J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 26431-26438, September 10, 1999
Progesterone Stimulation of Human Insulin-like Growth
Factor-binding Protein-5 Gene Transcription in Human Osteoblasts Is
Mediated by a CACCC Sequence in the Proximal Promoter*
Viroj
Boonyaratanakornkit
§,
Donna D.
Strong
¶
,
Suburraman
Mohan
**,
David J.
Baylink
,
Candice A.
Beck
, and
Thomas A.
Linkhart
§§¶¶
From the J. L. Pettis Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the
Departments of
Biochemistry, ¶ Microbiology and
Molecular Genetics, §§ Pediatrics, ** Physiology,
and
Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California
92357 and the 
University of Colorado Health
Sciences Center, Department of Pathology, Denver, Colorado 80262
 |
ABSTRACT |
Insulin-like growth factor-binding
protein-5 (IGFBP-5) is produced by osteoblasts and potentiates
insulin-like growth factor mitogenic stimulation in osteoblast cell
cultures. Progesterone (PG) increased IGFBP-5 expression in normal
human osteoblasts and increased IGFBP-5 transcription in U2 human
osteosarcoma cells. We developed a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase
reporter construct containing the human IGFBP-5 proximal promoter
sequence, which includes TATA and CAAT boxes, and five putative PG
response element half-sites. 10
8 M PG
increased promoter activity of this construct in U2 cells co-transfected with a PG receptor isoform A (PRA)
expression vector. Analysis of 5' deletion constructs indicates that PG
transactivation of IGFBP-5 promoter activity does not require the PG
response element half-sites but does require the region
162 to
124
containing two tandem CACCC box sequences. Mutation of the proximal
CACCC box at
139 eliminated PG transactivation. Gel shift assays
using a
162 to
124 DNA fragment, U2 cell nuclear extracts, and
purified PRA protein indicate that nuclear factors bind to
a CACCC sequence at
139 and that PRA alters the pattern
of transcription factor interaction with the CACCC sequence. Using a
luciferase reporter construct containing base pairs
252 to +24 of the
IGFBP-5 promoter, we found that both PRA and
PRB isoforms mediated PG stimulation of promoter activity.
These results suggest that PG may stimulate IGFBP-5 gene transcription
via a novel mechanism involving PR and CACCC-binding factors.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5
(IGFBP-5)1 belongs to a
family of six structurally related proteins that are unrelated to the
IGF receptors and that bind IGF-I and IGF-II with high affinity (1-3).
IGFBPs modulate the mitogenic and metabolic activities of the IGFs
in vitro, suggesting an important role in IGF physiology in vivo. Of the various IGFBPs, IGFBP-5 is unique in that it
stimulates IGF-induced osteoblastic cell proliferation when added
simultaneously with IGF I or II to serum-free osteoblast-like cell
cultures (4-7). Recent evidence suggests that IGFBP-5 may stimulate
cell proliferation by an IGF-independent mechanism involving IGFBP-5
specific cell surface binding sites (7, 8). In addition, IGFBP-5 binds with high affinity to hydroxyapatite and to various extracellular matrix proteins, properties that are consistent with a role for this
binding protein in fixing IGFs to extracellular matrices including
mineralized bone (7, 9, 10). IGFBP-5 may be a more potent enhancer of
IGF activities when bound to extracellular matrix than in solution
(10). Coding sequences and 5'-flanking regions of IGFBP-5 genes are
highly conserved in human, rat, and mouse (4, 5, 11-13), and the mouse
and human 5'-flanking regions have been found to impart basal promoter
activity to reporter gene constructs in several cell types, including
osteoblasts (12-16).
IGFBP-5 is expressed by a number of cell types including fibroblasts,
myoblasts, and osteoblasts, and production of IGFBP-5 is regulated by
growth factors, cytokines, and systemic hormones (15-21). Among the
nuclear receptor activating hormones, glucocorticoids and retinoic acid
have been shown to alter IGFBP-5 mRNA and protein levels in human
and rat osteoblast-like cells (16, 22-24). However, effects of
progesterone on IGFBP-5 expression have not been previously reported.
Pertinent to this study, we found that progesterone (PG) stimulated
human osteoblast cell proliferation (25, 26) and increased IGFBP-5
mRNA levels (27). However, the molecular mechanism by which PG
increased IGFBP-5 mRNA levels is not known. As a first step toward
understanding how bone cell production of IGFBP-5 is regulated by PG,
we isolated the 5'-flanking region of the human IGFBP-5 gene, linked
the IGFBP-5 proximal promoter to a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase
(CAT) reporter, and measured basal and progesterone-inducible promoter
activity in transient transfection assays with U2 human osteosarcoma
cells. We also examined the roles of progesterone receptor isoforms
PRA and PRB in mediating PG induction of
IGFBP-5 transcription. PRs are expressed in various cells as two
different isoforms that are transcribed from separate promoters in the
PR gene (28, 29). The B-receptor isoform (PRB) is 933 amino
acids in length, and the A-receptor isoform (PRA) lacks 164 amino acids at the N terminus.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Progesterone acetate was from Sigma, and R5020
(promegestone) was from NEN Life Science Products. U-2 OS (U2) human
osteogenic sarcoma cells (HTB96) were from the American Type Culture
Collection (Manassas, VA). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)
was from Mediatech, Inc. (Herndon, VA). Iron-supplemented bovine calf serum (CS) and charcoal-dextran-treated fetal bovine serum (CD-FBS) were from Hyclone (Logan, UT). Penicillin, streptomycin, and trypsin were from Life Technologies, Inc. Bovine serum albumin, crystallized, and guanidine isothiocyanate were from Fluka (Ronkonkoma, NH). The RNA
polymerase inhibitor
5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole-1-
-D-ribofuranoside was from
Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Recombinant human IGFBP-5 cDNA was the
generous gift of Drs. C. Dony and K. Lang of Roche Molecular
Biochemicals Therapeutics (Penzberg, Germany). PR mammalian expression
vectors phPR-A and phPR-B (30) were provided by Dr. B. O'Malley
(Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX). Purified PRA and
a specific monoclonal antibody (AB52) that recognizes PRA
(31) were provided by Dr. D. P. Edwards (University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO). Mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)
long terminal repeat promoter constructs pMSG-CAT and pMMTV-Luc were
from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech and Dr. Ron Evans (Salk Institute, San
Diego, CA), respectively.
D-threo-1,2-[14C]Chloramphenicol,
[
-32P]dCTP, and [
-32P]ATP were from
ICN Biochemical, Inc. (Irvine, CA). [
-32P]UTP was from
NEN Life Science Products. All other molecular biology grade chemicals
were obtained from U. S. Biochemical Corp., Sigma, and Calbiochem.
Oligodeoxynucleotides were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies
(Coralville, IA). For gel shift assays complimentary molecules were
annealed to produce double-stranded probes. The names and upper strand
sequences of these oligodeoxynucleotides are: BP5-PDRE,
5'-CCTCTCCCCACCCCCACCCCGTGTG-3' (wild type sequence); BP5-PDREm1
5'-CCTCTCaaaACCaaaACCCCGTGTG-3'; BP5-PDREm2,
5'-CCTCTCaaaACCCCCACCCCGTGTG-3'; BP5-PDREm3,
5'-CCTCTCCCaACCCCaACCCCGTGTG-3'; BP5-PDREm4,
5'-CCTCTCCCaACCCCCACCCCGTGTG-3'; BP5-PDREm5,
5'-CCTCTCCCCACCCCaACCCCGTGTG-3' (mutations in lowercase); c-fos RCE, 5'-CGCGCCACCCCTCTGGCGCCACCGTG-3' from the human
c-fos promoter (32); TGF-
RCE,
5'-CGCCCCCGGCCCCACCCCAGGAAG-3' from the human TGF
promoter (33);
MNF, 5'-ACGCACAACCACCCCACCCCCTGTG-3' from the human
myoglobin promoter (34); AP-2, 5'-GATCGAACTGACCGCCCGCGGCCCGT-3' from
the human metallothionein-IIA promoter (35); Sp1,
5'-AATCGATCGGGGCGGGGCGAGC-3' from the SV40 early promoter (36); and
MMTV-PRE, 5'-TTTGGTTACAAACTGTTCTTAAAACGAG-3' from the mouse
mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat (37).
Cell Culture--
U2 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented
with 10% CS at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere composed of 95%
air and 5% CO2. In most experiments, cells were changed to
phenol red-free DMEM and CD-FBS (described below). PG was dissolved in
ethanol at 10
2 M and was further diluted with
serum-free DMEM containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin before adding to
the cells. Control cultures were treated with ethanol diluted to the
same extent as for PG treatment.
Northern Blot Analysis--
Total RNA was extracted from cell
cultures by a single-step acid guanidinium
thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method (38). 20 µg of total RNA was
subjected to Northern analysis as described previously (23), using
Magnagraph hybridization membranes (MSI, Westboro, MA). The human
IGFBP-5 cDNA was a 0.35-kilobase fragment containing the coding
region of exon 1 and was labeled with 32P and hybridized as
described (23). Relative abundance of each mRNA species was
quantitated by laser densitometry (Biomed Instruments, Fullerton, CA)
and corrected as described (39) for the amounts of RNA transferred to
the hybridization membrane by dividing the densities of 28 S rRNA bands
that were stained with methylene blue before hybridization. Relative
mRNA levels are presented as the ratio of treated to control.
Nuclear Run-on Analysis--
The effect of PG on the rate of
IGFBP-5 gene transcription was determined with a modified nuclear
run-on analysis as described (40). Briefly, U2 cells were treated with
10 nM PG or with vehicle for 1 and 4 h. The cells were
rinsed and scraped into ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, nuclei were
isolated, and then nuclei were incubated in transcription buffer
consisting of 0.6 M KCl, 12.5 mM
MgCl2, 2.5 mM of ATP, CTP, and GTP, and 100 µCi of [32P]UTP (800 Ci/mmol). RNA was isolated and
equal amounts (2 × 106 dpm) were hybridized to 10 µg of alkali-denatured plasmid DNAs (IGFBP-5 cDNA,
-actin
cDNA, and pBluescript DNA) that had been immobilized to Hybond-N
filters. The filters were hybridized in a solution containing 10 mM TES, pH 7.4, 10 mM EDTA, 0.2% SDS, and 0.6 M NaCl at 68 °C for 48 h. After hybridization, the
filters were washed twice with 6× SSPE, 0.1% SDS at 42 °C for 30 min and once with 1× SSPE, 0.1% SDS at 42 °C for 30 min and
autoradiographed with two DuPont Cronex III intensifying screens for 3 days. The relative intensity of each band on the autoradiographs was
quantitated by laser densitometry (Biomed Instruments, Fullerton, CA).
Isolation of IGFBP-5 Genomic Clones--
A mixture of two
oligodeoxynucleotides, 5'-CCCAGGTAAGAGGAGAGGAA-3' and
5'-CTGGCTAGAGGAGGAGACA-3', corresponding to the 3'-untranslated region
of the human IGFBP-5 gene, was labeled with [
-32P] ATP
using T4 polynucleotide Kinase and was used to screen 6 × 106 clones of a human cosmid (pWE15) library derived from
placental DNA (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). Positive
clones were rescreened with a human IGFBP-5 full-length coding region
cDNA probe. DNA from a selected clone was digested with restriction
enzymes EcoRI, PstI, SacI,
BamHI, and HindIII, and analyzed by Southern blot using a 32P-labeled oligodeoxynucleotide,
5'-ACTCTCGCTCTCCTGCCCCA-3', corresponding to the 5'-untranslated
exon 1 region of human IGFBP-5. A 4.6-kilobase EcoRI
fragment was gel purified and subcloned into pGEM3Zf(
) (Promega,
Madison, WI). Both DNA strands of the fragment were sequenced with the
dideoxy chain termination method (41). It contained 1390 bp of
5'-flanking region, all of exon 1, and 2.9 kilobases of intron 1. Primer extension analysis was carried out as described (42).
Reporter Plasmid Construction--
Seven IGFBP-5
promoter-reporter constructs containing 753, 461, 345, 325, 252, 162, and 124 bp of IGFBP-5 5'-flanking region were prepared by inserting
selected restriction enzyme fragments or polymerase chain reaction
products into a CAT reporter gene vector pJFCAT1 (43). For pCAT162
CACCC box mutants, double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides with the
sequence corresponding to BP5-PDREm1 flanked by SphI sites
were synthesized, annealed and inserted in the sense orientation into
the SphI site of pCAT124 upstream of the IGFBP-5 5'-flanking
region. The IGFBP-5 promoter fragment from
252 to +24 bp was
subcloned to pGEM7 and then to pGL3 (Promega, Madison, WI) to create
the luciferase reporter construct pLUC-252. The sequence and
orientation of all promoter constructs used were confirmed using the
dideoxy method.
DNA Transfection--
To determine basal promoter activities of
the IGFBP-5 promoter CAT constructs, 3 × 105 U2 cells
were seeded in 60-mm dishes in DMEM supplemented with 10% CS. After
18 h of incubation, cells were rinsed once with DMEM and 1.6 ml of
DMEM containing 12 µl of LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies, Inc.), and
6 µg of Qiagen purified DNA (5 µg of CAT construct + 1 µg of
pCMV
-gal) was added to the cells. The cells were incubated for
4 h at 37 °C, in 95% air, 5% CO2. Medium was then
replaced with DMEM supplemented with 10% CS and cells were incubated
for 48 h before
-gal and CAT assay. To evaluate the effect of
PG on promoter activity, U2 cells were grown in phenol red-free DMEM
supplemented with 5% CD-FBS for 72 h before transfection. U2
cells were plated at 2 × 105/dish and, in most
experiments, were transfected with 2 µg of phPR-A plasmid (44), 3 µg of IGFBP-5 promoter construct, and 1 µg of pCMV-
-gal. After
transfection, cells were incubated in phenol red-free DMEM supplemented
with 2% CD-FBS for 24 h. Medium was then replaced with phenol
red-free DMEM supplemented with 2% CD-FBS, plus 10 nM PG
or solvent, for another 24 h. Cells were lysed with reporter lysis
buffer (Promega, Madison, WI) as recommended by the manufacturer. CAT
and
-galactosidase activities were determined as described (45, 46),
and CAT activity was expressed per unit of
-galactosidase activity.
To evaluate transactivation of IGFBP-5 promoter activity in a
luciferase reporter construct, cells were plated in 6-well plates at
120,000/well. All incubation, transfection, and treatment procedures
were as described for the CAT reporter construct studies except that
amounts of pLUC-252 and pCMV-
-gal were 0.375 and 0.125 µg/well,
respectively, phPR-A (and phPR-B) were tested at 0.0625-0.50
µg/well, and total DNA added was kept constant at 1.0 µg/well by
adding pGEM7 plasmid DNA. Luciferase activities were determined using
the Enhanced Luciferase Assay Kit (Pharmingen, San Diegao, CA). Because
this assay was less complex to perform than the CAT assay, experiments were done with 6 replicate wells/group. Statistical analysis of differences between groups by analysis of variance was done using the
Systat computer program (Systat Inc., Evanstan, IL).
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay--
U2 cells were plated
at 5 × 105 cells per 100 mm dish in 5% CD-FBS for
18 h. The medium was replaced with 2% CD-FBS and incubated for
48 h. Nuclear extracts were prepared as described (47). For the
EMSA, the binding reaction contained 4% glycerol, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 0.05 mg/ml poly(dI-dC), 1.5 µl (3 µg of protein) of nuclear extract, and 1 µl (50,000 cpm) of 32P-labeled
double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides in a total volume of 20 µl. For
cold competition experiments, nuclear extract was preincubated with
unlabeled double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides for 10 min at room
temperature before the addition of labeled double-stranded
oligodeoxynucleotides. The oligodeoxynucleotides used for competition
with the labeled IGFBP-5 CACCC box sequence are described under
"Materials." The mouse mammary tumor virus PRE oligodeoxynucleotide
was a double-stranded 28-mer based on the sequence 189-162 bp 5' of
the transcription start site and was described previously (37).
Purified PRA was obtained from a baculovirus expression
system and purified as described (31). To evaluate PR interactions with
U2 cell nuclear factors, different concentrations of PR proteins were
preincubated with 5 µg of U2 cell nuclear extract protein before the
addition of labeled double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides. The reaction
mixture was incubated at room temperature for 20 min and analyzed by
electrophoresis using a 5% polyacrylamide-0.125% bis-acrylamide gel
in 0.25 × TBE. For supershift experiments, 1 µg of anti-PR
antibody PR52 (41) was added to the reaction and incubated on ice for
an additional 15 min before loading onto the gel. After
electrophoresis, the gel was dried and autoradiographed using Kodak
X-OMAT or Biomax MS film and Cronex III screens.
Nucleotide Sequence Accession Number--
The
GenBankTM data base accession number of the human IGFBP-5
5'-flanking region determined in this study is U20271.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of PG and RU486 on IGFBP-5 Levels in Normal Human
Osteoblasts--
Previously we found that PG increased IGFBP-5
mRNA levels in normal human osteoblasts and in MG63 and U2-OS
osteosarcoma cells (27). In the present study we replicated this
earlier finding with normal human vertebral osteoblasts and determined
whether the progestin antagonist RU486 would affect PG induction of
IGFBP-5 expression. Treatment with 10
8 M PG
for 4 h increased IGFBP-5 mRNA levels to 190% of control (Fig. 1). 10
6 M
RU486 by itself did not affect IGFBP-5 mRNA levels and prevented the increase in IGFBP-5 mRNA levels induced by PG. These results support the conclusion that PG increases IGFBP-5 expression by a
PR-dependent mechanism.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
PG increases IGFBP-5 mRNA levels in
normal human osteoblasts. Osteoblast-like cells from human
calvaria bone were changed to serum-free medium with 1 mg/ml bovine
serum albumin and treated with vehicle control, 10 6
M RU486, 10 8 M PG, or RU486 + PG
for 4 h. Northern blot of 20 µg of total RNA/lane shows IGFBP-5
mRNA and 28 S rRNA bands. Average relative levels of IGFBP-5
mRNA in two separate experiments, determined by laser densitometry
and normalized to 28 S rRNA levels, were 1.0, 0.9, 1.9, and 1.1, respectively.
|
|
Effect of PG on IGFBP-5 Transcription--
U2 cells were selected
to investigate the mechanism of PG action in the present study because
both IGFBP-5 expression and transfection efficiency were higher in this
cell type than in other human osteoblast-like cell lines. PG treatment
for 1 h increased IGFBP-5 gene transcription determined by nuclear
run-on analysis to 334% of control (p < 0.002),
whereas the rate of
-actin gene transcription was not significantly
altered (Fig. 2). After 4 h of PG
treatment, the IGFBP-5 transcription rates in both the treated and
control groups were elevated such that the difference between
PG-treated and control groups was less compared with that found after
1 h of PG treatment (data not shown). To determine whether PG
effected IGFBP-5 mRNA stability, U2 cells were treated with PG for
4 h, and thereafter RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription was
inhibited with 4 × 10
5 M
5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole-1-
-D-ribofuranoside.
IGFBP-5 mRNA levels in control and PG-treated cultures were
determined at 5-24 h by Northern analysis. In these experiments,
IGFBP-5 mRNA half-life was estimated to be approximately 24 h
and was not affected by PG (data not shown). The long IGFBP-5 mRNA
half-life and absence of a PG effect on half-life are consistent with
the results of nuclear run-on analysis, suggesting that PG rapidly
increased IGFBP-5 mRNA levels in human osteoblasts primarily by a
transcriptional mechanism.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
PG increases IGFBP-5 gene transcription in U2
cells. U2 cells were treated for 1 h with 10 8
M PG or vehicle control (Con), and nuclei were
isolated. Transcription in 107 nuclei/group was continued
in vitro in the presence of [32P]UTP.
32P-Labeled RNA was hybridized to immobilized -actin
cDNA, IGFBP-5 cDNA, and pBluescript vector DNA as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Autoradiographs from three
preparations are shown. Labeled RNA binding to target DNAs were
measured by laser densitometry of the autoradiographs and are expressed
as percentages of solvent-treated control ± S.E. -actin,
130 ± 66%; IGFBP-5, 334 ± 32%, p < 0.01.
|
|
Functional Analysis of the IGFBP-5 Gene--
We isolated a pWE15
human genomic cosmid clone containing the IGFBP-5 gene and then
isolated a 4.6-kilobase EcoRI fragment containing the
5'-flanking region. The nucleotide sequence from position
461 through
the first exon was identical to that reported previously (12). The
proximal 5'-flanking region contains a TATA box, a CAAT box, and
several putative response elements. Primer extension analysis in U2
cells confirmed a single transcription start site 33 nucleotides from
the TATA box (data not shown) that was reported previously in a study
of human breast cancer cells (12).
To determine whether the putative IGFBP-5 promoter functioned in human
osteoblasts, CAT reporter constructs were made containing a
PstI fragment from
753 to +23 (pCAT753) and a 484-bp
HindIII/PstI fragment from
461 to +23
(pCAT461). U2 cells were transiently transfected with sense reporter
constructs, antisense constructs, or the pJFCAT1 promoterless control
vector and then incubated for 48 h in medium with 10% CS. CAT
activity in cells that were transfected with pCAT753 or pCAT461 sense
constructs was 620 and 730%, respectively, of CAT activity in cells
transfected with pJFCAT1. In contrast, CAT activity did not increase in
U2 cells transfected with antisense promoter constructs.
Identification of IGFBP-5 Promoter Sequences That Confer PG
Responsiveness--
In experiments for assessing effects of PG
treatment, concentrations of steroids and other factors in serum were
minimized by maintaining U2 cells for 72 h in phenol red-free DMEM
plus 5% CD-FBS and then plating the cells in 5% CD-FBS at two-thirds of the cell density used in the basal promoter expression experiments. Cells were co-transfected with pCAT753 and pCMV-
-gal, plus PR expression vector phPR-A (44), or a PR control vector from which the PR
coding region was removed. Cells were incubated 48 h in phenol
red-free DMEM supplemented with 2% CD-FBS in the absence or presence
of 10 nM PG. In these conditions basal promoter activity from pCAT753 was 285% of activity from the promoterless control pJFCAT1. The reduction of basal promoter activity in lower density U2
cells maintained in 2% CD-FBS compared with 10% CS suggests that
serum factors and cell density-dependent signals may
increase promoter activity.
When U2 cells were co-transfected with the expression vector phPR-A,
along with pCMV-
-gal and pCAT753, PG reproducibly increased IGFBP-5
promoter activity to 200-300% of control (p < 0.001, n = 5). Similar results were obtained after treatment
of co-transfected cells with promegestone (R5020), a nonmetabolizable
progestin analog (data not shown). Transfection with the PR control
vector did not impart PG responsiveness, suggesting that the effects of
phPR-A were mediated by PRA and not by the expression
vector backbone. PG increased activity of the MMTV promoter pMSG-CAT to
170% of solvent-treated control in cells co-transfected with phPR-A
(data not shown) (48).
Although the human IGFBP-5 promoter sequence does not contain a classic
palindromic PRE consensus sequence (49), five PRE half-site motifs were
identified at positions
528,
392,
333,
215, and
193. Clusters
of similar PRE half-sites mediated PG transcriptional activation of
other genes (49-51). We made a series of 5' deletions that contained
753, 461, 345, 325, 252, 162, and 124 bp of the IGFBP-5 5'-flanking
region with 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 0, and 0 putative PRE half-sites,
respectively (see Fig. 4). Basal activities determined in cultures
maintained in DMEM plus 10% CS were highest in the 345 and 325 bp
constructs, nearly 20-fold higher than promoterless pJFCAT1.
PG responsiveness of each deletion construct was determined in cells
precultured in DMEM + 5% CD-FBS, co-transfected with phPRA, pCMV
-gal and the deletion construct, and then
changed to DMEM + 2% CD-FBS with either solvent or 10 nM
PG. In multiple experiments, PG reproducibly increased promoter
activity 200-300% in all constructs containing from 753 to 162 bp of
proximal promoter (Fig. 3). PG did not
increase CAT activity in cells transfected with pCAT124, which
contained only the sequence from the CAAT box to the start of
transcription, although pCAT124 and pCAT162 had similar levels of basal
promoter activity in the same experiments. These data suggest that none
of the PRE half-sites were required for PG-dependent
transactivation of the IGFBP-5 promoter and that elements between
162
and
124 that contain two tandem CACCC box sequences,
5'-CCCCACCCCCACCC-3', may impart PG responsiveness to the IGFBP-5
promoter.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Analysis of IGFBP-5 promoter deletion
constructs. A schematic representation of the IGFBP-5 proximal
promoter-reporter construct indicates relative positions of putative
PRE half-sites (solid bars), CACCC box sequences
(hatched box), CAAT box (oval), TATA box
(open box), and the start of transcription (+1). Constructs
shown below contain 753, 461, 345, 325, 252, 162, and 124 bp of IGFBP-5
5'-flanking region + 23 bp of untranslated Exon 1 inserted into
pJFCAT1. Basal promoter activities in cultures co-transfected with each
construct and pCMV- -gal and then maintained in 10% CS are shown in
the first column, expressed as percentages of promoterless pJFCAT1
activity. Progesterone inductions of promoter activity in cultures
co-transfected with each IGFBP-5 promoter construct, phPR-A and
pCMV- -gal, and then changed to CD-FBS and treated with solvent or
10 8 M PG are shown in the second column,
expressed as percentages of the respective solvent control group. All
data are based on normalizing CAT to -galactosidase activities, and
are means ± S.E. of at least three independent experiments for
each construct. There was no significant difference in fold induction
of CAT expression by PG among groups pCAT753-pCAT162 as determined by
analysis of variance. PG induction of CAT expression in the pCAT124
group was not significant and was significantly lower than in all other
groups (p < .001). Basal promoter activities (minus
PG) in pCAT162 and pCAT124 were the same, approximately 3-fold of
pJFCAT1 control.
|
|
The CACCC box is an important enhancer element that binds several
different transcription factors (32, 33, 35, 52-58). CACCC-binding
proteins can either bind directly to the CACCC box or interact with
other transcription factors and bind as a complex (58). To determine
whether CACCC sequences between positions
162 and
124 are required
for PG stimulation of IGFBP-5 promoter activity, mutations were made in
the distal (pCAT162mDi), proximal (pCAT162mPr), or both (pCAT162mut)
CACCC sequences in pCAT162 (changing CCCACCC to aaaACCC). In multiple
experiments, PG increased pCAT162 and pCAT162mDi promoter activities
but failed to increase pCAT162mut and pCAT162mPr promoter activities
(Fig. 4). Thus mutation of the proximal
CACCC box at position
139 abolished PG transactivation of hIGFBP-5
promoter activity. These data provide strong evidence that the proximal
CACCC box at position
139 is required for PG-dependent transactivation of IGFBP-5 promoter activity.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Mutation of CACCC boxes eliminates PG
induction of IGFBP-5 promoter activity. U2 cells were transfected
as described under "Experimental Procedures" with phPR-A, with
pCMV -gal, and with pCAT124, wild type pCAT162, or mutant pCAT162
promoter-reporter constructs. In pCAT162mut both CACCC boxes at
positions 147 to 134 were mutated from CCCACCCCCACCCC to
aaaACCaaaACCCC. Only the distal CACCC box was
mutated to aaaACCCCCACCCC in pCAT162mDi, and
only the proximal CACCC box was mutated to
CCCACCaaaACCCC in pCAT162mPr. Transfected cells
were incubated in 2% CD-FBS in the presence or absence of
10 8 M PG. CAT activity was normalized to
-galactosidase activity and expressed as a percentage of respective
control group (transfected cells incubated without PG), mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments. PG significantly increased CAT
activity in pCAT162- and pCAT162mDi-transfected cells
(p < 0.001) but did not significantly affect CAT
activities in pCAT162mut, pCAT162mPr, or pCAT124-transfected
cells.
|
|
Interaction of IGFBP-5 Promoter CACCC Box Sequences with Nuclear
Extract Proteins--
To determine whether U2 cell nuclear proteins
interact with the CACCC box motif of the IGFBP-5 promoter, EMSA were
performed. 32P-Labeled double-stranded synthetic
oligodeoxynucleotides corresponding to the wild type IGFBP-5 promoter
sequence from
155 to
128, designated the IGFBP-5
progesterone-dependent responsive element (BP5-PDRE), were
incubated with U2 cell nuclear extract proteins. Analysis by EMSA
resulted in a reproducible set of shifted bands (Fig.
5A). Unlabeled BP5-PDRE
oligodeoxynucleotide or different oligodeoxynucleotides containing
CACCC box core motif sequences from enhancers of other promoters were
used to compete for binding to labeled BP5-PDRE. These enhancers were
RCE sequences from the TGF-
and c-fos promoters (32, 33)
and the MNF-binding site sequence from the myoglobin promoter (34).
Other competitors tested were the consensus AP-2-binding site sequence
from the metallothionein-IIA promoter (35) and the consensus
Sp1-binding site sequence from Simian virus 40 (36) because Sp1 and AP2 have been shown to bind to nonconsensus sequences containing CACCC boxes (52, 57, 59). As shown in Fig. 5A, 50-fold excess unlabeled BP5-PDRE specifically competed with labeled BP5-PDRE for
binding to U2 cell nuclear proteins and eliminated bands 1-4. At a
50-fold excess molar ratio of unlabeled DNA to labeled BP5-PDRE DNA,
consensus AP-2, Sp-1, MNF, and the RCE sequence from the TGF-
promoter competed as effectively as unlabeled BP5-PDRE for binding in
complexes 1, 3, and 4 (Fig. 5A). AP-2, Sp-1, and
c-fos RCE sequences did not compete as effectively as
BP5-PDRE, MNF, or TGF-
RCE sequences for protein binding in complex
2. Competition with 25-, 50-, and 100-fold molar excess of BP5-PDRE and
MNF-binding sequences are compared in Fig. 5B. Competition
for binding to band 5 was variable and may be nonspecific. These
results suggest that nuclear protein(s) in the band 2 complex are
specific for the CCCCACCCC sequence, which is identical in the
BP5-PDRE, MNF, and TGF-
RCE sequences and different in the other
sequences that were tested. Binding of nuclear protein(s) in bands 1, 3, and 4 may be more specific for sequences adjacent to CCCCACCCC.

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
EMSA of BP5-PDRE binding to U2 cell
nuclear factors. All oligodeoxynucleotide sequences used for cold
competition experiments with 32P-labeled BP5-PDRE are
listed under "Experimental Procedures." A,
32P-labeled BP5-PDRE ( 155 to 128 of human IGFBP-5
promoter) was incubated with 3 µg of U2 cell nuclear extract as
described under "Experimental Procedures" in the absence
(lane b) or presence of a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled
BP5-PDRE (lane c), BP5-PDREm1 mutant with six altered
nucleotides in the CACCC boxes (lane d), consensus AP-2
(lane e) and Sp1 (lane f) sequences, MNF-binding
sequence (lane g), and RCE sequences from TGF and
fos promoters (lane h and i,
respectively). Lane a shows the 32P-end labeled
BP5-PDRE in the absence of nuclear extract. B,
32P- labeled BP5-PDRE was incubated with 3 µg of U2 cell
nuclear extract in the absence (lane b) or the presence of
25-, 50-, and 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled BP5-PDRE (lanes
c, d, and e, respectively), or with 25-, 50-, and 100-fold molar excess of CACCC core sequence-containing
MNF-binding sequence from the human myoglobin promoter (lanes
f, g, and h, respectively). Lanes
a in A and B show 32P-labeled
BP5-PDRE without added proteins.
|
|
When CCCACCC sequences at positions
147 and
139 were mutated to
aaaACCC (BP5-PDREm1), this mutant oligodeoxynucleotide did not compete
with labeled BP5-PDRE oligodeoxynucleotides (Fig. 6). However, when the distal CACCC box
alone was mutated from CCCACCC to aaaACCC (BP5-PDREm2), the unlabeled
BP5-PDREm2 competed very effectively with labeled BP5-PDRE, supporting
the conclusion that only the proximal CACCC box at
139 is required
for PG-dependent transactivation of the IGFBP-5 promoter.
To further determine which of the tandem CACCC boxes in the IGFBP-5
promoter is required for binding to nuclear factors, single base pair
mutations from CCCACCC to CCaACCC were made. Mutation of both distal
and the proximal CACCC sequences or mutation of only the proximal CACCC sequence (BP5-PDREm3 and BP5-PDREm5) eliminated the ability of the
sequence to compete with wild type labeled BP5-PDRE for nuclear factor
binding (Fig. 6). However, when the distal CACCC sequence alone was
mutated (BP5-PRDEm4), this oligodeoxynucleotide competed very
effectively with labeled BP5-PDRE for nuclear factor binding. These
results suggest that the distal CACCC sequence at
147 may not be
important for forming the complexes observed by EMSA. Furthermore, these data provide evidence that the cytosine at position
139 in the
proximal CACCC box is important for the binding of U2 cell nuclear
protein(s).

View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Cold competition EMSA of labeled BP5-PDRE
with mutated BP5-PDRE deoxyoligonucleotides. All mutated
oligonucleotide sequences used for cold competition experiments with
32P-labeled BP5-PDRE are shown under "Experimental
Procedures." 32P-Labeled BP5-PDRE was incubated with 3 µg of U2 cell nuclear extract as described under "Experimental
Procedures" in the absence (lane b) or presence of
50-fold molar excess of wild type unlabeled BP5-PDRE (lane
c), BP5-PDREm1 (lane d), BP5-PDREm2 (lane
e), BP5-PDREm3 (lane f), BP5-PDREm4 (lane
g), and BP5-PDREm5 (lane h). Lane a contains
32P-labeled BP5-PDRE without added proteins.
|
|
PRA Interation with Nuclear BP5-PDRE-binding
Protein(s)--
Deletion of the region
162 to
124 and mutation of
the CACCC sequences within this region abolished PG responsiveness of the IGFBP-5 promoter, and the BP5-PDRE oligodeoxynucleotide
corresponding to this region of the promoter bound to U2 cell nuclear
factors. These results suggested that PRA could either
directly bind to the BP5-PDRE or interact with nuclear protein(s) that
bind to the BP5-PDRE. To determine whether PRA could bind
to the IGFBP-5-PDRE sequence at
139 we used EMSA to examine binding
of baculovirus-expressed, purified human PRA to labeled
BP5-PDRE oligodeoxynucleotide. As a positive control the
PRA preparation was first tested with a consensus
progesterone response element oligodeoxynucleotide (MMTV-PRE) from the
mouse mammary tumor virus promoter (30) and the anti-PR monoclonal
antibody, AB52 (31). Purified PRA binding to labeled MMTV-PRE was dependent on the presence of nuclear extract proteins, as
observed previously (31), and produced a strong mobility shift band,
which was supershifted by incubating the protein-DNA complexes with the
PR antibody (Fig. 7A).
Purified PRA protein alone did not bind the BP5-PDRE
oligodeoxynucleotide, which is similar to the result with the MMTV-PRE.
Incubation of labeled BP5-PDRE with 5 µg of U2 cell nuclear protein
alone produced multiple shifted bands (Fig. 7B), as in Fig.
4. When increasing amounts of PRA were preincubated with
nuclear extract proteins and then mixed with labeled BP5-PDRE, the
intensity of complexes 1 and 3 progressively decreased, whereas the
intensity of complex 4 progressively increased (Fig. 7B).
Addition of anti-PR antibody together with PRA and nuclear
extract proteins did not alter the gel shift pattern of labeled
BP5-PDRE, suggesting that either PRA did not participate in
direct binding to BP5-PDRE or that the PRA epitope to which
the monoclonal antibody binds was masked by the nuclear proteins. As a
negative control for the effects of PRA on the BP5-PDRE gel
shift pattern, PRA was added with nuclear extract to
labeled Sp1 and TGF-
RCE oligodeoxynucleotides, which have similar
CACCC box sequences. PRA had no effect on the gel shift
patterns with these sequences (data not shown).

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
PRA interaction
with nuclear BP5-PDRE-binding protein(s). A, labeled
consensus PRE from the MMTV promoter (37) was incubated with 5 fmol of
purified PRA (lane a) or with 1 µg of U2 cell
nuclear extract (lane b) or combination of nuclear extract
and PRA (lane c) prior to analysis by EMSA.
Lane d was the same as lane c except 1 µg of PR
antibody AB-52 was added as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Lane e was labeled BP5-PDRE incubated with 5 fmol of purified PRA. These data demonstrate that the
PRA protein preparation used in panel B is
active. B, labeled BP5-PDRE was incubated with 5 µg of U2
cell nuclear extract (lane a) in the presence of increasing
amounts of PRA (lanes b-f). Numbers
above each lane indicate fmol of PRA.
1 µg of anti-PR antibody AB-52 was added to the mixture run in
lane f.
|
|
PRA and PRB Mediate PG Induction of IGFBP-5
Promoter Activity--
Initial experiments comparing abilities of
PRA and PRB isoforms to transactivate the
IGFBP-5 promoter in CAT reporter constructs suggested that
PRB was inactive (data not shown), so experiments to define
the regions of the promoter that mediate transactivation were limited
to PRA. This apparent specificity for PRA could
not be confirmed, however, using different phPR-B plasmid preparations and a luciferase reporter construct containing 252 bp of IGFBP-5 5'-flanking region. U2-OS cells were co-transfected with 0.0625-0.50 µg/well of PR expression plasmids phPR-A and phPR-B together with pCMV-
-gal and pLUC-252. With this luciferase reporter construct, both PRA and PRB transactivated IGFBP-5
promoter activity in the presence of PG, and PRB was more
effective at higher transfected DNA levels (Fig.
8). PG-dependent
PRB transactivation of the MMTV promoter was much higher
than PRA transactivation of this promoter (data not shown),
as described previously (48). We also found that RU486 inhibited
PRA and PRB transactivation of the IGFBP-5 promoter, which correlates with the effects of RU486 to decrease IGFBP-5 mRNA levels in normal human osteoblast cultures.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
PRA and PRB mediate PG stimulation of IGFBP-5
promoter activity. A, U2-OS cells were plated in 6-well
plates and co-transfected with pLUC-252, pCMV- -gal, and different
amounts of phPR-A (open bars) or phPR-B (hatched
bars) expression vectors as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The cells were treated with solvent control or
10 8 M PG. for 24 h. Promoter activities
were calculated as luciferase light units (photons)/ -gal activities
and are expressed as percentages of the respective control (0 progesterone) for each group (n = 6). B,
cells were transfected with pLUC-252, pCMV- -gal, and 0.25 µg/well
of phPR-A (open bars) or phPR-B (hatched bars)
and analyzed as in A. Cells were treated with PG,
10 6 M RU486, or both. a indicates
significantly different from respective solvent control
(p < 0.001). b indicates significant
inhibition by RU486 (p < 0.001) as determined by
analysis of variance.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The human IGFBP-5 promoter does not contain classic consensus
palindromic progesterone or glucocorticoid response elements (GRE/PRE),
defined as two hexameric half-sites with a 3-bp spacer (60). However
the IGFBP-5 promoter contains five putative GRE/PRE half-sites that
have strong sequence similarity to the hexanucleotide motifs
5'-TGTTCT-3' of the MMTV promoter and 5'-TGTTCA-3' of the uteroglobin
gene promoter (50, 60). Although GR and PR do not bind to GRE/PRE
half-sites as effectively as to the palindromic GRE/PRE consensus
sequence, clusters of GRE/PRE half-site sequences in MMTV, uteroglobin,
and other promoters have been shown to bind the receptors and
effectively mediate ligand-dependent transactivation through synergistic interactions between the multiple half-sites (50,
60). Furthermore, PR as well as other steroid hormones receptors affect
transcription of many genes without directly binding to consensus
hormone response elements (61-66). Many of these actions of nuclear
receptors involve interactions with co-activators and co-repressors
(67, 68). Although the presence of PRE half-sites in the IGFBP-5
promoter suggested the possibility that they might mediate PG
transactivation, our results demonstrate that this is not the case.
Rather, results of the series of reporter construct IGFBP-5 promoter
deletions suggest that a repeated CACCC box motif (BP5-PDRE)
proximal to the PRE half-sites mediates PG transactivation.
The CACCC box is an important promoter element required for efficient
and accurate gene expression in the TGF-
, c-fos,
c-jun, and IGF I genes (32, 33, 52, 59). In addition, a
number of transcription factors including the RCE-binding protein, MNF, and AP2 bind to CACCC box sequences and effect transcription (35, 54).
CACCC-binding proteins can either bind directly to the CACCC box
sequence or interact with other transcription factors and bind as a
complex (58). Duan and Clemmons (14) reported that human IGFBP-5
promoter activity is increased by AP-2. They found that the two
overlapping AP-2-binding sites in the CACCC box motif at positions
162 to
124 were not required for AP-2 stimulation of promoter
activity in human hepatoma cells and skin fibroblasts. Rather, an
alternate consensus AP-2-binding sequence 5'-GCCNNNGGC-3' at positions
52 to
35, adjacent to the TATA box, mediated AP-2 transactivation.
Both of the sequences bound purified AP-2 protein in EMSA experiments
even though only the sequence adjacent to the TATA box was involved in
AP-2 transactivation of promoter activity. In contrast, we found that
PRA transactivation of the IGFBP-5 promoter in osteoblastic
cells required the AP-2-binding sequence at position
139. This
suggests that AP-2 and PRA transactivate the IGFBP-5
promoter by different mechanisms.
Although EMSA analysis suggested that purified PRA did not
bind to BP5-PDRE directly, addition of PRA altered the gel
shift band pattern produced by binding of nuclear extract proteins to the BP5-PDRE DNA sequence. This result suggests that PRA
interacted with BP5-PDRE-binding proteins, although the identities of
the binding proteins are not known. Of the CACCC box sequences tested in competition EMSA experiments, the RCE and MNF-binding sites of the
TGF-
and myoglobin promoters (33, 34) are most similar to the
BP5-PDRE sequence, and the RCE and MNF sequences most effectively competed with the BP5-PDRE in binding nuclear extract proteins. These
results, although not definitive, are consistent with the possibility
that RCE, MNF, or related proteins may be involved in binding
BP5-PDRE.
Our results indicate that both PRA and PRB can
mediate PG induction of hIGFBP-5 promoter activity. For many genes that
are induced by progestins, human PRB is more active than
human PRA (44, 69, 70), although PRA has been
reported to be a stronger transactivator than PRB for chicken ovalbumin
and human tyrosine aminotransferase genes (44, 48). In many
PG-inducible genes that have been examined, activated PRB
increases transcription by binding to a PRE within the gene promoter,
and PRA functions as a negative regulator without directly
binding to a PRE (44, 69). It remains to be established whether
PRB mediates transactivation of the IGFBP-5 promoter by a
mechanism that is similar to or different from that of PRA
(70).
PRA and PRB are differentially expressed in a
cell type- and species-specific manner (71, 72). Depending on the cell
type, either both isoforms are induced by estrogen or PRB
is differentially induced (73-75). In human osteoblasts both isoforms
of PR are expressed, and estrogen induced both A and B promoters (74).
Progestins have been found to stimulate osteoblast proliferation,
differentiation, and growth factor expression (25, 26, 76-80) and to
increase bone formation (81, 82). In ovariectomized dogs, PG increased bone formation (83) and in postmenopausal women progestins combined with estrogen increased bone density to a greater extent than estrogen
alone (84, 85). Because IGFBP-5 increases the mitogenic and anabolic
activities of IGFs and IGF activities are important for bone formation,
one could speculate that PG induction of IGFBP-5 expression in
osteoblasts contributes to the positive effects of PG on bone formation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. N. Weigel and Dr. B. O'Malley
(Baylor College of Medicine) and Dr. R. Evans (Salk Institute),
respectively, for supplying PR and GR expression constructs. We
gratefully acknowledge Jerry L. Pettis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Medical Media Department for photography. We acknowledge and thank
Sylvia Morales and Connie Zastrow for excellent technical assistance
and Dr. Kuk-Wha Lee for helping with the nuclear run-on assay.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Veterans
Administration (to D. J. B., D. D. S, and T. A. L.), National Institutes of Health Grant AR 31062, funds from
the Loma Linda University Medical School Research Seed Grant Committee,
and grants from the Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Loma Linda
University.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by a Predoctoral grant from the Department of
Biochemistry, Loma Linda University.
¶¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed:
Musculoskeletal Disease Center, Research Service (151), J. L. Pettis
VAMC, 11201 Benton St., Loma Linda, CA 92357. E-mail:
linkhart@llvamc.va.gov.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IGFBP, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein;
IGF, insulin-like growth
factor;
PG, progesterone;
PR, progesterone receptor;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
bp, base pairs;
-gal,
-galactosidase;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
CS, calf
serum;
CD-FBS, charcoal-dextran-treated fetal bovine serum;
PRE, PG
response element;
MMTV, mouse mammary tumor virus;
TES, 2-{[tris-(hydroxymethyl)]-methylamino}-ethanesulfonic acid;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay(s);
RCE, retinoblastoma control element;
MNF, myocyte nuclear factor;
GRE, glucocorticoid response element.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Rechler, M. M.
(1993)
Vitam. Horm.
47,
1-114[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Shimasaki, S.,
and Ling, N.
(1991)
Prog. Growth Factor Res.
3,
243-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Clemmons, D. R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
140,
19-24[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Andress, D.,
and Birnbaum, R. S.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
176,
213-218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Bautista, C. M.,
Baylink, D. J.,
and Mohan, S.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
176,
756-763[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Schmid, C.,
Schlapfer, I.,
Gosteli-Peter, M. A.,
Froesch, E. R.,
and Zapf, J.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
E1029-E1035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Mohan, S.,
Nakao, Y.,
Honda, Y.,
Landale, E.,
Leser, U.,
Dony, C.,
Lang, K.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20424-20431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Andress, D. L.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
274,
E744-E750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Campbell, P. G.,
and Andress, D. L.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
E1005-E1013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Parker, A.,
Rees, C.,
Clarke, J.,
Busby, W. H., Jr.,
and Clemmons, D. R.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
2383-2392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Shimasaki, S.,
Shimonaka, M.,
Zhang, H.-P.,
and Ling, N.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
10646-10653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Allander, S. V.,
Larsson, C. L.,
Ehrenborg, E.,
Suwanichakul, A.,
Weber, G.,
Morris, S. L.,
Bajalica, S.,
Kiefer, M. C.,
Luthman, H.,
and Powell, D. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
10891-10898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Kou, K.,
Mittanck, D. W.,
Fu, C.,
and Rotwein, P.
(1995)
DNA Cell Biol.
14,
241-243[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Duan, C.,
and Clemmons, D. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24844-24851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
McCarthy, T. L.,
Casinghino, S.,
Mittanck, D. W.,
Ji, C. H.,
Centrella, M.,
and Rotwein, P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
6666-6671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Gabbitas, B.,
Pash, J. M.,
Delany, A. M.,
and Canalis, E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9033-9038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Hayden, J. M.,
Mohan, S.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(1995)
Bone
17,
93S-98S[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Franchimont, N.,
Durant, D.,
and Canalis, E.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
3380-3386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Yeh, L. C.,
Adamo, M. L.,
Duan, C.,
and Lee, J. C.
(1998)
J. Cell. Physiol.
175,
78-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Nasu, M.,
Sugimoto, T.,
Kaji, H.,
Kano, J.,
and Chihara, K.
(1998)
Endocr. J.
45,
229-234[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Sunic, D.,
McNeil, J. D.,
Rayner, T. E.,
Andress, D. L.,
and Belford, D. A.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
2356-2362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Dong, Y.,
and Canalis, E.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
2000-2006[Abstract]
|
| 23.
|
Chevalley, T.,
Strong, D. D.,
Mohan, S.,
Baylink, D. J.,
and Linkhart, T. A.
(1996)
Eur. J. Endocrinol.
134,
591-601[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Zhou, Y.,
Mohan, S.,
Douglas, J.,
Linkhart, T. A.,
Baylink, D. J.,
and Strong, D. D.
(1996)
Endocrinology.
137,
975-983[Abstract]
|
| 25.
|
Tremollieres, F. A.,
Strong, D. D.,
Baylink, D. J.,
and Mohan, S.
(1992)
Acta Endocrinol.
126,
329-337
|
| 26.
|
Scheven, B. A.,
Damen, C. A.,
Hamilton, N. J.,
Verhaar, H. J.,
and Duursma, S. A.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
186,
54-60[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Lempert, U. G.,
Strong, D. D.,
Mohan, S.,
Demarest, K.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(1992)
in
Calcium Regulating Hormones
(Cohn, D. V.
, Gennari, C.
, and Tashjian, A. J., eds)
, pp. 239-243, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam
|
| 28.
|
Schrader, W. T.,
Birnbaumer, M. E.,
Hughes, M. R.,
Weigel, N. L.,
Grody, W. W.,
and O'Malley, B. W.
(1981)
Recent Prog. Horm. Res.
37,
583-633
|
| 29.
|
Kastner, P.,
Krust, A.,
Turcotte, B.,
Stropp, U.,
Tora, L.,
Gronemeyer, H.,
and Chambon, P.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
1603-1614[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
El-Ashry, D.,
Onate, S.,
Nordeen, S. K.,
and Edwards, D. P.
(1989)
Mol. Endocrinol.
3,
1545-1558[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Onate, S. A.,
Prendergast, P.,
Wagner, J. P.,
Reeves, M.,
Pettijohn, D. E.,
and Edwards, D. P.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
3376-3391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Robbins, P. D.,
Horowitz, J. M.,
and Mulligan, R. C.
(1990)
Nature
346,
668-671[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Kim, S. J.,
Lee, H. D.,
Robbins, P. D.,
Busam, K.,
Sporn, M. B.,
and Roberts, A. B.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
3052-3056[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Bassel-Duby, R.,
Hernadez, D. M.,
Gonzalez, A. M.,
Krueger, K. J.,
and Williams, S. R.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
5024-5032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Williams, T.,
Admon, A.,
Luscher, B.,
and Tjian, R.
(1988)
Genes Dev.
2,
1557-1569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Briggs, M. R.,
Kadonaga, J. T.,
Bell, S. P.,
and Tjian, R.
(1986)
Science
234,
47-52[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
DeMarzo, A. M.,
Beck, C. A.,
Onate, S. A.,
and Edwards, D. P.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
72-76[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Chomczynski, P.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Strong, D. D.,
Beachler, A. L.,
Wergedal, J. E.,
and Linkhart, T. A.
(1991)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
6,
15-23[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Celeno, P.,
Bechtold, C.,
and Casero, R. A.
(1989)
BioTechniques
7,
942-944[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Sanger, F.,
Nicklen, S.,
and Coulson, A. R.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
74,
5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, pp. 7.79-7.87, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 43.
|
Fridocich-Kiel, J. L.,
Gudas, J. M.,
Bryan, I. B.,
and Pardee, A. B.
(1989)
BioTechniques
5,
572-579
|
| 44.
|
Vegeto, E.,
Shahbaz, M. M.,
Wen, D. X.,
Goldman, M. E.,
O'Malley, B. W.,
and McDonnell, D. P.
(1993)
Mol. Endocrinol.
7,
1244-1255[Abstract]
|
| 45.
|
Seed, B.,
and Sheen, J.-Y.
(1988)
Gene (Amst.)
67,
271-277[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Rosenthal, N.
(1987)
Methods Enzymol.
152,
704-720[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Dignam, D.,
Lebowitz, R.,
and Roeder, R.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
1475-1489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Tora, L.,
Gronemeyer, H.,
Turcotte, B.,
Gaub, M. P.,
and Chambon, P.
(1988)
Nature
333,
185-188[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Lieberman, B. A.,
Bona, B. J.,
Edwards, D. P.,
and Nordeen, S. K.
(1993)
Mol. Endocrinol.
7,
515-527[Abstract]
|
| 50.
|
Bailly, A.,
Lepage, C.,
Rauch, M.,
and Milgrom, E.
(1986 |