![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 26529-26536, September 10, 1999
*
,From the Department of Molecular and Structural Biology, University of Aarhus, C. F. Møllers Allé, Building 130, 8000 Århus C, Denmark
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eukaryotic topoisomerase II is a nuclear enzyme
essential for DNA metabolism and chromosome dynamics. The enzyme has a
dimeric structure, and subunit dimerization is vital to the cellular
functions and activities of the enzyme. Two biochemical approaches
based on metal ion affinity chromatography and immunoprecipitation have been carried out to map the dimerization region(s) in human
topoisomerase II Eukaryotic topoisomerase II is a nuclear enzyme involved in
regulating the topological conformation of DNA (1, 2). It fulfills
essential functions during DNA replication (3, 4) and chromosome
segregation in both mitosis (5, 6) and meiosis (7), and it is thought
to play a key role in certain types of DNA recombination events
(8-12). The enzyme has furthermore been suggested to constitute a
component of the nuclear scaffold (13, 14), where it is involved in
chromosome condensation (15) and decondensation (16).
Mammalian cells contain two structurally similar but biochemically
distinct topoisomerase II isoforms, topoisomerase II The functional implications of a dimeric nature of eukaryotic
topoisomerase II have been supported by several observations. Hydrodynamic studies indicate that the enzyme exists in solution as a
dimer (18, 19, 22), and this has further been strengthened by studies
of topoisomerase II heterodimers, which have been found to be highly
stable in vitro without the ability to dissociate and
produce enzymes with a homodimeric conformation (19, 23). Furthermore,
structural data obtained either from crystallization of a 92-kDa
fragment of yeast topoisomerase II or from electron microscopy studies
of human topoisomerase II Early analysis of the amino acid sequence of human topoisomerase II The most compelling data on eukaryotic topoisomerase II dimerization so
far have derived from resolution of the crystal structure of a 92-kDa
fragment of yeast topoisomerase II (31). This structure shows a primary
interaction domain in the C-terminal part of the fragment involving two
minor regions covering amino acids 1031-1046 and 1114-1130 in the
yeast topoisomerase II enzyme.
In the present study, we have mapped the regions involved in primary
dimerization of human topoisomerase II Yeast Strains and Plasmids--
The yeast strains BJ5462
(MAT Yeast Transformation and Complementation--
Yeast cells were
transformed by using a modified version of the LiAc method of Ito
et al. (34). To test the ability of the mutated
topoisomerase II constructs to complement the lack of endogenous
topoisomerase II in BJ201 the LEU2-based constructs were transformed
into BJ201, and cells were transferred to medium plates containing 5'
fluoro-orotic acid (1 mg/ml) to select against the URA3 plasmid
carrying the Schizosaccharomyces pombe TOP2 gene (33).
Metal Ion Affinity Chromatography--
Single- and
double-transformed yeast cells were grown in 50 ml of selection medium
to late log phase and then transferred to 1 liter of YPD medium and
grown for approximately 12 h before harvesting by centrifugation.
Yeast cells were extracted with 2 volumes of extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 1 M NaCl, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and 1 volume of acid-washed glass beads
(425-600 µm, Sigma) by vortexing at 4 °C for 30 min. Glass beads
and cell debris were removed by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min,
and the supernatant was further centrifuged for 20 min at 12000 rpm.
After filtration (0.65 µm pore size filters), the crude extract was
loaded on a 2-ml Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose column
(matrix purchased from Qiagen) equilibrated with equilibration buffer
(20 mM imidazole, pH 8, 1 M NaCl, 10 mM KPi, pH 8, 10% glycerol). The column was subsequently washed with equilibration buffer, and protein was eluted with elution
buffer (1 M imidazole, pH 8, 1 M NaCl, 10 mM KPi, pH 8, 10% glycerol) in a gradient of imidazole
ranging from 20 mM to 1 M. All chromatographic
steps were performed using an Amersham Pharmacia Biotech FPLC system
under the control of an LCC-500 plus. When metal ion affinity
chromatography was used for enzyme purification, yeast cell extraction
and the following Ni2+ column chromatography were performed
as described above, except that all buffers contained 500 mM NaCl rather than 1 M. Partly purified
enzymes were stored in elution buffer supplemented with 50% glycerol.
Antibodies and Immunostaining--
The C-terminally tagged human
topoisomerase II Immunoprecipitation--
Immunoprecipitation of human
topoisomerase II Topoisomerase II-mediated DNA Decatenation--
The activity of
topoisomerase II Metal Ion Affinity Chromatography as a Biochemical Method to
Identify Interactions between Human DNA Topoisomerase II
To first verify the specificity of the assay, a human topoisomerase
II Importance of the C-terminal Region of Human Topoisomerase II Two Minor Regions Located in the C-terminal Part of Topoisomerase
II
The observation underscores the result obtained from the experiment
employing the h
To establish whether the region corresponding to amino acids 1031-1046
in the yeast enzyme also influences dimerization in human topoisomerase
II
To address whether an exact spacing between the two primary
dimerization regions in human topoisomerase II
Recently, a fragment spanning residues 1109-1163 in S. cerevisiae topoisomerase II was found to interact with the enzymes Sgs1 and Pat1 known to be involved in DNA metabolism (37, 38). It is a
somewhat surprising observation that more or less the same regions in
S. cerevisiae topoisomerase II are involved in subunit
contact as well as in directing other protein-protein interactions.
This lends further support to a more accessible and flexible structure
of the C-terminal domain in eukaryotic topoisomerase II.
In human cells two topoisomerase II isoforms are present, which can
exist in either a homo- or heterodimeric configuration. To investigate
whether the regions responsible for homodimerization of human
topoisomerase II
Numerous studies have addressed the mechanism and nature of subunit
interaction in eukaryotic topoisomerase II. As predicted from the human
topoisomerase II
Recently, an in vitro study employing human topoisomerase
II Immunoprecipitation Verifies the Requirement of Two Minor Regions
for Subunit Dimerization in Human Topoisomerase II Secondary Dimerization in Human Topoisomerase II
To test whether mutant topoisomerase II
Recently, Maxwell and co-workers (42) presented results obtained with
an N-terminal human topoisomerase II
Taken together, our study has demonstrated the presence of two small
regions in the C-terminal domain of human topoisomerase II
. The results demonstrate that two regions spanning
amino acids 1053-1069 and 1124-1143 are both essential for
dimerization. The regions correspond to the interaction domains
revealed in yeast topoisomerase II after crystallization of a central
fragment of this enzyme, indicating that the overall C-terminal
dimerization structure of eukaryotic topoisomerase II is conserved from
yeast to human. Furthermore, linker insertion analysis has demonstrated that the two dimerization regions are located in a highly flexible part
of the enzyme. Topoisomerase II
mutant enzymes unable to dimerize
via the C-terminal primary dimerization regions due to lack of one of
the defined dimerization regions can still be forced to dimerize if DNA
and an ATP analog are added to the reaction mixture. The result
indicates that secondary interactions occur by ATP analog-mediated
clamp closing when the subunits are brought together on DNA.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and II
,
existing in either a homo- or heterodimeric configuration (17-19). The
dimeric nature of topoisomerase II is essential to enzyme function.
Thus, during the catalytic cycle of the enzyme, it introduces a
transient double-strand break into the DNA backbone, where the subunits
become covalently linked to the 5'-ends of the respective DNA strands
through O4-phosphotyrosine bonds. A second DNA duplex is
then transported through the cleaved DNA before it is finally
religated (1, 20, 21).
have demonstrated a dimeric nature of
these enzymes (24, 25). Despite the strong evidence in favor of a
dimeric structure of eukaryotic topoisomerase II, biochemical data on a
mapping of the exact regions involved in subunit interaction are still lacking.
revealed the presence of a leucine zipper (26), a motif that has been
shown to selectively direct homo-and heterodimerization of proteins by
forming a coiled coil structure, and it was suggested that
topoisomerase II dimerization could be mediated through this motif. The
importance of the leucine zipper in topoisomerase II dimerization has,
however, been questioned by the absence of a similar motif in human
topoisomerase II
(27), as well as by results obtained by Kroll
et al. (28), showing that disruption of the leucine zipper
did not have any effect on topoisomerase II dimerization. The same
group detected by use of topoisomerase II
fragments in far Western
blotting a region covering amino acids 951-1042 to constitute a
minimal subunit association region, whereas maximal homodimerization
required sequences C-terminal to position 1042 (29). Similar, another
study, using a small human topoisomerase II
peptide with the ability
to adopt a coiled coil structure, has demonstrated that this peptide,
covering amino acids 1013-1056, forms a stable homodimer in solution
(30).
using two biochemical approaches based on metal ion affinity chromatography and
immunoprecipitation. The defined sequences are located in the
C-terminal region of the enzyme and correspond to the interaction
domains discovered in yeast topoisomerase II from crystallization of
the central fragment of the yeast enzyme. A further investigation of
human topoisomerase II
mutant enzymes lacking the primary C-terminal dimerization region has shown that such enzymes are still capable of
dimerization via secondary dimerization regions if DNA and an ATP
analog are present.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
ura3 trp1 leu2 pep4:: HIS3 prb1 can1) and
BJ201 (MAT
ura3 trp1 leu2 pep4:: HIS3 prb1 can1 top2::TRP1) were used for expression of topoisomerase II
constructs. Plasmids pBY105 and pBY106, which contain the yeast triose
phosphate isomerase promoter inserted into the LEU2/ARS-CEN plasmid
pRS315 and the URA3/ARS-CEN plasmid pRS316 (32), respectively, were used as backbone for introduction of h
C1121, h
C1233, h1121-12, and wild-type TOP2 cDNAs into Saccharomyces
cerevisiae. Plasmid pYX212 (purchased from R&D Systems) containing
the yeast triose phosphate isomerase promoter and the 2-µm origin was
used as backbone for introduction of the cDNA constructs
h
1053-1069 and h
1124-1143 into S. cerevisiae.
Construction of the plasmids pHT300, h
C1121, h
C1233, and h1121-12
is described in Ref. 33. Construction of h
1053-1069 was carried out
using the 5' polymerase chain reaction primer
5'-TGGCTCCTAGGAATGCTTGGTGCTGAATCTGCTAAACTGAATAATCAGGCTCGCTTTAAAGAATTAATTAAAGTTC-3' outlooping the region between amino acids 1053 and 1069 and
having the topoisomerase II AvrII site at the 5'-end and the 3' primer 5'-GGACTCTTTCTTTTTAATGTG-3' having the PstI site at the
3'-end. The resulting AvrII-PstI fragment was subsequently
used to substitute the normal AvrII-PstI fragment present in
topoisomerase II. Construction of h
1124-1143 was carried out
substituting an XhoI-PstI fragment of h1121-2
(33) by a duplex made from the two oligonucleotides 5'-TCGAGCCAACCTGCA-3' and 5'-GGTTGGC-3' and having 5' XhoI
and 3' PstI overhangs. All constructs have been sequenced to
verify the introduced mutations.
mutants were detected by the mouse monoclonal
antibody MYC1-9E10.2 (diluted 1:500), purchased from Genosys. Untagged
human topoisomerase II versions were recognized by the
anti-topoisomerase II
antibody CRB (Genosys) raised against the
C-terminal peptide (RAKKPIKYLEESDEDLF) of the wild-type human
topoisomerase II
enzyme (diluted 1:5000). For immunostaining,
samples collected from the Ni2+ column were subjected to
SDS-PAGE1 on 8.5%
polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher & Schüll, 0.45 µm), and immunostaining was carried out according to the ECL protocol (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies were used as secondary
antibodies (Jackson Immunochemicals). For studies of secondary
dimerization, immunostaining of immunoprecipitated material was
performed using the penta-His antibody (Qiagen).
was carried out using Dynabeads-280 sheep
anti-rabbit IgG (Dynal) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Briefly, 50 µl of beads were incubated with the anti-topoisomerase
II
antibody CRB (2 µg) overnight followed by extensive washing
with phosphate-buffered saline buffer (1 mM
NaH2PO4, 5 mM
Na2HPO4, 140 mM NaCl, 0.1% bovine serum albumin). The beads were then incubated with 500 µl of yeast extract containing the different mutated topoisomerase II enzymes for
2-4 h at 4 °C with gentle shaking. Following extensive wash, 60 µl of Laemmli loading buffer was added, and the samples were boiled
for 2-5 min before being loaded onto 8% SDS protein gels. Immunostaining was carried out with the MYC1-9E10.2 antibody. Immunoprecipitation using partly purified topoisomerase II
mutant enzymes for studies of secondary dimerization was performed using protein A-Sepharose. 250 mg of protein A-Sepharose was extensively washed in distilled water followed by three washes in
immunoprecipitation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 0.35%
Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl). The
Sepharose was finally dissolved in 5 ml of immunoprecipitation buffer.
For each immunoprecipitation reaction, 100 µl of Sepharose was coated
with 2 µg of anti-topoisomerase II
antibody (CRB) by incubation
overnight at 4 °C with gentle shaking. Coated Sepharose was next
washed in immunoprecipitation buffer and used for immunoprecipitation by adding the h
1053-1069 enzyme. Following incubation for 1-2 h at
4 °C with gently shaking, the h
C1121 mutant enzyme was added either alone or together with DNA (28-mer duplex containing a strong
topoisomerase II recognition sequence (8)) and/or an ATP analog
(AMP-PNP, Roche Molecular Biochemicals; final concentration, 500 µM), and incubation was continued for 1-2 h before
precipitation by centrifugation at 5000 rpm. The NaCl concentration was
throughout the immunoprecipitation reaction kept at 100 mM.
To avoid unspecific interaction, the precipitated material was washed
four times in immunoprecipitation buffer supplemented with 1 M NaCl and 0.1% SDS and one time in 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. The pellet was further prepared for SDS-PAGE as
described above.
mutant enzymes was tested by in vitro
decatenation of kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) using yeast extract
overexpressing the topoisomerase II enzyme of interest. Extract was
incubated with 300 ng of kDNA in 1 mM ATP, 5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM
EDTA, 50 mM bis-Tris-propane (pH 8), 120 mM
potassium glutamate in a total volume of 20 µl. The samples were
incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and subsequently subjected to
electrophoresis on a 0.7% agarose gel. The contribution of the
endogenous yeast topoisomerase II enzyme to decatenation is negligible,
as no decatenation activity was seen in yeast extracts when
overexpression of the human topoisomerase II
enzymes was omitted.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Subunits--
In eukaryotic topoisomerase II, subunit dimerization is
a key process that is essential for the function of this highly complex enzyme. To map the regions that participate in dimerization in human
topoisomerase II
, we have taken a biochemical approach employing a
previously developed protein-protein interaction assay, which takes
advantage of the affinity of metal ions for histidine-containing proteins (19). The assay involves coexpression in yeast of two versions
of topoisomerase II
, one of which is His-tagged, followed by
analysis of the extract by metal ion affinity chromatography. The
strategy behind the assay is that an untagged topoisomerase II enzyme
will be retained on a Ni2+ column only if it has interacted
with a His-tagged version. A positive interaction can afterward be
visualized if the Ni2+ column fractions are examined by immunostaining.
mutant enzyme truncated at residue 1233 (h
C1233) and fused at
its C-terminal end to a bicomposite tag consisting of a hexahistidine
tail, and a c-Myc epitope was expressed in the yeast strain BJ201.
Crude extract was subjected to metal ion affinity chromatography under
highly stringent conditions, and samples of the eluted material were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Immunostaining with anti-c-Myc antibody
demonstrated the presence of the histidine-tagged h
C1233
topoisomerase II
mutant in the elution profile (Fig. 1, top panel). In contrast,
when an untagged version of wild-type human topoisomerase II
was
analyzed in the dimerization assay, it exhibited no detectable affinity
for binding to the nickel column, as evident from the immunostain shown
in Fig. 1 (bottom panel), in which the enzyme is visualized
by the anti-topoisomerase II
antibody. The assay is thus highly
specific for topoisomerase II enzymes containing a hexahistidine tag,
and the method therefore provides a powerful tool to investigate
possible interactions between tagged and untagged topoisomerase II
subunits.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Metal ion affinity chromatography
specifically traps histidine-containing versions of human DNA
topoisomerase II
. Immunostainings of
column fractions from experiments in which extracts from yeast cells
expressing either the His-c-Myc-tagged h
C1233 topoisomerase II
mutant (top panel) or the untagged wild-type human
topoisomerase II
(bottom panel) were subjected to metal
ion affinity chromatography. Collected fractions were analyzed by 8.5%
SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with the anti-c-Myc antibody
(top panel) or the anti-topoisomerase II
antibody
recognizing a C-terminal epitope in human topoisomerase II
(bottom panel). Fractions are indicated above the
immunostainings. Undiluted and 2- and 5-fold diluted extracts are
shown. The imidazole gradient used in the elution step ranges from 20 to 1000 mM as indicated. The majority of histidine-tagged
human topoisomerase II
was eluted at approximately 120 mM imidazole.
indicates the position of the wild-type
human topoisomerase II
enzyme.
in
Subunit Dimerization--
Several biochemical studies have implied an
important role for the C-terminal region of eukaryotic topoisomerase II
in mediating subunit interaction (30, 33, 35, 36), although direct biochemical evidence is still lacking. As an initial step to map the
dimerization region of human topoisomerase II
, extracts from yeast
cells coexpressing untagged wild-type human topoisomerase II
and a
His- and c-Myc-tagged C-terminal truncation mutant of the enzyme
deleted at either amino acid 1233 or 1121 were analyzed in the described dimerization assay (Fig. 2 and Table
I). When the wild-type enzyme was
expressed together with h
C1233, the anti-c-Myc antibody
identified h
C1233 as a constituent of the column eluate, as
expected. The wild-type form of human topoisomerase II
was retained
on the column as well and eluted in the same fractions as the truncated
form, as demonstrated by staining with the anti-topoisomerase II
antibody (Fig. 2, top panel). It has previously been shown
that under the conditions employed, unspecific interaction, as well as
multimerization, does not occur at least to a detectable level between
topoisomerase II dimers (19). The coexistence of the truncated and
wild-type forms in the elution profile therefore can only be a result
of an interaction between the two different subunits, demonstrating
that h
C1233 still carries the region essential for dimerization.
When extract from yeast cells coexpressing wild-type human
topoisomerase II
and the C-terminal truncation mutant deleted at
residue 1121 (h
C1121) was analyzed in the dimerization assay, only
the tagged h
C1121 mutant was eluted (Fig. 2, bottom
panel). The h
C1121 enzyme is therefore unable to
participate in a heterodimeric configuration, suggesting that the
region spanning residues 1121-1233 in human topoisomerase II
has an
important role in directing subunit interaction. However, the obtained
result does not rule out the possibility that h
C1121 is able to form
homodimers. Furthermore, the possibility cannot be excluded that the
observed lack of heterodimerization is caused by an altered or
destroyed folding of the h
C1121 enzyme.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Regions involved in subunit interaction are
located in the C-terminal domain of human topoisomerase
II
. Extract prepared from yeast cells
co-expressing a His-tagged C-terminal truncated version and an untagged
wild-type form of human topoisomerase II
was analyzed by
immunostaining following metal ion affinity chromatography. Top
panel, extract contains the His-tagged h
C1233 truncation mutant
in addition to the wild-type enzyme. Bottom panel, extract
contains the His-tagged h
C1121 truncation mutant and the wild-type
enzyme. In both cases, immunostaining was performed with a combination
of the anti-c-Myc and anti-topoisomerase II
antibodies. Column
fractions are indicated above the immunostainings. Although h
C1121
gives a strong signal in the eluted material, the enzyme gives only a
weak signal in the extract due to a relatively low expression of this
truncated enzyme.
Analysis of C-terminal mutants of human topoisomerase II
constructs
employed. The names of the constructs are indicated to the left, where
the numbers refer to amino acid residues in topoisomerase II. wt-yTOPII
and wt-hTOPII illustrate wild-type yeast and human topoisomerase II
,
respectively. C-terminal truncation mutants of human topoisomerase
II
are denoted by h
C followed by a number reflecting the
truncation position. Mutant h1121-12 contains a 12-amino acid linker,
indicated as a solid bar, inserted at amino acid position 1121. Constructs with internal deletions are illustrated as h
followed by
numbers indicating the deleted amino acids. The enzymes are divided
into three major domains, where the grey box represents the N-terminal
ATPase domain, the open box depicts the central cleavage/religation
domain, and the hatched box illustrates the divergent C-terminal
region. The crystallized fragment of yeast topoisomerase II is
indicated by the black line below the schematic representation of
S. cerevisiae topoisomerase II. The two minor dimerization
regions in yeast topoisomerase II and human topoisomerase II
are
shown as black vertical lines. Deletion of one or both of these primary
dimerization regions in human topoisomerase II
is indicated by
and a replacement of the black line with a grey line. Constructs fused
to a bicomposite tag consisting of the c-Myc epitope, and a
hexahistidine tail is marked with
c-Myc-His6. The abilities
of all constructs to mediate dimerization, to complement mitotic growth
of the yeast strain BJ201, and to decatenate kinetoplast DNA are
indicated by + and
signs. nd, not
determined.
Are Essential for Subunit Interaction--
The interpretation of
the results obtained with the C-terminal truncated topoisomerase II
enzymes is that a region residing between amino acids 1121 and 1233 is
required for subunit interaction in human topoisomerase II
. A
further dissection of the dimerization region(s) was performed based on
information derived from the crystallization of a 92-kDa central
fragment of yeast topoisomerase II (31). As evident from the crystal
structure a major dimerization interface is present in the C-terminal
region of the yeast enzyme involving residues 1031-1046 and
1114-1130. Because dimerization is a highly conserved feature of
eukaryotic topoisomerase II, it is likely that subunit contacts will be
mediated by corresponding regions in topoisomerase II enzymes of
different eukaryotic origin. Therefore, a human topoisomerase II
mutant was first constructed carrying a deletion of amino acids
1124-1143 (h
1124-1143) equivalent to the most C-terminal
dimerization region observed in the crystal structure of yeast
topoisomerase II (residues 1114-1130). This mutant was coexpressed in
yeast together with the histidine-tagged, truncated form of human
topoisomerase II
, h
C1233, which still contains the potential to
dimerize. In the experiment, h
C1233 was preferred to the wild-type
enzyme, as this mutant can easily be distinguished from the deletion
mutant upon SDS-PAGE due to its smaller size. Analysis of the crude
yeast extract in the dimerization assay revealed that no heterodimer
formation takes place between h
C1233 and the deletion mutant
h
1124-1143 (Fig. 3, top
panel), because only the h
C1233 enzyme was retained on the
column. The result strongly suggests that the deletion mutant no longer
contains the region required for subunit interaction. This is further
supported by a failure of h
1124-1143 to sustain mitotic growth of
the top2 deletion strain BJ201, as well as an inability of the mutant
enzyme to decatenate kinetoplast DNA, demonstrating that h
1124-1143 lacks a feature necessary for enzymatic activity (Table I).

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Dissection of the specific subdomains
important for dimerization in human topoisomerase
II
. Immunostainings of column fractions
from experiments in which extracts from cells expressing the
His-tagged, truncated h
C1233 mutant enzyme and either the untagged
deletion mutant h
1124-1143 (top panel), the untagged
deletion mutant h
1053-1069 (middle panel), or the
untagged linker insertion mutant h1121-12 (bottom panel)
were subjected to metal ion affinity chromatography. In all cases,
samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting using a
combination of the anti-c-Myc and anti-topoisomerase II
antibody.
Fractions are indicated above the immunostainings.
C1121 mutant (Fig. 2). In contrast to this severely
C-terminal truncated mutant, the deletion mutant only lacks 20 amino
acids, and it is highly unlikely that this deletion would obstruct the
overall tertiary conformation of the enzyme. Therefore, the
dimerization inability of h
C1121 is most probably due to lack of a
region essential for subunit interaction rather than incorrect folding.
, a second deletion mutant, deleted from amino acid 1053 to 1069, was constructed and tested in the dimerization assay together with
h
C1233. From the immunostain shown in Fig. 3 (middle
panel), it is seen that only the h
C1233 enzyme was retained on
the column, revealing that the h
1053-1069 deletion mutant had also
lost its dimerization ability. In correlation with these data, deletion
of residues 1053-1069 abolished the ability of the deletion mutant to
complement the top2 null strain BJ201 (Table I). From these
observations, we conclude that the region from amino acid 1053 to 1069 plays an essential role in dimerization. Thus, like in the yeast
enzyme, two minor dimerization regions exist in the C-terminal end of
human topoisomerase II
, where lack of either one of these regions or
both (Fig. 3 and Table I) is detrimental for dimerization. Our
biochemical data therefore leads support to the structural information
derived from the crystal structure. Moreover, the overall organization of subunit contacts seems to be conserved from yeast to human.
is a prerequisite for
dimer formation, we have investigated the dimerization potential of a
mutant containing a linker inserted at position 1121. In this mutant, a
12-amino acid linker including two proline residues further separates
the two subdomains involved in dimerization (33). The linker mutant
h1121-12 was tested for its ability to interact with h
C1233 in the
dimerization assay (Fig. 3, bottom panel; Table
I). Immunostaining with the anti-topoisomerase II
antibody together
with the anti-c-Myc antibody identifies two distinct bands of the
appropriate sizes in the elution profile (Fig. 3, bottom
panel). Because this result demonstrates that insertion of
an extensive linker between the two dimerization regions is tolerated
without functional consequences on the dimerization ability of the
enzyme, a correct positioning of the two minor dimerization domains is
not required for proper subunit interaction. It cannot be ruled out
that the introduced peptide in the linker insertion mutant loops out in
a folded conformation due to the presence of two proline residues,
thereby conserving the spacing between the two dimerization regions.
However, insertion of either two or seven amino acids, designed not to
permit outlooping, at position 1121 in human topoisomerase II
, does
not affect the ability of the enzyme to complement the top2 deletion
strain BJ201 (33), demonstrating that these mutant enzymes are still in
a dimeric configuration (data not shown). Thus, dimerization of human
topoisomerase II
is resistant to alterations in the length separating the two dimerization regions, suggesting a more flexible structure of the C-terminal part of the enzyme.
are identical to the regions through which this
isoform interacts with the
isoform, the untagged human
topoisomerase II
mutant h
1053-1069 was coexpressed in yeast
together with a histidine-tagged wild-type version of human topoisomerase II
. Analysis of the extract in the dimerization assay
demonstrates that the tagged topoisomerase II
enzyme is unable to
retain the mutated human topoisomerase II
enzyme on the column (data
not shown). Thus, a topoisomerase II
mutant deleted in one of the
primary dimerization regions is deficient in both homo- and
heterodimerization, suggesting that the
isoform can interact with
either
or
through the same region(s).
cDNA, it has been postulated that a potential
leucine zipper motif spanning residues 994-1021 plays a key role in
mediating subunit interaction (26). However, point mutations disrupting
the leucine repeat sequence in the enzyme does not influence
dimerization (28), which is in accordance with our demonstration of a
more C-terminal localization of the dimerization regions. Also, a
leucine zipper motif is lacking in the human topoisomerase II
isoform (27), which together with the natural occurrence of
/
heterodimers in human cells further rules out the importance of the
leucine zipper in human topoisomerase II dimerization (19).
fragments defined a minimal region between residues 951 and 1042 to be required for homodimerization, whereas amino acids C-terminal to
position 1042 were found to be necessary for maximal subunit
interaction (29). In addition, a peptide fragment covering amino acids
1013-1056 in the human
enzyme was found to form stable dimeric
coiled-coil structures, indicating that this small fragment possesses
the structural requirements needed for dimerization (30). These
observations, however, are not completely compatible with the
structural data derived from the crystallization of yeast topoisomerase
II and with our biochemical dimerization data on human topoisomerase
II
, where the identified interaction regions are found more
C-terminally. The discrepancy in these results might be due to use of
only small peptide fragments of human topoisomerase II
in the two
former in vitro studies. It is possible that such fragments
may not be folded in the same way and thereby not exposed when present
in the full-length enzyme. Furthermore, in the study by Kroll (29), the
methods employed to detect dimerization between topoisomerase II
fragments involved conditions of low stringency such as 50 mM NaCl. In contrast, the in vivo dimerization
assay applied in our study is carried out in the presence of 1 M NaCl to avoid unspecific interactions as well as
topoisomerase II multimerization. It cannot be excluded that our assay
might be too stringent to detect weak interactions between subunits of
topoisomerase II, which could be identified in the above described
in vitro studies. Given that the regions observed from the
in vitro experiments locate in the vicinity of the
dimerization domains mapped in our study and to those in the yeast
crystal, it is likely that they play an important role in stabilizing
subunit interaction in human topoisomerase II
.
--
To confirm
the above data and to provide an alternative line of evidence for the
localization of the two dimerization domains in human topoisomerase
II
, immunoprecipitation experiments were carried out on
topoisomerase II from crude yeast extract. For this purpose, extract
was prepared from cells expressing the combination of two topoisomerase
II enzymes previously tested in the dimerization assay. One of the
components is either one of the His-c-Myc-tagged C-terminally truncated
enzymes, h
C1233 or h
C1121, and the other component is the
wild-type enzyme, one of the deletion mutants, h
1053-1069 and
h
1124-1143, or the linker insertion mutant h1121-12. In all cases,
the extract was incubated with Dynabeads previously coated with the
anti-topoisomerase II
antibody recognizing the 15 outermost
C-terminal residues in human topoisomerase II
. If both topoisomerase
II enzymes present in the extract contain the regions involved in
subunit interaction, the enzymes recognized by the antibody coupled to
the beads will allow co-immunoprecipitation of the truncated
topoisomerase II enzyme. The presence of the truncation mutant in the
immunoprecipitated material can subsequently be visualized by
immunostaining using the c-Myc antibody. As shown in Fig.
4, the truncated h
C1233 mutant enzyme
co-precipitates with wild-type human topoisomerase II
(lane
1). When further amino acids are deleted from the C-terminal
region to position 1121, the truncated form is no longer precipitated
by the wild-type enzyme, indicating a loss of dimerization (lane
2). However, the linker insertion mutant h1121-12 is able to
precipitate the h
C1233 mutant (lane 3), verifying that
dimerization is not abolished by insertion of 12 amino acids between
the two proposed minor dimerization regions. Finally, neither the
h
1053-1069 nor the h
1124-1143 deletion mutant contains the
capacity to bring down the truncated h
C1233 mutant (lanes
4 and 5), so these deletion mutants are deficient in
mediating subunit interaction. The immunoprecipitation experiments were carried out in the presence of 1 M NaCl,
providing high stringency and thereby eliminating unspecific
interaction or multimerization between the different topoisomerase II
enzymes. Moreover, the anti-topoisomerase II
antibody used for
immunoprecipitation is highly specific (19), and immunoprecipitation
performed with rabbit preimmune serum provides an additional control
(lane 6). Thus, the immunoprecipitation data are in
correlation with the results obtained from the dimerization assay.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Verification of C-terminally located
subdomains involved in human DNA topoisomerase II
dimerization. Immunostaining of material precipitated using
magnetic beads coated with anti-topoisomerase II
antibodies on
extracts from cells expressing h
C1233 together with either wild-type
human topoisomerase II
(lane1), h1121-12 (lane
3), h
1053-1069 (lane 4), or h
1124-1143
(lane 5) or from cells expressing h
C1121 together with
wild-type human topoisomerase II
(lane 2). Lane
6, rabbit preimmune serum used in the precipitation reaction with
extract similar to that in lane 1. Lane 7, h
C1233 mutant enzyme serving as a size marker. The precipitated
material was analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE prior to visualization of the
c-Myc-tagged C-terminally truncated h
C1233 or h
C1121 enzymes by
the anti-c-Myc antibody.
Mutant Enzymes
Lacking the Primary Dimerization Region--
Biochemical studies by
Wang and co-workers (39-41) have demonstrated that topoisomerase II
operates as an ATP modulated protein clamp. Based on this work as well
as information obtained from studies of the homologous gyrase enzyme, a
model has been presented in which an ATP-dependent
dimerization region exists in the far N-terminal part of eukaryotic
topoisomerase II besides the primary dimerization regions in the
C-terminal end. Permanent clamp closure was only detected in the
presence of an ATP analog, indicating that ATP binding results in clamp
closing, whereas ATP hydrolysis causes enzyme turnover and reopening of
the clamp. Another N-terminal interaction face has been suggested from
elucidation of the crystal structure of the yeast enzyme, where also
this interaction is believed to be ATP-dependent, as well
as DNA-dependent (31). Electron microscopy studies have
demonstrated that a similar overall conformation, including several
dimerization faces, is present in the human topoisomerase II
enzyme
(25).
enzymes lacking the primary
C-terminal dimerization regions are able to dimerize in the presence of
an ATP analog due to the existence of a secondary dimerization
region(s), an immunoprecipitation experiment was performed using
h
1053-1069 and h
C1121, each lacking one of the C-terminal
dimerization regions (Fig. 5). In the
immunoprecipitation reactions the h
1053-1069 enzyme was incubated
with protein A-Sepharose coated with the anti-topoisomerase II
antibody recognizing the outermost C-terminal region of topoisomerase
II
before h
C1121 was added. Immunoprecipitation was performed in
the absence or in the presence of an ATP analog and/or DNA to study the
effect of these molecules on the ability of h
C1121 to dimerize with h
1053-1069 through secondary dimerization regions. As seen from the
immunostaining in Fig. 5, secondary dimerization between the two mutant
enzymes only takes place if both DNA and an ATP analog is present
(lane 1). Precipitation in the presence of ATP analog (lane 2) or DNA (lane 3) alone or in the absence
of these cofactors (lane 4) can only be revealed after
strong overexposure of the film presented in Fig. 5 and probably
relates to unspecific protein-protein interactions. The fact that
neither DNA nor the ATP analog by itself is able to promote
dimerization suggests a model in which DNA is required to bring the two
different enzyme subunits together, after which, the ATP analog, by its
ability to stably close the N-terminal clamp between the two protein
partners, ensures continuous dimerization. The absence of a
considerable precipitation in the presence of an ATP analog alone
suggests that the two mutant enzymes are not directly in contact with
each other in the absence of DNA, because the ATP analog otherwise
would be expected to make this interaction stable. In the case in which
only DNA is present, the protein partners should be in contact
according to the described model, but as the precipitated material is
washed in 1 M NaCl prior to SDS-PAGE, the complex will
dissociate from the DNA, and apparently, the secondary dimerization is
too weak to withstand this high salt concentration in the absence of an
ATP analog. Thus, our results are consistent with a DNA requirement for
secondary dimerization of human topoisomerase II
enzymes lacking the
primary C-terminal dimerization region, in which it is so far unknown whether DNA binding per se is sufficient or if DNA cleavage
is required. Alternatively, our results can be explained by
DNA-independent dimerization followed by subunit exchange. In this
case, the two C-terminal topoisomerase II
mutant enzymes exist as
homodimers already at the time of purification, and heterodimerization
is only occurring as a result of subunit exchange. If this holds true,
our results indicate that a high level of DNA-dependent subunit exchange occurs when h
C1121 is added to h
1153-1169
coupled to protein A-Sepharose. However, we have earlier demonstrated that subunit exchange does not occur to a detectable level with human
topoisomerase II
(19), which makes this explanation less favorable.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
DNA and ATP analog are required for secondary
dimerization in topoisomerase II
lacking the
C-terminal primary dimerization region. Immunostaining of
h
C1121 co-precipitated by h
1053-1069 coupled to protein
A-Sepharose by the anti-topoisomerase II
antibody. Precipitation was
performed in the presence of ATP analog and 28-mer duplex DNA
(lane 1), ATP analog alone (lane 2), or 28-mer
duplex DNA alone (lane 3) or in the absence of any
co-factors (lane 4). Precipitated material was analyzed by
SDS-PAGE after an extensive wash in 1 M NaCl, and
immunostaining was performed using the Penta-His antibody recognizing
both the precipitated h
1053-1069 and the co-precipitated h
C1121.
The two enzyme constructs are illustrated below the Western blot. The
dimerization regions are shown as black vertical lines, and
deletion of one of these regions is indicated by
and replacement of
the black line with a gray line.
fragment covering amino acids
1-435. By cross-linking experiments, the fragment was shown to be in a
dimer configuration in the absence of DNA, no matter whether an ATP
analog or ATP was present or not. The result suggests that secondary
dimerization regions present in the N-terminal fragment allow stable
interaction under the low salt conditions used in the experiment. The
discrepancy between the results obtained by Maxwell and co-workers (42)
and our results, in which DNA is fully required to obtain secondary
dimerization, might be caused by the use of very different enzyme
fragments in the two experiments. Thus, with the almost full-length
enzymes used in our experiments, other regions in the enzymes that are absent in the N-terminal peptide might influence the secondary dimerization of the N-terminal regions. Furthermore, our precipitated material was washed in 1 M NaCl before analysis, which will
disrupt weak protein interactions, but as discussed above, if the
mutant enzymes dimerize in the absence of DNA, we would have expected to see the same amount of precipitation of h
C1121 whenever an ATP
analog was added, no matter whether DNA is present or not.
spanning
residues 1053-1069 and 1124-1143, each of which is essential for
homodimerization of the enzyme. The overall C-terminal dimerization
structure is conserved from yeast to human, although the regions
involved are located in a highly flexible domain of the enzyme. In our
study, deleting part of the C-terminal interaction region abolished the
dimerization ability of the enzyme, indicating that if secondary
interfaces exist in the protein in the absence of ATP analogs, they are
not sufficient to keep the enzyme in a dimeric form under the
conditions employed here or, alternatively, that the N-terminal
interactions are dependent on a functional C-terminal interaction.
However, enzymes lacking the C-terminal dimerization regions can still
be brought together if DNA is present. Such dimers are highly unstable
in the absence of ATP analogs that ensure clamp closing of the
N-terminal domain of the enzyme. Utilization of the biochemical
dimerization assay described in this study may allow a dissection of
the potential ATP-dependent secondary dimerization regions
in human topoisomerase II
. A complete knowledge on the dimerization
faces will aid the further elucidation of the structural organization
of topoisomerase II
and thereby provide valuable information on the
catalytic mechanism of this complex enzyme.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Dr. Kent Christiansen and Yong Wang for valuable discussions and to Kirsten Andersen for skillful technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Danish Cancer Society Grants 95-100-40 and 97-100-32, the Danish Center for Genome Research, the Danish Center for Molecular Gerontology, the Danish Center for Respiratory Adaptation, and the Thaysen Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: The Scripps Research Institute, Dept. of
Molecular Biology, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla,
CA 92037.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 45-89422600; Fax: 45-89-422612; E-mail: aha@mbio.aau.dk.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviation used is: PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Osheroff, N. (1989) Pharmacol. Ther. 41, 223-241[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Vosberg, H. P. (1985) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 114, 19-102[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Nelson, W. G., Liu, L. F., and Coffey, D. S. (1986) Nature 322, 187-189[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Snapka, R. M.,
Powelson, M. A.,
and Strayer, J. M.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
515-521 |
| 5. |
Holm, C.,
Stearns, T.,
and Botstein, D.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
159-168 |
| 6. | Holm, C., Goto, T., Wang, J. C., and Botstein, D. (1985) Cell 41, 553-563[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Rose, D., Thomas, W., and Holm, C. (1990) Cell 60, 1009-1017[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Andersen, A. H.,
Sorensen, B. S.,
Christiansen, K.,
Svejstrup, J. Q.,
Lund, K.,
and Westergaard, O.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
9203-9210 |
| 9. |
Bae, Y. S.,
Kawasaki, I.,
Ikeda, H.,
and Liu, L. F.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
2076-2080 |
| 10. |
Gale, K. C.,
and Osheroff, N.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
12090-12097 |
| 11. | Kim, R. A., and Wang, J. C. (1989) Cell 57, 975-985[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Schmidt, V. K., Sorensen, B. S., Sorensen, H. V., Alsner, J., and Westergaard, O. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 241, 18-25[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Gasser, S. M., Laroche, T., Falquet, J., Boy de la Tour, E., and Laemmli, U. K. (1986) J. Mol. Biol. 188, 613-629[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Adachi, Y., Kas, E., and Laemmli, U. K. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 3997-4006[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Adachi, Y., Luke, M., and Laemmli, U. K. (1991) Cell 64, 137-148[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Roberge, M.,
Th'ng, J.,
Hamaguchi, J.,
and Bradbury, E. M.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
1753-1762 |
| 17. | Drake, F. H., Hofmann, G. A., Bartus, H. F., Mattern, M. R., Crooke, S. T., and Mirabelli, C. K. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 8154-8160[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Shelton, E. R.,
Osheroff, N.,
and Brutlag, D. L.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
9530-9535 |
| 19. |
Biersack, H.,
Jensen, S.,
Gromova, I.,
Nielsen, I. S.,
Westergaard, O.,
and Andersen, A. H.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
8288-8293 |
| 20. |
Liu, L. F.,
Rowe, T. C.,
Yang, L.,
Tewey, K. M.,
and Chen, G. L.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
15365-15370 |
| 21. | Andersen, A. H., Christiansen, K., Zechiedrich, E. L., Jensen, P. S., Osheroff, N., and Westergaard, O. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 6237-6244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Goto, T.,
Laipis, P.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
10422-10429 |
| 23. | Lindsley, J. E., and Wang, J. C. (1993) Nature 361, 749-750[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Berger, J. M., and Wang, J. C. (1996) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 84-90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Schultz, P.,
Olland, S.,
Oudet, P.,
and Hancock, R.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5936-5940 |
| 26. | Zwelling, L. A., and Perry, W. M. (1989) Mol. Endocrinol. 3, 603-604[Abstract] |
| 27. | Austin, C. A., Sng, J. H., Patel, S., and Fisher, L. M. (1993) Biochim.Biophys. Acta 1172, 283-291[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Kroll, D. J., Sullivan, D. M., Gutierrez Hartmann, A., and Hoeffler, J. P. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 305-318[Abstract] |
| 29. | Kroll, D. J. (1997) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 345, 175-184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Frere, V.,
Sourgen, F.,
Monnot, M.,
Troalen, F.,
and Fermandjian, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem
270,
17502-17507 |
| 31. | Berger, J. M., Gamblin, S. J., Harrison, S. C., and Wang, J. C. (1996) Nature 379, 225-232[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Sikorski, R. S.,
and Hieter, P.
(1989)
Genetics
122,
19-27 |
| 33. | Jensen, S., Andersen, A. H., Kjeldsen, E., Biersack, H., Olsen, E. H., Andersen, T. B., Westergaard, O., and Jakobsen, B. K. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3866-3877[Abstract] |
| 34. |
Ito, H.,
Fukuda, Y.,
Murata, K.,
and Kimura, A.
(1983)
J. Bacteriol.
153,
163-168 |
| 35. |
Caron, P. R.,
Watt, P.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
3197-3207 |
| 36. | Thomas, W., Spell, R. M., Ming, M. E., and Holm, C. (1991) Genetics 128, 703-716[Abstract] |
| 37. |
Wang, X.,
Watt, P. M.,
Louis, E. J.,
Borts, R. H.,
and Hickson, I. D.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
4791-4797 |
| 38. | Watt, P. M., Louis, E. J., Borts, R. H., and Hickson, I. D. (1995) Cell 81, 253-260[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Roca, J., and Wang, J. C. (1992) Cell 71, 833-840[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Roca, J., and Wang, J. C. (1994) Cell 77, 609-616[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
Roca, J.,
Berger, J. M.,
Harrison, S. C.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
4057-4062 |
| 42. | Gardiner, L. P., Roper, D. I., Hammonds, T. R., and Maxwell, A. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 16997-17004[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. Linka, A. C.G. Porter, A. Volkov, C. Mielke, F. Boege, and M. O. Christensen C-Terminal regions of topoisomerase II{alpha} and II{beta} determine isoform-specific functioning of the enzymes in vivo Nucleic Acids Res., June 28, 2007; 35(11): 3810 - 3822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||