![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 26120-26126, September 10, 1999
From the Banting and Best Department of Medical Research,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L6, Canada
Ca2+ activation of skeletal
(RyR1) and cardiac (RyR2) muscle Ca2+ release channels
(ryanodine receptors) occurs with EC50 values of about 1 µM. Ca2+ inactivation occurs with an
IC50 value of about 3.7 mM for
RyR1, but RyR2 shows little inactivation, even at >100
mM Ca2+. In an attempt to localize the low
affinity Ca2+ binding sites responsible for
Ca2+ inactivation in RyR1, chimeric RyR1/RyR2 molecules
were constructed. Because [3H]ryanodine binds only to
open channels, and because channel opening and closing are
Ca2+-dependent, the Ca2+ dependence
of [3H]ryanodine binding was used as an indirect
measurement of Ca2+ release channel opening and closing.
IC50 values for [3H]ryanodine binding
suggested that Ca2+ affinity for the low affinity
Ca2+ inactivation sites was unchanged in a chimera in which
a glutamate-rich sequence (amino acids 1743-1964) in RyR1 was replaced
with the corresponding, less acidic sequence from RyR2.
Ca2+ affinity (IC50) for low affinity
Ca2+ inactivation sites was intermediate in RyR1/RyR2
chimeras containing RyR2 amino acids 3726-4186 (RF9), 4187-4628
(RF10), or 4629-5037 (RF11), was closer to RyR2 values in RyR1
chimeras with longer RyR2 replacements (RF9/10 or RF10/11), and was
indistinguishable from RyR2 in RyR1 containing all three RyR2
replacements (RF9/10/11). These data suggest that multiple low affinity
Ca2+ binding sites or multiple components of a low affinity
Ca2+ binding site are located between amino acids 3726 and
5037 and that their effects on Ca2+ inactivation of the
release channel are cooperative. Measurement of Ca2+
activation of [3H]ryanodine binding showed that chimeras
RF10, RF9/10, and RF9/10/11 were more sensitive to Ca2+
than was either RyR1 or RyR2. Measurement of caffeine activation of
Ca2+ release in vivo showed that chimeras RF9,
RF10, RF9/10, RF10/11, and RF9/10/11 were more sensitive to caffeine
than wild-type RyR1. These results suggest that Ca2+ and
caffeine activation sites also involve COOH-terminal sequences in RyR1
and RyR2.
Ca2+ release channels from the sarcoplasmic reticulum
of skeletal and cardiac muscle (ryanodine receptors,
RyRs)1 are modulated by
endogenous and exogenous modulators such as ATP, Ca2+,
calmodulin, Mg2+, ruthenium red, and ryanodine (1, 2). The
Ca2+ release channels from both skeletal (RyR1) and cardiac
(RyR2) muscles are activated by micromolar Ca2+, but only
RyR1 is inactivated by millimolar Ca2+ (1-8).
[3H]Ryanodine binds only to activated Ca2+
release channels, making [3H]ryanodine binding a useful
assay for the activation state of the channels (1, 2). High
concentrations of Ca2+, which inhibit
[3H]ryanodine binding to CHAPS-solubilized recombinant
RyR1, do not inhibit [3H]ryanodine binding to
CHAPS-solubilized recombinant RyR2 under identical conditions (9).
These results suggest that RyR1 has high affinity Ca2+
binding sites for Ca2+ activation and low affinity
Ca2+ binding sites for inactivation of channel function,
whereas RyR2 has only high affinity sites for Ca2+
activation (1, 7, 9).
The location of the low affinity Ca2+ binding site(s) in
RyR1 is not known. A glutamate-rich sequence lying between residues 1872 and 1923 (D3) is a potential low affinity Ca2+ binding
site, based on the amino acid sequence deduced from a cDNA sequence
(10). This potential Ca2+ binding site is also one of the
three most divergent sequences between RyR1 and RyR2, which include
RyR1 amino acids 1342-1403 (D2) and 4254-4631 (D1) (11). Three
regions in the COOH terminus of RyR1 and two regions in the middle of
RyR2 score highly as potential EF-hand structures for high affinity
Ca2+ binding (10, 12-14). Two potential EF-hand sequences
detected in lobster RyR1 were shown to have homology with similar
sequences in mammalian RyR1 and RyR2 and were proposed to be involved
in Ca2+ inactivation (15). In RyR1, Ca2+
binding and ruthenium red binding sites have been mapped to several locations, including three in the COOH terminus of RyR1 (16-18). High
affinity Ca2+ binding sites have also been identified in
hydrophobic sequences (19-21). The relationship of any of these
Ca2+ binding sites to Ca2+ inactivation of
channel function is undefined.
We have explored the question of whether the glutamate-rich region (D3)
and the COOH-terminal region are responsible for Ca2+
inactivation in RyR1 by constructing a series of RyR1/RyR2 chimeras in
which the glutamate-rich D3 sequence and three other sequences (3726-4186 (F9), 4187-4628 (F10), and 4629-5037 (F11)) in RyR1 were
replaced separately and in groups by the corresponding sequences in
RyR2. We tested the Ca2+ dependence of high affinity
[3H]ryanodine binding to the chimeras, and we measured
in vivo Ca2+ release induced by caffeine in
Ca2+ photometry. We found that the low affinity
Ca2+ inactivation site is not affected by exchange of the
D3 sequence but that Ca2+ inactivation is affected to
different degrees by multiple exchanges of fragments at the COOH
terminus of RyR1. Our results suggest that multiple Ca2+
inactivation sites or multiple components of a single Ca2+
inactivation site in RyR1 are located between amino acids 3726 and 5037.
Materials--
Pfu DNA polymerase, restriction
endonucleases, and other DNA-modifying enzymes were from Stratagene,
Roche Molecular Biochemicals, New England Biolabs, Promega, and
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; Fura-2 acetoxymethyl ester was from
Molecular Probes; caffeine and protease inhibitors were from Sigma;
[3H]ryanodine was from NEN Life Sciences Products;
unlabeled ryanodine was from Calbiochem; CHAPS was from Bio-Rad; and
phosphatidylcholine was from Avanti Polar Lipids. The expression vector
pcDNA3.1( Construction of Full-length Chimeric RyR cDNA for
Expression--
The methods for expression of cDNAs encoding
rabbit skeletal muscle RyR1 and cardiac muscle RyR2 were described
previously (9, 23, 24). The boundaries used in construction of chimeric RYR cDNAs from RYR1 and RYR2 are
outlined in Fig. 1. The three regions most divergent in amino acid
sequence between RyR1 and RyR2 are labeled as D1-D3 (11) in Fig. 1.
Cassette 9, lying between NdeI and NheI in a
modified RYR1 cDNA (25) and encoding amino acids
3726-4186, is designated F9; part of cassette 10, lying between
NheI and XcaI in a modified RYR1
cDNA (25) and encoding amino acids 4187-4628, which encompass the
D1 region, is designated F10; the remainder of cassette 10 plus
cassette 11, lying between XcaI and HindIII and
encoding amino acids 4629-5037, is designated F11. RYR2
fragments were amplified using a Pfu polymerase-based polymerase chain reaction in which restriction endonuclease sites were
introduced at each end (NdeI-NheI for F9;
NheI-XcaI for F10; XcaI-HindIII for F11). These fragments were
inserted into their corresponding sequences in pBS-RyR1 to form
pBS-RF9, pBS-RF10, and pBS-RF11. The chimeric constructs were subcloned
into pcDNA3.1(
The construction of the chimera involving the D3 region was carried out
in RYR1 cDNA cassette 5 (MluI-SpeI). The sequence in RYR1
between MluI and Eco47III, encoding amino acids
1743-1964 (designated as F5a) was replaced with the corresponding
nucleotide sequence encoding amino acids 1734-1931 from
RYR2. The fragments were amplified by a Pfu DNA
polymerase-based polymerase chain reaction, with the introduction of
MluI and Eco47III restriction endonuclease sites
on the ends. The chimeric cassette 5 was inserted into the
corresponding region of pBS-RyR1 to form pBS-R12F5a with MluI and SpeI, and the entire chimeric cDNA
sequence was then excised and inserted into pcDNA3.1( Cell Culture and DNA Transfection--
Culture of HEK-293 cells
and cDNA transfection by the calcium phosphate precipitation method
(26) was carried out as described previously (24).
Fluorescence Measurements--
A microfluorimetry system (Photon
Technologies, Inc.) was used to monitor the Fura-2 acetoxymethyl ester
fluorescence changes in transiently transfected or nontransfected
HEK-293 cells, as described previously (9).
Solubilization of Transfected HEK-293 Cells and Measurement of
[3H]Ryanodine Binding--
Transfected HEK-293 cells
grown in 100-mm Petri dishes were solubilized with 1% CHAPS and 5 mg/ml phosphatidylcholine and analyzed with the
[3H]ryanodine binding assay described previously (9). In
brief, 25-µl aliquots of solubilized total cellular protein were
diluted 10-fold in binding buffer composed of 0.5 M KCl, 1 mM ATP, 100 µM free Ca2+, 0.2 mM EGTA, 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.1, a protease
inhibitor mixture (9), and various concentrations of
[3H]ryanodine. Nonspecific binding was determined using a
1000-fold excess of unlabeled ryanodine. After 2 h at 37 °C,
the 0.25-ml samples were diluted with 1 ml of ice-cold washing buffer
composed of 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.1, and 0.25 M KCl
and placed on Whatman GF/B membrane filters pre-soaked with 1%
polyethyleneimine in washing buffer. Filters were washed three times
with 6 ml of washing buffer. The radioactivity remaining on the filters
was determined by liquid scintillation counting to determine the amount
of [3H]ryanodine bound to the filter. All binding assays
were carried out in duplicate. To assess the effects of
Ca2+ on high affinity ryanodine binding, protocols were
modified by removal of ATP from the binding buffer and addition of
different concentrations of Ca2+ with 2.5 nM
[3H]ryanodine. Free Ca2+ was calculated using
the apparent binding constants described by Fabiato (27).
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and
Immunoblotting--
About 50 µg of proteins from cells lysed with
CHAPS were separated by 5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(28). RyR proteins were detected by immunoblotting (29), as described previously (23).
Protein Assay--
Protein concentration was determined by dye
binding using bovine serum albumin as a standard (30).
Data Analysis--
All data were analyzed with Microcal Origin
software (Microcal Software Ltd., Northampton, MA). Scatchard analysis
was used to determine the dissociation constant (Kd)
and maximal binding capacity (Bmax) from
equilibrium binding data. EC50 or IC50 values
were obtained by fitting the curves with an equation for logistic dose
response. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. An unpaired
Student's t test was used for evaluation of the mean values
between groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to
be statistically significant.
Transient Expression of Chimeric RyR cDNAs--
In earlier
studies, we showed that the curve of Ca2+ dependence for
[3H]ryanodine binding to recombinant RyR1 is bell-shaped,
indicating that [3H]ryanodine binding is sensitive to
both Ca2+ activation and inactivation of Ca2+
release channel function. By contrast, the curve of Ca2+
dependence of [3H]ryanodine binding for recombinant RyR2
did not display a falling phase, indicating that
[3H]ryanodine binding is sensitive to Ca2+
activation but resistant to Ca2+ inactivation of
Ca2+ release channel function (9). Because we were
interested in the structural basis for this difference in
Ca2+ inactivation, we constructed several chimeric RyR
proteins by replacing the glutamate-rich D3 sequence and different
lengths of the COOH terminus of RyR1 with the corresponding sequences from RyR2 (Fig. 1). These constructs were
then expressed transiently in HEK-293 cells, and the Ca2+
dependence of [3H]ryanodine binding (9) was used as an
indirect measurement of Ca2+ activation and inactivation.
In addition, caffeine-induced Ca2+ release was measured by
in vivo Ca2+ photometry applied to HEK-293 cells
transfected with the chimeric proteins.
Immunostaining of CHAPS-solubilized cell lysates, using mAb 34C against
an epitope located in RyR1 amino acids 2756-2803 (25), was used to
detect the expression of RyR proteins in transfected HEK-293 cells.
Fig. 2 shows the absence of RyR
immunostaining in pcDNA-transfected cells. Monoclonal antibody 34C
stained both RyR1 and RyR2, but the similar level of staining of RyR1
and RyR2 does not reflect a difference in their levels of expression,
probably because of slight differences in the epitope that binds mAb
34C. Because the chimeric proteins all retained the RyR1 epitope,
immunostaining with mAb 34C can be used as a measure of RyR expression.
Immunostaining demonstrates that chimeras RF10, RF11, RF9/10, RF10/11,
and RF9/10/11 were all expressed at levels up to 10-fold higher than
RyR1.
These studies illustrate the fact that RyR1 and RyR2 are not expressed
with equal efficiency in mammalian cells. The studies of chimeras show
that F10 and F11 are the key sequences concerned with high levels of
expression in mammalian cells (Fig. 2). It is not clear whether the
differences in expression are transcriptional, translational, or
post-translational. It is of interest, however, that
bacteria-expressing plasmids containing RYR2 cDNA grow
very slowly and that the yield of DNA is low, whereas
bacteria-expressing plasmids containing RYR1 cDNA grow
much faster, yielding more DNA.
RyR2 moved in SDS gels with a slightly higher mobility than did RyR1.
The mobility of chimeras RF10, RF9/10, RF10/11, and RF9/10/11 was also
higher than that of RyR1. Thus there is a correlation between the
presence of the F10 amino acid sequence and high mobility of the
expressed protein.
Fluorescence Measurements of Caffeine-induced Ca2+
Release in Vivo--
We used Fura-2 fluorescence to measure the
properties of caffeine-induced Ca2+ release in the chimeric
proteins expressed in HEK-293 cells (9). No significant
Ca2+ release occurred with caffeine up to 30 mM
in pcDNA-transfected cells (9), but caffeine-induced
Ca2+ release was observed in transfected cells. The peak
fluorescence amplitude was measured following incremental application
of 0.03 to 30 mM caffeine and normalized to the peak
amplitude for maximal Ca2+ release induced by 30 mM caffeine. EC50 values for the chimeras were
then calculated by fitting the caffeine dose-response curves with an
equation for logistic dose response. As described previously (9),
EC50 values measuring the caffeine sensitivity of
Ca2+ release were higher for recombinant RyR2 than for
recombinant RyR1 (Fig. 3).
Dose-response curves for RyR1, RyR2, and chimeric RyR1/RyR2
proteins are shown in Fig. 3, and EC50 values are
summarized in the inset to Fig. 3.
Chimeras involving the D3 sequence had EC50 values for
caffeine that were similar to that of RyR1. However, chimeras RF9, RF10, RF9/10, RF10/11, and RF9/10/11 had lower caffeine
EC50 values, indicating that RyR1 chimeras containing RyR2
sequences F9 and F10 were more sensitive to caffeine than was wild-type
RyR1. The Hill coefficient for RyR1 was 1.9, whereas the Hill
coefficient for RyR2 was 1.2. The Hill coefficients for all chimeras
except RF5a resembled that for RyR2 (inset to Fig. 3),
indicating that each of the three RyR2 sequences can partially suppress
the cooperative interactions that occur in RyR1.
High Affinity Equilibrium Binding of [3H]Ryanodine to
Chimeric RyRs--
We measured the equilibrium properties of
[3H]ryanodine binding to the chimeric RyRs to determine
whether the high affinity ryanodine binding site was preserved in these
chimeras. We also used [3H]ryanodine binding to determine
expression levels, because 1 mol of a tetrameric RyR molecule binds 1 mol of ryanodine with high affinity (9, 23, 31). Scatchard analysis
showed a single binding site in all of the chimeras (Fig.
4). Kd values for
these chimeras were similar to those for wild-type RyR2 and RyR1 (Ref.
9 and the inset to Fig. 4), ranging from 1.6 to 2.6 nM. These data indicate that the high affinity binding site
for ryanodine is normal in all the chimeras.
Bmax values ranged from 0.46 to 2.0 pmol/mg of
protein in the chimeras (Fig. 4 and inset), reflecting
different expression levels. These results show that RF10 and RF11
expression was increased 4- to 5-fold over RyR1 expression, RF9/10
expression was increased 3-fold, and RF10/11 and RF9/10/11 expression
was increased 10-fold, confirming results from immunoblotting. As
reported previously (9), there was no significant binding in lysates
isolated from pcDNA-transfected HEK-293 cells.
Ca2+ Activation of High Affinity
[3H]Ryanodine Binding to Chimeric
RyRs--
Dose-response curves for Ca2+ activation and
inactivation of [3H]ryanodine binding to wild-type RyR1
and RyR2 and to chimeras are shown in Fig.
5. At Ca2+ concentrations
below pCa 7, there was little binding of
[3H]ryanodine to the recombinant RyR proteins.
[3H]Ryanodine binding was activated by increasing
Ca2+ concentrations, with maximal binding occurring between
pCa 5.7 and pCa 4. EC50 values,
expressed as pCa, for wild-type RyR1 and RyR2 were similar,
and EC50 values for chimeras RF9, RF11, RF10/11, and RF5a
did not differ from those of either RyR1 or RyR2 (Fig. 5 and Table
I). However, in chimeras RF10, RF9/10,
and RF9/10/11, activation of [3H]ryanodine binding was
observed with lower Ca2+ concentrations, and
EC50 values were significantly higher than those for
wild-type RyR1 and RyR2 (Fig. 5 and Table I). These results suggest
that chimeras RF10, RF9/10, and RF9/10/11 are more sensitive to
Ca2+ activation.
Ca2+ Inactivation of High Affinity
[3H]Ryanodine Binding to Chimeric
RyRs--
Ca2+ inactivation was studied indirectly through
measurement of the inhibition of [3H]ryanodine binding by
elevated Ca2+. IC50 values, expressed in terms
of pCa, are also presented in Table I and illustrated in
Fig. 5. The difference in IC50 between RyR1 (pCa
2.43) and RyR2 (pCa 0.12) was very large. The
IC50 for chimera RF5a in which the D3 sequence of RyR2
replaced the corresponding region in RyR1 did not differ from wild-type
RyR1. This experiment, together with a previously published analysis of
deletions (32), effectively rules out any involvement of the D3
sequence in Ca2+ inactivation.
The pattern of Ca2+ inactivation of
[3H]ryanodine binding was different, however, for
chimeric mutants at the COOH terminus. IC50 values were
reduced, when compared with RyR1, for each of the chimeras RF9
(pCa 1.46), RF10 (pCa 1.56), and RF11
(pCa 1.83) in which individual RyR1 sequences were replaced
with RyR2 sequences. The IC50 values were reduced still
further for chimeras RF9/10 (pCa 0.26) and RF10/11
(pCa 0.24) in which two adjacent sequences were replaced. In
the chimera in which all three RyR1 COOH-terminal sequences were
replaced with the corresponding RyR2 sequences, the IC50
value was not significantly different from wild-type RyR2
(pCa 0.14).
The slopes for the curves of inactivation could be divided into two
groups. For RyR1 and chimeras RF9, RF10, RF11, and RF5a, the slope of
Ca2+ inactivation ranged between 0.8 and 1.1. For RyR2 and
chimeras RF9/10, RF10/11, and RF9/10/11, slopes of inactivation ranged between 0.1 and 0.4. These data indicate that each of the three sequences tested made a contribution to Ca2+ inactivation.
This may occur because several low affinity Ca2+ binding
sites exist that act cooperatively, or because a single low affinity
Ca2+ binding site exists that is composed of elements
contained in several sequences throughout the COOH-terminal region.
Our studies did not permit analysis of the topology of the
Ca2+ inactivation sites, because they were carried out in
the presence of detergent. We examined the question of whether similar
results would be obtained if we measured [3H]ryanodine
binding to microsomal vesicles. We recognized, however, that the
conditions of the experiment (2 h at 37 o C) would lead to
significant equilibration of Ca2+ across the membrane.
[3H]Ryanodine binding to microsomal vesicles from
recombinant RyR1, RyR2, RF10, RF11, RF10/11, and RF9/10/11 was carried
out (data not shown). RyR1, RF11, and RF10/11 were inactivated by
similar concentrations of elevated Ca2+ in microsomes and
solubilized vesicles. RyR2 and RF9/10/11 were not inactivated by
elevated Ca2+ in either solubilized form or in microsomes.
