JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanafusa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nishida, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanafusa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nishida, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 27161-27167, September 17, 1999


Involvement of the p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Pathway in Transforming Growth Factor-beta -induced Gene Expression*

Hiroshi HanafusaDagger , Jun Ninomiya-Tsuji§, Norihisa MasuyamaDagger , Michiru Nishita, Jun-ichi Fujisawaparallel , Hiroshi Shibuya, Kunihiro Matsumoto§, and Eisuke NishidaDagger **

From the Dagger  Department of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan, the § Department of Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-01, Japan, the  Division of Morphogenesis, Department of Developmental Biology, National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan, and the parallel  Department of Microbiology, Kansai Medical University, Moriguchi-shi, Osaka 570, Japan

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta )-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), a member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase family, is suggested to be involved in TGF-beta -induced gene expression, but the signaling mechanism from TAK1 to the nucleus remains largely undefined. We have found that p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, and its direct activator MKK6 are rapidly activated in response to TGF-beta . Expression of dominant negative MKK6 or dominant negative TAK1 inhibited the TGF-beta -induced transcriptional activation as well as the p38 activation. Constitutive activation of the p38 pathway in the absence of TGF-beta induced the transcriptional activation, which was enhanced synergistically by coexpression of Smad2 and Smad4 and was inhibited by expression of the C-terminal truncated, dominant negative Smad4. Furthermore, we have found that activating transcription factor-2 (ATF-2), which is known as a nuclear target of p38, becomes phosphorylated in the N-terminal activation domain in response to TGF-beta , that ATF-2 forms a complex with Smad4, and that the complex formation is enhanced by TGF-beta . In addition, expression of a nonphosphorylatable form of ATF-2 inhibited the TGF-beta -induced transcriptional activation. These results show that the p38 pathway is activated by TGF-beta and is involved in the TGF-beta -induced transcriptional activation by regulating the Smad-mediated pathway.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Members of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta )1 superfamily regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. They exert their effects through heteromeric receptor complexes consisting of type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors. Following ligand binding, the type II receptor phosphorylates the type I receptor to activate it (1, 2). Intracellular signaling downstream of these receptor complexes is mediated by the recently identified Smad family. To date, at least nine vertebrate Smad proteins have been identified (1-5). Each member of the Smad family has different roles in signaling. For example, the receptor-regulated Smads, Smad1, -2, -3, -5, and -8, are phosphorylated within a conserved C-terminal SS(V/M)S motif by the specific type I receptors (6-14) and then associate with the common Smad, Smad4, which in turn translocates into the nucleus (6, 7, 10, 12, 15-20). Following nuclear translocation, Smads induce transcriptional activation of specific target genes through cooperation with other transcriptional factors. The Smad2·Smad4 complex interacts with the Mix.2 promoter through FAST1, a transcription factor that binds to an activin response element, and interacts with the goosecoid promoter through FAST2/FAST1 (21-24). Similarly, at AP-1 binding sites in the promoter of TGF-beta -responsive genes, the Smad3·Smad4 complex interacts with c-Jun/c-Fos (25). Other transcription factors and coactivators such as TFE3, cAMP-response element-binding protein-binding protein/p300, and cAMP-response element-binding protein have been shown to interact with Smad complexes (25-31). Thus, the mechanism of transcriptional activation by Smads is likely, at least partly, based on the interaction with other transcription factors.

Although previous studies indicated that TAK1, a member of the MAP kinase kinase kinase family, is involved in the TGF-beta signaling pathway (32, 33), the signaling mechanism to the nucleus remains largely undefined. TAK1 is a potent activator of the p38 pathway and the SAPK/JNK pathway (34-36). However, it is not known whether TAK1 actually acts as a physiological activator of these signaling pathways in vivo. Recently, it was reported that the SAPK/JNK pathway is required for TGF-beta -mediated signaling (36-38). But the activation of SAPK/JNK by TGF-beta is maximal 12 h after stimulation, whereas TGF-beta induces the activation of TAK1 within 15 min. These results seemed to imply that TAK1 is not a direct activator of the SAPK/JNK pathway in TGF-beta signaling. Thus we have investigated which pathway plays a pivotal role downstream of TAK1 in TGF-beta signaling. Furthermore, we have examined the possible functional link between the Smad and TAK1 pathways in TGF-beta signaling. Here we report that the MKK6-p38 kinase cascade appears to lie downstream of TAK1 in TGF-beta signaling, and the transcription factor ATF-2 functions as one of targets of this pathway. ATF-2 can associate with Smad4 in response to TGF-beta . Our results suggest that TGF-beta activates the Smad and TAK1 pathways, resulting in the formation of an active transcription complex containing Smad4 and ATF-2.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Antibodies, Immunoblotting, and Immunoprecipitation-- For assaying endogenous p38, SAPK/JNK, MKK6, and ATF-2 activities, 2 × 105 cells were lysed in 150 µl of lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 12.5 mM 2-glycerophosphate, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 10 mM NaF, 0.5% Triton X-100, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 20 µg/ml aprotinin. Cell lysates (20 µl/lane) were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated anti-phospho-specific antibodies. For anti-Myc immunoprecipitations, cell lysates were incubated with anti-Myc 9E10 antibody and protein G-Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 2 h at 4 °C with rocking. The beads were washed three times with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and subjected to kinase assays or association assays.

