![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 26789-26793, September 17, 1999
From the Previous work has indicated that the turnover of
chloroplast ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco;
EC 4.1.1.39) may be controlled by the redox state of certain cysteine residues. To test this hypothesis, directed mutagenesis and chloroplast transformation were employed to create a C172S substitution in the
Rubisco large subunit of the green alga Chlamydomonas
reinhardtii. The C172S mutant strain was not substantially
different from the wild type with respect to growth rate, and the
purified mutant enzyme had a normal circular dichroism spectrum.
However, the mutant enzyme was inactivated faster than the wild-type
enzyme at 40 and 50 °C. In contrast, C172S mutant Rubisco was more
resistant to sodium arsenite, which reacts with vicinal dithiols. The
effect of arsenite may be directed to the cysteine 172/192 pair that is
present in the wild-type enzyme, but absent in the mutant enzyme. The
mutant enzyme was also more resistant to proteinase K in
vitro at low redox potential. Furthermore, oxidative (hydrogen
peroxide) or osmotic (mannitol) stress-induced degradation of Rubisco
in vivo was delayed in C172S mutant cells relative to
wild-type cells. Thus, cysteine residues could play a role in
regulating the degradation of Rubisco under in vivo stress conditions.
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase
(Rubisco1; EC 4.1.1.39)
catalyzes the photosynthetic fixation of CO2 through the
Calvin cycle, the metabolic route that accounts for most of the carbon
input into the biosphere (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). However,
O2 is mutually competitive with CO2 at the same large-subunit active site, and oxygenation of RuBP leads to the loss of
CO2 through the seemingly wasteful photorespiratory
pathway. In all plants and green algae, Rubisco is composed of eight
55-kDa large subunits (encoded by the chloroplast rbcL gene)
and eight 15-kDa small subunits (encoded by a family of nuclear
rbcS genes). Photosynthetic prokaryotes have plant-type
hexadecameric holoenzymes, homodimeric enzymes composed of
large-subunit homologues, or both (reviewed in Ref. 3). The x-ray
crystal structures of representative enzymes have been solved (4-7),
and in each case, the catalytic site has been found to reside at the
interface between large subunits.
Because the difference between the velocities of carboxylation and
oxygenation determines net photosynthetic CO2 fixation (1,
8), many studies have been devoted to understanding the structural
basis for CO2/O2 specificity by screening for
chloroplast Rubisco mutants in the green alga Chlamydomonas
reinhardtii (reviewed in Ref. 9) or by expressing directed mutant
prokaryotic enzymes in Escherichia coli (reviewed in Ref.
2). Directed mutagenesis of eukaryotic Rubisco is hindered by the need
to transform the highly polyploid chloroplast genome. However, the
chloroplasts of Chlamydomonas and tobacco can be transformed
(e.g. Refs. 10 and 11), and directed mutagenesis has already
been used to investigate Chlamydomonas Rubisco (10, 12,
13).
In addition to its enzymatic function, Rubisco is a remarkably abundant
protein storing a considerable amount of nitrogen. The reutilization of
this nitrogen through the turnover of the enzyme and the mobilization
of its amino acids during natural or stress-induced senescence plays a
role in the nutritional balance of plants (reviewed in Ref. 14).
Proteolysis of Rubisco is indeed a prominent feature in the stress
responses of plants and algae, and several studies have shown that
Rubisco is oxidatively modified prior to its degradation (15-20).
Moreover, oxidation of Cys residues in vitro has been
proposed to switch Rubisco from a protease-resistant to
protease-sensitive form (21-23). The critical residues have not yet
been identified, but because oxidative modification of Rubisco is
widespread among species (15-20), it is likely that these residues are
conserved. Redox regulation by oxidation/reduction of Cys thiol groups
has been demonstrated for other chloroplast proteins, including
carbohydrate metabolism enzymes (24), ATP synthase (25, 26), components
of photosynthetic membrane complexes (27), and translation factors
(28). Nonetheless, there is as yet no evidence for a physiological role
of such a regulatory mechanism acting on Rubisco stability/turnover
in vivo. Thus, we have started to use directed mutagenesis
and chloroplast transformation of Chlamydomonas to scan for
the proposed regulatory properties of Cys residues. Accordingly, the
highly conserved Cys-172 has been changed to Ser, and the mutant
Rubisco has been studied both in vitro and in
vivo.
Strains and Culture Conditions--
C. reinhardtii
2137 mt+ is the wild-type strain (29). Rubisco
mutant 18-7G mt+ was used as the host for
transformation. Mutant 18-7G lacks Rubisco holoenzyme and requires
acetate for growth (30). It results from an rbcL nonsense
mutation that changes large-subunit Trp-66 to amber (31). All strains
were maintained at 25 °C in the dark with medium containing 10 mM sodium acetate and 1.5% Bacto-agar (29). For
biochemical analysis, photosynthesis-competent strains were grown in
acetate liquid medium (without agar) in either 500-ml or 2.5-liter
half-filled Erlenmeyer flasks under continuous white light (15 microeinsteins/m2/s) on a rotary shaker at 28 °C. For
Rubisco extraction, cells were harvested at stationary phase
(~107 cells/ml). Growth curves were determined in 50-ml
cultures with acetate or minimal (without acetate) medium at 15 microeinsteins/m2/s. Cells were counted with a hemocytometer.
Directed Mutagenesis and Chloroplast Transformation--
A
2951-base pair HaeIII DNA fragment (bases Rubisco Purification and Assay--
Cells were collected by
centrifugation at 2500 × g for 5 min. Pellets were
weighed, frozen with liquid N2, and stored at Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy--
Far (195-240 nm) and near
(250-300) UV circular dichroism spectra were obtained in a CD-6
dicrograph (Jobin-Yvon) using quartz cells of 0.1- and 10-mm optical
paths, respectively. Spectra were recorded at 0.5 nm/s with an
integration constant of 1 s. After averaging three runs for each
sample, solvent spectra were subtracted from those for purified Rubisco
(0.2 mg/ml in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.2, 10 mM
MgCl2, and 10 mM NaHCO3). Molar
ellipticity is expressed as degrees cm2/dmol, where the
molar units refer to amino acid residues in the far-UV spectrum and to
Rubisco heterodimer in the near-UV region.
Thermal Stability Measurements--
Purified Rubisco samples
(0.2 mg/ml in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.2, 10 mM
MgCl2, and 10 mM NaHCO3) were
placed in Eppendorf tubes and submerged in a water bath at 40 or
50 °C. At the indicated times, 20-µl aliquots of the samples were
mixed with 180 µl of 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.2, 10 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM
NaHCO3 in preincubated (30 °C) plastic vials (Bio-vial,
Beckman Instruments). The mixtures were further incubated at 30 °C
for 15 min before the RuBP carboxylase assay was started by the
addition of RuBP and NaH14CO3 (22).
Redox Buffers and Susceptibility to Proteolysis--
Aliquots
(200 µl) of purified Rubisco (0.2 mg/ml) were combined
with 100 µl of cystamine/cysteamine mixtures of constant monomeric
concentration (120 mM in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH
8.2, 10 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM
NaHCO3). Different cystamine/cysteamine ratios or other
oxidative agents were added as specified. Samples were incubated at
30 °C for 2 h, and 20-µl aliquots were then assayed for RuBP
carboxylase activity. To measure proteolysis, 80-µl aliquots were
incubated with 20 µl of freshly prepared proteinase K (0.5 µg/ml in
the same buffer; Roche Molecular Biochemicals) at 30 °C for 5 min.
Proteolysis was stopped by adding 10 µl of 22 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride in 100% ethanol and keeping the mixture
on ice for 10 min. Then, 55 µl of 0.25 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2 M 2-mercaptoethanol, 6.5% SDS, and 25% (w/v)
glycerol were added, and the samples were boiled for 4 min. Aliquots
(10-20 µl) were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, immunoblotting with rabbit antiserum directed against Euglena gracilis Rubisco, and blot densitometry as described previously (17, 22).
In Vivo Stress Experiments--
Rubisco content was determined
by centrifuging 1 ml of culture at 5000 × g for 1 min;
resuspending the pellet in 0.2 ml of 83 mM Tris-HCl, pH
6.8, 0.66 M 2-mercaptoethanol, 2.17% SDS, and 8.3% (w/v)
glycerol; and boiling for 4 min. The samples were quantified by blot
densitometry (17, 22).
Recovery and Phenotype of the C172S Mutant--
The C172S mutant
was recovered by transforming the 18-7G rbcL nonsense mutant
with pLS-C172S DNA and selecting for photosynthetic ability on minimal
medium in the light. Thus, it was clear that the C172S mutant Rubisco
retained substantial catalytic activity. The C172S mutant strain was
indistinguishable from the wild type when grown on acetate-supplemented
medium, and no difference was observed when its rate of growth in
liquid culture was compared with that of the wild type under
photoautotrophic, photoheterotrophic, or heterotrophic conditions (Fig.
1). However, crude extracts of the C172S
mutant cells had less RuBP carboxylase activity (~50 or 25% less in
extracts of autotrophically or photoheterotrophically grown cells,
respectively) than wild-type extracts. This difference was due both to
a decreased enzyme content of the C172S mutant cells and to a lower
specific activity of the purified C172S enzyme (~20% lower than that
of the wild-type enzyme).
Structural Stability of Purified C172S Rubisco--
Circular
dichroism spectra obtained for the purified C172S and wild-type Rubisco
enzymes were coincident, both in the far- and near-UV regions (Fig.
2), indicating that the single-atom substitution in C172S Rubisco did not substantially affect the secondary or tertiary structure. However, when incubated at elevated temperatures of 40 or 50 °C, C172S Rubisco was inactivated faster than the wild-type enzyme (Fig. 3). These
results indicate that the loss of a possible Cys-172-Cys-192 disulfide
bond (5) might be responsible for a decrease in the thermal stability
of C172S Rubisco. However, reduction of disulfide bonds with DTT caused similar increases in thermal inactivation for both the mutant and
wild-type enzymes at 50 °C (Fig. 3B).
Redox Modulation of Purified Rubisco--
Exposure of purified
Rubisco to different thiol-oxidizing agents resulted in enzyme
inactivation to a variable extent (Table I). Cystamine and
5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoate) substantially reduced RuBP carboxylase
activity, whereas copper ions and oxidized glutathione had less effect.
The only difference between the C172S and wild-type Rubisco
enzymes was observed with arsenite (Table I). Arsenite, a reagent for
vicinal dithiols (37), decreased wild-type RuBP carboxylase activity by
26%, but the effect on the mutant enzyme was negligible. In wild-type
Rubisco, arsenite may link the thiol groups of the closely associated
Cys-172 and Cys-192 residues (5), one of which is absent in the C172S
mutant enzyme.
Incubation of the purified C172S and wild-type Rubisco enzymes with
different ratios of cystamine and cysteamine showed that similar
amounts of oxidative inactivation took place at similar redox
potentials (Fig. 4). A
cystamine/cysteamine ratio of 2, which is close to the value of 1.5 found for Euglena Rubisco (22), caused a 50% inactivation
of both the C172S and wild-type Rubisco enzymes (Fig. 4). The
proteolytic sensitivity of the Rubisco large subunit also increased
with increasing ratios of cystamine to cysteamine (Fig.
5), and this has also been observed for
the Euglena enzyme (22). However, C172S mutant Rubisco was
more resistant to proteolysis under moderately oxidative conditions
than was the wild-type enzyme. For example, a disulfide/thiol ratio of 4.5 was required to obtain the same amount of mutant Rubisco
proteolysis as observed for the wild-type enzyme at a ratio of 3.5 (Fig. 5).
In Vivo Turnover of the C172S and Wild-type Rubisco Enzymes in
Stressed Cells--
Exposure of exponentially growing cells to strong
osmotic (0.45 M mannitol) or oxidative (10 mM
H2O2) stress induced the degradation of Rubisco
(Fig. 6), but the loss of holoenzyme was
slower in the C172S mutant cells than in the wild-type cells under both stress conditions. Despite the reduced structural stability of C172S
mutant Rubisco in vitro (Fig. 3), its stress-induced
half-life in vivo was 2-3 times greater than that of
wild-type Rubisco (Fig. 6). This held true regardless of whether the
amount of Rubisco was calculated as a percentage of initial Rubisco
content (Fig. 6) or as a percentage of total protein (data not shown),
indicating that the observed difference in turnover rate was selective
for Rubisco.
Thirty years ago, Sugiyama et al. (38) discovered that
chemical modification of Rubisco thiols with
p-chloromercuribenzoate inactivated the enzyme, disassembled
its subunits, and facilitated its proteolysis. More recently, several
studies have shown that Rubisco is oxidatively modified and degraded
in vivo under stress conditions (16, 17, 39). The discovery
that oxidative modification of Cys residues also sensitizes purified
Rubisco to proteolysis (21) leads one to consider that Cys oxidation
in vivo may mark the enzyme for degradation during natural
senescence or under stress conditions that are known to produce an
oxidative environment in the chloroplast (23). Despite indirect
evidence such as finding that some Rubisco Cys residues are indeed
oxidized at the onset of stress (17), no direct connection between Cys
oxidation and Rubisco degradation in vivo has been
demonstrated. Now that it is possible to use directed mutagenesis and
chloroplast transformation of Chlamydomonas as a means for
examining eukaryotic Rubisco (9), we decided to examine the potential
role of Cys oxidation in the regulated degradation of Rubisco.
Only three pairs of Cys residues are close enough within the Rubisco
crystal structure to have the potential for forming disulfide bonds (5,
40). The large-subunit Cys-247/Cys-247 (between subunits) and
Cys-172/Cys-192 residues are conserved among eukaryotic Rubisco enzymes
(5, 7). Whereas the tobacco and Chlamydomonas Rubisco
enzymes may also have a disulfide bond between Cys-449 and Cys-459 (5),
spinach Rubisco contains Thr-449. Cys-172 and Cys-192 are particularly
interesting because they appear to form a covalent bond in unactivated
tobacco Rubisco, but are only in van der Waals contact in activated
Rubisco (5, 40). Affinity labeling of spinach Rubisco with
N-bromoacetylethanolamine phosphate also revealed that
Cys-172 and Cys-459 were chemically modified in unactivated
Rubisco, but not in activated Rubisco (41). Although Cys residues do
not play a direct role in catalysis (reviewed in Ref. 2), they may have
a dynamic role in function, structure, or regulation.
When Cys-172 was replaced by Ser (substitution of only a single
atom) in the Chlamydomonas large subunit, no significant
effect on the growth of the mutant cells was observed (Fig. 1), and
C172S mutant Rubisco assembled into a native structure (Fig. 2). Thus, the identity of Cys-172 and the proposed dynamics of Cys-172-Cys-192 disulfide bond formation (5, 40) are not essential for holoenzyme assembly or catalysis. This is particularly surprising because previous
analysis of Chlamydomonas rbcL mutations showed that substitutions G171D and T173I eliminate RuBP carboxylase activity without affecting the amount of Rubisco in vivo (42,
43).
C172S Rubisco is less stable to elevated temperature than the wild-type
enzyme (Fig. 3). This might be expected if the C172S substitution
disrupts a Cys-172-Cys-192 disulfide bond. However, activated mutant
Rubisco was used in this study, and based on interpretation of the
tobacco Rubisco crystal structures (5, 40), Cys-172 and Cys-192 are not
expected to form a disulfide bond under this condition. There are
additional reasons for doubting that the C172S mutation exerts its
influence by disrupting a disulfide bond.
Treatment of both the C172S mutant and wild-type Rubisco enzymes with
the disulfide-exchanging thiol DTT decreased the thermal stability of
both enzymes to the same extent (Fig. 3B). This indicates that the increase in thermal sensitivity is due to DTT acting on
disulfides other than the Cys-172/Cys-192 pair. Nonetheless, one may
argue that the putative Cys-172-Cys-192 disulfide bond is resistant to
DTT, as is the Cys-247-Cys-247 disulfide bond that is buried within
the hydrophobic core of spinach Rubisco (7, 44).
In contrast to the wild-type enzyme, the RuBP carboxylase activity of
C172S Rubisco was found to be resistant to arsenite inactivation (Table
I). Because arsenite reacts exclusively with vicinal thiol groups (37),
it is likely that arsenite bridges the only free thiols (Cys-172 and
Cys-192) that are close together in wild-type Rubisco (5), thereby
reducing the RuBP carboxylase-specific activity of the wild-type enzyme
by 25% (Table I). The mutant enzyme would be resistant to arsenite
because it lacks one of these free thiols (Cys-172). Thus, the results
are consistent with the idea that Cys-172 and Cys-192 do not form a
disulfide bond in activated wild-type Rubisco.
The C172S substitution does not affect the critical redox potential for
enzyme inactivation (Fig. 4), further indicating that a
Cys-172-Cys-192 disulfide bond is not required for the catalytic function of Rubisco. However, in comparison to wild-type Rubisco, the
C172S mutant enzyme is somewhat more resistant to proteolysis in
vitro at lower redox potentials (Fig. 5). Furthermore, mutant Rubisco degradation in vivo is slower than that of wild-type
Rubisco under oxidative (hydrogen peroxide) or osmotic (mannitol)
stress conditions (Fig. 6). This indicates a subtler role for Cys-172 than merely stabilizing Rubisco structure through a disulfide bond. In
fact, the delayed degradation of Rubisco in stressed cells is opposite
to what one would expect from the lower thermal stability of
C172S Rubisco observed in vitro (Fig. 3). Perhaps the
delayed degradation of C172S Rubisco observed in vivo
results from alteration of an oxidative signal transduction pathway
that triggers Rubisco turnover. Cys-172 would be a significant
component of this pathway.
The absence of Cys-172 shifts the critical redox potential for Rubisco
proteolysis to more oxidative conditions (Fig. 5) and protects Rubisco
from degradation under stress conditions (Fig. 6). However, the C172S
substitution does not completely prevent induced Rubisco turnover,
indicating that more than one Cys residue may contribute to redox
regulation of Rubisco degradation. Additional Cys substitutions may
help to elucidate the redox signaling pathway.
We thank Dr. Esteban Ballestar for technical
advice in obtaining and interpreting the CD spectra, Dr. Carlos
García-Ferris for a helpful suggestion to improve the
proteolytic susceptibility analysis, Drs. Seokjoo Hong and Irina
Khrebtukova for help with directed mutagenesis and chloroplast
transformation, and Marçal Vilar and Santiago Ramón for
help with biochemical analysis.
*
This work was supported by Dirección General de
Investigación Científica y Técnica Grant PB95-1075
(to J. M.), a NATO fellowship (to J. M.), and United States
Department of Agriculture Grant 97-35306-4525 (to R. J. S.). This is
Nebraska Agricultural Research Division Journal Series Paper 12593.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. de
Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Facultad Ciencias
Biológicas, Universitat de València, Av. Dr. Moliner 50, E-46100 Burjassot, Spain. Tel.: 34-963864385; Fax: 34-963864635;
E-mail: joaquin.moreno@uv.es.
The abbreviations used are:
Rubisco, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase;
RuBP, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate;
DTT, dithiothreitol.
C172S Substitution in the Chloroplast-encoded Large Subunit
Affects Stability and Stress-induced Turnover of
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase*
§ and
Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia
Molecular, Universitat de València, Burjassot E-46100, Spain
and the ¶ Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska,
Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0664
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
175 to 2776),
containing the entire rbcL gene (bases 1-1428) (32), was
cloned into SmaI-digested pBluescript SK+
(Stratagene). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed according to the
method of Vandeyar et al. (33) by employing a T7-GEN kit
from U. S. Biochemical Corp. as described previously (10). To produce
the C172S mutation, the rbcL gene sequence TGT (bases 514-516) was changed to TCT. This mutation abolished an
RsaI site and expedited the initial screening of
transformants. The mutation was confirmed by performing DNA sequencing
with an IsoTherm DNA sequencing kit (Epicentre Technologies Corp.) and
synthetic oligonucleotide primers (Genosys Biotechnologies, Inc.). The
plasmid containing the C172S rbcL mutant gene was named
pLS-C172S. Chloroplast transformation with this plasmid was performed
via microprojectile bombardment (34) as described previously (10, 13).
Although the phenotype conferred by the rbcL mutant gene
could not be predicted, transformation of the 18-7G rbcL
mutant with pLS-C172S was found to yield photosynthesis-competent colonies. Successive rounds of single-colony isolation were performed to ensure homoplasmicity of the mutant genes (10, 12). Total DNA was
then purified (31); the rbcL gene was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (35); and the entire coding region was
sequenced. Only the intended mutation was present. The rbcL mutant strain created by directed mutagenesis and transformation was
named C172S.
80 °C.
Frozen cells were resuspended (0.25 g/ml) in 100 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 20 mM MgCl2, 5 mM
2-mercaptoethanol, and 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
and sonicated at 0 °C. After adding 2% (w/v)
polyvinylpolypynolidone and stirring for 5 min at 4 °C, the crude
extract was centrifuged at 35,000 × g for 10 min.
Rubisco was purified from the supernatant by ammonium sulfate
precipitation, sucrose gradient fractionation, and DEAE-cellulose
chromatography as previously detailed (22). The final protein
preparation contained >90% Rubisco (ascertained by densitometry of
Coomassie Blue-stained gels) and was essentially free of nucleic acids
(A280/260 nm > 1.7). Purified Rubisco was
activated in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.2, 10 mM
MgCl2, and 10 mM NaHCO3 by
gel filtration through a Sephadex G-25 column (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech PD-10) and further diluted to an absorbance of 0.31 at 280 nm
(~0.2 mg/ml). RuBP carboxylase activity was measured as the
incorporation of acid-stable 14C from
NaH14CO3 (22). The amount of total protein in
the extracts was determined by the method of Lowry et al.
(36).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Growth curves of C172S mutant (
) and
wild-type (
) Chlamydomonas cells in minimal medium
(A), acetate medium in the light (B),
and acetate medium in the dark (C). Cell density
was determined with a hemocytometer counting
400 cells/measure.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Far-UV (A) and near-UV
(B) circular dichroism spectra of purified C172S
mutant (····) and wild-type (------) Rubisco enzymes.
deg, degrees.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Thermal inactivation of purified C172S mutant
(
) and wild-type (
) Rubisco enzymes at 40 °C
(A) and 50 °C (B) in the absence
(
and
) or presence (
and
) of 40 mM DTT. Error bars indicate means ± S.D. for the
average of three samples.
Effects of different oxidative agents on the RuBP carboxylase activity
of Rubisco purified from the wild-type and C172S mutant enzymes

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Percentage of RuBP carboxylase activity of
purified C172S mutant (
) and wild-type (
) Rubisco enzymes
remaining after 2 h of incubation at 30 °C with different
ratios of 40 mM cystamine/cysteamine. Error
bars indicate means ± S.D. for the average of three
samples.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Proteolytic susceptibility of purified C172S
mutant (
) and wild-type (
) Rubisco enzymes after 2 h of
incubation at 30 °C with different ratios of 40 mM
cystamine/cysteamine. After incubation with the redox buffer
mixtures, Rubisco was digested with proteinase K (0.5 µg/ml) for 5 min. The extent of degradation was determined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and densitometry of the large subunit of the enzyme
(17, 22). One representative of three separate experiments is shown.
Error bars indicate means ± S.D. for the average of
three samples.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Time course of Rubisco content in C172S
mutant (
) and wild-type (
) Chlamydomonas cells
stressed by addition of 10 mM H2O2
(A) or 0.45 M mannitol
(B) to the culture medium. The extent of
degradation was determined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of
total protein, immunoblotting, and densitometry of the large subunit of
the enzyme (17, 22). One representative of four separate experiments is
shown. Error bars indicate means ± S.D. for the average of three
samples.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Spreitzer, R. J.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
43,
411-434
2.
Hartman, F. C.,
and Harpel, M. R.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
63,
197-234[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Watson, G. M. F.,
and Tabita, F. R.
(1997)
FEMS Lett.
146,
13-22[CrossRef]
4.
Andersson, I.,
Knight, S.,
Schneider, G.,
Lindqvist, Y.,
Lundqvist, T.,
Branden, C. I.,
and Lorimer, G. H.
(1984)
Nature
337,
229-234[CrossRef]
5.
Schreuder, H. A.,
Knight, S.,
Curmi, P. M. G.,
Andersson, I.,
Cascio, D.,
Sweet, R. M.,
Branden, C. I.,
and Eisenberg, D.
(1993)
Protein Sci.
2,
1136-1146[Abstract]
6.
Newman, J.,
and Gutteridge, S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
25876-25886 7.
Andersson, I.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
259,
160-174[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Laing, W. A.,
Ogren, W. L.,
and Hageman, R. H.
(1974)
Plant Physiol. (Bethesda)
54,
678-685 9.
Spreitzer, R. J.
(1998)
in
The Molecular Biology of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Chlamydomonas
(Rochaix, J. D.
, Goldschmidt-Clermont, M.
, and Merchant, S., eds)
, pp. 515-527, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
10.
Zhu, G.,
and Spreitzer, R. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3952-3956 11.
Kanevski, I.,
Maliga, P.,
Rhoades, D. F.,
and Gutteridge, S.
(1999)
Plant Physiol. (Bethesda)
119,
133-141 12.
Zhu, G.,
and Spreitzer, R. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
18494-18498 13.
Larson, E. M.,
O'Brien, C. M.,
Zhu, G.,
Spreitzer, R. J.,
and Portis, A. R., Jr.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17033-17037 14.
Leegood, R. C.,
Lea, P. J.,
Adcock, M. D.,
and Hausler, R. E.
(1995)
J. Exp. Bot.
46,
1397-1414
15.
Ferreira, R. B.,
and Davies, D. D.
(1989)
Planta (Heidelb.)
179,
448-455
16.
Mehta, R. A.,
Fawcett, T. W.,
Porath, D.,
and Mattoo, A. K.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
2810-2816 17.
García-Ferris, C.,
and Moreno, J.
(1994)
Planta (Heidelb.)
193,
208-215
18.
Bruggemann, W.
(1995)
Plant Cell Physiol.
36,
733-736 19.
Eckardt, N. A.,
and Pell, E. J.
(1995)
Plant Physiol. Biochem.
33,
273-282
20.
Desimone, M.,
Henke, A.,
and Wagner, E.
(1996)
Plant Physiol. (Bethesda)
111,
789-796[Abstract]
21.
Penarrubia, L.,
and Moreno, J.
(1990)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
281,
227-235
22.
García-Ferris, C.,
and Moreno, J.
(1993)
Photosynth. Res.
35,
55-66
23.
Moreno, J.,
Penarrubia, L.,
and García-Ferris, C.
(1995)
Plant Physiol. Biochem.
33,
121-127
24.
Buchanan, B. B.
(1980)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.
31,
341-374
25.
Nalin, C. M.,
and McCarty, R. E.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
7275-7280 26.
Ketcham, S. R.,
Davenport, J. W.,
Warncke, K.,
and McCarty, R. E.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
7286-7293 27.
Tanaka, S.,
and Wada, K.
(1988)
Photosynth. Res.
17,
255-266[CrossRef]
28.
Danon, A.,
and Mayfield, S. P.
(1994)
Science
266,
1717-1719 29.
Spreitzer, R. J.,
and Mets, L.
(1981)
Plant Physiol. (Bethesda)
67,
565-569 30.
Spreitzer, R. J.,
and Ogren, W. L.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
6293-6297 31.
Spreitzer, R. J.,
Goldschmidt-Clermont, M.,
Rahire, M.,
and Rochaix, J. D.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
5460-5464 32.
Dron, M.,
Rahire, M.,
and Rochaix, J. D.
(1982)
J. Mol. Biol.
162,
775-793[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Vandeyar, M.,
Weiner, M.,
Hutton, C.,
and Batt, C.
(1988)
Gene (Amst.)
65,
129-133[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Finer, J. J.,
Vain, P.,
Jones, M. W.,
and McMullen, M. D.
(1992)
Plant Cell Rep.
11,
323-328
35.
Saiki, R. K.,
Gelfand, D. H.,
Stoffel, S.,
Scharf, S. J.,
Higuchi, R.,
Horn, G. T.,
Mullis, K. B.,
and Erlich, H. A.
(1988)
Science
239,
487-491 36.
Lowry, O. H.,
Rosebrough, N. J.,
Farr, A. L.,
and Randall, R. J.
(1951)
J. Biol. Chem.
193,
265-275 37.
Torchinsky, Y. M.
(1981)
Sulfur in Proteins
, Pergamon Press plc, Oxford
38.
Sugiyama, T.,
Nakayama, N.,
Ogawa, M.,
Akazawa, T.,
and Oda, T.
(1968)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
125,
98-106[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Ferreira, R. B.,
and Shaw, N. M.
(1989)
Planta (Heidelb.)
179,
456-465
40.
Curmi, P. M. G.,
Cascio, D.,
Sweet, R. M.,
Eisenberg, D.,
and Schreuder, H. A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16980-16989 41.
Schloss, J. V.,
Stringer, C. D.,
and Hartman, F. C.
(1978)
J. Biol. Chem.
253,
5707-5711 42.
Spreitzer, R. J.,
Jordan, D. B.,
and Ogren, W. L.
(1982)
FEBS Lett.
148,
117-121[CrossRef]
43.
Spreitzer, R. J.,
Brown, T.,
Chen, Z.,
Zhang, D.,
and Al-Abed, S. R.
(1988)
Plant Physiol. (Bethesda)
86,
987-989 44.
Ranty, B.,
Lorimer, G.,
and Gutteridge, S.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
200,
353-358[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Moreno, M. J. Garcia-Murria, and J. Marin-Navarro Redox modulation of Rubisco conformation and activity through its cysteine residues J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1605 - 1614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. J. Parry, A. J. Keys, P. J. Madgwick, A. E. Carmo-Silva, and P. J. Andralojc Rubisco regulation: a role for inhibitors J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1569 - 1580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Yosef, V. Irihimovitch, J. A. Knopf, I. Cohen, I. Orr-Dahan, E. Nahum, C. Keasar, and M. Shapira RNA Binding Activity of the Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase Large Subunit from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii J. Biol. Chem., March 12, 2004; 279(11): 10148 - 10156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Marcus, H. Altman-Gueta, A. Finkler, and M. Gurevitz Dual Role of Cysteine 172 in Redox Regulation of Ribulose 1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase Activity and Degradation J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2003; 185(5): 1509 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yamauchi, Y. Ejiri, and K. Tanaka Glycation by Ascorbic Acid Causes Loss of Activity of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase and Its Increased Susceptibility to Proteases Plant Cell Physiol., November 15, 2002; 43(11): 1334 - 1341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Charrier, A. Champion, Y. Henry, and M. Kreis Expression Profiling of the Whole Arabidopsis Shaggy-Like Kinase Multigene Family by Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction Plant Physiology, October 1, 2002; 130(2): 577 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Irihimovitch and M. Shapira Glutathione Redox Potential Modulated by Reactive Oxygen Species Regulates Translation of Rubisco Large Subunit in the Chloroplast J. Biol. Chem., May 19, 2000; 275(21): 16289 - 16295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. Du and R. J. Spreitzer Suppressor Mutations in the Chloroplast-encoded Large Subunit Improve the Thermal Stability of Wild-type Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase J. Biol. Chem., June 23, 2000; 275(26): 19844 - 19847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Ott, B. D. Smith, A. R. Portis Jr., and R. J. Spreitzer Activase Region on Chloroplast Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase. NONCONSERVATIVE SUBSTITUTION IN THE LARGE SUBUNIT ALTERS SPECIES SPECIFICITY OF PROTEIN INTERACTION J. Biol. Chem., August 18, 2000; 275(34): 26241 - 26244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |