JBC Transcription and Nuclear Factor Monoclonals

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morty, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Burleigh, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morty, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Burleigh, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 26149-26156, September 10, 1999


Oligopeptidase B from Trypanosoma brucei, a New Member of an Emerging Subgroup of Serine Oligopeptidases*

Rory E. MortyDagger §, John D. Lonsdale-Eccles, Jennifer Moreheadparallel , Elisabet V. Calerparallel , Reinhardt Mentele**, Ennes A. Auerswald**, Theresa H. T. CoetzerDagger , Norma W. Andrewsparallel , and Barbara A. Burleighparallel Dagger Dagger

From the Dagger  Department of Biochemistry, University of Natal, Private Bag X01, 3209 Scottsville, South Africa, the  Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, the parallel  Section of Microbial Pathogenesis, Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06536, and the ** Abteilung für Klinische Chemie und Klinische Biochemie in der Chirurgischen Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Nußbaumstraße 20, D 80336 München, Germany

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Trypanosoma brucei contains a soluble serine oligopeptidase (OP-Tb) that is released into the host bloodstream during infection, where it has been postulated to participate in the pathogenesis of African trypanosomiasis. Here, we report the identification of a single copy gene encoding the T. brucei oligopeptidase and a homologue from the related trypanosomatid pathogen Leishmania major. The enzymes encoded by these genes belong to an emerging subgroup of the prolyl oligopeptidase family of serine hydrolases, referred to as oligopeptidase B. The trypanosomatid oligopeptidases share 70% amino acid sequence identity with oligopeptidase B from the intracellular pathogen Trypanosoma cruzi, which has a demonstrated role in mammalian host cell signaling and invasion. OP-Tb exhibited no activity toward the prolyl oligopeptidase substrate H-Gly-Pro-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin. Instead, it had activity toward substrates of trypsin-like enzymes, particularly those that have basic amino acids in both P1 and P2 (e.g. benzyloxycarbonyl-Arg-Arg-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin kcat/Km = 529 s-1 µM-1). The activity of OP-Tb was enhanced by reducing agents and by polyamines, suggesting that these agents may act as in vivo regulators of OP-Tb activity. This study provides the basis of the characterization of a novel subgroup of serine oligopeptidases from kinetoplastid protozoa with potential roles in pathogenesis.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study, we identify and characterize a new member of the prolyl oligopeptidase family of serine hydrolases (the "S9" family in the nomenclature of Barrett and Rawlings (1)). This family includes endopeptidases, aminoacylpeptidases, and dipeptidyl aminopeptidases (2). The members of this diverse family share significant amino acid sequence identity within the catalytic domain, and all have activity that is restricted to the hydrolysis of peptides, not proteins (2, 3). Although direct evidence is scarce, proposed roles for these enzymes include neuropeptide and peptide hormone metabolism (4), generation of beta -amyloid protein in Alzheimer's disease (5), memory formation (6), regulation of blood pressure (7), DNA synthesis (8), and processing of the mating pheromone alpha -factor (9).

As suggested by the name, the majority of the prolyl oligopeptidases cleave their substrates after proline residues. Examples of these enzymes are found in some prokaryotes (10, 11), in yeast (9, 12, 13), and in higher eukaryotes (14-17). However, in some cases, the term prolyl oligopeptidase now appears to be an unfortunate misnomer. This is because a smaller subgroup of this family cleaves substrates on the carboxyl side of basic residues (18-20), not prolyl residues. This subfamily is referred to as oligopeptidase B, e.g. Escherichia coli protease II or oligopeptidase B (EC 3.4.21.83). Until recently, examples of the oligopeptidase B subfamily were restricted to prokaryotes and had received scant attention. However, studies (including this report) have now shown that oligopeptidase B enzymes are also found in trypanosomatids and that these enzymes may play key roles in disease pathology. In the case of the human pathogen Trypanosoma cruzi, the oligopeptidase appears to play a central role in host cell invasion (20, 21). Studies show that oligopeptidase B null mutants of T. cruzi have a markedly impaired ability to infect mice or cultured mammalian cells (21). This impairment seems to be mediated by disruption of the oligopeptidase involvement in trypomastigote-induced intracellular Ca2+ transients that occur during mammalian host cell invasion (20, 22). The proposed function of the oligopeptidase in T. cruzi entry is that of a processing enzyme that generates an active signaling ligand for mammalian host cells (23, 24) through the hydrolysis of a stage-specific precursor (20, 21).

However, as with the larger family of prolyl oligopeptidases, it seems likely that more than one function may be ascribed to this enzyme. All life cycle stages of T. cruzi express oligopeptidase B (20), but not all life cycle stages invade mammalian cells. Furthermore, trypsin-like enzymes with properties similar to those of the T. cruzi oligopeptidase B have been described in other kinetoplastids, including the pathogenic parasite Leishmania (Refs. 25 and 26 and this report), and in the African trypanosomes, Trypanosoma brucei, Trypanosoma vivax, and Trypanosoma congolense (27-29). If these enzymes are homologues of the T. cruzi oligopeptidase B, this raises intriguing questions regarding the roles of these enzymes in parasites with such widely different lifestyles. Thus, one goal of this study was to confirm or refute the contention that the trypsin-like enzymes found in African trypanosomes belong to the oligopeptidase B subfamily of prolyl oligopeptidases.

Oligopeptidase B-like enzymes may be important potential chemotherapeutic targets (as evidenced by the trypanocidal action of many OP-Tb1 inhibitors (30)). Our studies have indicated that the T. brucei oligopeptidase, called OP-Tb, may play an important direct role in the pathogenesis of African trypanosomiasis. During infection, OP-Tb is released into the host bloodstream, where it is insensitive to serum protease inhibitors (28). Hence, it is free to cleave regulatory peptides predicted to be present in host serum. Indeed, the disturbed hormonal pulsatility and endocrine rhythms (31), the unusual cleavage of peptide hormones in the blood of T. brucei-infected rats (32), the diminished levels of regulatory peptides such as atrial natriuretic factor (which is a substrate for OP-Tb (28)) (33), and many of the generalized symptoms of trypanosomiasis (34) all point to the possible role of oligopeptidase B in the disruption of host hormone metabolism during trypanosome infection. Here, we report that, on the basis of gene sequence identity and kinetic analyses, the oligopeptidase from T. brucei (OP-Tb (28)) is an atypical serine peptidase belonging to the oligopeptidase B subgroup of the prolyl oligopeptidase family. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of the trypanosomatid oligopeptidase B genes, including the Leishmania major sequence that we also report here, demonstrates that these enzymes are closely related to the bacterial oligopeptidase B enzymes in terms of sequence identity and substrate specificity. Together, the oligopeptidase B enzymes define a new subgroup of the prolyl oligopeptidase family.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Fluorogenic peptide substrates were obtained from Sigma, Cambridge Research Biochemicals (Cambridge, United Kingdom), or Enzyme Systems Products (Los Angeles, CA). Peptidyl diazomethyl ketones and chloromethyl ketones were from Bachem (Bubendorf, Switzerland). All other reagents were from Sigma.

Purification of OP-Tb-- T. brucei brucei (clone ILTat1.1) were passaged in adult male Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats and purified from infected blood by a combination of Percoll isopycnic gradient centrifugation (35) and anion-exchange chromatography on DEAE-cellulose (36). OP-Tb was purified as described previously (28), and the concentration of active enzyme was determined using 4-methylumbelliferyl p-guanidobenzoate (37).

Enzyme and Protein Assays-- OP-Tb activity was routinely determined against 5 µM Cbz-Arg-Arg-AMC at 37 °C in assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl and 10 mM dithiothreitol (pH 8.0)) (28) in a Hitachi F-2000 spectrofluorometer (lambda ex = 370 nm, lambda em = 460 nm). Protein assays were conducted according to the modified (38) method of Bradford (63).

Amino Acid Sequencing-- Endoproteinase Lys-C digests of OP-Tb were resolved by reverse-phase high pressure liquid chromatography as detailed previously (39). Amino acid sequencing of the N termini of selected OP-Tb-derived peptides was performed with an Applied Biosystems Model 473A gas-phase sequencer following the manufacturer's instructions.

Oligopeptidase B Gene Cloning-- Nitrocellulose filters spotted with a T. brucei brucei YTat1.1 cosmid library constructed in a SuperCos vector (provided by Dr. Elisabetta Ullu, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT) were screened with a 32P-labeled probe derived from the full-length T. cruzi oligopeptidase B gene generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as described (20). Positive clones (obtained from Dr. Sara Melville, T. brucei Genome Project, Cambridge, UK) were subcloned into pUC19 following EcoRI/PstI digestion. A subclone containing the entire T. brucei oligopeptidase B gene open reading frame within a 5.0-kilobase EcoRI-PstI insert was sequenced in both directions (GenBankTM/EBI accession number AF078916). To obtain the full-length L. major oligopeptidase B gene, an L. major LV39 sheared DNA cosmid library (40) was screened in the laboratory of Dr. Angela Cruz (Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) using a 32P-labeled full-length T. cruzi oligopeptidase B gene as a probe. Positive cosmids provided were subcloned into pUC19 following BamHI digestion. Sequencing of a positive BamHI subclone revealed that this was a partial clone that lacked an initiation codon. Therefore, sequencing was completed using a positive cosmid clone. 4066 base pairs were sequenced in one direction. Second strand sequencing was carried out to confirm the L. major oligopeptidase B gene sequence (GenBankTM/EBI accession number AF109875).

Generation of Recombinant Oligopeptidase B-- The full-length T. brucei oligopeptidase B gene was amplified by PCR from the 5.0-kilobase cosmid subclone using primers (forward, 5'-ACTCGGATCCACTTTCCATCAC-3'; and reverse, 5'-CCTTAGGATCCCAAGTTTCAG-3') with built-in BamHI sites. PCR was carried out as follows using a Takara LA PCR kit: 94 °C for 2 min; followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 56 °C for 1 min, and 68 °C for 3 min; and a final 10-min extension step at 72 °C. The resulting PCR product was cloned into pCR2.1 (Invitrogen, Madison, WI) and then excised with BamHI to yield a 2.2-kilobase fragment containing the full-length T. brucei oligopeptidase B gene. This fragment was ligated to the pET19b expression vector (Novagen, Carlsbad, CA) linearized with BamHI. A clone containing an insert with the correct orientation was expressed in E. coli BL21 (Novagen). Recombinant T. brucei oligopeptidase B was purified on a Ni2+-agarose column as described previously (20).

Immunoblot Analysis-- Soluble lysates of T. brucei YTat1.1 procyclics trypomastigotes, T. cruzi tissue culture trypomastigotes, and L. major promastigotes were prepared in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM CaCl2 as described (22). 10 µg of soluble parasite lysates or 100 ng of recombinant peptidase were separated on a Laemmli SDS-polyacrylamide gel under reducing conditions (42) and blotted onto ImmobilonTM (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). Blots were blocked in antibody dilution buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20, 5% (w/v) nonfat skim milk, 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin, and 0.1% (w/v) sodium azide) overnight at 4 °C prior to a 1-h incubation at room temperature with 5 µg ml-1 polyclonal anti-T. cruzi recombinant oligopeptidase B IgG (20). Following five 10-min washes in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20, blots were incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) diluted to 1:10,000 and developed using the ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Kinetic Analyses-- Substrate specificity of OP-Tb was determined using fluorogenic substrates by preincubation of OP-Tb (1.5 ng, 18.75 fmol of active enzyme, 37 °C, 5 min) or recombinant oligopeptidase (2 ng) in assay buffer, followed by addition of substrate. The initial steady-state velocity (v0) was determined by continuous assay for a range of substrate concentrations (45 nM to 75 µM). Km and Vmax were determined by hyperbolic regression of the kinetic data using the software package Hyper Version 1.01 (obtained from Dr. J. S. Easterby, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK). The kcat was determined from kcat = Vmax/[E]0, where [E]0 represents the active enzyme concentration.

The pH profile for OP-Tb was conducted as described above, except that constant ionic strength acetate/Mes/Tris (AMT) buffers (100 mM acetic acid, 200 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM Mes, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 4 mM EDTA, I = 0.1) over the pH range 4-12 (43) replaced the assay buffer. Similarly, pH stability of OP-Tb was investigated by preincubating OP-Tb (15 ng, 188 fmol of active enzyme, 5 min) in the same set of AMT buffers (37 °C, 1 h) before assaying residual activity of a 10-µl aliquot in AMT buffer at pH 8.

The effect of reducing agents on OP-Tb activity was investigated by preincubating OP-Tb in assay buffer containing dithiothreitol, GSH, or L-cysteine (1-25 mM, 37 °C, 5 min) prior to addition of Cbz-Arg-Arg-AMC (5 µM final concentration). To test for dimerization of OP-Tb under nonreducing conditions, OP-Tb was preincubated in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8) in the absence or presence of dithiothreitol (10 mM) for 5 days at 4 °C. Samples (25 µl, containing 50 ng of OP-Tb) were subsequently resolved by molecular exclusion chromatography on a Sephacryl S-200 HR column (900 × 15 mm, 0.3 ml min-1, 4 °C) equilibrated in the preincubation buffer. Column fractions were assayed for activity against Cbz-Arg-Arg-AMC as described above. Column fractions collected under nonreducing conditions were reduced prior to assaying by preincubation with 10 mM dithiothreitol to reactivate inactive OP-Tb. The effects of divalent metal ions, nucleotides, polyamines, and heparin were examined by preincubating OP-Tb (5 ng, 62.5 fmol of active concentration, 37 °C, 10 min) in assay buffer containing these potential effectors, after which residual activity against 5 µM Cbz-Arg-Arg-AMC was determined. Dithiothreitol was omitted from the assays involving these compounds.

Inhibition of OP-Tb-- The mechanism of inhibition of OP-Tb was determined from the effect of inhibitors on the Km and Vmax for the hydrolysis of Cbz-Arg-Arg-AMC. For reversible competitive inhibitors, the Ki was determined as described (44). The enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis of Cbz-Arg-Arg-AMC was monitored continuously to establish an uninhibited rate of substrate hydrolysis (v0), after which a 20-fold molar excess of inhibitor over enzyme was added (in <5% of the total assay volume), and the new steady-state velocity in the presence of the inhibitor (vi) was determined. The apparent inhibition constant in the presence of substrate (Ki(app)) was given by v0/vi = 1 + [I]/Ki(app). The true Ki was calculated for competitive inhibitors, catering for the presence of substrate, from the relationship Ki = Ki(app)/1 + [S]/Km, where [S] denotes substrate concentration. The ka between OP-Tb and reversible inhibitors was determined as described for irreversible inhibitors, except that the ka was corrected for the presence of substrate by multiplying kobs/[I] by 1 + [S]/Km (28). The rate constant for complex dissociation (kd) was determined from the relationship Ki = kd/ka (45).

The effects of irreversible serine and cysteine peptidase inhibitors were investigated as described (46) by adding an aliquot of inhibitor (10 µl) to a buffered enzyme solution (140 µl, containing 50 ng of OP-Tb in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 37 °C) to initiate the inactivation. Aliquots were removed at timed intervals, and residual activity (vt) was determined against Cbz-Arg-Arg-AMC as described above. Pseudo first-order inhibition rate constants (kobs) were obtained from plots of ln vt/v0 versus time, where v0 represents the activity prior to addition of inhibitor. Apparent second-order inhibition rate constants (ka) were obtained from the relationship ka = kobs/[I], where [I] represents the inhibitor concentration. The time required for the free enzyme concentration to decrease by 50% (half-life, t1/2) is given by t1/2 = 0.693/ka[I] (44). As thiol-reactive agents may react with dithiothreitol in solution, ka values were determined in the presence and absence of dithiothreitol.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cloning and Sequencing of Oligopeptidase B-- The 80-kDa oligopeptidase (OP-Tb) was purified from T. brucei as described previously (28). Amino-terminal sequence analysis of OP-Tb was unsuccessful, suggesting that the N terminus is blocked. However, four peptides generated by digestion of OP-Tb with endoproteinase Lys-C (Fig. 1) were sequenced and revealed 54% similarity to the deduced amino acid sequences of corresponding peptides in T. cruzi oligopeptidase B and 30% similarity to corresponding peptides in the E. coli and Moraxella lacunata enzymes. This indicated that the T. brucei peptidase OP-Tb is related to the oligopeptidase B enzymes of the prolyl oligopeptidase family.


View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of T. brucei oligopeptidase B. The amino acid sequence is shown immediately below the nucleotide sequence. Both are numbered on the right. Amino acid sequences obtained by direct sequencing of OP-Tb peptides generated by endoproteinase Lys-C cleavage are underlined. The predicted active-site serine residue (Ser563) appears in a black box. The sequence is available from GenBankTM/EBI under accession number AF078916.

Preliminary Southern blot analysis revealed that the genomes of T. brucei as well as a related kinetoplastid protozoan parasite, L. major, contained nucleotide sequences homologous to the oligopeptidase B gene of T. cruzi (data not shown). To determine the relationship between OP-Tb and the putative oligopeptidase B homologues detected by Southern blotting, cosmid libraries were screened using the T. cruzi oligopeptidase B gene as a probe. Full-length clones of the oligopeptidase B genes of T. brucei and L. major were obtained. The entire intron-free, T. brucei oligopeptidase B open reading frame was contained within a 5.0-kilobase EcoRI/PstI fragment subcloned from a positive cosmid. The gene consisted of 2145 base pairs and is predicted to encode a polypeptide of 715 amino acids (Fig. 1). The amino acid sequence of the OP-Tb-derived peptides precisely matched peptide sequences found in the deduced amino acid sequence of the T. brucei oligopeptidase B gene (Fig. 1), and we therefore conclude that the T. brucei enzyme (OP-Tb) is encoded by the gene for oligopeptidase B. Similarly, the full-length gene encoding the L. major oligopeptidase B gene (2196 base pairs) was isolated and sequenced and encodes a similar protein of 732 amino acids (GenBankTM/EBI accession number AF109875) (data not shown). Southern blot analysis using homologous probes revealed that the oligopeptidase B genes of T. brucei (Fig. 2) and L. major (data not shown) are present as single copy genes per haploid genome, as previously shown for the T. cruzi oligopeptidase B gene (20).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Southern blotting to determine the copy number of the T. brucei oligopeptidase B gene. T. brucei DNA was digested with no enzyme (lane 1), EcoRI (lane 2), HindIII (lane 3), PstI (lane 4), BglII (lane 5), or XhoI (lane 6). Digested DNA was separated on 0.8% agarose gels and transferred to a nylon membrane. Hybridization was carried out overnight at 42 °C in 5× SSC, 50% formamide, 5× Denhardt's solution, and 0.5% (w/v) SDS using the [32P]dCTP-labeled full-length T. brucei opdB gene as a probe. The blot was washed to a final stringency of 0.2× SSC at 60 °C and subjected to autoradiography. kb, kilobases.

The deduced amino acid sequences of the three trypanosomatid oligopeptidase B enzymes exhibited significant homology over their entire sequences. The T. brucei oligopeptidase B is 71% identical to the T. cruzi oligopeptidase and 67% identical to the L. major oligopeptidase. The overall similarity of their respective amino acid sequences is 80%. The similarity of the peptidases was further demonstrated by immunoblot analysis. Polyclonal antibodies generated against the T. cruzi oligopeptidase B readily reacted with oligopeptidase B in lysates of T. brucei (Fig. 3, lane 4) and T. cruzi (lane 5; see also Ref. 20). The full-length T. brucei oligopeptidase B gene was expressed in E. coli as a catalytically active (Table I), histidine-tagged recombinant enzyme (Fig. 3, lane 1) with a yield of ~12 mg/liter of bacterial culture. Immunoblot analysis demonstrated that it was detected at the expected size on a Western blot (Fig. 3, lane 2), similar to the T. cruzi recombinant enzyme (lane 5).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Analysis of native oligopeptidase B in trypanosomatid extracts and purified recombinant oligopeptidase B. 15 µg of recombinant oligopeptidase B (rOP-Tb) were evaluated for purity on a Coomassie Blue-stained 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (lane 1). 10 µg of soluble extracts prepared from T. brucei (lane 2) and T. cruzi (lane 3) and 100 ng of recombinant oligopeptidase B from T. brucei (lane 4) and T. cruzi (lane 5) were analyzed by immunoblot analysis with polyclonal anti-T. cruzi oligopeptidase B antibody as described under "Experimental Procedures." rOP-Tc, recombinant oligopeptidase B from T. cruzi.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Amidolytic activity of native and recombinant OP-Tb

OP-Tb Substrates-- Consistent with the properties of the prolyl oligopeptidase family (2), our previous findings have demonstrated that OP-Tb is unable to hydrolyze polypeptide substrates (28), including mammalian plasma proteins.2 Therefore, fluorogenic peptide substrates were employed for the enzymatic characterization of the native and recombinant forms of the T. brucei oligopeptidase B. The reactions followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics. The Km values obtained using the recombinant T. brucei enzyme approximated those obtained for the purified native enzyme (Table I).

In contrast to the prolyl oligopeptidase class of enzymes, OP-Tb exhibited no activity against H-Gly-Pro-AMC (Table I). Instead, peptide hydrolysis by OP-Tb indicated that the enzyme has a trypsin-like specificity. The presence of basic amino acid residues in the P1 position (nomenclature of Ref. 49) was obligatory (see Table I). The poor kcat/Km for H-Arg-AMC (0.07 s-1 µM-1) and the lack of activity against H-Gly-AMC and H-Leu-AMC suggest that OP-Tb is not an aminopeptidase. (This conclusion is also supported by failure of the aminopeptidase inhibitors amastatin and bestatin to inhibit OP-Tb (see Table III).) In contrast, the equivalent substrate with its N terminus blocked with a Cbz group (i.e. Cbz-Arg-AMC) had an elevated kcat/Km (157-fold). Thus, substrate binding is more successful when both P1 and P2 are occupied.

A variety of residues were acceptable in the P2 position, including Arg, Lys, Phe, Leu, Gly, and Pro. Substitution of Arg in P2 with Lys in Boc-Leu-Arg-Arg-AMC had little (0.01% increase) effect on kcat/Km, indicating that Lys and Arg are equally acceptable in P2 in this situation. However, substitution of Arg in P2 with Lys in Boc-Gly-Arg-Arg-AMC resulted in a 4-fold decrease in kcat/Km. Thus, the substitution of Leu for Gly in P3 had a substantial effect on the P2 preference for Arg or Lys. A comparison of Cbz-Arg-Arg-AMC and Cbz-Phe-Arg-AMC hydrolysis indicates that Arg is preferred over Phe in P2, with a 6.5-fold decrease in kcat/Km for the Phe-containing substrate. A comparison of Boc-Val-Gly-Arg-AMC versus Boc-Val-Pro-Arg-AMC hydrolysis illustrates that replacing Pro with Gly in P2 is accompanied by a 8.5-fold increase in kcat/Km. Thus, the overall P2 preference appears to be Arg/Lys > Gly > Phe > Pro.

OP-Tb Inhibitors-- Both native and recombinant OP-Tb were inactivated by irreversible inhibitors of serine peptidases (Table II). The most potent of these inhibitors was 3,4-dichloroisocoumarin, which had a ka of 142 M-1 s-1, similar to the ka values for 3,4-dichloroisocoumarin inhibition of bovine trypsin (198 M-1 s-1) and human plasmin (133 M-1 s-1) (50). OP-Tb was also inactivated by 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride, diisopropyl fluorophosphate, and phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride. The rates of inactivation by these compounds ranged from 10- to 30-fold faster than those reported for the inhibition of serum kallikrein (51).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Irreversible inhibitors of native and recombinant OP-Tb

OP-Tb was also inhibited by the peptide aldehydes antipain and leupeptin, which contain the aldehyde on Arg in P1 (Table III). The lower Ki and higher ka of antipain are a likely consequence of the comparatively basic nature of the antipain tripeptide. No inhibition was observed for chymostatin, where the aldehyde is present on Phe in P1. This supports our contention that Phe is not readily accepted in the P1-binding site (Tables I and III). Interestingly, OP-Tb was inhibited competitively by E-64 (trans-epoxysuccinyl-L-leucylamido-(4-guanidino)butane), with a Ki of 62.5 µM. This contrasts with the widely held view that E-64 is a class-specific inhibitor of cysteine peptidases (52), although the inhibition of bovine beta -trypsin by E-64 by a reversible competitive mechanism with a Ki of 36 µM has also been reported (53). Benzamidine, a low molecular mass inhibitor of trypsin-like peptidases, was a comparatively poor inhibitor of OP-Tb, with a Ki of 254 µM, compared with Ki values of 36 µM for bovine beta -trypsin and 12 µM for mast cell tryptase (54). This supports our earlier suggestion that substrate or inhibitor binding is more effective when two or more substrate-binding sites are occupied (Table I). The lack of inhibition by EDTA, EGTA, and 1,10-phenanthroline reinforces the idea that OP-Tb has no metal ion dependence.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Competitive reversible inhibitors of OP-Tb

OP-Tb Effectors-- OP-Tb activity was enhanced by several reducing agents, including dithiothreitol, glutathione, and cysteine. Maximal activation (~3-fold) occurred in the presence of 10 mM dithiothreitol (Fig. 4A). This enhancement does not appear to result from the reduction of catalytically inactive disulfide-bonded multimers (as has been demonstrated recently for the thermolysin-like metallo-oligopeptidase (soluble metallo-endopeptidase, EC 3.4.24.15) (55)). No significant difference was observed in the elution profiles for two samples of purified OP-Tb fractionated by molecular exclusion chromatography under reducing and nonreducing conditions (Fig. 4B). This suggests that no inactive high molecular mass complexes were formed under our in vitro experimental conditions.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of reducing agents on OP-Tb activity. A, OP-Tb (1.5 ng) was assayed in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8) containing dithiothreitol (black-square), reduced glutathione (), or L-cysteine (open circle ) at various concentrations. Data points represent the means ± S.E. (n = 3). B, OP-Tb was resolved under reducing or nonreducing conditions by molecular exclusion chromatography on a Sephacryl S-200 HR column (900 × 15 mm, 0.3 ml min-1, 4 °C). Column fractions were assayed for activity against 5 µM Cbz-Arg-Arg-AMC in the presence of 10 mM dithiothreitol. AFU, arbitrary fluorescence units.

OP-Tb was maximally stable at neutral pH in the absence of dithiothreitol (Fig. 5C). Although OP-Tb had maximal activity at pH 9 (Fig. 5A), it retained considerable activity (75% of maximal activity) at physiological pH (pH 7.4). Over the pH range studied, pH exerted a dramatic effect on the kcat (up to 100-fold), whereas the Km was relatively unaffected (1.6-fold) (Fig. 5B). The shape of the curve suggests that OP-Tb activity is dependent upon residues with pKa values of ~6 and 10. This is consistent with the ionization of active-site histidine and serine residues, respectively, of serine peptidases (56).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effect of pH on the activity and stability of OP-Tb. A, OP-Tb (1.5 ng) was assayed in AMT buffers (I = 0.1) over the pH range 4.0-12.0 in the presence of 10 mM dithiothreitol. B, shown are the individual effects of pH on the Km (triangle ) and kcat (open circle ) from the data presented in A. C, OP-Tb (10 ng) was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in AMT buffers (I = 0.1) over the pH range 4.0-12.0 in the absence () and presence (black-square) of 10 mM dithiothreitol. Residual enzymatic activity against Cbz-Arg-Arg-AMC was then determined in AMT buffer at pH 8.

The activity of OP-Tb (against Cbz-Arg-Arg-AMC in the presence of 50 µM polyamines) was enhanced by spermine and spermidine (77 and 62%, respectively, over the control values; data not shown). Putrescine and ornithine had no effect. Curiously, heparin, which carries an opposite charge to polyamines, also enhanced OP-Tb activity (by 58%) at 30 µg ml-1. Neither ATP nor GTP had any effect on the activity of OP-Tb, which is consistent with its being unrelated to the ATP-dependent peptidases.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have previously reported that bloodstream forms of T. brucei possess a high molecular mass trypsin-like serine peptidase (27) and that this enzyme is released into the blood of T. brucei-infected rats (28). The present studies show that this trypsin-like enzyme does not belong to the classic class of trypsins, but instead belongs to the serine peptidases of the prolyl oligopeptidase subgroup. The classic trypsins and chymotrypsins all require a free N-terminal amino acid for full expression of enzymatic activity, and yet, abundant activity can be found in OP-Tb, which has a blocked N terminus, and in recombinant OP-Tb, which has an N-terminal polyhistidine tag. Clearly, a free N terminus is not required by this enzyme. Additional differences exist. For example, we see no evidence of a zymogen form (inactive precursor) of OP-Tb. Since each life cycle stage (29) of T. brucei possesses this cytosolic (28, 57) enzyme, alternate means of controlling its activity must exist. As trypanosomes are known to contain the polyamines spermine and spermidine (58) as well as a number of intracellular reducing agents such as trypanothione (59), we tested to see if such molecules might regulate the activity of OP-Tb. The activity of OP-Tb was enhanced by reducing agents and by spermine and spermidine. Curiously, dithiothreitol has no enhancing effect on the catalytic activity of the prolyl oligopeptidase from human brain (60) despite its apparent similarity to OP-Tb.

The activity of OP-Tb was inhibited by thiol-reactive agents such as iodoacetate. Because we now know that OP-Tb belongs to the prolyl oligopeptidase group of enzymes, rather than the classic serine protease group, such inhibition is now understandable. It is likely that inhibition by thiol reagents is explained by a crucial cysteine residue (Cys255 in porcine prolyl oligopeptidase and perhaps Cys256 in OP-Tb) that is in close proximity to the catalytic site in the folded enzyme (61). Covalent attachment of bulky thiol-reactive groups to this cysteine residue is predicted to interfere, by steric hindrance, with either the substrate binding or the charge relay system of the catalytic residues.

Prior to the sequencing of the T. brucei and L. major oligopeptidase B genes, the closest homologues of the T. cruzi enzyme were the oligopeptidase B enzymes from E. coli and M. lacunata (20). Here, we find that the trypanosomatid enzymes share ~32% identity with the E. coli and M. lacunata prolyl oligopeptidases, but exhibit less identity to other "true" post-proline-cleaving enzymes (in the range of 20%). Since sequence homology among members of the prolyl oligopeptidase family is greatest within the catalytic domain (2, 61), this region of the trypanosomatid oligopeptidase B enzymes was aligned with several prolyl oligopeptidases (Fig. 6). The oligopeptidase B enzymes possess the GXSXGGZZ consensus sequence (where X is any residue and Z is a hydrophobic residue) (2) containing the catalytic serine residue (Ser563 in T. brucei (Fig. 1) and Ser577 in L. major) and exhibit considerable sequence conservation within the catalytic domain. However, even within this highly conserved region, it is clear that the oligopeptidase B subfamily of enzymes (T. brucei, T. cruzi, L. major, M. lacunata, and E. coli) exhibit greater homology to each other than to the post-prolyl-cleaving enzymes (Fig. 6). Furthermore, the kinetoplastid (T. brucei, T. cruzi, and L. major) oligopeptidase B enzymes are even more similar to each other, exhibiting an overall identity of 70%. Since the oligopeptidase B enzymes can be distinguished from the true prolyl oligopeptidases using sequence identity and substrate specificity as criteria, we propose that the oligopeptidase B enzymes constitute a subfamily of the prolyl oligopeptidase family defined by Barrett and Rawlings (2).


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Alignment of the catalytic domains of oligopeptidase B and prolyl oligopeptidase. Shown are the amino acid residues composing the predicted catalytic domains of the prolyl oligopeptidase family based on the structure of the porcine brain prolyl oligopeptidase (residues 428-710) (61): residues 436-716 of T. brucei oligopeptidase B (GenBankTM/EBI accession number AF078916), residues 435-714 of T. cruzi oligopeptidase B (accession number U69897 (20)), residues 450-731 of L. major oligopeptidase B (accession number AF109875), residues 408-682 of M. lacunata oligopeptidase B (accession number D38405 (19)), residues 407-691 of E. coli oligopeptidase B (accession number D10976 (18)), residues 414-690 of Aeromonas hydrophila prolyl oligopeptidase (accession number 730361 (11)), residues 432-705 of Flavobacterium meningosepticum prolyl oligopeptidase (accession number 130759 (10)), residues 428-710 of human T cells (accession number 1346769 (41)), and porcine brain prolyl oligopeptidases (accession number 130759 (61)). The cleavage specificities of the oligopeptidase B and post-prolyl-cleaving enzymes are indicated on the right.

The difference in substrate specificity between the prolyl oligopeptidases and the oligopeptidase B enzymes may be explained by comparing the structure and sequence of the prolyl oligopeptidases with the sequences of the oligopeptidase B enzymes (Fig. 6). Several residues in the active-site pocket are predicted to be involved in substrate recognition by the prolyl oligopeptidases (61). Among these residues is a tryptophan (Trp595 in porcine oligopeptidase) that may be involved in stabilizing the interaction with the P1 proline of the substrate (61). Although this tryptophan residue is conserved in the oligopeptidase B enzymes (Trp608 in T. brucei) (Fig. 6), it is surrounded by conserved glutamic acid residues in the oligopeptidase B enzymes, but these are absent in the post-proline-cleaving enzymes. Thus, it seems most likely that these negatively charged residues contribute to the recognition of basic substrates by the oligopeptidase B enzymes.

No information regarding the three-dimensional structure of oligopeptidase B is available, although the structure of porcine prolyl oligopeptidase has been reported recently (61). The active sites of prolyl oligopeptidases were proposed to lie buried in active-site "pits" (2). This suggestion is consistent with the structural observation that access of proteins to the catalytic site of porcine prolyl oligopeptidase is likely to be impeded by the positioning of the catalytic apparatus in a tunnel-like cavity (61). This suggestion is supported by our observations reported here and the previously reported observations of others (48) that oligopeptidase B is unable to hydrolyze proteins and that its activity is not inhibited by high molecular mass peptidase inhibitors.

Although the preponderance of known members of the prolyl oligopeptidase family are post-proline-cleaving peptidases, our data indicate that a subgroup of related peptidases is emerging that exhibits specificity for substrates containing paired basic amino acids. To date, these oligopeptidase B enzymes have been identified only in prokaryotes and kinetoplastid protozoan parasites. No oligopeptidase B enzymes have been identified in or cloned from mammalian cells. The homologous enzymes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae are specific for cleavage after proline residues (9, 13). The preference of oligopeptidase B for cleavage after paired basic residues is intriguing since these sites are abundant in precursors of biologically active molecules and are recognized as sites for processing (62). It was previously suggested that the oligopeptidase B enzymes might function as processing enzymes involved in the generation of biologically active peptides (20, 48). Recently, oligopeptidase B from T. cruzi was demonstrated to have a role in the generation of a signaling ligand for mammalian host cells that is involved in the mechanism of host cell invasion by this intracellular pathogen (20, 21). Although the physiological function of other oligopeptidase B enzymes is currently unclear, T. brucei OP-Tb may play a major role in pathogenesis of disease through the degradation of regulatory peptide hormones in the blood of infected hosts in African trypanosomiasis (28). Further structural and functional characterization of the oligopeptidase B enzymes in prokaryotes and kinetoplastid protozoan parasites will be useful to better understand the functions this subgroup of the prolyl oligopeptidase family carries out in these organisms and may provide insights into the evolutionary role of this enzyme.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Amino acid sequencing work was carried out (by R. M.) in the laboratory of Dr. F. Lottspeich (Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsreid, Germany). Screening of the L. major LV39 cosmid library was carried out in the laboratory of Dr. Angela Cruz. We thank Drs. C. Huynh and P. Kima for critical reading of this manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by a National Institutes of Health Grant (to N. W. A.), South African Foundation for Research Development Grant 2034170 and the University of Natal Research Fund (to T. H. T. C.), and German BMBF Bilateral Cooperation Grant 39.6.60B.6.B (to T. H. T. C. and E. A. A.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF078916 and AF109875.

§ Fellow of the South African Foundation for Research Development. Present address: Section of Microbial Pathogenesis, Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 295 Congress Ave., New Haven, CT 06536-0812.

Dagger Dagger Performed this work during the tenure of a fellowship award from the American Heart Association, Connecticut Affiliate, Inc. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-432-2495; Fax: 617-738-4914; E-mail: bburleig@hsph.harvard.edu.

2 R. E. Morty, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: OP-Tb, endogenous oligopeptidase B from T. brucei; Cbz, benzyloxycarbonyl; AMC, 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; Mes, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; Boc, t-butoxycarbonyl.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Barrett, A. J., and Rawlings, N. D. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 318, 247-250[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Barrett, A. J., and Rawlings, N. D. (1992) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 373, 353-360[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Rawlings, N. D., Polgar, L., and Barrett, A. J. (1991) Biochem. J. 279, 907-911
4. Mentlein, R. (1988) FEBS Lett. 234, 251-256[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Shinoda, M., Toide, K., Ohsawa, I., and Kohsaka, S. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 235, 641-645[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Toide, K., Shinoda, M., Fujiwara, T., and Iwamoto, Y. (1997) Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 56, 427-434[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Welches, W. R., Brosnihan, K. B., and Ferrario, C. M. (1993) Life Sci. 33, 2149-2157
8. Ishino, T., Ohtsuki, S., Homma, K., and Natori, S. (1998) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 123, 540-545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Julius, D., Blair, L., Brake, A., Sprague, G. F., and Thorner, J. (1983) Cell 32, 839-852[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Yoshimoto, T., Kanatani, A., Shimoda, T., Inaoka, T., Kokubo, T., and Tsuru, D. (1991) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 110, 873-878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Kanatani, A., Yoshimoto, T., Kitazono, A., Kokubo, T., and Tsuru, D. (1993) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 113, 790-796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Fuller, R. S., Sterne, R. E., and Thorner, J. (1988) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 50, 345-362[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Roberts, C., Pohlig, G., Rothman, J. H., and Stevens, T. H. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 1363-1373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Rennex, D., Hemmings, B. A., Hofsteenge, J., and Stone, S. R. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 2195-2203[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Darmoul, D., Lacasa, M., Baricault, L., Marguet, D., Sapin, C., Trotot, P., Barbat, A., and Trugnan, G. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4824-4833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Ogata, S., Misumi, Y., and Ikehara, Y. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 3596-3601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Vanhoof, G., Goossens, F., Hendriks, L., De Meester, I., Hendriks, D., Vriend, G., Van Broeckhoven, C., and Scharpe, S. (1994) Gene (Amst.) 149, 363-366[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Kanatani, A., Masuda, T., Shimoda, T., Misoka, F., Lin, X. S., Yoshimoto, T., and Tsuru, D. (1991) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 110, 315-320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Yoshimoto, T., Tabira, J., Kabashima, T., Inoue, S., and Ito, K. (1995) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 117, 654-660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Burleigh, B. A., Caler, E. V., Webster, P., and Andrews, N. W. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 609-620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Caler, E. V., Vaena, S., Haynes, P. A., Andrews, N. W., and Burleigh, B. A. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4975-4986[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Burleigh, B. A., and Andrews, N. W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5172-5180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Rodriguez, A., Rioult, M. G., Ora, A., and Andrews, N. W. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 1263-1273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Leite, M. F., Moyer, M. S., Nathanson, M. H., and Andrews, N. W. (1998) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 92, 1-13[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Ashall, F. (1990) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 38, 77-87[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Ribeiro de Andrade, A. S., Santoro, M. M., de Melo, M. N., and Mares-Guia, M. (1998) Exp. Parasitol. 89, 153-160[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Kornblatt, J. D., Mpimbaza, G. W. N., and Lonsdale-Eccles, J. D. (1992) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 293, 25-31[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Troeberg, L., Pike, R. N., Morty, R. E., Berry, R. K., Coetzer, T. H. T., and Lonsdale-Eccles, J. D. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 238, 728-736[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Mbawa, Z., Gumm, I., Fish, W. R., and Lonsdale-Eccles, J. D. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 195, 183-190[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Morty, R. E., Troeberg, L., Pike, R. N., Jones, R., Nickel, P., Lonsdale-Eccles, J. D., and Coetzer, T. H. T. (1998) FEBS Lett. 433, 251-256[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Brandenberger, G., Buguet, A., Spiegel, K., Stanghellini, A., Muanga, G., Bogui, P., and Dumas, M. (1996) J. Biol. Rhythms 11, 258-267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Tetaert, D., Soudan, B., Huet-Duvillier, G., Degand, P., and Boersma, A. (1993) Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 41, 147-152[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Ndung'u, J. M., Wright, N. G., Jennings, F. W., and Murray, M. (1992) Parasitol. Res. 78, 553-556[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Tizard, I., Nielson, K., Seed, J. R., and Hall, J. E. (1978) Microbiol. Rev. 42, 661-681
35. Grab, D. J., and Bwayo, J. J. (1982) Acta Trop. 39, 363-366[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Lanham, S. M., and Godfrey, D. G. (1970) Exp. Parasitol. 28, 521-534[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Jameson, G. W., Roberts, D. V., Adams, R. W., Kyle, W. S., and Elmore, D. T. (1973) Biochem. J. 131, 107-117[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Read, S. M., and Northcote, D. H. (1981) Anal. Biochem. 116, 53-64[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Auerswald, E. A., Genenger, G., Mentele, R., Lenzen, S., Assfalg-Machleidt, I., Mitschang, L., Oschkinat, H., and Fritz, H. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 200, 131-138[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Ryan, K., Dasgupta, S., and Beverely, S. M. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 131, 145-150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Shirasawa, Y., Osawa, T., and Hirashima, A. (1994) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 115, 724-729[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Ellis, K. J., and Morrison, J. F. (1982) Methods Enzymol. 87, 405-426[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Salvesen, G., and Nagase, H. (1989) in Proteolytic Enzymes: A Practical Approach (Benyon, R. J. , and Bond, J. S., eds) , pp. 83-104, IRL Press, Oxford
45. Beith, J. G. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 248, 59-84[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Potempa, J., Pike, R. N., and Travis, J. (1997) Biol. Chem. 378, 223-230
47. Deleted in proof
48. Polgàr, L. (1997) Proteins 28, 375-379[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Schechter, I., and Berger, A. (1967) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 32, 898-902
50. Harper, J. W., Hemmi, K., and Powers, J. C. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 1831-1841[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Markwardt, F., Drawert, J., and Walsmann, P. (1974) Biochem. Pharmacol. 23, 2247-2256[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Barrett, A. J., Kambhavi, A. A., Brown, M. A., Kirschke, H., Knight, C. G., Tamai, M., and Hanada, K. (1982) Biochem. J. 201, 189-198[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Sreedharan, S. K., Verma, C., Caves, L. S. D., Brocklehurst, S. M., Gharbia, S. E., Shah, H. N., and Brocklehurst, K. (1996) Biochem. J. 316, 777-786
54. Caughey, G. H., Raymond, W. W., Bacci, E., Lombardy, R. J., and Tidwell, R. R. (1993) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 264, 676-682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Shrimpton, C. N., Glucksman, M. J., Lew, R. A., Tullai, J. W., Marguiles, E. H., Roberts, J. L., and Smith, A. I. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17395-17399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Dunn, B. M. (1989) in Proteolytic Enzymes: A Practical Approach (Benyon, R. J. , and Bond, J. S., eds) , pp. 57-81, IRL Press, Oxford
57. Lonsdale-Eccles, J. D., and Grab, D. J. (1987) Eur. J. Biochem. 169, 467-475[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. McCann, P. P., Bacchi, C. J., Clarkson, A. B., Seed, J. R., Nathan, H. C., Amole, B. O., Hutner, S. H., and Sjoerdsma, A. (1981) Med. Biol. (Helsinki) 59, 434-440
59. Fairlamb, A. H., Blackburn, P., Ulrich, P., Chait, B. T., and Cerami, A. (1985) Science 227, 1485-1487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
60. Kalwant, S., and Porter, A. G. (1991) Biochem. J. 276, 237-244
61. Fülöp, V., Böcskei, Z., and Polgár, L. (1998) Cell 94, 161-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Kreil, G. (1990) Trends Biochem. Sci. 15, 23-26[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
63. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.