J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 26407-26415, September 10, 1999
The Release of Acetylcholine Receptor Inducing Activity (ARIA)
from Its Transmembrane Precursor in Transfected Fibroblasts*
Bomie
Han
and
Gerald D.
Fischbach§
From the Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Massachusetts 02115
 |
ABSTRACT |
Acetylcholine receptor inducing activity (ARIA)
is made by motoneurons and is released at the neuromuscular synapse to
stimulate the synthesis of acetylcholine receptors by skeletal muscle.
ARIA is derived from a transmembrane precursor (pro-ARIA) via
proteolytic cleavage of the ectodomain. We studied requirements in the
amino acid sequence at the cleavage site with various substitution and deletion mutations. Wild type (WT) and mutant proteins were transiently expressed in COS cells, and release of ARIA into the conditioned medium
was measured by tyrosine phosphorylation of its receptor, p185, in L6
cells. Removal of all potential cleavage sites between the
extracellular epidermal growth factor domain and the transmembrane domain by substitution and small deletions (<11 amino acid residues out of 21) did not significantly reduce ARIA release, whereas larger
deletions abolished it. We propose that cleavage occurs independently
of amino acid sequence at a short distance from the epidermal growth
factor domain, unless sterically hindered by the nearby secondary
structure. A mutant with shorter cytoplasmic domain ("c" isoform)
released significantly less ARIA than the WT ("a" isoform),
suggesting that the c isoform may be suitable for signaling through
direct cell-cell contact. Alternatively, proteolytic conversion of the
a isoform to the c isoform may rapidly down-regulate release of
ARIA.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Acetylcholine receptor inducing activity
(ARIA)1 is a 42-43-kDa
glycoprotein initially purified from chick brain based on its ability
to stimulate acetylcholine receptor synthesis by cultured myotubes (1,
2). Molecular cloning of the cDNA (2) revealed that ARIA belongs to
a family of proteins that include neu differentiation factor (3),
heregulin (4), and glial growth factor (5). These proteins are derived
from a single gene by alternative mRNA splicing (6), and the family
has come to be known as neuregulins (NRGs) (5).
ARIA and many other NRGs are derived from transmembrane precursor
proteins (pro-ARIA or pro-NRG, respectively) via proteolytic cleavage
of the ectodomain. Considering that an EGF-like domain, located in the
membrane proximal half of the extracellular segment, is crucial for all
biological actions of NRGs (reviewed in Ref. 7), proteolytic cleavage
of pro-ARIA must occur between the extracellular EGF-like domain and
the transmembrane domain in order to release functional ARIA. The
C-terminal end of the EGF-like domain can be functionally defined as
Met185 (see Fig. 1a), because a synthetic NRG
ending with this residue was fully functional, and this methionine was
critical for receptor activation (8).
In transfected CHO cells, significant portion of pro-ARIA is expressed
at the cell surface before it is cleaved to release ARIA (9, 10).
Cleavage of pro-ARIA appears to involve a protein kinase
C-dependent step because it can be stimulated by treatment of the cells with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), a protein kinase C activator (9, 10). However, the nature of the processing enzyme remains elusive.
It is clear that NRG plays an important role at the developing and
mature nerve-muscle synapses. The number of postsynaptic acetylcholine
receptors is reduced in heterozygous NRG knockout (NRG+/
) mice (11).
Homozygous knockout mice (NRG
/
) die by embryonic day 10 before
neuromuscular junction develops (12, 13). It is not clear if this
action of NRG depends on an action of cleaved and "soluble" NRG or
if the transmembrane form is biologically active. In certain cases,
transmembrane form of growth factors are not simply precursors for the
soluble counterparts, but they can signal through direct cell-cell
contact (juxtacrine signaling) (14-18). In the case of TNF
,
juxtacrine signaling mediated by pro-TNF
may mediate local
inflammatory responses, whereas systemic signaling through soluble
TNF
may be responsible for septic shock or cachexia (14). Therefore,
proteolytic cleavage of the transmembrane form of these molecules may
be viewed as an important regulatory mechanism in deciding between
signaling at a distance (paracrine) versus signaling through
contact (juxtacrine) rather than simply regulating the amount of
soluble factors.
In this paper, we examine the constraints on the amino acid sequence of
pro-ARIA at the cleavage site. We also examine potential differences
between different isoforms of pro-ARIA in release of soluble ARIA.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Mutagenesis of Pro-ARIA--
Plasmid DNA derived from pcDNAI
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing full-length cDNA for pro-ARIA
has been described earlier (2). Mutagenesis of the pro-ARIA was
performed by Kunkel's method (19) using the Mutagen kit (Bio-Rad).
Mutagenic oligonucleotides often contained an additional silent
mutation to create a restriction site, which was used for screening of
the mutants. All mutations and lack of additional unwanted mutation
were confirmed by sequencing the entire coding region of pro-ARIA.
Plasmid DNA was purified with a Qiagen kit (Qiagen Inc., Santa Clarita,
CA) before sequencing and transfection into COS cells.
Transient Transfection of COS Cells and Analysis of Total
Cellular Expression--
COS cells were maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented
with 10% fetal calf serum, L-glutamine, penicillin, and
streptomycin (DMEM+). Cells were split 1 day before transfection into
24-well plates at a density of 20-30% confluence. On the day of
transfection, 400 ng of plasmid DNA was used to transfect cells in 1 well using LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to
manufacturer's recommendation. Briefly, the cells were incubated with
DNA/LipofectAMINE mixture for 6 h in Opti-MEM (Life Technologies,
Inc.) before fetal calf serum was added to 10%. The following day,
cells were washed twice with Opti-MEM and incubated for 10 h with
Opti-MEM containing 10% fetal calf serum to allow recovery of the
cells. To collect conditioned medium for measurement of steady-state
release of ARIA, medium was replaced with Opti-MEM containing 2 mM CaCl2 and further incubated for 48 h.
Conditioned medium was filtered through 0.22-µm filter to remove
floating cells and stored frozen until p185 phosphorylation assay.
After collecting conditioned medium, total cell lysates were obtained
by adding 100 µl of 2× strength SDS-PAGE sample buffer to each well.
Total cellular expression of precursor proteins was examined by Western
blotting of the cell lysates. Proteins were separated in a 7.5%
polyacrylamide gel and transferred to Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore,
Bedford, MA). Immunoblotting was performed according to standard
procedures. Membrane was blocked for 1 h in 5% nonfat dry milk
solution prepared in PBS, incubated with primary antibody for 1 h
in blocking solution, washed three times in PBS for 5 min each,
incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit antibody in blocking solution, and then washed three times
in PBS for 5 min each. Proteins were visualized with Renaissance
chemiluminescence reagent (NEN Life Science Products) according to the
manufacturer's protocol.
p185 Phosphorylation Assay--
ARIA was assayed by tyrosine
phosphorylation of p185 in L6 muscle cells basically as described (20)
with minor modifications. L6 cells were grown in DMEM+. For p185
phosphorylation assay, cells were seeded into 48-well plates (Costar,
Acton, MA) and grown in DMEM+ until they became confluent and fused.
