JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Höök, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Höök, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 26272-26278, September 10, 1999


Adherence of Borrelia burgdorferi
IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL LYSINE RESIDUES IN DbpA REQUIRED FOR DECORIN BINDING*

Eric L. Brown, Betty P. GuoDagger , Pamela O'Neal, and Magnus Höök§

From the Center for Extracellular Matrix Biology, Albert B. Alkek Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, Texas 77030

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, expresses on its surface two decorin binding adhesins, DbpA and DbpB. Previous studies have demonstrated that vaccination of mice with DbpA provided protection against challenge with heterologous Borrelia strains despite considerable sequence variability among DbpA in these strains.

We have now examined the importance of individual amino acid residues in DbpA for decorin binding. We demonstrated that chemical modification of lysine residues resulted in loss of ligand binding activity. Of the 27 lysine residues in native DbpA from strain 297, 6 are present in most and 5 are conserved in all 30 DbpA sequences examined so far. Analysis of recombinant DbpA in which individual lysine residues have been mutated to alanine suggested that three of the conserved residues distributed throughout the DbpA sequence are required for decorin binding. These mutants lost their ability to bind decorin in Western ligand blot assay and bound reduced amounts of decorin in an ELISA. Furthermore, these mutant DbpA proteins did not inhibit the adherence of B. burgdorferi to a decorin substrata, and they did not recognize decorin in an extracellular matrix established by human fibroblast cultures. We conclude that the three lysine residues Lys-82, Lys-163, and Lys-170 are crucial for the binding of DbpA to decorin.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Borrelia burgdorferi, and other closely related Borreliae are the causative agents of Lyme disease. Lyme disease is transmitted by infected ticks, which during a blood meal can deposit a small number of organisms in the dermis of the host animal (1). This initial skin infection is often accompanied by a local rash (erythema migrans), which can be followed by a general flu-like illness (2, 3). Untreated Lyme borreliosis can develop into a chronic, multisystemic disorder that may affect the joints (Lyme arthritis), skin, heart, and central nervous system (2).

Microbial adhesion to and colonization of host tissue is an early, critical event in an infection process. In the case of Lyme disease, host tissue adherence appears to be of importance during different stages of the disease process. Initially, during an infected tick's blood meal, a small number of spirochetes are deposited in the dermis of the host, where the bacteria appear to colonize collagen fibers (4, 5). As the infection disseminates to other tissues, bacteria may colonize additional extracellular matrix structures, and host cells may be involved. We previously showed that adherence of B. burgdorferi to collagen fibers involved a specific binding of the spirochete to decorin, a dermatan sulfate proteoglycan that is associated with and "decorates" collagen fibers, whereas a direct binding to collagen could not be demonstrated (6-9). A dermal route of entry into the host appears to be important for the development of disease. Spirochetes administered intravenously are rapidly and effectively cleared by Kupffer cells in the liver (10), whereas those inoculated intradermally consistently establish infection (11). Perhaps the initial dermal colonization allows the organism to adapt to in vivo conditions before blood stream dissemination.

We and others (8, 12, 13) have recently cloned and sequenced the genes coding for the two decorin-binding proteins (DbpA and DbpB),1 which are expressed at the surface of the spirochete as lipoproteins and act as adhesins of the microbial surface component-recognizing adhesive matrix molecule family (14). We showed that recombinant forms of DbpA and DbpB are capable of binding to decorin and that DbpA effectively inhibited the adherence of B. burgdorferi to a decorin substrate (8).

Active and passive immunization of mice using DbpA and DbpA antiserum, respectively, protected against challenge with B. burgdorferi (12, 13, 15, 16). In a recent study (16), DbpA sequences were found to vary significantly among different Borrelia strains. Nevertheless, antibodies to one recombinant form of DbpA conferred broad protection against various strains, suggesting that at least some immunoprotective epitopes are conserved.

In this study, we have initiated a detailed analysis of the decorin/DbpA interactions. We report that chemical modification of primary amino groups in DbpA resulted in loss of decorin binding activity. Furthermore, using a panel of site-directed mutants, we identified three specific lysine residues conserved in DbpA sequences among B. burgdorferi sensu lato isolates (16) as critical for the ligand binding activity of the protein.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Bacterial Strains, Culture, and Materials-- Low-passage B. burgdorferi strain 297 (passage 7) was used in this study and cultured in Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly II medium at 34 °C (17). Bacterial cultures were incubated in CO2-enriched atmosphere in a GasPak chamber (BBL Microbiologica Media, Baltimore, MD) containing BBL GasPak Plus envelopes and a GasPak anaerobic indicator (Beckton Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD) until the cells reached log phase. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 15 min and resuspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (137 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 4 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4). The density of bacteria was determined using dark field microscopy and a Petroff-Hausser chamber.