Cell Cultures and Transfection-- C2C12 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 15% fetal bovine serum. mink lung epithelial (Mv1Lu) cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F-12 containing 5% fetal bovine serum. These cells were transfected using LipofectAMINE according to the manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies, Inc.). For protein kinase assays, we prepared cell lysates from 5 × 105 cells that were transiently transfected with the indicated constructs (~20-50% transfection efficiencies).

Protein Kinase Assays-- Immunocomplex kinase reactions of Myc-MKK6 and Myc-p38 were performed in a final volume of 15 µl containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EGTA, 15 mM MgCl2, 100 µM [gamma -32P]ATP, and 3 µg of His-tagged kinase-negative MPK-2 or glutathione S-transferase-tagged ATF-2. Samples were incubated at 30 °C for 20 min. Reactions were terminated by the addition of sample buffer and boiling. Substrate phosphorylations were detected and quantified by autoradiography and image analysis (Bio-Rad).

Luciferase Assays-- For luciferase reporter assays, cells were transiently transfected with p3TP-Lux, which contains TGF-beta -responsive elements (40), pCMVbeta -gal, and the indicated constructs or with empty vector alone. The total amount of DNA for each transfection was kept constant using empty vector. Cells were treated for 15-20 h with or without 5-10 ng/ml TGF-beta , and luciferase activity in cell lysates was measured using the luciferase assay system (Promega) in a Berthold Lumat LB 9507 luminometer. To determine transfection efficiency in each assay, beta -galactosidase activity was measured according to the protocol of Promega, and the data were normalized for beta -galactosidase activity.

