![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 27161-27167, September 17, 1999
From the Transforming growth factor- Members of the transforming growth factor- Although previous studies indicated that TAK1, a member of the MAP
kinase kinase kinase family, is involved in the TGF- Antibodies, Immunoblotting, and Immunoprecipitation--
For
assaying endogenous p38, SAPK/JNK, MKK6, and ATF-2 activities, 2 × 105 cells were lysed in 150 µl of lysis buffer
containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 12.5 mM
2-glycerophosphate, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 10 mM NaF, 0.5%
Triton X-100, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM sodium
vanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 20 µg/ml aprotinin. Cell lysates (20 µl/lane) were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated anti-phospho-specific antibodies. For
anti-Myc immunoprecipitations, cell lysates were incubated with
anti-Myc 9E10 antibody and protein G-Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 2 h at 4 °C with rocking. The beads were washed three times with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and subjected to kinase assays or association assays.
Cell Cultures and Transfection--
C2C12 cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 15% fetal bovine
serum. mink lung epithelial (Mv1Lu) cells were cultured in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium/F-12 containing 5% fetal bovine serum. These
cells were transfected using LipofectAMINE according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies, Inc.). For protein
kinase assays, we prepared cell lysates from 5 × 105
cells that were transiently transfected with the indicated
constructs (~20-50% transfection efficiencies).
Protein Kinase Assays--
Immunocomplex kinase reactions of
Myc-MKK6 and Myc-p38 were performed in a final volume of 15 µl
containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EGTA,
15 mM MgCl2, 100 µM
[ Luciferase Assays--
For luciferase reporter assays, cells
were transiently transfected with p3TP-Lux, which contains
TGF- Smad Association Assays--
C2C12 cells cotransfected with
hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged XSmad2, Myc-tagged XSmad4, and the indicated
plasmids were treated with TGF- Recent studies have shown that TAK1 can activate the p38 and
SAPK/JNK pathways in vitro and when overexpressed in cells
(34-36), but the physiological significance of this reaction is
unclear. Because TAK1 has been shown to function as a mediator of the
TGF- To test possible involvement of the p38 pathway in the induction of
gene expression by TGF-
Involvement of the p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Pathway
in Transforming Growth Factor-
-induced Gene Expression*
,
,
,
**
Department of Biophysics, Graduate
School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku,
Kyoto 606-8502, Japan, the § Department of Molecular
Biology, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku,
Nagoya 464-01, Japan, the ¶ Division of Morphogenesis,
Department of Developmental Biology, National Institute for Basic
Biology, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan, and the
Department of
Microbiology, Kansai Medical University, Moriguchi-shi,
Osaka 570, Japan
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(TGF-
)-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), a member of the mitogen-activated
protein kinase kinase kinase family, is suggested to be involved in
TGF-
-induced gene expression, but the signaling mechanism from TAK1
to the nucleus remains largely undefined. We have found that p38
mitogen-activated protein kinase, and its direct activator MKK6 are
rapidly activated in response to TGF-
. Expression of dominant
negative MKK6 or dominant negative TAK1 inhibited the TGF-
-induced
transcriptional activation as well as the p38 activation. Constitutive
activation of the p38 pathway in the absence of TGF-
induced the
transcriptional activation, which was enhanced synergistically by
coexpression of Smad2 and Smad4 and was inhibited by expression of the
C-terminal truncated, dominant negative Smad4. Furthermore, we have
found that activating transcription factor-2 (ATF-2), which is known as
a nuclear target of p38, becomes phosphorylated in the N-terminal
activation domain in response to TGF-
, that ATF-2 forms a complex
with Smad4, and that the complex formation is enhanced by TGF-
. In
addition, expression of a nonphosphorylatable form of ATF-2 inhibited
the TGF-
-induced transcriptional activation. These results show that the p38 pathway is activated by TGF-
and is involved in the
TGF-
-induced transcriptional activation by regulating the
Smad-mediated pathway.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(TGF-
)1 superfamily
regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. They exert
their effects through heteromeric receptor complexes consisting of type
I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors. Following ligand
binding, the type II receptor phosphorylates the type I receptor to
activate it (1, 2). Intracellular signaling downstream of these
receptor complexes is mediated by the recently identified Smad family.