Escherichia coli strain JM101 (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) was grown at 37 °C in Lennox broth (Difco) (18) containing the appropriate antibiotics.

Human fibroblast skin cells (ATCC CRL-1475) were cultured on 16-well chamber slides (Nunc, Naperville, IL) in Dulbecco's modified essential medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C as described previously (8).

Labeling of Decorin-- Decorin from bovine fetal skin was purified as described previously and provided by Dr. Lawrence Rosenberg (8, 19). Purified decorin was stored in 4 M guanidine hydrochloride at -80 °C and dialyzed extensively against PBS before use. Decorin was labeled with digoxigenin-3-O-methylcarbonyl-epsilon -aminocaproic acid-N-hydroxy-succinimide ester (digoxigenin) (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's instructions and stored at -20 °C. To label decorin with biotin, 7.5 mg of NHS-LC-biotin (sulfosuccinimidyl-6-(biotinamido) hexanoate) (Pierce) was dissolved in 100 µl of dimethyl sulfoxide and combined with 0.5 mg of decorin and 0.5 ml of 0.2 M sodium borate (pH 8.0) in a total reaction volume of 1 ml as described previously (8, 20).

Construction of Expression Plasmids and Site-directed Mutagenesis-- DbpA 549 (referred to in this manuscript as DbpA) was constructed using polymerase chain reaction (8). DbpA lysine mutations of Lys-14-Lys-170 were constructed using extension overlap polymerase chain reaction as described previously (8, 21) and involved single lysine to alanine substitutions of the residues indicated in Fig. 2. Oligonucleotides used for polymerase chain reaction, listed in Table I, were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Lysine to alanine verification for each mutant was analyzed by nucleotide sequencing with the Sequenase version 2.0 sequencing kit (U. S. Biochemical Corp.) as described previously (8).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Primers used to construct DbpA 549 and the DbpA lysine mutants

Expression and Purification of Recombinant Proteins-- Recombinant DbpA, outer surface protein C (OspC) (8), and DbpA site-directed mutants from B. burgdorferi strain 297 were expressed in E. coli (JM101) harboring the appropriate plasmid. E. coli was grown in Lennox broth until it reached an A600 of 0.6. Isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside (Life Technologies, Inc.) was added to a final concentration of 0.2 mM, and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for an additional 4 h. Cells from a 1-liter culture were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 10 ml of binding buffer (BB) (20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, 15 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) and lysed in a French pressure cell at 11,000 pounds/inch2. The lysate was centrifuged at 40,000 × g for 15 min, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 µm filter. A 1-ml iminodiacetic acid-Sepharose column (Sigma) was charged with 75 mM NiCl2·6H2O and equilibrated with BB. The filtered supernatant was applied to the column and washed with 10 volumes of BB and then 10 volumes of BB containing 60 mM imidazole. The bound proteins were eluted with BB containing 200 mM imidazole, dialyzed against PBS containing 10 mM EDTA, then dialyzed against PBS. The protein concentration was determined by the bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce), and proteins were stored at -20 °C.

SDS-PAGE, Western Ligand Blots, and Western Blot-- Proteins (purified DbpA, DbpA site-directed mutants and OspC) were subjected to SDS-PAGE (reducing conditions) and probed with rabbit anti-DbpA polyclonal sera (R625) or with digoxigenin-labeled decorin as described previously (8).

Binding of Decorin to DbpA and DbpA Mutants-- Immulon-1 microtiter plate wells (Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, VA) were coated with 0.4 µg of DbpA, DbpA mutants, and K-mod in 50 µl of PBS overnight at 4 °C. The wells were washed and then blocked with 200 µl of Super Block (Pierce) for 1 h. After washing, 0.12 µg/ml of biotin-conjugated decorin in 100 µl of Super Block was added to the wells and incubated for 1 h. After washing, 100 µl of a 1:10,000 dilution of alkaline phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin (1 unit/ml) (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was added and incubated for 1 h. The wells were washed and incubated for 30 min with 100 µl of a 1 mg/ml Sigma 104 phosphatase substrate (Sigma) dissolved in 1 M diethanolamine, 0.5 mM MgCl2, pH 9.8. Plates were washed four times with PBS-0.05% Tween 20 between all steps and all incubations took place at 37 °C unless otherwise specified. All dilutions were made using Super Block. The absorbance at 405 nm was determined in a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, CA).