RF10, however, was slightly more resistant to inactivation by
elevations in Ca2+ in solubilized form than it was in
microsomal vesicles, for reasons unknown.
Ca2+ Inactivation--
As reported previously,
[3H]ryanodine binding by RyR1 is decreased at
Ca2+ concentrations higher than pCa 4 but
remains elevated up to pCa 1.5 in RyR2 (Ref. 9 and Fig. 5,
A and B), indicating that RyR2 is not sensitive
to Ca2+ inactivation and does not have the low affinity
Ca2+ binding site(s) responsible for inactivation at high
concentrations of Ca2+ (1, 7). We have attempted to
characterize and locate these low affinity Ca2+ binding
sites in RyR1 by constructing chimeric RyRs in which various sequences
are replaced by the corresponding sequence in RyR2. Because it is
widely recognized that the inhibition of [3H]ryanodine
binding by high concentrations of Ca2+ is a consequence of
occupation of the low affinity, inactivating Ca2+ binding
sites (1, 2), we have used [3H]ryanodine binding as an
indirect assay of Ca2+ inactivation of the channel to show
that these sites are located in the COOH-terminal end of RyR1.
Our studies of RyR1/RyR2 chimeras have allowed us to map the low
affinity Ca2+ binding sites to three adjacent regions lying
between amino acids 3726 and 5037 at the COOH terminus of RyR1. This
mapping is in agreement with earlier observations that there are
multiple Ca2+ binding sites and that these sites are
located in the COOH terminus of RyR1 (19, 33). These sites are probably
interactive because replacement of one or even two of these sequences
did not result in full insensitivity to high concentrations of
Ca2+. We could not, however, rule out the possibility that
a single low affinity Ca2+ binding site in the tetrameric
molecule is made up of multiple components from these three fragments.
Among these three fragments, it is evident that the F9 and F10
fragments in RyR1 contribute most strongly to Ca2+
inactivation (Fig. 5).
Earlier studies have shown that several Ca2+ binding sites
exist in the COOH-terminal sequences. A 45Ca2+ and
ruthenium red binding fragment, composed of amino acids 3657-3776 (18), overlaps partially with F9, composed of amino acids 3726-4186. Two EF-hand Ca2+ binding sites have been identified in
lobster RyR, and these correspond to RyR1 amino acids 4073-4135 (15).
In F10, composed of amino acids 4187-4628, three sequences, amino
acids 4246-4267, 4382-4417, and 4478-4512, bind
45Ca2+ and ruthenium red (16-18). In F11,
composed of amino acids 4629-5037, amino acids 4765-5037 bind
45Ca2+ and ruthenium red (18). Most of these
sequences are hydrophilic, even though F11 has several hydrophobic
sequences. Antibodies against the sequence between amino acids 4478 and
4512 bind to both denatured and native forms of the ryanodine receptor,
indicating that the sequence containing the Ca2+ binding
site is detectable on the surface and is hydrophilic. Because these
sequences bind Ca2+ in the millimolar range and because
RyR1 is activated by micromolar Ca2+ and inhibited by
millimolar Ca2+, these sequences are likely to form low
affinity Ca2+ binding sites and may play a role in the
Ca2+ inactivation of RyR1.
The properties of low affinity Ca2+ binding sites in RyR1
have been investigated using terbium (Tb3+) fluorescence
(33). As a Ca2+ analog, Tb3+ replaces
Ca2+ in both the high affinity and low affinity binding
sites. At low concentrations, Tb3+ activates single
channels in lipid bilayers. At higher concentrations, Tb3+
binds to two or more low affinity Ca2+ binding sites and
causes an inhibition of [3H]ryanodine binding, a strongly
enhanced green fluorescence at 543 nm, and an inhibition of single
channel activity, indicating that Tb3+ binding to the low
affinity Ca2+ sites results in conformational changes in
the protein and in closure of the channel. This knowledge has not yet
led to the identification of the low affinity Ca2+ binding sites.
A possible location of the low affinity Ca2+ binding sites
has been deduced from studies using dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (19), a
carboxyl modifying compound, which binds to hydrophobic sequences, usually those forming transmembrane helices. Because
dicyclohexylcarbodiimide modifies both low affinity and high affinity
Ca2+ binding sites, these sites are likely to be located in
the COOH terminus of RyR1, where the transmembrane sequences are
concentrated (19). Single-channel recordings in planar lipid bilayers
showed that an increase in luminal Ca2+ from micromolar to
millimolar decreased channel activities, suggesting that luminal
Ca2+ could pass through the Ca2+ release
channel and then regulate the channel (34). From these studies, it was
concluded that the Ca2+ inactivation sites were very close
to the Ca2+ release site, implying that the inactivation
sites are those sequences located around the aqueous pore of the channel.
The D3 sequence between amino acids 1872 and 1923 in RyR1 has been
proposed as a possible low affinity Ca2+ binding site (10).
However, constructs in which D3 and surrounding sequences were deleted
formed channels that retained Ca2+ inactivation (32).
Replacement of the D3 sequence in RyR1 with the corresponding sequence
in RyR2 in this study did not alter the Ca2+ dependence of
[3H]ryanodine binding from that of wild-type RyR1. These
data, when taken together, strongly argue that the D3 sequence is not
the Ca2+ inactivation site.
Ca2+ and Caffeine Activation--
In this and a
previous study (9), we demonstrated that recombinant RyR2 is more
sensitive to caffeine-induced Ca2+ release than is
recombinant RyR1, although both had a similar sensitivity to
Ca2+ activation of [3H]ryanodine binding.
Similar observations have been made in studies of skeletal and cardiac
muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum (1, 6-8, 35). The replacement of F9 and
F10 in the COOH terminus of RyR1 with the corresponding sequence from
RyR2 led to caffeine sensitivity as high as that observed in RyR2 (Fig.
3). This replacement also enhanced the Ca2+ sensitivity of
[3H]ryanodine binding (Fig. 5 and Table I), highlighting
F10 and at least part of F9 as candidates for further study of the site of Ca2+ activation. It is of interest that F10 encompasses
another highly divergent region referred to as D1 (see Fig. 1). Thus
the high affinity Ca2+ and caffeine activation sites in
RyR2 may both be located in the F9/F10 sequence.
The final sensitivity of intact, tetrameric RyR1 and RyR2 molecules to
Ca2+ and caffeine is clearly the result of a number of
intraprotein and even interprotein interactions. Some of these
interactions might be permissive and some might be inhibitory.
Alteration of physical juxtapositions in chimeric molecules might alter
the balance of conformational changes favoring Ca2+ and/or
caffeine activation. In a previous study (16), we reported that an
antibody raised against amino acids 4478-4512, inside F10, increased
the Ca2+ sensitivity for activation of the Ca2+
release channel in a planar bilayer system by approximately 1 order of
magnitude. Because Ca2+ was still able to activate the
antibody-Ca2+ release channel complex, it did not appear to
act directly against the high affinity Ca2+ site. We
proposed that the antibody was acting against a sequence adjacent to
the Ca2+ binding site or that it activated a distant
Ca2+ binding site through allosteric interactions (16). It
is conceivable that this antibody bound to a Ca2+
inactivation site, which, we now believe, lies in this region, resulting in activation of the channel or in conformational changes favoring activation of the channel. Further knowledge of the
composition of the activation and inactivation sites will help to
clarify the way in which these sites act to regulate the channel.
*
This work was supported by Grant MT-3399 (to D. H. M.)
from the Medical Research Council of Canada.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Banting and Best
Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Charles H. Best Institute, 112 College St., Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L6, Canada. Tel.: 416-978-5008; Fax: 416-978-8528; E-mail: david. maclennan{at}utoronto.ca.
The abbreviations used are:
RyR, ryanodine
receptor;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
HEK, human embryonic kidney..
Ca2+ Inactivation Sites Are Located in the
COOH-terminal Quarter of Recombinant Rabbit Skeletal Muscle
Ca2+ Release Channels (Ryanodine Receptors)*
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
) was from Invitrogen. Monoclonal antibody 34C (mAb 34C)
was a kind gift from Dr. Judith Airey (22). All other reagents were of reagent grade or highest grade available.
) with XbaI and HindIII to
obtain pcDNA-RF9, pcDNA-RF10, and pcDNA-RF11. To obtain
RF9/10 and RF10/11, the F10 fragment from pBS-RF10 was excised and
inserted into pBS-RF9 or pBS-RF11 with NheI-XcaI, and the full-length chimeric cDNAs were inserted into
pcDNA3.1(
) with XbaI and HindIII to form
pcDNA-RF9/10 and pcDNA-RF10/11. There is a natural, conserved
NdeI restriction endonuclease site at nucleotide 11170 in
RYR1 and 11072 in RYR2 cDNA. We exchanged the
RYR1 sequence between amino acids 3726 and 5037 with the
corresponding RYR2 sequence (amino acids 3692 to 4969) to
construct chimera RF9/10/11. The
NdeI-(11072-ClaI) fragment from plasmid pBS-CRRa (9), encoding amino acid residues 3692 and 4969, was excised and
inserted into pBS-RyR1 cleaved with NdeI-ClaI.
The entire chimera was then cleaved with XbaI and
NheI and inserted into the XbaI site of
pcDNA3.1(
) to form pcDNA-RF9/10/11.
) with
XbaI and HindIII. These chimeric inserts were
confirmed by DNA sequencing and restriction enzyme digestion mapping.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Scheme of construction of RyR1/RyR2
chimeras. The top line represents RyR amino acid
sequences. The stippled bar represents RyR1, and the
diagonally striped bar represents RyR2. The labels D1, D2,
and D3 represent the three most divergent regions between RyR1 and RyR2
(11). F5a designates RyR1 amino acids 1743-1964; F9 designates RyR1
amino acids 3726-4186; F10 designates RyR1 amino acids 4189-4628; F11
designates RyR1 amino acids 4629-5037. Amino acid sequences are
presented on the right side with RyR1 sequences unlabeled
and RyR2 sequences labeled with (R2). The construction of
these RyR1/RyR2 chimeras is described under "Experimental
Procedures."

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Expression of RyR1, RyR2, and RyR1/RyR2
chimeras in HEK-293 cells. CHAPS lysates from HEK-293 cells (25 µl containing about 50 µg of protein) harvested 48 h after
transfection with pcDNA, RYR1, RYR2, and
RYR1/RYR2 chimeric cDNAs were subjected to
5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to
nitrocellulose filters, and probed with monoclonal antibody 34C and
secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Dose-response curves obtained from
fluorescence measurements of in vivo Ca2+ release induced by incremental
concentrations of caffeine in HEK-293 cells transfected with
RYR1, RYR2, and RYR1/RYR2 chimeric
cDNAs. Cells on a glass coverslip were loaded with 1 µM Fura-2 acetoxymethyl ester and mounted on the stage of
an inverted microscope. Selected fields containing about 30 cells were
challenged with incremental concentrations of caffeine added on the top
of the cells immersed in media. Caffeine was washed out to restore
resting Ca2+ concentrations after the peak amplitude (peak
of change in the ratio of fluorescence at 340/380 nm, indicating peak
changes in [Ca2+]i) was obtained. Individual peak
amplitudes (fluorescence ratio at the highest response to caffeine
minus the ratio at rest) were collected and normalized to the maximal
amplitude of the peak response in 340/380 nm fluorescence ratio caused
by 30 mM caffeine in each experiment. The resulting
dose-response curves were fitted with an equation for logistic dose
response to obtain EC50 values and Hill coefficients.
Values are the averages of 4-9 separate experiments for the chimeras
and are presented in the inset. a indicates
p < 0.05 when compared with RyR1. Values for RyR1 and
RyR2 were from our previous study (9).

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Scatchard analysis of
[3H]ryanodine binding to solubilized RyR1,
RyR2, and RyR1/RyR2 chimeras expressed in transfected HEK-293
cells. Solubilized proteins (25 µl) were incubated with various
concentrations of [3H]ryanodine (0.031-20
nM) in binding buffer (pCa 4.7) containing 0.1%
CHAPS and 1 mM ATP at 37 °C for 2 h. Specific
[3H]ryanodine binding was determined by filtration, as
described under "Experimental Procedures."
[3H]Ryanodine bound/free (pmol/mg of
protein/nM) was plotted as a function of
[3H]ryanodine bound (pmol/mg of protein). Linear fitting
yielded the Kd and Bmax
values, which are presented in the inset, from 3-4 separate
experiments.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Ca2+ dependence of
[3H]ryanodine binding to RyR1, RyR2, and
RyR1/RyR2 chimeras. Solubilized proteins (25 µl) from
transfected HEK-293 cells were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with
2.5 nM [3H]ryanodine in binding buffer
containing different Ca2+ concentrations in a total volume
of 0.25 ml. The experiments were carried out as described under
"Experimental Procedures" and elsewhere (9).
Ca2+ activation (EC50) and Ca2+ inactivation
(IC50) for Ca2+ dependence of [3H]ryanodine
binding to RyR1, RyR2, and their chimeras
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Postdoctoral fellow of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Coronado, R.,
Morrissette, J.,
Sukhareva, M.,
and Vaughan, D. M.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
266,
C1485-C1504 2.
Zucchi, R.,
and Ronca-Testoni, S.
(1997)
Pharmacol. Rev.
49,
53-98 3.
Meissner, G.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
2365-2374 4.
Pessah, I. N.,
Waterhouse, A. L.,
and Casida, J. E.
(1985)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
128,
449-456[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Smith, J. S.,
Coronado, R.,
and Meissner, G.
(1986)
J. Gen. Physiol.
88,
573-588 6.
Michalak, M.,
Dupraz, P.,
and Shoshan-Barmatz, V.
(1988)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
939,
587-594[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Chu, A.,
Fill, M.,
Stefani, E.,
and Entman, M. L.
(1993)
J. Membr. Biol.
135,
49-59[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Laver, D. R.,
Roden, L. D.,
Ahern, G. P.,
Eager, K. R.,
Junankar, P. R.,
and Dulhunty, A. F.
(1995)
J. Membr. Biol.
147,
7-22[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Du, G. G.,
Imredy, J. P.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33259-33266 10.
Zorzato, F.,
Fujii, J.,
Otsu, K.,
Phillips, M.,
Green, N. M.,
Lai, F. A.,
Meissner, G.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
2244-2256 11.
Sorrentino, V.,
and Volpe, P.
(1993)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
14,
98-103[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Takeshima, H.,
Nishimura, S.,
Matsumoto, T.,
Ishida, H.,
Kangawa, K.,
Minamino, N.,
Matsuo, H.,
Ueda, M.,
Hanaoka, M.,
Hirose, T.,
and Numa, S.
(1989)
Nature
339,
439-445[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Otsu, K.,
Willard, H. F.,
Khanna, V. K.,
Zorzato, F.,
Green, N. M.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
13472-13483 14.
Nakai, J.,
Imagawa, T.,
Hakamat, Y.,
Shigekawa, M.,
Takeshima, H.,
and Numa, S.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
271,
169-177[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Xiong, H.,
Feng, X.,
Gao, L.,
Xu, L.,
Pasek, D. A.,
Seok, J. H.,
and Meissner, G.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
4804-4814[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Chen, S. R.,
Zhang, L.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
23318-23326 17.
Chen, S. R.,
Zhang, L.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
13414-13421 18.
Chen, S. R.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
22698-22704 19.
Feng, W.,
and Shoshan-Barmatz, V.
(1996)
Mol. Membr. Biol.
13,
85-93[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Chen, S. R. W.,
Ebisawa, K.,
Li, X.,
and Zhang, L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14675-14678 21.
Du, G. G.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31867-31872 22.
Airey, J. A.,
Beck, C. F.,
Murakami, K.,
Tanksley, S. J.,
Deerinck, T. J.,
Ellisman, M. H.,
and Sutko, J. L.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
14187-14194 23.
Chen, S. R.,
Vaughan, D. M.,
Airey, J. A.,
Coronado, R.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
3743-3753[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Chen, S. R.,
Leong, P.,
Imredy, J. P.,
Bartlett, C.,
Zhang, L.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
1904-1912 25.
Tong, J.,
Oyamada, H.,
Demaurex, N.,
Grinstein, S.,
McCarthy, T. V.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
26332-26339 26.
Chen, C.,
and Okayama, H.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
2745-2752 27.
Fabiato, A.
(1988)
Methods Enzymol.
157,
378-417[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Towbin, H.,
Staehelin, T.,
and Gordon, J.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4350-4354 30.
Lowry, O. H.,
Rosebrough, N. J.,
Farr, A. L.,
and Randall, R. J.
(1951)
J. Biol. Chem.
193,
265-275 31.
Inui, M.,
Saito, A.,
and Fleischer, S.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
1740-1747 32.
Bhat, M. B.,
Zhao, J.,
Hayek, S.,
Freeman, E. C.,
Takeshima, H.,
and Ma, J.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
1320-1328 33.
Hadad, N.,
Zable, A. C.,
Abramson, J. J.,
and Shoshan-Barmatz, V.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
24864-24869 34.
Tripathy, A.,
and Meissner, G.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
70,
2600-2615 35.
Zimanyi, I.,
and Pessah, I. N.
(1991)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
256,
938-946
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Tanskanen, J. L. Greenstein, A. Chen, S. X. Sun, and R. L. Winslow Protein Geometry and Placement in the Cardiac Dyad Influence Macroscopic Properties of Calcium-Induced Calcium Release Biophys. J., May 15, 2007; 92(10): 3379 - 3396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Fessenden, W. Feng, I. N. Pessah, and P. D. Allen Amino Acid Residues Gln4020 and Lys4021 of the Ryanodine Receptor Type 1 Are Required for Activation by 4-Chloro-m-cresol J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2006; 281(30): 21022 - 21031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Xiong, J.-Z. Zhang, R. He, and S. L. Hamilton A Ca2+-Binding Domain in RyR1 that Interacts with the Calmodulin Binding Site and Modulates Channel Activity Biophys. J., January 1, 2006; 90(1): 173 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Fessenden, W. Feng, I. N. Pessah, and P. D. Allen Mutational Analysis of Putative Calcium Binding Motifs within the Skeletal Ryanodine Receptor Isoform, RyR1 J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53028 - 53035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Radzyukevich, A. E. Moseley, D. A. Shelly, G. A. Redden, M. M. Behbehani, J. B. Lingrel, R. J. Paul, and J. A. Heiny The Na+-K+-ATPase {alpha}2-subunit isoform modulates contractility in the perinatal mouse diaphragm Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): C1300 - C1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. George, H. Jundi, N. L. Thomas, M. Scoote, N. Walters, A. J. Williams, and F. A. Lai Ryanodine Receptor Regulation by Intramolecular Interaction between Cytoplasmic and Transmembrane Domains Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2004; 15(6): 2627 - 2638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Fessenden, C. F. Perez, S. Goth, I. N. Pessah, and P. D. Allen Identification of a Key Determinant of Ryanodine Receptor Type 1 Required for Activation by 4-Chloro-m-cresol J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2003; 278(31): 28727 - 28735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang, Z. Liu, H. Masumiya, R. Wang, D. Jiang, F. Li, T. Wagenknecht, and S. R. W. Chen Three-dimensional Localization of Divergent Region 3 of the Ryanodine Receptor to the Clamp-shaped Structures Adjacent to the FKBP Binding Sites J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2003; 278(16): 14211 - 14218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-W. Xiong, R. A. Newman, G. G. Rodney, O. Thomas, J.-Z. Zhang, A. Persechini, M. A. Shea, and S. L. Hamilton Lobe-dependent Regulation of Ryanodine Receptor Type 1 by Calmodulin J. Biol. Chem., October 18, 2002; 277(43): 40862 - 40870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Marks Cardiac Intracellular Calcium Release Channels : Role in Heart Failure Circ. Res., July 7, 2000; 87(1): 8 - 11. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Du, V. K. Khanna, and D. H. MacLennan Mutation of Divergent Region 1 Alters Caffeine and Ca2+ Sensitivity of the Skeletal Muscle Ca2+ Release Channel (Ryanodine Receptor) J. Biol. Chem., April 14, 2000; 275(16): 11778 - 11783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Du, X. Guo, V. K. Khanna, and D. H. MacLennan Functional Characterization of Mutants in the Predicted Pore Region of the Rabbit Cardiac Muscle Ca2+ Release Channel (Ryanodine Receptor Isoform 2) J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2001; 276(34): 31760 - 31771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||