To date, at least nine vertebrate Smad proteins have been identified
(1-5). Each member of the Smad family has different roles in
signaling. For example, the receptor-regulated Smads, Smad1, -2, -3, -5, and -8, are phosphorylated within a conserved C-terminal SS(V/M)S
motif by the specific type I receptors (6-14) and then associate with
the common Smad, Smad4, which in turn translocates into the nucleus (6,
7, 10, 12, 15-20). Following nuclear translocation, Smads induce
transcriptional activation of specific target genes through cooperation
with other transcriptional factors. The Smad2·Smad4 complex interacts
with the Mix.2 promoter through FAST1, a transcription factor that binds to an activin response element, and interacts with the goosecoid promoter through FAST2/FAST1 (21-24). Similarly, at AP-1 binding sites
in the promoter of TGF-
-responsive genes, the Smad3·Smad4 complex
interacts with c-Jun/c-Fos (25). Other transcription factors and
coactivators such as TFE3, cAMP-response element-binding protein-binding protein/p300, and cAMP-response element-binding protein
have been shown to interact with Smad complexes (25-31). Thus, the
mechanism of transcriptional activation by Smads is likely, at least
partly, based on the interaction with other transcription factors.
signaling pathway (32, 33), the signaling mechanism to the nucleus remains largely undefined. TAK1 is a potent activator of the p38 pathway and
the SAPK/JNK pathway (34-36). However, it is not known whether TAK1
actually acts as a physiological activator of these signaling pathways
in vivo. Recently, it was reported that the SAPK/JNK pathway
is required for TGF-
-mediated signaling (36-38). But the activation
of SAPK/JNK by TGF-
is maximal 12 h after stimulation, whereas
TGF-
induces the activation of TAK1 within 15 min. These results
seemed to imply that TAK1 is not a direct activator of the SAPK/JNK
pathway in TGF-
signaling. Thus we have investigated which pathway
plays a pivotal role downstream of TAK1 in TGF-
signaling.
Furthermore, we have examined the possible functional link between the
Smad and TAK1 pathways in TGF-
signaling. Here we report that the
MKK6-p38 kinase cascade appears to lie downstream of TAK1 in TGF-
signaling, and the transcription factor ATF-2 functions as one of
targets of this pathway. ATF-2 can associate with Smad4 in response to
TGF-
. Our results suggest that TGF-
activates the Smad and TAK1
pathways, resulting in the formation of an active transcription complex
containing Smad4 and ATF-2.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP, and 3 µg of His-tagged kinase-negative
MPK-2 or glutathione S-transferase-tagged ATF-2. Samples
were incubated at 30 °C for 20 min. Reactions were terminated by the
addition of sample buffer and boiling. Substrate phosphorylations were
detected and quantified by autoradiography and image analysis
(Bio-Rad).
-responsive elements (40), pCMV
-gal, and the indicated
constructs or with empty vector alone. The total amount of DNA for each
transfection was kept constant using empty vector. Cells were treated
for 15-20 h with or without 5-10 ng/ml TGF-
, and luciferase
activity in cell lysates was measured using the luciferase assay system
(Promega) in a Berthold Lumat LB 9507 luminometer. To determine
transfection efficiency in each assay,
-galactosidase activity was
measured according to the protocol of Promega, and the data were
normalized for
-galactosidase activity.
for 60 min and then were lysed in
TNE buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 20 µg/ml aprotinin.
The total amount of DNA for each transfection was kept constant using
empty vector. Cell lysates were subjected to anti-Myc
immunoprecipitation as described above. XSmad complexes in the
immunoprecipitates and in total lysates were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by immunoblotting
as indicated.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-induced transcriptional activation (32), we investigated
whether p38 or SAPK/JNK also functions in TGF-
signaling. To
determine whether p38 or SAPK/JNK is activated in response to TGF-
,
we first tested these kinase activities using antibodies specific for
the phosphorylated forms of p38 or SAPK/JNK, respectively. The
immunoblotting of whole cell extracts showed that slight activation of
p38 was detected within 15 min of TGF-
stimulation, and marked
activation was observed at 30-60 min in C2C12 cells (Fig.
1A, TGF-
,
P-p38). The level of the activation was about one-fourth
or one-fifth of the maximal activation that was attained by osmotic
shock (Fig. 1A, NaCl). The total amount of p38
was unchanged during stimulation (Fig. 1A,
p38). In contrast to p38, there was no apparent
activation of SAPK/JNK within 60 min of TGF-
stimulation (Fig.
