JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forsberg, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bresnick, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forsberg, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bresnick, E. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 26850-26859, September 17, 1999


Requirement of an E1A-sensitive Coactivator for Long-range Transactivation by the beta -Globin Locus Control Region*

E. Camilla ForsbergDagger , Kirby JohnsonDagger , Tatiana N. Zaboikina, Eric A. Mosser, and Emery H. Bresnick§

From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Four erythroid-specific DNase I-hypersensitive sites at the 5'-end of the beta -globin locus confer high-level transcription to the beta -globin genes. To identify coactivators that mediate long-range transactivation by this locus control region (LCR), we assessed the influence of E1A, an inhibitor of the CBP/p300 histone acetylase, on LCR function. E1A strongly inhibited transactivation of Agamma - and beta -globin promoters by the HS2, HS2-HS3, and HS1-HS4 subregions of the LCR in human K562 and mouse erythroleukemia cells. Short- and long-range transactivation mediated by the LCR were equally sensitive to E1A. The E1A sensitivity was apparent in transient and stable transfection assays, and E1A inhibited expression of the endogenous gamma -globin genes. Only sites for NF-E2 within HS2 were required for E1A sensitivity in K562 cells, and E1A abolished transactivation mediated by the activation domain of NF-E2. E1A mutants defective in CBP/p300 binding only weakly inhibited HS2-mediated transactivation, whereas a mutant defective in retinoblastoma protein binding strongly inhibited transactivation. Expression of CBP/p300 potentiated HS2-mediated transactivation. Moreover, expression of GAL4-CBP strongly increased transactivation of a reporter containing HS2 with a GAL4 site substituted for the NF-E2 sites. Thus, we propose that a CBP/p300-containing coactivator complex is the E1A-sensitive factor important for LCR function.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The beta -globin locus control region (LCR)1 is a complex genetic element necessary for high-level transcription of the beta -globin genes (1-3). The LCR was defined initially by its ability to confer copy number-dependent and position-independent expression to beta -globin transgenes (1). The LCR also confers strong, erythroid-specific expression to linked genes in transfection assays, consistent with an intrinsic transcriptional enhancer function. Mutational studies have shown that multiple recognition sites for trans-acting factors are necessary for enhancer activity in stable transfection assays and to overcome position effects in transgenic mice (4-10).

Tandem binding sites for the hematopoietic transcription factor NF-E2 within the HS2 subregion of the LCR are important for strong transactivation of beta -globin promoters in multiple systems (6, 11-14). NF-E2 binds to DNA as a heterodimer consisting of a 45-kDa hematopoietic subunit, p45 (15, 16), and an 18-kDa ubiquitous subunit, p18 (16, 17). Besides NF-E2, additional proteins such as NRF1 (18, 19), NRF2 (20), AP-1 (21), and Bach (22) proteins are known to interact with the NF-E2 sites, although the consequence of these interactions for LCR function is unresolved. The involvement of NF-E2 in functioning through these sites has been established in CB3 cells, murine erythroleukemia cells that lack p45 (23, 24). However, disruption of the murine p45 gene does not greatly impair beta -globin synthesis (25), suggesting that there may be redundant factors functioning through the NF-E2 sites. The p45 gene disruption resulted in defective platelet formation, implicating NF-E2 as a critical regulator of megakaryopoiesis. Based on the requirement of NF-E2 for megakaryopoiesis and importance for globin synthesis in CB3 cells, it is of considerable interest to determine how NF-E2 activates transcription.

Sequences within the amino terminus of p45 are necessary for strong transactivation (26-28). Since these sequences are not required for DNA binding, and their deletion does not confer protein instability, they may engage in protein-protein interactions with coactivators. Several proteins have been suggested to be important for NF-E2-mediated transactivation, including WW domain-containing E3 ubiquitin ligases (28, 29), a HAT (CBP/p300) (30), and TAF110 (27), a component of the TFIID complex. We have shown that a PTY sequence within a 41-amino acid region of the amino terminus of p45, which is necessary for strong transactivation, mediates specific and high-affinity binding to WW domains from the WWP1 ubiquitin ligase (28). Gavva et al. (29) also measured the binding of a GST-p45 fusion protein to several WW domains. WW domains are protein modules that mediate protein-protein interactions by binding to PPXY ligand sequences (31). The functional significance of a WW domain protein interaction was supported by mutagenesis studies in which PTY was mutated to AAA, resulting in a 73% reduction in transactivation (28). However, this p45 mutant retained weak but significant activity, suggesting that the protein binding to PTY is not the sole mediator of transactivation.

In this study, we asked whether the CBP/p300 interaction with NF-E2 is functionally important within the context of the beta -globin LCR. It is possible that the interaction would be critical for the activity of a simple promoter driven exclusively by NF-E2, but not for a complex element containing multiple factor-binding sites such as the LCR. The requirements for transactivation from simple and complex activating elements can differ, as was exemplified recently by studies of glucocorticoid receptor phosphorylation (32). Phosphorylation of the receptor enhanced transactivation of a reporter gene containing a simple glucocorticoid-responsive promoter but not a complex glucocorticoid-responsive promoter with multiple transcription factor-binding sites. Here, we show that an inhibitor of CBP/p300, the adenoviral E1A protein, almost completely abolishes LCR-mediated transactivation of Agamma - and beta -globin promoters. The implications of this result are discussed vis à vis models of LCR function invoking the recruitment of HATs that remodel chromatin and regulate the activity of nonhistone components.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- The human erythroleukemia cell line K562 (33) was maintained in IMEM medium (Biofluids) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 25 µg/ml gentamycin, and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Life Technologies, Inc.). In certain experiments, K562 cells were treated with 40 µM hemin for 48 h to induce erythroid differentiation before transfection. The mouse erythroleukemia cell line MEL (34) was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Biofluids) containing 5% fetal calf serum, 5% calf serum, and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution. Cells were grown in a humidified incubator at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2.

