![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 26962-26967, September 17, 1999
From the Mac1 is a metalloregulatory protein that
regulates expression of the high affinity copper transport system in
the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Under conditions of
high copper concentration, Mac1 represses transcription of genes coding
for copper transport proteins. Mac1 binds to DNA sequences called
copper response elements (CuREs), which have the consensus sequence
5'-TTTGC(T/G)C(A/G)-3'. Mac1 contains two zinc binding sites, a copper
binding site, and the sequence motif RGRP, which has been found in
other proteins to mediate binding to the minor groove of A/T-rich
sequences in DNA. We have used hydroxyl radical footprinting, missing
nucleoside, and methylation interference experiments to investigate the
structure of the complex of the DNA binding domain of Mac1 (called here Mac1t) with the two CuRE sites found in the yeast
CTR1 promoter. We conclude from these experiments that
Mac1t binds in a modular fashion to DNA, with its RGRP
AT-hook motif interacting with the TTT sequence at the 5' end of the
CTR1 CuRE site, and with another DNA-binding module(s)
binding in the adjacent major groove in the GCTCA sequence.
Transcription of genes encoding the high affinity copper transport
system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is subject to
copper-dependent repression. These genes include the plasma
membrane permeases CTR1 and CTR3, the cell
surface metalloreductase FRE1, and a FRE1 homolog
of unknown function designated FRE7 (1-5). These genes are
maximally expressed in copper-deficient yeast, but are repressed in
copper-replete cells.
Copper-dependent expression of CTR1,
CTR3, FRE1, and FRE7 is regulated by
the transcriptional activator Mac1 (4, 6, 7). Binding sites for Mac1
exist in the 5' promoter sequences of each of the four genes (4, 7, 8).
These sites, designated copper-response elements
(CuREs),1 have the consensus
sequence 5'-TTTGC(T/G)C(A/G)-3'. Binding of Mac1 to CuREs is required
for transcriptional activation of the target genes (4, 7). The CuRE is
present in at least two copies in each of the four genes. The CuREs are
oriented as either direct or inverted repeats. The spacing between CuRE
sites is variable, and changes in spacing have a limited effect on
expression (8). The apparent requirement for the presence of at least two CuRE sites likely lies in the need for synergism for proper copper-dependent gene regulation (8, 9).
The Mac1 protein consists of 417 amino acids (Fig. 1). The distribution
of charged amino acid residues in Mac1 is not uniform; the N-terminal
segment (residues 1-201) is strongly basic, while the C-terminal
segment (residues 202-417) is mostly acidic (6). The DNA-binding
domain of Mac1 maps to the N-terminal 159 residues. Two Zn(II) ions are
coordinated by the protein in the DNA-binding domain (8). Part of the
Mac1 DNA-binding domain (residues 1-40) is homologous to the conserved
zinc-binding module found in the copper-activated transcription factors
Ace1 and Amt1 from S. cerevisiae and Candida
glabrata, respectively (6-8, 10-12). This zinc-binding subdomain
has been implicated in making direct interactions with DNA in the minor
groove of an A/T-rich sequence (13).
Copper at concentrations above 1 nM represses Mac1 function
in vivo by attenuating DNA binding activity. Footprinting
experiments in vivo revealed that Mac1 binds to the CuREs
upstream of the CTR3 gene in copper-starved but not
copper-replete cells (4). Further studies have shown, however, that
copper-dependent inactivation of Mac1 is more complex than
this simple picture might suggest. First, DNA binding in
vitro either by the minimal DNA binding domain of Mac1 or by
full-length Mac1 prepared by in vitro
transcription/translation is not copper-dependent (7, 8).
Second, the transactivation activity of Mac1 is repressed in
copper-supplemented cells (14, 15). Transactivation activity maps to
two cysteine-rich sequences (residues 264-337) in the C-terminal
region of Mac1 (15). Eight Cu(I) ions bind within this domain (16).