Smad Association Assays-- C2C12 cells cotransfected with hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged XSmad2, Myc-tagged XSmad4, and the indicated plasmids were treated with TGF-beta for 60 min and then were lysed in TNE buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 20 µg/ml aprotinin. The total amount of DNA for each transfection was kept constant using empty vector. Cell lysates were subjected to anti-Myc immunoprecipitation as described above. XSmad complexes in the immunoprecipitates and in total lysates were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by immunoblotting as indicated.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Recent studies have shown that TAK1 can activate the p38 and SAPK/JNK pathways in vitro and when overexpressed in cells (34-36), but the physiological significance of this reaction is unclear. Because TAK1 has been shown to function as a mediator of the TGF-beta -induced transcriptional activation (32), we investigated whether p38 or SAPK/JNK also functions in TGF-beta signaling. To determine whether p38 or SAPK/JNK is activated in response to TGF-beta , we first tested these kinase activities using antibodies specific for the phosphorylated forms of p38 or SAPK/JNK, respectively. The immunoblotting of whole cell extracts showed that slight activation of p38 was detected within 15 min of TGF-beta stimulation, and marked activation was observed at 30-60 min in C2C12 cells (Fig. 1A, TGF-beta , alpha P-p38). The level of the activation was about one-fourth or one-fifth of the maximal activation that was attained by osmotic shock (Fig. 1A, NaCl). The total amount of p38 was unchanged during stimulation (Fig. 1A, alpha p38). In contrast to p38, there was no apparent activation of SAPK/JNK within 60 min of TGF-beta stimulation (Fig. 1A, alpha P-SAPK/JNK). Essentially identical results were obtained in Mv1Lu cells and HaCaT cells (data not shown). Then we focused on the p38 pathway. We have previously demonstrated that MKK6, a member of the MAP kinase kinase family, can act as a strong activator of p38 (34, 39). We tested whether MKK6 is also activated by TGF-beta in C2C12 cells. The anti-phospho immunoblotting of whole cell extracts showed that activation of MKK6 was observed within 15 min of TGF-beta stimulation and peaked at 45 min (Fig. 1B). The slight activation of MKK3, another activator of p38, was also observed (Fig. 1B). The total amounts of MKK6 and MKK3 did not change during stimulation (Fig. 1B). Next, Myc epitope-tagged MKK6 or p38 was transiently transfected into C2C12 cells. After treatment of the cells with TGF-beta , their activities were determined by in vitro kinase assays using kinase-negative MPK-2 and ATF-2, respectively, as substrates. Both the transfected MKK6 and the transfected p38 were activated in response to TGF-beta , with the time courses of their activation being the same as those of endogenous MKK6 and p38 (Fig. 1C, cf. Fig. 1, A and B). The TGF-beta -induced activation of MKK6 was blocked by expression of dominant negative TAK1, TAK1(K63W) (Fig. 1D, upper left panel). The TGF-beta -induced activation of p38 was also blocked by expression of TAK1(K63W). It was inhibited by expression of dominant negative TGF-beta type I receptor, Tbeta RI(K232R) or by that of dominant negative MKK6, MKK6(AA) (Fig. 1D, upper right panel). The anti-phospho immunoblotting of whole cell extracts showed that the activation of endogenous p38 by TGF-beta was also inhibited by expression of Tbeta RI(K232R), TAK1(K63W), or MKK6(AA) (Fig. 1D, lower panel). In these experiments, transfection efficiencies of dominant negative constructs were ~50% and endogenous p38 in whole cells was assayed, so it is reasonable that only partial inhibitions were seen, and about 50% inhibitions seen might mean almost complete inhibition. These results demonstrate that the MKK6-p38 cascade is activated in response to TGF-beta through TAK1.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Activation of MKK6 and p38 by TGF-beta treatment. A, TGF-beta stimulates the kinase activity of p38, but not SAPK/JNK, rapidly. C2C12 cells were exposed to TGF-beta (20 ng/ml) or NaCl (0.7 M) for the indicated times. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with polyclonal antibody to phospho-p38 (alpha P-p38) (Thr180/Tyr182) or phospho-SAPK/JNK (alpha P-SAPK/JNK) (Thr183/Tyr185), respectively (Biolabs). That the amounts of p38 and SAPK/JNK proteins were unchanged was confirmed by immunoblotting total cell lysates using anti-p38 antibody (alpha p38) and anti-SAPK/JNK (alpha SAPK/JNK) antibody (Biolabs). Essentially the same results were obtained in three independent experiments. B, activation of MKK6 by TGF-beta is shown. C2C12 cells were exposed to TGF-beta (20 ng/ml) or NaCl (0.7 M) for the indicated times. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with polyclonal antibody to phospho-MKK3/6 (alpha P-MKK3/6) (Ser189/Ser207) (Biolabs). That the amount of MKK6 or MKK3 protein was unchanged was confirmed by immunoblotting total cell lysates using anti-MKK6 monoclonal antibody (alpha MKK6) (39) or anti-MKK3 polyclonal antibody (alpha MKK3) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), respectively. Essentially the same results were obtained in two independent experiments. C, activation of MKK6 and p38 by TGF-beta treatment is shown. C2C12 cells were transiently transfected with pSRalpha -Myc-MKK6 (2.0 µg). After 24 h, the cells were stimulated with TGF-beta (10 ng/ml) or NaCl (0.7 M) for the indicated times prior to harvesting. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc 9E10 antibody (alpha Myc), and immunoprecipitates were subjected to in vitro kinase assay using His-tagged kinase-negative MPK-2 (KN-MPK2) as substrate. The phosphorylated proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by autoradiography (upper panel). C2C12 cells transiently transfected with pSRalpha -Myc-p38 (2.0 µg) were stimulated with TGF-beta (10 ng/ml), and the anti-Myc immunoprecipitations were subjected to in vitro kinase assay using glutathione S-transferase-tagged ATF-2 as substrate (lower panel). That an equal amount of MKK6 or p38 was immunoprecipitated was confirmed by immunoblotting of the immunoprecipitations. Essentially the same results were obtained in three independent experiments. D, effect of the dominant negative forms of various kinases on TGF-beta -induced MKK6 and p38 activation is shown. C2C12 cells were transiently transfected with pSRalpha -Myc-MKK6 (1.0 µg) together with an empty vector or pEF TAK1(K63W) kinase-dead mutant (each 1.0 µg). After 24 h, the cells were stimulated with TGF-beta (10 ng/ml) for 45 min and then were subjected to in vitro kinase assay as described above (upper left panel). C2C12 cells were transiently transfected with pSRalpha -Myc-p38 (1.0 µg) in the presence of expression vectors encoding Tbeta RI(K232R), TAK1(K63W), MKK6(AA), or pSRalpha vector alone (each 1.0 µg). After 24 h, the cells were left untreated or treated with TGF-beta (10 ng/ml) for 1 h prior to harvesting. Kinase activities of p38 were measured as described above (upper right panel). C2C12 cells were transiently transfected with indicated expression vectors encoding Tbeta RI(K232R), TAK1(K63W), MKK6(AA), or pSRalpha vector alone (each 2.0 µg). After 24 h, the cells were stimulated with TGF-beta (10 ng/ml) for 1 h and then the cell lysates were immunoblotted with the polyclonal antibody to phospho-p38 (alpha P-p38) (Thr180/Tyr182) (lower panel). Nearly the same results were obtained in three independent experiments.

To test possible involvement of the p38 pathway in the induction of gene expression by TGF-beta , we examined the effect of dominant negative mutants of TAK1 and MKK6 on TGF-beta -induced transcriptional activation. We used the p3TP-Lux reporter construct containing a luciferase gene controlled by a TGF-beta -inducible promoter (40). Transient transfection of p3TP-Lux into Mv1Lu cells resulted in a strong induction of luciferase activity in response to TGF-beta (Fig. 2A). Cotransfection of an expression plasmid encoding TAK1(K63W) or MKK6(AA) inhibited activation of 3TP promoter by TGF-beta in Mv1Lu cells (Fig. 2A). Similar results were obtained with C2C12 cells, and the inhibitory effect of MKK6(AA) on transcriptional activation by TGF-beta was dose-dependent (Fig. 2A). Cotransfection of a plasmid encoding CL100, which is a dual-specificity phosphatase acting on members of the MAP kinase superfamily including p38, also resulted in inhibition of the transcriptional activation by TGF-beta (data not shown). Moreover, expression of a constitutively active MKK6, MKK6(DE), induced the transcriptional activation in the absence of TGF-beta , and coexpression of p38 enhanced this transcriptional activation (Fig. 2B). These results indicate that a kinase cascade consisting of TAK1, MKK6, and p38 is involved in the induction of gene expression by TGF-beta .


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effect of the TAK1-MKK6-p38 pathway on TGF-beta -induced transcriptional activation. Mv1Lu or C2C12 cells were transfected with p3TP-Lux (0.2 µg) together with the indicated plasmids (0.6 µg) and treated with or without TGF-beta (5 ng/ml). After 20 h, cells were harvested and assayed for luciferase activity. The relative luciferase activities (means ± S.D.; n = 3) are presented. A, left panel, Mv1Lu cells were cotransfected with an empty vector alone or with expression vectors encoding wild type TAK1 (WT), dominant negative TAK1(K63W), wild type MKK6(WT), or dominant negative MKK6(AA), respectively. Right panel, C2C12 cells were cotransfected with MKK6(WT) or various amounts of MKK6(AA). B, dose-dependent effect of the activated MKK6 on transcriptional activity is shown. C2C12 cells cotransfected with an empty vector alone, with various amounts of the activated MKK6(DE), or with the indicated combinations of MKK6(WT) and p38. These experiments were repeated three times, and the data shown were representative.

Because it has been shown that Smad proteins play an essential role in TGF-beta signaling, we examined the relationship between the Smad and p38 pathways. As previously reported (12, 16, 17), overexpression of Smad2 and Smad4 induced activation of the 3TP promoter in the absence of TGF-beta . Although expression of either TAK1(WT) or MKK6(DE) induced some modest increase of transcriptional activation, coexpression with Smad2 and Smad4 resulted in a strong induction of 3TP promoter activation (Fig. 3). Coexpression of Smad2 and Smad4 along with TAK1 and TAB1, which is an activator of TAK1, resulted in further synergetic activation of 3TP promoter, and this activation was enhanced by expression of MKK6 (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 4A, the MKK6(DE)-induced transcriptional activation was effectively inhibited by the C-terminal truncated type of Smad4 (Smad4Delta C), which is known as the dominant interfering type of Smad4. On the other hand, TAK1(K63W) and MKK6(AA) scarcely inhibited the transcriptional activation induced by overexpression of Smad2 and Smad4 (Fig. 4B). In a control experiment, coexpression of Smad4Delta C completely abolished the Smad2/4-induced transcriptional activation (Fig. 4B). These results suggest that the TAK1-MKK6-p38 pathway interacts cooperatively with the Smad pathway to mediate signaling of TGF-beta to the nucleus and that the signaling of the p38 pathway requires the Smad pathway.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Synergistic effect of the TAK1-MKK6-p38 pathway and Smad proteins on transcriptional activation. C2C12 cells were transfected with p3TP-Lux (0.2 µg) together with the indicated combinations of Smad2 and Smad4 (Smad2/4), wild type TAK1(WT), and MKK6(DE) (each 0.3 µg). After 24 h, cells were harvested and assayed for luciferase activity. The relative luciferase activities (means ± S.D.; n = 3) are presented. The total amount of DNA for each transfection was kept constant (0.8 µg) with an empty vector. The experiment was repeated three times, and the data shown were representative.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Relationship between the TAK1-MKK6-p38 pathway and Smad proteins in TGF-beta signaling. A, effect of the C-terminal truncated type (Delta C) of Smad4 on the activated MKK6(DE)-induced reporter activity is shown. C2C12 cells were transfected with p3TP-Lux (0.2 µg) together with plasmids encoding MKK6(DE) (0.3 µg) and Smad4Delta C (0.3 µg) or an empty vector plasmid. After 24 h, cells were harvested and assayed for luciferase activity. The relative luciferase activities (means ± S.D.; n = 3) are presented. The experiment was repeated three times with similar results. B, effect of dominant negative TAK1 or dominant negative MKK6 on Smad-induced reporter activity is shown. C2C12 cells were transfected with p3TP-Lux (0.2 µg) and the indicated combinations of Smad2 and Smad4 (Smad2/4), Smad4Delta C, TAK1(K63W), and MKK6(AA). After 24 h, cells were harvested and assayed for luciferase activity. The relative luciferase activities (means ± S.D.; n = 3) are presented. The experiment was repeated three times with similar results. C, effect of the TAK1-MKK6-p38 pathway on TGF-beta -induced interaction of Smad2 with Smad4 is shown. C2C12 cells were transfected with SRalpha -HA-Xenopus Smad2 (a gift from Dr. D. A. Melton) and SRalpha -Myc-Xenopus Smad4 together with Tbeta RI(K232R) (Tbeta R1(KR)), TAK1(K63W), or MKK6(AA) or the activated forms of TAK1(Delta N) (Delta NTAK1) as indicated. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-Myc 9E10 antibody and then immunoblotted (IB) using anti-HA Y11 antibody or anti-Myc 9E10 antibody. To confirm equivalent levels of Smad2 expression, aliquots of total lysates were immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody. The experiment was repeated three times with similar results.

To investigate the possibility that p38 might regulate Smad proteins directly, we tested the effect of the TAK1-MKK6-p38 pathway on association of Smad2 and Smad4 in response to TGF-beta . Coexpression of Smad2 and Smad4 in C2C12 cells resulted in formation of a heteromeric complex in a TGF-beta stimulation-dependent manner (Fig. 4C). This association was significantly decreased in the presence of Tbeta RI(KR), the dominant interfering Tbeta RI mutant. In contrast, coexpression of TAK1(K63W) or MKK6(AA) did not affect the association (Fig. 4C). A constitutively active TAK1, Delta NTAK1, did not affect it either (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that the TAK1-MKK6-p38 pathway does not directly regulate the association of Smads.

As the other likely mechanism by which the TAK1-MKK6-p38 pathway regulates the TGF-beta -induced transcriptional activation, we then hypothesized the possibility of p38-mediated phosphorylation of transcription factors. The 3TP promoter contains three consecutive 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate response elements and a portion of the plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 promoter region that contains putative AP-1 sites (40). Among the transcription factors known to bind to the AP-1 element, ATF-2 has been shown to be phosphorylated by p38 on Thr69 and Thr71 (41-43). Phosphorylation of ATF-2 on these sites causes an increase in transcriptional activity in vivo (41-43). To determine whether TGF-beta stimulates phosphorylation of ATF-2 at these threonine residues, we analyzed phosphorylation at these sites using an antibody specific for the Thr71-phosphorylated form of ATF-2. Little, if any, phospho-ATF-2 was detected in Mv1Lu cells in the absence of TGF-beta signaling, whereas TGF-beta treatment stimulated the phosphorylation of endogenous ATF-2 on Thr71 (Fig. 5A). We next analyzed the effect of the TAK1 pathway on the phosphorylation of ATF-2 in human embryonic kidney epithelial 293 cells, which lack any detectable expression of the endogenous TGF-beta type II receptor (Tbeta RII) (44). When 293 cells were transiently transfected with HA epitope-tagged ATF-2, Tbeta RI, and Tbeta RII and treated with TGF-beta , we observed TGF-beta -stimulated phosphorylation of ATF-2 (Fig. 5B, left). Some phosphorylation of ATF-2 in the absence of ligand is also observed and is likely caused by overexpression of Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII in 293 cells, which drives their ligand-independent association and consequent activation of Tbeta RI. Activation of TAK1 by cotransfection of TAB1 and TAK1 caused enhanced phosphorylation of ATF-2 (Fig. 5B, right). These results suggest that ATF-2 phosphorylation in response to TGF-beta signaling is mediated by the TAK1 pathway. This is consistent with the observation that TAK1 regulates the MKK6-p38 cascade. Because ATF-2 is localized in the nucleus, it is likely that TGF-beta stimulation induces the nuclear accumulation of Smads and consequent association with ATF-2. To examine this possibility, we tested the interaction between ATF-2 and Smad4. Coexpression of ATF-2 and Smad4 in COS7 cells resulted in formation of a complex, and this association was enhanced in response to TGF-beta (Fig. 5C). Furthermore, overexpression of ATF-2(Ala69/Ala71), a nonphosphorylated form of ATF-2 in which Thr69 and Thr71 are replaced by alanine residues, inhibited transcriptional activation induced by TGF-beta (Fig. 5D). Taken together, these observations suggest that Smad complexes and phosphorylated ATF-2 participate in a complex that binds to DNA sequences present in the region of p3TP-Lux, resulting in its transcriptional activation.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Involvement of ATF-2 in TGF-beta signaling. A, phosphorylation of ATF-2 by TGF-beta is shown. Mv1Lu cells were left untreated or treated with TGF-beta (10 ng/ml) for the indicated times. The nuclear extracts were immunoblotted with polyclonal antibodies to phospho-Th71-ATF-2 (anti-P-ATF2) or ATF-2 (anti-ATF2). B, the TAK1 pathway-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2 is shown. 293 cells were transfected with expression vectors encoding ATF-2 and Tbeta RI plus Tbeta RII (left) or ATF-2 with (+) or without (-) TAK1 and TAB1 expression vectors (right). Cells were left untreated or treated with TGF-beta (2 ng/ml) for 15 min (left). Phosphorylated ATF-2 or total ATF-2 was immunoblotted as described above. C, interaction of ATF-2 with Smad4. COS7 cells were transfected with expression vectors encoding ATF-2 and Flag-Smad4 as indicated. Cells were left untreated or treated with TGF-beta (2 ng/ml) for 60 min. Proteins from cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag. Precipitated ATF-2 was detected with polyclonal antibody to ATF-2 (anti-ATF2) (top panel). Immunoprecipitated Flag-Smad4 was detected with anti-Flag (middle panel). Expression of ATF-2 protein was determined by immunoblotting total cell lysates with anti-ATF-2 (bottom panel). In A-C, similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. IgG, immunoglobulin G. D, effect of ATF-2(Ala69/Ala71) on TGF-beta -inducible gene expression is shown. Mv1Lu cells were transiently transfected with 3TP-Lux and expression vectors encoding ATF-2 or ATF-2(Ala69/Ala71) as indicated. Cells were left untreated or treated with TGF-beta (5 ng/ml) for another 15 h. Luciferase activities were determined as described in the legend to Fig. 2. The experiment was repeated three times with similar results.

The present and previous studies have demonstrated that the TGF-beta signal activates two independent pathways, the TAK1-mediated and the Smad-mediated pathways (2, 32, 34, 35, 45). In the Smad pathway, TGF-beta stimulation leads to the direct phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 by the type I receptor kinase, consequent hetero-oligomer formation with Smad4, and accumulation in the nucleus (9, 11-13, 46, 47). Our results indicate that in the TAK1 pathway TGF-beta activates the TAK1-MKK6-p38 kinase cascade leading to the phosphorylation of ATF-2, and ATF-2 associates with Smad4 in response to TGF-beta . Therefore, Smad complexes and phosphorylated ATF-2 may interact in a nucleoprotein complex that associates with DNA and activates transcription of TGF-beta -responsive genes. Two papers reporting a similar conclusion appeared after submission of this article (48, 49). In our study, dominant negative Smad4 could inhibit the p38 pathway-dependent transcriptional activation efficiently, although dominant negative TAK1 or dominant negative MKK6 could not inhibit the Smad2·Smad4-induced transcriptional activation. Thus, the Smad pathway is essential. It is likely that the affinity of Smad2 and Smad4 for DNA in the absence of TGF-beta is low or insufficient, and other transcription factors such as ATF-2 may enhance or stabilize Smad·DNA complexes in a ligand-dependent manner. Overexpression of Smad2 and Smad4 may be sufficient for efficient binding to DNA even in the absence of TGF-beta to activate transcription of target genes. On the other hand, expression of a nonphosphorylated form of ATF-2 could inhibit the TGF-beta -induced transcriptional activation completely, whereas dominant negative MKK6 could inhibit it significantly but not completely. It is possible that other MAP kinase-related pathways such as JNK/SAPK and classical MAP kinase pathways are involved in the transcriptional activation through phosphorylation of ATF-2 or ATF-2-related transcriptional factors.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank R. Derynck, S. Ishii, J. Massague, D. A. Melton, K. Miyazono, and J. L. Wrana for materials.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan (to E. N.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 81-75-753-4235; E-mail: L50174@sakura.kudpc.kyoto-u. ac.jp.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: TGF-beta , transforming growth factor-beta ; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; TAK1, TGF-beta -activated kinase 1; SAPK, stress-activated protein kinase; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; ATF-2, activating transcription factor-2; TAB1, TAK1-binding protein; HA, hemagglutinin; Tbeta RI, TGF-beta type I receptor; Tbeta RII, TGF-beta type II receptor; Mv1Lu, mink lung epithelial..

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Massague, J. (1996) Cell 85, 947-950[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Heldin, C.-H., Miyazono, K., and ten Dijke, P. (1997) Nature 390, 465-471[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Derynck, R., and Feng, X. H. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1333, 105-150
4. Attisano, L., and Wrana, J. L. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 188-194[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Whitman, M. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 2445-2462[Free Full Text]
6. Eppert, K., Scherer, S. W., Ozcelik, H., Pirone, R., Hoodless, P., Kim, H., Tsui, L. C., Bapat, B., Gallinger, S., Andrulis, I. L., Thomsen, G. H., Wrana, J. L., and Attisano, L. (1996) Cell 86, 543-552[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Hoodless, P. A., Haerry, T., Abdollah, S., Stapleton, M., O'Connor, M. B., Attisano, L., and Wrana, J. L. (1996) Cell 85, 489-500[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Lechleider, R. J., de Caestecker, M. P., Dehejia, A., Polymeropoulos, M. H., and Roberts, A. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17617-17620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Abdollah, S., Macias-Silva, M., Tsukazaki, T., Hayashi, H., Attisano, L., and Wrana, J. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27678-27685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Kretzschmar, M., Liu, F., Hata, A., Doody, J., and Massague, J. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 984-995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Liu, X., Sun, Y., Constantinescu, S. N., Karam, E., Weinberg, R. A., and Lodish, H. F. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 10669-10674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Nakao, A., Imamura, T., Souchelnytskyi, S., Kawabata, M., Ishisaki, A., Oeda, E., Tamaki, K., Hanai, J., Heldin, C.-H., Miyazono, K., and ten Dijke, P. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 5353-5362[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Nakao, A., Roijer, E., Imamura, T., Souchelnytskyi, S., Stenman, G., Heldin, C.-H., and ten Dijke, P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2896-2900[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Souchelnytskyi, S., Tamaki, K., Engstrom, U., Wernstedt, C., ten Dijke, P., and Heldin, C.-H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 28107-28115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Lagna, G., Hata, A., Hemmati-Brivanlou, A., and Massague, J. (1996) Nature 383, 832-836[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Liu, F., Hata, A., Baker, J. C., Doody, J., Carcamo, J., Harland, R. M., and Massague, J. (1996) Nature 381, 620-623[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Zhang, Y., Feng, X., We, R., and Derynck, R. (1996) Nature 383, 168-172[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Wu, R. Y., Zhang, Y., Feng, X. H., and Derynck, R. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2521-2528[Abstract]
19. Zhang, Y., Musci, T., and Derynck, R. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 270-276[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Kawabata, M., Inoue, H., Hanyu, A., Imamura, T., and Miyazono, K. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4056-4065[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Chen, X., Rubock, M. J., and Whitman, M. (1996) Nature 383, 691-696[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Labbe, E., Silvestri, C., Hoodless, P. A., Wrana, J. L., and Attisano, L. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 109-120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Zhou, S., Zawel, L., Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 121-127[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Liu, F., Pouponnot, C., and Massague, J. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 3157-3167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Zhang, Y., Feng, X. H., and Derynck, R. (1998) Nature 394, 909-913[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Hua, X., Liu, X., Ansari, D. O., and Lodish, H. F. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 3084-3095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Feng, X. H., Zhang, Y., Wu, R. Y., and Derynck, R. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 2153-2163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Janknecht, R., Wells, N. J., and Hunter, T. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 2114-2119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Pouponnot, C., Jayaraman, L., and Massague, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22865-22868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Topper, J. N., DiChiara, M. R., Brown, J. D., Williams, A. J., Falb, D., Collins, T., and Gimbrone, M. A., Jr. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 9506-9511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Szuts, D., Eresh, S., and Bienz, M. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 2022-2035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Yamaguchi, K., Shirakabe, K., Shibuya, H., Irie, K., Oishi, I., Ueno, N., Taniguchi, T., Nishida, E., and Matsumoto, K. (1995) Science 270, 2008-2011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Shibuya, H., Yamaguchi, K., Shirakabe, K., Tonegawa, A., Gotoh, Y., Ueno, N., Irie, K., Nishida, E., and Matsumoto, K. (1996) Science 272, 1179-1182[Abstract]
34. Moriguchi, T., Kuroyanagi, N., Yamaguchi, K., Gotoh, Y., Irie, K., Kano, T., Shirakabe, K., Muro, Y., Shibuya, H., Matsumoto, K., Nishida, E., and Hagiwara, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13675-13679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Shirakabe, K., Yamaguchi, K., Shibuya, H., Irie, K., Matsuda, S., Moriguchi, T., Gotoh, Y., Matsumoto, K., and Nishida, E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8141-8144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Wang, W., Zhou, G., Hu, M. C.-T., Yao, Z., and Tan, T. H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22771-22775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Atfi, A., Buisine, M., Mazars, A., and Gespach, C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24731-24734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Atfi, A., Djelloul, S., Chastre, E., Davis, R., and Gespach, C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1429-1432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Moriguchi, T., Toyoshima, F., Gotoh, Y., Iwamatsu, A., Irie, K., Mori, E., Kuroyanagi, N., Hagiwara, M., Matsumoto, K., and Nishida, E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26981-26988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Wrana, J. L., Attisano, L., Carcamo, J., Zentella, A., Doody, J., Laiho, M., Wang, X. F., and Massague, J. (1992) Cell 71, 1003-1014[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Livingstone, C., Patel, G., and Jones, N. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1785-1797[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Gupta, S., Campbell, D., Derijard, B., and Davis, R. J. (1995) Science 267, 389-393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. van Dam, H., Wilhelm, D., Herr, I., Steffen, A., Herrlich, P., and Angel, P. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1798-1811[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Ebner, R., Chen, R. H., Shum, L., Lawler, S., Zioncheck, T. F., Lee, A., Lopez, A. R., and Derynck, R. (1993) Science 260, 1344-1348[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Shibuya, H., Iwata, H., Masuyama, N., Gotoh, Y., Yamaguchi, K., Irie, K., Matsumoto, K., Nishida, E., and Ueno, N. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1019-1028[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Macias-Silva, M., Abdollah, S., Hoodless, P. A., Pirone, R., Attisano, L., and Wrana, J. L. (1996) Cell 87, 1215-1224[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Souchelnytskyi, S., ten Dijke, P., Miyazono, K., and Heldin, C.-H. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6231-6240[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Sano, Y., Harada, J., Tashiro, S., Gotoh-Mandeville, R., Maekawa, T., and Ishii, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8949-8957[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Adachi-Yamada, T., Nakamura, M., Irie, K., Tomoyasu, Y., Sano, Y., Mori, E., Gotoh, S., Ueno, N., Nishida, Y., and Matsumoto, K. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2322-2329[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Inagaki, E. Omori, J.-Y. Kim, Y. Komatsu, G. Scott, M. K. Ray, G. Yamada, K. Matsumoto, Y. Mishina, and J. Ninomiya-Tsuji
TAK1-binding Protein 1, TAB1, Mediates Osmotic Stress-induced TAK1 Activation but Is Dispensable for TAK1-mediated Cytokine Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2008; 283(48): 33080 - 33086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. Al-Salleeh and T. M. Petro
Promoter Analysis Reveals Critical Roles for SMAD-3 and ATF-2 in Expression of IL-23 p19 in Macrophages
J. Immunol., October 1, 2008; 181(7): 4523 - 4533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A.-k. Khimji, R. Shao, and D. C. Rockey
Divergent Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling in Hepatic Stellate Cells after Liver Injury: Functional Effects on ECE-1 Regulation
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2008; 173(3): 716 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Kajino-Sakamoto, M. Inagaki, E. Lippert, S. Akira, S. Robine, K. Matsumoto, C. Jobin, and J. Ninomiya-Tsuji
Enterocyte-Derived TAK1 Signaling Prevents Epithelium Apoptosis and the Development of Ileitis and Colitis
J. Immunol., July 15, 2008; 181(2): 1143 - 1152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. V. Miller, S. E. Alvarez, S. Spiegel, and D. A. Lebman
Sphingosine Kinases and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Are Critical for Transforming Growth Factor {beta}-Induced Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1 and 2 Activation and Promotion of Migration and Invasion of Esophageal Cancer Cells
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2008; 28(12): 4142 - 4151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. I. Kim, J. H. Kwak, L. Wang, and M. E. Choi
Protein Phosphatase 2A Is a Negative Regulator of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1-induced TAK1 Activation in Mesangial Cells
J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10753 - 10763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
J. Y. C. Chow, H. Dong, K. T. Quach, P. N. Van Nguyen, K. Chen, and J. M. Carethers
TGF-{beta} mediates PTEN suppression and cell motility through calcium-dependent PKC-{alpha} activation in pancreatic cancer cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): G899 - G905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. R. Neil and W. P. Schiemann
Altered TAB1:I{kappa}B Kinase Interaction Promotes Transforming Growth Factor {beta}-Mediated Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Activation during Breast Cancer Progression
Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 68(5): 1462 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
T. Liu, R. R. Warburton, O. E. Guevara, N. S. Hill, B. L. Fanburg, M. Gaestel, and U. S. Kayyali
Lack of MK2 Inhibits Myofibroblast Formation and Exacerbates Pulmonary Fibrosis
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., November 1, 2007; 37(5): 507 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Lu, J. Lee, M. Revelo, X. Wang, S. Lu, and Z. Dong
Smad3 Is Overexpressed in Advanced Human Prostate Cancer and Necessary for Progressive Growth of Prostate Cancer Cells in Nude Mice
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5692 - 5702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]