JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Kooyk, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Figdor, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Kooyk, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Figdor, C. G.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 26869-26877, September 17, 1999


The Actin Cytoskeleton Regulates LFA-1 Ligand Binding through Avidity Rather than Affinity Changes*

Yvette van KooykDagger , Sandra J. van Vliet, and Carl G. Figdor

From the Department of Tumor Immunology, University Hospital Nijmegen St. Radboud, 6525 EX Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

To elucidate the role of the cytoskeleton regulating avidity or affinity changes in the leukocyte adhesion receptor lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) (alpha Lbeta 2), we generated mutant cytoplasmic LFA-1 receptors and expressed these into the erythroleukemic cell line K562. We determined whether intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)-mediated adhesion of LFA-1, lacking parts of its cytoplasmic tails, is regulated through receptor diffusion/clustering and/or by altered ligand binding affinity. All cytoplasmic deletion mutants that lack the complete beta 2 cytoplasmic tail and/or the conserved KVGFFKR sequence in the alpha L cytoplasmic tail were constitutively active and expressed high levels of the activation epitopes NKI-L16 and M24. Surprisingly, whereas these mutants showed a clustered cell surface distribution of LFA-1, the ligand-binding affinity as measured by titration of soluble ligand ICAM-1 remained unaltered. The notion that redistribution of LFA-1 does not alter ligand-binding affinity is further supported by the finding that disruption of the cytoskeleton by cytochalasin D did not alter the binding affinity nor adhesion to ICAM-1 of these mutants. Most cytoplasmic deletion mutants that spontaneously bound ICAM-1 were not capable to spread on ICAM-1, demonstrating that on these mutants LFA-1 is not coupled to the actin cytoskeleton. From these data we conclude that LFA-1-mediated cell adhesion to ICAM-1 is predominantly regulated by receptor clustering and that affinity alterations do not necessarily coincide with strong ICAM-1 binding.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The beta 2 integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1)1 (CD11a/CD18 or alpha Lbeta 2) is a leukocyte-specific adhesion receptor that coordinates different adhesive and signaling interactions within the immune system (1-4). LFA-1 mediates cell-cell adhesion upon binding to its cellular ligand intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) (5). At distinct sites in the body, leukocytes behave as adherent cells, whereas at other sites they have to circulate as nonadherent cells. This dynamic control of adhesion is regulated by binding strength, and the kinetics of interactions between adhesive ligands and beta 2 integrins. In addition, events such as lateral diffusion of integrins (6-11) and interactions with and reorganization of the cytoskeleton enforce adhesion (12, 13). Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane molecules composed of an alpha  chain that is noncovalently linked to a beta  chain. The cytoplasmic tails of LFA-1, as well as other integrins, are essential for control of adhesion. Mutation or deletion of specific cytoplasmic sequences causes integrins to become constitutively active and have also revealed amino acids located in the beta 2 cytoplasmic tail that interact with the cytoskeleton (14-16). On resting, lymphocytes LFA-1 is inactive. It is thought that the attachment of LFA-1 to the actin cytoskeleton keeps the integrin in an inactive state. Binding to its ligand ICAM-1 is only observed through intracellular signals (3, 17-19) by TCR/CD3 cross-linking that causes LFA-1 activation (17, 18). A temporary dislodgment from the actin cytoskeleton may facilitate lateral diffusion of beta 2 integrins into clusters (9, 10, 20, 21), as can be observed after disruption of the cytoskeleton by cytochalasin D or activation of calpaises that facilitate adhesion of beta 2 integrins (22).

Activation of LFA-1 likely results in a conformational change in the alpha /beta heterodimer, as evidenced by the expression of neo-epitopes or activation epitopes (L16 and M24) (6, 23). This has led to the speculation that affinity changes in LFA-1 are associated with conformational alterations, leading to an enhanced binding to its ligand ICAM-1 (24). Both affinity (active conformation) and avidity (clustering) changes have been considered to be important for strong LFA-1-mediated cell binding (25). These affinity/avidity-induced conformational changes in LFA-1 depend on an intact cytoskeleton, physiological temperature, and on binding of divalent cations, Mg2+ in particular (7, 23, 26, 27). Binding of Ca2+ to LFA-1 supports clustering (high avidity state) of LFA-1 on the cell surface resulting in enhanced LFA-1-mediated adhesion (7, 8). Antibodies such as NKI-L16, which recognizes a Ca2+-dependent epitope on the alpha  chain of LFA-1 have been used to detect clustered LFA-1 on the cell surface, whereas the antibody M24 recognizes a Mg2+-dependent epitope on LFA-1 that coincides the high affinity state of LFA-1 or ligand bound state (23, 28, 29). Although the cytoplasmic tails of the alpha  and beta  chain LFA-1 are relatively short (58 and 45 amino acids, respectively) and do not contain any intrinsic kinase activity, the cytoplasmic tails seem to be involved in affinity or avidity regulation and cytoskeleton association. It has been demonstrated that the adhesiveness of LFA-1 is controlled by the cytoplasmic domain of the beta 2 subunit, because truncation of the cytoplasmic beta 2 tail, but not the alpha L tail, eliminates LFA-1 binding to ICAM-1 (30). Because deletion of the cytoplasmic domain of the alpha L subunit does not affect binding to ICAM-1, it is hypothesized that the cytoplasmic tail of alpha L is predominantly involved in "post-ligand binding" events by integrins (30).

In this work, we have examined the role of the alpha L and beta 2 cytoplasmic domains of LFA-1 on their capacity to regulate ligand binding affinity and avidity, and on the interaction with the actin cytoskeleton network. We observed that the cytoplasmic tail of both the beta 2 chain and the GFFKR sequence in the alpha L cytoplasmic tail play a pivotal role in regulating ligand binding through induction of avidity changes rather than by affinity changes.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Monoclonal Antibodies-- The monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) SPV-L7 (IgG1), NKI-L15 (IgG2a), and NKI-L16 (IgG2a) reactive with the alpha  chain of LFA-1 were raised as described previously (31, 32). NKI-L16 recognizes a Ca2+-dependent epitope on the alpha  chain of LFA-1 (32). The nonblocking mAb TS2/4 (IgG1) reactive with alpha L (33), M24 (IgG1) that recognizes a Mg2+-dependent epitope on alpha L (23), mAb 60.3 (IgG1) directed against beta 2 (34), and mAb KIM185 (IgG1) used to activate beta 2 integrins (35), were kindly provided by Drs. E. Martz, N. Hogg, J. Harlan, and M. Robinson, respectively

DNA Constructs-- The chimeric alpha  chain constructs alpha Lalpha 4 and alpha Lalpha X were generated by PCR using oligonucleotides for the alpha L containing at the 5' end a StuI site (GAGATCGAGGCCTCTTCC) and at the 3' end a AatII site (TTATAGACGTCCAACCTTGTACAGCACTAT). Oligonucleotides for the alpha 4 and alpha x contained at the 5' end AatII site (ATATTGACGTCTTCTTTAAAAGACAATACAAATC, and TTATTGACGTCTTCTTCAAGCGTCAGTAC, respectively) and at the 3' end a EclXI site (ATAAACGGCCGCATGAAGACATAATATGTCAC and ATATACGGCCGGTGGTGCAGTGGTTCC, respectively). Digestion of the PCR products with AatII followed by ligation of the two products was furthermore cloned by StuI and EclXI digestion in the pBluescript vector containing the alpha L cDNA thereby creating an AatII site in the chimeric product. The Delta KVGFFKR mutant was created by PCR with primers containing at the 5' end a StuI site and at the 3'end a AatII site for alpha L (see above) and an alpha L PCR product using primers containing at the 5' end RSAI site (ATTTGTACAACCTGAAGGAGAAGATGG) and at the 3' end EclXI (TTATACGGCCGGACTCAGTCCTTGCCAC). These two PCR products were ligated and digested with RSAI in alpha  chain removing only the KVGFFKR sequence from the alpha L cytoplasmic tail. The alpha L cytoplasmic deletion mutants Delta 1088alpha L and Delta 1095alpha L were generated by introduction of a termination codon into the alpha L cDNA by P-Alter. The following antisense oligonucleotides were used for mutation and amplification (Delta 1088alpha L, GTGCTGTACTAGGTTGGTTTC; and Delta 1095alpha L, TCTTCAAACGGTAGCTGAAGGAG). All alpha L cDNA constructs in pBluescript were digested with HindIII and EclX1 and cloned in the pRc/CMV vector (containing a neomycin resistance gene; Invitrogen Corp., San Diego, CA). The 4.2-kilobase alpha  chain of LFA-1 was cloned in the HindIII site of pRc/CMV. The Delta beta 2 mutant of LFA-1 was made by truncation of the beta 2 cytoplasmic tail from amino acid 724 as described earlier (36) (Fig. 2).

Cell Culture and Transfection-- Stable LFA-1 expressing K562 transfectants were established by electroporation of 107 cells in 0.8 ml of PBS at 280 V and 960 µF with either the wild-type alpha L (in pRc/CMV) and wild-type beta 2 subunit (in pCDM8), or truncated alpha L with beta 2 wild-type, truncated beta 2 and wild-type alpha L or double truncation mutants (36). K562-LFA-1 transfectants were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies Ltd., Paisley, Scotland), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (BioWhittaker, Verviers, Belgium), 1% antibiotics/antimycotics (Life Technologies, Inc.). After 48 h, the neomycin analogue, geneticin (2 mg/ml; Life Technologies Ltd.) was added to the culture medium. The different transfectants were sorted three or more times to obtain a homogeneous population of cells expressing high levels of LFA-1. Positive cells were stained with FITC-conjugated TS2/4 mAb and isolated using a Coulter Epics Elite cell sorter (Coulter, Hialeah, FL).

Immunofluorescence Analysis-- Expression of LFA-1 on the transfectants was determined by immunofluorescence. Cells (2 × 105) were incubated (30 min, 4 °C) in PBS containing 0.5% w/v bovine serum albumin (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) and 0.01% sodium azide (10 mM; Merck, Hohenbrunn, Germany), with appropriate dilutions of either an anti-integrin mAb or an isotype-matched control antibody. For L16 staining, cells were washed twice with cation-free PBS and staining was performed in the presence or absence of 1 mM CaCl2. For M24 staining, LFA-1 was activated by 1 mM MnCl2 for 30 min at 37 °C in TSM, cells were washed and followed incubation with monoclonal antibody M24 for 30 min, 4 °C. Subsequently cells were incubated with FITC-labeled goat (Fab')2 anti-mouse IgG mAb (Zymed Laboratories, Inc., San Francisco, CA) for 30 min at 4 °C. The relative fluorescence intensity was measured by FACScan analysis (Becton Dickinson).

Ligand Coating of Fluorescent Microspheres-- Carboxylate-modified TransFluorSpheres (488/645 nm, 1.0 µm; Molecular Probes) were coated with adhesion ligands as follows. Streptavidin was covalently coupled to the TransFluorSpheres as described by the manufacturer. 20 µl of streptavidin (5 mg/ml in 50 mM MES buffer) was added to 50 µl TransFluorSpheres. 30 µl of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (1.33 mg/ml) was added and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction was stopped by the addition of glycine to a final concentration of 100 mM. The streptavidin-coated beads were washed three times with PBS (50 mM phosphate, 0.9% NaCl, pH 7.4) and resuspended in 150 µl of PBA (PBS, 0.5% bovine serum albumin (w/v), 0.002 M NaAz). This suspension remained stable for 2 months if stored at 4 °C. The streptavidin-coated beads (15 µl) were incubated with biotinylated goat-anti-human anti-Fc (Fab')2 fragments (6 µg/ml) in 0.5 ml PBA for 2 h at 37 °C. The beads were washed once with PBA and incubated with human IgG1 Fc-fused ligands (2500 ng/ml) in 0.5 ml overnight at 4 °C. The IgG1 Fc-fused ligands used in this study were ICAM-1Fc. ICAM-1Fc consist of the extracellular part of both proteins fused to a human IgG1 Fc fragment. ICAM-1Fc was produced in Chinese hamster ovary K1 cells cotransfected with the ICAM-1-IgG1Fc (37) and pEE14 vector similarly as was described for CD4 T lymphocyte glycoprotein (38). The ICAM-1Fc concentration in the supernatant was determined by an IgG1 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the supernatant was used without further purification. The ligand-coated beads were washed with PBA, resuspended in 100 µl PBA, and stored at 4 °C.

Fluorescent Beads Adhesion Assay-- For cell adhesion to ICAM-1, cells were resuspended in TSA (TSM (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2), 0.5% bovine serum albumin (w/v); 5 × 106 cells/ml). 50,000 cells were preincubated with/without LFA-1-blocking mAb (20 µg/ml) for 10 min at room temperature in a 96-well V-shaped bottom plate. The ligand-coated TransFluoSpheres (20 beads/cell) and different integrin stimuli (100 nM PMA (Calbiochem), LFA-1-activating mAbs, KIM185 (10 µg/ml), respectively, were added, and the suspension was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. The cells were washed with TSA and incubated for 10 min at room temperature with FITC-conjugated anti-TS2/4-antibody. The cells were washed with TSA and resuspended in 100 µl TSA. The LFA-1 transfectants that expressed distinct levels of LFA-1, as determined by staining for TS2/4-FITC, were gated (mean fluorescence intensity of 40-60), to analyze only those cells that have similar expression levels. Thus, this assay allows comparison of different transfectants that express distinct levels of LFA-1. LFA-1-mediated adhesion was measured by flow cytometry using the FACScan. Values are depicted as integrin specific adhesion, i.e. cell adhesion percentage minus cell adhesion percentage in the presence of a LFA-1 blocking mAb (NKI-L15), which was always less than 3%.

Soluble ICAM-1Fc Binding-- Transfectants were resuspended in TSA (TSM (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2), 0.5% bovine serum albumin (w/v); 5 × 106 cells/ml). 50,000 cells were preincubated with/without LFA-1-blocking mAb (20 µg/ml) for 10 min at room temperature in a 96-well V-shaped bottom plate. Different concentrations of purified soluble ICAM-1Fc was added together with medium or the LFA-1-activating mAbs, KIM185 (10 µg/ml), and the suspension was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. The cells were washed with TSA and incubated for 30 min at room temperature with FITC-conjugated goat-anti-human Fc-specific antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch Labs, West Grove, PA). The cells were washed with TSA and resuspended in 100 µl TSA. The percentage of positive cells was measured by flow cytometry using the FACScan. Values are depicted as percentage of positive cells, i.e. cell adhesion percentage minus cell adhesion percentage in the presence of an integrin blocking LFA-1 mAb (NKI-L15), which was always less than 2% Alternatively, the concentration of soluble ICAM-1Fc that gives half-maximal adhesion (ED50) is depicted.

Confocal Microscopy-- Cells were fixed with 0.5% paraformaldehyde. Fixed cells were stained with TS2/4 mAb (10 µg/ml) for 30 min at 4 °C, followed by incubation with FITC-labeled goat (Fab')2 anti-mouse IgG mAb (Zymed Laboratories Inc.) 30 min at room temperature. Cells were attached to poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides, after which cell surface distribution of integrins was determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) at 488 nm with a krypton/argon laser (Bio-Rad 1000). The CLSM settings were: lens, 60×; gain, 1300; pinhole, 1.5 µm; and magnification, 2.0×. The same instrument settings of the CLSM were used throughout the distinct experiments.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Active Regulation of LFA-1 Ligand Binding by Disconnecting the Actin Cytoskeleton Network-- LFA-1 expressed on resting peripheral blood lymphocytes is inactive and poorly binds ICAM-1, even when the cells are stimulated by PMA (Fig. 1). This might enable leukocytes by a mechanism to migrate through the blood vessel wall in an nonadhesive state. Several findings have demonstrated that a number of cytoskeletal components (alpha  actinin, talin) are attached to the cytoplasmic tails of LFA-1. LFA-1 connected to the cytoskeleton remains inactive whereas temporary dislodgment of the cytoskeleton by treatment of cells with cytochalasin D, reduces the cytoskeleton restraints and results in enhanced LFA-1-ICAM-1-mediated binding (Fig. 1) (10, 22). We have demonstrated that this temporary dislodgment of the cytoskeleton alters the otherwise homogeneous cell surface distribution of LFA-1 into the formation of clusters (10). Here we analyzed in detail whether the connection of the cytoskeleton to the cytoplasmic tails of LFA-1 regulates cell adhesion by altering the cell surface distribution of LFA-1 (avidity) and/or the affinity for ICAM-1. We therefore generated different alpha L and beta 2 cytoplasmic tail deletion mutants and chimeric cytoplasmic mutants that were analyzed for these conditions (see "Experimental Procedures") (Fig. 2).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton network enhances LFA-1-mediated ICAM-1 binding and clustering of LFA-1 on the cell surface. Resting peripheral blood lymphocytes were treated with cytochalasin D (5 µg/ml; 30 min at 37 °C) or untreated as a control, followed by activation with PMA (50 nM). The mean percentage of LFA-1-specific adhesion of triplicate wells is shown. Specific adhesion is percentage of cells binding - percentage of cells binding in the presence of a LFA-1-blocking mAb (NKI-L15). One of three representative experiments is shown. LFA-1 cell surface distribution was analyzed by staining cells with the anti-LFA-1 mAb TS2/4 and FITC-labeled goat (Fab')2 anti-mouse IgG as earlier described (36).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Schematic diagram of LFA-1 alpha  and beta  subunit deletion mutants. The wild-type alpha  and beta  subunits are composed of a large extracellular part, a transmembrane (black box), and a cytoplasmic domain (right side). The conserved cytoplasmic KVGFFKR sequence corresponding to amino acids 1088-1094 is adjacent to the transmembrane domain. Mutant Delta KVGFFKRalpha L contained an internal deletion of the KVGFFKR sequence. Mutants Delta 1088alpha L and Delta 1095alpha L were generated by truncation of the cytoplasmic domain before and after the conserved KVGFFKR sequence, respectively. The chimeric alpha Xalpha L and alpha 4alpha L the alpha X and alpha 4 cytoplasmic tails, respectively, are joined to the alpha L cytoplasmic tail just after the KVGFFKR sequence of alpha L. The beta 2 cytoplasmic deletion mutants were created by truncation immediately after the transmembrane at amino acid position 724 (36).

Chimeric LFA-1 Molecules and the Actin Cytoskeleton-- To discriminate between the role of the integrin conserved KVGFFKR sequence present in the alpha  cytoplasmic tail in affinity/avidity regulation and that of other amino acids C-terminal of this sequence, we generated chimeric LFA-1 receptors in which the alpha L cytoplasmic tail was swapped for that of alpha X or alpha 4. K562 transfectants expressing high levels of alpha L chimeric LFA-1 receptors (Fig. 3) were generated as described under "Experimental Procedures." Analysis of expression levels of the L16 and the M24 epitopes, which have been described to be reporters for clustered or activated LFA-1, respectively, are expressed on low levels on both wild-type LFA-1 as on chimeric LFA-1 receptors as compared with expression of regulatory LFA-1 epitopes (i.e. SPV-L7) (Table I). As we earlier reported wild-type LFA-1 expressed in K562 cells does not bind ICAM-1 unless activated by the activating anti-beta 2 mAb (KIM185), whereas PMA is incapable of activating LFA-1 expressed in these cells (36). Also disconnection from the actin cytoskeleton network did not alter the LFA-1-mediated adhesion after treatment with cytochalasin D (Table II). Confocal laser microscopy studies revealed that these chimeric cytoplasmic LFA-1 mutants did not show any altered cell surface distribution of LFA-1 compared with wild-type LFA-1 (data not shown). From these data we conclude that the C-terminal part of LFA-1, immediately after the KVGFFKR region, is not involved in the active connection of LFA-1 to the actin cytoskeleton network, regulating avidity or affinity changes.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Expression of LFA-1 on LFA-1-transfected K562 cells. K562-alpha Lbeta 2 transfectants were stained with specific antibodies directed against the alpha  subunit (SPV-L7), the beta  subunit of LFA-1 (60.3), or an isotype-matched control antibody. One of five experiments is shown.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Expression of LFA-1 activation epitopes on the alpha  and beta  cytoplasmic deletion mutants
NKI-L16 expression was determined in the absence or presence of 1 mM CaCl2. The mean expression levels (relative fluorescence intensity) and the ratio (-Ca2+:+Ca2+) are depicted. M24 expression was determined in the absence or presence of 1 mM MnCl2. The mean expression levels and ratio -Mn2+:+Mn2+) are depicted. Expressions of isotype match control antibody and LFA-1 staining by an anti-CD11a mAb SPV-L7 are presented as the mean expression levels.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Effect of cytochalasin D (CD) on the spontaneous ICAM-1 adhesion of LFA-1 cytoplasmic deletion mutants
Various K-LFA-1 transfectants were pretreated with 10 µg/ml cytochalasin D or Me2SO as control for 15 min at 37 °C and subsequently allowed to adhere to ICAM-1Fc-coated fluorescent beads as described in the Materials and Methods section. Percentage of cells that spontaneously bind ICAM-1-coated fluorescent beads is depicted in the presence or absence of cytochalasin D (% adhesion ± CD), and factor by which adhesion is enhanced (adhesion index) is depicted (% adhesion with CD/% adhesion without CD). Whereas cytochalasin D has no effect on binding of wild-type LFA-1 to ICAM-1 nor on the spontaneous binding of the cytoplasmic deletion mutants, it enhances adhesion of mutant Delta 1095alpha L/beta 2 16-fold.

Domains in the alpha  and beta  Cytoplasmic Tails Important in Regulating LFA-1 Function-- To analyze in more detail, regions in the cytoplasmic alpha  and beta  tail of LFA-1 that are involved in the avidity and/or affinity regulation of LFA-1/ICAM-1 binding, different alpha L and beta 2 cytoplasmic tail deletion mutants were generated (Fig. 2). Cytoplasmic deletion mutants of the LFA-1 alpha  chain were created by deleting the cytoplasmic tail before the highly conserved KVGFFKR region (Delta 1088 alpha L) and just after the KVGFFKR region (Delta 1095alpha L), or by deleting only the KVGFFKR region (Delta KVGFFKRalpha L). Mutant Delta beta 2 was generated by truncation of the beta 2 cytoplasmic tail from the amino acid 724 tail of beta 2, deleting the conserved DLRE motif (36). Thus, we created LFA-1 transfectants that lack complete or parts of the alpha L or beta 2 cytoplasmic tail alone or that lack both alpha L and beta 2 cytoplasmic tails (Delta 1088alpha L/Delta beta 2 and Delta 1095alpha L/Delta beta 2). LFA-1 surface expression on these K562 transfectants was evaluated by staining for anti-beta 2 and anti-alpha L antibodies using flow cytometry (Fig. 3). All mutants expressed similar levels of LFA-1 except those LFA-1 mutants that lack both the alpha L and beta 2 cytoplasmic tail (Delta 1088alpha L/Delta beta 2 and Delta 1095alpha L/Delta beta 2) or that lacks only the KVGFFKR region (Delta KVGFFKRalpha L) expressed low amounts of LFA-1. Mutations in the cytoplasmic tail of alpha L or beta 2 did not affect alpha /beta association of LFA-1 based on expression of the MHM23 epitope, which has been reported to detect an alpha /beta association-dependent epitope on LFA-1 (39), and immunoprecipitation of LFA-1 from all mutants confirmed that mutant LFA-1 was expressed as alpha /beta heterodimers (data not shown).

Affinity and Avidity Regulation by the LFA-1 alpha L and beta 2 Cytoplasmic Tails-- The capacity of the LFA-1 tail deletion mutants to bind ICAM-1 was determined by the ICAM-1 fluorescent beads adhesion assay we developed (see "Experimental Procedures"),2 which allows analysis of only those cells that have similar expression levels of LFA-1, by staining LFA-1 with the FITC-conjugated nonblocking mAb TS2/4 and are under similar gate settings (fluorescence intensity 40-60). Thus, this new adhesion assay is suitable to investigate and compare various cell lines that express distinct levels of adhesion receptors and excludes variation in adhesion due to variation in expression levels of LFA-1. In contrast to wild-type LFA-1 and the chimeric LFA-1 transfectants, deletion of the beta 2 cytoplasmic tail (Delta beta 2) or alpha L cytoplasmic tail (Delta 1088alpha L) and deletion of only the KVGFFKR region in the alpha L cytoplasmic tail (Delta KVGFFKRalpha L) resulted in high spontaneous adhesion that was as high as adhesion after stimulation with the activating LFA-1 antibody KIM185 (Fig. 4B). Surprisingly, the alpha L deletion mutant that contained the GFFKR region (Delta 1095alpha L) did not show any spontaneous adhesion and was similar to wild-type LFA-1. The two mutants that contained deletion of both the alpha L cytoplasmic tail and the beta 2 cytoplasmic tails (Delta 1088alpha L/Delta beta 2 and Delta 1095 alpha L/Delta beta 2) also expressed a constitutive active receptor that bound to ICAM-1 spontaneously. These observations are in line with findings of others showing that integrins exert high spontaneous ligand binding when both cytoplasmic tails are deleted (14, 16). Furthermore these data demonstrate that the somewhat lower expression levels of LFA-1 on the double cytoplasmic deletion mutants and Delta KVGFFKRalpha L does not affect the adhesive state of the receptor, because they remain extremely active and bind extremely well to ICAM-1. We demonstrated previously that an altered distribution of integrins might affect the avidity state of the receptors, thus facilitating ligand binding (7-9). We therefore investigated whether adhesive properties of the alpha  or beta  cytoplasmic tail transfectants correlate with the cell surface distribution of LFA-1. Analysis by confocal microscopy revealed that the cytoplasmic deletion mutants that strongly bound to ICAM-1 (Delta KVGFFKRalpha L, Delta beta 2, Delta 1088alpha L/Delta beta 2, and Delta 1095alpha L/Delta beta 2) all show clusters of LFA-1 on the cell surface. Mutant Delta 1088alpha L LFA-1 contained tiny clusters, compared with K562 expressing wild-type LFA-1 or Delta 1095alpha L, who both show a homogeneous distribution of LFA-1 and did not adhere spontaneously to ICAM-1 (Fig. 5). Again the lower expression levels of LFA-1 present on the cytoplasmic deletion mutants could rule out its effect on surface distribution.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Binding of K562-alpha Lbeta 2 transfectants to bind to ICAM-1-coated fluorescent beads measured by flow cytometry. A, adhesion of cytoplasmic chimeric LFA-1 mutants; B, adhesion of alpha L deletion mutants; C, adhesion of beta 2 deletion mutants. K562-alpha Lbeta 2 cells were preincubated in medium (control, black-square), PMA (50 nM, ), or the activating anti-beta 2 mAb KIM185 (5 µg/ml, ), respectively, for 15 min at 37 °C in the absence or presence of the LFA-1 blocking mAb (NKI-L15). Depicted is the mean percentage of LFA-1-specific adhesion to ICAM-1 of the gated cells that expressed equal amounts of LFA-1 (mean fluorescent intensity 40-60) as determined by staining with the FITC-conjugated nonblocking anti-LFA-1 antibody (TS2/4). Integrin-specific adhesion: percentage of cells binding - percentage of cells binding in the presence of an integrin-blocking mAb (NKI-L15). Data are representative of four experiments.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Surface distribution of LFA-1 as determined by CLSM. Cells were fixed (0.5% paraformaldehyde) and subsequently stained with the anti-LFA-1 mAb TS2/4 and goat anti-mouse-(Fab')2-FITC second antibodies. Wild-type LFA-1 is found homogeneous on the cell surface similar as Delta 1095alpha Lbeta 2, although it is localized in little clusters on Delta 1088alpha Lbeta 2 and large clusters on Delta KVGFFKRalpha Lbeta 2, Delta beta 2, and the double alpha /beta deletions (Delta 1088alpha LDelta beta 2 and Delta 1095alpha LDelta beta 2. The instrument settings of the CLSM were the same for the four different panels: lens, 60×; gain, 1300; pinhole, 1.5 µm; and magnification × 2.0. One of three experiments is shown.

To investigate whether the affinity of LFA-1 for ICAM-1 is altered upon deletion or mutation of the cytoplasmic tails also, we determined the concentration of soluble ligand (ICAM-1Fc) that yielded half-maximal direct ligand binding activity (ED50) (11, 40). The lower the concentration of ICAM-1Fc needed to bind to 50% of the positive cells, the higher the affinity of LFA-1 for ICAM-1. Similar to the beads adhesion assay, strong binding of sICAM-1 was observed for the cytoplasmic deletion mutants that spontaneously adhered to ICAM-1 (Delta KVGFFKRalpha L, Delta beta 2, Delta 1088alpha L/Delta beta 2 and Delta 1088alpha L) (Fig. 6). Binding of sICAM-1 was completely LFA-1 dependent, because anti-LFA-1 antibodies completely blocked the binding (data not shown). When we calculated the concentration of sICAM-1 that yielded half-maximal binding we observed that sICAM-1 binding to LFA-1 for all the mutants ranged from ED50 of less than 1 µg/ml ICAM-1Fc (Delta KVGFFKRalpha L) to an ED50 of 2 µg/ml for all the other mutants (Table III). These findings indicate that, although the cytoplasmic tail deletion mutants Delta KVGFFKRalpha L, Delta 1088alpha L, Delta beta 2, Delta 1088alpha L/Delta beta 2, and Delta 1095alpha L/Delta beta 2 all show high spontaneous binding to ICAM-1, the affinity of LFA-1 for ICAM-1 on these transfectants is not higher than that of wild-type LFA-1.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Analysis of soluble ICAM-1Fc binding to K562 cytoplasmic deletion mutants by direct ligand binding. Recombinant ICAM-1Fc fusion protein was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with the transfectants in the presence of medium. The concentration of ligand varied 100-0.1 µg/ml. Binding was detected by staining with FITC-conjugated goat anti-human Fc, and analyzed on FACScan. The percentage of positive cells represent the percentage of cells binding soluble ICAM-1Fc. The specific adhesion could be blocked by blocking anti-LFA-1 mAbs, and was less than 2% (not shown). Data are representative of three experiments.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Cytochalasin D does not enhance soluble ICAM-1Fc binding of Delta 1095alpha L/beta 2
Mutants Delta 1095alpha L/beta 2, Delta 1088alpha L/beta 2, Delta KVGFFKRalpha L/beta 2,alpha L/Delta beta 2 and wild-type LFA-1 were preincubated with 10 µg/ml cytochalasin D for 15 min at 37 °C. Recombinant ICAM-1Fc fusion protein was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with the transfectants in the presence of medium. The concentration of ligand varied 100-0.1 µg/ml. Binding was detected by staining with FITC-conjugated goat anti-human Fc, and analyzed on FACScan. The specific adhesion could be blocked by blocking anti-LFA-1 mAbs (not shown). Depicted is the concentration of sICAM-1Fc that gives half maximal binding to the LFA-1 transfectants; data are representative of three experiments.

Expression of the LFA-1 Activation Epitopes (L16 and M24) on the LFA-1 Cytoplasmic Deletion Mutants-- Next we studied the expression of the L16 epitope and the M24 epitope that both have been described as reporters for clustered or activated forms of LFA-1, respectively. Although the L16 epitope is a Ca2+-dependent epitope on the alpha  chain of LFA-1 and correlates with the clustering status of LFA-1 on the cell surface (8, 31), the 24 epitope is a Mg2+-dependent epitope expressed on the alpha  chain of LFA-1 that has been used as an "activation reporter" of LFA-1, which can be induced by Mn2+ (23, 27). As depicted in Table I, wild-type LFA-1 transfected in K562 cells express only low levels of L16 (mean ratio 0.3 compared with expression of a regular LFA-1 epitope, SPV-L7) in line with previous findings (36). Similarly, low levels of M24 epitope are expressed on cells expressing wild-type LFA-1, but M24 can be induced by Mn2+ (mean ratio 0.3). In contrast, all cytoplasmic tail deletion mutants that express a constitutive active form of LFA-1 (Delta KVGFFKR alpha L, Delta beta 2, Delta 1088 alpha L/Delta beta 2 and Delta 1095 alpha L/Delta beta 2), express high levels of the L16 epitope, as well as the M24 epitope, without prior activation with Mn2+ (both mean ratio 0.9-1.0). The only exception is mutant Delta 1088alpha L, which also spontaneously binds ICAM-1 but does not express high levels of the L16 and M24 epitope and has little clustered LFA-1. In conclusion these data clearly demonstrate that when LFA-1 is found in large clusters on the cell surface, L16 and M24 epitopes are expressed. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that clustering of LFA-1 is not associated with an enhanced affinity for ICAM-1 (Fig. 6).

Disruption of Cytoskeleton Restraints Enhances LFA-1-mediated Ligand Binding and Is Associated with Avidity but Not Affinity Alterations-- We studied the role of the actin cytoskeleton by treating all LFA-1 cytoplasmic tail mutants with cytochalasin D and subsequently determined binding to ICAM-1-coated beads. As expected, the high spontaneous binding to ICAM-1 of mutants Delta 1088alpha L and Delta beta 2 and the double alpha Lbeta 2 cytoplasmic deletion mutants (Delta 1088alpha L/Delta beta 2 and Delta 1095alpha L/Delta beta 2) were not affected by disruption of the actin cytoskeleton network (Table II). Probably deletion of the cytoplasmic tail of the beta 2 or alpha L chain reduces the interaction with the cytoskeleton causing aggregates of LFA-1 receptors (avidity) that favors ligand binding. Surprisingly, Delta 1095alpha L, containing the wild-type beta 2 cytoplasmic tail together with the alpha L cytoplasmic tail deleted immediately after the GFFKR sequence, showed enhanced spontaneous binding to ICAM-1(from 2 to 32%, Table II) after cytochalasin D treatment, indicating that disruption of the cytoskeleton restraints, attached to the short cytoplasmic tail of alpha L, affect the spontaneous activated state of LFA-1. Titrations of cytochalasin D demonstrate that concentrations ranging from 0.5-0.1 µg/ml enhanced the spontaneous adhesion of Delta 1095alpha L 16-fold (data not shown).

To analyze whether the enhanced adhesion of Delta 1095alpha L was due to an altered redistribution of LFA-1 on the cell surface (avidity) or due to an altered affinity of LFA-1 for ICAM-1, both cell surface distribution by confocal laser microscopy as well as the affinity for ICAM-1 was analyzed with and without cytochalasin D. Fig. 7 and Table III clearly demonstrate that cytochalasin D alters the cell surface distribution of LFA-1 on Delta 1095alpha L but not the affinity for ICAM-1. The cell surface distribution of LFA-1 Delta 1095alpha L after treatment with cytochalasin D is similar to the clustered distribution of LFA-1 observed on mutant Delta 1088alpha L, which showed a high spontaneous adhesion to ICAM-1. In contrast, clustering of LFA-1 on Delta 1095alpha L was less than the huge LFA-1 clusters found on mutants Delta beta 2, Delta 1088alpha L/Delta beta 2, and Delta 1095alpha L/Delta beta 2. These results indicate that disrupting LFA-1 from the actin cytoskeleton network enhances the mobility of the receptors in the cell membrane to form aggregates, thereby enhancing the avidity of LFA-1-ICAM-1 interactions.


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Disruption of the interaction of LFA-1 with the actin cytoskeleton network by cytochalasin D induces clustering of LFA-1 transfectant Delta 1095alpha L/beta 2. LFA-1 is homogeneously distributed on Delta 1095alpha L/beta 2, whereas distribution shifts toward a clustered distribution upon cytochalasin D treatment (10 µg/ml). Cells were stained for 30 min with anti-LFA-1 mAb TS2/4 (10 µg/ml) and FITC-labeled goat (Fab')2 anti-mouse IgG. Fluorescence distribution was determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy at 488 nm. The same instrument settings of the CLSM were used throughout the experiment.

Post-ligand Binding Events Are Regulated by Both the alpha  and beta 2 Cytoplasmic Tail-- We also investigated the post-adhesion cell spreading on ICAM-1 of the LFA-1 cytoplasmic deletion mutants (Table IV) to study in more detail the role of the cytoskeleton in LFA-1-ICAM-1 adhesion. When activated by KIM185, wild-type LFA-1 transfected in K562 cells binds to ICAM-1, and cells are able to spread on ICAM-1, because a flattening of the cell is observed after 60 min of binding. Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton network after treatment of cells with cytochalasin D dramatically reduces the spreading, whereas no effect is seen on ICAM-1 binding. (Table II). Also the chimeric LFA-1 molecules alpha Lalpha X and alpha Lalpha 4 spread on ICAM-1 after KIM185 treatment similar to wild-type. Deletion of the beta 2 cytoplasmic tail resulted in high binding to ICAM-1, however, binding was not accompanied by any spreading of cells also not after KIM185 activation. Similarly, the double cytoplasmic tail deletion mutants did not spread on ICAM-1, indicating that spreading requires connections with the actin cytoskeleton. In contrast, truncation of the alpha L cytoplasmic tail before the KVGFFKR or just after this domain, results in strong binding of ICAM-1 and normal spreading, whereas the mutant in which only the KVGFFKR domain was deleted binds ICAM-1 very well, but does not spread. Together these data demonstrate that both the alpha L and the beta 2 cytoplasmic tails contain sequences that contribute to the reorganization of the cytoskeleton.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV
Spreading of the various LFA-1 cytoplasmic tail deletion mutants on ICAM-1-coated wells
The various LFA-1-K562 transfectants were activated with the activating anti-LFA-1 mAb KIM185 to adhere to ICAM-1Fc-coated wells (200 µg/ml). Cells were allowed to adhere for 1 h at 37 °C, after which spreading was scored (percentage of cells spreading) visually on a microscope using a 10× objective. Spontaneous adhesion was measured by incubation of the LFA-1 mutants, without further activation, with the fluorescent ICAM-1-coated beads as described in Fig. 4.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

From our results we conclude the following. 1) Deletion of the beta 2 and/or alpha L cytoplasmic tail including the KVGFFKR sequence leads to strong ICAM-1 binding by reducing cytoskeleton restraints, enabling the formation of LFA-1 clusters without the necessity of affinity alterations. 2) Together with earlier reports, this indicates that attachment of the actin cytoskeleton network to LFA-1 keeps the integrin in a default-inactive state by inhibiting the lateral movement of the receptors on the cell membrane. 3) Both the alpha L and beta 2 cytoplasmic tails are connected to the actin cytoskeleton network, because (a) cytochalasin D did not inhibit the spontaneous adhesion of the alpha L and beta 2 cytoplasmic deletion mutants, and (b) spreading of LFA-1 transfectants was impaired when the beta 2 or the KVGFFKR region in the alpha L tail were deleted. 3) LFA-1 deletion mutants that are constitutively active express both the L16 "clustering" epitope and the M24 activation reporter epitope, demonstrating that all clustered LFA-1 is active and binds ICAM-1. 4) Cytochalasin D enhances adhesion of Delta 1095alpha L to ICAM-1 by disrupting cytoskeleton restraints that are attached to the short remaining alpha L tail and enhances the avidity (clustering) but not the affinity of LFA-1.

On normal resting lymphocytes, LFA-1 is in an inactive state that poorly binds ICAM-1. Several recent publications have demonstrated that temporary dislodgment of LFA-1 from the cytoskeleton network facilitates ICAM-1 binding, following TCR/CD3 or PMA activation (inside-out activation of LFA-1) by increasing lateral diffusion of LFA-1 (9, 10, 20-22). This temporary disconnection from the cytoskeleton restraints by cytochalasin D may facilitate redistribution of LFA-1 receptors on the cell membrane altering LFA-1-ICAM-1 avidity interaction. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of the alpha  and beta  cytoplasmic tails of LFA-1 in regulating ICAM-1 binding through avidity changes or affinity changes.

Most integrins contain the conserved DLRE motif in the beta  cytoplasmic tail. Deletion of this sequence has already been shown to lead to an active receptor for various integrins, enabling it to bind spontaneously ligand (14, 16, 41). We confirmed this when the deletion of the beta 2 cytoplasmic tail (45 amino acids long) expressed a constitutively active LFA-1 when transfected in K562 cells. Comparison of the positions at which the distinct beta  cytoplasmic tail were truncated, would suggest that deletion of the conserved aspartic acid residue corresponding to position 731 in the beta 2 tail results in a constitutively active molecule, indicating that this residue is most important in regulating integrin activation. In contrast, we observed that in deletion mutants in which this conserved aspartic acid residue is not removed, the integrin activity can still be regulated. Moreover, amino acid sequences more C-terminal of the beta  cytoplasmic tail are more likely important in ligand binding capacity rather than in regulation of integrin activation (30, 41-46).

Also the alpha  cytoplasmic tails of other integrins contain the highly conserved GFFKR sequence that when deleted enhances ligand binding, similar to the DLRE motif (14, 16, 47, 48). This notion is supported by our observation that only those alpha L truncation mutants, which did not contain the KVGFFKR region (Delta 10888alpha L and Delta KVGFFKRalpha L), are constitutively active. Furthermore, it has been shown recently for both beta 2 and beta 1 integrins that mutation of the K in the GFFKR sequence reduces its capacity to spontaneous bind ligand (16). Hughes et al. (14) proposed that a salt-bridge between both the conserved sequences in the alpha  and beta  cytoplasmic tails keep the integrin in its inactive state.

To investigate whether the spontaneous activation of LFA-1, due to truncation of the cytoplasmic tail, was the result of affinity or avidity alterations, we determined the minimal concentration of soluble ICAM-1 to bind the various LFA-1 transfectants (affinity), as well as the surface distribution of LFA-1 by confocal microscopy (avidity). We observed that all LFA-1 mutants that spontaneously bound ICAM-1 (Delta 1088alpha L, Delta KVGFFKRalpha L, Delta beta 2 and the double alpha /beta deletion mutants) showed a clustered cell surface distribution of LFA-1, correlating well with our earlier findings in which we addressed the importance of clustering of LFA-1 to facilitate ICAM-1 binding (7-9). This notion is supported by the demonstration that expression of the clustering sensitive epitope on LFA-1 (L16) on all these mutants is increased except Delta 1088alpha L/beta 2, which has less clustered LFA-1 than Delta KVGFFKR, Delta beta 2 and the double alpha /beta deletion mutants.

Because clustering of LFA-1 on these cytoplasmic tail mutants might be due to a reduced capacity to interact with the cytoskeleton, we investigated whether disruption of the actin cytoskeleton by cytochalasin D affected adhesion. As expected, no reduction of spontaneous adhesion to ICAM-1 was observed, indicating that the cytoskeleton is not attached to LFA-1 when the beta  or alpha  cytoplasmic tails are truncated. Therefore, no post-receptor-binding events that depend on the attachment of cytoskeleton are observed (cell spreading on ICAM-1). Probably deletion of the cytoplasmic tail disconnects the integrin from the cytoskeleton and allows lateral movement of the integrin at the cell membrane, explaining the clustered distribution of LFA-1 on all the Delta beta 2 mutants or the Delta KVGFFKR mutants. By contrast, when the entire alpha L cytoplasmic tail was deleted (Delta 1088alpha L), LFA-1 was less clustered and was still able to spread on ICAM-1 similar to wild-type LFA-1.

It has been demonstrated that integrins can associate with cytoskeletal components (alpha -actinin, talin), particularly through the beta  chain and thereby may regulate the cell surface distribution of the integrin (49, 50). In particular, mutations of a triplet of threonines (position 758-760) and the phenylalanine residue at position 766 in the beta 2 cytoplasmic tail profoundly reduced the adhesiveness of LFA-1 (13, 41). It has been suggested that the altered adhesiveness due to mutation of the threonine triplet is caused by an altered cytoskeletal association/organization and not to an affinity change in LFA-1 (13).

Clustering of integrins on the cell surface can also co-localize important kinases essential for proper signal transduction (51). Not only the intracellular conformation or association with regulatory proteins is affected by clustering of integrins on the cell surface, but the extracellular conformation is altered also, as evidenced by enhanced L16 and M24 epitope expression when the beta 2 or alpha L cytoplasmic domain was deleted (Delta KVGFFKR). This may be attributed to distinct interactions with cytoplasmic proteins affecting the extracellular conformations of the integrin molecule.

Because K562-LFA-1 transfectants express ICAM-1, we investigated whether initial cell contact with ligand during culture may result in the dynamic clustering of integrins thereby augmenting the avidity for ligand. To rule out that the clustering of LFA-1 was induced by ligand binding, we cultured the transfectants that showed high spontaneous strong adhesion to ICAM-1 (Delta 1088alpha L/beta 2, Delta KVGFFKR, Delta beta 2 and the double alpha /beta deletion mutants) for several days in the presence of anti-ICAM-1 antibodies to reduce any ligand binding. Indeed cell aggregation of K562 transfectants was dramatically reduced, however no altered LFA-1 clustering or affinity or expression of L16 or M24 epitopes was observed (data not shown). This indicates that the clustering status of LFA-1 on the surface of the cytoplasmic deletion mutants is a direct consequence of reduced cytoskeleton restraints and is not affected by enhanced binding to ICAM-1. Thus, it might be that it is an intrinsic property of LFA-1 to form liquid crystals.

We have shown that Ca2+ indirectly enhances LFA-1-mediated adhesion by reorganizing LFA-1 into clusters on the cell surface, and thus increases the avidity of LFA-1-ligand interactions by expression of the Ca2+-dependent L16 epitope (8, 9, 52). We have observed that the L16 epitope is only expressed when LFA-1 is dimerized.3 The importance of clustering or dimerization of LFA-1 receptors is further substantiated by the observation that dimers of ICAM-1 have been shown to bind LFA-1 with much greater affinity than monomer ICAM-1 (53).4 This is in accordance with the finding that ICAM-1 is mostly expressed as dimer on the cell surface (54, 55). The recent crystal structure of a dimeric form of ICAM-1 containing only the outer two Ig-like domains, provides additional evidence that dimerization of ICAM-1, and consequently LFA-1, plays an important role in receptor-ligand interactions and downstream signaling (56).

Cytochalasin D treatment enhanced spontaneous LFA-1-mediated adhesion of the LFA-1 mutant Delta 1095alpha L, truncated immediate after the KVGFFKR. Enhanced adhesion after cytochalasin D treatment of Delta 1095alpha L was associated with clustering of LFA-1 but did not affect the ICAM-1 binding affinity. These findings correlate well with similar results that have been shown for alpha 4 tail deletions (11). The cytoplasmic domain of the alpha  chain may cover a negative site in the beta  tail, the unshielded and unregulated interactions of beta  tails with cytoskeletal proteins may lead to increased constitutive cytoskeletal anchoring, and thus diminished diffusion and clustering at adhesive sites.

Although previous reports for various integrins (beta 1 and beta 3) suggest that affinity alterations play an important role in regulating integrin-mediated adhesion (57, 58), we were not able to measure any affinity alterations for the beta 2 integrin LFA-1. It remains largely unknown whether affinity changes are involved in the regulation of cell adhesion. Thus far, LFA-1 affinity studies, by competition between sICAM-1 and function blocking antibody for binding to LFA-1 on T cells, have determined only low affinity of LFA-1 on resting T cells (100 µM), whereas activation of T cells increases the affinity up to 400 nM (24). Studies on the affinity of purified LFA-1, which is constitutively active, for binding sICAM-1 was calculated somewhat higher (130 nM) (53, 59). Other evidence for possible affinity changes of LFA-1, comes from the finding that activation of LFA-1 by EGTA and Mg2+ leads to enhanced expression of the Mg2+-dependent 24 epitope on CD11a, implying that Mg2+ binding involves induction of conformational changes in LFA-1 that coincides with ICAM-1 binding (28, 29, 40).

We observed that the cytoplasmic deletion mutants expressed a constitutively active LFA-1 receptor, all exhibited LFA-1 in large clusters on the cell surface, and expressed high levels of L16 and M24 epitopes. Both mutant Delta 1088alpha L/beta 2, as well as Delta 1095alpha L/beta 2 after cytochalasin D treatment, were spontaneously active, but did not express the L16 and M24 epitope, which correlated with less clustered LFA-1 distribution on these mutants than the double deletion mutants. From this study we may conclude that the small changes in LFA-1 clustering, as detected by confocal microscopy, can have huge consequences on the adhesion capacity, which cannot be detected by L16 and M24 expression.

All LFA-1 cytoplasmic tail deletion mutants that showed enhanced M24 expression were also L16 positive and showed large clusters of LFA-1 on the cell surface. This did not coincide with an enhanced affinity of LFA-1 fo