JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franch, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gerdes, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Franch, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gerdes, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 37, 26572-26578, September 10, 1999


Ribonuclease III Processing of Coaxially Stacked RNA Helices*

Thomas FranchDagger , Thomas Thisted§, and Kenn GerdesDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Molecular Biology, Odense University, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark and the § Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The RNase III family of endoribonucleases participates in maturation and decay of cellular and viral transcripts by processing of double-stranded RNA. RNase III degradation is inherent to most antisense RNA-regulated gene systems in Escherichia coli. In the hok/sok system from plasmid R1, Sok antisense RNA targets the hok mRNA for RNase III-mediated degradation. An intermediate in the pairing reaction between Sok RNA and hok mRNA forms a three-way junction. A complex between a chimeric antisense RNA and hok mRNA that mimics the three-way junction was cleaved by RNase III both in vivo and in vitro. Footprinting using E117A RNase III binding to partially complementary RNAs showed protection of the 13 base pairs of interstrand duplex and of the bottom part of the transcriptional terminator hairpin of the antisense RNA. This suggests that the 13 base pairs of RNA duplex are coaxially stacked on the antisense RNA terminator stem-loop and that each stem forms a monomer half-site, allowing symmetrical binding of the RNase III dimer. This processing scheme shows an unanticipated diversity in RNase III substrates and may have a more general implication for RNA metabolism.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

RNase III of Escherichia coli (1) belongs to a family of double strand-specific endoribonucleases (2, 3), which have retained interspecies substrate cleavage specificity (4). This family of enzymes comprises both prokaryotic and eukaryotic members whose primary function is processing of ribosomal RNA precursors (4-6). However, substrates also include several mRNAs from E. coli, bacteriophages lambda  and T7 (2, 3), U5 small nuclear RNA (7), U2 small nuclear RNA (8), and a large subset of small nucleolar RNA precursors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (9, 10). Substrate recognition requires two helical turns of an A-form RNA helix, and processing occurs with a consensus 2-nucleotide, 3'-recessive, staggered cut creating 5'-phosphate and 3'-hydroxyl termini (11, 12). The E. coli RNase III holoenzyme is a homodimer of 52 kDa that binds dsRNA1 in a quasi-symmetrical fashion concentrical of the scissile phosphodiester bonds (13). RNase III binding is dependent on a conserved dsRNA-binding motif present in the C-terminal end that forms an alpha -beta -beta -beta -alpha fold (14). Binding of dsRNA is believed to occur primarily via non-electrostatic interactions with a helical arrangement of 2'-hydroxyl groups in the minor groove as described for the dsRNA-binding motif binding of the mammalian dsRNA-activated protein kinase, PKR (15). In addition, a lysine residue may be required for dsRNA binding, similar to what has been observed for the staufen protein from Drosophila (16) and PKR (17-19). Binding of the dsRBD of RNA-binding protein A from Xenopus laevis to dsRNA has shown that two regions of the dsRBD contact successive minor grooves on the same face of the double-stranded RNA helix, whereas a third region contacts the spanning major groove (20). However, the recent finding of binding sequence anti-determinants in dsRNA that abolish RNase III cleavage in vitro (21) emphasizes the subtleties of substrate recognition by RNase III and may explain why certain dsRNA sequences like the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 TAR RNA hairpin are inherently refractory to processing (4).

Complete or partial duplexes of >= 20 bp formed between antisense RNAs and their target RNAs are efficiently processed by RNase III (22-26). The hok (host cell killing) mRNA from the hok/sok (suppression of killing) system of plasmid R1 (27) exists in three forms with alternative configurations and translational capacities (28). Sok antisense RNA consists of an 11-nucleotide 5'-single-stranded tail that is responsible for the initial interaction with hok mRNA and a hairpin that functions as a Rho-independent transcriptional terminator (Fig. 1A). Sok RNA represses hok translation by forming a 63-bp duplex with hok mRNA (Fig. 1C). The duplex is cleaved by RNase III in vivo and in vitro (26). Since formation of RNA/RNA binding intermediates could be faster than the formation of a full duplex between Sok RNA and hok mRNA, inactivation of the target RNA could occur prior to complete duplex formation, as in the cases of several other antisense RNA-regulated gene systems (29). To test this, we constructed a chimeric antisense RNA (CA-RNA) consisting of the 13-nucleotide 5'-tail of Sok fused to the terminator hairpin of PndB, an antisense RNA from plasmid R483 that is homologous to Sok (Fig. 1B). CA-RNA forms a 13-base pair duplex with hok mRNA, thereby resulting in the generation of a three-way junction (Fig. 1D, left panel). This complex mimics the naturally occurring binding intermediate between hok mRNA and Sok antisense RNA (Fig. 1D, right panel). Surprisingly, CA-RNA was able to inhibit hok expression in vivo,2 thus questioning the actual mechanism of hok target inactivation by Sok RNA.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Primary and secondary structures of antisense RNAs and deduced RNA complexes. A and B, primary and secondary structures of Sok and chimeric antisense RNAs, respectively. Sok RNA sequence is shown in boldface, and the sequence from the Sok homologous PndB antisense RNA is shown in lightface. C, complete duplex formation (63 bp) between Sok RNA and hok mRNA. Initial RNase III cleavage sites at position 13/11 examined throughout this study are indicated. D, schematic comparison of the complex formed between CA-RNA and hok mRNA (left panel) with the metastable Sok RNA/hok mRNA pairing intermediate (right panel). CA-RNA (B) can only form a 13-base pair partial duplex with the hok mRNA and thus mimics the naturally occurring transient TWJ complex. hok/sok sequence is shown with boldface lines, and pnd sequence with lightface lines. The part of hok mRNA shown in D consists of the 38 nucleotides (nt) that form the antisense RNA target stem-loop. Arrows indicate the RNase III cleavage sites at position 13/11 in the hok/sok duplex examined throughout this study.