Cells became confluent in 4-5 days and began to fuse. In about 10 days
after plating, cells fused both laterally and longitudinally forming a
large sheet of multinucleated cells, at which time response to ARIA
reached maximum sensitivity. Cells maintained maximum responsiveness
for about 4-5 days. All the p185 phosphorylation assays were done
during this period. After aspirating the growth medium, assay medium
was added in 200 µl volume per well and incubated for 45 min at
37 °C. At the end of incubation, assay medium was aspirated, and 50 µl of preheated 2× strength SDS-PAGE sample buffer was added to each
well. Cell lysates were collected into microcentrifuge tubes, heated at
100 °C for 5 min, and stored at
20 °C until analysis by Western
blotting. Samples were run in a 5% gel until the 130-kDa prestained
molecular mass marker (Bio-Rad) reached the bottom of the gel for best
separation of the p185 band from non-responding lower molecular weight
bands. The rest of the Western blotting was done similarly as described above except that 4G10 antibody (0.3 µg/ml final) was used as a
primary antibody in 3% nonfat dry milk, and horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Dako, Carpinteria, CA)
was used as a secondary antibody. 4G10 antibody was a gift from Dr. T. Roberts (Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston).
Quantitative Comparison of Released ARIA and Precursor
Expression--
To compare amounts of ARIA in the conditioned media
from cells transfected with mutant constructs with that from wild type (WT)-transfected cells, serial dilutions were made for each conditioned media. p185 phosphorylation assay was performed simultaneously for each
of the serially diluted media. L6 cell lysates were run in the same gel
for all the samples to be compared. X-ray film containing the Western
blotting results was scanned with a flat bed scanner in transmissive
mode at 600 dpi, 256 gray scale. The resulting digitized image was
imported into ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Band intensity of the p185 from different samples was measured by
drawing a rectangular box of identical size around each p185 band and
measuring integrated intensity using built-in volume-reporter function.
A calibration curve was generated using p185 band intensity by each of
the serial dilutions of the WT conditioned medium. The amount of ARIA
in undiluted medium was calculated for each mutant using the
calibration curve by linear regression. To compare total cellular
expression of the precursor protein for each mutant with that of the
WT, serial dilutions were made for each cell lysate in SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Western blotting and quantitation was performed in a similar manner as above. Data for qualitative and quantitative comparisons were
obtained from separate transfection experiments.
PMA Stimulation of ARIA Release--
Transfection of COS cells
was performed similarly as described above with minor modifications.
Cells were transfected in a 100-mm dish and incubated with DMEM+ for
24 h after recovery from transfection. On the day of PMA
stimulation, cells were washed once and incubated for 1 h with
prewarmed DMEM containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. After
collecting the medium for basal release of ARIA, cells were washed once
and incubated under the same condition with an additional 100 nM PMA for stimulated release. Collected conditioned media
were filtered through a 0.22-µm filter to remove floating cells, then
concentrated 20-fold using Centricon-10 (Millipore) before serial
dilutions were made, and p185 phosphorylation activity was assayed. PMA
was initially made in Me2SO at 1 mM
concentration. Control experiments with purified NRG showed that 100 nM PMA did not interfere with the p185 phosphorylation
assay, although a 10-fold higher concentration significantly reduced
the phosphorylation response.
Immunocytochemistry--
Two days after transfection, cells were
harvested by trypsinization and reseeded into 8-well glass chamber
slides (Nunc, Naperville, IL) precoated with laminin. Immunolabeling
was performed on the following day. For labeling of cell surface
pro-ARIA, cells were washed and prechilled with cold DMEM before they
were incubated with 183 antiserum for 1.5 h on ice. Antiserum 183 was raised against the whole pro-ARIA. Cells were washed with cold DMEM
twice, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, and washed thoroughly with PBS. Fixed cells were then incubated with Cy3-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit antibody (Molecular Probe, Eugene, OR) for 1 h at room
temperature and washed thoroughly with PBS. Antibody 1310, directed
against the cytoplasmic domain of pro-ARIA, gave no detectable staining
under the same condition. For labeling of total cellular pro-ARIA,
cells were first fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and then
permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100 for 2 min. Primary and secondary
antibodies were diluted in PBS containing 10% normal goat serum.
Antibody 1310 was used as a primary antibody for labeling of total
cellular pro-ARIA. Even when permeabilization with Triton X-100 was
omitted, fixation with paraformaldehyde alone apparently allowed access
of primary antibody to the intracellular space because clear staining
of transfected cells was visible. Slides were mounted with 5%
n-propyl gallate in 50% glycerol and then viewed and
photographed under rhodamine filter.
Effect of Metal Chelators on ARIA Release--
CHO cells stably
expressing WT pro-ARIA have been described earlier and were maintained
accordingly (10). Cells grown in 12-well plates to near confluence were
washed once and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with DMEM containing
different treatment reagents. Conditioned medium was centrifuged to
remove floating cells, and then treatment reagents were added to adjust
for differences. Thus, all conditioned media contained equal
concentrations of EDTA, o-phenanthroline (OP), PMA,
ZnCl2, and CaCl2 when p185 phosphorylation assay was performed to measure released ARIA. OP was initially made as
5 M concentration in EtOH.
 |
RESULTS |
Cleavage of Pro-ARIA Occurs between Extracellular EGF Domain and
the Putative Transmembrane Domain--
Cleavage of pro-ARIA must occur
between the C-terminal end of the EGF domain (Met185) and
the transmembrane domain to release functional ARIA. The transmembrane
domain was predicted to begin with Val207 based on the
hydropathy analysis and the presence of adjacent charged residues (see
Ref. 2). We call this region including Ala186 and
Arg206 the "stalk." Deletion of a large portion of the
stalk (>15 amino acid residues out of 21) prevented release of
functional ARIA into the medium without affecting expression of the
precursor proteins (Figs. 1 and
2).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Deletion of most (>15 amino acids out of 21)
amino acid residues between the extracellular EGF domain and the
transmembrane domain prevented release of functional ARIA.
a, schematic diagram of pro-ARIA and mutant constructs.
Pro-ARIA has an immunoglobulin-like domain (Ig, box with
horizontal lines), an EGF-like domain (EGF, solid box),
followed by a short segment containing the putative cleavage site(s)
(stalk, open box) in the extracellular N-terminal region.
Pro-ARIA also has a transmembrane domain (TM, shaded box)
and C-terminal cytoplasmic domain (Cytoplasmic, open box).
Amino acid sequence for the wild type pro-ARIA (WT) is shown
at the top for C-terminal end of the EGF domain (shown in
bold), the stalk (shown in plain text), and
N-terminal part of the transmembrane domain (shown in shaded
box). Dots indicate identical residues and
dashes indicate deletions. The diagram also shows the
epitopes for some of the antibodies used in this study. Affinity
purified antibody HM94 is directed against a peptide corresponding to a
segment within the Ig domain (10). Affinity purified antibody 1310 is
directed against a peptide corresponding to the C-terminal end of the c
isoform (see Fig. 6) (9). Affinity purified antibody SC348,
commercially available from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA)
is directed against a peptide corresponding to the C-terminal end of
the WT pro-ARIA (a isoform). Antiserum 183, not shown in this diagram,
was raised against the whole pro-ARIA expressed in bacteria (44).
b, tyrosine phosphorylation of the p185 from L6 muscle cells
by the medium conditioned with the COS cells transiently transfected
with WT and different mutant constructs as indicated. Western blotting
was done with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. c, left panel,
Western blotting of the transfected cell lysates with cytoplasmic
domain-specific antibody (Ab) (1310) or with
extracellular domain-specific antibody (HM94). c,
right panel, Western blotting of the cell lysates obtained from
the same cells used in the experiments shown in b. For both
b and c, control (Ctrl) indicates mock
transfection. Bracket indicates precursor proteins for each
construct. Open arrowhead indicates remnant for the WT. See
"Results" for assignment of each band.
|
|

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
WT and all tested mutants are expressed at
the cell surface. Unless indicated otherwise, transfected cells
were incubated with 183 antiserum, raised against the whole pro-ARIA,
on ice without fixation. After washing, the cells were fixed and
further incubated with Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody to stain cell
surface pro-ARIA. Fluorescence labeling was observed from only a subset
of cells, consistent with non-homogeneous nature of transient
transfection. Control (Ctrl) indicates mock-transfected
cells. Ctrl on the bottom right is a view under Nomarski
optics of the same field shown on the left. All others are
viewed under Cy3 fluorescence. WT-total indicates labeling
of total cellular pro-ARIA using 1310 antibody in cells that were fixed
and permeabilized and then incubated with the primary antibody.
|
|
WT and mutant proteins were transiently expressed in COS cells, and the
ARIA released into conditioned medium was assayed by its ability to
phosphorylate tyrosine residues on a p185 in L6 muscle cells (see
"Experimental Procedures"). p185 is a broad band containing NRG
receptors in extracts of L6 cells that migrates with an apparent
molecular mass of 185 kDa. The intensity of p185 band on Western blot
was concentration-dependent over a wide range of NRG
concentration. We routinely detected NRG at levels as low as 10 pM using this assay, whereas the response did not saturate until 1 nM concentration (see Fig. 7). ARIA in the
conditioned medium could not be directly detected by Western blotting
method using currently available antibodies, probably due to lower
sensitivity or lack of cross-reactivity between species.
Conditioned medium from the WT-transfected cells contained high levels
of ARIA as measured by p185 phosphorylation activity, whereas those
from mock-transfected cells had no activity (Fig. 1b). A
doublet of slightly lower molecular mass (about 150 kDa) that did not
respond to ARIA served as an internal control for loading of equal
amount of proteins. ARIA from the WT conditioned medium was readily
detectable even when the conditioned medium was diluted 10-fold (data
not shown). On the contrary, conditioned media from cells transfected
with large deletion mutants (delA, delB, and delC
in Fig. 1a) contained no detectable phosphorylation activity
(Fig. 1b), indicating that these mutants were defective in
release of functional ARIA.
We considered four explanations for lack of functional ARIA from cells
transfected with these mutants. First, the mutant proteins might not be
expressed in the transfected COS cells. When WT-transfected cell
lysates were examined by Western blotting method, two sets of broad
bands (each migrating similarly with 83- and 51-kDa molecular mass
markers) were observed using an antibody directed against the
cytoplasmic domain of pro-ARIA (antibody (Ab) 1310 in Fig. 1c). Only the upper set of bands was recognized by an
antibody directed against the extracellular Ig domain (antibody (Ab)
HM94 in Fig. 1c). This upper set of bands is most likely the
full-length transmembrane precursor (bracket in Fig.
1c) because it contains both extracellular and cytoplasmic
epitopes. Heterogeneity in the size of the bands is probably due to
variable glycosylation of the protein. The remnant, defined as the
transmembrane plus cytoplasmic domain after cleavage of the ectodomain,
is expected to run as a single band with a molecular mass of 44-46
kDa, depending on the exact cleavage site within the stalk. Among the
lower set of bands detected by the 1310 antibody but not by the HM94
antibody, a prominent band with an apparent molecular mass of 47 kDa
was assigned as the remnant (open arrowhead in Fig.
1c). Other bands may correspond to partial degradation
products. A significant level of expression was detected for the
precursors of all three mutants (bracket in Fig.
1c, right panel) when expression was measured in
the same cells from which conditioned media were collected. One of the
mutants (delB) actually showed a higher level of expression than the
WT. Therefore, lack of ARIA in the conditioned media from the
mutant-transfected cells was not due to lack of expression of the
precursor proteins.
Second, the mutant proteins might be expressed but not delivered to the
cell surface, perhaps due to disruption of a necessary signaling motif.
In stably transfected CHO cells, a significant portion of pro-NRG
reaches the cell surface before it is cleaved (9, 10). We examined the
cell surface expression of these proteins following transient
transfection into COS cells. Unfixed, transfected COS cells were
incubated with antiserum 183, raised against the whole pro-ARIA,
without permeabilization to prevent access of the primary antibody to
the intracellular space. Incubation was done on ice to prevent
internalization of the antibody. All of the mutants (delA, delB, and
delC) as well as the WT pro-ARIA were readily detected at the cell
surface (Fig. 2) upon examination of the labeled cells with
fluorescence microscopy. The pattern of labeling was consistent with
localization at the cell surface and was easily distinguishable from
cells that were fixed and permeabilized before incubation with the
primary antibody (Fig. 2, top panels). Labeling of
permeabilized cells showed staining of a meshwork structure consistent
with labeling of the trans-Golgi network (Fig. 2, WT-total).
Occasionally, a bright perinuclear staining was visible. On the
contrary, cell surface labeling gave numerous small punctate staining
patches with the brightest staining at the cell periphery. The pattern
of cell surface labeling showed no meshwork but was consistent with the
three-dimensional contour of the cell surface. Cotransfection
experiments with green fluorescent protein confirmed that those cells
that were labeled with pro-ARIA antibody were the cells that received
plasmid DNA during transfection (data not shown). There was no
noticeable difference in the intensity and frequency of labeled cells
among the mutants and the WT. Therefore, lack of ARIA in the
conditioned media from the mutant-transfected cells was not due to lack
of cell surface expression.