Inhibition of DbpA Decorin Binding by DbpA Mutants-- Immulon-1 microtiter plate wells were coated with 0.4 µg of DbpA in 50 µl of PBS overnight at 4 °C. The wells were washed and then blocked as described above. Biotin-conjugated decorin (100 µl of 0.12 µg/ml solution) was preincubated at 37 °C with various amounts (1.0, 0.5, 0.25, 0.12, and 0.0625 µg/well) of unlabeled DbpA, DbpA site-specific mutants, or K-mod. After washing, 100 µl of the biotin-conjugated decorin/inhibitor mixture was added to the wells and incubated for 1 h. After washing, the wells were incubated with streptavidin alkaline phosphatase and developed as described above. All dilutions were made using Super Block.

Attachment of B. burgdorferi to Decorin Substrates and Inhibition by Recombinant Proteins-- Immulon-1 microtiter plate wells were coated with 1.0 µg of decorin in 50 µl of PBS overnight at 4 °C. After washing and blocking as described above, 0.5 µg of inhibitor protein (DbpA, DbpA site-directed mutants, K-mod, or OspC) was added per well in 50 µl of Super Block and incubated for 1 h. Subsequently, 4 × 106 Borreliae were added to each well in 50 µl of Super Block, and the bacteria were allowed to attach to the substrate for 1 h at 37 °C as described previously (8). After washing, 100 µl of a 1:500 dilution of monoclonal mouse anti-OspA was added and incubated for 1 h. The wells were washed and incubated with 100 µl of a 1:3000 dilution of alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG for 1 h. After washing, the wells were developed as described above. All incubations took place at 37 °C unless otherwise specified. All dilutions were made using Super Block.

Immunofluorescence-- Human skin fibroblasts were cultured and fixed as described previously (8). Cells were plated onto 16-well chamber slides (Nunc) at a density of 2.5 × 105 cells/ml, grown for 2-3 days, and then fixed with -20 °C acetone and washed twice in PBS. All subsequent washes were done by immersing the slides in a staining dish filled with PBS three times, 10 min each wash unless otherwise specified. All incubations were done at room temperature. Unoccupied protein-binding sites on the slides were blocked with 80 µl of Super Block (Pierce) containing 1% goat and 5% horse serum (blocking buffer) (Life Technologies). The blocking buffer was carefully aspirated and 0.05 µg of DbpA, DbpA site-directed mutants, K-mod, or the unrelated His-tag protein osteopontin (22) were added in 60 µl of blocking buffer for 20 min. After washing, 60 µl of a 1:500 dilution of rabbit anti-DbpA was added for 30 min. After washing, a final incubation with 60 µl of a 1:50 dilution of rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG was added for 30 min in the dark. The slides were examined after washing using fluorescence microscopy. Photographs were taken at × 20 magnification using Fuji Film 1600 ASA slide film. Anti-DbpA and rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies were adsorbed against CRL-1475 cells prior to use. An equal mixture of 1 × 106 sonicated and whole CRL 1475 fibroblasts in 300 µl of PBS were incubated end over end at 37 °C for 1 h with an equal volume of each antibody. Adsorbed antiserum was collected after centrifugation of each tube at 5000 rpm for 5 min.

All antibody and protein dilutions were made in blocking buffer. Controls included (a) incubations with secondary antibody only, (b) anti-DbpA + secondary antibody, and (c) DbpA or osteopontin + secondary antibody.

Chemical Modification of Lysine and Arginine Residues-- Chemical modification of lysine residues was performed by incubating 700 µl of DbpA (1 mg/ml) with 5.4 mg of DL-glyceraldehyde and 37.8 mg of sodium cyanoborohydride for 1.5 h at room temperature followed by overnight dialysis at 4 °C in 2 liters of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and 2 liters of PBS (pH 7.5) twice each (23).

Chemical modification of arginine residues on DbpA was performed as described (24). Briefly, 1 mg of DbpA (2 ml) was dialyzed against 0.2 M sodium borate (pH 9.0) overnight at 4 °C. The dialyzed protein was transferred to an Eppendorf tube and incubated in the dark at 37 °C with 0.05 M cyclohexanedione. DbpA was then passed through a 0.02 M sodium borate-primed PD-10 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and four 0.5-ml aliquots were collected (25).

Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy-- Purified recombinant proteins were dialyzed against PBS (pH 7.4) at a concentration of 50 µg per ml. CD spectroscopy measurements were performed using a Jasco J720 spectropolarimeter calibrated with a 0.06% (w/v) 10-D-camphorsulfonic acid ammonium salt solution. Measurements were taken at room temperature in a 0.2-mm-path length quartz cell. All far-UV (250-190 nm) spectra were acquired with a time constant of 1 s, a scan rate of 20 nm/min, and 4 scans were accumulated and then averaged.

Antibodies-- Rabbit antiserum R625 (BioDesign International, Kennebunkport, ME) was raised against DbpA as described previously (8). Monoclonal IgG2a antibody against OspA (4.5 mg/ml) (BOR-018-48316) was purchased from Capricorn Products, Inc. (Scarborough, ME). Rhodamine-conjugated goat affinity purified antibody (1 mg/ml) to rabbit IgG (whole molecule) and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated (enzyme activity, 1191 units/ml) goat affinity purified antibody to murine IgG (whole molecule) were purchased from Cappel (Durham, NC).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Lysine Residues in DbpA Participate in Decorin Binding-- We previously demonstrated that B. burgdorferi expressed two adhesins in the 20-kDa molecular mass range (DbpA and DbpB) of the microbial surface component-recognizing adhesive matrix molecule family that mediated the attachment of the spirochete to decorin and bind the proteoglycan with an estimated KD of approximately 10-7 M (8, 20). DbpA bound decorin in both ELISA and Western ligand blot analysis. In addition, DbpA recognized decorin in an organized extracellular matrix produced by cultured skin fibroblasts and mediated attachment of DbpA-coated beads to fibroblast cultures (8, 20). To further characterize this interaction, we now seek to identify residues within DbpA that are necessary for binding to decorin.

In initial experiments, we found that biotin conjugation to primary amino groups in DbpA resulted in loss of decorin binding activity, suggesting a role for lysine residues in this interaction. To substantiate this hypothesis, we decided to chemically modify the side chains of lysine residues and examine the binding properties of the resulting protein. Chemical substitution of the primary amino groups resulted in a DbpA form that migrated as a somewhat larger protein compared with unmodified DbpA when analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1A). Both forms of DbpA migrated as two bands, monomers at 20 and 21 kDa and dimers at 40 and 42 kDa for DbpA and chemically modified DbpA (K-mod), respectively. The basis for the dimer formation is not entirely clear, although it is in part cysteine-mediated (8). The decorin binding activity of the DbpA and lysine-modified DbpA was examined in a Western ligand blot assay (Fig. 1B). Substitution of primary amino groups in DbpA resulted in loss of decorin binding, whereas unmodified DbpA transferred to a supporting membrane bound digoxigenin-labeled decorin. Chemical modification of arginine residues did not affect the ability of DbpA to bind decorin (data not shown).


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   SDS-PAGE and Western ligand blot analysis of DbpA and chemically modified DbpA (K-mod). Purified DbpA and K-mod were subjected to SDS-PAGE (12%) under reducing conditions and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (A) or transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (B). After blocking additional protein-binding sites, proteins on the membrane were probed with digoxigenin-labeled decorin and visualized by alkaline phosphatase reactivity.

The Importance of Individual Lysine Residues for Decorin Binding-- The results described above suggested that one or several lysine residues are critical for the decorin binding activity of DbpA. To evaluate the importance of individual lysine residues, we decided to change selected residues to alanine and analyze the decorin binding activity of the resulting mutants. Of the 27 lysine residues present in the native DbpA protein sequence, 3 are present in the leader sequence. The recombinant form of DbpA used in this study contained part of the leader sequence, including one of the lysine residues (Lys-14). By comparing the DbpA sequences of various B. burgdorferi sensu lato strains (26) to the DbpA sequence of B. burgdorferi 297 (8) (Fig. 2), we identified five lysine residues that were conserved in all 30 sequences examined (Lys-32, Lys-82, Lys-104, Lys-163, and Lys-170) and six that were conserved in most DbpA sequences (Lys-14, Lys-40, Lys-50, Lys-51, Lys-91, and Lys-102). These residues, shown in Fig. 2, were individually targeted for mutational analysis of recombinant DbpA of B. burgdorferi strain 297 using extension overlap polymerase chain reaction (Fig. 2) (8). DbpA and all mutant proteins were expressed as N-terminal polyhistidine (His tag) fusions and purified using nickel-chelating chromatography (9).


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Conserved lysine residues on DbpA. Conserved lysine residues were determined by protein sequence alignment of DbpA (strain 297) with DbpA sequences from various Borrelia genotypes (26). Bb, B. burgdorferi; Ba, Borrelia afzelii; Bg, Borrelia garinii. Numbers above the alignment indicate the numerical designation of each mutant when the corresponding lysine was mutated to alanine. Critical lysine residues involved in decorin binding are indicated in boldface.

SDS-PAGE analysis of DbpA site-directed mutants (Lys-14, Lys-32, Lys-40, and Lys-163 are not shown) revealed no significant differences when compared with native DbpA (Fig. 3A). CD spectroscopy showed that the overall secondary structure of DbpA and all site-directed mutants were nearly identical (data not shown), indicating that, the mutations did not grossly alter the structure of the protein. Western ligand blot analysis, however, demonstrated that, although all mutants were still recognized by anti-DbpA polyclonal antiserum (data not shown), proteins with mutations of Lys-82, Lys-163 (not shown), and Lys-170 lost their ability to bind decorin (Fig. 3B). The protein mutated at Lys-51 showed reduced decorin binding activity, and a recombinant, unrelated His-tag protein OspC did not bind decorin (Fig. 3B).


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   SDS-PAGE and Western ligand blot analysis of DbpA 549 and lysine-modified proteins. Purified recombinant DbpA 549, OspC, and lysine mutants of DbpA were either subjected to SDS-PAGE (12%) under reducing conditions and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (A) or transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (B). The membrane was probed with digoxigenin-labeled decorin and visualized by alkaline phosphatase reactivity.

We also examined the ability of biotin-conjugated decorin to bind to different forms of DbpA-coated microtiter wells (Fig. 4). The chemically modified DbpA (K-mod) was essentially unable to support the binding of decorin. Proteins mutated at the single lysines Lys-82, Lys-163, and Lys-170 bound significantly less decorin compared with the wild-type DbpA, and the binding of decorin to Lys-51 was marginally reduced. Because we have not determined the efficiency of binding to the wells for the different DbpA forms, a direct comparison between the different proteins decorin binding capacity from these results should be made with caution. However, a similar trend was observed in this ELISA-type assay as in the Western ligand blot assay.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Decorin binding to DbpA, lysine mutants, and K-mod. Biotin-conjugated decorin was used to probe microtiter wells coated with DbpA 549, selected lysine mutants, or K-mod. Data are expressed as A405 nm ± S.E. of triplicate wells minus the substrate control.

To directly compare the decorin binding potential of the different forms of DbpA, we designed an inhibition ELISA-type assay (Fig. 5). In this assay, labeled decorin was first incubated with increasing concentrations of soluble inhibitor protein, and the residual DbpA binding activity of decorin was then assessed by ELISA. All proteins tested as potential inhibitors caused a concentration-dependent reduction in decorin binding to DbpA. Unmodified DbpA and the Lys-91 mutant were equally effective in inhibiting the decorin-DbpA interaction. The Lys-14 (not shown), Lys-50, Lys-102, and Lys-104 mutants were also efficient inhibitors whereas Lys-51, Lys-82, Lys-163, and Lys-170 were significantly less effective, suggesting an impaired decorin binding function for these proteins. The chemically modified DbpA protein, K-mod, was the weakest inhibitor and caused less than 50% inhibition at the highest concentration tested.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Inhibition of decorin binding to DbpA by mutated or modified DbpA. Biotin-conjugated decorin was preincubated with increasing amounts of DbpA, lysine mutants, or K-mod (0.0625-1 µg) and then added to DbpA-coated microtiter wells as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data are expressed as A405 nm ± S.E. of triplicate wells minus the substrate control.

Inhibition of B. burgdorferi Attachment to Decorin by DbpA Proteins-- We have previously demonstrated that recombinant DbpA inhibited the adherence of B. burgdorferi to a decorin substrate (8). We have now compared the abilities of different DbpA mutants to interfere with bacterial attachment (Fig. 6). At the concentration of inhibitor protein examined (0.5 µg/well), mutations of Lys-104 and Lys-91 inhibited B. burgdorferi attachment as well as wild-type DbpA. Mutations of Lys-14 (not shown) Lys-50, Lys-51, and Lys-102 also caused a significant reduction in the number of bacteria adhering to the decorin substrate whereas mutations of Lys-82, Lys-163 (not shown), and Lys-170 did not inhibit bacterial attachment. Likewise, the chemically modified DbpA protein K-mod and the unrelated His-tag protein OspC, did not affect bacterial attachment. Thus the ability of the DbpA mutants to interfere with the adherence of B. burgdorferi to decorin mimics their relative affinity for the proteoglycan.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Inhibition of Borrelia attachment to decorin by DbpA mutants. Decorin-coated microtiter wells were incubated with 0.5 µg of DbpA, lysine mutants, K-mod, or OspC for 1 h prior to the addition of 4 × 106 Borrelia (strain 297, passage 7). Wells were probed with a monoclonal anti-OspA antibody. The data are expressed as A405 nm ± S.E. of triplicate wells minus the substrate control.

Binding of DbpA Mutants to a Fibroblast Matrix-- In the studies described above, we have used decorin extracted from bovine fetal skin under denaturing conditions as the ligand for DbpA (8). The conformation of decorin is probably different from the mature form of decorin that is found deposited in an extracellular matrix associated with other extracellular matrix components (27). We have previously shown that DbpA can be used in immunofluorescent staining of an extracellular matrix produced by cultured skin fibroblasts, demonstrating that extracellular matrix-incorporated decorin has binding sites available for DbpA (8). Similar fibrillar patterns were seen when DbpA or an antibody to decorin was used in these experiments (9). We have now examined the ability of the different DbpA proteins to bind to the fibroblast matrix using the immunofluorescent staining technique (Fig. 7). An extensive fibrillar extracellular matrix staining was observed when the cells were incubated with wild-type DbpA, Lys-51, or Lys-102 (Fig. 7, A, C, and F, respectively) or with Lys-14, Lys-32, Lys-40, Lys-91, or Lys-104 (not shown). Intermediate staining was seen when fibroblasts were incubated with Lys-50 (Fig. 7B), and matrix staining was not detected using Lys-82 or K-mod (Fig. 7, D and E, respectively) or Lys-163, Lys-170, or osteopontin (not shown). Incubation of the matrix with primary and secondary antibodies alone or secondary antibody resulted in no detectable binding (not shown). These results suggested that the different DbpA mutants have the same relative affinity for decorin in a fibroblast matrix compared with extracted, isolated decorin.


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Binding of DbpA, lysine mutants, or modified protein to a fibroblast extracellular matrix. Human skin fibroblasts were incubated with either 0.05 µg DbpA 549 (A), Lys-50 (B), Lys-51 (C), Lys-82 (D), K-mod (E), or Lys-102 (F). Cells were washed, incubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-DbpA, washed again, and incubated with a rhodamine-conjugated antibody against rabbit IgG. Magnification is × 20.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

B. burgdorferi colonization of the skin during the initial stages of infection may be mediated in part by surface-exposed DbpA and DbpB that bind the collagen-associated proteoglycan decorin. These adhesins have recently been identified as vaccine candidates in various studies (12, 13, 16) and in fact may be more effective than OspA-based vaccines (15, 16). We have initiated a detailed analysis of the interaction of DbpA with decorin. We demonstrated here that lysine, which makes up 13% of the residues in recombinant DbpA (8), is involved in decorin binding.

Alignment of DbpA sequences from various B. burgdorferi genotypes (26) to the sequence of DbpA from strain 297, used previously in our laboratory (8), allowed us to identify six lysine residues conserved in most DbpA sequences and five residues conserved in all of them. These lysine residues were individually mutated to alanine and examined by various assays for decorin binding activity.

Analysis of Lys-14-Lys-170 mutants revealed that Lys-82, Lys-163, and Lys-170 were not recognized by decorin in a Western ligand blot and bound reduced amounts of decorin in an ELISA. Lys-51 bound decorin weakly compared with Lys-50 and Lys-91-Lys-104 in Western ligand analysis, but in the ELISA, Lys-51 behaved similarly to DbpA and the other decorin-binding mutant proteins. In the Western ligand blot assay no decorin binding to Lys-82, Lys-163, or Lys-170 was observed, whereas in the ELISA-type assay, these mutants bound reduced but significant amounts of decorin. This difference may be explained by a different conformational status of the DbpA in the two assays. In the Western ligand blots, the DbpA may be at least partly denatured (following SDS-PAGE) when the bacterial protein encounters decorin, whereas a properly folded form of DbpA may be the target for decorin binding in the ELISA-type assay. Consistent with previous results, we found that recombinant DbpA inhibited the adherence of Borrelia to decorin-coated microtiter plates. Most of the lysine mutants had effects similar to that of DbpA. However, Lys-82, Lys-163, and Lys-170 had no effect on Borrelia adherence, and Lys-51 had an intermediate effect.

The binding of DbpA to a decorin-containing matrix established by human fibroblasts provided an assay for analyzing the interaction of the bacterial protein with a "native" form of decorin, as the proteoglycan is associated with other extracellular matrix molecules. In this assay, DbpA and most lysine mutants, including Lys-51, bound to the extracellular matrix and revealed a fibrillar-like distribution on immunohistological examination. However, Lys-82, Lys-163, Lys-170, or the unrelated protein osteopontin did not bind to the matrix.

Taken together, these results suggested that Lys-82, Lys-163, and Lys-170 are critical lysine residues involved in DbpA-decorin interactions. In addition to these three lysine residues, Lys-32 and Lys-104 are also conserved in all DbpA sequences examined so far. However, mutations of these residues did not alter the decorin binding capability of these recombinant proteins. Perhaps these two lysine residues are of importance in an aspect different from decorin binding. The K51A mutation appeared to result in a protein with somewhat reduced decorin binding activity, although the effect was not as dramatic as that observed for mutations of Lys-82, Lys-163, and Lys-170. Because K51A seems to be a relatively common natural variant (Fig. 2), it would be of interest to see whether the Borrelia strains carrying this variation at position 51 demonstrate a reduced adherence to decorin substrates.

The three lysine residues (Lys-82, Lys-163, and Lys-170) in DbpA identified in this study as critical for decorin binding are distributed throughout the protein. It is unclear whether these residues come together to form a binding pocket in the properly folded protein. We have previously shown that effective binding of decorin to DbpA involved an intact proteoglycan and that isolated glycosaminoglycan chains or core protein did not interfere with the decorin/DbpA binding. This observation might indicate the presence of two sites in DbpA that are engaged in decorin binding and that the critical lysine residues identified in this study could be involved in forming each of the hypothetical sites.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Dr. Steve LaBrenz for technical assistance with the CD experiments and helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Department of Health and Human Services, Grant CCU614695 from the Center for Disease Control (to E. L. B. and M. H.), and the Neva and Wesley West Foundation (to M. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Present Address: Harvard Medical School, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Boston, MA 02115.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Center for Extracellular Matrix Biology, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, Albert B. Alkek Institute of Biosciences and Technology, 2121 W. Holcombe Blvd., Suite 603, Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-677-7552; Fax: 713-677-7576; E-mail: mhook@ibt.tamu.edu.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Dbp, decorin-binding protein; Osp, outer surface protein; K-mod, lysine-modified DbpA; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; BB, binding buffer; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Steere, A. C., Green, J., Schoen, R. T., Taylor, E., Hutchinson, G. J., Rahn, D. W., and Malawista, S. E. (1985) N. Engl. J. Med. 312, 869-874[Abstract]
2. Steere, A. C. (1989) N. Engl. J. Med. 9, 586-596
3. Szczepanski, A., and Benach, J. L. (1991) Microbiol. Rev. 55, 21-34[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. VanMierlo, P., Jacob, W., and Docks, P. (1993) Dermatology 186, 306-310[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Duray, P. H. (1992) in Lyme Disease: Molecular and Immunologic Approaches (Schutzer, S. E., ed) , pp. 11-30, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
6. Iozzo, R. V. (1997) Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 32, 141-174[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Iozzo, R. V. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem 67, 609-652[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Guo, B. P., Brown, E. L., Dorward, D. W., Rosenberg, L. C., and Höök, M. (1998) Mol. Microbiol. 30, 711-723[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Hocking, A. M., Shinomura, T., and McQuillan, D. J. (1998) Matrix Biol. 17, 1-19[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Sambri, V., Aldini, R., Massaria, F., Montagnani, M., Casanova, S., and Cevenini, R. (1996) Infect. Immun. 64, 1858-1861[Abstract]
11. Barthold, S. W., de Souza, M. S. D., Janotka, J. L., Smith, A. L., and Persing, D. H. (1993) Am. J. Pathol. 143, 959-971[Abstract]
12. Feng, S., Hodzic, E., Stevenson, B., and Barthold, S. W. (1998) Infect. Immun. 66, 2827-2835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Hagman, K. E., Lahdenne, P., Popova, T. G., Porcella, S. F., Akins, D. R., Radolf, J. D., and Norgard, M. V. (1998) Infect. Immun. 66, 2674-2683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Patti, J. M., Allen, B. L., McGavin, M. J., and Höök, M. (1994) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 48, 585-617[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Cassatt, D. R., Patel, N. K., Ulbrandt, N. D., and Hanson, M. S. (1998) Infect. Immun. 66, 5379-5387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Hanson, M. S., Cassatt, D. R., Guo, B. P., Patel, N. K., McCarthy, M. P., Dorward, D. W., and Höök, M. (1998) Infect. Immun. 66, 2143-2153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Barbour, A. G. (1984) Yale J. Biol. Med. 57, 521-525[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F., and Sambrook, J. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , p. A.3, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
19. Choi, H. U., Johnson, T. L., Pal, S., Tang, L. H., Rosenberg, L. C., and Neame, P. J. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 2876-2884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Guo, B., Norris, S. J., Rosenberg, L. C., and Höök, M. (1995) Infect. Immun. 63, 3467-3472[Abstract]
