JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Menon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, F.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 26743-26750, September 17, 1999


Stereochemical Course and Steady State Mechanism of the Reaction Catalyzed by the GDP-fucose Synthetase from Escherichia coli*

Saurabh MenonDagger , Mark Stahl, Ravindra Kumar, Guang-Yi Xu, and Francis Sullivan

From Wyeth Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Recently the genes encoding the human and Escherichia coli GDP-mannose dehydratase and GDP-fucose synthetase (GFS) protein have been cloned and it has been shown that these two proteins alone are sufficient to convert GDP mannose to GDP fucose in vitro. GDP-fucose synthetase from E. coli is a novel dual function enzyme in that it catalyzes epimerizations and a reduction reaction at the same active site. This aspect separates fucose biosynthesis from that of other deoxy and dideoxy sugars in which the epimerase and reductase activities are present on separate enzymes encoded by separate genes. By NMR spectroscopy we have shown that GFS catalyzes the stereospecific hydride transfer of the ProS hydrogen from NADPH to carbon 4 of the mannose sugar. This is consistent with the stereospecificity observed for other members of the short chain dehydrogenase reductase family of enzymes of which GFS is a member. Additionally the enzyme is able to catalyze the epimerization reaction in the absence of NADP or NADPH. The kinetic mechanism of GFS as determined by product inhibition and fluorescence binding studies is consistent with a random mechanism. The dissociation constants determined from fluorescence studies indicate that the enzyme displays a 40-fold stronger affinity for the substrate NADPH as compared with the product NADP and utilizes NADPH preferentially as compared with NADH. This study on GFS, a unique member of the short chain dehydrogenase reductase family, coupled with that of its recently published crystal structure should aid in the development of antimicrobial or anti-inflammatory compounds that act by blocking selectin-mediated cell adhesion.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

GDP fucose is synthesized mainly by a de novo pathway from GDP mannose in a three-step reaction involving two enzymes as shown in Fig. 1. In the first step GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose is formed by oxidation at C-4 and subsequent reduction at C-6 of the mannose ring, catalyzed by an NADP-dependent enzyme GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase. In reactions catalyzed by GDP-fucose synthetase, this intermediate then undergoes an epimerization at C-3 and C-5 of the mannose ring followed by reduction of the keto group at C-4 to yield GDP fucose (1).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Pathway of GDP fucose biosynthesis. The enzymes catalyzing the conversion of GDP mannose to GDP fucose are shown above the arrows. GDP mannose-4,6-dehydratase (GMD) catalyzes the oxidation at C-4 followed by the reduction at C-6 of GDP mannose with loss of a water molecule to yield GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose. GDP-fucose synthetase (GFS) catalyzes the epimerization at C-3 and C-5 to yield GDP-4-keto-6-deoxyglucose which undergoes subsequent reduction to yield GDP Fucose

Fucose is found widely distributed in complex carbohydrates as a component of glycoconjugates such as glycoproteins and glycolipids in a wide variety of species from humans to bacteria. Fucose is added to these glycoconjugates by specific transferases that utilize GDP fucose as the sugar donor. In bacteria fucose is present as a component of the capsular polysaccharides and lipopolysaccharides which function as antigenic determinants. In several species defects in the genes encoding GFS1 have shed some light on the role played by fucose in these organisms. Inactivation of the nolK genes in Azorhizobium caulinodans results in an inability to introduce the 6-O-fucosyl branch on the lipochitooligosaccharides of the Nod factors which is an important modification for nodulation in some host plants (2). Recently it has been shown that the GFS gene which is responsible for biosynthesis of the O-antigen in Heliobacter pylori is induced at low pH and plays a role in the survival of the bacterium under acidic conditions and potentially in the virulence of the organism (3). In mammals fucose is present as a component of human blood group antigens and also is involved in regulation of the immune response. Humans deficient in the biosynthesis of GDP fucose suffer from the immune disorder leukocyte adhesion deficiency type II (4, 5). These patients fail to synthesize fucosylated blood groups and their leukocytes do not express fucose as a component of the selectin ligand, sialyl Lewis X (6, 7). The lack of fucose on different glycoconjugates does not seem to arise from a defect in fucosyltransferase activities but is related to the decrease in the intracellular production of GDP fucose, which serves as a substrate for these transferases. Conversely, increased fucosylation of glycoconjugates involved in metastasis has been observed in cancer patients (8). Understanding the mechanism of synthesis of GDP fucose should aid in the development of drugs having potential as anti-inflammatory or antimetastatic agents.

The NADH/NADPH-dependent short chain dehydrogenase reductase family consists of enzymes which comprise a wide variety of activities and include alcohol and polyol dehydrogenases, steroid dehydrogenases, prostaglandin dehydrogenases, carbonyl reductases, dihydropteridine reductases, and ketoacyl reductases (9, 10). These enzymes are present in bacteria, yeast, plants, and animals indicating that these enzymes are evolutionarily important in several metabolic pathways. Based on sequence and structural alignment studies, the short chain dehydrogenase family has also been shown to be distantly related to the family of steroid dehydrogeanses which include enzymes like 3-beta -hydroxy-5-ene steroid dehydrogenase, UDP-galactose-4-epimerase (Gal E), and some other proteins which in sum comprise five EC classes, dehydrogenases, reductases, dehydratases, epimerases, and isomerases. Most of the members of the SDR family show residue conservations of only about 15-30% with only 9 residues being conserved in more than 90% of the enzymes. These include the Ser-Tyr-Lys catalytic triad and the glycine residues involved in coenzyme binding.

Analysis of the amino acid sequence of GFS indicates that it contains a conserved Ser-Tyr-Lys catalytic triad, suggesting that it belongs to the family of short chain dehydrogenase reductases (11, 12). However, in contrast to UDP-galactose-4-epimerase and other enzymes of the SDR family, GFS catalyzes two distinct reactions, epimerizations at C-3 and C-5 of the mannose ring and the subsequent NADPH-dependent reduction at C-4 (1, 12-14). In this paper we show that like other SDR's (15-24) hydride transfer catalyzed by GFS is stereospecific and occurs at the ProS position of the nicotinamide ring. Furthermore, we present evidence that the epimerizations at C-3 and C-5 differ from that catalyzed by other members of the SDR family in that they do not involve the transient reduction and oxidation of an NAD or NADP cofactor and that the epimerization occurs in the absence of its cofactor NADPH. Our investigations also included various inhibition and fluorescence binding studies that indicated that GFS follows a random bi-bi mechanism. Our results show that the enzyme displays a much higher affinity for its cosubstrate NADPH, as compared with the product NADP, consistent with the catalytic mechanism in which NADPH binds to the enzyme transfers the hydride and is released as NADP.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Expression and Purification of Escherichia coli GFS-- The E. coli GFS gene was polymerase chain reaction amplified from pSEWCAG (1) using the following two oligonucleotides: GGCGCATATGAGTAAACAACGAGTTTTTATTGC and GGCGAAGCTTACCCCCGAAAGCGGTCTTGAT. The amplified DNA was gel purified, digested with NdeI and HindIII, and ligated into the NdeI and HindIII sites of the E. coli expression vector pRSETB (Invitrogen) to yield pT7WCAG. This resulted in isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside inducible expression of GFS having its native sequence, driven by a T7 promoter. E. coli strain BL21(DE3/pLysS), containing pT7WCAG, was grown in DM4 minimal salts with 0.5% glucose, trace metals, and supplemented with 100 mg/liter ampicillin, and 34 mg/liter chloramphenicol at 25 °C in a 10-liter Biostat C fermenter (B. Braun Biotech International) to an OD600 of 6.0 At that point isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside was added to a final concentration of 0.3 mM and the cells were grown for an additional 4 h before harvest by centrifugation. Cell pellets were stored at -80 °C. Typically 5 g of cells were broken in a French Press at 12,000 p.s.i. The cells were spun in a SS34 rotor at 15,000 rpm for 30 min. After centrifugation the supernatant was loaded onto a 20-ml DEAE Toyopearl column (Toso Hass). The enzyme was eluted with a gradient of 0-0.5 M NaCl followed by chromatography over a 10-ml heparin-Toyopearl column (Toso Hass) from which it was eluted with a stepwise gradient from 0 to 0.5 M NaCl. The protein was then loaded onto a propyl aspartamide column and eluted with a reverse gradient of 1-0 M ammonium sulfate. The resulting protein was greater than 90% pure as judged by SDS-PAGE and Commasie Blue staining. Alternatively E. coli strain GI934 containing plasmid pSEWCAG was grown in LB media containing ampicillin at 37 oC. The cells were induced with 1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside once they reached an OD of 0.5 at A600 and then grown for an additional 4 h. Cell pellets were then frozen and the protein was purified by the same procedure as above.

In Vitro Assays of Purified GFS-- The purified protein was assayed in 100 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT, 150 µM NADPH, and 300 µM GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose. A 96-well plate was incubated at 37 oC for 10 min and the reaction was initiated by the addition of 0.25 µg of GFS. Initial rates were determined by following the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm due to the conversion of NADPH (epsilon 340 = 6.22 mM-1 cm-1) to NADP.

Synthesis of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose-- GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was synthesized from GDP mannose using the purified E. coli GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase by a slight modification of a previously published procedure (1). Typical reaction conditions were 100 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM EDTA, 25 mM GDP mannose, 10 µM NADPH, and 100 µM NADP at 37 oC for 3-6 h. GDP mannose dehydratase (0.1 mg/ml), which had been previously incubated with NADP at 37 oC, was added to initiate the reaction. The reactions were allowed to proceed to completion as judged by high performance liquid chromatography and the protein was removed by ultrafiltration using a Centricon 10. The remaining mixture was loaded onto a Sephadex G-10 desalting column eluted with water and the peak for GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was determined by following the absorbance at 260 nm (epsilon 260 = 11.8 mM-1 cm-1). GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was then lyophilized and stored at -20 oC as a powder. GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose prepared by this procedure is ~100% pure as checked by NMR and mass spectroscopy.

Determination of Stereospecificity of Hydride Transfer-- 4S-[2H]NADPH was prepared by a previously published procedure for its synthesis from NADP, reduced glutathione, DTT, triethanolamine, and glutathione reductase in 2H2O (25, 26). Protiated NADPH was also prepared in a similar manner using H2O instead of D2O. 4R-[2H]NADPH was also prepared by a previously published procedure using NADP, acetaldehyde-D4, DTT, and aldehyde dehydrogenase (25, 26). The protinated and deuterated NADPH/D generated by the method above were then purified by chromatography on a Mono Q column followed by elution using a 0-1 M KCl gradient in 20 mM triethanolamine (25). 200 µM 4S- and or 4R-[2H]NADPH was reacted with 400 µM GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.8. The enzyme was added and the mixture was incubated at 37 oC. The reaction was allowed to go to completion determined by following the decrease in 340. After the reaction was over the mixture was lyophilized and exchanged with 1 ml of D2O twice. The mixture was finally resuspended in 0.7 ml of D2O and 1H NMR spectroscopy was performed on a 600 MHz Varian Unity Plus NMR spectrometer.

Paper Chromatography-- 14C-Labeled GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was synthesized beginning with 14C-labeled GDP mannose by the same procedure as stated above. The 14C-labeled GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was then incubated with GFS and NADPH, GFS and NADP, and GFS alone. The reaction products were then reduced with 0.2 M NaBH4 for 15 min to reduce the GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose and then were cleaved from the sugar by incubating in 1 M trichloroacetic acid for 10 min in boiling water. The resulting mixture was chromatographed on Whatman 3MM paper in descending mode using a solvent system consisting of ethyl acetate:pyridine:water (3.6:1.0:1.15) for 7 h. Free sugar standards were localized by AgNO3 staining in acetone followed by NaOH in methanol. Radioactivity was detected by cutting the paper into strips of 1 cm × 1 cm and counting on a scintillation counter.

Determination of Kinetic Parameters-- Assays were carried out as described above at varying concentrations of NADPH and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose. Since the order of substrate binding was not known, initial velocities were measured at various concentrations of NADPH (10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 µM) and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose (5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 80, and 100 µM) at varying concentrations of NADP (5 to 100 µM) and GDP fucose (20 to 140 µM) at unsaturating concentrations of either NADPH or GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose. The data were fit to double reciprocal plots of 1/NADPH and 1/GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose versus 1/intial velocity (Vo). We also explored the effect of GDP at varying concentrations of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose on the reaction and the data were analyzed by the same procedure as above.

pH Dependence and Isotope Effect-- Purified proteins were assayed in 100 mM MES, pH 5.0-6.0, and 25 mM HEPES, pH 6.5-8.0, buffer that contained 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT, and 150 µM NADPH. GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was varied from 20 to 300 µM. A 96-well plate was incubated at 37 oC for 10 min and the reaction was initiated by the addition of 0.25 µg of GFS. Initial rates were determined by following the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm due to the conversion of NADPH (epsilon 340 = 6.22 mM-1 cm-1) to NADP. The deuterium isotope effect was determined using the spectrophotometric assay as described above. To minimize errors arising from slight variations in enzyme activity or assay conditions data were collected at varying 4S-[1H]NADPH and 4S-[2H]NADPH on the same day.

Fluorescence Spectroscopy-- All fluorescence measurements were carried out at 25 oC at pH 7.0 on a Photon Technology International Fluorimeter with 0.55 and 5.5 µM GFS. Binding of NADPH and NADP to GFS was followed by monitoring the quenching of enzyme fluorescence intensity induced by their binding to the apoenzyme. The apoenzyme was prepared by a previously published procedure (27) followed by dialyzing the purified protein against 2 liters of potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, containing 5 mM EDTA and the buffer was changed periodically over a period of 2 days. The excitation wavelength was set at 280 nm and the quenching of the fluorescence emission of the protein at 339 nm was followed. The excitation and emission slits were 3 and 9 nm. The same procedure as above, quenching of fluorescence of apoenzyme, was used to determine the affinity of GFS for GDP fucose and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose. The quenching of GFS fluorescence was analyzed using a previously published nonlinear least squares procedure (27) that fit the average number of moles (nu ) of bound substrate per mole of protein and the free ligand [L]f to the Adair-Klotz equation. nu  was calculated by the same procedure using the relationship nu  = n(I - Ia)/(Ih - Ia), where n = number of binding sites, Ia = fluorescence of apoenzyme, I = measured fluorescence intensity at a particular concentration of substrate, Ih = fluorescence of holoenzyme with its n of binding sites saturated with substrate. [L]f was determined by using the relation [L]f = [L]t - n[Et], where Lt and Et represent total ligand and total enzyme concentration, respectively. 90% loss in fluorescence intensity was observed when enzyme was completely saturated with NADP and NADPH. Only 5% of the original fluorescence intensity of apoenzyme remained on complete satuaration, of GFS, with GDP fucose, GDP and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose.

Calorimetry-- Enthalpy of the binding of GDP fucose was obtained by microcalorimetry performed on a Microcal Isothermal Titration Calorimeter. The cell was calibrated to 28 oC using an internal cell heater. The cell was equilibrated in 10 mM Trizma (Tris base) buffer, pH 7.4, containing 50 mM NaCl buffer at 28 oC with stirring at 400 rpm for 30 min. Subsequently 1.4 ml of 70 µM GFS (epsilon 280 = 31,300 M-1 cm-1) which was dialyzed overnight in 10 mM Trizma buffer, pH 7.4, containing 50 mM NaCl solution was transferred into the calorimeter cell using a syringe. A 50-µl glass syringe containing 20 mM GDP fucose in the same buffer and an extended attachment to perform injections was attached to the calorimeter. The baseline signal was collected for at least 15 min before initiating the reaction by subsequent injections of GDP fucose. Integration of the thermogram was performed by the ITC program for Origin supplied by Microcal.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Stereospecificty of Hydride Transfer-- The 1H NMR spectrum of NADP generated at the end of the reaction was analyzed for the retention of deuterium at the 4 position of the pyridine ring (Fig. 2) (28). A ProS specific enzyme removes deuterium from 4S-[2H]NADPH and the NADP formed as an end product of the reaction shows a doublet at 8.8 ppm for the proton at the 4 position of the pyridine ring. Analogously when 4R-[2H]NADPH is used no doublet should be observed since it is the ProS proton that is transferred and the deuteron remains attached to the C-4 position of the pyridine ring. When NADPH deuterated at the 4S position was reacted with GFS the proton left over at the C-4 position exhibited a H1 splitting at about 8.8 ppm. When the experiment was repeated with NADPH deuterated at the 4R position no H1 splitting at position C-4 was observed, indicating deuterium was still attached at that position. This confirms that like all other enzymes belonging to the SDR class the hydride transfer catalyzed by GFS is stereospecific and occurs at the 4S position of NADPH.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Analysis of the stereospecificity of hydride transfer by NMR spectroscopy. 200 µM 4S- or 4R-[2H]NADPH was reacted with 400 µM GDP-4-keto-6 deoxymannose in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.8. The enzyme was added and the mixture was incubated at 37 oC. The reaction was allowed to go to completion determined by following the decrease in 340. After the reaction was over the mixture was lyophilized and exchanged with 1 ml of D2O twice. The mixture was finally resuspended in 0.7 ml of D2O and 1H NMR spectroscopy was performed. A, NADP+; B, reaction of GFS with 4S-[2H]NADPH; C, reaction of GFS with 4R-[2H]NADPH.

NADPH Is Not Required for the Epimerization Reaction-- To characterize the products of the epimerization and reduction reaction and to investigate the requirement for NADP in the epimerization reaction catalyzed by GFS we incubated the enzyme with 14C-labeled GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose under different conditions and the products of the reaction were identified by descending paper chromatography. Our data indicate that incubation of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose with GFS alone or with GFS plus NADP converts GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose to GDP-4-keto-6-deoxyglucose. The expected monosaccharides resulting from reduction of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxyglucose by borohydride and cleavage from the nucleotide by acid, 6-deoxyglucose, and fucose, comigrate with their unlabeled standards (Fig. 3). This confirms that GFS alone is sufficient to convert GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose to the epimerized product GDP-4-keto-6-deoxyglucose and that NADP is not required for the epimerization reaction. We confirmed that the product produced on incubation of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose and NADPH with GFS was GDP fucose by co-chromatography with authentic GDP fucose (Fig. 3). Incubation of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose alone under the same conditions as above followed by reduction and cleavage yielded rhamnose and 6-deoxytalose. 6-Deoxytalose is not observed as it runs off the chromatograph in this solvent system (data not shown).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Analysis of the reaction products of E. coli epimerase reductase by descending paper chromatography 14C-Labeled products were reduced with NaBH4, the resulting sugars were cleaved with acid and spotted on Whatman 3MM paper developed in pyridine:ethyl acetate:water. The paper was cut into strips and the 1-cm sections of each strip were counted. A, the reaction contained GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose, NADPH, and GFS (filled circles); B, the reaction contained GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose, NADP and GFS (filled squares); C, the reaction contained GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose and GFS (filled triangles); D, GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose alone, no enzyme (filled diamonds). The positions of unlabeled fucose, mannose, 6-deoxyglucose, and rhamnose that were run as standards are shown at the top of the trace.

Determination of Steady State Mechanism-- Values for Vmax, Km, and kcat/Km for NADPH and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose were determined by initial velocity studies which monitored the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm due to the oxidation of NADPH at varying concentrations of NADPH and GDP-keto-6-deoxymannose (Table I). Based on initial velocity studies GFS displayed a much more lower affinity for NADH (Km = 108.8 µM and Vmax = 6.6 µmol min-1 mg-1) as compared with NADPH. Product inhibition studies were carried out in order to elucidate the suspected order of substrate binding of GDP fucose synthetase. GDP fucose was a competitive inhibitor with respect to NADPH and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose since the double-reciprocal plots of 1/V versus 1/S at unsaturating concentrations of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy mannose and NADPH intersect on the 1/V axis (Fig. 4, A and B). NADP, the other product of the reaction, was also a competitive inhibitor when varied at different concentrations of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose and NADPH (Fig. 4, C and D). Thus the steady state kinetic results are consistent with a random bi-bi mechanism in which either the cofactor or substrate can bind to the enzyme in the absence of the other. GDP was a competitive inhibitor with respect to GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose with a Ki of 60.5 ± 6.8 µM.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Steady sate parameters of E. coli GDP-fucose synthetase


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Lineweaver-Burk plots of the effect of the products GDP fucose and NADP+ on the initial velocities of the GFS-catalyzed reaction. When NADPH was varied GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was held at 30 µM. When GDP-4-keto-6- deoxymannose was varied NADPH was held at 20 µM. A, initial velocities of the oxidation of NADPH at a fixed concentration of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose at varying concentrations of NADPH and several fixed concentrations of GDP fucose. The GDP fucose concentrations were 0, 40, 60, 80, and 120 µM. B, initial velocities of the oxidation of NADPH at a fixed concentration of NADPH at varying concentrations of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose and several fixed concentrations of GDP fucose. The GDP fucose concentrations were 0, 40, 60, 80, and 120 µM. C, initial velocities of the oxidation of NADPH at a fixed concentration of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose at varying concentrations of NADPH and several fixed concentrations of NADP. The NADP concentrations were 0, 40, 60, 80, and 120 µM. D, initial velocities of the oxidation of NADPH at a fixed concentration of NADPH at varying concentrations of GDP-4-keto-6 deoxymannose and several fixed concentrations of NADP. The NADP concentrations were 0, 40, 60, 80, and 120 µM.

pH Profile and Isotope Effects-- A number of buffers were screened to find a system where the rate of the reaction would be independent of buffer concentration. We found that MES over pH values 5.0, 5.5, and 6.0 and HEPES over pH values 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, and 8.0 were suitable for assays over the pH range 5.0-8.0. The effect of pH on log Vmax/Km indicates that there exists at least one catalytic group on the enzyme with a pKa between 6 and 6.5 (Fig. 5). An isotope effect of 1.4 ± 0.2 was observed on DV arising from deuterium substitution at the pro-S hydrogen at C-4 of NADPH. This effect is to small to be significant, hence hydride transfer may only be partially rate-limiting in the mechanism.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Log (Vmax/Km) versus pH for reduction of NADPH by GDP-4-keto-6 deoxymannose. Initial velocities of the reaction were determined at various pH values as described under "Experimental Procedures" and the data were fit to the Michealis-Menten equation to determine Vmax and Km.

Determination of Dissociation Constants for NADPH and NADP-- When excited at 280 nm the emission spectrum of GFS has two maxima, a primary maxima at 339 nm which is about twice as intense as the secondary maxima at 450 nm. The dissociation constants were determined by monitoring the increase and decrease in signal intensity at 450 nm and 338 nm induced by the binding of NADPH and NADP to the apoenzyme. The Kd for NADPH was determined to be 1.29 ± 0.07 µM assuming a ratio of 1 between concentration of binding sites and protein concentration. The dissociation constant for NADP was determined by monitoring the decrease in fluorescence intensity at 339 nm. The enzyme displayed a much weaker affinity for its product NADP as compared with NADPH and had a Kd of 74.2 ± 6.9 µM with the data best fitting the Adair-Klotz equation assuming n = 1 per monomer. This agrees with the crystal structure studies, which also indicates a 1:1, stoichiometry between NADPH/NADP and binding site per subunit (11, 12).

Determination of Dissociation Constants for GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose, GDP Fucose, and GDP-- The affinity of apoenzyme for GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was determined by monitoring the quenching of enzyme fluorescence upon substrate binding at 338 nm. The Kd was determined to be 2.9 ± 0.10 µM with n = 1 per monomer. Thus like NADP and NADPH the enzyme has two substrate-binding sites per functional dimer. We also determined the affinity of GFS for its product GDP fucose by fluorescence spectroscopy and calorimetry. The dissociation constant obtained from fluorimetry was 47 ± 2.8 µM and was comparable to that obtained from calorimetry which was 51 ± 3.2 µM (Fig. 6). The heat of the reaction determined from calorimetry was -6696 cal/mol and the value of binding sites obtained was 1.01 ± 0.03 per monomer. The ratio of binding sites to protein concentration was also in agreement with that determined by fluorimetry, which was two binding sites per functional dimer as reported for GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose. We tried to determine the dissociation constant for GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose by calorimetry but were unsuccessful in doing so due to the heat of reaction generated on account of epimerization of the substrate when it comes in contact with high concentrations of the enzyme. The dissociation constant for GDP was also ascertained by following the decrease in enzyme fluorescence at 339 nm. The data were fit to the Adair-Klotz equation and the Kd was established to be 51.8 ± 5.9 µM (Fig. 7A). This Kd along with the Ki of 60.5 ± 6.8 µM determined by inhibition studies (Fig. 7B), indicates that GDP binds at the same site as GDP fucose on the enzyme and that it is primarily the GDP part of GDP fucose that binds to the enzyme.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Determination of dissociation constant for GDP fucose using isothermal titration calorimetry. Upper panel shows the raw isothermal calorimetry data generated on an Omega Isothermal Calorimetry instrument. The reaction cell contained 70 µM GFS in 10 mM Trizma buffer, pH 7.4, containing 50 mM NaCl which was titrated against a solution of 20 mM GDP fucose in the same buffer. The lower panel shows a delta H plot of microcalories of heat versus molar ratio of GDP fucose versus GFS which gave a value of 1.01 ± 0.03 binding sites per monomer and values of 47 ± 2.8 µM and -6600 cal/mol for the Kd and heat of the reaction, respectively.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   A, effect of binding of GDP on the fluorescence emission spectrum of apo-GFS. The decrease in fluorescence intensity at 339 nm was used to analyze GDP binding of GFS. The apoenzyme concentration was 5.5 µM in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0. The excitation and emission slits were set at 3 and 9 nm, respectively. The data were fit to the Adair-Klotz equation and gave a Kd of 51.8 ± 5.9 µM assuming n = 1 per monomer. Inset, fluorescence emission spectra of apo-GFS and following titration with GDP. B, Lineweaver-Burk plot of the effect of GDP on the initial velocities of the GFS-catalyzed reaction. When GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was varied NADPH was held at 20 µM. The GDP concentrations were 0, 40, 80, and 120 µM.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

GFS as isolated from E. coli is a homodimer of 334 amino acids per subunit (11, 12). Analysis of its amino acid sequence with that of its recently published crystal structure reveals the presence of the conserved Ser-Lys-Tyr catalytic triad observed in other members of the SDR family. The ability of GFS to preferentially transfer the ProS hydrogen of NADPH is consistent with the chirality preference described for other members of the SDR family. The products resulting after incubation of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose either with GFS alone or with GFS plus NADP ascertained from paper chromatography provides evidence that excludes a non-enzymatic mechanism for epimerization for GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose and shows that it is not mediated by the transient reduction and oxidation of a bound NADP or NAD cofactor. GFS preferentially utilizes NADPH as compared with NADH. This is consistent with the crystal structure of the enzyme wherein the side chain of Arg-36 makes hydrogen bonds with the 2'-phosphate groups of NADPH and is thus able to compensate for the negative charge of the phosphate groups.

Product inhibition and fluorescence binding studies provided evidence in support of a random mechanism. Inhibition by NADP-like GDP fucose was competitive with respect to both NADPH and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose suggesting that either the cofactor or the enzyme can bind to the substrate first. A Ki of 55.3 ± 3.9 µM and 69.3 ± 5.9 µM for GDP fucose and NADP, respectively, obtained from product inhibition studies is in agreement with the dissociation constants obtained from fluorescence binding studies. The quenching of enzyme fluorescence observed on titrating the apoenzyme with GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose and GDP fucose demonstrated that a binary complex was possible in the absence of the pyridine nucleotide which function as cosubstrates in the reaction. The formation of a binary complex was further confirmed by monitoring the binding of GDP fucose by calorimetry. In contrast to earlier reports that the human enzyme exhibits half-sites reactivity (29), the fluorescence data presented here indicate that each subunit of the E. coli enzyme contains one substrate and one cofactor-binding site. This is in agreement with the crystal structure data, which shows the appearance of electron density for two pyridine nucleotides per dimer (11, 12).

On the basis of the decrease in fluorescence intensity observed on binding of NADPH to the apoenzyme, GFS was found to have one binding site per monomer with a Kd of 1.3 ± 0.07 µM. The value for the Km of NADPH is 9 ± 0.8 µM which is not that much greater than the dissociation constant. Other enzymes of the SDR family which follow an ordered Theorell-Chance mechanism like CDP-paratose synthase, flavonol 3-O-methyltransferase, and glutamic-gamma - semialdehyde dehydrogenase have a much higher Km/Kd ratio ranging from 25 to 5000 (30). The fact that both substrate and cofactor can bind to the enzyme alone, coupled with the product inhibition data seems to indicate that catalysis is unlikely to proceed by an ordered mechanism. The interpretation of the kinetic data is complicated, however, since all of our velocity studies monitor only the reduction reaction although the enzyme also catalyzes an epimerization reaction. Hence a special form of a random bi-bi reaction wherein one of the substrates adds in a rapid equilibrium fashion while the addition of the second substrate and interconversion of the central complex determine the overall velocity of the reaction cannot be ruled out. Support for this hypothesis comes from the isotope effect observed with NADPD, which demonstrates that hydride transfer is only partially rate-limiting in the reaction mechanism.

A comparison of the amino acid sequences shows E. coli GFS has 24% identity with Gal E. Both enzymes also contain the conserved Ser-Lys-Tyr catalytic triad (11). Further comparison of the amino acid sequences and structures of the enzymes reveals that the loop from residues Leu33-Phe54, which is thought to be responsible for the tight binding of cofactor in GalE, is absent in GFS. This is consistent with the different reaction mechanism of GFS from GalE in which a tightly bound NAD cofactor is transiently reduced and then reoxidized during the course of the enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The absence of this loop in GFS also results in NADPH binding in a more solvent-exposed manner which is consistent with the kinetic data that NADPH is released as NADP after GFS catalysis.

The presence of similar and properly structured catalytic triads in both Gal E and GFS seems to suggest similar roles for Ser107, Tyr136, and Lys140 of GFS (11). However, as mentioned earlier the epimerizations catalyzed by GFS are distinct from the one catalyzed by GalE in that they do not involve the transient reduction and oxidation of an NAD or NADP cofactor. The epimerizations at C-3 and C-5 of GDP-4-keto-6 deoxymannose catalyzed by GFS most likely proceeds via an enediol-enolate intermediate as has been proposed for related epimerases involved in deoxy and dideoxy sugar biosynthesis. (31, 32). Our pH studies seem to support this hypothesis since a pKa between 6.1 and 6.5 for GFS compares well with a pKa of ~6.1 reported for the tyrosinate form of the active site tyrosine in the Gal E reaction. We have proposed that Tyr136 by virtue of its ionized side chain is able to donate a proton resulting in the formation of an enediol/enolate intermediate. The side chain of His179 (Fig. 8) that is in close proximity to the 3' of the ribose could then fulfill the role of a general base and abstract a proton from this intermediate followed by reprotonation from the opposite face of the sugar ring. This possibility arises due to the presence of a "classical base" such as histidine 179 in the active site of GFS (Fig. 8), whereas a basic residue such as a histidine, glutamate, or aspartate is absent in the active site of Gal E. This mechanism would also be consistent with the loss of the proton at C-3 in the GFS-catalyzed reaction as demonstrated by Chang et al. (14) and with the ability of GFS to catalyze the epimerization reaction in the absence of NADPH. The same residues involved in the epimerization at C-3 may then catalyze the epimerization at C-5 by reorientation of the sugar in the active site. This is conceivable based on the studies of UDP-galactose epimerase which have revealed that different UDP sugar substrates can be accommodated in the active site by conformational changes in the UDP sugar and active site rearrangements of water molecules (33-35).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Environment of the catalytic residues in GDP fucose synthetase. A ball and stick representation showing the positions of the proposed catalytic residues Ser107, Tyr136, Lys140, and His179 in the crystal structure of GDP fucose synthetase co-crystallized with NADPH and the GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose modeled in is shown in this figure.

The second reaction catalyzed by GFS the NADPH-dependent reduction at C-4 appears to be more representative of that catalyzed by other SDR enzymes in that it involves a nicotinamide cofactor. In this case the role of the catalytic Ser-Lys-Tyr can be understood by analogy with other well studied SDR enzymes. The same groups involved in stabilizing the enediol/enolate intermediate during the epimerization reaction could catalyze the second reaction reduction at C-4. In the reduction mechanism we propose that Ser107 acts as the proton shuttle between the sugar and the phenolic side chain of Tyr136. We postulate that hydride transfer then occurs from the nicotinamide ring of NADPH to the 4 position of the sugar by a concerted mechanism. This catalytic serine may also help in stabilizing the conformation of the substrate in the active site. Lys140 may help to stabilize the nicotinamide ring in an active confirmation by interaction with the hydroxyl groups of the ribose sugar. This mechanism is supported by the structure of the ternary complexes of GalE with NADH and UDP sugars and mutagenesis experiments with GalE as well as the structure of ternary complexes of other SDR enzymes (11, 33). In GFS the Ser-Tyr-Lys catalytic triad is thus properly positioned to play an analogous role in the epimerization and NADPH-dependent reduction of the GDP-keto-6-deoxymannose at C-3/C-5 and C-4, respectively. However, in the absence of a complex structure for GFS with the GDP sugars, residues in the active site involved in the epimerization reaction cannot be confirmed.

In summary, our data indicates that GFS is truly a bifunctional enzyme that catalyzes both the epimerization and reduction reactions. The enzyme residues involved in the epimerization and reduction reaction should be confirmed by determining the structure of the complex of GFS with NADP and the GDP sugar and by site-directed mutagenesis experiments. This will help demonstrate if these reactions are typical of other SDR enzymes.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Wyeth Research, 87 Cambridge Park Dr., Cambridge, MA 02140. Tel.: 617-498-8952; Fax: 617-498-8993; E-mail: smenon@genetics.com.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GFS, GDP-fucose synthetase; SDR, short chain dehydrogenase reductase; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; DTT, dithiothreitol.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Sullivan, F. X., Kumar, R., Kriz, R., Stahl, M., Xu, G.-Y., Rouse, J., Chang, X., Boodhoo, A., Potvin, B., and Cumming, D. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8193-8202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Mergaert, P., Montagu, V. M., and Holsters, M. (1997) FEBS Lett. 409, 312-316[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. McGowan, C., Necheva, A., Thompson, S., Cover, T., and Blasser, J. (1998) Mol. Microbiol. 30, 19-31[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Etzioni, A., Frydman, M., Pollack, S., Avidor, I., Phillips, M. L., Paulson, J. C., and Gershoni-Baruch, R. (1992) N. Engl. J. Med 327, 1789-1792[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Sturla, L., Etzioni, A., Bisso, A., Zanardi, D., De Flora, G., Silengo, L., De Flora, A., and Tonneti, M. (1998) FEBS Lett. 429, 274-278[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Feizi, T. (1991) Trends. Biochem. Sci. 16, 84-86[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Kansas, G. S. (1996) Blood 88, 3259-3287[Free Full Text]
8. McEver, R. P. (1997) Glycoconj. J. 14, 585-591[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Jornvall, H., Persson, B., Krook, M., Atrian, S., Gonzales, R., Jefffrey, J., and Ghosh, D. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 6002-6013
10. Persson, B., Krook, M., and Jornvall, H. (1995) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 372, 383-395[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Somers, S. W., Stahl, L. M., and Sullivan, F. X. (1998) Structure 6, 1601-1612[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Rizzi, M., Tonetti, M., Vigevani, P., Sturla, L., Bisso, A., De Flora, A., Bordo, D., and Bolognesi, M. (1998) Structure 6, 1453-1465[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Tonetti, M., Sturla, L., Bisso, A., Benatti, U., and De Flora, A. (1996) J. Biol Chem. 271, 27274-27279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Chang, S., Duerr, B., and Serif, G. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 1693-1697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Thoden, J. B., Frey, P. A., and Holden, H. M. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 2149-2161[Abstract]
16. Varughese, K. I, Skinner, M. M., Whiteley, J. M., Matthews, D. A., and Xuong, N. H. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 6080-6084[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Ghosh, D., Weeks, C. M., Grochulski, P., Duax, W. L., Erman, M., Rimsay, R. L., and Orr, J. C. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 10064-10068[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Breton, R., Housset, D., Mazza, C., and Fontecilla Camps, J. C. (1996) Structure 4, 905-915[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Tanaka, N., Nonaka, T., Nakanishi, M., Deyashiki, Y., Hara, A., and Mitsui, Y. (1996) Structure 4, 33-45[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Rafferty, J. B., Simon, J. W., Stuitje, A. R., Slabas, A. R., Fawcett, T., and Rice, D. W. (1995) Structure 3, 927-938[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Andersson, A., Jordan, D., Schneider, G., and Lindqvist, Y. (1996) Structure 4, 1161-1170[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Nakajma, K., Yamashita, A., Akama, H., Nakatsu, T., Kato, H., Hashimoto, T., Oda, J., and Yamada, Y. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 4876-4881[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Tanaka, N., Nonaka, T., Tanabe, T., Yoshimoto, T, Tsuru, D., and Mitsui, Y. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 7715-7730[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Hulsmeyer, M., Hecht, H. J., Niefind, K., Hofer, B., Eltis, L. D., Timmis, K. N., and Schomburg, D. (1998) Protein Sci. 7, 1286-1293[Abstract]
25. Orr, G. A., and Blanchard, J. S. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 142, 232-234[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Benson, T. E., Marquardt, J. L., Marquardt, A. C., Etzkorn, F. A., and Walsh, C. T. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 2024-2030[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. He, X., Thorson, S. J., and Liu, H. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 4721-4731[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Arnold, J. L., You, K., Allison, W. S., and Kaplan, O, N. (1976) Biochemistry 15, 4844-4849[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Morelli, A., and Flora, D. (1977) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 179, 698-705[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Hallis, M. T., Lei, Y., Que, S. L. N., and Liu, H. N. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 4935-4945[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Ginsberg, V. (1961) J. Biol. Chem. 236, 2389-2393[Free Full Text]
32. Ginsberg, V. (1960) J. Biol. Chem. 235, 2196-2201[Free Full Text]
33. Thoden, J., Frey, A. P., and Holden, M. H. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 5137-5144[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Thoden, J., Hegeman, A., Wesenberg, G., Chapeau, C. M., Frey, A. P., and Holden, M. H. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 6294-6304[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Liu, Y., Thoden, J., Kim, J., Berger, E., Gulick, M. A., Ruzicka, J. F., Holden, M. H., and Frey, A. P. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 10675-10684[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
Y. Yamazaki, L. Danelishvili, M. Wu, M. MacNab, and L. E. Bermudez
Mycobacterium avium Genes Associated with the Ability To Form a Biofilm
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2006; 72(1): 819 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
G. Watt, C. Leoff, A. D. Harper, and M. Bar-Peled
A Bifunctional 3,5-Epimerase/4-Keto Reductase for Nucleotide-Rhamnose Synthesis in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2004; 134(4): 1337 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
M. Maki and R. Renkonen
Biosynthesis of 6-deoxyhexose glycans in bacteria
Glycobiology, March 1, 2004; 14(3): 1R - 15R.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. A. Wolucka and M. Van Montagu
GDP-Mannose 3',5'-Epimerase Forms GDP-L-gulose, a Putative Intermediate for the de Novo Biosynthesis of Vitamin C in Plants
J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2003; 278(48): 47483 - 47490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
K.-i. Nakayama, Y. Maeda, and Y. Jigami
Interaction of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose-3,5-epimerase-4-reductase with GDP-mannose-4,6-dehydratase stabilizes the enzyme activity for formation of GDP-fucose from GDP-mannose
Glycobiology, October 1, 2003; 13(10): 673 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
D. J. Becker and J. B. Lowe
Fucose: biosynthesis and biological function in mammals
Glycobiology, July 1, 2003; 13(7): 41R - 53R.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Kneidinger, M. Graninger, G. Adam, M. Puchberger, P. Kosma, S. Zayni, and P. Messner
Identification of Two GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose Reductases Synthesizing GDP-D-rhamnose in Aneurinibacillus thermoaerophilus L420-91T
J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2001; 276(8): 5577 - 5583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, F.
Right arrow