![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 26743-26750, September 17, 1999
,From Wyeth Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently the genes encoding the human and
Escherichia coli GDP-mannose dehydratase and GDP-fucose
synthetase (GFS) protein have been cloned and it has been shown that
these two proteins alone are sufficient to convert GDP mannose to GDP
fucose in vitro. GDP-fucose synthetase from E. coli is a novel dual function enzyme in that it catalyzes
epimerizations and a reduction reaction at the same active site. This
aspect separates fucose biosynthesis from that of other deoxy and
dideoxy sugars in which the epimerase and reductase activities are
present on separate enzymes encoded by separate genes. By NMR
spectroscopy we have shown that GFS catalyzes the stereospecific
hydride transfer of the ProS hydrogen from NADPH to carbon 4 of the
mannose sugar. This is consistent with the stereospecificity observed
for other members of the short chain dehydrogenase reductase family of
enzymes of which GFS is a member. Additionally the enzyme is able to
catalyze the epimerization reaction in the absence of NADP or NADPH.
The kinetic mechanism of GFS as determined by product inhibition and
fluorescence binding studies is consistent with a random mechanism. The
dissociation constants determined from fluorescence studies indicate
that the enzyme displays a 40-fold stronger affinity for the substrate NADPH as compared with the product NADP and utilizes NADPH
preferentially as compared with NADH. This study on GFS, a unique
member of the short chain dehydrogenase reductase family, coupled with
that of its recently published crystal structure should aid in the development of antimicrobial or anti-inflammatory compounds that act by
blocking selectin-mediated cell adhesion.
GDP fucose is synthesized mainly by a de novo pathway
from GDP mannose in a three-step reaction involving two enzymes as
shown in Fig. 1. In the first step
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose is formed by oxidation at C-4 and subsequent
reduction at C-6 of the mannose ring, catalyzed by an
NADP-dependent enzyme GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase. In
reactions catalyzed by GDP-fucose synthetase, this intermediate then
undergoes an epimerization at C-3 and C-5 of the mannose ring followed
by reduction of the keto group at C-4 to yield GDP fucose (1).
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Pathway of GDP fucose biosynthesis. The
enzymes catalyzing the conversion of GDP mannose to GDP fucose are
shown above the arrows. GDP mannose-4,6-dehydratase
(GMD) catalyzes the oxidation at C-4 followed by the
reduction at C-6 of GDP mannose with loss of a water molecule to yield
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose. GDP-fucose synthetase (GFS)
catalyzes the epimerization at C-3 and C-5 to yield
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxyglucose which undergoes subsequent reduction to yield
GDP Fucose
Fucose is found widely distributed in complex carbohydrates as a component of glycoconjugates such as glycoproteins and glycolipids in a wide variety of species from humans to bacteria. Fucose is added to these glycoconjugates by specific transferases that utilize GDP fucose as the sugar donor. In bacteria fucose is present as a component of the capsular polysaccharides and lipopolysaccharides which function as antigenic determinants. In several species defects in the genes encoding GFS1 have shed some light on the role played by fucose in these organisms. Inactivation of the nolK genes in Azorhizobium caulinodans results in an inability to introduce the 6-O-fucosyl branch on the lipochitooligosaccharides of the Nod factors which is an important modification for nodulation in some host plants (2). Recently it has been shown that the GFS gene which is responsible for biosynthesis of the O-antigen in Heliobacter pylori is induced at low pH and plays a role in the survival of the bacterium under acidic conditions and potentially in the virulence of the organism (3). In mammals fucose is present as a component of human blood group antigens and also is involved in regulation of the immune response. Humans deficient in the biosynthesis of GDP fucose suffer from the immune disorder leukocyte adhesion deficiency type II (4, 5). These patients fail to synthesize fucosylated blood groups and their leukocytes do not express fucose as a component of the selectin ligand, sialyl Lewis X (6, 7). The lack of fucose on different glycoconjugates does not seem to arise from a defect in fucosyltransferase activities but is related to the decrease in the intracellular production of GDP fucose, which serves as a substrate for these transferases. Conversely, increased fucosylation of glycoconjugates involved in metastasis has been observed in cancer patients (8). Understanding the mechanism of synthesis of GDP fucose should aid in the development of drugs having potential as anti-inflammatory or antimetastatic agents.
The NADH/NADPH-dependent short chain dehydrogenase
reductase family consists of enzymes which comprise a wide variety of
activities and include alcohol and polyol dehydrogenases, steroid
dehydrogenases, prostaglandin dehydrogenases, carbonyl reductases,
dihydropteridine reductases, and ketoacyl reductases (9, 10). These
enzymes are present in bacteria, yeast, plants, and animals indicating that these enzymes are evolutionarily important in several metabolic pathways. Based on sequence and structural alignment studies, the short
chain dehydrogenase family has also been shown to be distantly related
to the family of steroid dehydrogeanses which include enzymes like
3-
-hydroxy-5-ene steroid dehydrogenase, UDP-galactose-4-epimerase
(Gal E), and some other proteins which in sum comprise five EC classes,
dehydrogenases, reductases, dehydratases, epimerases, and isomerases.
Most of the members of the SDR family show residue conservations of
only about 15-30% with only 9 residues being conserved in more than
90% of the enzymes. These include the Ser-Tyr-Lys catalytic triad and
the glycine residues involved in coenzyme binding.
Analysis of the amino acid sequence of GFS indicates that it contains a
conserved Ser-Tyr-Lys catalytic triad, suggesting that it belongs to
the family of short chain dehydrogenase reductases (11, 12). However,
in contrast to UDP-galactose-4-epimerase and other enzymes of the SDR
family, GFS catalyzes two distinct reactions, epimerizations at C-3 and
C-5 of the mannose ring and the subsequent NADPH-dependent
reduction at C-4 (1, 12-14). In this paper we show that like other
SDR's (15-24) hydride transfer catalyzed by GFS is stereospecific and
occurs at the ProS position of the nicotinamide ring. Furthermore, we
present evidence that the epimerizations at C-3 and C-5 differ from
that catalyzed by other members of the SDR family in that they do not
involve the transient reduction and oxidation of an NAD or NADP
cofactor and that the epimerization occurs in the absence of its
cofactor NADPH. Our investigations also included various inhibition and
fluorescence binding studies that indicated that GFS follows a random
bi-bi mechanism. Our results show that the enzyme displays a much
higher affinity for its cosubstrate NADPH, as compared with the product NADP, consistent with the catalytic mechanism in which NADPH binds to
the enzyme transfers the hydride and is released as NADP.
| |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression and Purification of Escherichia coli GFS--
The
E. coli GFS gene was polymerase chain reaction amplified
from pSEWCAG (1) using the following two oligonucleotides: GGCGCATATGAGTAAACAACGAGTTTTTATTGC and
GGCGAAGCTTACCCCCGAAAGCGGTCTTGAT. The amplified DNA was gel
purified, digested with NdeI and HindIII, and
ligated into the NdeI and HindIII sites of the
E. coli expression vector pRSETB (Invitrogen) to yield
pT7WCAG. This resulted in isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside inducible
expression of GFS having its native sequence, driven by a T7 promoter.
E. coli strain BL21(DE3/pLysS), containing pT7WCAG, was
grown in DM4 minimal salts with 0.5% glucose, trace metals, and
supplemented with 100 mg/liter ampicillin, and 34 mg/liter
chloramphenicol at 25 °C in a 10-liter Biostat C fermenter (B. Braun
Biotech International) to an OD600 of 6.0 At that point
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside was added to a
final concentration of 0.3 mM and the cells were grown for
an additional 4 h before harvest by centrifugation. Cell pellets
were stored at
80 °C. Typically 5 g of cells were broken in a
French Press at 12,000 p.s.i. The cells were spun in a SS34 rotor
at 15,000 rpm for 30 min. After centrifugation the supernatant was
loaded onto a 20-ml DEAE Toyopearl column (Toso Hass). The enzyme
was eluted with a gradient of 0-0.5 M NaCl followed by
chromatography over a 10-ml heparin-Toyopearl column (Toso Hass) from
which it was eluted with a stepwise gradient from 0 to 0.5 M NaCl. The protein was then loaded onto a propyl aspartamide column and eluted with a reverse gradient of 1-0
M ammonium sulfate. The resulting protein was greater than
90% pure as judged by SDS-PAGE and Commasie Blue staining.
Alternatively E. coli strain GI934 containing plasmid
pSEWCAG was grown in LB media containing ampicillin at
37 oC. The cells were induced with 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside once they reached
an OD of 0.5 at A600 and then grown for an
additional 4 h. Cell pellets were then frozen and the protein was
purified by the same procedure as above.
In Vitro Assays of Purified GFS--
The purified protein was
assayed in 100 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT, 150 µM NADPH,
and 300 µM GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose. A 96-well plate was
incubated at 37 oC for 10 min and the reaction was
initiated by the addition of 0.25 µg of GFS. Initial rates were
determined by following the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm due to the
conversion of NADPH (
340 = 6.22 mM
1 cm
1) to NADP.
Synthesis of
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose--
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was
synthesized from GDP mannose using the purified E. coli
GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase by a slight modification of a previously
published procedure (1). Typical reaction conditions were 100 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM
DTT, 5 mM EDTA, 25 mM GDP mannose, 10 µM NADPH, and 100 µM NADP at
37 oC for 3-6 h. GDP mannose dehydratase (0.1 mg/ml),
which had been previously incubated with NADP at 37 oC,
was added to initiate the reaction. The reactions were allowed to
proceed to completion as judged by high performance liquid chromatography and the protein was removed by ultrafiltration using a
Centricon 10. The remaining mixture was loaded onto a Sephadex G-10
desalting column eluted with water and the peak for
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was determined by following the absorbance at
260 nm (
260 = 11.8 mM
1
cm
1). GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was then lyophilized and
stored at
20 oC as a powder. GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose
prepared by this procedure is ~100% pure as checked by NMR and mass spectroscopy.
Determination of Stereospecificity of Hydride Transfer-- 4S-[2H]NADPH was prepared by a previously published procedure for its synthesis from NADP, reduced glutathione, DTT, triethanolamine, and glutathione reductase in 2H2O (25, 26). Protiated NADPH was also prepared in a similar manner using H2O instead of D2O. 4R-[2H]NADPH was also prepared by a previously published procedure using NADP, acetaldehyde-D4, DTT, and aldehyde dehydrogenase (25, 26). The protinated and deuterated NADPH/D generated by the method above were then purified by chromatography on a Mono Q column followed by elution using a 0-1 M KCl gradient in 20 mM triethanolamine (25). 200 µM 4S- and or 4R-[2H]NADPH was reacted with 400 µM GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.8. The enzyme was added and the mixture was incubated at 37 oC. The reaction was allowed to go to completion determined by following the decrease in 340. After the reaction was over the mixture was lyophilized and exchanged with 1 ml of D2O twice. The mixture was finally resuspended in 0.7 ml of D2O and 1H NMR spectroscopy was performed on a 600 MHz Varian Unity Plus NMR spectrometer.
Paper Chromatography-- 14C-Labeled GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was synthesized beginning with 14C-labeled GDP mannose by the same procedure as stated above. The 14C-labeled GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was then incubated with GFS and NADPH, GFS and NADP, and GFS alone. The reaction products were then reduced with 0.2 M NaBH4 for 15 min to reduce the GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose and then were cleaved from the sugar by incubating in 1 M trichloroacetic acid for 10 min in boiling water. The resulting mixture was chromatographed on Whatman 3MM paper in descending mode using a solvent system consisting of ethyl acetate:pyridine:water (3.6:1.0:1.15) for 7 h. Free sugar standards were localized by AgNO3 staining in acetone followed by NaOH in methanol. Radioactivity was detected by cutting the paper into strips of 1 cm × 1 cm and counting on a scintillation counter.
Determination of Kinetic Parameters-- Assays were carried out as described above at varying concentrations of NADPH and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose. Since the order of substrate binding was not known, initial velocities were measured at various concentrations of NADPH (10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 µM) and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose (5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 80, and 100 µM) at varying concentrations of NADP (5 to 100 µM) and GDP fucose (20 to 140 µM) at unsaturating concentrations of either NADPH or GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose. The data were fit to double reciprocal plots of 1/NADPH and 1/GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose versus 1/intial velocity (Vo). We also explored the effect of GDP at varying concentrations of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose on the reaction and the data were analyzed by the same procedure as above.
pH Dependence and Isotope Effect--
Purified proteins were
assayed in 100 mM MES, pH 5.0-6.0, and 25 mM
HEPES, pH 6.5-8.0, buffer that contained 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT, and 150 µM
NADPH. GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was varied from 20 to 300 µM. A 96-well plate was incubated at 37 oC
for 10 min and the reaction was initiated by the addition of 0.25 µg
of GFS. Initial rates were determined by following the decrease in
absorbance at 340 nm due to the conversion of NADPH (
340 = 6.22 mM
1 cm
1) to NADP. The
deuterium isotope effect was determined using the spectrophotometric
assay as described above. To minimize errors arising from slight
variations in enzyme activity or assay conditions data were collected
at varying 4S-[1H]NADPH and
4S-[2H]NADPH on the same day.
Fluorescence Spectroscopy--
All fluorescence measurements
were carried out at 25 oC at pH 7.0 on a Photon Technology
International Fluorimeter with 0.55 and 5.5 µM GFS.
Binding of NADPH and NADP to GFS was followed by monitoring the
quenching of enzyme fluorescence intensity induced by their binding to
the apoenzyme. The apoenzyme was prepared by a previously published
procedure (27) followed by dialyzing the purified protein against 2 liters of potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, containing 5 mM EDTA and the buffer was changed periodically over a
period of 2 days. The excitation wavelength was set at 280 nm and the
quenching of the fluorescence emission of the protein at 339 nm was
followed. The excitation and emission slits were 3 and 9 nm. The same
procedure as above, quenching of fluorescence of apoenzyme, was used to
determine the affinity of GFS for GDP fucose and
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose. The quenching of GFS fluorescence was
analyzed using a previously published nonlinear least squares procedure
(27) that fit the average number of moles (
) of bound substrate per
mole of protein and the free ligand [L]f to the
Adair-Klotz equation.
was calculated by the same procedure using
the relationship
= n(I
Ia)/(Ih
Ia), where n = number of binding
sites, Ia = fluorescence of apoenzyme,
I = measured fluorescence intensity at a particular concentration of substrate, Ih = fluorescence of
holoenzyme with its n of binding sites saturated with
substrate. [L]f was determined by using the
relation [L]f = [L]t
n[Et],
where Lt and Et represent total
ligand and total enzyme concentration, respectively. 90% loss in
fluorescence intensity was observed when enzyme was completely saturated with NADP and NADPH. Only 5% of the original fluorescence intensity of apoenzyme remained on complete satuaration, of GFS, with
GDP fucose, GDP and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose.
Calorimetry--
Enthalpy of the binding of GDP fucose was
obtained by microcalorimetry performed on a Microcal Isothermal
Titration Calorimeter. The cell was calibrated to 28 oC
using an internal cell heater. The cell was equilibrated in 10 mM Trizma (Tris base) buffer, pH 7.4, containing 50 mM NaCl buffer at 28 oC with stirring at 400 rpm for 30 min. Subsequently 1.4 ml of 70 µM GFS
(
280 = 31,300 M
1
cm
1) which was dialyzed overnight in 10 mM
Trizma buffer, pH 7.4, containing 50 mM NaCl solution was
transferred into the calorimeter cell using a syringe. A 50-µl glass
syringe containing 20 mM GDP fucose in the same buffer and
an extended attachment to perform injections was attached to the
calorimeter. The baseline signal was collected for at least 15 min
before initiating the reaction by subsequent injections of GDP fucose.
Integration of the thermogram was performed by the ITC program for
Origin supplied by Microcal.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Stereospecificty of Hydride Transfer--
The 1H NMR
spectrum of NADP generated at the end of the reaction was analyzed for
the retention of deuterium at the 4 position of the pyridine ring (Fig.
2) (28). A ProS specific enzyme removes deuterium from 4S-[2H]NADPH and the NADP
formed as an end product of the reaction shows a doublet at 8.8 ppm for
the proton at the 4 position of the pyridine ring. Analogously when
4R-[2H]NADPH is used no doublet should be
observed since it is the ProS proton that is transferred and the
deuteron remains attached to the C-4 position of the pyridine ring.
When NADPH deuterated at the 4S position was reacted with
GFS the proton left over at the C-4 position exhibited a H1 splitting
at about 8.8 ppm. When the experiment was repeated with NADPH
deuterated at the 4R position no H1 splitting at position
C-4 was observed, indicating deuterium was still attached at that
position. This confirms that like all other enzymes belonging to the
SDR class the hydride transfer catalyzed by GFS is stereospecific and
occurs at the 4S position of NADPH.
|
NADPH Is Not Required for the Epimerization Reaction--
To
characterize the products of the epimerization and reduction reaction
and to investigate the requirement for NADP in the epimerization
reaction catalyzed by GFS we incubated the enzyme with
14C-labeled GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose under different
conditions and the products of the reaction were identified by
descending paper chromatography. Our data indicate that incubation of
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose with GFS alone or with GFS plus NADP converts
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose to GDP-4-keto-6-deoxyglucose. The
expected monosaccharides resulting from reduction of
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxyglucose by borohydride and cleavage from the
nucleotide by acid, 6-deoxyglucose, and fucose, comigrate with their
unlabeled standards (Fig. 3). This
confirms that GFS alone is sufficient to convert
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose to the epimerized product
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxyglucose and that NADP is not required for the
epimerization reaction. We confirmed that the product produced on
incubation of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose and NADPH with GFS was GDP
fucose by co-chromatography with authentic GDP fucose (Fig. 3).
Incubation of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose alone under the same conditions
as above followed by reduction and cleavage yielded rhamnose and
6-deoxytalose. 6-Deoxytalose is not observed as it runs off the
chromatograph in this solvent system (data not shown).
|
Determination of Steady State Mechanism--
Values for
Vmax, Km, and
kcat/Km for NADPH and
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose were determined by initial velocity studies
which monitored the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm due to the
oxidation of NADPH at varying concentrations of NADPH and GDP-keto-6-deoxymannose (Table I). Based
on initial velocity studies GFS displayed a much more lower affinity
for NADH (Km = 108.8 µM and
Vmax = 6.6 µmol min
1
mg
1) as compared with NADPH. Product inhibition studies
were carried out in order to elucidate the suspected order of substrate
binding of GDP fucose synthetase. GDP fucose was a competitive
inhibitor with respect to NADPH and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose since the double-reciprocal plots of 1/V versus 1/S at
unsaturating concentrations of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy mannose and NADPH
intersect on the 1/V axis (Fig.
4, A and B). NADP,
the other product of the reaction, was also a competitive inhibitor
when varied at different concentrations of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose
and NADPH (Fig. 4, C and D). Thus the steady
state kinetic results are consistent with a random bi-bi mechanism in
which either the cofactor or substrate can bind to the enzyme in the
absence of the other. GDP was a competitive inhibitor with respect to
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose with a Ki of 60.5 ± 6.8 µM.
|
|
pH Profile and Isotope Effects--
A number of buffers were
screened to find a system where the rate of the reaction would be
independent of buffer concentration. We found that MES over pH values
5.0, 5.5, and 6.0 and HEPES over pH values 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, and 8.0 were
suitable for assays over the pH range 5.0-8.0. The effect of pH on log
Vmax/Km indicates that there
exists at least one catalytic group on the enzyme with a
pKa between 6 and 6.5 (Fig.
5). An isotope effect of 1.4 ± 0.2 was observed on DV arising from deuterium substitution at
the pro-S hydrogen at C-4 of NADPH. This effect is to small to be
significant, hence hydride transfer may only be partially rate-limiting
in the mechanism.
|
Determination of Dissociation Constants for NADPH and NADP-- When excited at 280 nm the emission spectrum of GFS has two maxima, a primary maxima at 339 nm which is about twice as intense as the secondary maxima at 450 nm. The dissociation constants were determined by monitoring the increase and decrease in signal intensity at 450 nm and 338 nm induced by the binding of NADPH and NADP to the apoenzyme. The Kd for NADPH was determined to be 1.29 ± 0.07 µM assuming a ratio of 1 between concentration of binding sites and protein concentration. The dissociation constant for NADP was determined by monitoring the decrease in fluorescence intensity at 339 nm. The enzyme displayed a much weaker affinity for its product NADP as compared with NADPH and had a Kd of 74.2 ± 6.9 µM with the data best fitting the Adair-Klotz equation assuming n = 1 per monomer. This agrees with the crystal structure studies, which also indicates a 1:1, stoichiometry between NADPH/NADP and binding site per subunit (11, 12).
Determination of Dissociation Constants for
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose, GDP Fucose, and GDP--
The affinity of
apoenzyme for GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose was determined by monitoring
the quenching of enzyme fluorescence upon substrate binding at 338 nm.
The Kd was determined to be 2.9 ± 0.10 µM with n = 1 per monomer. Thus like NADP
and NADPH the enzyme has two substrate-binding sites per functional dimer. We also determined the affinity of GFS for its product GDP
fucose by fluorescence spectroscopy and calorimetry. The dissociation constant obtained from fluorimetry was 47 ± 2.8 µM
and was comparable to that obtained from calorimetry which was 51 ± 3.2 µM (Fig. 6). The
heat of the reaction determined from calorimetry was
6696 cal/mol and
the value of binding sites obtained was 1.01 ± 0.03 per monomer.
The ratio of binding sites to protein concentration was also in
agreement with that determined by fluorimetry, which was two binding
sites per functional dimer as reported for GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose. We tried to determine the dissociation constant for
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose by calorimetry but were unsuccessful in doing
so due to the heat of reaction generated on account of epimerization of
the substrate when it comes in contact with high concentrations of the
enzyme. The dissociation constant for GDP was also ascertained by
following the decrease in enzyme fluorescence at 339 nm. The data were
fit to the Adair-Klotz equation and the Kd was
established to be 51.8 ± 5.9 µM (Fig.
7A). This
Kd along with the Ki of 60.5 ± 6.8 µM determined by inhibition studies (Fig.
7B), indicates that GDP binds at the same site as GDP fucose on the enzyme and that it is primarily the GDP part of GDP fucose that
binds to the enzyme.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GFS as isolated from E. coli is a homodimer of 334 amino acids per subunit (11, 12). Analysis of its amino acid sequence with that of its recently published crystal structure reveals the presence of the conserved Ser-Lys-Tyr catalytic triad observed in other members of the SDR family. The ability of GFS to preferentially transfer the ProS hydrogen of NADPH is consistent with the chirality preference described for other members of the SDR family. The products resulting after incubation of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose either with GFS alone or with GFS plus NADP ascertained from paper chromatography provides evidence that excludes a non-enzymatic mechanism for epimerization for GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose and shows that it is not mediated by the transient reduction and oxidation of a bound NADP or NAD cofactor. GFS preferentially utilizes NADPH as compared with NADH. This is consistent with the crystal structure of the enzyme wherein the side chain of Arg-36 makes hydrogen bonds with the 2'-phosphate groups of NADPH and is thus able to compensate for the negative charge of the phosphate groups.
Product inhibition and fluorescence binding studies provided evidence in support of a random mechanism. Inhibition by NADP-like GDP fucose was competitive with respect to both NADPH and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose suggesting that either the cofactor or the enzyme can bind to the substrate first. A Ki of 55.3 ± 3.9 µM and 69.3 ± 5.9 µM for GDP fucose and NADP, respectively, obtained from product inhibition studies is in agreement with the dissociation constants obtained from fluorescence binding studies. The quenching of enzyme fluorescence observed on titrating the apoenzyme with GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose and GDP fucose demonstrated that a binary complex was possible in the absence of the pyridine nucleotide which function as cosubstrates in the reaction. The formation of a binary complex was further confirmed by monitoring the binding of GDP fucose by calorimetry. In contrast to earlier reports that the human enzyme exhibits half-sites reactivity (29), the fluorescence data presented here indicate that each subunit of the E. coli enzyme contains one substrate and one cofactor-binding site. This is in agreement with the crystal structure data, which shows the appearance of electron density for two pyridine nucleotides per dimer (11, 12).
On the basis of the decrease in fluorescence intensity observed on
binding of NADPH to the apoenzyme, GFS was found to have one binding
site per monomer with a Kd of 1.3 ± 0.07 µM. The value for the Km of NADPH is
9 ± 0.8 µM which is not that much greater than the
dissociation constant. Other enzymes of the SDR family which follow an
ordered Theorell-Chance mechanism like CDP-paratose synthase, flavonol
3-O-methyltransferase, and glutamic-
- semialdehyde
dehydrogenase have a much higher Km/Kd ratio ranging from 25 to
5000 (30). The fact that both substrate and cofactor can bind to the
enzyme alone, coupled with the product inhibition data seems to
indicate that catalysis is unlikely to proceed by an ordered mechanism. The interpretation of the kinetic data is complicated, however, since
all of our velocity studies monitor only the reduction reaction although the enzyme also catalyzes an epimerization reaction. Hence a
special form of a random bi-bi reaction wherein one of the substrates
adds in a rapid equilibrium fashion while the addition of the second
substrate and interconversion of the central complex determine the
overall velocity of the reaction cannot be ruled out. Support for this
hypothesis comes from the isotope effect observed with NADPD, which
demonstrates that hydride transfer is only partially rate-limiting in
the reaction mechanism.
A comparison of the amino acid sequences shows E. coli GFS has 24% identity with Gal E. Both enzymes also contain the conserved Ser-Lys-Tyr catalytic triad (11). Further comparison of the amino acid sequences and structures of the enzymes reveals that the loop from residues Leu33-Phe54, which is thought to be responsible for the tight binding of cofactor in GalE, is absent in GFS. This is consistent with the different reaction mechanism of GFS from GalE in which a tightly bound NAD cofactor is transiently reduced and then reoxidized during the course of the enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The absence of this loop in GFS also results in NADPH binding in a more solvent-exposed manner which is consistent with the kinetic data that NADPH is released as NADP after GFS catalysis.
The presence of similar and properly structured catalytic triads in
both Gal E and GFS seems to suggest similar roles for Ser107, Tyr136, and Lys140 of GFS
(11). However, as mentioned earlier the epimerizations catalyzed by GFS
are distinct from the one catalyzed by GalE in that they do not involve
the transient reduction and oxidation of an NAD or NADP cofactor. The
epimerizations at C-3 and C-5 of GDP-4-keto-6 deoxymannose catalyzed by
GFS most likely proceeds via an enediol-enolate intermediate as has
been proposed for related epimerases involved in deoxy and dideoxy
sugar biosynthesis. (31, 32). Our pH studies seem to support this
hypothesis since a pKa between 6.1 and 6.5 for GFS
compares well with a pKa of ~6.1 reported for the
tyrosinate form of the active site tyrosine in the Gal E reaction. We
have proposed that Tyr136 by virtue of its ionized side
chain is able to donate a proton resulting in the formation of an
enediol/enolate intermediate. The side chain of His179
(Fig. 8) that is in close proximity to
the 3' of the ribose could then fulfill the role of a general base and
abstract a proton from this intermediate followed by reprotonation from
the opposite face of the sugar ring. This possibility arises due to the
presence of a "classical base" such as histidine 179 in the active
site of GFS (Fig. 8), whereas a basic residue such as a histidine, glutamate, or aspartate is absent in the active site of Gal E. This
mechanism would also be consistent with the loss of the proton at C-3
in the GFS-catalyzed reaction as demonstrated by Chang et
al. (14) and with the ability of GFS to catalyze the epimerization reaction in the absence of NADPH. The same residues involved in the
epimerization at C-3 may then catalyze the epimerization at C-5 by
reorientation of the sugar in the active site. This is conceivable
based on the studies of UDP-galactose epimerase which have revealed
that different UDP sugar substrates can be accommodated in the active
site by conformational changes in the UDP sugar and active site
rearrangements of water molecules (33-35).
|
The second reaction catalyzed by GFS the NADPH-dependent reduction at C-4 appears to be more representative of that catalyzed by other SDR enzymes in that it involves a nicotinamide cofactor. In this case the role of the catalytic Ser-Lys-Tyr can be understood by analogy with other well studied SDR enzymes. The same groups involved in stabilizing the enediol/enolate intermediate during the epimerization reaction could catalyze the second reaction reduction at C-4. In the reduction mechanism we propose that Ser107 acts as the proton shuttle between the sugar and the phenolic side chain of Tyr136. We postulate that hydride transfer then occurs from the nicotinamide ring of NADPH to the 4 position of the sugar by a concerted mechanism. This catalytic serine may also help in stabilizing the conformation of the substrate in the active site. Lys140 may help to stabilize the nicotinamide ring in an active confirmation by interaction with the hydroxyl groups of the ribose sugar. This mechanism is supported by the structure of the ternary complexes of GalE with NADH and UDP sugars and mutagenesis experiments with GalE as well as the structure of ternary complexes of other SDR enzymes (11, 33). In GFS the Ser-Tyr-Lys catalytic triad is thus properly positioned to play an analogous role in the epimerization and NADPH-dependent reduction of the GDP-keto-6-deoxymannose at C-3/C-5 and C-4, respectively. However, in the absence of a complex structure for GFS with the GDP sugars, residues in the active site involved in the epimerization reaction cannot be confirmed.
In summary, our data indicates that GFS is truly a bifunctional enzyme
that catalyzes both the epimerization and reduction reactions.
The enzyme residues involved in the epimerization and reduction
reaction should be confirmed by determining the structure of the
complex of GFS with NADP and the GDP sugar and by site-directed mutagenesis experiments. This will help demonstrate if these reactions are typical of other SDR enzymes.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Wyeth Research, 87 Cambridge Park Dr., Cambridge, MA 02140. Tel.: 617-498-8952; Fax:
617-498-8993; E-mail: smenon@genetics.com.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: GFS, GDP-fucose synthetase; SDR, short chain dehydrogenase reductase; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; DTT, dithiothreitol.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Sullivan, F. X.,
Kumar, R.,
Kriz, R.,
Stahl, M.,
Xu, G.-Y.,
Rouse, J.,
Chang, X.,
Boodhoo, A.,
Potvin, B.,
and Cumming, D. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8193-8202 |
| 2. | Mergaert, P., Montagu, V. M., and Holsters, M. (1997) FEBS Lett. 409, 312-316[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | McGowan, C., Necheva, A., Thompson, S., Cover, T., and Blasser, J. (1998) Mol. Microbiol. 30, 19-31[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Etzioni, A., Frydman, M., Pollack, S., Avidor, I., Phillips, M. L., Paulson, J. C., and Gershoni-Baruch, R. (1992) N. Engl. J. Med 327, 1789-1792[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Sturla, L., Etzioni, A., Bisso, A., Zanardi, D., De Flora, G., Silengo, L., De Flora, A., and Tonneti, M. (1998) FEBS Lett. 429, 274-278[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Feizi, T. (1991) Trends. Biochem. Sci. 16, 84-86[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Kansas, G. S.
(1996)
Blood
88,
3259-3287 |
| 8. | McEver, R. P. (1997) Glycoconj. J. 14, 585-591[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Jornvall, H., Persson, B., Krook, M., Atrian, S., Gonzales, R., Jefffrey, J., and Ghosh, D. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 6002-6013 |
| 10. | Persson, B., Krook, M., and Jornvall, H. (1995) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 372, 383-395[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Somers, S. W., Stahl, L. M., and Sullivan, F. X. (1998) Structure 6, 1601-1612[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Rizzi, M., Tonetti, M., Vigevani, P., Sturla, L., Bisso, A., De Flora, A., Bordo, D., and Bolognesi, M. (1998) Structure 6, 1453-1465[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Tonetti, M.,
Sturla, L.,
Bisso, A.,
Benatti, U.,
and De Flora, A.
(1996)
J. Biol Chem.
271,
27274-27279 |
| 14. |
Chang, S.,
Duerr, B.,
and Serif, G.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
1693-1697 |
| 15. | Thoden, J. B., Frey, P. A., and Holden, H. M. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 2149-2161[Abstract] |
| 16. |
Varughese, K. I,
Skinner, M. M.,
Whiteley, J. M.,
Matthews, D. A.,
and Xuong, N. H.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6080-6084 |
| 17. |
Ghosh, D.,
Weeks, C. M.,
Grochulski, P.,
Duax, W. L.,
Erman, M.,
Rimsay, R. L.,
and Orr, J. C.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
10064-10068 |
| 18. | Breton, R., Housset, D., Mazza, C., and Fontecilla Camps, J. C. (1996) Structure 4, 905-915[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Tanaka, N., Nonaka, T., Nakanishi, M., Deyashiki, Y., Hara, A., and Mitsui, Y. (1996) Structure 4, 33-45[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Rafferty, J. B., Simon, J. W., Stuitje, A. R., Slabas, A. R., Fawcett, T., and Rice, D. W. (1995) Structure 3, 927-938[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Andersson, A., Jordan, D., Schneider, G., and Lindqvist, Y. (1996) Structure 4, 1161-1170[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Nakajma, K.,
Yamashita, A.,
Akama, H.,
Nakatsu, T.,
Kato, H.,
Hashimoto, T.,
Oda, J.,
and Yamada, Y.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
4876-4881 |
| 23. | Tanaka, N., Nonaka, T., Tanabe, T., Yoshimoto, T, Tsuru, D., and Mitsui, Y. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 7715-7730[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Hulsmeyer, M., Hecht, H. J., Niefind, K., Hofer, B., Eltis, L. D., Timmis, K. N., and Schomburg, D. (1998) Protein Sci. 7, 1286-1293[Abstract] |
| 25. | Orr, G. A., and Blanchard, J. S. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 142, 232-234[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Benson, T. E., Marquardt, J. L., Marquardt, A. C., Etzkorn, F. A., and Walsh, C. T. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 2024-2030[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | He, X., Thorson, S. J., and Liu, H. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 4721-4731[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Arnold, J. L., You, K., Allison, W. S., and Kaplan, O, N. (1976) Biochemistry 15, 4844-4849[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Morelli, A., and Flora, D. (1977) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 179, 698-705[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Hallis, M. T., Lei, Y., Que, S. L. N., and Liu, H. N. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 4935-4945[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Ginsberg, V.
(1961)
J. Biol. Chem.
236,
2389-2393 |
| 32. |
Ginsberg, V.
(1960)
J. Biol. Chem.
235,
2196-2201 |
| 33. | Thoden, J., Frey, A. P., and Holden, M. H. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 5137-5144[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Thoden, J., Hegeman, A., Wesenberg, G., Chapeau, C. M., Frey, A. P., and Holden, M. H. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 6294-6304[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Liu, Y., Thoden, J., Kim, J., Berger, E., Gulick, M. A., Ruzicka, J. F., Holden, M. H., and Frey, A. P. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 10675-10684[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Yamazaki, L. Danelishvili, M. Wu, M. MacNab, and L. E. Bermudez Mycobacterium avium Genes Associated with the Ability To Form a Biofilm Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2006; 72(1): 819 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Watt, C. Leoff, A. D. Harper, and M. Bar-Peled A Bifunctional 3,5-Epimerase/4-Keto Reductase for Nucleotide-Rhamnose Synthesis in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, April 1, 2004; 134(4): 1337 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maki and R. Renkonen Biosynthesis of 6-deoxyhexose glycans in bacteria Glycobiology, March 1, 2004; 14(3): 1R - 15R. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Wolucka and M. Van Montagu GDP-Mannose 3',5'-Epimerase Forms GDP-L-gulose, a Putative Intermediate for the de Novo Biosynthesis of Vitamin C in Plants J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2003; 278(48): 47483 - 47490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-i. Nakayama, Y. Maeda, and Y. Jigami Interaction of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose-3,5-epimerase-4-reductase with GDP-mannose-4,6-dehydratase stabilizes the enzyme activity for formation of GDP-fucose from GDP-mannose Glycobiology, October 1, 2003; 13(10): 673 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Becker and J. B. Lowe Fucose: biosynthesis and biological function in mammals Glycobiology, July 1, 2003; 13(7): 41R - 53R. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kneidinger, M. Graninger, G. Adam, M. Puchberger, P. Kosma, S. Zayni, and P. Messner Identification of Two GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose Reductases Synthesizing GDP-D-rhamnose in Aneurinibacillus thermoaerophilus L420-91T J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2001; 276(8): 5577 - 5583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||