Binding of Cu(I) to the Cys-rich motif induces an intramolecular
interaction with the N-terminal DNA-binding domain (16).
The CuRE sequences bound by Mac1 resemble the DNA binding sites for
Ace1 and Amt1 in having an A/T-rich sequence upstream of a related core
element (4, 7). This observation suggests that Ace1 and Mac1 may
interact with DNA in a similar manner, even though Ace1 activates the
copper sequestration machinery of the cell, while Mac1 activates the
copper acquisition machinery (7, 17).
To investigate the interaction of Mac1 with its DNA binding site, we
performed hydroxyl radical footprinting, missing nucleoside, and
methylation interference experiments. For these experiments we used a
truncated version of Mac1, which we call Mac1t. This protein contains the minimal DNA-binding domain of Mac1, and consists of residues 1-159 of Mac1 (see Fig. 1)
plus a C-terminal His tag. We studied the binding of Mac1t
to a fragment of the CTR1 promoter in order to establish
the contacts that Mac1 makes with a CuRE site.
DNA Preparation--
A DNA molecule containing a segment of the
CTR1 promoter, spanning positions
The CTR1-containing plasmid was digested with restriction
endonucleases NotI and EcoRI (New England
Biolabs, Beverly, MA). The resulting 96-bp restriction fragment was
singly end-labeled at either the NotI terminus using
[ Protein Preparation--
The truncated version of Mac1 that we
studied, Mac1t, was prepared as described previously (8).
Mac1t was stored in 20 mM sodium phosphate
buffer (pH 7.5), 0.3 M NaCl, 5 mM
dithiothreitol, and 50% glycerol, at Hydroxyl Radical Footprinting Experiments--
A singly
end-labeled DNA restriction fragment (0.1 pmol) in a buffer containing
20 mM Tris (pH 7.8), 65 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM dithiothreitol,
and 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin was incubated for 15 min on ice with
25 nM Mac1t. The hydroxyl radical footprinting
reaction was carried out by the addition of 2 mM Fe(II), 4 mM EDTA, 0.03% hydrogen peroxide, and 20 mM
sodium ascorbate (final concentrations) (18, 19). The reaction was
allowed to proceed for 2 min and was stopped by the addition of 26 mM thiourea. The DNA was precipitated by the addition of
0.3 M sodium acetate and ethanol. The DNA pellet was rinsed
with 85% ethanol and lyophilized. The DNA was resuspended in 90%
formamide-containing tracking dyes, heated at 90 °C for 4 min, and
electrophoresed on a 10% polyacrylamide-8 M urea
denaturing gel (19:1 acrylamide:bisacrylamide, 1× Tris·borate·EDTA
buffer) at 70 watts constant power. The dried gel was imaged by
exposure of an imaging phosphor plate (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale,
CA). The phosphor plate was scanned on a Molecular Dynamics model 400E
PhosphorImager using ImageQuant software.
Missing Nucleoside Experiments--
A 3' end-labeled DNA
restriction fragment in Tris·EDTA buffer was treated with the
hydroxyl radical by adding 2 mM Fe(II), 4 mM
EDTA, 0.03% H2O2, and 20 mM sodium
ascorbate (final concentrations), as described previously (20). The
reaction was allowed to proceed for 2 min, and was stopped by the
addition of 26 mM thiourea. The DNA was precipitated by the
addition of 0.3 M sodium acetate and ethanol. The DNA
pellet was rinsed with 70% ethanol and lyophilized. The hydroxyl
radical-treated DNA was resuspended in the protein binding buffer
described above for the footprinting experiments. Mac1t was
added to the hydroxyl radical-treated DNA at a concentration of 25 nM. Binding was allowed to proceed for 15 min on ice. After the addition of glycerol (4% final concentration), the sample was
immediately loaded on a 7.5% polyacrylamide native electrophoresis gel
(37.5:1 acrylamide:bisacrylamide, 1× Tris·borate·EDTA buffer). The
gel was run at 25 V/cm at 4 °C. To locate the bands containing DNA,
the gel was exposed to Kodak XAR-5 x-ray film for 30 min at room
temperature. Bands containing protein-bound and unbound DNA were
excised from the gel matrix and eluted by the crush and soak procedure
(21). DNA was isolated, precipitated, and electrophoresed on a 10%
denaturing polyacrylamide gel as described above. Gel composition,
running conditions, imaging, and analysis were the same as for the
footprinting experiments.
Methylation Interference Experiments--
DNA radiolabeled at
the 3' end, in a buffer consisting of 200 µl of 50 mM
sodium cacodylate (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, was treated with 0.5 µl of dimethyl sulfate for 15 s. The reaction was stopped by
addition of 300 mM sodium acetate and 100 mM
2-mercaptoethanol. DNA was precipitated by addition of ethanol. The DNA
pellet was rinsed with 70% ethanol and lyophilized (21). Methylated
DNA was resuspended in protein binding buffer. Mac1t was
added to a concentration of 25 nM, and binding was allowed
to proceed for 15 min on ice. After the addition of glycerol (4% final
concentration), the sample was loaded on a native polyacrylamide gel
with composition, buffer, and running conditions as described above for
the missing nucleoside experiment. Bands containing protein-bound and
unbound DNA were excised from the gel. DNA was extracted from the gel and precipitated by addition of ethanol. The DNA pellet was rinsed with
70% ethanol and lyophilized. The DNA pellet was suspended in 100 µl
of 1 M piperidine and heated at 90 °C for 20 min. DNA was precipitated by addition of 300 mM sodium acetate and
ethanol. The DNA pellet was rinsed with 85% ethanol, lyophilized,
dissolved in formamide buffer, and loaded on a 10% denaturing
polyacrylamide sequencing gel. Gel composition, running conditions, and
imaging were the same as described above for the footprinting experiments.
Quantitative Analysis of Gel Images--
We used the image
analysis program GelExplorer (22) to integrate the intensities of the
bands in the gel images from the footprinting and missing nucleoside
experiments. Normalization of data from one lane to another was
achieved by summing the whole-band integrals of at least five bands
above and below the protein binding site, and then multiplying by a
factor such that the summed integral for the normalizing bands had the
same value as the similar sum measured for the reference lane. Based on
studies we performed during the development of the GelExplorer method
(22), we estimate that the experimental error in a band integral
determined by GelExplorer analysis is ±5%.
The minimal DNA-binding domain of Mac1 consists of the N-terminal
159 residues (8). For our experiments we used a His-tagged derivative
of this 159-residue truncated version of Mac1, which we call
Mac1t. Mac1t binds to the CuRE sequence with an
apparent affinity of 5 nM (8). Mac1-(1-194) fused to
glutathione S-transferase gave similar results to
Mac1t in DNA binding experiments, demonstrating that the
His tag of Mac1t does not affect DNA binding. We carried out footprinting, missing nucleoside, and methylation interference experiments with Mac1t bound to the 96-bp CTR1
DNA molecule, which contains two CuRE sites separated by 14 bp. In the
CTR1 promoter the two CuRE sites are arranged as an inverted repeat.
Hydroxyl Radical Footprints of Mac1t Bound to the CTR1
Promoter--
We see a single strong hydroxyl radical footprint for
Mac1t on only one DNA strand in each of the two CuRE sites
in the CTR1 promoter (Fig. 2).
The region most strongly protected is found at positions
Besides the strong single-strand footprint we see in each of the two
CuRE sites, much weaker footprints are found on both strands in the 14 bp that separate the CuRE sites (Fig. 2, B and C). The four nucleotides that make up the 3'-half of each
CuRE site (5'-CTCA-3') are not protected (in fact, are slightly
enhanced in cleavage in the presence of protein). The next 15 nucleotides are protected to a slight but noticeable extent from
hydroxyl radical cleavage by bound Mac1t.
Missing Nucleoside Analysis of Mac1t Binding to the
CTR1 Promoter--
We used the missing nucleoside interference assay
to obtain information about specific nucleosides that are important for DNA binding by Mac1t. In this experiment (20), a protein is allowed to bind to a sample of DNA that has first been randomly gapped
by reaction with the hydroxyl radical. Each individual DNA molecule in
the sample has at most one gap in its backbone. Certain gaps in the DNA
backbone (missing nucleosides) interfere with protein binding, while
other gaps have no effect on binding. To determine which missing
nucleosides fall into which category, the mixture of gapped DNA and
protein is electrophoresed on a native polyacrylamide gel, which
separates free DNA from DNA-protein complexes. DNA extracted from the
bound and free fractions is subjected to denaturing gel electrophoresis
to reveal which missing nucleosides interfered with protein binding,
and which had no effect.
The missing nucleoside pattern for the coding strand shows that loss of
any of the nucleosides from positions Methylation Interference Analysis of Mac1t Binding to
the CTR1 Promoter--
Methylation of any of the guanines in the two
CuRE sequences interferes with protein binding (Fig.
4). These results confirm that
Mac1t makes specific interactions in the major groove of the CuRE site.
The results of our footprinting, missing nucleoside, and methylation
interference experiments are summarized on a helical representation of
DNA in Fig. 5.
Major Groove Interactions--
Both methylation interference and
missing nucleoside experiments show that Mac1t interacts
with the major groove of DNA in the CuRE sequence (Fig. 5). Methylation
of any of the three guanines in either copy of the CuRE in the
CTR1 promoter interferes with binding (Fig. 4). A set of
strong missing nucleoside signals (Fig. 3) is found in the same region
of the CuRE, supporting this conclusion.
Minor Groove Interactions--
Hydroxyl radical footprinting,
which shows how Mac1t is positioned on the binding site,
reveals an interesting structural result. The strongest protections are
located exclusively at the 5'-TTTG-3' sequence of each CuRE, on one
strand only. One or two adjacent nucleotides to the 5' side of each
CuRE also are strongly protected. It is somewhat surprising, based on
our experience in footprinting other proteins (19), that a
corresponding strong footprint on the other strand is not observed.
Instead, the DNA backbone is weakly protected on the other strand
across the major groove from the strong footprint (Fig. 5), and no
protection is found across the minor groove.
As shown in Fig. 5, the set of strong protections (green)
defines the edge of the minor groove that is adjacent to the major groove in which contacts were detected by missing nucleoside and methylation interference experiments. Missing nucleoside signals also
are observed at these strongly footprinted nucleotides, further evidence of the importance of these interactions to the binding of
Mac1t to DNA.
The RGRP DNA Binding Motif of Mac1t--
Several
DNA-binding proteins, such as Amt1, Ace1, HMG-I(Y), and Hin
recombinase, make important interactions with the minor groove of DNA.
A feature held in common by each of these proteins is the amino acid
sequence motif GRP (G = glycine; R = arginine; P = proline) (7, 23-26). This sequence motif has been called the AT-hook
(27), because it has been found to target A/T-rich sequences for
binding. Mac1 has the related motif RGRP near its N terminus (residues
36-39, Fig. 1).
For HMG-I(Y) and Hin recombinase, how the GRP motif (and the related
(and overlapping) RGRP motif) interacts with DNA has been determined by
NMR (24) and x-ray (28) structural studies, respectively. The (R)GR
motif forms a concave surface that is inserted in the minor groove of
A/T-rich sequences. Analysis of the x-ray and NMR structures
demonstrates that interactions made by arginine are instrumental in
sequence-specific binding. The proline in the (R)GRP motif directs the
peptide backbone away from the minor groove. Residues in the protein
that surround the core (R)GR motif were found to bind to adjacent nucleotides.
We suggest that the RGRP motif of Mac1t contributes to the
strong footprint we see on the T-rich strand of the CuRE. By analogy to
the NMR structure of the HMG-I(Y)-DNA complex (24), the two arginines
(residues 36 and 38) of Mac1t's RGRP sequence (Fig. 1)
would be oriented so as to interact with thymines in the minor groove.
It also is possible that the nearby basic residue Arg-34 interacts with
the T·A base pair 5' to the TTT segment of the CTR1 CuRE.
Similar to what is seen for other (R)GRP-containing proteins, Pro-39
would direct the peptide chain out of the DNA minor groove so that an
adjacent domain of the protein is situated to make the base-specific
contacts in the major groove that we observe.
Multiple DNA-binding Modules in Mac1t--
Our
methylation and missing nucleoside interference data show that
Mac1t makes important contacts with the CuRE at the
5'-TTTGCTC-3' sequence on the coding strand and with the 3'-ACGAGT-5'
sequence on the noncoding strand, whereas our hydroxyl radical
footprinting data show strong protection only of the coding-strand
sequence 5'-t(t/a)TTTG-3'. Weak footprints are apparent in the center
of the binding site, between the two CuRE repeats. Consideration of
both the footprinting and missing nucleoside data suggests to us that
there are two distinct DNA binding domains in Mac1t, perhaps coincident with the two zinc-binding modules of this protein. The N-terminal zinc-binding module, which is thought to bind in the
minor groove (4, 7, 15), would be associated with the RGRP motif, and
thus participate in making the contacts observed at the TTT sequence at
the 5' end of the CuRE. The second zinc module would then make the
contacts we observe in the adjacent major groove.
Our model of a modular interaction of Mac1 with DNA recalls the mode of
DNA binding of another GRP-containing protein, Hin recombinase.
Structural studies on Hin recombinase revealed a helix-turn-helix
motif, which binds in the major groove. Residues N-terminal to the
helix-turn-helix extend across the phosphodiester backbone to the
adjacent minor groove (28-30), where the GRP motif binds. A survey of
AT-hook-containing proteins revealed several other examples of proteins
with additional and distinct DNA-binding domains in addition to the
AT-hook (27). Our hydroxyl radical footprinting and missing nucleoside
interference data suggest to us that Mac1t contacts the TTT
sequence on one edge of the minor groove, adjacent to the major groove
where methylation interference and missing nucleoside experiments show
the protein binds (see Fig. 5).
The remarkable aspect of the Mac1t footprint, that only one
strand is strongly protected at the edge of each CuRE, can be accommodated by this model. We suggest that the RGRP AT-hook motif of
Mac1t is constrained to be located closer to one strand of the minor groove in which it is bound, because of its conjunction with
other DNA-binding module(s) of the protein. Protection thus is observed
only for the T-rich strand. This is in contrast to the structural
results for HMG-I(Y) and Hin recombinase, in which the (R)GRP motif is
seen to bind deep in the minor groove and interact with both strands.
Differences in the Interaction of Mac1t with the Two
CuRE Sequences of CTR1--
Kosman and co-workers (9) recently
demonstrated that the identity of nucleotides adjacent to the CuRE
consensus sequence can affect the DNA binding and transactivation
activity of Mac1. The two CuRE sites of CTR1 have identical
8-base pair consensus sequences, but the base pairs to the 5' side of
each site differ. In the upstream site the sequence is
5'-TATTTGCTCA-3', while in the downstream site the sequence
is 5'-TTTTTGCTCA-3' (reading the other strand), where the
5'-flanking nucleotides are underlined. Kosman and co-workers (9) found
that Mac1 binds preferentially to the former (TA) site. Constructs made
to contain two TA CuRE sites were more effective at transcriptional
activation, while a CuRE site with two TT sites had lower
transcriptional activity than wild-type. Our results are consistent
with these observations. We find that Mac1t strongly
protects two nucleotides immediately to the 5' side of the upstream
(TA) CuRE site (Fig. 5, arrow), while at the downstream (TT)
CuRE site only one nucleotide adjacent to the CuRE is protected, and
not very strongly at that (see Fig. 2).
Summary and Conclusions--
The results of our chemical
footprinting and interference experiments define in detail the
interactions that the DNA binding domain of Mac1 makes with the two
CuRE sites in the CTR1 promoter of S. cerevisae.
Missing nucleoside and methylation interference experiments show
clearly that Mac1 binds in the major groove of DNA at the conserved
GCTC sequence of the CuRE site. We observe a single strong hydroxyl
radical footprint that starts near the middle of each CuRE and extends
to nucleotides that flank the 5' side of the site. This strong
footprint defines the edge of the major groove in which the protein
binds, and the minor groove of the TTT sequence at the 5' side of the
CuRE site. We conclude that Mac1 binds in a modular fashion to the
CuRE, with the RGRP AT-hook sequence of the protein binding in the
T-rich minor groove, and other parts of the protein, likely including
zinc-binding motif(s), interacting with the major groove.
We gratefully acknowledge the use of
densitometry instrumentation maintained by the Institute for
Biophysical Research on Macromolecular Assemblies at Johns Hopkins
University, which was supported by a National Science Foundation
Biological Research Centers Award and by a grant from the W. M. Keck Foundation.
*
This work was supported in part by United States Public
Health Service Grants GM41930 (to T. D. T.) and CA61286 (to
D. R. W).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Recipient of National Research Service Award GM15503 from the
United States Public Health Service.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 617-353-2482;
Fax: 617-353-3535; E-mail: tullius@bu.edu.
The abbreviations used are:
CuRE, copper
response element;
His tag, 6× histidine tag;
bp, base pair(s).
The Yeast Transcription Factor Mac1 Binds to DNA in a Modular
Fashion*
§,
**
Department of Chemistry, The Johns Hopkins
University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, the ¶ Department of
Biochemistry, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake
City, Utah 84132, and the
Department of Chemistry, Boston
University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Amino acid sequence of Mac1. The 159 amino acids that make up Mac1t are boxed.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
361 to
299 upstream of
the transcription start site, was inserted into the
BamHI-XbaI site of plasmid pBluescript SK+. This
plasmid was amplified in Escherichia coli DH5
cells and
isolated using the Qiagen Plasmid Kit. Purified plasmid DNA was stored
at
20 °C in Tris·EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris, 0.2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0).
-32P]dGTP or at the EcoRI terminus using
[
-32P]dATP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with the
Klenow large fragment of DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs).
20 °C.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
336 to
331
on the coding strand and at
304 to
308 on the noncoding strand. The
most protected nucleotides are T(
334) on the coding strand and the
symmetry-related T(
305) on the noncoding strand. The strong footprint
is centered on the 5'-TTTG-3' sequence in each CuRE inverted repeat.
One or two nucleotides to the 5' side of each CuRE consensus sequence
also are protected.

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Hydroxyl radical footprints of
Mac1t bound to the CTR1 promoter.
A, phosphorimages of denaturing gels from a hydroxyl radical
footprinting experiment. Lane G, products of a
Maxam-Gilbert guanine-specific sequencing reaction; lane 1, DNA treated with hydroxyl radical; lane 2, Mac1t-DNA complex treated with hydroxyl
radical. Brackets to the right of each
autoradiograph mark the two CuRE sites present in CTR1.
B, densitometer scans of lanes from one of the
phosphorimages shown in panel A. Data for the
coding strand are shown. Solid line, DNA treated
with the hydroxyl radical in the absence of protein. Dashed line, DNA treated with the hydroxyl radical with
Mac1t present. C, GelExplorer-derived footprints
for Mac1t bound to the CTR1 promoter. Note that
the y axes of the two plots are oriented in opposite
directions. Positive values in these plots represent nucleotides
protected from hydroxyl radical cleavage; negative values represent
nucleotides for which cleavage is enhanced in the presence of
protein.
335 to
328 and
312 to
307
interferes with protein binding (Fig. 3).
The pattern for the non-coding strand shows that nucleosides at
positions
332 to
324 and
313 to
305 are important for protein
binding.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Missing nucleoside analysis of
Mac1t binding to the CTR1 promoter.
A, phosphorimages of denaturing gels from a missing
nucleoside experiment. Lane G, products of a
Maxam-Gilbert guanine-specific sequencing reaction; lane F, hydroxyl radical-treated DNA (the input DNA for the
experiment); lane U, gapped DNA that did not bind
to Mac1t (unbound DNA); lane B,
gapped DNA that bound to Mac1t (bound DNA). The
brackets to the right of each autoradiograph mark
the two CuRE sites present in CTR1. B,
GelExplorer-derived missing nucleoside patterns for Mac1t
binding to the CTR1. Integrals of bands in phosphorimages
were determined using GelExplorer (22). Plotted is the ratio of the
integral of a band in the free DNA lane (F) to the integral
of the corresponding band in the bound DNA lane (B), minus
1. Positive values in this plot represent nucleosides whose loss
interferes with binding of Mac1t.

View larger version (75K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Methylation interference analysis of
Mac1t binding to the CTR1 promoter.
Lane G, products of a Maxam-Gilbert
guanine-specific sequencing reaction; lane B,
methylated DNA that bound to Mac1t; lane U, methylated DNA that was unable to bind to
Mac1t; lane F, input methylated DNA.
DNA in each lane was treated with piperidine before denaturing gel
electrophoresis to reveal positions of methylated guanines. Guanine
residues critical for Mac1t binding are indicated to the
right of each autoradiograph. The brackets to the
left of each autoradiograph mark the two CuRE sites present
in CTR1.

View larger version (235K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
DNA binding data for Mac1t
superimposed on a double-helical representation of the CTR1 promoter. The strong hydroxyl radical protections observed
in the CuRE sites are indicated by green coloring of the
sugar-phosphate backbone. The much weaker footprints at the center of
the CTR1 promoter (see Fig. 2, B and
C) are indicated by yellow coloring of the
backbone. The DNA backbone is colored blue where no
footprint is observed. Missing nucleoside signals are indicated by
red coloring of the bases. Guanine bases at which
methylation interference signals are observed are marked by
black filled circles.
Vertical bars and sequences adjacent to the DNA
model mark the positions of the CuRE sites in the CTR1
promoter. The arrow at the top right
points to the additional protection seen in the TA CuRE site (see text
for details).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Dancis, A.,
Haile, D.,
Yuan, D. S.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem
269,
25660-25667 2.
Hassett, R.,
and Kosman, D. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
128-134 3.
Knight, S. A. B.,
Labbe, S.,
Kwon, L. F.,
Kosman, D. J.,
and Thiele, D. J.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1917-1926 4.
Labbe, S.,
Zhu, Z.,
and Thiele, D. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15951-15958 5.
Martins, L. J.,
Jensen, L. T.,
Simons, J. R.,
Keller, G.,
and Winge, D. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
23716-23721 6.
Jungmann, J.,
Reins, H. A.,
Lee, J.,
Romeo, A.,
Hassett, R.,
Kosman, D.,
and Jentsch, S.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
5051-5056[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Yamaguchi-Iwai, Y.,
Serpe, M.,
Haile, D.,
Yang, W.,
Kosman, D. J.,
Klausner, R. D.,
and Dancis, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17711-17718 8.
Jensen, L. T.,
Posewitz, M. C.,
Srinivasan, C.,
and Winge, D. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
23805-23811 9.
Joshi, A.,
Serpe, M.,
and Kosman, D. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
218-226 10.
Thiele, D. J.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
2745-2752 11.
Welch, J.,
Fogel, S.,
Buchman, C.,
and Karin, M.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
255-260[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Zhou, P.,
and Thiele, D. J.
(1991)
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
6112-6116 13.
Farrell, R. A.,
Thorvalsden, J. L.,
and Winge, D. R.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
1571-1580[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Georgatsou, E.,
Mavrogiannis, L. A.,
Fragiadakis, G. S.,
and Alexandraki, D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13786-13792 15.
Graden, J. A.,
and Winge, D. R.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5550-5555 16.
Jensen, L. T.,
and Winge, D. R.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
5400-5408[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Furst, P.,
Hu, S.,
Hackett, R.,
and Hamer, D.
(1988)
Cell
55,
705-717[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Levin, J. R., Burkhoff, A. M., and Tullius, T. D. (1991)
in A Laboratory Guide to in Vitro Studies of Protein/DNA
Interactions (Saluz, H. P., and Jost, J.-P., eds) BioMethods
Series, Vol. 5, pp. 133-144, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel
19.
Dixon, W. J.,
Hayes, J. J.,
Levin, J. R.,
Weidner, M. D.,
Dombroski, B. A.,
and Tullius, T. D.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
208,
380-413[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Hayes, J. J.,
and Tullius, T. D.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
9521-9527[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Maxam, A. M.,
and Gilbert, W.
(1980)
Methods Enzymol.
65,
499-560[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Shadle, S. E.,
Allen, D. F.,
Guo, H.,
Pogozelski, W. K.,
Bashkin, J. S.,
and Tullius, T. D.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
850-860 23.
Koch, K. A.,
and Thiele, D. J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
724-734[Abstract]
24.
Huth, J. R.,
Bewley, C. A.,
Nissen, M. S.,
Evan, J. N. S.,
Reeves, R.,
Gronenborn, A. M.,
and Clore, G. M.
(1997)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4,
657-665[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Geierstanger, B. H.,
Volkman, B. F.,
Kremer, W.,
and Wemmer, D. E.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
5347-5355[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Mack, D. P.,
Sluka, J. P.,
Shin, J. A.,
Griffin, J. H.,
Simon, M. I.,
and Dervan, P. B.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
6561-6567[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Aravind, L.,
and Landsman, D.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
4413-4421 28.
Feng, J. A.,
Johnson, R. C.,
and Dickerson, R. E.
(1994)
Science
263,
348-355 29.
Sluka, J. P.,
Horvath, S. J.,
Bruist, M. F.,
Simon, M. I.,
and Dervan, P. B.
(1987)
Science
238,
1129-1132 30.
Sluka, J. P.,
Horvath, S. J.,
Glasgow, A. C.,
Simon, M. I.,
and Dervan, P. B.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
6551-6561[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I.-S. Song, H. H. W. Chen, I. Aiba, A. Hossain, Z. D. Liang, L. W. J. Klomp, and M. T. Kuo Transcription Factor Sp1 Plays an Important Role in the Regulation of Copper Homeostasis in Mammalian Cells Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 74(3): 705 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-C. Lai, A. L. Kosorukoff, P. V. Burke, and K. E. Kwast Metabolic-State-Dependent Remodeling of the Transcriptome in Response to Anoxia and Subsequent Reoxygenation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell, September 1, 2006; 5(9): 1468 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Beaudoin and S. Labbe Copper Induces Cytoplasmic Retention of Fission Yeast Transcription Factor Cuf1 Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2006; 5(2): 277 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Rutherford and A. J. Bird Metal-Responsive Transcription Factors That Regulate Iron, Zinc, and Copper Homeostasis in Eukaryotic Cells Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2004; 3(1): 1 - 13. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Beaudoin, A. Mercier, R. Langlois, and S. Labbe The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cuf1 Is Composed of Functional Modules from Two Distinct Classes of Copper Metalloregulatory Transcription Factors J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2003; 278(16): 14565 - 14577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gross, M. Kelleher, V. R. Iyer, P. O. Brown, and D. R. Winge Identification of the Copper Regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by DNA Microarrays J. Biol. Chem., October 6, 2000; 275(41): 32310 - 32316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Beaudoin and S. Labbe The Fission Yeast Copper-sensing Transcription Factor Cuf1 Regulates the Copper Transporter Gene Expression through an Ace1/Amt1-like Recognition Sequence J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2001; 276(18): 15472 - 15480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |