J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 26329-26336, September 10, 1999
Soluble Rous Sarcoma Virus Reverse Transcriptases
, 
,
and
Purified from Insect Cells Are Processive DNA
Polymerases That Lack an RNase H 3'
5' Directed Processing
Activity*
Susanne
Werner and
Birgitta M.
Wöhrl
From the Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Physiologie,
Abteilung Physikalische Biochemie, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
 |
ABSTRACT |
Reverse transcriptase (RT) isolated from Rous
sarcoma virus (RSV) consists of heterodimeric RT
, RT
, and
RT
. The
subunit (63 kDa) contains an N-terminal polymerase and a
C-terminal RNase H domain. The N terminus of
(95 kDa) corresponds
to
with the integrase domain attached to the C terminus (32 kDa).
We have constructed baculoviruses expressing the genes for
or
or the entire pol (99 kDa). Infection of insect cells with
recombinant virus yielded highly active and soluble RSV RT enzymes that
could be purified to >90% homogeneity. HPLC gel filtration showed
that
is a dimeric enzyme that can be partially monomerized upon the addition of 45% Me2SO. DNA synthesis on DNA-DNA and
DNA-RNA primer-templates in the presence of competitor substrates
revealed that 
and
as well as
are processive polymerases.
However, the affinity of
and 
for primer-template substrates
appears to be higher than that of
. All RSV enzymes investigated
have the potential to displace RNA-RNA duplexes more efficiently than
human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RT. Unlike human immunodeficiency
virus type 1 RT, RSV RTs can catalyze an initial RNase H
endonucleolytic cleavage of the RNA template but not a 3'
5'
directed processing activity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Reverse transcriptase
(RT)1 is the key enzyme
required for retroviral replication. Retroviral RTs are encoded by the
pol gene and are expressed as large precursor proteins
together with the gene products of the gag gene. The Gag-Pol
precursor is processed into individual proteins by the viral protease.
RTs from closely related lentiviruses like human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV-1 and HIV-2), simian immunodeficiency virus and equine infectious anemia virus show similar RT organization (1-4). The RTs of these viruses are heterodimeric with a large ~66-kDa subunit harboring the
N-terminal polymerase and the C-terminal RNase H domains, and a small
~51-58-kDa subunit lacking the RNase H domain. The RT from mouse
leukemia virus is a monomeric ~80-kDa polypeptide that was suggested
to dimerize only upon binding to nucleic acid (5). Like HIV-1 RT, it
contains an N-terminal polymerase domain and an RNase H domain at the C terminus.
The situation in the group of avian sarcoma and leukosis viruses (ASLV)
including Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) is quite different. Pol is composed
of the polymerase, RNase H, and integrase domains. The C terminus of
Pol harbors a short 4.1-kDa protein, which is removed by the viral
protease during processing of the Pol precursor protein (6). It has
been shown to be dispensable for the formation of virions (7). The
reverse transcriptase of RSV consists of an
and a
subunit. The
subunit with a molecular weight of 63 kDa comprises the N-terminal
polymerase and the C-terminal RNase H domain. The
subunit (95 kDa)
contains the N-terminal polymerase and RNase H domains and the
integrase domain at the C terminus (8-11). The integrase domain is
also present as an independent protein with a molecular mass of 32 kDa
(10, 12). Three forms of RT have been isolated from ASLVs: homodimeric
RT
and heterodimeric 
and
(8, 13, 14). The
protein isolated form virions has been suggested to exist as either a monomer
or dimer (8, 14). Glycerol gradient centrifugation analysis of
recombinant RSV
isolated from Escherichia coli indicated that the enzyme is active as a homodimer. It sedimented in a single peak corresponding to a molecular mass of about 105 kDa. The
recombinant
protein was shown to exhibit considerable polymerase
activity with long DNA products being synthesized (15).
The presence of the three different Pol cleavage products,
,
,
and 
, in virions suggests that they might have different roles
during viral replication. Interestingly, recent findings with the RT of
human T-cell leukemia virus type 1, the etiologic agent of human adult
T-cell leukemia, expressed in an in vitro transcription/translation system, indicate a subunit organization similar to RSV RT, with the larger subunit harboring the integrase domain (16).
Because of the different subunit organization of RSV RT, we are
interested in comparative studies to obtain more information on
structure-function relationships of retroviral RTs. Previous analyses
of RSV RT functions have caused problems, since the
pol-derived proteins do not normally exist in a soluble and
active form in infected cells. Furthermore, isolation of RSV RT from
virions does not allow the introduction of mutations that are lethal to the virus. Efforts to express the
and
RT subunits of ASLV RT in
E. coli proved to be difficult, because the major fraction of the recombinant proteins (~90%) was found in inclusion bodies (15).
To circumvent these problems, we expressed the
and
subunits of
RSV RT as well as Pol by means of recombinant baculovirus constructs in
insect cells. It has been shown recently that various constructs of
recombinant baculoviruses harboring gag-pol or
pol sequences of avian leukosis virus expressed in insect
cells exhibit RT activity (17). An optimized purification procedure of
the His-tagged recombinant proteins now allows us to obtain pure and soluble proteins in sufficient amounts for further analysis. Here we
show that the purified recombinant proteins
,
, 
, Pol, and
Pol possess polymerase as well as RNase H activity. We describe the
enzymatic characterization of the purified proteins, which yields
valuable information about structure-function relationships of RSV RTs
in comparison with RTs from other retroviruses.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Buffers
Annealing buffer consisted of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, and 50 mM NaCl. RT buffer contained 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 80 mM KCl, 5 mM DTT, 0.1% Triton X-100. Formamide
loading buffer was prepared as described (18). Lysis buffer contained
20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 25% glycerol, 1 M
NaCl, 3 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.01% IGEPAL CA 630 (Sigma) and 1 mM MgCl2. 2× SDS loading buffer consisted of
8.5% SDS, 35% glycerol, 410 mM monothioglycerol, 0.05%
bromphenol blue in 120 mM Tris, pH 8.5. Enzyme storage
buffer contained 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 250 mM
NaCl, 50% glycerol, 0.1% IGEPAL CA 630, and 2 mM DTT.
Enzyme dilutions were performed in enzyme storage buffer.
Construction of Baculovirus Transfer Vectors
For cloning of the different RSV RT genes and pol
into the baculovirus transfer vector, a subclone of the RCASBP (A)
vector of RSV was used (19). This subclone contains the entire
pol gene and short flanking regions from nucleotide 5970 (PstI site) to nucleotide 9089 (PvuII site) of
RCASBP (A) in the vector pUC 119. Using a combination of polymerase
chain reaction amplification and restriction site cloning, the genes
encoding the
subunit and pol were cloned into a
bacterial vector in order to obtain a 5' BamHI and a 3' stop
codon followed by a HindIII site. The desired DNA fragments
were then cloned into the
BamHI/HindIII-restricted baculo transfer vector
pBlueBacHis2A (Invitrogen). The transfer vector encoding the
protein was produced by cleaving the pol containing transfer
vector with KpnI and SalI, thus removing the 3'-terminal region of pol coding for the 4.1-kDa protein. A
shortened 3' fragment containing the correct end of the
gene and a
TAA stop codon was produced via polymerase chain reaction and cloned into the KpnI/SalI-restricted
pol-containing transfer vector. All of the recombinant
baculovirus constructs express RSV RTs that contain an additional 34 amino acids at the N terminus of the proteins derived from the transfer
vector. This 34-amino acid extension includes a His6 tag,
11 amino acids of gene 10 from phage T7, and the enterokinase cleavage
site (Invitrogen). In addition,
was also expressed in a
similar construct lacking the N-terminal extension. This
construct was used to produce heterodimeric 
RT in which only the
subunit possesses the His tag for nickel-chelate affinity
chromatography. No significant differences from the heterodimer containing His extensions on both subunits were observed.
Isolation of Recombinant Baculoviruses
Recombinant baculoviruses were produced by co-transfecting SF 21 insect cells with viral DNA from the wild type baculovirus AcMNPV
(Bac-N-Blue-DNA, Invitrogen) together with recombinant transfer vector
DNA. Homologous recombination between the transfer vector DNA and the
polyhedrin gene of wild type virus DNA in vivo leads to
expression of the recombinant gene under the control of the polyhedrin
promoter. Transfection was performed with the Bac-N-Blue transfection
kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol with minor
modifications as follows. After the addition of the transfection
mixture, the cells were incubated at 27 °C. After 4 h, 1 ml of
TC 100 medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) plus 20% fetal calf serum
(FCS) was added, and the cells were incubated further at 27 °C.
72 h later, the supernatant was removed, and 2 ml of fresh TC 100 plus 10% FCS was added. Culture supernatants were harvested 5 days
after transfection and tested for recombinant virus by plaque assays
according to the manufacturer's protocol. The supernatants were stored
at 4 °C.
Preparation of High Titer Viral Stocks
Isolation of viral DNA from the culture supernatants (see
above), and polymerase chain reaction analyses were performed according to the protocol from Invitrogen. Recombinant virus that was free of
wild type virus DNA as determined by polymerase chain reaction was used
for preparing high titer viral stocks according to the protocol from
Invitrogen with the exception that TC100 plus 10% FCS was used for
cell growth. Viral stocks were kept at 4 °C. Virus titers were
determined by end point dilution. The virus titer was calculated as
described by Gruenwald and Heitz (20). Virus titers determined were in
the range of 7 × 107 to 3 × 108
infectious units/ml.
Growth and Infection of Sf 21 Insect Cells
Small amounts of Sf 21 cells were grown in TC 100 plus 10% FCS
as monolayers in 75-cm2 culture bottles. Large amounts of
cells were grown as shaker cultures in 1.8-liter Fernbach flasks (360 ml/flask). 0.1% Pluronic F68 was added to the growth medium (TC100
plus 10% FCS) to prevent aggregation of the cells. After growth of the
cells at 27 °C to a density of 2.5-3 × 106/ml,
cells were concentrated to a titer of 8 × 106/ml and
infected with recombinant virus with a multiplicity of infection of 10. For the expression of the heterodimeric proteins
Pol and 
,
cells were coinfected with the two corresponding viruses with a
multiplicity of infection of 5 for each virus. After 1 h at
27 °C, cells were diluted with fresh medium to their original
concentration and shaken further at 27 °C. Cells expressing
or
Pol were harvested 60 h postinfection, and all other infected cells were harvested 72 h postinfection. Cells were centrifuged for 10 min at 2500 × g and 4 °C, and the cell
pellets were stored at
20 °C.
Optimization of the Purification of RSV RT Proteins
2-4.5 liter of cells were grown as shaker cultures and infected
and harvested as described above. After centrifugation, the cell pellet
was resuspended in lysis buffer to a concentration of 5 × 107 cells/ml, sonicated and the cell extract centrifuged at
47,000 × g at 4 °C for 60 min. This procedure led
to >80% of the RT being present in the supernatant. The supernatant
was diluted in buffer lacking
-mercaptoethanol, MgCl2,
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and glycerol to reach a glycerol
concentration of 12%. After filtration through a 0.2-µm filter, the
supernatant was loaded onto a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid-Sepharose
column (Qiagen). RT was eluted by applying a gradient of 15-300
mM imidazole. After dialysis of the eluate in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, and 0.01% IGEPAL CA 630 (Sigma), the solution was diluted in the same buffer lacking NaCl to
reach a concentration of 75 mM NaCl for
or of 150 mM NaCl for all other RSV RT enzymes. The solution was
loaded onto a heparin column (HighTrap Heparin; Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) and washed with 50 volumes of the corresponding loading
buffer. RSV
was eluted by applying an NaCl gradient from 0.075 to
1.2 M NaCl. For all other RSV RTs, a gradient from 0.15 to
1.2 M NaCl was used. The eluted RTs were about 90-95%
homogeneous. The eluted enzymes were dialyzed against enzyme storage
buffer and could be stored at
20 °C under these conditions for
several months without losing activity. The concentration of the
enzymes was 45 µg/ml for
and in the range of 1-2.5 mg/ml for all
other RSV RTs.
HPLC Gel Filtration Analysis
HPLC size exclusion chromatography was performed as described
previously (21) at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl and 500 mM NaCl. The molecular mass
standard kit for HPLC from U.S. Biochemical Corp. was used for
calibration. The standard proteins were run under the same conditions
as the RSV enzymes. The retention times of the marker proteins were
used to obtain a calibration curve for determination of the molecular mass of RSV
.
Quantitative RT Activity Assay
RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity was
quantitated on a poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18 substrate in a
standard assay (30-µl reaction volume) as described previously (22)
with 9-13 ng of enzyme in RT buffer. Under these conditions, 1 unit of
RT activity catalyzes the incorporation of 1 nmol of dTTP into
poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18 in 10 min at 37 °C.
Analysis of Polymerization Products by High Resolution Gel
Electrophoresis
DNA-dependent DNA Polymerase--
Products of
DNA-dependent DNA synthesis were determined using
single-stranded bacteriophage M13 DNA to which a
32P-end-labeled 17-mer primer was hybridized (23). 0.1 pmol
of primer-M13 DNA substrate and 0.1 pmol of the desired RSV RT were preincubated in RT buffer at 37 °C. Polymerization was started by
the addition of 250 µM dNTPs and incubated further at
37 °C for 10 min in a total reaction volume of 10 µl. Reactions
were stopped with 10 µl of formamide buffer and heating to 95 °C
for 3 min and loaded onto a 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gel
containing 7 M urea. To analyze processivity and substrate
affinity, either poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18 or an 18/36-mer
DNA-DNA p-t (24) was added as a competitor together with the dNTPs at
the start of the reaction. A 100- or 1000-fold molar excess of
competitor was used. The excess of poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18
over enzyme was calculated by assuming that about five enzyme molecules
can bind to one poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18 substrate molecule
(ratio poly(rA):oligo(dT) = 1:24) with an average length of the
poly(rA) template of 357 nucleotides.
RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase--
Poly(rA) with an
average length of 357 nucleotides (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was
hybridized to a 5-fold molar excess of 32P-end-labeled
oligo(dT)16 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Polymerization was analyzed as described above for DNA-dependent
polymerization in RT buffer containing 250 µM dTTP.
Examination of processivity and affinity to the substrate was also
performed as described above.
RNase H Activity Assays
RNase H activity was analyzed on a 36/127-mer DNA-RNA p-t. The
127-mer RNA was prepared by in vitro transcription,
dephosphorylated, and gel-purified. After the RNA was radiolabeled at
its 5' end, it was hybridized to the 36-mer DNA primer (22, 25). 0.1 pmol of p-t was incubated with 0.1 pmol of RT in RT buffer in the
absence of dNTPs for 10 min or 40 min in a total volume of 10 µl. The reactions were stopped by the addition of 10 µl of formamide buffer, and the hydrolysis products were analyzed on 10% denaturing gels as
described above.
The same substrate (0.1 pmol) was used to determine RNase H activity
during DNA polymerization. In this case, stepwise polymerization from
the 3'-OH end of the primer was accomplished using a mixture of dNTPs
(50 µM) containing one chain-terminating ddNTP (250 µM). Depending on the ddNTP chosen, elongation of the
primer by 4 nucleotides (dATP plus ddGTP), 10 nucleotides (dATP, dGTP,
ddTTP), or 19 nucleotides (dATP, dGTP, dTTP, ddCTP) was achieved. The
addition of four dNTPs leads to full extension of the primer. Reactions
were started by the addition of 0.1 pmol of RT in a total volume of 10 µl, incubated for 10 min at 37 °C, and further analyzed as
described above. When DNA polymerization products were examined with
this substrate, similar assays were performed, however with the 36-mer DNA primer labeled at the 5' end.
 |
RESULTS |
Purification of RSV pol Gene Products--
The availability of RSV
RT as a soluble recombinant protein that can be purified in sufficient
amounts is an important prerequisite for the analysis of enzyme
function. Since it has been shown previously that expression of the
and
subunits of RSV RT in E. coli leads to mainly
insoluble proteins (15), we decided to make use of a eukaryotic
expression system. We constructed recombinant baculoviruses expressing
RSV
,
or Pol and infected Sf21 insect cells with these
viruses. Co-infection of Sf21 cells with two different types of
viruses yielded heterodimeric RSV 
and
Pol. Pol and
Pol were included in some of our studies to analyze the influence of the
C-terminal 4.1-kDa extension of Pol on enzyme activity. The 4.1 kDa
polypeptide is cleaved off during virus maturation to yield
and

.
In order to get the different forms of RSV RT into the soluble fraction
of the cell lysate and purify them to homogeneity, we modified the
purification protocol described for partial purification of
pol gene products from insect cells by Stewart and Vogt
(17). Since the affinity of the pol gene products to DNA
appears to be very high, 1 M NaCl was added to the lysis
buffer. 25% glycerol and 0.01% of detergent (IGEPAL CA 630) were
added to avoid aggregation of the proteins. Fig.
1 shows a Coomassie stain of the enzymes after purification over nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid-Sepharose and
heparin columns. The preparation of Pol contains an additional band
with an approximate molecular mass of 95 kDa. The same band is present
in the
Pol preparation. We assume that this protein corresponds to
the Pol gene product shortened by the C-terminal 4.1-kDa protein by
cellular proteases and thus corresponds to RSV
.

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Analysis of the purified RSV RTs by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were detected by
Coomassie staining. Lane M, protein molecular
mass markers in kDa. Due to the N-terminal extensions, the recombinant
proteins run at a higher molecular mass than expected.
|
|
Quantitative Analysis of Polymerase Activity--
In a
quantitative RT assay, the RNA-dependent DNA polymerase
activities of the purified enzymes were determined on the homopolymeric substrate poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18 and compared with
commercially available AMV RT purified from virions and with HIV-1 RT
purified in our laboratory (21). The specific activities are summarized in Table I. For better comparison, enzyme
activities were also calculated as units/pmol of enzyme. Our results
demonstrate that all of the RSV RTs purified are highly active and that
their activity is comparable with that of commercially available AMV RT
purified from virions. The activities of
and 
are higher than
those of the other RSV RT enzymes. The heterodimeric
Pol enzyme
appears to be less active than the mature RT 
. The low activity
of
might be due to the low concentration of the stock solution of RT
(45 µg/ml), which can lead to protein instability. However, we
were not able to increase the expression level of the
protein. In
general, higher activities were found for
and 
in different polymerization assays (see below).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Quantitative analysis of RNA-dependent DNA-polymerase
activities on a homopolymeric substrate
Activities are given in units/mg or units/pmol protein, where 1 unit
catalyzes the incorporation of 1 nmol of dTTP in
poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18 in 10 min at 37 °C. For calculation
of the molarity, the enzymes were assumed to be present as dimers.
|
|
Determination of the Quaternary Structure of RSV RT
--
It
has been shown previously that RT isolated from virions of ASLV
consists of 
heterodimers,
homodimers, and
proteins. RSV
RT
has been suggested by different groups to be enzymatically active as either a monomer or dimer (8, 14, 15).
To determine whether RSV RT
isolated from insect cells is active as
a monomer or dimer, we analyzed purified RSV RT
by HPLC gel
filtration. Fig. 2A shows that
RSV RT
yields a single peak with a retention time of 26.6 min. The
corresponding molecular mass of 117 kDa was determined by comparison
with molecular mass standard proteins under the same conditions (see
"Experimental Procedures").

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
HPLC size exclusion chromatography of
purified RT . Analysis was performed at
room temperature. The molecular masses were determined using molecular
mass standard proteins from U.S. Biochemical Corp. in the same buffer.
A, analysis of 50 µg of purified RT . The retention time
of the protein of 26.6 min corresponds to an apparent molecular mass of
117 kDa. B, analysis of 8.3 µg of RSV RT after
treatment with 45% Me2SO. The peak with a retention time
of 16.12 min (peak 1) does not contain protein
(see below). The retention times of 26.7 min (peak 2) and 30.35 min (peak 3), correspond
to molecular masses of ~117 and ~41 kDa, respectively.
C, analysis of the dissociation assay and the peak fractions
by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were detected by
Coomassie staining. The collected fractions corresponding to peaks 1, 2, and 3, respectively, were precipitated with 10% of trichloroacetic
acid resuspended in 2× SDS loading buffer (8.5% SDS, 35% glycerol,
410 mM monothioglycerol, 0.05% bromphenol blue in 120 mM Tris, pH 8.5) and loaded on a 10% SDS-gel.
Lane 1, RSV RT untreated; lane 2, RSV RT after treatment with Me2SO before
column separation; lane 3, peak 1;
lane 4, peak 2; lane 5,
peak 3; lane M, protein molecular mass markers in
kDa.
|
|
Since the apparent molecular mass found for
was higher than that
expected for the monomer (67 kDa), we assumed a homodimeric organization and attempted to monomerize the enzyme. The use of acetonitrile to monomerize RSV RT
as described for HIV-1 RT was
unsuccessful. However, we were able to partially monomerize the
homodimer (3.9 µM) by the addition of 45%
Me2SO (26). The enzyme was incubated for 15 min on ice in
the presence of Me2SO in a buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl, 5% glycerol, 475 mM NaCl, 0.1%
IGEPAL CA 630, and 2 mM DTT. HPLC gel filtration analysis
shows the appearance of a peak with a retention time of 30.35 min (peak
3), corresponding to a molecular mass of 41 kDa (Fig. 2B).
To determine whether this peak corresponds to the monomerized
protein or to a protein degradation product, the Me2SO-treated enzyme was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. In addition, all of the peak fractions were collected,
precipitated with trichloroacetic acid, and also analyzed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Coomassie staining of the gel
(Fig. 2C) shows that no degradation products are visible
after Me2SO treatment. Furthermore, peak 2 (26.6 min) and
peak 3 (35.35 min) contain RSV
protein, indicating that peak 3 consists of monomerized RSV RT
. This result implies that
homodimeric RSV RT
is responsible for the polymerase activity of
the enzyme. No band is visible with the fractions corresponding to peak
1 (16.12 min), indicating that this peak is not due to protein.
To analyze the polymerase activity of the partially monomerized
,
the sample was diluted 10-fold to reach a Me2SO
concentration of 4.5% (final concentration of
was 390 nM). The RT polymerase activity of the
Me2SO-treated sample was reduced to about 40% as compared
with untreated
protein incubated in buffer with 4.5%
Me2SO. This result suggests that the polymerase activity measured with the partially monomerized sample is probably due to
remaining dimeric protein.
Qualitative Analysis of DNA-dependent DNA
Polymerization Activities--
For qualitative analysis of
DNA-dependent DNA polymerase function, single-stranded M13
DNA was used to which a 5'-end-labeled 17-mer DNA primer was
hybridized. For comparison, AMV RT and HIV-1 RT were included in the
experiment. Fig. 3 shows that RSV RT
is highly active and yields long extension products similar to AMV RT.
No short polymerization products are visible with
. The other RSV
enzymes appear to be less active than
, yielding also short
extension products with only a few nucleotides added to the primer and
a major pause site at +8/+9 nucleotides. In addition, high molecular
weight DNA products are synthesized. All RSV enzymes stall at similar
sites; however, more of the high molecular weight DNA products are
synthesized with
,
Pol and 
than with Pol and
.
Similarly to the data obtained with the RT activity assay (Table I),
Pol and
are less active than the other RSV enzymes (i.e.
less DNA product is synthesized).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Qualitative analysis of polymerization
activities catalyzed on a DNA template. Reactions were performed
for 10 min at 37 °C in RT buffer with 10 nM M13
substrate and enzyme and 250 µM dNTPs. Lane M shows DNA size markers (their sizes are indicated on the
left); lane RT, p-t without
enzyme.
|
|
The processivity of a polymerase is defined as the number of
nucleotides incorporated before the enzyme dissociates from the template (27). To obtain some information on the processivity of the
enzymes on DNA templates and on their affinities to the M13 substrate,
competitor substrates were added to the assay. Since Pol and
Pol
revealed qualitative polymerase activities similar to those of
and

, respectively, they were not included in the assay. The results
of these analyses are shown in Fig. 4.
poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18 or an 18/36-mer DNA-DNA was added in a 100- or 1000-fold molar excess over the M13 substrate (see "Experimental Procedures"). Interestingly, already in the presence of a 100-fold excess of poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18, no
extension products are visible with
, indicating a significantly
lower affinity to the M13 DNA-DNA substrate than that of
and

. On the contrary, competition with
poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18 or the 18/36-mer DNA-DNA still
yields long extension products with
or 
. Since determination
of the molar excess of poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18 is not very
precise (see "Experimental Procedures"), we cannot unequivocally
conclude that the affinities of
or the other enzymes for DNA-RNA
p-ts is higher than for DNA-DNA p-ts.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Analysis of polymerization activities on a
DNA template in the presence of competitor substrates.
DNA-dependent DNA synthesis was performed in RT buffer for
10 min at 37 °C with 250 µM dNTPs, 10 nM
M13 substrate, and 10 nM ,  , or as indicated
at the bottom of the gel, in the presence of a 100-fold
(lanes 1) or a 1000-fold (lanes 2) molar excess of poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18
(indicated as rA/dT) or 18/36-mer DNA-DNA (indicated as
DNA/DNA) as a competitor substrate; lane M, DNA size markers indicated on the left;
lane C, no competitor added; lane
RT, p-t without enzyme.
|
|
Our result indicates, however, that all enzymes tested are processive.
In contrast to results published previously (14), we show here that
polymerizes in a processive mode, since long products are synthesized
even after the addition of competitor. Furthermore,
pauses at the
same sites as 
and
. The major difference between
and the
other two enzymes appears to be the reduced affinity of RSV RT
for
nucleic acid substrates.
Qualitative Analysis of RNA-dependent DNA
Polymerization Activities--
The results described above were
confirmed on RNA templates. RNA-dependent DNA
polymerization activity was analyzed on a homopolymeric poly(rA)/oligo(dT) substrate. oligo(dT)16 was radioactively
labeled and hybridized in a 5-fold molar excess to poly(rA) with an
average length of 357 nucleotides. Fig.
5A shows that all RSV enzymes tested are highly active on this substrate and capable of synthesizing high molecular weight products that are longer than the average template length of 357 nucleotides. This result indicates that
,
, and 
are able to catalyze strand transfer reactions
efficiently.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Analysis of DNA polymerization activities on
a homopolymeric RNA template in the absence or presence of competitor
substrates. Reactions were performed for 10 min at 37 °C in RT
buffer with 250 µM dTTP, 10 nM
poly(rA)/oligo(dT)16 substrate (see "Experimental
Procedures"), and a 10 nM concentration of the
corresponding enzyme. A, polymerization products without
competitor. Lane RT, p-t without enzyme.
B, reaction products of ,  , or as indicated at
the bottom of the gel, in the presence of a 100-fold
(lanes 1) or a 1000-fold (lanes 2) molar excess of poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18
(indicated as rA/dT) or 18/36-mer DNA-DNA (indicated as
DNA/DNA) as a competitor substrate. Lane
RT, primer-template without enzyme; lane
C, no competitor added; lane M, DNA
molecular size marker (the sizes of the DNA fragments are shown on the
right).
|
|
The behavior of
, 
, and
was further analyzed in the
presence of either a 100- or a 1000-fold excess of unlabeled
poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18 or of 18/36-mer DNA-DNA p-t (Fig.
5B). Again, poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18 was more
efficient as a trap. The experiment confirms that the affinity of
for nucleic acids is lower than that of the two other enzymes tested.
Nevertheless, even after the addition of the competitor substrate,
produces high molecular weight DNA. Our results demonstrate that
,

, and
are able to synthesize in a processive mode on DNA as
well as RNA templates.
Qualitative Evaluation of RNase H Activity--
In contrast to the
RTs from lentiviruses like HIV-1 RT, RSV RTs possess two RNase H
domains in the homodimeric
, Pol, and
enzymes as well as in the

or
Pol heterodimers. The heterodimeric HIV-1 RT p66/p51
harbors the RNase H domain only in the larger p66 subunit. To determine
whether the different subunit composition has an impact on the
properties of the RNase H activities, we performed qualitative RNase H
assays with the various RSV RTs. A 5'-end-labeled 127-mer RNA was
hybridized to a 36-mer DNA and incubated with RT. Fig.
6B shows that the RNase H
activities of all RSV RTs investigated are similar with respect to the
cleavage site in the DNA-RNA hybrid. However, in comparison with HIV-1 RT, there is a striking difference. It has been shown that retroviral RTs function as endonucleases (28-31). In addition, after the
endonucleolytic cleavage by HIV-1 RT, the enzyme reveals a 3'
5'
directed processing activity (30-32) leading to a
time-dependent shortening of the 5' RNA fragment after
cleavage of the hybrid. With the substrate used, HIV-1 RT performs an
endonucleolytic cleavage at nucleotide 71 of the template strand, which
is followed by 3'
5' directed processing of the cleaved 5' RNA
strand to position 62 (Fig. 6, A and B) (33, 34).
Contrary to the results observed with HIV-1 RT, even after prolonged
incubation times of 40 min, no directed processing activity can be
detected with any of the RSV RTs (Fig. 6B). Rather, only the
endonucleolytic cleavage at positions 71 and 72 is performed.
Furthermore, this result indicates that the distance between the active
sites of polymerase and RNase H is similar to that in HIV-1 RT (31, 35,
36) and corresponds to about 18 nucleotides.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Qualitative analysis of RNase H activities in
the absence of polymerization. A, schematic
representation of the heteropolymeric DNA-RNA p-t substrate comprising
a 5'-end-labeled 127-mer RNA to which a 36-mer DNA primer was
hybridized. The major cleavage sites determined for RSV RTs (positions
71 and 72) and HIV-1 RT (position 72) in the absence of dNTPs and the
5' RNA fragment created by HIV-1 RT after 3' 5' directed processing
(position 62) are indicated by arrows. B,
reactions were performed for 10 or 40 min as indicated at the
bottom of the gel at 37 °C in RT buffer with 10 nM of 36/127-mer DNA-RNA p-t and 10 nM of
enzyme. The sizes of the 5' RNA cleavage products are indicated on the
left; lane RT, p-t without
enzyme.
|
|
RNase H Cleavage after Primer Elongation--
The same DNA-RNA p-t
substrate was used to investigate the RNase H activities of RSV RTs
, 
, and
in the presence of dNTPs (Fig.
7). The polymerization process was
stopped after the incorporation of 4, 10, or 19 nucleotides by the
addition of the appropriate ddNTP. The addition of four dNTPs allows
polymerization of the full-length DNA product. Previous enzymatic
analyses of a p-t substrate possessing the same template overhang
sequence by Ghosh et al. (34) revealed extensive secondary
structures in the putative single-stranded region of the RNA template.
In fact, the entire region of the template overhang is involved in the
formation of an extended intramolecular hairpin structure. Therefore,
elongation of the DNA primer by RT requires strand displacement
activity. Fig. 7B shows that at the enzyme concentrations
used, HIV-1 RT performs RNA cleavages at sites close to the site used
in the absence of dNTPs. This implies that due to the extensive
secondary structures of the template overhang, primer extension is
impaired with HIV-1 RT, thus allowing the RNase H to cleave the RNA
before DNA synthesis can start. However, obviously each of the RSV RTs tested can unwind the RNA secondary structures very effectively and
extend the primer to the end of the template. This is demonstrated by
the presence of a short RNase H cleavage fragment of about 16 nucleotides in length at the bottom of the gel. These results imply
that there is a qualitative difference in strand displacement activities of the RTs derived from RSV as compared with HIV-1 RT.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Qualitative analysis of RNase H and
polymerase activities during programmed DNA polymerization.
Reactions were performed for 10 min at 37 °C in RT buffer with a 10 nM concentration of the 36/127-mer DNA-RNA p-t and 10 nM of enzyme. A, the 36/127-mer DNA-RNA p-t and
the length of the extensions, indicated by a dotted arrows, are shown. The RNase H cleavage site at position 72 is indicated by an arrow. B, the 127-mer RNA was
5'-end-labeled. The size of the 5' RNA cleavage products is indicated
on the left. Conditions were chosen, permitting extension by
+4, +10, or +19 nucleotides (see "Experimental Procedures"), as
indicated at the top. Complete primer extension of 54 nucleotides (full) was achieved by omission of ddNTPs in the
reaction mixture. Lane 1, RT; lane
, enzyme without dNTPs. C, comparative analysis of
programmed primer extension reactions with the 36/127-mer DNA-RNA p-t
substrate. The 36-mer DNA primer was 5'-end-labeled and used for primer
extension reactions. Conditions and labeling of lanes are as
in B.
|
|
To prove that polymerization with such a template is less efficient
with HIV-1 RT, we performed a control experiment with the same
substrate but with 5'-end-labeled primer DNA to visualize the
polymerization products. Fig. 7C shows strong pause sites with HIV-1 RT after extension of 4 and 15 nucleotides in the presence of four dNTPs, allowing full extension of the primer. Again, RSV RT
appears to be less active than the other RSV RTs, as indicated by the
larger amount of unextended 36-mer primer DNA.
 |
DISCUSSION |
One purpose of this investigation was to establish an expression
system that allows production of soluble RSV RT enzymes in sufficient
amounts to purify them to homogeneity in order to obtain more reliable
information on their enzymatic functions. In this study, we show that
the baculovirus/Sf21 insect cell expression system fulfills this
goal, and this allowed us to characterize the RTs of RSV more
thoroughly than previously possible. Furthermore, since the expression
system chosen is independent of RSV replication, it enables us to
produce mutant RSV RTs and assess their function. This is of special
interest when mutations are introduced that would be lethal to virus
replication.2
In this report, we describe the expression of five different products
of RSV pol in Sf21 insect cells in a soluble form.
Besides the three enzyme forms normally isolated from virions (
,
, and 
), two additional proteins were expressed and purified;
the full-length Pol and the heterodimeric
Pol were included to study whether the 4.1-kDa extension of Pol has an impact on polymerase and
RNase H activities. Quantitative analysis of the RT activities of the
purified RSV RT enzymes shows that their activities are comparable with
that of AMV RT isolated from virions, demonstrating that this
expression system yields RSV RTs that are functional and can be used
for further analysis.
One important question with respect to RT function in general is
whether RTs are active as monomers, dimers, or even multimers. For
HIV-1 RT p66/p51, it has been shown that the monomeric subunits do not
possess enzymatic activities (37, 38). RSV RT 
and
have been
isolated from virions as dimeric proteins (14). However, at 20 °C
and 4% glycerol the native active form of AMV RT appears to be a
tetramer composed of two 
heterodimers (
)2 (39).
Hizi and Joklik (14) suggested that the
subunit isolated from RSV
exists and is active as a monomer. On the other hand, RSV RT
isolated from E. coli appears to be active as a dimer (15).
Glycerol density centrifugation of RSV RT
isolated from virions
yielded a molecular mass of about 90 kDa, which did not allow a precise
determination of the quaternary structure of
(8). In this report,
we show that the molecular mass of 117 kDa we determined corresponds to
the dimeric form of
, since it can be partially monomerized upon the
addition of 45% Me2SO. Our results are in agreement with
those obtained by Soltis and Skalka (15), suggesting that the active
form of RSV RT
is the homodimer.
Qualitative analysis of polymerization activities shows that all RSV
RTs are able to synthesize high molecular weight DNA products on DNA as
well as RNA templates, thus being processive polymerases. This has been
shown previously for
and 
. Previous reports with
isolated
from virions implied that
is a distributive polymerase (40). This
was determined by Hizi et al. (40) by analyzing the amount
of radioactively labeled nucleotide incorporated into a homopolymer in
the presence or absence of a competitor substrate. However, this method
does not allow measurement of the length of the synthesized DNA, which
is an important parameter for determination of processivity.
In this paper, we identified the products of DNA polymerization
synthesized by
,
, and 
. Determination of product lengths with DNA or RNA templates shows that RSV RT
can synthesize long DNA
fragments similar to those synthesized by
or 
, even after the
addition of competitor substrate (Figs. 5 and 6) Therefore, we suggest
that
is a processive polymerase. However, the affinity of the
enzyme toward nucleic acid substrates is reduced as compared with
and 
, presumably due to the lack of the integrase domain. The
decrease in affinity does not make the enzyme a distributive polymerase, since long products are synthesized even in the presence of
competitor substrate. The reduction in affinity can also explain the
results observed by Hizi et al. (40) described above, since they did not examine the length of the DNA product but the
incorporation of nucleotides into the competitor substrate. If the
decrease in affinity was due to an increase in the dissociation rate,
one would expect a distributive enzyme. This effect was found for homodimeric equine infectious anemia virus p51/p51 RT. In that case,
deletion of the RNase H domain of the p66 subunit makes the enzyme
distributive (24). Our results with RSV RT
suggest a different
mechanism, i.e. faster incorporation of nucleotides as
compared with homodimeric
or heterodimeric 
. Alternatively, it is possible that the affinity of the enzyme increases in the presence of nucleotides or after the enzyme has changed from the initiation to the elongation mode of polymerization. Further
experiments are necessary to elucidate these hypotheses.
Our results imply that one major function of the integrase domain in
the
subunit is to increase the affinity to the substrate. All other
enzyme functions analyzed do not differ significantly between RSV RT
and RSV RT
or 
(see below). However, the differences in
substrate affinities might lead to differences in fidelity or in the
rates of nucleotide incorporation and polymerization. Experiments are
being performed to test these possibilities.
We find that RSV RT
as well as RSV RT
and 
are capable of
performing template switching, indicated by polymerization products
that are longer than the original template strand (Fig. 5). Moreover,
reveals a highly efficient strand displacement activity similar to
that observed with
and 
. Strand displacement activity is
necessary during viral replication to resolve secondary structures of
the template strand and to perform the strand transfer reactions during
the first and second jump when RT reaches the end of the template after
synthesis of strong stop DNA. Strand displacement activity has been
described previously for heterodimeric AMV RT (41) as well as for
heterodimeric HIV-1 RT (42). We show here that in comparison with HIV-1
RT, the strand displacement activity of all RSV RTs tested is much more
efficient (Fig. 7), implicating differences in the mechanism of genome
replication of the two viruses.
Another striking difference we observed with RSV RTs in comparison with
HIV-1 RT is the absence of a 3'
5' directed processing activity
during hydrolysis of RNA (Fig. 6B). This activity of HIV-1
RT further degrades the 5' RNA fragment after the initial endonucleolytic cleavage has occurred in the RNA-DNA substrate (30-32). In contrast to HIV-1 RT, RSV RTs do not further degrade the
5' RNA fragment after performing the initial cut at positions 71 and
72. It has been proved that the 3'
5' directed processing activity
of HIV-1 RT is necessary for catalyzing the strand transfer reactions
during reverse transcription of the viral genome (43). During the
production of minus strand strong stop DNA the RNA is degraded by the
RNase H activity of HIV-1 RT. When the end of the template is reached,
an initial 14-mer RNA fragment of the template is still annealed to the
DNA. This 14-mer is further degraded by the polymerase independent 3'
5' directed processing activity of the RNase H to give rise to a
shorter RNA fragment of 8 nucleotides. Only then can an efficient
strand transfer process occur. It requires the binding of the new
template strand and displacement of the 8-mer RNA fragment (43). The
length of the RNA fragment created when RSV RT enzymes reach the end of
the template is a 16-mer, which apparently is not digested further (Fig. 7B). This result further indicates that RSV RTs do not
possess a 3'
5' RNase H processing activity. We suggest that due to the highly efficient strand displacement activity of RSV RTs, these
enzymes are capable of unwinding longer double-stranded regions than
HIV-1 RT and thus do not need a 3'
5' RNase H processing activity,
which HIV-1 RT requires. Therefore, efficient strand transfer reactions
can be performed even in the presence of longer hybrid regions at the
end of the template. In addition, this result is in agreement with
earlier findings by Omer and Faras (44) showing that during reverse
transcription of avian retroviruses the tRNA primer is released intact.
A 3'
5' RNase H processing activity would lead to a tRNA shortened
by several nucleotides.
Our results demonstrate that there are significant differences in the
mechanism of polymerization and RNase H hydrolysis between RTs from
different retroviruses and that the results obtained with one
retroviral RT are not necessarily valid for RTs from other
retroviruses. Additional studies will be required to test the results
found here more thoroughly and to examine the special organization of
the different RSV RT enzymes with respect to their function during
reverse transcription and integration. The stability and high activity
of the recombinant RSV RTs we obtained now enables us to construct
mutant enzymes to further analyze the structure-function relationships
of RSV RTs.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Dr. Steve Hughes (NCI-Frederick
Cancer Research and Development Center) for providing plasmid RCASBP
(A) and a subclone thereof carrying the RSV pol gene. We
thank Martina Wischnewski and Karin Vogel-Bachmayr for skilled
technical assistance with protein purification and cloning procedures,
Dr. Tobias Restle for helpful discussions, and Prof. Dr. Roger Goody
for careful reading of the manuscript and for continuous support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft and
by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to B. W.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-231-133-2312; Fax: 49-231-133-2699; E-mail:
birgit.woehrl@mpi-dortmund.mpg.de.
2
S. Werner and B. Wöhrl, manuscript in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
RT, reverse
transcriptase;
HIV, human immunodeficiency virus;
RSV, Rous sarcoma
virus;
ASLV, avian sarcoma and leukosis viruses;
HPLC, high performance
liquid chromatography;
p-t, primer-template hybrid;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
ddNTP, dideoxynucleoside
triphosphate;
AMV, avian myeloblastosis virus.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lightfoote, M.,
Coligan, J.,
Folks, T.,
Fauci, A. S.,
Martin, M. A.,
and Venkatesan, S.
(1986)
J. Virol.
60,
771-775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Di Marzo Veronese, F.,
Copeland, T. D.,
DeVico, A. L.,
Rahman, R.,
Oroszlan, S.,
Gallo, R. C.,
and Sarngadharan, M. G.
(1986)
Science
231,
1289-1291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Kraus, G.,
Behr, E.,
Baier, M.,
Konig, H.,
and Kurth, R.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
192,
207-213[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
DeVico, A.,
Montelaro, R. C.,
Gallo, R. C.,
and Sarngadharan, M. G.
(1991)
Virology
185,
387-394[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Telesnitsky, A.,
and Goff, S. P.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
1276-1280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Alexander, F.,
Leis, J.,
Soltis, D. A.,
Crowl, R. M.,
Danho, W.,
Poonian, M. S.,
Pan, Y. C.,
and Skalka, A. M.
(1987)
J. Virol.
61,
534-542[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Katz, R. A.,
and Skalka, A. M.
(1988)
J. Virol.
62,
528-533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Grandgenett, D. P.,
Gerard, G. F.,
and Green, M.
(1973)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
70,
230-234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Rho, H. M.,
Grandgenett, D. P.,
and Green, M.
(1975)
J. Biol. Chem.
250,
5278-5280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Schiff, R. D.,
and Grandgenett, D. P.
(1978)
J. Virol.
28,
279-291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Golomb, M.,
and Grandgenett, D.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
1606-1613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Grandgenett, D. P.,
Vora, A. C.,
and Schiff, R. D.
(1978)
Virology
89,
119-132[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Kacian, D. L.,
Watson, K. F.,
Burny, A.,
and Spiegelman, S.
(1971)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
246,
365-383[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Hizi, A.,
and Joklik, W. K.
(1977)
J. Biol. Chem.
252,
2281-2289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Soltis, D. A.,
and Skalka, A. M.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
3372-3376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Trentin, B.,
Rebeyrotte, N.,
and Mamoun, R. Z.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
6504-6510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Stewart, L.,
and Vogt, V. M.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
7582-7596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E., F,
and Maniatis, T.
(1994)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 19.
|
Petropoulos, C. J.,
and Hughes, S. H.
(1991)
J. Virol.
65,
3728-3737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Gruenwald, S.,
and Heitz, J.
(1993)
Baculovirus Expression Vector System: Procedures and Methods Manual
, PharMingen, San Diego, CA
|
| 21.
|
Wöhrl, B. M.,
Krebs, R.,
Thrall, S. H.,
Le Grice, S. F. J.,
Scheidig, A. J.,
and Goody, R. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17581-17587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Jacques, P. S.,
Wöhrl, B. M.,
Ottmann, M.,
Darlix, J.-L.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
26472-26478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Wöhrl, B. M.,
Howard, K. J.,
Jacques, P. S.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
8541-8548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Souquet, M.,
Restle, T.,
Krebs, R.,
Le Grice, S. F.,
Goody, R. S.,
and Wöhrl, B. M.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
12144-12152[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Ghosh, M.,
Howard, K. J.,
Cameron, C. E.,
Benkovic, S. J.,
Hughes, S. H.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7068-7076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Grandgenett, D. P.
(1976)
J. Virol.
17,
950-961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|