Transient Transfections, Luciferase, and beta -Galactosidase Assays-- Exponentially growing cells (5 × 105) were collected by centrifugation at 240 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, resuspended in 0.5 ml of IMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 25 µg/ml gentamycin, and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Life Technologies, Inc.), and mixed with 3.5 ml of identical medium in each well of a 6-well plate. Plasmid DNA (4 µg in 150 µl of IMEM (for K562 cells) or DMEM (MEL cells)) was incubated with 16 µl of Superfect transfection reagent (Qiagen) for 15 min at room temperature and then added to cells. Cells were incubated for 40 h, harvested, and assayed for luciferase activity as described previously (10). Luciferase activity was normalized by the protein content of the lysate, determined by Bradford assay using gamma -globulin as a standard. In certain experiments, the constitutively active beta -galactosidase expression vector pCH110 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (1 µg) was included in each transfection reaction, so that luciferase activity could be normalized for differences in transfection efficiency. beta -Galactosidase activity was assayed with a luminescent substrate (Galacton Plus) according to the manufacturer's instructions (TROPIX, Inc.). Since the expression of CBP increased the activity of the SV40 promoter, which controls beta -galactosidase expression from pCH110, the experiment of Fig. 10 was done without co-transfecting pCH110. Expression of E1A did not influence the activity of the SV40 promoter of pCH110. All transient transfection experiments except for Figs. 8 and 10 were done in the presence and absence of pCH110, and similar results were obtained regardless of whether the luciferase activity was normalized to beta -galactosidase activity.

The following plasmids were used in the transfection assays: pcDNA3 (Invitrogen); pCMVCBP encoding human CBP (35) (Dr. Johan Ericsson, Ludwig Institute of Cancer Research, Uppsala, Sweden); pCL1-E1A and pCL1-H3N (36); pEF1alpha -neo, pEF1alpha -neoE1A, pEF1alpha -neoE1ADelta 2-36, pEF1alpha -neoE1ADelta 38-67, and pEF1alpha -neoE1Apm928 (37); pgamma luc, pHS2gamma luc, pHS2(2.2)gamma luc, pHS2-HS3gamma luc, pHS2-HS3(5.1)gamma luc, pHS2(Delta NF-E2)gamma luc, pHS2(Delta GATA)gamma luc, pHS2(Gal4)gamma luc, mini-LCRgamma luc, mini-LCR(5.1)gamma luc; pCH110 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech); pGFPemd-c [R] control (Packard). The LCR-based plasmids were described previously (38, 39). The reporter plasmids containing NF-E2 and GATA-1 site mutants of HS2 (pHS2(Delta NF-E2)gamma luc and HS2(Delta GATA)gamma luc) were constructed from pHS2gamma luc by standard PCR-based mutagenesis and confirmed by DNA sequence analysis. A XhoI site (CTCGAG) was substituted for the high-affinity GATA-1 site (CCTATC) of HS2 at position 8728 of the human beta -globin locus. For the plasmid pHS2(Delta NF-E2)gamma luc, a SalI site (GTCGAC) was substituted for the tandem NF-E2 sites of HS2 (TGAGTCATGATGAGTCA). For the plasmid HS2(GAL4)gamma luc, a XhoI site and a GAL4-binding site (CTCGAGCGGAAGACTCTCCTCCG) were substituted for the tandem NF-E2 sites of HS2 (CAATGCTGAGTCATGATGAGTCA) at position 8654. The pG5TIluc reporter plasmid contains five Gal4-binding sites, a TATA box from the adenovirus major late promoter, and the murine terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase initiator element cloned into the pGL2-Basic luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega) (40). The plasmid GAL4-p45(1-90) encodes amino acids 1-90 of murine p45 fused to the yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain (amino acids 1-147) in the vector pcDNA3. beta 106(hAP1)2-luc and beta 106-luc plasmids were derived from pGL2-Basic (Promega) and contained a minimal human beta -globin promoter fused to luciferase with or without upstream tandem NF-E2-binding sites from human HS2, respectively (Dr. Ross Hardison, Penn State University, University Park, PA). pGAL-CBP FL encodes a fusion of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain to wild-type CBP (41).

Flow Cytometric Analysis-- K562 clonal line HS2(2.2)gamma luc#20 contained two copies of a stably integrated HS2(2.2)gamma luc reporter gene. The line was derived from K562 cells by co-transfection of the HS2(2.2)gamma luc plasmid with a selection plasmid containing the thymidine kinase promoter driving the hygromycin resistance gene as described previously (38). Clones were isolated by limiting dilution analysis in the presence of 0.2 mg/ml hygromycin, and cells were then cultured in the presence of 0.1 mg/ml hygromycin.

To assess the influence of transiently expressed E1A on the activity of the stably integrated luciferase reporter gene, cells were transiently co-transfected with the pGFPemd-c [R] control expression vector, containing the SV40 enhancer and promoter driving EGFP, and either pCL1-E1A or pcDNA3. EGFP was used as a marker for transfection, allowing one to test the influence of transiently expressed E1A on the activity of the stably integrated luciferase reporter gene. A ratio of pCL1-E1A or pcDNA3 to EGFP of 3:1 was used to ensure that EGFP-positive cells contained pCL1-E1A or pcDNA3. Cells (5 × 105) were collected by centrifugation at 240 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, resuspended in 0.5 ml of IMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum, 25 µg/ml gentamycin, and 0.1 mg/ml hygromycin, and mixed with 3.5 ml of identical medium in each well of a 6-well plate. Plasmid DNA (6 µg in 150 µl of IMEM) was incubated with 24 µl of Superfect transfection reagent (Qiagen) for 15 min at room temperature and then added to cells. Cells were incubated for 65 h, harvested, and triplicate transfection reactions for each condition were combined. EGFP-positive cells were isolated by FACS with a FACStar-plus instrument (Becton Dickinson). Equal numbers of cells (5000 cells) transfected with pcDNA3 and pCL1-E1A were harvested, and luciferase assays were performed with the sorted cells as described above.

RT-PCR Analysis of Endogenous gamma -Globin Gene Expression-- Exponentially growing K562 cells (12 × 106) were transfected with a total of 72 µg of DNA in 288 µl of Superfect. The ratio of pCL1-E1A or pcDNA3 to EGFP was 5:1. Cells were incubated for 3 days, and equal numbers of EGFP-positive cells transfected with E1A or pcDNA3 were isolated by FACS. Trizol-extracted RNA was analyzed using the Access RT-PCR kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Products were visualized by ethidium bromide staining of a 1.2% agarose gel. The intensity of staining was estimated by image analysis with NIH Image software. Primer sequences: gamma -globin, 5'-GGAGGAGAAACCCTGGGAAG and 5'-CCCAGGAGCTTGAAGTTCTC; HPRT, 5'-CAGACTGAAGAGCTATTGTAATG and 5'-CTTAGATGCTGTCTTTGATGTG.

Expression and Purification of Recombinant Proteins-- A prokaryotic expression vector containing the cDNA for murine p45 was obtained from Beverly Emerson (Salk Institute). Polyhistidine-tagged p45 was overexpressed in the BL21DE3pLysS strain of Escherichia coli and purified on a column containing nickel-NTA resin equilibrated in buffer containing 8 M urea, as described previously (28). Protein samples were dialyzed overnight against 20 mM Tris, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 7.8, at 4 °C with two changes of buffer. Protein concentrations were measured by Bradford assay using gamma -globulin as a standard. Purified baculovirus expressed, flag epitope-tagged human p300 was kindly provided by Drs. Alex Vassilev and Yoshihiro Nakatani (National Institutes of Health).

Solid-state Protein-Protein Interaction Assay-- Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were performed as described previously (28). Purified p300 or GST (100 ng) was immobilized in triplicate wells of a 96-well enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plate (Costar EIA/RIA number 3590). Wells were blocked by incubation with bovine serum albumin (1 mg) for 1 h. The immobilized protein was incubated with increasing amounts of purified p45 and then washed five times with 300 µl of wash buffer (phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20). Anti-p45 antibody (28) (1/2000 dilution in wash buffer, 50 µl total) was added for 1 h, and then the plate was washed five times. After incubation with goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (1/1500 dilution in wash buffer, 50 µl total) (Sigma), the plate was washed five times, and the horseradish peroxidase substrate ABTS was added (0.2 mg/ml). Color development was allowed to proceed for 20 min, and absorbance measurements were made at 405 nm with an Elx800 universal microplate reader (BIO-TEK Instruments, Inc.), under conditions in which the absorbance was in the linear range. Incubations were done at room temperature with gentle agitation.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Requirement of an E1A-sensitive Factor for LCR-Mediated Transactivation in Erythroleukemia Cells at Various Stages of Erythroid Differentiation-- To test the functional significance of the NF-E2-CBP/p300 interaction for LCR-mediated transactivation, we used the adenoviral E1A protein, an inhibitor of CBP/p300. Transient transfection assays were done in K562 erythroleukemia cells with luciferase reporter constructs containing a human Agamma -globin promoter with or without HS2, HS2-HS3, or a mini-LCR containing HS1-HS4. As shown in Fig. 1, co-transfection of small amounts of an E1A expression vector abolished transactivation mediated by HS2, HS2-HS3, and the mini-LCR. E1A slightly increased the activity of the Agamma -globin promoter without LCR elements. Thus, inhibition by E1A was mediated by factors binding to the LCR elements and not the promoter. The experiments of Fig. 1 were done with uninduced K562 cells, and it is possible that the requirements for transactivation may differ in cells of varying differentiation states. We tested whether HS2-mediated transactivation was also sensitive to E1A in hemin-treated K562 cells, which differentiate along the erythroid lineage. Similar to the results of Fig. 1, expression of E1A abolished HS2-mediated transactivation in induced K562 cells (data not shown).


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Transactivation mediated by HS2, HS2-HS3, and HS1-HS4 in K562 cells is abolished by E1A. The reporter plasmids contained the human Agamma -globin promoter linked to luciferase with or without HS2, HS2-HS3, or the mini-LCR. Reporter plasmids were transiently transfected into K562 cells with or without expression plasmids encoding E1A or the blank vector pcDNA3. The graphs on the left show the absolute luciferase activities of the reporter constructs. The graphs on the right show the relative luciferase activities, where the luciferase activities of reporter constructs transfected without the blank expression vector (pcDNA3) or the E1A expression vector (pCL1-E1A) were set at 100%. Luciferase activity was normalized by the protein concentration of the lysate. Similar results were obtained when the beta -galactosidase expression vector pCH110 was included in transfections, and luciferase activity was normalized by beta -galactosidase activity (data not shown). A, HS2-mediated transactivation (mean ± S.E., n = 9). B, HS2-HS3-mediated transactivation (mean ± S.E., n = 6). C, mini-LCR (HS1-HS4)-mediated transactivation (mean ± S.E., n = 6).

MEL cells represent a later stage of erythroid differentiation than K562 cells and express beta -globin rather than epsilon - and gamma -globins characteristic of K562 cells. We assessed the sensitivity of LCR-mediated transactivation to E1A in MEL cells to determine whether the sensitivity was dependent on the stage of erythroid differentiation. As shown in Fig. 2, transactivation of a beta -globin promoter mediated by HS2 was strongly inhibited by E1A in MEL cells. In contrast to the K562 cell system, the inhibition was incomplete, suggesting that a component of the activity in MEL cells is resistant to inhibition by E1A. These results are consistent with a requirement of the E1A-sensitive factor for HS2-mediated transactivation at multiple stages of erythroid differentiation.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Transactivation mediated by HS2 in MEL cells is strongly inhibited by E1A. The reporter plasmids contained the human beta -globin promoter linked to luciferase with or without HS2. Reporter plasmids were transiently transfected into MEL cells with or without expression plasmids encoding E1A (pCL1-E1A) or the blank vector pcDNA3. The beta -galactosidase expression vector, pCH110, was included in all conditions. The graph on the left shows the absolute luciferase activities of the reporter constructs. The graph on the right shows the relative luciferase activities, where the luciferase activities of reporter constructs transfected without the blank expression vector (pcDNA3) or the E1A expression vector, were set at 100%. Luciferase activity was normalized by the protein concentration and the beta -galactosidase activity of the lysate (mean ± S.E., n = 6).

Requirement of the E1A-sensitive Factor for Long-range Transactivation-- The transactivation property of the LCR is often studied with constructs containing the LCR positioned near (within 1-2 kb) a beta -globin promoter linked to a reporter gene. However, within the endogenous beta -globin locus, the LCR is 7-50 kb upstream of the beta -globin promoters. Thus, it was important to determine whether the E1A sensitivity of LCR-mediated transactivation is also apparent over long distances. We asked whether transactivation of a Agamma -globin promoter by HS2-HS3 and by the mini-LCR positioned 5.1 kb from the promoter was sensitive to E1A in a transient transfection assay. Regardless of whether the LCR elements were positioned 20 base pairs or 5.1 kb from the promoter, E1A strongly inhibited transactivation (Fig. 3).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Short- and long-range transactivation mediated by HS2-HS3 and HS1-HS4 are equally sensitive to inhibition by E1A. A, the reporter plasmids containing the human Agamma -globin promoter linked to luciferase with or without HS2-HS3, the mini-LCR, or a 5.1-kb phage lambda  DNA fragment separating the LCR elements from the promoter are shown. B, the graph shows the absolute luciferase activities of reporter constructs after transient transfection into K562 cells. Reporter plasmids were co-transfected with or without expression plasmids encoding E1A (pCL1-E1A) or the blank vector pcDNA3. The beta -galactosidase expression vector, pCH110, was included in all conditions. Luciferase activity was normalized by the protein concentration and the beta -galactosidase activity of the lysate (mean ± S.E., n = 3).

We also tested the influence of E1A on the activity of linearized templates in transient transfection assays to determine whether the requirement of the E1A-sensitive factor was unique to plasmids. Constructs containing HS2 20 base pairs or 5.1 kb from the promoter or the promoter alone were linearized downstream of the luciferase gene with NotI, and linear DNA was transfected into K562 cells. Expression of E1A completely inhibited the activity of both HS2-containing templates without affecting the activity of the construct containing the promoter alone (data not shown). Thus, short- and long-range transactivation mediated by the LCR are equally sensitive to inhibition by E1A with circular and linear templates.

The E1A-sensitive Factor Is Critical for Transactivation of a Chromosomal Reporter Gene and Endogenous gamma -Globin Genes-- The experiments described above used transient transfection assays, in which the DNA is nonreplicating and may not be assembled into organized chromatin. As the transactivation requirements may differ for templates in transient and stable assays, we asked whether HS2-mediated transactivation of an integrated reporter gene was sensitive to E1A. An expression vector encoding E1A or the blank vector and a vector encoding EGFP were transiently co-transfected into the K562 clonal cell line HS2(2.2)gamma luc#20, which contains two copies of an integrated HS2(2.2)gamma luc reporter gene. Cells positive for EGFP were isolated by FACS and assayed for luciferase activity. This procedure allows one to assess the influence of the transiently expressed E1A on the reporter gene present in all cells. Expression of E1A strongly reduced luciferase activity relative to the control vector (Fig. 4). Thus, the E1A-sensitive factor is required for strong LCR-mediated transactivation in stable transfection assays, in addition to transient assays as described above.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   HS2-mediated transactivation of a chromosomal HS2(2.2)gamma luciferase reporter gene is inhibited by E1A. A blank plasmid (pcDNA3) or an E1A expression plasmid (pCL1-E1A) was co-transfected with an EGFP expression plasmid into the K562 clonal line HS2(2.2)gamma luc#20, which contains two copies of an integrated HS2(2.2)gamma luciferase reporter gene. FACS was used to isolate cells expressing EGFP. Equal numbers of EGFP-positive cells were assayed for luciferase activity. Luciferase activity was normalized by the protein concentration of the lysate (mean ± S.E., n = 4).

To determine the influence of E1A on endogenous gamma -globin gene expression, K562 cells were co-transfected with the control vector pcDNA3 or an E1A expression vector and a vector encoding EGFP. EGFP-positive cells were isolated by FACS, and RNA was analyzed by RT-PCR using primer pairs to detect human gamma -globin or HPRT transcripts. Expression of E1A strongly reduced the steady-state level of gamma -globin transcripts without influencing the level of HPRT transcripts (Fig. 5). The average decrease from two independent experiments was 3.2-fold. Since inhibition by E1A is apparent with the endogenous gamma -globin genes and is not unique to transfected LCR-containing constructs, the E1A-sensitive factor is likely to be important for the physiological regulation of the gamma -globin genes.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Endogenous gamma -globin gene expression is inhibited by E1A. A blank plasmid (pcDNA3) or an E1A expression plasmid (pCL1-E1A) was co-transfected with an EGFP expression plasmid into K562 cells. FACS was used to isolate cells expressing EGFP. Total RNA was isolated from 250,000 or 750,000 (two independent experiments) EGFP-positive cells. gamma -Globin and HPRT expression was assayed by RT-PCR with increasing amounts of RNA (equivalent to the total RNA from 16, 667, 3333, and 667 cells). RT-PCR reaction products were resolved on an agarose gel, and a representative ethidium bromide-stained gel is shown. Control reactions lacking RNA or reverse transcriptase are also shown. The positions of the expected products are indicated by arrows.

Requirement of NF-E2 but Not GATA-1 Sites of HS2 for E1A Sensitivity-- As tandem NF-E2 sites and a GATA-1 site of HS2 are important for transactivation (8), and both NF-E2 and GATA-1 can physically interact with CBP/p300 (30, 37), we asked whether both sites are required for sensitivity to E1A. Importantly, distinct sequences of CBP/p300 are bound by NF-E2 and GATA-1, suggesting that a multivalent interaction by these factors may be required to recruit a CBP/p300-containing coactivator complex. As shown in Fig. 6A, deletion of the tandem NF-E2 sites of HS2 strongly reduced transactivation (99% decrease). The residual activity of the construct, which could be measured accurately, was increased 3.5-fold upon expression of E1A. E1A slightly increased the activity of the Agamma -globin promoter alone (1.9-fold). Deletion of the GATA-1 site resulted in a 61% reduction in activity. Importantly, the activity of the GATA-1 mutant construct was strongly inhibited (87% decrease) by expression of E1A. Thus, the NF-E2 sites, but not the GATA-1 site, are required for E1A sensitivity as depicted in the model of Fig. 6B. We also tested whether the NF-E2 sites were necessary for E1A sensitivity in hemin-induced K562 cells. Similar to the uninduced cells, E1A did not inhibit the activity of the NF-E2 mutant construct in induced cells (data not shown).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Requirement of NF-E2 sites but not the GATA-1 site within HS2 for E1A sensitivity. A, the reporter plasmids contained the human Agamma -globin promoter linked to luciferase with or without wild-type HS2, or NF-E2 or GATA-1-site mutants of HS2 (Delta NF-E2 and Delta GATA-1, respectively). The top graph shows the absolute luciferase activities of reporter constructs after transient transfection into K562 cells. Reporter plasmids were co-transfected with or without expression plasmids encoding E1A (pCL1-E1A) or the blank vector pcDNA3 (125 ng). The beta -galactosidase expression vector, pCH110, was included in all conditions. Luciferase activity was normalized by the protein concentration and the beta -galactosidase activity of the lysate (mean ± S.E., n = 3). The bottom graph shows normalized data, in which conditions with the pcDNA3 vector were set at 100%. B, model of NF-E2-mediated recruitment of a CBP/p300-containing coactivator complex. The transcription factor-binding sites within HS2 are indicated at the bottom. Two of these factors, NF-E2 and GATA-1, have been reported to interact with CBP/p300. The model assumes that a direct physical interaction between the p45 subunit of NF-E2 and CBP/p300 is critical for recruitment of the coactivator complex in K562 cells. In contrast, GATA-1 is not required to recruit the complex in these cells, but could potentially facilitate recruitment through interactions with the carboxyl-terminal domain of CBP/p300. The stoichiometry of NF-E2 binding to tandem sites within HS2 is unclear, and we have depicted a single NF-E2 heterodimer bound to the DNA.

Deletion of the NF-E2 sites of HS2 almost completely abolished transactivation by HS2, and therefore it is possible that the requirement of the NF-E2 sites for E1A sensitivity is indirect. Factors binding to the NF-E2 sites may be critical for forming a functional HS2 complex but might not directly mediate activation through the E1A-sensitive factor. To test whether the E1A-sensitive factor is required for transactivation by proteins binding to the tandem NF-E2 sites of HS2, we asked whether transactivation mediated by these sites alone was sensitive to E1A. The tandem NF-E2 sites from HS2 activated a minimal beta -globin promoter 5.3-fold after transient transfection into K562 cells (Fig. 7). Expression of E1A strongly inhibited transactivation, consistent with a direct involvement of the E1A-sensitive factor in transactivation mediated by the NF-E2 sites.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Transactivation mediated by the tandem NF-E2 sites of HS2 is inhibited by E1A. The reporter plasmids contained a minimal beta -globin promoter linked to luciferase with and without the tandem NF-E2-binding sites from human HS2. Reporter plasmids were transiently transfected into K562 cells with or without expression plasmids encoding E1A (pCL1-E1A) or the blank vector pcDNA3. The beta -galactosidase expression vector pCH110 was included in all conditions. The graph on the left shows the absolute luciferase activities of the reporter constructs. The graph on the right shows the relative luciferase activities, where the luciferase activities of reporter constructs transfected without the blank expression vector (pcDNA3) or the E1A expression vector (pCL1-E1A) were set at 100%. Luciferase activity was normalized by the protein concentration and the beta -galactosidase activity of the lysate (mean ± S.E., n = 3).

Since multiple factors can interact with the NF-E2 sites (15, 18-22), we wanted to determine whether transactivation mediated by NF-E2 was sensitive to E1A. Thus, we generated a mutant HS2 reporter construct (HS2(GAL4)gamma luc) with a single GAL4-binding site substituted for the tandem NF-E2 sites of HS2. The construction maintained the natural spacing between other cis elements within HS2. We then asked whether expression of the transactivation domain of p45 fused to the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 (GAL4-p45(1-90)) activated the HS2(GAL4)gamma luc reporter and whether activation was sensitive to E1A. Expression of GAL4-p45(1-90) activated the HS2(GAL4)gamma luc reporter 3.6-fold, and the activation was prevented by coexpression of E1A (Fig. 8A). E1A had no effect on the activity of the reporter alone. Expression of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain alone did not influence reporter activity (data not shown). As the expression of GAL4-p45(1-90) was driven by the CMV promoter, and this concentration of E1A does not inhibit the CMV promoter in K562 cells (data not shown), the inhibitory effect does not result from reduced expression of GAL4-p45(1-90). Expression of GAL4-p45(1-90) strongly activated (850-fold) a control promoter with five GAL4-binding sites linked to the adenovirus major late promoter TATA box (pG5TIluc) (Fig. 8B). Similar to the HS2(GAL4)gamma luc reporter, E1A strongly inhibited transactivation. The GAL4-binding sites were required for transactivation by GAL4-p45(1-90), as expression of GAL4-p45(1-90) had no effect on the activity of the HS2(Delta NF-E2)gamma luc reporter, which has a SalI site substituted for the tandem NF-E2-binding sites of HS2 and lacks GAL4-binding sites (Fig. 8C).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Transactivation mediated by the activation domain of p45 is inhibited by E1A. The Gal4-p45(1-90) expression plasmid (1 µg) was transiently transfected into K562 cells with or without expression plasmids encoding E1A (pCL1-E1A) or the blank vector pcDNA3 (60 ng). A, fold activation of an HS2gamma luc reporter in which a single Gal4-binding site is substituted for the two NF-E2 sites of HS2. B, fold activation of the synthetic plasmid pG5TIluc containing five Gal4-binding sites upstream of the adenovirus major later promoter TATA box. C, fold activation of a NF-E2 site mutant of HS2 deleted for both NF-E2 sites. Luciferase activity was normalized by the protein concentration of the lysate (mean ± S.E., n = 3). Average absolute luciferase activities for reporters alone were 531 relative light units/s/µg for HS2(Gal4)gamma luc, 4 relative light units/s/µg for pG5TIluc, and 214 relative light units/s/µg for HS2(Delta NF-E2)gamma luc.

Involvement of CBP/p300 in LCR-mediated Transactivation-- Although E1A inhibits CBP/p300, E1A can have multiple effects on cell function (42). Sequences within the amino terminus and the CR1 domain of E1A are important for CBP/p300 binding, whereas the CR1 and CR2 domains contain sequences necessary for retinoblastoma protein binding (36, 43). We tested E1A mutants defective in either CBP/p300 or retinoblastoma protein binding to assess the importance of these interactions for inhibition of LCR activity by E1A (Fig. 9A). A point mutant of E1A (H3N) and the amino-terminal truncation mutant E1ADelta 2-36 were shown previously to be defective in CBP/p300 binding (36, 43). These mutations do not influence the binding of E1A to retinoblastoma protein family members. In contrast, the E1ADelta 38-67 mutant lacks sequences important for both CBP/p300 and retinoblastoma protein binding, and the pm928 mutant of E1A is defective only in retinoblastoma protein binding (43). Neither wild-type nor mutants of E1A inhibited expression of the gamma luc reporter (Fig. 9B). Expression of the H3N and Delta 2-36 mutants in K562 cells had little effect on HS2-mediated transactivation, under conditions in which wild-type E1A and the pm928 mutant nearly abolished transactivation (Fig. 9C). Expression of the Delta 38-67 mutant weakly inhibited transactivation. Thus, amino acids of E1A required for CBP/p300 binding but not retinoblastoma protein binding are necessary to inhibit HS2-mediated transactivation.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   E1A mutants defective in CBP/p300 binding only weakly inhibit HS2-mediated transactivation. A, diagram of wild-type and E1A mutant proteins. Conserved regions 1 and 2 are indicated by shaded boxes. Amino acids 1-289 refer to the E1A 13S gene product. B, K562 cells were transiently co-transfected with the gamma luc reporter plasmid and either the blank vector pEF1alpha -neo or expression vectors encoding wild-type E1A (pEF1alpha -neoE1A) or mutants of E1A (pCL1-H3N, pEF1alpha -neoE1ADelta 2-36, pEF1alpha -neoE1ADelta 38-67, and pEF1alpha -neoE1Apm928). The beta -galactosidase expression vector, pCH110, was included in all conditions. Luciferase activity was assayed in cell lysates and normalized by the protein concentration and the beta -galactosidase activity of the lysate (mean ± S.E., n = 6). C, the transfection conditions were identical to B, except that the HS2gamma luc reporter plasmid was used.

To further test the hypothesis that CBP/p300 is a coactivator necessary for LCR enhancer activity, we asked whether expression of CBP influences HS2-mediated transactivation. Expression of CBP in MEL cells increased the activity of the HS2beta luc reporter (3.8-fold) (Fig. 10). CBP expression also increased the activity of the beta luc reporter, but to a lesser extent than the HS2beta luc construct (2.1-fold). The weak stimulation of the promoter-only construct could be related to the ability of CBP/p300 to associate with RNA polymerase II (44), which may have a general stimulatory effect on transcription. Taken with the results of the E1A mutants, these data support a model in which CBP/p300 is important for strong LCR-mediated transactivation.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Potentiation of HS2-mediated transactivation by CBP. MEL cells were transiently co-transfected with the beta luc or HS2beta luc reporter plasmids and either the blank vector pcDNA3 or an expression vector encoding CBP. Luciferase activity was assayed in cell lysates and normalized by the protein concentration of the lysate (mean ± S.E., n = 4).

To circumvent potential problems related to overexpressing CBP in cells that express endogenous CBP/p300, we performed an activator by-pass experiment to assess the ability of CBP to function through the LCR. The tandem NF-E2 sites of HS2 were replaced with a recognition site for the yeast transcription factor GAL4, while maintaining the correct spacing between adjacent cis-acting elements. We tested whether expression of the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 alone or a fusion of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain to CBP (GAL4-CBP) influences transactivation from HS2(GAL4)gamma luc, HS2gamma luc, and HS2(Delta NF-E2)gamma luc reporter constructs in transient transfection assays. With the HS2(GAL4)gamma luc reporter plasmid containing the GAL4 recognition site, expression of GAL4-CBP, but not GAL4, strongly increased transactivation of the reporter gene to 62% of wild-type activity (Fig. 11). Neither expression plasmid influenced the activity of the HS2gamma luc or HS2(Delta NF-E2)gamma luc reporters, which lack GAL4 recognition sites. Thus, tethering CBP to HS2 via a GAL4 DNA-binding domain at the site normally bound by NF-E2 strongly rescues the loss of activity resulting from deletion of the tandem NF-E2 sites.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Tethering CBP to HS2 at the site normally bound by NF-E2 strongly transactivates a reporter gene. K562 cells were transiently co-transfected with the HS2gamma luc, HS2(GAL4)gamma luc, or HS2(Delta NF-E2)gamma luc reporter plasmids and either the blank vector pcDNA3 or expression vectors encoding the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 alone or fused to CBP. Luciferase activity was assayed in cell lysates and normalized by the protein concentration of the lysate (mean ± S.E., n = 3). Average absolute luciferase activities for reporters alone were 38,698 relative light units/s/µg for HS2gamma luc, 1779 relative light units/s/µg for HS2(Gal4)gamma luc, and 418 relative light units/s/µg for HS2(Delta NF-E2)gamma luc.

Since the NF-E2 sites, but not the GATA-1 site, of HS2 were required for E1A sensitivity, factors binding to the NF-E2 sites must be critical for recruitment of the E1A-sensitive factor. As mentioned above, a GST-p45 fusion protein has been reported to interact with GST fusions of CBP/p300 (30). However, we have not been able to coimmunoprecipitate endogenous NF-E2 and CBP/p300 using K562 nuclear extracts, which may reflect a highly regulated transient interaction between NF-E2 and CBP/p300 in cells. This could be analogous to the requirement for CREB to be phosphorylated by protein kinase A to bind CBP with high affinity (41). An alternative possibility is that the GST pull-down assays (30) may have detected a low affinity interaction not likely to occur in cells. Thus, we asked whether purified, full-length p45 binds to full-length p300 and whether the interaction is of high-affinity, which would further support a physiological role of CBP/p300 as a mediator of NF-E2 function. We overexpressed p45 in E. coli and used purified p45 in a quantitative, solid-state equilibrium binding assay to estimate its affinity for baculovirus expressed, purified p300. Incubation of increasing concentrations of p45 with immobilized p300 resulted in saturable binding with an estimated KD of 41.3 nM (Fig. 12). Saturation resulted from the binding of a stoichiometric excess of p45 to the immobilized p300. This analysis assumes that 100% of the recombinant p45 is in a native conformation. Since p45 was purified in a denatured state and required renaturation, it is unlikely that all p45 molecules are native. If less than 100% of the p45 was competent for binding, the binding affinity would be even higher.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12.   High affinity binding of p45 to p300. A, solid-state protein-protein interaction assay. p300 or GST were immobilized in the wells of a microtiter plate in triplicate. Vertical rows of the plate were incubated with increasing amounts of purified p45, followed by anti-p45 antibody and then a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. p45 binding was measured by adding a peroxidase substrate. B, quantitative analysis. The absorbance values at 405 nm were corrected by subtracting the background absorbance from the corresponding wells containing immobilized GST. The corrected values (mean ± S.E., n = 3) were plotted against the p45 concentration, and nonlinear regression analysis was used to estimate the KD of the interaction.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

An E1A-Sensitive Factor Is Critical for LCR-mediated Transactivation-- We have shown that the CBP/p300 inhibitor E1A strongly reduces LCR-mediated transactivation in transient and stable transfection assays and inhibits expression of endogenous gamma -globin genes. Four lines of evidence support a functional relationship between the E1A sensitivity of LCR-mediated transactivation and CBP/p300 inhibition. First, recognition sites for a high-affinity CBP/p300-binding protein, NF-E2, were required for E1A sensitivity of LCR-mediated transactivation in K562 cells. Second, mutants of E1A defective in CBP/p300 binding (H3N, Delta 2-36, and Delta 38-67) had little effect on transactivation. In contrast, an E1A mutant defective in retinoblastoma protein binding (pm928) was an equally effective inhibitor of transactivation as wild-type E1A. Third, expression of CBP potentiated transactivation. Last, transactivation mediated by the activation domain of p45 was inhibited by E1A, and the NF-E2 requirement for HS2 enhancer activity could be by-passed by tethering CBP to HS2 via a GAL4 DNA-binding domain. The comparable requirement of the E1A-sensitive factor for short- and long-range transactivation and its importance for transactivation of a chromosomal reporter gene and endogenous gamma -globin genes strongly suggests that the E1A-sensitive factor is a coactivator required for the enhancer function of the LCR.

The physiological importance of the E1A-sensitive factor is reinforced by the experiment of Fig. 5 and the results of Blobel et al. (37). Blobel and co-workers (37) showed that the conditional expression of E1A in MEL cells prevented endogenous beta -globin gene expression. However, in the MEL cell system, beta -globin gene expression occurs upon induction of erythroid differentiation with dimethyl sulfoxide. Thus, the inhibition by E1A could have resulted from perturbation of multiple regulatory steps necessary for differentiation. Our results in K562 cells provide direct evidence that the E1A-sensitive factor is required to maintain steady-state levels of endogenous gamma -globin mRNA in a system that does not require differentiation to activate beta -globin genes.

To determine whether the E1A-sensitive factor was recruited to the LCR through protein-protein interactions with LCR-binding proteins, we defined the cis-acting elements required for E1A sensitivity. We tested the hypothesis that a multivalent interaction between NF-E2, GATA-1, and CBP/p300 is required to efficiently recruit a CBP/p300 coactivator complex. This experiment was based on the observations that NF-E2 interacts with the amino-terminal domain of CBP/p300 (30), while GATA-1 interacts with the carboxyl-terminal domain of CBP/p300 (37). We reasoned that this scenario may be analogous to the situation in which thyroid hormone receptor and NF-E2 interact with distinct domains of CBP/p300, resulting in positive cross-talk (30). As CBP/p300 and its associated HAT, PCAF, are likely to exist as a large macromolecular complex (45, 46), a single protein-protein interaction may be insufficient to efficiently recruit the complex. However, only the NF-E2 sites were required for E1A sensitivity, inconsistent with a critical role for GATA-1 in CBP/p300 recruitment to HS2 for activation of the gamma -globin promoter in K562 cells (Fig. 6B).

It is formally possible that the NF-E2 sites are required to form a functional HS2 complex and therefore the requirement of the sites for recruitment of the E1A-sensitive factor may be indirect. This is unlikely, as the inhibition of transactivation by E1A is nearly complete, mimicking the effect of deleting the NF-E2 sites. No other deletions of cis-acting elements within HS2 result in such strong inhibition of transactivation. Furthermore, the results of Fig. 8 showing that transactivation mediated by the activation domain of p45 is abolished by E1A supports the hypothesis that NF-E2 is directly required to recruit or utilize the E1A-sensitive factor.

Although the potentiation of HS2-mediated transactivation by expression of CBP was consistently greater than the effect on the promoter (Fig. 10), the stimulation was only moderate. Furthermore, only moderate stimulation of HS2gamma luc was observed in K562 cells (data not shown). Two considerations are relevant to this point. First, MEL and K562 cells already express CBP/p300. Therefore, CBP/p300 may not be limiting in these systems. Second, CBP/p300 is likely to function in a large heteromeric complex, and the transient expression of a single component may not efficiently generate functional complexes. The strong stimulation of transactivation through the LCR by GAL4-CBP provides evidence that CBP can function through the region of HS2 normally bound by NF-E2.

Implications of the Requirement of the E1A-sensitive Factor for Mechanisms of Long-range Transactivation by the LCR-- The coactivator function of CBP/p300 may result from acetylation of core histones (47) or nonhistone components, such as transcription factors. The transcription factors p53 (48), GATA-1 (49), EKLF (50), and components of the basal transcription machinery (51) have been reported to be acetylated by CBP/p300, and acetylation enhances the DNA binding activity of p53 (48) and GATA-1 (49). The lack of requirement of the GATA-1 site of HS2 for E1A sensitivity is particularly important given the recent reports by Boyes et al. (49) and Blobel and co-workers (57) identifying GATA-1 as a substrate for acetylation by CBP/p300. The E1A sensitivity of LCR-mediated transactivation could potentially have resulted from failure of CBP/p300 to acetylate GATA-1 and therefore reduced GATA-1 binding to GATA-1 sites of the LCR. The results of Fig. 6A are inconsistent with such a mechanism.

The coactivator function of CBP/p300 is apparent in transient transfection assays in multiple systems (52). Thus, if the coactivator function requires histone acetylation, a fraction of the transiently transfected DNA templates must be organized into chromatin. As multiple copies of the transiently transfected DNA templates are present in a cell, and the chromatin organization of these templates is likely to be heterogeneous, it is difficult to determine whether a low percentage of the templates contain organized chromatin. Importantly, the E1A-sensitive factor is required for LCR-mediated transactivation in stable transfection assays and for expression of endogenous gamma -globin genes, where templates are likely to have a more homogeneous chromatin structure than in transient transfection assays.

We have proposed that the ability of the LCR to confer high-level transcription to the beta -globin genes over long distances on a chromosome requires the recruitment of chromatin remodeling enzymes, which modulate the chromatin structure of the beta -globin promoters (3, 38, 46). The strong synergism among the hypersensitive sites, which is necessary for long-range transactivation (38), may be explained by the recruitment of distinct classes of coactivators that function collectively to catalyze a chromatin structure transition of the promoters at the appropriate developmental stage. The results described herein suggest that CBP/p300 is one such coactivator critical for long-range transactivation by the LCR. As CBP/p300 can exist as a complex with other HATs such as PCAF, additional factors may be important for the coactivator function. Our previous work (28) implicated WW domain proteins as other factors required for NF-E2-mediated transactivation of the beta -globin genes in CB3 cells. Although the endogenous WW domain interactors have not been identified, we hypothesized that the ubiquitin ligase WWP1 may be a functionally relevant interactor, based on its expression in fetal liver and high affinity for the transactivation domain of NF-E2. The two enzymes, a HAT and a ubiquitin ligase, may be part of a larger complement of interacting components necessary for LCR function.

It is unknown whether HATs are requisite coactivators for long-range transactivation. In this regard, a recent report by Krumm et al. (53) provided evidence for the involvement of PCAF and p300 in long-range transactivation of a simple, synthetic promoter. Expression of PCAF or p300 fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain stimulated transactivation when GAL4 sites were placed 3.1 kb downstream of the promoter. At least two mechanisms may explain how regulatory complexes stimulate transactivation over long distances on chromosomes. The complex may induce the unfolding of chromatin of an entire chromosomal domain, resulting in enhanced accessibility of cis-acting sequences throughout the domain. Alternatively, the complex may have a local action on the chromatin structure surrounding a promoter. Since loss of the LCR in its normal chromosomal context does not abrogate the general DNase I sensitivity of the beta -globin locus (54), a potential indicator of unfolded chromatin, it is unlikely that chromatin modifying enzymes recruited by the LCR mediate a broad unfolding of the entire beta -globin domain. Rather, the LCR may exert local effects on the chromatin structure of the beta -globin promoters, analogous to the restricted acetylation of histones on the human interferon-beta promoter (55) and a plasmid-based HIS3 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (56).

In summary, our studies implicating the E1A-sensitive factor represent the first demonstration of a coactivator required for LCR function. It will be of considerable interest to ask whether the conditional expression of E1A, CBP/p300, and WWP1 influence the acetylation and ubiquitination state of histones within the beta -globin locus or of other factors required for transcription of the beta -globin genes.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Michael Rosenfeld for the wild-type and mutant (H3N) E1A expression vector, Dr. Gerd Blobel for the wild-type and mutant E1A expression vectors, Dr. Johan Ericsson for the CBP expression vector, Dr. John Chrivia for the GAL4-CBP expression vector, Dr. Peggy Farnham for plasmid pG5TIluc, Dr. Ross Hardison for plasmids beta 106(hAP1)2-luc and beta 106-luc, and Drs. Alex Vassilev and Yoshihiro Nakatani for purified p300. We also thank Dr. Moshe J. Sadofsky for a critical review of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant DK50107, the Leukemia Society of America, and the Milwaukee Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Contributed equally to the results of this article.

§ Leukemia Society of America Scholar and Shaw Scientist. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 608-265-6446; Fax: 608-262-1257; E-mail: ehbresni@facstaff.wisc.edu.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: LCR, locus control region; CREB, cyclic AMP response element-binding protein; CBP, CREB-binding protein; CR1, conserved region 1 of E1A; CR2, conserved region 2 of E1A; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; GST, glutathione S-transferase; HAT, histone acetyltransferase; HS, hypersensitive site; HPRT, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase; IMEM, Iscove's modified Eagle's medium; p300, a CBP homolog; PCAF, p300/CBP-associated factor; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; FACS, fluorescence activated cell sorting; kb, kilobase(s); CMV, cytomegalovirus.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Grosveld, F., van Assendelft, G. B., Greaves, D. R., and Kollias, G. (1987) Cell 51, 975-985[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Forrester, W. C., Takegawa, S., Papayannopoulou, T., Stamatoyannopoulos, G., and Groudine, M. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 10159-10177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Bresnick, E. H. (1997) Chemtracts Biochem. Mol. Biol. 10, 1001-1009
4. Talbot, D., Philipsen, S., Fraser, P., and Grosveld, F. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 2169-2177[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Philipsen, S., Talbot, D., Fraser, P., and Grosveld, F. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 2159-2167[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Talbot, D., and Grosveld, F. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 1391-1398[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Liu, D., Chang, J. C., Moi, P., Liu, W., Kan, Y. W., and Curtin, P. T. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 3899-3903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Caterina, J. J., Ciavatta, D. J., Donze, D., Behringer, R. R., and Townes, T. M. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1006-1011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Elnitski, L., Miller, W., and Hardison, R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 369-378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Lam, L. T., and Bresnick, E. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32421-32429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Ney, P. A., Sorrentino, B. P., McDonagh, K. T., and Nienhuis, A. W. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 993-1006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Moon, A. M., and Ley, T. J. (1991) Blood 77, 2272-2284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Chang, J. C., Liu, D., and Kan, Y. W. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 3107-3110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Gong, Q., and Dean, A. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 911-917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Andrews, N. C., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Davidson, M. B., Tempst, P., and Orkin, S. H. (1993) Nature 362, 722-728[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Ney, P. A., Andrews, N. C., Jane, S. M., Safer, B., Purucker, M. E., Weremowicz, S., Morton, C. C., Goff, S. C., Orkin, S. H., and Nienhuis, A. W. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 5604-5612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Andrews, N. C., Kotkow, K. J., Ney, P. A., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., and Orkin, S. H. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 11488-11492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Chan, J. Y., Han, X. L., and Kan, Y. W. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 11371-11375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Caterina, J. J., Donze, D., Sun, C. W., Ciavatta, D. J., and Townes, T. M. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 2383-2391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Moi, P., Chan, K., Asunis, I., Cao, A., and Kan, Y. W. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9926-9930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Karin, M., Liu, Z., and Zandi, E. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 240-246[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Igarashi, K., Hoshino, H., Muto, A., Suwabe, N., Nishikawa, S., Nakauchi, H., and Yamamoto, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 11783-11790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Lu, S. J., Rowan, S., Bani, M. R., and Ben-David, Y. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 8398-8402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Kotkow, K. J., and Orkin, S. H. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4640-4647[Abstract]
25. Shivdasani, R. A., Rosenblatt, M. F., Zucker-Franklin, D., Jackson, C. W., Hunt, P., Saris, C. J., and Orkin, S. H. (1995) Cell 81, 695-704[CrossRef][Medline]