Third, cleavage might have occurred within the EGF domain of the
mutants and destroyed the activity of ARIA. Fourth, cleavage of the
ectodomain may have been impaired for the mutant proteins either
because the cleavage site was eliminated or because of other structural
constraints. The results of the Western blotting analysis were more
consistent with lack of ectodomain cleavage for these mutants than with
destruction of activity by cleavage within the EGF domain. The remnant
band, clearly seen from the WT-transfected cell lysate (open
arrowhead in Fig. 1c), was almost completely missing in
the delC-transfected cell lysate. Other large deletion mutants also
showed marked reduction in the intensity of this band.
Small Deletions and Substitutions Did Not Affect Release of
ARIA--
We attempted to localize the precise cleavage site within
the stalk. First, we examined if the pair of basic residues at the juxtamembrane position (Lys205-Arg206) was a
major cleavage site. Many prohormones and proproteins contain pairs of
basic amino acid residues that are cleaved by subtilisin-like proteases
(21-23). To eliminate the potential cleavage site while preserving the
putative boundary between the transmembrane and the extracellular
domain, we simultaneously substituted Lys205 to Glu and
Arg206 to Asp (KR/ED mutant; Fig.
3a). The amount of ARIA
released into the medium from KR/ED-transfected cells showed no
decrease when compared with WT (Fig. 3b, upper
panel). Total cellular expression level of the precursor proteins
was similar between WT and the KR/ED mutant (Fig. 3b,
lower panel). Therefore, elimination of dibasic residues did
not significantly reduce release of ARIA.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Substitution of the juxtamembrane dibasic
residues and small deletions within the putative cleavage region
(stalk) did not affect ARIA release. a, schematic
diagram of the mutants. Amino acid sequence for the wild type pro-ARIA
(WT) is shown at the top for the C-terminal end
of the EGF domain (shown in bold), the stalk region (shown
in plain text), and the N-terminal part of the transmembrane
domain (shown in shaded box). Dots indicate
identical residues, and dashes indicate deletions.
b and c, upper panels, tyrosine phosphorylation
of the p185 from L6 muscle cells by the medium conditioned with the
cells transfected with WT and different mutant constructs as indicated.
Control (Ctrl) indicates mock transfection. b and
c, lower panels, Western blotting of the transfected cell
lysates with 1310 antibody. Cell lysates were obtained from the same
cells used in the experiments shown in the upper panels.
Brackets indicate precursor proteins for each construct.
d, quantitative comparison of released ARIA (gray
bar) and total cellular expression of precursors (open
bar) for each mutant construct relative to the WT. Error
bars indicate range of actual data from two measurements.
Solid bar represents ratio of average value for the released
ARIA to that of the precursor expression. The results were obtained
from separate transfection experiments as shown in b and
c.
|
|
Quantitative comparison of the released ARIA and total cellular
expression of the precursor between the WT and the KR/ED mutant confirmed this conclusion (Fig. 3d). To quantitate released
ARIA, serial dilutions were made for conditioned media, and the p185 phosphorylation activity was assayed for each of them. The amount of
ARIA in the conditioned medium for the mutant was quantified using a
calibration curve generated by serial dilutions of the WT conditioned
medium and, therefore, was expressed as relative to the WT (see
"Experimental Procedures"). Cellular expression levels of the
precursors were also quantified in a similar manner using serial
dilutions of the cell lysates. In this transfection experiment, the
amount of released ARIA for the KR/ED mutant was reduced to half of WT,
but this was explained adequately by the reduced expression of the
precursor (Fig. 3d). The ratio of the released ARIA to
precursor expression represents efficiency of ARIA release normalized
for protein expression. The efficiency of ARIA release thus defined was
not decreased for the KR/ED mutant compared with the WT (solid
bar in Fig. 3d). We conclude that the juxtamembrane
dibasic residues are not a major cleavage site for pro-ARIA.
Next, we made a series of small (4-6 amino acid residues) deletions to
cover the rest of the entire stalk (Fig. 3a, delD, delE, delF, and delG). Unlike the large deletion
mutations (delA, delB, and delC), none of these small deletions
affected the release of ARIA from the transfected cells (Fig.
3c). Total cellular expression levels of the precursor
proteins were similar between the WT and the mutants. Quantitative
comparison of the ARIA release and precursor expression between the
mutants and the WT (Fig. 3d) confirmed the conclusion that
none of these deletions deleteriously affected efficiency of ARIA
release. In this experiment, delE mutant showed a 50% increase in the
expression of the precursor protein compared with the WT, with a
similar increase in ARIA release. Concomitant increase in ARIA release
with increased precursor expression also demonstrated that the capacity
of the transfected cells to process pro-ARIA was not saturated,
validating the method of comparison. Failure to prevent release of ARIA
by any of the small deletions and substitutions strongly suggested that
cleavage of pro-ARIA is not sequence-specific.
Length of Stalk Affects Efficiency of ARIA Release--
Although
cleavage of pro-ARIA was sequence-independent, lack of ARIA release by
large deletions (delA, delB, and delC mutants) clearly demonstrated the
necessity of stalk for such a process. To determine the minimum length
of stalk for efficient ARIA release, we made additional deletion
mutations within the stalk (Fig.
4a, delH, delI,
delJ, and delK).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Efficient release of ARIA requires a certain
length for the stalk. a, schematic diagram of the
mutants with deletions of 9-11 amino acid residues. Amino acid
sequence for the wild type pro-ARIA (WT) is shown at the
top for C-terminal end of the EGF domain (shown in
bold), the stalk (shown in plain text), and
N-terminal part of the transmembrane domain (shown in shaded
box). Dots indicate identical residues, and
dashes indicate deletions. Also shown is amino acid sequence
for a naturally occurring 2a isoform. B, upper panel,
tyrosine phosphorylation of the p185 from L6 muscle cells by the medium
conditioned with the COS cells transiently transfected with WT and
different mutant constructs as indicated. Control (Ctrl)
indicates mock transfection. Also shown is p185 phosphorylation by WT
conditioned medium serially diluted as indicated. b, lower
panel, Western blotting of the transfected cell lysates using 1310 antibody. Cell lysates were obtained from the same cells as used in the
experiments shown in the upper panel. Bracket
indicates precursor proteins for each construct. c,
quantitative comparison of released ARIA (gray bar) and
total cellular expression of precursors (open bar) for each
mutant construct relative to the WT. Error bars indicate
range of actual data from two measurements. Solid bar
represents ratio of average value for the released ARIA to that of the
precursor expression. The results were obtained from separate
transfection experiments as shown in b. Below
each mutant are shown the number of amino acid residues deleted from
each mutant and the number of amino acid residues remaining in the
stalk within parentheses.
|
|
Deletion of 9 (delJ) or 10 (delH and delI) amino
acid residues did not significantly affect ARIA release (Fig.
4b, upper panel). Total cellular expression of
the precursor proteins was also comparable to the WT (Fig.
4b, lower panel). When 11 amino acid residues were deleted (delK mutant), release of ARIA was noticeably reduced (Fig. 4b, upper panel) even though total cellular
expression of the precursor was comparable to the WT (Fig.
4b, lower panel). Intensity of the p185 band by
delK conditioned medium was similar to that by 10-fold diluted WT
conditioned medium. Quantitative comparison of the ARIA release and
total cellular expression of the precursors confirmed these conclusions
(Fig. 4c). Efficiency of ARIA release was decreased
moderately (to about 50% of the WT) when 10 amino acid residues were
deleted (delH and delI), regardless of the position of the deletion
within the stalk. Deletion of 9 amino acid residues (delJ) did not
affect the efficiency of ARIA release, whereas deletion of an
additional 2 more amino acid residues dramatically reduced it (delK).
Considering that the stalk in the WT contains 21 amino acid residues,
we conclude that a minimum of 11 amino acid residues is needed in the
stalk to support efficient cleavage of the pro-ARIA ectodomain with no
or little constraint on the actual amino acid sequence. It is
noteworthy that the shortest length of the stalk for naturally occurring isoforms is 13 amino acid residues in the
2a isoform, which is known to release its ectodomain efficiently (6). Amino acid
sequence of the
2a isoform is shown in Fig. 4a as a comparison.
Zinc Chelator Inhibits Release of ARIA from CHO Cells--
Because
ectodomain cleavage of many cell surface proteins in CHO cells has been
shown to be mediated by zinc metalloproteases (24), we tested if
similar proteases were responsible for cleavage of pro-ARIA in these
cells (Fig. 5). Release of ARIA from
stably transfected CHO cells was not affected by EDTA, indicating that pro-ARIA cleaving enzyme does not require Ca2+. On the
other hand, ARIA release was strongly inhibited by 5 mM OP
which chelates Zn2+ and other heavy metal ions. The
inhibition of ARIA release by OP was reversed by ZnCl2 but
not by the same concentration of CaCl2. Thus, the pro-ARIA
cleaving enzyme in CHO cells appeared to be a
Ca2+-independent zinc metalloprotease.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Release of ARIA from CHO cells expressing
pro-ARIA is inhibited by a zinc chelator OP. Cells were incubated
for 30 min at 37 °C with DMEM containing different treatments.
Released ARIA in the conditioned medium was assayed by tyrosine
phosphorylation of p185. EDTA and OP were used at 5 mM.
ZnCl2 and CaCl2 were added to 5 mM
in excess of existing concentrations in the DMEM. PMA was used at 100 nM.
|
|
Ectodomain cleavage for many transmembrane proteins is known to be
stimulated by protein kinase C activators (24). Similar observations
have been made for pro-ARIA cleavage (9, 10). These studies measured
the change in the amount of immunoreactivity in the conditioned medium
upon treatment with PMA, a protein kinase C activator. We confirmed
that PMA stimulated ARIA release by measuring p185 phosphorylation
activity in the conditioned medium (Fig. 5). PMA-stimulated ARIA
release was also inhibited by OP but not significantly by EDTA (Fig.
5), suggesting that PMA-stimulated cleavage of pro-ARIA involved the
same class of proteases as those responsible for steady-state cleavage.
Role of Cytoplasmic Domain in the Release of Functional
ARIA--
Alternative mRNA splicing generates three distinct
isoforms of pro-NRG that are different in the length and amino acid
sequence of the cytoplasmic domain (a, b, or c isoforms) (6). To
examine if isoforms with different cytoplasmic domain have differences in ARIA release, we prepared a deletion mutant (
1c in
Fig. 6a). In this mutant, the
C-terminal half of the cytoplasmic domain of pro-ARIA ("a" isoform)
was deleted so that the cytoplasmic domain corresponded to that of
naturally occurring "c" isoforms. Release of ARIA was significantly
decreased from the cells transfected with the
1c mutant compared
with the WT-transfected cells (Fig. 6b).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Long ( 1a) isoform of
pro-ARIA released more ARIA than the short
( 1c) isoform at steady state.
a, schematic diagram of the mutants with deletion or
substitution in the cytoplasmic domain of pro-ARIA. In the V602R
mutant, C-terminal valine (Val602) was substituted to
arginine. In the 1c mutant, the C-terminal half of the cytoplasmic
domain was deleted to convert the cytoplasmic domain of the WT (a
isoform) to that of naturally occurring c isoforms. In this mutant, the
C-terminal amino acid residue is arginine. b, tyrosine
phosphorylation of the p185 from L6 muscle cells by the medium
conditioned with the COS cells transiently transfected with WT and
different mutant constructs as indicated. c, left panel,
Western blotting of the transfected cell lysates with cytoplasmic
domain-specific antibody (1310) or with extracellular
domain-specific antibody (HM94). C, right panel,
Western blotting of the cell lysates obtained from the same cells used
in the experiments shown in b. For both b and
c, control (Ctrl) indicates mock transfection.
Brackets indicate precursor forms for WT and V602R
(precursor-a) or for 1c (precursor-c). Open arrowhead
indicates remnant for the WT. Filled arrowhead indicates
remnant for the 1c. See "Results" for assignment of each band.
d, quantitative comparison of released ARIA (gray
bar) and total cellular expression of precursors (open
bar) for each mutant construct relative to the WT. Error
bars indicate range of actual data from two measurements.
Solid bar represents ratio of average value for the released
ARIA to that of the precursor expression. The results were obtained
from separate transfection experiments as shown in b and
c.
|
|
To measure total cellular expression of the precursor proteins, Western
blotting of the cell lysates was performed (Fig. 6c). Considering that the
1c is shorter than the WT by 216 amino acid residues, it was expected that the precursor for
1c would run 24 kDa
shorter than the WT precursor. Diffuse set of bands commonly detected
by both intracellular and extracellular antibodies (1310 and HM94,
respectively) showed expected decrease in molecular weight and,
therefore, was assigned as the full-length precursor molecule for
1c
(precursor-c in Fig. 6c). Interestingly,
WT-transfected cell lysate also showed a diffuse set of bands that
comigrated with the
1c precursor (Fig. 6c), suggesting
that parts of the WT (
1a) precursor proteins are proteolytically
converted to the
1c forms. 1310 antibody detected additional lower
molecular weight bands that were not detected by the HM94 antibody from
both WT- and
1c-transfected cell lysates. Among these, a band with
an apparent molecular mass of 25 kDa was in good agreement with the predicted size (20-22 kDa depending on exact site of cleavage within
the stalk) of the remnant for the
1c mutant (filled
arrowhead in Fig. 6c). Detection of a band from the
WT-transfected cell lysate that comigrated with the
1c remnant was
consistent with the notion that part of the WT precursor proteins (a
isoform) were converted to the c isoform via proteolytic processing of the cytoplasmic domain.
Total cellular expression level of the
1c precursor molecule was
comparable to the WT when measured in the same cells from which the
conditioned media were collected (Fig. 6c, right
panel). Therefore, the observed decrease in ARIA release from the
1c mutant was not due to a decrease in expression of the precursor. Quantitative comparison of the ARIA release and precursor expression showed that the efficiency of ARIA release from the
1c mutant was
less than 20% of the WT (Fig. 6d). The intensity of the
remnant band relative to that of the precursor was also significantly decreased for the
1c mutant compared with the WT (Fig.
6c), consistent with decreased cleavage of the ectodomain.
Decreased release of ARIA from the
1c mutant did not appear to be
due to decreased expression at the cell surface. The
1c mutant was
also expressed at the cell surface as shown by cell surface
immunolabeling method (Fig. 2). The intensity of the cell surface
labeling was not decreased from that of WT.
In the case of pro-TGF-
, efficient ectodomain cleavage requires
C-terminal valine or other aliphatic amino acid residues (25). Because
the
1c mutant contained arginine as a C-terminal residue, we
prepared another mutant in which only the C-terminal valine was
substituted to arginine (V602R in Fig. 6a) to
test if the decreased release of ARIA from the
1c mutant was simply due to change of the C-terminal residue. Unlike the
1c mutant, however, the V602R mutant did not show any decrease in ARIA release (Fig. 6b), and expression of the precursor protein was not
significantly different from the WT (Fig. 6c, right
panel). Quantitative comparison of the ARIA release efficiency
confirmed this conclusion (Fig. 6d).
Despite the lower steady-state level of ARIA release from the c isoform
than from the a isoform, both isoforms were stimulated to release ARIA
equally well by PMA treatment (Fig. 7).
Comparison of p185 phosphorylation activity between PMA-untreated and
-treated conditioned media at each dilution of the media showed that
ARIA release from WT-transfected cells was increased by about 5-fold upon treatment with PMA. A similar degree of stimulation was obtained for both V602R and the
1c mutant.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
C-terminal amino acid residue in pro-ARIA
does not affect PMA stimulation of ARIA release. PMA (100 nM) stimulated the release of ARIA from both V602R and
1c to the same extent as from WT. Compare intensity of the p185
between upper ( PMA) and lower (+PMA) panel for
the same construct at each dilution of the conditioned media. NRG is a
purified rat NRG containing only the EGF-like domain of the 1
isoform. See Fig. 6 for structure and amino acid sequence of V602R and
1c.
|
|
We conclude that the identity of the C-terminal residue is not
important for PMA stimulation of ARIA release. This is different from
PMA-stimulated ectodomain cleavage of pro-TGF-
, which requires valine at the C-terminal position. We also conclude that the shorter isoform (c isoform) releases less than the corresponding longer isoform
(a isoform) and that the membrane distal portion of the cytoplasmic
domain plays a role in cleavage of the ectodomain, perhaps by binding
to cytoplasmic proteins.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Many precursor proteins are cleaved at sites of dibasic or
tetrabasic residues by eukaryotic subtilisin-like proteases, or furins,
as they mature into fully active molecules (reviewed in Ref. 23).
Pro-ARIA and related NRGs contain dibasic residues at the extracellular
juxtamembrane position, which has been proposed to be a cleavage site
(2, 4). However, our results show that this is not a major cleavage
site at least when the precursor is expressed in fibroblasts. We
attempted to remove a potential cleavage site by making a series of
small (4-5 amino acid residues) deletions (delD, delE, delF, or delG)
to cover the rest of the entire stalk (between extracellular EGF domain
and the transmembrane domain). None of these deletions prevented ARIA
release, indicating that cleavage was not sequence-specific.
Alternatively, cleavage may occur at more than one specific site. Once
a primary cleavage site is removed by deletion, a secondary cleavage
site may be utilized as has been shown to occur with pro-TGF-
(16)
and pro-TNF
(26, 27). Quantitative analysis of the released ARIA and
expression of the precursor proteins showed no decrease in efficiency
of ARIA release for any of these mutants, indicating that efficiency of
cleavage is not different between the putative primary and the
secondary cleavage sites. Cleavage at multiple sites with equal
efficiency would be considered as a special case of cleavage with no
sequence specificity. Therefore, we conclude that cleavage of pro-ARIA
is not sequence-specific.
Although cleavage of pro-ARIA may not require a specific amino acid
sequence at the cleavage site, release of ARIA does not appear to be a
result of random degradation of the pro-ARIA. Marked reduction in ARIA
release by deletion of 11 amino acid residues within the stalk (delK
mutant) indicates that cleavage of pro-ARIA is a specific process
subject to structural constraints. C-terminal sequencing of the
purified NRGs also showed predominance of a specific amino acid residue
at the C terminus (28), indicating cleavage at a specific site. Two
different mechanisms have been proposed for specific cleavage of
transmembrane precursor proteins in a sequence-independent manner.
Cleavage of amyloid precursor protein by
-secretase, which we term
as "molecular ruler mechanism," has been shown to occur at a
certain distance from the membrane regardless of the exact amino acid
sequence (29). Proteolytic cleavage of ectodomain of the transmembrane
form of angiotensin-converting enzyme was also shown to be independent
of the amino acid sequence at the cleavage site (30, 31). In this case,
which we term as "modified molecular ruler mechanism," cleavage
occurred at a certain distance from the membrane-proximal extracellular
folded domain rather than from the membrane. Lu et al. (28)
have expressed various pro-NRG isoforms in CHO cells and purified the
NRGs from the conditioned media. The C-terminal amino acid residue of
all the purified NRGs was close to the C-terminal end of the EGF domain but not close to the N terminus of the transmembrane domain despite wide differences in the amino acid sequence and length of the stalk.
From our results and those of Lu et al. (28), we propose that cleavage of pro-NRG occurs via the "modified ruler mechanism." In this model, cleavage of pro-ARIA occurs independently of the amino
acid sequence within a short distance (3-4 amino acid residues) from
the extracellular EGF domain but requires a specific length of the
stalk for efficient cleavage.
The substrate for those "ruler" proteases would be a stretch of
amino acid residues not sterically hindered by the local secondary structure or by the nearby bulky structures. The minimum length of such
an unhindered stretch of amino acid residues appears to be 11 amino
acid residues for pro-ARIA considering a sharp decrease in the
efficiency of ARIA release when the length of the stalk was decreased
from 11 to 10 amino acid residues. Ehlers et al. (30, 31)
have also proposed the same length of stalk for optimal ectodomain
cleavage of membrane-anchored angiotensin-converting enzyme. It is
interesting to note that despite wide variation in the length and
sequence of the stalk among different pro-NRG isoforms, all isoforms
have longer than 11 amino acid residues in their stalk, and they all
efficiently release the ectodomain (6). The shortest naturally
occurring stalk is that for the the
2a isoform with 13 amino acid residues.
Diverse transmembrane proteins undergo ectodomain cleavage (reviewed in
Refs. 32 and 33). Although amino acid sequences around the cleavage
site do not show a high degree of homology, a common mechanism appears
to operate. A group of metalloprotease inhibitors, OP and TAPI-2 but
not EDTA, inhibited ectodomain cleavage of diverse transmembrane
proteins from CHO cells suggesting a Ca2+-independent
metalloprotease as a cleaving enzyme for diverse membrane proteins
(24). Considering that ARIA release from transfected CHO cells was also
inhibited by OP but not by EDTA, it appears likely that cleavage of
pro-ARIA is also mediated by the similar protease in these cells.
A candidate has been identified. Cloning of cDNA for a protease
responsible for cleavage of pro-TNF
(TACE) revealed that it belonged
to an ADAM family of transmembrane zinc metalloprotease (34, 35). Cells
derived from mice lacking both copies of this gene were defective in
ectodomain cleavage of not only pro-TNF
but also many transmembrane
proteins including pro-TGF-
, L-selectin, and TNF
receptor (36). It is not known how TACE recognizes these diverse
proteins. TACE may be a ruler protease that recognizes an unhindered
stretch of amino acid residues near the membrane rather than a specific
amino acid sequence of each of these proteins. Being anchored to the
membrane, TACE would be in a good position to measure distance from the
membrane or from a membrane-proximal folded domain. Such a possibility
has not been tested yet.
Ectodomain cleavage of many transmembrane proteins can be up-regulated
by treatment with PMA (24, 37, 38). In the case of pro-TGF-
, the
C-terminal residue in the cytoplasmic domain is crucial for such
up-regulation. Substitution of the C-terminal valine with polar amino
acid residues significantly impaired stimulation of ectodomain cleavage
in response to PMA (25). Although many other transmembrane precursor
proteins including pro-ARIA, CSF-1, and the c-kit ligand
also contain valine at the C terminus (2, 39, 40), the requirement of
the C-terminal valine for PMA-stimulated ectodomain cleavage does not
appear to be universal. Burgess et al. (9) have shown that
an
2c isoform of pro-NRG with arginine as a C-terminal residue
undergoes PMA-stimulated ectodomain cleavage equally well or even
faster than a
4a isoform of pro-NRG with valine as a C-terminal
residue. It remained possible, however, that the two different isoforms
are under different regulatory mechanisms considering the many
differences in the sequence and length of both the extracellular and
intracellular domains. To eliminate such possibilities, we changed the
cytoplasmic sequence of pro-ARIA without affecting the rest of the
molecule. The C-terminal valine of pro-ARIA could be substituted to
arginine without affecting PMA stimulation of ARIA release. Deletion of
the C-terminal half of the cytoplasmic domain to convert the pro-ARIA
(a isoform) to a c isoform (
1c mutant) also did not affect PMA
stimulation of ARIA release despite the large difference in the size of
the cytoplasmic domain. From these comparisons, we conclude that a membrane-distal portion of the cytoplasmic domain, including the C-terminal valine, is not required for PMA stimulation of ARIA release.
At steady state, the c isoform (
1c mutant) released much less ARIA
than the corresponding a isoform (WT), suggesting that the C-terminal
half of the cytoplasmic domain contributes to efficiency of pro-ARIA
cleavage. Consistent with our findings, Wen et al. (6) have
also reported that, despite higher expression of the
2c isoform than
the
2a isoform in the transfected COS cells, the amount of released
NRG was comparable between the two. The difference in the efficiency of
ARIA release between the two isoforms raises the possibility that the a
isoforms of pro-NRGs may serve primarily as a precursor to release
soluble NRGs (paracrine signaling), whereas the c isoforms may stay as
a membrane-bound form to signal through direct cell-cell contact
(juxtacrine signaling). Alternatively, the c isoforms may be degraded
faster and release less soluble NRG than the a isoforms. In either
case, proteolytic cleavage of the cytoplasmic domain may
instantaneously convert a isoforms of pro-NRGs to c isoforms without
involving mRNA splicing. Such proteolytic processing of pro-NRG may
provide a mechanism for rapid conversion of the signaling mode from
paracrine to juxtacrine or for rapid down-regulation of NRG release.
Observation of bands from the WT (a isoform)-transfected cell lysates
that comigrated with those from the
1c-transfected cell lysate
supports the notion that the a isoform can be proteolytically converted
to the c isoform. Wang et al. (41) have reported that the
cytoplasmic domain of pro-NRG interacts with LIM kinase 1. It will be
interesting to find out if the LIM kinase is involved in regulation of
NRG release or signaling by the pro-NRG.
In contrast to our findings that the membrane-distal portion of the
cytoplasmic domain is important for ARIA release, Liu et al.
(42) have recently proposed that the membrane-proximal half of the
cytoplasmic domain was critical for proteolytic cleavage of the
ectodomain. They reported that a mutant lacking the whole cytoplasmic
domain did not release detectable amounts of NRG, whereas the
2a and
2c isoforms released similar amounts of NRG. This observation was
inconsistent with our findings that the c isoform (
1c mutant)
released significantly less amount of ARIA than the corresponding a
isoform (WT). This discrepancy may not be attributed to differences
between the
and the
isoforms because Wen et al. (6)
have also reported that the release of soluble NRG from the
2c
isoform was less than that from the
2a isoform. Burgess et
al. (9) also showed that the amount of radioactive NRG in the
medium 4 h after pulse labeling with 35S was much
higher for the
4a isoform than the
2c isoform. Although the
half-life of the precursor was shorter for the
2c isoform than the
4a isoform, quicker disappearance of the
2c may be due to
degradation of the precursor without release of functional NRG.
Therefore, data from our experiments and others (6, 9) all indicate
that the c isoform releases less NRG than the a isoform. We conclude
that the membrane-distal portion of the cytoplasmic domain (unique to
the a isoform) plays an important role in the steady-state level of
ARIA release. The membrane-proximal portion of the cytoplasmic domain
may make an additional contribution to proteolytic cleavage of the
ectodomain (43), although we have not tested this possibility.
Why is ARIA initially made as a transmembrane precursor? Aside from the
possibility that pro-ARIA may itself serve as a signaling molecule
through cell-cell contact, there is a unique advantage to being made as
a transmembrane precursor form. Release of many proteins and peptides
is under tight regulation. Insulin, for example, is released only when
blood glucose level rises after a meal. These proteins are made by
cells that have secretory vesicles designed for regulated release of
proteins. ARIA, on the other hand, is made not only in neurons but also
in many other cell types including cells of mesenchymal origins. Most
cell types do have constitutive secretory pathways, but not all of them
have a regulated secretion mechanism. Delivering pro-ARIA to the cell surface via a constitutive pathway and then regulating cleavage of the
ectodomain would be an economical solution to achieve the regulated
release of ARIA in these cells without implementing a regulated
secretory pathway.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Dr. Kenneth Rosen for careful reading
of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grant RO1 NS18458.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported in part by the Harvard Mahoney Institute and by the
Helen Hay Whitney Foundation.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: NINDS, 31 Centre Dr.,
Bldg. 31, Rm. 8A52, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892. Tel.: 301-496-9746; Fax: 301-486-9172; E-mail:
gdfisch@ninds.nih.gov.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ARIA, acetylcholine
receptor inducing activity;
NRG, neuregulin;
PMA, phorbol 12-myrisate
13-acetate;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
WT, wild type;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
OP, o-phenanthroline;
TGF, transforming growth factor;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
TACE, TNF
-converting enzyme.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Usdin, T. B.,
and Fischbach, G. D.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
103,
493-507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Falls, D. L.,
Rosen, K. M.,
Corfas, G.,
Lane, W. S.,
and Fischbach, G. D.
(1993)
Cell
72,
801-815[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Wen, D.,
Peles, E.,
Cupples, R.,
Suggs, S. V.,
Bacus, S. S.,
Luo, Y.,
Trail, G.,
Hu, S.,
Silbiger, S. M.,
Levy, R. B.,
Koski, R. A.,
Lu, H. S.,
and Yarden, Y.
(1992)
Cell
69,
559-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Holmes, W. E.,
Sliwkowski, M. X.,
Akita, R. W.,
Henzel, W. J.,
Lee, J.,
Park, J. W.,
Yansura, D.,
Abadi, N.,
Raab, H.,
Lewis, G. D.,
Shepard, H. M.,
Kuang, W.-J.,
Wood, W. I.,
Goeddel, D. V.,
and Vandlen, R. L.
(1992)
Science
256,
1205-1210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Marchionni, M. A.,
Goodearl, A. D.,
Chen, M. S.,
Bermingham-McDonogh, O.,
Kirk, C.,
Hendricks, M.,
Danehy, F.,
Misumi, D.,
Sudhalter, J.,
Kobayashi, K.,
Wroblewski, D.,
Lynch, C.,
Baldassare, M.,
Hiles, I.,
Davis, J. B.,
Hsuan, J. J.,
Totty, N. F.,
Otsu, M.,
McBurney, R. N.,
Waterfield, M. D.,
Stroobant, P.,
and Gwynne, D.
(1993)
Nature
362,
312-318[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Wen, D.,
Suggs, S. V.,
Karunagaran, D.,
Liu, N.,
Cupples, R. L.,
Luo, Y.,
Janssen, A. M.,
Ben-Baruch, N.,
Trollinger, D. B.,
Jacobsen, V. L.,
Meng, S.-Y.,
Lu, H. S.,
Hu, S.,
Chang, D.,
Yang, W.,
Yanigahara, D.,
Koski, R. A.,
and Yarden, Y.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1909-1919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Carraway, K. L., III,
and Burden, S. J.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
5,
606-612[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Barbacci, E. G.,
Guarino, B. C.,
Stroh, J. G.,
Singleton, D. H.,
Rosnack, K. J.,
Moyer, J. D.,
and Andrews, G. C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
9585-9589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Burgess, T. L.,
Ross, S. L.,
Qian, Y.,
Brankow, D.,
and Hu, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
19188-19196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Loeb, J. A.,
Susanto, E. T.,
and Fischbach, G. D.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
11,
77-91[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Sandrock, A. W., Jr.,
Dryer, S. E.,
Rosen, K. M.,
Gozani, S. N.,
Kramer, R.,
Theill, L. E.,
and Fischbach, G. D.
(1997)
Science
276,
599-603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Meyer, D.,
and Birchmeier, C.
(1995)
Nature
378,
386-390[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Kramer, R.,
Bucay, N.,
Kane, D. J.,
Martin, L. E.,
Tarpley, J. E.,
and Theill, L. E.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
4833-4838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Kriegler, M.,
Perez, C.,
DeFay, K.,
Albert, I.,
and Lu, S. D.
(1988)
Cell
53,
45-53[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Wong, S. T.,
Winchell, L. F.,
McCune, B. K.,
Earp, H. S.,
Teixido, J.,
Massague, J.,
Herman, B.,
and Lee, D. C.
(1989)
Cell
56,
495-506[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Brachmann, R.,
Lindquist, P. B.,
Nagashima, M.,
Kohr, W.,
Lipari, T.,
Napier, M.,
and Derynck, R.
(1989)
Cell
56,
691-700[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Flanagan, J. G.,
Chan, D. C.,
and Leder, P.
(1991)
Cell
64,
1025-1035[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Grell, M.,
Douni, E.,
Wajant, H.,
Lohden, M.,
Clauss, M.,
Maxeiner, B.,
Georgopoulos, S.,
Lesslauer, W.,
Kollias, G.,
Pfizenmaier, K.,
and Scheurich, P.
(1995)
Cell
83,
793-802[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Kunkel, T. A.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
488-492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Corfas, G.,
Falls, D. L.,
and Fischbach, G. D.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
1624-1628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Thomas, G.,
Thorne, B. A.,
Thomas, L.,
Allen, R. G.,
Hruby, D. E.,
Fuller, R.,
and Thorner, J.
(1988)
Science
241,
226-230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Wise, R. J.,
Barr, P. J.,
Wong, P. A.,
Kiefer, M. C.,
Brake, A. J.,
and Kaufman, R. J.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
9378-9382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Barr, P.
(1991)
Cell
66,
1-3[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Arribas, J.,
Coodly, L.,
Vollmer, P.,
Kishimoto, T. K.,
Rose-John, S.,
and Massague, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
11376-11382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Bosenberg, M. W.,
Pandiella, A.,
and Massague, J.
(1992)
Cell
71,
1157-1165[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Perez, C.,
Albert, I.,
DeFay, K.,
Zachariades, N.,
Gooding, L.,
and Kriegler, M.
(1990)
Cell
63,
251-258[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Decoster, E.,
Vanhaesebroeck, B.,
Vandenabeele, P.,
Grooten, J.,
and Fiers, W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
18473-18478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Lu, H. S.,
Hara, S.,
Wong, L. W.-I.,
Jones, M. D.,
Katta, V.,
Trail, G.,
Zou, A.,
Brankow, D.,
Cole, S.,
Hu, S.,
and Wen, D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
4775-4783[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Maruyama, K.,
Kametani, F.,
Usami, M.,
Yamao-Harigaya, W.,
and Tanaka, K.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
179,
1670-1676[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Ehlers, M. R.,
Schwager, S. L.,
Scholle, R. R.,
Manji, G. A.,
Brandt, W. F.,
and Riordan, J. F.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
9549-9559[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Ehlers, M. R.,
Schwager, S. L.,
Chubb, A. J.,
Scholle, R. R.,
Brandt, W. F.,
and Riordan, J. F.
(1997)
Immunopharmacology
36,
271-278[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Ehlers, M. R. W.,
and Riordan, J. F.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
10065-10074[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Massague, J.,
and Pandiella, A.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
62,
515-541[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Black, R. A.,
Rauch, C. T., |