1A,
P-SAPK/JNK). Essentially identical results
were obtained in Mv1Lu cells and HaCaT cells (data not shown). Then we
focused on the p38 pathway. We have previously demonstrated that MKK6,
a member of the MAP kinase kinase family, can act as a strong activator
of p38 (34, 39). We tested whether MKK6 is also activated by TGF-
in
C2C12 cells. The anti-phospho immunoblotting of whole cell extracts showed that activation of MKK6 was observed within 15 min of TGF-
stimulation and peaked at 45 min (Fig. 1B). The slight
activation of MKK3, another activator of p38, was also observed (Fig.
1B). The total amounts of MKK6 and MKK3 did not change
during stimulation (Fig. 1B). Next, Myc epitope-tagged MKK6
or p38 was transiently transfected into C2C12 cells. After treatment of
the cells with TGF-
, their activities were determined by in
vitro kinase assays using kinase-negative MPK-2 and ATF-2,
respectively, as substrates. Both the transfected MKK6 and the
transfected p38 were activated in response to TGF-
, with the time
courses of their activation being the same as those of endogenous MKK6
and p38 (Fig. 1C, cf. Fig. 1, A and
B). The TGF-
-induced activation of MKK6 was blocked by
expression of dominant negative TAK1, TAK1(K63W) (Fig. 1D, upper left panel). The TGF-
-induced activation of p38 was
also blocked by expression of TAK1(K63W). It was inhibited by
expression of dominant negative TGF-
type I receptor, T
RI(K232R)
or by that of dominant negative MKK6, MKK6(AA) (Fig. 1D,
upper right panel). The anti-phospho immunoblotting of whole
cell extracts showed that the activation of endogenous p38 by TGF-
was also inhibited by expression of T
RI(K232R), TAK1(K63W), or
MKK6(AA) (Fig. 1D, lower panel). In these
experiments, transfection efficiencies of dominant negative constructs
were ~50% and endogenous p38 in whole cells was assayed, so it is
reasonable that only partial inhibitions were seen, and about 50%
inhibitions seen might mean almost complete inhibition. These results
demonstrate that the MKK6-p38 cascade is activated in response to
TGF-
through TAK1.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Activation of MKK6 and p38 by
TGF-
treatment. A, TGF-
stimulates the kinase activity of p38, but not SAPK/JNK, rapidly. C2C12
cells were exposed to TGF-
(20 ng/ml) or NaCl (0.7 M)
for the indicated times. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with
polyclonal antibody to phospho-p38 (
P-p38)
(Thr180/Tyr182) or phospho-SAPK/JNK
(
P-SAPK/JNK) (Thr183/Tyr185),
respectively (Biolabs). That the amounts of p38 and SAPK/JNK proteins
were unchanged was confirmed by immunoblotting total cell lysates using
anti-p38 antibody (
p38) and anti-SAPK/JNK
(
SAPK/JNK) antibody (Biolabs). Essentially the same
results were obtained in three independent experiments. B,
activation of MKK6 by TGF-
is shown. C2C12 cells were exposed to
TGF-
(20 ng/ml) or NaCl (0.7 M) for the indicated times.
Cell lysates were immunoblotted with polyclonal antibody to
phospho-MKK3/6 (
P-MKK3/6)
(Ser189/Ser207) (Biolabs). That the amount of
MKK6 or MKK3 protein was unchanged was confirmed by immunoblotting
total cell lysates using anti-MKK6 monoclonal antibody
(
MKK6) (39) or anti-MKK3 polyclonal antibody
(
MKK3) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), respectively.
Essentially the same results were obtained in two independent
experiments. C, activation of MKK6 and p38 by TGF-
treatment is shown. C2C12 cells were transiently transfected with
pSR
-Myc-MKK6 (2.0 µg). After 24 h, the cells were stimulated
with TGF-
(10 ng/ml) or NaCl (0.7 M) for the indicated
times prior to harvesting. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
anti-Myc 9E10 antibody (
Myc), and immunoprecipitates were
subjected to in vitro kinase assay using His-tagged
kinase-negative MPK-2 (KN-MPK2) as substrate. The
phosphorylated proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and visualized by autoradiography (upper
panel). C2C12 cells transiently transfected with pSR
-Myc-p38
(2.0 µg) were stimulated with TGF-
(10 ng/ml), and the anti-Myc
immunoprecipitations were subjected to in vitro kinase assay
using glutathione S-transferase-tagged ATF-2 as substrate
(lower panel). That an equal amount of MKK6 or p38 was
immunoprecipitated was confirmed by immunoblotting of the
immunoprecipitations. Essentially the same results were obtained in
three independent experiments. D, effect of the dominant
negative forms of various kinases on TGF-
-induced MKK6 and p38
activation is shown. C2C12 cells were transiently transfected with
pSR
-Myc-MKK6 (1.0 µg) together with an empty vector or pEF
TAK1(K63W) kinase-dead mutant (each 1.0 µg). After 24 h, the
cells were stimulated with TGF-
(10 ng/ml) for 45 min and then were
subjected to in vitro kinase assay as described above
(upper left panel). C2C12 cells were transiently
transfected with pSR
-Myc-p38 (1.0 µg) in the presence of
expression vectors encoding T
RI(K232R), TAK1(K63W), MKK6(AA), or
pSR
vector alone (each 1.0 µg). After 24 h, the cells were
left untreated or treated with TGF-
(10 ng/ml) for 1 h prior to
harvesting. Kinase activities of p38 were measured as described above
(upper right panel). C2C12 cells were transiently
transfected with indicated expression vectors encoding T
RI(K232R),
TAK1(K63W), MKK6(AA), or pSR
vector alone (each 2.0 µg). After
24 h, the cells were stimulated with TGF-
(10 ng/ml) for 1 h and then the cell lysates were immunoblotted with the polyclonal
antibody to phospho-p38 (
P-p38)
(Thr180/Tyr182) (lower panel).
Nearly the same results were obtained in three independent
experiments.
, we examined the effect of dominant negative
mutants of TAK1 and MKK6 on TGF-
-induced transcriptional activation.
We used the p3TP-Lux reporter construct containing a luciferase gene
controlled by a TGF-
-inducible promoter (40). Transient transfection
of p3TP-Lux into Mv1Lu cells resulted in a strong induction of
luciferase activity in response to TGF-
(Fig.
2A). Cotransfection of an
expression plasmid encoding TAK1(K63W) or MKK6(AA) inhibited activation
of 3TP promoter by TGF-
in Mv1Lu cells (Fig. 2A). Similar
results were obtained with C2C12 cells, and the inhibitory effect of
MKK6(AA) on transcriptional activation by TGF-
was
dose-dependent (Fig. 2A). Cotransfection of a
plasmid encoding CL100, which is a dual-specificity phosphatase acting on members of the MAP kinase superfamily including p38, also resulted in inhibition of the transcriptional activation by TGF-
(data not
shown). Moreover, expression of a constitutively active MKK6, MKK6(DE),
induced the transcriptional activation in the absence of TGF-
, and
coexpression of p38 enhanced this transcriptional activation (Fig.
2B). These results indicate that a kinase cascade consisting
of TAK1, MKK6, and p38 is involved in the induction of gene expression
by TGF-
.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effect of the TAK1-MKK6-p38 pathway on
TGF-
-induced transcriptional activation.
Mv1Lu or C2C12 cells were transfected with p3TP-Lux (0.2 µg) together
with the indicated plasmids (0.6 µg) and treated with or without
TGF-
(5 ng/ml). After 20 h, cells were harvested and assayed
for luciferase activity. The relative luciferase activities (means ± S.D.; n = 3) are presented. A, left
panel, Mv1Lu cells were cotransfected with an empty vector alone
or with expression vectors encoding wild type TAK1 (WT),
dominant negative TAK1(K63W), wild type MKK6(WT), or dominant negative
MKK6(AA), respectively. Right panel, C2C12 cells were
cotransfected with MKK6(WT) or various amounts of MKK6(AA).
B, dose-dependent effect of the activated MKK6
on transcriptional activity is shown. C2C12 cells cotransfected with an
empty vector alone, with various amounts of the activated MKK6(DE), or
with the indicated combinations of MKK6(WT) and p38. These experiments
were repeated three times, and the data shown were
representative.
Because it has been shown that Smad proteins play an essential role in
TGF-
signaling, we examined the relationship between the Smad and
p38 pathways. As previously reported (12, 16, 17), overexpression of
Smad2 and Smad4 induced activation of the 3TP promoter in the absence
of TGF-
. Although expression of either TAK1(WT) or MKK6(DE) induced
some modest increase of transcriptional activation, coexpression with
Smad2 and Smad4 resulted in a strong induction of 3TP promoter
activation (Fig. 3). Coexpression of
Smad2 and Smad4 along with TAK1 and TAB1, which is an activator of
TAK1, resulted in further synergetic activation of 3TP promoter, and
this activation was enhanced by expression of MKK6 (data not shown). As
shown in Fig. 4A, the MKK6(DE)-induced transcriptional activation was effectively inhibited by the C-terminal truncated type of Smad4 (Smad4
C), which
is known as the dominant interfering type of Smad4. On the other hand,
TAK1(K63W) and MKK6(AA) scarcely inhibited the transcriptional activation induced by overexpression of Smad2 and Smad4 (Fig. 4B). In a control experiment, coexpression of Smad4
C
completely abolished the Smad2/4-induced transcriptional activation
(Fig. 4B). These results suggest that the TAK1-MKK6-p38
pathway interacts cooperatively with the Smad pathway to mediate
signaling of TGF-
to the nucleus and that the signaling of the p38
pathway requires the Smad pathway.
|
|
To investigate the possibility that p38 might regulate Smad proteins
directly, we tested the effect of the TAK1-MKK6-p38 pathway on
association of Smad2 and Smad4 in response to TGF-
. Coexpression of
Smad2 and Smad4 in C2C12 cells resulted in formation of a heteromeric complex in a TGF-
stimulation-dependent manner (Fig.
4C). This association was significantly decreased in the
presence of T
RI(KR), the dominant interfering T
RI mutant. In
contrast, coexpression of TAK1(K63W) or MKK6(AA) did not affect the
association (Fig. 4C). A constitutively active TAK1,
NTAK1, did not affect it either (Fig. 4C). These results
suggest that the TAK1-MKK6-p38 pathway does not directly regulate the
association of Smads.
As the other likely mechanism by which the TAK1-MKK6-p38 pathway
regulates the TGF-
-induced transcriptional activation, we then
hypothesized the possibility of p38-mediated phosphorylation of
transcription factors. The 3TP promoter contains three consecutive 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate response elements and a
portion of the plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 promoter region that contains putative AP-1 sites (40). Among the transcription factors known to bind to the AP-1 element, ATF-2 has been shown to be phosphorylated by p38 on Thr69 and Thr71
(41-43). Phosphorylation of ATF-2 on these sites causes an increase in
transcriptional activity in vivo (41-43). To determine
whether TGF-
stimulates phosphorylation of ATF-2 at these threonine
residues, we analyzed phosphorylation at these sites using an antibody
specific for the Thr71-phosphorylated form of ATF-2.
Little, if any, phospho-ATF-2 was detected in Mv1Lu cells in the
absence of TGF-
signaling, whereas TGF-
treatment stimulated the
phosphorylation of endogenous ATF-2 on Thr71 (Fig.
5A). We next analyzed the
effect of the TAK1 pathway on the phosphorylation of ATF-2 in human
embryonic kidney epithelial 293 cells, which lack any detectable
expression of the endogenous TGF-
type II receptor (T
RII) (44).
When 293 cells were transiently transfected with HA epitope-tagged
ATF-2, T
RI, and T
RII and treated with TGF-
, we observed
TGF-
-stimulated phosphorylation of ATF-2 (Fig. 5B,
left). Some phosphorylation of ATF-2 in the absence of
ligand is also observed and is likely caused by overexpression of
T
RI and T
RII in 293 cells, which drives their ligand-independent association and consequent activation of T
RI. Activation of TAK1 by
cotransfection of TAB1 and TAK1 caused enhanced phosphorylation of
ATF-2 (Fig. 5B, right). These results suggest
that ATF-2 phosphorylation in response to TGF-
signaling is mediated
by the TAK1 pathway. This is consistent with the observation that TAK1
regulates the MKK6-p38 cascade. Because ATF-2 is localized in the
nucleus, it is likely that TGF-
stimulation induces the nuclear
accumulation of Smads and consequent association with ATF-2. To examine
this possibility, we tested the interaction between ATF-2 and Smad4. Coexpression of ATF-2 and Smad4 in COS7 cells resulted in formation of
a complex, and this association was enhanced in response to TGF-
(Fig. 5C). Furthermore, overexpression of
ATF-2(Ala69/Ala71), a nonphosphorylated form of
ATF-2 in which Thr69 and Thr71 are replaced by
alanine residues, inhibited transcriptional activation induced by
TGF-
(Fig. 5D). Taken together, these observations suggest that Smad complexes and phosphorylated ATF-2 participate in a
complex that binds to DNA sequences present in the region of p3TP-Lux,
resulting in its transcriptional activation.
|
The present and previous studies have demonstrated that the TGF-
signal activates two independent pathways, the TAK1-mediated and the
Smad-mediated pathways (2, 32, 34, 35, 45). In the Smad pathway,
TGF-
stimulation leads to the direct phosphorylation of Smad2 and
Smad3 by the type I receptor kinase, consequent hetero-oligomer formation with Smad4, and accumulation in the nucleus (9, 11-13, 46,
47). Our results indicate that in the TAK1 pathway TGF-
activates
the TAK1-MKK6-p38 kinase cascade leading to the phosphorylation of
ATF-2, and ATF-2 associates with Smad4 in response to TGF-
. Therefore, Smad complexes and phosphorylated ATF-2 may interact in a
nucleoprotein complex that associates with DNA and activates transcription of TGF-
-responsive genes. Two papers reporting a
similar conclusion appeared after submission of this article (48, 49).
In our study, dominant negative Smad4 could inhibit the p38
pathway-dependent transcriptional activation efficiently, although dominant negative TAK1 or dominant negative MKK6 could not
inhibit the Smad2·Smad4-induced transcriptional activation. Thus, the
Smad pathway is essential. It is likely that the affinity of Smad2 and
Smad4 for DNA in the absence of TGF-
is low or insufficient, and
other transcription factors such as ATF-2 may enhance or stabilize Smad·DNA complexes in a ligand-dependent manner.
Overexpression of Smad2 and Smad4 may be sufficient for efficient
binding to DNA even in the absence of TGF-
to activate transcription
of target genes. On the other hand, expression of a nonphosphorylated form of ATF-2 could inhibit the TGF-
-induced transcriptional activation completely, whereas dominant negative MKK6 could inhibit it
significantly but not completely. It is possible that other MAP
kinase-related pathways such as JNK/SAPK and classical MAP kinase
pathways are involved in the transcriptional activation through
phosphorylation of ATF-2 or ATF-2-related transcriptional factors.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank R. Derynck, S. Ishii, J. Massague, D. A. Melton, K. Miyazono, and J. L. Wrana for materials.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan (to E. N.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 81-75-753-4235; E-mail: L50174@sakura.kudpc.kyoto-u. ac.jp.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
TGF-
, transforming growth factor-
;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
TAK1, TGF-
-activated kinase 1;
SAPK, stress-activated protein kinase;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
ATF-2, activating transcription factor-2;
TAB1, TAK1-binding protein;
HA, hemagglutinin;
T
RI, TGF-
type I
receptor;
T
RII, TGF-
type II receptor;
Mv1Lu, mink lung epithelial..
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Massague, J. (1996) Cell 85, 947-950[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Heldin, C.-H., Miyazono, K., and ten Dijke, P. (1997) Nature 390, 465-471[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Derynck, R., and Feng, X. H. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1333, 105-150 |
| 4. | Attisano, L., and Wrana, J. L. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 188-194[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Whitman, M.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2445-2462 |
| 6. | Eppert, K., Scherer, S. W., Ozcelik, H., Pirone, R., Hoodless, P., Kim, H., Tsui, L. C., Bapat, B., Gallinger, S., Andrulis, I. L., Thomsen, G. H., Wrana, J. L., and Attisano, L. (1996) Cell 86, 543-552[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Hoodless, P. A., Haerry, T., Abdollah, S., Stapleton, M., O'Connor, M. B., Attisano, L., and Wrana, J. L. (1996) Cell 85, 489-500[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Lechleider, R. J.,
de Caestecker, M. P.,
Dehejia, A.,
Polymeropoulos, M. H.,
and Roberts, A. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17617-17620 |
| 9. |
Abdollah, S.,
Macias-Silva, M.,
Tsukazaki, T.,
Hayashi, H.,
Attisano, L.,
and Wrana, J. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27678-27685 |
| 10. |
Kretzschmar, M.,
Liu, F.,
Hata, A.,
Doody, J.,
and Massague, J.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
984-995 |
| 11. |
Liu, X.,
Sun, Y.,
Constantinescu, S. N.,
Karam, E.,
Weinberg, R. A.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10669-10674 |
| 12. | Nakao, A., Imamura, T., Souchelnytskyi, S., Kawabata, M., Ishisaki, A., Oeda, E., Tamaki, K., Hanai, J., Heldin, C.-H., Miyazono, K., and ten Dijke, P. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 5353-5362[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Nakao, A.,
Roijer, E.,
Imamura, T.,
Souchelnytskyi, S.,
Stenman, G.,
Heldin, C.-H.,
and ten Dijke, P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2896-2900 |
| 14. |
Souchelnytskyi, S.,
Tamaki, K.,
Engstrom, U.,
Wernstedt, C.,
ten Dijke, P.,
and Heldin, C.-H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28107-28115 |
| 15. | Lagna, G., Hata, A., Hemmati-Brivanlou, A., and Massague, J. (1996) Nature 383, 832-836[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Liu, F., Hata, A., Baker, J. C., Doody, J., Carcamo, J., Harland, R. M., and Massague, J. (1996) Nature 381, 620-623[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Zhang, Y., Feng, X., We, R., and Derynck, R. (1996) Nature 383, 168-172[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Wu, R. Y., Zhang, Y., Feng, X. H., and Derynck, R. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2521-2528[Abstract] |
| 19. | Zhang, Y., Musci, T., and Derynck, R. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 270-276[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Kawabata, M., Inoue, H., Hanyu, A., Imamura, T., and Miyazono, K. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4056-4065[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Chen, X., Rubock, M. J., and Whitman, M. (1996) Nature 383, 691-696[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Labbe, E., Silvestri, C., Hoodless, P. A., Wrana, J. L., and Attisano, L. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 109-120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Zhou, S., Zawel, L., Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 121-127[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Liu, F.,
Pouponnot, C.,
and Massague, J.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
3157-3167 |
| 25. | Zhang, Y., Feng, X. H., and Derynck, R. (1998) Nature 394, 909-913[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Hua, X.,
Liu, X.,
Ansari, D. O.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
3084-3095 |
| 27. |
Feng, X. H.,
Zhang, Y.,
Wu, R. Y.,
and Derynck, R.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2153-2163 |
| 28. |
Janknecht, R.,
Wells, N. J.,
and Hunter, T.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2114-2119 |
| 29. |
Pouponnot, C.,
Jayaraman, L.,
and Massague, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22865-22868 |
| 30. |
Topper, J. N.,
DiChiara, M. R.,
Brown, J. D.,
Williams, A. J.,
Falb, D.,
Collins, T.,
and Gimbrone, M. A., Jr.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9506-9511 |
| 31. |
Szuts, D.,
Eresh, S.,
and Bienz, M.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2022-2035 |
| 32. |
Yamaguchi, K.,
Shirakabe, K.,
Shibuya, H.,
Irie, K.,
Oishi, I.,
Ueno, N.,
Taniguchi, T.,
Nishida, E.,
and Matsumoto, K.
(1995)
Science
270,
2008-2011 |
| 33. | Shibuya, H., Yamaguchi, K., Shirakabe, K., Tonegawa, A., Gotoh, Y., Ueno, N., Irie, K., Nishida, E., and Matsumoto, K. (1996) Science 272, 1179-1182[Abstract] |
| 34. |
Moriguchi, T.,
Kuroyanagi, N.,
Yamaguchi, K.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Irie, K.,
Kano, T.,
Shirakabe, K.,
Muro, Y.,
Shibuya, H.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Nishida, E.,
and Hagiwara, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13675-13679 |
| 35. |
Shirakabe, K.,
Yamaguchi, K.,
Shibuya, H.,
Irie, K.,
Matsuda, S.,
Moriguchi, T.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Matsumoto, K.,
and Nishida, E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8141-8144 |
| 36. |
Wang, W.,
Zhou, G.,
Hu, M. C.-T.,
Yao, Z.,
and Tan, T. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22771-22775 |
| 37. |
Atfi, A.,
Buisine, M.,
Mazars, A.,
and Gespach, C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24731-24734 |
| 38. |
Atfi, A.,
Djelloul, S.,
Chastre, E.,
Davis, R.,
and Gespach, C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1429-1432 |
| 39. |
Moriguchi, T.,
Toyoshima, F.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Iwamatsu, A.,
Irie, K.,
Mori, E.,
Kuroyanagi, N.,
Hagiwara, M.,
Matsumoto, K.,
and Nishida, E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26981-26988 |
| 40. | Wrana, J. L., Attisano, L., Carcamo, J., Zentella, A., Doody, J., Laiho, M., Wang, X. F., and Massague, J. (1992) Cell 71, 1003-1014[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Livingstone, C., Patel, G., and Jones, N. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1785-1797[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. |
Gupta, S.,
Campbell, D.,
Derijard, B.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1995)
Science
267,
389-393 |
| 43. | van Dam, H., Wilhelm, D., Herr, I., Steffen, A., Herrlich, P., and Angel, P. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1798-1811[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Ebner, R.,
Chen, R. H.,
Shum, L.,
Lawler, S.,
Zioncheck, T. F.,
Lee, A.,
Lopez, A. R.,
and Derynck, R.
(1993)
Science
260,
1344-1348 |
| 45. | Shibuya, H., Iwata, H., Masuyama, N., Gotoh, Y., Yamaguchi, K., Irie, K., Matsumoto, K., Nishida, E., and Ueno, N. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1019-1028[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. | Macias-Silva, M., Abdollah, S., Hoodless, P. A., Pirone, R., Attisano, L., and Wrana, J. L. (1996) Cell 87, 1215-1224[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. | Souchelnytskyi, S., ten Dijke, P., Miyazono, K., and Heldin, C.-H. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6231-6240[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. |
Sano, Y.,
Harada, J.,
Tashiro, S.,
Gotoh-Mandeville, R.,
Maekawa, T.,
and Ishii, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8949-8957 |
| 49. |
Adachi-Yamada, T.,
Nakamura, M.,
Irie, K.,
Tomoyasu, Y.,
Sano, Y.,
Mori, E.,
Gotoh, S.,
Ueno, N.,
Nishida, Y.,
and Matsumoto, K.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
2322-2329 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Inagaki, E. Omori, J.-Y. Kim, Y. Komatsu, G. Scott, M. K. Ray, G. Yamada, K. Matsumoto, Y. Mishina, and J. Ninomiya-Tsuji TAK1-binding Protein 1, TAB1, Mediates Osmotic Stress-induced TAK1 Activation but Is Dispensable for TAK1-mediated Cytokine Signaling J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2008; 283(48): 33080 - 33086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Al-Salleeh and T. M. Petro Promoter Analysis Reveals Critical Roles for SMAD-3 and ATF-2 in Expression of IL-23 p19 in Macrophages J. Immunol., October 1, 2008; 181(7): 4523 - 4533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-k. Khimji, R. Shao, and D. C. Rockey Divergent Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling in Hepatic Stellate Cells after Liver Injury: Functional Effects on ECE-1 Regulation Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2008; 173(3): 716 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kajino-Sakamoto, M. Inagaki, E. Lippert, S. Akira, S. Robine, K. Matsumoto, C. Jobin, and J. Ninomiya-Tsuji Enterocyte-Derived TAK1 Signaling Prevents Epithelium Apoptosis and the Development of Ileitis and Colitis J. Immunol., July 15, 2008; 181(2): 1143 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Miller, S. E. Alvarez, S. Spiegel, and D. A. Lebman Sphingosine Kinases and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Are Critical for Transforming Growth Factor {beta}-Induced Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1 and 2 Activation and Promotion of Migration and Invasion of Esophageal Cancer Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2008; 28(12): 4142 - 4151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Kim, J. H. Kwak, L. Wang, and M. E. Choi Protein Phosphatase 2A Is a Negative Regulator of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1-induced TAK1 Activation in Mesangial Cells J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10753 - 10763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. C. Chow, H. Dong, K. T. Quach, P. N. Van Nguyen, K. Chen, and J. M. Carethers TGF-{beta} mediates PTEN suppression and cell motility through calcium-dependent PKC-{alpha} activation in pancreatic cancer cells Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): G899 - G905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Neil and W. P. Schiemann Altered TAB1:I{kappa}B Kinase Interaction Promotes Transforming Growth Factor {beta}-Mediated Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Activation during Breast Cancer Progression Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 68(5): 1462 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Liu, R. R. Warburton, O. E. Guevara, N. S. Hill, B. L. Fanburg, M. Gaestel, and U. S. Kayyali Lack of MK2 Inhibits Myofibroblast Formation and Exacerbates Pulmonary Fibrosis Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., November 1, 2007; 37(5): 507 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lu, J. Lee, M. Revelo, X. Wang, S. Lu, and Z. Dong Smad3 Is Overexpressed in Advanced Human Prostate Cancer and Necessary for Progressive Growth of Prostate Cancer Cells in Nude Mice Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5692 - 5702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |