J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 26843-26849, September 17, 1999
Isolation and Characterization of Bone Morphogenetic
Protein-binding Proteins from the Early Xenopus Embryo*
Shun-ichiro
Iemura
,
Takamasa S.
Yamamoto
,
Chiyo
Takagi
,
Hideyuki
Kobayashi§, and
Naoto
Ueno
¶
From the
Department of Developmental Biology,
National Institute for Basic Biology, 38 Nishigonaka, Myodaiji,
Okazaki, 444-8585 Japan, the § National Food Research
Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba, 305-8642 Japan, and the ¶ Department of
Molecular Biomechamics, School of Life Science, The Graduate University
for Advanced Studies, 38 Nishigonaka, Myodaiji,
Okazaki, 444-8585 Japan
 |
ABSTRACT |
Using a surface plasmon resonance biosensor as a
sensitive and specific monitor, we have isolated two distinct bone
morphogenetic protein (BMP)-binding proteins, and identified them as
lipovitellin 1 and Ep45, respectively. Lipovitellin 1 is an egg yolk
protein that is processed from vitellogenin. Both vitellogenin and Ep45 are synthesized under estrogen control in the liver, secreted, and
taken up by developing oocytes. In this paper, we have shown that of
the TGF-
family members tested, Ep45 can bind only to BMP-4, whereas
lipovitellin 1 can bind to both BMP-4 and activin A. Because of this
difference in specificity, we have focused on and further studied Ep45.
Kinetic parameters were determined by surface plasmon resonance studies
and showed that Ep45 associated rapidly with BMP-4
(ka = 1.06 × 104
M
1s
1) and dissociated slowly
(kd = 1.6 × 10
4
s
1). In Xenopus embryos microinjected with
Ep45 mRNA, Ep45 blocked the ability of follistatin to inhibit BMP
activity and to induce a secondary body axis in a
dose-dependent manner, whereas it had no effect on other
BMP antagonists, chordin and noggin. These results support the
possibility that Ep45 interacts with BMP to modulate its activities
in vivo.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Bone morphogenetic proteins
(BMPs),1 members of the
transforming growth factor-
(TGF-
) superfamily, are dimeric
secreted glycoproteins. These proteins were originally identified by
their ability to induce ectopic bone formation in mammals (1). BMPs are
now known to be expressed in vertebrate embryos (2) and to possess a
variety of embryological functions (3). In early Xenopus
embryos, the BMP family of ligands inhibit dorsal mesoderm formation
and induce ventral mesoderm formation (4). Furthermore, in ectoderm,
BMPs have been shown to inhibit neural cell differentiation and to
promote epidermal differentiation (5). In this way, BMPs are
thought to play essential roles in the dorsoventral patterning of the
embryo (6, 7).
It is generally accepted that these important biological activities are
negatively regulated by inhibitors of the BMPs (8, 9), noggin,
follistatin, and chordin, which are expressed in the Spemann's
organizer and are thus called organizer factors. All of these have been
shown to neuralize ectoderm directly (10-12). Recent reports
demonstrate that these organizer factors can bind to BMP-4 directly and
thus inhibit the anti-neural activity of BMP-4 (13-15). In addition to
these organizer factors, gremlin, cerberus, and DAN, which belong to
the DAN family, have been found to block BMP signaling by direct
binding to BMP-2 and BMP-4 (16, 17). Gremlin is not expressed during
gastrulation, although its activities are similar to those of noggin,
chordin, and follistatin. Rather, it is implicated in neural crest
development in later embryogenesis (16). Cerberus has a potent head
inducing activity that can lead to the formation of an ectopic head
when its mRNA is microinjected into Xenopus embryos. It
is normally expressed in the anterior endomesoderm of
Xenopus gastrulae (18). These results suggest that BMP
activities are regulated throughout development by various BMP
antagonists with different affinities and binding specificities.
Here, we screened Xenopus embryo extract to find novel
BMP-4-binding molecules that may regulate the multipotent BMP activity in development. To do the screening, we used a surface plasmon resonance biosensor. Because of its high sensitivity for monitoring real time protein-protein interactions (19), this technique replaced
the conventional biological and immunochemical assays. We purified two
BMP-binding proteins and identified them as lipovitellin 1 and Ep45,
respectively, using their N-terminal amino acid sequences and
biochemical analyses. Lipovitellin 1, which is processed from vitellogenin, is a 120-kDa yolk platelet protein (20, 21). The
precursor protein vitellogenin (210 kDa) is synthesized under estrogen
control in the liver, transported to the ovary, and processed there to
the yolk proteins lipovitellin and phosvitin (20, 22). Ep45 (45 kDa) is
also synthesized under estrogen control in the liver and released into
the blood stream (23, 24). The amino acid sequence indicates that Ep45
is a secreted glycoprotein and a member of the serine protease
inhibitor (serpin) superfamily. Moreover, Ep45 is a Ni2+
binding protein and is implicated in Ni2+-induced
teratogenesis (25, 26). In this report, we performed functional
analyses of Ep45 in the interaction between BMP and its antagonist
follistatin and found that Ep45 blocked the binding of BMP to follistatin.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Measurements and Analysis by Surface Plasmon Resonance
Biosensor--
All measurements of binding activity in each
purification step, binding experiments, and kinetic analysis were
performed using the BIACORE2000TM (Biacore AB, Uppsala,
Sweden). The basic principles behind the technique and its successful
use have been previously documented (27). Samples were injected over
the surfaces of sensor chips at a flow rate of 20 µl/min at 25 °C
for 150 s. For the controls, all samples were simultaneously
injected over mock-coupled sensor chip surfaces containing no protein
with each experimental run. All curves were corrected for background by
subtracting the blank run, using BIAevaluation software, version 3.0 (Biacore AB). The BMP binding activity in resonance units (RU) was
determined 30 s after sample injection. The running and sample
dilution buffer was HBS (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM
NaCl, 3.4 mM EDTA, and 0.005% Tween 20, pH 7.4). BMP-4,
activin A, TGF-
1, and FS-288 were immobilized on the sensor chip
surface (CM5, certified grade, Biacore AB) by the amine coupling method
(28). sBMPR that was biotinylated using sulfo-NHS-biotin (Pierce) was
immobilized on a sensor chip surface (SA5, research grade, Biacore AB)
that had been immobilized previously with streptavidin (15).
To examine whether the binding of Ep45 to BMP-4 is dependent on the
conformation of BMP-4, BMP-4 was reduced with 1% 2-mercaptoethanol at
37 °C for 1 h. The sample was diluted with CF3COOH
(trifluoroacetic acid), and then applied to a µRPC C2/C18 reverse
phase column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Monomer BMP-4 was separated
and used as an analyte. Ep45 was immobilized on a sensor chip surface (1050 RU) as described above.
To determine kinetic parameters, 503 RU of BMP-4 was immobilized on the
sensor chip surface (CM5) by the amine coupling method. The flow rate
was 20 µl/min at 25 °C for an injection time of 150 s. The
bound Ep45 was then allowed to dissociate for 120 s.
Recombinant Proteins--
Recombinant Xenopus BMP-4
and the extracellular domain of the mouse BMP type I receptor (sBMPR)
were obtained using a silkworm expression system (29). Recombinant
human follistatin (FS-288) was gift from Dr. S. Shimasaki (30),
recombinant activin A was a gift from Dr. Y. Eto (Ajinomoto, Tokyo),
and Xenopus chordin was a gift from Dr. S. Piccolo (14).
Recombinant human TGF-
1 was purchased (King Jyouhzo, Hyogo, Japan).
Purification of BMP-binding Proteins from Xenopus
Embryo--
Extract (20 ml) from Xenopus embryos
(approximately 8,000) at stage 8-10 was prepared as described
previously (31). It was dialyzed against 25 mM sodium
acetate buffer, pH 5.5, at 4 °C and then applied to a POROS SP/H
cation ion exchange column (Perseptive Biosystems, Framingham, MA). The
column was eluted by a NaCl concentration gradient (0-0.5
M), and the BMP binding activity of each fraction (10 ml)
was monitored by the biosensor. The major peak (3.3 min) of BMP binding
activity was pooled and then separated on a Superose 12 gel filtration
column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) pre-equilibrated with HBS. The
three major protein peaks were pooled, acidified to pH 3.0 with 1.0 N acetic acid, and separated on a µRPC C2/C18 reverse
phase column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) pre-equilibrated with 0.1%
CF3COOH (trifluoroacetic acid). The fractions containing the main peak of BMP binding activity were pooled. For purification of
Ep45 under neutral conditions, the Ep45-enriched fraction separated by
Superose 12 was applied to nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose charged with
Ni2+ (Qiagen), pre-equilibrated with 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 5 mM CaCl2 (25). Ep45 was
eluted with an imidazole gradient from 0 to 0.2 M. The
fractions of each chromatography step were tested for Ep45 by SDS-PAGE
and by using the biosensor. Protein concentration was determined using
the BCA protein assay reagent kit (Pierce) according to the
manufacturer's instructions, except for fractions from the µRPC
C2/C18 column, for which it was determined by comparison with the
absorbance (peak area) of a standard protein (bovine serum albumin; Sigma).
Amino Acid Sequence Analysis and Identification of Ep45 and
Vitellogenin--
N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis was
performed on a Hewlett-Packard protein sequencer operated with the
routine 3.1 sequencer program. Ep45 (30 pmol) and lipovitellin 1 (10 pmol) purified by the µRPC C2/C18 column were sequenced.
Xenopus Ep45 and vitellogenin A2 were identified in a BLAST
search of the SWISS-PROT data base (32).
Embryo Manipulations--
Xenopus embryos were
obtained by artificial fertilization and 2- or 4-cell stage embryos
were microinjected with synthetic RNAs as described previously (33). To
evaluate mesodermal markers, the dorsal or ventral marginal region was
excised when injected embryos reached stage 10. For the animal cap
assay, presumptive ectoderm fragments were collected when the injected
embryos reached stage 8.5.
Chemical Cross-linking and Two-dimensional
Electrophoresis--
Chemical cross-linking and two-dimensional
electrophoresis were performed as described previously (15). Briefly,
BMP-4 (75 nM) and Ep45 (750 nM) were incubated
for 1 h at room temperature in 100 µl of HBS. Dithiobis
(sulfosuccinimidylpropionate) (Pierce) was added to a final
concentration of 0.5 mM and incubated for 30 min. After
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) was added to a final concentration of 50 mM to quench the reaction, the sample was subjected to
diagonal SDS-PAGE analysis. BMP-4 was detected by Western blotting
using BMP-4 antibody (Ab97).
Assay of Serine Protease Inhibitor Activity--
A reaction
mixture of Ep45 (5 µg/ml), BMP-4 (2 µg/ml), and
-chymotrypsin (5 µg/ml; Sigma) in 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 5 mM CaCl2, 20 mg/ml bovine serum albumin was incubated for 60 min at 37 °C (25). Samples were subjected to electrophoresis on a
15% gel and electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford). The membrane was blocked with 20 mM
Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1.0% Tween 20 containing 5%
nonfat dry milk, incubated with the BMP-4 antibody (Ab97) at 4 °C
overnight (34), and then reacted with a horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room
temperature. Western blots were developed using the chemiluminescent
ECL plus kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the
manufacturer's instructions.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of BMP-binding Proteins from Xenopus Embryos--
We
isolated two BMP-binding proteins from Xenopus embryos using
the BIAcore biosensor as a detection system. Both Ep45 and lipovitellin
1 were purified by three-step column chromatography (Fig.
1). After the embryo extract was dialyzed
against chromatography buffer, it was first purified by POROS SP/H
cation ion exchange chromatography (Fig. 1A). Although the
column was eluted by a NaCl concentration gradient (0-0.5
M), the highest activity was eluted with concentrations
above 0.5 M NaCl. These last peak fractions with BMP
binding activity were eluted at 3.3 min and were pooled (10 ml). The
samples were next separated by Superose 12 gel filtration chromatography (Fig. 1B). Three major protein peaks (20 min,
peak Vo; 30 min, peak A; 35 min, peak
B) were obtained, and the fractions containing each peak were
pooled. Each peak was further separated by µRPC C2/C18 reverse phase
chromatography. After this chromatography, the BMP binding activity of
the first peak (Vo) in Superose 12 was lost (data not
shown), whereas both pools A and B gave single peaks with significant
BMP binding activities (Fig. 1, C and D, asterisks). Each peak was collected and analyzed by SDS-PAGE
(Fig. 2, A and B).
A 45-kDa protein from pool B and a 120-kDa protein from pool A were
detected. This result also shows that the proteins were purified to
near homogeneity. The isolated proteins yielded specific binding
responses to BMP-4 of 2.0 × 106 and 2.2 × 106 RU/mg, respectively (Table
I). Approximately 5.7% (45-kDa protein) and 5.2% (120-kDa protein) of the total BMP binding activity in the
starting material (extract) were recovered as 6 and 5 µg of pure
protein, respectively.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Sequential chromatographic purification of
BMP-binding proteins. A, POROS SP/H chromatography.
B, Superose 12 chromatography. Vo, void volume.
C and D, µRPC C2/C18 chromatography. Pools A
and B from B were separated (C and D,
respectively). Each BMP binding activity was eluted in a sharp peak
(asterisks). Buffer B was 80% CH3CN in 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid. The bar charts indicate the BMP
binding activity in each fraction as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
SDS-PAGE and amino acid sequence analyses of
BMP-binding proteins. Active fractions separated by reverse phase
chromatography were analyzed by SDS-PAGE with silver staining.
A, aliquots of the fraction containing the activity from
Fig. 1D were subjected to electrophoresis on 12.5% SDS gels
under reducing conditions. B, aliquots of the fraction
containing the activity from Fig. 1C were subjected to
electrophoresis on 7.5% SDS gels under reducing conditions.
C, the amino acid sequence of the 45-kDa protein
corresponded exactly to the amino acid sequence of Ep45. The
arrowhead after Ala-16 indicates the predicted position of
cleavage of the signal peptide. The 45-kDa protein obtained lacked
seven amino acid residues compared with full-length, mature Ep45.
D, the amino acid sequence of the 120-kDa protein
corresponded to the amino acid sequence of vitellogenin A2 precursor
(VTA2).
|
|
Amino Acid Sequence Analysis of the 45- and 120-kDa
Proteins--
The N-terminal amino acid sequences of the purified 45- and 120-kDa proteins were analyzed using an automated liquid phase sequencer, and 20 and 29 amino acid residues, respectively, were determined (Fig. 2, C and D). A BLAST search
showed that the 45-kDa protein was Ep45 and that the 120-kDa protein
was vitellogenin A2 precursor. Comparison of the amino acid sequence of
purified 45-kDa protein with a previously reported sequence predicted
from Ep45 cDNA (24) showed that the 45-kDa protein lacked only
seven N-terminal amino acid residues of full-length, mature Ep45 (Fig. 2C). Despite the correspondence of the N-terminal amino acid
sequence, the molecular mass of the 120-kDa protein was not consistent
with that of vitellogenin A2 precursor (210 kDa). Given the molecular mass of this protein, it is most likely to be lipovitellin 1, which is
a cleavage product of vitellogenin (20).
The Binding Specificity of Ep45 and Lipovitellin 1 to TGF-
Family Ligands--
The ability of Ep45 and lipovitellin 1 to bind
known TGF-
family proteins was tested using the BIAcore biosensor
(Fig. 3). Purified activin A, TGF-
1,
or BMP-4 was immobilized on a sensor chip surface, and then Ep45 (5 µg/ml) or lipovitellin 1 (3 µg/ml) was injected to flow over the
sensor chips as an analyte. As lipovitellin 1 flowed over immobilized
BMP-4, a rising slope of resonance signal was observed, indicating
binding was evident, and after injection, the resonance signal
decreased slowly (Fig. 3B). Moreover, this change in
resonance signal was also detectable when lipovitellin 1 flowed over
activin A immobilized on a sensor chip surface. However, no change in
resonance signal was detectable on the TGF-
1-immobilized surface. In
contrast to lipovitellin 1, Ep45 showed a detectable signal only when
it was injected to flow over the BMP-4-immobilized sensor chip surface
but not over either activin A or TGF-
1 (Fig. 3A). Because
Ep45 can interact only with BMP-4 among the TGF-
family ligands we
tested and its role in development is poorly understood, we decided to
focus on Ep45 and to exclude lipovitellin 1 from further
consideration.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Binding specificity of Ep45 and lipovitellin
1. BMP-4, activin A, and TGF- 1 were immobilized on the sensor
chip surface. The amounts of immobilized BMP-4, activin A, and TGF- 1
were 2650, 2614, and 2409 RU, respectively. A, Ep45 (5 µg/ml) was injected to flow over the sensor chips as an analyte.
B, lipovitellin 1 (3 µg/ml) was injected to flow over the
surfaces. Arrowheads represent the initiation and
termination of injections.
|
|
To confirm this physical interaction between Ep45 and BMP-4, we
chemically cross-linked the Ep45-BMP-4 complex and performed two-dimensional electrophoresis (Fig. 4).
Separated BMP-4 was visualized by Western blotting using specific
antibody for BMP-4. As shown in Fig. 4A, BMP-4 bound to Ep45
migrated from 30 kDa to ~120 kDa, whereas BMP-4 alone with
cross-linking (Fig. 4B) did not shift significantly. These
results suggest that BMP-4 binds to Ep45 directly in the reaction
mixture.

View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Diagonal SDS-PAGE analysis of BMP-4-Ep45
complex. A, cross-linked BMP-4-Ep45 complex was
analyzed by two-dimensional electrophoresis. BMP-4 was detected by
Western blotting. Two shifted bands of BMP-4 (arrowheads)
were detected. B, for comparison of molecular mass,
cross-linked BMP-4 alone was subjected to two-dimensional
electrophoresis. Arrows indicate the original bands of BMP-4
(16 and 18 kDa in the second dimension). In both A and
B, unreduced BMP-4 (30 kDa) were detected in the second
dimension (under reducing conditions).
|
|
Next, to examine whether this binding of Ep45 to BMP-4 is dependent on
the conformation of BMP-4, the interaction of Ep45 with reduced BMP-4
was determined using the surface plasmon resonance biosensor. When
reduced monomer BMP-4 was injected over the Ep45 immobilized sensor
chip, the response was not detected (data not shown). This result
suggests that at least tertiary structure of BMP-4 was required to
interact with Ep45.
To determine kinetic parameters, we injected Ep45 at increasing
concentrations and allowed it to flow over BMP-4 immobilized on a
sensor chip (95-1, 500 nM). The sensorgrams obtained were analyzed using the BIAevaluation 3.0 program. The association rate
constant (ka) was calculated to be 1.06 × 104 M
1 s
1, and the
dissociation rate constant (kd) was calculated to be
1.6 × 10
4 s
1, which is slow. From
these two rate constants (kd/
ka), the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant
(KD) was calculated to be 15.1 nM.
Ep45 Blocks the Activity of Follistatin--
To clarify the
biological function of Ep45 in binding to BMP-4 directly, we
microinjected Ep45 mRNA into Xenopus embryos. We
expected, based on previous studies (13-16), that if Ep45 inhibits endogenous BMPs through direct binding, it might cause dorsalization of
mesoderm and lead to secondary axis formation. Although 100-2,000 pg
of Ep45 mRNA was injected into the two dorsal or ventral
blastomeres of 4-cell embryos, it had no effect on the embryonic
phenotype or on the expression of marker genes (data not shown). This
result suggested that Ep45 does not affect BMP-BMP receptor
interaction. To confirm this, we tested whether Ep45 blocks the binding
of BMP-4 to its receptor using the BIACORE biosensor. sBMPR was
immobilized on a BIACORE sensor chip (422 RU), and then BMP-4 (1 µg/ml) was injected to flow over the chip. As shown in Fig.
5, Ep45 did not influence the binding of
BMP-4 to its type I receptor even at the higher concentrations, which
is consistent with the fact that Ep45 did not induce dorsal mesoderm by
inhibiting endogenous BMP-4 in embryos. Next, we attempted to test
whether Ep45 could influence the interaction between BMP-4 and the
BMP-binding proteins, chordin, noggin, and follistatin. Chordin,
noggin, or follistatin mRNA was coinjected with Ep45 mRNA into
the two ventral blastomeres of 4-cell embryos (Fig.
6A). Chordin, noggin, and
follistatin independently induce dorsal mesoderm and a secondary body
axis in embryos when they are ventrally overexpressed (12, 15, 35)
(Fig. 6A, panels b, e, and
h). Coinjection of Ep45 and chordin or noggin did not
inhibit the dorsalizing effect of these proteins (Fig. 6A,
panels c and d or panels f and
g). In contrast, Ep45 did inhibit the dorsalizing signal of
follistatin in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6A,
panels i and j). To confirm that this result was
due to the direct interference of Ep45 with the BMP-4-follistatin interaction, we carried out a competition assay using the biosensor. As
shown in Fig. 6B, Ep45 competed with the binding of BMP-4 to FS-288 immobilized on the sensor chip in a dose-dependent
manner, suggesting that Ep45 inhibits BMP-4-follistatin interaction by direct binding to BMP-4.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
No effect of Ep45 on the binding of BMP-4 to
sBMPR. sBMPR (422 RU) was immobilized on the sensor chip surface.
Line a, BMP-4 (1 µg/ml) was injected to flow over the
surface. Line b, BMP-4 (1 µg/ml) and Ep45 (5 µg/ml) were
incubated for 30 min at room temperature and then injected to flow over
the surface. Line c, a mixture of BMP-4 (1 µg/ml) with
Ep45 (50 µg/ml) was incubated and injected as described above.
Line d, Ep45 (50 µg/ml) was injected to flow over the
surface. Arrowheads represent the initiation and termination
of injections.
|
|

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Inhibitory effect of Ep45 on the binding of
BMP-4 to follistatin. A, phenotypes of
Xenopus embryos ventrally coinjected with Ep45 mRNA and
chordin, noggin, or follistatin mRNA. 500 pg of chordin mRNA
(panel b), 1 pg of noggin mRNA (panel e), or
50 pg of follistatin mRNA (panel h) was injected into
the equatorial region of the two ventral blastomeres at the 4-cell
stage as described previously (45). 500 pg of chordin mRNA was
coinjected with 1 ng (panel c) or 2 ng (panel d)
of Ep45 mRNA. 1 pg of noggin mRNA was coinjected with 500 pg
(panel f) or 2 ng (panel g) of Ep45 mRNA. In
contrast, 50 pg of follistatin mRNA was coinjected with 500 pg
(panel i) or 2 ng (panel j) of Ep45 mRNA.
Panel a, uninjected embryo. Embryos were evaluated and
photographed at the tadpole stage. Arrowheads indicate a
secondary axis. B, dose-dependent inhibition of
the binding of BMP-4 to follistatin by Ep45. FS-288 was immobilized on
the sensor chip surface (1432 RU). Line a, BMP-4 (1 µg/ml)
was injected to flow over the sensor chip as an analyte. After
incubating for 30 min at room temperature, BMP-4 (1 µg/ml) was
coinjected with 1 mg/ml of bovine serum albumin (line b),
with 35 µg/ml of Ep45 (line c), or with 280 µg/ml of
Ep45 (line d). Line e, 280 µg/ml of Ep45 alone
was injected to over the surface. Arrowheads represent the
initiation and termination of injections.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
It is broadly accepted that many proteins such as enzymes,
polypeptide growth factors, and transcription factors are negatively regulated by their specific binding proteins (36). This emphasizes the
importance of screening for binding proteins for biologically active
substances. BIACORE technology is useful and rapidly expanding in a
variety of scientific fields, not only for kinetic analyses of
protein-protein interactions but also for screening for novel binding
molecules. Using this new screening technique, we have searched for and
isolated two BMP-binding proteins, lipovitellin 1 and Ep45. The
relative amounts of Ep45 and lipovitellin 1 proteins were estimated to
be 0.05% (6 µg) and 0.04% (5 µg) of total protein, respectively,
and both proteins appeared to be abundant in the Xenopus
embryo. In our experiment, we did not isolate the other known
BMP-binding proteins such as noggin and chordin, which bind to BMP with
high affinities, probably because the relative amounts of noggin,
chordin, and the other binding proteins may be far lower than those of
Ep45 and lipovitellin 1. If the side fractions of each chromatography
step were further analyzed, it might be possible to purify such less
abundant proteins.
Lipovitellin 1 is known to be generated from vitellogenin in the egg
yolk (20). Its precursor, vitellogenin, binds both activin and
BMP.2 Our results also
suggest that at least the lipovitellin 1 region of the vitellogenin
protein binds to BMP and activin. Although the potential regulatory
relationship between lipovitellin 1 (or vitellogenin) and BMP-4 is
poorly understood in embryos, we decided to exclude it from further
analyses because vitellogenin has already been shown to bind to
both BMP and activin and its binding specificity is lower than that of Ep45.
In this study, we did not find that Ep45 affected the binding of BMP-4
to its type I receptor (Fig. 5), despite its direct binding to BMP-4.
Ep45 neither inhibited the binding of BMP to type I receptor as chordin
does nor affected the BMP-BMP receptor binding profile as does
follistatin (15). These results are consistent with the results we
obtained from in vivo experiments by microinjection of Ep45
mRNA, where ventrally overexpressed Ep45 mRNA did not change
the fate of the ventral region of the embryo (data not shown). These
findings suggest that Ep45 does not inhibit the function of BMP-4 in
the Xenopus embryo. Rather, we found that in
Xenopus Ep45 inhibited the antagonistic interaction of
follistatin with BMP-4 but not of chordin or noggin. Our BIACORE analysis further confirmed that Ep45 interfered with the direct interaction between BMP-4 and follistatin. One reason for this difference may be that follistatin, chordin, and noggin have different binding affinities. Follistatin binds to BMP-4 with lower affinity (KD = 23 nM) than chordin
(KD = 0.3 nM) and noggin
(KD = 19 pM) (13-15), whereas Ep45
binds to BMP-4 with higher affinity (KD = 15.1 nM) than follistatin. Although the kinetic data of chordin
or noggin for BMP-4 was obtained by different methods, this tendency is
thought to be correct because chordin and noggin can be coprecipitated
with BMP-4, but follistatin cannot (13-15). On the basis of these
observations, it is assumed that Ep45 does not interfere with the high
affinity binding of BMP to BMP-binding proteins. Because DAN family
member proteins bind to BMPs with high affinities and are
coprecipitated with BMPs (16, 17), Ep45 probably has no effect on these
interactions. These findings led us to the conclusion that Ep45 is a
specific inhibitor of BMP-follistatin binding.
Now this specificity of Ep45 to inhibit follistatin activity against
BMP raises a question about the in vivo role of follistatin in the early development of Xenopus embyos. Although the
expression of Ep45 protein in the organizer region has so far not been
ascertained, it has been shown that Ep45 mRNA expression is broad,
spatially and temporally (data not shown), and that Ep45 protein
appears to be abundant in embryos as described above. Therefore, in the presence of Ep45, it is most likely that follistatin cannot act as an
organizer factor by binding to BMP. Furthermore, this explains why
dorsal overexpression of Ep45 did not perturb normal neural development. It is presumed that neural induction occurred antagonizing BMP activity not by follistatin but by noggin and chordin that have
redundant BMP binding activities. In zebrafish, it has been shown that
follistatin mRNA is expressed in anterior paraxial regions but not
in the organizer region, despite having the same dorsalizing properties
as its Xenopus homologue (37). In the mouse, follistatin
mRNA is also not expressed in the node, the mouse equivalent of the
Spemann's organizer, or the notochord (38, 39). Furthermore,
follistatin knock-out mice exhibit neither aberrant neural development
nor defects in early dorsoventral patterning (40). Taken together, in
different vertebrate species, it is assumed that follistatin probably
functions as a BMP antagonist in later processes of development but not
in early patterning process.
Ep45 belongs to the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) superfamily
(24). It may protect the BMP protein from some serine proteases by
binding to BMP. In fact, we tested whether Ep45 inhibits the activity
of
-chymotrypsin (Fig. 7). BMP-4 was
partially digested by
-chymotrypsin to yield lower molecular mass
forms, as described in a previous study showing that a proteolytic
cleavage with trypsin occurs at the N terminus of BMP-2 (41). The
addition of Ep45 significantly blocked the limited proteolytic
digestion of BMP-4. In addition, this experiment together with the
previous study demonstrates that both
-chymotrypsin and trypsin are
capable of cleaving the N terminus of BMP-4.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Inhibitory effect of Ep45 on bovine
pancreatic -chymotrypsin activity.
Activity of Ep45 as a serine protease inhibitor was tested by Western
blot analysis as described under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Both BMP-2 and -4 have a basic amino acid region in their N terminus
that binds heparin (42). These sites have been postulated to be
important in the storage and stabilization of BMPs (43, 44). Also,
interactions of BMPs with the extracellular matrix via heparin-binding
sites are thought to be important during development for the
establishment of morphogenetic gradients by limiting the free diffusion
of BMPs. Ep45 may help regulate the extracellular matrix-binding
behavior of BMPs. The role of the protease inhibitors and the
relationship between BMPs and protease inhibitors in development remain
to be investigated.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Y. Eto, Ajinomoto Inc. for the
activin A, S. Piccolo and E. De Robertis for the chordin-containing
medium, Y. Sasai for the Xenopus chordin plasmid, S. Shimasaki for the human FS-288 protein, A. Hemmati-Brivanlou for the
Xenopus follistatin plasmid, and R. Harland for the
Xenopus noggin plasmid. We also thank Dr. K. Cho for
beneficial comments and discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work is supported by "Research for the Future"
program of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant
JSPS-RFTF96L00406.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
81-564-55-7570; Fax: 81-564-55-7571; E-mail: nueno@nibb.ac.jp.
2
T. Nakamura, personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
BMP, bone
morphogenetic protein;
FS-288, follistatin-288;
TGF-
, transforming
growth factor-
;
sBMPR, soluble form of mouse BMP type IA receptor;
RU, resonance unit;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Reddi, A. H.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
4,
737-744[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Nishimatsu, S.,
Suzuki, A.,
Shoda, A.,
Murakami, K.,
and Ueno, N.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
186,
1487-1495[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Hogan, B. L. M.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1580-1594[Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Maeno, M.,
Ong, R. C.,
Xue, Y.,
Nishimatsu, S.,
Ueno, N.,
and Kung, H. F.
(1994)
Dev. Biol.
161,
522-529[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Wilson, P. A.,
and Hemmati-Brivanlou, A.
(1995)
Nature
376,
331-333[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Sive, H. L.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
1-12[Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Harland, R. M.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
10243-10246[Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Graff, J. M.
(1997)
Cell
89,
171-174[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Thomsen, G. H.
(1997)
Trends Genet.
13,
209-211[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Smith, W. C.,
and Harland, R. M.
(1992)
Cell
70,
829-840[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Hemmati-Brivanlou, A.,
Kelly, O. G.,
and Melton, D. A.
(1994)
Cell
77,
283-295[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Sasai, Y.,
Lu, B.,
Steinbeisser, H.,
Geissert, D.,
Gont, L. K.,
and De Robertis, E. M.
(1994)
Cell
79,
779-790[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Zimmerman, L. B.,
De Jesus-Escobar, J. M.,
and Harland, R. M.
(1996)
Cell
86,
599-606[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Piccolo, S.,
Sasai, Y.,
Lu, B.,
and De Robertis, E. M.
(1996)
Cell
86,
589-598[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Iemura, S.,
Yamamoto, T. S.,
Takagi, C.,
Uchiyama, H.,
Natsume, T.,
Shimasaki, S.,
Sugino, H.,
and Ueno, N.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9337-9342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Hsu, D. R.,
Economides, A. N.,
Wang, X.,
Eimon, P. M.,
and Harland, R. M.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
673-683[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Piccolo, S.,
Agius, E.,
Leyns, L.,
Bhattacharyya, S.,
Grunz, H.,
Bouwmeester, T.,
and De Robertis, E. M.
(1999)
Nature
397,
707-710[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Bouwmeester, T.,
Kim, S.,
Sasai, Y.,
Lu, B.,
and De Robertis, E. M.
(1996)
Nature
382,
595-601[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Lackmann, M.,
Bucci, T.,
Mann, R. J.,
Kravets, L. A.,
Viney, E.,
Smith, F.,
Moritz, R. L.,
Carter, W.,
Simpson, R. J.,
Nicola, N. A.,
Mackwell, K.,
Nice, E. C.,
Wilks, A. F.,
and Boyd, A. W.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
2523-2527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Berridge, M. V.,
and Lane, C. D.
(1976)
Cell
8,
283-297[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Gerber-Huber, S.,
Nardelli, D.,
Haefliger, J. A.,
Cooper, D. N.,
Givel, F.,
Germond, J. E.,
Engel, J.,
Green, N. M.,
and Wahli, W.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
4737-4760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Clemens, M. J.
(1974)
Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
28,
69-108[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Holland, L. J.,
and Wangh, L. J.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
49,
63-73[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Holland, L. J.,
Suksang, C.,
Wall, A. A.,
Roberts, L. R.,
Moser, D. R.,
and Bhattacharya, A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
7053-7059[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Beck, B. L.,
Henjum, D. C.,
Antonijczuk, K.,
Zaharia, O.,
Korza, G.,
Ozols, J.,
Hopfer, S. M.,
Barber, A. M.,
and Sunderman, F., Jr.
(1992)
Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol.
77,
3-16[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Sunderman, F., Jr.
(1993)
Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health
1,
75-80
|
| 27.
|
Johnsson, B.,
Löfås, S.,
and Lindquist, G.
(1991)
Anal. Biochem.
198,
268-277[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Karlsson, R.,
Roos, H.,
Färgestam, L.,
and Persson, B.
(1994)
Methods
6,
99-110[CrossRef]
|
| 29.
|
Natsume, T.,
Tomita, S.,
Iemura, S.,
Kinto, N.,
Yamaguchi, A.,
and Ueno, N.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11535-11540[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Inouye, S.,
Guo, Y.,
DePaolo, L.,
Shimonaka, M.,
Ling, N.,
and Shimasaki, S.
(1991)
Endocrinology
129,
815-822[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Ueno, N.,
Shoda, A.,
Takebayashi, K.,
Suzuki, A.,
Nishimatsu, S.,
Kikuchi, T.,
Wakimasu, M.,
Fujino, M.,
and Murakami, K.
(1992)
Growth Factors
7,
233-240[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Altschul, S. F.,
Gish, W.,
Miller, W.,
Myers, E. W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
215,
403-410[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Suzuki, A.,
Kaneko, E.,
Maeda, J.,
and Ueno, N.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
232,
153-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Nishimatsu, S.,
Takebayashi, K.,
Suzuki, A.,
Murakami, K.,
and Ueno, N.
(1993)
Growth Factors
8,
173-176[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Sasai, Y.,
Lu, B.,
Steinbeisser, H.,
and De Robertis, E. M.
(1995)
Nature
376,
333-336[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Perrimon, N.,
and McMahon, A. P.
(1999)
Cell
97,
13-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Bauer, H.,
Meier, A.,
Hild, M.,
Stachel, S.,
Economides, A.,
Hazelett, D.,
Harland, R. M.,
and Hammerschmidt, M.
(1998)
Dev. Biol.
204,
488-507[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Albano, R. M.,
Arkell, R.,
Beddington, R. S.,
and Smith, J. C.
(1994)
Development
120,
803-813[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Feijen, A.,
Goumans, M. J.,
and van den Eijnden-van Raaij, A. J.
(1994)
Development
120,
3621-3637[Abstract]
|
| 40.
|
Matzuk, M. M.,
Lu, N.,
Vogel, H.,
Sellheyer, K.,
Roop, D. R.,
and Bradley, A.
(1995)
Nature
374,
360-363[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Koenig, B. B.,
Cook, J. S.,
Wolsing, D. H.,
Ting, J.,
Tiesman, J. P.,
Correa, P. E.,
Olson, C. A.,
Pecquet, A. L.,
Ventura, F.,
Grant, R. A.,
Chen, G.-X.,
Wrana, J. L.,
Massagué, J.,
and Rosenbaum, J. S.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
5961-5974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Ruppert, R.,
Hoffmann, E.,
and Sebald, W.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
237,
295-302[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Paralkar, V. M.,
Nandedkar, A. K.,
Pointer, R. H.,
Kleinman, H. K.,
and Reddi, A. H.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
17281-17284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Paralkar, V. M.,
Weeks, B. S., Yu, Y. M.,
Kleinman, H. K.,
and Reddi, A. H.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
1721-1728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Jones, C. M.,
Lyons, K. M.,
Lapan, P. M.,
Wright, C. V.,
and Hogan, B. L.
(1992)
Development
115,
639-647[Abstract]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z.-J. Shen, T. Nakamoto, K. Tsuji, A. Nifuji, K. Miyazono, T. Komori, H. Hirai, and M. Noda
Negative Regulation of Bone Morphogenetic Protein/Smad Signaling by Cas-interacting Zinc Finger Protein in Osteoblasts
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 9, 2002;
277(33):
29840 - 29846.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Sidis, A. L. Schneyer, P. M. Sluss, L. N. Johnson, and H. T. Keutmann
Follistatin: Essential Role for the N-terminal Domain in Activin Binding and Neutralization
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 18, 2001;
276(21):
17718 - 17726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|