![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 27039-27046, September 17, 1999
IIPKC*
§¶,
§
**
, and
§
From the § Ernest Gallo Research Center, the Departments
of
Neurology,
Cellular and Molecular
Pharmacology, and ** Pediatrics, and the

Neuroscience Graduate Program and Center
for Neurobiology of Addiction, University of California, San
Francisco, California 94110-3518
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protein kinase C (PKC) isozymes move upon
activation from one intracellular site to another. PKC-binding
proteins, such as receptors for activated C kinase (RACKs), play an
important role in regulating the localization and diverse functions of
PKC isozymes. RACK1, the receptor for activated Specific intracellular localization of signaling proteins such as
PKC1 is important for the
regulation of complex signal transduction cascades (1). PKC is a family
of 10 isozymes that are localized to specific intracellular sites in
unstimulated cells. Upon activation, each PKC isozyme moves to a
different intracellular site (2). Localization of inactive or activated
PKC isozymes is mediated, at least in part, by interaction with
anchoring proteins (3, 4). For example, inactive PKC isozymes appear to
be localized by binding to the scaffolding proteins AKAP-79 and gravin
(5, 6). In contrast, activated PKC isozymes are localized by binding to
receptors for activated C kinase (RACKs). RACK1 specifically binds the
active form of Although RACK1 binds activated PKC and is clearly important for PKC
function, the mechanism by which RACK1 localizes Materials
Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) was purchased from LC
Laboratories. ET18OCH3, calphostin C, bisindolylmaleimide
HCl (GF-109), chelerythrin chloride and
1,1'-decamethylenebis-4-aminoquinaldinium chloride (DECA (dequalinium))
were purchased from Calbiochem. Diacylglycerol (DAG) and
phosphatidylserine were purchased from Avanti. Luminol and
p-coumaric acid were purchased from Sigma. The enhanced
chemiluminesence plus kit was purchased from Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech. The dopamine D2 agonist
trihydroxy-N-propyl-noraporphine hydrobromide (NPA) was
purchased from RBI. Recombinant human Cell Culture
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing the long
form of the dopamine D2 receptor (D2L) (17) were seeded and grown in
Ham's F-12 medium containing 10% FBS and 2 mM glutamine. After 48 h, media were replaced with Ham's F-12 medium containing 5% serum and 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 2 mM
glutamine, 50 µg/ml human transferrin, 10 µg/ml oleic acid
(complexed with 2 mg/ml fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin), 25 µg/ml bovine insulin, and trace elements at the following
concentrations: 0.5 nM MnCl2, 0.5 nM
(NH4)6Mo7O24, 0.25 nM SnCl4, 25 nM
Na3VO4, 5 nM CdSO4, 0.25 nM NiSO4, 15 nM
H2SeO3, and 25 nM
Na2SiO3. On day 4, the cells were treated with
different reagents as described in the figure legends. NG108-15
neuroblastoma X glioma hybrid cells were grown as described (18) and
treated as described in the figure legends to Figs. 1-6 and 7,
b and c.
Immunocytochemistry and Confocal Microscopy
CHO/D2L or NG108-15 cells were treated with different reagents
as described in the figure legends. The cells were then washed with
cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed with ice-cold methanol for
3 min, and then washed twice with cold PBS. Cells were incubated for
2 h with 1% normal goat serum in PBS containing 0.1% Triton
X-100, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with the appropriate
primary antibody (diluted in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin). Cells were then washed three times with
PBS containing 0.1% Triton and incubated for 1.5 h with
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:500,
Cappel), Texas Red, or Cy5-conjugated anti-mouse (IgM) antibodies
(1:500, Cappel). Cells were washed an additional three times with cold
PBS containing 0.1% Triton. Slides were mounted using Vectashield and
viewed with a Bio-Rad MRC-1024 laser scanning confocal microscope. The
confocal images were processed using the computer programs NIH Image,
version 1.61 (National Institutes of Health), and Adobe Photoshop
(Adobe Systems Inc.). All the images shown are individual middle
sections of projected Z-series.
Image Analysis
Quantification of Co-localization--
Co-localization of the
pairs RACK1 and
Each image contained 20-100 cells.
Scoring Movement--
Movement of RACK1 and
IIPKC, determines
the localization and functional activity of
IIPKC. However, the
mechanism by which RACK1 localizes activated
IIPKC is not known.
Here, we provide evidence that the intracellular localization of RACK1
changes in response to PKC activation. In Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the dopamine D2L receptor and in NG108-15 cells, PKC
activation by either phorbol ester or a dopamine D2 receptor agonist
caused the movement of RACK1. Moreover, PKC activation resulted in the
in situ association and movement of RACK1 and
IIPKC to
the same intracellular sites. Time course studies indicate that PKC
activation induces the association of the two proteins prior to their
co-movement. We further show that association of RACK1 and
IIPKC is
required for the movement of both proteins. Our results suggest that
RACK1 is a PKC shuttling protein that moves
IIPKC from one
intracellular site to another.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
IIPKC (7, 8) thereby regulating PKC function (8-12).
In vitro, RACK1 binds PKC only in the presence of PKC
activators and increases PKC kinase activity, presumably by stabilizing
its active conformation (13). The RACK1 binding site on PKC is within
the C2 region of the regulatory domain providing a direct
protein-protein interaction (8). Indeed, RACK1 belongs to the WD40
family of proteins, and the WD40 motif is implicated in mediating
protein-protein interactions (14). Furthermore, peptides derived from
either PKC and/or RACK1 can alter PKC activity in vitro and
in vivo (8, 12, 15, 16).
IIPKC to its site
after activation is not understood. One prediction is that the
anchoring protein RACK1 should always be localized to the same site
that accepts
IIPKC after translocation. We therefore used confocal
microscopy to determine whether RACK1 is co-localized with activated
IIPKC, whether RACK1 is localized to a specific organelle, and
whether the intracellular localization of RACK1 changes in response to
PKC activation. Here, we provide evidence that RACK1 is localized to
different sites in unstimulated and stimulated cells and that PKC
activation leads to movement of RACK1. Furthermore, PKC activation
induces the association and co-localization of RACK1 with
IIPKC.
Based on these results, we propose that RACK1 is a shuttling protein
that localizes
IIPKC upon activation by shuttling the kinase to its
appropriate subcellular site.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
IIPKC was purchased from
Panvera. Polyclonal anti-
IIPKC antibodies and the
IIPKC peptide
were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies. Monoclonal
anti-mannosidase was purchased from Berkeley Antibody Co., and
monoclonal (IgM) anti-RACK1 antibodies were from Transduction Laboratories. The Golgi marker BODIPY FL C5-ceramide was
purchased from Molecular Probes. The secondary antibodies fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, Texas Red-conjugated goat
anti-mouse (IgM), and Cy5-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies (IgM)
were purchased from Cappel.
IIPKC or mannosidase and
IIPKC was determined
using the NIH Image program, version 1.61. Threshold was used to
separate immunofluoresence pixels from background and to create binary
images. The intensity values of each image were recorded. Pairs of
binary images of RACK1 and
IIPKC or mannosidase and
IIPKC were
multiplied and divided by 255 to generate a final merged image that
could be visualized with an 8-bit gray scale. The intensity value of
the final merged image was recorded. The percentage of RACK1 staining
merged with
IIPKC staining was calculated using the following
equation.
The number of pixels with intensity
value>0 in RACK1 image
IIPKC was scored
by counting at least three random fields of cells (total of at least
100 cells per treatment) for staining of RACK1 and/or
IIPKC. The
percentage of translocated (moved) RACK1 and/or
IIPKC was calculated
using the following
equation. The number of cells in which RACK1
Each image contained 20-100 cells.
Co-Immunoprecipitation
107 cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with
either fresh media, 100 nM PMA, or 500 nM NPA.
Cells were washed once with cold PBS and lysed in 20 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM
EDTA, 0.25 M sucrose, 1% Triton X-100, and 10 µg/ml of
the following protease inhibitors: soybean trypsin inhibitor (Sigma),
aprotinin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma), and leupeptin. Lysed
cells were centrifuged at 14,000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min. The Triton-soluble material (supernatant) was precleared by
incubation with 50 µl of protein G agarose (Life Technologies, Inc.)
for 2 h at 4 °C. The samples were centrifuged and protein quantity was determined using BCA reagent (Pierce). Immunoprecipitation was performed with 5 µg of anti-
IIPKC antibody or anti-RACK1 antibody, together with approximately 0.5 mg of protein diluted in an
equal volume of 2× immunoprecipitation buffer (1× = 1% Triton X-100,
150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM sodium
vanadate, and 10 µg/ml each of soybean trypsin inhibitor, aprotinin,
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and leupeptin) and water to a total
volume of 1 ml. After overnight incubation at 4 °C, 50 µl of
protein G agarose was added and the mixture was incubated at 4 °C
for 2 h. The agarose resin was then washed three times with 1×
immunoprecipitation buffer and twice with ice-cold PBS. The sample was
centrifuged and sample buffer was added to the pellet fraction. The
sample was resolved on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was cut
at approximately 50 kDa and probed with monoclonal anti-RACK1
antibodies (lower part) (1:500) and polyclonal anti-
IIPKC antibodies
(upper part) (1:250). Immunoreactivity was detected using a
chemiluminescent reaction (2.5 mM luminol and 400 µM p-coumaric acid).
In Vitro Binding Assay
Recombinant RACK1 (125 ng) was blotted onto nitrocellulose
membrane (Schleicher & Schuell) using a slot blot apparatus (Schleicher & Schuell). Unbound material was removed, and the membrane was incubated in overlay block (0.2 M NaCl, 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 3% bovine serum albumin, and 0.1% polyethylene
glycol) for 1 h at room temperature. In a separate tube,
IIPKC
(1 µg of purified recombinant SF9-expressed protein) was incubated in
the presence of 50 µg/ml phosphatidylserine, 0.8 µg/DAG, and 1 mM calcium in overlay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 7.4, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml
soybean trypsin inhibitor 0.1% polyethylene glycol, 0.2 M
NaCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, and 12 mM
-mercaptoethanol) and in the presence or absence of PKC inhibitors
(12 nM bisindolylmaleimide HCl, 10 µM DECA,
50 nM calphostin C, and 660 nM chelerythrin
chloride). The mixture was incubated for 15 min while being rotated at
room temperature and then added to immobilized RACK1 for additional rotation of 15 min. Unbound material was removed, and the membrane was
given three 10-min washes in overlay wash buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.1% polyethylene glycol, 0.2 M NaCl,
0.1 mM CaCl2, and 12 mM
-mercaptoethanol). Binding of
IIPKC was detected using anti-
IIPKC polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz, 1:500) followed by
enhanced chemiluminescent reaction (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and
proccessed using the STORM system (Molecular Dynamics).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In order to determine whether RACK1 is co-localized with activated
translocated (moved)
IIPKC, we first established the localization of
RACK1 in CHO cells using confocal microscopy. As shown in Fig. 1a, RACK1 was localized to a
perinuclear structure in unstimulated cells. Next, we determined the
localization of
IIPKC in CHO cells. As shown in Fig.
2a,
IIPKC is localized to
the cytoplasm in unstimulated cells. Activation by a phorbol ester
(PMA) induced
IIPKC to move from the cytoplasm (Fig. 2a)
to a site that resembles the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 2b) and
not the perinuclear structure where RACK1 is found (Fig.
1a). This structure was identified as the Golgi apparatus by
double-staining of cells with anti-
IIPKC antibodies (Fig.
2d) and anti-mannosidase antibodies (Golgi marker) (Fig. 2e). Colocalization of
IIPKC with the Golgi marker was
confirmed by performing image analysis on the merged image as described under "Experimental Procedures."
IIPKC (Fig. 2d)
co-localized with mannosidase (Fig. 2e) as shown in the
merged image (Fig. 2f). Because RACK1 in unstimulated cells
is localized to the perinucleus (Fig. 1a) and is not
localized to the Golgi apparatus, where translocated (moved) activated
IIPKC is found (Fig. 2b), RACK1 is not always localized
to the same site as
IIPKC.
|
|
We next determined whether RACK1 is always localized to a specific organelle. Specifically, we asked whether RACK1 is always localized to perinuclear structures in CHO cells, regardless of the activation state of the cell. CHO cells that stably express the dopamine D2L receptor (CHO/D2L) were treated with either PMA or with the dopamine D2 agonist NPA, and RACK1 localization was determined. PKC activation either directly with PMA or by NPA activation of the D2 receptor induced the movement of RACK1 from perinuclear structures (Fig. 1a) to a different site (Fig. 1b and c). In another cell line, NG108-15 neuroblastoma × glioma cells, RACK1 was also localized to different intracellular sites before (Fig. 1e) and after PKC activation (Fig. 1f). In NG108-15 cells PKC activation induced RACK1 to move to yet unidentified cytosolic structures and to neurites (Fig. 1f). Therefore, RACK1 is not localized to a specific organelle, and activation of PKC leads to movement of RACK1.
If RACK1 movement is dependent on PKC activation via
phosphatidylinositol-derived second messengers, then a PLC inhibitor should inhibit RACK1 movement induced by activation of the D2L receptor. Indeed, movement of both RACK1 (Fig.
3a) and
IIPKC (Fig.
3b) was inhibited when CHO/D2L cells were pretreated with the PLC inhibitor ET18OCH3 prior to activation with NPA. As
expected, ET18OCH3 did not inhibit PMA-induced movement of
IIPKC or of RACK1 (Fig. 3), because phorbol esters bypass PLC
signaling and directly activate PKC. Therefore, RACK1 movement is
dependent on PLC activation, suggesting that under physiologic
conditions, the generation of second messengers is required not only
for the movement of
IIPKC but also for movement of RACK1.
|
PKC activation induced movement of both RACK1 and
IIPKC (Figs. 1 and
2). We therefore determined whether RACK1 and
IIPKC become
co-localized to the same site after PKC activation. CHO/D2L cells were
incubated in the absence and presence of PMA or NPA and stained for
both RACK1 and
IIPKC. The images were merged in order to detect
co-localization, and image analysis was performed. As shown in Fig.
4, a and d, in
unstimulated cells, approximately 60% of RACK1 and
IIPKC were not
co-localized. Upon PKC activation, RACK1 and
IIPKC moved to the same
site, and their intracellular staining patterns merged to more than
70% (Fig. 4, b-d). In CHO cells, PKC activation induced
IIPKC to move to the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 2, d-f). To
confirm that RACK1 also localized to the Golgi apparatus upon PKC
activation, we stained cells with anti-RACK1 antibodies together with
the specific Golgi marker BODIPY FL C5-ceramide. As shown
in Fig. 4, e and f, RACK1 co-localized with the
Golgi marker after PKC activation. Thus, PKC activation induces the co-localization of RACK1 and
IIPK and the movement of both proteins from different sites to the same locations.
|
The co-localization of RACK1 and
IIPKC after PKC activation,
observed by immunofluoresence (Fig. 4), suggests that the two proteins
associate with each other in cells. To explore this possibility, we
determined whether the two proteins can be co-immunoprecipitated and
whether PKC activation is required for their association.
IIPKC was
immunoprecipitated from unstimulated, PMA-treated, or NPA-treated cells
using anti-
IIPKC antibodies, and we determined whether RACK1 was
co-immunoprecipitated. Anti-
IIPKC antibodies co-immunoprecipitated
RACK1 in CHO-D2L cells (Fig. 5a,
lanes 5 and 6) and in NG108-15 cells (Fig. 5b,
lane 2), and anti-RACK1 antibodies also co-immunoprecipitated
IIPKC (data not shown), indicating that RACK1 and
IIPKC do
associate in cells. Furthermore, the association between RACK1 and
IIPKC was increased by PKC activation with PMA or NPA (Fig.
5a, lanes 5 and 6 compared with lane 7 for CHO/D2L cells and Fig. 5b, lane 2 compared with lane 1 for NG108-15 cells). Anti-
IPKC
antibodies, which were used as control antibodies, did not
immunoprecipitate RACK1 (data not shown), indicating that the
association between
IIPKC and RACK1 is specific. Western blot
analysis of RACK1 (30 kDa) and
IIPKC (80 kDa) show that the amount
of the detected protein does not significantly change with the
experimental conditions (Fig. 5, a, lanes 1-3, and b,
lanes 5 and 6), and no cross-reactivity with either
antibody was observed (data not shown). Taken together, our data
indicate that activation of PKC causes RACK1 and
IIPKC to
associate with each other.
|
We next determined whether RACK1 and
IIPKC move together or whether
the movement of one precedes the other. We therefore compared RACK1 and
IIPKC movement (Fig. 6a)
and co-localization (Fig. 6, b and c) as a
function of time. As shown in Fig. 6a, the time courses of
movement for both RACK1 and
IIPKC were very similar, indicating that
it is unlikely that one protein moves prior to the other. In contrast,
the time course of co-localization (Fig. 6, b and
c) indicates that the two proteins co-localize prior to
their movement. At 1 and 5 min, more than 70% of RACK1 was
co-localized with
IIPKC, but only 25% of both proteins had reached
the Golgi apparatus at that time (Fig. 6, a and
b). Because co-localization was detected before RACK1 and
IIPKC reached the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 6c, compared with
Figs. 1, 2, and 4), it is possible that the two proteins associate
prior to their movement.
|
If prior association of
IIPKC and RACK1 is required for movement,
then inhibition of RACK1 and
IIPKC association should prevent
movement. Recently, the PKC inhibitor dequalinium (DECA) has been shown
to inhibit PKC movement by interacting with the RACK1 binding site on
PKC (1). We determined whether DECA inhibits the interaction of
IIPKC with RACK1 and compared the results with the effect of other
PKC inhibitors. The regulatory domain inhibitor calphostin C and the
kinase domain inhibitors bisindolylmaleimide HCl and chelerythrin
chloride were used at concentrations equal to their IC50
values. Fig. 7a presents an
overlay assay of
IIPKC binding to immobilized RACK1 in the presence
of activators and in the presence of DECA, calphostin C, and
bisindolylmaleimide HCl. DECA, as well as calphostin C, reduced the
binding of
IIPKC to RACK1 (Fig. 7a). On the other hand,
bisindolylmaleimide HCl did not affect the interaction between
IIPKC
to RACK1 (Fig. 7a). Similar effects were obtain with
chelerythrine (data not shown due to high background). We next
determined whether PKC inhibitors would inhibit the movement of both
RACK1 and
IIPKC. All inhibitors were used at concentrations equal to
their IC50 values. DECA inhibited movement of
IIPKC
(Fig. 7b) in CHO/D2L cells. Interestingly, DECA also
inhibited the movement of RACK1 (Fig. 7b). These data suggest that activation-induced binding of
IIPKC to RACK1 is a
prerequisite for the movement of both proteins. Furthermore, the
regulatory domain inhibitor calphostin C inhibited NPA-induced movement
and, to a lesser degree, PMA-induced movement (Fig. 7b). Because calphostin C is a competitive inhibitor for the DAG binding site, these results are another indication that suggests that generation of second messengers is required for the interaction and
movement of both proteins. On the other hand, the kinase domain inhibitors bisindolylmaleimide HCl and chelerythrin did not
significantly inhibit the movement of
IIPKC and RACK1, indicating
that PKC kinase activity is not involved in the movement of both
proteins (Fig. 7b).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PKC anchoring proteins determine the localization of different
activated PKC isozymes (3, 4). However, the mechanism by which PKC
anchoring proteins localize PKC isozymes to specific sites after
movement is not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that RACK1,
the anchoring protein for activated
IIPKC, also moves upon
activation of PKC. RACK1 moves in response to PKC activation and
localizes to the same sites as activated
IIPKC. The PLC inhibitor
ET18OCH3 blocked dopamine D2 receptor-induced movement of
RACK1, and calphostin C, an inhibitor that competes with DAG,
interfered with the interaction and movement of RACK1 and
IIPKC.
These results suggest that generation of second messengers needed for
the activation of PKC is also necessary for movement of RACK1. On the
other hand, our results with PKC kinase inhibitors suggest that PKC
kinase activity per se is not involved in the binding or is
required for the movement of the two proteins. These findings are in
line with previous data showing that RACK1 itself is not a substrate
for PKC (13).
We further show that RACK1 and
IIPKC co-localize prior to their
movement and that the association of the two proteins appears to be
required for their simultaneous movement. Based on these findings, we
propose that RACK1 is a PKC shuttling protein. When
IIPKC is
activated, it binds to RACK1. RACK1 then moves together with
IIPKC
to bring the enzyme in close proximity to its appropriate substrate.
The association between activated
IIPKC and RACK1 in situ
was detected by co-immunoprecipitation. These results are in agreement with previous in vitro studies showing that the association
of RACK1 and
IIPKC occurs only in the presence of the PKC activators phosphatidylserine, DAG, and calcium (13). The early time points of
co-localization between RACK1 and
IIPKC (30 s to 5 min) could be
detected with confocal microscopy but could not be confirmed by
immunoprecipitation. Labeling each protein with a different fluoresence
tag may allow us to follow the movement and co-localization of RACK1
and
IIPKC at early time points in live cells.
Although it is possible that movement of
IIPKC is responsible for
movement of RACK1, we consider this possibility unlikely for several
reasons; RACK1 belongs to the WD40 family of proteins that regulate
(via protein-protein interaction) the localization and/or activity of
various signaling proteins. For example, the
-adrenergic receptor
kinase is localized by the WD40-containing protein G
(the
subunit of GTP-binding protein) (19); the transforming growth
factor-
receptors interact with a subunit of phosphatase 2A (a
WD40-containing protein) (20); cytosolic phospholipase A2 binds to the
WD40-containing protein PLAP (21), and
PKC is localized by yet
another WD40-containing RACK, RACK2 (22). Furthermore, PKC-mediated
functions are inhibited when the association between RACK1 and PKC is
disrupted by peptides (8, 16). Therefore, it is most likely that RACK1
is directing activated
IIPKC to a specific site.
Furthermore, PKC activation induces
IIPKC to move to different sites
in different cells. For example, in NIH3T3 cells, activated
IIPKC is
found in cytoskeletal elements (23); in cardiac myocytes, activated
IIPKC is localized to perinuclear structures; and in human leukemic
cell lines,
IIPKC moves to the nuclear membrane, where it
phosphorylates lamin B (24). Activation induces
IIPKC to move to
cytoplasmic filaments (25) in human endothelial cells, and to the
plasma membrane in HEK 293 cells (26). In addition, different stimuli
cause
IIPKC to move to different intracellular sites in the same
cell (2, 25). Therefore, it is not surprising that we detected
IIPKC
movement to the perinulcear structures in CHO cells and to neurites in
NG108 cells. We suggest that RACK1 can localize activated
IIPKC to
different sites because it is a mobile rather than a fixed protein.
This is consistent with our finding that RACK1 is not associated to a
specific organelle and with other reports that RACK1 is localized at
different sites (10, 27). Indeed, sequence analysis reveals that RACK1
does not contain consensus sequence motifs that could anchor it to a
particular subcellular site. Thus, the mobility of RACK1 enables it to
shuttle
IIPKC to different sites in different cells. These observations also suggest that RACK1 movement may be affected by other
signaling cascades. Indeed, we have found that treatment with ethanol
induces RACK1 to move to the nucleus, whereas
IIPKC localization is
unchanged in three different cell lines (NG108-15, CHO, and C6), as
well as in certain brain areas of
mice.2 Furthermore, we found
that forskolin (an activator of adenylate cyclase) also induces the
nuclear movement of RACK1 but not
IIPKC.3 Taken together,
our studies indicate that different stimuli induce the recruitment of
RACK1 to different sites. These results also suggest that the
intracellular localization of RACK1 does not depend exclusively upon
PKC activation, whereas the movement of
IIPKC is directed by RACK1.
RACK1 may represent a new class of mobile targeting proteins. It is conceivable that other anchoring, scaffolding, or adaptor proteins may also shuttle signaling proteins between intracellular sites. One possible candidate is the adaptor protein 14-3-3 that has recently been shown to bind both inactive Raf in the cytosol and active Raf at the plasma membrane (28). 14-3-3 protein could be a Raf shuttling protein that is responsible for movement of Raf from the cytosol to the plasma membrane. Other candidates are members of the AKAP family of proteins that are redistributed in response to stimuli (29, 30).
What mediates the localization of RACK1? It is possible that RACK1
localization is determined by interaction with organelle specific
proteins. One intriguing possibility is that RACK1 targets membranes of
organelles via binding to the pleckstrin homology (PH) domains that
bind both phospholipids and proteins. Indeed, WD40-containing proteins
have been found to interact with PH domain-containing proteins (31).
The WD40 motif of G
binds to the PH domain of
-adrenergic
receptor kinase (31, 32), and RACK1 itself was found to bind PH domains
in vitro.4 Another
possibility is that RACK1 is associated with a PKC substrate after
movement. Some of the PH-containing proteins, such as pleckstrin, are
PKC substrates, and RACK1 associates with the cytoplasmic domain of
-integrins only in the presence of PMA (10). Based on the
translocating properties of RACK1, it is possible that activation of
PKC causes movement of RACK1 together with
IIPKC to the plasma
membrane, where RACK1 binds to the cytoplasmic tail of
-integrin,
allowing PKC to phosphorylate either
-integrin or neighboring proteins.
In summary, our data show that RACK1 localization is regulated by PKC
activation and suggest that RACK1 is a PKC shuttling protein. The
shuttling properties of RACK1 and other members of its class may add
another dimension to our understanding of how PKC isozymes are
localized to different sites after activation and movement.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Robert Messing for help with image analysis and Carol Web for editorial support. We also thank Drs. Robert Messing, Mike Miles, Nicki Vasquez, and Dean Sheppard for helpful discussion and critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant AA10039.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 415-648-7111, ext. 364; Fax: 415-648-7116; E-mail: dorit@itsa.ucsf.edu.
2 D. Ron, D. P. Dohrman, A. J. Vagts, Z. Jiang, L. Yao, J. Crabbe, J. E. Grisel, and I. Diamond, manuscript in preparation.
3 Ron, D., and Vagts, A. unpublished results.
4 Rodriguez, M., Ron, D., Kazushige, T., Chen, C.-H., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1999) Biochemistry, in press.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PKC, protein kinase C; RACK, receptor for activated C kinase; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; DECA, 1,1'-decamethylenebis-4-aminoquinaldinium chloride; DAG, diacylglycerol; NPA, trihydroxy-N-propyl-noraporphine hydrobromide; PH, pleckstrin homology; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Rotenberg, S. A.,
and Sun, X.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2390-2395 |
| 2. | Disatnik, M. H., Buraggi, G., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1994) Exp. Cell Res. 210, 287-297[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1995)
Science
268,
247-251 |
| 4. |
Pawson, T.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1997)
Science
278,
2075-2080 |
| 5. |
Faux, M. C.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17038-17044 |
| 6. | Nauert, J. B., Klauck, T. M., Langeberg, L. K., and Scott, J. D. (1997) Curr Biol 7, 52-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Mochly-Rosen, D., Smith, B. L., Chen, C. H., Disatnik, M. H., and Ron, D. (1995) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 23, 596-600[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Ron, D.,
Luo, J.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24180-24187 |
| 9. | Battaini, F., Pascale, A., Paoletti, R., and Govoni, S. (1997) Trends Neurosci. 20, 410-415[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Liliental, J.,
and Chang, D. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2379-2383 |
| 11. |
Padanilam, B. J.,
and Hammerman, M. R.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
F160-F166 |
| 12. |
Ron, D.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
21395-21398 |
| 13. |
Ron, D.,
Chen, C. H.,
Caldwell, J.,
Jamieson, L.,
Orr, E.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
839-843 |
| 14. | Neer, E. J., Schmidt, C. J., Nambudripad, R., Smith, T. F., Neer, E. J., Schmidt, C. J., Nambudripad, R., and Smith, T. F. (1994) Nature 371, 297-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Ron, D.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
492-496 |
| 16. |
Yedovitzky, M.,
Mochly-Rosen, D.,
Johnson, J. A.,
Gray, M. O.,
Ron, D.,
Abramovitch, E.,
Cerasi, E.,
and Nesher, R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1417-1420 |
| 17. |
Fishburn, C. S.,
Elazar, Z.,
and Fuchs, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29819-29824 |
| 18. |
Gordon, A. S.,
Yao, L.,
Wu, Z. L.,
Coe, I. R.,
and Diamond, I.
(1997)
Mol Pharmacol
52,
554-559 |
| 19. |
Pitcher, J. A.,
Inglese, J.,
Higgins, J. B.,
Arriza, J. L.,
Casey, P. J.,
Kim, C.,
Benovic, J. L.,
Kwatra, M. M.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1992)
Science
257,
1264-1267 |
| 20. |
Griswold-Prenner, I.,
Kamibayashi, C.,
Maruoka, E. M.,
Mumby, M. C.,
and Derynck, R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6595-6604 |
| 21. |
Clark, M. A.,
Ozgur, L. E.,
Conway, T. M.,
Dispoto, J.,
Crooke, S. T.,
and Bomalaski, J. S.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
5418-5422 |
| 22. |
Csukai, M.,
Chen, C. H.,
De Matteis, M. A.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29200-29206 |
| 23. |
Goodnight, J.,
Mischak, H.,
Kolch, W.,
and Mushinski, J. F.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
9991-10001 |
| 24. |
Murray, N. R.,
Burns, D. J.,
and Fields, A. P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
21385-21390 |
| 25. | Zhou, L. Y., Disatnik, M., Herron, G. S., Mochly-Rosen, D., and Karasek, M. A. (1996) J Invest Dermatol 107, 248-252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Feng, X.,
Zhang, J.,
Barak, L. S.,
Meyer, T.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Hannun, Y. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10755-10762 |
| 27. |
Chang, B. Y.,
Conroy, K. B.,
Machleder, E. M.,
and Cartwright, C. A.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3245-3256 |
| 28. | Tzivion, G., Luo, Z., and Avruch, J. (1998) Nature 394, 88-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Dell'Acqua, M. L., Faux, M. C., Thorburn, J., Thorburn, A., and Scott, J. D. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2246-2260[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Eide, T., Coghlan, V., Orstavik, S., Holsve, C., Solberg, R., Skalhegg, B. S., Lamb, N. J., Langeberg, L., Fernandez, A., Scott, J. D., Jahnsen, T., and Tasken, K. (1998) Exp. Cell Res. 238, 305-316[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Touhara, K.,
Inglese, J.,
Pitcher, J. A.,
Shaw, G.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
10217-10220 |
| 32. | Wang, D. S., Shaw, R., Winkelmann, J. C., and Shaw, G. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 203, 29-35[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Ohgaki, N. Fukura, M. Matsushita, K. Mitsui, and H. Kanazawa Cell Surface Levels of Organellar Na+/H+ Exchanger Isoform 6 Are Regulated by Interaction with RACK1 J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2008; 283(7): 4417 - 4429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Isacson, Q. Lu, R. H. Karas, and D. H. Cox RACK1 is a BKCa channel binding protein Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): C1459 - C1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Vallentin and D. Mochly-Rosen RBCK1, a Protein Kinase CbetaI (PKCbetaI)-interacting Protein, Regulates PKCbeta-dependent Function J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2007; 282(3): 1650 - 1657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Palmer, J. K. Thompson, L. Li, A. Prat, and P. Wang Gib2, A Novel Gbeta-like/RACK1 Homolog, Functions as a Gbeta Subunit in cAMP Signaling and Is Essential in Cryptococcus neoformans J. Biol. Chem., October 27, 2006; 281(43): 32596 - 32605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Broughman, L. Sun, S. Umar, J. H. Sellin, and A. P. Morris Chronic PKC-beta2 activation in HT-29 Cl.19a colonocytes prevents cAMP-mediated ion secretion by inhibiting apical membrane CFTR targeting Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): G331 - G344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Rothberg, D. L. Burdette, J. Pfannstiel, N. Jetton, R. Singh, and L. Ruben The RACK1 Homologue from Trypanosoma brucei Is Required for the Onset and Progression of Cytokinesis J. Biol. Chem., April 7, 2006; 281(14): 9781 - 9790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dehghani and A. C Hahnel Expression profile of protein kinase C isozymes in preimplantation mouse development Reproduction, October 1, 2005; 130(4): 441 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dehghani, C. Reith, and A. C Hahnel Subcellular localization of protein kinase C {delta} and {varepsilon} affects transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes in four-cell mouse embryos Reproduction, October 1, 2005; 130(4): 453 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pascale, M. Amadio, G. Scapagnini, C. Lanni, M. Racchi, A. Provenzani, S. Govoni, D. L. Alkon, and A. Quattrone Neuronal ELAV proteins enhance mRNA stability by a PKC{alpha}-dependent pathway PNAS, August 23, 2005; 102(34): 12065 - 12070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |