a half-life of 7 h) (38). Our approach focused
on the mechanism of metronidazole resistance under microaerophilic
conditions since, after tissue invasion, amoebae are exposed to
elevated levels of oxygen, and therefore, from a clinical point of
view, only those E. histolytica trophozoites that are
drug-resistant in the presence of oxygen are of medical importance.
However, as our preliminary results indicated, amoeba grown under
anaerobic conditions are less susceptible to the drug. Therefore, the
mechanism of resistance under these conditions might differ. The
metronidazole susceptibility of the amoeba isolates used for selection
was comparable with that reported previously (39). To our knowledge,
there is no documented example of drug-resistant amoebae that have been
grown in the presence of 40 µM metronidazole. The only
report so far available describes a metronidazole-resistant E. histolytica line that, after 177 days of selection under
microaerophilic conditions, could be maintained in medium containing as
little as 10 µM metronidazole (22). In contrast,
metronidazole-resistant lines of other protozoan parasites such as
Trichomonas and Giardia that could be grown in as
much as several 100 µmol have repeatedly being reported (15, 40).
Thus, consistent with our results, it is obviously more difficult and
time-consuming to generate metronidazole-resistant E. histolytica, as this parasite appears to be unable to develop resistance to high concentrations of the drug. As in the previous study
(22), metronidazole resistance of amoebae was found to be associated
with high levels of expression of Fe-SOD and could not be attributed to
down-regulation of pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase, as expression of
this enzyme was only marginally decreased, or to up-regulation of
P-glycoproteins, as expression of this class of proteins was unaltered
in resistant amoebae. However, as was shown for the aerobic
metronidazole resistance of T. vaginalis, resistant E. histolytica expressed reduced levels of ferredoxin 1-specific RNA.
Interestingly, expression of a second amoebic ferredoxin (ferredoxin 2)
remained unchanged in metronidazole-resistant cells, suggesting that
the two ferredoxins exert different functions within the parasite.
However, down-regulation of ferredoxin 1 appears to be of importance
only in those E. histolytica trophozoites that are resistant
to high concentrations of metronidazole, as this phenomenon was found
only in cells resistant to a 40 µM concentration of this,
but not in those resistant to 6 µM. The increase of
Fe-SOD in metronidazole-resistant amoebae is most likely not the result of a general stress response as previously suggested (22) since cultivation of E. histolytica trophozoites under standard
stress-inducing conditions such as elevated temperatures or addition of
ethanol did not increase Fe-SOD activity (data not shown).
It has to be considered that transfected amoebae were more sensitive to
metronidazole, most likely due to superimposing effects caused by G418
or hygromycin selection. Nevertheless, transfected trophozoites
overexpressing Fe-SOD revealed a significant reduction in the
susceptibility to metronidazole; they quickly adapted to constant
exposures of otherwise lethal metronidazole concentrations; and
metronidazole selection favored retention of the transfected plasmid.
Taken together, these results strongly suggest that increased expression of Fe-SOD constitutes an important component involved in the
mechanism of metronidazole resistance in E. histolytica.
Besides increased Fe-SOD expression, our data indicate that resistance
of amoebae is also associated with increased expression of
peroxiredoxin. At present, it is hard to assess whether peroxiredoxin expression in resistant amoebae is directly linked to metronidazole or
whether it is a consequence of the induction of Fe-SOD, as increased
peroxiredoxin expression was also found in cells transfected with the
Fe-SOD expression plasmid. On the other hand, although transfection
with pNeoPRD did not reduce susceptibility to metronidazole, the
strongest reduction in metronidazole susceptibility was obtained in
cells transfected with both the Fe-SOD- and peroxiredoxin-containing plasmids, indicating that overexpression of peroxiredoxin is not sufficient, but may at least support resistance to metronidazole.
Questions remain open about the role of Fe-SOD and peroxiredoxin in
mediating resistance. It may be possible that besides dismutation of
superoxide radical anions, amoebic SOD is able to detoxify nitro
radicals of reactive metronidazole metabolites. For the nervous system,
it has been shown that excess production of reactive nitric oxide
radicals leads to various neurotoxic effects, which could be reversed
by overexpression of SOD (41). Alternatively, inactivation of
metronidazole might simply be due to reoxidation of nitro radicals, as
cultivation of E. histolytica trophozoites takes place under
microaerophilic conditions. In the presence of oxygen, the reoxidation
of the nitro radicals produces the nontoxic metronidazole and
superoxide radical anions. On one hand, this might be a detoxification
reaction since the free toxic radical is oxidized. On the other hand,
superoxide radical anions are produced. The superoxide radical anions
can be removed by E. histolytica Fe-SOD, which leads to the
production of toxic hydrogen peroxide. Since amoebae do not contain
detectable amounts of catalase or peroxidase (42, 43), detoxification of hydrogen peroxide is most likely catalyzed by E. histolytica peroxiredoxin. Consistent with our findings, this
reaction pathway would require elevated levels of Fe-SOD and peroxiredoxin.
The episomal transfection and overexpression of Fe-SOD did not confer
metronidazole resistance to the extent obtained in long-term metronidazole-selected cells. Therefore, it is probable that additional factors such as down-regulation of ferredoxin 1 are involved in metronidazole resistance. To evaluate the role of ferredoxin 1 in the
mechanism of E. histolytica metronidazole resistance,
knockout experiments or antisense-mediated reduction of ferredoxin
expression is required. Unfortunately, gene knockout in E. histolytica has not been achieved so far, and antisense inhibition
did not reveal stable phenotypes that reproducibly express decreased
levels of ferredoxin.
Amoeba made resistant exhibited reduced levels of flavin reductase
activity, and transfected cells overexpressing the enzyme revealed
higher sensitivity to metronidazole exposure. Toxicity of flavin
reductase in conjunction with metronidazole might be explained by the
following two mechanisms. (i) The E. histolytica enzyme
might function as a nitroreductase, whereas the reduced flavin of the
E. histolytica enzyme is oxidized by metronidazole, which
leads to the toxic nitro radical. The presence of nitroreductase activity was described for another class of NAD(P)H:flavin
oxidoreductases of various organisms such as Salmonella
typhimurium and Vibrio fischeri (44, 45). (ii) Under
microaerophilic conditions, amoebic flavin reductase has been shown to
reduce oxygen, which leads to the formation of increased amounts of
toxic hydrogen peroxide (24).
Metronidazole is a cheap, effective, and widely used drug. Although
failures in the treatment of amoebiasis with metronidazole have been
reported, it has been questioned whether in vivo
metronidazole resistance of amoebae does exist, as no case of clinical
resistance of E. histolytica has been documented (46, 47).
The difficulties in generating amoebae in vitro that are
resistant to substantial amounts of the drug might support this idea.
However, as we have shown here, in principle, it is possible to select
E. histolytica trophozoites that are able to tolerate a
constant exposure to metronidazole levels comparable to those found in
serum during therapy following recommended doses.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
= 6.22 M/cm) at
25 °C. One unit of NADPH oxidase activity is defined as the amount
of enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of 1 µmol of NADPH/min.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Expression of antioxidant enzymes in
metronidazole-susceptible and -resistant E. histolytica. A, Northern blot analyses. Total
RNAs (10 µg) of the metronidazole-susceptible E. histolytica isolate HM-1 and of the metronidazole-resistant
isolate HM-1/Met (which was cultivated for 8 weeks in the presence of
40 µM metronidazole) were submitted to electrophoresis;
blotted; and sequentially hybridized with coding regions of Fe-SOD,
peroxiredoxin (prd), flavin peroxidase (fr), and
pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (pfor). For comparison,
an actin probe was used as a control. B, Western blot
analyses. Trophozoites of the E. histolytica isolates HM-1
and HM-1/Met were washed in phosphate-buffered saline, freeze-thawed
five times in solid CO2/ethanol, and sedimented by
centrifugation at 4 °C for 40 min. The 150,000 × g
supernatants were separated on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel under
reducing conditions. The proteins were blotted onto nitrocellulose and
developed with antisera to Fe-SOD, peroxiredoxin, and flavin reductase.
C, Northern blot analyses. Total RNAs (10 µg) of the
metronidazole-susceptible E. histolytica isolate HM-1
and of the metronidazole-resistant isolate HM-1/Met (which was
cultivated for 8 weeks in the presence of 40 µM
metronidazole) were submitted to electrophoresis; blotted; and
sequentially hybridized with coding regions of Fe-SOD, ferredoxins 1 and 2, and P-glycoprotein 1 (pgp1). For comparison, an actin
probe was used as a control. PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
Activities of antioxidant enzymes in metronidazole-susceptible (HM-1)
and resistant (HM-1/Met) E. histolytica trophozoites

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Northern blot analyses of transfected
amoebae. Trophozoites of the E. histolytica isolate
HM-1:IMSS were transfected with various expression plasmids allowing
overexpression of Fe-SOD, peroxiredoxin (prd), and flavin
reductase (fr) alone or in combination (pNeoFe-SOD, pNeoPRD,
pNeoFR, pNeoPRD/pHygFR, and pNeoPRD/pHygFR). As a control, trophozoites
were transfected with pNeoCass or pNeoCass/pHygCass. The transfected
amoebae were selected in the presence of 50 µg/ml G418 with or
without 10 µg/ml hygromycin. Total RNAs of the respective amoebae
were extracted; electrophoresed on an agarose gel; blotted; and
sequentially hybridized with coding regions of Fe-SOD, peroxiredoxin,
flavin reductase, and actin.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Western blot analyses of transfected
amoebae. Trophozoites of the E. histolytica isolate
HM-1:IMSS were transfected with the various expression plasmids (see
the legend to Fig. 2). The transfected amoebae were selected in the
presence of 50 µg/ml G418 with or without 10 µg/ml hygromycin.
Subsequently, trophozoites were washed in phosphate-buffered saline,
freeze-thawed five times in solid CO2/ethanol, and
sedimented by centrifugation at 4 °C for 40 min. The 150,000 × g supernatants were separated on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide
gel under reducing conditions. Proteins were blotted onto
nitrocellulose and developed with antisera to Fe-SOD, peroxiredoxin
(PRD), and flavin reductase (FR).
Enzymatic activities of transfected amoebae (HM-1) overexpressing
antioxidant enzymes

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Survival of transfected amoebae in the
presence of metronidazole. Trophozoites of the E. histolytica isolate HM-1:IMSS were transfected with the various
expression plasmids (see the legend to Fig. 2). Transfected amoebae
were selected in the presence of 50 µg/ml G418 with or without 10 µg/ml hygromycin. Trophozoites (1 × 106) were
cultivated in the presence of 6 µM metronidazole for 48 and 72 h, and the numbers of viable cells were counted.
Shown are the rates of surviving cells relative to controls.
Significant survival rates (p < 0.05) are marked by
asterisks.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Retention of the Fe-SOD-containing
plasmid in transfected E. histolytica under selection
with metronidazole. Trophozoites of the E. histolytica
isolate HM-1:IMSS were transfected with pNeoFe-SOD. Trophozoites
transfected with pNeoCass were used as controls. The transfected
amoebae were selected in the presence of 50 µg/ml G418. After a few
weeks, amoebae transfected with pNeoFe-SOD were cultivated for 4 weeks
in the presence or absence of metronidazole (Met.), but
without further G418 selection. Total RNAs of the respective amoebae
were extracted; separated by agarose gel electrophoresis; blotted; and
sequentially hybridized with coding regions of Fe-SOD, ferredoxins 1 and 2 (fd1 and fd2, respectively),
neo, and actin.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank B. Weseloh and W. Olbrich for skillful technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant BR1744/1-2.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The work presented here includes part of the doctoral thesis (from
C. W.).
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-40-42818485; Fax. 49-40-42818512; E-mail: bruchhaus@bni.uni-hamburg.de.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviation used is: Fe-SOD, iron-containing superoxide dismutase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Freeman, C. D., Klutman, N. E., and Lamp, K. C. (1997) Drugs 54, 679-708[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Müller, M. (1986) Biochem. Pharmacol. 35, 37-41[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Biaglow, J. E., Varnes, M. E., Roizen-Towle, L., Clark, E. P., Epp, E. R., Astor, M. B., and Hall, E. J. (1986) Biochem. Pharmacol. 35, 77-90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Whitmore, G. F., and Varghese, A. J. (1986) Biochem. Pharmacol. 35, 97-103[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Townson, S. M., Boreham, P. F. L., Upcroft, P., and Upcroft, J. A. (1994) Acta Trop. 56, 173-194[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Docampo, R., and Moreno, S. N. J. (1986) FASEB J. 45, 2471-2475 |
| 7. | Johnson, J. P. (1993) Parasitol. Today 9, 183-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Sindar, P., Britz, M. L., and Wilkinson, R. G. (1982) J. Med. Microbiol. 15, 503-509[Abstract] |
| 9. | Müller, M., Lossick, J. G., and Gorrell, T E. (1988) Sex. Transm. Dis. 15, 17-24[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Tachezy, J., Kulda, J., and Tomkova, E. (1993) Parasitology 106, 31-37 |
| 11. | Land, K. M., and Johnson, P. J. (1997) Exp. Parasitol. 87, 305-308[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Yarlett, N., Yarlett, N. C., and Lloyd, D. (1986) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 19, 111-116[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Quon, D. V. K.,
D'Oliveira, C. E.,
and Johnson, P. J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
4402-4406 |
| 14. | Yarlett, N., Yarlett, N. C., and Lloyd, D. (1986) Biochem. Pharmacol. 35, 1703-1708[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Kulda, J.,
erkasov, J.,
Demes, P.,
and erkasovová, A.
(1984)
Exp. Parasitol.
57,
93-103[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16. |
Kulda, J.,
Tachezy, J.,
and erkasovová, A.
(1993)
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
40,
262-269[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17. | Upcroft, J. A., Healey, A., Murray, D. G., Boreham, P. F. L., and Upcroft, P. (1992) Parasitology 104, 397-405 |
| 18. |
erkasovová, A.,
erkasov, J.,
and Kulda, J.
(1984)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
11,
105-118[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19. | Ellis, J. E., Wingfield, J. M., Cole, D., Boreham, P. F. L., and Lloyd, D. (1993) Int. J. Parasitol. 23, 35-39[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Smith, N. C., Bryant, C., and Boreham, P. F. L. (1988) Int. J. Parasitol. 18, 991-997[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Upcroft, J. A., and Upcroft, P. (1993) Parasitol. Today 9, 187-190 |
| 22. |
Samarawickrema, N. A.,
Brown, D. M.,
Upcroft, J. A.,
Thammapalerd, N.,
and Upcroft, P.
(1997)
J. Antimicrobiol. Chemother.
40,
833-840 |
| 23. | Reeves, R. E. (1984) Adv. Parasitol. 23, 105-142[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Bruchhaus, I., Richter, S., and Tannich, E. (1998) Biochem. J. 330, 1217-1221 |
| 25. | Bruchhaus, I., Richter, S., and Tannich, E. (1997) Biochem. J. 326, 785-789 |
| 26. | Poole, L. B., Chae, H. Z., Flores, B. M., Reed, S. L., Rhee, S. G., and Torian, B. E. (1997) Free Radical Biol. Med. 23, 955-959[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Diamond, L. S., Harlow, D. R., and Cunnick, C. C. (1978) Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 72, 431-432[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Hamann, L.,
Nickel, R.,
and Tannich, E.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
8975-9879 |
| 29. | Hamann, L., Buß, H., and Tannich, E. (1997) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 84, 83-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Tannich, E., Bruchhaus, I., Walter, R. D., and Horstmann, R. D. (1991) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 49, 61-71[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Bruchhaus, I., and Tannich, E. (1993) Trop. Med. Parasitol. 44, 116-118[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Bruchhaus, I., and Tannich, E. (1995) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 70, 187-191[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Thurman, R. G., Ley, H. G., and Scholz, R. (1972) Eur. J. Biochem. 25, 420-430[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Lo, H.-S., and Reeves, R. E. (1980) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2, 23-30[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
McCord, J. M.,
and Fridovich, I.
(1969)
J. Biol. Chem.
244,
6049-6055 |
| 36. |
Leippe, M.,
Ebel, S.,
Schoenberger, O. L.,
Horstman, R. D.,
and Müller-Eberhard, H. J.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
7659-7663 |
| 37. | Bruchhaus, I., Brattig, N. W., and Tannich, E. (1992) Arch. Med. Res. 23, 27-29[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. | Scully, B. E. (1988) Med. Clin. North Am. 72, 613-621[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Gault, M. J., Reiner, D. S., and Gillin, F. D. (1985) Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 79, 60-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Townson, S. M., Laqua, H., Upcroft, P., Boreham, P. F., and Upcroft, J. A. (1992) Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 86, 521-522[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
Gonzalez-Zulueta, M.,
Ensz, L. M.,
Mukhina, G.,
Lebovitz, R. M.,
Zwacka, R. M.,
Engelhardt, J. F.,
Oberley, L. W.,
Dawson, V. L.,
and Dawson, T. M.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
2040-2055 |
| 42. | Dierickx, P. J., Almar, M. M., and De Jonckheere, J. F. (1990) Biochem. Int. 22, 593-600[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. |
Fahey, R. C.,
Newton, G. L.,
Arrick, B.,
Overdank-Bogart, T.,
and Aley, S. B.
(1984)
Science
224,
70-72 |
| 44. | Inouye, S. (1994) FEBS Lett. 347, 163-168[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. |
Watanabe, M.,
Nishino, T.,
Takio, K.,
Sofuni, T.,
and Nohmi, T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
23922-23928 |
| 46. |
Knight, R.
(1980)
J. Antimicrobiol. Chemother.
6,
577-593 |
| 47. | Ravdin, J. I. (1995) Clin. Infect. Dis. 20, 1453-1464[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Ali and T. Nozaki Current Therapeutics, Their Problems, and Sulfur-Containing-Amino-Acid Metabolism as a Novel Target against Infections by "Amitochondriate" Protozoan Parasites Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2007; 20(1): 164 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nowak, H. Lotter, E. Tannich, and I. Bruchhaus Resistance of Entamoeba histolytica to the Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitor E64 Is Associated with Secretion of Pro-enzymes and Reduced Pathogenicity J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 38260 - 38266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tokoro, T. Asai, S. Kobayashi, T. Takeuchi, and T. Nozaki Identification and Characterization of Two Isoenzymes of Methionine {gamma}-Lyase from Entamoeba histolytica: A KEY ENZYME OF SULFUR-AMINO ACID DEGRADATION IN AN ANAEROBIC PARASITIC PROTIST THAT LACKS FORWARD AND REVERSE TRANS-SULFURATION PATHWAYS J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2003; 278(43): 42717 - 42727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sannella, L. Gradoni, T. Persichini, E. Ongini, G. Venturini, and M. Colasanti Intracellular Release of Nitric Oxide by NCX 972, an NO-Releasing Metronidazole, Enhances In Vitro Killing of Entamoeba histolytica Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2003; 47(7): 2303 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Gilchrist, M. Leo, C. G. Line, B. J. Mann, and W. A. Petri Jr. Calcium Modulates Promoter Occupancy by the Entamoeba histolytica Ca2+-binding Transcription Factor URE3-BP J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 2003; 278(7): 4646 - 4653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Vidakovic, C. R. Crossnoe, C. Neidre, K. Kim, K. L. Krause, and J. P. Germanas Reactivity of Reduced [2Fe-2S] Ferredoxins Parallels Host Susceptibility to Nitroimidazoles Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2003; 47(1): 302 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. J. Nixon, A. Wang, J. Field, H. G. Morrison, A. G. McArthur, M. L. Sogin, B. J. Loftus, and J. Samuelson Evidence for Lateral Transfer of Genes Encoding Ferredoxins, Nitroreductases, NADH Oxidase, and Alcohol Dehydrogenase 3 from Anaerobic Prokaryotes to Giardialamblia and Entamoebahistolytica Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2002; 1(2): 181 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Upcroft and P. Upcroft Drug Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Protozoa Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2001; 45(6): 1810 - 1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Upcroft and J. A. Upcroft Drug Targets and Mechanisms of Resistance in the Anaerobic Protozoa Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2001; 14(1): 150 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||