Here, we have compared the effect of Sok RNA and CA-RNA on hok mRNA metabolism in rnc+ and rnc- strains. Complexes between antisense and target RNAs that correspond to the RNA complexes observed in vivo were assayed for RNase III binding and processing in vitro. Intriguingly, all data support a model in which RNase III recognizes and cleaves coaxially stacked RNA helices.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Uniformly labeled RNAs ([alpha -32P]CTP or [alpha -3H]CTP) were synthesized using T7 RNA polymerase (Promega) and polymerase chain reaction-generated templates (30). 5'-32P-Labeled RNAs were prepared with alkaline phosphatase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), T4 kinase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and [gamma -32P]ATP using standard techniques (31). RNAs were purified as described (30).

Construction of Plasmids-- The hok-/sok+ and hok-/sok- constructs described previously (32) were inserted in the BamHI-EcoRI restriction sites of the low-copy number mini-R1 test plasmid pMH82 (KanR). Thus, pTF821(hok-/sok+) carries a hok/sok system with an amber codon in the hok gene, whereas pTF821(hok-/sok-) carries an additional point mutation that inactivates the sok promoter. These mutations do not influence the stability or processing patterns of hok mRNA (30).

The pTF322 to pTF324 plasmid series was constructed by polymerase chain reaction-generated fragments inserted into the EcoRI-BamHI restriction sites of pBR322 using the following primers: pTF322: T7-1 (5'-CGGGATCCTGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCGCTTGAGGCTTTCTGCCTCATG-3') and Hok5 (5'-CCCCGAATTCACAACATCAGCAAGGAGAAA-3') on a pPR633 template carrying a wild-type hok/sok system; pTF323: Hok5 and T7-AN1 (5'-CGGGATCCTGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCGCTTGAGGCTGTATGCCGAAAG-3') on a pTT33 template carrying a pnd-hok hybrid system2; and pTF324: T7-AN1 and Pnd611 (5'-CCCCGAATTCGCAAAGGCATTCGGCTGGAG-3') using pAN2 carrying a wild-type pnd system from plasmid R483.

Northern Transfer Analysis-- Northern analysis was carried out as described (26) using the W3110 (rnc+) and HT115 (rnc-) E. coli strains grown in LB broth supplemented with 50 µg/ml kanamycin and 100 µg/ml ampicillin for retainment of the mini-R1 test plasmid and pBR322 antisense RNA-donating plasmid, respectively. 10 µg/ml tetracycline was added to the HT115 strain.

Lead(II) Acetate Probing-- 5'-End-labeled CA-RNA or hok38 RNA was incubated either alone or in complex with an excess (1 pmol) of partner RNA in a buffer (50 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, and 50 mM KCl) supplemented with 5 µg of tRNA in a total reaction volume of 10 µl. Lead(II) acetate (2.5 µl) dissolved in H2O immediately prior to use was added to a final concentration of 0, 5, or 10 mM and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Reactions were quenched by addition of EDTA to a final concentration of 40 mM. The RNA was precipitated, washed twice, resuspended in formamide dye, and subsequently resolved on 15% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea and 1× Tris borate/EDTA.

RNA Cleavage Assay-- 5 nM RNA was incubated in the presence or absence of an 10-fold excess of various complementary partner RNAs in 1× TMK-glutamate buffer (20 mM Tris acetate, 10 mM magnesium acetate, and 200 mM potassium glutamate) supplemented with 1 mM dithiothreitol and 1 µg of tRNA in a reaction volume of 20 µl. 50 nM N-terminal His6-tagged RNase III was added, and samples were withdrawn to formamide dye on ice at the time points indicated and subsequently loaded on 5.5 or 15% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea and 0.5× Tris borate/EDTA.

Protein Purification-- RNase III and E117A RNase III, both carrying N-terminal His6 tags, were purified from strains W3110 and HT115, respectively, as described (33) with the following exceptions. A gene encoding wild-type N-terminal His6-tagged RNase III was cloned in the EcoRI-BamHI sites of pUHE24-2 (obtained from Herman Bujard, University of Heidelberg) by polymerase chain reaction using primers rnc-histagN (5'-CCCTTGAATTCATTAAAGAGGAGAAATTAACTATGCATCACCATCACCATCACAACCCCATCGTAATTAATCGGCTTCAACGG-3') and rnc-BamHI (5'-CCCTTTGGATCCCGATGCTCATTCCAGCTCCAGTTTTTTC-3'), resulting in pTF600.

The E117A amino acid substitution was introduced by double polymerase chain reaction using the above primers and rnc-E117A-1 (5'-CCGACACCGTCGCAGCATTAATTGG-3') and rnc-E117A-2 (5'-CCAATTAATGCTGCGACGGTGTCGG-3'), generating pTF601. LacI was expressed from the co-resident plasmid pMS421, which carries lacIq and a gene conferring spectinomycin resistance (34). Initial affinity purification was accomplished by protein binding to TALONTM resin in 1× binding buffer (4% (NH4)2SO4 and 30 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)). Three wash steps in 1× binding buffer were followed by a wash in 1× binding buffer supplemented with 5 mM imidazole as recommended by the manufacturer (CLONTECH). Proteins were eluted in 1 M NH4Cl with 150 mM imidazole and loaded directly onto a pre-equilibrated poly(I)·poly(C) AG column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as described (33). Eluted protein was dialyzed against 1× TMK-glutamate buffer supplemented with 1 mM dithiothreitol.

E117A RNase III Footprinting-- One nM 5'-32P-labeled CA-RNA alone or in complex with 10 nM 3H-labeled hok13 was incubated with 0, 1, or 2.5 µM E117A RNase III in 1× TMK-glutamate buffer supplemented with 1 mM dithiothreitol and 5 µg of tRNA in a 20-µl reaction volume at room temperature. 0.1 unit of cobra venom nuclease (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was added for 5 min, and reactions were quenched by addition of 80 µl of phenol. RNA samples were precipitated, washed, resuspended in formamide dye, and resolved on a 15% polyacrylamide gel containing M urea and 0.5× Tris borate/EDTA.

Cleavage Kinetics and Substrate Affinity Determinations-- Km and kcat calculations were made by a double-reciprocal plot of 1/V (initial velocity) versus 1/S (substrate concentration) as described (33). 7.5 nM N-terminal His6-tagged RNase III dimer was incubated with 62-1000 nM preformed complexes between 32P-labeled antisense RNA and equimolar 3H-labeled target RNA in a 10-µl reaction volume using TMK-glutamate buffer supplemented with 1 mM dithiothreitol (see above). Samples were quenched after 2 min by addition of formamide dye loading buffer. RNAs were resolved on a 15% polyacrylamide gel containing M urea and 0.5× Tris borate/EDTA.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In Vivo RNase III Processing of hok mRNA-- To test the effect of natural and artificial antisense RNAs on the level of hok mRNA in vivo, a hok/sok system with abolished Sok RNA expression was constructed and cloned into a low-copy number mini-R1 plasmid (pTF821). To avoid detrimental expression of the Hok toxin, this construct carries an amber stop codon mutation in the hok gene (hok-). Northern analysis showed that wild-type E. coli cells (strain W3110, rnc+) carrying pTF821 contain three hok mRNA species (Fig. 2, left panel, lane 2). We have shown previously that hok mRNA-1 and -2 are full-length mRNAs that are translationally inactive and bind Sok RNA inefficiently, whereas the third RNA is a 3'-truncated species (denoted Tr. in Fig. 2) that is translationally active and binds Sok RNA avidly (28). hok mRNA-2 is an RNase III cleavage product of RNA-1 (Fig. 2, compare left and right panels). This latter cleavage removes the 3'-terminal hairpin of RNA-1 and does not influence the analyses presented here (26).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Northern transfer analysis of hok mRNAs. Shown are the results from Northern transfer analysis of hok mRNAs in W3110 (rnc+; left panel) and HT115 (rnc-; right panel). The hok mRNAs were expressed from a mini-R1 plasmid carrying either hok-/sok+ (pTF820) (lane 1) or hok-/sok- (pTF821) (lanes 2-6) gene systems. The hok- and sok- genotypes denote an amber mutation in the hok gene preventing toxin expression and a mutation in the sok promoter that abolishes Sok RNA expression, respectively (32). Lane 3, the pBR322 control plasmid; lanes 4-6, wild-type Sok RNA (pTF322) and CA-RNA (pTF323) and PndB (pTF324) antisense RNAs produced in trans from pBR322-derived plasmids, respectively. Translationally inactive hok mRNA-1 and -2 as well as the active truncated (Tr.) hok mRNA are indicated. hok mRNA-2 is not produced in the rnc- strain.

Plasmid pTF820 is the isogenic sok+ derivative of pTF821 that produces wild-type Sok RNA in cis. Wild-type cells carrying pTF820 do not contain detectable amounts of the 3'-truncated mRNA due to its rapid interaction with Sok RNA and subsequent rapid cleavage by RNase III (Fig. 2, left panel, lane 1) (26). Consistent with this interpretation, the truncated RNA appears in cells devoid of RNase III (Fig. 2, right panel, lane 1).

We examined the effect of three antisense RNAs expressed in trans from pBR322-derived plasmids on the hok mRNA band pattern in rnc+ and rnc- cells (Fig. 2). The pBR322 control plasmid did not affect the hok mRNA band pattern (Fig. 2, left panel, lane 3). In trans expression of wild-type Sok RNA from pTF322 resulted in the disappearance of the truncated mRNA (Fig. 2, left panel, lane 4). The high level of Sok RNA production also resulted in a modest reduction in hok mRNA-1 and -2, presumably due to antisense RNA binding to hok mRNA during its synthesis (Fig. 2, left panel, lane 4). Interestingly, expression of CA-RNA also caused the disappearance of truncated hok mRNA (Fig. 2, left panel, lane 5), an effect similar to that of Sok RNA. In contrast, wild-type PndB antisense RNA (pTF324) from plasmid R483 had no effect on hok mRNA (Fig. 2, left panel, lane 6).

When we examined the hok mRNA in an rnc- strain, neither Sok RNA nor CA-RNA affected the metabolism of truncated hok mRNA (Fig. 2, right panel). Thus, CA-RNA, which carries 13 nucleotides that are complementary to hok mRNA, is sufficient to target the truncated hok mRNA for degradation in the rnc+ strain. These results indicate that CA-RNA and the truncated hok mRNA form a partial duplex (i.e. the TWJ; see below) that is adequate for RNase III-mediated hydrolysis in vivo.

The CA-RNA·hok mRNA Complex Forms a Three-way Junction in Vitro-- hok38 RNA constitutes the antisense target stem-loop structure in hok mRNA shown schematically in Fig. 1D. We tested the in vitro complex formed between CA-RNA and hok38 RNA by lead(II) acetate probing of 5'-end-labeled CA-RNA (Fig. 3A, left panel) or hok38 (Fig. 3A, right panel) either alone or in complex with hok38 or CA-RNA, respectively. The interpretation of the RNA probing is shown in Fig. 3B. Single strand-specific lead(II) acetate cleavages were observed in the 5'-tail and in the top stem and loop region of the unpaired CA-RNA. Binding of hok38 to 32P-labeled CA-RNA resulted in repression of cleavages at the tail nucleotides only, whereas cleavages at other sites were unaffected (Fig. 3A, left panel). Probing of unpaired hok38 resulted in cleavages in the loop and in the top stem region (Fig. 3A, right panel). Binding of CA-RNA specifically protected the nucleotides that are complementary to the bases in the tail of CA-RNA. Although binding of CA-RNA caused a modest enhancement of cleavages in the bottom stem of hok38 (Fig. 3A, right part of the left panel), the probing supports the formation of the three-way junction, as shown in Fig. 3B.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Demonstration that CA-RNA and the minimal target RNA form at the three-way junction. Shown are the results from lead(II) acetate probing of the complex formed between CA-RNA and hok38 RNA. A, 50 fmol of 32P-5'-end-labeled CA-RNA (left panel) or hok 38 (right panel) was incubated either alone or in complex with an excess (1 pmol) of unlabeled hok38 or CA-RNA, respectively. Lead(II) acetate was added at the concentrations indicated. RNase T1 cleavage reactions (T1) were carried out as (36) on native RNA. L denotes the alkaline ladders. The loops of CA-RNA and hok38 and the single-stranded 5'-tail of CA-RNA are indicated. The bulged-out A33 of hok38 is indicated to aid cleavage site localization. B, shown is the structure of the complex formed between CA-RNA and hok38 based on the lead(II) acetate probing results in A. The 13 nucleotides of the 5'-tail of CA-RNA that are complementary to the target in hok38 are shown in boldface, and the RNA stem-loop structure derived from the PndB antisense RNA in lightface. Lead(II) acetate cleavages of labeled CA-RNA and hok38 that are unaffected by complex formation are indicated by asterisks, whereas cleavage sites repressed upon complex formation are indicated by boldface lines. RNase T1 cleavage sites are indicated with thin arrows.

In Vitro RNase III Processing of the TWJ-- Different antisense RNA/target RNA combinations were tested for their ability to function as RNase III-processing signals in vitro using purified histidine-tagged RNase III (Fig. 4). The cleavage reactions were performed at high stringency (i.e. at a high concentration of monovalent salt). As expected, truncated hok mRNA alone was not affected by RNase III (Fig. 4A, left panel), consistent with the extraordinary stability of this mRNA in vivo (28). Addition of Sok RNA resulted in a major cleavage product in addition to multiple consecutive cleavage fragments (MCF; Fig. 4A, middle panel). In contrast, addition of CA-RNA to truncated hok mRNA yielded two well defined cleavage products, indicative of a single specific cleavage site. Consistently, the longest cleavage fragments in the two reactions were of similar sizes (Fig. 4A).


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   In vitro RNase III processing of the three-way junction and of coaxially stacked RNA helices. Uniformly 32P-labeled hok mRNA (A), Sok RNA (B), and CA-RNA (C and D) were preincubated either alone or with a 10-fold excess of 3H-labeled partner RNA as indicated for 30 min before addition of N-terminal His6-tagged RNase III at 37 °C (A-C) or 25 °C (D). Samples were withdrawn at the time points indicated. Uncleaved RNA (UC), the 5'- and 3'-end cleavage products, and the multiple cleavage fragments (MCF) resulting from consecutive RNase III processings are indicated by arrowheads.

We also examined RNase III cleavage of labeled wild-type Sok RNA (Fig. 4B) and CA-RNA (Fig. 4C). Alone, both RNAs were resistant to RNase III processing. The lack of cleavage is consistent with the presence of upper stem helix irregularities that may act to protect the RNAs from RNase III cleavage. Such stem irregularities are known to prevent RNase III cleavage (35). Addition of truncated hok mRNA resulted in multiple cleavages of Sok RNA (Fig. 4B, middle panel) and a single cleavage of CA-RNA (Fig. 4C, middle panel), consistent with the cleavage pattern observed for hok mRNA in Fig. 4A. These results show that all RNase III cleavages described here reflect coordinated double-strand scissions. Furthermore, primer-extension analysis showed that all double-strand cleavages occurred at the phosphodiester bond between nucleotides +13 and +14 of the antisense 5'-tail and the corresponding phosphodiester bond in hok mRNA, resulting in a 2-nucleotide 3'-overhang according to consensus RNase III processing (data not shown). This cleavage site is designated position 13/11 below.

As implied by the in vivo and in vitro RNase III processing experiments, a partial duplex between the CA-RNA antisense RNA and the hok mRNA seems to be sufficient for RNase III processing. A 14-nucleotide fragment (hok13) of hok mRNA sequence that is complementary to the 13-nucleotide 5'-tail of Sok RNA and CA-RNA was synthesized (the fragment carried an additional 5'-G for efficient transcription by T7 RNA polymerase). Addition of hok13 to Sok RNA or CA-RNA resulted in single specific RNase III cleavages (Fig. 4, B and C, right panels) at the same processing site at position 13/11 described above (data not shown). These observations are consistent with the in vivo processing data and confirm that a partial antisense RNA/target RNA duplex comprising 13 bp of interstrand pairing is adequate for RNase III processing.

To test if all 13 bp of the duplex were required for processing, we examined 3'-end-shortened hok mRNA fragments of 7 (hok7) and 10 (hok10) nucleotides for RNase III-mediated CA-RNA cleavage (Fig. 4D). hok7 failed to sustain cleavage (Fig. 4D, left panel), whereas partial cleavage was observed with hok10 (middle panel). Thus, all 13 base pairs are required for optimal enzyme binding or processing. In addition, the cleavage observed with hok10 occurred at the site at position 13/11 described above, implying that binding and/or cleavage is fixed at a unique position and does not change with the 5'-end border of the partial duplex (data not shown).

Cleavage Kinetics and Substrate Affinity-- The kinetic parameters for RNase III processing of Sok RNA in duplex with hok13 and CA-RNA in duplexes with hok13 and hok38 are shown in Table I. The kcat and Km values for RNase III processing of all three complexes are similar to the values calculated for the R1.1 substrate from bacteriophage T7 using wild-type RNase III (33). In addition, the formation of a TWJ in the CA-RNA·hok38 complex does not impair affinity or cleavage rate compared with the Sok RNA·hok13 and CA-RNA·hok13 complexes. Thus, the in vitro kinetic parameters for RNase III processing of the partial duplexes clearly support the ability of this substrate to compete for RNase III binding and cleavage in vivo.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Kinetic parameters for RNase III processing of minimal RNA substrates
kcat and Km calculations were carried out as described (33) by a Lineweaver-Burk plot using 7.5 nM N-terminal His6-tagged RNase III dimer and 62-1000 nM substrate. S.D. values were <20% in all experiments.

The Transcriptional Terminator Stem-Loop Structure Is Prerequisite for RNase III Cleavage of hok13-- Complexes formed between uniformly 32P-labeled hok13 and Sok RNA, CA-RNA, or Sok13, which corresponds to the 13 nucleotides of the 5'-tail sequence of Sok RNA (and CA-RNA) were examined for accurate RNase III cleavage (Fig. 5). Binding of either Sok RNA or CA-RNA resulted in RNase III cleavage at the specific site in hok13. In contrast, RNase III failed to perform accurate processing of the hok13·Sok13 complex. Hence, the 13 base pair interstrand RNA duplex is not a substrate for RNase III. These results show that the transcriptional terminator hairpins of Sok RNA and CA-RNA are necessary for RNase III processing. The cleavage sites at position 13/11 suggest that the 13 bp of antisense RNA/target RNA duplexes and the bottom stem of the antisense RNA transcriptional terminator hairpins each constitute RNase III monomer half-sites.


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   In vitro RNase III cleavage of uniformly 32P-labeled hok13 transcripts. The assays were conducted as described in the legend to Fig. 3 at 37 °C. The alkali ladder (L) was made on a 32P-5'-end-labeled hok13 fragment as described (36). Uncleaved RNA (UC) and the 5'- and 3'-cleavage products corresponding to 3 and 11 nucleotides, respectively, are indicated.

RNase III Binding to Coaxially Stacked RNA Helices-- RNase III binding was examined using an RNase III derivative carrying an E117A amino acid substitution. This protein shows binding properties identical to those of the wild-type enzyme, but is impaired in substrate cleavage (13). 32P-5'-End-labeled CA-RNA was incubated either alone or with hok13 in the presence or absence of E117A RNase III (Fig. 6A). As the substrates tested contained almost exclusively double-stranded or stacked nucleotides, we used cobra venom nuclease to monitor substrate binding (Fig. 6B). At both concentrations of E117A RNase III, the unpaired CA-RNA was not protected from cobra venom nuclease cleavages. Adding the hok13 fragment resulted in E117A RNase III-mediated protection of the 5'-tail and bottom hairpin at both the 5'- and 3'-sides. These data are consistent with a symmetrical binding of E117A RNase III coaxially stacked helices that comprise the bottom part of the CA-RNA transcriptional terminator hairpin stacked on the 13 bp of the interstrand CA-RNA/hok13 duplex. A structural model showing the protection of the CA-RNA·hok13 complex by E117A RNase III is presented in Fig. 6B. Protection extends roughly 10-12 bp on each side of the cleavage sites, which are located in the hinge region of the stacked helices (Fig. 6A).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Footprinting of E117A RNase III on a minimal CA-RNA·hok13 complex. A, footprinting of E117A RNase III on 32P-5'-end-labeled CA-RNA using cobra venom nuclease to monitor protein/RNA interaction. 50 fmol of 32P-labeled CA-RNA was preincubated either alone (lanes 1-4) or with a 10-fold excess of 3H-labeled hok13 (lanes 5-8). E117A RNase III was added to a final concentration of 0 µM (lanes 1 and 5), 1 µM (lanes 2 and 6), or 2.5 µM (lanes 3 and 7) and probed with cobra venom ribonuclease (lanes 1-3 and 5-7). The product(s) of cleavage reactions using wild-type RNase III (lanes 4 and 8) are shown by an arrowhead. RNase T1 cleavage (T1) on native RNA and the alkali ladder (L) were as described (36). C indicates the control reaction in which E117A RNase III and cobra venom nuclease were omitted. B, the secondary structure and coaxially stacked helices of the CA-RNA·hok13 complex. The hok/sok sequence is shown in boldface, and the PndB sequence in lightface. The approximate extent of E117A RNase III protection from A is shown with boldface lines. The proposed symmetrical binding of RNase III on each half-site is illustrated by double barrels, and the positions of the staggered dsRNA breaks are indicated by arrows. The symmetrically located C-G base pairs described under "Discussion" are boxed.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Many antisense RNAs target their complementary transcripts for RNase III-mediated degradation. Although the antisense RNAs of the Sok RNA family can form complete duplexes with their target RNAs, our data show that a pairing intermediate of 13 base pairs that forms a TWJ is sufficient for RNase III-mediated degradation in vivo. Intriguingly, substrates corresponding to the transcripts examined in vivo were cleaved by purified RNase III at a single specific site in both strands of the antisense RNA/target RNA duplexes. Our data support a minimal substrate that consists of the antisense RNA transcriptional terminator hairpin and the 13 nucleotides of the 5'-tail engaged in RNA interstrand pairing. However, RNase III processing normally requires at least two helical turns of RNA duplex (2, 3). Indeed, the 13 bp of duplex are necessary, yet insufficient for RNase III cleavage (Fig. 4). E117A RNase III protein footprinting supports enzyme binding at the 13 bp of interstrand duplex and at the bottom 10-12 bp of the antisense RNA hairpin stem. This substrate most likely forms a rigid coaxially stacked structure that constitutes more than two helical turns of RNA helix, thus being reminiscent of more conventional RNase III substrates. The observation that RNase III is unable to perform any cleavage on the 13-bp duplex substrate suggests either of the following. (i) Simultaneous contact between the substrate half-sites and the dsRNA-binding motifs of each RNase III subunit is required to confer catalytic activity to the enzyme. This could occur by structural transitions of the enzyme upon substrate binding, perhaps to attain the transition state. (ii) Binding of a single monomer subunit to the RNA complex provides insufficient binding energy to sustain substrate cleavage.

Consistent with the above-described conclusions, the footprinting experiment showed that binding of the dimeric E117A RNase III requires both monomer half-sites of the CA-RNA·hok13 complex (Fig. 6). The absence of protection of the monomer half-site in CA-RNA suggests that the equilibrium dissociation constant for the interaction between the RNase III dsRBD and the half-site is significantly higher than 2.5 µM. A low binding affinity for such a monomer/half-site interaction is expected to increase the stringency in substrate binding and to prevent titration of RNase III by dsRNA elements that are not RNase III substrates. The Km and kcat values for CA-RNA in partial duplex with hok13 and hok38 and for Sok RNA in complex with hok13 are similar to the values previously reported for RNase III processing (33) and concur with the observation that the CA-RNA·hok mRNA substrate is efficiently processed in vivo. Thus, formation of the TWJ in the CA-RNA·hok mRNA complex (Figs. 1D and 3) does not impede RNase III processing (Figs. 2 and 4 and Table I), which could suggest that the enzyme does not form a tightly closed complex surrounding the cleavage site since the extra RNA stem is accommodated by the catalytic site without affecting kcat.

Several RNase III substrates have structural irregularities (i.e. bulges, mismatches, and internal loops) (2) around the scissile bonds, including the Sok RNA·hok13 and CA-RNA·hok13 complexes and the R1.1 substrate of bacteriophage T7. However, data obtained with the native R1.1 substrate of bacteriophage T7 and an engineered version with perfect helicity showed similar equilibrium dissociation constants, suggesting that little or no discrimination on substrate binding is conferred by the catalytic site (13). Instead, the recent finding of RNase III binding anti-determinants implies that the stringency of processing is on the level of enzyme binding exclusively (21). Consistent with the efficient processing, none of the substrates tested here convey the RNase III binding anti-determinants. Alignment of RNase III-processing signals from E. coli has identified a preference for a C-G base pair at position +6/+4 relative to the scissile bonds (21, 37). Interestingly, the CA-RNA·hok mRNA complex contains one C-G base pair in the tail/target duplex and one C-G base pair in the terminator hairpin of CA-RNA located symmetrically (disregarding the bulged-out U) at position +6/+4 (Fig. 6B). The crystal structure of the dsRBD of the dsRNA-binding protein A of X. laevis in complex with dsRNA revealed a single sequence-specific contact between a backbone carbonyl group and the exocyclic amine of G in the minor groove of a C-G base pair (20). Thus, a similar interaction could be important for RNase III binding of its substrates and may in some cases specify the cleavage site location. This is supported by the fixed cleavage site at position 13/11 observed here for RNase III processing of the CA-RNA·hok10 complex, for which the end of the interstrand duplex has been juxtaposed, compared with the CA-RNA·hok mRNA and CA-RNA·hok13 complexes.

The fact that the family of RNase III enzymes shows at least partial interspecies substrate specificity (4) suggests that coaxially stacked helices could function as processing signals for RNase III enzymes in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Recently, an RNase III-processing signal composed of noncontiguous helices was suggested for the small nuclear R40 precursor of S. cerevisiae (10). However, for this substrate, the junction of the RNA helices is positioned 6-8 base pairs from the scissile phosphodiester bonds, most likely displaced from the catalytic site.

Intriguingly, binding of coaxially stacked dsRNA by two copies of the double dsRBD may apply to a diverse set of proteins with unrelated function. In a recent experiment, the dsRBD of PKR was shown to bind in vitro selected RNA with noncontiguous and most likely coaxially stacked RNA helices (38). Thus, it is conceivable that enzymes like PKR and ADAR (adenine deaminase that acts on RNA) that carry multiple copies of the dsRBD can bind coaxially stacked RNA stems in a fashion similar to RNase III and thereby trigger such diverse cellular responses as apoptosis, the interferon-induced viral response (39, 40), or RNA degradation (41).

The processing of coaxially stacked RNA helices reported here shows that RNase III substrates are more versatile than previously assumed. This novel substrate specificity could have a more general implication on the metabolism of diverse RNAs.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank E. G. H. Wagner for critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Center for Interaction, Structure, Function, and Engineering of Macromolecules of the Danish Biotechnology Program.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 45-65-50-24-13; Fax: 45-65-93-27-81.; E-mail: kgerdes@molbiol.ou.dk.

2 T. Thisted, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: dsRNA, double-stranded RNA; dsRBD, double-stranded RNA-binding domain; bp, base pair(s); CA-RNA, chimeric antisense RNA; TWJ, three-way junction.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Robertson, H. D., Webster, R. E., and Zinder, N. D. (1968) J. Biol. Chem. 243, 82-91[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Court, D. (1993) in Control of Messenger RNA Stability (Belasco, J. G. , and Brawerman, G., eds) , pp. 71-116, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA
3. Nicholson, A. W. (1996) Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 52, 1-65[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Rotondo, G., Huang, J. Y., and Frendewey, D. (1997) RNA 3, 1182-1193[Abstract]
5. Young, R. A., and Steitz, J. A. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75, 3593-3597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Abou-Elela, S., Igel, H., and Ares, M. (1996) Cell 85, 115-124[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Chanfreau, G., Abou Elela, S., Ares, M., Jr., and Guthrie, C. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 2741-2751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Abou Elela, S., and Ares, M., Jr. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 3738-3746[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Chanfreau, G., Rotondo, G., Legrain, P., and Jacquier, A. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 3726-3737[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Chanfreau, G., Legrain, P., and Jacquier, A. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 284, 975-988[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Dunn, J. J. (1982) in The Enzymes (Boyer, P. D., ed), Vol. 15, Part B , pp. 485-499, Academic Press, New York
12. Robertson, H. D. (1982) Cell 30, 669-672[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Li, H., and Nicholson, A. W. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 1421-1433[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Kharrat, A., Macias, M. J., Gibson, T. J., Nilges, M., and Pastore, A. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3572-3584[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Bevilacqua, P. C., and Cech, T. R. (1996) Biochemistry 33, 9983-9994
16. Bycroft, M., Grünert, S., Murzin, A. G., Proctor, M., and Johnston, D. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3563-3571[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Green, S. R., and Mathews, M. B. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 2478-2490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Green, S. R., Manche, L., and Mathews, M. B. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 358-364[Abstract]
19. McMillan, N. A. J., Carpick, B. W., Hollis, B., Toone, W. M., Zamanian-Daryoush, M., and Williams, B. R. G. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2601-2606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Ryter, J. M., and Schultz, S. C. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 7505-7513[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Zhang, K., and Nicholson, A. W. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 13437-13441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Krinke, L., and Wulff, D. L. (1987) Genes Dev. 1, 1005-1013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Case, C. C., Simons, E. L., and Simons, R. W. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 1259-1266[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Blomberg, P., Wagner, E. G. H., and Nordström, K. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 2331-2340[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Malmgren, C., Wagner, E. G. H., Ehresmann, C., Ehresmann, B., and Romby, P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 12508-12512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Gerdes, K., Nielsen, A. K., Thorsted, P., and Wagner, E. G. H. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 226, 637-649[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Gerdes, K., Gultyaev, A. P., Franch, T., Pedersen, K., and Mikkelsen, N. D. (1997) Annu. Rev. Genet. 31, 1-31[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Franch, T., Gultyaev, A. P., and Gerdes, K. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 273, 38-51[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Brantl, S., and Wagner, E. G. H. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 451-454[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Thisted, T., Sørensen, N. S., Wagner, E. G. H., and Gerdes, K. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1960-1968[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring, NY
32. Thisted, T., and Gerdes, K. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 223, 41-54[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Li, H., Chelladurai, B. S., Zhang, K., and Nicholson, A. W. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 1919-1925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Graña, D. T., Gardella, T., and Susskind, M. M. (1988) Genetics 120, 319-327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Hjalt, T. Å. H., and Wagner, E. G. H. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 571-579[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Thisted, T., Sørensen, N. S., and Gerdes, K. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 247, 859-873[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Krinke, L., and Wulff, D. L. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 4809-4815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Bevilacqua, P. C., George, C. X., Samuel, C. E., and Cech, T. R. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 6303-6316[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Der, S. D., Yang, Y.-L., Weissmann, C., and Williams, B. R. G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 3279-3283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Wong, A. H.-T., Tam, N. W. N., Yang, Y.-L., Cuddihy, A. R., Li, S., Kirchhoff, S., Hauser, H., Decker, T., and Koromilas, A. E. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1291-1304[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Scadden, A. D. J., and Smith, C. W. J. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 2140-2149[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. H. Urban and J. Vogel
Translational control and target recognition by Escherichia coli small RNAs in vivo
Nucleic Acids Res., February 16, 2007; 35(3): 1018 - 1037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
O. R. Faridani, A. Nikravesh, D. P. Pandey, K. Gerdes, and L. Good
Competitive inhibition of natural antisense Sok-RNA interactions activates Hok-mediated cell killing in Escherichia coli
Nucleic Acids Res., November 6, 2006; 34(20): 5915 - 5922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. V. Pertzev and A. W. Nicholson
Characterization of RNA sequence determinants and antideterminants of processing reactivity for a minimal substrate of Escherichia coli ribonuclease III
Nucleic Acids Res., August 8, 2006; 34(13): 3708 - 3721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Zer and G. Chanfreau
Regulation and Surveillance of Normal and 3'-Extended Forms of the Yeast Aci-reductone Dioxygenase mRNA by RNase III Cleavage and Exonucleolytic Degradation
J. Biol. Chem., August 12, 2005; 280(32): 28997 - 29003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S. Gottesman
Stealth regulation: biological circuits with small RNA switches
Genes & Dev., November 15, 2002; 16(22): 2829 - 2842.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
T. Moller, T. Franch, C. Udesen, K. Gerdes, and P. Valentin-Hansen
Spot 42 RNA mediates discoordinate expression of the E. coli galactose operon
Genes & Dev., July 1, 2002; 16(13): 1696 - 1706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
C.-Y. Wu, J.-F. Fu, and S.-T. Liu
The replicon of pSW800 from Pantoea stewartii
Microbiology, October 1, 2001; 147(10): 2757 - 2767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
V. A. Erdmann, M. Z. Barciszewska, M. Szymanski, A. Hochberg, N. d. Groot, and J. Barciszewski
The non-coding RNAs as riboregulators
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2001; 29(1): 189 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


<
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager