JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ron, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ron, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, A.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 27039-27046, September 17, 1999


Coordinated Movement of RACK1 with Activated beta IIPKC*

Dorit RonDagger §, Zhan Jiang§, Lina Yao§, Alicia Vagts§, Ivan DiamondDagger §parallel **Dagger Dagger , and Adrienne GordonDagger Dagger §parallel

From the § Ernest Gallo Research Center, the Departments of Dagger  Neurology, parallel  Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, and ** Pediatrics, and the Dagger Dagger  Neuroscience Graduate Program and Center for Neurobiology of Addiction, University of California, San Francisco, California 94110-3518

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein kinase C (PKC) isozymes move upon activation from one intracellular site to another. PKC-binding proteins, such as receptors for activated C kinase (RACKs), play an important role in regulating the localization and diverse functions of PKC isozymes. RACK1, the receptor for activated beta IIPKC, determines the localization and functional activity of beta IIPKC. However, the mechanism by which RACK1 localizes activated beta IIPKC is not known. Here, we provide evidence that the intracellular localization of RACK1 changes in response to PKC activation. In Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the dopamine D2L receptor and in NG108-15 cells, PKC activation by either phorbol ester or a dopamine D2 receptor agonist caused the movement of RACK1. Moreover, PKC activation resulted in the in situ association and movement of RACK1 and beta IIPKC to the same intracellular sites. Time course studies indicate that PKC activation induces the association of the two proteins prior to their co-movement. We further show that association of RACK1 and beta IIPKC is required for the movement of both proteins. Our results suggest that RACK1 is a PKC shuttling protein that moves beta IIPKC from one intracellular site to another.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Specific intracellular localization of signaling proteins such as PKC1 is important for the regulation of complex signal transduction cascades (1). PKC is a family of 10 isozymes that are localized to specific intracellular sites in unstimulated cells. Upon activation, each PKC isozyme moves to a different intracellular site (2). Localization of inactive or activated PKC isozymes is mediated, at least in part, by interaction with anchoring proteins (3, 4). For example, inactive PKC isozymes appear to be localized by binding to the scaffolding proteins AKAP-79 and gravin (5, 6). In contrast, activated PKC isozymes are localized by binding to receptors for activated C kinase (RACKs). RACK1 specifically binds the active form of beta IIPKC (7, 8) thereby regulating PKC function (8-12). In vitro, RACK1 binds PKC only in the presence of PKC activators and increases PKC kinase activity, presumably by stabilizing its active conformation (13). The RACK1 binding site on PKC is within the C2 region of the regulatory domain providing a direct protein-protein interaction (8). Indeed, RACK1 belongs to the WD40 family of proteins, and the WD40 motif is implicated in mediating protein-protein interactions (14). Furthermore, peptides derived from either PKC and/or RACK1 can alter PKC activity in vitro and in vivo (8, 12, 15, 16).

Although RACK1 binds activated PKC and is clearly important for PKC function, the mechanism by which RACK1 localizes beta IIPKC to its site after activation is not understood. One prediction is that the anchoring protein RACK1 should always be localized to the same site that accepts beta IIPKC after translocation. We therefore used confocal microscopy to determine whether RACK1 is co-localized with activated beta IIPKC, whether RACK1 is localized to a specific organelle, and whether the intracellular localization of RACK1 changes in response to PKC activation. Here, we provide evidence that RACK1 is localized to different sites in unstimulated and stimulated cells and that PKC activation leads to movement of RACK1. Furthermore, PKC activation induces the association and co-localization of RACK1 with beta IIPKC. Based on these results, we propose that RACK1 is a shuttling protein that localizes beta IIPKC upon activation by shuttling the kinase to its appropriate subcellular site.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials

Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) was purchased from LC Laboratories. ET18OCH3, calphostin C, bisindolylmaleimide HCl (GF-109), chelerythrin chloride and 1,1'-decamethylenebis-4-aminoquinaldinium chloride (DECA (dequalinium)) were purchased from Calbiochem. Diacylglycerol (DAG) and phosphatidylserine were purchased from Avanti. Luminol and p-coumaric acid were purchased from Sigma. The enhanced chemiluminesence plus kit was purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. The dopamine D2 agonist trihydroxy-N-propyl-noraporphine hydrobromide (NPA) was purchased from RBI. Recombinant human beta IIPKC was purchased from Panvera. Polyclonal anti-beta IIPKC antibodies and the beta IIPKC peptide were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies. Monoclonal anti-mannosidase was purchased from Berkeley Antibody Co., and monoclonal (IgM) anti-RACK1 antibodies were from Transduction Laboratories. The Golgi marker BODIPY FL C5-ceramide was purchased from Molecular Probes. The secondary antibodies fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-mouse (IgM), and Cy5-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies (IgM) were purchased from Cappel.

Cell Culture

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing the long form of the dopamine D2 receptor (D2L) (17) were seeded and grown in Ham's F-12 medium containing 10% FBS and 2 mM glutamine. After 48 h, media were replaced with Ham's F-12 medium containing 5% serum and 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 2 mM glutamine, 50 µg/ml human transferrin, 10 µg/ml oleic acid (complexed with 2 mg/ml fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin), 25 µg/ml bovine insulin, and trace elements at the following concentrations: 0.5 nM MnCl2, 0.5 nM (NH4)6Mo7O24, 0.25 nM SnCl4, 25 nM Na3VO4, 5 nM CdSO4, 0.25 nM NiSO4, 15 nM H2SeO3, and 25 nM Na2SiO3. On day 4, the cells were treated with different reagents as described in the figure legends. NG108-15 neuroblastoma X glioma hybrid cells were grown as described (18) and treated as described in the figure legends to Figs. 1-6 and 7, b and c.

Immunocytochemistry and Confocal Microscopy

CHO/D2L or NG108-15 cells were treated with different reagents as described in the figure legends. The cells were then washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed with ice-cold methanol for 3 min, and then washed twice with cold PBS. Cells were incubated for 2 h with 1% normal goat serum in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with the appropriate primary antibody (diluted in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin). Cells were then washed three times with PBS containing 0.1% Triton and incubated for 1.5 h with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:500, Cappel), Texas Red, or Cy5-conjugated anti-mouse (IgM) antibodies (1:500, Cappel). Cells were washed an additional three times with cold PBS containing 0.1% Triton. Slides were mounted using Vectashield and viewed with a Bio-Rad MRC-1024 laser scanning confocal microscope. The confocal images were processed using the computer programs NIH Image, version 1.61 (National Institutes of Health), and Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc.). All the images shown are individual middle sections of projected Z-series.

Image Analysis

Quantification of Co-localization-- Co-localization of the pairs RACK1 and beta IIPKC or mannosidase and beta IIPKC was determined using the NIH Image program, version 1.61. Threshold was used to separate immunofluoresence pixels from background and to create binary images. The intensity values of each image were recorded. Pairs of binary images of RACK1 and beta IIPKC or mannosidase and beta IIPKC were multiplied and divided by 255 to generate a final merged image that could be visualized with an 8-bit gray scale. The intensity value of the final merged image was recorded. The percentage of RACK1 staining merged with beta IIPKC staining was calculated using the following equation. The number of pixels with intensity  
<FR><NU><UP>value >0 in the final merged image</UP></NU><DE><UP>The number of pixels with intensity </UP></DE></FR><UP>×100</UP>
value>0 in RACK1 image

Each image contained 20-100 cells.

Scoring Movement-- Movement of RACK1 and beta IIPKC was scored by counting at least three random fields of cells (total of at least 100 cells per treatment) for staining of RACK1 and/or beta IIPKC. The percentage of translocated (moved) RACK1 and/or beta IIPKC was calculated using the following equation. The number of cells in which RACK1
<FR><NU><UP> or &bgr;IIPKC stained at the Golgi</UP></NU><DE><UP>Total number of cells</UP></DE></FR>×100
Each image contained 20-100 cells.

Co-Immunoprecipitation

107 cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with either fresh media, 100 nM PMA, or 500 nM NPA. Cells were washed once with cold PBS and lysed in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 0.25 M sucrose, 1% Triton X-100, and 10 µg/ml of the following protease inhibitors: soybean trypsin inhibitor (Sigma), aprotinin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma), and leupeptin. Lysed cells were centrifuged at 14,000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min. The Triton-soluble material (supernatant) was precleared by incubation with 50 µl of protein G agarose (Life Technologies, Inc.) for 2 h at 4 °C. The samples were centrifuged and protein quantity was determined using BCA reagent (Pierce). Immunoprecipitation was performed with 5 µg of anti-beta IIPKC antibody or anti-RACK1 antibody, together with approximately 0.5 mg of protein diluted in an equal volume of 2× immunoprecipitation buffer (1× = 1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM sodium vanadate, and 10 µg/ml each of soybean trypsin inhibitor, aprotinin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and leupeptin) and water to a total volume of 1 ml. After overnight incubation at 4 °C, 50 µl of protein G agarose was added and the mixture was incubated at 4 °C for 2 h. The agarose resin was then washed three times with 1× immunoprecipitation buffer and twice with ice-cold PBS. The sample was centrifuged and sample buffer was added to the pellet fraction. The sample was resolved on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was cut at approximately 50 kDa and probed with monoclonal anti-RACK1 antibodies (lower part) (1:500) and polyclonal anti-beta IIPKC antibodies (upper part) (1:250). Immunoreactivity was detected using a chemiluminescent reaction (2.5 mM luminol and 400 µM p-coumaric acid).

In Vitro Binding Assay

Recombinant RACK1 (125 ng) was blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell) using a slot blot apparatus (Schleicher & Schuell). Unbound material was removed, and the membrane was incubated in overlay block (0.2 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 3% bovine serum albumin, and 0.1% polyethylene glycol) for 1 h at room temperature. In a separate tube, beta IIPKC (1 µg of purified recombinant SF9-expressed protein) was incubated in the presence of 50 µg/ml phosphatidylserine, 0.8 µg/DAG, and 1 mM calcium in overlay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor 0.1% polyethylene glycol, 0.2 M NaCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, and 12 mM beta -mercaptoethanol) and in the presence or absence of PKC inhibitors (12 nM bisindolylmaleimide HCl, 10 µM DECA, 50 nM calphostin C, and 660 nM chelerythrin chloride). The mixture was incubated for 15 min while being rotated at room temperature and then added to immobilized RACK1 for additional rotation of 15 min. Unbound material was removed, and the membrane was given three 10-min washes in overlay wash buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.1% polyethylene glycol, 0.2 M NaCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, and 12 mM beta -mercaptoethanol). Binding of beta IIPKC was detected using anti-beta IIPKC polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz, 1:500) followed by enhanced chemiluminescent reaction (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and proccessed using the STORM system (Molecular Dynamics).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In order to determine whether RACK1 is co-localized with activated translocated (moved) beta IIPKC, we first established the localization of RACK1 in CHO cells using confocal microscopy. As shown in Fig. 1a, RACK1 was localized to a perinuclear structure in unstimulated cells. Next, we determined the localization of beta IIPKC in CHO cells. As shown in Fig. 2a, beta IIPKC is localized to the cytoplasm in unstimulated cells. Activation by a phorbol ester (PMA) induced beta IIPKC to move from the cytoplasm (Fig. 2a) to a site that resembles the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 2b) and not the perinuclear structure where RACK1 is found (Fig. 1a). This structure was identified as the Golgi apparatus by double-staining of cells with anti-beta IIPKC antibodies (Fig. 2d) and anti-mannosidase antibodies (Golgi marker) (Fig. 2e). Colocalization of beta IIPKC with the Golgi marker was confirmed by performing image analysis on the merged image as described under "Experimental Procedures." beta IIPKC (Fig. 2d) co-localized with mannosidase (Fig. 2e) as shown in the merged image (Fig. 2f). Because RACK1 in unstimulated cells is localized to the perinucleus (Fig. 1a) and is not localized to the Golgi apparatus, where translocated (moved) activated beta IIPKC is found (Fig. 2b), RACK1 is not always localized to the same site as beta IIPKC.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   PKC activation induces RACK1 movement. CHO/D2L cells were treated with either 100 nM PMA for 10 min at 37 °C or with a 500 nM concentration of a D2 receptor agonist, NPA. NG108-15 cells were treated with 100 nM PMA. Cells were washed, fixed, and blocked as described under "Experimental Procedures." RACK1 localization was assayed by immunostaining with monoclonal anti-RACK1 antibodies (Transduction Laboratories, 1:100). Cells were scanned using a confocal microscope and viewed with a × 60 lens for CHO/D2L and a × 40 for NG108-15 cells. RACK1 staining is represented by false color; intensity is represented by the false color bar on the left, with red indicating the areas with the most intense staining. No change in staining intensity or localization was observed when unstimulated cells were incubated with fresh medium containing 0.001% Me2SO in the medium or with media containing 0.01% ascorbic for 10 min to 1 h. a, control CHO/D2L cells; b, CHO/D2L cells treated with 100 nM PMA for 10 min; c, CHO/D2L cells treated with 500 nM NPA for 30 min; d, unstimulated CHO/D2L cells stained with anti-RACK1 antibodies (1:100) that were preabsorbed overnight at 4 °C with 5 µg of the recombinant fusion protein maltose-binding protein RACK1. e, unstimulated NG108-15 cells; f, NG108-15 cells treated with 100 nM PMA for 10 min. The images are representative of more than 10 individual experiments for CHO/D2L and 3 experiments for NG108-15. The images shown are individual middle sections of the projected Z-series.


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   PKC activation induces beta IIPKC movement to the Golgi apparatus in CHO cells. CHO/D2L cells were treated with 100 nM PMA for 10 min at 37 °C. Cells were washed, fixed, and blocked as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cells were then stained with both polyclonal anti-beta IIPKC antibody (1:100) (a-d) and monoclonal anti-mannosidase antibodies (1:5000) (e) and visualized with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies (1:500) for beta IIPKC and Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-mouse (1:500) antibodies for mannosidase. Cells were scanned using a confocal microscope and viewed with a × 40 lens. No change in staining intensity or localization was observed when unstimulated cells were incubated with fresh media, with 0.001% Me2SO in the medium (because PMA stock solution is dissolved in Me2SO), or with 0.01% ascorbic acid in the medium (because dilution of NPA is done in medium containing 0.01% ascorbic acid) for 10 min to 1 h. CHO/D2L cells incubated in the absence (a and c) or presence of 100 nM PMA (b, d-e). Specificity of the anti-beta IIPKC antibody was confirmed by staining the cells with antibody preabsorbed to the immunizing beta IIPKC peptide (c). Panel f represents a merged image of d and e performed with image analysis as described under "Experimental Procedures." The images are representative of three individual experiments. The images shown are individual middle sections of the projected Z-series.

We next determined whether RACK1 is always localized to a specific organelle. Specifically, we asked whether RACK1 is always localized to perinuclear structures in CHO cells, regardless of the activation state of the cell. CHO cells that stably express the dopamine D2L receptor (CHO/D2L) were treated with either PMA or with the dopamine D2 agonist NPA, and RACK1 localization was determined. PKC activation either directly with PMA or by NPA activation of the D2 receptor induced the movement of RACK1 from perinuclear structures (Fig. 1a) to a different site (Fig. 1b and c). In another cell line, NG108-15 neuroblastoma × glioma cells, RACK1 was also localized to different intracellular sites before (Fig. 1e) and after PKC activation (Fig. 1f). In NG108-15 cells PKC activation induced RACK1 to move to yet unidentified cytosolic structures and to neurites (Fig. 1f). Therefore, RACK1 is not localized to a specific organelle, and activation of PKC leads to movement of RACK1.

If RACK1 movement is dependent on PKC activation via phosphatidylinositol-derived second messengers, then a PLC inhibitor should inhibit RACK1 movement induced by activation of the D2L receptor. Indeed, movement of both RACK1 (Fig. 3a) and beta IIPKC (Fig. 3b) was inhibited when CHO/D2L cells were pretreated with the PLC inhibitor ET18OCH3 prior to activation with NPA. As expected, ET18OCH3 did not inhibit PMA-induced movement of beta IIPKC or of RACK1 (Fig. 3), because phorbol esters bypass PLC signaling and directly activate PKC. Therefore, RACK1 movement is dependent on PLC activation, suggesting that under physiologic conditions, the generation of second messengers is required not only for the movement of beta IIPKC but also for movement of RACK1.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   The PLC inhibitor ET18OCH3 inhibits the movement of RACK1 and beta IIPKC induced by NPA. a, RACK1 movement in the presence of ET18OCH3. b, beta IIPKC movement in the presence of ET18OCH3. CHO/D2L cells were preincubated for 30 min at 37 °C with 10 µM of ET18OCH3 (a selective phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C inhibitor). The cells were then treated with either 100 nM PMA for 10 min at 37 °C or with 500 nM NPA for 30 min at 37 °C. Cells were then stained, visualized, and scored as described under "Experimental Procedures." The percentage of movement is defined as (the number of cells in which RACK1 (a) or beta IIPKC (b) was translocated (moved)/ the total number of cells) × 100. Data are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments.

PKC activation induced movement of both RACK1 and beta IIPKC (Figs. 1 and 2). We therefore determined whether RACK1 and beta IIPKC become co-localized to the same site after PKC activation. CHO/D2L cells were incubated in the absence and presence of PMA or NPA and stained for both RACK1 and beta IIPKC. The images were merged in order to detect co-localization, and image analysis was performed. As shown in Fig. 4, a and d, in unstimulated cells, approximately 60% of RACK1 and beta IIPKC were not co-localized. Upon PKC activation, RACK1 and beta IIPKC moved to the same site, and their intracellular staining patterns merged to more than 70% (Fig. 4, b-d). In CHO cells, PKC activation induced beta IIPKC to move to the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 2, d-f). To confirm that RACK1 also localized to the Golgi apparatus upon PKC activation, we stained cells with anti-RACK1 antibodies together with the specific Golgi marker BODIPY FL C5-ceramide. As shown in Fig. 4, e and f, RACK1 co-localized with the Golgi marker after PKC activation. Thus, PKC activation induces the co-localization of RACK1 and beta IIPK and the movement of both proteins from different sites to the same locations.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   PKC activation induces movement of beta IIPKC and RACK1 from different sites to the same site. a-c, CHO/D2L cells treated as described in Figs. 1 and 2 with either PMA or NPA. The cells were stained with both monoclonal anti-RACK1 antibodies and polyclonal anti-beta IIPKC antibodies (1:100) that were visualized with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies (1:500) for beta IIPKC and Cy5-conjugated goat anti-mouse (IgM) antibodies for RACK1 (1:500). RACK1 staining is red, beta IIPKC staining is green, and the merged image of the two colors is yellow. Images were viewed with a × 40 lens. a, double staining of beta IIPKC and RACK1 in control cells; b, double staining of beta IIPKC and RACK1 in PMA-treated cells; c, double staining of beta IIPKC and RACK1 in NPA-treated cells. Images are representative of six unstimulated experiments, six PMA experiments, and four NPA experiments. The images shown are individual middle sections of the projected Z-series. d, quantification of the data presented in A-C. Data were analyzed using NIH Image as described under "Experimental Procedures." The percentage of beta IIPKC and RACK1 co-localization is defined as (the pixels value of the merged image/pixel value of RACK1 staining) × 100. Data are mean ± S.D. of unstimulated and PMA n = 6, NPA n = 4. Data were analyzed by Student's t test. *, p < 0.01. e-g, CHO/D2L cells treated as described in Figs. 1 and 2 with either PMA or NPA. The cells were stained with both monoclonal anti-RACK1 antibodies and visualized with Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-mouse (IgM) (1:500) together with the Golgi marker BODIPY FL C5-ceramide (1:200). RACK1 staining is red, Golgi staining is green, and the merged image of the two colors is yellow. Images were viewed with a × 60 lens. g, double staining of RACK1 and the Golgi marker. f, RACK1 staining. g, Golgi staining. Images are representative of two experiments. The images shown are individual middle sections of the projected Z-series.

The co-localization of RACK1 and beta IIPKC after PKC activation, observed by immunofluoresence (Fig. 4), suggests that the two proteins associate with each other in cells. To explore this possibility, we determined whether the two proteins can be co-immunoprecipitated and whether PKC activation is required for their association. beta IIPKC was immunoprecipitated from unstimulated, PMA-treated, or NPA-treated cells using anti-beta IIPKC antibodies, and we determined whether RACK1 was co-immunoprecipitated. Anti-beta IIPKC antibodies co-immunoprecipitated RACK1 in CHO-D2L cells (Fig. 5a, lanes 5 and 6) and in NG108-15 cells (Fig. 5b, lane 2), and anti-RACK1 antibodies also co-immunoprecipitated beta IIPKC (data not shown), indicating that RACK1 and beta IIPKC do associate in cells. Furthermore, the association between RACK1 and beta IIPKC was increased by PKC activation with PMA or NPA (Fig. 5a, lanes 5 and 6 compared with lane 7 for CHO/D2L cells and Fig. 5b, lane 2 compared with lane 1 for NG108-15 cells). Anti-beta IPKC antibodies, which were used as control antibodies, did not immunoprecipitate RACK1 (data not shown), indicating that the association between beta IIPKC and RACK1 is specific. Western blot analysis of RACK1 (30 kDa) and beta IIPKC (80 kDa) show that the amount of the detected protein does not significantly change with the experimental conditions (Fig. 5, a, lanes 1-3, and b, lanes 5 and 6), and no cross-reactivity with either antibody was observed (data not shown). Taken together, our data indicate that activation of PKC causes RACK1 and beta IIPKC to associate with each other.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   PKC activation induces association of beta IIPKC and RACK1 in situ. a, CHO/D2L cells were treated with either PMA or NPA as described in Fig. 1. Co-immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-beta IIPKC and anti-RACK1 antibodies as described under "Experimental Procedures." Membranes were cut and probed with either anti-beta IIPKC antibodies (top) or anti-RACK1 antibodies (bottom). Lanes 1-3, Western blot analysis using cell extracts of NPA-treated cells (lane 1), PMA-treated cells (lane 2), and control cells (lane 3). Lanes 4-7, immunoprecipitation with anti-beta IIPKC antibodies. Anti-beta IIPKC antibodies were incubated in immunoprecipitation buffer (lane 4), with NPA-treated cells (lane 5), with PMA-treated cells (lane 6), or with control cells (lane 7). Lower molecular weight bands were observed for anti-beta IIPKC antibodies. It is unclear whether this band is a degradation product or is due to nonspecific staining. Data are representative of three experiments. b, NG108-15 cells were treated with PMA as described in Fig. 1. Co-immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-beta IIPKC antibodies as described under "Experimental Procedures." The membrane was probed with anti-RACK1 antibodies. Lanes 1-4, immunoprecipitation. Anti-beta IIPKC antibodies were incubated in immunoprecipitation buffer with control cells (lane 1), with PMA-treated cells (lane 2), or with immunoprecipitation buffer alone (lane 3). Protein G was incubated with control cell extract (lane 4). Lanes 5 and 6, Western blot analysis using cell extracts of control cells (lane 5) and PMA-treated cells (lane 6). Data are representative of three experiments.

We next determined whether RACK1 and beta IIPKC move together or whether the movement of one precedes the other. We therefore compared RACK1 and beta IIPKC movement (Fig. 6a) and co-localization (Fig. 6, b and c) as a function of time. As shown in Fig. 6a, the time courses of movement for both RACK1 and beta IIPKC were very similar, indicating that it is unlikely that one protein moves prior to the other. In contrast, the time course of co-localization (Fig. 6, b and c) indicates that the two proteins co-localize prior to their movement. At 1 and 5 min, more than 70% of RACK1 was co-localized with beta IIPKC, but only 25% of both proteins had reached the Golgi apparatus at that time (Fig. 6, a and b). Because co-localization was detected before RACK1 and beta IIPKC reached the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 6c, compared with Figs. 1, 2, and 4), it is possible that the two proteins associate prior to their movement.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   NPA-induced RACK1 and beta IIPKC movement and co-localization as function of time. a, CHO/D2L cells were treated with 500 nM NPA at 37 °C. Cells were washed, fixed, and blocked at different time points as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cells were then stained, visualized, and scored as described under "Experimental Procedures." Results are presented as mean ± S.D. of three experiments. The percentage of movement was defined as (the number of cells in which RACK1 or beta IIPKC was translocated (moved)/ the total number of cells) × 100. Data are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments. b, CHO/D2L cells were treated as in a, and the data were analyzed using the computer program NIH Image 1.61 as described under "Experimental Procedures." The percentage of beta IIPKC and RACK1 co-localization is defined as (the pixels value of the merged image/the pixel value of RACK1 staining) × 100. Data are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments. c, CHO/D2L cells were treated with 500 nM NPA for 30 s to 5 min as described in Fig. 1. RACK1 staining is red, beta IIPKC staining is green, and a merged image of the two colors is yellow. Images were viewed with a × 60 lens. Image is a representative of three different experiments. The images shown are individual middle sections of the projected Z-series.

If prior association of beta IIPKC and RACK1 is required for movement, then inhibition of RACK1 and beta IIPKC association should prevent movement. Recently, the PKC inhibitor dequalinium (DECA) has been shown to inhibit PKC movement by interacting with the RACK1 binding site on PKC (1). We determined whether DECA inhibits the interaction of beta IIPKC with RACK1 and compared the results with the effect of other PKC inhibitors. The regulatory domain inhibitor calphostin C and the kinase domain inhibitors bisindolylmaleimide HCl and chelerythrin chloride were used at concentrations equal to their IC50 values. Fig. 7a presents an overlay assay of beta IIPKC binding to immobilized RACK1 in the presence of activators and in the presence of DECA, calphostin C, and bisindolylmaleimide HCl. DECA, as well as calphostin C, reduced the binding of beta IIPKC to RACK1 (Fig. 7a). On the other hand, bisindolylmaleimide HCl did not affect the interaction between beta IIPKC to RACK1 (Fig. 7a). Similar effects were obtain with chelerythrine (data not shown due to high background). We next determined whether PKC inhibitors would inhibit the movement of both RACK1 and beta IIPKC. All inhibitors were used at concentrations equal to their IC50 values. DECA inhibited movement of beta IIPKC (Fig. 7b) in CHO/D2L cells. Interestingly, DECA also inhibited the movement of RACK1 (Fig. 7b). These data suggest that activation-induced binding of beta IIPKC to RACK1 is a prerequisite for the movement of both proteins. Furthermore, the regulatory domain inhibitor calphostin C inhibited NPA-induced movement and, to a lesser degree, PMA-induced movement (Fig. 7b). Because calphostin C is a competitive inhibitor for the DAG binding site, these results are another indication that suggests that generation of second messengers is required for the interaction and movement of both proteins. On the other hand, the kinase domain inhibitors bisindolylmaleimide HCl and chelerythrin did not significantly inhibit the movement of beta IIPKC and RACK1, indicating that PKC kinase activity is not involved in the movement of both proteins (Fig. 7b).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   The cPKC inhibitor DECA inhibits binding and movement of beta IIPKC and RACK1. a, RACK1 was immobilized onto nitrocellulose in lanes 2-5. In vitro overlay assays performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." beta IIPKC binding to immobilized RACK1 in the presence of DAG, PS, and calcium (lane 2) and in the presence of 12 nM bisindolylmaleimide HCl (lane 3), 10 µM DECA (lane 4), and 50 nM calphostin C (lane 5) or to the nitrocellulose membrane (lane 1). No nonspecific binding of beta IIPKC to the nitrocellulose membrane was detected (lane 1). Data are representative of three experiments. b and c, CHO/D2L cells were preincubated for 30 min at 37 °C with 12 nM bisindolylmaleimide HCl, 10 µM DECA, 50 nM calphostin C, and 660 nM chelerythrin chloride. Cells were then treated with either 100 nM PMA for 10 min at 37 °C (b) or 500 nM NPA for 30 min at 37 °C (c). Cells were then stained, visualized, and scored as described under "Experimental Procedures." The percentage of translocated RACK1 and beta IIPKC was defined as (the number of cells in which RACK1 or beta IIPKC was translocated/the total number of cells) × 100. Data are the mean ± S.D. of five experiments with DECA and two experiments with bisindolylmaleimide, calphostin C, and chelerythrin.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

PKC anchoring proteins determine the localization of different activated PKC isozymes (3, 4). However, the mechanism by which PKC anchoring proteins localize PKC isozymes to specific sites after movement is not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that RACK1, the anchoring protein for activated beta IIPKC, also moves upon activation of PKC. RACK1 moves in response to PKC activation and localizes to the same sites as activated beta IIPKC. The PLC inhibitor ET18OCH3 blocked dopamine D2 receptor-induced movement of RACK1, and calphostin C, an inhibitor that competes with DAG, interfered with the interaction and movement of RACK1 and beta IIPKC. These results suggest that generation of second messengers needed for the activation of PKC is also necessary for movement of RACK1. On the other hand, our results with PKC kinase inhibitors suggest that PKC kinase activity per se is not involved in the binding or is required for the movement of the two proteins. These findings are in line with previous data showing that RACK1 itself is not a substrate for PKC (13).

We further show that RACK1 and beta IIPKC co-localize prior to their movement and that the association of the two proteins appears to be required for their simultaneous movement. Based on these findings, we propose that RACK1 is a PKC shuttling protein. When beta IIPKC is activated, it binds to RACK1. RACK1 then moves together with beta IIPKC to bring the enzyme in close proximity to its appropriate substrate.

The association between activated beta IIPKC and RACK1 in situ was detected by co-immunoprecipitation. These results are in agreement with previous in vitro studies showing that the association of RACK1 and beta IIPKC occurs only in the presence of the PKC activators phosphatidylserine, DAG, and calcium (13). The early time points of co-localization between RACK1 and beta IIPKC (30 s to 5 min) could be detected with confocal microscopy but could not be confirmed by immunoprecipitation. Labeling each protein with a different fluoresence tag may allow us to follow the movement and co-localization of RACK1 and beta IIPKC at early time points in live cells.

Although it is possible that movement of beta IIPKC is responsible for movement of RACK1, we consider this possibility unlikely for several reasons; RACK1 belongs to the WD40 family of proteins that regulate (via protein-protein interaction) the localization and/or activity of various signaling proteins. For example, the beta -adrenergic receptor kinase is localized by the WD40-containing protein Gbeta (the beta  subunit of GTP-binding protein) (19); the transforming growth factor-beta receptors interact with a subunit of phosphatase 2A (a WD40-containing protein) (20); cytosolic phospholipase A2 binds to the WD40-containing protein PLAP (21), and epsilon PKC is localized by yet another WD40-containing RACK, RACK2 (22). Furthermore, PKC-mediated functions are inhibited when the association between RACK1 and PKC is disrupted by peptides (8, 16). Therefore, it is most likely that RACK1 is directing activated beta IIPKC to a specific site.

Furthermore, PKC activation induces beta IIPKC to move to different sites in different cells. For example, in NIH3T3 cells, activated beta IIPKC is found in cytoskeletal elements (23); in cardiac myocytes, activated beta IIPKC is localized to perinuclear structures; and in human leukemic cell lines, beta IIPKC moves to the nuclear membrane, where it phosphorylates lamin B (24). Activation induces beta IIPKC to move to cytoplasmic filaments (25) in human endothelial cells, and to the plasma membrane in HEK 293 cells (26). In addition, different stimuli cause beta IIPKC to move to different intracellular sites in the same cell (2, 25). Therefore, it is not surprising that we detected beta IIPKC movement to the perinulcear structures in CHO cells and to neurites in NG108 cells. We suggest that RACK1 can localize activated beta IIPKC to different sites because it is a mobile rather than a fixed protein. This is consistent with our finding that RACK1 is not associated to a specific organelle and with other reports that RACK1 is localized at different sites (10, 27). Indeed, sequence analysis reveals that RACK1 does not contain consensus sequence motifs that could anchor it to a particular subcellular site. Thus, the mobility of RACK1 enables it to shuttle beta IIPKC to different sites in different cells. These observations also suggest that RACK1 movement may be affected by other signaling cascades. Indeed, we have found that treatment with ethanol induces RACK1 to move to the nucleus, whereas beta IIPKC localization is unchanged in three different cell lines (NG108-15, CHO, and C6), as well as in certain brain areas of mice.2 Furthermore, we found that forskolin (an activator of adenylate cyclase) also induces the nuclear movement of RACK1 but not beta IIPKC.3 Taken together, our studies indicate that different stimuli induce the recruitment of RACK1 to different sites. These results also suggest that the intracellular localization of RACK1 does not depend exclusively upon PKC activation, whereas the movement of beta IIPKC is directed by RACK1.

RACK1 may represent a new class of mobile targeting proteins. It is conceivable that other anchoring, scaffolding, or adaptor proteins may also shuttle signaling proteins between intracellular sites. One possible candidate is the adaptor protein 14-3-3 that has recently been shown to bind both inactive Raf in the cytosol and active Raf at the plasma membrane (28). 14-3-3 protein could be a Raf shuttling protein that is responsible for movement of Raf from the cytosol to the plasma membrane. Other candidates are members of the AKAP family of proteins that are redistributed in response to stimuli (29, 30).

What mediates the localization of RACK1? It is possible that RACK1 localization is determined by interaction with organelle specific proteins. One intriguing possibility is that RACK1 targets membranes of organelles via binding to the pleckstrin homology (PH) domains that bind both phospholipids and proteins. Indeed, WD40-containing proteins have been found to interact with PH domain-containing proteins (31). The WD40 motif of Gbeta binds to the PH domain of beta -adrenergic receptor kinase (31, 32), and RACK1 itself was found to bind PH domains in vitro.4 Another possibility is that RACK1 is associated with a PKC substrate after movement. Some of the PH-containing proteins, such as pleckstrin, are PKC substrates, and RACK1 associates with the cytoplasmic domain of beta -integrins only in the presence of PMA (10). Based on the translocating properties of RACK1, it is possible that activation of PKC causes movement of RACK1 together with beta IIPKC to the plasma membrane, where RACK1 binds to the cytoplasmic tail of beta -integrin, allowing PKC to phosphorylate either beta -integrin or neighboring proteins.

In summary, our data show that RACK1 localization is regulated by PKC activation and suggest that RACK1 is a PKC shuttling protein. The shuttling properties of RACK1 and other members of its class may add another dimension to our understanding of how PKC isozymes are localized to different sites after activation and movement.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Robert Messing for help with image analysis and Carol Web for editorial support. We also thank Drs. Robert Messing, Mike Miles, Nicki Vasquez, and Dean Sheppard for helpful discussion and critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant AA10039.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 415-648-7111, ext. 364; Fax: 415-648-7116; E-mail: dorit@itsa.ucsf.edu.

2 D. Ron, D. P. Dohrman, A. J. Vagts, Z. Jiang, L. Yao, J. Crabbe, J. E. Grisel, and I. Diamond, manuscript in preparation.

3 Ron, D., and Vagts, A. unpublished results.

4 Rodriguez, M., Ron, D., Kazushige, T., Chen, C.-H., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1999) Biochemistry, in press.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PKC, protein kinase C; RACK, receptor for activated C kinase; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; DECA, 1,1'-decamethylenebis-4-aminoquinaldinium chloride; DAG, diacylglycerol; NPA, trihydroxy-N-propyl-noraporphine hydrobromide; PH, pleckstrin homology; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Rotenberg, S. A., and Sun, X. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2390-2395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Disatnik, M. H., Buraggi, G., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1994) Exp. Cell Res. 210, 287-297[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Mochly-Rosen, D. (1995) Science 268, 247-251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Pawson, T., and Scott, J. D. (1997) Science 278, 2075-2080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Faux, M. C., and Scott, J. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17038-17044[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Nauert, J. B., Klauck, T. M., Langeberg, L. K., and Scott, J. D. (1997) Curr Biol 7, 52-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Mochly-Rosen, D., Smith, B. L., Chen, C. H., Disatnik, M. H., and Ron, D. (1995) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 23, 596-600[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Ron, D., Luo, J., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24180-24187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Battaini, F., Pascale, A., Paoletti, R., and Govoni, S. (1997) Trends Neurosci. 20, 410-415[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Liliental, J., and Chang, D. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2379-2383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Padanilam, B. J., and Hammerman, M. R. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, F160-F166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Ron, D., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21395-21398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Ron, D., Chen, C. H., Caldwell, J., Jamieson, L., Orr, E., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 839-843[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Neer, E. J., Schmidt, C. J., Nambudripad, R., Smith, T. F., Neer, E. J., Schmidt, C. J., Nambudripad, R., and Smith, T. F. (1994) Nature 371, 297-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Ron, D., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 492-496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Yedovitzky, M., Mochly-Rosen, D., Johnson, J. A., Gray, M. O., Ron, D., Abramovitch, E., Cerasi, E., and Nesher, R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1417-1420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Fishburn, C. S., Elazar, Z., and Fuchs, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29819-29824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Gordon, A. S., Yao, L., Wu, Z. L., Coe, I. R., and Diamond, I. (1997) Mol Pharmacol 52, 554-559[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Pitcher, J. A., Inglese, J., Higgins, J. B., Arriza, J. L., Casey, P. J., Kim, C., Benovic, J. L., Kwatra, M. M., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1992) Science 257, 1264-1267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Griswold-Prenner, I., Kamibayashi, C., Maruoka, E. M., Mumby, M. C., and Derynck, R. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 6595-6604[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Clark, M. A., Ozgur, L. E., Conway, T. M., Dispoto, J., Crooke, S. T., and Bomalaski, J. S. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 5418-5422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Csukai, M., Chen, C. H., De Matteis, M. A., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29200-29206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Goodnight, J., Mischak, H., Kolch, W., and Mushinski, J. F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 9991-10001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Murray, N. R., Burns, D. J., and Fields, A. P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21385-21390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Zhou, L. Y., Disatnik, M., Herron, G. S., Mochly-Rosen, D., and Karasek, M. A. (1996) J Invest Dermatol 107, 248-252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Feng, X., Zhang, J., Barak, L. S., Meyer, T., Caron, M. G., and Hannun, Y. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 10755-10762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Chang, B. Y., Conroy, K. B., Machleder, E. M., and Cartwright, C. A. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3245-3256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Tzivion, G., Luo, Z., and Avruch, J. (1998) Nature 394, 88-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Dell'Acqua, M. L., Faux, M. C., Thorburn, J., Thorburn, A., and Scott, J. D. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2246-2260[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Eide, T., Coghlan, V., Orstavik, S., Holsve, C., Solberg, R., Skalhegg, B. S., Lamb, N. J., Langeberg, L., Fernandez, A., Scott, J. D., Jahnsen, T., and Tasken, K. (1998) Exp. Cell Res. 238, 305-316[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Touhara, K., Inglese, J., Pitcher, J. A., Shaw, G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10217-10220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Wang, D. S., Shaw, R., Winkelmann, J. C., and Shaw, G. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 203, 29-35[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Ohgaki, N. Fukura, M. Matsushita, K. Mitsui, and H. Kanazawa
Cell Surface Levels of Organellar Na+/H+ Exchanger Isoform 6 Are Regulated by Interaction with RACK1
J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2008; 283(7): 4417 - 4429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
C. K. Isacson, Q. Lu, R. H. Karas, and D. H. Cox
RACK1 is a BKCa channel binding protein
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): C1459 - C1466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Vallentin and D. Mochly-Rosen
RBCK1, a Protein Kinase CbetaI (PKCbetaI)-interacting Protein, Regulates PKCbeta-dependent Function
J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2007; 282(3): 1650 - 1657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. A. Palmer, J. K. Thompson, L. Li, A. Prat, and P. Wang
Gib2, A Novel Gbeta-like/RACK1 Homolog, Functions as a Gbeta Subunit in cAMP Signaling and Is Essential in Cryptococcus neoformans
J. Biol. Chem., October 27, 2006; 281(43): 32596 - 32605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
J. R. Broughman, L. Sun, S. Umar, J. H. Sellin, and A. P. Morris
Chronic PKC-beta2 activation in HT-29 Cl.19a colonocytes prevents cAMP-mediated ion secretion by inhibiting apical membrane CFTR targeting
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): G331 - G344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. G. Rothberg, D. L. Burdette, J. Pfannstiel, N. Jetton, R. Singh, and L. Ruben
The RACK1 Homologue from Trypanosoma brucei Is Required for the Onset and Progression of Cytokinesis
J. Biol. Chem., April 7, 2006; 281(14): 9781 - 9790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H. Dehghani and A. C Hahnel
Expression profile of protein kinase C isozymes in preimplantation mouse development
Reproduction, October 1, 2005; 130(4): 441 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H. Dehghani, C. Reith, and A. C Hahnel
Subcellular localization of protein kinase C {delta} and {varepsilon} affects transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes in four-cell mouse embryos
Reproduction, October 1, 2005; 130(4): 453 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Pascale, M. Amadio, G. Scapagnini, C. Lanni, M. Racchi, A. Provenzani, S. Govoni, D. L. Alkon, and A. Quattrone
Neuronal ELAV proteins enhance mRNA stability by a PKC{alpha}-dependent pathway
PNAS, August 23, 2005; 102(34): 12065 - 12070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]