![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 26233-26239, September 10, 1999
§,
§,
,
,
,
,
, and
§§
From the
Research Institute of Molecular Pathology,
Dr. Bohr Gasse 7, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, ¶ Boehringer
Ingelheim Austria, Dr. Boehringer-Gasse 5-11, A-1121 Vienna, Austria, the
Department of General and
Experimental Pathology, University of Innsbruck, Fritz-Preglstrasse 3, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria, the ** Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown
University Medical Center, Washington, D.C. 20007-2197, and the

Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry,
Am Klopferspitz, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We used flow cytometry to sort and analyze apical
and basolateral endocytic vesicles from filter-grown Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells after membrane internalization of the lipophilic fluorescent probe trimethylamino-diphenylhexatriene. Western blot analysis of sorted fractions showed enrichment of the early endosomal markers transferrin receptor and the small GTPase Rab5. Two-dimensional gel analysis indicated that the apical and basolateral early endosomes differed significantly in their protein composition. We found nine
polypeptides to be specifically enriched in apical or basolateral endocytic vesicles. An apical protein identified by microsequencing was
the adaptor molecule syntenin. This protein contains two PDZ domains
(PSD-95, Dlg, and ZO-1 homology) that bind syndecan and ephrin-B2
cytoplasmic domains. In MDCK cells, transiently overexpressed Myc-tagged syntenin localized to both plasma membrane domains and to an
intracellular vesicular compartment. Syntenin positive vesicles
colocalized with internalized transferrin in the perinuclear region. In
addition, syntenin colocalized in the apical supranuclear region with
Rab5 and Rab11; the latter is a marker for the apical recycling
endosomes in MDCK cells.
Endocytosis includes "cellular drinking" (the unselective
uptake of fluids) and the selective uptake of nutrients, hormones, and
growth factors by receptors. Endocytosis occurs from both apical and
basolateral surfaces in epthelial cells (1, 2). Clathrin-coated
vesicles derived from the apical or basolateral plasma membrane lose
their coat and fuse with early endosomes. Endocytosed cell surface
receptors and other membrane proteins, as well as fluid phase markers,
therefore appear first in early endosomes. Early endosomes comprise at
least two functionally distinct compartments (3). Internalized
receptors and ligands first enter the peripheral sorting endosomes. In
these compartments, some membrane proteins are sorted away from those
proteins destined for degradation. In particular, some receptor-ligand
complexes and the remaining solutes are transported to late endosomes
and lysosomes to be degraded, whereas the transferrin receptor
(Tf-R)1 recycles back to the
basolateral cell surface (4). Recycling back to the plasma membrane can
occur directly from the so-called sorting endosome (fast cycle) or
indirectly via the recycling endosome (5).
Work on endocytic compartments in epithelial MDCK cells has
demonstrated that apical early endosomes are distributed below the
apical microvilli above the ring of tight junctions and that basolateral early endosomes are found alongside the lateral as well as
the basal membranes (6, 7). Both compartments form three-dimensional
networks of tubular cisternal and vesicular structures (2). In
vitro fusion assays with endosomes derived from the MDCK cell line
have confirmed that there is a specific set of early endosomes
associated with each plasma membrane domain. These endosomes show
homotypic fusion but no heterotypic fusion activities with each other
(7, 8). Recent evidence suggests that in epithelia, apical and
basolateral endocytic pathways converge in an apically located,
pericentriolar endosomal compartment termed the apical recycling
endosome. In this compartment, apically and basolaterally internalized
membrane constituents are thought to be sorted for recycling back to
their site of origin or for transcytosis to the opposite plasma
membrane domain. Up to now, marker proteins for early endosomes, such
as Rab5, were found on both apical and basolateral early endosomes (9).
Other proteins, such as annexin II, show, in addition to miscellaneous
subcellular localizations, an association with peripheral
transferrin-labeled endosomes in epithelial cells (10), whereas Rab25
and Rab11a were found to be associated with the apical recycling system
of polarized MDCK cells (11). In addition, it was shown that recycling
of endocytosed transferrin and transferrin receptor through this
pericentriolar endosomal compartment requires hydrolysis of GTP on
Rab11 (12, 13).
The complexity of endocytic recycling and the limited number of marker
proteins identified to date suggests that there are many yet
unidentified molecules involved in regulating endocytic trafficking in
polarized cells. One approach to gain more knowledge about the apical
and basolateral specifities for endocytosis is to analyze the overall
molecular composition and organization of apical and basolateral early
endocytic vesicles. For this purpose, the lipophilic fluorescent probe
trimethylamino-diphenylhexatriene (TMA-DPH) that intercalates in
membrane structures has been used for studying endocytosis (14-20).
TMA-DPH is a cationic analogue of DPH that has also proven useful as a
probe for studying bulk-phase endocytosis (14-17, 20-22). In
addition, the dye does not diffuse through tight junctions, and for
this reason, it has been used successfully in anisotropy experiments to
estimate in situ the lipid order of the plasma membrane of
polarized MDCK II cells (23).
Here we combined the use of TMA-DPH with conventional density gradient
centrifugation (24) with high speed organelle sorting in a flow
cytometer (fluorescence-activated organelle sorting (FAOS)) to analyze
the apical and basolateral endosomal proteins in MDCK cells (22, 25).
Using high resolution 2D gel electrophoresis (2DE) and protein
microsequencing, we identified the adaptor protein syntenin in apical
endocytic vesicles. Syntenin contains a tandem repeat of two PDZ
domains. PDZ domains mediate protein-protein interactions and typically
bind to short amino acid motifs at the carboxyl terminus of interacting
proteins, including certain ion channels and transmembrane receptors.
As such, syntenin reacts with the FYA carboxyl-terminal amino acid
sequence of syndecans (26) and with the carboxyl terminus of B-type
ephrins (27). By combining a novel strategy for subcellular
fractionation with biochemical analysis and transient overexpression of
syntenin, we could for the first time demonstrate an association of
this recently identified adaptor molecule with the apical recycling compartment of MDCK cells.
Cells, Media, and Antibodies--
MDCK I and II cells were
cultured and seeded on filters (Costar; pore size, 0.4 µm) as
described previously (10, 28). Before each experiment, the confluency
of the monolayer was confirmed by measuring transepithelial electrical
resistance. In vivo staining with TMA-DPH was carried out
with a baby hamster kidney cell line (BHK-21) grown on coverslips
(29).
Monoclonal anti-human Tf-R antibodies were obtained from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals, and the monoclonal antibodies against E-cadherin and annexin II were from Transduction Laboratories. Polyclonal antibodies against Rab4, Rab5, and Rab7 were raised against
synthetic peptides derived from the carboxyl terminus and prepared in
our laboratory as outlined (30). Polyclonal antibodies against Rab11
(31) and monoclonal antibodies against Rab5 (9) were used as described
previously. Myc-tagged syntenin was detected with an anti 9E10
monoclonal antibody or a polyclonal affinity-purified antibody
generated in our laboratory against a Myc peptide (32). All secondary
antibodies were obtained from Dianova.
In Vivo Labeling of Cells with TMA-DPH--
Lyophilized TMA-DPH
was from Molecular Probes and reconstituted as a 20 mM
stock solution in Me2SO (Fluka).
BHK-21 cells were washed 2-3 times with prechilled PBS2+
(PBS, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM
MgCl2) at 4 °C. Drops of TMA-DPH diluted to 100 µM in NaOAc transport buffer (250 mM HEPES,
pH 7.4, 1.15 M NaOAc, 25 mM MgCl2)
were added on top of the monolayer. After incubation for 3-4 min on an
ice-cold metal plate, the dye was removed by briefly washing with
prechilled PBS2+. Internalization was carried out in an
incubator at 37 °C for various time points. Double stainings with
acridine orange were peformed as described (33).
Filter-grown MDCK II cells were washed twice in ice-cold
PBS2+ for 5 min at 4 °C and once for 2 min in prechilled
NaOAc buffer. TMA-DPH diluted to 50 µM in NaOAc transport
buffer was added to the apical or basolateral cell surface and the
cells incubating for 2 min at 4 °C. Immediately after TMA-DPH
binding, the filters were incubated at 37 °C in a water bath for 2 min with prewarmed medium.
Subcellular Fractionation--
Following internalization, MDCK
II cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and scraped, and a postnuclear
supernatant (PNS) was prepared as described previously (22, 24, 34).
The PNS from one and a half filter inserts was loaded on top of one
SW60 tube (Beckman) containing a continuous sucrose gradient (10-40%
sucrose). After centrifugation (100,000 × g at 4 °C
for 16 h), 20 fractions were collected with an Auto Densi-Flow
fraction collector (Labconco Corp.) and analyzed. To generate amounts
suitable for preparative FACS sorting, up to 10 filter inserts were used.
Internalization of HRP as Fluid-Phase Marker--
Horseradish
peroxidase (HRP) (5-10 mg/ml; Sigma) was internalized from fetal calf
serum-free medium into early endosomes and further chased into late
endosomes as described previously (24). HRP activity was assayed using
o-dianisidine and peroxide as substrates as described (24).
Specific activity of the fractions is given as ng of HRP/mg of protein.
Western Blotting--
Protein concentrations were measured using
the Micro BCA protein assay reagent kit (Pierce) following the
manufacturer's specifications. All protein precipitations were carried
out with the CHCl3/methanol method (35). Precipitated
proteins were dissolved in SDS-sample buffer and separated by 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by semidry
electrophoretic transfer onto nitrocellulose membranes. Proteins were
detected using specific antibodies as outlined previously (34).
FAOS of TMA-DPH-labeled Endosomes--
TMA-DPH was titrated by
flow cytometry using labeled PNS to avoid complex quenching effects
from the Förster-type fluorescence resonance autotransfer (18).
The best compromise between the highest amount of sortable material and
the minimum of false positive structures was obtained at 50 µM TMA-DPH (data not shown). Fractions enriched in
TMA-DPH-labeled endosomes were diluted 1:100 in PBS and analyzed using
a FACS Vantage Turbo Sort Option (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA)
equipped with an Argon laser tuned to 40 MW multiline UV and 210 mW 488 nm output using a 4xx/44-nm bandpass filter and a 50-µm nozzle.
System threshold was set on forward light scatter, and photomultiplier
tube voltage was adjusted using unlabeled PNS. Fractions containing
more than 10% of labeled vesicles were gated for preparative sorts.
The concentration of these fractions was adjusted to give event rates
of approximately 15,000 events/s at lowest possible sample differential
pressure at a sheath pressure of 45 psi. Droplet formation frequency
was adjusted to approximately 70 kHz. The large volumes (typically more
than 20 ml) of sorted material was concentrated by several steps of
sec-butanol extraction and finally
CHCl3/methanol precipitated (35).
2DE and Microsequencing--
2DE was performed following in-gel
sample reswelling as described (34, 36). The gels were stained with
ammoniacal silver, scanned, and analyzed as described (34, 36, 37).
Preparative amounts of total membrane fractions from MDCK II cells (34, 36) were precipitated, dissolved, and separated as outlined for
analytical gels and stained with Coomassie (34, 36). Candidate proteins
were identified in several gels and spots collected for microsequencing. Microsequencing was performed as described (34).
Transient Transfection, Transferrin Internalization, and
Immunofluorescence--
A polymerase chain reaction fragment amplified
with BamHI-XhoI linkers encoding the cDNA of
syntenin (amino acids residues 2-298) was generated from a human
syntenin cDNA clone obtained from the IMAGE Consortium (unique
IMAGE Consortium identifier 33203 and GenBankTM accession
number R19118). This BamHI-XhoI fragment was
subcloned in frame, into a BamHI-XhoI
downstream of a Myc epitope in a pcDNA-3 expression vector
(Invitrogen) containing a Kozak consensus sequence. Thus, an
amino-terminally Myc-tagged human syntenin cDNA was created that
could be recognized by the 9E10 anti-Myc antibody (32). DNA sequencing
was performed to confirm the integrity of this pcDNAIII-Myc-syntenin construct.
Filter-grown MDCK I Rab5 cells were transfected with
pcDNAIII-Myc-syntenin using a PEI/Ad5 system as described
previously (38). For internalization of transferrin, the cells were
washed with Hanks' balanced salts (Life Technologies, Inc.) and
incubated in serum-free medium containing 50 µM
desferoxamine mesylate (Sigma) for 3 h at 37 °C to deplete the
cells from Fe2+ and enrich ligand-free transferrin receptor
on the plasma membrane. Thereafter, the cells were washed with ice-cold
PBS2+. The filters were then placed on a drop of prewarmed
medium (on a piece of parafilm) containing 100 µg/ml
transferrin-Alexa 488TM (Molecular Probes), overlaid with prewarmed
medium, and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Internalization was
stopped by placing the filters in ice-cold PBS2+, followed
by three washes to remove free transferrin. Subsequently, cells were
extracted with 0.05% saponin in cytoskeleton buffer (10 mM
PIPES, pH 6.8, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM glucose, 5 mM MgCl2) and
processed for immunofluorescence as described (28). The filter pieces
were mounted in 50% glycerol in cytoskeleton buffer containing 4%
n-propyl gallate (Sigma), and confocal microscopy images
were obtained using a Leica TCS NT confocal microscope (Leica,
Heidelberg, Germany). Images were processed using the Imaris and
Colocalization software packages (Bitplane AG, Zürich, Switzerland) after deconvolution using measured point-spread functions with the Huygens software (Scientific Volume Imaging, Hilversum, Netherlands).
TMA-DPH Labeling and Sample Preparation for Flow
Cytometry--
TMA-DPH has been shown to interact with living BHK-21
cells by instantaneous incorporation into the plasma membrane. To
confirm the predicted properties of TMA-DPH as endocytic membrane
tracer (14, 20, 21), we established an internalization protocol in
BHK-21 cells, in which filling kinetics of endosomes are well characterized. For this purpose, we prebound TMA-DPH to the cell surface at 4 °C and internalized for 2 and 30 min by warming up the
sample to 37 °C. The distribution of TMA-DPH in living cells was
analyzed by direct fluorescence microscopy (Fig.
1). TMA-DPH bound to the plasma membrane
at 4 °C (Fig. 1A) and could be internalized into an early
endocytic compartment 2 min after raising the temperature to 37 °C
(Fig. 1B). In addition, the perinuclear compartment (Fig. 1C) that was labeled after 30 min of TMA-DPH internalization
was colocalized with acridine orange, a marker for acidic late
endocytic/lysosomal compartments (Fig. 1D). This confirms
that TMA-DPH is rapidly incorporated into the plasma membrane and
follows the normal intracellular traffic of internalization, thus
behaving as a suitable marker for membrane endocytosis under the
applied conditions.
Preenrichment of HRP and TMA-DPH Containing Endocytic
Organelles--
We first compared the distribution of fluid phase
internalized HRP with internalized TMA-DPH after subcellular
fractionation of cells on sucrose gradients. We internalized HRP in
filter-grown MDCK II cells through the apical or basolateral medium.
Cells were homogenized, and the PNS was then loaded on top of a
continuous sucrose gradient (10-40%) and centrifuged to equilibrium.
A total of 20 fractions per gradient were collected and analyzed for
their HRP activity and total amounts of protein (Fig.
2A). The apical and
basolateral internalization profiles showed a peak area that spanned
fractions 10-16, corresponding to 25-35% of sucrose concentration (1.104-1.151 g/cm3). We next examined the gradient
distribution for TMA-DPH-labeled early endocytic structures. After
binding TMA-DPH to the basolateral or apical plasma membrane for 2 min
at 4 °C, the fluorescent dye was internalized for 2 min at 37 °C
(Fig. 2B), and cells were fractionated as in Fig.
2A. When compared with the distribution profiles obtained by
HRP labeling of apical and basolateral endocytic vesicles of MDCK II
cells, TMA-DPH labeling revealed a largely overlapping peak area
between fractions 14 and 16, corresponding to 30-35% concentration of
sucrose.
Immunoblotting of these fractions revealed the presence of Tf-R, Rab5,
and Rab4 as early endosomal markers (10, 39, 40) and Rab7 as a marker
protein for late endosomes (41) in the overlapping peak areas (outlined
in Fig. 2C). However, this sucrose concentration
corresponded to the density of early endocytic organelles rather than
to the reported density of late endocytic vesicles (42), emphasizing
that conventional gradient fractionation is not sufficient to separate
(a) early from late endocytic structures, or (b)
apical from basolateral endosomes in MDCK II cells.
Western Blot Analysis of the FACS-sorted Fractions Confirms
Enrichment of Endosomes--
Gradient fractions containing >10%
TMA-DPH-labeled apical or basolateral vesicles, as referred to the PNS
fraction, were pooled and subsequently sorted in a flow cytometer as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Proteins of sorted
fractions were concentrated and precipitated, and their protein content
was determined. 5 µg of protein (equivalent to about 40 million
sorted fluorescent events) derived from apical or basolateral sorts and
5 µg of protein precipitated from the starting fraction were
separated by 10% Tris-glycine SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
The gel was transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane, stained with
Ponceau-S to confirm equal loading of samples (Fig.
3A), and prepared for immunodetection. Apical as well as basolateral fractions revealed an
enrichment of early endocytic markers after FACS sorting (Fig. 3B). Rab5a is a common component of the apical and
basolateral endocytic machinery in polarized MDCK cells (9) and was
strongly enriched in both fractions. However, Tf-R, a basolaterally
endocytosed and recycling transmembrane protein (43, 44), was only
enriched in basolateral fractions but was clearly present in the apical compartment. A marker protein for the plasma membrane, E-cadherin, was
significantly decreased in the sorted fractions, as well as the late
endosomal GTPase Rab7. Annexin II, a Ca2+-, phospholipid-,
and actin-binding protein implicated in the regulation of vesicular
traffic (10, 45, 46) was much less abundant when compared with the
gradient purified starting fractions. Taken together, when compared
with the gradient purified starting material, TMA-DPH-sorted fractions
revealed substantial enrichment of early endocytic markers.
2DE Illustrates Significant Differences in Overall Protein Content
of FACS-sorted Fractions--
High resolution 2DE was used to analyze
the complexity of the obtained samples and to characterize the protein
composition of FACS-sorted fractions.
Subcellular fractionation of the PNS (Fig.
4A) revealed simplified
protein patterns (Fig. 4B) and specific enrichment of
proteins in the FACS-sorted fractions (Fig. 4, C and
D). In order to identify some of the proteins by protein
sequencing, we resolved preparative amounts of total MDCK II membrane
fractions by high resolution 2D gels (34, 36). The analytical gels of
basolateral or apical early endosomes were aligned with preparative
gels of total membrane fractions, and some of the candidate proteins
were found as Coomassie-stained spots (data not shown). Spots were
excised and subsequently microsequenced after in-gel digestion (34,
36). First, we confirmed the presence of known organelle markers in the
starting fractions (see Fig. 4A and Table
I). The endoplasmic reticulum proteins
calreticulin and BIP (GRP78) and VIP36, a lectin involved in
biosynthetic transport, were clearly less abundant in the sorted
fractions when compared with PNS and gradient-purified fractions. The
association of the epithelial-specific cytokeratin 19 (intermediate
filaments) and of cathepsin D (late endosomes/lysosomes) with membranes
was not affected, whereas the Syntenin Is Associated with an Apical Endosomal
Compartment--
We found six polypeptides specifically enriched in
apical vesicles and three basolateral-specific ones (Fig. 4,
C and D and Table I). Two peptides were sequenced
out of the apical spot ap1, yielding two sequences of 6 and 18 amino
acids (Table I), identical with amino acids 187-204 and 218-224 of a
protein originally submitted as Pbp1 (human scaffold protein,
GenBankTM accession number
U83463).2 An identical
sequence was submitted and characterized later as syntenin
(GenBankTM accession number AF000652, see Ref. 26).
Syntenin was described as human scaffold/adaptor protein that can
associate with the cytoplasmic leaflet of membranes by binding syndecan
and B-class ephrin cytoplasmic domains (26, 27).
To confirm the association of syntenin with an apical endosomal
compartment, we transiently transfected filter-grown MDCK I cells
overexpressing Rab5 (10) with a pcDNAIII-Myc-syntenin construct. Indirect double immunofluorescence analysis by laser scanning confocal microscopy in saponin-permeabilized and PFA-fixed cells revealed a perinuclear colocalization of syntenin with an Alexa
488TM-labeled transferrin after internalization through the basolateral
medium, reminiscent of the pericentriolar recycling endosome (Fig.
5A). In support of this
finding, syntenin partially co-localized with Rab5 containing apical
early endosomes (Fig. 5B). Antibodies to Rab11 label an
apical pericentriolar endosomal compartment that is accessible to
membrane-bound markers internalized from either the apical or
basolateral pole, functionally defining it as the apical recycling
endosome (11). Most importantly, a significant colocalization of
syntenin with Rab11 in the apical recycling endosome of transfected
cells was detected (Fig. 5C).
When grown on permeable filter supports, MDCK cells form a
polarized monolayer with apical and basolateral compartments that are
tightly sealed and separated from each other by tight junctions (47).
Using this cell system and selective internalization of endocytic
tracers, we have gained experimental access to apical and basolateral
endocytic compartments (7). This was accomplished by internalizing
TMA-DPH into early endosomes through the apical or basolateral medium
for 2 min and then fractionating the MDCK homogenate using continuous
sucrose gradients (22, 49). As expected, the TMA-DPH peak fraction
contained early and late endocytic markers that co-migrated in sucrose
gradients together with fluid phase-internalized HRP. These fractions
served as starting material for the FAOS in a conventional FACS machine.
Basolateral fractions obtained after FAOS were enriched in endocytic
markers, such as Tf-R and Rab5. However, although to a much lesser
extent, there was also Tf-R found on vesicle populations isolated after
apical membrane endocytosis, implying that after 2 min of membrane
internalization, the lipophilic fluorescent probe TMA-DPH can reach an
apical endosomal compartment containing Tf-R, Rab5, and Rab11. The
significant simplification of protein patterns and the selective
abatement of other organelle markers in the TMA-DPH-sorted fractions
supports the potential of FAOS as an enrichment method for early
endocytic vesicles (22, 25).
We mapped apical and basolateral fractions on high resolution 2DE and
analyzed their overall protein composition. Among the six polypeptides
specifically enriched in apical vesicles, we identified spot ap1 as
syntenin by direct microsequencing from preparative 2D gels (34, 36).
Syntenin is a 30-kDa protein that binds to the cytoplasmic domains of
several transmembrane receptors. One target of syntenin is the family
of syndecans, which are cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans that
participate in multiple cell functions (50). Syntenin binds via its
tandem PDZ domains to the FYA carboxyl-terminal amino acid sequence of the syndecans (26). When syntenin is expressed as a green fluorescence protein fusion protein in Chinese hamster ovary cells, staining is
observed at both the plasma membrane and uncharacterized intracellular vesicles (26). Interestingly, syntenin may have a general function as a
scaffold protein, because another set of receptors, B-class ephrins,
also bind syntenin through their carboxyl-terminal tail (27). B-class
ephrins are transmembrane proteins and function as ligands for B-class
ephrin receptor tyrosine kinases. Both receptors and ligands are
postulated to possess an intrinsic signaling function and are involved
in the hormone dependent morphogenesis of the mammary gland (27).
Because syntenin itself has no obvious catalytic domain (26), it may
function as an intracellular adaptor or scaffolding protein to link
transmembrane receptors to signaling components or the submembranous cytoskeleton.
The correct recycling and localization of cell surface receptors after
endocytosis is required for cellular integrity and in some cases may be
linked to signaling events. For example, activated epidermal growth
factor receptors are rapidly internalized into the endocytotic
compartment and degraded in lysosomes after epidermal growth factor
stimulation. The mechanism of epidermal growth factor receptor
internalization occurs via its transient association with the
SH3-SH2-SH3 adaptor protein GRB2, which is able to couple with the
endocytic regulator dynamin (18). Likewise, syntenin may also function
in rapid trafficking or recycling of transmembrane receptors, because
our fractionation experiments demonstrated that endogenous syntenin
protein was associated with an early endocytic vesicular compartment of
apical origin. To further explore this possibility, we transiently
expressed Myc-tagged syntenin in a MDCK I cell line stably transfected
with Rab5 (9). Ectopically expressed syntenin was found to be uniformly
distributed over both plasma membrane domains, as well as on
intracellular Rab5 positive vesicles, as revealed by indirect
immunofluorescence analysis. Interestingly, syntenin co-localized with
internalized transferrin-Alexa 488TM in the pericentriolar recycling
compartment. Furthermore, apical syntenin vesicles showed substantial
colocalization with Rab11. The small GTP-binding protein Rab11 is
concentrated in the pericentriolar endosomal recycling compartment of
cultured mammalian cells and plays a key role in the passage of
recycling Tf-R through that compartment (13). The intracellular
localization of syntenin as revealed by immunofluorescence analysis
confirms the resolution obtained by the combined subcellular
fractionation approach. Although these apical endocytic vesicles showed
significant enrichment of syntenin after FAOS, the subcellular
distribution of syntenin at the immunofluorescence level indicates that
its passage through the apical recycling compartment in MDCK cells is
quite dynamic, and only a small portion of cytoplasmic syntenin is
associated with it at any time. The exact function of syntenin is still
unclear. Syntenin has recently been shown to interact with the
cytoplasmic tail of pro-transforming growth factor- One of the major challenges of studying endocytosis in polarized
epithelial cells has been the lack of proteins specific for apical
endosomal compartments. In principle, flow cytometry can be used for
purification of any organelle or cellular constituent that can be
labeled with a fluorescent compound (25). The labeling and
fractionation system that was developed here may allow the identification of additional proteins involved in apical and
basolateral endocytosis.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (107K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
In vivo labeling of plasma
membrane and various endocytic compartments in BHK-21 cells with
TMA-DPH. BHK-21 cells were grown on coverslips, and TMA-DPH (50 µM) was bound to the cell surface at 4 °C.
Subsequently, the dye was internalized for 2 min or 30 min at 37 °C.
After 30 min of internalization, the coverslip was counterstained with
the vital dye acridine orange, which labels acidic late
endosomal/lysosomal compartments. Bar, 10 µm.
A, TMA-DPH binds and labels the cell surface following
incubation at 4 °C. B, bound TMA-DPH was internalized
into early endosomes for 2 min at 37 °C. C, TMA-DPH
labels a perinuclear late endocytic compartment after 30 min of
internalization. D, double in vivo labeling of
the same cells as in C with acridine orange.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Continuous sucrose gradients yield early and
late endocytic fractions between 25 and 35% of sucrose and cannot
separate apical from basolateral endosomes. A, profile of
the HRP/protein content (ng/µg) of apical (filled symbols)
and basolateral (open symbols) fractions obtained from a
continuos sucrose gradient (10-40%), plotted against the fraction
number. Cells were grown on permeable filter supports, and HRP (5 mg/ml) was internalized through the apical or basolateral medium for 10 min at 37 °C. The cells were scraped and homogenized, and the
resulting PNS was loaded on top of a continuous sucrose gradient
(10-40%). 20 fractions per gradient were collected, and the
HRP/protein content determined. Both gradients showed a peak area
covering fractions 10-16, corresponding to a sucrose concentration of
25-35%. B, TMA-DPH-labeled early endocytic vesicles
(filled symbols, apical fractions; open symbols,
basolateral fractions) were preenriched in a largely overlapping peak
area with HRP-labeled endosomes (fraction 10-16, corresponding to
25-35% sucrose). MDCK II cells were grown on permeable filter
supports and fractionated as in A, and fractions were
analyzed by flow cytometry. The percentage of labeled vesicles per
fraction was plotted against the fraction number. C, Western
blot analysis of fractions collected from continuous sucrose gradients
(A and B). Equal volumes of each fraction were
precipitated and analyzed on immunoblots for Tf-R, Rab5, and Rab4 as
early endocytic markers and Rab7 as a late endocytic marker. The figure
indicates an overlap of early and late endocytic markers within the
peak areas of internalized HRP/TMA-DPH (A and
B).

View larger version (82K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Western blot analysis of TMA-DPH-sorted
endosomes. FACS-sorted fractions of apical and basolateral
TMA-DPH-labeled early endosomes were separated on a 10% Tris-glycine
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel and transferred to
nitrocellulose. Subsequent immunoblotting revealed enrichment of the
sorted material in comparison to the input gradient fractions.
A, scans of the Ponceau-S stained nitrocellulose membranes
(5 µg of protein were loaded in all lanes). Lane 1, basolateral sorted fractions; lane 2, apical sorted
material; lane 3, gradient fraction serving as a reference.
B, antibody detection of the nitrocellulose membrane shown
in A (E-cadherin, Tf-R, annexin II, Rab5, and Rab7).
1- and
2-subunits of trimeric G
proteins, as well as actin and annexin II (compare with Fig. 3), were
significantly reduced in amounts after sorting. Taken together, the
protein patterns of apical and basolateral early endocytic fractions
differed remarkably (compare Fig. 4, C and D).
Further experiments were aimed at identifying one of the apically
enriched proteins and confirming its subcellular localization.

View larger version (124K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
2DE of apical and basolateral endosomes of
MDCK II cells. Equal amounts of protein (6 µg) were loaded in
all gels. Gels were aligned, compared, and assigned with MELANIE.
Numbers define either SWISS-PROT accession numbers of known proteins in
the according PNS (e.g. P02570,
-actin) or polypeptides
specifically enriched in apical (e.g. ap1) and basolateral
early endocytic fractions (e.g. bl1), respectively.
A, PNS; B, gradient fraction; C,
apical sorted fraction; D, basolateral sorted
fraction.
Proteins identified in FACS sorted apical and basolateral endocytic
vesicles

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Colocalization analysis of syntenin
with Rab5, internalized transferrin, and Rab11. An MDCK I cell
line stably overexpressing Rab5 was grown on permeable filter supports
and transiently transfected with pcDNA-III-Myc-syntenin.
Transferrin-containing compartments were labeled for 15 min by
continuous internalization of transferrin-Alexa488TM. Red
labeling shows Myc-syntenin (A-C); green
labeling is transferrin-Alexa488TM (A), Rab5 (B),
or Rab11 (C); and yellow indicates locations at
which they are merged. Extended focus (summarizing staining in several
stacks of x-y axis planes) and a vertical section
image (x-z axis) taken by confocal microscopy and image
processing are shown. Vertical section in C was recorded in
the direction indicated by the white line. Myc-tagged
syntenin partially co-localizes with internalized transferrin
(A) and Rab5 (B) in the pericentriolar recycling
compartment of MDCK cells. Significant overlap of syntenin with Rab11
is found in the apical supranuclear region (C).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and thereby
participates in targeting it to the cell surface (48). In polarized
epithelial cells, PDZ proteins, such as syntenin, may function in
regulating the correct localization of transmembrane receptors via
rerouting them through an apical endosomal compartment.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Jola Glotzer and Jan-Michael Peters for carefully reading the manuscript and for helpful discussions. We acknowledge Drs. Angela Wandinger-Ness and Rob Parton for the supply with monoclonal antibodies against Rab5 and polyclonal sera against Rab11, respectively. We also thank Drs. Marino Zerial and Cecilia Bucci for MDCK I cell lines overexpressing Rab5A.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Austrian Industrial Research Promotion Fund Grant FFF 3/11504, Austrian Science Foundation Grant FWF P11446-MED, and a grant from the Johnson & Johnson Focused Giving Program (to L. A. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ The first two authors contributed equally to this work.
§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 43-1-79730-622; Fax: 43-1-7987153; E-mail: huber@nt.imp.univie.ac.at.
2 P. D. Burbelo, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: Tf-R, transferrin receptor; TMA-DPH, 1-(4-trimethylammoniumphenyl)-6-phenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene p-toluene-sulfonate; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; FAOS, fluorescence-activated organelle sorting; MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney; BHK, baby hamster kidney; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; 2D, two-dimensional; 2DE, 2D gel electrophoresis; PDZ, PSD-95, Dlg, and ZO-1; PNS, postnuclear supernatant; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Simons, K., and Fuller, S. E. (1985) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1, 243-288[CrossRef] |
| 2. | Gruenberg, J., and Maxfield, F. R. (1995) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 552-563[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Ghosh, R. N., Gelman, D. L., and Maxfield, F. R. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 2177-2189[Abstract] |
| 4. |
Ghosh, R. N.,
and Maxfield, F. R.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
549-561 |
| 5. |
Hopkins, C. R.,
Gibson, A.,
Shipman, M.,
Strickland, D. L.,
and Trowbridge, I. S.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
1265-1274 |
| 6. |
Parton, R. G.,
Prydz, K.,
Bomsel, M.,
Simons, K.,
and Griffiths, G.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
3259-3272 |
| 7. |
Bomsel, M.,
Prydz, K.,
Parton, R. G.,
Gruenberg, J.,
and Simons, K.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
3243-3258 |
| 8. | Bomsel, M., Parton, R., Kuznetsov, S. A., Schroer, T. A., and Gruenberg, J. (1990) Cell 62, 719-731[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Harder, T.,
and Gerke, V.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1119-1132 |
| 10. |
Bucci, C.,
Wandinger-Ness, A.,
Lütcke, A.,
Chiariello, M.,
Bruni, C. B.,
and Zerial, M.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
5061-5065 |
| 11. |
Casanova, J. E.,
Wang, X.,
Kumar, R.,
Bhartur, S. G.,
Navarre, J.,
Woodrum, J. E.,
Altschuler, Y.,
Ray, G. S.,
and Goldenring, J. R.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
47-61 |
| 12. |
Ren, M.,
Xu, G.,
Zeng, J.,
De Lemos-Chiarandini, C.,
Adesnik, M.,
and Sabatini, D. D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6187-6192 |
| 13. |
Ullrich, O.,
Reinsch, S.,
Urbe, S.,
Zerial, M.,
and Parton, R. G.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
913-924 |
| 14. | Illinger, D., Poindron, P., Fonteneau, P., Modollel, M., and Kuhry, J.-G. (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1030, 73-81[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Cupers, P.,
Veithen, A.,
Kiss, A.,
Baudhuin, P.,
and Courtoy, P. J.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
725-735 |
| 16. |
Illinger, D.,
and Kuhry, J. G.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
783-794 |
| 17. | Masumoto, N., Tasaka, K., Mizuki, J., Tahara, M., Miyake, A., and Tanizawa, O. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 197, 207-213[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Illinger, D., Duportail, G., Mely, Y., Poirelmorales, N., Gerard, D., and Kuhry, J. G. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1239, 58-66[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Wang, Z. X., and Moran, M. F. (1996) Science 272, 1935-1939[Abstract] |
| 20. | Illinger, D., Poindron, P., and Kuhry, J. G. (1991) Biol. Cell 73, 131-138[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Illinger, D., Poindron, P., and Kuhry, J. G. (1991) Biol. Cell 71, 293-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Böck, G., Steinlein, P., Haberfellner, M., Gruenberg, J., and Huber, L. A. (1998) in Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook (Celis, J. E., ed), Vol. 2 , pp. 63-69, Academic Press, San Diego, CA |
| 23. |
Le Grimellec, C.,
Friedlander, G.,
and Giocondi, M. C.
(1988)
Am. J. Physiol.
255,
F22-F32 |
| 24. | Gruenberg, J., and Gorvel, J.-P. (1992) in Protein Targeting: A Practical Approach (Magee, A. I. , and Wileman, T., eds) , pp. 187-216, Oxford University Press, Oxford |
| 25. | Böck, I., Steinlein, P., and Huber, L. A. (1997) Tr. Cell Biol. 7, 499-503[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Grootjans, J. J.,
Zimmermann, P.,
Reekmans, G.,
Smets, A.,
Degeest, G.,
Durr, J.,
and David, G.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13683-13688 |
| 27. |
Lin, D.,
Gish, G. D.,
Songyang, Z.,
and Pawson, T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3726-3733 |
| 28. |
Huber, L. A.,
Pimplikar, S.,
Parton, R. G.,
Virta, H.,
Zerial, M.,
and Simons, K.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
35-45 |
| 29. |
Gruenberg, J.,
Griffiths, G.,
and Howell, K.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
108,
1301-1317 |
| 30. | Zerial, M., Parton, R., Chavrier, P., and Frank, R. (1992) Methods Enzymol. 219, 398-407[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Urbé, S., Huber, L. A., Zerial, M., Tooze, S. A., and Parton, R. G. (1993) FEBS Lett. 334, 175-182[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Evan, G. I.,
Lewis, G. K.,
Ramsay, G.,
and Bishop, J. M.
(1985)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5,
3610-3616 |
| 33. |
Matteoni, R.,
and Kreis, T. E.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
1253-1265 |
| 34. | Fialka, I., Pasquali, C., Lottspeich, F., Ahorn, H., and Huber, L. A. (1997) Electrophoresis 18, 2582-2590[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Wessel, D., and Flügge, U. I. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 138, 141-143[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Pasquali, C., Fialka, I., and Huber, L. A. (1997) Electrophoresis 18, 2573-2581[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. | Appel, R. D., Palagi, P. M., Walther, D., Vargas, J. R., Sanchez, J. C., Ravier, F., Pasquali, C., and Hochstrasser, D. F. (1997) Electrophoresis 18, 2724-2734[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. | Bischof, J., Vietor, I., Cotten, M., and Huber, L. A. (1999) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 380, 269-273 |
| 39. |
Van der Sluijs, P.,
Hull, M.,
Zahraoui, A.,
Tavitian, A.,
Goud, B.,
and Mellman, I.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
6313-6317 |
| 40. | Van der Sluijs, P., Hull, M., Webster, P., Mâle, P., Goud, B., and Mellman, I. (1992) Cell 70, 729-740[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Chavrier, P., Parton, R. G., Hauri, H. P., Simons, K., and Zerial, M. (1990) Cell 62, 317-329[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Aniento, F., and Gruenberg, J. (1995) Cold. Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 60, 205-209[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Nunez, M. T., Tapia, V., and Arredondo, M. (1996) J. Nutr. 126, 2151-2158 |
| 44. |
Odorizzi, G.,
Pearse, A.,
Domingo, D.,
Trowbridge, I. S.,
and Hopkins, C. R.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
139-152 |
| 45. |
Emans, N.,
Gorvel, J.-P.,
Walter, C.,
Gerke, V.,
Kellner, R.,
Griffiths, G.,
and Gruenberg, J.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
1357-1369 |
| 46. | Harder, T., Kellner, R., Parton, R. G., and Gruenberg, J. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 533-545[Abstract] |
| 47. | Simons, K., and Virta, H. (1998) in Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook (Celis, J. E., ed), 2nd Ed., Vol. 1 , pp. 101-106, Academic Press, Inc, San Diego, CA |
| 48. | Fernández-Larrea, J., Merlos-Suárez, A., Ureña, J. M., Baselga, J., and Arribas, J. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 423-433[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. | Howell, K. E., Devaney, E., and Gruenberg, J. (1989) Trends. Biochem. Sci. 14, 44-47[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. | Rapraeger, A. C., and Ott, V. L. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 620-628[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 51. | Fiedler, K., Kellner, R, and Simons, K. (1997) Electrophoresis 18, 2613-2619[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Chatterjee, J. Stegmuller, P. Schatzle, K. Karram, M. Koroll, H. B. Werner, K.-A. Nave, and J. Trotter Interaction of Syntenin-1 and the NG2 Proteoglycan in Migratory Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2008; 283(13): 8310 - 8317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Estrach, J. Legg, and F. M. Watt Syntenin mediates Delta1-induced cohesiveness of epidermal stem cells in culture J. Cell Sci., August 15, 2007; 120(16): 2944 - 2952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Stasyk, N. Schiefermeier, S. Skvortsov, H. Zwierzina, J. Peranen, G. K. Bonn, and L. A. Huber Identification of Endosomal Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Targets by Functional Organelle Proteomics Mol. Cell. Proteomics, May 1, 2007; 6(5): 908 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Latysheva, G. Muratov, S. Rajesh, M. Padgett, N. A. Hotchin, M. Overduin, and F. Berditchevski Syntenin-1 Is a New Component of Tetraspanin-Enriched Microdomains: Mechanisms and Consequences of the Interaction of Syntenin-1 with CD63 Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2006; 26(20): 7707 - 7718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Gimferrer, A. Ibanez, M. Farnos, M.-R. Sarrias, R. Fenutria, S. Rosello, P. Zimmermann, G. David, J. Vives, C. Serra-Pages, et al. The Lymphocyte Receptor CD6 Interacts with Syntenin-1, a Scaffolding Protein Containing PDZ Domains J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1406 - 1414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bananis, S. Nath, K. Gordon, P. Satir, R. J. Stockert, J. W. Murray, and A. W. Wolkoff Microtubule-Dependent Movement of Late Endocytic Vesicles In Vitro: Requirements for Dynein and Kinesin Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2004; 15(8): 3688 - 3697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tomoda, J. H. Kim, C. Zhan, and M. E. Hatten Role of Unc51.1 and its binding partners in CNS axon outgrowth Genes & Dev., March 1, 2004; 18(5): 541 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Huber, K. Pfaller, and I. Vietor Organelle Proteomics: Implications for Subcellular Fractionation in Proteomics Circ. Res., May 16, 2003; 92(9): 962 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Wucherpfennig, M. Wilsch-Brauninger, and M. Gonzalez-Gaitan Role of Drosophila Rab5 during endosomal trafficking at the synapse and evoked neurotransmitter release J. Cell Biol., May 12, 2003; 161(3): 609 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Z. Rappoport and S. M. Simon Real-time analysis of clathrin-mediated endocytosis during cell migration J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2003; 116(5): 847 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Matsuzaki, S. Hanai, H. Kishi, Z. Liu, Y. Bao, A. Kikuchi, K. Tsuchida, and H. Sugino Regulation of Endocytosis of Activin Type II Receptors by a Novel PDZ Protein through Ral/Ral-binding Protein 1-dependent Pathway J. Biol. Chem., May 17, 2002; 277(21): 19008 - 19018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Thery, M. Boussac, P. Veron, P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli, G. Raposo, J. Garin, and S. Amigorena Proteomic Analysis of Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosomes: A Secreted Subcellular Compartment Distinct from Apoptotic Vesicles J. Immunol., June 15, 2001; 166(12): 7309 - 7318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Zimmermann, D. Tomatis, M. Rosas, J. Grootjans, I. Leenaerts, G. Degeest, G. Reekmans, C. Coomans, and G. David Characterization of Syntenin, a Syndecan-binding PDZ Protein, as a Component of Cell Adhesion Sites and Microfilaments Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2001; 12(2): 339 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||