J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 26511-26517, September 10, 1999
Tenascin-R Is a Functional Modulator of Sodium Channel
Subunits*
Zhi-Cheng
Xiao
§,
David S.
Ragsdale¶,
Jyoti Dhar
Malhotra
,
Laura N.
Mattei
,
Peter E.
Braun
,
Melitta
Schachner**, and
Lori L.
Isom

From the
Department of Biochemistry, McGill
University, Montreal H3G 1Y6, Quebec, Canada, the ¶ Montreal
Neurological Institute, McGill University,
Montreal H3A 2B4, Quebec, Canada, the
Department of
Pharmacology, University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0632, and the ** Zentrum für
Molekulare Neurobiologie, Universität Hamburg,
Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
 |
ABSTRACT |
Voltage-gated sodium channels isolated from
mammalian brain are composed of
,
1, and
2 subunits. The
subunit forms the ion conducting pore of the channel, whereas the
1
and
2 subunits modulate channel function, as well as channel plasma
membrane expression levels.
1 and
2 each contain a single,
extracellular Ig-like domain with structural similarity to the neural
cell adhesion molecule (CAM), myelin Po.
2 contains strong amino
acid homology to the third Ig domain and to the juxtamembrane region of
F3/contactin. Many CAMs of the Ig superfamily have been shown to
interact with extracellular matrix molecules. We hypothesized that
2
may interact with tenascin-R (TN-R), an extracellular matrix molecule
that is secreted by oligodendrocytes during myelination and that binds F3-contactin. We show here that cells expressing sodium channel
1 or
2 subunits are functionally modulated by TN-R. Transfected cells
stably expressing
1 or
2 subunits initially recognized and then
were repelled from TN-R substrates. The cysteine-rich amino-terminal
domain of TN-R expressed as a recombinant peptide, termed EGF-L,
appears to be responsible for the repellent effect on
subunit-expressing cells. The epidermal growth factor-like repeats and
fibronectin-like repeats 6-8 are most effective in the initial
adhesion of
subunit-expressing cells. Application of EGF-L to
IIA
1
2 channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes
potentiated expressed sodium currents without significantly altering
current time course or the voltage dependence of current activation or inactivation. Thus, sodium channel
subunits appear to function as
CAMs, and TN-R may be an important regulator of sodium channel localization and function in neurons.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Sodium channels from brain are heterotrimeric structures composed
of a central, pore-containing
subunit and two auxiliary subunits,
1 (or its splice variant
1A) and
2. The
subunits do not
form the pore but play critical roles in channel gating, voltage
dependence of activation and inactivation, and expression levels
(1-3).1
1 and
2
subunits contain Ig-like extracellular domains and are members of the
V-set of the Ig superfamily that includes
CAMs2 (3, 4).
2 exhibits
strong amino acid homology to F3/contactin, a CAM that interacts with
the extracellular matrix molecule TN-R as well as with the Ig
superfamily adhesion molecules L1 and TAG-1 in rodents and NgCAM and
NrCAM in chicken. This homology is most striking in the third Ig-like
domain and to the region just proximal to the transmembrane segment of
F3/contactin. Two members of the tenascin family bind directly to
purified rat brain sodium channels (5). Using immobilized GST fusion
proteins, it was shown that purified, heterotrimeric brain sodium
channels, as well as a recombinant
2 extracellular domain, bind
specifically to the fibronectin repeat regions of TN-R and TN-C.
Tenascin molecules play important roles in cellular interactions in the
developing nervous system, such as neuronal migration, neuritogenesis,
and neuronal regeneration (6-9). TN-R is expressed predominantly by
oligodendrocytes during the onset and early phases of myelin formation
and remains expressed by some oligodendrocytes in the adult (10-14).
It is also expressed in some neurons and interneurons in the spinal
cord, retina, cerebellum, and hippocampus (10, 12, 14). TN-R
co-localizes with other glial-derived molecules (i.e.
myelin-associated glycoprotein and a phosphacan-related molecule) at
high density in central nervous system myelinated axons (15). TN-R has
been shown to have disparate effects resulting from interaction with
one of its neuronal receptors, F3/contactin: promotion of neurite
outgrowth when presented as a uniform substrate for some neuronal cell
types and inhibition of growth cone advance and axonal outgrowth from
retinal ganglion cells when offered as a sharp substrate boundary. TN-R
also induces axonal defasciculation in vitro (15-21).
We postulated that
subunits might function as CAMs in terms of
interaction with extracellular matrix molecules. To determine whether
sodium channel
subunits are functionally modulated by TN-R, we used
stably transfected fibroblasts expressing
1 or
2 subunits plated
on substrates that contained TN-R or recombinant TN-R domains
synthesized as GST fusion proteins. We show that cells expressing
1
or
2 subunits initially recognize TN-R plated on a nitrocellulose
substrate. This event is then followed by repulsion. Application of a
recombinant peptide domain of TN-R, EGF-L, resulted in the rapid and
specific potentiation of sodium currents expressed by coinjection of
,
1, and
2 subunits in Xenopus oocytes. We
hypothesize that functional interactions between sodium channel
subunits and TN-R may be important for neuronal defasiculation or
growth cone guidance during central nervous system development and may
represent a critical communication link between the axon and the node
of Ranvier.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Purification of TN-R from adult mouse brains by
immunoaffinity chromatography was performed as described (13).
Generation and purification of the recombinant domains of TN-R as
fusion proteins with GST were performed as described (21). Chinese hamster lung (CHL) 1610 cells were obtained from the American Type
Culture Collection. Nitrocellulose used in the cell repulsion assays
was obtained from Schleicher & Schuell (catalog no. 401188, BA85, 0.45 µm).
Construction of Mammalian Expression Vectors--
A mammalian
expression vector containing the coding sequence of the rat brain
sodium channel
2 subunit (3) was constructed by subcloning an
Asp718/NotI restriction fragment from
p
2L.SP64T-BXN (3) into the Asp718 and NotI
restriction endonuclease sites of pcDNA3.1Zeo (+) (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA), a vector that also contains the gene for zeocin
resistance. The resulting plasmid (pcDNA3.1Zeo-
2L) was
then sequenced completely with ThermoSequenase (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). A mammalian expression vector for
1, pcDNA3
1, was
developed previously (3).
Transfection and Characterization of Cell Lines--
1610 cells
were transfected with 10 µg of cDNA using DOTAP as described
previously (22). The following transfections were performed: 1610 + pcDNA3 (mock transfection), 1610 +
1, and 1610 +
2. Following
drug selection with G418 (Life Technologies, Inc.) or Zeocin
(Invitrogen), surviving cell clones were expanded and analyzed by
Northern and Western blots for
subunit expression. Northern blot
analysis was performed as described previously (3) using Trizol
reagent-purified total RNA (Life Technologies, Inc.) and
digoxigenin-labeled cRNA probes for
1 (22) or
2 (3). Chemiluminescent labeling and detection were performed using Genius reagents (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). For Western blot analysis, confluent T-225 cell culture flasks of
1- or
2-expressing cells were used to prepare crude membranes, as described previously (22). 50 µg of each preparation were separated on 10% acrylamide SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels and blotted to Hybond ECL
nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and probed with
antibodies to
1 or
2. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies were generated
against multiple-antigenic peptides by Research Genetics (Huntsville,
AL). Multiple-antigenic peptides specific to an extracellular domain of
1 (KRRSETTAETFTEWTFR) or a cytoplasmic domain of
2
(KCVRRKKEQKLSTD) were synthesized by the Protein and Carbohydrate
Structure Core facility at the University of Michigan. Horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG was used as the secondary
antibody. Immunoreactive bands were detected using Westdura
chemiluminescent reagent (Pierce).
Cell Repulsion Assays--
4-well or 24-well tissue culture
dishes were coated with methanol-solubilized nitrocellulose as
described (23). 2.5-µl aliquots of TN-R (15 µM) or GST
fusion domains of TN-R (25 µM) were applied to the
nitrocellulose/poly-DL-ornithine (PO)-coated surfaces of the dishes and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in a humidified
atmosphere as described previously (21). The dishes were then washed
three times with Ca2+- and Mg2+-free Hanks'
balanced salt solution (CMF-HBSS). The coating efficiency was
determined as described previously (21). Substrate boundaries were
marked in ink. The source of nitrocellulose (see under "Materials") was critical to obtaining consistent results in this assay. Parental 1610 or transfected cells were plated at a density of 105
cells/ml. After 20 h, the cells were fixed with 2.5%
glutaraldehyde and stained with Coomassie Blue (Sigma). The number of
cells adhering to the extracellular matrix-coated protein areas were
counted under a microscope. All experiments were performed at least
three times. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's
t test.
Cell Adhesion Assays--
Tissue culture 4-well or 24-well
dishes were coated with methanol-solubilized nitrocellulose (23) and
air-dried under a sterile hood. For adhesion assays, 2.5-µl spots of
different TN-R fragments or GST (each at a concentration of 25 µM) were applied to the nitrocellulose-coated surfaces of
the dishes and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in a humidified
atmosphere. The dried spots were washed with PBS and then flooded with
CMF-HBSS containing 2% heat-inactivated fatty acid-free BSA (Sigma)
and incubated for 2 h to block residual nonspecific protein
binding sites. The dishes were then washed with PBS, and cells from the
various cell lines were plated at a density of 105 cells/ml
in 0.5 ml of growth medium containing 10% BSA. After 20 h of
growth (5% CO2 at 37 °C), cultures were fixed with
CMF-HBSS containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde. For adhesion blocking assays, a mixture of EGF-L, EGF-S, and FN 6-8 was added to the culture medium
at the concentrations indicated in Table II. After fixation, cultures
were stained with 0.5% toluidine blue in 2.5% sodium carbonate. Cells
adhering to the various spots of TN-R fragments were photographed and
counted. All experiments were performed at least five times.
Electrophysiological Analysis of the Effects of the EGF-L Domains
of TN-R on Sodium Channels--
Xenopus oocytes were
isolated by collagenase treatment of pieces of ovary, as described
previously (24). On the day after isolation, oocytes were microinjected
with 50 nl of RNA encoding the
IIA
1, and
2 subunits. The
concentration of
IIA subunit RNA was 20-50 ng/µl, and the
concentration of
1 and
2 subunit RNA was 100-200 ng/µl.
Two-electrode voltage clamp recording was performed 2-5 days after
injection, using a Turbo TEC 10C amplifier (Adams & List, Westbury, NY)
and pCLAMP software (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Electrodes
were filled with 3 M KCl and had resistances of <0.5 M
.
Data were sampled at 20 kHz and filtered at 2.5 kHz. Capacity
transients, as well as leak currents, were subtracted using the P/4
procedure (25). Recordings were performed at room temperature in a
200-µl chamber filled with frog Ringer solution (115 mM
NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2). Fusion proteins were added directly to
the bath and subsequently washed out by superfusion. As controls for
the electrophysiological effects of the recombinant EGF-L domain of
TN-R, the fusion protein was treated with proteinase K (100 µg/ml)
overnight at 56 °C. The enzyme was then inactivated by heating at
90 °C for 15 min. This procedure digested the fusion protein such
that no silver-stained bands were visible after SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis on 15% acrylamide gels.
 |
RESULTS |
Repulsive Interactions between TN-R and Transfected Cells
Expressing Sodium Channel
Subunits--
To determine whether
sodium channel
subunits are modulated by TN-R, we examined the
growth behavior of transfected 1610 cells (26). We created stable cell
lines that express
1 alone (1610
1, clone 4), and
2 alone
(1610
2, clone 1). We also created mock-transfected 1610 cells that
contained pcDNA3 alone. Characterization of
1 or
2 expression
in these cell lines by Northern and Western blot analyses is shown in
Fig. 1.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Characterization of transfected cell
lines. A, Northern blot analysis. Total RNA was
prepared from one 60-mm cell culture dish of each cell line using
Trizol reagent. 10 µg of each RNA sample were separated on a
formaldehyde-agarose gel, blotted to nylon, probed with
digoxigenin-labeled cRNA probes specific to 1 or 2, and detected
with CDP-Star (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) as described previously
(3). Left panel, 1: lane 1, 1610 1-4 cells;
lane 2, 1610 cells. Right panel, 2: lane
1, 1610 2-1 cells; lane 2, 1610 cells. B,
Western blot analysis. Membranes were prepared from 1610 1-4 cells,
1610 2-1 cells, and rat brain. 50 µg of each preparation were
separated on 10% polyacrylamide SDS gels, transferred to
nitrocellulose, and probed with anti- 1 (left panel, 1:500
dilution) or anti- 2 (right panel, 1:500 dilution)
antibodies followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit
IgG. Immunoreactive bands were visualized with Westdura
chemiluminescent reagent and Hyperfilm ECL. Molecular mass markers are
expressed in kDa.
|
|
Because 1610 cells do not express endogenous sodium channel
,
1,
or
2 subunits (22) (Fig. 1) or F3/contactin (data not shown), we
were able to examine the effects of TN-R on sodium channel
subunits
in isolation. We predicted that
2 subunits may interact with TN-R
because of their homology to F3/contactin.
1 also contains an
extracellular CAM domain and is structurally homologous to
2 (4). We
observed that CHL cells transfected with
2 (1610
2) or
1
(1610
1) subunits were strongly repelled by TN-R substrate coated on
top of PO on nitrocellulose when allowed to settle in culture for
20 h (Fig. 2). Parental 1610 cells
adhered well to TN-R during this time. These results are similar to
observations in which cerebellar neurons expressing F3/contactin were
repelled from a TN-R substrate (15, 18, 19, 21). One or both of the
auxiliary
subunits may elicit signaling events similar to those
described for F3/contactin upon interaction with TN-R (15). Parental
1610 cells and cells transfected with
1 or
2 subunits were not
repelled from NCAM or laminin (data not shown). Thus,
1 and
2
subunits appear to be modulated specifically by TN-R to produce a
repellent effect of the transfected cells away from the TN-R substrate.
This effect could be the result of other processes (for example,
apoptosis or anti-adhesion), although previous studies describing the
repulsion of cerebellar neurons from a TN-R substrate excluded cell
death as a reason for detachment (18).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Repulsive effects of tenascin-R on sodium
channel subunit-transfected Chinese hamster
lung (1610) fibroblast cells. Left panel, bright-field
micrographs of 1610 and subunit-transfected 1610 cells plated on
spots of TN-R coated onto PO-treated four-well dishes. Cells were
maintained for 20 h at 37 °C before fixation and staining with
Coomassie Blue. Coating concentration was 15 µM for TN-R.
The identities of the cell lines are indicated on the figure.
Scale bar, 50 µm. Right panel, quantitation of
the repulsive effects of TN-R on cells expressing sodium channel subunits. Parental or transfected CHL (1610) cells were plated on spots
of TN-R coated onto PO-treated four-well dishes. Cells were maintained
for 20 h at 37 °C before fixation and staining with Coomassie
Blue. Coating concentration was 15 µM for TN-R. Values
are reported as the mean ± S.E./visual field. CHL, (parental 1610 cells) 280 ± 42 cells/visual field; 1, (1610 1) 34 ± 6 cells/visual field, p = 0.017; 2, (1610 2) 17 ± 4 cells/visual field, p = 0.014. The value of
adherent CHL cells on TN-R is shown as a control (100%).
Asterisks indicate significant values, with
p < 0.05.
|
|
Repulsive Effects of Different Domains of TN-R on Sodium Channel
Subunits Transfected in CHL Cells--
We used recombinant
peptides of TN-R (summarized in Fig. 3)
along with 1610
1 and 1610
2 cells to determine which domains are
responsible for the observed repellent effects. TN-R has a modular
structure containing a cysteine-rich amino-terminal domain followed by
EGF-like repeats, fibronectin type III (FN III) domains, and a
fibrinogen-like knob at the carboxyl terminus (6-9, 12, 27-30). The
fusion protein EGF-L contains the amino-terminal cysteine-rich domain
plus the EGF-like repeats. EGF-S contains only the EGF-like repeats. FN
6-8 contains the sixth through the eighth fibronectin domains. FG
contains the carboxyl-terminal fibrinogen-like knob. CHL cells were
plated onto nitrocellulose that had been coated with PO and GST fusion
proteins containing various domains of TN-R (21). Adhesion of
untransfected CHL cells was the same on the EGF-S, EGF-L, FN 6-8, and
FG domains as GST (data not shown). Both
the 1610
1 and 1610
2 cell lines were strongly repelled by EGF-L
(Figs. 4 and 5) but adhered well to
EGF-S, FN 6-8, FG, and GST (Figs. 4 and 5), suggesting that the
cysteine-rich amino-terminal domain of TN-R may be involved in
modulating both the
1 and
2 subunits.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
TN-R domain structure. The following
domains are illustrated: cysteine-rich amino-terminal domain
(hexagon), EGF-like repeats (circles), FN type
III-like repeats (squares), and the FG knob
(oval). Arrows represent the domains of TN-R
included in the GST fusion proteins used in our experiments.
|
|

View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Repulsive effects of TN-R domains on
1610 1-4 and 1610 2-1
cells. Bright-field micrographs of 1610 1-4 cells (left
panels, as indicated) and 1610 2-1 cells (right
panels, as indicated) plated on spots of different recombinant
domains of TN-R coated onto PO-treated four-well dishes. Cells were
maintained for 20 h at 37 °C before fixation and staining with
Coomassie Blue. Coating concentration was 25 µM for
different domains of TN-R. The identities of the cell lines are
indicated. Scale bar, 50 µm.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Quantitation of repulsive effects of
recombinant TN-R domains on cells expressing sodium channel subunits. Parental or transfected CHL cells
were plated on spots of various TN-R fusion protein domains coated onto
PO-treated four-well dishes. Cells were maintained for 20 h at
37 °C before fixation and staining with Coomassie Blue. Coating
concentration was 25 µM for domains of TN-R or GST.
Values are reported as the mean ± S.E./visual field. 1
(top panel): 1610 1 cells plated on GST, 390 ± 66;
plated on EGF-L, 93 ± 6, p = 0.031; plated on
EGF-S, 341 ± 77, p = 0.77; plated on FN 6-8,
303 ± 81, p = 0.67; plated on FG, 313 ± 72, p = 0.68. The value of adherent cells on GST is shown
as a control (100%). 2 (bottom panel): 1610 2 cells
plated on GST, 463 ± 42; plated on EGF-L, 83 ± 4, p = 0.044; plated on EGF-S, 263 ± 93, p = 0.89; plated on FN 6-8, 320 ± 63, p = 0.49; plated on FG, 402 ± 67, p = 0.77. The value of adherent cells on GST is shown
as a control (100%). Asterisks indicate significant values,
with p < 0.05.
|
|
Adhesive Effects of Different Domains of Tenascin-R on Subunits of
Sodium Channels Transfected in CHL Cells--
A finely tuned balance
between opposing principles allows cells to engage in transient
contacts leading to long term avoidance reactions (18). Previous
studies showed that F3/contactin mediates initial adhesion of neurons
and transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells to TN-R. This interaction
is followed by repulsion of neuronal cell bodies and neurites. Using
cell-substrate binding assays performed under different conditions, it
was shown that it is possible to investigate adhesion versus
repulsion separately (18). We hypothesized that sodium channel
subunits expressed in CHL cells may initially recognize TN-R as
adhesive, prior to repulsion, similar to the situation with
F3/contactin. Using a cell-substrate assay described previously to
detect cell adhesion, we have found that cells expressing
1 subunits
adhere to TN-R recombinant domains. As summarized in Table
I,
1-expressing cells adhere to FN
6-8 and to EGF-S. Table II shows that a
mixture of EGF-L, EGF-S, and FN 6-8 fusion proteins added to the cell
culture medium blocks the adhesion of
1-expressing CHL cells to the
EGF-like or fibronectin-like domains of TN-R in a
concentration-dependent manner. As in the situation for
F3-contactin interactions with TN-R, our results suggest that sodium
channel
1 subunits initially recognize TN-R substrates with an
adhesive response. Following that recognition, cells expressing
1
subunits are repelled by TN-R, as we show using cell-substrate assays
to designed to detect repulsion. Similar experiments were attempted for
2-expressing cells. Unfortunately, our results were uninterpretable
due to nonspecific interactions with GST alone. Other methods must be
explored to answer this question in the future.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
CHL cells expressing 1 subunits adhere to TN-R recombinant domains
Tissue culture 4-well or 24-well dishes were coated with
methanol-solubilized nitrocellulose according to Lagenaur and Lemmon
(23) and air-dried under a sterile hood. For adhesion assays, 2.5-µl
spots of different TN-R fragments or GST, each at a concentration of 25 µM, were applied to the nitrocellulose-coated surfaces of the dishes
and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere. The
spots were then washed three times with PBS. The dishes were flooded
with CMF-HBSS containing 2% heat-inactivated fatty acid-free BSA and
incubated 2 h to block residual nonspecific protein binding sites.
Subsequently, the dishes were washed with PBS and the cells of
different lines were plated in 0.5 ml medium with 10% BSA at a density
of 100,000 cells/ml. After 20 h, the cultures were fixed by
flooding with CMF-HBSS containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde. After fixation,
cultures were stained with 0.5% toluidine blue in 2.5% sodium
carbonate. The number of cells adhering to different protein spots were
photographed and counted. Data are presented as the mean and S.D. of
five independent experiments.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Blockade of adhesion
Tissue culture 4-well or 24-well dishes were coated with
methanol-solubilized nitrocellulose according to Lagenaur and Lemmon
(23) and air-dried under a sterile hood. 2.5-µl spots of EGF-L,
EGF-S, or FN6-8 (each at a concentration of 25 µM) were
applied to the nitrocelluose-coated surfaces of the dishes and
incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere. The
spots were washed with PBS and then flooded with CMF-HBSS containing
2% heat-inactivated fatty acid free BSA and incubated 2 h to
block residual non-specific protein binding sites. The dishes were then
washed with PBS and cells from the various cell lines were plated at a
density of 100,000 cells/ml in 0.5 ml of growth medium containing 10%
BSA. A mixture of EGF-L, EGF-S, and FN 6-8 was added to the culture
medium at the concentrations indicated and preincubated with the cells
for 1h. After 20 h of growth (5% CO2, 37 °C) cultures
were fixed with CMF-HBSS containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde. Cultures were
then stained with 0.5% toluidine blue in 2.5% sodium carbonate. The
numbers of cells adhering to the various spots of TN-R fragments were
photographed and counted. Data presented are the results of at least
five independent experiments.
|
|
The EGF-L Domain of TN-R Potentiates Sodium Currents--
Our
results from the adhesion and repulsion assays suggested an interaction
between TN-R and sodium channel
subunits. This interaction, direct
or indirect, might be expected to alter the functional properties of
the ion channel as well. To test this hypothesis, we examined the
effects of EGF-L and FN 6-8 fusion proteins on whole cell sodium
currents recorded by voltage-clamp. Initially, we assessed sodium
currents in SNaIIA cells (26) transfected with
1 and
2 subunits,
using the whole cell configuration of the patch clamp technique. In
these experiments, neither EGF-L nor FN 6-8 fusion proteins
significantly altered the amplitude, time course, or voltage dependence
of sodium currents (data not shown). Preliminary results from the cell
migration assays suggested that protein phosphorylation may modulate
EGF-L-mediated effects on cell migration (data not shown). However, in
the whole cell recording configuration used to record sodium currents
in SNaIIA +
1 +
2 cells, the cell cytoplasm was dialyzed into the
patch pipette, which may have resulted in loss of intracellular
constituents necessary for EGF-L- or FN-dependent
modulation of sodium channel function. Therefore, as an alternative
approach, we expressed sodium channels in Xenopus oocytes
and examined whole cell sodium currents by two-electrode voltage clamp.
In two-electrode recordings, EGF-L fusion protein produced a rapid
increase in the amplitude of sodium currents (Fig.
6). EGF-L-mediated potentiation was
observed in oocytes coexpressing the type IIA
subunit along with
1 and
2 (Fig. 6A), as well as in oocytes coexpressing
IIA alone (Fig. 6B). In contrast, neither FN 6-8 fusion
protein nor GST affected sodium currents in oocytes (Fig.
6E), suggesting that potentiation is a specific effect of
the EGF-L domain of TN-R. EGF-L-mediated potentiation was not
accompanied by any detectable changes in the voltage dependence of
current activation (Fig. 6C) or inactivation (Fig.
6D) or in any obvious effects on current time course (Fig. 6, A and B). The concentration of 50 ng/µl was
chosen in the experiments shown in Fig. 6 because it elicited a maximal
potentiation response. However, clear potentiation was also observed
with concentrations as low as 5 ng/µl. The potentiating activity was
not inactivated by heating EGF samples to 100 °C for 10 min,
suggesting that a highly stable protein domain is responsible for
potentiation. In contrast, potentiation was greatly reduced by
pretreatment of the fusion protein with proteinase K (Fig.
6F).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
EGF-L fusion protein potentiates sodium
currents in Xenopus oocytes. A and
B, sodium currents in an oocyte expressing the type IIA subunit, along with 1 and 2 (A) and in an oocyte
expressing the IIA subunit alone (B). Currents were
evoked before (control traces) and after addition of EGF-L fusion
protein. The currents were elicited by depolarization to +10 mV from a
holding potential of 90 mV. In this and subsequent panels, the final
concentration of fusion protein in the bath was 50 ng/µl.
C, current-voltage relationship for the experiment shown in
A, before ( ) and after ( ) application of EGF-L.
D, inactivation curves for the experiment in A,
before ( ) and after ( ) application of EGF-L. E,
amplitudes of currents elicited by brief depolarizations to 0 mV,
applied at 20-s intervals. FN fusion protein, GST, and EGF-L were
applied for the times indicated by the bars. F,
amplitudes of currents elicited by depolarizations to 0 mV, applied at
10-s intervals. The oocyte was first exposed to a sample of EGF-L that
had been pretreated with proteinase K. After washout of the proteinase
K-treated sample, the oocyte was exposed to untreated EGF-L from the
same fusion protein preparation.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The extracellular matrix protein TN-R modulates cells expressing
sodium channel
1 or
2 subunits. Using a combination of adhesion
and repulsion assays, we describe events beginning with an initial
recognition of the FN 6-8 and EGF-like repeats of TN-R followed by a
repellent effect on transfected cells away from a TN-R substrate,
mediated through the amino-terminal and EGF-like domains. The initial
recognition event between TN-R and cells expressing sodium channel
subunits can be blocked by the addition of TN-R recombinant fragments
to the cell culture medium, suggesting that TN-R and sodium channel
auxiliary subunits interact directly. Our data confirm a recent report
showing that purified, heterotrimeric rat brain sodium channels or a
recombinant
2 subunit extracellular domain synthesized as a GST
fusion protein bind with high affinity to recombinant fibronectin-like
fusion protein domains of TN-R or TN-C immobilized on microtiter plates
and display a low affinity for the EGF-like repeats (5).
It is interesting to consider the developmental time course of
1 and
2 subunit expression in brain (3, 31) compared with the development
of oligodendrocytes. Over 90% of sodium channels in the rat brain
during early postnatal development are thought to contain a
disulfide-linked
2 subunit as well as a non-covalently linked
1
subunit (32). Most oligodendrocytes develop after postnatal day 7 in
rat brain (33). Thus,
1 and
2 subunits would be expected to be
present in the neuronal plasma membrane during the early stages of
myelination, when TN-R is secreted. It may be possible that
1 and
2 subunits function as CAMs apart from
and play roles in
neuronal development other than channel modification. It is also
possible that
1, which is noncovalently bound to
, can dissociate
and reassociate with the channel complex, such that the channel is
dimeric or trimeric, depending on the particular needs of the cell.
Thus, the presence or absence of
1 in the channel complex may
determine the level of responsiveness of the sodium channel to
TN-R.
The interaction of TN-R with the CAMs
1 and
2 in the central
nervous system may lead to neuronal defasiculation (20). Central
nervous system axons have been shown to form fascicles via homophilic
or heterophilic binding of CAMs between axons. Preliminary results from
our laboratory show that
1 and
2 exhibit homophilic binding when
expressed individually in Drosophila S2 cells, leading to
cell aggregation.3 Through
binding to
subunits or other CAMs on adjacent axons,
subunits
may contribute to axonal fasiculation. Interaction of TN-R with
1 or
2 may then serve to disrupt this interaction, initiating the process
of defasciculation.
TN-R has been shown previously to inhibit growth cone advance as well
as neurite outgrowth when presented as a sharp substrate boundary
(16-19). The repulsion of
subunit-expressing fibroblasts from TN-R
substrates in our hands may occur through a similar mechanism. It is
possible that growth cone repulsion, and thus axon guidance, is
facilitated through the interaction of TN-R with sodium channel
subunits present at the growth cones, resulting in cell repulsion.
EGF-L-mediated potentiation of sodium currents may represent a novel
mechanism for modulation of sodium channel activity. Potentiation could
involve an increase in the probability of sodium channel opening, an
increase in single channel conductance, or up-regulation of silent
channels. Surprisingly, potentiation was observed not only in oocytes
coexpressing
IIA,
1, and
2 but also in oocytes expressing
IIA alone. This observation suggests the possibility that EGF-L can
interact directly with sodium channel
subunits. Alternatively,
potentiation of sodium currents in oocytes may be an indirect effect of
EGF-L, reflecting a second messenger-mediated signal initiated by EGF-L
interaction with some other oocyte membrane protein.
Recent observations on the activity of voltage-dependent
sodium channels in TN-R knockout mice are in agreement with the
hypothesis that TN-R modulates the activity of sodium channels (34). In these mice, there is no apparent change in expression or distribution of sodium channels, but compound action potential recordings from the
optic nerves of the mutant mice show a significant decrease in
conduction velocity as compared with wild type controls. Thus, in the
absence of TN-R, the observed decrease in the optic nerve conduction
velocity may reflect altered channel function. A more thorough analysis
of the properties of sodium channels in the TN-R knock-out mutant and
morphometric analysis of nodal area in the optic nerve or other
myelinated fiber tracks will be required to investigate these possibilities.
The physiological significance of EGF-L-mediated potentiation is, at
present, unclear. One intriguing possibility is that it is a means by
which neurons or neuronal processes translate contact with TN-R into an
intracellular signal. For example, influx of calcium through
voltage-gated calcium channels has been shown to be a signal for
myelin-evoked growth cone collapse in cultured rat locus coeruleus
neurons (35-39); however, the mechanism by which myelin activates
calcium channels is not understood. Our results suggest that calcium
channel activation could result, at least in part, from TN-R-mediated
potentiation of sodium currents, leading to increased
excitability of the growth cone membrane. To our knowledge, no studies
have examined the role of sodium channels in growth cone behavior. This
will be an interesting area for future investigation.
The potential clinical importance of the role of sodium channel
subunits as CAMs is illustrated by a recent report describing a
mutation underlying generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus
(40). Mutation of a critical cysteine residue (C121W) predicted to be
involved in formation of the extracellular Ig fold of
1 (41) is
postulated to be responsible for the familial epileptic phenotype.
These results, combined with the results of our study, suggest that a
deficit in the ability of
1 subunits to interact with extracellular
matrix molecules may cause changes in sodium channel conductance or
gating properties to produce excitotoxicity. Alternatively, expression
of
1 subunits that are incapable of functioning as CAMs may alter
sodium channel density and localization in the neuronal plasma membrane
or cause changes in axonal guidance events, such as fasiculation or
growth cone collapse during brain development.
An interesting parallel may be drawn from the present study to the
adhesion molecule on glia (AMOG/
2), the
2 subunit of the murine
Na+, K+-ATPase (42). This cell surface
glycoprotein is expressed by glial cells during neuronal development,
as well as in the adult. It can form a complex with the
1 subunit to
yield a functionally active Na+,K+-ATPase
enzyme when injected into Xenopus oocytes, indicating that
it can act as an integral member of the ion transport complex. In
addition, AMOG/
2 acts as a CAM involved in neuron-glia interactions, promoting neurite outgrowth from cerebellar and hippocampal neurons. It
is thought to be unlikely that Na+,K+-ATPase
activity is involved in neurite outgrowth. Instead, AMOG/
2 may
function independently of
subunits to exert this effect. Evidence
that AMOG/
2 may appear at the cell surface independent of an
subunit has been found in the distal colon (43). Like AMOG/
2, sodium
channel
subunits are cell surface glycoproteins expressed during
critical stages of neuronal development.
1 and
2 now appear to
have dual functions: as modulators of ion channel activity and as CAMs.
We do not yet know whether sodium channel
subunits can appear and
function at the cell surface independently of
during brain
development. The present study now provides a framework from which the
physiological significance of sodium channel-extracellular matrix
interactions can be investigated.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Vicky Kottis (McGill University) and
Hongling Li (Montreal Neurological Institute) for excellent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a Neuroscience Network of Canada
grant (to P. E. B.), NMSS Grant RG-2882-A-1 and a Johnson & Johnson Focused Giving Award (to L. L. I.), Medical Research Council Grant MT-13485 (to D. S. R.), and a grant from the German Research Society (to M. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Dept. of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of
Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Pharmacology, University of Michigan, 1301 MSRB III, Ann Arbor,
MI 48109-0632. Tel.: 734-936-3050; Fax: 734-763-4450; E-mail:
lisom@umich.edu.
1
K. Kazen-Gillespie, D. S. Ragsdale, and
L. L. Isom, unpublished results.
3
J. Malhotra, M. Hortsch, and L. Isom,
unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
EGF, epidermal
growth factor;
EGF-L, fragment containing the cysteine-rich amino
terminus and the EGF-like repeats;
EGF-S, fragment containing the
EGF-like repeats;
FG, fibrinogen-like;
FN, fibronectin;
FN 6-8, fragment containing FN type III homologous repeats 6-8;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
PO, poly-DL-ornithine;
TN, tenascin;
CAM, cell adhesion
molecule;
CHL, Chinese hamster lung;
CMF-HBSS, Ca2+- and
Mg2+-free Hanks' balanced salt solution.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Isom, L. L.,
De Jongh, K. S.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1994)
Neuron
12,
1183-1194[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Isom, L. L.,
De Jongh, K. S.,
Patton, D. E.,
Reber, B. F. X.,
Offord, J.,
Charbonneau, H.,
Walsh, K.,
Goldin, A. L.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1992)
Science
256,
839-842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Isom, L. L.,
Ragsdale, D. S.,
De Jongh, K. S.,
Westenbroek, R. E.,
Reber, B. F. X.,
Scheuer, T.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1995)
Cell
83,
433-442[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Isom, L. L.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1996)
Nature
383,
307-308[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Srinivasan, J.,
Schachner, M.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
15753-15757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Bartsch, U.
(1996)
Prog. Neurobiol.
49,
145-168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Chiquet-Ehrismann, R.,
Hagios, C.,
and Matsumoto, K.
(1994)
Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol.
2,
3-7[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Erickson, H. P.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
5,
869-876[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Schachner, M.,
Taylor, J.,
Bartsch, U.,
and Pesheva, P.
(1994)
Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol.
2,
33-41[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Bartsch, U.,
Pesheva, P.,
Raff, M.,
and Schachner, M.
(1993)
Glia
9,
57-69[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Fuss, B.,
Pott, U.,
Fischer, P.,
Schwab, M. E.,
and Schachner, M.
(1991)
J. Neurosci. Res.
29,
299-307[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Fuss, B.,
Wintergerst, E. S.,
Bartsch, U.,
and Schachner, M.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
1237-1249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Pesheva, P.,
Spiess, E.,
and Schachner, M.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
1765-1778[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Wintergerst, E. S.,
Fuss, B.,
and Bartsch, U.
(1993)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
5,
299-310[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Xiao, Z. C.,
Hillenbrand, R.,
Schachner, M.,
Thermes, S.,
Rougon, G.,
and Gomaz, S.
(1997)
J. Neurosci. Res.
49,
698-709[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Lochter, A.,
and Schachner, M.
(1993)
J. Neurosci.
13,
3986-4000[Abstract]
|
| 17.
|
Lochter, A.,
Taylor, J.,
Fuss, B.,
and Schachner, M.
(1994)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
6,
597-606[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Pesheva, P.,
Gennarini, G.,
Goridis, C.,
and Schachner, M.
(1993)
Neuron
10,
69-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Taylor, J.,
Pesheva, P.,
and Schachner, M.
(1993)
J. Neurosci Res.
35,
347-362[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Xiao, Z. C.,
Revest, J. M.,
Laeng, P.,
Rougon, G.,
Schachner, M.,
and Montag, D.
(1998)
J. Neurosci. Res.
52,
390-404[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Xiao, Z. C.,
Taylor, J.,
Montag, D.,
Rougon, G.,
and Schachner, M.
(1996)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
8,
766-782[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Isom, L. L.,
Scheuer, T.,
Brownstein, A. B.,
Ragsdale, D. S.,
Murphy, B. J.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
3306-3312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Lagenaur, C.,
and Lemmon, V.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
7753-7757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
McPhee, J. C.,
Ragsdale, D. S.,
Scheuer, T.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
12025-12034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Armstrong, C. M.,
and Bezanilla, F.
(1974)
J. Gen. Physiol.
63,
533-552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
West, J. W.,
Scheuer, T.,
Maechler, L.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1992)
Neuron
8,
59-70[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Bristow, J.,
Tee, M. K.,
Gitelman, S. E.,
Mellon, S. H.,
and Miller, W. L.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
265-278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Gulcher, J. R.,
Nies, D. E.,
Marton, L. S.,
and Stefansson, K.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
1588-1592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Jones, F. S.,
Hoffman, S.,
Cunningham, B. A.,
and Edelman, G. M.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
1905-1909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Nörenberg, U.,
Wille, H.,
Wolff, J. M.,
Frank, R.,
and Rathjen, F. G.
(1992)
Neuron
8,
849-863[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Patton, D. E.,
Isom, L. L.,
Catterall, W. A.,
and Goldin, A. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
17649-17655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Catterall, W. A.
(1992)
Physiol. Rev.
72 (suppl.),
S15-S48
|
| 33.
|
Skoff, R. P.,
Proce, D. L.,
and Stocks, A.
(1976)
J. Comp. Neurol.
169,
313-334[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Weber, P.,
Bartsch, U.,
Rasband, M. N.,
Czaniera, R.,
Lang, Y.,
Bluethmann, H.,
Margolis, R. U.,
Levinson, S. R.,
Shrager, P.,
Montag, D.,
and Schachner, M.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
4245-4262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Fields, R. D.,
and Nelson, P. G.
(1994)
J. Neurobiol.
25,
281-293[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Moorman, S. J.,
and Hume, R. I.
(1993)
J. Neurosci.
13,
4727-4736[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Muller, B.,
Stahl, B.,
and Bonhoeffer, F.
(1990)
J. Exp. Biol.
153,
29-46[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Schwab, M. E.
(1996)
Neurochem. Res.
21,
755-761[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Tessier-Lavigne, M.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
4,
596-601[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Wallace, R. H.,
Wang, D. W.,
Singh, R.,
Scheffer, I. E.,
George, A. L.,
Phillips, H. A.,
Saar, K.,
Reis, A.,
Johnson, E. W.,
Sutherland, G. R.,
Berkovic, S. F.,
and Mulley, J. C.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
19,
366-370[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
McCormick, K. A.,
Isom, L. L.,
Ragsdale, D. S.,
Smith, D.,
Scheuer, T.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3953-3963
|
| 42.
|
Müller-Husmann, G.,
Gloor, S.,
and Schachner, M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26260-26267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Marxer, A.,
Stieger, B.,
Quaroni, A.,
Kashgarian, M.,
and Hauri, H.-P.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
1057-1069[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. J. Brackenbury, M. B.A. Djamgoz, and L. L. Isom
An Emerging Role for Voltage-Gated Na+ Channels in Cellular Migration: Regulation of Central Nervous System Development and Potentiation of Invasive Cancers
Neuroscientist,
December 1, 2008;
14(6):
571 - 583.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Fein, M. A. Wright, E. A. Slat, A. B. Ribera, and L. L. Isom
scn1bb, a Zebrafish Ortholog of SCN1B Expressed in Excitable and Nonexcitable Cells, Affects Motor Neuron Axon Morphology and Touch Sensitivity
J. Neurosci.,
November 19, 2008;
28(47):
12510 - 12522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Hargus, Y. Cui, J.-S. Schmid, J. Xu, M. Glatzel, M. Schachner, and C. Bernreuther
Tenascin-R Promotes Neuronal Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells and Recruitment of Host-Derived Neural Precursor Cells After Excitotoxic Lesion of the Mouse Striatum
Stem Cell |