21. Ho, S. N., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pullen, J. K., and Pease, L. R. (1989) Gene 77, 51-59[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. McFarland, R. J., Garza, S., Butler, W. T., and Höök, M. (1995) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 760, 327-331[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Acharya, A. S., Sussman, L. G., and Marjula, B. N. (1984) J. Chromatogr. 297, 37-40[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Patthy, L., and Smith, E. L. (1975) J. Biol. Chem. 250, 557-564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Takahashi, K. (1968) J. Biol. Chem. 243, 6171-6179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Roberts, W. C., Mullikin, B. A., Lathigra, R., and Hanson, M. S. (1998) Infect. Immun. 66, 5275-5285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Ramamurthy, P., Hocking, A. M., and McQuillan, D. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19578-19584[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
Y. Shi, Q. Xu, K. McShan, and F. T. Liang
Both Decorin-Binding Proteins A and B Are Critical for the Overall Virulence of Borrelia burgdorferi
Infect. Immun., March 1, 2008; 76(3): 1239 - 1246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
Q. Xu, S. V. Seemanaplli, K. McShan, and F. T. Liang
Increasing the Interaction of Borrelia burgdorferi with Decorin Significantly Reduces the 50 Percent Infectious Dose and Severely Impairs Dissemination
Infect. Immun., September 1, 2007; 75(9): 4272 - 4281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
Y. Shi, Q. Xu, S. V. Seemanapalli, K. McShan, and F. T. Liang
The dbpBA Locus of Borrelia burgdorferi Is Not Essential for Infection of Mice
Infect. Immun., November 1, 2006; 74(11): 6509 - 6512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
A. S. Barbosa, P. A. E. Abreu, F. O. Neves, M. V. Atzingen, M. M. Watanabe, M. L. Vieira, Z. M. Morais, S. A. Vasconcellos, and A. L. T. O. Nascimento
A Newly Identified Leptospiral Adhesin Mediates Attachment to Laminin
Infect. Immun., November 1, 2006; 74(11): 6356 - 6364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
F. T. Liang, J. Yan, M. L. Mbow, S. L. Sviat, R. D. Gilmore, M. Mamula, and E. Fikrig
Borrelia burgdorferi Changes Its Surface Antigenic Expression in Response to Host Immune Responses
Infect. Immun., October 1, 2004; 72(10): 5759 - 5767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. H. Kim, J. Singvall, U. Schwarz-Linek, B. J. B. Johnson, J. R. Potts, and M. Hook
BBK32, a Fibronectin Binding MSCRAMM from Borrelia burgdorferi, Contains a Disordered Region That Undergoes a Conformational Change on Ligand Binding
J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 41706 - 41714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
F. T. Liang, E. L. Brown, T. Wang, R. V. Iozzo, and E. Fikrig
Protective Niche for Borrelia burgdorferi to Evade Humoral Immunity
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2004; 165(3): 977 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. C. Zambrano, A. A. Beklemisheva, A. V. Bryksin, S. A. Newman, and F. C. Cabello
Borrelia burgdorferi Binds to, Invades, and Colonizes Native Type I Collagen Lattices
Infect. Immun., June 1, 2004; 72(6): 3138 - 3146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X. F. Yang, S. M. Alani, and M. V. Norgard
The response regulator Rrp2 is essential for the expression of major membrane lipoproteins in Borrelia burgdorferi
PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 11001 - 11006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. S. Pikas, E. L. Brown, S. Gurusiddappa, L. Y. Lee, Y. Xu, and M. Hook
Decorin-binding Sites in the Adhesin DbpA from Borrelia burgdorferi: A SYNTHETIC PEPTIDE APPROACH
J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 30920 - 30926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. R. Fischer, N. Parveen, L. Magoun, and J. M. Leong
Decorin-binding proteins A and B confer distinct mammalian cell type-specific attachment by Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease spirochete
PNAS, June 10, 2003; 100(12): 7307 - 7312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
T. Heikkila, I. Seppala, H. Saxen, J. Panelius, H. Yrjanainen, and P. Lahdenne
Species-Specific Serodiagnosis of Lyme Arthritis and Neuroborreliosis Due to Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Stricto, B. afzelii, and B. garinii by Using Decorin Binding Protein A
J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2002; 40(2): 453 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
N. D. Ulbrandt, D. R. Cassatt, N. K. Patel, W. C. Roberts, C. M. Bachy, C. A. Fazenbaker, and M. S. Hanson
Conformational Nature of the Borrelia burgdorferi Decorin Binding Protein A Epitopes That Elicit Protective Antibodies
Infect. Immun., August 1, 2001; 69(8): 4799 - 4807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
K. E. Hagman, X. Yang, S. K. Wikel, G. B. Schoeler, M. J. Caimano, J. D. Radolf, and M. V. Norgard
Decorin-Binding Protein A (DbpA) of Borrelia burgdorferi Is Not Protective When Immunized Mice Are Challenged via Tick Infestation and Correlates with the Lack of DbpA Expression by B. burgdorferi in Ticks
Infect. Immun., August 1, 2000; 68(8): 4759 - 4764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
D. A. Haake
Spirochaetal lipoproteins and pathogenesis
Microbiology, July 1, 2000; 146(7): 1491 - 1504.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow