![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 26810-26814, September 17, 1999
-Protein*
,From the Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida 32224
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Alzheimer's amyloid protein (A The amyloid that is invariably deposited in Alzheimer's disease
(AD)1 is composed of an
approximately 4-kDa peptide (amyloid Strong evidence that A The evidence implicating A Purification of PI-PLC--
PI-PLC was expressed in
Bacillus subtilis cultures transformed with a plasmid
containing the Bacillus thuringiensis gene and was purified
from 8 liters of the culture media (28). Briefly, the secreted PI-PLC
was concentrated by filtration through a Millipore pelican filter,
adjusted to 0.2 M NaCl, and loaded onto a 50-ml octyl-Sepharose column. The column was washed with 100 ml of 20 mM Na3PO4, 0.2 M NaCl,
pH 7, and eluted with 20 mM Na3PO4,
pH 7. Fractions containing active PI-PLC were adjusted to pH 8.5 and
0.055% Triton X-100 and loaded onto an 80-ml DEAE column. The column
was washed with 70 ml of Tris acetate, pH 8.5, 0.55% Triton X-100 and
eluted with 20 mM Tris acetate, 0.55% Triton X-100, pH
5.0. The activity of the fractions was assayed by the measurement of
its capacity to hydrolyze 3H-labeled phosphatidylinositol
(PI) in 50 mM Tris acetate, pH 5.5, containing 2 mM
1,2-diheptanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (Avanti
Polar Lipids, Inc.). The free inositol released by PI-PLC was measured
in the aqueous fraction after stopping the reaction in 10:5:0.1
chloroform:methanol:HCl. The protein concentration was determined by a
BCA assay (Pierce). At this stage the PI-PLC is very pure as judged by
the detection of a single band on a Coomassie Blue-stained
SDS-polyacrylamide gel that was subsequently stained with silver. For
most of our treatments, we used 2 µg/ml of this purified PI-PLC.
Mixed Brain Cultures--
Mixed brain cultures from guinea pig
fetuses were prepared from 30-day embryos using a method developed by
Dr. Yasumasa Ohyagi (see Ref. 29). Briefly, a pregnant guinea pig was
sacrificed with carbon dioxide, and six embryos were recovered from the
uterus. The brains were dissected and minced into fine pieces. These
pieces were treated with 10 volumes of 0.03% trypsin and 0.02% EDTA
in HEPES-buffered saline, pH 6.4, for 3 min, and the reaction was stopped by the addition of an equal volume of 5% calf serum in Opti-MEM (Life Technologies, Inc.). The cells were collected by centrifugation, and the pellet was resuspended in 20 ml of Opti-MEM containing 5% calf serum and filtered through a 67-µm polyester mesh
(Spectrum). The resulting cells were plated at a high density (107 cells per dish) to prevent astrocytic overgrowth.
These cultures can be maintained in the same medium for over a month
without loss of viability. In addition to being a good cell culture
model for events that occur in the brain, this system benefits from the
secretion of easily detectable levels of the A Cell Lines and Media--
A wild type CHO-K1 cell line (GPI+)
expressing GPI-anchored human placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) and
a derivative line with a mutation in the GPI biosynthesis pathway
(gpi85) were kind gifts from Dr. Victoria Stevens (31). The
gpi85 mutant is deficient in
N-acetylglucosaminylphosphatidylinositol deacetylase which is responsible for the second step in the biosynthesis of the GPI
anchor (32). These cultures were maintained in Ham's F-12 media
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 µg/ml G418.
Enzyme Assays--
Alkaline phosphatase activity was assayed
using 24 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate as a
substrate in 1 M diethanolamine buffer, pH 9.6, containing
20 mM homoarginine. The samples were first heated to
55 °C for 10 min to increase the specificity for placental alkaline
phosphatase activity (33).
Drug and PI-PLC Treatments--
All treatments were carried out
in the serum-free CCM5 medium (HyClone) after adapting the cultures for
24 h in the same medium. Phorbol dibutyrate (PDBu 1 mM; Sigma) was dissolved in Me2SO, which was
also added to controls and other treatments. Me2SO
concentrations were maintained at 0.2% for PDBu treatments.
Bisindolylmaleimide (BIS) stocks were prepared in distilled water and
directly diluted to 2.5 µM into the culture medium
(4).
Antibodies--
Monoclonal antibodies BAN50 (A A Western Blots--
The human/guinea pig-specific BAN50 antibody
and the sAPP PI-PLC Treatment Reduces the Secretion of A Effects of PI-PLC Treatment on A
To determine the concentration of PI-PLC needed to remove GPI-anchored
proteins from the cell surface, we treated GPI+ cultures with two doses
of PI-PLC and measured the release of PLAP (Fig. 2). More than 80% of total cellular PLAP
was released in 1 h by treatment with 20 µg/ml PI-PLC. The small
amount of PLAP remaining after this treatment appears to be
inaccessible to PI-PLC and is presumably mostly intracellular because
no additional PLAP was released by treating cells for 3 h with 20 µg/ml PI-PLC (Fig. 2). The amount of PLAP released by treatment with
2 µg/ml PI-PLC for 1 h was 75% of that released by 20 µg/ml,
but essentially the same amount was released when treatment with 2 µg/ml PI-PLC was extended to 3 h (Fig. 2). Thus treatment with 2 µg/ml PI-PLC for 3 h appears to be adequate to remove virtually
all of the GPI-anchored protein at the cell surface, and subsequent
experiments were conducted using 2 µg/ml PI-PLC.
In 10 independent experiments, secreted A Activation of PKC by PI-PLC-mediated Hydrolysis of PI Does Not
Account for the Reduction in Secreted A
To address further the question of DAG-induced PKC activation, the PKC
inhibitor BIS (G109203X) was added to GPI+ cultures prior to treatment
with PI-PLC. This compound has previously been shown to block the
changes in APP metabolism (4) that occur when PDBu is used to activate
PKC (4). Our control experiments showed that PDBu reduces A
Densitometric analysis showed that sAPP The proteins involved in A The coordinate reduction of A Although reduced, secretion of sAPP Given the complexity of the cell surface and intracellular events that
are involved in A The number of cell-surface GPI-anchored proteins that are involved in
) is
released from the larger amyloid
-protein precursor (APP) by
unidentified enzymes referred to as
- and
-secretase.
-Secretase cleaves APP on the amino side of A
producing a large
secreted derivative (sAPP
) and an A
-bearing C-terminal derivative
that is subsequently cleaved by
-secretase to release A
.
Alternative cleavage of the APP by
-secretase at A
16/17 releases
the secreted derivative sAPP
. In yeast,
-secretase activity has
been attributed to glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored aspartyl
proteases. To examine the role of GPI-anchored proteins, we
specifically removed these proteins from the surface of mammalian cells
using phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC). PI-PLC
treatment of fetal guinea pig brain cultures substantially reduced the
amount of A
40 and A
42 in the medium but had no effect on sAPP
.
A mutant CHO cell line (gpi85), which lacks GPI-anchored
proteins, secreted lower levels of A
40, A
42, and sAPP
than its
parental line (GPI+). When this parental line was treated with PI-PLC,
A
40, A
42, and sAPP
decreased to levels similar to those
observed in the mutant line, and the mutant line was resistant to these
effects of PI-PLC. These findings provide strong evidence that one or
more GPI-anchored proteins play an important role in
-secretase
activity and A
secretion in mammalian cells. The cell-surface
GPI-anchored protein(s) involved in A
biogenesis may be excellent
therapeutic target(s) in Alzheimer's disease.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-peptide, A
) that is derived
from a larger protein referred to as the amyloid
-protein precursor
(APP) (1, 2). APP is a type I integral membrane glycoprotein with a
large N-terminal extracellular domain, a single transmembrane domain,
and a short cytoplasmic tail. The A
peptide begins 99 amino acids
from the C terminus of APP, and it extends from the extracellular
region to a point half-way through the APP membrane-spanning domain
(1). A
is released from APP by cleavage on its N- and C-terminal
ends by
- and
-secretase, respectively.
-Secretase cleavage
before residue 1 of A
(672 of APP770) also releases the secreted
derivative sAPP
, whereas an alternative cleavage before residue 17 by
-secretase releases sAPP
. In most culture systems tested, the
predominant cleavage product is sAPP
, and this may serve to prevent
the production of A
(1). The proteolytic processing of APP to sAPP
and A
is regulated by protein kinase C (3), protein tyrosine kinase (4), muscarinic receptors (5), and estrogens (6). The regulatory
pathways involved are cell type-dependent, have little or
no effect in some cell types, and normally stimulate the secretion of
sAPP
while simultaneously reducing the secretion of A
(2). A
metalloproteinase related to the tumor necrosis factor-
converting enzyme (7, 8) can cleave APP to sAPP
upon activation of PKC by
phorbol esters2 (9, 10).
plays an important role in AD pathogenesis
has come from the study of mutations in the APP (11-14), presenilin 1 (15), and presenilin 2 (16) genes that are known to cause early onset
familial AD (FAD) (17). A fundamental effect of all the FAD-linked
mutations is to increase the concentration of A
42 or of both A
40
and A
42 (18-22). A
42 is deposited early and selectively in the
senile plaques that are observed in all forms of AD, so these findings
provide strong evidence that the FAD-linked mutations all act to cause
AD by increasing the extracellular concentration of A
42.
in AD pathogenesis has made both
- and
-secretase important therapeutic targets, but neither has yet been
identified. It was recently demonstrated, however, that APP is
proteolytically processed by an
-secretase-like pathway in the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (23, 24). This processing pathway
was shown to involve the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored
aspartyl proteases YAP3 and MKC7 (25, 26). In mammals, GPI-anchored
proteins are a relatively small class of membrane proteins that are
anchored to the outer leaflet of the cell membrane by a glycolipid
anchor consisting of ethanolamine, mannose, glucosamine, and
phosphatidylinositol (27). These proteins can be removed from the cell
surface by treatment with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC), which cleaves the phosphatidylinositol in
GPI-anchored proteins to release the protein. In this study we used
PI-PLC to evaluate the role of GPI-anchored proteins in mammalian
secretase activity and A
biogenesis. Our data indicate that at least
one form of
-secretase or one of its essential, constitutively
active regulators is GPI-anchored. It appears, however, that
-secretase is not a GPI-anchored protease in mammalian cells.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
40 and A
42 peptides. Furthermore, unlike rodents, the guinea pig A
sequence is
identical to that in man, thereby allowing the use of the
human-specific antibody against A
1-16 (BAN50) for the analysis of
sAPP
(30).
1-16), BNT77
(A
11-24), BC05(A
42), and BA27 (A
40) have been
previously described (20) and were gifts from Dr. Nobu Suzuki (Takeda
Industries). Ivan Lieberburg and John Anderson (Elan Corp.) kindly
provided the 192 antibody, specific for sAPP
(34). When appropriate,
selected antibodies were tagged with horseradish peroxidase, using a
kit from Pierce as described by the manufacturer.
ELISA--
A
was measured using an established,
sensitive, and specific sandwich ELISA (20). Briefly, Nunc immunomax
dishes were coated with capture antibodies BAN50 (guinea pig) or BNT77
(CHO) in 0.1 M carbonate buffer, pH 9.6, and blocked with
0.5% block ace (Wako) in PBS, pH 7.4. The media samples (100 µl)
were incubated overnight in 50 µl of ELISA buffer I (0.02 M sodium phosphate, 2 mM EDTA, 0.4 M NaCl, 0.2% bovine serum albumin, 0.05% CHAPS, 0.4%
block ace, 0.05% NaN3, pH 7.0), washed three times with
PBS, and treated overnight with the horseradish peroxidase-labeled
detection antibodies BA27 and BC05 diluted in ELISA buffer II (0.02 M sodium phosphate, 2 mM EDTA, 0.4 M NaCl, 1.0% bovine serum albumin, 0.002% thimerosal, pH
7.0). After washing twice with PBS and once with PBS + 0.05% Tween 20 horseradish peroxidase activity was detected using a Pierce ELISA kit
as described by the manufacturer. Addition of PI-PLC-containing
CCM5 medium did not influence the measurement of standard
A
.
-specific 192 antibody were used to determine the levels
of sAPP
and sAPP
, respectively, by Western blotting using methods
described earlier (20, 34, 35). We also verified the specificity of the
192 antibody by probing peptide spots CSEVKM, CSEVK, and CSEVKMD. As
expected, strong signals were only obtained for the CSEVKM peptide,
which corresponds to sAPP
cleavage, and the other two-peptide spots
were negative, demonstrating the end specificity of the 192 antibody
(data not shown). Total sAPP in the medium was detected using the 22C11
antibody (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
but Not sAPP
in
Guinea Pig Mixed Brain Cultures--
Guinea pig mixed brain cultures
were treated with PI-PLC for 1 and 3 days in triplicate. Over 3 days of
PI-PLC treatment, sAPP
was not reduced in amount (Fig.
1), but both A
40 and A
42 were
substantially reduced (Table I). This
large reduction was readily observed after 1 day of treatment and was
sustained for at least 3 days. Since PI-PLC treatment is known to
release GPI-anchored proteins from the cell surface, these data suggest
that one or more GPI-anchored proteins are involved in A
biogenesis.
The lack of an effect on sAPP
indicates that cleavage by
-secretase is not affected by the removal of cell-surface
GPI-anchored proteins and that PI-PLC treatment has no appreciable
effect on APP synthesis.

View larger version (78K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
PI-PLC has no effect on mammalian
sAPP
. Media from triplicate guinea pig
brain cultures that were untreated (lanes 1-3) or treated
with PI-PLC for 3 days (lanes 4-6) were probed with the
BAN50 antibody to residues 1-16 of A
. Densitometric analysis of the
blot showed that the levels of sAPP
were similar in treated and
untreated cultures, whereas cultures treated with PI-PLC showed a large
decline in the amounts of secreted A
40 and A
42 (Table I).
PI-PLC reduces A
40 and A
42 secretion in guinea pig mixed brain
cultures
40 and A
42.
Secretion from CHO
Cultures--
To investigate further the role of GPI-anchored proteins
in A
biogenesis, we investigated the mutant CHO cell line,
gpi85. This line was derived (31) from a recombinant CHO
cell line (GPI+), which expresses human PLAP as a GPI-anchored reporter protein. The gpi85 line is deficient in
N-acetylglucosaminylphosphatidylinositol deacetylase (4),
which is responsible for the second step in the biosynthesis of the GPI
anchor (32). The loss of GPI anchor synthesis is neither lethal nor
detrimental to the growth of mammalian cells. However, in cells
(e.g. gpi85) that do not synthesize the GPI
anchor, proteins that are normally GPI-anchored are degraded in the
endoplasmic reticulum (36, 37) and are not, therefore, found at the
cell surface.

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Release of human PLAP from GPI+ CHO cells by
PI-PLC. The PLAP release into the medium of untreated GPI+
cultures was 100-fold lower than with PI-PLC treatment. The mutant
gpi85 cultures did not release any PLAP, as reported. By
3 h of treatment, 2 µg/ml PI-PLC released as much PLAP as 20 µg/ml, indicating that all the accessible PLAP was cleaved by the
lower dose.
was compared in
gpi85 and GPI+ cells cultured in parallel. In 9 of these
experiments, the effect of PI-PLC treatment (2 µg/ml for 3 h)
was analyzed in both cell types. The results of this study, which were
analyzed statistically using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, are shown
in Table II. In untreated
gpi85 cells, which lack GPI-anchored proteins, there was a
consistent, highly significant reduction in A
40 (p < 0.0008) and A
42 (p < 0.03) relative to untreated
GPI+ cells. In gpi85 cells, PI-PLC had no significant effect
on A
40 or A
42, as expected. In GPI+ cells, as in fetal guinea pig
brain cultures, removal of cell-surface GPI-anchored proteins with
PI-PLC caused a consistent, highly significant reduction in A
40
(p < 0.008) and A
42 (p < 0.03). As
shown in Table II, GPI+ cells treated with PI-PLC and mutant
gpi85 cells produced remarkably similar amounts of A
40
and A
42 that were consistently ~40% less than the amount produced
by normal GPI+ cells. Thus, the removal of GPI-anchored proteins by
PI-PLC and by mutation causes a similar, highly significant reduction
in A
40 and A
42. Confirming these findings, we have also observed
that total secreted A
(4-kDa band), immunoprecipitated from
[35S]methionine-labeled CHO cells expressing high levels
of human APP695, is reduced upon PI-PLC treatment (p < 0.05) to approximately the same extent as shown in Table II without
significantly changing sAPP
(data not shown).
PI-PLC reduces A
40 and A
42 secretion in GPI+ CHO cells but not in
the GPI-anchor-deficient mutant, gpi85
40 and A
42.
Levels in GPI+
Cells--
In many cell types, PKC activation results in a substantial
stimulation of sAPP
release coupled with a reduction in A
secretion (3). By hydrolyzing PI in membranes, PI-PLC treatment could, in principle, activate PKC by releasing diacylglycerol (DAG). It is,
however, highly unlikely that PKC activation contributes significantly
to the effect of PI-PLC on guinea pig brain cultures, because PI-PLC
decreased A
but did not increase sAPP
in this preparation (Fig.
1). That A
was reduced similarly in PI-PLC-treated GPI+ cells (where
DAG may be released) and in untreated gpi85 cells (where no
DAG is released) also makes it highly unlikely that DAG release
contributes importantly to the A
reduction observed in
PI-PLC-treated CHO cells.
secretion in GPI+ cells, and this reduction was completely blocked by
2.5 µM BIS. In addition, as previously reported (4), PDBu
treatment elevated total sAPP secretion by about 15-fold, and this was
also blocked by the BIS treatment (data not shown). Treatment of GPI+
cultures with BIS did not, however, block the reduction in A
40 and
A
42 caused by PI-PLC (Table III).
Thus, our results clearly show that the effect of PI-PLC on A
biogenesis is not due to DAG-induced PKC activation.
Addition of the PKC inhibitor BIS blocks PDBu-mediated but not
PI-PLC-mediated A
reduction in GPI+ cultures
40
and A
42.
-Secretase Processing of APP Is Reduced in PI-PLC-treated CHO
Cultures--
The PI-PLC-induced reduction in A
could be caused by
a reduction in either
- or
-secretase activity. To evaluate
whether
-secretase activity is reduced when GPI-anchored proteins
are removed, several experiments were performed in which we treated GPI+ and gpi85 cultures in triplicate with PI-PLC for
24 h and then evaluated sAPP
and total sAPP (sAPP
+ sAPP
)
by immunoblotting (Fig. 3). For specific
detection of sAPP
, we used antibody 192, which efficiently binds APP
cleaved between residues
1 and +1 of the A
sequence but shows a
low affinity for full-length APP, sAPP
, and other APP fragments
(34). We could not specifically analyze the sAPP
secreted from the
GPI+ and gpi85 cell lines, because antibodies to human
A
1-16 do not detect the hamster APP sequence (GenBank accession
number AF030413), which is the same as the sequence in other rodents.
For this reason, we analyzed total sAPP (sAPP
+ sAPP
) by
immunoblotting with monoclonal antibody 22C11, which recognizes both
human and rodent sAPP.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
PI-PLC substantially reduces mammalian
sAPP
. The proteins in media from
gpi85 cells (1 untreated; 2-4 PI-PLC-treated) and GPI+
cells (5-7 untreated; 8-10 PI-PLC-treated) were separated on 10-20%
Tris-Tricine gels. A, immunolabeled with antibody 192, which
specifically detects sAPP
(solid arrow). B,
immunolabeled with antibody 22C11, which detects total sAPP (sAPP
+ sAPP
, open arrow). Densitometric analysis of lanes from
two independent blots showed that sAPP
was reduced by 90% when GPI+
cultures were treated with PI-PLC. sAPP
was 71% lower in
gpi85 than in GPI+ cultures, and PI-PLC treatment had no
consistent effect on the amount of sAPP
secreted by gpi85
cells. Total sAPP was slightly reduced (~16%) when GPI+ cultures
were treated with PI-PLC. Total sAPP was also slightly lower in
gpi85 than in GPI+ cultures. PI-PLC treatment had no
consistent effect on the amount of total sAPP secreted by gpi85
cells. The relative levels of sAPP are shown in the
graphs in C. Since the differences in total sAPP
were small, we repeated this study, and the data in C are
summarized from the two experiments.
was reduced by approximately
90% upon PI-PLC treatment of GPI+ cultures (Fig. 3). In contrast,
total sAPP (sAPP
+ sAPP
) was only slightly reduced (~16%).
Since sAPP
is the major secreted species in GPI+ cells, the small
reduction in total sAPP indicates that PI-PLC has little effect on
sAPP
. Levels of sAPP
were also highly (71%) reduced in untreated
gpi85 cells as compared with GPI+ cells, but again total
sAPP was only slightly affected. As expected, PI-PLC treatment did not
consistently affect sAPP
or the total sAPP secreted by gpi85 cells. These results provide strong evidence that
GPI-anchored cell-surface proteins play an important role in
-secretase activity.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
biogenesis are important therapeutic
targets in Alzheimer's disease. To date, none of these proteins has
been unequivocally identified. In this study, we investigated the role
of GPI-anchored cell- surface proteins in A
biogenesis. Our results
provide strong evidence that, in mammalian cells, one or more
cell-surface GPI-anchored proteins play an important role in
-secretase activity and A
secretion. In addition, they indicate
that cell-surface GPI-anchored proteins do not play a major role in
-secretase activity. These conclusions are based on the following
observations. (i) PI-PLC, which removes GPI-anchored proteins from the
cell surface, substantially reduces the A
40 and A
42 secreted from
fetal guinea pig brain cultures and the wild type GPI+ CHO cell
cultures. (ii) The mutant gpi85 line, which lacks
cell-surface GPI-anchored proteins, shows reductions in secreted A
40
and A
42 similar to those observed when the parental GPI+ line is
treated with PI-PLC. (iii) The PI-PLC treatment that lowers the A
40
and A
42 secreted from GPI+ cells has no detectable effect on the
residual A
secretion that occurs in gpi85 cells. (iv)
sAPP
is substantially reduced in gpi85 cells and in
PI-PLC-treated GPI+ cells but shows no additional reduction in
PI-PLC-treated gpi85 cells. (v) PI-PLC treatment does not
affect the levels of sAPP
in fetal guinea pig brain cultures and
only slightly reduces total sAPP (sAPP
+ sAPP
) in GPI+ and
gpi85 cultures.
40 and A
42, the profound reduction
of sAPP
, and the lack of change in sAPP
that occurs when GPI-anchored proteins are removed from the cell surface clearly implicate one or more cell-surface GPI-anchored proteins in
-secretase activity and A
biogenesis. This finding fits well with
recent reports that APP and A
are found in detergent-insoluble
membrane domains enriched in GPI-anchored proteins (38, 39). These domains are rich in cholesterol, which has been reported to be important for A
production (40, 41).
, A
40, and A
42 continues
both in PI-PLC-treated cells and in mutant gpi85 cells
deficient in GPI-anchored proteins. This suggests that normal
-secretase activity may involve both GPI-dependent and
-independent proteins. One should, however, be cautious in drawing this
conclusion. A small percentage of the GPI-anchored proteins may be
resistant to PI-PLC because of fatty acylation of the GPI anchor (28). PI-PLC treatment removes cell-surface GPI-anchored proteins but may not
remove intracellular GPI-anchored proteins that could continue to
produce A
and sAPP
. In gpi85 cells, GPI-anchored proteins continue to be synthesized. These proteins are rapidly degraded when they fail to be GPI-anchored, and they do not accumulate at the cell surface, but some residual protein precursor capable of
processing intracellular APP to sAPP
and A
may remain in the
secretory pathway. Thus our findings are consistent with separate GPI-anchored protein-dependent and -independent
-secretase pathways, but they do not eliminate the possibility that
normal
-secretase cleavage is carried out entirely by one or several
GPI-anchored proteins.
biogenesis, it is likely that some secreted A
is produced through alternative proteolytic pathways that do not
involve cell-surface GPI-anchored proteins. Thus there is likely to be
an upper limit to the reduction in A
secretion that can be achieved
by removing GPI-anchored proteins. In the CHO cell lines that we
examined, removal of cell-surface GPI-anchored proteins caused a
coordinate ~50% reduction of A
40 and A
42 at 24 h that was
smaller than the 80-90% reduction in sAPP
. This sizable difference
suggests that, in CHO cells, most sAPP
is produced by a GPI-anchored
protein-dependent pathway, whereas a substantial percentage
of A
is produced by alternative pathways that do not result in the
secretion of sAPP
. This finding agrees well with the published
evidence for the presence of secondary
-secretase activities, which
cleave APP at alternative locations close to the N-terminal end of the
A
sequence. The sequence of the secreted A
begins at all known
residues ranging from 1 to 11 indicating that the cleavage can occur at
any one of these residues (42, 43). The sAPP
-specific antibody, 192, will not detect sAPP cleaved at these secondary sites, but the sandwich ELISA will detect the A
generated by these cleavages which may be
GPI anchor-independent.
-secretase activity and the precise nature of these proteins remain
to be determined. It is entirely possible that the effects we have
observed are all due to the removal of a single catalytically active
-secretase that is GPI-anchored to the cell surface. Alternatively,
a GPI-anchored protein could (i) be an essential non-catalytic subunit
in a multi-subunit
-secretase; (ii) perform a post-translational
modification required to sustain
-secretase activity; (iii)
chaperone to bring together APP and
-secretase into one compartment;
or (iv) activate another factor that performs one of the functions
listed above. Whatever its precise nature, any cell-surface
GPI-anchored protein involved in
-secretase activity is of great
interest as a therapeutic target in AD. GPI-anchored proteins can be
substantially enriched in cell lysates on the basis of their detergent
insolubility, and they can be released specifically from intact cells
or cell lysates by PI-PLC. In addition, these proteins can be
incorporated from the medium into live cultured cells in a functionally
active form. These unique properties and the relatively small number of
mammalian GPI-anchored proteins should be highly advantageous in the
effort to isolate and characterize the specific GPI-anchored protein(s)
that are involved in
-secretase activity.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Victoria Stevens for providing us with the GPI+ and gpi85 strains, Dr. Ivan Lieberburg and Dr. John Anderson of Elan Corp. for the 192 antibody, and Dr. Nobu Suzuki of Takeda Industries for antibodies BAN50, BNT77, BA27, and BC05. We also thank Meera Parasuraman for reading the manuscript and providing valuable assistance in editing the text.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant 1RO3AG14883 (to K. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Mayo Clinic, 4500 San
Pablo Rd., Jacksonville, FL 32224. Tel.: 904-953-7383; Fax: 904-953-7380; E-mail: samba@mayo.edu.
§ Present address: Nathan Kline Institute, 140 Old Orangeburg, Orangeburg, NY 10962.
2 L. M. Refolo and K. Sambamurti, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
AD, Alzheimer's
disease;
FAD, familial AD;
A
, Alzheimer's amyloid
-protein;
A
40, A
ending at residue 40;
A
42, A
ending at residue 42;
sAPP, secreted APP derived from APP by proteolytic cleavage;
sAPP
, sAPP product of
-secretase cleavage;
sAPP
, sAPP product of
-secretase cleavage;
APP, A
-protein precursor;
PI, phosphatidylinositol;
PI-PLC, phosphatidylinositol-specific
phospholipase C;
PLAP, human placental alkaline phosphatase;
GPI+, Chinese hamster ovary cell line transfected with PLAP gpi85
derivative of GPI+ with mutation in
N-acetylglucosaminylphosphatidylinositol deacetylase
responsible for the synthesis of the GPI anchor;
PDBu, phorbol
dibutyrate;
BIS, bisindolylmaleimide;
DAG, diacylglycerol;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
CHO, Chinese hamster
ovary;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PKC, protein kinase C;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Haass, C., and Selkoe, D. J. (1993) Cell 75, 1039-1042[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Checler, F. (1995) J. Neurochem. 65, 1431-1444[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Buxbaum, J. D.,
Gandy, S. E.,
Cicchetti, P.,
Ehrlich, M. E.,
Czernik, A. J.,
Fracasso, R. P.,
Ramabhadran, T. V.,
Unterbeck, A. J.,
and Greengard, P.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
6003-6006 |
| 4. | Petryniak, M. A., Wurtman, R. J., and Slack, B. E. (1996) Biochem. J. 320, 957-963 |
| 5. |
Nitsch, R. M.,
Slack, B. E.,
Wurtman, R. J.,
and Growdon, J. H.
(1992)
Science
258,
304-307 |
| 6. | Xu, H., Gouras, G. K., Greenfield, J. P., Vincent, B., Naslund, J., Mazzarelli, L., Fried, G., Jovanovic, J. N., Seeger, M., Relkin, N. R., Liao, F., Checler, F., Buxbaum, J. D., Chait, B. T., Thinakaran, G., Sisodia, S. S., Wang, R., Greengard, P., and Gandy, S. (1998) Nat. Med. 4, 447-451[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Black, R. A., Rauch, C. T., Kozlosky, C. J., Peschon, J. J., Slack, J. L., Wolfson, M. F., Castner, B. J., Stocking, K. L., Reddy, P., Srinivasan, S., Nelson, N., Boiani, N., Schooley, K. A., Gerhart, M., Davis, R., Fitzner, J. N., Johnson, R. S., Paxton, R. J., March, C. J., and Cerretti, D. P. (1997) Nature 385, 729-733[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Moss, M. L., Jin, S. L., Milla, M. E., Bickett, D. M., Burkhart, W., Carter, H. L., Chen, W. J., Clay, W. C., Didsbury, J. R., Hassler, D., Hoffman, C. R., Kost, T. A., Lambert, M. H., Leesnitzer, M. A., McCauley, P., McGeehan, G., Mitchell, J., Moyer, M., Pahel, G., Rocque, W., Overton, L. K., Schoenen, F., Seaton, T., Su, J. L., and Becherer, J. D. (1997) Nature 385, 733-736[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Merlos-Suarez, A.,
Fernandez-Larrea, J.,
Reddy, P.,
Baselga, J.,
and Arribas, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24955-24962 |
| 10. |
Buxbaum, J. D.,
Liu, K. N.,
Luo, Y.,
Slack, J. L.,
Stocking, K. L.,
Peschon, J. J.,
Johnson, R. S.,
Castner, B. J.,
Cerretti, D. P.,
and Black, R. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27765-27767 |
| 11. | Goate, A., Chartier-Harlin, M. C., Mullan, M., Brown, J., Crawford, F., Fidani, L., Giuffra, L., Haynes, A., Irving, N., James, L., Mani, R., Newton, P., Rooke, K., Roques, P., Talbot, C., Pericak-Vance, M., Roses, A., Williamson, R., Rossen, M., Owen, M., and Hardy, J. (1991) Nature 349, 704-706[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Mullan, M., Crawford, F., Axelman, K., Houlden, H., Lilius, L., Winblad, B., and Lannfelt, L. (1992) Nat. Genet. 1, 345-347[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Murrell, J.,
Farlow, M.,
Ghetti, B.,
and Benson, M.
(1991)
Science
254,
97-99 |
| 14. |
Kennedy, A.,
Newman, S.,
McCaddon, A.,
Ball, J.,
Roques, P.,
Mullan, M.,
Hardy, J.,
Chartier-Harlin, M. C.,
Frackowiak, R. S.,
and Warrington, E. K.
(1993)
Brain
116,
309-324 |
| 15. | Sherrington, R., Rogaev, E. I., Liang, Y., Rogaeva, E. A., Levesque, G., Ikeda, M., Chi, H., Lin, C., Li, G., Holman, K., Tsuda, T., Mar, L., Foncin, J. F., Bruni, A. C., Montesi, M. P., Sorbi, S., Rainero, I., Pinessi, L., Nee, L., Chumakov, I., Pollen, D., Brookes, A., Sanseau, P., Polinsky, R. J., Wasco, W., Da Silva, H. A. R., Haines, J. L., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Tanzi, R. E., Roses, A. D., Fraser, P. E., Rommens, J. M., and St. George Hyslop, P. H. (1995) Nature 375, 754-760[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Levy-Lahad, E.,
Wasco, W.,
Poorkaj, P.,
Romano, D. M.,
Oshima, J.,
Pettingell, W. H., Yu, C. E.,
Jondro, P. D.,
Schmidt, S. D.,
Wang, K.,
Crowley, A. C.,
Fu, Y. H.,
Guenette, S. Y.,
Galas, D.,
Nemens, E.,
Wijsman, E. M.,
Bird, T. D.,
Schellenberg, G. D.,
and Tanzi, R. E.
(1995)
Science
269,
973-977 |
| 17. |
Hardy, J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2095-2097 |
| 18. | Citron, M., Oltersdorf, T., Haass, C., McConlogue, L., Hung, A. Y., Seubert, P., Vigo-Pelfrey, C., Lieberburg, I., and Selkoe, D. J. (1992) Nature 360, 672-674[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Cai, X. D.,
Golde, T. E.,
and Younkin, S. G.
(1993)
Science
259,
514-516 |
| 20. |
Suzuki, N.,
Cheung, T. T.,
Cai, X. D.,
Odaka, A.,
Otvos, L., Jr.,
Eckman, C.,
Golde, T. E.,
and Younkin, S. G.
(1994)
Science
264,
1336-1340 |
| 21. | Borchelt, D. R., Thinakaran, G., Eckman, C. B., Lee, M. K., Davenport, F., Ratovitsky, T., Prada, C. M., Kim, G., Seekins, S., Yager, D., Slunt, H. H., Wang, R., Seeger, M., Levey, A. I., Gandy, S. E., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., Price, D. L., Younkin, S. G., and Sisodia, S. S. (1996) Neuron 17, 1005-1013[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Scheuner, D., Eckman, C., Jensen, M., Song, X., Citron, M., Suzuki, N., Bird, T. D., Hardy, J., Hutton, M., Kukull, W., Larson, E., Levy-Lahad, E., Viitanen, M., Peskind, E., Poorkaj, P., Schellenberg, G., Tanzi, R., Wasco, W., Lannfelt, L., Selkoe, D., and Younkin, S. (1996) Nat. Med. 2, 864-870[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Hines, V., Zhang, W., Ramakrishna, N., Styles, J., Mehta, P., Kim, K. S., Innis, M., and Miller, D. L. (1994) Cell. & Mol. Biol. Res. 40, 273-284[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Zhang, H.,
Komano, H.,
Fuller, R. S.,
Gandy, S. E.,
and Frail, D. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27799-27802 |
| 25. | Zhang, W., Espinoza, D., Hines, V., Innis, M., Mehta, P., and Miller, D. L. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1359, 110-122[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Komano, H.,
Seeger, M.,
Gandy, S.,
Wang, G. T.,
Krafft, G. A.,
and Fuller, R. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31648-31651 |
| 27. | McConville, M. J., and Ferguson, M. A. (1993) Biochem. J. 294, 305-324 |
| 28. |
Deeg, M. A.,
Humphrey, D. R.,
Yang, S. H.,
Ferguson, T. R.,
Reinhold, V. N.,
and Rosenberry, T. L.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
18573-18580 |
| 29. | Clarke, N. J., Tomlinson, A. J., Ohyagi, Y., Younkin, S., and Naylor, S. (1998) FEBS Lett. 430, 419-423[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Johnstone, E. M., Chaney, M. O., Norris, F. H., Pascual, R., and Little, S. P. (1991) Mol. Brain Res. 10, 299-305[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Stevens, V. L., Zhang, H., and Harreman, M. (1996) Biochem. J. 313, 253-258 |
| 32. |
Nakamura, N.,
Inoue, N.,
Watanabe, R.,
Takahashi, M.,
Takeda, J.,
Stevens, V. L.,
and Kinoshita, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15834-15840 |
| 33. | Berger, J., Hauber, J., Hauber, R., Geiger, R., and Cullen, B. R. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 66, 1-10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Seubert, P., Oltersdorf, T., Lee, M. G., Barbour, R., Blomquist, C., Davis, D. L., Bryant, K., Fritz, L. C., Galasko, D., Thal, L. J., Lieberburg, I., and Schenk, D. B. (1993) Nature 361, 260-263[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Sambamurti, K., Shioi, J., Anderson, J. P., Pappolla, M. A., and Robakis, N. K. (1992) J. Neurosci. Res. 33, 319-329[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. |
Field, M. C.,
Moran, P.,
Li, W.,
Keller, G. A.,
and Caras, I. W.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
10830-10837 |
| 37. |
Delahunty, M. D.,
Stafford, F. J.,
Yuan, L. C.,
Shaz, D.,
and Bonifacino, J. S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
12017-12027 |
| 38. |
Bouillot, C.,
Prochiantz, A.,
Rougon, G.,
and Allinquant, B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
7640-7644 |
| 39. | Lee, S. J., Liyanage, U., Bickel, P. E., Xia, W., Lansbury, P. T., Jr., and Kosik, K. S. (1998) Nat. Med. 4, 730-734[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Simons, K., and Ikonen, E. (1997) Nature 387, 569-572[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
Simons, M.,
Keller, P.,
De Strooper, B.,
Beyreuther, K.,
Dotti, C. G.,
and Simons, K.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6460-6464 |
| 42. |
Wang, R.,
Sweeney, D.,
Gandy, S. E.,
and Sisodia, S. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31894-31902 |
| 43. | Miller, D. L., Papayannopoulos, I. A., Styles, J., Bobin, S. A., Lin, Y. Y., Biemann, K., and Iqbal, K. (1993) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 301, 41-52[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Cappai, F. Cheng, G. D. Ciccotosto, B. E. Needham, C. L. Masters, G. Multhaup, L.-A. Fransson, and K. Mani The Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) of Alzheimer Disease and Its Paralog, APLP2, Modulate the Cu/Zn-Nitric Oxide-catalyzed Degradation of Glypican-1 Heparan Sulfate in Vivo J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 13913 - 13920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-P. Huang, W.-P. Chang, G. Koelsch, R. T. Turner III, F. Lupu, and J. Tang Internalization of Exogenously Added Memapsin 2 ({beta}-Secretase) Ectodomain by Cells Is Mediated by Amyloid Precursor Protein J. Biol. Chem., September 3, 2004; 279(36): 37886 - 37894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Y. Y. Tam, K. W. Finnson, and A. Philip Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored Proteins Regulate Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling in Human Keratinocytes J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 49610 - 49617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hartmann, B. de Strooper, L. Serneels, K. Craessaerts, A. Herreman, W. Annaert, L. Umans, T. Lubke, A. Lena Illert, K. von Figura, et al. The disintegrin/metalloprotease ADAM 10 is essential for Notch signalling but not for {alpha}-secretase activity in fibroblasts Hum. Mol. Genet., October 2, 2002; 11(21): 2615 - 2624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. LEFTEROV, R. P. KOLDAMOVA, and J. S. LAZO Human bleomycin hydrolase regulates the secretion of amyloid precursor protein FASEB J, September 1, 2000; 14(12): 1837 - 1847. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. Pinnix, U. Musunuru, H. Tun, A. Sridharan, T. Golde, C. Eckman, C. Ziani-Cherif, L. Onstead, and K. Sambamurti A Novel gamma -Secretase Assay Based on Detection of the Putative C-terminal Fragment-gamma of Amyloid beta Protein Precursor J. Biol. Chem., January 5, 2001; 276(1): 481 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Spurway, J. A. Dalley, S. High, and N. J. Bulleid Early Events in Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchor Addition. SUBSTRATE PROTEINS ASSOCIATE WITH THE TRANSAMIDASE SUBUNIT Gpi8p J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2001; 276(19): 15975 - 15982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||